<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Securosis Blog on Securosis</title><link>/blog/</link><description>Recent content in Securosis Blog on Securosis</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en-us</language><lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2026 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="/blog/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>AWS Destroyed the Value Proposition for Bedrock</title><link>/blog/aws-destroyed-the-value-proposition-for-bedrock/</link><pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/aws-destroyed-the-value-proposition-for-bedrock/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;When you ran inference on AWS Bedrock, the deal was explicit: prompts and completions stayed inside the AWS boundary, and model providers never saw your data. That guarantee is why regulated shops and European organizations route their AI workloads through Bedrock instead of going straight to the model vendor.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>AI Will Accelerate Your Tech Debt</title><link>/blog/ai-will-accelerate-your-tech-debt/</link><pubDate>Sun, 22 Mar 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/ai-will-accelerate-your-tech-debt/</guid><description>&lt;h2 id="the-tech-debt-crisis-is-coming"&gt;The Tech Debt Crisis Is Coming&lt;/h2&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Like the American middle class living paycheck to paycheck, organizations near or below the security poverty line are one big incident away from catastrophic bankruptcy. They got here through years of underinvesting in core capabilities and unified architecture, not stupidity, but a long series of decisions that prioritized shipping over sustainability. And now every smaller incident consumes the cycles that could have gone toward paying down that debt, making the hole deeper every time. Tech debt isn&amp;rsquo;t just a code quality problem. It&amp;rsquo;s an operational survival problem. The environment is too complex to reason about, too brittle to refactor, and too interconnected to safely improve. Every incident response leaves the org a little more exhausted and a little further behind. We&amp;rsquo;re rapidly approaching a security crisis that looks like the financial crisis of 2008. Thousands, maybe millions, of companies with business models that cannot afford proper security are about to get breached and go out of business. Like the families with mortgages they couldn&amp;rsquo;t afford, many of these companies were on borrowed time to begin with. The unsympathetic response will be &amp;ldquo;they shouldn&amp;rsquo;t have been in business at all,&amp;rdquo; but people will still be out of work, investors will still be out of money, and the ripple effects will be real. And AI is only going to make this worse.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>AI Security Invariants</title><link>/blog/ai-security-invariants/</link><pubDate>Sat, 21 Mar 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/ai-security-invariants/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;(Co-Authored with &lt;a href="https://www.linkedin.com/in/ariel-septon-6046b4200/"&gt;Ariel Septon&lt;/a&gt; of &lt;a href="https://native.security/"&gt;Native&lt;/a&gt;) Security invariants are a critical component of your cloud and IT governance strategy. However, how can we apply this same thinking to the non-deterministic world of Generative AI?&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Going to RSAC 2026? Disaster Recovery Breakfast and MORE!</title><link>/blog/going-to-rsac-2026-disaster-recovery-breakfast-and-more/</link><pubDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/going-to-rsac-2026-disaster-recovery-breakfast-and-more/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Someone asked me last week if I was going to RSAC. I replied that I&amp;rsquo;m pretty sure after I die they&amp;rsquo;ll prop my body up in a corner of Moscone, Irish wake style. Eventually I&amp;rsquo;ll retire or move on, but this year isn&amp;rsquo;t THAT year. I still get tremendous value out of RSAC. Personally I spend nearly no time on the show floor, a lot of time in meetings, and a bit of time in sessions. As a review committee member I see all the content for my track before I show up and I think most people who complain about the conference get blasted by the show floor and don&amp;rsquo;t go to sessions. The content has improved materially over the past decade, with more deep technical content than most people realize. This year I&amp;rsquo;m presenting in four sessions (unexpectedly).&lt;a href="https://path.rsaconference.com/flow/rsac/us26/FullAgenda/page/catalog/session/1755278108940001L5Tm"&gt; I&amp;rsquo;m co-presenting with Aaron Turner on some IANS content on MCP/agent architectures we collaborated on&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;a href="https://path.rsaconference.com/flow/rsac/us26/FullAgenda/page/catalog/session/1769041185316001TesW"&gt;I&amp;rsquo;m running a cloud incident analysis workshop with Ryan Bergsma, one of my Cloud Security Alliance co-workers&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;a href="https://path.rsaconference.com/flow/rsac/us26/FullAgenda/page/catalog/session/1756082803280001SGDR"&gt;I&amp;rsquo;m giving a new presentation on K-12 and &amp;ldquo;below the security poverty line&amp;rdquo; orgs with a first-time collaborator, Michael Klein&lt;/a&gt;, and I&amp;rsquo;m facilitating a &lt;a href="https://path.rsaconference.com/flow/rsac/us26/FullAgenda/page/catalog/session/1766346761940001LNt8"&gt;Fundamentals Forum&lt;/a&gt;. I&amp;rsquo;m also presenting at our &lt;a href="https://www.rsaconference.com/usa/agenda/seminars"&gt;CSA Summit on Monday (on the Governance hierarchy&amp;hellip; and announcing a new CSA initiative)&lt;/a&gt;, participating in a panel on OpenClaw, and&amp;hellip; yeah, busy week. &lt;em&gt;For the first time we are offering 1-on-1&amp;rsquo;s to CSA members at the&lt;/em&gt; Summit! Yes, I am voluntarily packing my schedule every 30 minutes like back in Gartner days. Just email me for more info on that. But I saved the best for last. The 16th annual Disaster Recovery Breakfast! And for the second time this is hosted by our friends over at 1Password (like, actual friends I&amp;rsquo;ve known for decades). My kids are on spring break this week and all my content is approved, so I&amp;rsquo;m off for some family time before my four day marathon, I hope to see you there, and email me at &lt;a href="mailto:rmogull@securosis.com"&gt;rmogull@securosis.com&lt;/a&gt; if you want to catch up or snag one of those 1-on-1 slots on Monday. &lt;img src="Disaster.png" alt="Disaster Recovery Breakfast"&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>AI, have you been drinking?</title><link>/blog/ai-have-you-been-drinking/</link><pubDate>Mon, 11 Aug 2025 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/ai-have-you-been-drinking/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;For the last couple months I have been working with AI security. First with the general architecture and data flows for Generative and Agentic AI systems, and lately more with prompt &amp;amp; response security techniques. These later topics are where AI systems offer greenfield for attackers to apply all the old &amp;ndash; and a select few new &amp;ndash; attack techniques. I was researching how to coerce AI to misbehave, as part of my introduction to prompt engineering, I am stumbling across cases where we do not need attackers at all &amp;ndash; the AI systems seem eager to misbehave all on their own.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>The 15th Annual Disaster Recovery Breakfast</title><link>/blog/the-15th-annual-disaster-recovery-breakfast/</link><pubDate>Mon, 31 Mar 2025 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/the-15th-annual-disaster-recovery-breakfast/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;It has survived recessions, obsessions, parenthood, natural disasters, pandemics, unnatural disasters, and the rise and fall of eateries great and small. That&amp;rsquo;s right, it&amp;rsquo;s the Securosis RSAC Disaster Recovery Breakfast! This year we&amp;rsquo;ve changed things up thanks to our new partner, 1Password, who reached out and offered to host the DRB in their event space just up the street from the Moscone center. With all the changes in the restaurant scene in that particular area of town&amp;hellip; you can understand how this&amp;hellip; reduced our annual organizational stress. As always this is a quiet hangout of an event. Drop in and out as you please to catch up with friends, strangers, and&amp;hellip; well, whoever wanders in. An RSVP is appreciated to make sure we have enough food, but as always is not required. We hope to see you there! &lt;img src="DRB2025-1.png" alt=""&gt; Optional RSVP at &lt;a href="https://events.1password.io/RSA2025#"&gt;https://events.1password.io/RSA2025#&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Announcing the CloudSLAW Patreon!</title><link>/blog/announcing-the-cloudslaw-patreon/</link><pubDate>Tue, 25 Feb 2025 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/announcing-the-cloudslaw-patreon/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://patreon.com/CloudSLAW"&gt;TL;DR: Support CloudSLAW Here!&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I know that as most of you lay your weary heads to rest every night (or morning, for you night shifters), the last thought that fires through your synapses is, “I really wish I could get more CloudSLAW!”&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>And then a not-a-miracle occurs...</title><link>/blog/and-then-a-not-a-miracle-occurs/</link><pubDate>Sun, 24 Nov 2024 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/and-then-a-not-a-miracle-occurs/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://www.researchgate.net/figure/Then-a-Miracle-Occurs-Copyrighted-artwork-by-Sydney-Harris-Inc-All-materials-used-with_fig2_302632920"&gt;&lt;img src="https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Michael-Wade-5/publication/302632920/figure/fig2/AS:751645805789184@1556217733527/Then-a-Miracle-Occurs-Copyrighted-artwork-by-Sydney-Harris-Inc-All-materials-used-with.png" alt="Then a Miracle Occurs. Copyrighted artwork by Sydney Harris Inc. All materials used with permission."&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;It&amp;rsquo;s a perfect fall Sunday morning here in Phoenix. After a brutally hot summer the air is cool, the sky is clear, and the fresh air is drifting into the hotel ballroom while I wait for my daughter to take the stage in the Irish dance regionals competition.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Enterprise Governance Is Failing Cloud Security</title><link>/blog/enterprise-governance-is-failing-cloud-security/</link><pubDate>Fri, 18 Oct 2024 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/enterprise-governance-is-failing-cloud-security/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;We have a major problem. It isn&amp;rsquo;t really getting better, and soon a critical window of opportunity will close that we can&amp;rsquo;t afford to lose. I don&amp;rsquo;t say this lightly, and I think anyone who has read my prior work knows I am not prone to FUD. No one can possibly know the actual percentage of enterprise workloads and applications that have moved to cloud, but every statistic I could find estimates that, at most, it is somewhere in the range of 25% (&lt;a href="https://www.techrepublic.com/article/gartner-cloud-computing-future/"&gt;here&amp;rsquo;s one Gartner take&lt;/a&gt;). I think under 25% is likely accurate, but I estimate that well over 90% of organizations have some production workloads in cloud, including SaaS and PaaS/IaaS. The lake is wide but only deep for a relatively small number of enterprises. This is natural and expected; it takes decades to transition existing workloads, especially when they are running happily in datacenters and there&amp;rsquo;s no major driver to move them out. This is our window. Most organizations are in the shallow end of the pool, staring wistfully at the adventurous kids jumping off the high dive and frolicking around in the deep end. We have a choice &amp;ndash; wait, learn to swim, or strap on some floaties and hope for the best. Oh, and there&amp;rsquo;s no lifeguard and there are most definitely some sharks. With lasers. If organizations don&amp;rsquo;t improve their cloud governance, they have no chance of meaningfully improving their cloud security. That&amp;rsquo;s bad enough with today&amp;rsquo;s relatively limited cloud adoption, but as we gradually move more and more workloads to the cloud, without effective governance the problem will increase exponentially. &lt;em&gt;Nearly every single cloud security issue and breach is the direct result of a governance failure, not a technology failure.&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>On TidBITS: My Take on Apple Intelligence and Private Cloud Compute</title><link>/blog/on-tidbits-my-take-on-apple-intelligence-and-private-cloud-compute/</link><pubDate>Mon, 01 Jul 2024 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/on-tidbits-my-take-on-apple-intelligence-and-private-cloud-compute/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I just published a piece on&lt;a href="https://tidbits.com/2024/07/01/how-apple-intelligence-sets-a-new-bar-for-ai-security-privacy-and-safety/"&gt; Apple Intelligence at TidBITS&lt;/a&gt; that I&amp;rsquo;m pretty excited to release. I wrote it (literally sitting poolside on vacation) to try and explain why this matters to someone even if they don&amp;rsquo;t know anything about AI or security. For those of us in cloud security, some really interesting things are going on:&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Old Dog, New Tricks [Final Incite: June 24, 2024]</title><link>/blog/old-dog-new-tricks-final-incite-june-24-2024/</link><pubDate>Mon, 24 Jun 2024 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/old-dog-new-tricks-final-incite-june-24-2024/</guid><description>&lt;blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;TL;DR: Back in December, I took a job as head of strategy and technology for a candy-importing company called &lt;a href="https://www.dorvaltrading.com"&gt;Dorval Trading&lt;/a&gt;. To explain the move I dusted off the confessor structure, and also performed a POPE evaluation of the opportunity below. I’ll be teaching at Black Hat this summer, so I hope to see many of you there. Otherwise you can always reach me at my Securosis email, at least until Rich cancels my account.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>The Cloud Shared Irresponsibilities Model</title><link>/blog/the-cloud-shared-irresponsibilities-model/</link><pubDate>Tue, 04 Jun 2024 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/the-cloud-shared-irresponsibilities-model/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;The next phase of cloud security won&amp;rsquo;t be about shiny new products or services, although we&amp;rsquo;ll have those. It won&amp;rsquo;t be about stopping the next world-ending cloud 0-day, but we&amp;rsquo;ll continue trying to prevent them. It won&amp;rsquo;t be about AI, but we&amp;rsquo;ll still have to do something with AI to appease our machine overlords. &lt;em&gt;It will be about making cloud deployments more inherently secure through better, smarter defaults, and better, smarter, and yes, cheaper, built-in capabilities.&lt;/em&gt; Here&amp;rsquo;s why: When I first started researching and working with public cloud about 15 years ago, I realized that cloud providers have massive economic incentives to be better at security than your organization. A major breach of a cloud provider that affects all (or most) tenants would be an existential event which would destroy trust in that provider and crater their business. We&amp;rsquo;ve arguably had moderate multi-tenant events, and are witnessing events in real time — wondering whether my theory will stand, and a major CSP will suffer from a direct breach (as a result of &lt;a href="https://securosis.com/blog/its-time-for-a-microsoft-trusted-cloud-initiative/"&gt;Microsoft&amp;rsquo;s recent incidents and the CISA CSRB report&lt;/a&gt;). This was the origin of the &lt;em&gt;shared responsibilities model&lt;/em&gt;. There&amp;rsquo;s a waterline in the technology: below it the cloud provider is responsible for ensuring the services you consume are inherently secure. Above it you are responsible for how you secure and configure what you use. Security is transitive. When I build on a service, I am only as secure as the underlying service. It turns out this plays both ways. It&amp;rsquo;s a two-way door. Security &lt;em&gt;impacts&lt;/em&gt; are also transitive. If a customer on a cloud platform suffers a major security breach, every headline includes the name of the cloud provider. Sure, you can blame the customer for misconfiguring your service, but that doesn&amp;rsquo;t mean everyone won&amp;rsquo;t still think you&amp;rsquo;re responsible.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>AWS Cloud Incident Analysis Query Cheatsheet</title><link>/blog/aws-cloud-incident-analysis-query-cheatsheet/</link><pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2024 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/aws-cloud-incident-analysis-query-cheatsheet/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I&amp;rsquo;ve been teaching cloud incident response with Will Bengtson at Black Hat for a few years now, and one of the cool side effects of running training classes is that we are forced to document our best practices and make them simple enough to explain. (BTW — you should definitely &lt;a href="https://www.blackhat.com/us-24/training/schedule/#adversarial-cloud-incident-response-37383"&gt;sign up for the 2024 version of our class before the price goes up&lt;/a&gt;!) One of the more amusing moments was the first year we taught the class, when I realized I was trying to hand-write all the required CloudTrail log queries in front of the students, because I had only prepared a subset of what we needed. As &lt;a href="https://securosis.com/blog/resolve-90-of-cloud-incidents-with-recipe-picks/"&gt;I wrote in my RECIPE PICKS&lt;/a&gt; post, you really only need a handful of queries to find 90% of what you need for most cloud security incidents.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Let Your Devs and Admins See the Vulns</title><link>/blog/let-your-devs-and-admins-see-the-vulns/</link><pubDate>Mon, 13 May 2024 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/let-your-devs-and-admins-see-the-vulns/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;A year or so ago I was on an application security program assessment project in one of those very large enterprises. We were working with the security team and they had all the scanners, from SAST/SCA to DAST to vulnerability assessment, but their process was really struggling. It took a long time for bugs to get fixed, things were slow to get approved and deployed, and remediating in-production vulnerabilities could also be slow and inefficient. At one point I asked how vulnerabilities (anything discovered after deployment) were being communicated back to the developers/admins? &amp;ldquo;Oh, that data is classified as security sensitive so they aren&amp;rsquo;t allowed access.&amp;rdquo; Uhh&amp;hellip; okay, So you are not letting the people responsible for creating and fixing the problem know about the problem? How&amp;rsquo;s that going for you? This came up in a conversation today about providing cloud deployment administrators access to the CSPM/CNAPP. In my book this is often an even worse gap, since a large percentage of organizations I work with do not allow the security team change access to cloud deployments, yet issues there are often immediately exploitable over the Internet (or you have a public data exposure&amp;hellip; just read the &lt;a href="UCTM_v_1.0.pdf"&gt;Universal Cloud Threat Model&lt;/a&gt;, okay?). Here are my recommendations:&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>New Accidental Research Release: The Universal Cloud Threat Model (UCTM)</title><link>/blog/new-accidental-research-release-the-universal-cloud-threat-model-uctm/</link><pubDate>Tue, 23 Apr 2024 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/new-accidental-research-release-the-universal-cloud-threat-model-uctm/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;The conversation went something like this: Me: &amp;ldquo;Hey Chris, want to co-present at RSA? I have this idea around how we fix things when we get dropped into a new org and they have a cloud security mess.&amp;rdquo; Chris: &amp;ldquo;Sure, you want to write up the description and submit it?&amp;rdquo; Me: &amp;ldquo;Yep, on it!&amp;rdquo; [A couple months later] Chris: &amp;ldquo;So what&amp;rsquo;s this &lt;em&gt;Universal Cloud Threat Model&lt;/em&gt; you put in the description?&amp;rdquo; Me: &amp;ldquo;Oh, I just thought we&amp;rsquo;d make fun of all the edgy cloud security attack research since nearly every attack is just the same 3 things over and over.&amp;rdquo; Chris: &amp;ldquo;Yeah, sounds about right, want to hop on a quick call to map out the slides?&amp;rdquo; [A two hour spontaneous Zoom call later] Chris: &amp;ldquo;Crap, I think we need to write a paper.&amp;rdquo; Me: &amp;ldquo;Really?&amp;rdquo; Chris: &amp;ldquo;Yeah, this is good stuff.&amp;rdquo; Me: &amp;ldquo;Fine. But only if we can put my cat in as a threat actor. He just broke a bowl and is making a move on my bourbon .&amp;rdquo; Chris: &amp;ldquo;Sure, what&amp;rsquo;s his name?&amp;rdquo; Me: &amp;ldquo;Goose&amp;rdquo; Chris: &amp;ldquo;Well what did you expect?&amp;rdquo; &lt;a href="https://securosis.com/research/papers/the-universal-cloud-threat-model-for-cloud-native-security/"&gt;You can download the UCTM here&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;a href="https://www.chrisfarris.com/post/uctm/"&gt;And read Chris&amp;rsquo; absolutely epic announcement post in the voice of Winston Churchill!&lt;/a&gt; &lt;img src="IMG_0813.jpeg" alt=""&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Sisense: Learning Lessons Before the Body Hits the Ground</title><link>/blog/sisense-learning-lessons-before-the-body-hits-the-ground/</link><pubDate>Fri, 12 Apr 2024 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/sisense-learning-lessons-before-the-body-hits-the-ground/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Look, we don&amp;rsquo;t yet know what really happened at Sisense. Thanks to &lt;a href="https://krebsonsecurity.com/2024/04/why-cisa-is-warning-cisos-about-a-breach-at-sisense/"&gt;Brian Krebs and CISA&lt;/a&gt;, combined with the note sent out by the CISO (bottom of this post), it&amp;rsquo;s pretty obvious the attackers got a massive trove of secrets. Just look at that list of what you have to rotate. It&amp;rsquo;s every cred you ever had, every cred you ever thought of, and the creds of your unborn children and/or grandchildren. Brian&amp;rsquo;s article has basically one sentence that describes the breach:&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>You are infected with Epstein-Barr. You are also infected with the next XZ.</title><link>/blog/you-are-infected-with-epstein-barr-you-are-also-infected-with-the-next-xz/</link><pubDate>Fri, 05 Apr 2024 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/you-are-infected-with-epstein-barr-you-are-also-infected-with-the-next-xz/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Nearly everyone in the United States (and probably elsewhere) is infected with the Epstein-Barr virus at some point in their life. Most people will never develop symptoms, although a few end up with mono. Even without symptoms you carry this invasive genetic material for life. There&amp;rsquo;s no cure, and EBV causes some people to develop cancers and possibly Multiple Sclerosis, Chronic Fatigue Syndrome, and other problems. Those later diseases are likely caused by some other precipitating even or infection that &amp;ldquo;triggers&amp;rdquo; a reaction with EBV. Look, I have most of a molecular biology degree and I&amp;rsquo;m a paramedic and I won&amp;rsquo;t pretend to fully understand it all. The tl;dr is EBV is genetic material floating around your body for life and at some point it activates or interacts with something else and causes badness. (Me write good! Use words!) As I&amp;rsquo;ve been reading about the XZ Initiative (I&amp;rsquo;m using &lt;em&gt;initiative&lt;/em&gt; deliberately due to the planning and premeditation) the same week that the &lt;a href="https://securosis.com/blog/its-time-for-a-microsoft-trusted-cloud-initiative/"&gt;CISA CSRB released their scathing report on Microsoft&lt;/a&gt;, it&amp;rsquo;s damn clear that our software supply chain issues are as deep as the emptiness of my cat&amp;rsquo;s soul. (I mean I love him, and I&amp;rsquo;m excited he&amp;rsquo;s coming back from the hospital this afternoon, but I couldn&amp;rsquo;t come up with a more-amusing analogy). If you aren&amp;rsquo;t up to date on all things XZ I suggest reading &lt;a href="https://vulnu.mattjay.com/p/the-xz-incident?utm_source=vulnu.mattjay.com&amp;amp;utm_medium=newsletter&amp;amp;utm_campaign=vulnerable-u-058"&gt;Matt Johansen&amp;rsquo;s rollup&lt;/a&gt; in his Vulnerable U newsletter. Here&amp;rsquo;s how EBV and XZ relate, at least in my twisted mind. XZ was clearly premeditated, well planned, sophisticated, and designed to slowly spread itself under the radar for many years before being triggered. There is absolutely no chance this approach hasn&amp;rsquo;t already been used by multiple threat actors. As much as I hate FUD and hyperbole, I am 100% confident that there is code in tools and services I use that has been similarly compromised. We didn&amp;rsquo;t miraculously catch the first ever attempt, because a Microsoft dev is anal-retentive about performance. XZ is the first such exploit which got caught. If I were a cybercriminal or government operative, I would already have several of these long-term attacks underway. You are welcome to believe our record is 1 for 1. I think it&amp;rsquo;s 1 catch of N attacks, and N scares me. I also do not believe we can eliminate this threat vector. I don&amp;rsquo;t think the best SAST/SCA tools and a signed SBOM have any chance at making this go away. Ever. That doesn&amp;rsquo;t mean we give up and lose hope — we just change our perspective and focus more on resilience to these attacks than pure prevention. I don&amp;rsquo;t have all the answers — not even close — but there are three aspects I think we should explore more. First, let&amp;rsquo;s make it harder on threat actors. Let&amp;rsquo;s increase their costs. How? Well, aside from all the improved security scanning over the past few years, I like the idea Daniel Miessler recently mentioned in a conversation and &lt;a href="https://danielmiessler.com/p/ul-426"&gt;noted in his newsletter&lt;/a&gt;: use AI to automatically perform open source intel (OSINT) on OSS contributors. Do they have a history outside that code repo? Any real human interactions? This will be far from perfect, but will likely increase the cost of attack to build a persona which looks sufficiently real. We also have compromises in commercial software (hello Solar Winds). Vendors need to explore better internal code controls, sourcing, and human processes. &lt;em&gt;E.g.&lt;/em&gt; require YubiKeys from all devs, side channel notifications and approvals of commits, and I suspect there are some new and innovative scanning approaches we can take as AI evolves (until it evolves past humanity and enslaves us all). &lt;em&gt;E.g.&lt;/em&gt; &amp;ldquo;this may not be a known security defect, but it looks weird compared to this developer&amp;rsquo;s history, so maybe ping another &lt;del&gt;future energy source&lt;/del&gt; human to review it&amp;rdquo;. I&amp;rsquo;m also a fan of making critical devs work on dedicated machines separate from the ones they use for email and web browsing, to reduce phishing/malware as a vector. No, I haven&amp;rsquo;t ever had anyplace I&amp;rsquo;ve worked approve that, but I &lt;em&gt;have&lt;/em&gt; heard of some shops which pulled it off. The final part is preparing for the next XZ that slips through and is eventually triggered. Early detection, rapid remediation, and all the other hard expensive things. SBOM/SCA/DevSecOps are key here: you MUST be able to figure out where you are using any particular software package, and be able to implement compensating defenses (&lt;em&gt;e.g.,&lt;/em&gt; firewalls) and patch quickly. This is &lt;strong&gt;NOT SIMPLE AT SCALE,&lt;/strong&gt; but it&amp;rsquo;s your best bet as the downstream customer for these things. None of what I suggested is easy. I think this is the next phase of the Assume Breach mindset. You can&amp;rsquo;t cure EBV. You can&amp;rsquo;t prevent all possible negative outcomes. But you can reduce some risks, detect others earlier, and react aggressively when those first cancer cells show up.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>It's Time for a Microsoft Trustworthy Cloud Initiative</title><link>/blog/its-time-for-a-microsoft-trusted-cloud-initiative/</link><pubDate>Wed, 03 Apr 2024 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/its-time-for-a-microsoft-trusted-cloud-initiative/</guid><description>&lt;blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;“All cloud security failures are IAM failures, and all IAM failures are governance failures.&amp;quot; — me on Twitter (too many years ago to find)&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>The 14th Annual RSAC Disaster Recovery Breakfast Is on!</title><link>/blog/the-14th-annual-rsac-disaster-recovery-breakfast-is-on/</link><pubDate>Wed, 03 Apr 2024 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/the-14th-annual-rsac-disaster-recovery-breakfast-is-on/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Over 15 years ago (pre-Blip) I wanted to do something fun and casual for friends and Securosis readers at the annual RSA Conference&amp;hellip; that I, as a budding entrepreneur, could actually afford. I started calling around and found a little place called Jillian&amp;rsquo;s right near the conference willing to open up early and serve breakfast for a reasonable rate. We ended up with around 50 people dropping in and out over those few hours, just mostly sitting around a table talking about whatever. Little did I know that our Disaster Recovery Breakfast would outlast Jillian&amp;rsquo;s, and, it seems, downtown San Francisco? I also never thought it would peak out at one point at around 300 people and inspire dozens of copycats. But one thing never changed — the casual atmosphere, the chance to talk without having to scream into someone&amp;rsquo;s ear, and the great conversations fueled by coffee (and the occasional Irish coffee). Once again, we&amp;rsquo;re back! Like last year we are hosting at the Pink Elephant which is just a few minutes walk and totally worth it if you want breakfast burritos or an omelette. This year we have two of our long-standing partners helping us out, plus a new (old) face. Here are the details:&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Resolve 90% of Cloud Incidents with RECIPE PICKS</title><link>/blog/resolve-90-of-cloud-incidents-with-recipe-picks/</link><pubDate>Thu, 07 Mar 2024 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/resolve-90-of-cloud-incidents-with-recipe-picks/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;As any long-time readers know, I constantly abuse my past experiences and hobbies to try and make my current work sound WAY more interesting than it probably is. Or maybe it&amp;rsquo;s just an ego thing, I don&amp;rsquo;t want to think too hard about it. But, on occasion, lessons from my parallel lives actually inspire some original work. As a paramedic and a pilot I have had to memorize many dozens of mnemonics, and I&amp;rsquo;ve forgotten many more. Mnemonics are proven to be highly effective memory devices even in the midst of intense stress, like flying a plane or working a 9-1-1 call. For example, I learned &amp;ldquo;SAMPLE&amp;rdquo; for taking a patient&amp;rsquo;s history probably 30 years ago and I still use it today because in the insanity that is some calls it can be easy to lose track and forget a fundamental. This I always remember to ask about Signs and Symptoms, Allergies, Medications, Prior medical history, Last oral intake, and Event (why did they call us today?). Having issues ventilating an intubated patient? Use DOPE. Accidentally put your airplane into a spin? Use PARE (Power, Aileron, Rudder, Elevator). The more you drill these the better they work. I memorized RAKETS for my private pilot checkride but I definitely need to look that one up (it&amp;rsquo;s used to figure out if you can still fly a plane with a broken part). We don&amp;rsquo;t really use these in infosec, and I think it&amp;rsquo;s time to change that. Thus I present to you RECIPE PICKS for cloud incident response. This one hit me yesterday on an internal dev review call in one window while finishing my paramedic recertification in an open browser tab. For 4 years now here is how I&amp;rsquo;ve taught what to look for first in a cloud incident: &lt;img src="https://securosis.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/Screenshot-2024-03-07-at-11.57.58%E2%80%AFAM-300x168.png" alt="Analysis slide"&gt; I have the students leave that one up when we start the scenarios and live fire exercises. But standing in the shower I came up with a much better way to remember what to do. NOTE: the order doesn&amp;rsquo;t matter, as with SAMPLE it&amp;rsquo;s to make sure you don&amp;rsquo;t miss anything (the format breaks a little at the end due to this sites rendering, sorry): &lt;strong&gt;R&lt;/strong&gt; esource (current config/state) &lt;strong&gt;E&lt;/strong&gt; vents (api call(s) on that resource) &lt;strong&gt;C&lt;/strong&gt; hanges (diff plus associated API calls) &lt;strong&gt;I&lt;/strong&gt; dentity (who made the triggering change or API call) &lt;strong&gt;P&lt;/strong&gt; ermissions (of the identity; informs the blast radius) &lt;strong&gt;E&lt;/strong&gt; ntitlements (of the resource: e.g. it&amp;rsquo;s IAM role or managed identity) &lt;strong&gt;P&lt;/strong&gt; ublic (is it public?) &lt;strong&gt;I&lt;/strong&gt; P (all API calls from that IP address) &lt;strong&gt;C&lt;/strong&gt; aller (all other API calls from the calling identity) trac&lt;strong&gt;K&lt;/strong&gt;(look for indications of a pivot; e.g. role chaining) foren&lt;strong&gt;S&lt;/strong&gt; ics (on a resource, or digging into resource logs) These steps shouldn&amp;rsquo;t be done in order, except the last two probably need to be the last two (especially the forensics). This is all based on the process I&amp;rsquo;ve figured out over the years and I estimate you can probably close 90% of incidents relatively quickly by pulling this data. I&amp;rsquo;m definitely going to start trying to build more of these into my trainings, and I&amp;rsquo;ll do some more blog posts in the coming weeks on how to use RECIPE PICKS. I&amp;rsquo;d also be remiss if I didn&amp;rsquo;t link over to a&lt;a href="https://defense.firemon.cloud/resolve-90-of-cloud-incidents-in-2-minutes-or-less/?utm_source=securosis&amp;amp;utm_medium=web&amp;amp;utm_campaign=701VN000003d3M5YAI"&gt; work blog post on how our platform does most of this automatically on every incident&lt;/a&gt;. Let me know what you think and if I missed anything. Just email &lt;a href="mailto:rmogull@securosis.com"&gt;rmogull@securosis.com&lt;/a&gt; since I have comments turned off due to all the ridiculous spam.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Check out the shiny new Cloud Security Maturity Model 2.0!</title><link>/blog/check-out-the-shiny-new-cloud-security-maturity-model-2-0/</link><pubDate>Tue, 27 Feb 2024 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/check-out-the-shiny-new-cloud-security-maturity-model-2-0/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src="https://securosis.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/02/Screenshot-2024-02-27-at-9.39.05%E2%80%AFAM-300x107.png" alt="CSMM 2.0 Header"&gt; I&amp;rsquo;m pretty excited about this one. We are finally releasing version 2.0 of the Cloud Security Maturity Model. This is the culmination of nearly 9 months of research and analysis, a massive update from the original released in 2020. The tl;dr is that this version is not only updated to reflect current cloud security practices, but it &lt;em&gt;includes around 100 cloud security control objectives to use as Key Performance Indicators —&lt;/em&gt; each matched 1:1 (where possible) with a technical control you can assess (AWS for now— we plan to expand to Azure and GCP next).&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>I Broke the 3-2-1 Rule and Almost Paid The Price!</title><link>/blog/i-broke-the-3-2-1-rule-and-almost-paid-the-price/</link><pubDate>Thu, 22 Feb 2024 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/i-broke-the-3-2-1-rule-and-almost-paid-the-price/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;This post isn&amp;rsquo;t about some fancy new research. Consider it a friendly nudge to floss.&lt;/em&gt; I&amp;rsquo;m pretty Type A about backing up and have data going back 20+ years at this point. I&amp;rsquo;m especially particular about my family photos. Until yesterday (this is called foreshadowing) my strategy was:&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Regression to the Fundamentals</title><link>/blog/regression-to-the-fundamentals/</link><pubDate>Tue, 06 Feb 2024 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/regression-to-the-fundamentals/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;After 25 years in technology, mostly in security, I recently realized I&amp;rsquo;m regressing. No, not in terms of my mental acuity or health (although all of you would be better judges on my brain function), but more in terms of my career. And no, I don&amp;rsquo;t mean I&amp;rsquo;m going back to the Helpdesk&amp;hellip; and according to my children and most of my family I never really left anyway. Not that I&amp;rsquo;m paid for it. Well, sometimes with some cookies. But never enough cookies. It&amp;rsquo;s just that the longer I do this the more I realize that it&amp;rsquo;s the fundamentals that really matter. That as much as I love all the fun advanced research, all that work really only addresses and helps a relatively small percentage of the world. The hard problems aren&amp;rsquo;t the hard problems; the hard problems are solving the easy problems consistently. We mostly suck at that. What&amp;rsquo;s fascinating is that this isn&amp;rsquo;t a problem limited to security. I really noticed it recently when I was working on my paramedic recertification. As a paramedic I can do all sorts of advanced things that involve drugs, electricity, and tubes. In some cases, especially cardiac arrest, the research now shows that you, the bystander, starting good quality CPR early is far more important than me injecting someone with epinephrine. In fact, studies seem to indicate that epi in cardiac arrest does not improve long term patient outcomes. CPR and electricity (AEDs) for the win. Advanced clinicians for myself? Useful and necessary, but useless without the fundamentals before we get there. Back to security. As a researcher (and a vendor) we are drawn to the hard problems. I&amp;rsquo;m not saying they don&amp;rsquo;t matter — they very much do. As much as AI is in the hype machine right now it&amp;rsquo;s there for a reason and we need experts engaged early, even if most of what they&amp;rsquo;ll do will fail because AI is a truly disruptive innovation. If you don&amp;rsquo;t believe me just re-read this sentence after the 2024 election. And some basic problems need new innovations instead of banging our heads against the wall. Passwordless is a great example of attacking an intractable problem with hard engineering that is invisible to users. As much as I&amp;rsquo;d like to be doing more leading-edge research, I keep finding myself focusing on the basics, and trying to help other people do the basics better. Let&amp;rsquo;s take cloud incident response, my current bread and butter. Will Bengtson and I keep coming up with all sorts of cool, advanced cloud attacks to include in our IR training at Black Hat. The reality is those are mostly there so people think we are smart and to keep the rare advanced students interested. Nearly all cloud attacks a student working on a real IR team will encounter are the same two or three &amp;ldquo;simple&amp;rdquo; things. Lost or stolen credentials used for crypto, ransomware, or data exfiltration, or hacking a vulnerable public-facing instance for&amp;hellip; crypto, ransomware, or data exfiltration. Instead of spending my time on leading-edge research I&amp;rsquo;m &lt;a href="https://slaw.securosis.com"&gt;building training for people with zero experience&lt;/a&gt;. I&amp;rsquo;m working on &lt;a href="https://www.iansresearch.com/resources/cloud-security-maturity-model"&gt;simple models which hopefully help people focus better&lt;/a&gt;. On the product side I&amp;rsquo;m focusing more on &lt;a href="https://defense.firemon.cloud"&gt;basic problems that seem to slip through the gaps&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;a href="https://www.chrisfarris.com"&gt;Chris Farris&lt;/a&gt; and I are working on a new talk and threat modeling approach to focus consistently on the fundamentals which really matter, not all the crazy advanced stuff in your inbox every day. Researchers and research teams mostly publish on the fun, interesting and advanced things because that&amp;rsquo;s more intellectually interesting and gets the headlines. There&amp;rsquo;s nothing wrong with that — we need it — but never forget that the basics matter more. I still get FOMO from time to time, but in the end I can do a lot more good at a much larger scale focusing on helping with fundamentals. Simple isn&amp;rsquo;t sexy, but without plumbers we&amp;rsquo;re all covered in shit pretty damn quickly. As a paramedic the one thing we are exceptional at is facing utter chaos, identifying what will kill you, and keeping things from getting worse. Maybe I biased my career from the start. &lt;em&gt;Chris says he objects to being called a simple problem. Please humor him. Will just asked that I spell his name correctly.&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Is This Thing Still On?</title><link>/blog/is-this-thing-still-on/</link><pubDate>Thu, 01 Feb 2024 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/is-this-thing-still-on/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I started a blog in 2006. This blog, to be precise. I kinda just wanted a blog. Blogs were cool. Twitter wasn&amp;rsquo;t really a thing yet. YouTube was only like a year old. The iPhone was hiding in an engineering and design lab. I didn&amp;rsquo;t expect securosis.com to be around 18 years later. I certainly didn&amp;rsquo;t expect it would become my full time job for 15 of those years. I most definitely didn&amp;rsquo;t expect to take on partners, spin out a product startup, have kids, lose my hair, grow&amp;hellip; other hair, lose a partner (to a bank, not the grave, if there&amp;rsquo;s a difference), and, as of last weekend, migrate the entire site to our fourth hosting provider and third new software stack without losing any significant content. And most embarrassing of all, I didn&amp;rsquo;t expect to not write on my own site for&amp;hellip; 3 years. But that&amp;rsquo;s what happens when you build a startup that gets acquired (and &lt;a href="https://defense.firemon.cloud"&gt;I still work there full time&lt;/a&gt;), your consulting customers keep you super busy with hands-on technical projects, and you spend a chunk of the pandemic running around playing paramedic. Oh, and when your kids hit the age where you and your wife effectively become unpaid ride share drivers. Now it&amp;rsquo;s time to come home. I&amp;rsquo;m still working and writing at FireMon and other places, but thanks to the success of &lt;a href="https://slaw.securosis.com"&gt;CloudSLAW&lt;/a&gt; (my lab a week newsletter/blog/YouTube channel) I have the itch to just start blogging about random non-day-job security stuff again. I also have some new research on the way, and maybe some friends will be dropping in. Securosis (the company) is just for side projects now, and weirdly I think that gives me a freedom in my writing I forgot about. We just moved the site and I&amp;rsquo;m slowly updating things. In the coming weeks I also plan to pull some old posts from the 18-year history of this site and rip them to shreds with my modern knowledge and sensibilities. I hope some of you stick around for the ride, but I plan to have fun no matter what.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>The THIRTEENTH Annual Disaster Recovery Breakfast: Changing of the Guard</title><link>/blog/2023-recoverybreakfast/</link><pubDate>Wed, 29 Mar 2023 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/2023-recoverybreakfast/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;What a long, strange trip it’s been over the last 3 years. In fact, the last time I saw many of you was at the last Disaster Recovery Breakfast in 2020. Within two weeks of that event, the world shut down due to COVID. Well, a lot has changed since then. DisruptOps was acquired by &lt;a href="https://www.firemon.com/"&gt;Firemon&lt;/a&gt; in September 2021. In early 2022, Rich decided he wanted to see our cloud security vision through and dedicate his full-time efforts to the &lt;a href="https://www.firemon.com/products/cloud-defense/"&gt;Cloud Defense&lt;/a&gt; product. In July of 2022, I decided to partner with Alan Shimel and Mitch Ashley and join &lt;a href="https://techstronggroup.com/"&gt;Techstrong&lt;/a&gt; as head of the research business. We still do cloud security training and house our cloud security content in Securosis, but we’ve both moved on. Our long-time venue for the DRB, Jillian’s (then TableTop Tap House) in San Fransisco, didn’t survive the pandemic. They went out of business in early 2022 and took our deposit for the 2022 DRB with them. Ouch. But given the lack of venues and the rescheduling of the RSA Conference to June 2022, we couldn’t pull off the breakfast last year. But this year, &lt;strong&gt;we are back.&lt;/strong&gt; But it’s different. We have a different venue, which is The Pink Elephant (142 Minna St). We have a different organizer, which is now Techstrong and our &lt;a href="https://securityboulevard.com/"&gt;Security Boulevard&lt;/a&gt; site. We have mostly the same sponsors, so we need to thank our pals at &lt;a href="https://www.iansresearch.com/"&gt;IANS&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://golaunchtech.com/"&gt;LaunchTech&lt;/a&gt;, and &lt;a href="https://aimpointgroup.com/"&gt;AimPoint Group&lt;/a&gt;. Their support is critical. So yes, we’ve had a changing of the guard. But what isn’t different is breakfast. It’s still a place where you can grab some breakfast and see some friends without the pomp and circumstance of a major conference. We hope to see you there. &lt;img src="breakfast-small.jpg" alt=""&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Heading to Techstrong</title><link>/blog/heading-to-techstrong/</link><pubDate>Tue, 12 Jul 2022 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/heading-to-techstrong/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;The phone rang. On the other end, I heard a booming voice many of you are familiar with. “Hey Mikey! What’s shaking? What’s your plan now that Rich is with Firemon?” It was Alan Shimel, my good friend and head of &lt;a href="https://techstronggroup.com"&gt;Techstrong Group&lt;/a&gt;. It was maybe 10 minutes after Rich’s announcement had hit Twitter. I told Alan I would stay the course, but he had other ideas. “We should do something together. Think about it.” So I did. We had a call a few days later and started sketching out what it would look like if I joined Alan and the team. I’d want to build a research team since that’s what I love to do. I’d also like to have a hand in developing the corporate strategy. Alan said that sounded great; when can I start? I wasn’t there yet. I needed to know more about the business. I needed to spend some more time with the team. So I made the pilgrimage down to Boca to do a working session with Alan and see what we could work out. I learned that Techstrong is at the center of some pretty disruptive technology shifts, like DevOps (yes, &lt;a href="https://devops.com/"&gt;DevOps.com&lt;/a&gt; is ours), cloud-native computing, containers (&lt;a href="https://containerjournal.com/"&gt;containerjournal.com&lt;/a&gt;), microservices, and of course, security (&lt;a href="https://securityboulevard.com/"&gt;securityboulevard.com&lt;/a&gt;). There is an excellent &lt;a href="https://www.techstrongevents.com/virtual/upcoming"&gt;events business&lt;/a&gt; with tons of virtual events. I’ve been a guest on &lt;a href="https://digitalanarchist.com/videos/techstrong-tv"&gt;TechstrongTV&lt;/a&gt; more times than I could count, so I know about their video capabilities. And the company has a top-notch customer list. So there is an exciting platform to build on. But could I have an impact? Next, I dug into the research business that another old friend, Mitchell Ashley, created. There are some &lt;a href="https://techstrongresearch.com/#resources"&gt;short reports&lt;/a&gt; and they did some speaking gigs, but Techstrong Research didn’t have a point of view about where the markets are heading. So it was “research,” but not the kind of research I do. So yeah, I can have an impact on Techstrong Research. The timing also felt right. My youngest kids are off to college in August, so it’s a good time to make some changes. It’s not like my partners at Securosis haven’t done a similar thing. Adrian headed off into corporate cloud land a couple of years ago. Rich made a move to Firemon earlier this year. As much as I loved the 12 years with Securosis, I’m ready to tilt at another windmill. Though it had to be the right situation, and I found that with Techstrong. I’m happy to say I’m taking my talents to &lt;del&gt;South Beach&lt;/del&gt; Boca. I’ve taken the role of Chief Strategy Officer of Techstrong Group and General Manager of Techstrong Research. &lt;img src="IMG_9002.jpg" alt=""&gt; The intangibles made this an easy decision for me. It’s about working with my friends. It always has been. I have been fortunate to work with Rich and Adrian for the past 12 years. When we spun out DisruptOps, I was able to work with Jody Brazil, Brandy Peterson, and Matt Eberhart. And now I get to work with my good friends Alan, Mitch, and Parker. I have no illusions about how much work lies ahead. I’m back to building a research business, and it’s very exciting. Ultimately I’m a builder, and I’m lucky to have the opportunity to build with another set of good friends. Securosis is still a thing. Rich and I will continue to run our cloud security curriculum and training activities here. But Securosis will no longer function as an analyst firm. I’ll continue to support existing clients, but that work will transition to Techstrong Research when it makes sense. I’m not sure if this is good or bad, but you’ll see a lot more of me. I’ll be visible across the Techstrong network, writing, speaking, and interviewing exciting companies. I’ll be publishing trends and forward-looking research and ensuring that Techstrong has a strong point of view about where technology is going. I’ll be at Black Hat, so if you are there, let me know. It’ll be great to meet up, and I can fill you in on all the cool stuff we do at Techstrong.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>SOC 2025: Operationalizing the SOC</title><link>/blog/soc-2025-operationalizing-the-soc/</link><pubDate>Mon, 18 Apr 2022 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/soc-2025-operationalizing-the-soc/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;So far in this series, we’ve discussed &lt;a href="https://securosis.com/blog/soc-2025-the-coming-soc-evolution"&gt;the challenges of security operations&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="https://securosis.com/blog/soc-2025-making-sense-of-security-data"&gt;making sense of security data&lt;/a&gt;, and &lt;a href="https://securosis.com/blog/soc-2025-detection-analytics"&gt;refining detection/analytics&lt;/a&gt;, which are all critical components of building a modern, scalable SOC. Yet, there is an inconvenient fact that warrants discussion. Unless someone does something with the information, the best data and analytics don’t result in a positive security outcome. Security success depends on consistent and effective operational motions. Sadly, this remains a commonly overlooked aspect of building the SOC. As we wrap up the series, we’re going to go from alert to action and do it effectively and efficiently, every time (consistently), which we’ll call the 3 E’s. The goal is to automate everything that can be automated, enabling the carbon (you know, humans) to focus on the things that suit them best. Will we get there by 2025? That depends on you, as the technology is available, it’s a matter of whether you use it.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>SOC 2025: Detection/Analytics</title><link>/blog/soc-2025-detection-analytics/</link><pubDate>Thu, 10 Mar 2022 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/soc-2025-detection-analytics/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;We spent &lt;a href="https://securosis.com/blog/soc-2025-making-sense-of-security-data"&gt;the last post&lt;/a&gt; figuring out how to aggregate security data. Alas, a lake of security data doesn’t find attackers, so now we have to use it. Security analytics has been all the rage for the past ten years. In fact, many security analytics companies have emerged promising to make sense of all of this security data. It turns out analytics aren’t a separate thing; they are part of every security thing. That’s right, analytics drive endpoint security offerings. Cloud security products? Yup. Network security detection? Those too. It’s hard to envision a security company of scale without analytics playing a central role in providing value to their customers. As a security leader, what do you have to know about analytics and detection as you figure out how the SOC should evolve? First, it’s not about [analytics technique A] vs. [analytics technique B]. It’s about security outcomes, and to get there you’ll need to start thinking in terms of the &lt;em&gt;SOC platform&lt;/em&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>SOC 2025: Making Sense of Security Data</title><link>/blog/soc-2025-making-sense-of-security-data/</link><pubDate>Tue, 08 Feb 2022 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/soc-2025-making-sense-of-security-data/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Intelligence comes from data. And there is no lack of security data, that’s for sure. Everything generates data. Servers, endpoints, networks, applications, databases, SaaS services, clouds, containers, and anything else that does anything in your technology environment. Just as there is no award for finding every vulnerability, there is no award for collecting all the security data. You want to collect the right data to make sure you can detect an attack before it becomes a breach. As we consider what &lt;a href="https://securosis.com/blog/soc-2025-the-coming-soc-evolution"&gt;the SOC will look like in 2025&lt;/a&gt;, given the changing attack surface and available skills base, we’ve got to face reality. The sad truth is that TBs of security data sit underutilized in various data stores throughout the enterprise. It’s not because security analysts don’t want to use the data. They don’t have a consistent process to evaluate ingested data and then analyze it constantly. But let’s not get the cart before the proverbial horse. First, let’s figure out what data will drive the SOC of the Future.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>SOC 2025: The Coming SOC Evolution</title><link>/blog/soc-2025-the-coming-soc-evolution/</link><pubDate>Mon, 24 Jan 2022 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/soc-2025-the-coming-soc-evolution/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;It’s brutal running a security operations center (SOC) today. The attack surface continues to expand, in a lot of cases exponentially, as data moves to SaaS, applications move to containers, and the infrastructure moves to the cloud. The tools used by the SOC analysts are improving, but not fast enough. It seems adversaries remain one (or more) steps ahead. There aren’t enough people to get the job done. Those that you can hire typically need a lot of training, and retaining them continues to be problematic. As soon as they are decent, they head off to their next gig for a huge bump in pay. At the same time, security is under the spotlight like never before. Remember the old days when no one knew about security? Those days are long gone, and they aren’t coming back. Thus, many organizations embrace managed services for detection and response, mostly because they have to. Something has to change. Actually, a lot has to change. That’s what this series, entitled &lt;em&gt;SOC 2025&lt;/em&gt; is about. How can we evolve the SOC over the next few years to address the challenges of dealing with today’s security issues, across the expanded attack surface, with far fewer skilled people, while positioning for tomorrow? We want to thank &lt;a href="https://www.splunk.com/en_us/software/enterprise-security.html"&gt;Splunk&lt;/a&gt;(you may have heard of them) for agreeing to be the preliminary licensee for the research. That means when we finish up the research and assemble it as a paper, they will have an opportunity to license it. Or not. There are no commitments until the paper is done, in accordance with our Totally Transparent Research methodology.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>New Age Network Detection: Use Cases</title><link>/blog/new-age-network-detection-use-cases/</link><pubDate>Wed, 18 Aug 2021 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/new-age-network-detection-use-cases/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;As we wrap up the New Age Network Detection (NAND) series, we’ve made the point that network analysis remains critical to finding malicious activity, even as you move to the cloud. But clearly, collection and analysis need to change as the underlying technology platforms evolve. But that does put the cart a bit ahead of the horse. We haven’t spent much time honing in on the specific use cases where NAND makes a difference. So that’s how we’ll bring the series to a close. To be clear, this is not an exhaustive list of use cases, but it hits the high points and helps you understand the value of NAND relative to other means of detection.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Papers Posted</title><link>/blog/papers-posted/</link><pubDate>Mon, 12 Jul 2021 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/papers-posted/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;It turns out that we are still writing papers and posting them in our &lt;a href="https://securosis.com/research"&gt;research library&lt;/a&gt;, even though far less frequently than back in the day. Working with enterprises on their cloud security strategies consumes most of our cycles nowadays. When we’re not assessing clouds or training on clouds or getting into trouble, we’ve published 3 papers over the past year. I’ve finally posted them to the research library for you to check out.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>New Age Network Detection: Collection and Analysis</title><link>/blog/new-age-network-detection-collection-and-analysis/</link><pubDate>Tue, 06 Jul 2021 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/new-age-network-detection-collection-and-analysis/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;As we return to our series on &lt;em&gt;New Age Network Detection,&lt;/em&gt; let’s revisit &lt;a href="https://securosis.com/blog/new-age-network-detection-introduction"&gt;our first post&lt;/a&gt;. We argued that we’re living through technology disruption on a scale, and at a velocity, we haven’t seen before. Unfortunately security has failed to keep pace with attackers. The industry’s response has been to &lt;em&gt;move the goalposts,&lt;/em&gt; focusing on new shiny tech widgets every couple years. We summed it up in that first post:&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>New Age Network Detection: Introduction</title><link>/blog/new-age-network-detection-introduction/</link><pubDate>Tue, 25 May 2021 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/new-age-network-detection-introduction/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Like the rest of the technology stack, the enterprise network is undergoing a huge transition. With data stores increasingly in the cloud and connectivity to SaaS providers and applications running in Infrastructure as a Service (IaaS) platforms, a likely permanently remote workforce has new networking requirements. Latency and performance continue to be important, but also being able to protect employee devices in all locations and providing access to only authorized resources. Bringing the secure network to the employee represents a better option to solve these requirements instead of forcing the employee onto the secure network. The network offers a secure connection; thus, you no longer backhaul traffic on-prem to run through the corporate web proxy or go through a centralized VPN server. And the operational challenges of running a global network forces the likely embrace of managed networking service to allow organizations to focus on what rides on top of the network and less on building and operating the pipes. Using capabilities like a software-defined perimeter (or Zero Trust Network Access, if you like that term better) and intelligent routing gets employees to the resources they need, quickly and efficiently. Pretty compelling, eh? But alas, it’ll be a long time before we fully move to this new model because &lt;em&gt;installed base&lt;/em&gt;. Many companies still have a lot of enterprise networking gear, and the CFO said they couldn’t just toss it. Most sensitive corporate data remains on-prem, meaning we’ll still need to maintain interoperability with the data center networks for the foreseeable future. But to be clear, networks will look much different in 5 - 7 years. As exciting as these new networks may be, you can’t depend on the service provider to find adversaries in your environment. You can’t expect them to track a multi-faceted attack from the employee to the database they targeted as they pivot through various connections, compromised devices, and data stores. Even if you don’t manage the network, you need to detect and eradicate attackers, and if anything doing that across these different networks and cloud services makes it even harder. What’s the urgency? We’ve been in the security business for close to 30 years, and disruption happens slower than you expect. This Bill Gates quote sums it up nicely: &lt;em&gt;“We always overestimate the change that will occur in the next two years and underestimate the change that will occur in the next ten. Don’t let yourself be lulled into inaction.”&lt;/em&gt; There is a lot to unpack there. What kind of actions should you be taking?&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Securing APIs: Empowering Security</title><link>/blog/securing-apis-empowering-security/</link><pubDate>Thu, 15 Apr 2021 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/securing-apis-empowering-security/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;As discussed in &lt;a href="https://securosis.com/blog/securing-apis-application-architecture-disrupted"&gt;Application Architecture Disrupted&lt;/a&gt;, macro changes including the migration to cloud disrupting the tech stack, application design patterns bringing microservices to the forefront, and DevOps changing dev/release practices dramatically impact building and deploying applications. In this environment, the focus turns to APIs as the fabric that weaves together modern applications. Alas, the increasing importance of APIs also makes them a target. Historically, enterprises take baby steps to adopt new technologies, experimenting and finding practical boundaries to meet security, reliability, and resilience requirements before fully committing. Requiring a trade-off between security and speed, it may take years to achieve widespread usage of new technologies. But that isn’t fast enough with the expectation that today’s businesses will &lt;em&gt;move fast and break stuff&lt;/em&gt;. As a result, DevOps organizations don’t play by the same rules governing IT adoption of new technologies. In fact, DevOps happened because corporate IT couldn’t move fast enough. These DevOps teams adopt these technologies first and ask for permission later. There needs to be a middle ground where the organization can implement security as part of the tech stack, ensuring adherence to security policies, including protecting critical data, while moving fast enough to deliver in each application sprint.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Securing APIs: Modern API Security</title><link>/blog/securing-apis-modern-api-security/</link><pubDate>Mon, 29 Mar 2021 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/securing-apis-modern-api-security/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;As we started &lt;a href="https://securosis.com/blog/securing-apis-application-architecture-disrupted"&gt;the API Security series&lt;/a&gt;, we went through how application architecture evolves and how that’s changing the application attack surface. API Security requires more than traditional application security. Traditional application security tactics like SAST/DAST, WAF, API Gateway, and others are necessary but not sufficient. We need to build on top of the existing structures of application security to protect modern applications. So what does API Security look like? We wouldn’t be analysts if we didn’t think in terms of process and lifecycle. Having practiced security for decades, one of the only truisms which held up over time has been &lt;em&gt;visibility, then control.&lt;/em&gt; There are a hundred ways to describe it, like “you can’t manage what you can’t see,” and they are right. Let’s use that prism to look at API security, and that means starting with visibility.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Securing APIs: Application Architecture Disrupted</title><link>/blog/securing-apis-application-architecture-disrupted/</link><pubDate>Fri, 05 Mar 2021 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/securing-apis-application-architecture-disrupted/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;When you think of disruption, the typical image is a tornado coming through and ripping things up, leaving towns leveled and nothing the same moving forward. But disruption can be slow and steady, incremental in the way everything you thought you knew has changed. Securing cloud environments was like that, initially trying to use existing security concepts and controls, which worked well enough. Until they didn’t and forced a re-evaluation of everything that we thought we knew about security. The changes were (and still are for many) challenging, but overall very positive. We see the same type of disruption in how applications are built, deployed, and maintained within most organizations. Macro changes include the migration to cloud disrupting the tech stack, application design patterns bringing microservices to the forefront, and DevOps changing dev/release practices. As we’ve been slowly navigating this sea change, the common thread between these changes is an increasing reliance on application programming interfaces (APIs). From a security standpoint, this new dependence on APIs changes the source of risk - it’s not just the front end under siege from traditional attacks and recon activities that map out backend processes. APIs have quickly emerged as the most attractive and least protected target within these new applications since they have access to critical data and services. Thus, we’ve decided to document this disruption and the impact on how you have to view application security moving forward. We’re happy to introduce our latest blog series called &lt;em&gt;Securing APIs: The New Application Attack Surface.&lt;/em&gt; In the series, we’ll go through how application architecture and the attack surface is changing, how application security needs to evolve to deal with these disruptions, and how to empower security in an environment where DevOps rules the roost. Because that is the way. Let’s give thanks to &lt;a href="https://salt.security"&gt;Salt Security&lt;/a&gt; as the potential licensee of this blog series before we get started. As a refresher for those new around here, we don’t write sponsored papers. We publish research for practitioners that we may license to a vendor at the end of the process. That gives us the flexibility to go where our research takes us &lt;a href="https://securosis.com/about/totally-transparent-research"&gt;without undue influence&lt;/a&gt;. It’s a bit of a counter-intuitive model, but we’ve been doing it for 13 years at this point, and it works pretty well.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Infrastructure Hygiene: Success and Consistency</title><link>/blog/infrastructure-hygiene-success-and-consistency/</link><pubDate>Mon, 01 Mar 2021 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/infrastructure-hygiene-success-and-consistency/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;We went through the &lt;a href="https://securosis.com/blog/infrastructure-hygiene-why-its-critical-for-protection"&gt;risks and challenges of infrastructure hygiene&lt;/a&gt;, and then various approaches for &lt;a href="https://securosis.com/blog/infrastructure-hygiene-fixing-vulnerabilities"&gt;fixing the vulnerabilities&lt;/a&gt;. Let’s wrap up the series by seeing how this kind of approach works in practice and how we’ll organize to ensure the consistent and successful execution of an infrastructure patch. Before we dive in, we should reiterate that none of the approaches we’ve offered are mutually exclusive. A patch does eliminate the vulnerability on the component, but the most expedient path to reduce the risk might be a virtual patch. The best long-term solution may involve moving the data layer to a PaaS service. You figure out the best approach on a case-by-case basis, balancing risk, availability, and the willingness to consider refactoring the application.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Infrastructure Hygiene: Fixing Vulnerabilities</title><link>/blog/infrastructure-hygiene-fixing-vulnerabilities/</link><pubDate>Fri, 26 Feb 2021 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/infrastructure-hygiene-fixing-vulnerabilities/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;As discussed in &lt;a href="https://securosis.com/blog/infrastructure-hygiene-why-its-critical-for-protection"&gt;the first post&lt;/a&gt; in the Infrastructure Hygiene series, the most basic advice we can give on security is to &lt;em&gt;do the fundamentals well.&lt;/em&gt; That doesn’t insulate you from determined and well-funded adversaries or space alien cyber attacks, but it will eliminate the path of least resistance that most attackers take. The blurring of infrastructure as more tech stack components become a mix of on-prem, cloud-based, and managed services further complicate matters. How do you block and tackle well when you have to worry about three different fields and multiple teams playing on each field? Maybe that’s enough of the football analogies. As if that wasn’t enough, now you have no margin for error because attackers have automated the recon for many attacks. So if you leave something exposed, they will find it. &lt;em&gt;They&lt;/em&gt; being the bots and scripts always searching the Intertubes for weak links. Although you aren’t reading this to keep hearing about the challenges of doing security, are you? So let’s focus on how to fix these issues.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Infrastructure Hygiene: Why It’s Critical for Protection</title><link>/blog/infrastructure-hygiene-why-its-critical-for-protection-2/</link><pubDate>Mon, 22 Feb 2021 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/infrastructure-hygiene-why-its-critical-for-protection-2/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;After many decades as security professionals, it is depressing to have the same issues repeatedly. It’s kind of like we’re stuck in this hacker groundhog day. Get up, clean up after stupid users, handle a new attack, fill out compliance report, and then do it all over again. Of course, we all live in an asymmetrical world when it comes to security. The attackers only have to be right once, and they are in your environment. The defenders only have to be wrong once, and the attackers also gain a foothold. It’s not fair, but then again, no one said life was fair. The most basic advice we give to anyone building a security program is to make sure you do the fundamentals well. You remember security fundamentals, right? Visibility for every asset. Maintain a strong security configuration and posture for those assets. Patch those devices efficiently and effectively when the vendor issues an update. Most practitioners nod their head about the fundamentals and then spend all day figuring out how the latest malware off the adversary assembly line works — or burning a couple of days threat hunting in their environment. You know, the fun stuff. The fundamentals are just… boring. The fact is, the fundamentals work, not for every attack but a lot of them. So we’re going to provide a reminder of that in this series we are calling &lt;em&gt;Infrastructure Hygiene: The First Line of Security.&lt;/em&gt; We can’t eliminate all of the risks, but shame on us if we aren’t making it harder for the adversaries to gain a foothold in your environment. It’s about closing the paths of least resistance and making the adversaries work to compromise your environment. We want to thank our pals at &lt;a href="https://www.oracle.com/security/"&gt;Oracle&lt;/a&gt; for potentially licensing the paper. We appreciate a company that is willing to remind its folks about the importance of blocking and tackling instead of just focusing on the latest, shiniest widget.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Data Security in the SaaS Age: Quick Wins</title><link>/blog/data-security-in-the-saas-age-quick-wins/</link><pubDate>Wed, 05 Aug 2020 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/data-security-in-the-saas-age-quick-wins/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;As we wrap up our series on Data Security in the SaaS age, let’s work through a scenario to show how these concepts apply in a specific scenario. We’ll revisit the “small, but rapidly growing” pharmaceutical company we used as an example in our &lt;a href="https://securosis.com/blog/14967"&gt;Data Guardrails and Behavioral Analytics&lt;/a&gt; paper. The CISO has seen the adoption of SaaS accelerate over the past two years. Given the increasing demand to &lt;em&gt;work from anywhere&lt;/em&gt; at all organizations, the CTO and CEO have decided to minimize on-premise technology assets. A few years ago they shifted their approach to use data guardrails and behavioral analytics to protect the sensitive research and clinical trial data generated by the business. But they still need a structured program and appropriate tools to protect their SaaS applications. With hundreds of SaaS applications in use and many more coming, it can be a bit overwhelming to the team, who needs to both understand their extended attack surface and figure out how to protect it at scale. With guidance from their friends at Securosis, they start by looking at a combination of risk (primarily to high-profile data) and broad usage within the business, as they figure out which SaaS application to focus on protecting first. The senior team decides to start with CRM. Why? After file storage/office automation, CRM tends to be the most widespread application, representing the most sensitive information stored in a SaaS application: customer data. They also have many business partners and vendors accessing the data and the application, because they have multiple (larger) organizations bringing their drugs to market; they want to make sure all those constituencies have the proper entitlements within their CRM. Oh yeah, and their auditors were in a few months back, and &lt;em&gt;suggested&lt;/em&gt; that assessing their SaaS applications needs to be a priority, given the sensitive data stored there. As we described in &lt;a href="https://securosis.com/blog/data-security-in-the-saas-age-thinking-small"&gt;our last post&lt;/a&gt;, we’ll run through a process to determine &lt;strong&gt;who&lt;/strong&gt; should use the data and &lt;strong&gt;how&lt;/strong&gt;. For simplicity’s sake, we’ll generalize and answer these questions at a high level, but you should dig down much deeper to drive policy.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Data Security in the SaaS Age: Thinking Small</title><link>/blog/data-security-in-the-saas-age-thinking-small/</link><pubDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2020 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/data-security-in-the-saas-age-thinking-small/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Our &lt;a href="https://securosis.com/blog/data-security-in-the-saas-age-focus-on-what-you-control"&gt;last post&lt;/a&gt; in Data Security in a SaaS World discussed how the &lt;em&gt;use&lt;/em&gt; and &lt;em&gt;sharing&lt;/em&gt; phases of the (frankly partially defunct) Data Security Lifecycle remain relevant. That approach hinges on a detailed understanding of each application to define appropriate policies for what is allowed and by whom. To be clear, these are not – and cannot be – generic policies. Each SaaS application is different and as such your policies must be different, so you (or a vendor or service provider) need to dig into it to understand what it does and who should do it. Now the fun part. The typical enterprise has hundreds, if not thousands, of SaaS services. So what’s the best approach to secure those applications? Any answer requires gratuitous use of many platitudes, including both “How do you eat an elephant? One bite at a time.” and that other old favorite, “You can’t boil the ocean.” Whichever pithy analogy you favor for providing data security for SaaS, you need to &lt;em&gt;think small,&lt;/em&gt; by setting policies to protect one application or service at a time. We’re looking for baby steps, not big bangs. The big bang killed initiatives like DLP. (You remember DLP, right?) Not that folks don’t do DLP successfully today – they do – but if you try to classify all the data and build rules for every possible data loss… you’ll get overwhelmed, and then it’s hard to complete the project. We’ve been preaching this small and measured approach for massive, challenging projects like SIEM for years. You don’t set up all the SIEM rules and use cases at once – at least not if you want the project to succeed. The noise will bury you, and you’ll stop using the tool. People with successful SIEM implementations under their belts started small with a few use cases, then added more once they figured out how to make a few sets set work. The &lt;a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pareto_principle"&gt;Pareto principle&lt;/a&gt; applies here, bigtime. You can eliminate the bulk of your risk by protecting 20% of your SaaS apps. But if you use 1,000 SaaS apps, you still need to analyze and set policies for 200 apps – a legitimately daunting task. We’re talking about a journey here, one that takes a while. So prioritization of your SaaS applications is essential for project success. We’ll also discuss opportunities to accelerate the process later on — you can jump the proverbial line with smart technology use.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Data Security in the SaaS Age: Focus on What You Control</title><link>/blog/data-security-in-the-saas-age-focus-on-what-you-control/</link><pubDate>Mon, 15 Jun 2020 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/data-security-in-the-saas-age-focus-on-what-you-control/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;As we launched our series on &lt;em&gt;Data Security in the SaaS Age,&lt;/em&gt; we described the challenge of &lt;a href="https://securosis.com/blog/data-security-in-the-saas-age-rethinking-data-security"&gt;protecting data as it continues to spread across dozens&lt;/a&gt; (if not hundreds) of different cloud providers. We also focused attention on the Data Security Triangle, as the best tool we can think of to keep focused on addressing at least one of the underlying prerequisites for a data breach (data, exploit, and exfiltration). If you break any leg of the triangle you stop the breach. The objective of this research is to &lt;em&gt;rethink&lt;/em&gt; data security, which requires us to revisit where we’ve been. That brings us back to the Data Security Lifecycle, which we last updated in 2011 in parts &lt;a href="https://www.securosis.com/blog/introducing-the-data-security-lifecycle-2.0"&gt;one&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="https://securosis.com/blog/data-security-lifecycle-2.0-and-the-cloud-locations-and-access"&gt;two&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href="https://securosis.com/blog/data-security-lifecycle-2.0-functions-actors-and-controls"&gt;three&lt;/a&gt;).&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Insight 6/2/2020: Walking Their Path</title><link>/blog/insight-6-2-2020-walking-their-path/</link><pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2020 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/insight-6-2-2020-walking-their-path/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Between Mira and I, we have 5 teenagers. For better or worse, the teenage experience of the kids this year looks quite a bit different; thanks COVID! They haven’t really been able to go anywhere, and although things are loosening up a bit here in Atlanta, we’ve been trying to keep them pretty isolated. To the degree we can. In having the kids around a lot more, you can’t help but notice both the subtle and major differences. Not just in personality, but in interests and motivation. Last summer (2019) was a great example. Our oldest, Leah, was around after returning a trip to Europe with her Mom. (remember when you could travel abroad? Sigh.) She’s had different experiences each summer, including a bunch of travel and different camps. Our second oldest (Zach) also spent the summer in ATL. But he was content to work a little, watch a lot of YouTube, and hang out with us. Our third (Ella) and fifth (Sam) went to their camps, where each has been going for 7-8 years. It’s their home and their camp friends are family. And our fourth (Lindsay) explored Israel for a month. Many campers believe in “10 for 2.” They basically have to suffer through life for 10 months to enjoy the 2 months at camp each year. I think of it as 12 for 2 because we have to work &lt;em&gt;hard&lt;/em&gt; for the entire year to pay for them to go away. Even if all of the kids need to spend the summer near ATL, they’ll do their own thing in their own way. But that &lt;em&gt;way&lt;/em&gt; is constantly evolving. I’ve seen the huge difference 6 months at college made for Leah. I expect a similar change for Z when he (hopefully) goes to school in the fall. As the kids get older, they learn more and inevitably think they’ve figured it out. Just like 19-year-old Mike had all the answers, each of the kids will go through that invincibility stage. The teenage years are challenging because even though the kids think they know everything, we still have some control over them. If they want to stay in our home, they need to adhere to certain rules and there is (almost) daily supervision. Not so much when they leave the nest, and that means they need to figure things out – themselves. I have to get comfortable letting them be and learning lessons. After 50+ years of screwing things up, I’ve made a lot of those mistakes (A LOT!) and could help them avoid a bunch of heartburn and wasted time. &lt;img src="sakura.jpg" alt=""&gt; But then I remember I’ve spent most of my life being pretty hard-headed and I that I didn’t listen to my parents trying to tell me things either. I guess I shouldn’t say didn’t, because I’m not sure if they tried to tell me anything. I wasn’t listening. The kids have to walk their own path(s). Even when it means inevitable failure, heartbreak, and angst. That’s how they learn. That’s how I learned. It’s an important part of the development process. Life can be unforgiving at times, and shielding the kids from disappointment doesn’t prepare them for much of anything. The key is to be there when they fall. To help them understand what went wrong and how they can improve the next time. If they aren’t making mistakes, they aren’t doing enough. There should be no stigma of failing. Only to quitting. If they are making the same mistakes over and over again, then I’m not doing my job as a parent and mentor. I guess one of the epiphanies I’ve had over the past few years is that my path was the right path. &lt;strong&gt;For me.&lt;/strong&gt; I could have done so many things differently. But I’m very happy with where I am now and am grateful for the experiences, which have made me. That whole thing about being formed in the crucible of experience is exactly right. So that’s my plan. Embrace and celebrate each child’s differences and the different paths they will take. Understand that their experiences are not mine and they have to make and then own their choices, and deal with the consequences. Teach them they need to introspect and learn from everything they do. And to make sure they know that when they fall on their ass, we’ll be there to pick them up and dust them off. Photo credit: &lt;em&gt;“Sakura Series”&lt;/em&gt; originally uploaded by &lt;a href="https://flic.kr/p/GB7bxC"&gt;Nick Kenrick&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Data Security in the SaaS Age: Rethinking Data Security</title><link>/blog/data-security-in-the-saas-age-rethinking-data-security/</link><pubDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2020 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/data-security-in-the-saas-age-rethinking-data-security/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Securosis has a long history of following and publishing on data security. Rich was the lead analyst on DLP about a zillion years ago during his time with Gartner. And when Securosis first got going (even before Mike joined), it was on the back of data security advisory and research. Then we got distracted by this cloud thing, and we haven’t gone back to refresh our research, given some minor shifts in how data is used and stored with SaaS driving the front office and IaaS/PaaS upending the data center (yes that was sarcasm). We described a lot of our thinking of the early stages of this transition in &lt;a href="https://securosis.com/blog/tidal-forces-the-trends-tearing-apart-security-as-we-know-it"&gt;Tidal Forces 1&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href="https://securosis.com/blog/tidal-forces-software-as-a-service-is-the-new-back-office"&gt;Tidal Forces 3&lt;/a&gt;, and it seems (miraculously) a lot of what we expected 3 years ago has come to pass. But data security remains elusive. You can think of it as a holy grail of sorts. We’ve been espousing the idea of “data-centric security” for years, focusing on protecting &lt;em&gt;the data,&lt;/em&gt; which then allows you to worry less about securing devices, networks, and associated infrastructure. As with most big ideas, it seemed like a good idea at the time. In practice, data-centric security has been underwhelming as having security policy and protection travel along with the data, as data spreads to every SaaS service you know about (and a bunch you don’t know about), was too much. How did Digital Rights Management work at scale? Right. The industry scaled back expectations and started to rely on techniques like tactical encryption, mostly using built-in capabilities (FDE for structured data, and embedded encryption for file systems). Providing a path of least resistance to both achieve compliance requirements, as well as “feel” the data was protected. Though to be clear, this was mostly security theater, as compromising the application still provided unfettered access to the data. Other techniques, like masking and tokenization, also provided at least a “means” to shield the sensitive data from interlopers. New tactics like test data generation tools also provide an option to ensure that developers don’t inadvertently expose production data. But even with all of these &lt;em&gt;techniques&lt;/em&gt; , most organizations still struggle with protecting their data. And it’s not getting easier.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Insight 5/27/2020: Samson</title><link>/blog/insight-5-27-2020-samson/</link><pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2020 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/insight-5-27-2020-samson/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Do you ever play those wacky question games with your friends? You know, where the questions try to embarrass you and make you say silly things? I was never much of a game player, but sometimes it’s fun. At some point in every game, a question about your favorite physical feature comes up. A lot of people say their eyes. Or their legs. Or maybe some other (less obvious) feature. It would also be interesting to ask your significant other or friends what they thought. I shudder to think about that. But if you ask me, the answer is pretty easy. It’s my hair. Yeah, that sounds a bit vain, but I do like my hair. Even though it turned gray when I was in my early 30s, that was never an impediment. It probably helped early in my career, as it made me seem a bit older and more experienced, even though I had no idea what I was doing (I still don’t). The only issue that ever materialized was when I first started dating Mira (who also has great hair). She showed my picture to her daughter (who was 12 at the time), and she asked, “why are you dating that old guy?” That still cracks me up. &lt;img src="IMG_7504_small.jpg" alt=""&gt; This COVID thing has created a big challenge for me. I usually wear my hair pretty short, trimmed with a clipper on the sides, and styled up top. But for a couple of months, seeing my stylist wasn’t an option. So my hair has grown. And grown. And grown. As it gets longer, it elevates. It’s like a bird’s nest elevation. You know, like losing your keys in there elevation. I could probably fit a Smart Car in there if I don’t get it cut at some point soon. If I’m going to grow my hair out, I want to have Michael Douglas’s hair. His hair is incredible, especially during his &lt;a href="https://i.pinimg.com/originals/6e/8f/b5/6e8fb59b4941c053d468a64e277b3620.jpg"&gt;Black Rain&lt;/a&gt; period. The way his hair flowed as he was riding the motorcycle through Tokyo in that movie. It was awesome, but that is not to be. My destiny is to have big bird nest hair. Mira told me to shave it off. I have a bunch of friends that have done the home haircut, and it seems to work OK. I learned that a friend of mine has been doing his hair at home for years. And he looks impeccable even during the pandemic. I’m a bit jealous. I even bought a hair clipper to do it myself. I figured I’d let one of the kids have fun with it, and it would make for a fun activity. What else are we doing? The clipper is still in its packaging. I can’t bring myself to use it. Even if the self-cut turned out to be a total fiasco, my hair grows so fast it would only take a few weeks to grow out. So we aren’t talking about common sense here. There is something deeper in play, which took me a little while to figure out. I used to wear my hair very short in college during my meathead stage. So it’s not that I’m scared of really short hair. Then I remembered the one time I did a buzz cut as an adult. It was the mid-90s when I was 60 lbs heavier and into denim shirts. Yes, denim shirts were cool back then, trust me. So combine a big dude with a buzz cut in a denim shirt, and then one of my friends told me I looked like &lt;a href="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-8hzi_n4nd5M/T7aXQHSn0JI/AAAAAAAAApM/-60Dd-IkJIY/s1600/erland.jpg"&gt;Grossberger from Stir Crazy&lt;/a&gt;, that was that. No more buzz cut. Clearly, I’m still scarred from that. I guess I have a bit of a Samson complex. It’s like I’ll lose my powers if I get a terrible haircut. I’m not sure what powers I have, but I’m not going to risk it. I’ll just let the nest keep growing. Mira says she likes it, especially when I gel my hair into submission and comb it straight back. I call it the poofy &lt;a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gordon_Gekko"&gt;Gekko&lt;/a&gt; look. But I fear the gel strategy won’t last for much longer. By the end of the day, the top is still under control, but my sides start to go a little wacky, probably from me running my hands through my hair throughout the day. I kind of look like Doc Brown from Back to the Future around 6 PM. It’s pretty scary. What to do? It turns out hair salons were one of the first businesses to reopen in Georgia. So I made an appointment for mid-June to get a cut from my regular stylist. Is it a risk? Yes. And I’ve never checked her license, but I’m pretty sure her name isn’t Deliah. The salon is taking precautions. I’ll be wearing a mask and so will she. We have to wait outside, and she cleans and disinfects everything between customers. It’s a risk that I’m willing to take. Because at some point, we have to return to some sense of normalcy. And for me, getting my hair cut without risking a Grossberger is the kind of normalcy I need.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Insight 5/14/2020: Hugs</title><link>/blog/insight-5-14-2020-hugs/</link><pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2020 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/insight-5-14-2020-hugs/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;The pandemic is hard on everyone. (says the Master of the Obvious) It’s a combination of things. There are layers of fear — both from the standpoint of the health impact, as well as the financial challenges facing so many. We cannot underestimate the human toll, and unfortunately, the US has never prioritized mental health. As I mentioned last week in &lt;a href="https://securosis.com/blog/insight-5-4-2020-confessions"&gt;my inaugural new Insight&lt;/a&gt;, I’m not scared for myself, although too many people I care about are in vulnerable demographics. I’m lucky that (at least for now) the business is OK. I work in an industry that continues to be important and for a company that is holding its own. But it’s hard not to let the fear run rampant. The Eastern philosophies teach us to &lt;em&gt;stay in the moment.&lt;/em&gt; To try to focus on what’s right in front of you. Do not fixate on decisions made or roads not taken. Do not think far ahead about all of the things that may or may not come to pass. Stay right here in the experience of the present. And I try. I really try to keep the things I control at the forefront. Yet there is so much I don’t control about this situation. And that creates a myriad of challenges. For example, I don’t control the behavior of others. I believe the courteous thing to do now is wear a mask when in public. There are certainly debates about whether the masks make a real difference in controlling the spread of the novel coronavirus. But when someone near me is wearing a mask, it’s a sign (to me anyway) that they care about other people. Maybe I’m immunocompromised (thankfully I’m not). Maybe I live with someone elderly. They don’t know. The fact is they likely don’t have the infection. But perhaps they do. It’s about consideration, not about personal freedoms. I have the right to approach someone sitting nearby and fart (from 6 feet away, of course). But I don’t do that because it’s rude. I put wearing a mask into the same category. But alas, I don’t control whether other people wear masks. I can only avoid those that don’t. NY Governor Andrew Cuomo said it pretty well. &lt;img src="Screenshot_2020-05-12_at_3.12.01_PM2_.png" alt=""&gt; I don’t control who takes isolation seriously and who doesn’t. Many people have decided to organize small &lt;em&gt;quarantine pods&lt;/em&gt; who isolate with each other because they don’t see anyone else. This arrangement requires discipline and trust and doesn’t scale much past 2 or 3 families. Being in a blended household means that I had my pod defined for me. There are my household and the households of both of our former spouses. It’s hard to keep everyone in sync. My kids were staying with their Mom in the early days of quarantine. But my son was seeing other kids in the neighborhood. Not a lot, but a few. And supposedly those kids were staying isolated – until they weren’t. One of the neighbors had a worker in the house and then had a visitor who was a healthcare professional in Canada. Sigh. So he goes into isolation for two weeks, and I can’t see my kids. Then my former spouse got religion about isolation and decided that she wasn’t comfortable with my pod, which includes Mira’s former spouse. She doesn’t know him, and in this situation, trust is challenging. Sigh. Another six weeks of not seeing my kids. Mira and I have done a few social distance walks with them, but it’s hard. You wonder if they are too close. So we adapted and set up chairs in a parking lot and hung out. It’s tough. All I wanted to do was hug my kids, but I couldn’t. &lt;img src="5077132547_0ede17c018_w.jpg" alt=""&gt; To be clear, in the grand scheme of things, this is a minor problem. A point in time that will pass. Maybe in 6 months, or maybe in a year. But it will pass. And I’ve got it good, given my health and ability to still work. Many people don’t. They may be alone, or they may not have a job. Those are big problems. But I also don’t want to minimize my experience. It sucks not to be able to parent your kids. It’s getting more complicated by the day. Things in Georgia (where I live) are opening up. Many of the kid’s friends are getting together, and the reality is that we can’t keep them isolated forever. So their Mom and I decided we would keep things locked down through the end of May and then revisit our decision in June. My kids could stay with me for a little while. And that happened last week. When I went over to pick them up, I was overcome. It was only a hug, but it felt like a lot more than that. Over the past week, I got to wake them up, pester them to do online classes, eat with them, and sit next to them as we watched something on Netflix. We were going to figure out week by week where the kids would stay. I’m not going anywhere, so that would work great. But the best-laid plans… I found out that my oldest is seeing her friends. And isn’t socially distancing. Sigh. She’s an adult (if you call 19 an adult), and she made the decision. I’m unhappy but trying to be kind. I’m trying to understand her feelings as her freshman year in college abruptly ended. She went from the freedom of being independent (if you call college independent living) to being locked up in her Mom’s house. That when you are 19, you don’t really think about the impact of your actions on other people. That you can get depressed and forget about the rules and do anything to take a drive with a couple of friends. And now the other house where my kids live is no longer in my pod. One of the kids is with me, and she’ll stay for a couple of weeks. But after that, we have to go back to isolation. It’ll no more hugs for a while. And it makes me sad. Hug? originally uploaded by &lt;a href="https://flic.kr/p/8JDCC4"&gt;Simon Hayhurst&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Insight 5/4/2020: Confessions</title><link>/blog/insight-5-4-2020-confessions/</link><pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2020 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/insight-5-4-2020-confessions/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;It’s a sunny late spring day. Mike steps into the dank building and can smell the must. It feels old but familiar. Strangely familiar. The building looks the same, but he knows it’s different. Too much time has passed. He steps into the confessional and starts to talk. &lt;strong&gt;Mike:&lt;/strong&gt; Forgive me. It’s been almost 3 and a half years since I’ve been here. I’d say it was because I have been busy, which I have. But it’s not that. I spent close to 13 years here, and I had gone through a pretty significant personal transformation. As I was navigating the associated &lt;a href="https://securosis.com/blog/incite-5-25-2016-transitions"&gt;transitions&lt;/a&gt;, I guess I just wanted to live a bit and integrate a lot of the lessons I’ve learned behind the scenes for a while. &lt;strong&gt;Confessor:&lt;/strong&gt; OK. That seems reasonable. How’s that been going? &lt;strong&gt;Mike:&lt;/strong&gt; Pretty good, I’d say. I mentioned my new love (her name is Mira). We got married in mid-2017. I’ve packed my oldest daughter off to college last August and my step-son leaves for his college hopefully at the end of this summer. We’ve got a wonderful blended family and we’ve made some close friends as well. Physically I’m good as well. I’ve been able to maintain my fitness through intense workouts (thanks to OrangeTheory) and use the time in class as my mindfulness practice. And I just try to improve a little bit each day and live my life with kindness and grace. &lt;strong&gt;Confessor:&lt;/strong&gt; How’s work going? You mentioned being busy, but what does that mean? Everyone is busy. &lt;strong&gt;Mike:&lt;/strong&gt; That’s a good point. Culturally there is some kind of weird incentive to be busy. Or to look busy, anyway. Rich and I have been grinding away. Adrian decided to &lt;a href="https://securosis.com/blog/saying-goodbye"&gt;move on last December&lt;/a&gt;, so we’ve just kept pushing forward. Evidently cloud security is a thing, so we’ve benefited from being in the right place at the right time. But we spend a lot of time thinking about how work changes and the impact to security. We don’t quite know what it will look like, but we’re pretty sure it accelerates a lot of the trends we’ve been talking about for the past 5 years. I’m also happy to say DisruptOps is doing well (we closed a Series A back in late February). I guess I’m just grateful. I work with great people and I can still pay the bills, so no complaints. &lt;img src="seeking_confession.jpg" alt=""&gt; &lt;strong&gt;Confessor:&lt;/strong&gt; Hmmm. So you are in a good spot personally and the business is doing well. It seems that you used the time away from here productively. Why come back now? &lt;strong&gt;Mike:&lt;/strong&gt; I found that being here was a way of documenting my journey, for me. And that many of the people here enjoyed it and learned a thing or two. The fact is we are in the midst of a very uncertain time. Our society has undergone shocks to the system and we’re all trying to figure out what a “new normal” looks like. I don’t have any answers, to be clear, but I want to share my fears, my hopes, and my experiences and hope that we’ll all navigate these challenging and turbulent waters together. &lt;strong&gt;Confessor:&lt;/strong&gt; Fear. That’s a good place to start. What are you scared of? &lt;strong&gt;Mike:&lt;/strong&gt; Simply put, that COVID-19 impacts people that I love. We’ve been lucky so far, taking the quarantine seriously, but I am not taking that for granted and continuing to stay inside. Good thing I can come here virtually. Strangely enough, I have little fear regarding my own physical well-being. I made a deal with Mira that we’d be together for at least 44 years and I plan to make good on that deal. But our parents are old and in some cases, immunocompromised. We can’t control what other people do and whether they respect the threat or the science. So it’s definitely scary. &lt;strong&gt;Confessor:&lt;/strong&gt; How are you holding up mentally? &lt;strong&gt;Mike:&lt;/strong&gt; It’s tough. My head was spinning. I was consumed by the news and reacting to most every Tweet. It wasn’t productive. So I’ve started seated meditation again. I just needed to shut down my thoughts, even for a short time, and open up to possibility. To get into the habit of controlling my thoughts, my outlook, and my mood. Meditation helps me do that. And it’s hard to not be able to do the things we love and have no idea when things will return to some semblance of normal. You know, doing simple things that I took for granted, like travel. Mira and I love to travel and we’re very fortunate to go on very cool trips. We can’t see shows or live sports for the time being. That sucks. I also value the time I can spend with clients and at conferences. Who knew that the RSA Conference would be the last time many of us will travel for business for who knows how long? But you make the best of it. &lt;strong&gt;Confessor:&lt;/strong&gt; We’ve changed a lot in the time that you were away. There are new people here. Some have moved on. &lt;strong&gt;Mike&lt;/strong&gt; : It’s not like I’m the same person either. We’re all constantly changing. The goal is to navigate change in the most graceful way possible. I like to think my changes have been positive. I don’t need to act like a grump anymore, I was happy to leave that aspect of my persona behind. I think there is also something to be said about the wisdom of experience. I don’t claim to be wise, but I have a lot of experience. Mostly screwing things up. Hopefully, I’ll be able to continue sharing that experience here and we can learn together. We’re in uncharted territory and that can be pretty exciting if you are open to the inevitable changes ahead. &lt;strong&gt;Confessor:&lt;/strong&gt; So when will you be back? And I suspect it won’t look the same, will it? &lt;strong&gt;Mike:&lt;/strong&gt; You are pretty perceptive. I always enjoyed that about being here. I’m going to aim to visit twice a month. Maybe more often when I have a lot to say. Maybe a little less often at times too. And yes, it will look a bit different. First off, I’m changing the name. Kind of. When I &lt;a href="https://securosis.com/blog/incite-12-21-2016-to-incite"&gt;retired a few years ago&lt;/a&gt;, it was because the term &lt;em&gt;incite&lt;/em&gt; didn’t fit anymore. But the idea of providing &lt;em&gt;insight&lt;/em&gt; does. It’s really what I want to do. So that’s what we’ll call my periodic visits. So welcome back to the &lt;em&gt;Insight&lt;/em&gt;. &lt;strong&gt;Confessor:&lt;/strong&gt; I have to say, I’m glad you’re back. It’s been way too long… &lt;strong&gt;Mike:&lt;/strong&gt; Thanks. It’s nice to be home. Photo credit: “seeking confession” from &lt;a href="https://flic.kr/p/8oc4F"&gt;Chris Booth&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Understanding COVID, ARDS, and Mechanical Ventilation</title><link>/blog/understanding-covid-ards-and-mechanical-ventilation/</link><pubDate>Wed, 01 Apr 2020 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/understanding-covid-ards-and-mechanical-ventilation/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;April 7 Update: some research is emerging since I posted this that COVID related ARDS is not typical ARDS. Here’s the medical reference for providers but it’s very early evidence so far we should keep an eye on:&lt;a href="https://www.atsjournals.org/doi/abs/10.1164/rccm.202003-0817LE"&gt;COVID-19 Does Not Lead to a “Typical” ARDS&lt;/a&gt;. This was further validated by an &lt;a href="https://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/928236"&gt;article in MedScape&lt;/a&gt; that previews some emerging peer-reviewed research. Thus while my explanations of ARDS and ventilators is accurate, the ties to COVID-19 are not and new treatment protocols are emerging.&lt;/strong&gt; Although this is a security blog, this post has absolutely nothing to do with security. No parallels from medicine, no mindset lessons, just some straight-up biology. As many readers know I am a licensed Paramedic. I first certified in the early 1990’s, dropped down to EMT for a while, and bumped back up to full medic two years ago. Recently I became interested in flight and critical care and completed an online critical care and flight medic course from the great team at &lt;a href="https://flightbridgeed.com"&gt;FlightBridgeED&lt;/a&gt;. Paramedics don’t normally work with ventilators – it is an add-on skill specific for flight and critical care (ICU) transports. I’m a neophyte to ventilator management, with online and book training but no practice, but I understand the principles, and thanks to molecular biology back in college, have a decent understanding of cellular processes. COVID-19 dominates all our lives now, and rightfully so. Ventilators are now a national concern and one the technology community is racing to help with. Because of my background I’ve found myself answering a lot of questions on COVID-19, ARDS, and ventilators. While I’m a neophyte at running vents, I’m pretty decent at translating complex technical subjects for non-experts. Here’s my attempt to help everyone understand things a bit better. The TL;DR is that COVID-19 damages the lungs, which for some people triggers the body to overreact with too much inflammation. This extra fluid interferes with gas exchange in the lungs, and oxygen can’t as easily get into the bloodstream. You don’t actually stop breathing, so we use the ventilators to change pressure and oxygen levels, in an attempt to diffuse more oxygen through this barrier and into the lungs without, causing more damage by overinflating them.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Mastering the Journey—Building Network Manageability and Security for your Path</title><link>/blog/mastering-the-journey-building-network-manageability-and-security-for-your-path-2/</link><pubDate>Thu, 27 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/mastering-the-journey-building-network-manageability-and-security-for-your-path-2/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;This is the third post in our series, “Network Operations and Security Professionals’ Guide to Managing Public Cloud Journeys”, which we will release as a white paper after we complete the draft and have some time for public feedback. You might want to start with&lt;a href="https://securosis.com/blog/your-cloud-journeys-is-unique-but-not-unknown"&gt;our first&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href="https://securosis.com/blog/defining-the-journey-the-four-cloud-adoption-patterns"&gt;second&lt;/a&gt; posts. Special thanks to Gigamon for licensing. As always, the content is being developed completely independently using our &lt;a href="https://securosis.com/about/totally-transparent-research"&gt;Totally Transparent Research&lt;/a&gt; methodology.&lt;/em&gt; Learning cloud adoption patterns doesn’t just help us identify key problems and risks – we can use them to guide operational decisions to address the issues they consistently raise. This research focuses on managing networks and network security, but the patterns include broad security and operational implications which cover all facets of your cloud journey. Governance issues aside, we find that networking is typically one of the first areas of focus for organizations, so it’s a good target for our first focused research. (For the curious, IAM and compliance are two other top areas organizations focus on, and struggle with, early in the process).&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Defining the Journey—the Four Cloud Adoption Patterns</title><link>/blog/defining-the-journey-the-four-cloud-adoption-patterns-2/</link><pubDate>Thu, 20 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/defining-the-journey-the-four-cloud-adoption-patterns-2/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;This is the second post in our series, “Network Operations and Security Professionals’ Guide to Managing Public Cloud Journeys”, which we will release as a white paper after we complete the draft and have some time for public feedback. You might want to start with&lt;a href="https://securosis.com/blog/your-cloud-journeys-is-unique-but-not-unknown"&gt;our first post&lt;/a&gt;. Special thanks to Gigamon for licensing. As always, the content is being developed completely independently using our &lt;a href="https://securosis.com/about/totally-transparent-research-ajax"&gt;Totally Transparent Research&lt;/a&gt; methodology.&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Your Cloud Journeys is Unique, but Not Unknown</title><link>/blog/your-cloud-journeys-is-unique-but-not-unknown/</link><pubDate>Mon, 17 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/your-cloud-journeys-is-unique-but-not-unknown/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;This is the first post in a new series, our “Network Operations and Security Professionals’ Guide to Managing Public Cloud Journeys”, which we will release as a white paper after we complete the draft and have some time for public feedback. Special thanks to Gigamon for licensing. As always, the content is being developed completely independently using our&lt;a href="https://securosis.com/about/totally-transparent-research-ajax"&gt;Totally Transparent Research&lt;/a&gt; methodology.&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>The TWELFTH Annual Disaster Recovery Breakfast: (IM)MATURITY</title><link>/blog/2020-recoverybreakfast/</link><pubDate>Mon, 20 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/2020-recoverybreakfast/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;For Rich and me, it seems like forever that we’ve been doing this cloud thing. We previewed the first CCSK class back at RSAC 2011, so we’re closing in on 10 years of hands-on, in the weeds cloud stuff. It’s fundamentally changed Securosis, and we ended up as founders of DisruptOps as well.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Saying Goodbye</title><link>/blog/saying-goodbye/</link><pubDate>Mon, 02 Dec 2019 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/saying-goodbye/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I never thought I would say this, but I am leaving Securosis. By the time you read this I will have started a new position with Bank of America. I have been asked to help out with application and cloud security efforts. I have been giving a lot of thought to what I like to do, what makes me happy, and what I want to do with the rest of my career, and I came to the realization it is time for a change. There are aspects of the practice of security which I can never explore with Securosis or DisruptOps. The bank offers many challenges – and operates at a scale – which I have never experienced. That, and I will get to work with a highly talented team already in place. I could not really have written a better job description for myself, so I am jumping at this opportunity.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Understanding and Selecting RASP 2019: New Paper</title><link>/blog/understanding-and-selecting-rasp-2019-new-paper/</link><pubDate>Tue, 19 Nov 2019 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/understanding-and-selecting-rasp-2019-new-paper/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Today we are launching our 2019 updated research paper from our recent series, Understanding and Selecting RASP (Runtime Application Self-Protection). RASP was part of the discussion on application security in just about every one of the hundreds of calls we have taken, and it’s clear that there is a lot of interest – and confusion – on the subject, so it was time to publish a new take on this category. And we would like to heartily thank you to &lt;a href="https://www.contrastsecurity.com/"&gt;Contrast Security&lt;/a&gt; for licensing this content. Without this type of support we could not bring this level of research to you, both free of charge and without requiring registration. We think this research paper will help developers and security professionals who are tackling application security from within understand what other security measures are at their disposal to protect application stacks from attack.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Enterprise DevSecOps: Security’s Role In DevOps</title><link>/blog/enterprise-devsecops-securitys-role-in-devops-2/</link><pubDate>Wed, 16 Oct 2019 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/enterprise-devsecops-securitys-role-in-devops-2/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;As we mentioned earlier, DevOps is not all about tools and technology – much of its success lies in how people work within the model. We have already gone into great detail about tools and process, and we approached much of this content from the perspective of security practitioners getting onboard with DevOps. This paper is geared toward helping security folks, so here we outline their role in a DevOps environment. We hope to help you work with other teams and reduce friction.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Enterprise DevSecOps: Security Test Integration and Tooling</title><link>/blog/enterprise-devsecops-security-test-integration-and-tooling/</link><pubDate>Mon, 14 Oct 2019 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/enterprise-devsecops-security-test-integration-and-tooling/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;In this section we show you how to weave security into the fabric of your DevOps automation framework. We are going to address the questions “We want to integrate security testing into the development pipeline, and are going to start with static analysis. How do we do this?”, “We understand “shift left”, but are the tools effective?” and “What tools do you recommend we start with, and how do we integrate them?”. As DevOps encourages testing in all phases of development and deployment, we will discuss what a build pipeline looks like, and the tooling appropriate for stage. The security tests typically sit side by side with functional and regression tests your quality assurance teams has likely already deployed. And beyond those typical post-build testing points, you can include testing on a developer’s desktop prior to check-in, in the code repositories before and after builds, and in pre-deployment staging areas.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Enterprise DevSecOps: Security Planning</title><link>/blog/enterprise-devsecops-security-planning/</link><pubDate>Fri, 11 Oct 2019 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/enterprise-devsecops-security-planning/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;This post is intended to help security folks create an outline or &lt;em&gt;structure&lt;/em&gt; for an application security program. We are going to answer such common questions as “How do we start building out an application security strategy?”, “How do I start incorporating DevSecOps?” and “What application security standards should I follow?”. I will discuss the Software Development Lifecycle (SDLC), introduce security items to consider as you put your plan in place, and reference some application security standards for use as guideposts for what to protect against. This post will help your strategy; the next one will cover tactical tool selection.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Enterprise DevSecOps: How Security Works With Development</title><link>/blog/enterprise-devsecops-how-security-works-with-development/</link><pubDate>Thu, 10 Oct 2019 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/enterprise-devsecops-how-security-works-with-development/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;In our first paper on ‘&lt;a href="https://cdn.securosis.com/assets/library/reports/Security_Into_DevOps_Final.pdf"&gt;Building Security Into DevOps&lt;/a&gt;’, given the ‘newness’ of DevOps for most of our readers, we included a discussion on the foundational principles and how DevOps is meant to help tackle numerous problems common to software delivery. Please refer to that paper is you want more detailed background information. For our purposes here we will discuss just a few principles that directly relate to the integration of security teams and testing with DevOps principles. These concepts lay the foundations for addressing the questions we raised in the first section, and readers will need to understand these as we discuss security tooling and approaches in a DevOps environment.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Enterprise DevSecOps: New Series</title><link>/blog/enterprise-devsecops-new-series/</link><pubDate>Thu, 03 Oct 2019 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/enterprise-devsecops-new-series/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;DevOps is an operational framework which promotes software consistency and standardization through automation. It helps address many nightmare development issues around integration, testing, patching, and deployment – both by breaking down barriers between different development teams, and also by prioritizing things which make software development faster and easier.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Understanding and Selecting RASP 2019: Selection Guide</title><link>/blog/understanding-and-selecting-rasp-2019-selection-guide/</link><pubDate>Fri, 13 Sep 2019 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/understanding-and-selecting-rasp-2019-selection-guide/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;We want to take a more formal look at the RASP selection process. For our 2016 version of this paper, the market was young enough that a simple list if features was enough to differentiate one platform from another. But the current level of platform maturity makes top-tier products more difficult to differentiate.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Understanding and Selecting RASP 2019: Integration</title><link>/blog/understanding-and-selecting-rasp-2019-integration/</link><pubDate>Wed, 11 Sep 2019 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/understanding-and-selecting-rasp-2019-integration/</guid><description>&lt;ul&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&lt;em&gt;Editor’s note&lt;/em&gt;* We have been having VPN interruptions, so I apologize for the uneven cadence of delivery on these posts. We are working on the issue.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In this section we will outline how RASP fits into the technology stack, in both production deployment and application build processes. We will show what that looks like and why it’s important to fit into these steps for newer application security technologies. We will close with a discussion of how RASP differs from other security technologies, and discuss advantages and tradeoffs of differing approaches.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Understanding and Selecting RASP 2019: Technology</title><link>/blog/understanding-and-selecting-rasp-2019-technology/</link><pubDate>Mon, 09 Sep 2019 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/understanding-and-selecting-rasp-2019-technology/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;It is time to discuss technical facets of RASP products – including how the technology works, how it integrates into an application environment, and the advantages of different integration options. We will also outline important considerations such as platform support which impact the selection process. We will also consider a couple aspects of RASP technology which we expect to evolve over next couple years.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Understanding and Selecting RASP 2019: Use Cases</title><link>/blog/understanding-and-selecting-rasp-2019-use-cases/</link><pubDate>Fri, 30 Aug 2019 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/understanding-and-selecting-rasp-2019-use-cases/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Updated 9-13 to include business requirements&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The primary function of RASP is to protect web applications against known and emerging threats. In some cases it is deployed to block attacks at the application layer, before vulnerabilities can be exploited, but in many cases RASP tools process a request until it detects an attack and then blocks the action.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Understanding and Selecting RASP: 2019</title><link>/blog/understanding-and-selecting-rasp-2019/</link><pubDate>Tue, 27 Aug 2019 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/understanding-and-selecting-rasp-2019/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;During &lt;a href="https://cdn.securosis.com/assets/library/reports/Security_Into_DevOps_Final.pdf"&gt;our 2015 DevOps research&lt;/a&gt; conversations, developers consistently turned the tables on us, asking dozens of questions about embedding security into their development process. We were surprised to discover how much developers and IT teams are taking larger roles in selecting security solutions, working to embed security products into tooling and build processes. Just like they use automation to build and test product functionality, they automate security too.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Firestarter: Multicloud Deployment Structures and Blast Radius</title><link>/blog/firestarter-multicloud-deployment-structures-and-blast-radius/</link><pubDate>Wed, 07 Aug 2019 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/firestarter-multicloud-deployment-structures-and-blast-radius/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;In this, our second Firestarter on multicloud deployments, we start digging into the technological differences between the cloud providers. We start with the concept of how to organize your account(s). Each provider uses different terminology but all support similar hierarchies. From the overlay of AWS organizations to the org-chart-from-the-start of an Azure tenant we dig into the details and make specific recommendations. We also discuss the inherent security barriers and cover a wee bit of IAM.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>DisruptOps: Breaking Attacker Kill Chains in AWS: IAM Roles</title><link>/blog/disruptops-breaking-attacker-kill-chains-in-aws-iam-roles/</link><pubDate>Fri, 02 Aug 2019 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/disruptops-breaking-attacker-kill-chains-in-aws-iam-roles/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://disruptops.com/breaking-attacker-kill-chains-in-aws-iam-roles/"&gt;Breaking Attacker Kill Chains in AWS: IAM Roles&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Over the past year I’ve seen a huge uptick in interest for concrete advice on handling security incidents inside the cloud, with cloud native techniques. As organizations move their production workloads to the cloud, it doesn’t take long for the security professionals to realize that the fundamentals, while conceptually similar, are quite different in practice. One of those core concepts is that of the kill chain, a term first coined by &lt;a href="https://www.lockheedmartin.com/en-us/index.html"&gt;Lockheed Martin&lt;/a&gt; to describe the attacker’s process. Break any link and you break the attack, so this maps well to combining defense in depth with the active components of incident response.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Firestarter: So you want to multicloud?</title><link>/blog/firestarter-so-you-want-to-multicloud/</link><pubDate>Thu, 01 Aug 2019 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/firestarter-so-you-want-to-multicloud/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;This is our first in a series of Firestarters covering multicloud. Using more than one IaaS cloud service provider is, well, a bit of a nightmare. Although this is widely recognized by anyone with hands-on cloud experience that doesn’t mean reality always matches our desires. From executives worried about lock in to M&amp;amp;A activity we are finding that most organizations are being pulled into multicloud deployments. In this first episode we lay out the top level problems and recommend some strategies for approaching them.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>What We Know about the Capital One Data Breach</title><link>/blog/what-we-know-about-the-capital-one-data-breach/</link><pubDate>Mon, 29 Jul 2019 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/what-we-know-about-the-capital-one-data-breach/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I’m not a fan of dissecting complex data breaches when we don’t have any information. In this case we do know more than usual due to the &lt;a href="https://www.justice.gov/usao-wdwa/pr/seattle-tech-worker-arrested-data-theft-involving-large-financial-services-company"&gt;details in the complaint filed by the FBI&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>DisruptOps: Build Your Own Multi-Cloud Security Monitoring in 30 Minutes or Less with StreamAlert</title><link>/blog/disruptops-build-your-own-multi-cloud-security-monitoring-in-30-minutes-or-less-with-streamalert/</link><pubDate>Fri, 19 Jul 2019 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/disruptops-build-your-own-multi-cloud-security-monitoring-in-30-minutes-or-less-with-streamalert/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://disruptops.com/build-your-own-multi-cloud-security-monitoring-in-30-minutes-or-less-with-streamalert/"&gt;Build Your Own Multi-Cloud Security Monitoring in 30 Minutes or Less with StreamAlert&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;One of the most difficult problems in cloud security is building comprehensive &lt;a href="https://disruptops.com/guardrails/security/"&gt;multi-account/multi-cloud security monitoring and alerting&lt;/a&gt;. I’d say maybe 1 out of 10 organizations I assess or work with have something effective in place when I first show up. That’s why I added a major monitoring lab based on AirBnB’s StreamAlert project to the Securosis Advanced Cloud Security and Applied DevSecOps training class (&lt;a href="https://www.blackhat.com/us-19/training/schedule/index.html#advanced-cloud-security-and-applied-devsecops-14285"&gt;we still have some spots available for our Black Hat 2019 class&lt;/a&gt;).&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Apple Flexes Its Privacy Muscles</title><link>/blog/apple-flexes-its-privacy-muscles/</link><pubDate>Wed, 12 Jun 2019 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/apple-flexes-its-privacy-muscles/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Apple events follow a very consistent pattern, which rarely changes beyond the details of the content. This consistency has gradually become its own language. Attend enough events and you start to pick up the deliberate undertones Apple wants to communicate, but not express directly. They are the facial and body expressions beneath the words of the slides, demos, and videos.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>DisruptOps: The Security Pro’s Quick Comparison: AWS vs. Azure vs. GCP</title><link>/blog/the-security-pros-quick-comparison-aws-vs-azure-vs-gcp-disruptops/</link><pubDate>Wed, 12 Jun 2019 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/the-security-pros-quick-comparison-aws-vs-azure-vs-gcp-disruptops/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I’ve seen a huge increase in the number of questions about cloud providers beyond AWS over the past year, especially in recent months. I decided to write up an overview comparison &lt;a href="https://disruptops.com/aws-vs-azure-vs-gcp-a-security-pros-quick-comparison/"&gt;over at DisruptOps&lt;/a&gt;. This will be part of a slow-roll series going into the differences across the major security program domains – including monitoring, perimeter security, and security management. Here’s an excerpt:&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Selecting Enterprise Email Security: the Buying Process</title><link>/blog/selecting-enterprise-email-security-the-buying-process/</link><pubDate>Tue, 28 May 2019 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/selecting-enterprise-email-security-the-buying-process/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;To wrap up this series we will bring you through a process of narrowing down the shortlist and then testing products and/or services in play. With email it’s less subjective because malicious email is… well, malicious. But given the challenges of policy management at scale (discussed in &lt;a href="https://securosis.com/blog/selecting-enterprise-email-security-scaling-to-the-enterprise"&gt;our last post&lt;/a&gt;), you’ll want to ensure a capable UX and sufficient reporting capabilities as well.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Selecting Enterprise Email Security: Scaling to the Enterprise</title><link>/blog/selecting-enterprise-email-security-scaling-to-the-enterprise/</link><pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2019 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/selecting-enterprise-email-security-scaling-to-the-enterprise/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;As we continue down the road of Selecting Enterprise Email Security, let’s hone in on the ‘E’ word: Enterprise. Email is a universal application, and scaling up protection to the enterprise level is all about &lt;em&gt;managing&lt;/em&gt; email security in a consistent way. So this post will dig into selecting the security platform, integrating with other enterprise security controls, and finally some adjacent services which can improve the security of your email and so should be considered as part of broad protection.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Selecting Enterprise Email Security: Detection Matters</title><link>/blog/selecting-enterprise-email-security-detection-matters-2/</link><pubDate>Thu, 09 May 2019 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/selecting-enterprise-email-security-detection-matters-2/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;As we covered in &lt;a href="https://securosis.com/blog/selecting-enterprise-email-security-introduction"&gt;the introduction to our Selecting Enterprise Email Security series&lt;/a&gt;, even after over a decade of trying to address the issue, email-borne attacks are still a scourge on pretty much every enterprise. That doesn’t mean the industry hasn’t made progress – it’s just that between new attacker tactics and the eternal fallibility of humans clicking on things, we’re arguably in about the same place we’ve been all along.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Selecting Enterprise Email Security: Introduction</title><link>/blog/selecting-enterprise-email-security-introduction-2/</link><pubDate>Tue, 23 Apr 2019 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/selecting-enterprise-email-security-introduction-2/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;It’s 2019, and we’re revisiting email security. Wait; what? Did we step out of a time machine and end up in 2006? Don’t worry – you didn’t lose the past 13 years in a &lt;em&gt;cloud&lt;/em&gt; of malware (see what we did there?). But before we discuss the current state of email security, we thought we should revisit what we wrote in our 2012 RSA Guide about email security.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>DisruptOps: Cloud Security CoE Organizational Models</title><link>/blog/disruptops-cloud-security-coe-organizational-models/</link><pubDate>Tue, 09 Apr 2019 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/disruptops-cloud-security-coe-organizational-models/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://www.firemon.com/"&gt;Cloud Security CoE Organizational Models&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the first post of our &lt;a href="https://www.firemon.com/"&gt;Cloud Security Center of Excellence&lt;/a&gt; series we covered the two critical aspects of being successful at cloud security: accountability and empowerment. Without accepting accountability to secure all the organization’s cloud assets, and being empowered to make changes to the environment in the name of improved security, it’s hard to enforce a consistent baseline of security practices that can dramatically reduce an organization’s attack surface.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>DisruptOps: Forming the Cloud Security Center of Excellence</title><link>/blog/disruptops-forming-the-cloud-security-center-of-excellence/</link><pubDate>Tue, 19 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/disruptops-forming-the-cloud-security-center-of-excellence/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://www.firemon.com/"&gt;Forming the Cloud Security Center of Excellence&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;We spend a lot of time talking to cloud security professionals, basically trying to figure out the best ways to get their jobs done in largely uncharted territory. Cloud technology is evolving at an unprecedented rate, empowering line of business users to move fast and not ask permission from IT or Security. Of course this can result in an unmanaged environment, with many traditional governance models rendered useless by the accessibility and ease of using the cloud. This is what we call &lt;em&gt;cloud chaos&lt;/em&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>The ELEVENTH Annual Disaster Recovery Breakfast: Is that you Caesar?</title><link>/blog/2019-recoverybreakfast/</link><pubDate>Mon, 28 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/2019-recoverybreakfast/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Things have been good in security. Really good. For a really long time. We can remember when there were a couple hundred people that showed up for the RSA Conference. Then a couple thousand. Now &lt;strong&gt;over 40,000 people&lt;/strong&gt; descend on San Francisco to check out this security thing. There are hundreds of companies talking cyber. VC money has flowed for years, funding pretty much anything cyber. Cyber cyber cyber.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Firestarter: 2019: Insert Winter is Coming Meme Here</title><link>/blog/firestarter-2019-insert-winter-is-coming-meme-here/</link><pubDate>Mon, 07 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/firestarter-2019-insert-winter-is-coming-meme-here/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;In this year-end/start firestarter the gang jumps into our expectations for the coming year. Spoiler alert- the odds are some consolidation and contraction in security markets are impending… and not just because the Chinese are buying fewer iPhones.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Quick Wins with Data Guardrails and Behavioral Analytics</title><link>/blog/quick-wins-with-data-guardrails-and-behavioral-analytics/</link><pubDate>Wed, 26 Dec 2018 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/quick-wins-with-data-guardrails-and-behavioral-analytics/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;This is the third (and final) post in our series on Protecting What Matters: Introducing Data Guardrails and Behavioral Analytics. Our first post,&lt;a href="https://securosis.com/blog/protecting-what-matters-defining-data-guardrails-and-behavioral-analytics"&gt;Introducing Data Guardrails and Behavioral Analytics: Understand the Mission&lt;/a&gt; we introduced the concepts and outlined the major categories of insider risk. In the second post we delved into and defined the terms. And as we wrap up the series, we’ll bring it together via a scenario showing how these concepts would work in practice&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Firestarter: re:Invent Security Review</title><link>/blog/firestarter-invent-security-review/</link><pubDate>Mon, 17 Dec 2018 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/firestarter-invent-security-review/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;It’s that time of year again. The time when Amazon takes over our lives. No, not the holiday shopping season but the annual re:Invent conference where Amazon Web Services takes over Las Vegas (really, all of it) and dumps a firehouse of updates on the world. Listen in to hear our take on new services like Transit Hub, Security Hub, and Control Tower.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>DisruptOps: Something You Probably Should Include When Building Your Next Threat Models</title><link>/blog/disruptops-something-you-probably-should-include-when-building-your-next-threat-models/</link><pubDate>Tue, 13 Nov 2018 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/disruptops-something-you-probably-should-include-when-building-your-next-threat-models/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://disruptops.com/something-you-probably-should-include-when-building-your-next-threat-models/"&gt;Something You Probably Should Include When Building Your Next Threat Models&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;We are working on our threat modeling here at DisruptOps and I decided to refresh my knowledge of different approaches. One thing that quickly stood out is that nearly none of the threat modeling documentation or tools I’ve seen cover the CI/CD pipeline.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>DisruptOps: Three of the Most Crucial Sections of the DevSecOps Roadmap</title><link>/blog/disruptops-three-of-the-most-crucial-sections-of-the-devsecops-roadmap/</link><pubDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2018 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/disruptops-three-of-the-most-crucial-sections-of-the-devsecops-roadmap/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;a href="https://disruptops.com/three-of-the-most-crucial-sections-that-make-up-the-devsecops-roadmap/"&gt;Three of the Most Crucial Sections of the DevSecOps Roadmap&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;As I mentioned in &lt;a href="https://disruptops.com/devsecops-vs-devsecops/"&gt;the (DevSec)Ops vs. Dev(SecOps) post&lt;/a&gt;, we’ve been traveling around to a couple of **&lt;a href="https://www.devopsdays.org/"&gt;DevOpsDays conferences&lt;/a&gt; **doing the &lt;em&gt;Quick and Dirty DevSecOps&lt;/em&gt; talk. One of the things I tend to start with early in the talk is that like DevOps, DevSecOps is not a product. Or something you can deploy and forget. It’s a cultural change. It’s a process. It’s a journey.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Protecting What Matters: Defining Data Guardrails and Behavioral Analytics</title><link>/blog/protecting-what-matters-defining-data-guardrails-and-behavioral-analytics/</link><pubDate>Tue, 06 Nov 2018 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/protecting-what-matters-defining-data-guardrails-and-behavioral-analytics/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;This is the second post in our series on Protecting What Matters: Introducing Data Guardrails and Behavioral Analytics. Our first post,&lt;a href="https://securosis.com/blog/introducing-data-guardrails-and-behavioral-analytics-understand-the-mission"&gt;Introducing Data Guardrails and Behavioral Analytics: Understand the Mission&lt;/a&gt;, introduced the concepts and outlined the major categories of insider risk. This post defines the concepts.&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Building a Multi-cloud Logging Strategy: Issues and Pitfalls</title><link>/blog/building-a-multi-cloud-logging-strategy-issues-and-pitfalls/</link><pubDate>Tue, 30 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/building-a-multi-cloud-logging-strategy-issues-and-pitfalls/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;As we begin our series on Multi-cloud logging, we start with reasons some traditional logging approaches don’t work. I don’t like to start with a negative tone, but we need to point out some challenges and pitfalls which often beset firms on first migration to cloud. That, and it helps frame our other recommendations later in this series. Let’s take a look at some common issues by category.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>DAM Not Moving to the Cloud</title><link>/blog/dam-not-moving-to-the-cloud/</link><pubDate>Mon, 29 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/dam-not-moving-to-the-cloud/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I have concluded that &lt;em&gt;nobody&lt;/em&gt; is using Database Activity Monitoring (DAM) in public Infrastructure or Platform as a Service. I never see it in any of the cloud migrations we assist with. Clients don’t ask about how to deploy it or if they need to close this gap. I do not hear stories, good or bad, about its usage. Not that DAM &lt;em&gt;cannot&lt;/em&gt; be used in the cloud, but it is not.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>DisruptOps: The 4 Phases to Automating Cloud Management</title><link>/blog/disruptops-the-4-phases-to-automating-cloud-management/</link><pubDate>Mon, 29 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/disruptops-the-4-phases-to-automating-cloud-management/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://disruptops.com/the-4-phases-to-automating-cloud-management/"&gt;A Security Pro’s Cloud Automation Journey&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Catch me at a conference and the odds are you will overhear my saying “cloud security starts with architecture and ends with automation.” I quickly follow with how important it is to adopt a cloud native mindset, even when you’re bogged down with the realities of an ugly lift and shift before the data center contract ends and you turn the lights off. While that’s a nice quip, it doesn’t really capture anything about how I went from a meat and potatoes (firewall and patch management) kind of security pro to an architecture and automation and automation cloud native. Rather than preaching from the mount, I find it more useful to describe my personal journey and my technical realizations along the way. If you’re a security pro, or someone trying to up-skill a security pro for cloud, odds are you will end up on a very similar path.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>DisruptOps: Consolidating Config Guardrails with Aggregators</title><link>/blog/disruptops-consolidating-config-guardrails-with-aggregators/</link><pubDate>Fri, 26 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/disruptops-consolidating-config-guardrails-with-aggregators/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://disruptops.com/consolidating-config-guardrails-with-aggregators/"&gt;Disrupt:Ops: Consolidating Config Guardrails with Aggregators&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In &lt;a href="https://disruptops.com/quick-and-dirty-building-an-s3-guardrail-with-config/"&gt;Quick and Dirty: Building an S3 guardrail with Config&lt;/a&gt; we highlighted that one of the big problems with Config is you need to build it in all regions of all accounts separately. Now your best bet to make that manageable is to use infrastructure as code tools like CloudFormation to replicate your settings across environments. We have a lot more to say on scaling out baseline security and operations settings, but for this post I want to highlight how to aggregate Config into a unified dashboard.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Building a Multi-cloud Logging Strategy: Introduction</title><link>/blog/building-a-multi-cloud-logging-strategy-introduction/</link><pubDate>Thu, 25 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/building-a-multi-cloud-logging-strategy-introduction/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Logging and monitoring for cloud infrastructure has become the top topic we are asked about lately. Even general conversations about moving applications to the cloud always seem to end with clients asking how to ‘do’ logging and monitoring of cloud infrastructure. Logs are key to security and compliance, and moving into cloud services – where you do not actually control the infrastructure – makes logs even more important for operations, risk, and security teams. But these questions make perfect sense – logging in and across cloud infrastructure is complicated, offering technical challenges and huge potential cost overruns if implemented poorly.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Cloudera and Hortonworks Merge</title><link>/blog/cloudera-and-hortonworks-merge/</link><pubDate>Thu, 25 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/cloudera-and-hortonworks-merge/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I had been planning to post on the recent announcement of the planned merger between &lt;a href="http://investors.hortonworks.com/news-releases/news-release-details/cloudera-and-hortonworks-announce-merger-create-worlds-leading"&gt;Hortonworks and Cloudera&lt;/a&gt;, as there are a number of trends I’ve been witnessing with the adoption of Hadoop clusters, and this merger reflects them in a nutshell. But catching up on my reading I ran across Mathew Lodge’s recent article in VentureBeat titled &lt;a href="https://venturebeat.com/2018/10/06/cloudera-and-hortonworks-merger-means-hadoops-influence-is-declining/"&gt;Cloudera and Hortonworks merger means Hadoop’s influence is declining&lt;/a&gt;. It’s a really good post. I can confirm we see the same lack of interest in deployment of Hadoop to the cloud, the same use of S3 as a storage medium when Hadoop is used atop Infrasrtucture as a Service (IaaS), and the same developer-driven selection of whatever platform is easiest to use and deploy on. All in all it’s an article I wish I’d written, as he did a great job capturing most of the areas I wanted to cover. And there are some humorous bits like “Ironically, there has been no Cloud Era for Cloudera.” Check it out – it’s worth your time.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>DisruptOps: Quick and Dirty: Building an S3 Guardrail with Config</title><link>/blog/disruptops-quick-and-dirty-building-an-s3-guardrail-with-config/</link><pubDate>Wed, 24 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/disruptops-quick-and-dirty-building-an-s3-guardrail-with-config/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://disruptops.com/quick-and-dirty-building-an-s3-guardrail-with-config/"&gt;Disrupt:Ops: Quick and Dirty: Building an S3 Guardrail with Config&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In &lt;a href="https://disruptops.com/how-s3-buckets-become-public-and-the-fastest-way-to-find-yours/"&gt;How S3 Buckets Become Public, and the Fastest Way to Find Yours&lt;/a&gt; we reviewed the myriad ways S3 buckets become public and where to look for them. Today I’ll show the easiest way to continuously monitor for public buckets using AWS Config. The good news is this is pretty easy to set up; the bad news is you need to configure it separately in every region in every account.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Introducing Data Guardrails and Behavioral Analytics: Understand the Mission</title><link>/blog/introducing-data-guardrails-and-behavioral-analytics-understand-the-mission/</link><pubDate>Tue, 23 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/introducing-data-guardrails-and-behavioral-analytics-understand-the-mission/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;After over 25 years of the modern IT security industry, breaches still happen at an alarming rate. Yes, that’s fairly obvious but still disappointing, given the billions spent every year in efforts to remedy the situation. Over the past decade the mainstays of security controls have undergone the &lt;em&gt;next generation&lt;/em&gt; treatment – initially firewalls and more recently endpoint security. New analytical techniques have been mustered to examine infrastructure logs in more sophisticated fashion.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>DisruptOps: How S3 Buckets Become Public, and the Fastest Way to Find Yours</title><link>/blog/disruptops-how-s3-buckets-become-public-and-the-fastest-way-to-find-yours/</link><pubDate>Mon, 22 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/disruptops-how-s3-buckets-become-public-and-the-fastest-way-to-find-yours/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://disruptops.com/how-s3-buckets-become-public-and-the-fastest-way-to-find-yours/"&gt;How S3 Buckets Become Public, and the Fastest Way to Find Yours&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In &lt;a href="https://disruptops.com/how-s3-buckets-become-public-and-the-fastest-way-to-find-yours/disruptops.com/blog"&gt;What Security Managers Need to Know About Amazon S3 Exposures&lt;/a&gt; we mentioned that one of the reasons finding public S3 buckets is so darn difficult is because there are multiple, overlapping mechanisms in place that determine the ultimate amount of S3 access. To be honest, there’s a chance I don’t even know all the edge cases but this list should cover the vast majority of situations.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>DisruptOps: Why Everyone Automates in Cloud</title><link>/blog/disruptops-why-everyone-automates-in-cloud/</link><pubDate>Fri, 19 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/disruptops-why-everyone-automates-in-cloud/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://disruptops.com/why-everyone-automates-in-cloud/"&gt;Why Everyone Automates in Cloud&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;If you see me speaking about cloud it’s pretty much guaranteed I’ll eventually say:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Cloud security starts with architecture and ends with automation.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>DisruptOps: (DevSec)Ops vs. Dev(SecOps)</title><link>/blog/disruptops-devsecops-vs-devsecops/</link><pubDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/disruptops-devsecops-vs-devsecops/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://disruptops.com/devsecops-vs-devsecops/"&gt;(DevSec)Ops vs. Dev(SecOps)&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I just got back from the Boston DevOps Days. I really enjoy hanging around DevOps and cloud people. The energy of these conferences is great, and they are genuinely excited about transforming how their organizations build and deploy applications. Many don’t have a negative perception of security folks, but they don’t really understand what security folks do either.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>DisruptOps: What Security Managers Need to Know About Amazon S3 Exposures (2/2)</title><link>/blog/disruptops-what-security-managers-need-to-know-about-amazon-s3-exposures-2-2/</link><pubDate>Mon, 15 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/disruptops-what-security-managers-need-to-know-about-amazon-s3-exposures-2-2/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://disruptops.com/what-security-managers-need-to-know-about-amazon-s3-exposures-2-2/"&gt;What Security Managers Need to Know About Amazon S3 Exposures (2/2)&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Our first Disrupt:Ops post discussed how exposure of S3 data becomes such a problem, with some details on how buckets become public in the first place. This post goes a bit deeper, before laying a foundation for how to manage S3 to avoid these mistakes yourself.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>DisruptOps: What Security Managers Need to Know About Amazon S3 Exposures (1/2)</title><link>/blog/disruptops-what-security-managers-need-to-know-about-amazon-s3-exposures-1-2/</link><pubDate>Thu, 11 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/disruptops-what-security-managers-need-to-know-about-amazon-s3-exposures-1-2/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;As we spin up Disrupt:OPS we are beginning to post cloud-specific content over there, mixing theory with practical how-to guidance. Not to worry! We have plenty of content still planned for Securosis. But we haven’t added any staff at Securosis so there is only so much we can write. In the meantime, linking to non-product posts from Securosis should help ensure you don’t lose sleep over missing even a single cloud-related blog entry.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Firestarter: Hardware Hacks and Lift and Pray</title><link>/blog/firestarter-hardware-hacks-and-lift-and-pray/</link><pubDate>Thu, 04 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/firestarter-hardware-hacks-and-lift-and-pray/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Did China manage to hardware hack the Apple and Amazon data centers? Or did Bloomberg get it wrong? And what the heck can you do about it anyway? This week we start with a discussion of &lt;a href="https://www.bloomberg.com/news/features/2018-10-04/the-big-hack-how-china-used-a-tiny-chip-to-infiltrate-america-s-top-companies"&gt;today’s blockbuster security news&lt;/a&gt;, before shifting gears back to cloud. It turns out most organizations are having to lift and shift to cloud, even when that is not ideal. We talk about some of your options, even in the face of ridiculous management timelines.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Making an Impact with Security Awareness Training: Quick Wins and Sustained Impact</title><link>/blog/making-an-impact-with-security-awareness-training-quick-wins-and-sustained-impact/</link><pubDate>Thu, 27 Sep 2018 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/making-an-impact-with-security-awareness-training-quick-wins-and-sustained-impact/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Our &lt;a href="https://securosis.com/blog/making-an-impact-with-security-awareness-training-continuous-contextual-content"&gt;last post&lt;/a&gt; explained Continuous Contextual Content as a means to optimize the effectiveness of a security awareness program. CCC acknowledges that users won’t get it, at least not initially. That means you need to reiterate your lessons over and over (and probably over) again. But when should you do that? Optimally when their receptivity is high – when they just made a mistake.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Making an Impact with Security Awareness Training: Continuous Contextual Content</title><link>/blog/making-an-impact-with-security-awareness-training-continuous-contextual-content/</link><pubDate>Tue, 11 Sep 2018 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/making-an-impact-with-security-awareness-training-continuous-contextual-content/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;As we discussed in &lt;a href="https://securosis.com/blog/making-an-impact-with-security-awareness-training-structuring-the-program"&gt;the first post&lt;/a&gt; of our Making an Impact with Security Awareness Training series, organizations need to architect training programs around a clear definition of success, both to determine the most appropriate content to deliver, and also to manage management expectations. The definition of success for any security initiative is measurable risk reduction, and that applies just as much to security awareness training.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Firestarter: Advanced Persistent Tenacity</title><link>/blog/advanced-persistent-tenacity/</link><pubDate>Mon, 03 Sep 2018 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/advanced-persistent-tenacity/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Mike and Rich discuss the latest Wired piece in Notpetya and how advanced attacks, despite the hype, are very much still alive and well. These days you might be a victim not because you are targeted, but because you are a pivot to a target or share some underlying technology. As a new Apache Struts vulnerability rolls out, we thought it a good time to re-address some fundamentals and evaluate the real risks of both widespread and targeted attacks.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Making an Impact with Security Awareness Training: Structuring the Program</title><link>/blog/making-an-impact-with-security-awareness-training-structuring-the-program/</link><pubDate>Thu, 30 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/making-an-impact-with-security-awareness-training-structuring-the-program/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;We have long been fans of security awareness training. As explained in our 2013 paper &lt;a href="https://securosis.com/research/security-awareness-training-evolution"&gt;Security Awareness Training Evolution&lt;/a&gt;, employees remain the last line of defense, and in all too many cases those defenses fail. We pointed out many challenges facing security awareness programs, and have since seen modest improvement in some of those areas. But few organizations rave about their security awareness training, which means we still have work to do.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Firestarter: Black Hat and AI… What Could Go Wrong?</title><link>/blog/firestarter-black-hat-and-ai-what-could-go-wrong/</link><pubDate>Tue, 28 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/firestarter-black-hat-and-ai-what-could-go-wrong/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;In this episode we review the lessons of this year’s Black Hat and DEF CON. In particular, we talk about how things have changed with the students we have in class, now that we’ve racked up over 5 years of running trainings on cloud security. then we delve into one of the biggest, and most confusing, trends… the mysteries of Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning. Considering our opinions of natural intelligence, you might guess where this heads…&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Firestarter: It’s a GDPR Thing</title><link>/blog/firestarter-its-a-gdpr-thing/</link><pubDate>Fri, 06 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/firestarter-its-a-gdpr-thing/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Mike and Rich discuss the ugly reality that GDPR really is a thing. Not that privacy or even GDPR are bad (we’re all in favor), but they &lt;em&gt;do&lt;/em&gt; require extra work on our part to ensure that policies are in place, audits are performed, and pesky data isn’t left lying around in log files unexpectedly.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Scaling Network Security: The Scaled Network Security Architecture</title><link>/blog/scaling-network-security-the-scaled-network-security-architecture/</link><pubDate>Sun, 01 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/scaling-network-security-the-scaled-network-security-architecture/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;After considering the challenges of existing network security architectures (&lt;a href="https://securosis.com/blog/scaling-network-security-rip-moat"&gt;RIP Moat&lt;/a&gt;) we laid out a number of &lt;a href="https://securosis.com/blog/scaling-network-security-the-new-network-security-requirements"&gt;requirements for the new network security&lt;/a&gt;. This includes the needs for scale, intelligence, and flexibility. That’s all well and good, but &lt;em&gt;how do you get there?&lt;/em&gt; We’ll wrap up this series by discussing a couple key architectural constructs which will influence how you build your future network security architecture.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Scaling Network Security: The New Network Security Requirements</title><link>/blog/scaling-network-security-the-new-network-security-requirements/</link><pubDate>Fri, 22 Jun 2018 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/scaling-network-security-the-new-network-security-requirements/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;In our last post we &lt;a href="https://securosis.com/blog/scaling-network-security-rip-moat"&gt;bid adieu to &lt;em&gt;The Moat&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;, given the encapsulation of almost everything into standard web protocols and the movement of critical data to an expanding set of cloud services. Additionally, the insatiable demand for bandwidth further complicates how network security scales. So it’s time to reframe the requirements of the new network security. Basically, as we rethink network security, what do we need it to do?&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Scaling Network Security: RIP, the Moat</title><link>/blog/scaling-network-security-rip-moat/</link><pubDate>Tue, 05 Jun 2018 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/scaling-network-security-rip-moat/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;The young people today laugh at folks with a couple decades of experience when they rue about the &lt;em&gt;good old days,&lt;/em&gt; when your network was snaked along the floors of your office (shout out for &lt;a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/10BASE5"&gt;Thicknet&lt;/a&gt;!), and trusted users were on the corporate network, and untrusted users were not.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>SecMon State of the Union: The Buying Process</title><link>/blog/secmon-state-of-the-union-the-buying-process/</link><pubDate>Mon, 04 Jun 2018 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/secmon-state-of-the-union-the-buying-process/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Now that you’ve revisited your important use cases, and derived a set of security monitoring requirements, it’s time to find the right fit among the dozens of alternatives. To wrap up this series we will bring you through a reasonably structured process to narrow down your short list, and then testing the surviving products. Once you’ve chosen the &lt;em&gt;technical&lt;/em&gt; winner, you need to make the business side of things work – and it turns out the technical winner is not always the solution you end up buying.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>SecMon State of the Union: Refreshing Requirements</title><link>/blog/secmon-state-of-the-union-refreshing-requirements/</link><pubDate>Tue, 29 May 2018 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/secmon-state-of-the-union-refreshing-requirements/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Now that you understand the &lt;a href="https://securosis.com/blog/secmon-state-of-the-union-focusing-on-use-cases"&gt;use cases for security monitoring&lt;/a&gt;, our next step is to translate them into requirements for your strategic security monitoring platform. In other words, now that you have an idea of the problem(s) you need to solve, what capabilities do you need to address them? Part of that discussion is inevitably about what you &lt;em&gt;don’t&lt;/em&gt; get from your existing security monitoring approach – this research wouldn’t be very interesting if your existing tools were all peachy.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>SecMon State of the Union: Focus on Use Cases</title><link>/blog/secmon-state-of-the-union-focusing-on-use-cases/</link><pubDate>Thu, 17 May 2018 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/secmon-state-of-the-union-focusing-on-use-cases/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;When we &lt;a href="https://securosis.com/blog/secmon-state-of-the-union-revisiting-the-team-of-rivals"&gt;revisited the Security Monitoring Team of Rivals&lt;/a&gt; it became obvious that the overlap between SIEM and security analytics has passed a point of no return. So with a Civil War brewing our key goal is to determine what will be your strategic platform for security monitoring. This requires you to shut out the noise of fancy analytics and colorful visualizations, and focus on the problem you are trying to solve &lt;em&gt;now,&lt;/em&gt; with an eye to how it will evolve in the future. That means getting back to use cases. The cases for security monitoring tend to fall into three major buckets:&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>The Security Profession Needs to Adopt Just Culture</title><link>/blog/the-security-profession-needs-to-adopt-just-culture/</link><pubDate>Fri, 04 May 2018 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/the-security-profession-needs-to-adopt-just-culture/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Yesterday &lt;a href="https://blog.twitter.com/official/en_us/topics/company/2018/keeping-your-account-secure.html"&gt;Twitter revealed they had accidentally stored plain-text passwords in some log files&lt;/a&gt;. There was no indication the data was accessed and users were warned to update their passwords. There was no known breach, but Twitter went public anyway, and was excoriated in the press and… on Twitter.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>SecMon State of the Union: Revisiting the Team of Rivals</title><link>/blog/secmon-state-of-the-union-revisiting-the-team-of-rivals/</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/secmon-state-of-the-union-revisiting-the-team-of-rivals/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Things change. That’s the only certainty in technology today, and certainly in security. Back when we wrote &lt;a href="https://securosis.com/research/papers/security-analytics-team-of-rivals"&gt;Security Analytics Team of Rivals&lt;/a&gt;, SIEM and Security Analytics offerings were different and did not really overlap. It was more about how can they coexist, instead of choosing one over the other. But nowadays the overlap is significant, so you need existing SIEM players basically bundling in security analytics capabilities and security analytics players positioning their products as next-generation SIEM.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Firestarter: The RSA 2018 Episode</title><link>/blog/firestarter-the-rsa-2018-episode/</link><pubDate>Thu, 12 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/firestarter-the-rsa-2018-episode/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;This week Rich, Mike, and Adrian talk about what they expect to see at the RSA Security Conference, and if it really means anything. As we do in most of our RSA Conference related discussions the focus is less on what to see and more on what industry trends we can tease out, and the potential impact on the regular security practitioner. For example, what happens when blockchain and GDPR collide? Do security vendors finally understand cloud? What kind of impact does DevOps have on the security market? Plus we list where you can find us, and, as always, don’t forget to attend the Tenth Annual Disaster Recovery Breakfast!&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Complete Guide to Enterprise Container Security *New Paper*</title><link>/blog/complete-guide-to-enterprise-container-security-new-paper/</link><pubDate>Mon, 02 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/complete-guide-to-enterprise-container-security-new-paper/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;The explosive growth of containers is not surprising because the technology (most obviously Docker) alleviates several problems for deploying applications. Developers need simple packaging, rapid deployment, reduced environmental dependencies, support for micro-services, generalized management, and horizontal scalability – all of which containers help provide. When a single technology enables us to address several technical problems at once, it is very compelling. But this generic model of packaged services, where the environment is designed to treat each container as a “unit of service”, sharply reduces transparency and audit-ability (by design), and gives security pros nightmares. We run more code faster, but must in turn accept a loss of visibility inside the containers. It begs the question, “How can we introduce security without losing the benefits of containers?”&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Firestarter: Auditors, Assessors, and Cloud.. Oh My!</title><link>/blog/firestarter-old-school-and-false-analogies/</link><pubDate>Mon, 19 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/firestarter-old-school-and-false-analogies/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;This week the gang discusses Rich’s recent discussions with some clients struggling to deal with auditors and assessors who don’t really understand cloud computing.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Evolving to Security Decision Support: Laying the Foundation</title><link>/blog/evolving-to-security-decision-support-laying-the-foundation/</link><pubDate>Sun, 04 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/evolving-to-security-decision-support-laying-the-foundation/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;As we resume our series on Evolving to Security Decision Support, let’s review where we’ve been so far. The first step in making better security decisions is ensuring you have &lt;a href="https://securosis.com/blog/evolving-to-security-decision-support-visibility-is-job-1"&gt;full visibility of your enterprise assets&lt;/a&gt;, because if you don’t know assets exist, you cannot make intelligent decision about protecting them. Next we discussed how &lt;a href="https://securosis.com/blog/evolving-to-security-decision-support-data-to-intelligence"&gt;threat intelligence and security analytics can be brought to bear&lt;/a&gt; to get both internal and external views of your attack environment, again with the goal of turning data into information you can use to better prioritize efforts.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>The TENTH Annual Disaster Recovery Breakfast: Are You F’ing Kidding Me?</title><link>/blog/the-tenth-annual-disaster-recovery-breakfast-are-you-fing-kidding-me/</link><pubDate>Tue, 27 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/the-tenth-annual-disaster-recovery-breakfast-are-you-fing-kidding-me/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src="RecoveryBreakfastInvite-2019_750.jpg" alt=""&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;What was the famous Bill Gates quote? &lt;em&gt;“We always overestimate the change that will occur in the next two years and underestimate the change that will occur in the next ten.”&lt;/em&gt; Well, we at Securosis actually can gauge that accurately given this is the TENTH annual RSA Conference Disaster Recovery Breakfast.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Evolving to Security Decision Support: Data to Intelligence</title><link>/blog/evolving-to-security-decision-support-data-to-intelligence/</link><pubDate>Mon, 19 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/evolving-to-security-decision-support-data-to-intelligence/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;As we kicked off our &lt;a href="https://securosis.com/blog/evolving-to-security-decision-support-visibility-is-job-1"&gt;Evolving to Security Decision Support series&lt;/a&gt;, the point we needed to make was the importance of enterprise visibility to the success of your security program. Given all the moving pieces in your environment – including the usage of various clouds (SaaS and IaaS), mobile devices, containers, and eventually IoT devices – it’s increasingly hard to know where all your critical data is and how it’s being used.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Firestarter: Old School and False Analogies</title><link>/blog/old-school-and-false-analogies/</link><pubDate>Mon, 12 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/old-school-and-false-analogies/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Old School and False Analogies&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This week we skip over our series on cloud fundamentals to go back to the Firestarter basics. We start with a discussion of the week’s big acquisition (like BIG considering the multiple). Then we talk about the hyperbole around the release of the iBoot code from an old version of iOS. We also discuss Apple, cyberinsurance, and the actuarial tables. Then we finish up with Rich blabbing about lessons learned as he works on his paramedic again and what parallels to bring to security. For more on that you can read these posts: &lt;a href="https://securosis.com/blog/this-security-shits-hard-and-it-aint-gonna-get-any-easier"&gt;https://securosis.com/blog/this-security-shits-hard-and-it-aint-gonna-get-any-easier&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href="https://securosis.com/blog/best-practices-unintended-consequences-negative-outcomes"&gt;https://securosis.com/blog/best-practices-unintended-consequences-negative-outcomes&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Best Practices, Unintended Consequences, and Negative Outcomes</title><link>/blog/best-practices-unintended-consequences-negative-outcomes/</link><pubDate>Thu, 08 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/best-practices-unintended-consequences-negative-outcomes/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Information Security is a profession. We have job titles, recognized positions in nearly every workplace, professional organizations, training, and even some fairly new degree programs. I mean none of that sarcastically, but I wouldn’t necessarily say we are a &lt;em&gt;mature&lt;/em&gt; profession. We still have a lot to learn about ourselves. This isn’t unique to infosec – it’s part of any maturing profession, and we can learn the same lessons the others already have.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Firestarter: Best Practices for Root Account Security and… SQRRL!!!!</title><link>/blog/firestarter-best-practices-for-root-account-security-and-sqrrl/</link><pubDate>Mon, 05 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/firestarter-best-practices-for-root-account-security-and-sqrrl/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Just because we are focusing on cloud fundamentals doesn’t mean we are forgetting the rest of the world. This week we start with a discussion over the latest surprise acquisition of Sqrrl by Amazon Web Services and what it might indicate. Then we jump into our ongoing series of posts on cloud security by focusing on the best practices for root account security. From how to name the email accounts, to handling MFA, to your break glass procedures.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Evolving to Security Decision Support: Visibility is Job #1</title><link>/blog/evolving-to-security-decision-support-visibility-is-job-1/</link><pubDate>Thu, 01 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/evolving-to-security-decision-support-visibility-is-job-1/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;To demonstrate our mastery of the obvious, it’s not getting easier to detect attacks. Not that it was ever really &lt;em&gt;easy,&lt;/em&gt; but at least you used to know what tactics adversaries used, and you had a general idea of where they would end up, because you knew where your important data was, and which (single) type of device normally accessed it: the PC. It’s hard to believe we now long for the days of early PCs and centralized data repositories.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Firestarter: Architecting Your Cloud with Accounts</title><link>/blog/firestarter-architecting-your-cloud-with-accounts/</link><pubDate>Wed, 31 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/firestarter-architecting-your-cloud-with-accounts/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;We are taking over our own Firestarter and kicking off a new series of discussions on cloud security… from soup to nuts (whatever that means). Each week for the next few months we will cover, in order, how to build out your cloud security program. We are taking our assessment framework and converting it into a series of discussions talking about what we find and how to avoid issues. This week we start with architecting your account structures, after a brief discussion of the impact of the Meltdown and Spectre vulnerabilities since they impact cloud (at least for now) more than your local computer.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>This Security Shit’s Hard and It Ain’t Gonna Get Any Easier</title><link>/blog/this-security-shits-hard-and-it-aint-gonna-get-any-easier/</link><pubDate>Tue, 30 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/this-security-shits-hard-and-it-aint-gonna-get-any-easier/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;In case you couldn’t tell from the title, this line is your official EXPLICIT tag. We writers sometimes need the full spectrum of language to make a point.&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Wrangling Backoffice Security in the Cloud Age: Part 2</title><link>/blog/wrangling-backoffice-security-in-the-cloud-age-part-2/</link><pubDate>Fri, 26 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/wrangling-backoffice-security-in-the-cloud-age-part-2/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;This is the second part in a two-part series (later paper) on managing increased use and reliance on SaaS for traditional back-office applications.&lt;a href="https://securosis.com/blog/wrangling-backoffice-security-in-the-age-of-cloud"&gt;See Part 1.&lt;/a&gt; This will also be included in a webcast with Box on March 6, and you can &lt;a href="https://go.box.com/FY18Q4_01_US_WBNR_1576841-Security-Registration-Page.html"&gt;register here&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Container Security 2018: Logging and Monitoring</title><link>/blog/container-security-2018-logging-and-monitoring/</link><pubDate>Wed, 24 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/container-security-2018-logging-and-monitoring/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;We close out this research paper with two key areas: Monitoring and Auditing. We want to draw attention to them because they are essential to security programs, but have received only sporadic coverage in security blogs and the press. When we go beyond network segregation and network policies for what we allow, the ability to detect misuse is extremely valuable, which is where monitoring and logging come in. Additionally, most Development and Security teams are not aware of the variety of monitoring options available, and we have seen a variety of misconceptions and outright fear of the volume of audit logs to capture, so we need to address these issues.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Wrangling Backoffice Security in the Cloud Age</title><link>/blog/wrangling-backoffice-security-in-the-age-of-cloud/</link><pubDate>Wed, 24 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/wrangling-backoffice-security-in-the-age-of-cloud/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Over a year ago we first published our series on &lt;a href="https://securosis.com/blog/tidal-forces-the-trends-tearing-apart-security-as-we-know-it"&gt;Tidal Forces: The Trends Tearing Apart Security As We Know It&lt;/a&gt;. We called out three megatrends in technology with deep and lasting impact on security practice:&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Container Security 2018: Runtime Security Controls</title><link>/blog/container-security-2018-runtime-security-controls/</link><pubDate>Mon, 22 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/container-security-2018-runtime-security-controls/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;After the focus on tools and processes in previous sections, we can now focus on containers in production systems. This includes which images are moved into production repositories, selecting and running containers, and the security of underlying host systems.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Container Security 2018: Securing Container Contents</title><link>/blog/container-security-2018-securing-container-contents/</link><pubDate>Mon, 15 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/container-security-2018-securing-container-contents/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Testing the code and supplementary components which will execute within containers, and verifying that everything conforms to security and operational practices, is core to any container security effort. One of the major advances over the last year or so is the introduction of security features for the software supply chain, from container engine providers including Docker, Rocket, OpenShift and so on. We also see a number of third-party vendors helping to validate container content, both before and after deployment. Each solution focuses on slightly different threats to container construction – Docker, for example, offers tools to certify that a container has gone through your process without alteration, using digital signatures and container repositories. Third-party tools focus on security benefits outside what engine providers offer, such as examining libraries for known flaws. So while things like process controls, digital signing services to verify chain of custody, and creation of a bill of materials based on known trusted libraries are all important, you’ll need more than what is packaged with your base container management platform. You will want to consider third-party to help harden your container inputs, analyze resource usage, analyze static code, analyze library composition, and check for known malware signatures. In a nutshell, you need to look for risks which won’t be caught by your base platform.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>The Future of Security Operations: Embracing the Machines</title><link>/blog/the-future-of-security-ops-embracing-the-machines/</link><pubDate>Fri, 12 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/the-future-of-security-ops-embracing-the-machines/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;To state the obvious, traditional security operations is broken. Every organization faces more sophisticated attacks, the possibility of targeted adversaries, and far more complicated infrastructure; compounding the problem, we have fewer skilled resources to execute on security programs. Obviously it’s time to evolve security operations by leveraging technology to both accelerate human work and take care of rote, tedious tasks which don’t add value. So security orchestration and automation are terms you will hear pretty consistently from here on out.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Container Security 2018: Build Pipeline Security</title><link>/blog/container-security-2018-build-pipeline-security/</link><pubDate>Thu, 11 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/container-security-2018-build-pipeline-security/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Most people fail to consider the build environment when thinking about container security, but it is critical. The build environment is traditionally the domain of developers, who don’t share much detail with outsiders (meaning security teams). But with Continuous Integration (CI) or full Continuous Deployment (CD), we’re shooting new code into production… potentially several times a day. An easy way for an attacker to hack an application is get into its development or build environment – usually far less secure than production – and alter code or add new code to containers. The risk is aggravated by DevOps rapidly breaking down barriers between groups, and operations and security teams given access so they can contribute to the process. Collaboration demands a more complex and distributed working environment, with more stakeholders. Better controls are needed to restrict who can alter the build environment and update code, and an audit process to validate who did what.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Container Security 2018: Threats and Concerns</title><link>/blog/container-security-2018-threats-and-concerns/</link><pubDate>Tue, 09 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/container-security-2018-threats-and-concerns/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;To better understand which container security areas you should focus on, and why we recommend particular controls, it helps to understand which threats need to be addressed and which areas containers affect most. Some threats and issues are well-known, some are purely lab proofs of concept, and others are threat vectors which attackers have yet to exploit – typically because there is so much low-hanging fruit elsewhere.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Building a Container Security Program 2018: Introduction</title><link>/blog/building-a-container-security-program-2018-intro/</link><pubDate>Sun, 07 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/building-a-container-security-program-2018-intro/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;The explosive growth of containers is not surprising – these technologies, such as Docker, alleviate several problems for developers deploying applications. Developers need simple packaging, rapid deployment, reduced environmental dependencies, support for microservices, generalized management, and horizontal scalability – all of which containers help provide. When a single technology enables us to address several technical problems at once, it’s very compelling. But this generic model of packaged services, where the environment is designed to treat each container as a “unit of service”, sharply reduces transparency and auditability (by design), and gives security pros nightmares. We run more code and faster, but must accept a loss of visibility inside the container. It begs the question, “How can we introduce security without losing the benefits of containers?”&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>How Cloud Security Managers Should Respond to Meltdown and Spectre</title><link>/blog/how-cloud-security-managers-should-respond-to-meltdown-and-spectre/</link><pubDate>Fri, 05 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/how-cloud-security-managers-should-respond-to-meltdown-and-spectre/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I hope everyone enjoyed the holidays… just in time to return to work, catch up on email, and watch the entire Internet burn down thanks to a cluster of hardware vulnerabilities built into pretty much every computing platform available.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>New Paper: Understanding Secrets Management</title><link>/blog/new-paper-understanding-secrets-management/</link><pubDate>Tue, 02 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/new-paper-understanding-secrets-management/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Traditional application security concerns are shifting, responding to disruptive technologies and development frameworks. Cloud services, containerization, orchestration platforms, and automated build pipelines – to name just a few – all change the way we build and deploy applications. Each effects security a different way. One of the new application security challenges is to provision machines, applications, and services with the credentials they need at runtime. When you remove humans from the process things move much faster – but knowing how and when to automatically provide passwords, authentication tokens, and certificates is not an easy problem. This secrets management problem is not new, but our need grows exponentially when we begin orchestrating the entire application build and deployment process. We need to automate distribution and management of secrets to ensure secure application delivery.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Firestarter: An Explicit End of Year Roundup</title><link>/blog/firestarter-an-explicit-end-of-year-roundup/</link><pubDate>Thu, 21 Dec 2017 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/firestarter-an-explicit-end-of-year-roundup/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;The gang almost makes it through half the episode before dropping some inappropriate language as they summarize 2017. Rather than focusing on the big news, we spend time reflecting on the big trends and how little has changed, other than the pace of change. How the biggest breaches of the year stemmed from the oldest of old issues, to the newest of new. And last we want to thank all of you for all your amazing support over the years. Securosis has been running as a company for a decade now, which likely scares all of you even more than us. We couldn’t have done it without you… seriously.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Firestarter: Breacheriffic EquiFail</title><link>/blog/firestarter-breacheriffic-equifail/</link><pubDate>Fri, 15 Dec 2017 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/firestarter-breacheriffic-equifail/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;This week Mike and Rich address the recent spate of operational fails leading to massive security breaches. This isn’t yet another blame the victim rant, but a frank discussion of why these issues are so persistent and so difficult to actually manage. We also discuss the rising role of automation and its potential to reduce these all-too-human errors.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>The Future of Security Operations: Regaining Balance</title><link>/blog/the-future-of-secops-regaining-balance/</link><pubDate>Mon, 27 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/the-future-of-secops-regaining-balance/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;The first post in this series, &lt;a href="https://securosis.com/blog/the-future-of-secops-behind-the-8-ball"&gt;Behind the 8 Ball&lt;/a&gt;, raised a number of key challenges practicing security in our current environment. These include continual advancement and innovation by attackers seeking new ways to compromise devices and exfiltrate data, increasing complexity of technology infrastructure, frequent changes to said infrastructure, and finally the systemic skills shortage which limits our resources available to handle all the challenges created by the other issues. Basically, practitioners are behind the 8-ball in getting their job done and protecting corporate data.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Endpoint Advanced Protection Buyer’s Guide: Top 10 Questions for Detection and Response</title><link>/blog/endpoint-advanced-protection-buyers-guide-top-10-questions-for-detection-and-response/</link><pubDate>Tue, 21 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/endpoint-advanced-protection-buyers-guide-top-10-questions-for-detection-and-response/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;There are plenty of obvious questions you could ask an endpoint security vendor. But most won’t really help you understand the nuances of their approach, so we decided to distill the selection criteria down to a couple of key points. We’ll provide not just the questions, but the rationale behind them.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Endpoint Advanced Protection Buyer’s Guide: Key Technologies for Detection and Response</title><link>/blog/endpoint-advanced-protection-buyers-guide-key-technologies-for-detection-and-response/</link><pubDate>Mon, 20 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/endpoint-advanced-protection-buyers-guide-key-technologies-for-detection-and-response/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Now let’s dig into some key EDR technologies which appear across all the use cases: detection, response, and hunting.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;h2 id="agent"&gt;Agent&lt;/h2&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The agent is deployed to each monitored endpoint, so you be sensitive to its size and its performance hit on devices. A main complaint regarding older endpoint protection was performance impact on devices. The smaller the better, and the less performance impact the better (duh!), but just as important is agent deployability and maintainability.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Endpoint Advanced Protection Buyer’s Guide: Key Capabilities for Response and Hunting</title><link>/blog/endpoint-advanced-protection-buyers-guide-key-capabilities-for-response-and-hunting/</link><pubDate>Fri, 17 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/endpoint-advanced-protection-buyers-guide-key-capabilities-for-response-and-hunting/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;As we resume posting Endpoint Detection and Response (D/R) selection criteria, let’s start with a focus on the Detection use case.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Endpoint Advanced Protection Buyer’s Guide: Key Capabilities for Detection</title><link>/blog/endpoint-advanced-protection-buyers-guide-key-capabilities-for-detection/</link><pubDate>Thu, 16 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/endpoint-advanced-protection-buyers-guide-key-capabilities-for-detection/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;As we resume posting Endpoint Detection and Response (D/R) selection criteria, let’s start with a focus on the Detection use case.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Endpoint Advanced Protection Buyer’s Guide: Detection and Response Use Cases</title><link>/blog/endpoint-advanced-protection-buyers-guide-detection-and-response-use-cases/</link><pubDate>Wed, 15 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/endpoint-advanced-protection-buyers-guide-detection-and-response-use-cases/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;As we continue documenting what you need to know to understand Endpoint Advanced Protection offerings, it’s time to delve into Detection and Response. Remember that before you are ready to pick anything, you need to understand the problem you are trying to solve. Detecting all endpoint attacks within microseconds and without false positives isn’t really achievable. You need to determine the key use cases most important to you, and make an honest assessment of your team and adversaries.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Endpoint Advanced Protection Buyer’s Guide: Top 10 Questions on Prevention</title><link>/blog/endpoint-advanced-protection-buyers-guide-top-10-questions-on-prevention/</link><pubDate>Fri, 10 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/endpoint-advanced-protection-buyers-guide-top-10-questions-on-prevention/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;There are plenty of obvious questions you could ask an endpoint security vendor. But most won’t really help you understand the nuances of their approach, so we decided to distill the selection criteria down to a couple of key points. We’ll provide not just the questions, but the rationale behind them.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Endpoint Advanced Protection Buyer’s Guide: Key Prevention Technologies</title><link>/blog/endpoint-advanced-protection-buyers-guide-key-prevention-technologies/</link><pubDate>Thu, 09 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/endpoint-advanced-protection-buyers-guide-key-prevention-technologies/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;After exploring prevention approaches, you should understand some common technologies which are foundational to endpoint advanced prevention offerings. Machine Learning Machine learning is a catch-all term to indicate that the endpoint protection vendor uses sophisticated mathematical analysis on a large set of data to generate models for detecting malicious files or activity on devices. There are a couple mathematical algorithms which can improve malware prevention. Static file analysis: With upwards of a billion malicious file samples in circulation, mathematical analysis of malware can pinpoint commonalities across malicious files. With a model of what malware looks like, advanced prevention products then&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Face ID is the Future of Security (Authentication)</title><link>/blog/face-id-is-the-future-of-security-authentication/</link><pubDate>Thu, 09 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/face-id-is-the-future-of-security-authentication/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Every year, as I travel the security conference circuit, hallway conversations always turn to, “See anything interesting?”. To be honest, I can’t remember the last time I was excited about an honestly cool security technology (which I didn’t create myself, but let’s not go there today). I see plenty of cloud innovation, and plenty of security evolution, but not a lot of revolution.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>The Future of Security Operations: Behind the 8 Ball</title><link>/blog/the-future-of-secops-behind-the-8-ball/</link><pubDate>Thu, 09 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/the-future-of-secops-behind-the-8-ball/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;As the velocity of technology infrastructure change continues to increase, it is putting serious stress on Security Operations (SecOps). This has forced security folks to face the fact that &lt;em&gt;operations&lt;/em&gt; has never really been our forte. That’s a bit harsh, but denial never helps address serious problems. The case is fairly strong that most organizations are pretty bad at security operations. How many high-profile breaches could have been avoided if one of many alerts was acted upon? How many attacks were made possible by not having properly patched servers or infrastructure? How many successful compromises resulted from human error?&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Endpoint Advanced Protection Buyer’s Guide: Preventing the Attacks, Part 2</title><link>/blog/endpoint-advanced-protection-buyers-guide-preventing-the-attacks-part-2-2/</link><pubDate>Wed, 08 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/endpoint-advanced-protection-buyers-guide-preventing-the-attacks-part-2-2/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Let’s resume our discussion of endpoint attack prevention approaches with the options available once an attack actually begins to execute, or once it has already executed on a device.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Endpoint Advanced Protection Buyer’s Guide: Preventing the Attacks, Part 1</title><link>/blog/endpoint-advanced-protection-buyers-guide-preventing-the-attacks-part-1-2/</link><pubDate>Tue, 07 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/endpoint-advanced-protection-buyers-guide-preventing-the-attacks-part-1-2/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;We discussed specific attacks in our last post, so it’s time to examine approaches which can prevent them. But first let’s look at the general life cycle of an attack.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Endpoint Advanced Protection Buyer’s Guide: The Attacks</title><link>/blog/endpoint-advanced-protection-buyers-guide-the-attacks-2/</link><pubDate>Mon, 06 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/endpoint-advanced-protection-buyers-guide-the-attacks-2/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;As we previewed in the &lt;a href="https://securosis.com/blog/introducing-the-endpoint-advanced-protection-buyers-guide"&gt;Introduction&lt;/a&gt; to our Endpoint Advanced Protection Buyer’s Guide, the first step to selecting an endpoint security product is figuring out what problem you are trying to solve. Then figure out which capabilities are most important to solve those problems. Only then can you start trying to find a vendor who meets those requirements. This is what we call establishing *selection criteria.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Minimum Viable Cloud is an Anti-Pattern</title><link>/blog/minimum-viable-cloud-is-an-anti-pattern/</link><pubDate>Mon, 06 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/minimum-viable-cloud-is-an-anti-pattern/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;About a year ago I first heard the dreaded acronym “MVC”. It was during a call about a potential project, and this contact kept namedropping it like Kanye or something – not that I knew what it meant at the time. I kept wondering how Model/View/Controller was so important to their deployment. Eventually I learned it stands for “Minimum Viable Cloud”.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Firestarter: The team is back from the dead, and so are some really crappy cloud ideas.</title><link>/blog/firestarter-the-team-is-back-from-the-dead-and-so-are-some-really-crappy-cloud-ideas/</link><pubDate>Tue, 31 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/firestarter-the-team-is-back-from-the-dead-and-so-are-some-really-crappy-cloud-ideas/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;The team is back from the dead, and so are some really crappy cloud ideas.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Watch or listen:&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Bad vs. Less Bad Security Reporting: CoreML vs. Ships</title><link>/blog/bad-vs-less-bad-security-reporting-coreml-vs-ships/</link><pubDate>Thu, 26 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/bad-vs-less-bad-security-reporting-coreml-vs-ships/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;As I was flying home from a meeting today I read two security stories that highlighted the differences between bad and less bad ways to report on security issues.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Secrets Management: Deployment Considerations</title><link>/blog/secrets-management-deployment-considerations/</link><pubDate>Fri, 29 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/secrets-management-deployment-considerations/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;We will close out this series with a look at several operational considerations for selecting a secrets management platform. There are quite a few secrets management tools, both commercial and otherwise, on the market, and each does things a bit differently. Rather than a giant survey of every product and how it works, we will focus on the facets of these products which enable them to handle the use cases discussed earlier. Central questions include how these platforms deploy, how they provide scalability and resiliency, and how they integrate with the services they supply secrets to? To better distinguish between products you need to understand why they were created, because core functions and deployment models are heavily influenced by a platform’s intended use.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Secrets Management: Features and Functions (updated)</title><link>/blog/secrets-management-features-and-functions/</link><pubDate>Fri, 22 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/secrets-management-features-and-functions/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;In this section we will discuss the core features of a secrets management platform. There are basic functions every secrets management platform needs to address the basic use cases. These include secure storage and disbursement of secrets, identity management, and API access, for starters. There are plenty of tools out there, many open source, and several bundled into other platforms. But when considering what you need from one of these platforms, the key thing to keep in mind is that most of them were originally developed to perform a single very specific task – such as injecting secrets into containers at runtime, or integrating tightly with a Jenkins build server, or supplementing a cloud identity service. Those do one thing well, but typically do not address multiple use cases.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Secrets Management: Use Cases</title><link>/blog/secrets-management-use-cases/</link><pubDate>Thu, 21 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/secrets-management-use-cases/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;This post will discuss why secrets management is needed at all, along with the diverse use cases which teams need it to address. In every case there is some secret data which needs to be sent – hopefully not in plain text – to an application or service. And in every case we want the ability to provide secrets, both when an operator is present and automatically. The biggest single issue is that security around these secrets today is largely absent, and they are kept in cleartext within documents of various types. Let’s dive in.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Secrets Management: New Series</title><link>/blog/secrets-management-new-series/</link><pubDate>Tue, 19 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/secrets-management-new-series/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;This week we are starting a new research series on Secrets Management. What is secrets management and why do you care? A good number of you in security will be asking these questions. Secrets Management platforms do exactly what the name implies; they store, manage and provide secrets. This technology addresses several problems most security folks don’t yet know they have. As development teams leverage automation and orchestration techniques, they are creating new security issues to be tackled. Let’s jump into some of the back story, and then outline what we will accomplish in this research effort.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>The TLS 1.3 Controversy, and Why We Need to Choose Stronger Security</title><link>/blog/the-tls-1-3-controversy-and-why-we-need-to-choose-stronger-security/</link><pubDate>Thu, 24 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/the-tls-1-3-controversy-and-why-we-need-to-choose-stronger-security/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Transport Layer Security (TLS) is fundamental to the security of the Internet. Proposed changes to the protocol are generating extensive controversy within and outside the security industry. Rather than getting into cryptographic specifics, this post focuses on the root of the controversy, and why we believe TLS 1.3 should proceed with the full support of technical professionals.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Introducing the Endpoint Advanced Protection Buyer’s Guide</title><link>/blog/introducing-the-endpoint-advanced-protection-buyers-guide-2/</link><pubDate>Tue, 22 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/introducing-the-endpoint-advanced-protection-buyers-guide-2/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Endpoint security has undergone a renaissance recently. Similar to network security a decade ago, the technology had not seen significant innovation for years, and adversaries improved to a point where many organizations questioned why they kept renewing existing endpoint protection suites. It was an untenable situation.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>How to Evaluate a Possible Apple Face ID</title><link>/blog/how-to-evaluate-a-possible-apple-face-id/</link><pubDate>Thu, 03 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/how-to-evaluate-a-possible-apple-face-id/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;It’s usually more than a little risky to comment on hypothetical Apple products, but while I was out at Black Hat and DEF CON &lt;a href="https://www.macrumors.com/2017/07/29/homepod-firmware-details-apple-smart-speaker/"&gt;Apple accidentally released the firmware for their upcoming HomePod&lt;/a&gt;. Filled with references to other upcoming products and technologies, the firmware release makes it reasonably probable that Apple will release an updated iPhone without a Touch ID sensor, relying instead on facial recognition.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Upcoming Webcast on Dynamic Security Assessment</title><link>/blog/upcoming-webcast-on-dynamic-security-assessment/</link><pubDate>Mon, 05 Jun 2017 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/upcoming-webcast-on-dynamic-security-assessment/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;It’s been a while since I’ve done a webcast, so if you are going through the DTs like I am, you are in luck. On Wednesday at 1 PM ET (10 AM PT), I’m doing an event with my friends at SafeBreach on our Dynamic Security Assessment content. I even convinced them to use one of my favorite sayings in the title:&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>DLP in the Cloud</title><link>/blog/dlp-in-the-cloud/</link><pubDate>Tue, 30 May 2017 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/dlp-in-the-cloud/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;It’s been quite a while since we updated our Data Loss Prevention (DLP) research. It’s not that DLP hasn’t continued to be an area of focus (it has), but a bunch of other shiny things have been demanding our attention lately. Yeah, like the cloud. Well, it turns out a lot of organizations are using this cloud thing now, so they inevitably have questions about whether and how their existing controls (including DLP) map into the new world.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Multi-cloud Key Management Research Paper</title><link>/blog/multi-cloud-key-management-research-paper/</link><pubDate>Wed, 24 May 2017 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/multi-cloud-key-management-research-paper/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Cloud computing is the single biggest change to computing we have seen, fundamentally changing how we use computing resources. We have reached a point where multi-cloud support is a reality for most firms; SaaS and private clouds are complimented by public PaaS and IaaS. With these changes we have received an increasing number of questions on how to protect data in the cloud, so in this research paper we discuss several approaches to both keeping data secure and maintaining control over access.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Multi-Cloud Key Management: Selection and Migration</title><link>/blog/multi-cloud-key-management-selection-and-migration/</link><pubDate>Thu, 20 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/multi-cloud-key-management-selection-and-migration/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Cloud services are typically described as sharing responsibility for security, but the reality is that you don’t working shoulder to shoulder with the vendor. Instead you implement security with the building blocks they provide you, possibly filling in gaps where they don’t provide solutions. One of the central goals of this research project was to show that it is possible to take control of data security, supplanting embedded encryption and key management services, even when you don’t control the environment. And with key management you can gain as much security as your on-premise solution provides – in some cases even continuing leverage familiar tools – with minimal disruption to existing management processes.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Multi-Cloud Key Management: Service and Deployment Options</title><link>/blog/multi-cloud-key-management-deployment-options/</link><pubDate>Sun, 16 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/multi-cloud-key-management-deployment-options/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;This post will discuss how to deploy encryption keys into a third-party cloud service. We illustrate the deployment options, along with the components of a solution. We will then walk through the process of getting a key from your on-premise Hardware Security Module (HSM) into a cloud HSM. We will discuss variations on using cloud-based HSM for all encryption operations, as well as cases where you instead delegate encryption operations to the cloud-native encryption service. We’ll close out with a discussion of software-based (non-HSM) key management systems running on IaaS cloud services.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Multi-Cloud Key Management: Use Cases</title><link>/blog/multi-cloud-key-management-use-cases/</link><pubDate>Wed, 12 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/multi-cloud-key-management-use-cases/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;This post will cover some issues and concerns customers cite when considering a move – or more carefully reassessing a move they have &lt;em&gt;already&lt;/em&gt; made – to cloud services.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Identifying the biggest challenges in running security teams</title><link>/blog/identifying-the-biggest-challenges-in-running-security-teams/</link><pubDate>Tue, 11 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/identifying-the-biggest-challenges-in-running-security-teams/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;It’s hard to believe, but it’s been 10 years since I published the Pragmatic CSO. Quite a bit has changed in terms of being a senior security professional. Adversaries continuously improve and technology infrastructure is undergoing the most significant disruption I’ve seen in 25 years in technology. It’s never been more exciting – or harder – to be a security professional.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Multi-Cloud Key Management (New Series)</title><link>/blog/multi-cloud-key-management-new-series/</link><pubDate>Mon, 10 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/multi-cloud-key-management-new-series/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Running IT systems on public cloud services is a reality for most companies. Just about every company uses Software as a Service to some degree; with many having already migrated back-office systems like email, collaboration, file storage, and customer relationship management software. But we are now also witnessing the core of the data center – financial systems, databases, supply chain, and enterprise resource planning software – moving to public Platform and Infrastructure “as a Service” (PaaS &amp;amp; IaaS) providers. It’s common for medium and large enterprises to run SaaS, PaaS, and IaaS at different providers, all in parallel with on-premise systems. Some small firms we speak with no longer have data centers, with all their applications hosted by third parties.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Introducing Threat Operations: TO in Action</title><link>/blog/introducing-threat-operations-to-in-action/</link><pubDate>Wed, 22 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/introducing-threat-operations-to-in-action/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;As we wrap up our Introduction to Threat Operations series, let’s recap. We started by discussing why the way threats are handled hasn’t yielded the results the industry needs and how to &lt;a href="https://securosis.com/blog/introducing-threat-operations-thinking-differently"&gt;think differently&lt;/a&gt;. Then we delved into what’s &lt;em&gt;really&lt;/em&gt; required to keep pace with increasingly sophisticated adversaries: &lt;a href="https://securosis.com/blog/introducing-threat-operations-accelerating-the-human"&gt;accelerating the human&lt;/a&gt;. To wrap up let’s use these concepts in a scenario to make them more tangible.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Introducing Threat Operations: Accelerating the Human</title><link>/blog/introducing-threat-operations-accelerating-the-human/</link><pubDate>Tue, 14 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/introducing-threat-operations-accelerating-the-human/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;In &lt;a href="https://securosis.com/blog/introducing-threat-operations-thinking-differently"&gt;the first post of our Introducing Threat Operations Series&lt;/a&gt;, we explored the need for much stronger operational discipline around handling threats. With all the internal and external security data available, and the increasing sophistication of analytics, organizations should be doing a better job of handling threats. If what you are doing isn’t working, it’s time to start thinking differently about the problem, and addressing the root causes underlying the inability to handle threats. It comes down to _accelerating the human: making your practitioners better through training, process, and technology.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Security Analytics Team of Rivals: A Glimpse into the Future</title><link>/blog/security-analytics-team-of-rivals-a-glimpse-into-the-future/</link><pubDate>Tue, 21 Feb 2017 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/security-analytics-team-of-rivals-a-glimpse-into-the-future/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;A lot of our research is conceptual, so we like to wrap up with a scenario. This helps make the ideas a bit more tangible, and provides context for you to apply it to your particular situation. To illuminate how the Security Analytics Team of Rivals can work, let’s consider a scenario involving a high-growth retailer who needs to maintain security while scaling operations which are stressed by that growth.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Introducing Threat Operations: Thinking Differently</title><link>/blog/introducing-threat-operations-thinking-differently/</link><pubDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2017 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/introducing-threat-operations-thinking-differently/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Let’s start with a rhetorical question: Can you really “manage” threats? Is that even a worthy goal? And how do you even define a &lt;em&gt;threat.&lt;/em&gt; We’ve seen a more accurate description of how adversaries operate by abstracting multiple attacks/threats into a &lt;em&gt;campaign.&lt;/em&gt; That intimates a set of interrelated attacks all with a common mission. That seems like a better way to think about how you are being attacked, rather than the whack a mole approach of treating every attack as a separate thing and defaulting to the traditional threat management cycle: Prevent (good luck), Detect, Investigate, Remediate.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Security Analytics Team of Rivals: Coexistence Among Rivals</title><link>/blog/security-analytics-team-of-rivals-coexistence-among-rivals/</link><pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2017 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/security-analytics-team-of-rivals-coexistence-among-rivals/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;As we described in the &lt;a href="https://securosis.com/blog/security-analytics-team-of-rivals-introduction"&gt;introduction to this series&lt;/a&gt;, security monitoring has been around for a long time and is evolving quickly. But one size doesn’t fit all, so if you are deploying a &lt;em&gt;Team of Rivals&lt;/em&gt; they will need to coexist for a while. Either the old guard evolves to meet modern needs, or the new guard will supplant them. But in the meantime you need to figure out how to solve a problem: detecting advanced attackers in your environment.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>REMINDER: Register for the Disaster Recovery Breakfast</title><link>/blog/reminder-register-for-the-disaster-recovery-breakfast/</link><pubDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2017 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/reminder-register-for-the-disaster-recovery-breakfast/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src="RecoveryBreakfastInvite-2017_thumb.jpg" alt=""&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;If you are going to be in San Francisco next week. Yes, next week. How the hell is the RSA Conference next week? Anyhow, don’t forget to swing by the Disaster Recovery Breakfast and say hello Thursday morning. Our friends from &lt;a href="http://kulesafaul.com/"&gt;Kulesa Faul&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://www.chenpr.com/"&gt;CHEN PR&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://golaunchtech.com/"&gt;LaunchTech&lt;/a&gt;, and &lt;a href="https://cyber-edge.com/"&gt;CyberEdge Group&lt;/a&gt; will be there. And hopefully Rich will remember his pants, this time.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Securing SAP Clouds [New Paper]</title><link>/blog/securing-sap-clouds-new-paper/</link><pubDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2017 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/securing-sap-clouds-new-paper/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Use of cloud services is common in IT. Gmail, Twitter, and Dropbox are ubiquitous; as are business applications like Salesforce, ServiceNow, and QuickBooks. But along with the basic service, customers are outsourcing much of application security. As more firms move critical back-office components such as SAP Hana to public platform and infrastructure services, those vendors are taking on much more security responsibility. It is far from clear how to assemble a security strategy for complex a application such as SAP Hana, or how to adapt existing security controls to an unfamiliar environment with only partial control.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Security Analytics Team of Rivals: Introduction [New Series]</title><link>/blog/security-analytics-team-of-rivals-introduction-new-series/</link><pubDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2017 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/security-analytics-team-of-rivals-introduction-new-series/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Security monitoring has been a foundational element of most every security program for over a decade. The initial driver for separate security monitoring infrastructure was the overwhelming amount of alerts flooding out of intrusion detection devices, which required some level of correlation to determine which mattered. Soon after, compliance mandates (primarily PCI-DSS) emerged as a forcing function, providing a clear requirement for log aggregation – which SIEM already did. As the primary security monitoring technology, SIEM became entrenched for alert reduction and compliance reporting.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Tidal Forces: Software as a Service Is the New Back Office</title><link>/blog/tidal-forces-software-as-a-service-is-the-new-back-office/</link><pubDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/tidal-forces-software-as-a-service-is-the-new-back-office/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;TL;DR: SaaS enables Zero Trust networks with pervasive encryption and access. Box vendors lose once again.&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;It no longer makes sense to run your own mail server in your data center. Or file servers. Or a very long list of enterprise applications. Unless you are on a very &lt;strong&gt;very&lt;/strong&gt; short list of organizations. Running enterprise applications in an enterprise data center is simply an anachronism in progress. A quick peek at the balance sheets of the top tier Software as a Service providers shows the transition to SaaS continues unabated.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Dynamic Security Assessment: In Action</title><link>/blog/dynamic-security-assessment-in-action/</link><pubDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/dynamic-security-assessment-in-action/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;In the first two posts of this Dynamic Security Assessment series, we delved into &lt;a href="https://securosis.com/blog/dynamic-security-assessment-the-limitations-of-security-testing-new-series"&gt;the limitations of security testing&lt;/a&gt; and then presented the &lt;a href="https://securosis.com/blog/dynamic-security-assessment-the-process-and-functions"&gt;process and key functions&lt;/a&gt; you need to implement it.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Securing SAP Clouds: Application Security</title><link>/blog/securing-sap-clouds-application-security/</link><pubDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/securing-sap-clouds-application-security/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;This post will discuss the foundational elements of an application security program for SAP HCP deployments. Without direct responsibility for management of hardware and physical networks you lose the traditional security data capture points for traffic analysis and firewall technologies. The net result is that, whether on PaaS or IaaS, your application security program &lt;em&gt;becomes more important than ever&lt;/em&gt; as what you have control over. Yes, SAP provides some network monitoring and DDoS services, but your options are are limited, they don’t share much data, and what they monitor is not tailored to &lt;em&gt;your&lt;/em&gt; applications or requirements.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Securing SAP Clouds: Architecture and Operations</title><link>/blog/securing-sap-clouds-architecture-and-operations/</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/securing-sap-clouds-architecture-and-operations/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;This post will discuss several keys differences in application architecture and operations – with a direct impact on security – which you need to reconsider when migrating to cloud services. These are the areas which make operations easier and security better.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Tidal Forces: Endpoints Are Different—More Secure, and Less Open</title><link>/blog/tidal-forces-endpoints-are-different-more-secure-and-less-open-2/</link><pubDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/tidal-forces-endpoints-are-different-more-secure-and-less-open-2/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;This is the second post in the Tidal Forces series.&lt;a href="https://securosis.com/blog/tidal-forces-the-trends-tearing-apart-security-as-we-know-it"&gt;The introduction is available.&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/em&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Computers aren’t computers any more.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Call it a personal computer. A laptop, desktop, workstation, PC, or Mac. Whatever configuration we’re dealing with, and whatever we call it, much of the practice of information security focuses on keeping the devices we place in our users’ hands safe. They are the boon and bane of information technology – forcing us to find a delicate balance between safety, security, compliance, and productivity. Lock them down too much and people can’t get things done – they will find an unmanaged alternative instead. Loosen up too much, and a single click on the wrong ad banner can take down a company. Vendors know it is possible to escalate a foothold on the enterprise endpoint, or the network, to reach hundreds of millions – perhaps even billions – in revenue. Extend this out to consumer computers at home, and even a small market footprint can sustain a decade of other failed products and corporate missteps.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Secure Networking in the Cloud Age: Use Cases</title><link>/blog/secure-networking-in-the-cloud-age-use-cases/</link><pubDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/secure-networking-in-the-cloud-age-use-cases/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;As we wrap up our series on secure networking in the cloud era, we have covered the &lt;a href="https://securosis.com/blog/network-security-in-the-cloud-age-requirements-and-migration"&gt;requirements and migration considerations&lt;/a&gt; for this new network architecture – highlighting increased flexibility for configuration, scaling, and security services. In a technology environment which can change as quickly as a developer hitting ‘commit’ for a new feature, infrastructure needs to keep pace, and that is not something most enterprises can or should build themselves.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Network Security in the Cloud Age: Requirements and Migration</title><link>/blog/network-security-in-the-cloud-age-requirements-and-migration/</link><pubDate>Tue, 10 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/network-security-in-the-cloud-age-requirements-and-migration/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;As we noted in our introductory post for this &lt;a href="https://securosis.com/blog/network-security-in-the-cloud-age-everything-changes"&gt;Network Security in the Cloud Age&lt;/a&gt; series, everything changes, and technology is undergoing the most radical change and disruption since… well, ever. We’re not kidding – check out our &lt;a href="https://securosis.com/blog/tidal-forces-the-trends-tearing-apart-security-as-we-know-it"&gt;Tidal Forces&lt;/a&gt; post for the rundown. This disruption will have significant ramifications for how we build and manage networks. Let’s work through the requirements for this network of the future, and then provide some perspective on how you can and should migrate to the new network architecture.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Assembling A Container Security Program [New Paper]</title><link>/blog/assembling-a-container-security-program-new-paper/</link><pubDate>Wed, 04 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/assembling-a-container-security-program-new-paper/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;We are pleased to launch our latest research paper, on Docker security: Assembling a Container Security Program. Containers are now such integral elements of software delivery that enterprises are demanding security in and around containers. And it’s no coincidence that Docker has recently added a variety of security capabilities to its offerings, but they are only a small subset of what customers need. During our research we learned many things, including that:&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Network Security in the Cloud Age: Everything Changes</title><link>/blog/network-security-in-the-cloud-age-everything-changes/</link><pubDate>Tue, 03 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/network-security-in-the-cloud-age-everything-changes/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;We have spent a lot of time discussing the disruptive impact of the cloud and mobility on… pretty much everything. If you need a reminder, check out our &lt;a href="https://securosis.com/research/papers/the-future-of-security-the-trends-and-technologies-transforming-security"&gt;Inflection paper&lt;/a&gt;, which lays out how we (correctly, in hindsight) saw the coming tectonic shifts in the computing landscape. Rich is updating that research now, so you can check out his first post, where he discusses the trends which threaten promise to upend everything we know about security: &lt;a href="https://securosis.com/blog/tidal-forces-the-trends-tearing-apart-security-as-we-know-it"&gt;Tidal Forces&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Tidal Forces: The Trends Tearing Apart Security As We Know It</title><link>/blog/tidal-forces-the-trends-tearing-apart-security-as-we-know-it/</link><pubDate>Tue, 03 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/tidal-forces-the-trends-tearing-apart-security-as-we-know-it/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Imagine a black hole suddenly appearing in the solar system – gravity instantly warping space and time in our celestial neighborhood, inexorably drawing in all matter. Closer objects are affected more strongly, with the closest whipping past the event horizon and disappearing from the observable universe. Farther objects are pulled in more slowly, but still inescapably. As they come closer to the disturbance, the gravitational field warping space exponentially, closer points are pulled away from trailing edges, potentially ripping entire planets apart.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Dynamic Security Assessment: Process and Functions</title><link>/blog/dynamic-security-assessment-process-and-functions/</link><pubDate>Thu, 29 Dec 2016 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/dynamic-security-assessment-process-and-functions/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;As we wind down the year it’s time to return to forward-looking research, specifically a concept we know will be more important in 2017. As described in the &lt;a href="https://securosis.com/blog/dynamic-security-assessment-the-limitations-of-security-testing-new-series"&gt;first post of our Dynamic Security Assessment series&lt;/a&gt;, there are clear limitations to current security testing mechanisms. But before we start talking about solutions we should lay out the requirements for our vision of dynamic security assessment.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Incite 12/21/2016: To Incite</title><link>/blog/incite-12-21-2016-to-incite/</link><pubDate>Wed, 21 Dec 2016 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/incite-12-21-2016-to-incite/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;In the process of wrapping up the year I realize the last Incite I wrote was in August. Damn. That’s a long respite. It’s in my todo list every Tuesday. And evidently I have dutifully rescheduled it for about 3 months now. I am one to analyze (and probably overanalyze) everything, so I need to figure out why I have resisted writing the Incite.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>The NINTH Annual Disaster Recovery Breakfast: the More Things Change…</title><link>/blog/the-ninth-annual-disaster-recovery-breakfast-the-more-things-change-2/</link><pubDate>Mon, 19 Dec 2016 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/the-ninth-annual-disaster-recovery-breakfast-the-more-things-change-2/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src="RecoveryBreakfastInvite-2019_750.jpg" alt=""&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Big 9. Lucky 9. Or maybe not so lucky 9, because by the time you reach our annual respite from the wackiness of the RSA Conference, you may not be feeling very lucky. But if you flip your perspective, you’ll be in the home stretch, with only one more day of the conference before you can get the hell out of SF.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>The NINTH Annual Disaster Recovery Breakfast: the More Things Change…</title><link>/blog/the-ninth-annual-disaster-recovery-breakfast-the-more-things-change/</link><pubDate>Mon, 19 Dec 2016 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/the-ninth-annual-disaster-recovery-breakfast-the-more-things-change/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src="RecoveryBreakfastInvite-2017_thumb.jpg" alt=""&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Big 9. Lucky 9. Or maybe not so lucky 9, because by the time you reach our annual respite from the wackiness of the RSA Conference, you may not be feeling very lucky. But if you flip your perspective, you’ll be in the home stretch, with only one more day of the conference before you can get the hell out of SF.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Amazon re:Invent Takeaways? Hang on to Your A**es…</title><link>/blog/amazon-reinvent-takeaways-hang-on-to-your-aes/</link><pubDate>Thu, 08 Dec 2016 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/amazon-reinvent-takeaways-hang-on-to-your-aes/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I realized I &lt;a href="https://securosis.com/blog/ten-years-of-securosis-time-for-a-memory-dump"&gt;promised to start writing more again to finish off the year&lt;/a&gt; and then promptly disappeared for over a week. Not to worry, it was for a good cause, since I spent all of last week at Amazon’s re:Invent conference. And, umm, might have been distracted this week by the release of the Rogue One expansion pack for Star Wars Battlefront. But enough about me…&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Cloud Security Automation: Code vs. CloudFormation or Terraform Templates</title><link>/blog/cloud-security-automation-code-vs-cloudformation-or-terraform-templates/</link><pubDate>Wed, 16 Nov 2016 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/cloud-security-automation-code-vs-cloudformation-or-terraform-templates/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Right now I’m working on updating many of my little command line tools into releasable versions. It’s a mixed bag of things I’ve written for demos, training classes, clients, or Trinity (our mothballed product). A few of these are security automation tools I’m working on for clients to give them a skeleton framework to build out their own automation programs. Basically, what we created Trinity for, that isn’t releasable.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Cloud Database Security: 2011 vs. Today</title><link>/blog/cloud-database-security-2011-vs-today/</link><pubDate>Mon, 14 Nov 2016 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/cloud-database-security-2011-vs-today/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Adrian here.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I had a brief conversation today about security for cloud database deployments, and their two basic questions encapsulated many conversations I have had over the last few months. It is relevant to a wider audience, so I will discuss them here.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Dynamic Security Assessment: The Limitations of Security Testing [New Series]</title><link>/blog/dynamic-security-assessment-the-limitations-of-security-testing-new-series/</link><pubDate>Thu, 10 Nov 2016 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/dynamic-security-assessment-the-limitations-of-security-testing-new-series/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;We have been fans of testing the security of infrastructure and applications as long as we can remember doing research. We have always known attackers are testing your environment all the time, so if you aren’t also self-assessing, inevitably you will be surprised by a successful attack. And like most security folks, we are no fans of surprises.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Assembling a Container Security Program: Monitoring and Auditing</title><link>/blog/assembling-a-container-security-program-monitoring-and-auditing/</link><pubDate>Wed, 09 Nov 2016 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/assembling-a-container-security-program-monitoring-and-auditing/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Our last post in this series covers two key areas: Monitoring and Auditing. We have more to say, in the first case because most development and security teams are not aware of these options, and in the latter because most teams hold many misconceptions and considerable fear on the topic. So we will dig into these two areas essential to container security programs.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Assembling a Container Security Program: Container Validation</title><link>/blog/assembling-a-container-security-program-container-validation/</link><pubDate>Mon, 07 Nov 2016 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/assembling-a-container-security-program-container-validation/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;This post is focused on security testing your code and container, and verifying that both conform to security and operational practices. One of the major advances over the last year or so is the introduction of security features for the software supply chain, from both Docker itself and a handful of third-party vendors. All the solutions focus on slightly different threats to container construction, with Docker providing tools to certify that containers have made it through your process, while third-party tools are focused on vetting the container contents. So Docker provides things like process controls, digital signing services to verify chain of custody, and creation of a Bill of Materials based on known trusted libraries. In contrast, third-party tools to harden container inputs, analyze resource usage, perform static code analysis, analyze the composition of libraries, and check against known malware signatures; they can then perform granular policy-based container delivery based on the results. You will need a combination of both, so we will go into a bit more detail:&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Assembling a Container Security Program: Runtime Security</title><link>/blog/assembling-a-container-security-program-runtime-security/</link><pubDate>Mon, 07 Nov 2016 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/assembling-a-container-security-program-runtime-security/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;This post will focus on the ‘runtime’ aspects of container security. Unlike the tools and processes discussed in previous sections, here we will focus on containers in production systems. This includes which images are moved into production repositories, security around selecting and running containers, and the security of the underlying host systems.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Firestarter: How to Tell When Your Cloud Consultant Sucks</title><link>/blog/firestarter-how-to-tell-when-your-cloud-consultant-sucks/</link><pubDate>Mon, 07 Nov 2016 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/firestarter-how-to-tell-when-your-cloud-consultant-sucks/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Mike and Rich had a call this week with another prospect who was given some pretty bad cloud advice. We spend a little time trying to figure out why we keep seeing so much bad advice out there (seriously, BIG B BAD not OOPSIE bad). Then we focus on the key things to look for to figure out w&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>More on Bastion Accounts and Blast Radius</title><link>/blog/more-on-bastion-accounts-and-blast-radius/</link><pubDate>Mon, 07 Nov 2016 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/more-on-bastion-accounts-and-blast-radius/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I have received some great feedback on &lt;a href="https://securosis.com/blog/bastion-transit-networks-are-the-dmz-to-protect-your-cloud-from-your-datace"&gt;my post last week on bastion accounts and networks&lt;/a&gt;. Mostly that I left some gaps in my explanation which legitimately confused people. Plus, I forgot to include any pretty pictures. Let’s work through things a bit more.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Assembling a Container Security Program: Securing the Build</title><link>/blog/assembling-a-container-security-program-securing-the-build/</link><pubDate>Sun, 06 Nov 2016 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/assembling-a-container-security-program-securing-the-build/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;As we mentioned in our last post, most people don’t seem to consider the build environment when thinking about container security, but it’s important. Traditionally, the build environment is the domain of developers, and they don’t share a lot of details with outsiders (in this case, Operations folks). But this is beginning to change with Continuous Integration (CI) or full Continuous Deployment (CD), and more automated deployment. The build environment is more likely to go straight into production. This means that operations, quality assurance, release management, and other groups find themselves having to cooperate on building automation scripts and working together more closely. Collaboration means a more complex, distributed working environment, with more stakeholders having access. DevOps is rapidly breaking down barriers between groups, even getting some security teams to contribute test scripts and configuration updates. Better controls are needed to restrict who can alter the build environment and update code, and an audit process to validate who did what.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Bastion (Transit) Networks Are the DMZ to Protect Your Cloud from Your Datacenter</title><link>/blog/bastion-transit-networks-are-the-dmz-to-protect-your-cloud-from-your-datace/</link><pubDate>Fri, 04 Nov 2016 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/bastion-transit-networks-are-the-dmz-to-protect-your-cloud-from-your-datace/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;In &lt;a href="https://securosis.com/blog/your-cloud-consultant-probably-sucks"&gt;an earlier post&lt;/a&gt; I mentioning bastion accounts or virtual networks. Amazon calls these “transit VPCs” and &lt;a href="https://aws.amazon.com/answers/networking/transit-vpc/"&gt;has a good description&lt;/a&gt;. Before I dive into details, the key difference is that I focus on using the concept as a security control, and Amazon for network connectivity and resiliency. That’s why I call these “bastion accounts/networks”.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Endpoint Advanced Protection: Remediation and Deployment</title><link>/blog/endpoint-advanced-protection-remediation-and-deployment/</link><pubDate>Fri, 04 Nov 2016 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/endpoint-advanced-protection-remediation-and-deployment/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Now that we have gotten through 80% of the &lt;a href="https://securosis.com/blog/endpoint-advanced-protection-the-endpoint-protection-lifecycle"&gt;Endpoint Advanced Protection lifecycle&lt;/a&gt; we can focus on remediation, and then how to start getting value from these new alternatives.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Assembling a Container Security Program: Threats</title><link>/blog/assembling-a-container-security-program-threats/</link><pubDate>Wed, 02 Nov 2016 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/assembling-a-container-security-program-threats/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;After a somewhat lengthy hiatus – sorry about that – I will close out this series over the next couple days.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Seven Steps to Secure Your AWS Root Account</title><link>/blog/seven-steps-to-secure-your-aws-root-account/</link><pubDate>Wed, 02 Nov 2016 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/seven-steps-to-secure-your-aws-root-account/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;The following steps are very specific to AWS, but with minimal modification they will work for other cloud platforms which support multi factor authentication. And if your cloud provider doesn’t support MFA and the other features you need to follow these steps… find another provider.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Endpoint Advanced Protection: Detection and Response</title><link>/blog/endpoint-advanced-protection-detection-and-response/</link><pubDate>Tue, 01 Nov 2016 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/endpoint-advanced-protection-detection-and-response/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;As we discussed previously, despite all the cool innovation happening to effectively &lt;a href="https://securosis.com/blog/endpoint-advanced-protection-the-evolution-of-prevention"&gt;prevent compromises on endpoints&lt;/a&gt;, the fact remains that you &lt;em&gt;cannot&lt;/em&gt; stop all attacks. That means detecting the compromise quickly and effectively, and then figuring out how far the attack has spread within your organization, continues to be critical.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>How to Start Moving to the Cloud</title><link>/blog/how-to-start-moving-to-the-cloud/</link><pubDate>Tue, 01 Nov 2016 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/how-to-start-moving-to-the-cloud/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Yesterday &lt;a href="https://securosis.com/blog/your-cloud-consultant-probably-sucks"&gt;I warned against building a monolithic cloud infrastructure&lt;/a&gt; to move into cloud computing. It creates a large blast radius, is difficult to secure, costs more, and is far less agile than the alternative. But I, um… er… uh… didn’t really mention an alternative.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Ten Years of Securosis: Time for a Memory Dump</title><link>/blog/ten-years-of-securosis-time-for-a-memory-dump/</link><pubDate>Mon, 31 Oct 2016 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/ten-years-of-securosis-time-for-a-memory-dump/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I started Securosis as a blog a little over 10 years ago. 9 years ago it became my job. Soon after that Adrian Lane and Mike Rothman joined me as partners. Over that time we have published well over 10,000 posts, around 100 research papers, and given countless presentations. When I laid down that first post I was 35, childless, a Research VP at Gartner still, and recently married. In other words I had a secure job and the kind of free time no one with a kid ever sees again. Every morning I woke up energized to &lt;strong&gt;tell the Internet important things&lt;/strong&gt;!&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Your Cloud Consultant Probably Sucks</title><link>/blog/your-cloud-consultant-probably-sucks/</link><pubDate>Mon, 31 Oct 2016 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/your-cloud-consultant-probably-sucks/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;There is a disturbing consistency in the kinds of project requests I see these days. Organizations call me because they are in the midst of their first transition to cloud, and they are spending many months planning out their exact AWS environment and all the security controls “before we move any workloads up”. More often than not some consulting firm advised them they need to spend 4-9 months building out 1-2 virtual networks in their cloud provider and implementing all the security controls before they can actually start in the cloud.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>The Difference between SecDevOps and Rugged DevOps</title><link>/blog/the-difference-between-secdevops-and-rugged-devops/</link><pubDate>Wed, 26 Oct 2016 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/the-difference-between-secdevops-and-rugged-devops/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Adrian here.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I wanted to do a quick post on a question I’ve been getting a lot: “Is there a difference between SecDevOps, Rugged DevOps, DevSecOps, and the rest of those various terms? Aren’t they all the same?”&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>SAP Cloud Security: Contracts</title><link>/blog/sap-cloud-security-contracts/</link><pubDate>Mon, 24 Oct 2016 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/sap-cloud-security-contracts/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;This post will discuss the division of responsibility between a cloud provider and you as a tenant, and how to define aspects of that relationship in your service contract. Renting a platform from a service provider does not mean you can afford to cede all security responsibility. Cloud services free you from many traditional IT jobs, but &lt;em&gt;you&lt;/em&gt; must still address security. The cloud provider assumes some security responsibilities, but many still fall into your lap, while others are shared. The administration and security guides don’t spell out all the details of how security works behind the scenes, or what the provider &lt;em&gt;really&lt;/em&gt; provides. Grey areas should be defined and clarified in your contract up fron. During an incident response is a terrible time to discover what SAP &lt;em&gt;actually&lt;/em&gt; offers.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Endpoint Advanced Protection: The Evolution of Prevention</title><link>/blog/endpoint-advanced-protection-the-evolution-of-prevention/</link><pubDate>Mon, 17 Oct 2016 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/endpoint-advanced-protection-the-evolution-of-prevention/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;As we discussed in &lt;a href="https://securosis.com/blog/endpoint-advanced-protection-the-endpoint-protection-lifecycle"&gt;our last post&lt;/a&gt;, there is a logical lifecycle which you can implement to protect endpoints. Once you know what you need to protect and how vulnerable the devices are, you try to &lt;em&gt;prevent&lt;/em&gt; attacks, right? Was that a snicker? You’ve been reading the trade press and security marketing telling you prevention is futile, so you’re a bit skeptical. You have every right to be – time and again you have had to clean up ransomware attacks (hopefully before they encrypt entire file servers), and you detect command and control traffic indicating popped devices frequently. A sense of futility regarding actually preventing compromise is all too common.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Assembling a Container Security Program [New Series]</title><link>/blog/assembling-a-container-security-program-new-series/</link><pubDate>Tue, 04 Oct 2016 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/assembling-a-container-security-program-new-series/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;The explosive growth of containers is not surprising – technologies such as Docker address several problems facing developers when they deploy applications. Developers &lt;em&gt;need&lt;/em&gt; simple packaging, rapid deployment, reduced environmental dependancies, support for micro-services, and horizontal scalability – all of which containers provide, making them very compelling. Yet this generic model of packaged services, where the environment is designed to treat each container as a “unit of service” sharply reduces transparency and auditability (by design) and gives security pros nightmares. We run more code and run it faster, begging the question, “How can you introduce security without losing the benefits of containers?”&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Securing SAP Clouds [New Series]</title><link>/blog/securing-sap-clouds-new-series/</link><pubDate>Mon, 03 Oct 2016 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/securing-sap-clouds-new-series/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Every enterprise uses cloud computing services to some degree – tools such as Gmail, Twitter, and Dropbox are ubiquitous; as are business applications like Salesforce, ServiceNow, and Quickbooks. Cost savings, operational stability, and reduced management effort are all proven advantages. But when we consider moving back-office infrastructure – systems at the heart of business – there is significant angst and uncertainty among IT and security professionals. For big and complex applications like SAP, they wonder if cloud services are a viable option. The problem is that security is not optional, but actually critical. For folks operating in a traditional on-premise environment, it is often unclear how to adapt the security model to an unfamiliar environment where they only have partial control.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Endpoint Advanced Protection: The Endpoint Protection Lifecycle</title><link>/blog/endpoint-advanced-protection-the-endpoint-protection-lifecycle/</link><pubDate>Wed, 28 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/endpoint-advanced-protection-the-endpoint-protection-lifecycle/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;As we return to our Endpoint Advanced Protection series, let’s dig into the &lt;em&gt;lifecycle&lt;/em&gt; alluded to at the end of our &lt;a href="https://securosis.com/blog/endpoint-advanced-protection-the-state-of-the-endpoint-security-union"&gt;introduction&lt;/a&gt;. We laid out a fairly straightforward set of activities required to protect endpoint devices. But we all know &lt;em&gt;straightforward&lt;/em&gt; doesn’t mean &lt;em&gt;easy&lt;/em&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Incite 8/31/2016: Meetings: No Thanks</title><link>/blog/incite-8-31-2016-meetings-no-thanks/</link><pubDate>Wed, 31 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/incite-8-31-2016-meetings-no-thanks/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;It’s been a long time since I had an office job. I got fired from my last in November 2005. I had another job since then, but I commuted to Boston. So I was in the office maybe 2-3 days a week. But usually not. That means I rarely have a bad commute. I work from wherever I want, usually some coffee shop with headphones on, or in a quiet enough corner to take a call. I spend some time in the home office when I need to record a webcast or record a video with Rich and Adrian.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Nuke It from Orbit</title><link>/blog/nuke-it-from-orbit/</link><pubDate>Wed, 31 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/nuke-it-from-orbit/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I had a call today, that went pretty much like all my other calls.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;An organization wants to move to the cloud. Scratch that – they &lt;em&gt;are&lt;/em&gt; moving, quickly. The team on the phone was working hard to figure out their architectures and security requirements. These weren’t ostriches sticking their heads in the sand, they were very cognizant of many of the changes cloud computing forces, and were working hard to enable their organization to move as quickly and safely as possible. They were not blockers. The company was big.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>New Paper: Understanding and Selecting RASP</title><link>/blog/new-paper-understanding-and-selecting-rasp/</link><pubDate>Mon, 29 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/new-paper-understanding-and-selecting-rasp/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;We are pleased to announce the availability of our Understanding RASP (Runtime Application Self-Protection) research paper. We would like to heartily thank &lt;a href="https://www.immun.io/securosis-runtime-application-self-protection-report"&gt;Immunio&lt;/a&gt; for licensing this content. Without this type of support we could not bring this level of research to you, both free of charge and without requiring registration. We think this research paper will help developers and security professionals who are tackling application security from within.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Endpoint Advanced Protection: The State of the Endpoint Security Union</title><link>/blog/endpoint-advanced-protection-the-state-of-the-endpoint-security-union/</link><pubDate>Wed, 17 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/endpoint-advanced-protection-the-state-of-the-endpoint-security-union/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Innovation comes and goes in security. Back in 2007 network security had been stagnant for more than a few years. It was the same old, same old. Firewall does this. IPS does that. Web proxy does a third thing. None of them did their jobs particularly well, struggling to keep up with attacks encapsulated in common protocols. Then the next generation firewall emerged, and it turned out that regardless of what it was called, it was more than a firewall. It was the evolution of the network security gateway.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Thoughts on Apple’s Bug Bounty Program</title><link>/blog/thoughts-on-apples-bug-bounty-program-2/</link><pubDate>Thu, 04 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/thoughts-on-apples-bug-bounty-program-2/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;It should surprise no one that Apple is writing their own playbook for bug bounties. Both bigger, with the largest potential payout I’m aware of, and smaller, focusing on a specific set of vulnerabilities with, for now, a limited number of researchers. Many, including myself, are definitely free to be surprised that Apple is launching a program at all. I never considered it a certainty, nor even necessarily something Apple &lt;em&gt;had to do&lt;/em&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Incident Response in the Cloud Age [new paper]</title><link>/blog/incident-response-in-the-cloud-age-new-paper/</link><pubDate>Thu, 28 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/incident-response-in-the-cloud-age-new-paper/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Incident response is always tough today. But when you need to deal with faster networks, an increasingly mobile workforce, and that thing called cloud computing, IR gets even harder. Sure, there are new technologies like threat intelligence, better network and endpoint telemetry, and analytics to help you investigate faster. But don’t think you’ll be able to do the same thing tomorrow as you did yesterday. You will need to evolve your incident response process and technology to handle the cloud age, just like you have had to adapt many of your other security functions to this new reality.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;img src="CAIR-Cover.png" alt=""&gt;&lt;br&gt;
Our Incident Response in the Cloud Age paper digs into impacts of the cloud, faster and virtualized networks, and threat intelligence on your incident response process. Then we discuss how to streamline response in light of the lack of people to perform the heavy lifting of incident response. Finally we bring everything together with a scenario to illuminate the concepts.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Incite 7/27/2016: The 3 As</title><link>/blog/incite-7-27-2016-the-3-as/</link><pubDate>Tue, 26 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/incite-7-27-2016-the-3-as/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;One of the hardest things for me to realize has been that I don’t control everything. I spent years railing against the machine, and getting upset when nothing changed. Active-minded people (as opposed to passive) believe they make their own opportunities and control their destiny, sometimes by force of will. Over the past few years, I needed a way to handle this reality and not make myself crazy. So I came up with 3 “A” words that make sense to me. The first ‘A’, &lt;em&gt;Acceptance,&lt;/em&gt; is very difficult for me because it goes against most of what I believe. When you think about it, acceptance seems so defeatist. How can you push things forward and improve them if you accept the way they are now? I struggled with this for the first 5 years I practiced mindfulness.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Summary: News…. and pulling an AMI from Packer and Jenkins</title><link>/blog/summary-news-and-pulling-an-ami-from-packer-and-jenkins-2/</link><pubDate>Thu, 14 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/summary-news-and-pulling-an-ami-from-packer-and-jenkins-2/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Rich here.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Before I get into tech content, a quick personal note. I just signed up for my first charity athletic event, and will be riding 250 miles in 3 days to support challenged athletes. I’ve covered the event costs, so all donations go right to the cause. &lt;a href="http://support.challengedathletes.org/site/TR/Events/MDC-NoTeams?px=1199088&amp;amp;pg=personal&amp;amp;fr_id=1202"&gt;Click here if you are interested in supporting the Challenged Athletes Foundation&lt;/a&gt; (and my first attempt at fundraising since I sold lightbulbs for the Boy Scouts. Seriously. Lightbulbs. Really crappy ones which burned out in months, making it very embarrassing to ever hit that neighborhood again. Then again, that probably prepared me for a career in security sales).&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Building a Threat Intelligence Program [New Paper]</title><link>/blog/building-a-threat-intelligence-program-new-paper/</link><pubDate>Thu, 30 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/building-a-threat-intelligence-program-new-paper/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Threat Intelligence has made a significant difference in how organizations focus resources on their most significant risks. Yet far too many organizations continue to focus on very tactical use cases for external threat data. These help, but they underutilizing the intelligence’s capabilities and potential. The time has come to advance threat intelligence into the broader and more structured TI program to ensure systematic, consistent, and repeatable value. A program must account for ongoing attack indicator changes and keep up with evolution in adversaries’ tactics.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Managed Security Monitoring: Selecting a Service Provider</title><link>/blog/managed-security-monitoring-selecting-a-service-provider/</link><pubDate>Thu, 30 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/managed-security-monitoring-selecting-a-service-provider/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Based on the discussion &lt;a href="https://securosis.com/blog/managed-security-monitoring-use-cases"&gt;in our first post&lt;/a&gt;, you have decided to move toward a managed security monitoring service. Awesome! That was the easy part. Now you need to figure out what kind of deployment model makes sense, and then do the hard work of actually selecting the best service provider &lt;em&gt;for you&lt;/em&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Incite 6/29/16: Gone Fishin’ (Proverbially)</title><link>/blog/incite-6-29-16-gone-fishin-proverbially-2/</link><pubDate>Wed, 29 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/incite-6-29-16-gone-fishin-proverbially-2/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;It was a great Incite. I wrote it on the flight to Europe for the second leg of my summer vacation. I said magical stuff. Such depth and perspective, I even amazed myself. When I got to the hotel in Florence and went to post the Incite on the blog, it was gone. That’s right: G. O. N. E.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Managed Security Monitoring: Use Cases</title><link>/blog/managed-security-monitoring-use-cases/</link><pubDate>Mon, 27 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/managed-security-monitoring-use-cases/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Many security professionals feel the deck is stacked against them. Adversaries continue to improve their techniques, aided by plentiful malware kits and botnet infrastructures. Continued digitization at pretty much every enterprise means everything of interest in on some system somewhere. Don’t forget the double whammy of mobile and cloud, which democratizes access without geographic boundaries, and takes the one bastion of control, the traditional data center, out of your direct control. Are we having fun yet?&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Summary: Modifying rsyslog to Add Cloud Instance Metadata</title><link>/blog/summary-modifying-rsyslog-to-add-cloud-instance-metadata/</link><pubDate>Thu, 23 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/summary-modifying-rsyslog-to-add-cloud-instance-metadata/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Rich here. &lt;em&gt;Quick note: I basically wrote an entire technical post for Tool of the Week, so feel free to skip down if that’s why you’re reading.&lt;/em&gt; Ah, summer. As someone who works at home and has children, I’m learning the pains of summer break. Sure, it’s a wonderful time without homework fights and after-school activities, but it also means all 5 of us in the house nearly every day. It’s a bit distracting. I mean do you have any idea how to tell a 3-year-old you cannot ditch work to play Disney Infinity on the Xbox? Me neither, which explains my productivity slowdown. I’ve actually been pretty busy at ‘real work’, mostly building content for our new &lt;a href="https://securosis.com/blog/updates-to-our-black-hat-cloud-security-training-classes"&gt;Advanced Cloud Security course&lt;/a&gt; (it’s sold out, but we still have room in our Hands-On class). Plus a bunch of recent cloud security assessments for various clients. I have been seeing some interesting consistencies, and will try to write those up after I get these other projects knocked off. People are definitely getting a better handle on the cloud, but they still tend to make similar mistakes. With that, let’s jump right in…&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Shining a Light on Shadow Devices [New Paper]</title><link>/blog/shining-a-light-on-shadow-devices-new-paper/</link><pubDate>Wed, 15 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/shining-a-light-on-shadow-devices-new-paper/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Visible devices are only some of the network-connected devices in your environment. There are hundreds, quite possibly thousands, of other devices you don’t know about on your network. You don’t scan them periodically, and you have no idea of their security posture. Each one can be attacked, and might provide an adversary with opportunity to gain presence in your environment. Your attack surface is much larger than you thought. In our Shining a Light on Shadow Devices paper, we discuss the attacks on these devices which can become an issue on your network, along with some tactics to&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Getting the SWIFT Boot</title><link>/blog/getting-the-swift-boot-2/</link><pubDate>Mon, 13 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/getting-the-swift-boot-2/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;As long as I have been in security and following the markets, I have observed that no one &lt;em&gt;says&lt;/em&gt; security is unimportant. Not out loud, anyway. But their actions usually show a different view. Maybe there is a little more funding. Maybe somewhat better visibility at the board level. But mostly security gets a lot of lip service.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Understanding and Selecting RASP: Buyers Guide</title><link>/blog/understanding-and-selecting-rasp-buyers-guide/</link><pubDate>Mon, 13 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/understanding-and-selecting-rasp-buyers-guide/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Before we jump into today’s post, we want to thank Immunio for expressing interest in licensing this content. This type of support enables us to bring quality research to you, free of charge. If you are interested in licensing this Securosis research as well, please let us know. And we want to thank all of you who have been commenting throughout this series – we have received many good comments and questions. We have in fact edited most of the posts to integrate your feedback, and added new sections to address your questions. This research is certainly better for it!&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Building Resilient Cloud Network Architectures [New Paper]</title><link>/blog/building-resilient-cloud-network-architectures-new-paper/</link><pubDate>Thu, 09 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/building-resilient-cloud-network-architectures-new-paper/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;Building Resilient Cloud Network Architectures&lt;/em&gt; builds on our &lt;a href="https://securosis.com/research/papers/pragmatic-security-for-cloud-and-hybrid-networks"&gt;Pragmatic Security Cloud and Hybrid Networks&lt;/a&gt; research, focusing on cloud-native network architectures that provide security and availability infeasible in a traditional data center. The key is that cloud computing provides architectural options which are either impossible or economically infeasible in traditional data centers, enabling greater protection and better availability.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Summary: June 10, 2016</title><link>/blog/summary-june-10-2016/</link><pubDate>Thu, 09 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/summary-june-10-2016/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Adrian here.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A phone call about Activity Monitoring administrative actions on mainframes, followed by a call on security architectures for new applications in AWS. A call on SAP vulnerability scans, followed by a call on Runtime Application Self-Protection. A call on protecting relational databases against SQL injection, followed by a discussion of relevant values to key security event data for a big data analytics project. Consulting with a firm which releases code every 12 months, and discussing release management with a firm that is moving to two-a-day in a continuous deployment model. This is what my call logs look like.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Evolving Encryption Key Management Best Practices: Use Cases</title><link>/blog/evolving-encryption-key-management-best-practices-use-cases/</link><pubDate>Wed, 08 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/evolving-encryption-key-management-best-practices-use-cases/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;This is the third in a three-part series on evolving encryption key management best practices. The first post is&lt;a href="https://securosis.com/blog/evolving-encryption-key-management-best-practices-introduction"&gt;available here.&lt;/a&gt; This research is also &lt;a href="https://github.com/Securosis/keymanagementbestpractices/blob/master/Evolving%20Encryption%20Key%20Management%20Best%20Practices%20for%20the%20Data%20Center.md"&gt;posted at GitHub&lt;/a&gt; for public review and feedback. My thanks to Hewlett Packard Enterprise for licensing this research, in accordance with our strict &lt;a href="https://securosis.com/about/totally-transparent-research"&gt;Totally Transparent Research policy&lt;/a&gt;, which enables us to release our independent and objective research for free.&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Incite 6/7/2016: Nature</title><link>/blog/incite-6-7-2016-nature/</link><pubDate>Wed, 08 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/incite-6-7-2016-nature/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Like many of you, I spend a lot of time sitting on my butt banging away at my keyboard. I&amp;rsquo;m lucky that the nature of my work allows me to switch locations frequently, and I can choose to have a decent view of the world at any given time. Whether it&amp;rsquo;s looking at a wide assortment of people in the various Starbucks I frequent, my home office overlooking the courtyard, or pretty much any place I can open my computer on my frequent business travels. Others get to spend all day in their comfy (or not so comfy) cubicles, and maybe stroll to the cafeteria once a day.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Mr. Market Loves Ransomware</title><link>/blog/mr-market-loves-ransomware/</link><pubDate>Tue, 07 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/mr-market-loves-ransomware/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;The old business rule is: when something works, do more of it. By that measure ransomware is clearly working. One indication is the number of new domains popping up which are associated with ransomware attacks. According to an &lt;a href="http://seekingalpha.com/pr/16505743-ransomware-domains-increase-35-fold-q1-2016-according-infoblox-dns-threat-index"&gt;Infoblox research report&lt;/a&gt; (and they provide DNS services, so they should know), there was a 35x increase in ransomware domains in Q1.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Building a Vendor (IT) Risk Management Program [New Paper]</title><link>/blog/building-a-vendor-it-risk-management-program-new-paper/</link><pubDate>Mon, 06 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/building-a-vendor-it-risk-management-program-new-paper/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;In &lt;em&gt;Building a Vendor (IT) Risk Management Program,&lt;/em&gt; we explain why you can no longer ignore the risk presented by third-party vendors and other business partners, including managing an expanded attack surface and new regulations demanding effective management of vendor risk. We then offer ideas for how to build a structured and systematic program to assess vendor (IT) risk, and take action when necessary.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Evolving Encryption Key Management Best Practices: Part 2</title><link>/blog/evolving-encryption-key-management-best-practices-part-2/</link><pubDate>Fri, 03 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/evolving-encryption-key-management-best-practices-part-2/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;This is the second in a four-part series on evolving encryption key management best practices. The first post is&lt;a href="https://securosis.com/blog/evolving-encryption-key-management-best-practices-introduction"&gt;available here.&lt;/a&gt; This research is also &lt;a href="https://github.com/Securosis/keymanagementbestpractices/blob/master/Evolving%20Encryption%20Key%20Management%20Best%20Practices%20for%20the%20Data%20Center.md"&gt;posted at GitHub&lt;/a&gt; for public review and feedback. My thanks to Hewlett Packard Enterprise for licensing this research, in accordance with our strict &lt;a href="https://securosis.com/about/totally-transparent-research"&gt;Totally Transparent Research policy&lt;/a&gt;, which enables us to release our independent and objective research for free.&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Incident Response in the Cloud Age: In Action</title><link>/blog/incident-response-in-the-cloud-age-in-action/</link><pubDate>Thu, 02 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/incident-response-in-the-cloud-age-in-action/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;When we do a process-centric research project, it works best to wrap up the series with a scenario that really illuminates the concepts we&amp;rsquo;ve discussed throughout the series and make things a bit more tangible.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Summary: June 3, 2016</title><link>/blog/summary-june-3-2016/</link><pubDate>Thu, 02 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/summary-june-3-2016/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Adrian here.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Unlike my business partners who have been logging thousands of air miles, speaking at conferences and with clients around the country, I have been at home. And with the mildest spring in Phoenix&amp;rsquo;s recored history, it&amp;rsquo;s been a blessing as we&amp;rsquo;re 45 days past the point we typically encounter 100 degree days. Bike rides. Hiking. Running. That is, when I get a chance to sneak outdoors and enjoy it. With our pivot there is &lt;em&gt;even more&lt;/em&gt; writing and research going on than normal, if that’s even possible. You will begin to see the results of this work within the next couple of weeks, and we are looking forward to putting a fresh face on the business. That launch will coincide with us posting lots more hands on advice for cloud security and migrations.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Firestarter: Where to start?</title><link>/blog/firestarter-where-to-start/</link><pubDate>Tue, 31 May 2016 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/firestarter-where-to-start/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;It’s long past the day we need to convince you that cloud and DevOps is a thing. We all know it’s happening, but one of the biggest questions we get is “Where do I start?” In this episode we scratch the surface of how to start approaching the problem when you don’t get to join a hot unicorn startup and build everything from scratch with an infinite budget behind you.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Understanding and Selecting RASP: Integration</title><link>/blog/understanding-and-selecting-rasp-integration/</link><pubDate>Tue, 31 May 2016 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/understanding-and-selecting-rasp-integration/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;This post will offer examples for how to integrate RASP into a development pipeline. We’ll cover both how RASP fits into the technology stack, and development processes used to deliver applications. We will close this post with a detailed discussion of how RASP differs from other security technologies, and discuss advantages and tradeoffs compared to other security technologies.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Incident Response in the Cloud Age: Addressing the Skills Gap</title><link>/blog/incident-response-in-the-cloud-age-addressing-the-skills-gap/</link><pubDate>Thu, 26 May 2016 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/incident-response-in-the-cloud-age-addressing-the-skills-gap/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;As we described in &lt;a href="https://securosis.com/blog/incident-response-in-the-cloud-age-more-data-no-data-or-both"&gt;our last post&lt;/a&gt;, incident response in the Cloud Age requires an evolved response process, in light of data sources you didn’t have before, including external threat intelligence, and the ability to analyze data in ways that weren’t possible just a few years ago. You also need to factor in the fact that access to specific telemetry, especially around the network, is limited because you don’t have control over networks anymore.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Incite 5/25/2016: Transitions</title><link>/blog/incite-5-25-2016-transitions/</link><pubDate>Wed, 25 May 2016 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/incite-5-25-2016-transitions/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I have always been pretty transparent about my life in the Incite. I figured maybe readers could learn something that helps them in life through my trials and tribulations, and if not perhaps they’d be entertained a bit. I also write Incites as a journal of sorts for myself. A couple times a year I search through some old Incites and remember where I was at that point in my life. There really wasn’t much I wouldn’t share, but I wondered if at some point I’d find a line I wouldn’t cross in writing about my life publicly.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Incident Response in the Cloud Age: More Data, No Data, or Both?</title><link>/blog/incident-response-in-the-cloud-age-more-data-no-data-or-both/</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 May 2016 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/incident-response-in-the-cloud-age-more-data-no-data-or-both/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;As we discussed in the &lt;a href="https://securosis.com/blog/incident-response-in-the-cloud-age-shifting-foundations"&gt;first post&lt;/a&gt; of this series, incident response needs to change, given disruptions such as cloud computing and the availability of new data sources, including external threat intelligence. We wrote a paper called &lt;a href="https://securosis.com/research/papers/leveraging-threat-intelligence-in-security-monitoring"&gt;Leveraging Threat Intelligence in Incident Response (TI+IR)&lt;/a&gt; back in 2014 to update our existing I/R process map. Here is what we came up with:&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Understanding and Selecting RASP: Use Cases</title><link>/blog/understanding-and-selecting-rasp-use-cases/</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 May 2016 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/understanding-and-selecting-rasp-use-cases/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;As you might expect, the primary function of RASP is to protect web applications against known and emerging threats; it is typically deployed to block attacks at the application layer, before vulnerabilities can be exploited. There is no question that the industry needs application security platforms – major new vulnerabilities are disclosed just about every week. And there are good reasons companies look to outside security vendors to help protect their applications. Most often we hear that firms simply have too many critical vulnerabilities to fix in a timely manner, with many reporting their backlog would take years to fix. In many cases the issue is legacy applications – ones which probably should never have been put on the Internet. These applications are often unsupported, with the engineers who developed them no longer available, or the platforms so fragile that they become unstable if security fixes are applied. And in many cases it is simply economics: the cost of securing the application itself is financially unfeasible, so companies are willing to accept the risk, instead choosing to address threats externally as best they can.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Evolving Encryption Key Management Best Practices: Introduction</title><link>/blog/evolving-encryption-key-management-best-practices-introduction/</link><pubDate>Mon, 23 May 2016 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/evolving-encryption-key-management-best-practices-introduction/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;This is the first in a four-part series on evolving encryption key management best practices. This research is also&lt;a href="https://github.com/Securosis/keymanagementbestpractices/blob/master/Evolving%20Encryption%20Key%20Management%20Best%20Practices%20for%20the%20Data%20Center.md"&gt;posted at GitHub&lt;/a&gt; for public review and feedback. My thanks to Hewlett Packard Enterprise for licensing this research, in accordance with our strict &lt;a href="https://securosis.com/about/totally-transparent-research"&gt;Totally Transparent Research policy&lt;/a&gt;, which enables us to release our independent and objective research for free.&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Incite 5/20/2016: Dance of Joy</title><link>/blog/incite-5-20-2016-dance-of-joy/</link><pubDate>Fri, 20 May 2016 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/incite-5-20-2016-dance-of-joy/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Perception of time is a funny thing. As we wind down the school year in Atlanta, it’s hard to believe how quickly this year has flown by. It seems like yesterday XX1 was starting high school and the twins were starting middle school. I was talking to XX1 last week as she was driving herself to school (yes, that’s a surreal statement) and she mentioned that she couldn’t believe the school year was over. I tried to explain that as you get older, time seems to move more quickly.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Incident Response in the Cloud Age: Shifting Foundations</title><link>/blog/incident-response-in-the-cloud-age-shifting-foundations/</link><pubDate>Thu, 19 May 2016 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/incident-response-in-the-cloud-age-shifting-foundations/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Since we published our &lt;a href="https://securosis.com/research/papers/react-faster-and-better-new-approaches-for-advanced-incident-response"&gt;React Faster and Better&lt;/a&gt; research and &lt;a href="https://securosis.com/blog/incident-response-fundamentals-index-of-posts/"&gt;Incident Response Fundamentals&lt;/a&gt;, quite a bit has changed relative to responding to incidents. First and foremost, incident response is a &lt;em&gt;thing&lt;/em&gt; now. Not that it wasn’t a discipline mature security organizations focused on before 2012, but since then a lot more resources and funding have shifted away from ineffective prevention towards detection and response. Which we think is awesome.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Summary: May 19, 2016</title><link>/blog/summary-may-19-2016/</link><pubDate>Thu, 19 May 2016 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/summary-may-19-2016/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Rich here. Not a lot of news from us this week, because we’ve mostly been traveling, and for Mike and me the kids’ school year is coming to a close. Last week I was at the &lt;a href="https://www.rmisc.org/"&gt;Rocky Mountain Information Security Conference&lt;/a&gt; in Denver. The Denver ISSA puts on a great show, but due to some family scheduling I didn’t get to see as many sessions as I hoped. I presented my usual pragmatic cloud pitch, a modification of my RSA session from this year. It seems one of the big issues organizations are still facing is a mixture of where to get started on cloud/DevOps, with switching over to understand and implement the fundamentals. For example, one person in my session mentioned his team &lt;em&gt;thought&lt;/em&gt; they were doing DevOps, but actually mashed some tools together without understanding the philosophy or building a continuous integration pipeline. Needless to say, it didn’t go well. In other news, our advanced Black Hat class sold out, but there are still openings in our main class &lt;a href="https://securosis.com/blog/updates-to-our-black-hat-cloud-security-training-classes"&gt;I highlighted the course differences in a post.&lt;/a&gt; You can &lt;a href="http://eepurl.com/bQfTPH"&gt;subscribe to only the Friday Summary&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Understanding and Selecting RASP: Technology Overview</title><link>/blog/understanding-and-selecting-rasp-technology-overview/</link><pubDate>Tue, 17 May 2016 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/understanding-and-selecting-rasp-technology-overview/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;This post will discuss technical facets of RASP products, including how the technology works, how it integrates into an application environment, and the advantages or disadvantages of each. We will also spend some time on which application platforms supported are today, as this is one area where each provider is limited and working to expand, so it will impact your selection process. We will also consider a couple aspects of RASP technology which we expect to evolve over next couple years.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Shining a Light on Shadow Devices: Seeing into the Shadows</title><link>/blog/shining-a-light-on-shadow-devices-seeing-into-the-shadows/</link><pubDate>Mon, 16 May 2016 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/shining-a-light-on-shadow-devices-seeing-into-the-shadows/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;As we have posted this Shadow Devices series, we have discussed the millions (likely billions) of new devices which will be connecting to networks over the coming decade. Clearly many of them won’t be traditional computer devices, which can be scanned and assessed for security issues. We called these other devices &lt;em&gt;shadow devices&lt;/em&gt; because this is about more than the “Internet of Things” – &lt;em&gt;any&lt;/em&gt; networked device which can be used to steal information – whether directly or by providing a stepping stone to targeted information – needs to be considered.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>SIEM Kung Fu [New Paper]</title><link>/blog/siem-kung-fu-new-paper/</link><pubDate>Tue, 10 May 2016 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/siem-kung-fu-new-paper/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;In the &lt;em&gt;SIEM Kung Fu&lt;/em&gt; paper, we tell you what you need to know to get the most out of your SIEM, and solve the problems you face today by increasing your capabilities (the promised Kung Fu).&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Shining a Light on Shadow Devices: Attacks</title><link>/blog/shining-a-light-on-shadow-devices-attacks/</link><pubDate>Mon, 09 May 2016 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/shining-a-light-on-shadow-devices-attacks/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;What is the real risk of the &lt;em&gt;Shadow Devices&lt;/em&gt; we described back in &lt;a href="https://securosis.com/blog/shadow-devices-the-exponentially-expanding-attack-surface"&gt;our first post&lt;/a&gt;? It is clear that more organizations don’t really take their risks seriously. They certainly don’t have workarounds in place, or proactively segment their environments to ensure that compromising these devices doesn’t provide opportunity for attackers to gain presence and a foothold in their environments. Let’s dig into three broad device categories to understand what attacks look like.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Understanding and Selecting RASP *edited* [New Series]</title><link>/blog/understanding-and-selecting-rasp-new-series/</link><pubDate>Mon, 09 May 2016 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/understanding-and-selecting-rasp-new-series/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;In 2015 we researched &lt;a href="https://cdn.securosis.com/assets/library/reports/Security_Into_DevOps_Final.pdf"&gt;Putting Security Into DevOps&lt;/a&gt;, with a close look at how automated continuous deployment and DevOps impacted IT and application security. We found DevOps provided a very real path to improve application security using continuous automated testing, run each time new code was checked in. We were surprised to discover developers and IT teams taking a larger role in selecting security solutions, and bringing a new set of buying criteria to the table. Security products must do more than address application security issues; they need to mesh with continuous integration and deployment approaches, with automated capabilities and better integration with developer tools.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Updates to Our Black Hat Cloud Security Training Classes</title><link>/blog/updates-to-our-black-hat-cloud-security-training-classes/</link><pubDate>Mon, 09 May 2016 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/updates-to-our-black-hat-cloud-security-training-classes/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;We have been getting questions on our training classes this year, so I thought I should update everyone on major updates to our ‘old’ class, and what to expect from our ‘advanced’ class. The short version is that we are adding new material to our basic class, to align with upcoming Cloud Security Alliance changes and cover DevOps. It will still include some advanced material, but we are assuming the top 10% (in terms of technical skills) of students will move to our new advanced class instead, enabling us to focus the basic class on the meaty part of the bell curve.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Summary: May 5, 2016</title><link>/blog/summary-may-5-2016/</link><pubDate>Fri, 06 May 2016 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/summary-may-5-2016/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Rich here.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;It’s been a busy couple weeks, and the pace is only ramping up. This week I gave a presentation and a workshop at Interop. It seemed to go well, and the networking-focused audience was very receptive. Next week I’m out at the &lt;a href="http://rmisc.org"&gt;Rocky Mountain Infosec Conference&lt;/a&gt;, which is really just an excuse to spend a few more days back near my old home in Colorado. I get home just in time for my wife to take a trip, then even before she’s back I’m off to Atlanta to keynote an &lt;a href="http://bit.ly/1StVgNS"&gt;IBM Cybersecurity Seminar&lt;/a&gt; (free, if you are in the area). I’m kind of psyched for that one because it’s at the aquarium, and I’ve been begging Mike to take me for years.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Updating and Pruning our Mailing Lists</title><link>/blog/updating-and-pruning-our-mailing-lists/</link><pubDate>Wed, 04 May 2016 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/updating-and-pruning-our-mailing-lists/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;As part of updating All Things Securosis, the time has come to migrate our mailing lists to a new provider (MailChimp, for the curious). The CAPTCHA at our old provider wasn’t working properly, so people couldn’t sign up. I’m not sure if that’s technically irony for a security company, but it was certainly unfortunate. So…&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Firestarter: What the hell is a cloud anyway?</title><link>/blog/firestarter-what-the-hell-is-a-cloud-anyway/</link><pubDate>Tue, 03 May 2016 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/firestarter-what-the-hell-is-a-cloud-anyway/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;In our wanderings we’ve noticed that when we pull our heads out of the bubble, not everyone necessarily understands what cloud is or where it’s going. Heck, many smart IT people are still framing it within the context of what they currently do. It’s only natural, especially when they get crappy advice from clueless consultants, but it certainly can lead you down some ugly paths. This week Mike, Adrian and Rich are also joined by Dave Lewis (who accidentally sat down next to Rich at a conference) to talk about how people see cloud, the gaps, and how to navigate the waters.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Summary: April 28, 2016</title><link>/blog/summary-april-28-2016/</link><pubDate>Thu, 28 Apr 2016 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/summary-april-28-2016/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Rich here.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Okay, have I mentioned how impatient I’m getting about updating our site? Alas, there is only so fast you can push a good design and implementation. The foundation is all set and we hope to start transferring everything into our new AWS architecture within the next month.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Incite 4/27/2016: Tap the B.R.A.K.E.S.</title><link>/blog/incite-4-27-2016-tap-the-b-r-a-k-e-s/</link><pubDate>Wed, 27 Apr 2016 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/incite-4-27-2016-tap-the-b-r-a-k-e-s/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I mentioned back in January that &lt;a href="https://securosis.com/blog/incite-1-13-2016-permitted"&gt;XX1 has gotten her driver’s permit&lt;/a&gt; and was in command of a two ton weapon on a regular basis. Driving with her has been, uh, &lt;em&gt;interesting&lt;/em&gt;. I try to give her an opportunity to drive where possible, like when I have to get her to school in the morning. She can navigate the couple of miles through traffic on the way to her school. And she drives to/from her tutor as well, but that’s still largely local travel.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Building a Vendor IT Risk Management Program: Ongoing Monitoring and Communication</title><link>/blog/building-a-vendor-it-risk-management-program-ongoing-monitoring-and-communi/</link><pubDate>Mon, 25 Apr 2016 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/building-a-vendor-it-risk-management-program-ongoing-monitoring-and-communi/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;As &lt;a href="https://securosis.com/blog/building-a-vendor-it-risk-management-program-evaluating-vendor-risk"&gt;we mentioned last post&lt;/a&gt;, after you figure out what risk means to your organization, and determine the best way to quantify and rank your vendors in terms that concept of risk, you’ll need to revisit your risk assessment; because security in general, and each vendor’s environment specifically, is dynamic and constantly changing. We also need to address how to deal with vendor issues (breaches and otherwise) – both within your organization, and potentially to customers as well.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Building a Vendor IT Risk Management Program: Evaluating Vendor Risk</title><link>/blog/building-a-vendor-it-risk-management-program-evaluating-vendor-risk/</link><pubDate>Fri, 22 Apr 2016 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/building-a-vendor-it-risk-management-program-evaluating-vendor-risk/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;As we discussed in the &lt;a href="https://securosis.com/blog/building-a-vendor-it-risk-management-program-understanding-vendor-it-risk"&gt;first post in this series&lt;/a&gt;, whether it’s thanks to increasingly tighter business processes/operations with vendors andtrading partners, or to regulation (especially in finance) you can no longer ignore vendor risk management. So we delved into the &lt;a href="https://securosis.com/blog/building-a-vendor-it-risk-management-program-program-structure"&gt;structure&lt;/a&gt; and mapped out a few key aspects of a VRM program. Of course we are focused on the IT aspects of vendor management, which should be a significant component of a broader risk management approach for your environment.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Friday Summary: April 21, 2016</title><link>/blog/summary-april-21-2016/</link><pubDate>Thu, 21 Apr 2016 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/summary-april-21-2016/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Adrian here.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Starting with the 2008 RSA conference, Rich and Chris Hoff presented each year on the then-current state of cloud services, and predicted where they felt cloud computing was going. This year Mike helped Rich conclude the series with some new predictions, but more importantly they went back to assess the accuracy of previous prognostications. My takeaway is that their predictions for what cloud services would do, and the value they would provide, were pretty well spot on. And in most cases, when a specific tool or product was identified as being critical, they totally missed the mark. Wildly.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>How iMessage distributes security to block “phantom devices”</title><link>/blog/how-imessage-distributes-security-to-block-phantom-devices-2/</link><pubDate>Tue, 19 Apr 2016 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/how-imessage-distributes-security-to-block-phantom-devices-2/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Last Friday I spent some time in a discussion with senior members of Apple’s engineering and security teams. I knew most of the technical content but they really clarified Apple’s security approach, much of which they have never explicitly stated, even on background. Most of that is fodder for my next post, but I wanted to focus on one particular technical feature I have never seen clearly documented before; which both highlights Apple’s approach to security, and shows that iMessage is more secure than I thought.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Summary April 14, 2016</title><link>/blog/summary-april-14-2016/</link><pubDate>Thu, 14 Apr 2016 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/summary-april-14-2016/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Rich here.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Mike, Adrian, and I are just back from a big planning session for what we are calling “Securosis 2.0”. Everything is lining up nicely, and now we mostly just need to get the website updated. We are fully gutting the current design and architecture, and moving everything into AWS. The prototyping is complete and next week I get to build out the deployment pipeline, because we are going with a completely immutable design.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Summary: The Great Vomit Apology</title><link>/blog/summary-vomit/</link><pubDate>Fri, 08 Apr 2016 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/summary-vomit/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Rich here.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I started to write an apology for this week’s Summary, because I missed last week due to an unplanned stomach bug that hit at 4am Thursday, when I normally write these. It was nearly 5 days before I fully recovered. Then I realized I had fully drafted a Summary on March 11 – an abridged version due to my daughter waking up with a stomach infection. It turns out I left that one as a draft, and never even noticed… that’s what kids do to ya.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Maximizing WAF Value: Management</title><link>/blog/maximizing-waf-value-managing-your-waf/</link><pubDate>Thu, 07 Apr 2016 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/maximizing-waf-value-managing-your-waf/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;As described in &lt;a href="https://securosis.com/blog/maximizing-waf-value-deploying-the-waf"&gt;last post&lt;/a&gt;, deploying a WAF requires knowledge of both application security and &lt;em&gt;your&lt;/em&gt; specific application(s). Management it requires an ongoing effort to keep a WAF current with emerging attacks and frequent application changes. Your organization likely adds new applications and changes network architectures at least a couple times a year. We see more and more organizations embracing continuous deployment for their applications. This means application functions and usage are constantly changing as well. So you need to adjust your defenses regularly to keep pace.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Incite 4/6/2016—Hindsight</title><link>/blog/incite-4-6-2016-hindsight-2/</link><pubDate>Wed, 06 Apr 2016 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/incite-4-6-2016-hindsight-2/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;When things don’t go quite as you hoped, it’s human nature to look backwards and question your decisions. If you had done something different maybe the outcome would be better. If you didn’t do the other thing, maybe you’d be in a different spot. We all do it. Some more than others. It’s almost impossible to not wonder what would have been.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Maximizing WAF Value: Deployment</title><link>/blog/maximizing-waf-value-deploying-the-waf/</link><pubDate>Wed, 06 Apr 2016 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/maximizing-waf-value-deploying-the-waf/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Now we will dig into the myriad ways to deploy a Web Application Firewall (WAF), including where to position it and the pros &amp;amp; cons of on-premise devices versus WAF services. A key part of the deployment process is training the WAF for specific applications and setting up the initial rulesets. We will also highlight effective practices for moving from &lt;em&gt;visibility&lt;/em&gt; (getting alerts) to &lt;em&gt;control&lt;/em&gt; (blocking attacks). Finally we will present a Quick Wins scenario because it’s critical for any security technology to get a ‘win’ early in deployment to prove its value.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Maximizing Value From Your WAF [New Series]</title><link>/blog/maximizing-value-from-your-waf-new-series/</link><pubDate>Thu, 31 Mar 2016 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/maximizing-value-from-your-waf-new-series/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Web Application Firewalls (WAFs) have been in production use for well over a decade, maturing from point solutions primarily blocking SQL injection to mature application security tools. In most mature security product categories, such as anti-virus, there hasn’t been much to talk about, aside from complaining that not much has changed over the last decade. WAFs are different: they have continued to evolve in response to new threats, new deployment models, and a more demanding clientele’s need to solve more complicated problems. From SQL injection to cross-site scripting (XSS), from PCI compliance to DDoS protection, and from cross-site request forgeries (CSRF) to 0-day protection, WAFs have continued add capabilities to address emerging use cases. But WAF’s greatest evolution has taken place in areas undergoing heavy disruption, notably cloud computing and threat analytics.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Incite 3/30/2016: Rational People Disagree</title><link>/blog/incite-3-30-2016-rational-people-disagree/</link><pubDate>Wed, 30 Mar 2016 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/incite-3-30-2016-rational-people-disagree/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;It’s definitely a presidential election year here in the US. My Twitter and Facebook feeds are overwhelmed with links about what this politician said and who that one offended. We get to learn how a 70-year old politician got arrested in his 20s and why that matters now. You also get to understand that there are a lot of different perspectives, many of which make absolutely no sense to you. Confirmation bias kicks into high gear, because when you see something you don’t agree with, you instinctively ignore it, or have a million reasons why dead wrong. I know mine does.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Resilient Cloud Network Architectures: Design Patterns</title><link>/blog/resilient-cloud-network-architectures-design-patterns/</link><pubDate>Tue, 29 Mar 2016 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/resilient-cloud-network-architectures-design-patterns/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;We introduced resilient cloud networks in &lt;a href="https://securosis.com/blog/resilient-cloud-network-architectures-fundamentals"&gt;this series’ first post&lt;/a&gt;. We define them as networks using cloud-specific features to provide both stronger security and higher availability for your applications. This post will dig into two different design patterns, and show how cloud networking enables higher resilience.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Securing Hadoop: Security Recommendations for Hadoop [New Paper]</title><link>/blog/securing-hadoop-security-recommendations-for-hadoop-new-paper/</link><pubDate>Tue, 29 Mar 2016 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/securing-hadoop-security-recommendations-for-hadoop-new-paper/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;We are pleased to release our updated white paper on big data security: Securing Hadoop: Security Recommendations for Hadoop Environments. Just about everything has changed in the four years since we published the original. Hadoop has solidified its position as the dominant big data platform, by constantly advancing in function and scale. While the ability to customize a Hadoop cluster to suit diverse needs has been its main driver, the security advances make Hadoop viable for enterprises. Whether embedded directly into Hadoop or deployed as add-on modules, services like identity, encryption, log analysis, key management, cluster validation, and fine-grained authorization are all available. Our goal for this research paper is first to introduce these technologies to IT and security teams, and also to help them assemble these technologies into an coherent security strategy.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Resilient Cloud Network Architectures: Fundamentals</title><link>/blog/resilient-cloud-network-architectures-fundamentals/</link><pubDate>Fri, 25 Mar 2016 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/resilient-cloud-network-architectures-fundamentals/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;As much as we like to believe we have evolved as a species, people continue to be scared of things they don’t understand. Yes, many organizations have embraced the cloud whole hog and are rushing headlong into the cloud age. But it’s a big world, and millions of others remain paralyzed – not really understanding cloud computing, and taking the general approach that it can’t be secure because, well, it just can’t. Or it’s too new. Or some for other unfounded and incorrect reason. Kind of like when folks insisted that the Earth was the center of the universe.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Incite 3/23/2016: The Madness</title><link>/blog/incite-3-23-2016-the-madness/</link><pubDate>Wed, 23 Mar 2016 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/incite-3-23-2016-the-madness/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I’m not sure why I do it, but every year I fill out brackets for the annual NCAA Men’s College basketball tournament. Over all the years I have been doing brackets, I won once. And it wasn’t a huge pool. It was a small pool in my office, when I used to work in an office, so the winnings probably didn’t even amount to a decent dinner at Fuddrucker’s. I won’t add up all my spending or compare against my winning, because I don’t need a PhD in Math to determine that I am way below the waterline.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Shadow Devices: The Exponentially Expanding Attack Surface [New Series]</title><link>/blog/shadow-devices-the-exponentially-expanding-attack-surface/</link><pubDate>Wed, 23 Mar 2016 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/shadow-devices-the-exponentially-expanding-attack-surface/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;One of the challenges of being security professionals for decades is that we actually remember the olden days. You remember, when Internet-connected devices were PCs; then we got fancy and started issuing laptops. That’s what was connected to our networks. If you recall, life was simpler then. But we don’t have much time for nostalgia. We are too busy getting a handle on the explosion of devices connected to our networks, accessing our data.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Summary: Who pays who?</title><link>/blog/summary-who-pays-who/</link><pubDate>Fri, 18 Mar 2016 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/summary-who-pays-who/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Adrian here…&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.bizjournals.com/sanjose/news/2016/03/17/googles-newest-cloud-customer-is-its-biggest-apple.html"&gt;Apple buying space on Google’s cloud&lt;/a&gt; made news this week, as many people were surprised that Apple relies on others to provide cloud services, but they have been leveraging AWS and others for years. Our internal chat was alive with discussion about build vs. buy for different providers of cloud services. Perhaps a hundred or so companies have the scale to make a go at building from scratch at this point, and the odds of success for many of those are small. You need massive scale before the costs make it worth building your own. Especially the custom engineering required to get equivalent hardware margins. That leave a handful of firms who can make a go of this, and it’s still not always clear whether they should. Even Apple buys others’ services, and it usually makes good economic sense.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Building a Vendor IT Risk Management Program: Program Structure</title><link>/blog/building-a-vendor-it-risk-management-program-program-structure/</link><pubDate>Thu, 17 Mar 2016 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/building-a-vendor-it-risk-management-program-program-structure/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;As we started exploring &lt;a href="https://securosis.com/blog/building-a-vendor-it-risk-management-program-understanding-vendor-it-risk"&gt;when we began Building a Vendor IT Risk Management Program&lt;/a&gt;, modern integrated business processes have dramatically expanded the attack surface of pretty much every organization. You can no longer ignore the risk presented by vendors or other business partners, even without regulatory bodies pushing for formal risk management of vendors and third parties. As security program fanatics we figure it’s time to start documenting such a program.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Building a Vendor IT Risk Management Program: Understanding Vendor IT Risk</title><link>/blog/building-a-vendor-it-risk-management-program-understanding-vendor-it-risk/</link><pubDate>Tue, 15 Mar 2016 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/building-a-vendor-it-risk-management-program-understanding-vendor-it-risk/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Outsourcing is nothing new. Industries have been embracing service providers for functions they either couldn’t or didn’t want to perform for years. This necessarily involved integrating business systems and providing these third-party vendors with access to corporate networks and computer systems. The risk was generally deemed manageable and rationalized by the business need for those integrated processes. Until it wasn’t.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Firestarter: The Rugged vs. SecDevOps Smackdown</title><link>/blog/firestarter-the-rugged-vs-secdevops-smackdown/</link><pubDate>Tue, 15 Mar 2016 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/firestarter-the-rugged-vs-secdevops-smackdown/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;After a short review of the RSA Security Conference, Rich, Mike, and Adrian debate the value of using labels like “Rugged DevOps” or “SecDevOps”. Rich sees them as different, Mike wonders if we really need them, and Adrian has been tracking their reception on the developer side of the house. Okay, it’s pathetic as smackdowns go, but you wouldn’t have read this far if we didn’t give it an interesting title.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>SIEM Kung Fu: Getting Started and Sustaining Value</title><link>/blog/siem-kung-fu-getting-started-and-sustaining-value/</link><pubDate>Thu, 10 Mar 2016 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/siem-kung-fu-getting-started-and-sustaining-value/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;As we wrap up this series on SIEM Kung Fu, we have discussed &lt;a href="https://securosis.com/blog/siem-kung-fu-fundamentals-new-series"&gt;SIEM Fundamentals&lt;/a&gt; and some &lt;a href="https://securosis.com/blog/siem-kung-fu-advanced-use-cases"&gt;advanced use cases&lt;/a&gt; to push your SIEM beyond its rather limited out-of-the-box capabilities. To make the technology more useful over time, you should revisit your SIEM operation process.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Incite 3/9/2016: Star Lord</title><link>/blog/incite-3-9-2016-star-lord/</link><pubDate>Wed, 09 Mar 2016 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/incite-3-9-2016-star-lord/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Everything is a game nowadays. Not like Words with Friends (why yes, since you ask – I &lt;em&gt;do&lt;/em&gt; enjoy getting my ass kicked by the women in my life) or even Madden Mobile (which the Boy plays constantly) – I’m talking about gamification. In our security world, the idea is that rank and file employees will actually pay attention to security stuff they don’t give a rat’s ass about… if you make it all into a game. So get departments to compete for who can do best in the phishing simulation. Or give a bounty to the team with the fewest device compromises due to surfing pr0n. Actually, though, it might be more fun to post the link that compromised the machine in the first place. The employee with the nastiest NSFW link would win. And get fired… But I digress.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>SIEM Kung Fu: Advanced Use Cases</title><link>/blog/siem-kung-fu-advanced-use-cases/</link><pubDate>Tue, 08 Mar 2016 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/siem-kung-fu-advanced-use-cases/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Given the advance of SIEM technology, the use cases described in &lt;a href="https://securosis.com/blog/siem-kung-fu-fundamentals-new-series"&gt;the first post of our SIEM Kung Fu series&lt;/a&gt; are very achievable. But with the advent of more packaged attack kits leveraged by better organized (and funded) adversaries, and the insider threat, you need to go well beyond what comes out of the [SIEM] box, and what can be deployed during a one-week PoC, to detect real advanced attacks.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Incite 2/29/2016: Leap Day</title><link>/blog/incite-2-29-2016-leap-day/</link><pubDate>Mon, 29 Feb 2016 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/incite-2-29-2016-leap-day/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Today is leap day, the last day of February in a leap year. That means the month of February has 29 days. It happens once every 4 years. I have one friend (who I know of) with a birthday on Leap Day. That must have been cool. You feel very special every four years. And you just jump on the Feb 28 bandwagon to celebrate your birthday in non-leap years. Win/win.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Presenting the RSA Conference Guide 2016</title><link>/blog/presenting-the-rsa-conference-guide-2016/</link><pubDate>Thu, 25 Feb 2016 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/presenting-the-rsa-conference-guide-2016/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Apparently the RSA Conference folks failed to regain their senses after letting us have free reign last year to post our RSA Conference Guide to the conference blog. We changed the structure this year, and here is how we explained it in the introductory post of the Guide.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Summary: The Cloud Horizon</title><link>/blog/summary/</link><pubDate>Thu, 25 Feb 2016 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/summary/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;By Adrian&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Two weeks ago Rich sketched out some changes to our Friday Summary, including how the content will change. But we haven’t spelled out our reasons. Our motivation is simple. In a decade, over half your systems will be in some cloud somewhere. The Summary will still be about security, but we’ll focus on security for cloud services, cloud applications, and how DevOps techniques intertwine with each. Rather than rehash on-premise security issues we have covered (&lt;em&gt;ad nauseum&lt;/em&gt;) for 9 years, we believe it’s far more helpful to IT and security folks to discuss what is on the near horizon which they are &lt;em&gt;not&lt;/em&gt; already familiar with. We can say with certainty that most of what you’ve learned about “the right way to do things” in security will be challenged by cloud deployments, so we are tuning the Summary to increase understanding the changes in store, and what to do about them. Trends, features, tools, and even some code. We know it’s not for everybody, but if you’re seriously interested, you can &lt;a href="http://eepurl.com/bQfTPH"&gt;subscribe directly to the Friday Summary&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Building a Threat Intelligence Program: Gathering TI</title><link>/blog/building-a-threat-intelligence-program-gathering-ti/</link><pubDate>Fri, 19 Feb 2016 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/building-a-threat-intelligence-program-gathering-ti/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;[Note: We received some feedback on the series that prompted us to clarify what we meant by scale and context towards the end of the post. See? We do listen to feedback on the posts. - Mike]&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Do We Have a Right to Security?</title><link>/blog/do-we-have-a-right-to-security/</link><pubDate>Fri, 19 Feb 2016 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/do-we-have-a-right-to-security/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Don’t be distracted by the technical details. The model of phone, the method of encryption, the detailed description of the specific attack technique, and even feasibility are all irrelevant.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Summary: Law Enforcement and the Cloud</title><link>/blog/summary-law-enforcement-and-the-cloud/</link><pubDate>Fri, 19 Feb 2016 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/summary-law-enforcement-and-the-cloud/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;While the big story this week was the &lt;a href="http://www.macworld.com/article/3034355/ios/why-the-fbis-request-to-apple-will-affect-civil-rights-for-a-generation.html"&gt;FBI vs. Apple&lt;/a&gt;, I’d like to highlight something a little more relevant to our focus on the cloud. You probably know about the &lt;a href="http://www.techpolicydaily.com/technology/the-microsoft-ireland-case/"&gt;DOJ vs. Microsoft&lt;/a&gt;. This is a critically important case where the US government wants to assert access on the foreign branch of a US company, putting it in conflict with local privacy laws. I highly recommend you take a look, and we will post updates here.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Firestarter: RSA Conference—the Good, Bad, and the Ugly</title><link>/blog/firestarter-rsa-conference-the-good-bad-and-the-ugly/</link><pubDate>Wed, 17 Feb 2016 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/firestarter-rsa-conference-the-good-bad-and-the-ugly/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Every year we focus a lot on the RSA Conference. Love it or hate it, it is the biggest event in our industry. As we do every year, we break down some of the improvements and disappointments we expect to see. Plus, we spend a few minutes talking about some of the big changes coming here at Securosis. We cover a possibly-insulting keynote, the improvements in the sessions, and how we personally use the event to improve our knowledge.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Securing Hadoop: Technical Recommendations</title><link>/blog/securing-hadoop-technical-recommendations/</link><pubDate>Tue, 16 Feb 2016 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/securing-hadoop-technical-recommendations/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Before we wrap up this series on securing Hadoop databases, I am happy to announce that &lt;a href="http://www.vormetric.com/"&gt;Vormetric&lt;/a&gt; has asked to license this content, and &lt;a href="http://hortonworks.com/"&gt;Hortonworks&lt;/a&gt; is also evaluating a license as well. It’s community support that allows us to bring you this research free of charge. Also, I’ve received a couple email and twitter responses to the content; if you have more input to offer, now is the time to send it along to be evaluated with the rest of the feedback as we will assembled the final paper in the coming week. And with that, onto the recommendations.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Securing Hadoop: Enterprise Security For NoSQL</title><link>/blog/securing-hadoop-enterprise-security-for-nosql/</link><pubDate>Mon, 15 Feb 2016 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/securing-hadoop-enterprise-security-for-nosql/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Hadoop is now enterprise software.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;There, I said it. I know lots of readers in the IT space still look at Hadoop as an interloper, or worse, part of the rogue IT problem. But better than 50% of the enterprises we spoke with are running Hadoop &lt;em&gt;somewhere&lt;/em&gt; within the organization. A small percentage are running Mongo, Cassandra or Riak in parallel with Hadoop, for specific projects. Discussions on what ‘big data’ is, if it is a viable technology, or even if open source can be considered ‘enterprise software’ are long past. What began as proof of concept projects have matured into critical application services. And with that change, IT teams are now tasked with getting a handle on Hadoop security, to which they response with questions like “How &lt;em&gt;do&lt;/em&gt; I secure Hadoop?” and “How do I map existing data governance policies to NoSQL databases?”&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>The Summary is dead. Long live the Summary!</title><link>/blog/the-summary-is-dead-long-live-the-summary/</link><pubDate>Fri, 12 Feb 2016 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/the-summary-is-dead-long-live-the-summary/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;As part of our changes at Securosis this year, it’s time to say goodbye to the old Friday Summary, and hello to the new one. Adrian and I started the Summary way back before Mike joined the company, as our own version of his weekly Security Incite. Our objective was to review the highlights of the week, both our work and things we found on the Internet, typically with an introduction based on events in our personal lives.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Securing Hadoop: Operational Security Issues</title><link>/blog/securing-hadoop-operational-security-issues/</link><pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2016 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/securing-hadoop-operational-security-issues/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Beyond the architectural security issues endemic to Hadoop and NoSQL platforms discussed in the last post, IT teams expect some common security processes and supporting tools familiar from other data management platforms. That includes “turning the dials” on configuration management, vulnerability assessment, and maintaining patch levels across a complex assembly of supporting modules. The day-to-day processes IT managers follow to ensure typical application platforms are properly configured have evolved over years – core platform capabilities, community contributions, and commercial third-party support to fill in gaps. Best practices, checklists, and validation tools to verify things like admin rights are sufficiently tight, and that nodes are patched against known and perhaps even unknown vulnerabilities. Hadoop security has come a long way in just a few years, but it still lacks the maturity in day to day operational security offerings, and it is here that we find most firms continue to struggle.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Summary: Die Blah, Die!!</title><link>/blog/summary-die-blah-die/</link><pubDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2016 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/summary-die-blah-die/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Rich here.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I was a little burnt out when the start of this year rolled around. Not “security burnout” – just one of the regular downs that hit everyone in life from time to time. Some of it was due to our &lt;a href="https://securosis.com/blog/security-is-changing.-so-is-securosis"&gt;weird year with the company&lt;/a&gt;, a bunch of it was due to travel and impending deadlines, plus there was all the extra stress of &lt;a href="https://securosis.com/blog/summary-impossible"&gt;trying to train for a marathon while injured&lt;/a&gt; (and working a ton).&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Incite 2/3/2016: Courage</title><link>/blog/incite-2-3-2016-courage/</link><pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2016 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/incite-2-3-2016-courage/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;A few weeks ago I spoke about &lt;a href="https://securosis.com/blog/incite-1-20-2016-ch-ch-ch-ch-changes"&gt;dealing with the inevitable changes of life&lt;/a&gt; and setting sail on the &lt;em&gt;SS Uncertainty&lt;/em&gt; to whatever is next. It’s very easy to &lt;em&gt;talk&lt;/em&gt; about changes and moving forward, but it’s actually pretty hard to do. When moving through a transformation, you not only have to accept the great unknown of the future, but you also need to grapple with what society expects you to do. We’ve all been programmed since a very early age to adhere to cultural norms or suffer the consequences. Those consequences may be minor, like having your friends and family think you’re an idiot. Or decisions could result in very major consequences, like being ostracized from your community, or even death in some areas of the world.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>test</title><link>/blog/test/</link><pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2016 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/test/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;test&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>third test</title><link>/blog/third-test/</link><pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2016 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/third-test/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;third test using tomorrow’s date&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>test with taqs</title><link>/blog/test-with-taqs/</link><pubDate>Tue, 02 Feb 2016 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/test-with-taqs/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;test&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Event-Driven AWS Security: A Practical Example</title><link>/blog/event-driven-security-on-aws-a-practical-example/</link><pubDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2016 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/event-driven-security-on-aws-a-practical-example/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Would you like the ability to revert unapproved security group (firewall) changes in Amazon Web Services in 10 seconds, without external tools? That’s about 10-20 minutes &lt;em&gt;faster&lt;/em&gt; than is typically possible with a SIEM or other external tools. If that got your attention, then read on…&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Securing Hadoop: Architectural Security Issues</title><link>/blog/securing-hadoop-architectural-security-issues/</link><pubDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2016 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/securing-hadoop-architectural-security-issues/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Now that we have sketched out the elements a Hadoop cluster, and what one looks like, let’s talk threats to the databases. We want to consider both the database infrastructure itself, as well as the data under management. Given the complexity of a Hadoop cluster, the task is closer to &lt;em&gt;securing an entire data center&lt;/em&gt; than a typical relational database. All the features that provide flexibility, scalability, performance, and openness, create specific security challenges. The following are some specific threats to clustered databases.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Securing Hadoop: Architecture and Composition</title><link>/blog/securing-hadoop-architecture-and-composition/</link><pubDate>Fri, 29 Jan 2016 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/securing-hadoop-architecture-and-composition/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Our goal for this post is to succinctly outline what Hadoop (and most NoSQL) clusters look like, how they are assembled, and how they are used. This provides better understanding of the security challenges, and what sort of protections need to be leveraged to secure them. Developers and data scientists continue to stretch system performance and scalability, using customized combinations of open source and commercial products, so there is really no such thing as a ‘standard’ Hadoop deployment. With these considerations in mind, it is time to map out threats to the cluster.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Securing Hadoop: Security Recommendations for NoSQL platforms [New Series]</title><link>/blog/securing-hadoop-security-recommendations-for-nosql-platforms-new-series/</link><pubDate>Mon, 25 Jan 2016 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/securing-hadoop-security-recommendations-for-nosql-platforms-new-series/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;It’s been three and a half years since we published our research paper on &lt;a href="https://cdn.securosis.com/assets/library/reports/SecuringBigData_FINAL.pdf"&gt;Securing Big Data&lt;/a&gt;. That research paper has been one of the more popular papers we’ve ever written. And it’s no wonder as NoSQL adoption was faster than we expected; we see hundreds of new projects popping up, leveraging the scale, analytics and low cost of these platforms. It’s not hyperbole to claim it has revolutionized the database market over the last 5 years, and community support behind these platforms – and especially Hadoop – is staggering.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Security is Changing. So is Securosis.</title><link>/blog/security-is-changing-so-is-securosis/</link><pubDate>Mon, 25 Jan 2016 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/security-is-changing-so-is-securosis/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Last week Rich sent around &lt;a href="http://techcrunch.com/2016/01/06/cockroaches-vs-unicorns-the-golden-age-of-cybersecurity-startups/"&gt;Cockroaches Versus Unicorns: The Golden Age Of Cybersecurity Startups&lt;/a&gt;, by Mahendra Ramsinghani over at TechCrunch, for us to read. It isn’t an article every security professional needs to read, but it is certainly mandatory reading for anyone who makes buying decisions, tracks the security market, or is on the investment or startup side.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>The EIGHTH Annual Disaster Recovery Breakfast: Clouds Ahead</title><link>/blog/2016-recoverybreakfast/</link><pubDate>Mon, 25 Jan 2016 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/2016-recoverybreakfast/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src="RecoveryBreakfastInvite-2016_thumb.jpg" alt=""&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Once again Securosis and friends are hosting our RSA Conference Disaster Recovery Breakfast. It’s really hard to believe this is the &lt;strong&gt;eighth&lt;/strong&gt; year for this event. Regardless of San Francisco’s February weather, &lt;strong&gt;we&lt;/strong&gt; expect to be seeing clouds all week. But we’re happy to help you cut through the fog to grab some grub, drinks, and bacon.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Incite 1/20/2016 — Ch-ch-ch-ch-changes</title><link>/blog/incite-1-20-2016-ch-ch-ch-ch-changes-2/</link><pubDate>Wed, 20 Jan 2016 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/incite-1-20-2016-ch-ch-ch-ch-changes-2/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I have always gotten great meaning from music. I can point back to times in my life when certain songs totally resonate. Like when I was a geeky teen and Rush’s Signals spoke to me. I saw myself as the awkward kid in Subdivisions who had a hard time fitting in. Then I went through my Pink Floyd stage in college, where “The Wall” dredged up many emotions from a challenging childhood and the resulting distance I kept from people. Then Guns ‘n Roses spoke to me when I was partying and raging, and to this day I remain shocked I escaped largely unscathed (though my liver may not agree).&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Summary: Impossible</title><link>/blog/summary-impossible/</link><pubDate>Fri, 15 Jan 2016 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/summary-impossible/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Rich here.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;When I hurt my knee running right before Thanksgiving everyone glanced at my brace and felt absolutely compelled to tell me how much “getting old sucks”. Hell, even my doctor commiserated as he discussed his recent soccer injury.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Incite 1/13/2016: Permitted</title><link>/blog/incite-1-13-2016-permitted/</link><pubDate>Wed, 13 Jan 2016 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/incite-1-13-2016-permitted/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I’m not sure how it happened, but XX1 turned 15 in November and got her driver’s permit. Wait, what?!?! That little girl can now drive. Like, legally? WTF? Clearly it is now January, and I am still in shock that 15 years has passed by in the blink of an eye.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>SIEM Kung Fu: Fundamentals [New Series]</title><link>/blog/siem-kung-fu-fundamentals-new-series/</link><pubDate>Tue, 12 Jan 2016 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/siem-kung-fu-fundamentals-new-series/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Another SIEM blog series? Really? Why are we still talking about SIEM? Isn’t that old technology? Hasn’t it been subsumed by new and shiny security analytics products and services? Be honest – those thoughts crossed your mind, especially because we have published a lot of SIEM related research over the past few years. We previously worked through &lt;a href="https://securosis.com/research/papers/understanding-and-selecting-siem-log-management"&gt;the basics of the technology&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href="https://securosis.com/research/papers/security-management-2.5-replacing-your-siem-yet"&gt;how to choose the right SIEM&lt;/a&gt; for your needs. A bit over a year ago we looked into how to &lt;a href="https://securosis.com/research/papers/monitoring-the-hybrid-cloud-evolving-to-the-cloudsoc"&gt;monitor hybrid cloud environments&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Incite 1/6/2016 — Recharging</title><link>/blog/incite-1-6-2016-recharging-2/</link><pubDate>Wed, 06 Jan 2016 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/incite-1-6-2016-recharging-2/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;The last time I took 2 weeks off was probably 20 years ago. As I write that down, it makes me sad. I’ve been been running pretty hard for a long time. Even when I had some forced vacations (okay, when I got fired), I took maybe a couple days off before I started focusing on the next thing. Whether it was a new business or a job, I got consumed by what was next almost immediately. I didn’t give myself any time to recharge and heal from the road rash that accumulated from one crappy job after another.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Incite 12/15/2015: Looking Forward</title><link>/blog/incite-12-15-2015-looking-forward/</link><pubDate>Wed, 16 Dec 2015 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/incite-12-15-2015-looking-forward/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;In last week’s Incite I &lt;a href="https://securosis.com/blog/incite-12-9-2015-looking-backwards"&gt;looked backwards at 2015&lt;/a&gt;. As we close out this year (this will be the last Incite in 2015), let me take a look forward at what’s in store for 2016.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Building a TI Program: Success and Sharing</title><link>/blog/building-a-ti-program-success-and-sharing/</link><pubDate>Tue, 15 Dec 2015 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/building-a-ti-program-success-and-sharing/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;To wrap up our series on Building a Threat Intelligence Program (&lt;a href="https://securosis.com/blog/building-a-threat-intelligence-program-new-series"&gt;Introduction&lt;/a&gt;; &lt;a href="https://securosis.com/blog/building-a-threat-intelligence-program-gathering-ti"&gt;Gathering TI&lt;/a&gt;; &lt;a href="https://securosis.com/blog/building-a-threat-intelligence-program-using-ti"&gt;Using TI&lt;/a&gt;), we need to jump back to the beginning for a bit. How do you define success of the program? More importantly, how can you kickstart the program with a fairly high-profile success to show the value of integrating external data into your defenses, and improve your security posture? That involves getting a &lt;em&gt;quick win&lt;/em&gt; and then publicizing it.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Threat Detection Evolution [New Paper]</title><link>/blog/threat-detection-evolution-new-paper/</link><pubDate>Mon, 14 Dec 2015 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/threat-detection-evolution-new-paper/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Most organizations have realized that threat prevention has limitations, so we have seen renewed focus on threat detection. But like most other security markets, the term &lt;em&gt;threat detection&lt;/em&gt; has been distorted to cover almost everything. So we figure it’s time to clarify what threat detection is and how it is evolving to deal with advanced attacks, sophisticated adversaries, and limited resources.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Building Security Into DevOps [New Paper]</title><link>/blog/building-security-into-devops-new-paper/</link><pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2015 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/building-security-into-devops-new-paper/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;We are pleased to announce the launch of our latest research paper, on Building Security Into DevOps. We expect DevOps to fundamentally change the practice of software development over the next decade, and with it how we handle application security.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>2015 Wrap Up and 2016 Non-Predictions</title><link>/blog/2015-wrap-up-and-2016-non-predictions/</link><pubDate>Wed, 09 Dec 2015 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/2015-wrap-up-and-2016-non-predictions/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Rich, Mike, and Adrian highlight the big trends from the year and where our expectations were right and wrong. We teeter on the brink of predictions, but manage to pull ourselves back from falling into that chasm of idiocy. Mostly.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Incite 12/9/2015: Looking Backwards</title><link>/blog/incite-12-9-2015-looking-backwards/</link><pubDate>Wed, 09 Dec 2015 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/incite-12-9-2015-looking-backwards/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;As a guy who pretty much always looks forward, I still find it useful at the end of each calendar year to look backwards and evaluate where I am in life and what (if anything) I want to focus on in the coming year. 2015 has been a very interesting year, both personally and professionally. I’m at an age where transformation happens, and that has been a real focus for me. I’ve spent a long time evaluating every aspect of my life and making changes, some small and some very significant. Trying to navigate those changes gracefully requires focus and effort.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Summary: Surviving the Holidays</title><link>/blog/summary-surviving-the-holidays/</link><pubDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2015 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/summary-surviving-the-holidays/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;With the holidays upon us, and the weather in Phoenix at that optimal temperature of 50F warmer than wherever people come from, the migration has begun. The snowbirds are back in Phoenix. And all my relatives want to visit. All pretty much at the same time. As I write this I am recovering from 20 &lt;em&gt;contiguous&lt;/em&gt; days of four different groups of friends and relatives staying at my home. Overlapping, I might add. And it was glorious – it was great to see each and every one of them – but I heaved a great sigh of relief when the last party got onto a plane and flew back home. I think I have baked, roasted, toasted, and barbecued every type of food I know how to cook. I’ve been a tour guide across the state – twice over – showing off every interesting place within a three-hour drive. Today’s summary is a toast to all of you who survived Thanksgiving – I am thankful for many things, and I am also thankful this holiday is only once a year.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Incite 12/2/2015: Grateful Habits</title><link>/blog/incite-12-2-2015-grateful-habits/</link><pubDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2015 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/incite-12-2-2015-grateful-habits/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;A week ago most folks in the US were in food comas from the Thanksgiving feast. Of course this is a great time of year to be grateful for what you have. Whether it’s family, health, work, or anything else. This morning I got a great reminder that expressing gratitude is a habit, which requires daily work – especially for security people.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Summary: Boy in the Bubble</title><link>/blog/summary-boy-in-the-bubble/</link><pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2015 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/summary-boy-in-the-bubble/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;I’m going to write a fairly innocuous opening to this week’s Friday Summary, despite the gravity of current events. Because some things are best dealt with… not now, and not here.&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Cloud Security Best Practice: Limit Blast Radius with Multiple Accounts</title><link>/blog/cloud-security-best-practice-limit-blast-radius-with-multiple-accounts/</link><pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2015 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/cloud-security-best-practice-limit-blast-radius-with-multiple-accounts/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;This is one of those ideas that I’m pretty sure I picked up on while either at a presentation or working with a client, but I honestly can’t remember where I first heard it. That said, it’s become one of my absolutely essential cloud security recommendations for years now. It’s also a great example of using the cloud for security advantage, rather than getting hung up on the differences.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>The Blame Game</title><link>/blog/the-blame-game/</link><pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2015 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/the-blame-game/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Get hacked? Blame China. Miss a quarter? Blame China. Serve malware to everyone visiting your site? Don’t take responsibility, just blame your anti-ad-blocking vendor. Or China. Or both. Look, we really can’t keep track of these things, but in this episode Mike and Rich talk about the lack of accountability in our industry (and other industries). One warning… a particular analogy goes a little too far. Maybe we need the explicit tag on this one.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Critical Security Capabilities for Cloud Providers</title><link>/blog/critical-security-capabilities-for-cloud-providers/</link><pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2015 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/critical-security-capabilities-for-cloud-providers/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Between teaching classes and working with clients, I spend a fair bit of time talking about particular cloud providers. The analyst in me never wants to be biased, but the reality is there are big differences in terms of capabilities, and some of them &lt;em&gt;matter&lt;/em&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Summary: Refurbished</title><link>/blog/summary-refurbished/</link><pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2015 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/summary-refurbished/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;The grout in my shower isn’t merely cracking, it’s starting to flake out in chunks, backed by the mildew it spent years defending from my cleansing assaults. Our hallway walls downstairs are streaked like the protective concrete edges around a NASCAR track. Black, gray, and red marks left behind from hundreds of minor impacts with injection-molded plastic vehicles. The carpet in our family room, that little section between the sliding glass door to our patio and the kitchen, looks like it misses its cousins at the airport.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Massive, Very Bad Java 0-Day (and, Sigh, Oracle)</title><link>/blog/massive-very-bad-java-0-day-and-sigh-oracle/</link><pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2015 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/massive-very-bad-java-0-day-and-sigh-oracle/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Last Friday my wife and I were out at a concert when, thanks to social media, I learned &lt;a href="http://foxglovesecurity.com/2015/11/06/what-do-weblogic-websphere-jboss-jenkins-opennms-and-your-application-have-in-common-this-vulnerability/"&gt;there is a major vulnerability in a common component of Java&lt;/a&gt;. I planned to write it up, but spent most of Monday dealing with a 6+ hour flight delay, and all day yesterday in a meeting. I’m glad I waited.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>The Power of Immutable</title><link>/blog/the-power-of-immutable/</link><pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2015 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/the-power-of-immutable/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I wrote up a post over at the &lt;a href="http://www.rsaconference.com/blogs/the-power-of-immutable"&gt;RSA Conference blog this week introducing the idea of &lt;em&gt;immutable infrastructure&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt; to security professionals. It is a concept that really highlights some of the massive security benefits when you combine cloud computing and DevOps principles. Here’s a snippet:&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Summary: Distract and Deceive</title><link>/blog/summary-distract-and-deceive/</link><pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2015 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/summary-distract-and-deceive/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Today I was sitting in my office, window open, enjoying the cold front that finally shoved the summer heat out of Phoenix. I had an ice pack on my leg because my achilles tendon has been a little twitchy as I go into the last 8 weeks of marathon training. My wife was going through the mail, walked in, and dropped a nice little form letter from the United States Office or Personnel Management onto my desk.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>The Economist Hack: Good Intentions, Bad Execution</title><link>/blog/the-economist-hack-good-intentions-bad-execution/</link><pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2015 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/the-economist-hack-good-intentions-bad-execution/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;The Economist used a tool on their site to block collect stats and serve ads to visitors using ad blockers. I will avoid diving into the ad-blocking debate, but I will note that my quick check showed 16 ad trackers and beacons on the page. I don’t mind ads, but I do mind tracking.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>CSA Guidance V4 Content on GitHub</title><link>/blog/csa-guidance-v4-content-on-github/</link><pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2015 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/csa-guidance-v4-content-on-github/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;A while back we announced that we were contracted by the &lt;a href="http://cloudsecurityalliance.org/"&gt;Cloud Security Alliance&lt;/a&gt; to write the next version of the &lt;a href="https://cloudsecurityalliance.org/group/security-guidance/"&gt;CSA Guidance&lt;/a&gt;. This is actually a community project, not us off writing by ourselves in a corner. The plan is to:&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>DevOpsed to Death</title><link>/blog/devopsed-to-death/</link><pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2015 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/devopsed-to-death/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Alan Shimmel asks &lt;a href="http://devops.com/2014/03/24/chuck-norris-doesnt-need-devops-but-have-we-beat-what-is-devops-to-death-yet/"&gt;have we beat “What is DevOps” to death yet?&lt;/a&gt; Alan illustrates his point by using the more-than-beaten-to-death, we-wish-it-would-go-away-right-now of Chuck Norris meme. Those of us who have talked about DevOps for a while are certainly beginning to tire of explaining why it is more than automation. But Alan’s question is legit, and I have to say the answer is “No!” We are in the top of the second inning of a game that will be playing out for years.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Incite 11/4/2015: The Taper</title><link>/blog/incite-11-4-2015-the-taper/</link><pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2015 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/incite-11-4-2015-the-taper/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;As I mentioned, &lt;a href="https://securosis.com/blog/incite-7-29-2015-finding-my-cause"&gt;I’m running a half marathon&lt;/a&gt; for Team in Training to defeat blood cancers. I’ve &lt;a href="http://pages.teamintraining.org/ga/rnrsav15/mrothman"&gt;raised a bunch of money&lt;/a&gt; and still appreciate any donations you can make. I’m very grateful to have made it through my training in one piece (mostly), and ready to go. The race is this coming Saturday and the final two weeks of training are referred to as &lt;em&gt;the taper,&lt;/em&gt; when you recover from months of training and get ready to race.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Why I design for one cloud at a time</title><link>/blog/why-i-design-for-one-cloud-at-a-time/</link><pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2015 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/why-i-design-for-one-cloud-at-a-time/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Putting all your eggs in one basket is always a little disconcerting. Anyone who works with risk is always wary of reducing options. So I am never surprised when clients ask about alternative cloud providers and try to design cloud-agnostic applications.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Million Dollar iOS Exploit? Maybe.</title><link>/blog/million-dollar-ios-exploit-maybe/</link><pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2015 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/million-dollar-ios-exploit-maybe/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I wrote an &lt;a href="http://tidbits.com/article/16054"&gt;article over at TidBITS today on the news that Zerodium paid $1M for an iOS exploit&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;There are a few dynamics working in favor of us normal iOS users. While those that purchase the bug will have incentives to use it before Apple patches it, the odds are they will still restrict themselves to higher-value targets. The more something like this is used, the greater the chance of discovery. That also means there are reasonable odds that Apple can get their hands on the exploit, possibly through a partner company, or even by focusing their own internal security research efforts. And the same warped dynamics that allow a company like Zerodium to exist also pressure it to exercise a little caution. Selling to a criminal organization that profits via widespread crime is far noisier than selling quietly to government agencies out to use it for spying.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Get Your Marshmallows</title><link>/blog/get-your-marshmallows/</link><pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2015 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/get-your-marshmallows/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Last week we learned that &lt;a href="http://www.pcworld.com/article/2999146/encryption/google-threatens-action-against-symantec-issued-certificates-following-botched-investigation.html"&gt;not only did Symantec mess up managing their root SSL certificates, but they also botched their audit so bad Google may remove them from Chrome and other products&lt;/a&gt;. This is just one example in a long history of security companies failing to practice what they preach. From poor code development practices to weak internal controls, the only new thing in this instance is the combination of getting caught, potential consequences, and a lack of wiggle room.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Summary: Edumacation</title><link>/blog/summary-edumacation/</link><pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2015 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/summary-edumacation/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;For those who skip the intro, the biggest security news this week was the passage of CISA, Oracle’s… interesting.. security claims, more discussion on encryption weirdness from the NSA, and security research getting a DMCA exemption. All these stories are linked down below.&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>The Economics of Cloud Security</title><link>/blog/the-economics-of-cloud-security/</link><pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2015 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/the-economics-of-cloud-security/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I have talked a lot about this, but I don’t think I’ve ever posted it here on the blog.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I am consistently amused by people who fear moving to the cloud (and by people who take random potshots at the cloud) because they are worried about a lack of security.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Hybrid Clouds: An Ugly Reality</title><link>/blog/hybrid-clouds-an-ugly-reality/</link><pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2015 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/hybrid-clouds-an-ugly-reality/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;In my &lt;a href="https://cdn.securosis.com/assets/library/reports/PragmaticNetSec.v.1.final.pdf"&gt;recent paper on cloud network security&lt;/a&gt; I came down pretty hard on hybrid networks. I have been saying similar things in many presentations, including my most recent RSA session. Enough that I got a request for clarification. Here is some additional detail I will add to the paper; feedback or criticism is appreciated.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>How I got a CISSP and ended up nominated for the Board of Directors</title><link>/blog/how-i-got-a-cissp-and-ended-up-nominated-for-the-board-of-directors/</link><pubDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2015 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/how-i-got-a-cissp-and-ended-up-nominated-for-the-board-of-directors/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;About two years ago I was up in Toronto having dinner with James Arlen and Dave Lewis (&lt;a href="http://twitter.ciom/myrcurial"&gt;@myrcurial&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href="http://twitter.com/gattaca"&gt;@gattaca&lt;/a&gt;). Since Dave was serving on the (ISC)2 Board of Directors, and James and I were &lt;em&gt;not&lt;/em&gt; CISSPs, the conversation inevitably landed on our feelings as to the relative value of the organization and the certifications.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Chewie, We’re Home</title><link>/blog/chewie-were-home/</link><pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2015 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/chewie-were-home/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Every week, we here at Securosis like to highlight the security industry’s most important news in our Friday Summary. Those events that not only made the press, but are likely to significantly impact your professional lives and, potentially, the well-being of the organization you work for.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Incite 10/21/2015: Appreciating the Classics</title><link>/blog/incite-10-21-2015-appreciating-the-classics/</link><pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2015 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/incite-10-21-2015-appreciating-the-classics/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;It has been a while since I’ve mentioned my gang of kids. XX1, XX2 and the Boy are alive and well, despite the best efforts of their Dad. All of them started new schools this year, with XX1 starting high school (holy crap!) and the twins starting middle school. So there has been a lot of adjustment. They are growing up and it’s great to see. It’s also fun because I can start to pollute them with the stuff that I find entertaining.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>re:Invent Yourself (or else)</title><link>/blog/reinvent-yourself-or-else/</link><pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2015 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/reinvent-yourself-or-else/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;A bit over a week ago we were all out at Amazon’s big cloud conference, which is now up to 19,000 attendees. Once again it got us thinking as to how quickly the world is changing, and the impact it will have on our profession. Now that big companies are rapidly adopting public cloud (and they are), that change is going to hit even faster than ever before. In this episode the Securosis team lays out some of what that means, and how now is the time to get on board.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>It’s a Developer’s World Now</title><link>/blog/its-a-developers-world-now-2/</link><pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2015 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/its-a-developers-world-now-2/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Last week Mike, Adrian, and myself were out at the Amazon re:Invent conference. It’s the third year I’ve attended and it’s become one of the core events of the year for me; even more important than most of the security events. To put things in perspective, there were over 19,000 attendees and this is only the fourth year of the conference.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Building Security Into DevOps: The Role of Security in DevOps</title><link>/blog/building-security-into-devops-the-role-of-security-in-devops/</link><pubDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2015 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/building-security-into-devops-the-role-of-security-in-devops/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;In today’s post I am going to talk about the role of security folks in DevOps. A while back we provided a research paper on &lt;a href="https://cdn.securosis.com/assets/library/reports/SecureAgileDevelopment_Nov2014_FINAL.pdf"&gt;Putting Security Into Agile Development&lt;/a&gt;; the feedback we got was the most helpful part of that report was guiding security people on how best to work with development. How best to position security in a way to help development teams be more Agile was successful, so this portion of our research on DevOps we will strive to provide similar examples of the role of security in DevOps.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Building a Threat Intelligence Program: Using TI</title><link>/blog/building-a-threat-intelligence-program-using-ti/</link><pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2015 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/building-a-threat-intelligence-program-using-ti/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;As we dive back into the Threat Intelligence Program, we have summarized &lt;a href="https://securosis.com/blog/building-a-threat-intelligence-program-new-series"&gt;why a TI program is important&lt;/a&gt; and how to (&lt;a href="https://securosis.com/blog/building-a-threat-intelligence-program-gathering-ti"&gt;gather intelligence&lt;/a&gt;. Now we need a programmatic approach for using TI to improve your security posture and accelerate your response &amp;amp; investigation functions.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Building Security Into DevOps: Tools and Testing in Detail</title><link>/blog/building-security-into-devops-tools-and-testing-in-detail/</link><pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2015 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/building-security-into-devops-tools-and-testing-in-detail/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Thus far I’ve been making the claim that security can be woven into the very fabric of your DevOps framework; now it’s time to show exactly how. DevOps encourages testing at all phases in the process, and the earlier the better. From the developers desktop prior to check-in, to module testing, and against a full application stack, both pre and post deployment - it’s all available to you.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>New Report: Pragmatic Security for Cloud and Hybrid Networks</title><link>/blog/new-report-pragmatic-security-for-cloud-and-hybrid-networks/</link><pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2015 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/new-report-pragmatic-security-for-cloud-and-hybrid-networks/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;This is one of those papers I’ve been wanting to write for a while. When I’m out working with clients, or teaching classes, we end up spending a ton of time on just how different networking is in the cloud, and how to manage it. On the surface we still see things like subnets and routing tables, but now everything is wired together in software, with layers of abstraction meant to &lt;em&gt;look&lt;/em&gt; the same, but not really &lt;em&gt;work&lt;/em&gt; the same.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Building Security Into DevOps: Security Integration Points</title><link>/blog/building-security-into-devops-security-integration-points/</link><pubDate>Sat, 03 Oct 2015 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/building-security-into-devops-security-integration-points/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;A couple housekeeping items before I begin today’s post - we’ve had a couple issues with the site so I apologize if you’ve tried to leave comments but could not. We think we have that fixed. Ping us if you have trouble.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Pragmatic Security for Cloud and Hybrid Networks: Design Patterns</title><link>/blog/pragmatic-security-for-cloud-and-hybrid-networks-design-patterns/</link><pubDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2015 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/pragmatic-security-for-cloud-and-hybrid-networks-design-patterns/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;This is the fourth post in a new series I’m posting for public feedback, licensed by&lt;a href="http://www.algosec.com/"&gt;Algosec&lt;/a&gt;. Well, that is if they like it – we are sticking to our &lt;a href="https://securosis.com/about/totally-transparent-research"&gt;Totally Transparent Research&lt;/a&gt; policy. I’m also live-writing the content &lt;a href="https://github.com/Securosis/PragmaticNetSecCloud"&gt;on GitHub&lt;/a&gt; if you want to provide any feedback or suggestions. &lt;a href="https://securosis.com/blog/pragmatic-security-for-cloud-and-hybrid-networks-introduction"&gt;Click here for the first post in the series&lt;/a&gt;, [here for post two](&lt;a href="https://securosis.com/blog/pragmatic-security-for-cloud-and-hybrid-networks-cloud-networking-101"&gt;https://securosis.com/blog/pragmatic-security-for-cloud-and-hybrid-networks-cloud-networking-101&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="https://securosis.com/blog/pragmatic-security-for-cloud-and-hybrid-networks-network-security-controls"&gt;post 3&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="https://securosis.com/blog/pragmatic-security-for-cloud-and-hybrid-networks-building-your-cloud-networ"&gt;post 4&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Pragmatic Security for Cloud and Hybrid Networks: Building Your Cloud Network Security Program</title><link>/blog/pragmatic-security-for-cloud-and-hybrid-networks-building-your-cloud-networ/</link><pubDate>Mon, 28 Sep 2015 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/pragmatic-security-for-cloud-and-hybrid-networks-building-your-cloud-networ/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;This is the fourth post in a new series I’m posting for public feedback, licensed by&lt;a href="http://www.algosec.com/"&gt;Algosec&lt;/a&gt;. Well, that is if they like it – we are sticking to our &lt;a href="https://securosis.com/about/totally-transparent-research"&gt;Totally Transparent Research&lt;/a&gt; policy. I’m also live-writing the content &lt;a href="https://github.com/Securosis/PragmaticNetSecCloud"&gt;on GitHub&lt;/a&gt; if you want to provide any feedback or suggestions. &lt;a href="https://securosis.com/blog/pragmatic-security-for-cloud-and-hybrid-networks-introduction"&gt;Click here for the first post in the series&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="https://securosis.com/blog/pragmatic-security-for-cloud-and-hybrid-networks-cloud-networking-101,%20%5Bpost%203%5D(https://securosis.com/blog/pragmatic-security-for-cloud-and-hybrid-networks-network-security-controls)"&gt;here for post two&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Building Security Into DevOps: The Emergence of DevOps</title><link>/blog/building-security-into-devops-the-emergence-of-devops/</link><pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2015 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/building-security-into-devops-the-emergence-of-devops/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;In this post we will outline some of the key characteristics of DevOps. In fact, for those of you new to the concept, this is the most valuable post in this series. We believe that DevOps is one of the most disruptive trends to ever hit application development, and will be driving organizational changes for the next decade. But it’s equally disruptive for application security, and in a good way. It enables security testing, validation and monitoring to be interwoven with application development and deployment. To illustrate why we believe this is disruptive – both for application development and for application security, we are first going to delve into what Dev Ops is and talk about how it changes the entire development approach.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Incite 9/23/2015: Friday Night Lights</title><link>/blog/incite-9-23-2015-friday-night-lights/</link><pubDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2015 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/incite-9-23-2015-friday-night-lights/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I didn’t get the whole idea of high school football. When I was in high school, I went to a grand total of zero point zero (0.0) games. It would have interfered with the Strat-o-Matic and D&amp;amp;D parties I did with my friends on Friday listening to Rush. Yeah, I’m not kidding about that.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Pragmatic Security for Cloud and Hybrid Networks: Network Security Controls</title><link>/blog/pragmatic-security-for-cloud-and-hybrid-networks-network-security-controls/</link><pubDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2015 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/pragmatic-security-for-cloud-and-hybrid-networks-network-security-controls/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;This is the second post in a new series I’m posting for public feedback, licensed by&lt;a href="http://www.algosec.com/"&gt;Algosec&lt;/a&gt;. Well, that is if they like it – we are sticking to our &lt;a href="https://securosis.com/about/totally-transparent-research"&gt;Totally Transparent Research&lt;/a&gt; policy. I’m also live-writing the content &lt;a href="https://github.com/Securosis/PragmaticNetSecCloud"&gt;on GitHub&lt;/a&gt; if you want to provide any feedback or suggestions. &lt;a href="https://securosis.com/blog/pragmatic-security-for-cloud-and-hybrid-networks-introduction"&gt;Click here for the first post in the series&lt;/a&gt;, and &lt;a href="https://securosis.com/blog/pragmatic-security-for-cloud-and-hybrid-networks-cloud-networking-101"&gt;here for post two&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Pragmatic Security for Cloud and Hybrid Networks: Cloud Networking 101</title><link>/blog/pragmatic-security-for-cloud-and-hybrid-networks-cloud-networking-101/</link><pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2015 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/pragmatic-security-for-cloud-and-hybrid-networks-cloud-networking-101/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;This is the second post in a new series I’m posting for public feedback, licensed by&lt;a href="http://www.algosec.com/"&gt;Algosec&lt;/a&gt;. Well, that is if they like it – we are sticking to our &lt;a href="https://securosis.com/about/totally-transparent-research"&gt;Totally Transparent Research&lt;/a&gt; policy. I’m also live-writing the content &lt;a href="https://github.com/Securosis/PragmaticNetSecCloud"&gt;on GitHub&lt;/a&gt; if you want to provide any feedback or suggestions. &lt;a href="https://securosis.com/blog/pragmatic-security-for-cloud-and-hybrid-networks-introduction"&gt;Click here for the first post in the series&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Pragmatic Security for Cloud and Hybrid Networks: Introduction</title><link>/blog/pragmatic-security-for-cloud-and-hybrid-networks-introduction/</link><pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2015 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/pragmatic-security-for-cloud-and-hybrid-networks-introduction/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;This is the start in a new series I’m posting for public feedback, licensed by&lt;a href="http://www.algosec.com/"&gt;Algosec&lt;/a&gt;. Well, that is if they like it – we are sticking to our &lt;a href="https://securosis.com/about/totally-transparent-research"&gt;Totally Transparent Research&lt;/a&gt; policy. I’m also live-writing the content &lt;a href="https://github.com/Securosis/PragmaticNetSecCloud"&gt;on GitHub&lt;/a&gt; if you want to provide any feedback or suggestions. With that, here’s the content…&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Building Security into DevOps [New Series]</title><link>/blog/building-security-into-devops-new-series/</link><pubDate>Mon, 14 Sep 2015 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/building-security-into-devops-new-series/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I have been in and around software development my entire professional career. As a new engineer, as an architect, and later as the guy responsible for the whole show. And I have seen as many failed software deliveries – late, low quality, off-target, etc. – as successes. Human dysfunction and miscommunication seem to creep in everywhere, and &lt;a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Murphy's_law"&gt;Murphy’s Law&lt;/a&gt; is in full effect. Getting engineers to deliver code on time was just one dimension of the problem – the interaction between development and QA was another, and how they could both barely contain their contempt for IT was yet another. Low-quality software and badly managed deployments make productivity go backwards. Worse, repeat failures and lack of reliability create tension and distrust between all the groups in a company, to the point where they become rival factions. Groups of otherwise happy, well-educated, and well-paid people can squabble like a group of dysfunctional family members during a holiday get-together.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>EMV Migration and the Changing Payments Landscape [New Paper]</title><link>/blog/emv-migration-and-the-changing-payments-landscape-new-paper/</link><pubDate>Fri, 04 Sep 2015 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/emv-migration-and-the-changing-payments-landscape-new-paper/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;With the upcoming EMV transition deadline for merchants fast approaching, we decided to take an in-depth look at what this migration is all about – and particularly whether it is &lt;em&gt;really&lt;/em&gt; in merchants’ best interests to adopt EMV. We thought it would be a quick, straightforward set of conversations. We were wrong.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Incite 8/26/2015: Epic Weekend</title><link>/blog/incite-8-26-2015-epic-weekend/</link><pubDate>Wed, 26 Aug 2015 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/incite-8-26-2015-epic-weekend/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Sometimes I have a weekend when I am just amazed. Amazed at the fun I had. Amazed at the connections I developed. And I’m aware enough to be overcome with gratitude for how fortunate I am. A few weekends ago I had one of those experiences. It was awesome.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Applied Threat Intelligence [New Paper]</title><link>/blog/applied-threat-intelligence-new-paper/</link><pubDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2015 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/applied-threat-intelligence-new-paper/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src="TDE_Cover.png" alt=""&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Threat Intelligence remains one of the hottest areas in security. With its promise to help organizations take advantage of information sharing, early results have been encouraging. We have researched Threat Intelligence deeply; focusing on where to get TI and the differences between gathering data from networks, endpoints, and general Internet sources. But we come back to the fact that having data is not enough – not now and not in the future.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Friday Summary: Customer Service</title><link>/blog/summary-customer-service/</link><pubDate>Thu, 13 Aug 2015 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/summary-customer-service/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Rich here.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A few things this week got me thinking about customer service. For whatever reason, I have always thought the best business decision is to put the needs of the customer first, then build your business model around that. I’m enough of a realist to know that isn’t always possible, but combine that with “don’t make it hard for people to give you money” and you sure tilt the odds in your favor.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Incite 8/12/2015: Transitions</title><link>/blog/incite-8-12-2015-transitions/</link><pubDate>Wed, 12 Aug 2015 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/incite-8-12-2015-transitions/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;The depths of summer heat in Atlanta can only mean one thing: the start of the school year. The first day of school is always the second Monday in August, so after a week of frenetic activity to get the kids ready, and a day’s diversion for some Six Flags roller coaster goodness, the kids started the next leg of their educational journey.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>MAD Karma</title><link>/blog/karma/</link><pubDate>Wed, 12 Aug 2015 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/karma/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Way back in 2004 Rich wrote an article over at Gartner on the serious issues plaguing Oracle product security. The original piece is long gone, but &lt;a href="http://www.crn.com.au/News/20547,gartner-oracle-needs-to-come-clean-on-vulnerability.aspx"&gt;here is an article about it&lt;/a&gt;. It lead to a moderately serious political showdown, Rich flying out to meet with Oracle execs, and eventually their move to a quarterly patch update cycle (due more to the botched patch than Rich’s article). This week Oracle’s 25-year-veteran CISO Mary Ann Davidson &lt;a href="http://web.archive.org/web/20150811052336/http://blogs.oracle.com/maryanndavidson/entry/no_you_really_can_t"&gt;published a blog post decrying customer security assessments of their products&lt;/a&gt;. Actually she threatened legal action for evaluation of Oracle products using tools that look at application code. Then she belittled security researchers (for crying wolf, not understanding what they are talking about, and wasting everybody’s time – especially her team’s), told everyone to trust Oracle because they find nearly all the bugs anyway (not that they seem to patch them in a timely fashion), and… you get it.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Incite 7/29/2015: Finding My Cause</title><link>/blog/incite-7-29-2015-finding-my-cause/</link><pubDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2015 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/incite-7-29-2015-finding-my-cause/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;When you have resources you are supposed to give back. That’s what they teach you as a kid, right? There are folks less fortunate than you, so you help them out. I learned those lessons. I dutifully gave to a variety of charities through the years. But I was never passionate about any cause. Not enough to get involved beyond writing a check.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>EMV and the Changing Payment Space: Mobile Payment</title><link>/blog/emv-and-the-changing-payment-space-mobile-payment/</link><pubDate>Mon, 27 Jul 2015 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/emv-and-the-changing-payment-space-mobile-payment/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;As we close out this series on the EMV migration and changes in the payment industry, we are adding a section on mobile payments to clarify the big picture. Mobile usage is invalidating some long-held assumptions behind payment security, so we also offer tips to help merchants and issuing banks deal with the changing threat landscape.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>EMV and the Changing Payment Space: Systemic Tokenization</title><link>/blog/emv-and-the-changing-payment-space-systemic-tokenization/</link><pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2015 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/emv-and-the-changing-payment-space-systemic-tokenization/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;This post covers why I think tokenization will radically change payment security.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;EMV-compliant terminals offer several advantages over magnetic stripe readers – notably the abilities to communicate with mobile devices, validate chipped credit cards, and process payment requests with tokens rather than credit card numbers. Today’s post focuses on use of tokens in EMV-compliant payment systems. This is critically important, because when you read the EMV tokenization specification it becomes clear that its security model is to stop passing PAN around as much as possible, thereby limiting its exposure.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Building a Threat Intelligence Program [New Series]</title><link>/blog/building-a-threat-intelligence-program-new-series/</link><pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2015 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/building-a-threat-intelligence-program-new-series/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Security practitioners have been falling behind their adversaries, who launch new attacks using new techniques daily. Furthermore, defenders remain hindered by the broken negative security model of looking for attacks they have never seen before (well done, compliance mandates), and so consistently missing these attacks. If your organization hasn’t seen the attack or updated your controls and monitors to look for these new patterns… oh, well.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>EMV and the Changing Payment Space: The Liability Shift</title><link>/blog/emv-and-the-changing-payment-space-the-liability-shift/</link><pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2015 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/emv-and-the-changing-payment-space-the-liability-shift/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;So far we have discussed the EMV requirement, covered the players in the payment landscape, and considered merchant migration issues. It is time to get into the meat of this series. Our next two posts will discuss the &lt;em&gt;liability shift&lt;/em&gt; in detail, and explain why it is not as straightforward as its marketing. Next I will talk about the EMV specification’s application of tokenization, and how it changes the payment security landscape.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>EMV and the Changing Payment Space: Migration</title><link>/blog/emv-and-the-changing-payment-space-emv-migration/</link><pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2015 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/emv-and-the-changing-payment-space-emv-migration/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Moving to EMV compliant terminals is not a plug-and-play endeavor. You can’t simply plug them in, turn them on and expect everything to work. Changes are needed to the software for supporting point-of-sale systems (cash registers). You will likely need to provision keys to devices; if you manage keys internally you will also need to make sure everything is safely stored in an HSM. There are often required changes to back-office software to sync up with the POS changes. IT staff typically need to be trained on the new equipment. Merchants who use payment processors or gateways that manage their terminals for them face less disruption, but it’s still a lot of work and rollouts can take months.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Summary: Community</title><link>/blog/summary-community/</link><pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2015 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/summary-community/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Rich here.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I’m going to pull an Adrian this week, and cover a few unrelated things. Nope, no secret tie-in at the end, just some interesting things that have hit over the past couple weeks, since I wrote a Summary.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Living with the OPM Hack</title><link>/blog/living-with-the-opm-hack/</link><pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2015 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/living-with-the-opm-hack/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;And yep, thanks to his altruistic streak even Rich is affected. We don’t spend much time on blame or history, but more on the personal impact. How do you move on once you know much of your most personal information is now out there, you don’t know who has it, and you don’t know how they might want to use it?&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Incite 7/15/15 — On Top of the Worlds</title><link>/blog/10055/</link><pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2015 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/10055/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I discussed &lt;a href="https://securosis.com/blog/incite-7-1-2015-explorers"&gt;my love of exploring&lt;/a&gt; in the last Incite, and I have been fortunate to have time this summer to actually explore a bit. The first exploration was a family vacation to NYC. Well, kind of NYC. My Dad has a place on the Jersey shore, so we headed up there for a couple days and took day trips to New York City to do the tourist thing.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>EMV and the Changing Payment Space: the Basics</title><link>/blog/emv-and-the-changing-payments-space-the-basics/</link><pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2015 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/emv-and-the-changing-payments-space-the-basics/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;This is the second post in our series on the “liability shift” proposed by EMVCo – the joint partnership of Visa, Mastercard, and Europay. Today we will cover the basics of what the shift is about, requirements for merchants, and what will happen to those who do not comply. But to help understand we will also go into a little detail about payment providers behind the scenes.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Threat Detection Evolution: Quick Wins</title><link>/blog/threat-detection-evolution-quick-wins/</link><pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2015 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/threat-detection-evolution-quick-wins/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;As we wrap up this series on Threat Detection Evolution, we’ll work through a quick scenario to illustrate how these concepts come together to impact on your ability to detect attacks. Let’s assume you work for a mid-sized super-regional retailer with 75 stores, 6 distribution centers, and an HQ. Your situation may be a bit different, especially if you work in a massive enterprise, but the general concepts are the same.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Incite 7/1/2015: Explorers</title><link>/blog/incite-7-1-2015-explorers/</link><pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2015 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/incite-7-1-2015-explorers/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;When I take a step back I see I am pretty lucky. I’ve seen a lot of very cool places. And experienced a lot of different cultures through my business travels. And now I’m at a point in life where I want to explore more. Not just do business hotels and see the sights from the front seat of a colleague’s car or taxi. I want to explore and see all the cool things this big world has to offer.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>New Series: EMV, Tokenization, and the Changing Payment Space</title><link>/blog/new-series-emv-tokenization-and-the-changing-payment-space/</link><pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2015 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/new-series-emv-tokenization-and-the-changing-payment-space/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;October 1st, 2015, is the deadline for merchants to upgrade “Point of Sale” and “Point of Swipe” terminals to recommended EMV compliant systems. To quote Wikipedia, “&lt;a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/EMV"&gt;EMV (Europay MasterCard Visa)&lt;/a&gt;, is a technical standard for smart payment cards and for payment terminals and automated teller machines which can accept them.” These new terminals can validate an EMV specific chip in a customer’s credit card on swipe, or validate a secure element in a mobile device when it is scanned by a terminal. The press is calling this transition “The EMV Liability Shift” because merchants who do not adopt the new standard for payment terminals are being told that they – not banks – will be responsible for fraudulent transactions. There are many possible reasons for this push.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Threat Detection: Analysis</title><link>/blog/threat-detection-analysis/</link><pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2015 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/threat-detection-analysis/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;As discussed in our last post, evolved threat detection’s first step is &lt;a href="https://securosis.com/blog/threat-detection-evolution-data-collection"&gt;gathering internal and external security data&lt;/a&gt;. Once you have the data aggregated you need to analyze it to look for indications that you have compromised devices and/or malicious activity within your organization.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Summary: I Am Now a Security Risk</title><link>/blog/summary-i-am-now-a-security-risk/</link><pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2015 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/summary-i-am-now-a-security-risk/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Rich here,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Yep, it looks very likely my personal data is now in the hands of China, or someone pretending to be China, or someone who wants it to look like China. While I can’t go into details, as many of you know I’ve done things with the federal government related to my rescue work. It isn’t secret or anything, but I never feel comfortable talking specifics because it’s part-time and I’m not authorized to represent any agency.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Threat Detection Evolution: Data Collection</title><link>/blog/threat-detection-evolution-data-collection/</link><pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2015 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/threat-detection-evolution-data-collection/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://securosis.com/blog/threat-detection-evolution-why-evolve-new-series"&gt;The first post in this series&lt;/a&gt; set the stage for the evolution of threat detection. Now that we’ve made the case for why detection must evolve, let’s work through the mechanics of what that actually means. It comes down to two functions: security data collection, and analytics of the collected data. First we’ll go through what data is helpful and where it should come from.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Incite 6/10/2015: Twenty Five</title><link>/blog/incite-6-10-2015-twenty-five/</link><pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2015 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/incite-6-10-2015-twenty-five/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;This past weekend I was at my college reunion. It’s been twenty five years since I graduated. TWENTY FIVE. It’s kind of stunning when you think about it. I joked after the last reunion in 2010 that the seniors then were in diapers when I was graduating. The parents of a lot of this year’s seniors hadn’t even met. Even scarier, I’m old enough to be &lt;em&gt;their&lt;/em&gt; parent. It turns out a couple friends who I graduated with actually have kids in college now. Yeah, that’s disturbing.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>My 2015 Personal Security Guiding Principles and the New Rand Report</title><link>/blog/my-2015-personal-security-guiding-principles-and-the-new-rand-report/</link><pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2015 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/my-2015-personal-security-guiding-principles-and-the-new-rand-report/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;In 2009, I published &lt;a href="https://securosis.com/blog/my-personal-security-guiding-principles"&gt;My Personal Security Guiding Principles&lt;/a&gt;. They hold up well, but my thinking has evolved over six years. Some due to personal maturing, and a lot due to massive changes in our industry.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Contribute to the Cloud Security Alliance Guidance: Community Drives, Securosis Writes</title><link>/blog/contribute-to-the-cloud-security-alliance-guidance-community-drives-securos/</link><pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2015 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/contribute-to-the-cloud-security-alliance-guidance-community-drives-securos/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;This week we start one of the cooler projects in the history of Securosis. The &lt;a href="http://cloudsecurityalliance.org/"&gt;Cloud Security Alliance&lt;/a&gt; contracted Securosis to write the next version of the &lt;a href="https://cloudsecurityalliance.org/research/security-guidance/#_overview"&gt;CSA Guidance&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Threat Detection Evolution: Why Evolve? [New Series]</title><link>/blog/threat-detection-evolution-why-evolve-new-series/</link><pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2015 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/threat-detection-evolution-why-evolve-new-series/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;As we discussed recently in &lt;a href="https://securosis.com/blog/network-based-threat-detection-operationalizing-detection"&gt;Network-based Threat Detection&lt;/a&gt;, prevention isn’t good enough any more. Every day we see additional proof that adversaries cannot be reliably stopped. So we have started to see the long-awaited movement of focus and funding from prevention, to detection and investigation. That said, for years security practitioners have been trying to make sense of security data to shorten the window between compromise and detection – largely unsuccessfully.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Network Security Gateway Evolution [New Series]</title><link>/blog/network-security-gateway-evolution-new-series/</link><pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2015 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/network-security-gateway-evolution-new-series/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;(&lt;strong&gt;Note:&lt;/strong&gt; We’re restarting this series over the next week, so we are reposting the intro to get things moving again. – Mike )&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>We Don’t Know Sh—. You Don’t Know Sh</title><link>/blog/we-dont-know-sh-you-dont-know-sh/</link><pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2015 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/we-dont-know-sh-you-dont-know-sh/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Once again we have a major security story slumming in the headlines. This time it’s Hackers on a Plane, but without all that Samuel L goodness. But what’s the real story? It’s time to face the fact that the only people who know are the ones who aren’t talking, and everything you hear is most certainly wrong.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Summary: Ginger</title><link>/blog/summary-ginger/</link><pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2015 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/summary-ginger/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Rich here.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;As a redhead (what little is left) I have spent a large portion of my life answering questions about red hair. Sometimes it’s about pain tolerance/wound healing (yes, there are genetic differences), but most commonly I get asked if the attitude is genetic or environmental.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Incite 5/20/2015: Slow down [to speed up]</title><link>/blog/incite-5-20-2015-slow-down-to-speed-up/</link><pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2015 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/incite-5-20-2015-slow-down-to-speed-up/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;When things get very busy it’s hard to stay focused. There is so much flying at you, and so many things stacking up. Sometimes you just do the easy things because they are easy. You send the email, you put together the proposal, you provide feedback on the document. It can be done in 15 minutes, so you do it. Leaving the bigger stuff for later. At least I do.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Summary: DevOpsinator</title><link>/blog/summary-devopsinator/</link><pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2015 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/summary-devopsinator/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;It seems we messed up, and last week’s Summary never made it out of draft. So I doubled up and apologize for the spam, but since I already put in all the time, here you go…&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Network-based Threat Detection: Operationalizing Detection</title><link>/blog/network-based-threat-detection-operationalizing-detection/</link><pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2015 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/network-based-threat-detection-operationalizing-detection/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;As we wrap up our Network-based Threat Detection series, we have already covered &lt;a href="https://securosis.com/blog/network-based-threat-detection-overcoming-the-limitations-of-prevention"&gt;why prevention isn’t good enough&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href="https://securosis.com/blog/network-based-threat-detection-looking-for-indicators"&gt;how to find indications&lt;/a&gt; that an attack is happening, based on what you see on the network. Our last post worked through adding context to collected data to allow &lt;a href="https://securosis.com/blog/network-based-threat-detection-prioritizing-with-context"&gt;some measure of prioritization&lt;/a&gt; for alerts. To finish things off we will discuss additional context and making alerts operationally useful.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Network-based Threat Detection: Prioritizing with Context</title><link>/blog/network-based-threat-detection-prioritizing-with-context/</link><pubDate>Mon, 11 May 2015 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/network-based-threat-detection-prioritizing-with-context/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;During speaking gigs we ask how many in the audience actually get through their to-do list every day. Usually we get one or two jokers in the crowd between jobs, or maybe just trying to troll us a bit. But nobody in a security operational role gets everything done every day. So the critical success factor is to make sure you are getting the &lt;em&gt;right&lt;/em&gt; things done, and not burning time on activities that don’t reduce risk or contain attack damage.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Incite 5/6/2015: Just Be</title><link>/blog/incite-5-6-2015-just-be/</link><pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2015 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/incite-5-6-2015-just-be/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I’m spent after the RSAC. By Friday I have been &lt;em&gt;on&lt;/em&gt; for close to a week. It’s nonstop, from the break of dawn until the wee hours of the morning. But don’t feel too bad – it’s one of my favorite weeks of the year. I get to see my friends. I do a bunch of business. And I get a feel for how close our research is to reflecting the larger trends in the industry.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>RSAC wrap-up. Same as it ever was.</title><link>/blog/rsac-wrap-up-same-as-it-ever-was/</link><pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2015 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/rsac-wrap-up-same-as-it-ever-was/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;The RSA conference is over and put up some massive numbers (for security). But what does it all mean? Can all those 450 vendors on the show floor possibly survive? Do any of them add value?&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Network-based Threat Detection: Looking for Indicators</title><link>/blog/network-based-threat-detection-looking-for-indicators/</link><pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2015 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/network-based-threat-detection-looking-for-indicators/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Now that RSAC is behind us, it’s time to get back to our research agenda. So we pick up Network-based Threat Detection where we left off. In &lt;a href="https://securosis.com/blog/network-based-threat-detection-overcoming-the-limitations-of-prevention"&gt;that first post&lt;/a&gt;, we made the case that math and context are the keys to detecting attacks from network activity, given that we cannot totally prevent endpoint compromise. Attackers always leave a trail on the network.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>RSA Conference Guide 2015 Deep Dives: Security Management</title><link>/blog/rsa-conference-guide-2015-deep-dives-security-management/</link><pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2015 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/rsa-conference-guide-2015-deep-dives-security-management/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Last year Big Data was all the rage at the RSAC in terms of security monitoring and management. So the big theme this year will be…(drum roll, please)…Big Data. Yes, it’s more of the same, though we will see security big data called a bunch of different things—including insider threat detection, security analytics, situational awareness, and probably two or three more where we have no idea what they even mean.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>RSA Conference Guide 2015 Deep Dives: Endpoint Security</title><link>/blog/rsa-conference-guide-2015-deep-dives-endpoint-security/</link><pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2015 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/rsa-conference-guide-2015-deep-dives-endpoint-security/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;What you’ll see at the RSAC in terms of endpoint security is really more of the same. Advanced attacks blah, mobile devices blah blah, AV-vendor hatred blah blah blah. Just a lot of blah… But we are still recovering from the advanced attacker hangover, which made painfully clear that existing approaches to preventing malware just don’t work. So a variety of alternatives have emerged to do it better. Check out our Advanced Endpoint and Server Protection paper to learn more about where the technology is going. None of these innovations has really hit the mainstream yet, so it looks like the status quo will prevail again in 2015. But the year of endpoint security disruption is coming—perhaps 2016 will be it…&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>RSA Conference Guide 2015 Deep Dives: Identity and Access Management</title><link>/blog/rsa-conference-guide-2015-deep-dives-identity-and-access-management/</link><pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2015 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/rsa-conference-guide-2015-deep-dives-identity-and-access-management/</guid><description>&lt;h2 id="no-respect"&gt;No Respect&lt;/h2&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Identity is one of the more difficult topics to cover in our yearly RSAC Guide, because identity issues and trends don’t grab headlines. Identity and Access Management vendors tend to be light-years ahead of most customers. You may be thinking “Passwords and Active Directory: What else do I need to know?” which is pretty typical. IAM responsibilities sit in a no-man’s land between security, development, and IT… and none of them wants ownership. Most big firms now have a CISO, CIO, and VP of Engineering, but when was the last time you heard of a VP of Identity? Director? No, we haven’t either. That means customers—and cloud providers, as we will discuss in a bit—are generally not cognizant of important advancements. But those identity systems are used by every employee and customer. Unfortunately, despite ongoing innovation, much of what gets attention is somewhat backwards.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>RSA Conference Guide 2015 Deep Dives: Network Security</title><link>/blog/rsa-conference-guide-2015-deep-dives-network-security/</link><pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2015 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/rsa-conference-guide-2015-deep-dives-network-security/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;We had a little trouble coming up with a novel and pithy backdrop for what you will see in the Network Security space at RSAC 2015. We wonder if this year we will see the first IoT firewall, because hacking thermostats and refrigerators has made threat models go bonkers. The truth is that most customers are trying to figure out what to do with the new next-generation devices they already bought. We shouldn’t wonder why the new emperor looks a lot like the old emperor, when we dress our new ruler (NGFW) up in clothes (rules) that look so similar to our old-school port- and protocol-based rulesets.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>RSA Conference Guide 2015 Deep Dives: Application Security</title><link>/blog/rsa-conference-guide-2015-deep-dives-application-security/</link><pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2015 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/rsa-conference-guide-2015-deep-dives-application-security/</guid><description>&lt;h2 id="coming-soon-to-an-application-near-you-devops"&gt;Coming Soon to an Application Near You: DevOps&lt;/h2&gt;
&lt;p&gt;For several years you have been hearing the wonders of Agile development, and how it has done wondrous things for software development companies. Agile development isn’t a product – it is a process change, a new way for developers to communicate and work together. It’s effective enough to attract almost every firm we speak with away from traditional waterfall development. Now there is another major change on the horizon, called DevOps. Like Agile it is mostly a process change. Unlike Agile it is more operationally focused, relying heavily on tools and automation for success. That means not just your developers will be Agile – your IT and security teams will be, too!&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>RSA Conference Guide 2015 Deep Dives: Data Security</title><link>/blog/rsa-conference-guide-2015-deep-dives-data-security/</link><pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2015 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/rsa-conference-guide-2015-deep-dives-data-security/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Data security is the toughest coverage area to write up this year. It reminds us of those bad apocalypse films, where everyone runs around building DIY tanks and improvising explosives to “save the children,” before driving off to battle the undead hordes and—leaving the kids with a couple spoons, some dirt, and a can of corned beef hash.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>RSA Conference Guide 2015 Deep Dives: Cloud Security</title><link>/blog/rsa-conference-guide-2015-deep-dives-cloud-security/</link><pubDate>Sun, 19 Apr 2015 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/rsa-conference-guide-2015-deep-dives-cloud-security/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Before delving into the world of cloud security we’d like to remind you of a little basic physics. Today’s lesson is on velocity vs. acceleration. Velocity is how fast you are going, and acceleration is how fast velocity increases. They affect our perceptions differently. No one thinks much of driving at 60mph. Ride a motorcycle at 60mph, or plunge down a ski slope at 50mph (not that uncommon), and you get a thrill.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>RSA Conference Guide 2015 Deep Dives: Overview</title><link>/blog/rsa-conference-guide-2015-deep-dives-overview/</link><pubDate>Sun, 19 Apr 2015 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/rsa-conference-guide-2015-deep-dives-overview/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;With lots of folks (including us) at the RSA Conference this week, we figured we’d post the deep dives we wrote for the RSAC Guide and give those of you not attending a taste of what your missing. Though we haven’t figured out how to relay the feel of the meat market at the W bar after 10 PM nor the ear deafening bass at any number of conference parties nor the sharp pain you feel in your gut after a night of being way too festive. Though we’re working on that for next year’s guide.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>LAST CHANCE! Register for the Disaster Recovery Breakfast</title><link>/blog/last-chance-register-for-the-disaster-recovery-breakfast/</link><pubDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2015 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/last-chance-register-for-the-disaster-recovery-breakfast/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Holy crap! The RSA Conference starts on Monday. Which means… you don’t have much time left to register for the 7th annual Disaster Recovery Breakfast.*&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Presenting the 2015 RSA Conference Guide</title><link>/blog/presenting-the-2015-rsa-conference-guide/</link><pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2015 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/presenting-the-2015-rsa-conference-guide/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;As you’ve seen over the past week, we’ve been reposting our RSAC Guide here. That’s because the RSA Conference folks allowed us to post it on their blog first. Yes, they are nuts, but we aren’t going to complain.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Incite 4/15/2015: Boom</title><link>/blog/incite-4-15-2015-boom/</link><pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2015 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/incite-4-15-2015-boom/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I’ve been on the road a bit lately, and noticed discussions keep working around to the general health of our industry. I’m not sure whether we’re good or just lucky, but we security folk find ourselves in the middle of a maelstrom of activity. And that will only accelerate over the next week, as many of us saddle up and head to San Francisco for the annual RSA Conference. We’ve been posting our &lt;a href="http://www.rsaconference.com/blogs/welcome-to-the-securosis-guide-to-the-rsa-conference"&gt;RSA Conference Guide&lt;/a&gt; on the RSA Conference blog (are they nuts?) and tomorrow we’ll post our complete guide with all sorts of meme goodness.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>RSAC Guide 2015: P.Compliance.90X</title><link>/blog/rsac-guide-2015-p-compliance-90x/</link><pubDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2015 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/rsac-guide-2015-p-compliance-90x/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Compliance. It’s a principle driver for security spending, and vendors know this. That’s why each year compliance plays a major role in vendor messaging on the RSA show floor. A plethora of companies claiming to be “the leader in enterprise compliance products” all market the same basic message: “We protect you at all levels with a single, easy-to-use platform.” and “Our enterprise-class capabilities ensure complete data security and compliance.” Right.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>RSAC Guide 2015: Go Pro or Go Home</title><link>/blog/rsac-guide-2015-go-pro-or-go-home/</link><pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2015 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/rsac-guide-2015-go-pro-or-go-home/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;In the United States there’s a clearly defined line between amateur and professional athletes. And in our wacky world of American sports we have drafts, statistics, hefty contracts, trophies, and rings to demonstrate an athlete’s success.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>RSAC Guide 2015: IOWTF</title><link>/blog/rsac-guide-2015-iowtf/</link><pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2015 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/rsac-guide-2015-iowtf/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Have you heard a vendor tell you about their old product, which now protects the Internet of Things? No, it isn’t a pull-up bar, it’s an Iron Bar Crossfit (TM) Dominator!&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>RSA Guide 2015: Get Bigger (Data) Now!!!</title><link>/blog/rsa-guide-2015-get-bigger-data-now/</link><pubDate>Wed, 08 Apr 2015 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/rsa-guide-2015-get-bigger-data-now/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;This year at RSA we will no doubt see the return of Big Data to the show floor. This comes along with all the muscle confusion that it generates – not unlike Crossfit. Before you hoist me to the scaffolding or pummel me with your running shoes, let’s think about this. Other than the acolytes of this exercise regimen, who truly understands it? Say “Big Data” out loud. Does that hold any meaning for you, other than a shiny marketing buzzword and marketing imagery? It does? Excellent. If you say it three times out loud a project manager will appear, but sadly you will still need to fight for your budget.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>RSAC Guide 2015: DevOpsX Games</title><link>/blog/rsac-guide-2015-devopsx-games/</link><pubDate>Wed, 08 Apr 2015 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/rsac-guide-2015-devopsx-games/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;DevOps is one of the hottest trends in all of IT – sailing over every barrier in front of it like a boardercross racer catching big air on the last roller before the drop to the finish. (We’d translate that, but don’t want to make you feel too old and out of touch).&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>RSAC Guide 2015: Key Theme: Security Bonk</title><link>/blog/rsac-guide-2015-key-theme-security-bonk/</link><pubDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2015 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/rsac-guide-2015-key-theme-security-bonk/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;The Security Bonk&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;For better or worse, a bunch of the Securosis team have become endurance athletes. Probably more an indication of age impacting our explosiveness, and constant travel impacting our respective waistlines, than anything else. So we’re all too familiar with the concept of ‘bonking’: hitting the wall and capitulating. You may not give up, but you are just going through the motions.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>RSA Guide 2015: Change</title><link>/blog/rsa-guide-2015-change/</link><pubDate>Mon, 06 Apr 2015 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/rsa-guide-2015-change/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Every year we like to start the RSA Guide with review of major themes you will most likely see woven through presentations and marketing materials on the show floor. These themes are a bit like channel-surfing late-night TV – the words and images themselves illustrate our collective psychology more than any particular needs. It is easy to get excited about the latest diet supplement or workout DVD, and all too easy to be pulled along by the constant onslaught of finely-crafted messaging, but in the end what matters &lt;strong&gt;to you&lt;/strong&gt;? What is the reality behind the theme? Which works? Is it low-carb, slow-carb, or all carb? Is it all nonsense designed to extract your limited financial resources? How can you extract the useful nuggets from the noise?&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>RSAC Guide 2015: Key Theme: Change</title><link>/blog/rsac-guide-2015-key-theme-change/</link><pubDate>Mon, 06 Apr 2015 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/rsac-guide-2015-key-theme-change/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Every year we like to start the RSA Guide with review of major themes you will most likely see woven through presentations and marketing materials on the show floor. These themes are a bit like channel-surfing late-night TV – the words and images themselves illustrate our collective psychology more than any particular needs. It is easy to get excited about the latest diet supplement or workout DVD, and all too easy to be pulled along by the constant onslaught of finely-crafted messaging, but in the end what matters &lt;strong&gt;to you&lt;/strong&gt;? What is the reality behind the theme? Which works? Is it low-carb, slow-carb, or all carb? Is it all nonsense designed to extract your limited financial resources? How can you extract the useful nuggets from the noise?&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Friday Summary: April 3, 2013: Getting back in</title><link>/blog/friday-summary-april-3-2013-getting-back-in/</link><pubDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2015 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/friday-summary-april-3-2013-getting-back-in/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Running. I started running when I was 9. I used to tag along to exercise class at the local community college with my mom, and they always finished the evening with a couple laps around the track. High school was track and cross country. College too. When my friends and I started to get really fast, there would be the occasional taunting of rent-a-cops, and much hilarity during the chase, usually ending in the pursuers crashing into a fence we had neatly hopped over. Through my work career, running was a staple, with fantastic benefits for both staying healthy and washing away workday stresses.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Incite 4/1/2015: Fooling Time</title><link>/blog/incite-4-1-2015-fooling-time/</link><pubDate>Wed, 01 Apr 2015 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/incite-4-1-2015-fooling-time/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;As we started recording the Firestarter Monday Rich announced the date. When he said “March 30”, it was kind of jarring. It’s March 30? How did that happen? Wasn’t it just yesterday we rang in the new year? I guess it was almost 90 yesterdays. Thankfully Rich cut me off as I went down the rabbit hole of wondering where the time went.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Firestarter: Using RSA</title><link>/blog/using-rsa/</link><pubDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2015 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/using-rsa/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;The RSA Conference is the biggest annual event in our industry (really – there are tens of thousands of people there). But bigger doesn’t mean everything is better, and it can be all too easy to get lost in the event and fail to get value out of it. Even if you don’t attend, this is the time of year a lot of security companies focus on, which affects everything you see and read – for better and worse. This week we discuss how we get value out of the event, and how to find useful nuggets in the noise. From skipping panels (except Mike’s, of course) to hitting some of the less-known opportunities like Learning Labs and the Monday events, RSA can be very useful for any security pro, but only if you plan.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>New Paper! Endpoint Defense: Essential Practices</title><link>/blog/new-paper-endpoint-defense-essential-practices/</link><pubDate>Mon, 30 Mar 2015 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/new-paper-endpoint-defense-essential-practices/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;We’ve seen a renaissance of sorts regarding endpoint security. To be clear, most of solutions in the market aren’t good enough. Attackers don’t have to be advanced to make quick work of the endpoint protection suites in place. That realization has created a wave of innovation on the endpoint that promises to provide a better chance to prevent and detect attacks. But the reality is far too many organizations can’t even get the fundamentals of endpoint security.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Incite 3/25/2015: Playing it safe</title><link>/blog/incite-3-25-2015-playing-it-safe/</link><pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2015 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/incite-3-25-2015-playing-it-safe/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;A few weeks back at BSidesATL, I sent out a Tweet that kind of summed up my view of things. It was prompted by an email from a fitness company with the subject line “Embrace Discomfort.” Of course they were talking about the pain of whatever fitness regimen you follow. Not me. To me, &lt;em&gt;comfort is uncomfortable&lt;/em&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Network-based Threat Detection: Overcoming the Limitations of Prevention</title><link>/blog/network-based-threat-detection-overcoming-the-limitations-of-prevention/</link><pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2015 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/network-based-threat-detection-overcoming-the-limitations-of-prevention/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Organizations continue to invest heavily to block &lt;em&gt;advanced attacks&lt;/em&gt; , on both endpoints and networks. Despite all this investment devices continue to be compromised in increasing numbers, and high-profile breaches continue unabated. Something isn’t adding up. It comes down to psychology – security practitioners &lt;em&gt;want&lt;/em&gt; to believe that the latest shiny geegaw for preventing compromise will finally work and stop the pain.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Endpoint Defense Essential Practices</title><link>/blog/endpoint-defense-essential-practices/</link><pubDate>Fri, 20 Mar 2015 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/endpoint-defense-essential-practices/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;The area of security has the most increased focus recently is protecting the endpoint. Once you stop snickering, it makes some sense. For years (or decades, depending on how cynical you want to be) endpoint security was the beneficiary of the compliance driver. Whether the technologies actually protected anything was beside the point. Assessors would show up, and you needed to have AV. Then advanced attackers happened and the industry started innovating, starting with network security, leaving the endpoint largely unprotected.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>New! Cracking the Confusion: Encryption &amp; Tokenization for Data Centers, Servers, &amp; Applications</title><link>/blog/new-paper-cracking-the-confusion-encryption-and-tokenization-for-data-cente/</link><pubDate>Fri, 20 Mar 2015 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/new-paper-cracking-the-confusion-encryption-and-tokenization-for-data-cente/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Woo Hoo! It’s New Paper Friday!&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://cdn.securosis.com/assets/library/reports/Cracking_the_Confusion-_Datacenter_Encryption.v.1.final.pdf"&gt;&lt;img src="https://cdn.securosis.com/assets/library/main/Screen_Shot_2015-03-20_at_10.56.05_AM.png" alt="Cracking_the_Confusion-_Datacenter_Encryption.v.1.final.pdf"&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Over the past month or so you have seen Adrian and myself put together our latest work on encryption. This one is a top-level overview designed to help people decide which approach should work best for datacenter projects (including servers, storage, applications, cloud infrastructure, and databases). Now we have pieced it together into a full paper.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Summary: Crunch Time</title><link>/blog/summary-crunch-time/</link><pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2015 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/summary-crunch-time/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I’ve had one conversation about 8 times this week:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;“Ready for RSA?”&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;“Not even close.”&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;“Yeah, figured it would be better since they pushed it out an extra month, but not so much.”&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Incite 3/18/2015: Pause</title><link>/blog/incite-3-18-2015-pause/</link><pubDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2015 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/incite-3-18-2015-pause/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;It’s been over a month since I wrote an Incite. It’ is the longest period of downtime since I joined Securosis. I could talk about my workload, which is bonkers right now. But over the years I’ve written the Incite regardless of workload. I could talk about excessive travel, but I haven’t been traveling nearly as much as last year. I could come up with lots of excuses, but as I tell my kids all the time, “I’m not in the excuses business.”&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Firestarter: Cyber Cash Cow</title><link>/blog/firestarter-cyber-cash-cow/</link><pubDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2015 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/firestarter-cyber-cash-cow/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Last week we saw a security company hit the $2.4B valuation level. Yes, that’s a ‘B’, as in billion. This week we dig into the changing role of money and investment in our industry, and what it might mean. We like to pretend keeping our heads down and focusing on defense and tech is all that matters, but practically speaking we need to keep half an eye on the market around us. It not only affects the tools at our disposal, but influences the entire course of our profession.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Take Control of Security for Mac Users</title><link>/blog/take-control-of-security-for-mac-users/</link><pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2015 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/take-control-of-security-for-mac-users/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I spend a lot of time on Apple security, more for personal reasons than anything else. They are the tools I use every day, and where I send most of my friends and family to manage their digital lives, so my investment runs deeper than anything financial. I have been the Security Editor over at &lt;a href="http://www.tidbits.com/"&gt;TidBITS&lt;/a&gt; since about the time I founded Securosis, but I am not the only security expert over there. Joe Kissell has himself written books on the topic, and plenty of articles (mostly at TidBITS and Macworld).&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Be Careful What You Wish For, It’s the SEVENTH Annual Disaster Recovery Breakfast</title><link>/blog/2015-recoverybreakfast/</link><pubDate>Mon, 09 Mar 2015 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/2015-recoverybreakfast/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src="https://cdn.securosis.com/assets/library/main/RecoveryBreakfastInvite-2015_thumb.jpg" alt="2015 DRB, the be careful what you wish for edition"&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;There seems to something missing for us Securosis folks now that it’s the beginning of March. After some reflection we realized it’s that dull ache in our livers from surviving yet another RSA Conference. The show organizers had to move the conference to April this year, to ensure a full takeover of San Francisco. Regardless of when the conference is, there is one thing you can definitely count on: the DRB!&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>SecDevOps Learning Lab at RSA</title><link>/blog/secdevops-learning-lab-at-rsa/</link><pubDate>Mon, 09 Mar 2015 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/secdevops-learning-lab-at-rsa/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;We were invited to run a two-hour learning lab on a topic of our choice this year at the RSA Conference. I suspect it will surprise… no one… that we chose &lt;em&gt;Pragmatic SecDevOps&lt;/em&gt; as our topic.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Friday Summary: More Cowbell</title><link>/blog/summary-more-cowbell/</link><pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2015 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/summary-more-cowbell/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Rich here.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Not to get too personal, but I had a dream about being back on ski patrol last night.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Firestarter: Cyber vs. Terror (yeah, we went there)</title><link>/blog/firestarter-cyber-vs-terror-yeah-we-went-there/</link><pubDate>Mon, 02 Mar 2015 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/firestarter-cyber-vs-terror-yeah-we-went-there/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Last week the US Director of National Intelligence said &lt;a href="http://www.techtimes.com/articles/35965/20150227/cyber-attack-bigger-threat-than-isis-says-u-s-spy-chief.htm"&gt;cyberattacks are a greater risk than terrorism&lt;/a&gt;. This week we debate what that means, and whether terminology is getting so muddled that it becomes meaningless. Plus we rip into Rich’s post claiming security people need to stop thinking of themselves as warriors, and start thinking like spies.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Summary: You’re a Spy, not a Warrior</title><link>/blog/summary-youre-a-spy-not-a-warrior-2/</link><pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2015 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/summary-youre-a-spy-not-a-warrior-2/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Rich here.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;These days it is hard to swing a cyberstick without hearing a cybergasp of cyberstration at the inevitable cyberbuse of the word “cyber”.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Cracking the Confusion: Encryption Decision Tree</title><link>/blog/cracking-the-confusion-encryption-decision-tree/</link><pubDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2015 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/cracking-the-confusion-encryption-decision-tree/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;This is the final post in this series. If you want to track it through the entire editing process, you can&lt;a href="https://github.com/Securosis/DataCenterEncryption"&gt;follow along and contribute on GitHub&lt;/a&gt;. You can &lt;a href="https://securosis.com/blog/cracking-the-confusion-encryption-and-tokenization-for-data-centers-servers"&gt;read the first post&lt;/a&gt;, and find the other posts under “related posts” in full article view.&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Ticker Symbol: Hack - *Updated*</title><link>/blog/ticker-symbol-hack-updated/</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Feb 2015 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/ticker-symbol-hack-updated/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;There is a ticker symbol &lt;a href="http://quotes.morningstar.com/stock/s?t=HACK"&gt;HACK&lt;/a&gt; that tracks a group of publicly traded “Cyber Security” firms. Given how hot everything ‘Cyber’ is, HACK may do just fine – who knows? But perhaps one for breached companies (BRCH?) would be better. For you security geeks out there who love to talk about the cost of breaches, let’s take a look at the stock prices of several big-named firms which have been breached:&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Cracking the Confusion: Top Encryption Use Cases</title><link>/blog/cracking-the-confusion-top-encryption-use-cases/</link><pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2015 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/cracking-the-confusion-top-encryption-use-cases/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;This is the sixth post in a new series. If you want to track it through the entire editing process, you can&lt;a href="https://github.com/Securosis/DataCenterEncryption"&gt;follow along and contribute on GitHub&lt;/a&gt;. You can &lt;a href="https://securosis.com/blog/cracking-the-confusion-encryption-and-tokenization-for-data-centers-servers"&gt;read the first post&lt;/a&gt; and find the other posts under “related posts” in full article view.&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Summary: Three Mini Gadget Reviews… and a Big Week for Security Fails</title><link>/blog/summary-three-mini-gadget-reviews-and-a-big-week-for-security-fails/</link><pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2015 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/summary-three-mini-gadget-reviews-and-a-big-week-for-security-fails/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Rich here,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;Before I get into the cold open for this week, the past few days have been pretty nasty for privacy, security, and the digital supply chain. I will have a post on that up soon, but you can skip to the Top News section to catch the main stories. They are essential reading this week, and we don’t say that often.&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Cracking the Confusion: Additional Platform Features and Options</title><link>/blog/cracking-the-confusion-additional-platform-features-and-options/</link><pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2015 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/cracking-the-confusion-additional-platform-features-and-options/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;This is the fifth post in a new series. If you want to track it through the entire editing process, you can&lt;a href="https://github.com/Securosis/DataCenterEncryption"&gt;follow along and contribute on GitHub&lt;/a&gt;. You can &lt;a href="https://securosis.com/blog/cracking-the-confusion-encryption-and-tokenization-for-data-centers-servers"&gt;read the first post&lt;/a&gt; and find the other posts under “related posts” in full article view.&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Cracking the Confusion: Key Management</title><link>/blog/cracking-the-confusion-key-management/</link><pubDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2015 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/cracking-the-confusion-key-management/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;This is the fourth post in a new series. If you want to track it through the entire editing process, you can&lt;a href="https://github.com/Securosis/DataCenterEncryption"&gt;follow along and contribute on GitHub&lt;/a&gt;. You can &lt;a href="https://securosis.com/blog/cracking-the-confusion-encryption-and-tokenization-for-data-centers-servers"&gt;read the first post&lt;/a&gt; and find the other posts under “related posts” in full article view.&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Firestarter: Cyber!!!</title><link>/blog/firestarter-cyber/</link><pubDate>Mon, 16 Feb 2015 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/firestarter-cyber/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Last week President Obama held a cybersecurity summit out in the Bay Area. He issued a new executive order and is standing up a new threat sharing center. This is in response to ongoing massive attacks such as the Anthem breach and (as we heard this weekend) hundreds of millions stolen in bank thefts. But what does it all mean to security pros and the industry? The truth is, not much in our day-to-day (yet), but you certainly had better pay attention.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Some days, I think we are screwed</title><link>/blog/some-days-i-think-we-are-screwed/</link><pubDate>Mon, 16 Feb 2015 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/some-days-i-think-we-are-screwed/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I meant to write about this earlier and forgot. Last week I was listening to the Diane Rehm show on NPR while out for a long run (I am weird and prefer talk radio/podcasts on long workouts). &lt;a href="http://thedianerehmshow.org/shows/2015-02-10/debate_over_counter_cyberattack_strategies"&gt;The show was all about cybersecurity.&lt;/a&gt; To be honest, the panel was a bit weak (Ravi Pendse from Brown was decent).&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Cracking the Confusion: Encryption Layers</title><link>/blog/cracking-the-confusion-encryption-layers/</link><pubDate>Thu, 12 Feb 2015 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/cracking-the-confusion-encryption-layers/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Picture enterprise applications as a layer cake: applications sit on databases, databases on files, and files are mapped onto storage volumes. You can use encryption at each of these layers in your application stack: within the application, in the database, on files, or on storage volumes. &lt;em&gt;Where&lt;/em&gt; you use an encryption engine dominates security and performance. Higher up the stack can offer more security, with higher complexity and performance cost.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Friday Summary: February 13, 2015</title><link>/blog/friday-summary-february-13-2015/</link><pubDate>Thu, 12 Feb 2015 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/friday-summary-february-13-2015/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Welcome to the Friday the 13th edition of the Friday Summary! It has been a while since I wrote the summary so there is lots to cover …&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Cracking the Confusion: Building an Encryption System</title><link>/blog/cracking-the-confusion-building-an-encryption-system/</link><pubDate>Wed, 11 Feb 2015 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/cracking-the-confusion-building-an-encryption-system/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;This is the second post in a new series. If you want to track it through the entire editing process, you can&lt;a href="https://github.com/Securosis/DataCenterEncryption"&gt;follow along and contribute on GitHub&lt;/a&gt;. You can read the &lt;a href="https://securosis.com/blog/cracking-the-confusion-encryption-and-tokenization-for-data-centers-servers"&gt;first post here&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Cracking the Confusion: Encryption and Tokenization for Data Centers, Servers, and Applications</title><link>/blog/cracking-the-confusion-encryption-and-tokenization-for-data-centers-servers/</link><pubDate>Wed, 11 Feb 2015 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/cracking-the-confusion-encryption-and-tokenization-for-data-centers-servers/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;This is the first post in a new series. If you want to track it through the entire editing process, you can&lt;a href="https://github.com/Securosis/DataCenterEncryption/blob/master/datacenter_encryption.md"&gt;follow it and contribute on GitHub&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Firestarter: It’s Not My Fault!</title><link>/blog/firestarter-its-not-my-fault/</link><pubDate>Mon, 09 Feb 2015 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/firestarter-its-not-my-fault/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Rich, Mike, and Adrian each pick a trend they expect to hammer us in 2015. Then they talk about it, probably too much. From threat intel to tokenization to SaaS security.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Applied Threat Intelligence: Building a TI Program</title><link>/blog/applied-threat-intelligence-building-a-ti-program/</link><pubDate>Sun, 08 Feb 2015 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/applied-threat-intelligence-building-a-ti-program/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;As we wrap up our Applied Threat Intelligence series, we have already &lt;a href="https://securosis.com/blog/applied-threat-intelligence-defining-ti"&gt;defined TI&lt;/a&gt; and worked our way through a number of the key use cases (&lt;a href="https://securosis.com/blog/applied-threat-intelligence-use-case-1-security-monitoring"&gt;security monitoring&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="https://securosis.com/blog/applied-threat-intelligence-use-case-2-incident-response-management"&gt;incident response&lt;/a&gt;, and &lt;a href="https://securosis.com/blog/applied-threat-intelligence-use-case-3-preventative-controls"&gt;preventative controls&lt;/a&gt;) where TI can help improve your security program, processes, and posture. The last piece of the puzzle is building a repeatable process to collect, aggregate, and analyze the threat intelligence. This should include a number of different information sources, as well as various internal and external data analyses to provide context to clarify &lt;em&gt;what the intel means to you&lt;/em&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Even if Anthem Had Encrypted, It Probably Wouldn’t Have Helped</title><link>/blog/even-if-anthem-had-encrypted-it-probably-wouldnt-have-helped/</link><pubDate>Fri, 06 Feb 2015 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/even-if-anthem-had-encrypted-it-probably-wouldnt-have-helped/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Earlier today in the &lt;a href="https://securosis.com/blog/summary-analyze-dont-guess"&gt;Friday Summary&lt;/a&gt; I vented frustrations at news articles blaming the victims of crimes, and often guessing at the facts. Having been on the inside of major incidents that made the international news (more physical than digital in my case), I know how little often leaks to the outside world.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Submit for the RSA Crowdsourced Track</title><link>/blog/submit-for-the-rsa-crowdsourced-track/</link><pubDate>Fri, 06 Feb 2015 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/submit-for-the-rsa-crowdsourced-track/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Over the years the RSA Conference has racked up some (legitimate) criticism that its session selection process was too opaque, started too early for up-to-date content, and didn’t always reflect the community at large.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Summary: Analyze, Don’t Guess</title><link>/blog/summary-analyze-dont-guess-2/</link><pubDate>Thu, 05 Feb 2015 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/summary-analyze-dont-guess-2/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Rich here,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Another week, &lt;a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2015-02-05/signs-of-china-sponsored-hackers-seen-in-anthem-attack"&gt;another massive data breach&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This morning I woke up to a couple interview requests over this. I am always wary of speaking on incidents based on nothing more than press reports, so I try to make clear that all I can do is provide some analysis. Maybe I shouldn’t even do that, but I find I can often defuse hyperbole and inject context, even without speaking to the details of the incident.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Incite 2/4/2015: 30x32</title><link>/blog/incite-2-4-2015-30x32/</link><pubDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2015 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/incite-2-4-2015-30x32/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;It was a pretty typical day. I was settled into my seat at Starbucks writing something or other. Then I saw the AmEx notification pop up on my phone. $240.45, Ben Sherman, on the card I use for Securosis expenses. Huh? Who’s Ben Sherman? Pretty sure my bookie’s name isn’t Ben. So using my trusty Google fu I saw they are a highbrow mens clothier (nice stuff, BTW). But I didn’t buy anything from that store.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>New Paper: Security and Privacy on the Encrypted Network</title><link>/blog/new-paper-security-and-privacy-on-the-encrypted-network/</link><pubDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2015 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/new-paper-security-and-privacy-on-the-encrypted-network/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Our &lt;em&gt;Security and Privacy on the Encrypted Network&lt;/em&gt; paper tackles setting security policies to ensure that data doesn’t leak out over encrypted tunnels, and that employees adhere to corporate acceptable use policies, by decrypting traffic as needed. It also addresses key use cases and strategies for decrypting network traffic, including security monitoring and forensics, to ensure you can properly alert on security events and investigate incidents. We include guidance on how to handle human resources and compliance issues because an increasing fraction of network traffic is encrypted.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Applied Threat Intelligence: Use Case #3, Preventative Controls</title><link>/blog/applied-threat-intelligence-use-case-3-preventative-controls/</link><pubDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2015 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/applied-threat-intelligence-use-case-3-preventative-controls/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;So far, as we have looked to &lt;em&gt;apply&lt;/em&gt; threat intelligence to your security processes, we have focused on &lt;a href="https://securosis.com/blog/applied-threat-intelligence-use-case-1-security-monitoring"&gt;detection/security monitoring&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href="https://securosis.com/blog/applied-threat-intelligence-use-case-2-incident-response-management"&gt;investigation/incident response&lt;/a&gt; functions. Let’s jump backwards in the attack chain to take a look at how threat intelligence can be used in preventative controls within your environment.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Summary: Heads up</title><link>/blog/summary-heads-up/</link><pubDate>Thu, 29 Jan 2015 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/summary-heads-up/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Rich here.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Last week I &lt;a href="https://securosis.com/blog/summary-grind-on"&gt;talked about learning to grind it out&lt;/a&gt;. Whether it’s a new race distance, or plowing through a paper or code that isn’t really flowing, sometimes you need to just put your head down, set a pace, and keep moving.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Incite 1/28/2015: Shedding Your Skin</title><link>/blog/incite-1-28-2015-shedding-your-skin/</link><pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2015 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/incite-1-28-2015-shedding-your-skin/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;You are constantly changing. We all are. You live, you learn, you adapt, you &lt;em&gt;change&lt;/em&gt;. It seems that if you pay attention, every 7-9 years or so you realize you hardly recognize the person looking back at you from the mirror. Sometimes the changes are very positive. Other times a cycle is not as favorable. That’s part of the experience. Yet many people don’t think anything changes. They expect the same person year after year.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Applied Threat Intelligence: Use Case #2, Incident Response/Management</title><link>/blog/applied-threat-intelligence-use-case-2-incident-response-management/</link><pubDate>Tue, 27 Jan 2015 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/applied-threat-intelligence-use-case-2-incident-response-management/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;As we continue with our Applied Threat Intelligence series, let us now look at the next use case: incident response/management. Similar to the way threat intelligence helps with security monitoring, you can use TI to focus investigations on the devices most likely to be impacted, and help to identify adversaries and their tactics to streamline response.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Applied Threat Intelligence: Use Case #1, Security Monitoring</title><link>/blog/applied-threat-intelligence-use-case-1-security-monitoring/</link><pubDate>Mon, 26 Jan 2015 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/applied-threat-intelligence-use-case-1-security-monitoring/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;As we discussed in &lt;a href="https://securosis.com/blog/applied-threat-intelligence-defining-ti"&gt;Defining TI&lt;/a&gt;, threat intelligence can help detect attacks earlier by &lt;em&gt;benefiting from the misfortune of others&lt;/em&gt; and looking for attack patterns being used against higher profile targets. This is necessary because you simply cannot prevent everything. No way, no how. So you need to get better and faster at responding. The first step is improving detection to shorten the window between compromise and discovery of compromise.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Firestarter: 2015 Trends</title><link>/blog/firestarter-2015-trends/</link><pubDate>Mon, 26 Jan 2015 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/firestarter-2015-trends/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Rich, Mike, and Adrian each pick a trend they expect to hammer us in 2015. Then we talk about it, probably too much. From threat intel to tokenization to SaaS security.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>New Paper: Monitoring the Hybrid Cloud</title><link>/blog/new-paper-monitoring-the-hybrid-cloud/</link><pubDate>Mon, 26 Jan 2015 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/new-paper-monitoring-the-hybrid-cloud/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;We are pleased to announce the availability of our &lt;em&gt;Monitoring the Hybrid Cloud: Evolving to the CloudSOC&lt;/em&gt; paper. As the megatrends of cloud computing and mobility continue to play out in technology infrastructure, your security monitoring approach must evolve to factor in the lack of both visibility and control over the infrastructure. But senior management isn’t in the excuses business so you still need to provide the same level of diligence in protecting critical data. This paper looks at why the cloud is different, emerging use cases for hybrid cloud security monitoring, and some architectural ideas with migration plans to get there.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Applied Threat Intelligence: Defining TI</title><link>/blog/applied-threat-intelligence-defining-ti/</link><pubDate>Sun, 25 Jan 2015 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/applied-threat-intelligence-defining-ti/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;As we looked back on our research output for the past 2 years it became clear that threat intelligence (TI) has been a topic of interest. We have written no less than 6 papers on this topic, and feel like we have only scratched the surface of how TI can impact your security program.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Summary: Grind on</title><link>/blog/summary-grind-on/</link><pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2015 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/summary-grind-on/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Rich here.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Last weekend I ran a local half-marathon. It wasn’t my first, but I managed to cut 11 minutes off my time and set PRs (Personal Record for you couch potatoes) for both the half and a 10K. I didn’t really expect either result, especially since I was out of running for nearly a month due to a random foot injury (although I kept biking).&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Incite 1/21/2015: Making the Habit</title><link>/blog/incite-1-21-2015-making-the-habit/</link><pubDate>Wed, 21 Jan 2015 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/incite-1-21-2015-making-the-habit/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Over halfway through January (already!), how are those New Year’s resolutions going? Did you want to lose some weight? Maybe exercise a bit more? Maybe drink less, or is that just me? Or have some more fun? Whatever you wanted to do, how is that going?&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Firestarter: Full Toddler</title><link>/blog/firestarter-full-toddler/</link><pubDate>Mon, 19 Jan 2015 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/firestarter-full-toddler/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Yes, people, the disclosure debate is still alive and kicking. But now it is basically a pissing match between two of the largest tech companies. With Google setting rigid deadlines, and Microsoft stuck on their rigid schedule, who will win? Grab the popcorn as we talk about egos, internal inconsistencies, and why putting the user first is so damn hard.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>New Paper: Security Best Practices for Amazon Web Services</title><link>/blog/new-paper-security-best-practices-for-amazon-web-services/</link><pubDate>Mon, 19 Jan 2015 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/new-paper-security-best-practices-for-amazon-web-services/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I could probably write a book on AWS security at this point, except I don’t have the time, and most of you don’t have time to read it. So I wrote a concise paper on the key essentials to get you started – including the top four things to do in the first five minutes with a new AWS account.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>test post, do not publish - Testing Tagging system</title><link>/blog/test-post-do-not-publish-testing-tagging-system/</link><pubDate>Mon, 19 Jan 2015 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/test-post-do-not-publish-testing-tagging-system/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Testing tags&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Summary: No Surprises</title><link>/blog/summary-no-surprises/</link><pubDate>Thu, 15 Jan 2015 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/summary-no-surprises/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Rich here,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;First a quick note. I will be giving a webcast on&lt;a href="http://info.skyhighnetworks.com/2015-01WebinarManagingyourSaaSSecurityLifecyclein2015_Register.html?Source=Partner&amp;amp;LSource=Partner"&gt;managing SaaS security&lt;/a&gt; later this month. I am about to start writing more on the Cloud Security Gateway market and new techniques for dealing with SaaS.&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Incite 1/14/2015: Facing the Fear</title><link>/blog/incite-1-14-2015-facing-the-fear/</link><pubDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2015 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/incite-1-14-2015-facing-the-fear/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Some folks just naturally push outside their comfort zones as a matter of course. I am one of them. Others only do things that are comfortable, which is fine if it works for them. I believe that while you are basically born with a certain risk tolerance, you can be taught to get comfortable with pushing past your comfort zone.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Your Risk Isn't My Risk (Apple Thunderbolt Edition)</title><link>/blog/your-risk-isnt-my-risk-apple-thunderbolt-edition/</link><pubDate>Tue, 13 Jan 2015 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/your-risk-isnt-my-risk-apple-thunderbolt-edition/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Last Friday &lt;a href="http://tidbits.com/article/15331"&gt;I wrote an article on the Thunderstrike proof of concept attack against Macs&lt;/a&gt;. I won’t spend any more time analyzing it but I think it’s valuable as an example of risk assessment.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Friday Summary: Favorite Films of 2014 (Redux)</title><link>/blog/summary-favorite-films-of-2014/</link><pubDate>Sun, 11 Jan 2015 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/summary-favorite-films-of-2014/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;Rich here. Something went wonky so most of the Summary didn’t load properly on Friday. So I am reposting with the lost content…&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Incite 1/7/2014: Savoring the Moment</title><link>/blog/incite-1-7-2014-savoring-the-moment/</link><pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2015 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/incite-1-7-2014-savoring-the-moment/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Early December is a big deal in our house. It’s Nutcracker time, with both girls working all fall to get ready for their dance company’s annual production of the Xmas classic. They do 5 performances over a weekend, and neither girl wants it to end. We have to manage the letdown once that weekend is over. It has been really awesome to see all of the dancers grow up, via the Nutcracker. They start as little munchies playing party boys and girls in the first scene, and those who stick with it become Dew Drop or possibly even the Sugarplum Fairy.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Security and Privacy on the Encrypted Network: Selection Criteria and Deployment</title><link>/blog/security-and-privacy-on-the-encrypted-network-selection-criteria-and-deploy/</link><pubDate>Thu, 18 Dec 2014 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/security-and-privacy-on-the-encrypted-network-selection-criteria-and-deploy/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Our &lt;a href="https://securosis.com/blog/security-and-privacy-on-the-encrypted-network-use-cases"&gt;Use Cases post&lt;/a&gt; ran through setting policies for decryption, and specific use cases driving decryption of network traffic. We also brought up human resources and compliance considerations when building policies. But that doesn’t address the technical nuances of actually figuring out where to decrypt, or how to select and deploy the technology, so here we go. First let’s talk a bit about whether you need a standalone device.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Summary: That's a Wrap!</title><link>/blog/summary-thats-a-wrap/</link><pubDate>Thu, 18 Dec 2014 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/summary-thats-a-wrap/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Rich here,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Holy crap, what a year!&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I have been in the security business for a while now. I wouldn’t say I am necessarily jaded, but… yeah. Wow.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Security Best Practices for Amazon Web Services: Third Party Tools</title><link>/blog/security-best-practices-for-amazon-web-services-third-party-tools/</link><pubDate>Wed, 17 Dec 2014 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/security-best-practices-for-amazon-web-services-third-party-tools/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;This is our third post on AWS security best practices, to be compiled into a short paper. See also&lt;a href="https://securosis.com/blog/security-best-practices-for-amazon-web-services"&gt;our first post, on defending the management plane&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href="https://securosis.com/blog/security-best-practices-for-amazon-web-services-built-in-features"&gt;our second post, on using built-in AWS tools&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Firestarter: Predicting the Past</title><link>/blog/firestarter-predicting-the-past/</link><pubDate>Tue, 16 Dec 2014 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/firestarter-predicting-the-past/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;In our last Firestarter for this year, Mike, Adrian, and I take on some of the latest security predictions for 2015. Needless to say, we aren’t impressed. We do, however, close out with some trends we are seeing which are likely to play out next year, and are &lt;strong&gt;MOST DEFINITELY NOT PREDICTIONS&lt;/strong&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Security Best Practices for Amazon Web Services: Built-In Features</title><link>/blog/security-best-practices-for-amazon-web-services-built-in-features/</link><pubDate>Fri, 12 Dec 2014 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/security-best-practices-for-amazon-web-services-built-in-features/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;This is our second post on AWS security best practices, to be compiled into a short paper.&lt;a href="https://securosis.com/blog/security-best-practices-for-amazon-web-services"&gt;The first post on defending the management plane is here.&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Security and Privacy on the Encrypted Network: Use Cases</title><link>/blog/security-and-privacy-on-the-encrypted-network-use-cases/</link><pubDate>Thu, 11 Dec 2014 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/security-and-privacy-on-the-encrypted-network-use-cases/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;In the first post of this series on &lt;a href="https://securosis.com/blog/security-and-privacy-on-the-encrypted-network-the-future-is-encrypted"&gt;Security and Privacy on the Encrypted Network&lt;/a&gt;, we argued that organizations need to encrypt more traffic. Unfortunately the inability to see and inspect encrypted traffic impairs the ability to enforce security controls/policies and meet compliance mandates. So let’s dig into how to strategically decrypt traffic in order to address a few key use cases – including enforcing security policies and monitoring for security and compliance. We also need to factor in the HR and privacy issues associated with decrypting traffic – you don’t want to end up on the wrong side of a worker council protesting your network security approach.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Summary: Nantucket</title><link>/blog/summary-nantucket/</link><pubDate>Thu, 11 Dec 2014 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/summary-nantucket/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Rich here.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;There once was a boy from Securosis.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Who had an enormous… to do list.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;With papers to write…&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Incite 12/10/2014: Troll off the old block</title><link>/blog/incite-12-10-2014-troll-off-the-old-block/</link><pubDate>Wed, 10 Dec 2014 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/incite-12-10-2014-troll-off-the-old-block/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Every so often the kids do something that makes me smile. Evidently the Boss and I are doing something right and they are learning from our examples. I am constantly amused by the &lt;em&gt;huge&lt;/em&gt; personality XX2 has, especially when performing. She’s the drama queen, but in a good way… most of the time.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>3 Envelopes</title><link>/blog/3-envelopes/</link><pubDate>Mon, 08 Dec 2014 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/3-envelopes/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I really enjoyed Thom Langford’s recent post &lt;a href="http://thomlangford.com/2014/12/01/three-envelopes-one-ciso/"&gt;Three Envelopes, One CISO&lt;/a&gt;, on the old parable about preparing three envelopes to defer blame for bad things – until you cannot shift it, when you take the bullet.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Monitoring the Hybrid Cloud: Migration Planning</title><link>/blog/monitoring-the-hybrid-cloud-migration-planning/</link><pubDate>Mon, 08 Dec 2014 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/monitoring-the-hybrid-cloud-migration-planning/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;We will wrap up this series with a migration path to monitoring the hybrid cloud. Whether you choose to monitor the cloud services you consume, or go all the way and create your own SOC in the cloud, these steps will get you there. Let’s dive in.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Security Best Practices for Amazon Web Services</title><link>/blog/security-best-practices-for-amazon-web-services-2/</link><pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2014 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/security-best-practices-for-amazon-web-services-2/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;This is a short series on where to start with AWS security. We plan to release it as a concise white paper soon. It doesn’t cover everything but is designed to kickstart and prioritize your cloud security program on Amazon. We do plan to write a much deeper paper next year, but we received several requests for something covering the fundamentals, so here you go…&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Summary: 88 Seconds</title><link>/blog/summary-88-seconds/</link><pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2014 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/summary-88-seconds/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Rich here.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I don’t remember actually seeing Star Wars in the movie theater. I was six years old in 1977, and while I cannot remember the feelings of walking along the sticky theater floor, finding a seat I probably had to kneel on to see the screen from, and watching as the lights dimmed and John Williams assaulted my ears, I do remember standing with my father outside. In a line that stretched around the building. My lone image of this transformative day is of waiting near the back doors, my father beside me, wondering just what the big deal was.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Incite 12/3/2014: Winding Down</title><link>/blog/incite-12-3-2014-winding-down/</link><pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2014 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/incite-12-3-2014-winding-down/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;As I sit in yet another hotel, banging out yet another Incite, overlooking yet another city that isn’t home, this is a good time to look back on 2014 because this is my last scheduled trip for this year. It has been an interesting year. At this point the highs this year feel higher, and the lows lower. There were periods when I felt sick from the whiplash of ups and downs. That’s how life is sometimes. Of course my mindfulness practice helps me handle the turbulence with grace, and likely without much external indication of the inner gyrations.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Monitoring the Hybrid Cloud: Technical Considerations</title><link>/blog/monitoring-the-hybrid-cloud-technical-considerations/</link><pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2014 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/monitoring-the-hybrid-cloud-technical-considerations/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;New platforms for hybrid cloud monitoring bring both new capabilities and new challenges. We have already discussed some differences between &lt;a href="https://securosis.com/blog/monitoring-the-hybrid-cloud-emerging-soc-use-cases"&gt;monitoring the different cloud models&lt;/a&gt;, and some of the &lt;a href="https://securosis.com/blog/monitoring-the-hybrid-cloud-solution-architectures"&gt;different deployment options&lt;/a&gt; available. This post will dive into some technical considerations for these new hybrid platforms, highlighting potential benefits and issues for data security, privacy, scalability, security analytics, and data governance.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Monitoring the Hybrid Cloud: Solution Architectures</title><link>/blog/monitoring-the-hybrid-cloud-solution-architectures/</link><pubDate>Tue, 25 Nov 2014 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/monitoring-the-hybrid-cloud-solution-architectures/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;The good old days: Monitoring employees on company-owned PCs, accessing the company data center across corporate networks. You knew where everything was, and who was using it. And the company owned it all, so you could pretty much dictate where and how you performed security monitoring. With cloud and mobile? Not so much.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Firestarter: Numbness</title><link>/blog/firestarter-numbness/</link><pubDate>Mon, 24 Nov 2014 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/firestarter-numbness/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;SLmageddon V12. Polar Vortices. Ebola. APT123. We live in an era when every week it seems some massive new vulnerability, exploit, or attack is going to take down society. This week Rich, Mike, and Adrian tackle the endless progression of bad news; and how to maintain focus when everyone wants you to save the children.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Friday Summary: November 21, 2014</title><link>/blog/friday-summary-november-21-2014/</link><pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2014 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/friday-summary-november-21-2014/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Thus ends the busiest four weeks I have had since joining Securosis. A few conferences – AWS Re:Invent was awesome – a few client on-site days, meeting with some end customers, and about a half dozen webcasts, have together left me gasping for air. We all need a little R&amp;amp;R here and the holidays are approaching, so Firestarters and blog posts will be a bit sporadic. Technically it is still Friday, so here goes today’s (slightly late) summary.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Securing Enterprise Applications [New White Paper]</title><link>/blog/securing-enterprise-applications-new-white-paper/</link><pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2014 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/securing-enterprise-applications-new-white-paper/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Securing enterprise applications is hard work. These are complex platforms, with lots of features and interfaces, reliant on database support, and often deployed across multiple machines. They leverage both code provided by the vendor, as well as hundreds – if not thousands – of supporting code modules produced specifically for the customer’s needs. This make every environment a bit different, and acceptable application behavior unique to every company. This is problematic because during our research we found that most organizations rely on security tools which work on the network fringes, around applications. These tools cannot see &lt;em&gt;inside&lt;/em&gt; an application to fully understand its configuration and feature set, nor do they understand application-layer communication. This approach is efficient because a generic tool can see a wide variety of threats, but misses subtle misuse and most serious misconfigurations.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Incite 11/12/2014: Focus</title><link>/blog/incite-11-12-2014-focus/</link><pubDate>Wed, 12 Nov 2014 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/incite-11-12-2014-focus/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Interruption is death for a writer. At least it is for me. I need to get into a flow state, where I’m locked in and banging words out. With my travel schedule and the number of calls I make even when not traveling, finding enough space to get into flow has been challenging. Very challenging. And it gets frustrating. Very frustrating.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Ticker Symbol: HACK</title><link>/blog/ticker-symbol-hack/</link><pubDate>Wed, 12 Nov 2014 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/ticker-symbol-hack/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I think the financial equivalent of jumping shark is Wall Street creating an ETF based on your theme.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;If so, &lt;a href="http://www.etf.com/sections/daily-etf-watch/23776-daily-etf-watch-new-fund-called-hack.html"&gt;cybersecurity has arrived&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Building an Enterprise Application Security Program: Recommendations</title><link>/blog/building-an-enterprise-application-security-program-recommendations/</link><pubDate>Mon, 10 Nov 2014 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/building-an-enterprise-application-security-program-recommendations/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Our goal for this series is &lt;em&gt;not&lt;/em&gt; to cover the breadth and depth of an entire enterprise application security program – most of you have that covered already. Instead it is to identify the critical gaps at most firms and offer recommendations for how to close them. We have covered use cases and pointed out gaps; now it’s time to offer recommendations for how to address the deficiencies. You will notice many of the gaps noted in the previous section are byproducts of either a) attackers exposing soft spots in security; or b) innovation with the cloud, mobile, and analytics changing the boundaries of what is possible.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Changing Pricing (for the first time ever)</title><link>/blog/changing-pricing-for-the-first-time-ever/</link><pubDate>Mon, 10 Nov 2014 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/changing-pricing-for-the-first-time-ever/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;This is a corporate news post, so skip it if all you want is our usual snarky security analysis.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;For the first time since starting Securosis we are increasing our prices. Yes, it has been over seven years without any change in pricing for our services. The new prices are only a modest bump, and also streamlined to remove the uncertainty of travel expenses on engagements. Call it ego, but we think we are a heck of a bargain.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Monitoring the Hybrid Cloud: Emerging SOC Use Cases</title><link>/blog/monitoring-the-hybrid-cloud-emerging-soc-use-cases/</link><pubDate>Mon, 10 Nov 2014 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/monitoring-the-hybrid-cloud-emerging-soc-use-cases/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;In &lt;a href="https://securosis.com/blog/monitoring-the-hybrid-cloud-evolving-to-the-cloudsoc-new-series"&gt;the introduction to our series on Monitoring the Hybrid Cloud&lt;/a&gt; we went through all the disruptive forces which are increasingly complicating security monitoring. These include the accelerating move to cloud computing and expanding access via mobile devices. Those new models require much greater automation, and significantly less visibility and control over the physical layer of the technology stack. So you need to think about monitoring a bit differently.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Leveraging Threat Intelligence in Incident Response/Management [Final Paper]</title><link>/blog/leveraging-threat-intelligence-in-incident-response-management-final-paper/</link><pubDate>Sun, 09 Nov 2014 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/leveraging-threat-intelligence-in-incident-response-management-final-paper/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;We continue to investigate the practical use of Threat Intelligence (TI) within your security program. After tackling how to &lt;a href="https://securosis.com/research/papers/leveraging-threat-intelligence-in-security-monitoring"&gt;Leverage Threat Intel in Security Monitoring&lt;/a&gt;, we now turn our attention to Incident Response and Management. In this paper we go deep into how your existing incident response and management processes can (and should) integrate adversary analysis and other threat intelligence sources, to help narrow down the scope of your investigations.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>New Research Paper: Secure Agile Development</title><link>/blog/new-paper-secure-agile-development/</link><pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2014 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/new-paper-secure-agile-development/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Security teams are tightly focused on bringing security to applications, and meeting compliance requirements in the delivery of applications and services. On the other hand job #1 for software developers is to deliver code faster and more efficiently, with security a distant second. Security professionals and developers often share responsibility for security, but finding the best way to embed security into the software development lifecycle (SDLC) is not an easy challenge.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Summary: Comic Book Guy</title><link>/blog/summary-comic-book-guy/</link><pubDate>Thu, 06 Nov 2014 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/summary-comic-book-guy/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Rich here.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I only consistently read comic books for a relatively short period of my life. I always enjoyed them as a kid but didn’t really collect them until sometime around high school. Before that I didn’t have the money to buy them month to month. I kept up a little in college, but I probably had less free capital as a freshman than in elementary school. Gas money and cheap dates add up crazy fast.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Building an Enterprise Application Security Program: Security Gaps</title><link>/blog/building-an-enterprise-application-security-program-security-gaps/</link><pubDate>Wed, 05 Nov 2014 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/building-an-enterprise-application-security-program-security-gaps/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;This post will discuss the common security domains with enterprise applications, areas where generalized security tools lack the depth to address application and database specific issues, and some advice on how to fill in the gaps. But first I want to announce that &lt;a href="http://www.onapsis.com/"&gt;Onapsis&lt;/a&gt; has asked to license the content of this research series. As always, we are pleased when people like what we write well enough to get behind our work, and encourage our &lt;a href="https://securosis.com/about/totally-transparent-research"&gt;Totally Transparent Research&lt;/a&gt; style. With that, on with today’s post!&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Incite 11/5/2014: Be Like Water</title><link>/blog/incite-11-5-2014-be-like-water/</link><pubDate>Wed, 05 Nov 2014 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/incite-11-5-2014-be-like-water/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;You want it and you want it now. So do I. Whatever &lt;em&gt;it&lt;/em&gt; is. We live in an age of instant gratification. You don’t need to wait for the mailman to deliver letters – you get them via email. If you can’t wait the 2 days for Amazon Prime shipping, you order it online and pick it up at one of the few remaining brick and mortar stores. Record stores? Ha! Book stores? Double ha!! We live in the download age. You want it, you buy it (or not), and you download it. You have it within seconds.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Monitoring the Hybrid Cloud: Evolving to the CloudSOC [New Series]</title><link>/blog/monitoring-the-hybrid-cloud-evolving-to-the-cloudsoc-new-series/</link><pubDate>Mon, 03 Nov 2014 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/monitoring-the-hybrid-cloud-evolving-to-the-cloudsoc-new-series/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;As we wrote in &lt;a href="https://securosis.com/research/papers/the-future-of-security-the-trends-and-technologies-transforming-security"&gt;The Future of Security&lt;/a&gt;, we believe the collision of cloud computing and mobility will disrupt and transform security. We started documenting the initial stages of the transformation, so we now turn our attention to how controls will be implemented as the technology space moves to an automated and abstracted reality. That may sound like science fiction, but these technologies are here now, and it is only beginning to become apparent how automation and abstraction will ripple outward, transforming the technology environment.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Apple Security and Privacy Updates</title><link>/blog/apple-security-and-privacy-updates/</link><pubDate>Thu, 30 Oct 2014 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/apple-security-and-privacy-updates/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I realize I have been slacking off posting here at Securosis, but thanks to a string of big event thingies, I thought I should link to a bunch of recent Apple security and privacy articles I posted over at TidBITS (mostly) and Macworld.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Building an Enterprise Application Security Program: Use Cases</title><link>/blog/building-an-enterprise-application-security-program-use-cases/</link><pubDate>Thu, 30 Oct 2014 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/building-an-enterprise-application-security-program-use-cases/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;This post will discuss security and compliance use cases for an enterprise application security program. The following are the main issues enterprises need to address with enterprise application management, in no particular order. None of these drivers are likely to surprise you. But skimming the top-line does not do the requirements justice – you also need to understand why enterprise applications offer different challenges for data collection and analysis, to fully appreciate why off-the-shelf security tools leave coverage gaps.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Friday Summary; October 31, 2014</title><link>/blog/friday-summary-october-31-2014/</link><pubDate>Thu, 30 Oct 2014 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/friday-summary-october-31-2014/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I was at Intel’s Focus conference earlier this week. Intel basically held a McAfee coming-out party, and announced that the security practices of both firms will henceforth be run under the single umbrella of Intel Security. Not much to report on that, but I spoke to more customers at this event than at any other vendor event. And they were chatty, which is nice. But something is troubling me. Do you know what they did not mention as a problem? Mobile. Nope. The biggest surprise of the week was hearing security practitioners and CISOs talk about the threat of the IoT (Internet of Things), &lt;em&gt;without even mentioning&lt;/em&gt; mobile. I am still surprised, because a) mobile is really here, b) security of mobile data is a problem on most devices, c) mobile app controls and spotty authentication are still an issue, and d) the market has yet to embrace a good model for control. IoT does not even feel real yet, but the security practitioners I heard speak are currently dealing with threats to Point of Sale terminals, medical devices, cars, and a whole bunch of devices we have used for a long time, but where the current generation includes sophisticated processors and Internet connectivity. Still, IoT is your biggest concern? Really?&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Incite 10/29/2014: Short Memory</title><link>/blog/incite-10-29-2014-short-memory/</link><pubDate>Wed, 29 Oct 2014 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/incite-10-29-2014-short-memory/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Sometimes a short memory is very helpful. Of course as you get older, it may not be a choice. But old guy issues aside, there are times you need to forget what just happened and move on to the next thing. Maybe it’s a deal you lost, or a project you couldn’t get funded, or a bungled response to an incident. If you live to fight another day then you need to learn, put it in the past, and move forward.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>New Research Paper: Trends in Data Centric Security</title><link>/blog/new-research-paper-trends-in-data-centric-security/</link><pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2014 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/new-research-paper-trends-in-data-centric-security/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;The concept of Data Centric Security is not new, but its advantages are only now becoming clear. As customers embrace disruptive technologies – cloud, mobile, NoSQL – where the availability and effectiveness of security controls are in question, Data Centric Security is an approach to securing data regardless of where it is moved. DCS is a way to leverage these new technologies without compromising data security, integrity, or compliance.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Building an Enterprise Application Security Program [New Series]</title><link>/blog/building-an-enterprise-application-security-program-new-series/</link><pubDate>Mon, 27 Oct 2014 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/building-an-enterprise-application-security-program-new-series/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Over the last couple months I have had many similar conversations on enterprise application security: customers identify gaps in their security program, are unaware of the availability of certain types of solutions, or simply don’t believe that certain solutions deliver their advertised value. But I &lt;em&gt;expect&lt;/em&gt; issues when speaking to a company who wants to implement advanced security on a Hadoop database, where technology simply may not exist to deliver the security and performance required. It is altogether different when talking about SAP or Oracle financials. These are mature platforms, often in place for more than a decade, so you would expect every aspect to be covered. Surprisingly that is often not the case.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Firestarter: It’s All in the Cloud</title><link>/blog/firestarter-its-all-in-the-cloud/</link><pubDate>Mon, 27 Oct 2014 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/firestarter-its-all-in-the-cloud/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Adrian is out, so Rich and Mike cover the latest Amazon Web Services news as their big re:Invent conference closes in. We start with the new Frankfurt datacenter, and how a court case involving Microsoft could kill off the future of all US-based cloud companies (it’s always the little things). Then we discuss directory services in the cloud, and how this indicates increasing cloud adoption and maturity at a pace we really haven’t ever seen before.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Old School (Computer)</title><link>/blog/old-school-computer/</link><pubDate>Sun, 26 Oct 2014 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/old-school-computer/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Lots of folks talk lovingly about their first computers. Mine was a Timex Sinclair I ran through my 10” black-and-white TV. But that wasn’t the first computer I played with. My Dad was pretty early into the word processing world as part of his law practice. So when we went to the computer show down in NYC and checked out all the new wares, I was like a kid in a candy store.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Summary: Roamin’</title><link>/blog/summary-roamin-2/</link><pubDate>Thu, 23 Oct 2014 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/summary-roamin-2/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Rich here.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Last night I arrived home around 11pm from the &lt;a href="http://sector.ca"&gt;totally awesome SecTor conference in Toronto&lt;/a&gt;. It took about 11 hours to wend my way home through the air system, which has a certain beauty.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Incite 10/21/2014: Running Man</title><link>/blog/incite-10-21-2014-running-man/</link><pubDate>Wed, 22 Oct 2014 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/incite-10-21-2014-running-man/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;There were always reasons I wasn’t a runner. I was too big and carried too much weight. I was prone to knee pain. I never had good endurance. I remember the struggle when I had to run 3 miles as a pledge back in college. I finished, but I was probably 10 minutes behind everyone else. Running just wasn’t for me. So I focused on other methods of exercise. I lifted weights until my joints let me know that wasn’t a very good idea. Then I spent a couple years doing too many 12-ounce curls and eating too many burritos. For the past few years I have been doing yoga and some other body weight training.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Hindsight is 20/20</title><link>/blog/hindsight-is-20-20/</link><pubDate>Sun, 19 Oct 2014 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/hindsight-is-20-20/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;It won’t happen to you, right? After every breach you see all sorts of former employees and others crawl out from under their various rocks to talk about how screwed-up their former employer was. And how the breach was inevitable. It is a bit comical at this point. The latest example is &lt;a href="http://www.businessweek.com/articles/2014-09-12/home-depot-didnt-encrypt-credit-card-data-former-workers-say"&gt;a bunch of former Home Depot employees talking about their old shop&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>An Example of Gratitude</title><link>/blog/an-example-of-gratitude/</link><pubDate>Wed, 15 Oct 2014 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/an-example-of-gratitude/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;This is off topic, but &lt;a href="http://danielmiessler.com/blog/anything-just-greedy/"&gt;this post from Daniel Miessler&lt;/a&gt; is a great example of how I want to reorient my world view.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Friday Summary: October 17, 2014</title><link>/blog/friday-summary-october-17-2014/</link><pubDate>Wed, 15 Oct 2014 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/friday-summary-october-17-2014/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Ever tried to count to a billion? Don’t bother. The average human lifespan is about 2.5 billion seconds, so you’d waste half your life trying. But that may help put into perspective Databrick’s latest announcement that &lt;a href="http://databricks.com/blog/2014/10/10/spark-petabyte-sort.html"&gt;they were able to sort 10 &lt;em&gt;trillion&lt;/em&gt; records in four hours&lt;/a&gt; with the Spark platform. That’s three times faster than the previous record, with one-tenth the number of server nodes. Or perhaps you noticed that Amazon added &lt;a href="http://www.allthingsdistributed.com/2014/10/document-model-dynamodb.html"&gt;full JSON support to DynamoDB&lt;/a&gt;, so you can easily inject JSON directly into the cluster. Or maybe you saw that &lt;a href="https://www.datatorrent.com/real-time-streaming-for-dynamic-customer-micro-segmentation/"&gt;Data Torrent&lt;/a&gt; now supports analytics on the &lt;em&gt;incoming data stream&lt;/em&gt;. Or perhaps you were pleased to see &lt;a href="http://cloud-computing-today.com/2014/10/14/1071476/"&gt;ParStream’s distributed approach specifically geared to the Internet of Things&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Incite 10/15/2014: Competing</title><link>/blog/incite-10-15-2014-competing/</link><pubDate>Wed, 15 Oct 2014 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/incite-10-15-2014-competing/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;A few years ago I had to stop competing. The constant need to &lt;em&gt;win&lt;/em&gt; – whatever that even meant – was making me unhappy. Even when things were going well, I found some reason to feel like a loser. So I got off the hamster wheel and put myself in positions where I wasn’t really competing against others. I am always trying to improve, but I stopped doing that &lt;em&gt;in terms of others&lt;/em&gt;. Set a goal. Work toward it. Adjust as needed.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Summary: Physicality</title><link>/blog/summary-physicality/</link><pubDate>Thu, 09 Oct 2014 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/summary-physicality/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Writing is an oddly physical act.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Technically you are just sitting there, clanking away on the keyboard, while your bottom loses circulation and gets sore. (Maybe I need a new chair.) But keeping your brain running at the right tempo for effective writing involves a complicated dance of nutrition, sleep, physical movement, and environmental management.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>The New Agile: Deployment Pipelines and DevOps</title><link>/blog/the-new-agile-deployment-pipelines-and-devops/</link><pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2014 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/the-new-agile-deployment-pipelines-and-devops/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://securosis.com/blog/secure-agile-development-process-adjustments"&gt;Our last post reviewed key tools to conduct security tests in the development process&lt;/a&gt;, and before that we discussed big picture &lt;a href="https://securosis.com/blog/secure-agile-development-process-adjustments"&gt;process adjustments to accommodate security testing&lt;/a&gt;, but didn’t fully &lt;em&gt;how&lt;/em&gt; to integrate. Agile itself is in the middle of a major disruptive evolution, transforming into a new variant called DevOps, bringing significant long-term implications which are &lt;em&gt;beneficial to security&lt;/em&gt;. The evolution of development security and Agile are closely tied together, so we can start by specifying how to integrate into the deployment pipeline, then discuss the implications of DevOps.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Firestarter: Hulk bash</title><link>/blog/firestarter-hulk-bash/</link><pubDate>Mon, 06 Oct 2014 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/firestarter-hulk-bash/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Mike, Adrian, and I start off a little rough around the edges, but eventually get to the point. Travel is taking its toll so we won’t be able to keep our usual weekly schedule, but we will stay as close as possible – until I run off to Amsterdam for a week, for Black Hat Europe. We catch up on the inane for a few minutes, before jumping into a discussion of the &lt;code&gt;bash&lt;/code&gt; vulnerability and disclosure debacle. We agree it is often valuable to analyze an event after the initial shock waves (See what I did there? Shellshock? Shock waves?). Today we focus on the deeper implications and how the heck a disclosure could be so bungled. Plus a little advice on where to focus your patching efforts.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Friday Summary: October 3, 2014 cute puppy edition</title><link>/blog/friday-summary-october-3-2014/</link><pubDate>Thu, 02 Oct 2014 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/friday-summary-october-3-2014/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I was going to write more this week on Apple Pay security and it use of tokenization because more details have come out, but I won’t bother because &lt;a href="http://www.tuaw.com/2014/10/02/apple-pay-an-in-depth-look-at-whats-behind-the-secure-payment/"&gt;TUAW beat me to it&lt;/a&gt;. They did a good job explaining how tokenization is used by Apple, and went on to discuss one of the facets I have been trying to get details on: the CCV/CVV code. Apple is &lt;em&gt;dynamically&lt;/em&gt; generating a new CVV for each transaction, which can be verified by the payment processor to ensure it is coming from an authorized device. In a nutshell: fingerprint scan to verify the user is present, a token that represents the card/device combination, and a unique CVV to verify the device in use. That is not just beyond magstripes – it is better than EMV-style smart cards. No wonder the banks were happy to work with Apple. Tip of the cap to Yoni Heisler for a well-written article.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Incite 10/1/2014: Stranger in my own town</title><link>/blog/incite-10-1-2014-stranger-in-my-own-town/</link><pubDate>Wed, 01 Oct 2014 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/incite-10-1-2014-stranger-in-my-own-town/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I had a bit of a surreal experience earlier this week. Rich probably alluded to it a few times on the Twitter, but we are all as busy as we have been since we started the new Securosis 5 years ago. I m traveling like a mad man and it’s getting hard to squeeze in important meetings with long-time clients. But you do what you need to – we built this business on relationships, and that means we pay attention to the ones that matter.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Security and Privacy on the Encrypted Network: The Future is Encrypted</title><link>/blog/security-and-privacy-on-the-encrypted-network-the-future-is-encrypted/</link><pubDate>Mon, 29 Sep 2014 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/security-and-privacy-on-the-encrypted-network-the-future-is-encrypted/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;The cloud and mobility are disrupting how IT builds and delivers value to the organization. Whether you are moving computing workloads to the cloud with your data now on a network &lt;em&gt;outside&lt;/em&gt; your corporate perimeter, or an increasingly large portion of your employees are now accessing data outside of your corporate network, you no longer have control over networks or devices. Security teams need to adapt their security models to protect data. For details see our recent &lt;a href="https://securosis.com/research/papers/the-future-of-security-the-trends-and-technologies-transforming-security"&gt;Future of Security&lt;/a&gt; research.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Friday Summary: September 26, 2014</title><link>/blog/friday-summary-september-26-2014/</link><pubDate>Thu, 25 Sep 2014 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/friday-summary-september-26-2014/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I have a great job. The combination of extended coverage areas, coupled with business to tech, and everything in between, makes it so. In this week alone I have talked to customers about Agile development and process adjustments, technical details of how to deploy masking for Hadoop, how to choose between two SIEM vendors, and talked to a couple vendors about Oracle and SAP security. The breadth of stuff I am exposed to is awesome. People often ask me if I want to go back to being a CTO or offer me VP of Engineering positions, but I cannot imagine going back to just focusing on one platform. I don’t get my hands as dirty, but in some ways it is far more difficult to learn nuances of half a dozen competitive product areas than jus one. And what a great time to be neck deep in security … so long as I don’t drown in data.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Why Amazon is Rebooting Your Instances (Updated)</title><link>/blog/why-amazon-is-rebooting-your-instances/</link><pubDate>Thu, 25 Sep 2014 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/why-amazon-is-rebooting-your-instances/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Update:&lt;a href="http://aws.amazon.com/blogs/aws/ec2-maintenance-update/"&gt;Amazon published some details.&lt;/a&gt; Less than 10% of AWS systems are affected, and the vulnerability will be disclosed October 1st. As suspected this is about Xen – not the &lt;code&gt;bash&lt;/code&gt; vulnerability.&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Why the bash vulnerability is such a big deal (updated)</title><link>/blog/why-the-bash-vulnerability-is-such-a-big-deal/</link><pubDate>Thu, 25 Sep 2014 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/why-the-bash-vulnerability-is-such-a-big-deal/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Updated: I made a mistake and gave Akamai credit. Stephane doesn’t work for them – I misread the post. Fixed.&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Hindsight FTW</title><link>/blog/hindsight-ftw/</link><pubDate>Tue, 23 Sep 2014 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/hindsight-ftw/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;[soapbox]&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Within a week or two after &lt;em&gt;every&lt;/em&gt; high profile data breach, we get naysayers and Tuesday Morning Quarterbacks playing the “If they only did &lt;em&gt;X&lt;/em&gt; …” game. You know – the game where they are always right &lt;strong&gt;in hindsight.&lt;/strong&gt; I am a bit surprised Pescatore jumped on that bandwagon in &lt;a href="http://www.sans.org/security-trends/2014/09/23/simple-math-it-always-costs-less-to-avoid-a-breach-than-to-suffer-one"&gt;Simple Math: It Always Costs Less to Avoid a Breach Than to Suffer One&lt;/a&gt;, but he did.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Secure Agile Development: Building a Security Tool Chain</title><link>/blog/secure-agile-development-building-a-security-tool-chain/</link><pubDate>Mon, 22 Sep 2014 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/secure-agile-development-building-a-security-tool-chain/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Now that we have laid out the Agile process it’s time to discuss where different types of security testing fits within it. Your challenge is &lt;em&gt;not just&lt;/em&gt; to figure out what testing you need to identify code issues, but also to smoothly fit tests into the framework to help speed testing. You will incorporate multiple testing techniques into the the process, with each tool or technique focused on finding slightly different issues. Developers are clever, so development teams find ways to circumvent security testing if it interferes with efficient coding. And you will need to accept that some tests simply cannot be performed in certain parts of the process, while others can be incorporated in multiple places. To help you evaluate both &lt;em&gt;which&lt;/em&gt; tools to consider and &lt;em&gt;how&lt;/em&gt; to incorporate them, we offer several recommendations for designing a security “tool chain”.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Summary: Run Free</title><link>/blog/summary-run-free/</link><pubDate>Thu, 18 Sep 2014 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/summary-run-free/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Last night I spent four hours without my iPhone. Four conscious hours, to be specific. It was wonderful.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I realize that may sound strange, but I bet the majority of you reading this nearly always have a phone within hearing range, if not actively grasped in your hand or stuffed in a pocket where you obsessively check it every now and then, when the slightest breeze triggers the vibration nerves in your upper thigh.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Incite 9/17/2014: Break the Cycle</title><link>/blog/incite-9-17-2014-break-the-cycle/</link><pubDate>Wed, 17 Sep 2014 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/incite-9-17-2014-break-the-cycle/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;The NFL has had a tough week. The Ray Rice stuff I mentioned last week. And uber-running-back Adrian Peterson deactivated on Sunday, due to a child abuse indictment. The stories are terrible, especially given that NFL players are explosive athletes and trained in violence. No kid or spouse has a chance in the face of an angry NFL player. And no, I’m not going to anywhere near Floyd Mayweather on this topic.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Secure Agile Development: Process Adjustments</title><link>/blog/secure-agile-development-process-adjustments/</link><pubDate>Wed, 17 Sep 2014 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/secure-agile-development-process-adjustments/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;This is the fourth installment of our Secure Agile Development research. Today’s post discusses one of the toughest parts of bringing security into an Agile program; process modification. The common waterfall development process has cleanly delineated phases, each of which provides an opportunity for security integration, and each security activity must be completed before moving on to the next phase. Agile includes whatever work gets done in the sprint – it does &lt;em&gt;not&lt;/em&gt; bend to security so you need to bend security to fit Agile.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Firestarter: Apple Pay</title><link>/blog/firestarter-apple-pay/</link><pubDate>Tue, 16 Sep 2014 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/firestarter-apple-pay/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;After a short break, the boys are back and here to talk about Apple. No, not the new wrist-mounted toy, but the first mobile payment system you might actually use. Or &lt;a href="http://www.macworld.com/article/2607181/why-apple-pay-could-be-the-mobile-payment-system-youll-actually-use.html"&gt;so says Rich’s Macworld editor&lt;/a&gt;, based on his article title.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Fix Something</title><link>/blog/fix-something/</link><pubDate>Mon, 15 Sep 2014 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/fix-something/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Once again Wendy kills it with &lt;a href="http://idoneous-security.blogspot.com/2014/08/how-to-help.html"&gt;How to Help&lt;/a&gt;, saying things many of us probably think. Daily. It can get frustrating when all you hear is one person after another bitching about what’s wrong with security. And as she correctly points out, there are tools aplenty to tell you exactly how much work you have to do. But that doesn’t really help.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>New Paper! The Security Pro’s Guide to Cloud File Storage and Collaboration</title><link>/blog/new-paper-the-security-pros-guide-to-cloud-file-storage-and-collaboration-2/</link><pubDate>Fri, 12 Sep 2014 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/new-paper-the-security-pros-guide-to-cloud-file-storage-and-collaboration-2/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;You read the series, now it’s time to download the collected works.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Okay, maybe you read the series of blog posts. And by “collected works” I mean “white paper”, but you get the idea.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Friday Summary: September 12, 2014</title><link>/blog/friday-summary-september-12-2014/</link><pubDate>Thu, 11 Sep 2014 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/friday-summary-september-12-2014/</guid><description>&lt;blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;One day will be a business school case study how NFC went from handset (started with Nokia) to telcos to banks (HCE) and then to platforms&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Secure Agile Development: Working with Development</title><link>/blog/secure-agile-development-working-with-development/</link><pubDate>Thu, 11 Sep 2014 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/secure-agile-development-working-with-development/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;In the next couple posts we will break down our advice for adding security into Agile development. We will do this by considering the involved people, necessary processes, and technical integrations. Today’s post focuses on helping security professionals, first by outlining how Agile development works, and then by providing recommendation for how to work with development teams.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Incite 9/10/2014: Smile and Breathe</title><link>/blog/incite-9-10-2014-smile-and-breathe/</link><pubDate>Wed, 10 Sep 2014 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/incite-9-10-2014-smile-and-breathe/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Last week I mentioned how excited I was for the NFL season to be starting. I took the Boy to the Falcons’ home opener and it was awesome. It was a great game, and coming away with a victory in overtime was icing on the cake. As predicted, my voice was a bit rough on Monday from screaming all day Sunday, but it was worth it. I don’t think my son will ever forget that game, and neither will I.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Secure Agile Development: Agile and Agile Trends</title><link>/blog/secure-agile-development-agile-and-agile-trends/</link><pubDate>Wed, 10 Sep 2014 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/secure-agile-development-agile-and-agile-trends/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;If you are a developer reading this series, you probably have a feel for what Agile development means. For those of you who don’t live it every day, or have read the exceedingly poor Wikipedia page on &lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Agile_software_development"&gt;Agile software development&lt;/a&gt;, you are probably wondering what this is all about.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Secure Agile Development: New Series</title><link>/blog/secure-agile-development-new-series/</link><pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2014 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/secure-agile-development-new-series/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Back in 2009 Rich and I wrote a series on &lt;a href="https://securosis.com/blog/new-release-building-a-web-application-security-program"&gt;Building a Web Application Security program&lt;/a&gt;. That monstrous research paper discussed the new security challenges of building web applications, outlining how to incorporate security testing for specific types of web development programs. That research remains relevant today but issues of how to incorporate security into software development organizations – and most acutely into Agile development – remains a constant problem for clients. Knowing &lt;em&gt;what&lt;/em&gt; tool to use and &lt;em&gt;where&lt;/em&gt; does not address the fundamental issues of culture, goals, and process that make secure code development such a challenge. We have discussed many of the pitfalls of integrating security into Agile processes in the past, but never gone so far as to help security practitioners and CISOs learn to work with development teams. And that is about to change.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Feeding at the Data Breach Trough</title><link>/blog/feeding-at-the-data-breach-trough/</link><pubDate>Thu, 04 Sep 2014 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/feeding-at-the-data-breach-trough/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;They say when industries go nutty with consolidation and high-dollar M&amp;amp;A deals, the only folks who really make money are the bankers and the lawyers. Shareholders end up holding the bag, but these folks have moved on to the next deal.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Summary: Seven Year Scratch</title><link>/blog/summary-seven-year-scratch/</link><pubDate>Thu, 04 Sep 2014 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/summary-seven-year-scratch/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Sometimes life sneaks up on you.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Often when I am introduced to new clients and professional contacts, it is as “Analyst and CEO of Securosis; he used to be at Gartner”. I am fully cognizant of the fact that not only is Gartner where I started my analyst career, but also that my time and title there are the reason I was able to start Securosis. Not only did I learn how to be an analyst, but the Gartner name (as much as it pains some people) still carries a lot of weight. Leaving as a VP carries even more (a gift from my former boss, who knew he could never get my pay where it needed to be).&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Incite 9/3/2014: Potential</title><link>/blog/incite-9-3-2014-potential/</link><pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2014 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/incite-9-3-2014-potential/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;It starts with a blank slate. Not &lt;em&gt;entirely&lt;/em&gt; blank because some stuff has happened over the past few months, which offers hints to where things will go. But you largely ignore that data because you &lt;em&gt;want&lt;/em&gt; to believe. Maybe this time will be different. Or maybe it will be the same. All you can see is potential. Yet soon enough the delusions of grandeur will be shown to be exactly that – delusions.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>PR Fiascos for Dummies</title><link>/blog/pr-fiasco-for-dummies/</link><pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2014 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/pr-fiasco-for-dummies/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;If you are the head of communications for a big company and one of your executives goes off-script and says something … &lt;em&gt;ill advised&lt;/em&gt; … and puts the foot in the mouth, what can you do? You curse the gods for putting you in that job and you long for the days when someone else was in the hot seat, when you have to go into damage control.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Friday Summary: August 29, 2014</title><link>/blog/friday-summary-august-29-2014/</link><pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2014 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/friday-summary-august-29-2014/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;As you are likely out of the office much of today, preparing for a long weekend, I will keep this week’s summary short and to the point. Another three-star set of nits to pick.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Respect the Hierarchy</title><link>/blog/respect-the-hierarchy/</link><pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2014 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/respect-the-hierarchy/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Wendy (again) states things that we should already know in such an easy to understand way, that you smack yourself upside the head and wonder why you didn’t think of it. Her post on the 451 blog about &lt;a href="http://informationsecurity.451research.com/?p=5679"&gt;The hierarchy of IT needs&lt;/a&gt; makes very very clear why you continue to have problems making the case for security in your organization.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Incite 8/27/2014: It takes a village</title><link>/blog/incite-8-27-2014-it-takes-a-village/</link><pubDate>Wed, 27 Aug 2014 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/incite-8-27-2014-it-takes-a-village/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;The first couple weeks when the kids are back in school can be a little rough. We don’t have the routine down so there is some inevitable confusion and miscommunication. There are just so many details. Who is picking up which kid, from where? We drive that carpool &lt;em&gt;which&lt;/em&gt; night? What is the address of the 3rd kid to grab for LAX practice? You know, that kind of thing.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Shipping Decent Breach Notification</title><link>/blog/shipping-decent-breach-notification/</link><pubDate>Mon, 25 Aug 2014 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/shipping-decent-breach-notification/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Many folks have strong opinions about the &lt;em&gt;right&lt;/em&gt; way to perform breach notification. More to the point, many folks think &lt;em&gt;they&lt;/em&gt; know what not to do. But that’s okay – the great thing about opinions is that everyone gets their own. Recently the UPS Store, a franchised chain of shipping stores, &lt;a href="http://www.theupsstore.com/security/Pages/default.aspx"&gt;reported a breach&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Friday Summary: STEM</title><link>/blog/summary-stem/</link><pubDate>Thu, 21 Aug 2014 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/summary-stem/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;A few days after returning from DEF CON my family experienced an inevitable life-changing event you cannot really prepare for.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Incite 8/20/2014: Better get a Bucket</title><link>/blog/incite-8-20-2014-better-get-a-bucket/</link><pubDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2014 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/incite-8-20-2014-better-get-a-bucket/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;So I am finally home for a few weeks, coinciding with the kids starting school. As usual I grab my messenger bag first thing in the am and head out on my nomadic journey. With about 10 local Starbucks with Google WiFi, I am typically in one of those. I get faster Internet at Starbucks than I do at home (57mbps down FTW). It does make me a little more predictable, so that’s a bit alarming. But I’ll trade 50mb downloads for the anemic DSL speeds of AT&amp;amp;T WiFi every day of the week.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>APT hits the ER</title><link>/blog/apt-hits-the-er/</link><pubDate>Tue, 19 Aug 2014 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/apt-hits-the-er/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Everyone wants to be special. When I’m chatting with a company that doesn’t fit the typical profile for a state-sponsored attacker target, sometimes they seem disappointed. I certainly don’t mean to hurt their self-esteem, but the reality is that most businesses just don’t have anything of interest to a nation state.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>CISO’s Head Asplode</title><link>/blog/cisos-head-asplode-2/</link><pubDate>Mon, 18 Aug 2014 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/cisos-head-asplode-2/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Just in case you felt it was only you as the CISO who had an overwhelming amount of stuff to do, it’s not. &lt;a href="http://securityadvisoralliance.com/2014/04/10/the-role-of-the-ciso/"&gt;This mind map on the Security Advisor Alliance&lt;/a&gt; site should bring that message home.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Firestarter: You Can’t Handle the Gartner</title><link>/blog/firestarter-you-cant-handle-the-gartner/</link><pubDate>Mon, 18 Aug 2014 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/firestarter-you-cant-handle-the-gartner/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;After our little Black Hat and DEF CON induced hiatus, the boys are back to talk about the latest vendor suing Gartner. Yes, there is a Gartner Tax. No, it isn’t what you think. No, there is no pay for play. Yes, there are better ways to handle this. Yes, end users love Magic Quadrants no matter how much you trash talk them. And yeah, somehow we know a bit about how all this works from all sides.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>21st Century Shakedown</title><link>/blog/21st-century-shakedown/</link><pubDate>Fri, 15 Aug 2014 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/21st-century-shakedown/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Over the past year or so we have done a bunch of research into denial of service attacks, at both the &lt;a href="https://securosis.com/research/papers/defending-against-application-denial-of-service-attacks"&gt;application&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href="https://securosis.com/research/papers/defending-against-network-based-distributed-denial-of-service-ddos-attacks"&gt;network&lt;/a&gt; levels. Tactics are one thing, but we usually start with adversary analysis. You know: who wants to pop your environment and steal your stuff. Or maybe just knock you down so you can’t get up.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Friday Summary: August 15, 2014</title><link>/blog/friday-summary-august-15-2014/</link><pubDate>Thu, 14 Aug 2014 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/friday-summary-august-15-2014/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Oddly enough my big takeaway from the Black Hat security conference was not about security – it was about innovation. It seems many of the disruptive trends we have been talking about are finally taking hold, finding mainstream acceptance and recognition. We have been talking about cloud computing for a long time – Rich has been teaching cloud security for &lt;strong&gt;four years&lt;/strong&gt; now – but people seem to be really ‘getting’ it. It takes time for the mainstream to fully embrace new technologies, and only then do we see disruption fully take effect. It is as if you need to step fully into the new environment before what’s really possible takes shape and starts to manifest itself. Fo example, when the Internet hit big in 1996 or so, we talked about how this would hurt “brick and mortar” retail, but it was a good 7 to 10 years before that reality fully manifested. Only then did the change take full effect, and few industries were left untouched. We are just now reaching that point with the cloud, mobile, and NoSQL databases, and getting here has been exciting!&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>It’s not a problem until someone dies…</title><link>/blog/its-not-a-problem-until-someone-dies-2/</link><pubDate>Thu, 14 Aug 2014 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/its-not-a-problem-until-someone-dies-2/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;One of the noteworthy activities coming out of BlackHat/DEF CON was the open letter to the auto industry from &lt;em&gt;I am the Cavalry&lt;/em&gt; &lt;a href="https://www.iamthecavalry.org/domains/automotive/5star/"&gt;espousing 5 principles&lt;/a&gt; for making the computers in cars safer – before someone gets hurt. As our pal Josh Corman says in &lt;a href="http://www.csoonline.com/article/2463171/data-protection/hacker-coalition-sets-out-to-improve-critical-device-security-challenges-car-makers.html"&gt;a CSO article on the initiative&lt;/a&gt;:&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Incite 8/13/2014: Butterflies</title><link>/blog/incite-8-13-2014-butterflies/</link><pubDate>Wed, 13 Aug 2014 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/incite-8-13-2014-butterflies/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;A couple weeks ago we went to see the kids at camp on visiting day. They have so much fun, learn new skills, and grow as individuals at camp – despite being away from the watchful eyes of their parental units. Go figure – let your kids spread their wings, and they do. One of the new skills both XX2 and the Boy tried out was waterskiing. So during visiting day they get to show off for the folks.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Suing Gartner: a Pyrrhic Loss?</title><link>/blog/suing-gartner-a-pyrrhic-victory/</link><pubDate>Tue, 12 Aug 2014 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/suing-gartner-a-pyrrhic-victory/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;It happens every couple years. Some vendor is really pissed at their placement in the Magic Quadrant, and they decide to sue Gartner and make it right. Inevitably the suit involves the words &lt;em&gt;pay to play,&lt;/em&gt; and the vendor thinks they will be the company to make things right in the world. They will get justice for all those companies relegated to the loser niche quadrant. They will unmask the evil analysts for the shakedown artists they are.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Security Trolling Mass Media</title><link>/blog/security-trolling-mass-media/</link><pubDate>Mon, 11 Aug 2014 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/security-trolling-mass-media/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;At Black Hat last week, it became apparent just how mainstream our little part of the world has become. And it’s not so little any more, either. When 2 of the top 5 articles on &lt;code&gt;cnn.com&lt;/code&gt; are related to &lt;em&gt;cyber&lt;/em&gt; we have hit the big time. But that also means promoters and other shysters will start showing up in even greater numbers to capitalize on the media hype machine looking for any kind of &lt;em&gt;news&lt;/em&gt; to drive page views.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Cloud File Storage and Collaboration: Additional Security Features</title><link>/blog/cloud-file-storage-and-collaboration-additional-security-features/</link><pubDate>Fri, 01 Aug 2014 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/cloud-file-storage-and-collaboration-additional-security-features/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;This is part 4 of our Security Pro’s Guide to Cloud File Storage and Collaboration (file sync and share). The full paper is&lt;a href="https://github.com/Securosis/CloudFileStorageAndCollaboration"&gt;available on GitHub&lt;/a&gt; as we write it. See also &lt;a href="https://securosis.com/blog/the-security-pros-guide-to-cloud-file-storage-and-collaboration-introductio"&gt;part 1&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="https://securosis.com/blog/cloud-file-storage-and-collaboration-overview-and-baseline-security"&gt;part 2&lt;/a&gt;, and &lt;a href="https://securosis.com/blog/cloud-file-storage-and-collaboration-core-security-features"&gt;part 3&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Big Brother’s Price Tag</title><link>/blog/big-brothers-price-tag-2/</link><pubDate>Thu, 31 Jul 2014 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/big-brothers-price-tag-2/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;There is no free lunch. We need to be reminded of that over and over again. Apparently the &lt;a href="http://www.smh.com.au/national/surveillance-tax-will-cost-public-100-a-year-telcos-20140729-3cs3f.html"&gt;Australian government wants to mandate telcos store customer data for 2 years&lt;/a&gt;. This is ostensibly to combat terrorism.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Friday Summary, August 1, 2014: Productivity Metrics edition</title><link>/blog/friday-summary-august-1-2014-productivity-metrics-edition/</link><pubDate>Thu, 31 Jul 2014 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/friday-summary-august-1-2014-productivity-metrics-edition/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I read Jim Bird’s blog consistently because he talks about stuff that interests me. He has a ton of experience and his posts are thought-provoking. And every couple months I totally disagree with him, which makes reading his stuff all the more fun. This week is one of those times, with &lt;a href="http://swreflections.blogspot.com/2014/07/develops-isnt-killing-developers-but-it.html"&gt;Devops isn’t killing developers – but it is killing development and developer productivity&lt;/a&gt;. I think Jim flat-out misses the mark on this one.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Incite 7/30/2014: Free Fall</title><link>/blog/incite-7-30-2014-free-fall/</link><pubDate>Wed, 30 Jul 2014 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/incite-7-30-2014-free-fall/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;If you caught my weekend rantings on Twitter, I had some free time this past weekend. The Boss was on a girl’s weekend. The kids are away at camp. And I had a meeting with a client first thing Monday morning. So I could have stayed in the ATL and taken an evening flight out. Or I could fly out first thing in the morning and find a way to get my blood pumping.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>The DevOps-y Future of Security Engineering</title><link>/blog/the-devops-y-future-of-security-engineering/</link><pubDate>Wed, 30 Jul 2014 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/the-devops-y-future-of-security-engineering/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;We have talked a lot about how this &lt;em&gt;cloud&lt;/em&gt; thing and the associated DevOps revolution will fundamentally reshape security. Probably not tomorrow, or even the day after that. But before you know it, everything you thought you knew about security will have changed. Rich documented a bunch of our thinking in his &lt;a href="https://securosis.com/blog/new-paper-the-future-of-security-the-trends-and-technologies-transforming-s"&gt;Future of Security&lt;/a&gt; paper, so you can start there.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Recruiting Across the Spectrum</title><link>/blog/recruiting-across-the-spectrum/</link><pubDate>Mon, 28 Jul 2014 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/recruiting-across-the-spectrum/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I really like &lt;a href="http://www.businessinsider.com/startup-hires-people-on-autism-spectrum-2014-7"&gt;this story about ULTRA Testing&lt;/a&gt;, which hires folks on the autism spectrum to perform software testing. The CEO makes a great point here:&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>All Good Things</title><link>/blog/all-good-things/</link><pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2014 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/all-good-things/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;Side note: we are aware of the site issues and are working hard on them. There were major changes to the platform we use, and they conflict with our high-security setup. I think we should have it fixed soon, and we apologize. That’s what we get for having a non-DevOps-y legacy site.&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Cloud File Storage and Collaboration: Core Security Features</title><link>/blog/cloud-file-storage-and-collaboration-core-security-features/</link><pubDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2014 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/cloud-file-storage-and-collaboration-core-security-features/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;This is part 3 of our Security Pro’s Guide to Cloud File Storage and Collaboration (file sync and share). The full paper is&lt;a href="https://github.com/Securosis/CloudFileStorageAndCollaboration"&gt;available on GitHub&lt;/a&gt; as we write it. See also &lt;a href="https://securosis.com/blog/the-security-pros-guide-to-cloud-file-storage-and-collaboration-introductio"&gt;part 1&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href="https://securosis.com/blog/cloud-file-storage-and-collaboration-overview-and-baseline-security"&gt;part 2 here&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>The 2015 Endpoint and Mobile Security Buyer's Guide [Updated Paper]</title><link>/blog/the-2015-endpoint-and-mobile-security-buyers-guide-updated-paper/</link><pubDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2014 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/the-2015-endpoint-and-mobile-security-buyers-guide-updated-paper/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;In an uncommon occurrence we have updated one of our papers within a year of publication. As mentioned in the latest version of our Endpoint Security Buyer’s Guide, mobile devices are just additional endpoints that need to be managed like any other device. But it became clear that we needed to dig a bit deeper into securing mobile endpoints.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>The Identity Cheese Shop</title><link>/blog/identity-cheese-shop/</link><pubDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2014 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/identity-cheese-shop/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Gunnar and I frequently comment on the fragmented nature off-premise identity solutions. For example there is no Active Directory for mobile. Cloud IAM solutions commonly use bulk replication to propagate identity, while more elegant options are seldom considered. We pointed out how fragmented the market was a few months back when I wrote about the &lt;a href="https://securosis.com/blog/friday-summary-march-21-2014-the-iam-mosaic-edition"&gt;Identity Mosaic&lt;/a&gt;. When discussing the problem we wondered what vendors must say to customers looking for cloud or mobile identity solutions. It struck us that we’ve seen this act before: Monty Python’s Cheese Shop!&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>TI+IR/M: Quick Wins</title><link>/blog/tiir-m-quick-wins/</link><pubDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2014 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/tiir-m-quick-wins/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;The best way to understand how threat intelligence impacts your incident response/management process is to actually run through an incident scenario with commentary to illustrate the concepts. For simplicity’s sake we assume you are familiar with our recommended model for an incident response organization and the responsibilities of the tier 1, 2, and 3 response levels. You can get a refresher back in our &lt;a href="https://securosis.com/blog/incident-response-fundamentals-index-of-posts"&gt;Incident Response Fundamentals&lt;/a&gt; series.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Cloud File Storage and Collaboration: Overview and Baseline Security</title><link>/blog/cloud-file-storage-and-collaboration-overview-and-baseline-security/</link><pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2014 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/cloud-file-storage-and-collaboration-overview-and-baseline-security/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;This is part 2 of our Security Pro’s Guide to Cloud File Storage and Collaboration (file sync and share). The full paper is&lt;a href="https://github.com/Securosis/CloudFileStorageAndCollaboration"&gt;available on GitHub&lt;/a&gt; as we write it. See also &lt;a href="https://securosis.com/blog/the-security-pros-guide-to-cloud-file-storage-and-collaboration-introductio"&gt;Part 1&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Incite 7/23/2014: Mystic Rhythms</title><link>/blog/incite-7-23-2014-mystic-rhythms/</link><pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2014 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/incite-7-23-2014-mystic-rhythms/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;One of the things I most enjoy when the kids are at camp is being able to follow my natural rhythms. During the school year things are pretty structured. Get up at 5, do my meditation, get the kids ready for school, do some yoga/exercise, clean up, and get to work. When I’m on the road things are built around the business day, when I’m running around from meeting to meeting.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Firestarter: Hacker Summer Camp</title><link>/blog/firestarter-hacker-summer-camp/</link><pubDate>Tue, 22 Jul 2014 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/firestarter-hacker-summer-camp/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;In the latest Firestarter, Rich, Mike, and Adrian discuss the latest controversial research to hit the news from HOPE and Black Hat. We start with a presentation by &lt;a href="http://www.zdziarski.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2014/07/iOS_Backdoors_Attack_Points_Surveillance_Mechanisms.pdf"&gt;Jonathan Zdziarski on data recoverable using forensics on iOS&lt;/a&gt;. While technically accurate, we think the intent he ascribes intent to Apple shows a deeply flawed analysis. We then discuss a talk removed from Black Hat on de-anonymizing Tor. In this case it seems the researchers didn’t really understand the legal environment around them. Both cases are examples of great research gone a little awry.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>TI+IR/M: The New Incident (Response) &amp; Management Process Model</title><link>/blog/tiir-m-the-new-incident-response-management-process-model/</link><pubDate>Tue, 22 Jul 2014 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/tiir-m-the-new-incident-response-management-process-model/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Now that we have the &lt;a href="https://securosis.com/blog/tiir-m-threat-intelligence-data-collection-responding-better"&gt;inputs (both internal and external) to our incident response/management process&lt;/a&gt; we are ready to go operational. So let’s map out the IR/M process in detail to show where threat intelligence and other security data allows you to respond faster and more effectively.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>TI+IR/M: Threat Intelligence + Data Collection = Responding Better</title><link>/blog/tiir-m-threat-intelligence-data-collection-responding-better/</link><pubDate>Mon, 21 Jul 2014 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/tiir-m-threat-intelligence-data-collection-responding-better/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Our last post defined what is needed to &lt;a href="https://securosis.com/S=0/blog/leverging-ti-in-incident-response-management-really-responding-faster"&gt;Really Respond Faster&lt;/a&gt;, so now let’s peel back the next layer of the onion to delve into collecting data that will be useful for investigation, both internally and externally. This starts with gathering threat intelligence to cover the external side. It also involves a systematic effort to gather forensic information from networks and endpoints while leveraging existing security information sources including events, logs, and configurations.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Leading Security ‘People’</title><link>/blog/leading-security-people-2/</link><pubDate>Sun, 20 Jul 2014 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/leading-security-people-2/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;In the &lt;a href="https://securosis.com/blog/incite-7-2-2014-relativity"&gt;July 2 Incite&lt;/a&gt; I highlighted &lt;a href="http://www.linkedin.com/today/post/article/20140625185730-15113788-the-sales-role-of-security-leadership"&gt;Dave Elfering’s discussion&lt;/a&gt; of the need to &lt;em&gt;sell&lt;/em&gt; as part of your security program. Going through my Instapaper links I came across Dave’s post again, and I wanted to dig a bit deeper. Here is what I wrote in my snippet:&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Friday Summary: July 18, 2014, Rip Van Winkle edition</title><link>/blog/friday-summary-july-18-2014-the-rip-van-winkle-edition/</link><pubDate>Thu, 17 Jul 2014 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/friday-summary-july-18-2014-the-rip-van-winkle-edition/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I have been talking about data centric security all week, so you might figure that’s what I will talk about in this week’s summary. Wrong.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Incite 7/16/2014: Surprises</title><link>/blog/incite-7-16-2014-surprises/</link><pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2014 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/incite-7-16-2014-surprises/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Every time I took a new job, on my first day I would tell the team that I hate surprises. What I really meant was a warning, not to screw something up and not tell me. That’s not really a surprise, &lt;em&gt;per se&lt;/em&gt;. More a failure to communicate. But now that I’m a bit older I realize the importance of surprises. When you are surprised it really means you had no expectations.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>The Security Pro’s Guide to Cloud File Storage and Collaboration: Introduction</title><link>/blog/the-security-pros-guide-to-cloud-file-storage-and-collaboration-introduction/</link><pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2014 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/the-security-pros-guide-to-cloud-file-storage-and-collaboration-introduction/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;This is a new series on what security pros need to know about cloud file storage and collaboration (also called file sync and share). If you have feedback please leave a comment, or even&lt;a href="https://github.com/Securosis/CloudFileStorageAndCollaboration"&gt;track and edit the evolving paper over on GitHub&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Trends in Data Centric Security: Deployment Models</title><link>/blog/trends-in-data-centric-security-deployment-models/</link><pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2014 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/trends-in-data-centric-security-deployment-models/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;So far we have talked about the need for data centric security, what that means, and which tools fit the model. Now it is time to paint a more specific picture of how to implement and deploy data centric security, so here are some concrete examples of how the tools are deployed to support a data centric model.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Are CISOs finally ‘real’ executives?</title><link>/blog/are-cisos-finally-real-executives-2/</link><pubDate>Tue, 15 Jul 2014 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/are-cisos-finally-real-executives-2/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Many CISOs I have worked with over the past 10 years have consistently complained that no one else in the executive suite understands them. They can’t get the right level of support. They face constant roadblocks. Basically, they’re perplexed that business people are actually more worried about business.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Firestarter: China and Career Advancement</title><link>/blog/firestarter-china-and-career-advancement/</link><pubDate>Mon, 14 Jul 2014 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/firestarter-china-and-career-advancement/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Mike’s at the Jersey Shore, Rich is in Boulder, and Adrian is… baking in Phoenix in between tree-killing monsoons. This week we kept it simple with two topics. First up, China’s accusations that iOS and iDevices are a security risk. Which they should know, since they are all built there. Second is a discussion on security careers. How to break in, and what hiring managers should really look for.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Leverging TI in Incident Response/Management: Really Responding Faster</title><link>/blog/leverging-ti-in-incident-response-management-really-responding-faster/</link><pubDate>Mon, 14 Jul 2014 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/leverging-ti-in-incident-response-management-really-responding-faster/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;In the &lt;a href="https://securosis.com/blog/leveraging-threat-intelligence-in-incident-response-management"&gt;introduction to our Leveraging Threat Intelligence in Incident Response/Management&lt;/a&gt; series we described how the world has changed since we last documented our incident response process. Adversaries are getting better and using more advanced tactics. The difficulty is compounded by corporate data escaping our control into the cloud, and the proliferation of mobile devices.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>It’s Just a Matter of Time</title><link>/blog/its-just-a-matter-of-time-2/</link><pubDate>Sun, 13 Jul 2014 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/its-just-a-matter-of-time-2/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;So &lt;a href="https://securosis.com/blog/incite-6-25-2014-june-daze"&gt;a couple of weeks ago in the Incite (4th snippet)&lt;/a&gt; I gave Jamie Arlen huge kudos for being a soothsayer. At Black Hat 2011 Jamie presented an attack scenario attacking high frequency trading networks, and Bloomberg recently reported that attack actually hit a hedge fund.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Listen to Rich Talk, Win a ... Ducati?</title><link>/blog/listen-to-rich-talk-win-a-ducati/</link><pubDate>Fri, 11 Jul 2014 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/listen-to-rich-talk-win-a-ducati/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I have to admit, this is a bit of a first.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I am participating in a &lt;a href="http://elastica.net/ducati/"&gt;cloud security webinar July 21st with Elastica&lt;/a&gt;, a cloud application security gateway firm (that’s the name I’m playing with for this category). It will be less slides and more discussion, and not about their product. This is a product category I have started getting a lot of questions on, even if there isn’t a standard name yet, and I will probably pop off a research paper on it this fall.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Summary: Boulder</title><link>/blog/summary-boulder/</link><pubDate>Fri, 11 Jul 2014 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/summary-boulder/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Well, I did it. I survived over 6 months of weekly travel (the reason I haven’t been writing much). Even the one where the client was worried I was going to collapse due to flu in the conference room, and the two trips that started with me vomiting at home the morning I had to head to the airport.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Incite 7/9/2014: One dollar…</title><link>/blog/incite-7-9-2014-one-dollar/</link><pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2014 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/incite-7-9-2014-one-dollar/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;A few weeks ago I was complaining about travel and not being home – mostly because I’m on family vacations and doing work I enjoy. I acknowledged these are &lt;em&gt;first world problems&lt;/em&gt;. I didn’t appreciate what that means. You lose touch with a lot of folks’ reality when you are in the maelstrom of your own crap. I’m too busy. The kids have too many activities. There are too many demands on my time.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Open Source Development and Application Security Survey Analysis [New Paper]</title><link>/blog/open-source-development-and-application-security-survey-analysis-new-paper/</link><pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2014 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/open-source-development-and-application-security-survey-analysis-new-paper/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;We love data – especially when it tells us what people are doing about security. Which is why we were thrilled at the opportunity to provide a – dare I say &lt;em&gt;open&lt;/em&gt;? – analysis of the 2014 Open Source Development and Application Security survey. And today we launch the complete research paper with our analysis of the results. Here are a couple highlights:&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Trends in Data Centric Security: Tools</title><link>/blog/trends-in-data-centric-security-tools/</link><pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2014 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/trends-in-data-centric-security-tools/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;The three basic data centric security tools are tokenization, masking, and data element encryption. Now we will discuss what they are, how they work, and which security challenges they best serve.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Leveraging Threat Intelligence in Incident Response/Management</title><link>/blog/leveraging-threat-intelligence-in-incident-response-management/</link><pubDate>Tue, 08 Jul 2014 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/leveraging-threat-intelligence-in-incident-response-management/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;It’s hard to be a defender today. Adversaries continue to innovate, attacking software which is not under your control. These attacks move downstream as low-cost attack kits put weaponized exploits in the hands of less sophisticated adversaries, making them far more effective. But frequently attackers don’t even need to use innovative attacks because a little reconnaissance and a reasonably crafted phishing message can effectively target and compromise your employees. The good news is that we find very few still clinging to the hope that all attacks can be stopped by deploying the latest shiny object coming from a VC-funded startup.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Increasing the Cost of Compromise</title><link>/blog/increasing-the-cost-of-compromise/</link><pubDate>Mon, 07 Jul 2014 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/increasing-the-cost-of-compromise/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;It seems to be all threat intelligence all the time in the tech media, so I might as well jump on the bandwagon. My pals Wendy Nather of 451 and Jamie Blasco of AlienVault recently did a webcast on the topic. &lt;a href="http://www.itproportal.com/2014/07/02/threat-intelligence-its-about-making-criminals-work-harder/"&gt;Dan Raywood has a good overview of the content.&lt;/a&gt; Wendy does the analyst thing and categorizes the different types of threat intelligence. She points out that sharing is taking place, but more slowly than it should. Jamie then makes a compelling case for why everyone should share threat intel when possible. &lt;em&gt;Shared intelligence increases the cost of compromise&lt;/em&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Trends In Data Centric Security: Use Cases</title><link>/blog/trends-in-data-centric-security-use-cases/</link><pubDate>Mon, 07 Jul 2014 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/trends-in-data-centric-security-use-cases/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;After a short hiatus we are back with the next installment of our Data Centric Security series. This post will discuss why customers are interested in this approach, and specific use cases they are looking to address. It should be no surprise that all these use cases are driven by security or compliance. What’s interesting is &lt;em&gt;why&lt;/em&gt; other tools and technologies do not meet their needs. What prompts people to look for a different approach to data security? Those are the questions we will address with today’s post.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Incite 7/2/2014 — Relativity</title><link>/blog/incite-7-2-2014-relativity-2/</link><pubDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2014 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/incite-7-2-2014-relativity-2/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;As you get older time seems to move faster. There may be something to these theories of Einstein. It’s hard to believe that yesterday was July 1. That means half of 2014 is in the rear view mirror. &lt;strong&gt;HALF&lt;/strong&gt;. That’s unbelievable to me. Time is flying at the speed of light. I look at the list of things I wanted to do and it’s still largely unfinished. I did a bunch of things I didn’t expect to be doing. Though I guess that’s always the case.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Firestarter: G Who Shall Not Be Named</title><link>/blog/firestarter-g-who-shall-not-be-named/</link><pubDate>Mon, 30 Jun 2014 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/firestarter-g-who-shall-not-be-named/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;As they fight to keep the Firestarter running through Google outages, vacations, and client travel, our dynamic trio return once again. This week they discuss some of the latest news from a particular conference held out in Washington DC last week which Mike stopped by (well, the lobby bar) and Rich used to help run.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Updating the Endpoint Security Buyer’s Guide: Mobile Endpoint Security Management</title><link>/blog/updating-the-endpoint-security-buyers-guide-mobile-endpoint-security-management/</link><pubDate>Mon, 30 Jun 2014 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/updating-the-endpoint-security-buyers-guide-mobile-endpoint-security-management/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;In a rather uncommon occurrence, we are updating one of our papers within a year of publication. As shown by our recent deep dive into &lt;a href="https://securosis.com/research/advanced-endpoint-and-server-protection"&gt;Advanced Endpoint and Server Protection&lt;/a&gt;, endpoint security is evolving pretty quickly. As mentioned in the latest version of our &lt;a href="https://securosis.com/research/papers/the-2014-endpoint-security-buyers-guide"&gt;Endpoint Security Buyer’s Guide&lt;/a&gt;, mobile devices are just additional endpoints that need to be managed like any other device. But it has become clear that we need to dig a bit deeper into securing mobile endpoints, so we will.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Friday Summary: Legal wrangling edition</title><link>/blog/friday-summary-legal-wrangling-edition/</link><pubDate>Fri, 27 Jun 2014 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/friday-summary-legal-wrangling-edition/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;This week’s intro has nothing to do with security – just a warning in case that matters to you.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I’m betting most people spent their spare time this week watching the World Cup. Or perhaps “sick time”, given the apparent national epidemic that suddenly cleared up by Friday. I am not really a ‘football’ fan, but there were some amazing matches and I remain baffled at how a player thought he could get away with &lt;em&gt;biting&lt;/em&gt; another player during a match. And then flop and cry that he hurt his mouth! Speechless!&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Knucklehead-Employee.com</title><link>/blog/knucklehead-employee-com/</link><pubDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2014 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/knucklehead-employee-com/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;You have to love it when your employees take some initiative and aggressively take it to the competition who is cleaning your clock. They spend their time working the product, refining the messaging, and getting your mojo back in the market, right?&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Incite 6/25/2014: June Daze</title><link>/blog/incite-6-25-2014-june-daze/</link><pubDate>Wed, 25 Jun 2014 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/incite-6-25-2014-june-daze/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I’m not sure why I ever think I’ll get anything done in June. I do try. I convince myself this year will be different. I look at the calendar and figure I’ll be able to squeeze in some writing. I’m always optimistic that I will be able to crank through it because there is stuff to get done. And then at the end of June I just shrug and say to myself, “Yup, another June gone and not much got done.”&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Trends in Data Centric Security [New Series]</title><link>/blog/trends-in-data-centric-security-new-series/</link><pubDate>Mon, 23 Jun 2014 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/trends-in-data-centric-security-new-series/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;It’s all about the data. The need of many different audiences to derive value from data is driving several disruptive trends in IT. The question that naturally follows is “How do you maintain control over data regardless of where it moves?” If you want to make data useful, by using it in as many places as you can, but you cannot guarantee those places are secure, what can you do?&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Open Source Development Analysis: Development Trends</title><link>/blog/open-source-development-analysis-development-trends/</link><pubDate>Fri, 20 Jun 2014 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/open-source-development-analysis-development-trends/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;For the final installment of our analysis of the 2014 Open Source Development and Application Security Survey, we will focus on open source development trends. Our topic is less security &lt;em&gt;per se,&lt;/em&gt; and more how developers &lt;em&gt;use&lt;/em&gt; open source, how it is managed, and how it is perceived in the enterprise.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Open Source Development Analysis: Application Security</title><link>/blog/open-source-development-analysis-application-security/</link><pubDate>Wed, 18 Jun 2014 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/open-source-development-analysis-application-security/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Continuing our analysis of the &lt;a href="http://bit.ly/OpenSource14_Secure"&gt;2014 Open Source Development and Application Security Survey&lt;/a&gt;, we can now discuss results as the final version has just been released. Today’s post focuses on application security related facets of the data.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>2014 Open Source Development Webcast this Wednesday</title><link>/blog/2014-open-source-development-webcast-this-wednesday/</link><pubDate>Tue, 17 Jun 2014 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/2014-open-source-development-webcast-this-wednesday/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Reminder: 2014 Open Source Development Webcast this Wednesday&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A quick reminder: Brian Fox and I will be doing a webcast this Wednesday (June 18th) on the results of the 2014 Open Source Development and Application Security Survey. We have decided to divide the survey into a half dozen or so focus areas and discuss the results. We have different backgrounds in software development so we feel an open discussion is the best way to offer perspective on the results. Brian has been a developer and worked with the open source community for well over a decade, and I have worked with open source since the late ’90s and managed secure code development for about as long. The downside is that we were both created with the verbose option enabled, but we will be sure to leave time for comments at the end.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Firestarter: Apple and Privacy</title><link>/blog/firestarter-apple-and-privacy/</link><pubDate>Tue, 17 Jun 2014 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/firestarter-apple-and-privacy/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Mike is out on a beach this week sunning himself (don’t think to hard about that) so Rich and Adrian join up to talk about some interesting developments in Apple privacy, and how Apple may be using it to get some competitive advantage.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Mobile Malware Supply and Demand</title><link>/blog/mobile-malware-supply-and-demand/</link><pubDate>Tue, 17 Jun 2014 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/mobile-malware-supply-and-demand/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Just in case you thought supply and demand don’t apply to our little area of the world, think again. It is interesting to read about &lt;a href="http://arstechnica.com/security/2014/05/worlds-most-pricey-trojan-is-veritable-swiss-army-knife-targeting-android/"&gt;a $5,000 malware kit targeting Android&lt;/a&gt;. Dan Goodin digs into the specifics of the iBanking malware kit, the breadth of its capabilities, and how it proliferates (typically against users already infected with financial malware on their PCs); and resists whitelists to evade detection and prevention.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Incid#*%$ Happen: Manage Them</title><link>/blog/incid-happen-manage-them/</link><pubDate>Sun, 15 Jun 2014 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/incid-happen-manage-them/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;We all fall into the trap of adopting industry lingo to describe various functions. But when you take a step back, and think about mental cues we need to perform our best, sometimes it makes sense to look at things a bit differently. We all call the function of dealing with an attack &lt;em&gt;incident response&lt;/em&gt; now.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Friday Summary: June 13, 2014</title><link>/blog/friday-summary-june-12-2014/</link><pubDate>Fri, 13 Jun 2014 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/friday-summary-june-12-2014/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;As Rich said in last week’s Summary, the blog will be quiet this summer because we are busier than we have ever been before. The good news is that new research and Securosis offerings are usually the result. But that does not stop us from feeling guilty about our lack of blogging. With that, I leave you with a couple thoughts from my world this week on a Friday the 13th:&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Take our IT practices survey and win cool stuff (and free data)</title><link>/blog/take-our-it-practices-survey-and-win-cool-stuff-and-free-data/</link><pubDate>Thu, 12 Jun 2014 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/take-our-it-practices-survey-and-win-cool-stuff-and-free-data/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks to the cloud, mobility, and emerging practices like DevOps, I don’t think anyone would argue we aren’t in one of the most rapidly evolving IT eras since the emergence of the World Wide Web. Like it, hate it, or anywhere in between, everyone I speak with knows the winds have changed. Personally I believe these disruptions are more impactful than our first tenuous connections to the Internet but that’s fodder for another post.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Incite 6/11/2014: Dizney</title><link>/blog/incite-6-11-2014-dizney/</link><pubDate>Wed, 11 Jun 2014 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/incite-6-11-2014-dizney/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;This week I will take a page from Adrian’s Friday Summary approach, and just offer a stream of consciousness about the recent trip the family and I took to DisneyWorld. We went down there to watch the girls dance in Downtown Disney. Their dance company does this every other year, which means we are down in Orlando doing the Disney thing every two years. Trying to be more present and aware in my daily life was interesting in a place like Disney. So let me start with a few observations.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Open Source Development and Application Security Analysis [New Series]</title><link>/blog/open-source-development-and-application-security-analysis-new-series/</link><pubDate>Wed, 11 Jun 2014 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/open-source-development-and-application-security-analysis-new-series/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Earlier this year I participated in the 2014 Open Source Development and Application Security Survey, something I have participated in the last couple years. As a developer and former development manager – and let’s face it, an overtly opinionated one – I am always interested in adding my viewpoint to these inquiries, even if I’m just one developer voice among thousands. But I have also benefitted from these surveys – looking at the stuff my peers are using, and even selecting open source distributions based on these shared data points. Crazy, I know, but it’s another way to leverage the community.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Summary: Summer</title><link>/blog/summary-summer/</link><pubDate>Fri, 06 Jun 2014 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/summary-summer/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Rich here,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;When I grew up in New Jersey, summer didn’t really start until June 25th, the day we got out of school. It was weird to me when I moved to Colorado and school ended in May and started in August, but people also used the word “pop” to describe soda, so I figured it was a wacky cultural thing.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Cloudera acquires Gazzang</title><link>/blog/cloudera-acquires-gazzang/</link><pubDate>Tue, 03 Jun 2014 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/cloudera-acquires-gazzang/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Today Cloudera announced that they have &lt;a href="http://www.cloudera.com/content/cloudera/en/about/press-center/press-releases/2014/06/03/cloudera-strengthens-hadoop-security-with-acquisition-of-gazzang.html"&gt;acquired Austin-based data encryption vendor Gazzang&lt;/a&gt;. From the press release:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;While Cloudera customers will continue to have a choice of a broad range of cross-platform data protection methods available from Cloudera partners, Cloudera now offers encryption for all data-at-rest stored inside the Hadoop cluster – using an approach that is transparent to applications using the data, thereby minimizing the costs associated with enabling encryption. Cloudera plans to focus the efforts of the Gazzang team on additional security challenges in Hadoop. The team will become the heart of the Cloudera Center for Security Excellence focusing exclusively on Hadoop security.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Firestarter: Sputnik or Sputput</title><link>/blog/firestarter-sputnik-or-sputput/</link><pubDate>Mon, 02 Jun 2014 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/firestarter-sputnik-or-sputput/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Mike is off giving a giant mouse all his money, so Rich and Adrian ran the Firestarter as a duo this week. The question of the day is: Are we in a Sputnik moment? Did the Target breach shake things up so much that security is moving up the chain? Or are these short-term reactions, which will fade with our memories of what happened?&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Friday Summary: The Hammock Edition</title><link>/blog/friday-summary-the-hammock-edition/</link><pubDate>Fri, 30 May 2014 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/friday-summary-the-hammock-edition/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I am a pretty upbeat person, and despite my tendency towards snark I am optimistic by nature. You might find that surprising, given my profession of computer and software security, but it’s not. I have gotten a daily barrage of negative news about hacks, breaches, and broken software for well over a decade now. Like rainwater off a duck’s back, I let the bad news wash over me, and continue to educate those interested in security. Sure, I have had days where I say “Crap, security on everything is broken – and worse, nobody seems to get it.” Which is pretty much what Quinn Norton said last week with &lt;a href="https://medium.com/message/81e5f33a24e1"&gt;Everything is Broken&lt;/a&gt;. But her article was so well-written that it got to me. It is a testament to the elegance and effectiveness of her arguments that someone as calloused as I could be dragged along with her storyline, right into mild depression. It didn’t help that my morning reading consisted of that and &lt;a href="http://idlewords.com/bt14.htm"&gt;this presentation&lt;/a&gt; on how the Internet and always-on connectivity may be making our lives worse. Both offer a sober look at the state of security and privacy; both were well done, with provocative imagery and text. And I admit, for the first time in a long time, I allowed them to get to me. Powerful posts.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Incite 5/28/2014: Auditory Dissonance</title><link>/blog/incite-5-28-2014-auditory-dissonance/</link><pubDate>Wed, 28 May 2014 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/incite-5-28-2014-auditory-dissonance/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I didn’t want to become that Dad. The one who says, “Turn that crap down.” Or “What is this music?” Or “Get off my lawn!” I didn’t want that to be me. I wanted to be the cool Dad, who would listen to the new music with my kids and appreciate it. Maybe even like it. For a while, I was able to do that.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>What You Need to Know About Amazon’s New Volume Storage Encryption</title><link>/blog/what-you-need-to-know-about-amazons-new-volume-storage-encryption-2/</link><pubDate>Tue, 27 May 2014 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/what-you-need-to-know-about-amazons-new-volume-storage-encryption-2/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Amazon Web Services dropped a security bomb this week when they &lt;a href="http://aws.amazon.com/about-aws/whats-new/2014/05/21/Amazon-EBS-encryption-now-available/"&gt;announced the immediate availability of volume storage encryption&lt;/a&gt;. With one click, for free, you can encrypt any EBS (Elastic Block Storage) volume in AWS. For those who aren’t familiar with AWS, they are effectively virtual hard drives you attach to a running instance (virtual machine). I missed this one, but Contributing Analyst Gal Shpantzer picked it up and mailed it to us internally.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Summary: A Thousand Miles</title><link>/blog/summary-a-thousand-miles/</link><pubDate>Fri, 23 May 2014 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/summary-a-thousand-miles/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;The past week has been a bit of a whirlwind. Last Friday I flew out to Denver for a family thing, then transferred over to Boulder for a &lt;a href="http://devops.com/"&gt;DevOps.com&lt;/a&gt; advisory board meeting, Camp DevOps (where I presented), and Gluecon.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Translation Machine: Responding to (Uninformed) Bloggers</title><link>/blog/translation-machine-responding-to-uninformed-bloggers/</link><pubDate>Fri, 23 May 2014 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/translation-machine-responding-to-uninformed-bloggers/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;One of the things I don’t miss about running a marketing team is worrying about responding to negative press. It’s a lot worse today, now that you not only have to spin less informed beat reporters who frequently troll for page views by misrepresenting competitive nonsense. But also bloggers and Tweeters who make things up say things about the product.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Incite 5/21/2014: Recitals</title><link>/blog/incite-5-21-2014-recitals/</link><pubDate>Wed, 21 May 2014 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/incite-5-21-2014-recitals/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;As we get into late May it is getting to be summer in the ATL. The kids finish up school this week, the pools open, and my standard work attire consists of shorts, a T-shirt, and flip flops. The Boss is frantically getting the kids ready for camp, and we have a few family trips planned before they leave.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Firestarter: Wanted Posters and SleepyCon</title><link>/blog/firestarter-wanted-posters-and-sleepycon/</link><pubDate>Tue, 20 May 2014 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/firestarter-wanted-posters-and-sleepycon/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;We apologize for the quality of this week’s show… but Rich is on the road and can’t seem to understand the word ‘bandwidth’. Assuming you are willing to put up with us, watch us amuse ourselves over FBI wanted posters with Chinese army members on them. Then we debate the sometimes-sorry state of 95% of the 863 security cons in the world.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>When Security Services Attack</title><link>/blog/when-security-services-attack/</link><pubDate>Tue, 20 May 2014 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/when-security-services-attack/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;In the unintended consequences file, it’s awesome when big honking devices to stop attacks get owned and blast other sites. Yup, the folks at Incapsula found a huge DDoS that was &lt;a href="http://www.scmagazine.com/hijacked-anti-ddos-servers-used-to-carry-out-massive-ddos-attack/article/346619/"&gt;leveraging equipment from two (not one, but two!) DDoS protection services.&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>CEO on Line 2</title><link>/blog/ceo-on-line-2/</link><pubDate>Mon, 19 May 2014 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/ceo-on-line-2/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;It has been a couple weeks since Target’s CEO was &lt;em&gt;fired&lt;/em&gt;. Maybe not officially fired, but for all intents and purposes that’s what happened. The data breach was the most visible reason, though as George Hulme points out &lt;a href="https://community.csc.com/community/cio-engage/blog/2014/05/05/steinhafel-s-fall-don-t-believe-the-infosec-hype"&gt;that was really a red herring&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Friday Summary: May 16, 2014</title><link>/blog/friday-summary-may-16-2014/</link><pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2014 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/friday-summary-may-16-2014/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;It’s odd, given the large number of security conferences I attend, how few sessions I get to see. I am always meeting with clients &lt;em&gt;around&lt;/em&gt; events, but I rarely get to see the sessions. Secure360 is an exception, and that’s one of the reasons I like to go. I figured I’d share some of better ones – at least sessions where I not only learned something but got to laugh along the way:&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Incite 5/14/2014: Solo Exploration</title><link>/blog/incite-5-14-2014-solo-exploration/</link><pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2014 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/incite-5-14-2014-solo-exploration/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Is it possible to like interacting with people, yet need time alone? To really enjoy working in a team, yet cherish a night of solitude? I have always defined myself as an introvert. It provided a convenient excuse when I just didn’t want to deal with people. Though I do need my solo time to recharge, that’s for sure. But I also need to be social. Not all the time and not for extended periods of time, but a life of solitude doesn’t really appeal to me either. It’s an interesting contrast.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Firestarter: 3 for 5- McAfee, XP, and CEOs</title><link>/blog/firestarter-3-for-5-mcafee-xp-and-ceos/</link><pubDate>Mon, 12 May 2014 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/firestarter-3-for-5-mcafee-xp-and-ceos/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;A lot is going on in security land, so Rich, Mike, and Adrian return with another 3 for 5 episode. Three stories, five minutes each, all the sarcastic bite in a convenient package.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Summary: Thin Air</title><link>/blog/summary-thin-air/</link><pubDate>Fri, 09 May 2014 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/summary-thin-air/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Rich here. A quick mention: I will run a security session at &lt;a href="http://www.campdevops.com/"&gt;Camp DevOps in Boulder on May 20th&lt;/a&gt;. I am looking forward to learning some things myself.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Incite 5/7/2014: Accomplishments</title><link>/blog/incite-4-7-2014-accomplishments/</link><pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2014 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/incite-4-7-2014-accomplishments/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Yesterday I was in Winnipeg. By choice! I was invited to speak at the Western Canada Information Security Conference, and there isn’t much I like better than giving talks in Canada. Folks are nice. They appreciate when you come up to their towns to talk. They don’t say much during the pitch, but they come up after the session or in the coffee line and make it clear that they were listening. Just like in the Northeast. OK, not so much.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>New Paper: Advanced Endpoint and Server Protection</title><link>/blog/new-paper-advanced-endpoint-and-server-protection/</link><pubDate>Tue, 06 May 2014 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/new-paper-advanced-endpoint-and-server-protection/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Anti-virus is basically dead, at least according to the biggest anti-virus vendor. The good news is that signature-based AV has actually been dead for a long time; even the big players have been broadening their capabilities to assess, prevent, detect, and investigate advanced malware on endpoints and servers. There has been a tremendous amount of activity and innovation in protecting endpoint and servers, driven by necessity:&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Firestarter: There Is No SecDevOps</title><link>/blog/firestarter-there-is-no-secdevops/</link><pubDate>Mon, 05 May 2014 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/firestarter-there-is-no-secdevops/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Adrian is off at the altar of Buffett (the other one – not the one I wear a coconut bra for), so Mike and I delved into SecDevOps, triggered by a post from &lt;a href="http://devops.com/blogs/secdevops-security-automation/"&gt;Andrew Storms over at DevOps.com&lt;/a&gt;. This is where the world is heading folks – you might as well prepare yourselves now.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Friday Summary: Biased Analysis Edition</title><link>/blog/friday-summary-biased-analysis-edition/</link><pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2014 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/friday-summary-biased-analysis-edition/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Glenn Fleishman (&lt;a href="https://twitter.com/GlennF"&gt;@GlennF&lt;/a&gt;) tweeted “Next month’s Wired: ‘We painstakingly reconstructed Steve Jobs’ wardrobe so you can wear it, too.’” A catty response to Wired Magazine’s recent &lt;a href="http://www.wired.com/2014/04/steve-jobs-stereo-system/"&gt;reconstruction of Steve Jobs’ stereo&lt;/a&gt; system. Unlike Mr. Fleishman I was highly interested in this article, and found it relevant to current events. For people who love music and quality home music reproduction, iTunes’ disgustingly low-resolution MP3 files seem at odds with Jobs’ personal interest in HiFi. The equipment surrounding Jobs in the article’s lead picture was not just good stereo equipment, and not ‘name brand’ equipment either – but instead esoteric brands aimed at aficionados (indicating Jobs was &lt;em&gt;very&lt;/em&gt; serious about music reproduction and listening). The irony is that someone who was heavily invested in HiFi would become the principal purveyor of what audiophiles deem unholy evil. Sure, MP3s are a great convenience – just not so great for music quality. This picture has made HiFi trade magazines over the years, and while Jobs was alive the vanishingly small population of audiophiles held out hope that we would someday get high-resolution music from iTunes. The rumor – of which confirmation would be a great surprise – is that we may finally get &lt;a href="http://www.macrumors.com/2014/04/10/high-definition-itunes-music-downloads/"&gt;HiRes files&lt;/a&gt; from iTunes, which I suspect is why this picture was the subject of such scrutiny. The market for high-quality headphones has jumped 10-fold in the last 7 years, and &lt;a href="http://www.slate.com/blogs/future_tense/2014/01/06/vinyl_lp_sales_hit_22_year_record_in_2013_digital_music_sales_down_chart.html"&gt;vinyl record sales have gone up 6-fold in the same period&lt;/a&gt;, showing public interest in higher quality audio while CD sales plummet. Even piracy-paranoid anti-consumer vendors like &lt;a href="http://www.cnet.com/news/sony-gets-serious-about-high-resolution-audio-again/"&gt;Sony have begun to sell HiRes DSD files&lt;/a&gt;, so Apple has likely noticed these trends and we can hope they will follow suit.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Incite 4/30/2014: Sunscreen</title><link>/blog/incite-4-30-2014-sunscreen/</link><pubDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2014 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/incite-4-30-2014-sunscreen/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;After a mostly miserable winter, at least in terms of the weather, spring is here. And some days it feels like summer. This past weekend was awesome. A little hot, but nice. Sun shining. Watching the kids play LAX. Dinner/drinks to celebrate two of my best friends completing a trail marathon. Yes, they ran 26.2 miles through the woods. I didn’t say my friends were overly bright, did I?&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>XP Users Twisting in the Wind</title><link>/blog/xp-users-twisting-in-the-wind/</link><pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2014 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/xp-users-twisting-in-the-wind/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Windows XP’s recent end of life has garnered a bit of industry recognition. Mostly from vendors pushing controls to lock down the ancient operating system. Folks who are stuck on XP are, well, stuck. And now there is a &lt;a href="http://www.bbc.com/news/technology-27184188"&gt;new exploit in the wild&lt;/a&gt; that takes advantage of IE, so what are XP users to do?&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Firestarter: The Verizon DBIR</title><link>/blog/firestarter-the-verizon-dbir/</link><pubDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2014 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/firestarter-the-verizon-dbir/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;After missing a week, Rich, Mike, and Adrian return to talk about birthdays, the annual Verizon Data Breach Investigations Report, and child-induced alcohol consumption.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>NoSQL Security: Understanding NoSQL Platforms</title><link>/blog/nosql-security-understanding-nosql-platforms/</link><pubDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2014 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/nosql-security-understanding-nosql-platforms/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I started this series on &lt;a href="https://securosis.com/blog/big-data-security-2.0-new-series"&gt;recommendations for securing NoSQL clusters&lt;/a&gt; a couple weeks ago, so sorry for the delay posting the rest of the series. I had some difficulty contacting the people I spoke with during the first part of this “big data” research project, and some vendors were been slow to respond with current product capabilities. As I hoped, launching this series “shook the tree of knowledge”, and several people responded to my inquiries. It has taken a little more time than I thought to schedule calls and parse through the data, but I am finally restarting, and should be able to quickly post the rest of the research.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Defending Against Network-based Distributed Denial of Service Attacks [New Paper]</title><link>/blog/defending-against-nddos-attacks-new-paper/</link><pubDate>Sun, 27 Apr 2014 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/defending-against-nddos-attacks-new-paper/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;What’s a couple hundred gigabits per second of traffic between friends, right? Because that is the magnitude of recent volumetric denial of service attacks, which means regardless of who you are, you need a plan to deal with that kind of onslaught.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Summary: Time and Tourists</title><link>/blog/summary-time-and-tourists/</link><pubDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2014 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/summary-time-and-tourists/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Rich here,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Travel is about as close as any of us get to a time machine.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Leave home, step into an airport, and you step out of your life, even in our hyper-connected world. Sure, you are still on email, still talking to your family over the phone or Skype/FaceTime, and still surrounded by screens spewing endless worthless updates on the &lt;em&gt;tragedy du jour,&lt;/em&gt; but fundamentally you are cut off. From your normal life, daily patterns, and state of mind. It isn’t ‘bad’, but it is unavoidable – no matter how closely you hew to your familiar habits.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Pass the Hemlock</title><link>/blog/pass-the-hemlock/</link><pubDate>Thu, 24 Apr 2014 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/pass-the-hemlock/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I can certainly empathize with folks who suffer from burnout, in any occupation. It is miserable and clinical and not to be minimized or swept under the rug. But if this whole mindfulness approach has shown me anything, it is that &lt;em&gt;we control how we respond to situations.&lt;/em&gt; So yes, security is a tough job. Yes, you probably can’t win. Yes, your senior management has no idea what you do and can’t understand your value.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Incite 4/23/2014: New Coat of Paint</title><link>/blog/incite-4-23-2014-new-coat-of-paint/</link><pubDate>Wed, 23 Apr 2014 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/incite-4-23-2014-new-coat-of-paint/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;It is interesting to see the concept of &lt;em&gt;mindfulness&lt;/em&gt; enter the vernacular. For folks who have read the Incite for a while, I haven’t been shy about my meditation practice. And next week I will present on Neuro-Hacking with Jen Minella at &lt;a href="http://www.cvent.com/events/it-hot-topics-conference/event-summary-53eea589ef94461aaa14f2d54ecbb5b3.aspx"&gt;her company’s annual conference&lt;/a&gt;. I never really shied away from this discussion, but I didn’t go out of my way to discuss it either.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Understanding Role Based Access Control: Advanced Concepts</title><link>/blog/understanding-role-based-access-control-advanced-concepts/</link><pubDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2014 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/understanding-role-based-access-control-advanced-concepts/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;For some of you steeped in IAM concepts, our previous post on &lt;a href="https://securosis.com/blog/understanding-role-based-access-controls-role-lifecycle"&gt;Role Lifecycles&lt;/a&gt; seems a bit basic. But many enterprises are still grappling with how to plan for, implement, and manage roles throughout the enterprise. There are many systems which contribute to roles and privileges, so what may seem basic in theory is often quite complex in practice. Today’s post will dig a bit deeper into more advanced RBAC concepts. Let’s roll up our sleeves to look at role engineering!&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Verizon DBIR 2014: Incident Classification Patterns</title><link>/blog/verizon-dbir-2014-incident-classification-patterns/</link><pubDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2014 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/verizon-dbir-2014-incident-classification-patterns/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;[Note: Rich, Adrian, and Mike are all traveling today, so we asked Jamie Arlen to provide at least a little perspective on an aspect of the DBIR he found interesting. So thanks Jamie for this. We will also throw Gunnar under the bus a little because he has been very active on our email list, with all sorts of thoughts on the DBIR, but he doesn’t want to share them publicly. Maybe external shaming will work, but more likely he’ll retain his midwestern sensibilities and be too damn nice.]&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>DDoS-fuscation</title><link>/blog/ddos-fuscation/</link><pubDate>Sun, 20 Apr 2014 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/ddos-fuscation/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Akamai’s research team has an interesting post on &lt;a href="https://blogs.akamai.com/2014/04/cloudification-of-web-ddos-attacks.html"&gt;how attackers now use web proxies to shield their identities&lt;/a&gt; when launching DDoS attacks. Using fairly simple web-based tools they can launch attacks, and by routing the traffic through an exposed web proxy they can hide the bots or other devices performing the attacks.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Friday Summary: April 18, 2014, The IT Dysfunction Issue</title><link>/blog/friday-summary-april-18-2014-the-it-dysfunction-issue/</link><pubDate>Fri, 18 Apr 2014 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/friday-summary-april-18-2014-the-it-dysfunction-issue/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I just finished reading &lt;a href="http://www.amazon.com/Phoenix-Project-DevOps-Helping-Business/dp/0988262592/ref=sr_1_1?s=books&amp;amp;ie=UTF8&amp;amp;qid=1397765350&amp;amp;sr=1-1&amp;amp;keywords=Phoenix+Project"&gt;The Phoenix Project&lt;/a&gt; by Gene Kim, Kevin Behr, and George Spafford. And wow, what a great book! It really captures the organizational trends and individual behaviors that screw up software &amp;amp; IT projects. And, better yet, it offers some concrete examples for how to address these issues. The Phoenix Project is a bit like a time machine for me, because it so accurately captures the entire ecosystem of dysfunction at one of my former companies that it could have been based on that organization. I have worked with these people and witnessed those behaviors – but my Brent was a guy named Yudong who was very bright and well-intentioned, but without a clue how to operate. Those weekly emergency hair-on-fire sessions were typically caused by him. Low-quality software and badly managed deployments make productivity go backwards. Worse, repeat failures and lack of reliability create tension and distrust between all the groups in a company, to the point when they become rival factions. Not a pleasant work environment – everyone thinks everyone else is bad at their jobs! The Phoenix Project does a wonderful job of capturing these situations, and why companies fall into these behavioral patterns.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Incite 4/16/2014: Allergies</title><link>/blog/incite-4-16-2014-allergies/</link><pubDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2014 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/incite-4-16-2014-allergies/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;It was a crummy winter. Cold. Snowy. Whiplash temperature swings. Over the past few weeks, when ATL finally seemed to warm up for spring (and I was actually in town), I rejoiced. One of the advantages of living a bit south is the temperate weather from mid-February to late November.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Can’t Unsee (and the need for better social media controls)</title><link>/blog/cant-unsee-and-the-need-for-better-social-media-controls-2/</link><pubDate>Tue, 15 Apr 2014 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/cant-unsee-and-the-need-for-better-social-media-controls-2/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I have to admit the USAirways porno tweet had me cracking up. &lt;a href="http://www.businessinsider.com/us-airways-pornographic-tweet-2014-4"&gt;Business Insider has good coverage&lt;/a&gt; (even including the NSFW link, if you are a glutton for well, whatever). It was funny not because of the picture, but as an illustration of how a huge corporation could have its brand and image impacted by the mistake of one person. Also because it didn’t happen to me. I assure you the executive suite at the company did not think this was funny, &lt;em&gt;at all&lt;/em&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Understanding Role Based Access Control: Role Lifecycle</title><link>/blog/understanding-role-based-access-controls-role-lifecycle/</link><pubDate>Tue, 15 Apr 2014 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/understanding-role-based-access-controls-role-lifecycle/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Roles-based access control (RBAC) has earned a place in the access control architectures at many organization. Companies have many questions about how to effectively use roles, including “How can I integrate role-based systems with my applications? How can I build a process around roles? How can I manage roles on a day-to-day basis? And by the way, how does this work?” It is difficult to distinguish between the different options on the market – they all claim equivalent functionality. Our goal for this post is to provide a simple view of how all the pieces fit together, what you do with them, and how each piece helps provide and/or support role-based access.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Responsibly (Heart)Bleeding</title><link>/blog/responsibly-heartbleeding/</link><pubDate>Mon, 14 Apr 2014 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/responsibly-heartbleeding/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Yeah, we hit on the Heartbleed vulnerability in &lt;a href="https://securosis.com/blog/firestarter-three-for-five"&gt;this week’s FireStarter&lt;/a&gt;, but I wanted to call attention to how Akamai handled the vulnerability. They first came out with &lt;a href="https://blogs.akamai.com/2014/04/heartbleed-update.html"&gt;an announcement that their networks&lt;/a&gt; (and their customers) were safe because their systems were already patched. Big network service providers tend to get an early heads-up when stuff like this happens, so they can get a head start on patching.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>FFIEC’s Rear-View Mirror</title><link>/blog/ffiecs-rear-view-mirror-2/</link><pubDate>Sun, 13 Apr 2014 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/ffiecs-rear-view-mirror-2/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;You have to love compliance mandates, especially when they are anywhere from 18 months to 3 years behind the threat. Recently the FFIEC (the body that regulates financial institutions) &lt;a href="https://www.ffiec.gov/press/PDF/FFIEC%20DDoS%20Joint%20Statement.pdf"&gt;published some guidance&lt;/a&gt; for financials to defend against DDoS attacks. Hat tip to &lt;a href="http://news.techworld.com/applications/3510286/us-government-now-requires-banks-to-fight-ddos-attacks/"&gt;Techworld&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Firestarter: Three for Five</title><link>/blog/firestarter-three-for-five/</link><pubDate>Sun, 13 Apr 2014 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/firestarter-three-for-five/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;In this week’s Firestarter the team makes up for last week and picks three different stories, each with a time limit. It’s like one of those ESPN shows, but with less content and personality.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Understanding Role Based Access Control [New Series]</title><link>/blog/understanding-role-based-access-control-new-series/</link><pubDate>Wed, 09 Apr 2014 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/understanding-role-based-access-control-new-series/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Identity and Access Management (IAM) is a marathon rather than a sprint. Most enterprises begin their IAM journey by strengthening authentication, implementing single-sign on, and enabling automated provisioning. These are excellent starting points for an enterprise IAM foundation, but what happens next? Once users are provisioned, authenticated, and signed on to multiple systems, how are they authorized? Enterprises need to very quickly answer crucial questions: How is access managed for large groups of users? How will you map business roles to technology and applications? How is access reviewed for security and auditing? What level of access granularity is appropriate?&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Defending Against DDoS: Mitigations</title><link>/blog/defending-against-ddos-mitigations/</link><pubDate>Mon, 07 Apr 2014 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/defending-against-ddos-mitigations/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Our past two posts discussed &lt;a href="https://securosis.com/blog/defending-against-ddos-the-attacks"&gt;network-based Distributed Denial of Device (DDoS) attacks&lt;/a&gt; and the tactics used to &lt;a href="https://securosis.com/blog/defending-against-ddos-magnification"&gt;magnify those attacks to unprecedented scale and volume&lt;/a&gt;. Now it’s time to wrap up this series with a discussion of defenses. To understand what you’re up against let’s take a small excerpt from our &lt;a href="https://securosis.com/research/papers/defending-against-denial-of-service-dos-attacks"&gt;Defending Against Denial of Service Attacks&lt;/a&gt; paper.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>NoSQL Security 2.0 [New Series] *updated*</title><link>/blog/big-data-security-2-0-new-series/</link><pubDate>Fri, 04 Apr 2014 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/big-data-security-2-0-new-series/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;NoSQL, both the technology and the industry, have taken off. We are past the point where we can call big data a fad, and we recognize that we are staring straight into the face of the next generation of data storage platforms. About 2 years ago we started the first Securosis research project on big data security, and a lot has changed since then. At that point many people had heard of Hadoop, but could not describe what characteristics made big data different than relational databases – other than storing &lt;em&gt;a lot&lt;/em&gt; of data. Now there is no question that NoSQL — as a data management platform — is here to stay; enterprises have jumped into large scale analysis projects with both feet and people understand the advantages of leveraging analytics for business, operations, and security use cases. But as with all types of databases – and make no mistake, &lt;a href="https://securosis.com/blog/random-thought-meet-your-new-database"&gt;big data systems are databases&lt;/a&gt; – high quality data produces better analysis results. Which is why in the majority of cases we have witnessed, a key ingredient is sensitive data. It may be customer data, transactional data, intellectual property, or financial information, but it is a critical ingredient. It is not really a question of &lt;em&gt;whether&lt;/em&gt; sensitive data is stored within the cluster – more one of &lt;em&gt;which&lt;/em&gt; sensitive data it contains. Given broad adoption, rapidly advancing platforms, and sensitive data, it is time to re-examine how to secure these systems and the data they store.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Booth Babes Be Gone</title><link>/blog/booth-babes-be-gone/</link><pubDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2014 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/booth-babes-be-gone/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;OK. I have changed my tune. I have always had a &lt;em&gt;laissez-faire&lt;/em&gt; attitude toward booth babes. I come from the school of what works. And if booth babes generate leads, of which some statistically result in deals, I’m good. Mr. Market says that if something works, you keep doing it. And when it stops working you move on to the next tactic. Right?&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Incite 4/2/2014: Disruption</title><link>/blog/incite-4-2-2014-disruption/</link><pubDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2014 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/incite-4-2-2014-disruption/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;The times they are a-changin’. Whether you like it or not. Rich has hit the road, and has been having a ton of conversations about his &lt;a href="https://securosis.com/blog/new-paper-the-future-of-security-the-trends-and-technologies-transforming-s"&gt;Future of Security&lt;/a&gt; content, and I have adapted it a bit to focus on the impact of the cloud and mobility on network security. We tend to get one of three reactions:&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Breach Counters</title><link>/blog/breach-counters/</link><pubDate>Tue, 01 Apr 2014 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/breach-counters/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;The folks at the Economist (with some funding from Booz Allen Hamilton, clearly doing penance for bringing Snow into your Den) have introduced the &lt;a href="https://cybertab.boozallen.com/"&gt;CyberTab&lt;/a&gt; cyber crime cost calculator. And no, this isn’t an April Fool’s joke. The Economist is now chasing breaches and throwinging some &lt;em&gt;cyber&lt;/em&gt; around. Maybe they will sponsor a drinking game at DEFCON or something.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Defending Against DDoS: Magnification</title><link>/blog/defending-against-ddos-magnification/</link><pubDate>Mon, 31 Mar 2014 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/defending-against-ddos-magnification/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;As &lt;a href="https://securosis.com/blog/defending-against-ddos-the-attacks"&gt;mentioned in our last post&lt;/a&gt;, the predominant mechanism of network-based DDoS attacks involves flooding the pipes with standard protocols like SYN, ICMP, DNS, and NTP. But that’s not enough, so attackers now take advantage of weaknesses in the protocols to magnify the impact of their floods by an order of magnitude. This makes each compromised device far more efficient as an attack device and allows attackers to scale attacks over 400gbps (as recently &lt;a href="http://blog.cloudflare.com/technical-details-behind-a-400gbps-ntp-amplification-ddos-attack"&gt;reported by CloudFlare&lt;/a&gt;). Only a handful of organizations in the world can handle an attack of that magnitude, so DDoS + reflection + amplification is a potent combination.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Defending Against DDoS: Attacks</title><link>/blog/defending-against-ddos-the-attacks/</link><pubDate>Sun, 30 Mar 2014 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/defending-against-ddos-the-attacks/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;As we discussed in our &lt;a href="https://securosis.com/blog/defending-against-network-distributed-denial-of-service-attacks-new-series"&gt;Introduction to Defending Against Network-based Distributed Denial of Service Attacks&lt;/a&gt;, DDoS is a blunt force instrument for many adversaries. So organizations need to remain vigilant against these attacks. There is not much elegance in a volumetric attack – adversaries impact network availability by consuming all the bandwidth into a site and/or by knocking down network and security devices, overwhelming their ability to handle the traffic onslaught.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Analysis of Visa’s Proposed Tokenization Spec</title><link>/blog/analysis-of-visas-proposed-tokenization-spec-2/</link><pubDate>Fri, 28 Mar 2014 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/analysis-of-visas-proposed-tokenization-spec-2/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Visa, Mastercard, and Europay – together known as EMVCo – published a new specification for &lt;a href="http://www.emvco.com/specifications.aspx?id=263"&gt;Payment Tokenisation&lt;/a&gt; this month. Tokenization is a proven security technology, which has been adopted by a couple hundred thousand merchants to reduce PCI audit costs and the security exposure of storing credit card information. That said, there is really no tokenization standard, for payments or otherwise. Even the PCI-DSS standard does not address tokenization, so companies have employed everything from hashed credit card (PAN) values (craptastic!) to very elaborate and highly secure random value tokenization systems. This new specification is being provided to both raise the bar on shlock home-grown token solutions, but more importantly to address fraud with existing and emerging payment systems.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Friday Summary: March 28, 2014—Cloud Wars</title><link>/blog/friday-summary-march-28-2014-cloud-wars-2/</link><pubDate>Fri, 28 Mar 2014 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/friday-summary-march-28-2014-cloud-wars-2/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Begun, the cloud war has.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;We have been talking about cloud computing for a few years now on this blog, but in terms of market maturity it is still early days. We are really entering the equivalent of the second inning of a much longer game, it will be over for a long time, and things are just now getting really interesting. In case you missed it, the AWS Summit began this week in San Francisco, with Amazon announcing several new services and advances. But the headline of the week was Google’s announced &lt;a href="http://techcrunch.com/2014/03/25/google-drops-prices-for-compute-and-app-engine-by-over-30-cloud-storage-by-68-introduces-sustained-use-discounts/"&gt;price cuts for their cloud services&lt;/a&gt;:&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Security Sharing</title><link>/blog/security-sharing/</link><pubDate>Fri, 28 Mar 2014 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/security-sharing/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I really like that some organizations are getting more open about sharing information regarding their security successes and failures. &lt;a href="http://engineering.prezi.com/blog/2014/03/24/prezi-got-pwned-a-tale-of-responsible-disclosure/"&gt;Prezi comes clean&lt;/a&gt; about getting pwned as part of their bug bounty program. They described the bug, how they learned about it, and how they fixed it. We can all learn from this stuff.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Mike’s Upcoming Webcasts</title><link>/blog/mikes-upcoming-webcasts-2/</link><pubDate>Thu, 27 Mar 2014 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/mikes-upcoming-webcasts-2/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;After being on the road for what seems like a long time (mostly because it was), I will be doing two webcasts next week which you should check out.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Incite 3/26/2014: One Night Stand</title><link>/blog/incite-3-26-2014-one-night-stand/</link><pubDate>Wed, 26 Mar 2014 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/incite-3-26-2014-one-night-stand/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;There is no easy way to say this. I violated a vow I made years ago. It wasn’t a spur of the moment thing. I have been considering how to do it, without feeling too badly, for a few weeks. The facts are the facts. No use trying to obscure my transgression. I cheated. If I’m being honest, after it happened I didn’t feel bad. Not for long anyway.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Firestarter: The End of Full Disclosure</title><link>/blog/firestarter-the-end-of-full-disclosure/</link><pubDate>Mon, 24 Mar 2014 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/firestarter-the-end-of-full-disclosure/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Last week we held a wake for Windows XP. This week we continue that trend, as we discuss the end of yet era – coincidentally linked to XP. Last week the venerable Thunderdome of security lists bid adieu, as the Full Disclosure list suddenly shut down. And yes, this discussion is about more than just one email list going bye-bye.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Friday Summary: March 21, 2014—IAM Mosaic Edition</title><link>/blog/friday-summary-march-21-2014-iam-mosaic-edition/</link><pubDate>Fri, 21 Mar 2014 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/friday-summary-march-21-2014-iam-mosaic-edition/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Researching and writing about identity and access management over the last three years has made one thing clear: This is a horrifically fragmented market. Lots and lots of vendors who assemble a bunch of pieces together to form a ‘vision’ of how customers want to extend identity services outside the corporate perimeter – to the cloud, mobile, and whatever else they need. And for every possible thing you might want to do, there are three or more approaches. Very confusing.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Firestarter: An Irish Wake</title><link>/blog/firestarter-an-irish-wake/</link><pubDate>Wed, 19 Mar 2014 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/firestarter-an-irish-wake/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;We originally recorded this episode on St. Patty’s Day and thought it would be nice to send off Windows XP with a nice Irish wake, but Google had a hiccup and our video was stuck in Never Never Land for an extra day. To be honest, we thought we lost it, so no complaints.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Incite 3/18/2014: Yo Mama!</title><link>/blog/incite-3-18-2014-yo-mama/</link><pubDate>Wed, 19 Mar 2014 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/incite-3-18-2014-yo-mama/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;It’s really funny and gratifying to see your kids growing up. Over the weekend XX1 took her first solo plane trip. I checked her in as an unaccompanied minor, and she miraculously got TSA Pre-check. Of course that didn’t mean I did with my gate pass. So the TSA folks did their darndest to maintain the security theater, and swabbed my hands and feet.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Jennifer Minella Is Now a Contributing Analyst</title><link>/blog/jennifer-minella-is-now-a-contributing-analyst/</link><pubDate>Wed, 19 Mar 2014 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/jennifer-minella-is-now-a-contributing-analyst/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;We are always pretty happy-go-lucky around here, but some days we are &lt;em&gt;really&lt;/em&gt; happy.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Today is one of those days.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Webinar Tomorrow: What Security Pros Need to Know About Cloud</title><link>/blog/webinar-tomorrow-what-security-pros-need-to-know-about-cloud/</link><pubDate>Tue, 18 Mar 2014 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/webinar-tomorrow-what-security-pros-need-to-know-about-cloud/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Hey everyone,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I mentioned it on Twitter but also wanted to post it here. Tomorrow I will be giving a webinar on What Security Pros Need to Know About Cloud, &lt;a href="https://securosis.com/research/papers/what-cisos-need-to-know-about-cloud-computing"&gt;based on the white paper&lt;/a&gt; I recently released.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Defending Against Network Distributed Denial of Service Attacks [New Series]</title><link>/blog/defending-against-network-distributed-denial-of-service-attacks-new-series/</link><pubDate>Mon, 17 Mar 2014 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/defending-against-network-distributed-denial-of-service-attacks-new-series/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Back in 2013, volumetric denial of service (DoS) attacks targeting networks were all the rage. Alleged hacktivists effectively used the tactic first against Fortune-class banks, largely knocking down major banking brands for days at a time. But these big companies adapted quickly and got proficient at defending themselves, so attackers then bifurcated their attacks. On one hand they went after softer targets like public entities (the UN, &lt;em&gt;et al&lt;/em&gt;) and smaller financial institutions. They also used new tactics to take on content delivery networks like CloudFlare with multi-hundred-gigabyte attacks, just because they could.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Reminder: We all live in glass houses</title><link>/blog/reminder-we-all-live-in-glass-houses/</link><pubDate>Mon, 17 Mar 2014 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/reminder-we-all-live-in-glass-houses/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Forrester’s Rick Holland makes a great point in the epic &lt;a href="http://blogs.forrester.com/rick_holland/14-03-14-target_breach_vendors_youre_not_wrestlers_and_this_isnt_the_wwe"&gt;Target Breach: Vendors, You’re Not Wrestlers, And This Isn’t The WWE&lt;/a&gt; post. Epic mostly because he figured out how to work the WWE and a picture of The Rock into a security blog post.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>New Paper: Reducing Attack Surface with Application Control</title><link>/blog/new-paper-reducing-attack-surface-with-application-control/</link><pubDate>Sun, 16 Mar 2014 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/new-paper-reducing-attack-surface-with-application-control/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Attacks keep happening. Breaches keep happening. Senior management keeps wondering what the security team is doing.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The lack of demonstrable progress [in stopping malware] comes down to two intertwined causes. First, devices are built using software that has defects attackers can exploit. Nothing is perfect, especially not software, so every line of code presents an attack surface. Second, employees can be fooled into taking action (such as installing software or clicking a link) that enables attacks to succeed.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Summary: DevOps Trippin’</title><link>/blog/summary-devops-trippin-2/</link><pubDate>Fri, 14 Mar 2014 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/summary-devops-trippin-2/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Rich here,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;As technology professionals we always place bets with our careers. There is no way to really know, for certain, which sets of skills will be most in demand down the road. Yet, as with financial investments, we only have so many resources (time and brain cells) to allocate at any given time. Invest too much too early and your nifty new skills won’t be in demand. Too late and you miss the best opportunities, and are stuck playing catch-up if that’s even possible.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Incite 3/12/2014: Digging Out</title><link>/blog/incite-3-12-2014-digging-out/</link><pubDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2014 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/incite-3-12-2014-digging-out/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;The ritual is largely the same. I do my morning stuff (usually consisting of some meditation and some exercise), I grab a quick bite, and then I consult my list of things that need to get done. It is long, and seems to be getting longer. The more I work, the more I have to do. It’s a good problem to have, but it’s still a problem.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Firestarter: RSA Postmortem</title><link>/blog/firestarter-rsa-postmortem/</link><pubDate>Tue, 11 Mar 2014 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/firestarter-rsa-postmortem/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;We are all rested and recovered from RSA (yeah, right) and it’s time to review the week and what we think. Did we mention security is back, baby?! That’s right – it is clear budgets are now free, and the stink of desperation is fading.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Advanced Endpoint and Server Protection: Quick Wins</title><link>/blog/advanced-endpoint-and-server-protection-quick-wins/</link><pubDate>Mon, 10 Mar 2014 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/advanced-endpoint-and-server-protection-quick-wins/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;We have covered the main aspects of the threat management cycle, in terms of the endpoint and server contexts, in our last few posts. Now let’s apply these concepts to a scenario to see how it plays out. In this scenario you work for a high-tech company which provides classified technology to a number of governments, and has a lot of valuable intellectual property. You know you are targeted by state-sponsored adversaries for the classified information and intellectual property on your networks. So you have plenty of senior management support and significant resources to invest in dealing with advanced threats.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>New Paper: Leveraging Threat Intelligence in Security Monitoring</title><link>/blog/new-paper-leveraging-threat-intelligence-in-security-monitoring/</link><pubDate>Sun, 09 Mar 2014 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/new-paper-leveraging-threat-intelligence-in-security-monitoring/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;As we continue our research into the practical uses of threat intelligence (TI), we have documented how TI should change existing security monitoring (SM) processes. In our &lt;em&gt;Leveraging Threat Intelligence in Security Monitoring&lt;/em&gt; paper, we go into depth on how to update your security monitoring process to integrate malware analysis and threat intelligence. Updating our process maps demonstrates that we don’t consider TI a flash in the pan – it is a key aspect of detecting advanced adversaries as we move forward.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Advanced Endpoint and Server Protection: Detection/Investigation</title><link>/blog/advanced-endpoint-and-server-protection-detection-investigation/</link><pubDate>Fri, 07 Mar 2014 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/advanced-endpoint-and-server-protection-detection-investigation/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Our last AESP post covered a number of approaches to &lt;a href="https://securosis.com/blog/advanced-endpoint-and-server-protection-prevention"&gt;preventing&lt;/a&gt; attacks on endpoints and servers. Of course prevention remains the shiny object most practitioners &lt;em&gt;hope&lt;/em&gt; to achieve. If they can stop the attack before the device is compromised there need be no clean-up. We continue to remind everyone that hope is not a strategy, and counting on blocking every attack before it reaches your devices always ends badly.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Friday Summary: March 7, 2014</title><link>/blog/friday-summary-march-7-2014/</link><pubDate>Thu, 06 Mar 2014 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/friday-summary-march-7-2014/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I don’t code much. In fact over the last 10 years or so I have been actively discouraged from coding, with at least one employer threatening to fire me if I was discovered. I have helped firms architect new products, I have done code reviews, I have done some threat modeling, and even a few small Java utilities to weave together a couple other apps. But there has been very, very little development in the last decade. Now I have a small project I want to do so I jumped in with both feet, and it feels like I was dumped into the deep end of the pool. I forgot how much bigger a problem space application development is, compared to simple coding.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Incite 3/5/2014: Reentry</title><link>/blog/incite-3-5-2014-reentry/</link><pubDate>Wed, 05 Mar 2014 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/incite-3-5-2014-reentry/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;After I got off the plane Friday night, picked my bag up off the carousel, took the train up to the northern Atlanta suburbs, got picked up by the Boss, said hello to the kids, and then finally took a breath – my first thought was that RSA isn’t real. But it is quite real, just not sustainable. That makes reentry into my day to day existence a challenge for a few days.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Research Revisited: FireStarter: Agile Development and Security</title><link>/blog/research-revisited-8212-firestarter-agile-development-and-security/</link><pubDate>Fri, 28 Feb 2014 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/research-revisited-8212-firestarter-agile-development-and-security/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I have had many conversations over the last few months with firms about to take their first plunge into Agile development methodologies. Each time they ask how to map secure software development processes into an Agile framework. So I picked this Firestarter for today’s retrospective on Agile Development and Security (&lt;a href="https://securosis.com/blog/agile-development-and-security"&gt;see the original post with comments&lt;/a&gt;).&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Research Revisited: Off Topic: A Little Perspective</title><link>/blog/research-revisited-off-topic-a-little-perspective/</link><pubDate>Thu, 27 Feb 2014 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/research-revisited-off-topic-a-little-perspective/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;As I was crawling through the old archives for some posts, I found my very first reference to Mike here at Securosis. I timed this Revisited post to fire off when Mike’s post on joining Securosis goes live, and the title now seems to have more meaning.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Research Revisited: POPE analysis on the new Securosis</title><link>/blog/research-revisited-pope-analysis-on-the-new-securosis/</link><pubDate>Thu, 27 Feb 2014 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/research-revisited-pope-analysis-on-the-new-securosis/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Since we’re getting all nostalgic and stuff, I figured I’d dust off the rationale I posted the day we announced that I was joining Securosis. That was over 4 years ago and it has been a great ride. Rich and Adrian haven’t seen fit to fire me for cause yet, and I think we’ve done some great work.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Research Revisited: Apple, Security, and Trust</title><link>/blog/research-revisited-apple-security-and-trust/</link><pubDate>Wed, 26 Feb 2014 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/research-revisited-apple-security-and-trust/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Update:&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;After publishing this, I realized I should have taken more time editing, especially after Apple released their iOS Security paper this week. My intention was to refer to situations where, often due to attacks, vulnerabilities, or other events, Apple is pushed into responding. They can still struggle to balance the lines between what they want to say, and what outsiders want to hear. They have very much improved communications with researchers, the media, and the level of security information they publish in the open. It is the crisis situations that knock things off kilter at times.&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Research Revisited: Hammers vs. Homomorphic Encryption</title><link>/blog/research-revisited-8212-hammers-vs-homomorphic-encryption/</link><pubDate>Wed, 26 Feb 2014 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/research-revisited-8212-hammers-vs-homomorphic-encryption/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;We are running a retrospective during RSA because we cannot blog at the show. We each picked a couple posts we like and still think relevant enough to share. I picked a 2011 post on Hammers and Homomorphic Encryption, because a couple times a year I hear about a new startup which is going to revolutionize security with a new take on homomorphic encryption. Over and over. And perhaps some day we will get there, but for now we have proven technologies that work to the same end. (&lt;a href="https://securosis.com/blog/hammers-and-homomorphic-encryption"&gt;Original post with comments&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>New Paper: The Future of Security The Trends and Technologies Transforming Security</title><link>/blog/new-paper-the-future-of-security-the-trends-and-technologies-transforming-s/</link><pubDate>Tue, 25 Feb 2014 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/new-paper-the-future-of-security-the-trends-and-technologies-transforming-s/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;This paper originally started with a blog post called &lt;a href="https://securosis.com/blog/inflection"&gt;Inflection&lt;/a&gt;. Sure, many of our papers start as a series of posts, but this time the post came long before I thought of a paper. I started seeing a bunch of interrelated trends, and what appeared to be some likely unavoidable outcomes. Unlike most predictive pieces, I focused as much on inherent security trends as on disruptive forces. Less “new attacks” and more “new ways we are doing things”.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Research Revisited: RSA/NetWitness Deal Analysis</title><link>/blog/research-revisited-rsa-netwitness-deal-analysis/</link><pubDate>Tue, 25 Feb 2014 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/research-revisited-rsa-netwitness-deal-analysis/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;As we continue our journey down memory lane I want to take a look at what I said about the RSA/NetWitness deal back in April 2011, when it was announced. In hindsight the NetWitness technology has become the underlying foundation of RSA’s security management and security analytics offerings, so I underplayed that a bit. EnVision is pretty much dead. And we haven’t really seen a compelling alternative on the full packet capture and analytics front. Although a bunch of bigger SIEM players started introducing that technology this year.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Research Revisited: Security Snakeoil</title><link>/blog/research-revisited-security-snakeoil/</link><pubDate>Tue, 25 Feb 2014 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/research-revisited-security-snakeoil/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Wow! Sometimes we find things in the archives that still really resonate. This is a short one but I’ll be damned if I don’t expect to see this exact phrase used on the show floor at RSA this week.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Research Revisited: The Data Breach Triangle</title><link>/blog/research-revisited-the-data-breach-triangle/</link><pubDate>Mon, 24 Feb 2014 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/research-revisited-the-data-breach-triangle/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;This has always been one of my favorite posts, and it is one I still use regularly. I even have a slide on it in my RSA presentation for this week.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Research Revisited: 2006 Incites</title><link>/blog/research-revisited-2006-incites/</link><pubDate>Sun, 23 Feb 2014 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/research-revisited-2006-incites/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;All of us Securosis folks will be at the RSA Conference this week, so we figured we’d pre-load some old stuff to get a feel for how our research positions turned out. Mine is really old, digging back into the archives from when I had just started Security Incite. Each year I put together a set of &lt;em&gt;Incites&lt;/em&gt; that reflected what I expected to happen that year.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Research Revisited: The 3 Dirty Little Secrets of Disclosure No One Wants to Talk About</title><link>/blog/research-revisited-the-3-dirty-little-secrets-of-disclosure-no-one-wants-to/</link><pubDate>Sun, 23 Feb 2014 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/research-revisited-the-3-dirty-little-secrets-of-disclosure-no-one-wants-to/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;This post doesn’t hold up that well, but it goes back to 2006 and the first couple weeks the site was up. And I think it is interesting to reflect on how my thinking has evolved, as well as the landscape around the analysis.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Apple Bug Bad. Patch Now. Here Are Good Writeups</title><link>/blog/apple-bug-bad-patch-now-here-are-good-writeups/</link><pubDate>Sat, 22 Feb 2014 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/apple-bug-bad-patch-now-here-are-good-writeups/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Yesterday Apple released iOS 7.06, an important security update you have probably seen blasted across many other sites. A couple points:&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Firestarter Happy Hour- RSA 2014 (With an Audio Download Option)</title><link>/blog/firestarter-happy-hour-rsa-2014-with-an-audio-download-option/</link><pubDate>Fri, 21 Feb 2014 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/firestarter-happy-hour-rsa-2014-with-an-audio-download-option/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;We may have gone too far.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Okay, not really, but we hope you enjoy this beer-fueled extended episode of the Securosis Firestarter. Clocking in at a full hour, we prep and review the upcoming RSA show, which is really our way of covering how we think the year in the security industry will look.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Summary: A Little Tipsy, a Little Edgy</title><link>/blog/summary-a-little-tipsy-a-little-edgy/</link><pubDate>Thu, 20 Feb 2014 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/summary-a-little-tipsy-a-little-edgy/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;It is 6:44pm as I write this.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Adrian just left after we recorded our first extended Firestarter/Happy Hour.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The idea was that he would drive down, we would dial Mike in from Atlanta, talk about RSA stuff, Adrian would leave, and I would finish off work.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Incite 2/19/2014: Outwit, Outlast, OutRSA</title><link>/blog/incite-2-19-2014-outwit-outlast-outrsa/</link><pubDate>Wed, 19 Feb 2014 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/incite-2-19-2014-outwit-outlast-outrsa/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;No, we aren’t talking about &lt;em&gt;Survivor,&lt;/em&gt; which evidently is still on the air. Who knew? This week the band of merry Securosis men are frantically preparing for next week’s RSA Conference. We’ll all descend on San Francisco Sunday afternoon to get ready for a week of, well, work and play.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Security Analytics with Big Data Research Paper</title><link>/blog/security-analytics-with-big-data-research-paper/</link><pubDate>Wed, 19 Feb 2014 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/security-analytics-with-big-data-research-paper/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I am happy to announce the release of a research paper a long time in the making: Security Analytics with Big Data. This topic generates tons of questions from end users, and we get them from large and mid-sized enterprises alike. The goals of this research project were threefold:&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>The (Full) 2014 Securosis RSA Conference Guide</title><link>/blog/the-full-2014-rsa-conference-guide/</link><pubDate>Wed, 19 Feb 2014 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/the-full-2014-rsa-conference-guide/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Yes, you have seen this content because we have been blogging it for 10 days. But you can’t really take our blog with you to the RSA Conference, can you? Oh, smartphone browsers. Never mind.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Join the Securosis Firestarter Happy Hour: RSA Edition</title><link>/blog/join-the-securosis-firestarter-happy-hour-rsa-edition/</link><pubDate>Tue, 18 Feb 2014 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/join-the-securosis-firestarter-happy-hour-rsa-edition/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;When we started the FireStarter we also decided to try a quarterly (or whenever convenient) extended edition that breaks out of our usual 15-minute time limit. We will be recording the very first of these this Thursday at 5pm ET.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Firestarter: Payment Madness</title><link>/blog/firestarter-payment-madness/</link><pubDate>Mon, 17 Feb 2014 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/firestarter-payment-madness/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;This is our last regular Firestarter before we record our pre-RSA Quarterly Happy Hour. This week, after a few non-sequiturs, we talk about the madness of payment systems. It seems the US is headed towards chip and signature, not chip and PIN like the rest of the world, because banks think American are too stupid to remember a second PIN.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>RSA Conference Guide 2014 Deep Dive: Cloud Security</title><link>/blog/rsa-conference-guide-2014-deep-dive-cloud-security/</link><pubDate>Mon, 17 Feb 2014 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/rsa-conference-guide-2014-deep-dive-cloud-security/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;In our 2013 RSA Guide we wrote that 2012 was a tremendous year for cloud security. We probably should have kept our mouth shut and remembered all those hype cycles, adoption curves, and other wavy lines because 2013 blew it away. That said, cloud security is still quite nascent, and in many ways losing the race with the cloud market itself, expanding the gap between what’s happening in the cloud and what’s actually being secured in the cloud. The next few years are critical for security professionals and vendors as they risk being excluded from cloud transformation projects, and thus find themselves disengaged in enterprise markets as cloud vendors and DevOps take over security functions.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>RSA Conference Guide 2014 Deep Dive: Data Security</title><link>/blog/rsa-conference-guide-2014-deep-dive-data-security/</link><pubDate>Mon, 17 Feb 2014 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/rsa-conference-guide-2014-deep-dive-data-security/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;It is possible that 2014 will be the death of data security. Not only because we analysts can’t go long without proclaiming a vibrant market dead, but also thanks to cloud and mobile devices. You see, data security is far from dead, but is is increasingly difficult to talk about outside the context of cloud, mobile, or… er… Snowden. Oh yeah, and the NSA – we cannot forget them.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>RSA Conference Guide 2014 Deep Dive: Endpoint Security</title><link>/blog/rsa-conference-guide-2014-deep-dive-endpoint-security/</link><pubDate>Mon, 17 Feb 2014 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/rsa-conference-guide-2014-deep-dive-endpoint-security/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;We are in the home stretch, with only a few more deep dives to post.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;h2 id="epp-living-on-borrowed-time"&gt;EPP: Living on Borrowed Time?&lt;/h2&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Every year we take a step back and wonder if this is the year customers will finally revolt against endpoint protection suites and shift &lt;em&gt;en masse&lt;/em&gt; to something free, or one of the new technologies focused on preventing advanced attacks. It is so easy to forget how important inertia is to security buying cycles. Combined with the continued (ridiculous) PCI mandate for ‘anti-malware’ (whatever that means), the AV vendors continue to print money.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>RSA Conference Guide 2014 Deep Dive: Identity and Access Management</title><link>/blog/rsa-conference-guide-2014-deep-dive-identity-and-access-management/</link><pubDate>Sun, 16 Feb 2014 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/rsa-conference-guide-2014-deep-dive-identity-and-access-management/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;One of the biggest trends in security gets no respect at RSA. Maybe because identity folks still look at security folks cross-eyed. But this year things will be a bit different. Here’s why:&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>RSA Conference Guide 2014 Deep Dive: Application Security</title><link>/blog/rsa-conference-guide-2014-deep-dive-application-security/</link><pubDate>Fri, 14 Feb 2014 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/rsa-conference-guide-2014-deep-dive-application-security/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;With PoS malware, banking trojans, and persistent NSA threats the flavors of the month and geting all the headlines, application security seems to get overshadowed every year at the RSA Conference. Then again, who wants to talk about the hard, boring tasks of &lt;em&gt;fixing the applications&lt;/em&gt; that run your business. We have to admit it’s fun to read about &lt;a href="http://krebsonsecurity.com/2014/01/the-adventures-of-a-cybercrime-gumshoe/"&gt;who the real hackers are&lt;/a&gt;, including &lt;a href="http://krebsonsecurity.com/2013/12/whos-selling-credit-cards-from-target/"&gt;selfies&lt;/a&gt; of the dorks people apparently selling credit card numbers on the black market. Dealing with a code vulnerability backlog? Not so much fun. But very real and important trends are going on in application security, most of which involve “calling in the cavalry” – or more precisely outsourcing to people who know more about this stuff, to jumpstart application security programs.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>RSA Conference Guide 2014 Deep Dive: Security Management and Compliance</title><link>/blog/rsa-conference-guide-2014-deep-dive-security-management-and-compliance/</link><pubDate>Fri, 14 Feb 2014 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/rsa-conference-guide-2014-deep-dive-security-management-and-compliance/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;As we continue deep dives into our coverage areas, we now hit security management and compliance.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;h2 id="if-you-dont-like-it-secaas"&gt;If you don’t like it, SECaaS!&lt;/h2&gt;
&lt;p&gt;We have taken a bunch of calls this year from folks looking to have someone else manage their SIEM. Why? Because after two or three failed attempts, they figure if they are going to fail again, they might as well have a service provider to blame. Though that has put some wind in the sails of the service providers who offer monitoring services, and provided an opening for those who can co-source and outsource the SIEM. Just make sure to poke and prod the providers about how you are supposed to respond to an incident when &lt;em&gt;they&lt;/em&gt; have your data. And to be clear… they have your data.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Bit9 Bets on (Carbon) Black</title><link>/blog/bit9-bets-on-carbon-black/</link><pubDate>Thu, 13 Feb 2014 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/bit9-bets-on-carbon-black/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;In an advanced endpoint and server protection consolidation play, &lt;a href="https://www.bit9.com/company/news/press-releases/2-13-14-bit9-carbon-black-merge-deliver-unmatched-level-prevention-detection-response-cyber-threats/"&gt;Bit9 and Carbon Black announced a merger&lt;/a&gt; this morning. Simultaneously, the combined company raised another $38 million in investment capital to fund the integration, pay the bankers, and accelerate their combined product evolution. Given all the excitement over anything either &lt;em&gt;advanced&lt;/em&gt; or &lt;em&gt;cyber,&lt;/em&gt; this deal makes a lot of sense as Bit9 looks to fill in some holes in its product line, and Carbon Black gains a much broader distribution engine.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Friday Summary: February 14, 2014</title><link>/blog/friday-summary-february-14-2014/</link><pubDate>Thu, 13 Feb 2014 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/friday-summary-february-14-2014/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Bacon as a yardstick: This year will see the 6th annual Securoris Disaster Recovery Breakfast, and I am measuring attendance in required bacon reserves. Jillian’s at the Metreon has been a more than gracious host each year for the event. But when we order food we (now) do it in increments of 50 people. At the moment we are ordering bacon for 250, and we might need to bump that up! We have come a long way since 2009, when we had about 35 close friends show up, but we are overjoyed that so many friends and associates will turn out. Regardless, we expect a quiet, low-key affair. It has always been our favorite event of the week because of that. Bring your tired, your hungry, your hungover, or just plain conference-weary self over and say ‘Howdy’. There will be bacon, good company, and various OTC pharmaceuticals to cure what ills you.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>RSA Conference Guide 2014 Deep Dive: Network Security</title><link>/blog/rsa-conference-guide-2014-deep-dive-network-security/</link><pubDate>Thu, 13 Feb 2014 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/rsa-conference-guide-2014-deep-dive-network-security/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;As we begin deeper dives into our respective coverage areas, we will start with network security. We have been tracking the next generation (NG) evolution for 5 years, during which time it has fundamentally changed the meaning of the perimeter – as we will discuss below. Those who moved quickly to embrace NG have established leadership positions, at the expense of those that didn’t. Players who were leaders 5 short years ago have become non-existent, and there is a new generation of folks with innovative network security approaches to handle advanced attacks. After many years of stagnation, network security has come back with a vengeance.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>RSA Conference Guide 2014 Watch List: DevOps</title><link>/blog/rsa-conference-guide-2014-watch-list-devops/</link><pubDate>Thu, 13 Feb 2014 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/rsa-conference-guide-2014-watch-list-devops/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;We have covered the key themes we expect to see at the RSA Conference, so now we will cover a theme or two you probably &lt;em&gt;won’t&lt;/em&gt; see at the show (or not enough of, at least), but really should. The first is this DevOps things guys like Gene Kim are pushing. It may not be obvious yet, but DevOps promises to upend everything you know about building and launching applications, and make a fundamental mark on security. Or something I like to call “SecOps”.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Security Management 2.5: Replacing Your SIEM Yet? [New Paper]</title><link>/blog/security-management-2-5-replacing-your-siem-yet-new-paper/</link><pubDate>Thu, 13 Feb 2014 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/security-management-2-5-replacing-your-siem-yet-new-paper/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) systems create a lot of controversy among security folks – they are a pain but it is an instrumental technology for security, compliance, and operations management. The problem is – given the rapid evolution of SIEM/Log Management over the past 4-5 years – that product obsolescence is a genuine issue. The problems caused by products that have failed to keep pace with technical evolution and customer requirements cannot be trivialized. This pain becomes more acute when a SIEM fails to collect the essential information during an incident – and even worse when it completely fails to detect a threat. Customers spend significant resources (both time and money) on caring for and feeding their SIEM. If they don’t feel the value is commensurate with their investment they will move on – searching for better, easier, and faster products. It is only realistic for these customers to start questioning whether their incumbent offerings make sense moving forward.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Advanced Endpoint and Server Protection: Prevention</title><link>/blog/advanced-endpoint-and-server-protection-prevention/</link><pubDate>Wed, 12 Feb 2014 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/advanced-endpoint-and-server-protection-prevention/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;As we return to our Advanced Endpoint and Server Protection series, we are back working our way through the &lt;a href="https://securosis.com/blog/advanced-endpoint-and-server-protection-new-series"&gt;reimagined threat management process&lt;/a&gt;. After discussing &lt;a href="https://securosis.com/blog/advanced-endpoint-and-server-protection-new-series"&gt;assessment&lt;/a&gt; you know what you have and what risk those devices present to the organization. Now you can design a control set to &lt;em&gt;prevent&lt;/em&gt; compromise from happening in the first place.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Incite 2/12/2014: Kindling</title><link>/blog/incite-2-12-2014-kindling/</link><pubDate>Wed, 12 Feb 2014 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/incite-2-12-2014-kindling/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Sitting at my feet is the brand spanking new Kindle I ordered for XX1. It arrived before the snow and ice storm hits the ATL, so we got pretty lucky. She’s a voracious reader and it has become inefficient (and an ecological crime) to continue buying her paper books. She has probably read the Harry Potter series 5 or 6 times, and is constantly giving me new lists of books to buy. She has books everywhere. She reads on the bus. She gets in trouble because sometimes she reads in class. It’s pretty entertaining that the Boss and I need to try to discipline her, when her biggest transgression is reading in class. I kind of want to tell the teacher that if they didn’t suck at keeping the kid’s attention, it wouldn’t be a problem. But I don’t.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>RSA Conference Guide 2014 Key Theme: Cloud Everything</title><link>/blog/rsa-conference-guide-2014-key-theme-cloud-everything/</link><pubDate>Wed, 12 Feb 2014 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/rsa-conference-guide-2014-key-theme-cloud-everything/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;There is no stopping the train now that it’s rolling. Here is the final key theme that we expect to see at the show, and yes it’s all about the cloud. And yes, I managed to work a Jimmy Buffett lyric into the piece. Rich 1, Internet 0.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>RSA Conference Guide 2014 Key Theme: Crypto and Data Protection</title><link>/blog/rsa-conference-guide-2014-key-theme-crypto-and-data-protection/</link><pubDate>Wed, 12 Feb 2014 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/rsa-conference-guide-2014-key-theme-crypto-and-data-protection/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;You didn’t think you would need to wait long for a Snowden reference, did you? Well, you know we Securosis guys like to keep you in suspense. But without further ado, it’s time. Snowden time!&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Firestarter: Mass Media Abuse</title><link>/blog/firestarter-mass-media-abuse/</link><pubDate>Tue, 11 Feb 2014 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/firestarter-mass-media-abuse/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;In this week’s Firestarter we talk about the &lt;em&gt;Book of Mormon&lt;/em&gt; (the play, not the other thing), biking while intoxicated, and the ongoing predilection of mass media to abuse the truth about security for ratings. Because, NBC and Sochi.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>RSA Conference Guide 2014 Key Theme: Retailer Hacking</title><link>/blog/rsa-conference-guide-2014-key-theme-retailer-hacking/</link><pubDate>Tue, 11 Feb 2014 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/rsa-conference-guide-2014-key-theme-retailer-hacking/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;As we continue posting the key themes we expect to see at this year’s RSA Conference, it’s time hit the source of all things FUD: recent retailer breaches. Security marketing is driven by catalysts, to create urgency, to buy products and services. There have been plenty so far this year, and we will hear all about them at the show.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>New Paper: Defending Data on iOS 7</title><link>/blog/new-paper-defending-data-on-ios-7/</link><pubDate>Mon, 10 Feb 2014 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/new-paper-defending-data-on-ios-7/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I have been working on this one quietly for a while. It is a massive update to my previous paper on iOS security.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>RSA Conference Guide 2014 Key Theme: APT0</title><link>/blog/rsa-conference-guide-2014-key-theme-apt0/</link><pubDate>Mon, 10 Feb 2014 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/rsa-conference-guide-2014-key-theme-apt0/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;It’s that time of year. The security industry is gearing up for the annual pilgrimage to San Francisco for the RSA Conference. For the fifth year your pals at Securosis are putting together a conference guide to give you some perspective on what to look for and how to make the most of your RSA experience. We will start with a few key themes for the week, and then go into deep dives on all our coverage areas. The full guide will be available for download next Wednesday, and we will post an extended Firestarter video next Friday discussing the Guide. Without further ado, here is our first key theme.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>RSA Conference Guide 2014 Key Theme: Big Data Security</title><link>/blog/rsa-conference-guide-2014-key-theme-big-data-security/</link><pubDate>Mon, 10 Feb 2014 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/rsa-conference-guide-2014-key-theme-big-data-security/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;As we continue posting our key themes for the 2014 RSA Conference, let’s dig a bit into big bata, because you won’t be hearing anything about it at the show…&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>We Need to Thank Target for Being Hacked</title><link>/blog/we-need-to-thank-target-for-being-hacked/</link><pubDate>Mon, 10 Feb 2014 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/we-need-to-thank-target-for-being-hacked/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Normally we like to blame the victim, but in this case we need to thank them. &lt;a href="http://blogs.wsj.com/corporate-intelligence/2014/02/06/october-2015-the-end-of-the-swipe-and-sign-credit-card/"&gt;From the WSJ, the swap to Chip and PIN will happen by October 2015&lt;/a&gt;. Here is the key point:&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Friday Summary: Ink Stained Wretch</title><link>/blog/summary-ink-stained-wretch/</link><pubDate>Thu, 06 Feb 2014 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/summary-ink-stained-wretch/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I love writing.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Except when I hate it.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;When people ask what I do for a living, I almost never say ‘writer’. I’m an analyst, who occasionally dabbles as a tech journalist, but pumps out more words in typical a year than many professional writers.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Quick Wins with TISM</title><link>/blog/quick-wins-with-tism/</link><pubDate>Thu, 06 Feb 2014 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/quick-wins-with-tism/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;After making the case for threat intelligence (TI), and combining it with some ideas about how security monitoring (SM) is evolving – based both on customer needs and technology evolution – there is clear value in integrating TI into your SM efforts. But all that stuff is still conceptual. How can you actually apply this integrated process to shorten the window between compromise and detection? How can you get a &lt;em&gt;quick win&lt;/em&gt; for the integration of TI and SM to build some momentum for your efforts? Finally, how do you ensure you can turn that quick win into sustainable leverage, producing increased accuracy and better prioritization of alerts from the SM platform?&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Incite 2/5/2014: Super Dud</title><link>/blog/incite-2-5-2014-super-dud/</link><pubDate>Wed, 05 Feb 2014 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/incite-2-5-2014-super-dud/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I’m sure long-time Incite readers know I am a huge football fan. I have infected the rest of my family, and we have an annual Super Bowl party with 90+ people to celebrate the end of each football season. I have laughed (when Baltimore almost blew a 20 point lead last year), cried (when the NY Giants won in 2011), and always managed to have a good time. Even after I stopped eating chicken wings cold turkey (no pun intended), I still figure out a way to pollute my body with pizza, chips, and Guinness. Of course, lots of Guinness. It’s not like I need to drive home or anything.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Security’s Future: Implications for Cloud Providers</title><link>/blog/securitys-future-implications-for-cloud-providers-2/</link><pubDate>Wed, 05 Feb 2014 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/securitys-future-implications-for-cloud-providers-2/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;This is the fifth post in a series on the future of information security, which will be the basis for a white paper. You can leave feedback here as a blog comment, or even&lt;a href="https://github.com/Securosis/FutureOfSecurity/blob/master/FutureOfSecurity.md"&gt;submit edits directly over at GitHub, where we are running the entire editing process in public&lt;/a&gt;. This is the initial draft, and I expect to trim the content by about 20%. &lt;a href="https://securosis.com/blog/new-series-and-paper-the-future-of-information-security"&gt;The entire outline is available.&lt;/a&gt; See the &lt;a href="https://securosis.com/blog/securitys-future-a-disruptive-collision"&gt;first post&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="https://securosis.com/blog/securitys-future-six-trends-changing-the-face-of-security"&gt;second post&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="https://securosis.com/blog/securitys-future-what-it-means-part-1"&gt;third post&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href="https://securosis.com/blog/securitys-future-implications-for-security-vendors"&gt;fourth post&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Security’s Future: Implications for Security Vendors</title><link>/blog/securitys-future-implications-for-security-vendors-2/</link><pubDate>Tue, 04 Feb 2014 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/securitys-future-implications-for-security-vendors-2/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;This is the fourth post in a series on the future of information security, which will be the basis for a white paper. You can leave feedback here as a blog comment, or even&lt;a href="https://github.com/Securosis/FutureOfSecurity/blob/master/FutureOfSecurity.md"&gt;submit edits directly over at GitHub, where we are running the entire editing process in public&lt;/a&gt;. This is the initial draft, and I expect to trim the content by about 20%. &lt;a href="https://securosis.com/blog/new-series-and-paper-the-future-of-information-security"&gt;The entire outline is available.&lt;/a&gt; See the &lt;a href="https://securosis.com/blog/securitys-future-a-disruptive-collision"&gt;first post&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="https://securosis.com/blog/securitys-future-six-trends-changing-the-face-of-security"&gt;second post&lt;/a&gt;, and &lt;a href="https://securosis.com/blog/securitys-future-what-it-means-part-1"&gt;third post&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>TISM: The Threat Intelligence + Security Monitoring Process</title><link>/blog/tism-the-threat-intelligence-security-monitoring-process/</link><pubDate>Tue, 04 Feb 2014 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/tism-the-threat-intelligence-security-monitoring-process/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;As we discussed in &lt;a href="https://securosis.com/blog/tism-revisiting-security-monitoring"&gt;Revisiting Security Monitoring&lt;/a&gt;, there has been significant change on the security monitoring (SM) side, including the need to analyze far more data sources at a much higher scale than before. One of the emerging data sources is threat intelligence (TI), as detailed in &lt;a href="https://securosis.com/blog/TISM-benefiting-from-the-misfortune-of-others"&gt;Benefiting from the Misfortune of Others&lt;/a&gt;. Now we need to put these two concepts together, to detail the process of integrating threat intelligence into your security monitoring process. This integration can yield far better and more actionable alerts from your security monitoring platform, because the alerts are based on what is actually happening in the wild.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Firestarter: Inevitable Doom</title><link>/blog/firestarter-inevitable-doom/</link><pubDate>Mon, 03 Feb 2014 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/firestarter-inevitable-doom/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Okay, let’s just ignore the first part of this Firestarter where we talk about the Denver Broncos, okay? We recorded it on the Friday before the game and, well, enough said.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Security’s Future: What it Means (Part 3)</title><link>/blog/securitys-future-what-it-means-part-3/</link><pubDate>Mon, 03 Feb 2014 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/securitys-future-what-it-means-part-3/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;This is the third post in a series on the future of information security, which will be the basis for a white paper. You can leave feedback here as a blog comment, or even&lt;a href="https://github.com/Securosis/FutureOfSecurity/blob/master/FutureOfSecurity.md"&gt;submit edits directly over at GitHub, where we are running the entire editing process in public&lt;/a&gt;. This is the initial draft, and I expect to trim the content by about 20%. &lt;a href="https://securosis.com/blog/new-series-and-paper-the-future-of-information-security"&gt;The entire outline is available.&lt;/a&gt; See the &lt;a href="https://securosis.com/blog/securitys-future-a-disruptive-collision"&gt;first post&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href="https://securosis.com/blog/securitys-future-six-trends-changing-the-face-of-security"&gt;the second post&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Security’s Future: Six Trends Changing the Face of Security</title><link>/blog/securitys-future-six-trends-changing-the-face-of-security-2/</link><pubDate>Fri, 31 Jan 2014 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/securitys-future-six-trends-changing-the-face-of-security-2/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;This is the second post in a series on the future of information security, which will be the basis for a white paper. You can leave feedback here as a blog comment, or even&lt;a href="https://github.com/Securosis/FutureOfSecurity/blob/master/FutureOfSecurity.md"&gt;directly submit edits over at GitHub, where we are running the entire editing process in public&lt;/a&gt;. This is the initial draft, and I expect to trim the content by about 20%. &lt;a href="https://securosis.com/blog/new-series-and-paper-the-future-of-information-security"&gt;The entire outline is available.&lt;/a&gt; The &lt;a href="https://securosis.com/blog/securitys-future-a-disruptive-collision"&gt;first post is available.&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Friday Summary: January 31, 2014</title><link>/blog/friday-summary-january-31-2014/</link><pubDate>Thu, 30 Jan 2014 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/friday-summary-january-31-2014/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;During my total and complete laptop fail for this week’s Firestarter, I was trying to make the point that large software projects have a considerably higher probability of failure. It is no surprise that many government IT projects are ‘failures’ – they are normally managed as ginormous projects with many competing requirements. It worked or the Apollo missions so governments doggedly cling to that validated model. But in the commercial environment Agile is having a huge and positive impact on software development. Coincidentally, this week &lt;a href="http://swreflections.blogspot.com/2014/01/small-projects-and-big-programs.html"&gt;Jim Bird discussed the findings of the 2013 Chaos Report&lt;/a&gt;. In a nutshell the topline was “More projects are succeeding (39% in 2012, up from 29% in 2004), mostly because projects are getting smaller”. But Jim points out that you cannot conjure up an Agile development program like the &lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wonder_Twins"&gt;Wonder Twins&lt;/a&gt; activate their superhero powers – Agile development processes are one aspect, but program management across multiple Agile efforts is another thing entirely. A lot of thought and work has gone into this over the last few years, and things like the &lt;a href="http://scaledagileframework.com/"&gt;Scaled Agile Framework&lt;/a&gt; can help. Still, most government projects I have seen employ &lt;em&gt;no&lt;/em&gt; Agile techniques. There is a huge body of knowledge out on how to get these things done, and industry leads the public sector by a wide margin.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Security’s Future: a Disruptive Collision</title><link>/blog/securitys-future-a-disruptive-collision-2/</link><pubDate>Thu, 30 Jan 2014 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/securitys-future-a-disruptive-collision-2/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;This is the first post in a series on the future of information security, which will be the basis for a white paper. You can leave feedback here as a blog comment, or even&lt;a href="https://github.com/Securosis/FutureOfSecurity/blob/master/FutureOfSecurity.md"&gt;directly submit edits over at GitHub, where we run the entire editing process in public&lt;/a&gt;. This is the initial draft, and I expect to trim the content by about 20%. &lt;a href="https://securosis.com/blog/new-series-and-paper-the-future-of-information-security"&gt;The entire outline is available.&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>TISM: Revisiting Security Monitoring</title><link>/blog/tism-revisiting-security-monitoring/</link><pubDate>Thu, 30 Jan 2014 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/tism-revisiting-security-monitoring/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;In our first post on Leveraging Threat Intelligence in Security Monitoring (TISM), &lt;a href="https://securosis.com/blog/TISM-benefiting-from-the-misfortune-of-others"&gt;Benefiting from the Misfortune of Others&lt;/a&gt;, we discussed threat intelligence as a key information source for shortening the window between compromise and detection. Now we need a look in terms of security monitoring – basically how monitoring processes need to adapt to the ability to leverage threat intelligence.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Incite 1/29/2014: Southern Snowpocalypse</title><link>/blog/incite-1-29-2014-southern-snowpocalypse/</link><pubDate>Wed, 29 Jan 2014 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/incite-1-29-2014-southern-snowpocalypse/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I grew up in the northeast. My memories of snow weren’t really good. I didn’t ski, so all that I knew about snow was that I had to shovel it and it’s hard to drive in. It is not inherently hard to drive in snow, but too many folks have no idea what they are doing, which makes it hard.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Firestarter: Government Influence</title><link>/blog/firestarter-government-influence/</link><pubDate>Mon, 27 Jan 2014 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/firestarter-government-influence/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;In this week’s Firestarter Rich, Mike, and Adrian (until his computer died) discuss the importance (or lack thereof) of the security industry and community in influencing government.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>New Series (and Paper): The Future of Information Security</title><link>/blog/new-series-and-paper-the-future-of-information-security/</link><pubDate>Mon, 27 Jan 2014 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/new-series-and-paper-the-future-of-information-security/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;Update: Here are links to the series as we post it:&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;ul&gt;
&lt;li&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://securosis.com/blog/securitys-future-a-disruptive-collision"&gt;Post 1&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://securosis.com/blog/securitys-future-six-trends-changing-the-face-of-security"&gt;Post 2&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://securosis.com/blog/securitys-future-what-it-means-part-1"&gt;Post 3&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://securosis.com/blog/securitys-future-implications-for-security-vendors"&gt;Post 4&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://securosis.com/blog/securitys-future-implications-for-cloud-providers"&gt;Post 5&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Leveraging Threat Intelligence in Security Monitoring: Benefiting from the Misfortune of Others</title><link>/blog/tism-benefiting-from-the-misfortune-of-others/</link><pubDate>Sun, 26 Jan 2014 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/tism-benefiting-from-the-misfortune-of-others/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Threat intelligence (TI) is hot because it promises to close the gap a bit between attackers and defenders. So we have done considerable research on TI over the past year. We started by talking about the &lt;a href="https://securosis.com/research/papers/building-an-early-warning-system"&gt;Early Warning System&lt;/a&gt;, a monitoring concept that leverages threat intelligence feeds to look for emerging attacks. Then we dove into the &lt;a href="https://securosis.com/research/papers/network-based-threat-intelligence-searching-for-the-smoking-gun"&gt;kinds of TI you can extract from network traffic&lt;/a&gt;, the ability to identify malicious IPs and senders by &lt;a href="https://securosis.com/research/papers/email-based-threat-intelligence-to-catch-a-phish"&gt;gathering TI through email&lt;/a&gt;, and finally a view of the external world through &lt;a href="https://securosis.com/research/threat-intelligence-for-ecosystem-risk-management"&gt;EcoSystem TI&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Summary: Mmm. Beer.</title><link>/blog/summary-mmm-beer/</link><pubDate>Thu, 23 Jan 2014 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/summary-mmm-beer/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I realize this will shock many of you, but I hated beer in high school and the first couple years of college.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>The SIXTH Annual Disaster Recovery Breakfast (with 100% less boycott)</title><link>/blog/2014-recoverybreakfast/</link><pubDate>Thu, 23 Jan 2014 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/2014-recoverybreakfast/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src="RecoveryBreakfastInvite-2014_thumb.jpg" alt=""&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Holy crap, time flies! Especially when you mark years by making the annual pilgrimage to San Francisco for the RSA Conference. Once again we are hosting our RSA Conference Disaster Recovery Breakfast. It has been six frickin’ years! That’s hard to believe but reinforces that we are not spring chickens anymore.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Incite 1/22/2014: The Catalyst</title><link>/blog/incite-1-22-2014-the-catalyst/</link><pubDate>Wed, 22 Jan 2014 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/incite-1-22-2014-the-catalyst/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I was on the phone last week with &lt;a href="https://twitter.com/jjx"&gt;Jen Minella&lt;/a&gt;, preparing for a podcast on our &lt;a href="http://www.rsaconference.com/events/us14/agenda/sessions/1066/neuro-hacking-101-taming-your-inner-curmudgeon"&gt;Neuro-Hacking&lt;/a&gt; talk at this year’s RSA Conference, when she asked what my story is. We had never really discussed how we each came to start mindfulness practices. So we shared our stories, and then I realized that given everything else I share on the Incite, I should tell it here as well.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Firestarter: Target and Antivirus</title><link>/blog/firestarter-target-and-antivirus/</link><pubDate>Mon, 20 Jan 2014 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/firestarter-target-and-antivirus/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;In this week’s Firestarter Rich, Mike, and Adrian discuss the latest in the Target relevations and whether over-reliance on antivirus is to blame once again. We aren’t out to blame the victim. We also pick our top prevention strategies for this sort of attack. Ain’t hindsight great?&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Mindfulness Works</title><link>/blog/mindfulness-works/</link><pubDate>Mon, 20 Jan 2014 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/mindfulness-works/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Back in November &lt;a href="https://securosis.com/blog/blowing-your-mindfulness-at-rsa-2014"&gt;I learned&lt;/a&gt; I will be giving a talk on &lt;a href="http://www.rsaconference.com/events/us14/agenda/sessions/1066/neuro-hacking-101-taming-your-inner-curmudgeon"&gt;Neuro-Hacking&lt;/a&gt; at RSA with Jennifer Minella. We will be discussing how mindfulness practices can favorably impact the way you view things, basically allowing you to hack your brain. But I am pretty sure you can’t sell my synapses on an Eastern European carder forum.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Eliminate Surprises with Security Assurance and Testing [New Paper]</title><link>/blog/eliminate-surprises-with-security-assurance-and-testing-new-paper/</link><pubDate>Sun, 19 Jan 2014 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/eliminate-surprises-with-security-assurance-and-testing-new-paper/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;We have always been fans of making sure applications and infrastructure are &lt;em&gt;ready for prime time&lt;/em&gt; before letting them loose on the world. It’s important not to just use basic scanner functions either – your adversaries are unlikely to limit their tactics to things you find in an open source scanner. Security Assurance and Testing enables organizations to limit the unpleasant surprises that happen when launching new stuff or upgrading infrastructure.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>A Very Telling Antivirus Metric</title><link>/blog/a-very-telling-antivirus-metric/</link><pubDate>Thu, 16 Jan 2014 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/a-very-telling-antivirus-metric/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;From &lt;a href="http://krebsonsecurity.com/2014/01/a-first-look-at-the-target-intrusion-malware/"&gt;Brian Krebs’ awesome reporting on the Target breach&lt;/a&gt; (emphasis added):&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The source close to the Target investigation said that at the time this POS malware was installed in Target’s environment (sometime prior to Nov. 27, 2013), &lt;strong&gt;none of the 40-plus commercial antivirus tools used to scan malware at virustotal.com flagged the POS malware (or any related hacking tools that were used in the intrusion) as malicious&lt;/strong&gt;. “They were customized to avoid detection and for use in specific environments,” the source said.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Apple’s Very Different BYOD Philosophy</title><link>/blog/apples-very-different-byod-philosophy-2/</link><pubDate>Thu, 16 Jan 2014 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/apples-very-different-byod-philosophy-2/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;I am currently polishing off the first draft of my Data Security for iOS 7 paper, and reached one fascinating conclusion during the research which I want to push out early. Apple’ approach is implementing is very different from the way we normally view BYOD. Apple’s focus is on providing a consistent, non-degraded user experience while still allowing enterprise control. Apple enforces this by taking an active role in mediating mobile device management between the user and the enterprise, treating both as equals. We haven’t really seen this before – even when companies like Blackberry handle aspects of security and MDM, they don’t simultaneously treat the device as something the&lt;strong&gt;user&lt;/strong&gt; owns. Enough blather – here you go…&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Friday Summary: January 17, 2014</title><link>/blog/friday-summary-january-17-2014/</link><pubDate>Thu, 16 Jan 2014 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/friday-summary-january-17-2014/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Today I am going to write about tokenization. Four separate people have sent me a questions about tokenization in the last week. As a security paranoiac I figured there was some kind of conspiracy or social engineering going on – this whole NSA/Snowden/RSA thingy has me spooked. But after I calmed down and realized that these are ‘random’ events, I recognized that the questions are good and relevant to a wider audience, so I will answer a couple of them here on the blog. In no particular order:&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Incite 1/15/2014: Declutter</title><link>/blog/incite-1-15-2014-declutter/</link><pubDate>Wed, 15 Jan 2014 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/incite-1-15-2014-declutter/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;As I discussed last week, &lt;a href="https://securosis.com/blog/incite-1-8-2014-renew-year"&gt;the beginning of the year is a time for ReNewal&lt;/a&gt; and taking a look at what you will do over the next 12 months. Part of that renewal process should be clearing out the old so the new has room to grow. It’s kind of like forest fires. The old dead stuff needs to burn down so the new can emerge. I am happy to say the Boss is on board with this concept of renewal – she has been on a rampage, reducing the clutter around the house.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Reducing Attack Surface with Application Control: Use Cases and Selection Criteria</title><link>/blog/application-control-use-cases-and-selection-criteria/</link><pubDate>Wed, 15 Jan 2014 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/application-control-use-cases-and-selection-criteria/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;In the &lt;a href="https://securosis.com/blog/application-control-the-double-edged-sword-new"&gt;first post in our Application Control series&lt;/a&gt; we discussed why it is hard to protect endpoints, and some of the emerging alternative technologies that promise to help us do better. Mostly because it is probably impossible do a worse job of protecting endpoints, right? We described Application Control (also known as Application Whitelisting), one of these alternatives, while being candid about the perception and reality of this technology after years of use.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Security Management 2.5: Migration</title><link>/blog/security-management-2-5-migration/</link><pubDate>Wed, 15 Jan 2014 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/security-management-2-5-migration/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;If you made it this far we know your old platform is akin to an old junker automobile: every day you drive to work in a noisy, uncomfortable, costly vehicle that may or may not get you where you need to be, and every time you turn around you’re spending more money to fix something. With cars figuring out what you want, shopping, getting financing, and then dealing with car sales people is no picnic either, but in the end you do it to make you life a bit easier and yourself more comfortable. It is important to remember this because, at this stage of SIEM replacement, it feels like we have gone through a lot of work just so we can do more work to roll out the new platform. Let’s step back for a moment and focus on what’s important; getting stuff done as simply and easily as possible.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Advanced Endpoint and Server Protection: Assessment</title><link>/blog/advanced-endpoint-and-server-protection-assessment/</link><pubDate>Tue, 14 Jan 2014 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/advanced-endpoint-and-server-protection-assessment/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;As we described in the &lt;a href="https://securosis.com/blog/advanced-endpoint-and-server-protection-new-series"&gt;introduction to the Advanced Endpoint and Server Protection series&lt;/a&gt;, given the inability of most traditional security controls to defend against advanced attacks, it is time to reimagine how we do threat management. This new process has 5 phases; we call the first phase &lt;em&gt;Assessment&lt;/em&gt;. We described it as:&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Security Management 2.5: Negotiation</title><link>/blog/security-management-2-5-negotiation/</link><pubDate>Tue, 14 Jan 2014 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/security-management-2-5-negotiation/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;You made your decision and kicked it up the food chain – now the fun begins. Well, fun for some people, anyway. For the first half of this discussion we will assume you have decided to move to a new platform and offer tactics for negotiating for a replacement platform. But some people decide not to move, using the possible switch for negotiating leverage. It is no bad thing to stay with your existing platform, so long as you have done the work to know it can meet your requirements. We are writing this paper for the people who keep telling us about their unhappiness, and how their evolving requirements have not been met. So after asking all the right questions, if the best answer is to stay put, that’s a less disruptive path anyway.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Cloud Forensics 101</title><link>/blog/cloud-forensics-101/</link><pubDate>Mon, 13 Jan 2014 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/cloud-forensics-101/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Last week I wrote up my &lt;a href="https://securosis.com/blog/my-500-cloud-security-screwup"&gt;near epic fail on Amazon Web Services&lt;/a&gt; where I ‘let’ someone launch a bunch of Litecoin mining instances in my account.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Firestarter: Crisis Communications</title><link>/blog/firestarter-crisis-communications/</link><pubDate>Mon, 13 Jan 2014 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/firestarter-crisis-communications/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Okay, we have content in this thing. We promise. But we can’t stop staring at our new title video sequence. I mean, just look at it!&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Reducing Attack Surface with Application Control: The Double-Edged Sword [New Series]</title><link>/blog/application-control-the-double-edged-sword-new/</link><pubDate>Mon, 13 Jan 2014 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/application-control-the-double-edged-sword-new/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;The problems of protecting endpoints are pretty well understood. As we described in &lt;a href="https://securosis.com/research/papers/the-2014-endpoint-security-buyers-guide"&gt;The 2014 Guide to Endpoint Security&lt;/a&gt;, you have stuff (private data and/or intellectual property) that others want. On the other hand, you have employees who need to do their jobs and require access to said private data and/or intellectual property. Those employees have sensitive data on their devices, so you need to protect their endpoints. It’s not like this is anything new. Protecting endpoints has been a focus of security professionals since, well, always – with decidedly unimpressive results.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Security Management 2.5: Selection Process</title><link>/blog/security-management-2-5-selection-process/</link><pubDate>Mon, 13 Jan 2014 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/security-management-2-5-selection-process/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;With vendor evaluations in hand, you are ready to make your decision, right? The answer is both yes and no. We know the importance of this decision – you are here because your first attempt at this project wasn’t as successful as it needed to be. After the vendor evaluation process you are in a position to distinguish innovative technologies from pigs with fresh lipstick. But now you need to see which of the vendors is actually the best fit for you! Successful decision-making on SIEM replacement goes beyond vendor evaluation – it entails evaluating yourself too. It is important to differentiate between the two because you cannot make a decision without taking a long hard look at yourself, your team, and your company. This is an area where many projects fail, so let’s break the decision down to ensure you can make a good recommendation and feel comfortable with it – from both internal and external perspectives.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>New Paper: What CISOs Need to Know About Cloud Computing</title><link>/blog/new-paper-what-cisos-need-to-know-about-cloud-computing/</link><pubDate>Fri, 10 Jan 2014 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/new-paper-what-cisos-need-to-know-about-cloud-computing/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Over the past few years I have spent a lot of time traveling the world, talking and teaching about cloud security. To back that up I have probably spent more time researching the technologies than any other topic since I moved from being a developer and consultant into the analyst role. Something seemed different at such a fundamental level that I was driven to put my hands on a keyboard and see what it looked and felt like. To be honest, even after spending a couple years at this, I still feel I am barely scratching the surface.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Summary: Enlightening Embarrassment</title><link>/blog/summary-enlightening-embarrassment/</link><pubDate>Fri, 10 Jan 2014 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/summary-enlightening-embarrassment/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Rich here.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A funny thing happened this week.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;As I wrote on Tuesday, &lt;a href="https://securosis.com/blog/my-500-cloud-security-screwup"&gt;someone hacked my Amazon Web Services account when I accidentally left my keys in code I pushed up to GitHub&lt;/a&gt;. The first line of my code was,&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Security Management 2.5: The Decision Process</title><link>/blog/security-management-2-5-the-decision-process/</link><pubDate>Thu, 09 Jan 2014 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/security-management-2-5-the-decision-process/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;By this point you appreciate the difference large gap between &lt;em&gt;what you need&lt;/em&gt; and &lt;em&gt;what you have,&lt;/em&gt; so it’s time to dip your toes in the water to see what other platform vendors offer. But how? You need to figure out which vendors are worth investigating for their advantages, despite any disadvantages. Much of defining evaluation criteria and potential candidates involves wading objectively through vendor hyperbole to see what each offering &lt;em&gt;actually does&lt;/em&gt; vs. drug-induced optimism in the vendor’s marketing department. As technology markets mature (and SIEM is pretty mature), the base capabilities of the platforms converge, making them all look alike. Complicating the issue, vendors adopt similar messaging regardless of actual features, making it increasingly difficult to differentiate between the platforms.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Incite 1/8/2014: ReNew Year</title><link>/blog/incite-1-8-2014-renew-year/</link><pubDate>Wed, 08 Jan 2014 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/incite-1-8-2014-renew-year/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Since I’m on the East Coast of the US, when the ball drops in Times Square that’s it. The old year is done. The new year begins. With some of Dublin’s finest coursing through my veins, I get a little nostalgic. I don’t think about years in terms of “good” or “bad” anymore – instead I realize that 2013 is now merely a memory that will inevitably fade away.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Mikko Hypponen Still Speaking at the RSA Conference *Updated*</title><link>/blog/mikko-hypponen-still-speaking-at-the-rsa-conference/</link><pubDate>Tue, 07 Jan 2014 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/mikko-hypponen-still-speaking-at-the-rsa-conference/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;This speaks for itself:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.f-secure.com/weblog/archives/00002651.html"&gt;An Open Letter to the Chiefs of EMC and RSA&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;and&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.rsaconference.com/events/us14/agenda/sessions/1233/securing-smart-machines-where-we-are-where-we-want"&gt;Securing Smart Machines: Where We Are, Where We Want to Be, and Challenges&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>My $500 Cloud Security Screwup—UPDATED</title><link>/blog/my-500-cloud-security-screwup-updated/</link><pubDate>Tue, 07 Jan 2014 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/my-500-cloud-security-screwup-updated/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;Update: Amazon reached out to me and reversed the charges, without me asking or complaining (or in any way contacting them). I accept full responsibility and didn’t post this to get a refund, but I’m sure not going to complain – neither is Mike.&lt;/em&gt; This is a bit embarrassing to write. I take security pretty seriously. Okay, that seems silly to say, but we all know a lot of people who speak publicly on security don’t practice what they preach. I know I’m not perfect – far from it – but I really try to ensure that when I’m hacked, whoever gets me will have earned it. That said, I’m also human, and sometimes make sacrifices for convenience. But when I do so, I try to make darn sure they are deliberate, if misguided, decisions. And there is the list of things I know I need to fix but haven’t had time to get to. Last night, I managed to screw both those up. &lt;img src="52e80c79f698ed381fa4703128a179df.jpg" alt=""&gt; It’s important to fess up, and I learned (the hard way) some interesting conclusions about a new attack trend that probably needs its own post. And, as is often the case, I made three moderately small errors that combined to an epic FAIL. I was on the couch, finishing up an episode of &lt;em&gt;Marvel’s Agents of S.H.I.E.L.D.&lt;/em&gt; (no, it isn’t very good, but I can’t help myself; if they kill off 90% of the cast and replace them with Buffy vets it could totally rock, though). Anyway… after the show I checked my email before heading to bed. This is what I saw:&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Security Management 2.5: Evaluating the Incumbent</title><link>/blog/security-management-2-5-evaluating-the-incumbent/</link><pubDate>Tue, 07 Jan 2014 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/security-management-2-5-evaluating-the-incumbent/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;To explain the importance of picking a platform, rather than a product, our last post compared Log Management to SIEM, like the difference between using kitchen appliances and running a machine shop. One is easy to use, but limited in applicability; the other requires more work on your part, but can accomplish much more. Our goal was to contrast use cases and levels of expectations between the two product classes; despite lower overall platform satisfaction and the greater amount of work required, SIEM is what many customers need to get their work done. Pushing the boundaries of what is possible involves some pain.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Firestarter: The NSA and RSA</title><link>/blog/firestarter-the-nsa-and-rsa/</link><pubDate>Mon, 06 Jan 2014 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/firestarter-the-nsa-and-rsa/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Hey everyone. It’s a new year and time for new stuff from your pals here at Securosis.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;We used to run a Monday-morning ‘Firestarter’ post to get people thinking for the week. We decided to revive it with a twist. We are restarting the Firestarter as a weekly short video (15 minutes or so is our target). As we work out the details we also plan to push it out as a podcast, and once every month or so we will run a longer episode to dig deeper into a topic.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Security Management 2.5: Revisiting Requirements</title><link>/blog/security-management-2-5-revisiting-requirements/</link><pubDate>Mon, 06 Jan 2014 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/security-management-2-5-revisiting-requirements/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Given the evolution of SIEM technology and the security challenges facing organizations, it is time to revisit requirements and use cases. This is an essential part of the evaluation process. You need a fresh and critical look at your security management environment to understand what you need today, how that will change tomorrow, and what kinds of resources and expertise you can harness – unconstrained by your current state. While some requirements may not have changed all that much (such as ease of management and compliance reporting), as we described earlier in this series, the way we use these systems has changed dramatically.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Thank You</title><link>/blog/thank-you/</link><pubDate>Tue, 31 Dec 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/thank-you/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;As you may have noticed, I haven’t been blogging much the past month or so. 2013 has been an… &lt;em&gt;interesting&lt;/em&gt; … year, filled with personal and professional highs and lows. Our third child was born, and we were back in the thick of things with 3 kids aged four and under. Don’t even get me stared on the near nonstop string of minor illnesses. There’s nothing like stomach flu twice in a month. Once on a travel day – thus the last month of minimal blogging.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Security Management 2.5: Platform Evolution</title><link>/blog/security-management-2-5-platform-evolution/</link><pubDate>Mon, 30 Dec 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/security-management-2-5-platform-evolution/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;This post discusses evolutionary changes in SIEM, focusing on how underlying platform capabilities have evolved to meet &lt;a href="https://securosis.com/blog/security-management-2.5-changing-needs"&gt;the requirements discussed in the last post&lt;/a&gt;. To give you a sneak peek, it is all about doing more with more data. The change we have seen in these platforms over the past few years has been mostly under the covers. It’s not sexy, but this architectural evolution was necessary to make sure the platforms scaled and could perform the needed analysis moving forward. The problem is that most folks cannot appreciate the boatload of R&amp;amp;D which has been required to enable many platforms to receive a proverbial &lt;em&gt;brain transplant&lt;/em&gt;. We will start with the major advancements.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Security Management 2.5: Changing Needs</title><link>/blog/security-management-2-5-changing-needs/</link><pubDate>Fri, 27 Dec 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/security-management-2-5-changing-needs/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Today’s post discusses the changing needs and requirements organizations have for security management customers, which is just a fancy way of saying “Here’s why customers are unhappy.” The following items are the main discussion points when we speak with end users, and the big picture reasons motivating SIEM users to consider alternatives.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Advanced Endpoint and Server Protection [New Series]</title><link>/blog/advanced-endpoint-and-server-protection-new-series/</link><pubDate>Thu, 26 Dec 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/advanced-endpoint-and-server-protection-new-series/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Endpoint protection has become the punching bag of security. Every successful attack seems to be blamed on a failure of endpoint protection. Not that this is &lt;em&gt;totally&lt;/em&gt; unjustified – most solutions for endpoint protection have failed to keep pace with attackers. In our &lt;a href="https://securosis.com/research/papers/the-2014-endpoint-security-buyers-guide"&gt;2014 Endpoint Security Buyers Guide&lt;/a&gt;, we discussed many of the issues around endpoint hygiene and mobility. We also explored the human element underlying many of attacks, and how to prepare your employees for social engineering attacks in &lt;a href="https://securosis.com/research/papers/security-awareness-training-evolution"&gt;Security Awareness Training Evolution&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>New Paper: Defending Against Denial of Service Attacks</title><link>/blog/new-paper-defending-against-denial-of-service-attacks/</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Dec 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/new-paper-defending-against-denial-of-service-attacks/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Just in case you had nothing else to do during the holiday season, you can check out our latest research on Application Denial of Service Attacks. This paper continues our research into Denial of Service attacks after last year’s &lt;a href="https://securosis.com/research/papers/defending-against-denial-of-service-dos-attacks"&gt;Defending Against Denial of Service Attacks&lt;/a&gt; research. As we stated back then, DoS encompasses a number of different tactics, all aimed at impacting the availability of your applications or infrastructure. In this paper we dig &lt;em&gt;much&lt;/em&gt; deeper into application DoS attacks. For good reason – as the paper says:&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Security Management 2.5: Replacing Your SIEM Yet? [New Series]</title><link>/blog/security-management-2-5-replacing-your-siem-yet-new-series/</link><pubDate>Mon, 23 Dec 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/security-management-2-5-replacing-your-siem-yet-new-series/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) systems create a lot of controversy with security folks; they are one of the cornerstones on which the security program are built upon within every enterprise. Yet, simultaneously SIEM generates the most complaints and general angst. Two years ago Mike and I completed a research project on “&lt;a href="https://securosis.com/research/papers/security-management-2.0-time-to-replace-your-siem"&gt;SIEM 2.0: Time to Replace your SIEM?&lt;/a&gt;” based upon a series of conversations with organizations who wanted more from their investment. Specifically they wanted more scalability, easier deployment, and the ability to ‘monitor up the stack’ in context of business applications and better integration with enterprise systems (like identity).&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Security Assurance &amp; Testing: Quick Wins</title><link>/blog/security-assurance-testing-quick-wins/</link><pubDate>Sun, 22 Dec 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/security-assurance-testing-quick-wins/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;We started this Security Assurance and Testing (SA&amp;amp;T) series with &lt;a href="https://securosis.com/blog/security-assurance-and-testing-no-surprises"&gt;the need for testing&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href="https://securosis.com/blog/security-assurance-testing-tactics-and-programs"&gt;which tactics make sense within an SA&amp;amp;T program&lt;/a&gt;. But it is always helpful to see how the concepts apply to more tangible situations. So we will now show how the SA&amp;amp;T program can provide a &lt;em&gt;quick win&lt;/em&gt; for the security team, with two (admittedly contrived) scenarios that show how SA&amp;amp;T can be used – both at the front end of a project, and on an ongoing basis, to ensure the organization is well aware of its security posture.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Security Assurance &amp; Testing: Tactics and Programs</title><link>/blog/security-assurance-testing-tactics-and-programs/</link><pubDate>Fri, 20 Dec 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/security-assurance-testing-tactics-and-programs/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;As we discussed in the introduction to this &lt;a href="https://securosis.com/blog/security-assurance-and-testing-no-surprises"&gt;Security Assurance &amp;amp; Testing&lt;/a&gt; (SA&amp;amp;T) series, it is increasingly hard to adequately test infrastructure and applications before they go into production. But adversaries have the benefit of being able to target the weakest part of your environment – whatever it may be. So the key to SA&amp;amp;T is to ensure you are covering &lt;em&gt;the entire stack.&lt;/em&gt; Does that make the process a lot more detailed and complex? Absolutely, but you can’t be sure what will happen when facing real attackers without a comprehensive test.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Friday Summary: December 20, 2013 year end edition</title><link>/blog/friday-summary-december-20-2013-year-end-edition/</link><pubDate>Thu, 19 Dec 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/friday-summary-december-20-2013-year-end-edition/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I have not done a Friday Summary in a couple weeks, which is a blog post we have rarely missed over the last 6 years, so bad on me for being a flake. Sorry about that, but that does not mean I don’t have a few things I to talk about before years end.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Datacard Acquires Entrust</title><link>/blog/datacard-acquires-entrust/</link><pubDate>Tue, 17 Dec 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/datacard-acquires-entrust/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Datacard Group, a firm that produces smart card printers and associated products, has &lt;a href="http://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20131217005263/en/Datacard-Group-Announces-Agreement-Acquire-Entrust-Strengthen"&gt;announced its acquisition of Entrust&lt;/a&gt;. For those of you who are not familiar with Entrust, they were front and center in the PKI movement in the 1990s. Back then the idea was to issue a public/private key pair to uniquely identify every person and device in the universe. Ultimately that failed to scale and became unmanageable, with many firms complaining “I just spent millions of dollars so I can send encrypted email to the guy sitting next to me.” So for you old-time security people out there saying to yourself “Hey, wait, isn’t PKI dead?”, the answer is “Yeah, kinda.” Still others are saying “I thought Entrust was already acquired?”, to which the answer is “Yes”, by investment firm/holding company &lt;a href="http://www.thomabravo.com/"&gt;Thoma Bravo&lt;/a&gt; in 2009.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Incite 12/18/2013: Flow</title><link>/blog/incite-12-18-2013-flow/</link><pubDate>Tue, 17 Dec 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/incite-12-18-2013-flow/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;As I sit down to write the last Incite of the year I cannot help but be retrospective. How will I remember 2013? It has been a year of ups and downs. Pretty much like every year. I set out to prove some hypotheses I had at the beginning of the year, and I did. I let some opportunities pass by and I didn’t execute on others. Pretty much like every year. I had low lows and very high highs. Pretty much like every year.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Incite 12/11/2013: Commuter Hell</title><link>/blog/incite-12-11-2013-commuter-hell/</link><pubDate>Wed, 11 Dec 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/incite-12-11-2013-commuter-hell/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I’m pretty lucky – my most recent memories of a long commute were back in 1988, when I worked in NYC during my engineering co-op in college. It was miserable. Car to bus to train, and then walk a couple blocks through midtown to the office. It made me old when I was young. I only did it for 6 months, and I can’t imagine the toll it takes on folks who do it every day for decades.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Poor Man’s Immortality</title><link>/blog/poor-mans-immortality-2/</link><pubDate>Fri, 06 Dec 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/poor-mans-immortality-2/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;One of our esteemed colleagues to the North, Dave Lewis, summed up a danger in almost everything in his recent CSO post, &lt;a href="http://blogs.csoonline.com/security-industry/2858/we-need-be-uncomfortable"&gt;We need to be uncomfortable&lt;/a&gt;. Dave talks about realizing he could check out of a job and no one would notice, and how he knew it was time to find the next challenge. He’s right.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Incite 12/4/2013: Aging Gracefully</title><link>/blog/incite-12-4-2013-aging-gracefully/</link><pubDate>Wed, 04 Dec 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/incite-12-4-2013-aging-gracefully/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;My friend Shimmy must have taken his nostalgia pills over the long weekend – &lt;a href="https://twitter.com/ashimmy/status/407591594066325504"&gt;on Monday he tweeted&lt;/a&gt;:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Doesn’t it suck getting older I didn’t realize how truly carefree life was All is good here thinking about some new stuff&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Security Assurance and Testing: No Surprises</title><link>/blog/security-assurance-and-testing-no-surprises/</link><pubDate>Wed, 04 Dec 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/security-assurance-and-testing-no-surprises/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;The methods by which applications and supporting infrastructure are developed and deployed are undergoing fundamental change. Avoiding the predictable hyperbole, new methods including DevOps and Cloud Computing promise to disrupt most of IT over the next 5-10 years. But embedded infrastructure and legacy applications are not going away. IT professionals need to walk a fine line between delivering critical services at the lowest price for acceptable performance, and doing it quickly and reliably.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Scrub-a-dub-dub: Akamai and Prolexic in the tub</title><link>/blog/scrub-a-dub-dub-akamai-and-prolexic-in-the-tub/</link><pubDate>Mon, 02 Dec 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/scrub-a-dub-dub-akamai-and-prolexic-in-the-tub/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src="panda-bath.jpg" alt=""&gt;They say it is better to be lucky than good. I seem to test that theory on a daily basis. Just yesterday I ranted about the need for &lt;a href="https://securosis.com/blog/multi-layer-dos-defense-ftw"&gt;multi-layer DoS defenses&lt;/a&gt;, mostly by poking at a Prolexic white paper advocating the opposite. I alluded to the reality that most customers wouldn’t run &lt;em&gt;all&lt;/em&gt; their traffic through a scrubbing center, so they need on-premise defenses as well (so a multi-layer system).&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Multi-layer DoS Defense FTW</title><link>/blog/multi-layer-dos-defense-ftw/</link><pubDate>Sun, 01 Dec 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/multi-layer-dos-defense-ftw/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src="cute-but-wrong1.jpg" alt=""&gt;I guess I shouldn’t be surprised by highly biased marketing campaigns providing bad advice to customers. Normally I let it go (yes, Zen Mike is usually in the house), but not today. I saw Prolexic’s &lt;a href="http://www.prolexic.com/knowledge-center-white-paper-multi-layered-security-stategy-is-not-ideal-for-ddos-defense.html"&gt;Why a Multi-Layered Security Strategy is Not Ideal for DDoS Mitigation&lt;/a&gt; campaign and was a bit perplexed, especially by one statement:&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>The more things change…</title><link>/blog/the-more-things-change-2/</link><pubDate>Mon, 25 Nov 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/the-more-things-change-2/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src="tackling-dummy.jpg" alt=""&gt;Actually, things mostly don’t change. We talk a lot about the dynamic threatscape, advanced attacks, and all sorts of other things that make us feel special. But most of the same tactics that have been owning people and technology for decades are still in play. The mass market doesn’t learn, so they repeat history – over and over and over again.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>New Paper Available: The Executive Guide to Pragmatic Network Security Management</title><link>/blog/new-paper-available-the-pragmatic-guide-to-network-security-management/</link><pubDate>Fri, 22 Nov 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/new-paper-available-the-pragmatic-guide-to-network-security-management/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;This should be no surprise because I just pounded through all the posts and put the paper up on GitHub for open review.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Digging into the Underground</title><link>/blog/digging-into-the-underground/</link><pubDate>Thu, 21 Nov 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/digging-into-the-underground/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src="dig-for-victory.jpg" alt=""&gt;Dell SecureWorks CTU published a cool research report published today. Joe Stewart and David Shear &lt;a href="http://www.secureworks.com/resources/blog/the-underground-hacking-economy-is-alive-and-well/"&gt;dug into the marketplace of attackers&lt;/a&gt; and found that the market for attack products, tools, and services is thriving. Here are a couple of their more interesting findings:&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Summary: Stay away from the Light</title><link>/blog/summary-stay-away-from-the-light/</link><pubDate>Thu, 21 Nov 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/summary-stay-away-from-the-light/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Ah, the holidays. That wonderful time of year when I struggle to attempt to explain to my children why the Christmas decorations are up before Thanksgiving. They are very adamant that Thanksgiving is first, and there really shouldn’t be Xmas decorations yet. Because I agree, and struggle to keep “Burn their houses down!” in my head rather than out loud when I drive past certain neighbors, I really can’t explain.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Compliance for the Sake of Compliance</title><link>/blog/compliance-for-the-sake-of-compliance/</link><pubDate>Wed, 20 Nov 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/compliance-for-the-sake-of-compliance/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src="comply-or-die.jpg" alt=""&gt;Adrian put up an insightful (as opposed to &lt;em&gt;inciteful&lt;/em&gt;) column on Dark Reading, pointing out that that &lt;a href="http://www.darkreading.com/database/simple-security-is-a-better-bet/240163405"&gt;Simple Security Is A Better Bet&lt;/a&gt;. Though I quibble a bit with the subhead: “Complex security programs are little better than no security”. Of course any subhead taken out of context creates opportunity for misinterpretation. I would reword to say, “Complex security programs &lt;em&gt;done poorly&lt;/em&gt; are little better than no security”. But that’s just me.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Incite 11/20/2013—Live Right Now</title><link>/blog/incite-11-20-2013-live-right-now-2/</link><pubDate>Wed, 20 Nov 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/incite-11-20-2013-live-right-now-2/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;As I mentioned &lt;a href="https://securosis.com/blog/incite-10-30-2013-managing-the-details"&gt;a few weeks ago&lt;/a&gt;, XX1 had her Bat Mitzvah recently. It was great to be surrounded for a weekend by almost all the people we care about. And XX1 really stepped up and made us very proud. There are few things more gratifying than seeing your child excel – especially on a big stage in front of a lot of people. Part of the ceremony is a blessing from the parents. Some parents provide an actual blessing. Others tell entertaining stories about the child. I chose to give her some life perspective by distilling what I have learned over the past four decades down into a fairly simple concept. I understand she probably won’t get it for a while, but I’m okay with that. So here goes:&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>The CISO’s Guide to the Cloud: Real World Examples and Where to Go from Here</title><link>/blog/the-cisos-guide-to-the-cloud-real-world-examples-and-where-to-go-from-here/</link><pubDate>Wed, 20 Nov 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/the-cisos-guide-to-the-cloud-real-world-examples-and-where-to-go-from-here/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;This is part five of a series. You can read&lt;a href="https://securosis.com/blog/new-series-what-cisos-need-to-know-about-cloud-computing"&gt;part one&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="https://securosis.com/blog/the-cisos-guide-to-cloud-how-cloud-is-different-for-security"&gt;part two&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="https://securosis.com/blog/the-cisos-guide-to-cloud-adapting-security-for-cloud-computing"&gt;part three&lt;/a&gt;, or &lt;a href="https://securosis.com/blog/the-cisos-guide-to-the-cloud-adapting-security-for-cloud-computing-part-2"&gt;part four&lt;/a&gt;; or &lt;a href="https://github.com/Securosis/The-CISOs-Guide-to-Cloud-Security"&gt;track the project on GitHub&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>The CISO’s Guide to the Cloud: Adapting Security for Cloud Computing, Part 2</title><link>/blog/the-cisos-guide-to-the-cloud-adapting-security-for-cloud-computing-part-2-2/</link><pubDate>Tue, 19 Nov 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/the-cisos-guide-to-the-cloud-adapting-security-for-cloud-computing-part-2-2/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;This is part four of a series. You can read&lt;a href="https://securosis.com/blog/new-series-what-cisos-need-to-know-about-cloud-computing"&gt;part one&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="https://securosis.com/blog/the-cisos-guide-to-cloud-how-cloud-is-different-for-security"&gt;part two&lt;/a&gt;, or &lt;a href="https://securosis.com/blog/the-cisos-guide-to-cloud-adapting-security-for-cloud-computing"&gt;part three&lt;/a&gt;; or &lt;a href="https://github.com/Securosis/The-CISOs-Guide-to-Cloud-Security"&gt;track the project on GitHub&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;As a reminder, this is the second half of &lt;a href="https://securosis.com/blog/the-cisos-guide-to-cloud-adapting-security-for-cloud-computing"&gt;our section on examples for adapting security to cloud computing&lt;/a&gt;. As before this isn’t an exhaustive list – just ideas to get you started.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Black Hat Cloud Security Training (Beta) in Seattle Next Month</title><link>/blog/black-hat-cloud-security-training-beta-in-seattle-next-month/</link><pubDate>Mon, 18 Nov 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/black-hat-cloud-security-training-beta-in-seattle-next-month/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I am teaching another &lt;a href="https://www.blackhat.com/wc-13/training/Cloud-Security-Plus.html"&gt;cloud security class for Black Hat&lt;/a&gt;. There are two classes, one on December 9-10, and the other December 11-12.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>The CISO’s Guide to the Cloud: Adapting Security for Cloud Computing</title><link>/blog/the-cisos-guide-to-the-cloud-adapting-security-for-cloud-computing/</link><pubDate>Mon, 18 Nov 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/the-cisos-guide-to-the-cloud-adapting-security-for-cloud-computing/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;This is part three of a series. You can read&lt;a href="https://securosis.com/blog/new-series-what-cisos-need-to-know-about-cloud-computing"&gt;part one&lt;/a&gt; or &lt;a href="https://securosis.com/blog/the-cisos-guide-to-cloud-how-cloud-is-different-for-security"&gt;part two&lt;/a&gt;, or &lt;a href="https://github.com/Securosis/The-CISOs-Guide-to-Cloud-Security"&gt;track the project on GitHub&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This part is split into two posts – here is the first half:&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>You Cannot Outsource Accountability</title><link>/blog/you-cant-outsource-accountability/</link><pubDate>Mon, 18 Nov 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/you-cant-outsource-accountability/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Given our severe skills gap in security, managed services and other security outsourcing tactics continue to be very interesting to end users. Either that, or non-security senior management gets frustrated by the inability of the internal team to get anything done, so they look at having someone else take a crack. As the NSS folks ask in their blog post, &lt;a href="https://www.nsslabs.com/blog/outsource-or-not-outsource-question"&gt;To Outsource or Not to Outsource, That is the Question!&lt;/a&gt;, but I don’t think that’s the right question.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Defending Against Application Denial of Service: Building Protections in</title><link>/blog/defending-against-application-denial-of-service-building-protections-in/</link><pubDate>Fri, 15 Nov 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/defending-against-application-denial-of-service-building-protections-in/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;As we have discussed through this series, many types of attacks can impact the availability of your applications. To reiterate a number of points we made in &lt;a href="https://securosis.com/research/papers/defending-against-denial-of-service-dos-attacks"&gt;Defending Against Denial of Service Attacks&lt;/a&gt;, your defenses need to be coordinated at multiple levels: at the network layer, in front of your application, within the application stack, and finally within the application.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Friday Summary: November 15, 2013</title><link>/blog/friday-summary-november-15-2013/</link><pubDate>Thu, 14 Nov 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/friday-summary-november-15-2013/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;There is lots I want to talk about this week, so I decided to resort to some three-dot blogging. A few years ago at the security bloggers meet-up, Jeremiah Grossman, Rich Mogull and Robert Hansen were talking about browser security. After I rudely butted into the conversation they asked me if “the market” would be interested in a &lt;em&gt;secure&lt;/em&gt; browser, one that was not compromised to allow marketing and advertising concerns to trump security. I felt no one would pay for it but the security community and financial services types would certainly be interested in such a browser. So I was totally jazzed when WhiteHat finally &lt;a href="https://blog.whitehatsec.com/introducing-whitehat-aviator-a-safer-web-browser/"&gt;announced Aviator&lt;/a&gt; a couple weeks back. And work being what is has been, I &lt;em&gt;finally&lt;/em&gt; got a chance to download it today and use it for a few hours. So far I miss nothing from Firefox, Safari, or Chrome. It’s fast, navigation is straightforward, it easily imported all my Firefox settings, and preferences are simple – somewhat the opposite of Chrome, IMO. And I like being able to switch users as I switch between different ISPs/locations (&lt;em&gt;i.e.,&lt;/em&gt; &lt;a href="http://stratumsecurity.com/2010/12/03/shearing-firesheep-with-the-cloud/"&gt;tunnels to different cloud providers&lt;/a&gt; ). I am not giving up my dedicated &lt;a href="http://fluidapp.com/"&gt;Fluid&lt;/a&gt; browsers dedicated to specific sites, but Fluid has been breaking for unknown reasons on some sites. But the Aviator and &lt;a href="http://www.obdev.at/products/littlesnitch/index.html"&gt;Little Snitch&lt;/a&gt; combinations is pretty powerful for filtering and blocking outbound traffic. I recommend WhiteHat’s post on &lt;a href="https://blog.whitehatsec.com/whats-the-difference-between-aviator-and-chromium-google-chrome/"&gt;key differences between Aviator and Chrome&lt;/a&gt;. If you are looking for a browser that does not hemorrhage personal information to any and every website, &lt;a href="https://blog.whitehatsec.com/aviator-1-2-beta-released/"&gt;download a copy of Aviator&lt;/a&gt; and try it out.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Defending Against Application Denial of Service: Abusing Application Logic</title><link>/blog/defending-against-application-denial-of-service-abusing-application-logic/</link><pubDate>Wed, 13 Nov 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/defending-against-application-denial-of-service-abusing-application-logic/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;We looked at application denial of service in terms of &lt;a href="https://securosis.com/blog/defending-against-application-denial-of-service-attacking-the-application-s"&gt;attacking the application server&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href="https://securosis.com/blog/defending-against-application-denial-of-service-attacking-the-stack"&gt;the application stack&lt;/a&gt;, so now let’s turn our attention to attacking application itself. Clearly every application contains weaknesses that can be exploited, especially when the goal is simply to knock the application offline rather than something more complicated, such as stealing credentials or gaining access to the data. That lower bar of taking the application offline means more places to attack.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Incite 11/13/2013: Bully</title><link>/blog/incite-11-13-2013-bully/</link><pubDate>Wed, 13 Nov 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/incite-11-13-2013-bully/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;When you really see the underbelly of something, it is rarely pretty. The NFL is no different. Grown men are paid millions of dollars a year to display unbridled aggression, toughness, and competitiveness. That sounds like a pretty Darwinian environment, where the strong prey on the weak. And it is given what we have seen over the last few weeks, as behavior in the Miami Dolphins locker room comes to light.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>The CISO’s Guide to the Cloud: How the Cloud Is Different for Security</title><link>/blog/the-cisos-guide-to-the-cloud-how-the-cloud-is-different-for-security/</link><pubDate>Wed, 13 Nov 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/the-cisos-guide-to-the-cloud-how-the-cloud-is-different-for-security/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;This is part two of a series. You can&lt;a href="https://securosis.com/blog/new-series-what-cisos-need-to-know-about-cloud-computing"&gt;read part one here&lt;/a&gt; or &lt;a href="https://github.com/Securosis/The-CISOs-Guide-to-Cloud-Security"&gt;track the project on GitHub&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;h2 id="how-the-cloud-is-different-for-security"&gt;How the Cloud Is Different for Security&lt;/h2&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the early days of cloud computing, even some very well-respected security professionals claimed it was little more than a different kind of outsourcing, or equivalent to the multitenancy of a mainframe. But the differences run far deeper, and we will show how they require different cloud security controls. We know how to manage the risks of outsourcing or multi-user environments; cloud computing security builds on this foundation and adds new twists.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Defending Against Application Denial of Service: Attacking the Stack</title><link>/blog/defending-against-application-denial-of-service-attacking-the-stack/</link><pubDate>Tue, 12 Nov 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/defending-against-application-denial-of-service-attacking-the-stack/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;In our last post, we started digging into ways &lt;a href="https://securosis.com/blog/defending-against-application-denial-of-service-attacking-the-application-s"&gt;attackers target standard web servers, protocols, and common pages&lt;/a&gt; to impact application availability. These kinds of attacks are at the surface level and low-hanging fruit because they can be executed via widely available tools wielded by unsophisticated attackers. If you think of a web application as an onion, there always seems to be another layer you can peel back to expose additional attack surface.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>How to Detect Cloudwashing by Your Vendors</title><link>/blog/how-to-detect-cloud-washing-in-your-vendors/</link><pubDate>Tue, 12 Nov 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/how-to-detect-cloud-washing-in-your-vendors/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;“There is nothing more deceptive than an obvious fact” – Sherlock Holmes&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;It’s cloud. It’s cloud-ready. It’s cloud insert-name-here. As analysts we have been running into a lot of vendors labeling traditional products as ‘cloud’. Two years ago we expected the practice to die out once customers understood cloud services. We were wrong – vendors are still doing it rather than actually building the technology. Call it cloudwashing, cloudification, or just plain BS. As an enterprise buyer, how can you tell whether the system you are thinking of purchasing is a cloud application or not? It should be easy – just look at the products branded ‘cloud’, right? But dig deeper and you see it’s not so simple. Sherlock Holmes made a science of detection, and being an enterprise buyer today can feel like a being detective in a complex investigation. Vendors have anticipated your questions and have answers ready. What to do?&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>New Series: What CISOs Need to Know about Cloud Computing</title><link>/blog/new-series-what-cisos-need-to-know-about-cloud-computing/</link><pubDate>Tue, 12 Nov 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/new-series-what-cisos-need-to-know-about-cloud-computing/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;This is the first post in a new series detailing the key differences between cloud computing and traditional security. I feel pretty strongly that, although many people are talking about the cloud, nobody has yet done a good job of explaining &lt;em&gt;why&lt;/em&gt; and &lt;em&gt;how&lt;/em&gt; security needs to adapt at a fundamental level. It is more than outsourcing, more than multitenancy, and definitely more than simple virtualization. This is my best stab at it, and I hope you like it.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Defending Against Application Denial of Service: Attacking the Application Server</title><link>/blog/defending-against-application-denial-of-service-attacking-the-application-s/</link><pubDate>Mon, 11 Nov 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/defending-against-application-denial-of-service-attacking-the-application-s/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;It has been a while, but it is time to jump back into the Application Denial of Service series with both feet. As we described in the &lt;a href="https://securosis.com/blog/defending-against-application-denial-of-service-attacks-introduction"&gt;introduction&lt;/a&gt;, application denial of service can be harder to deal with than volume-based network DDoS because it is not always obvious what’s an attack and what’s legitimate traffic. Unless you are running all your traffic through a scrubbing center, your applications will remain targets for attacks that exploit the architecture, application stacks, business logic, and even legitimate functionality of the application.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>How to Edit Our Research on GitHub</title><link>/blog/how-to-edit-our-research-on-github-2/</link><pubDate>Mon, 11 Nov 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/how-to-edit-our-research-on-github-2/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I am still experimenting with posting research, from drafts through the editing process, on GitHub. No promises that we will keep doing this – it depends on the reaction we get. From a workflow standpoint it isn’t much more effort for us, but I like the radical transparency it enables.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Security Awareness Training Evolution [New Paper]</title><link>/blog/security-awareness-training-evolution-new-paper/</link><pubDate>Mon, 11 Nov 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/security-awareness-training-evolution-new-paper/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src="SATE_Cover.png" alt=""&gt;Everyone has an opinion about security awareness training, and most of them are negative. Waste of time! Ineffective! Boring! We have heard them all. And the criticism isn’t wrong – much of the content driving security awareness training is lame. Which is probably the kindest thing we can say about it. But it doesn’t need to be that way. Actually, it &lt;em&gt;cannot&lt;/em&gt; remain this way – there is too much at stake. Users remain the lowest-hanging fruit for attackers, and as long as that is the case attackers will continue to target them. Educating users about security is not a panacea, but it can and does help.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Trustwave Acquires Application Security Inc.</title><link>/blog/trustwave-acquires-application-security/</link><pubDate>Mon, 11 Nov 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/trustwave-acquires-application-security/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;It has been a while since we had an acquisition in the database security space, but today &lt;a href="https://www.trustwave.com/trustednews/2013/11/trustwave-acquisition-bolsters-data-protection#sthash.Gi1rTbGG.iaLO55g1.dpbs"&gt;Trustwave announced it acquired Application Security Inc.&lt;/a&gt; – commonly called “AppSec” by many who know the company.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Blowing Your Mind(fulness) at RSA 2014</title><link>/blog/blowing-your-mindfulness-at-rsa-2014/</link><pubDate>Fri, 08 Nov 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/blowing-your-mindfulness-at-rsa-2014/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;It was kind of a joke between two friends on a journey to become better people. Jen Minella (JJ) and I compared notes over way too many drinks at last year’s RSA, and we decided our experiences would make a good talk. I doubt either of us really thought it would be interesting to anyone but us. We were wrong.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Summary: Hands on</title><link>/blog/summary-hands-on/</link><pubDate>Thu, 07 Nov 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/summary-hands-on/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Before I dive into this week’s sermon, just a quick note that our posting will be a bit off through the end of the year. As happens from time to time, our collective workloads and travel are hitting insanity levels, which impedes our ability to push out more consistent updates. But, you know, gotta feed the kids and dogs.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Microsoft Upends the Bug Bounty Game</title><link>/blog/microsoft-upends-the-bug-bounty-game/</link><pubDate>Sun, 03 Nov 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/microsoft-upends-the-bug-bounty-game/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://blogs.technet.com/b/bluehat/archive/2013/11/01/bounty-evolution-100-000-for-new-mitigation-bypass-techniques-wanted-dead-or-alive.aspx"&gt;Microsoft is expanding its $100k bounty program to include incident responders who find and document Windows platform mitigation flaws.&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Today’s news means we are going from accepting entries from only a handful of individuals capable of inventing new mitigation bypass techniques on their own, to potentially thousands of individuals or organizations who find attacks in the wild. Now, both finders and discoverers can turn in new techniques for $100,000.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Friday Summary: Halloween 2013 Edition</title><link>/blog/friday-summary-halloween-2013-edition/</link><pubDate>Fri, 01 Nov 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/friday-summary-halloween-2013-edition/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;While you’re thinking about little kids in scary costumes, I’m here thinking about adults who write scary code. As I go through the results of a couple different companies’ code scans I am trying to contrast good vs. bad secure development programs. But I figure I should ask the community at large: What facet of your secure software development program has been most effective? Can you pinpoint one?&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Don’t Mess with Pen Test(ers)</title><link>/blog/dont-mess-with-pen-testers/</link><pubDate>Wed, 30 Oct 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/dont-mess-with-pen-testers/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Almost everyone you know is blissfully unaware of the digital footprints we all leave, and how that information can be used against us. The problem is that you understand, and if you spent much time thinking about it you’d probably lose your mind. So as a coping mechanism you choose not to think of how you could be attacked or how your finances could be wrecked, if targeted by the wrong person.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Incite 10/30/2013: Managing the Details</title><link>/blog/incite-10-30-2013-managing-the-details/</link><pubDate>Wed, 30 Oct 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/incite-10-30-2013-managing-the-details/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;As I wrote a few weeks ago, &lt;a href="https://securosis.com/blog/incite-10-16-2013-building-strengths"&gt;everyone has their strengths&lt;/a&gt;. I know that managing the details is &lt;em&gt;not&lt;/em&gt; one of mine. In fact I can’t stand it, which is very clear as we prepare for our oldest daughter’s &lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bar_and_Bat_Mitzvah"&gt;Bat Mitzvah&lt;/a&gt; this weekend. It’s a right of passage signaling the beginning of adulthood. I actually view it as the beginning of the transformation to adulthood, which is a good way to look at it because many folks never &lt;em&gt;complete&lt;/em&gt; that transition – at least judging from the way they behave.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>The Pragmatic Guide to Network Security Management: SecOps</title><link>/blog/the-pragmatic-guide-to-network-security-management-secops/</link><pubDate>Wed, 30 Oct 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/the-pragmatic-guide-to-network-security-management-secops/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;This is part 3 in a series.&lt;a href="https://securosis.com/blog/new-series-the-executive-guide-to-pragmatic-network-security-management"&gt;Click here for part 1&lt;/a&gt;, or &lt;a href="https://github.com/rmogull/PragmaticNetSecManagement"&gt;submit edits directly via GitHub&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;h2 id="workflows-from-sec-and-ops-to-secops"&gt;Workflows: from Sec and Ops to SecOps&lt;/h2&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Even mature organizations occasionally struggle to keep security aligned with infrastructure. But low-friction processes that don’t overly burden other areas of the enterprise reduce both errors and deliberate circumvention.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>The Pragmatic Guide to Network Security Management: The Process</title><link>/blog/the-pragmatic-guide-to-network-security-management-the-process/</link><pubDate>Tue, 29 Oct 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/the-pragmatic-guide-to-network-security-management-the-process/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;This is part 2 in a series.&lt;a href="https://securosis.com/blog/new-series-the-executive-guide-to-pragmatic-network-security-management"&gt;Click here for part 1&lt;/a&gt;, or submit edits &lt;a href="https://github.com/rmogull/PragmaticNetSecManagement"&gt;directly via GitHub&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;h2 id="the-pragmatic-process"&gt;The Pragmatic Process&lt;/h2&gt;
&lt;p&gt;As mentioned in the previous section, this process is designed primarily for more complex networks, and takes into account real-life organizational and technological complexities.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>New Series: The Executive Guide to Pragmatic Network Security Management</title><link>/blog/new-series-the-executive-guide-to-pragmatic-network-security-management/</link><pubDate>Mon, 28 Oct 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/new-series-the-executive-guide-to-pragmatic-network-security-management/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;This is the first post in a new paper I’m writing.&lt;a href="https://github.com/rmogull/PragmaticNetSecManagement"&gt;The entire paper is also posted on GitHub for direct feedback and suggestions.&lt;/a&gt; As an experiment, I prefer feedback on GitHub, but will also take it here, as usual.&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Thinking Small and Not Leading</title><link>/blog/thinking-small-and-not-leading/</link><pubDate>Mon, 28 Oct 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/thinking-small-and-not-leading/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Dave Elfering had a good post, making clear &lt;a href="http://orthosec.blogspot.com/2013/10/enabling-leadership-in-others-execution.html"&gt;the difference between managing and leading.&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I thought my job as a security leader was to produce detailed policies that might as well have been detailed pseudo code executed by robots.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Summary: Planned Coincidence</title><link>/blog/summary-planned-coincidence/</link><pubDate>Fri, 25 Oct 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/summary-planned-coincidence/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Every year Mike, Adrian, and I get together for a couple days to review our goals and financials, and to make plans for the next year. This year we scheduled it in Denver, and by an amazing coincidence Jimmy Buffett was in town playing.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Don’t Cry over Spilt Metrics</title><link>/blog/dont-cry-over-spilt-metrics-2/</link><pubDate>Thu, 24 Oct 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/dont-cry-over-spilt-metrics-2/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Our man Gunnar starts a &lt;a href="http://1raindrop.typepad.com/1_raindrop/2013/10/security-metrics-crying-need.html"&gt;recent post&lt;/a&gt; with:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Security Metrics crying need is for metrics that serve others, outside of info sec.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Incite 10/23/2013: What goes up…</title><link>/blog/incite-10-23-2013-what-goes-up-2/</link><pubDate>Wed, 23 Oct 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/incite-10-23-2013-what-goes-up-2/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Every so often I realize how spoiled I am. Sure, I am more aware of my good fortune than many, but I definitely take way too much stuff for granted. My health is good. I do what I like (most days). My family still seems to like me. I provide enough to live a pretty good lifestyle. It’s all good. I don’t have much to complain about.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Security Awareness Training Evolution: Quick Wins</title><link>/blog/security-training-awareness-training-evolution-quick-wins/</link><pubDate>Mon, 21 Oct 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/security-training-awareness-training-evolution-quick-wins/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;In the first two posts of this series we suggested that any security awareness training program needs to be focused on the &lt;em&gt;proper outcomes&lt;/em&gt; and &lt;a href="https://securosis.com/blog/security-awareness-training-evolution-focus-on-great-content"&gt;driven by great content&lt;/a&gt;. Let’s not forget the unassailable truth that the success of any security initiative is based on building momentum and making demonstrable progress early in the deployment cycle. This is not only the case for projects that involve implementing shiny boxes to block things. With a program as visible as security awareness training, with success criteria not necessarily directly attributed to training efforts, the need for a &lt;em&gt;Quick Win&lt;/em&gt; is more acute. Especially given the likely pushback from employees duped by attack simulations. But let’s not put the cart before the horse.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>The Great Securosis GitHub Experiment</title><link>/blog/the-great-securosis-github-experiment/</link><pubDate>Mon, 21 Oct 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/the-great-securosis-github-experiment/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Hey everyone,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;As you know, we try to make our research process as open and transparent as possible. We know any research that ends up with a vendor logo on it somewhere is viewed with justified skepticism, so our goal is to combat that perception of bias with radical transparency.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Friday Summary: October 18, 2013</title><link>/blog/friday-summary-october-18-2013/</link><pubDate>Fri, 18 Oct 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/friday-summary-october-18-2013/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I have been taking a lot of end-user calls on compliance lately. PCI, GLBA, Sarbanes-Oxley, state privacy laws, and the like. Today I was struck by how consistently these calls are more challenging than security discussions. With security users want to address a fairly well-defined problem. For example “How do we stop our IP from leaving the organization?” or “How can we protect users from phishing?” or “How do we verify administrator activity?” These discussions are far easier because of their much narrower scope, both in terms of technical approach and user perception of how they want to deal with the problem.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Security Awareness Training Evolution: Focus on Great Content</title><link>/blog/security-awareness-training-evolution-focus-on-great-content/</link><pubDate>Thu, 17 Oct 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/security-awareness-training-evolution-focus-on-great-content/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;As we come back to the Security Awareness Training Evolution series after our two-week hiatus, let’s revisit some of the key issues described in &lt;a href="https://securosis.com/blog/security-awareness-training-evolution-why-bother-training-users"&gt;the introduction&lt;/a&gt;. We made the case that for liability, compliance, and even security reasons you can’t really decide &lt;em&gt;not&lt;/em&gt; to train your users about security. Of course you &lt;em&gt;could,&lt;/em&gt; but it would be counterproductive – you need to be realistic, and accept that you cannot reach every employee and employees do stupid things. But you can reach some, if not most, and reaching those folks will minimize the number of issues you have to clean up.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Incite 10/16/2013: Building Strengths</title><link>/blog/incite-10-16-2013-building-strengths/</link><pubDate>Wed, 16 Oct 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/incite-10-16-2013-building-strengths/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Back when I managed people (and yes, it seems like a lifetime ago), I subscribed to the Gallup management concepts. Productivity is based on employee engagement, and employees are much more engaged when they are doing things they are good at. The book &lt;em&gt;&lt;a href="http://businessjournal.gallup.com/content/1144/first-break-all-rules-book-center.aspx"&gt;First, Break All the Rules&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/em&gt; was eye-opening – I have spent my entire career to date trying to make my weaknesses less weak, and not trying to improve my strengths.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Reality Check for Millennials Looking at Security</title><link>/blog/reality-check-for-millennials-looking-at-security/</link><pubDate>Wed, 16 Oct 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/reality-check-for-millennials-looking-at-security/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Evidently security as an industry does a crappy job at &lt;a href="http://www.scmagazine.com/study-millennials-not-encouraged-to-fill-security-workforce-demand/article/316365/"&gt;generating interest within kids today&lt;/a&gt;. How are we going to fill the massive skills gap we face, if we can’t get students interested in security from an early age. Right? RIGHT?&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>The Week in Webcasts</title><link>/blog/the-week-in-webcasts/</link><pubDate>Mon, 14 Oct 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/the-week-in-webcasts/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;On Tuesday – that’s tomorrow for you working this Columbus day – Gunnar Peterson and I will be taking about API gateways with Intel’s Travis Broughton. We will run this webcast as an open discussion, and focus on the practical questions and issues of using API gateways. Our goal is to focus on end-user questions we have been getting, so bring your questions too – we plan to be very interactive. You can sign up here: &lt;a href="https://www.brighttalk.com/webcast/5573/88265?6525995=1"&gt;API Gateways: Where Security Enables Innovation&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Why a vBulletin Exploit Matters to Enterprise Security</title><link>/blog/why-a-vbulletin-exploit-matters-to-enterprise-security/</link><pubDate>Mon, 14 Oct 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/why-a-vbulletin-exploit-matters-to-enterprise-security/</guid><description>&lt;blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Attackers appear to have compromised tens of thousands of Web sites using a security weakness in sites powered by the forum software vBulletin, security experts warn.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Summary: Age is wasted on the… middle aged</title><link>/blog/summary-age-is-wasted-on-the-middle-aged-2/</link><pubDate>Fri, 11 Oct 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/summary-age-is-wasted-on-the-middle-aged-2/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;You may have noticed our posting was down a bit this week.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Okay, pretty much non-existent. But take a look at the links in this Summary for what we have been reading and thinking about.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Firewall Management Essentials [New Paper]</title><link>/blog/firewall-management-essentials-new-paper/</link><pubDate>Thu, 10 Oct 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/firewall-management-essentials-new-paper/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src="FME_Cover.png" alt=""&gt;We all know and love the firewall. The cornerstone of every organization’s network security defense, firewalls enforce access control policies and determine what can and cannot enter your network. But, like almost every device you have had for a while, you take them for granted and perhaps don’t pay as much attention as you need to. Until a faulty rule change opens up a hole in your perimeter large enough to drive a tanker through. Then you get some religion about more effectively managing these devices.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Incite 10/9/2013: Youth is wasted on the young</title><link>/blog/incite-10-9-2013-youth-is-wasted-on-the-young/</link><pubDate>Wed, 09 Oct 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/incite-10-9-2013-youth-is-wasted-on-the-young/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;A couple years ago, when I decided to lose weight and change my eating habits, I did it with a view to living until I was at least 90. That was the number I envisioned, and given my family history, it should be achievable. So as I celebrated my 45th birthday this week, it was strange to realize that I’m close to halfway done. WTF? How did that happen?&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Friday Summary: October 4, 2013</title><link>/blog/friday-summary-october-4-2013/</link><pubDate>Fri, 04 Oct 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/friday-summary-october-4-2013/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I was never a big fan of the Rolling Stones. Heard them on the radio all the time growing up but never bought any of their stuff. It was good but not good enough to spend my hard-earned money. Recently a friend, a hardcore Stones addict, convinced me I needed some in my music collection. A couple clicks on Amazon, and three days later I had a big box of music waiting for me when I got back from the Splunk conference. In need of a little rest after a hectic few weeks, I cracked open the package and gave it a listen. And WTF? This is not what I heard on the radio. This song is hardcore blues. The next song is honky-tonk. Then rock and roll, followed by some delta blues. Singer, guitarist, and drummer all changing styles with each song like each one was a style they had played all their lives. This is amazing. Different, but (ahem) I liked it! The band as I heard it on the radio growing up is not the band on CDs and records. There is depth here. Versatility. Ingenuity. What I thought is not what they are. Their popularity suddenly makes sense. The songs played on radio and streaming services do a disservice to the band, and fail to capture special aspects of what they are (and were) about.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>New Whitepaper: A Practical Example of Software Defined Security</title><link>/blog/new-whitepaper-a-practical-example-of-software-defined-security/</link><pubDate>Thu, 03 Oct 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/new-whitepaper-a-practical-example-of-software-defined-security/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;A few months back I did a series of posts demonstrating a proof of concept for implementing some basic software defined security (using AWS, Chef, and Ruby). This ended up being the basis for my &lt;em&gt;KickaaS Security with APIs and Cloud&lt;/em&gt; talk at Black Hat.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Details for the Matasano Crypto Class</title><link>/blog/details-for-the-matasano-crypto-class/</link><pubDate>Wed, 02 Oct 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/details-for-the-matasano-crypto-class/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I’m really looking forward to this, although my skills will keep me in the back of the room:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.matasano.com/october-crypto-class/"&gt;October 2013 Chicago Crypto-For-Developers Class&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Exploit Disclosure</title><link>/blog/exploit-disclosure/</link><pubDate>Wed, 02 Oct 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/exploit-disclosure/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://threatpost.com/researchers-ponder-when-to-notify-users-of-public-vulnerability-exploits/102487"&gt;Threatpost has another good piece on exploit disclosure&lt;/a&gt; (I swear I still read other sites). This is the other side of vulnerability disclosure, where you need to decide on releasing exploit details based on factors such as detecting live exploits in the field.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Feds take down Silk Road</title><link>/blog/feds-take-down-silk-road/</link><pubDate>Wed, 02 Oct 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/feds-take-down-silk-road/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://krebsonsecurity.com/2013/10/feds-take-down-online-fraud-bazaar-silk-road-arrest-alleged-mastermind/"&gt;Brian Krebs breaks another story&lt;/a&gt;:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Prosecutors in New York today said that federal agencies have taken over the Silk Road, a sprawling underground Web site that has earned infamy as the “eBay of drugs.” On Tuesday, federal agents in San Francisco arrested the Silk Road’s alleged mastermind. Prosecutors say 29-year-old Ross William Ulbricht, a.k.a “Dread Pirate Roberts” (DPR), will be charged with a range of criminal violations, including conspiracy to commit drug trafficking, and money laundering.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Incite 10/2/2013: Shutdown</title><link>/blog/incite-10-2-2013-shutdown/</link><pubDate>Wed, 02 Oct 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/incite-10-2-2013-shutdown/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;17 years. That’s a long time. The last time the US Government shut down was December 1995 through January 1996. I was working for META Group at the time, probably on an airplane heading to a meeting with some client. I wasn’t married yet. I could sleep in on a Saturday. Those were the days. Life was fundamentally different. Looking back I don’t remember the specifics of what happened during the last shutdown, as that group of politicians battled each other over funding this, that, or the other thing. In fact, until this latest shutdown because a possibility, I didn’t even remember it happened in the first place. 17 years later, in my mind that shutdown was an inconsequential footnote in history that I needed to look up on Wikipedia to even remember it happened.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Security Awareness Training Evolution: Why Bother Training Users?</title><link>/blog/security-awareness-training-evolution-why-bother-training-users/</link><pubDate>Wed, 02 Oct 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/security-awareness-training-evolution-why-bother-training-users/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;It seems everyone has an opinion about security awareness training, and most of them are negative. Security luminaries have largely panned awareness training as ineffective and a waste of time and money. They use weird analogies, claiming things like we cannot train folks not to eat fast food, so training never works. Are they wrong? We have all sat through endless PowerPoint slides telling us what we can do and cannot do on the Internet. They threaten you with termination unless you follow the rules specified in the 15-page Acceptable Use Policy, without any context for why they matter. It is not much different than your parents telling you that you cannot do something &lt;em&gt;“because we said so.”&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>IE Zero Day Getting Serious</title><link>/blog/ie-zero-day-getting-serious/</link><pubDate>Tue, 01 Oct 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/ie-zero-day-getting-serious/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;A vulnerability in Internet Explorer has been known and unpatched for two weeks.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;According to ThreatPost, &lt;a href="http://threatpost.com/metasploit-module-released-for-ie-zero-day/102471"&gt;an exploit module is now in Metasploit&lt;/a&gt;, and &lt;a href="http://threatpost.com/three-new-attacks-using-ie-zero-day-exploit/102476"&gt;real attacks are growing&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>The Gartner Tax and Magic Quadrants</title><link>/blog/the-gartner-tax-and-magic-quadrants/</link><pubDate>Tue, 01 Oct 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/the-gartner-tax-and-magic-quadrants/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I haven’t worked at Gartner for over six years now, so I’m not surprised that many people still think vendors can pay to move up the rankings in a Magic Quadrant. I mean, just look at them. Big vendors almost always show up in the top left or right, so they have to be paying for play.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>The Goof Excuse</title><link>/blog/the-goof-excuse/</link><pubDate>Tue, 01 Oct 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/the-goof-excuse/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Another day, another breach – that’s not novel. A bunch of personal information (including driver’s license numbers) was stolen from Virginia Tech. But having the organization own up to the fact that &lt;a href="http://www.scmagazine.com/human-error-leads-to-virginia-tech-computer-server-breach/article/313797/"&gt;the breach resulted from a human error&lt;/a&gt; is uncommon.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Not the Rut You Think</title><link>/blog/not-the-rut-you-think/</link><pubDate>Mon, 30 Sep 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/not-the-rut-you-think/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Over at Network World Anton Gondalves wrote &lt;a href="http://www.networkworld.com/news/2013/093013-security-industry-in-rut-struggling-274315.html"&gt;Security industry in ‘rut,’ struggling to keep up with cybercriminals&lt;/a&gt;:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Dramatic changes are needed in multiple fronts if the security industry hopes to move ahead of cybercriminals, who are continuously finding new ways to breach corporate systems, experts say.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Summary Haiku</title><link>/blog/summary-haiku/</link><pubDate>Fri, 27 Sep 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/summary-haiku/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Hurt back yesterday&lt;br&gt;
Too much pain to write much now&lt;br&gt;
Haiku easier&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;And don’t forget to &lt;a href="https://www.blackhat.com/wc-13/training/Cloud-Security-Plus.html"&gt;sign up for our Black Hat cloud security training in December&lt;/a&gt;!&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Continuous Security Monitoring [New Paper]</title><link>/blog/continuous-security-monitoring-new-paper/</link><pubDate>Thu, 26 Sep 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/continuous-security-monitoring-new-paper/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src="CSM-Cover-2.png" alt=""&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Continuous Monitoring has become an overused and overhyped term in security circles, driven by US Government mandate (now called Continuous Diagnostics and Mitigation). But that doesn’t change the fact that monitoring needs to be a cornerstone of your security program, within the context of a risk-based paradigm. So your pals at Securosis did their best to document how you should think about &lt;em&gt;Continuous Security Monitoring&lt;/em&gt; and how to get there.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Cybercrime at the Speed of Light</title><link>/blog/cybercrime-at-the-speed-of-light/</link><pubDate>Wed, 25 Sep 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/cybercrime-at-the-speed-of-light/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;A few years ago our very own &lt;a href="http://twitter.com/myrcurial"&gt;James Arlen&lt;/a&gt; presented at Black Hat on the security risks of high-speed trading.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.theverge.com/2013/9/25/4770132/faster-than-light-message-could-mean-lawbreaking-at-federal-reserve"&gt;Today I read in The Verge&lt;/a&gt;:&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Data brokers and background checks are a massive security vulnerability</title><link>/blog/data-brokers-and-background-checks-are-a-massive-security-vulnerability/</link><pubDate>Wed, 25 Sep 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/data-brokers-and-background-checks-are-a-massive-security-vulnerability/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Brian Krebs has done some amazing investigative reporting over the years, but &lt;a href="http://krebsonsecurity.com/2013/09/data-broker-giants-hacked-by-id-theft-service/"&gt;this story is an absolute bombshell&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;An identity theft service that sells Social Security numbers, birth records, credit and background reports on millions of Americans has infiltrated computers at some of America’s largest consumer and business data aggregators, according to a seven-month investigation by KrebsOnSecurity.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Incite 9/25/2013: Road Trip</title><link>/blog/incite-9-25-2013-road-trip/</link><pubDate>Wed, 25 Sep 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/incite-9-25-2013-road-trip/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Every so often my mind wanders and I flash back to scenes from classic movies. When I remember &lt;a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0077975/"&gt;Animal House&lt;/a&gt;, I can’t help but spend perhaps 15 minutes thinking about all the great scenes in that movie. I don’t even know where to begin, but one scene that still cracks me up after all these years is:&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Walled Garden Fail</title><link>/blog/walled-garden-fail/</link><pubDate>Wed, 25 Sep 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/walled-garden-fail/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Mailbox is a very popular replacement mail app for iOS that apparently auto-executes JavaScript in incoming emails, according to &lt;a href="http://miki.it/blog/2013/9/24/mailboxapp-javascript-execution/"&gt;a post by Italian security researcher Michele Spanuolo&lt;/a&gt; (&lt;a href="https://twitter.com/mikispag"&gt;@MikiSpag&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Firewall Management Essentials: Quick Wins</title><link>/blog/firewall-management-essentials-quick-wins/</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Sep 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/firewall-management-essentials-quick-wins/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;As we put a little bow on our Firewall Management Essentials series, it’s time to focus on getting quick value from your investment. We are big fans of a &lt;em&gt;Quick Wins&lt;/em&gt; approach, because far too many technologies sputter as deployment lags and value commensurate with the investment is never seen. The quick wins approach focuses on building momentum early in the deployment by balancing what can be done &lt;em&gt;right now&lt;/em&gt; against longer-term goals for a technology investment. If a project team doesn’t prove value early and often, that typically dooms the implementation to failure. For firewall management, the lowest hanging fruit is optimization of existing rule sets before implementing a strong change management process. But let’s not put the cart before the horse – first you need to deploy the tool and integrate it with other enterprise systems.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>API Gateways [New Research]</title><link>/blog/api-gateways-new-research/</link><pubDate>Mon, 23 Sep 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/api-gateways-new-research/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;If you are thinking about skipping this post because you are not a developer, or think APIs are irrelevant to you, stop! You are missing the point of an important trend in both security and development. Today we launch our research paper on API gateways. It includes a ton of information about what these gateways are, how they work, and how best to take advantage of them. Additionally, we describe this industry trend and how it bakes security into the services. Even non-developers will be seeing these and working with one in the near future.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Investigating Touch ID and the Secure Enclave</title><link>/blog/investigating-touch-id-and-the-secure-enclave/</link><pubDate>Mon, 23 Sep 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/investigating-touch-id-and-the-secure-enclave/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;As much as it pained me, Friday morning I slipped out of my house at 3:30am, drove to the nearest Apple Store, set up my folding chair, and waited patiently to acquire an iPhone 5s. I was about number 150 in line, and it was a good thing I didn’t want a gold or silver model. This wasn’t my first time in a release line, but it is most definitely the first time I have stood in line since having children and truly appreciated the value of sleep.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Keep Calm and Bust out the Tinfoil Hat</title><link>/blog/keep-calm-and-bust-out-the-tin-foil-hat/</link><pubDate>Mon, 23 Sep 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/keep-calm-and-bust-out-the-tin-foil-hat/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Dennis Fisher writes what many of us have been feeling for a while in &lt;a href="https://threatpost.com/the-sky-is-not-falling-its-fallen/102372"&gt;The Sky is Not Falling–It’s Fallen&lt;/a&gt;. He argues that the fundamental underpinnings of security are being whittled away – slowly but surely. And the fact that it’s a cynical view doesn’t make it wrong.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>A Quick Response on the Great Touch ID Spoof</title><link>/blog/a-quick-response-on-the-great-touch-id-spoof/</link><pubDate>Sun, 22 Sep 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/a-quick-response-on-the-great-touch-id-spoof/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Hackers at the &lt;a href="http://www.ccc.de/en/updates/2013/ccc-breaks-apple-touchid"&gt;Chaos Computer Club were the first to spoof Apple’s Touch ID sensor&lt;/a&gt;. They used existing techniques, but at higher resolution. A quick response:&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Friday Summary: September 20, 2013</title><link>/blog/friday-summary-september-20-2013/</link><pubDate>Fri, 20 Sep 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/friday-summary-september-20-2013/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I have been so totally overwhelmed with projects that I have had very little time to read, research, or blog. So I was excited this morning to take a few minutes to download the new &lt;a href="http://blogs.technet.com/b/security/archive/2013/09/17/financial-services-a-survey-of-the-state-of-secure-application-development-processes.aspx"&gt;SDL research paper&lt;/a&gt; from Microsoft’s blog. It examines vendors using Microsoft’s SDL in both Microsoft and non-Microsoft environments. And what did I learn? Nothing. Apparently their research team has the same problem as the rest of us: no good metrics, and the best user stories get sanitized into oblivion. I am seriously disappointed – this type of research is sorely needed.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Defending Against Application Denial of Service Attacks [New Series]</title><link>/blog/defending-against-application-denial-of-service-attacks-introduction/</link><pubDate>Wed, 18 Sep 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/defending-against-application-denial-of-service-attacks-introduction/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;As we discussed last year in &lt;a href="https://securosis.com/research/papers/defending-against-denial-of-service-dos-attacks"&gt;Defending Against Denial of Service Attacks&lt;/a&gt;, attackers increasingly leverage availability-impacting attacks both to cause downtime (which costs site owners money) and to mask other kinds of attacks. These availability-impacting attacks are better known as Denial of Service (DoS) attacks. Our research identified a number of adversaries who increasingly use DoS attacks, including:&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Firewall Management Essentials: Managing Access Risk</title><link>/blog/firewall-management-essentials-managing-access-risk/</link><pubDate>Wed, 18 Sep 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/firewall-management-essentials-managing-access-risk/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;We have discussed two of the three legs of comprehensive firewall management: a &lt;a href="https://securosis.com/blog/firewall-management-essentials-change-management"&gt;change management process&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href="https://securosis.com/blog/firewall-management-essentials-optimizing-rules"&gt;optimizing the rules&lt;/a&gt;. Now let’s work through managing risk using the firewall.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Incite 9/18/2013: Got No Game</title><link>/blog/incite-9-18-2013-got-no-game/</link><pubDate>Wed, 18 Sep 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/incite-9-18-2013-got-no-game/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;On Monday night I did a guest lecture for some students in Kennesaw State’s information security program. It is always a lot of fun to get in front of the “next generation” of practitioners (see what I did there?). I focused on innovation in endpoint protection and network security, discussing the research I have been doing into threat intelligence. The kids (a few looked as old as me) seemed to enjoy hearing about the latest and greatest in the security space.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Black Hat West Cloud Security Training</title><link>/blog/black-hat-west-cloud-security-training/</link><pubDate>Tue, 17 Sep 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/black-hat-west-cloud-security-training/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I am psyched to announce that our Black Hat Vegas class went well, and we have been invited to teach in Seattle December 9-10 and 11-12. As before, we will be bringing some advanced material, but you shouldn’t be scared off – advanced skillz are not required to make it through the class.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Firewall Management Essentials: Optimizing Rules</title><link>/blog/firewall-management-essentials-optimizing-rules/</link><pubDate>Tue, 17 Sep 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/firewall-management-essentials-optimizing-rules/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Now that you have a solid, repeatable, and automated &lt;a href="https://securosis.com/blog/firewall-management-essentials-change-management"&gt;firewall change management process&lt;/a&gt;, it’s time to delve into the next major aspect of managing your firewalls: optimizing rules. Back in our &lt;a href="https://securosis.com/blog/firewall-management-essentials-introduction"&gt;introduction&lt;/a&gt; we talked about how firewall rule sets tend to resemble a closet over time. You have a ton of crap in there, most of which you don’t use, and whatever you do use is typically hard to get to. So you need to occasionally clean up and reorganize – getting rid of stuff you don’t need, making sure the stuff that’s still in there should be, and arranging things so you can easily access the stuff you use the most. But let’s drop the closet analogy to talk firewall specifics. You need to optimize rules for a variety of reasons:&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Threat Intelligence for Ecosystem Risk Management [New Paper]</title><link>/blog/threat-intelligence-for-ecosystem-risk-management-new-paper/</link><pubDate>Mon, 16 Sep 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/threat-intelligence-for-ecosystem-risk-management-new-paper/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src="EcosystemTI-Cover.png" alt=""&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Most folks think the move towards the extended enterprise is very cool. You know, get other organizations to do the stuff your organization isn’t great at. It’s a win/win, right? From a business standpoint, there are clear advantages to building a robust ecosystem that leverages the capabilities of all organizations. But from a security standpoint, the extended enterprise adds a tremendous amount of attack surface.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Firewall Management Essentials: Change Management</title><link>/blog/firewall-management-essentials-change-management/</link><pubDate>Fri, 13 Sep 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/firewall-management-essentials-change-management/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;As we dive back into Firewall Management Essentials, let’s revisit some of the high points from our &lt;a href="https://securosis.com/blog/firewall-management-essentials-introduction"&gt;Introduction&lt;/a&gt;:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The firewalls run on a set of rules that basically define what ports, protocols, networks, users, and increasingly applications, can do on your network. And just like a closet in your house, if you don’t spend time sorting through old stuff it can become a disorganized mess, with a bunch of things you haven’t used in years and don’t need any more.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Friday Summary: No Sleep, Mishmash Edition</title><link>/blog/friday-summary-the-no-sleep-mishmash-edition/</link><pubDate>Fri, 13 Sep 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/friday-summary-the-no-sleep-mishmash-edition/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I had a really great Friday Summary planned. I was going to go all in-depth and metaphysical on something really important, with a full-on “and knowing is half the battle” conclusion at the end, tying it back to security and making you reevaluate your life.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Incite 9/11/2013: Brave New World</title><link>/blog/incite-9-11-2013-a-brave-new-world/</link><pubDate>Wed, 11 Sep 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/incite-9-11-2013-a-brave-new-world/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;On a trip to the Bay Area recently, I drove past the first electronic billboard I ever saw. It’s right on the 101 around Palo Alto, and has been there at least 7 or 8 years.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Oracle Quietly Adds (Possibly Major) Java Security Update</title><link>/blog/oracle-quietly-adds-maybe-major-java-security-update/</link><pubDate>Wed, 11 Sep 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/oracle-quietly-adds-maybe-major-java-security-update/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;We received an email tip today that &lt;a href="http://www.oracle.com/us/corporate/press/2008412"&gt;Oracle added a new security feature to Java that might be pretty important&lt;/a&gt; (awaiting confirmation that I can publicly credit the person who sent it in):&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Unprecedented and Shortsighted</title><link>/blog/unprecedented-and-shortsighted/</link><pubDate>Mon, 09 Sep 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/unprecedented-and-shortsighted/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I am still putting my personal thoughts together on the recent NSA revelations. The short version is that when you look at it in the context of developments in vulnerability disclosure and markets, we are deep into a period of time where our benign government has actively undermined the security of citizens, businesses, and even other arms of government, at scale, in order to develop and maintain offensive capabilities. (Yes, I’m a patriotic type who considers our government benign).&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>What to do when your Twitter account is hacked</title><link>/blog/what-to-do-when-your-twitter-account-is-hacked/</link><pubDate>Mon, 09 Sep 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/what-to-do-when-your-twitter-account-is-hacked/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.pcworld.com/article/2047286/your-twitter-account-has-been-hacked-heres-what-to-do-about-it-.html"&gt;PCWorld/TechHive has a very clear article on how to deal with a Twitter hack.&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Print it out and keep it handy, especially if you manage a corporate account. If you are very big get a phone number for Twitter security, make contact, and add it to your IR plans.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Friday Summary: September 6, 2013</title><link>/blog/friday-summary-september-6-2013/</link><pubDate>Fri, 06 Sep 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/friday-summary-september-6-2013/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;When my wife an I were a young couple looking for a place in the hills of Berkeley, we came across an ad for an apartment with “Views of the Golden Gate Bridge”. The price was a bit over our budget and the neighborhood was less than thrilling, but we decided to check it out. We had both previously lived in places with bay views and we felt that the extra expense would be worth it. But after we got to the property the apartment was beyond shabby, and no place we wanted to live. What’s more, we could not find a view! We stayed for a while searching for the advertised view, and when neither of us could find it we asked the agent. She said the view was from the side of the house. As it turns out, if you either stood &lt;em&gt;on the fence&lt;/em&gt; in the alley, or &lt;em&gt;on the toilet seat&lt;/em&gt; of the second bathroom, and looked out the small window, you could see a sliver of the Golden Gate. The agent had not lied to us – technically there was a bridge view. But in a practical sense it did not matter. I would hardly invite company over for a glass of wine and have them stand on tiptoes atop the toilet lid for an obstructed view of the bridge.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>[New Paper] Identity and Access Management for Cloud Services</title><link>/blog/new-paper-identity-and-access-management-for-cloud-services/</link><pubDate>Thu, 05 Sep 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/new-paper-identity-and-access-management-for-cloud-services/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;We are happy to announce the release of our Identity and Access Management for Cloud Services research paper.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Identity, access management, and authorization are each reasonably complicated subjects, but they all reside at the center of most on-premise security projects. Cloud computing and cloud security are both &lt;em&gt;very&lt;/em&gt; complex subjects. Mix them all together, in essence federating your on-premise identity systems into the cloud, and you have complexity soup! Gunnar and I agreed that in light of the importance of identity management to cloud computing, and the complexity of the subject matter, users need a guide to help understand what the heck is going on. Far too often people talk about the technologies (&lt;em&gt;e.g.:&lt;/em&gt; SAML, OAuth, and OpenID) as the solution, while totally missing the bigger picture: the transformation of identity as we knew it into Cloud IAM. We are witnessing a major shift in how we both provide and consume identity, which is not obvious to a tools-centric view.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>[New Paper] Dealing with Database Denial of Service</title><link>/blog/new-paperdealing-with-database-denial-of-service/</link><pubDate>Wed, 04 Sep 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/new-paperdealing-with-database-denial-of-service/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;We are pleased to put the finishing touches on our Database Denial of Service (DB-DoS) research and distribute it to the security community. Unless you have had your head in the sand for the past year, you know DoS attacks are back with a vengeance. Less visible but no less damaging is the fact that attackers are “moving up the stack” to the application and database layers. Rather than “flooding the pipes” with millions of bogus packets, we now see cases where a single request topples a database – halting the web services it supported. Database DoS requires less effort for the attacker, and provides a stealthier approach to achieving their goals. Companies that have been victimized by DB-DoS are not eager to share details, but here at Securosis we think it’s time you know what we are hearing about so you can arm yourself with knowledge of how to defend against this sort of attack. Here is an except from the paper:&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Incite 9/4/2013: Annual Reset</title><link>/blog/incite-9-4-2013-annual-reset/</link><pubDate>Wed, 04 Sep 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/incite-9-4-2013-annual-reset/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;This week marks the end of one year and the beginning of the next. For a long time I took this opportunity around the holidays to revisit my goals and ensure I was still on track. I diligently wrote down my life goals and break those into 10, 5, and 1 year increments. Just to make sure I was making progress toward where I wanted to be. Then a funny thing happened. I realized that constantly trying to get somewhere else made me very unhappy. So I stopped doing that.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Friday Summary: Decisions, Decisions</title><link>/blog/friday-summary-decisions-decisions/</link><pubDate>Fri, 30 Aug 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/friday-summary-decisions-decisions/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I am in a bit of a pickle, and could use some advice.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Over the time I have been an analyst, I have learned that it is important to have the right distribution of research. My rule of thumb is 80-90% of it should be practical research to help people get their jobs done on a daily basis. Then you can spend 10-20% on future research that I promise not to call thought leadership.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Firewall Management Essentials: Introduction [New Series]</title><link>/blog/firewall-management-essentials-introduction/</link><pubDate>Thu, 29 Aug 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/firewall-management-essentials-introduction/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;It starts right there in &lt;a href="https://www.pcisecuritystandards.org/security_standards/documents.php"&gt;PCI-DSS&lt;/a&gt; Requirement 1. &lt;em&gt;Install and maintain a firewall configuration to protect cardholder data.&lt;/em&gt; Since it’s the first requirement, firewalls must be important, right? Not that PCI is the be all, end all of security goodness, but it does represent the low bar of controls you should have in place to defend against attackers. As the line of first defense on a network, it’s the firewall’s job to enforce a set of access policies that dictate what traffic should be allowed to pass. It’s basically the traffic cop on your network, as well as acting as a segmentation point between separate networks.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Tracking the Syrian Electronic Army</title><link>/blog/tracking-the-syrian-electronic-army/</link><pubDate>Thu, 29 Aug 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/tracking-the-syrian-electronic-army/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://krebsonsecurity.com/2013/08/who-built-the-syrian-electronic-army/"&gt;Brian Krebs is digging into the SEA and trying to out individuals&lt;/a&gt;:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A hacking group calling itself the Syrian Electronic Army (SEA) has been getting an unusual amount of press lately, most recently after hijacking the Web sites of The New York Times and The Washington Post, among others. But surprisingly little light has been shed on the individuals behind these headline-grabbing attacks. Beginning today, I’ll be taking a closer look at this organization, starting with one of the group’s core architects.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Deming and the Strategic Nature of Security</title><link>/blog/deming-and-the-strategic-nature-of-security/</link><pubDate>Wed, 28 Aug 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/deming-and-the-strategic-nature-of-security/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;FierceCIO’s Derek Slater offers an interesting perspective on why &lt;a href="http://www.fiercecio.com/story/w-edwards-deming-hates-your-approach-it-security/2013-08-19"&gt;W. Edwards Deming hates your approach to IT security&lt;/a&gt;. I was educated as an industrial engineer, so we had to study Deming left, right, and center in school. Of course when I graduated and went into programming, nobody realized that Deming’s concepts also apply to software development. But that’s another story for another Six Sigma.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Incite 8/27/2013: You Can’t Teach Them Everything</title><link>/blog/incite-8-27-2013-you-cant-teach-them-everything-2/</link><pubDate>Wed, 28 Aug 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/incite-8-27-2013-you-cant-teach-them-everything-2/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;It’s nice that my kids are still at a stage where they don’t want to disappoint me or the Boss. They need our approval and can be crushed if we show even the slightest measure of dissatisfaction in what they do. My ego-centric self likes that, but the rest of me wants them to learn to stop worrying about what everyone thinks and do what they think is right. Of course, that involves having enough life experience to understand the difference between right and wrong.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Security is Reactive. Learn to Love It.</title><link>/blog/security-is-reactive-learn-to-love-it/</link><pubDate>Wed, 28 Aug 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/security-is-reactive-learn-to-love-it/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Few things make me happier than getting to publicly disagree with one of my coworkers.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Earlier today Mike &lt;a href="https://securosis.com/blog/deming-and-the-strategic-nature-of-security"&gt;suggested that security is too reactive and tactical to succeed&lt;/a&gt;. Then we hear the usual platitudes about treating security as a risk management function, better metrics, blah blah blah. Not that there is anything wrong with all that, but it needs to be discussed in context of the fundamental nature of security.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>The future of security is embedded</title><link>/blog/the-future-of-security-is-embedded/</link><pubDate>Wed, 28 Aug 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/the-future-of-security-is-embedded/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I do not think &lt;a href="https://securosis.com/blog/deming-and-the-strategic-nature-of-security"&gt;Mike’s&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href="https://securosis.com/blog/security-is-reactive.-learn-to-love-it"&gt;Rich’s&lt;/a&gt; points are at odds at all.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Mike’s post lays out what in my view is infosec’s Achilles heel: lack of strategic alignment with the business. There are very few things that basically everyone in infosec agrees on; but a near universal one is that you can, should, and will never show a Return on Security Investment. “The business” is just supposed to accept this, apparently, and keep increasing the budget year after year; the People’s Republic of Information Security shall remain unsullied by such things as profit and loss, and breeze merrily along.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Third Time is the Charm</title><link>/blog/third-time-is-the-charm/</link><pubDate>Wed, 28 Aug 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/third-time-is-the-charm/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Nothing makes my day like getting to argue with my colleagues here at Securosis. Sadly today isn’t that day. The only thing that I love &lt;em&gt;almost&lt;/em&gt; as much is when &lt;a href="https://securosis.com/blog/deming-and-the-strategic-nature-of-security"&gt;Mike&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href="https://securosis.com/blog/security-is-reactive.-learn-to-love-it"&gt;Rich&lt;/a&gt; think they are arguing with each other, but I get to point out that they are &lt;em&gt;actually&lt;/em&gt; saying the same things, but from different angles, and therefore with different words.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Ecosystem Threat Intelligence: Use Cases and Selection Criteria</title><link>/blog/ecosystem-threat-intelligence-use-cases-and-selection-criteria/</link><pubDate>Tue, 27 Aug 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/ecosystem-threat-intelligence-use-cases-and-selection-criteria/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;We touched on the &lt;a href="https://securosis.com/blog/ecosystem-threat-intelligence-the-risk-of-the-extended-enterprise"&gt;Risks of the Extended Enterprise&lt;/a&gt; and the specifics of &lt;a href="https://securosis.com/blog/ecosystem-threat-intelligence-assessing-partner-risk"&gt;Assessing Partner Risk&lt;/a&gt;, so now let’s apply these concepts to a few use cases to help make the concepts a little more tangible. We will follow a similar format for each use case, talking about the business needs for access, then the threat presented by that access, and finally how Ecosystem Threat Intelligence (EcoTI) helps you make better decisions about specific partners.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>PCI 3.0 is coming. Hide the kids.</title><link>/blog/pci-3-0-is-coming-hide-the-kids/</link><pubDate>Tue, 27 Aug 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/pci-3-0-is-coming-hide-the-kids/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;The Payment Card Industry Security Standards Council &lt;a href="https://www.pcisecuritystandards.org/documents/DSS_and_PA-DSS_Change_Highlights.pdf"&gt;recently released a preview of potential changes in PCI 3.0&lt;/a&gt; that will go into effect in 2014.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Random Thought: Meet Your New Database</title><link>/blog/random-thought-meet-your-new-database/</link><pubDate>Tue, 27 Aug 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/random-thought-meet-your-new-database/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Something has been bugging me. It’s big data. Not the industry but the term itself. Every time I am asked about big data I need to use the term in order to be understood, but the term itself steers the uninitiated in the wrong direction. It leaves a bad taste in my mouth. It’s wrong.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Reactionary Idiot Test</title><link>/blog/reactionary-idiot-test/</link><pubDate>Tue, 27 Aug 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/reactionary-idiot-test/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;We generally avoid talking about the NSA, Snowden, and such, but this piece is actually illuminating, without any sort of political commentary.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>China Suffers Large DNS DDoS Attack</title><link>/blog/cjina-suffers-large-dns-ddos-attack/</link><pubDate>Mon, 26 Aug 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/cjina-suffers-large-dns-ddos-attack/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;From &lt;a href="http://blogs.wsj.com/chinarealtime/2013/08/26/chinese-internet-hit-by-attack-over-weekend/"&gt;the Wall Street Journal&lt;/a&gt; (via &lt;a href="http://theverge.com/"&gt;The Verge&lt;/a&gt;):&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The attack began at 2 a.m. Sunday morning and was followed by a more intense attack at 4 a.m., according to the China Internet Network Information Center, which apologized to affected users in its statement and said it is working to improve its “service capabilities.”&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Ecosystem Threat Intelligence: Assessing Partner Risk</title><link>/blog/ecosystem-threat-intelligence-assessing-partner-risk/</link><pubDate>Mon, 26 Aug 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/ecosystem-threat-intelligence-assessing-partner-risk/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;As we discussed in the &lt;a href="https://securosis.com/blog/ecosystem-threat-intelligence-the-risk-of-the-extended-enterprise"&gt;introduction post of our Ecosystem Threat Intelligence&lt;/a&gt; series, today’s business environment features increasing use of an extended enterprise. Integrating systems and processes with trading partners can benefit the business, but dramatically expands the attack surface. A compromised trading partner, with trusted access to your network and systems, gives their attackers that same trusted access to you. To net out the situation, you need to assess the security of your partner ecosystem; and be in a position to make risk-based decisions about whether the connection (collaboration) with trading partners makes sense, and what types of controls are necessary for protection given the potential exposure. To quote our first post:&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>VMWare Doubles Down on SDN</title><link>/blog/vmware-doubles-down-on-sdn/</link><pubDate>Mon, 26 Aug 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/vmware-doubles-down-on-sdn/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;VMWare is pushing hard on the virtual datacenter concept this week at VMWorld, with the first release of their new SDN networking approach based on the Nicira acquisition. &lt;a href="http://www.networkcomputing.com/cloud-computing/vmware-nsx-game-changer-for-data-center/240160449"&gt;Greg Ferro has a good take&lt;/a&gt; (hat tip to &lt;a href="http://twitter.com/beaker"&gt;@beaker/Hoff&lt;/a&gt; for the link):&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Friday Summary: August 23, 2013</title><link>/blog/friday-summary-august-23-2013/</link><pubDate>Fri, 23 Aug 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/friday-summary-august-23-2013/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;With seven trips in the last eight weeks – and I would have been 8 for 8 had I not been sick one week – I’d have been out of the office the entire last two months. It almost feels weird blogging again but there is going to be a lot to write about in the coming weeks given the huge amount of research underway.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>“Like” Facebook’s response to Disclosure Fail</title><link>/blog/like-facebooks-response-to-disclosure-fail-2/</link><pubDate>Thu, 22 Aug 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/like-facebooks-response-to-disclosure-fail-2/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Every company makes mistakes, especially when it comes to researchers disclosing security bugs and/or vulnerabilities. And when the frustrated researcher goes public and &lt;a href="http://news.cnet.com/8301-1023_3-57599043-93/researcher-posts-facebook-bug-report-to-mark-zuckerbergs-wall/"&gt;makes a scene&lt;/a&gt;, the company has a few choices.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Incite 8/21/2013: Hygienically Challenged</title><link>/blog/incite-8-21-2013-hygienically-challenged/</link><pubDate>Wed, 21 Aug 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/incite-8-21-2013-hygienically-challenged/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I spend a lot of time in public places. I basically work in &lt;a href="https://securosis.com/blog/incite-3-27-2013-office-space"&gt;coffee shops&lt;/a&gt; and spend more than my fair share of time in airports and restaurants. There is nothing worse than being in the groove, banging out a blog post, and then catching a whiff of someone – before I can see them. I start to wonder if the toilet backed up or something died in the wall.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>New Paper: The 2014 Endpoint Security Buyer’s Guide</title><link>/blog/new-paper-the-2014-endpoint-security-buyers-guide-2/</link><pubDate>Wed, 21 Aug 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/new-paper-the-2014-endpoint-security-buyers-guide-2/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Our updated and revised 2014 Endpoint Security Buyer’s Guide updates our research on key endpoint management functions, including patch and confirmation management and device control. We have also added coverage of anti- … malware, mobility, and BYOD. All very timely and relevant topics. The bad news is that securing endpoints hasn’t gotten any easier. Employees still click things, and attackers have gotten better at evading perimeter defenses and obscuring attacks.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Research Scratchpad: Stateless Security</title><link>/blog/research-scratchpad-stateless-security/</link><pubDate>Wed, 21 Aug 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/research-scratchpad-stateless-security/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Here’s another idea I’ve been playing with.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;As I spend more time playing with various cloud and infrastructure APIs, I’m starting to come around to the idea of &lt;em&gt;Stateless Security&lt;/em&gt;. Here’s what I mean:&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Two Apple Security Tidbits</title><link>/blog/two-apple-security-tidbits/</link><pubDate>Tue, 20 Aug 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/two-apple-security-tidbits/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Two interesting items.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;First up, whatever actual vulnerability was used, &lt;a href="http://www.macrumors.com/2013/08/20/apple-developer-center-outage-fixed-remote-code-execution-flaw/"&gt;the Apple Developer Center was exploited with a code execution flaw&lt;/a&gt;:&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>IBM/Trusteer: Shooting Across the Bow of the EPP Suites</title><link>/blog/ibm-trusteer-shooting-across-the-bow-of-the-epp-suites/</link><pubDate>Mon, 19 Aug 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/ibm-trusteer-shooting-across-the-bow-of-the-epp-suites/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src="swimming-in-money.jpg" alt=""&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Last week, &lt;a href="http://www-03.ibm.com/press/us/en/pressrelease/41487.wss"&gt;IBM announced a deal to acquire Trusteer&lt;/a&gt;, an Israeli company focused on advance endpoint malware detection. The price tag was &lt;a href="http://techcrunch.com/2013/08/15/ibm-buys-israelus-cybersecurity-specialist-trusteer-for-few-hundred-million-dollars/"&gt;reported to be $800MM - $1B&lt;/a&gt;, so it was a pretty healthy 7-8x multiple of rumored 2013 bookings. Trusteer’s technology fills a huge gap in IBM’s advanced malware story. They do some stuff on their network (IPS) box, but without a real presence on the endpoint, their solution is limited. And for company pushing a total security solution story like IBM, you can’t really have holes. Not obvious one’s anyway.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Lockheed-Martin Trademarks “Cyber Kill Chain”. “Cyberdouche” Still Available</title><link>/blog/lockheed-martin-trademarks-cyber-kill-chain-cyberdouche-still-available-2/</link><pubDate>Mon, 19 Aug 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/lockheed-martin-trademarks-cyber-kill-chain-cyberdouche-still-available-2/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;It appears that Lockheed Martin has &lt;a href="http://www.lockheedmartin.com/us/what-we-do/information-technology/cyber-security/cyber-kill-chain.html"&gt;trademarked the term “Cyber Kill Chain”&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This should be no surprise, and you can read my &lt;a href="https://securosis.com/blog/house-of-cybercards"&gt;House of Cybercards&lt;/a&gt; post if you want to know why this isn’t merely humorous.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>New Paper: The CISO’s Guide to Advanced Attackers</title><link>/blog/new-paper-the-cisos-guide-to-advanced-attackers-2/</link><pubDate>Sun, 18 Aug 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/new-paper-the-cisos-guide-to-advanced-attackers-2/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src="CGAA-Cover-1.png" alt=""&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Much of the security industry spends significant time and effort focused on how hard it is to deal with today’s attacks. Adversaries continue to improve their tactics. Senior management doesn’t get it, until there is a breach… &lt;em&gt;then&lt;/em&gt; your successor can educate them. And the compliance mandates hanging over your organization like albatross remain 3-4 years behind the attacks you see daily. The vendor community compounds the issues by positioning every product and/or service as a solution to the APT problem. Which means they don’t really understand advanced attackers at all. But complaining doesn’t solve problems, so we put together a &lt;em&gt;CISO’s Guide to Advanced Attackers&lt;/em&gt; to help you structure a programmatic effort to deal with these adversaries.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Friday Summary: Career Highlight</title><link>/blog/friday-summary-career-highlight/</link><pubDate>Fri, 16 Aug 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/friday-summary-career-highlight/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I got my first computer back in the mid-80’s, a few years after I started playing and programming in the back half of elementary school. It was a shiny new Commodore 64 a friend of my Mom’s gave me – we weren’t financially lucky enough to afford one ourselves.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Ecosystem Threat Intelligence: The Risk of the Extended Enterprise [New Series]</title><link>/blog/ecosystem-threat-intelligence-the-risk-of-the-extended-enterprise/</link><pubDate>Thu, 15 Aug 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/ecosystem-threat-intelligence-the-risk-of-the-extended-enterprise/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;A key aspect of business today is the extended enterprise. That’s a fancy way of saying no organization does it alone anymore. They have upstream suppliers who help produce whatever it is they produce. They have downstream distribution channels that help them sell whatever needs to be sold. They outsource business processes to third parties who can handle them better and more cheaply. With the advent of advanced communication and collaboration tools, teams work on projects even if they don’t work for the same company or reside on the same continent. Jack Welch coined the term &lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boundaryless_organization"&gt;“boundaryless organizations”&lt;/a&gt; back in 1990 to describe an organization that is not defined by, or limited to, horizontal, vertical, or external boundaries imposed by a predefined structure. They are common today.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Research Scratchpad: Outside Looking in</title><link>/blog/research-scratchpad-outside-looking-in/</link><pubDate>Thu, 15 Aug 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/research-scratchpad-outside-looking-in/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;I have bunch of random research thoughts I am working on. I think they are building into a cohesive whole but cannot make any promises. I’m branding these forming ideas as my “research scratchpad”, and will appreciate any feedback.&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Continuous Security Monitoring: Migrating to CSM</title><link>/blog/continuous-security-monitoring-migrating-to-csm/</link><pubDate>Wed, 14 Aug 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/continuous-security-monitoring-migrating-to-csm/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;We spent a bulk of this series defining the major use cases for Continuous Security Monitoring, taking a journey through &lt;a href="https://securosis.com/blog/continuous-security-monitoring-the-attack-use-case"&gt;Attacks&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="https://securosis.com/blog/continuous-security-monitoring-the-change-control-use-case"&gt;Change Control&lt;/a&gt;, and &lt;a href="https://securosis.com/blog/continuous-security-monitoring-csm-for-compliance"&gt;Compliance&lt;/a&gt;. We know that many of you tend to be people of action, who want to just get going. But without a proper plan and definition for what you are trying to achieve with your security monitoring initiative, you will just end up with a lot of shiny expensive shelfware.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Incite 8/14/2013: Tracking the Trends</title><link>/blog/incite-8-14-2013-tracking-the-trends/</link><pubDate>Wed, 14 Aug 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/incite-8-14-2013-tracking-the-trends/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I remember back in my 20s, when I though my success and wealth were assured. I was a high-flying analyst during the Internet bubble and made a bunch of coin. Then I lost a bunch of coin as the bubble deflated. Then I started a software company, which was sold off for the cash on our balance sheet. Then I chased a few hot startups that got less hot once I got there. None had a happy ending.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Incomplete Thought: Is the Cloud the Secproasaurus Extinction Event? And Are DevOps the Mammals?</title><link>/blog/incomplete-thought-is-cloud-the-secproasaurus-extinction-event-and-devops-a/</link><pubDate>Tue, 13 Aug 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/incomplete-thought-is-cloud-the-secproasaurus-extinction-event-and-devops-a/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Okay, I’m just throwing this one out there because the research is far from complete but I really want to hear what other people think.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Continuous Security Monitoring: Compliance</title><link>/blog/continuous-security-monitoring-csm-for-compliance/</link><pubDate>Mon, 12 Aug 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/continuous-security-monitoring-csm-for-compliance/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Let’s wrap up our use case discussions for Continuous Security Monitoring by digging into how CSM can contribute to your compliance efforts. We know the way we staged these use cases (first &lt;a href="https://securosis.com/blog/continuous-security-monitoring-the-attack-use-case"&gt;attack&lt;/a&gt;, then &lt;a href="https://securosis.com/blog/continuous-security-monitoring-the-change-control-use-case"&gt;change control&lt;/a&gt;) is bass-ackwards from how most folks implement monitoring. Compliance is typically the first use cases implemented, mostly because PCI-DSS mandates it. Regardless of how you adopt the technology, what you want to do is make sure whatever monitoring infrastructure you put in place will be extensible and relevant to all your use cases.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Credibility and the CISO</title><link>/blog/credibility-and-the-ciso/</link><pubDate>Sun, 11 Aug 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/credibility-and-the-ciso/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;We see continuing confusion regarding the CISO duties in many organizations. When I saw &lt;a href="http://www.scmagazine.com/what-are-the-duties-of-a-ciso-it-depends/article/304601/"&gt;this opinion piece in SC Mag&lt;/a&gt; by an experienced CISO (David Nathans) with both commercial and defense sector experience, I figured we might finally get some clarification. Yeah, I should have known better.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Continuous Security Monitoring: The Change Control Use Case</title><link>/blog/continuous-security-monitoring-the-change-control-use-case/</link><pubDate>Fri, 09 Aug 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/continuous-security-monitoring-the-change-control-use-case/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;We now resume our series on Continuous Security Monitoring. We have dug into the &lt;a href="https://securosis.com/blog/continuous-security-monitoring-the-attack-use-case"&gt;Attack Use Case&lt;/a&gt; so it’s time to cover the next most popular use case for security monitoring: Change Control. We will keep the same format as before; digging into what you are trying to do, what data is required to do it, and then how this information can and should guide your prioritization of operational activities.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Is Privacy Now Illegal?</title><link>/blog/is-privacy-now-illegal/</link><pubDate>Fri, 09 Aug 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/is-privacy-now-illegal/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://silentcircle.wordpress.com/2013/08/09/to-our-customers/"&gt;Silent Circle is shutting down their email service&lt;/a&gt;:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;However, we have reconsidered this position. We’ve been thinking about this for some time, whether it was a good idea at all. Today, another secure email provider, Lavabit, shut down their system lest they “be complicit in crimes against the American people.” We see the writing the wall, and we have decided that it is best for us to shut down Silent Mail now. We have not received subpoenas, warrants, security letters, or anything else by any government, and this is why we are acting now.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>HP goes past the TippingPoint of blogging nonsense</title><link>/blog/hp-goes-past-the-tippingpoint-of-blogging-nonsense/</link><pubDate>Thu, 08 Aug 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/hp-goes-past-the-tippingpoint-of-blogging-nonsense/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;After reading &lt;a href="http://h30499.www3.hp.com/t5/HP-Security-Products-Blog/Cisco-Buying-into-the-security-game/ba-p/6160981#.UgO3WGRgbbI"&gt;this inane blog post&lt;/a&gt;, “Cisco – Buying into the security game,” from an EMEA product manager for HP TippingPoint, the Security Twittersphere rose up together to call out this nonsense. I figured I would just let it lie, but I couldn’t. This is the worst type of competitive positioning – basically calling out a competitor for doing &lt;strong&gt;exactly&lt;/strong&gt; what you have done. I think psychologists call this &lt;em&gt;projection&lt;/em&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Incite 8/7/2013: Summer’s End</title><link>/blog/incite-8-7-2013-summers-end-2/</link><pubDate>Wed, 07 Aug 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/incite-8-7-2013-summers-end-2/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;By the time most of you read this I will be on my way back down the east coast, shuttling all the kid’s stuff home after a summer of camp in the family truckster. 12+ hours in pleasant solitude as the Boss flies the kids home. They start school next Monday so we didn’t want them to sit in the car all day. So I’m taking one for the team, but it’s okay. I will spend the solitary time working over my world domination plans. Like I do on every long trip.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>You Have Eight Months</title><link>/blog/you-have-eight-months/</link><pubDate>Tue, 06 Aug 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/you-have-eight-months/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I may be done with having children, but that doesn’t mean I’ve forgotten how quickly 8 months can stream by.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Sales/Marketing Spend, Cash Generation, and the FireEye-PO</title><link>/blog/sales-marketing-spend-cash-generation-and-the-fireeye-po/</link><pubDate>Mon, 05 Aug 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/sales-marketing-spend-cash-generation-and-the-fireeye-po/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;It doesn’t happen very often so it’s highly scrutinized. No, it’s not me being nice to someone. It’s a security company IPO. Last week the folks at FireEye filed their &lt;a href="http://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1370880/000119312513316773/d529551ds1.htm"&gt;Form S-1&lt;/a&gt;, which is the first step toward becoming a public company. The echo chamber blew up, mostly because of FireEye’s P&amp;amp;L.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>We’re at Black Hat—Go Read a Book</title><link>/blog/were-at-black-hat-go-read-a-book-2/</link><pubDate>Tue, 30 Jul 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/were-at-black-hat-go-read-a-book-2/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Pretty much the entire team is out at the Black Hat conference.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Yes, we really are working. Heck, by the time you read this, Rich and James will have taught 2 separate cloud security classes.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Endpoint Security Buyer’s Guide: Buying Considerations</title><link>/blog/endpoint-security-buyers-guide-buying-considerations-2/</link><pubDate>Fri, 26 Jul 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/endpoint-security-buyers-guide-buying-considerations-2/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;We have covered the reasons &lt;a href="https://securosis.com/blog/the-endpoint-security-buyers-guide-new-series"&gt;endpoint security is getting more challenging&lt;/a&gt;, and offered some perspective on what is important when buying &lt;a href="https://securosis.com/blog/endpoint-security-buyers-guide-anti-malware-protecting-endpoints-from-attac"&gt;anti-malware&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href="https://securosis.com/blog/endpoint-security-buyers-guide-endpoint-hygiene-reducing-attack-surface"&gt;endpoint hygiene&lt;/a&gt; products – or both in an integrated package. Then we addressed the &lt;a href="https://securosis.com/blog/endpoint-security-buyers-guide-the-impact-of-byod-and-mobility"&gt;issues BYOD and mobility present for protecting endpoints&lt;/a&gt;. To wrap up we just need to discuss the buying considerations driving you toward one solution over another, and develop a procurement process that can work for your organization.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Friday Summary: Dead Tree Edition</title><link>/blog/summary-dead-tree-edition/</link><pubDate>Fri, 26 Jul 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/summary-dead-tree-edition/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Phoenix can be a wild place for weather. We don’t get much rain, but when we do it often arrives with &lt;em&gt;fearsome vengeance&lt;/em&gt;. When I first moved down here I thought “monsoon season” was just a local colloquialism to make Phoenicians think they were all tough or something. I mean, surely the weather here couldn’t rival what I was used to in Colorado, where occasional 100mph gusts are called ‘invigorating’ rather than ‘tornadoes’ – tornadoes go in circles.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>API Gateways: Buyers Guide</title><link>/blog/api-gateways-buyers-guide/</link><pubDate>Thu, 25 Jul 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/api-gateways-buyers-guide/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;We will close out this series by examining key decision criteria to help you select an API gateway. We offer a set of questions to determine which vendor solutions support your API technically, as well as the features your developers and administrators need. These criteria can be used to check solutions against your design goals and help you walk through the evaluation process.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Endpoint Security Buyer’s Guide: The Impact of BYOD and Mobility</title><link>/blog/endpoint-security-buyers-guide-the-impact-of-byod-and-mobility-2/</link><pubDate>Thu, 25 Jul 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/endpoint-security-buyers-guide-the-impact-of-byod-and-mobility-2/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;When thinking about endpoint security it is important to decide what you consider an &lt;em&gt;endpoint&lt;/em&gt;. We define an endpoint as any computing device that can access corporate data. This deliberately broad definition includes not just PCs, but also mobile devices (smartphones and tablets). We don’t think it is too broad – employees today expect to access the data they need, on the device they are using, from wherever they are, at any time. And regardless of the details, the data needs to be protected.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Gonzales’ Partners Indicted</title><link>/blog/gonzales-partners-indicted-2/</link><pubDate>Thu, 25 Jul 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/gonzales-partners-indicted-2/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;This is all over the news, &lt;a href="http://www.wired.com/threatlevel/2013/07/albert-gonzalez-conspirators/"&gt;but Wired was the first I saw to put things in the right context&lt;/a&gt;:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Four Russians and one Ukrainian have been charged with masterminding a massive hacking spree that was responsible for stealing more than 160 million bank card numbers from companies in the U.S. over a seven-year period.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Database Denial of Service: Countermeasures</title><link>/blog/database-denial-of-service-the-countermeasures/</link><pubDate>Wed, 24 Jul 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/database-denial-of-service-the-countermeasures/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Before I delve into the meat of today’s post I want to say that the goal of this series is to aid IT security and database admins in protecting relational databases from DoS attacks. During the course of this research I have heard several rumors of database DoS but not found anyone willing to go on record or even provide details anonymously. Which is too bad – this type of information helps the community and helps reduce the number of companies affected. Another interesting note: we have been getting questions from network IT and application management teams rather than DBAs. In hindsight this is not so surprising – network security is the first line of defense and cloud database service providers (&lt;em&gt;e.g.,&lt;/em&gt; ISPs) don’t have database security specialists. Now let’s take a look at database DoS countermeasures.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Incite 7/23/2013: Sometimes You Miss</title><link>/blog/incite-7-23-2013-sometimes-you-miss/</link><pubDate>Wed, 24 Jul 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/incite-7-23-2013-sometimes-you-miss/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;The point of sending the kids to sleepaway camp is that they experience things they normally wouldn’t. They expand their worldviews, meet new people, and do things they might not normally do when under the watchful (and at times draconian) eyes of their parents. As long as it’s legal and appropriate I’m cool.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Cisco FIREs up a Network Security Strategy</title><link>/blog/cisco-fires-up-a-network-security-strategy/</link><pubDate>Tue, 23 Jul 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/cisco-fires-up-a-network-security-strategy/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;This morning Cisco made its first decisive move in the network security space in years, &lt;a href="http://newsroom.cisco.com/release/1225204"&gt;acquiring Sourcefire for $2.7 billion&lt;/a&gt;. That represents a 30% premium over Sourcefire’s closing price yesterday. But much more importantly it is a clear signal that Cisco hasn’t given up on security and intends to compete as organizations rebuild their network security around the poorly named &lt;em&gt;next generation&lt;/em&gt; application awareness technology.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Continuous Security Monitoring: The Attack Use Case</title><link>/blog/continuous-security-monitoring-the-attack-use-case/</link><pubDate>Tue, 23 Jul 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/continuous-security-monitoring-the-attack-use-case/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;We have discussed &lt;a href="https://securosis.com/blog/why.-continuous.-security.-monitoring-new-series"&gt;why continuous security monitoring is important&lt;/a&gt;, how we &lt;a href="https://securosis.com/blog/continuous-security-monitoring-defining-csm"&gt;define CSM&lt;/a&gt;, and finally how you should be &lt;a href="https://securosis.com/blog/continuous-security-monitoring-classification"&gt;classifying your assets&lt;/a&gt; to figure out the most appropriate levels of monitoring. Now let’s dig into the problems you are trying to solve with CSM. At the highest level we generally see three discrete use cases:&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Bastion Hosts for Cloud Computing</title><link>/blog/bastion-hosts-for-cloud-computing/</link><pubDate>Mon, 22 Jul 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/bastion-hosts-for-cloud-computing/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://blogs.aws.amazon.com/security/post/Tx2ZWDW1QA6D62Y/Controlling-network-access-to-EC2-instances-using-a-bastion-server"&gt;From the Amazon Web Services security blog:&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A best practice in this area is to use a bastion. A bastion is a special purpose server instance that is designed to be the primary access point from the Internet and acts as a proxy to your other EC2 instances.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Exploit U</title><link>/blog/exploit-u/</link><pubDate>Mon, 22 Jul 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/exploit-u/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src="back-to-school.jpg" alt=""&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;It seems &lt;a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2013/07/17/education/barrage-of-cyberattacks-challenges-campus-culture.html"&gt;Universities are the latest targets for targeted attackers&lt;/a&gt;, looking for a preview of the next set of technologies to come out of the major research universities. But protecting these networks is a herculean task, given the open nature of university operations, which are driven by collaboration and sharing. It makes it tough to protect things when they are fundamentally open.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>If You Don’t Have Permission, Don’t ‘Test’</title><link>/blog/if-you-dont-have-permission-dont-test-2/</link><pubDate>Mon, 22 Jul 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/if-you-dont-have-permission-dont-test-2/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;We don’t know much about last week’s Apple security incident, but &lt;a href="http://thenextweb.com/apple/2013/07/22/researcher-claims-he-told-apple-of-developer-center-vulnerability-but-didnt-maliciously-steal-data/"&gt;a security researcher claims he is responsible, and was just doing research and reporting it to Apple&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>New Paper: Defending Cloud Data with Infrastructure Encryption</title><link>/blog/new-paper-defending-cloud-data-with-infrastructure-encryption/</link><pubDate>Mon, 22 Jul 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/new-paper-defending-cloud-data-with-infrastructure-encryption/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;As anyone reading this site knows, I have been spending a ton of time looking at practical approaches to cloud security. An area of particular interest is infrastructure encryption. The cloud is actually spurring a resurgence in interest in data encryption (well, that and the NSA, but I won’t go there).&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Apple Developer Site Breached</title><link>/blog/apple-developer-site-breached/</link><pubDate>Sun, 21 Jul 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/apple-developer-site-breached/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://news.cnet.com/8301-13579_3-57594770-37/apple-developer-site-targeted-in-security-attack-still-down/"&gt;From CNet (and my inbox, as a member of the developer program):&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Last Thursday, an intruder attempted to secure personal information of our registered developers from our developer website. Sensitive personal information was encrypted and cannot be accessed, however, we have not been able to rule out the possibility that some developers’ names, mailing addresses, and/or email addresses may have been accessed. In the spirit of transparency, we want to inform you of the issue. We took the site down immediately on Thursday and have been working around the clock since then.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Endpoint Security Buyer’s Guide: Endpoint Hygiene and Reducing Attack Surface</title><link>/blog/endpoint-security-buyers-guide-endpoint-hygiene-and-reducing-attack-surface/</link><pubDate>Sun, 21 Jul 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/endpoint-security-buyers-guide-endpoint-hygiene-and-reducing-attack-surface/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;As we mentioned in the last post, anti-malware tends to be the anchor in endpoint security control sets. Given the typical attacks that is justified, but too many organizations forget the importance of keeping devices up-to-date and configured securely. Even “advanced attackers” don’t like to burn 0-day attacks when they don’t need to. So leaving long-patched vulnerabilities exposed, or keeping unnecessary services active on endpoints, makes it easy for them to own your devices. The progression in almost every attack – regardless of the attacker’s sophistication – is to compromise a device, gain a foothold, and then systematically move towards the target.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Black Hat Preview 2: Software Defined Security with AWS, Ruby, and Chef</title><link>/blog/black-hat-preview-2-software-defined-security-with-aws-ruby-and-chef/</link><pubDate>Fri, 19 Jul 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/black-hat-preview-2-software-defined-security-with-aws-ruby-and-chef/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://securosis.com/blog/black-hat-preview-automating-cloud-security-policy-compliance"&gt;I recently wrote a series on automating cloud security configuration management&lt;/a&gt; by taking advantage of DevOps principles and properties of the cloud. Today I will build on that to show you how the management plane can &lt;em&gt;make security easier&lt;/em&gt; than traditional infrastructure with a little ruby code. This is another example of material covered in &lt;a href="https://www.blackhat.com/us-13/training/cloud-security-fundamentals-ccsk-plus.html"&gt;our Black Hat cloud security training class&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Endpoint Security Buyer’s Guide: Anti-Malware, Protecting Endpoints from Attacks</title><link>/blog/endpoint-security-buyers-guide-anti-malware-protecting-endpoints-from-attacks/</link><pubDate>Fri, 19 Jul 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/endpoint-security-buyers-guide-anti-malware-protecting-endpoints-from-attacks/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;After going over the challenges of protecting those pesky endpoints in the &lt;a href="https://securosis.com/blog/the-endpoint-security-buyers-guide-new-series"&gt;introductory post of the Endpoint Security Buyer’s Guide&lt;/a&gt;, it is now time to turn our attention to the anchor feature of any endpoint security offering: anti-malware. Anti-malware technologies have been much maligned. In light of the ongoing (and frequently successful) attacks on devices ‘protected’ by anti-malware tools, we need some perspective – not only on where anti-malware has been, but where the technology is going, and how that impacts endpoint security buying decisions.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Friday Summary: Cloud Identity Edition</title><link>/blog/friday-summary-the-cloud-identity-edition/</link><pubDate>Fri, 19 Jul 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/friday-summary-the-cloud-identity-edition/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;One of my favorite industry events was last week, the 2013 Cloud Identity Summit. Last year’s was in Vail, Colorado, so I thought this year couldn’t top that. Wrong. This year was at the Mertiage in Napa – nice hotel, nice Italian restaurant, stunningly helpful staff, and perfect weather made for a great week. And while I was sorely tempted to tour the Napa Valley, I found the sessions too compelling to skip out. Here are a few of the highlights:&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>New Paper: Network-based Malware Detection 2.0: Assessing Scale, Accuracy and Deployment</title><link>/blog/new-paper-network-based-malware-detection-2-0-assessing-scale-accuracy-and/</link><pubDate>Thu, 18 Jul 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/new-paper-network-based-malware-detection-2-0-assessing-scale-accuracy-and/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Detecting malware feels like a losing battle. Between advanced attacks, innovative attackers, and well-funded state-sponsored and organized crime adversaries, organizations need every advantage they can get to stop the onslaught. We first identified and documented Network-Based Malware Detection (NBMD) devices as a promising technology back in early 2012, and they have made a difference in detecting malware at the perimeter. Of course nothing is perfect, but every little bit helps.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>PCI Standards Flow Downhill</title><link>/blog/pci-standards-flow-downstream/</link><pubDate>Thu, 18 Jul 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/pci-standards-flow-downstream/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Payment gateways and payment processors have to pass PCI requirements just like merchants do. And they don’t like it any more than you do, as evidenced by recent post by Stephen Ames of Shift4. He is pissed about a new interpretation of PA-DSS, provided to his QSA outside the officially published guidance and standards, which places &lt;a href="http://www.shift4.com/blog/post.cfm/pci-s-not-so-open-global-forum"&gt;PA-DSS section 4.2.7 &lt;em&gt;always&lt;/em&gt; in scope&lt;/a&gt;. From the post:&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Google may offer client-side encryption for Google Drive</title><link>/blog/google-may-offer-clientside-encryption-for-google-drive/</link><pubDate>Wed, 17 Jul 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/google-may-offer-clientside-encryption-for-google-drive/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;From &lt;a href="http://news.cnet.com/8301-13578_3-57594171-38/google-tests-encryption-to-protect-users-drive-files-against-government-demands/"&gt;Declan McCullagh at CNet&lt;/a&gt;:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Google has begun experimenting with encrypting Google Drive files, a privacy-protective move that could curb attempts by the U.S. and other governments to gain access to users’ stored files. Two sources told CNET that the Mountain View, Calif.-based company is actively testing encryption to armor files on its cloud-based file storage and synchronization service. One source who is familiar with the project said a small percentage of Google Drive files is currently encrypted.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Incite 7/17/2013: 80 años</title><link>/blog/incite-7-17-2013-80-anos-2/</link><pubDate>Wed, 17 Jul 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/incite-7-17-2013-80-anos-2/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;If you want a feel for how long 80 years is, here are a few facts. In 1933, the President was Herbert Hoover until March, when FDR became President. The Great Depression was well underway in the US and spreading around the world. Hitler first rose to power in Germany. And Prohibition was repealed in the US. I’ll certainly drink to that.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>The Temptation of the Developer</title><link>/blog/the-temptation-of-the-developer/</link><pubDate>Tue, 16 Jul 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/the-temptation-of-the-developer/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Threat modeling involves figuring out ways the system can be gamed and your [fill in the blank] can be compromised. Great modelers can take anything and come up with new ways to question the integrity of the system. When it comes to 0-day attacks, many tend to focus on increasingly sophisticated fuzzers and other techniques to find holes in code, like the tactics described in the &lt;a href="http://www.infoworld.com/d/security/in-his-own-words-confessions-of-cyber-warrior-222266"&gt;Confessions of a Cyber Warrior interview&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Counterpoint: KNOX vs. AZA throwdown</title><link>/blog/counterpoint-knox-vs-aza-throwdown/</link><pubDate>Mon, 15 Jul 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/counterpoint-knox-vs-aza-throwdown/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://securosis.com/blog/firestarter-knox-vs.-aza-throw-down"&gt;Adrian makes a number of excellent points.&lt;/a&gt; Enterprises need better usability &lt;em&gt;and&lt;/em&gt; management for mobile devices, but co-mingling these goals complicates solutions.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>FireStarter: KNOX vs. AZA mobile throwdown</title><link>/blog/firestarter-knox-vs-aza-throw-down/</link><pubDate>Mon, 15 Jul 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/firestarter-knox-vs-aza-throw-down/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;A group of us were talking about key takeaways for the &lt;a href="http://www.cloudidentitysummit.com/overview/index.cfm"&gt;2013 Cloud Identity Summit&lt;/a&gt; last week in Napa. CIS 2012 focused on getting rid of passwords; but the conversation centered on infrastructure and identity standards such as OAuth, OpenID Connect, and SAML, which provide tool to authenticate users to cloud services. 2013 was still about minimizing usage of passwords, but focused on the client side where the “rubber meets the road” with mobile client apps.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Intel Software Guard Extensions (SGX) Is Mighty Interesting</title><link>/blog/intel-software-guard-extensions-sgx-is-mighty-interesting/</link><pubDate>Mon, 15 Jul 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/intel-software-guard-extensions-sgx-is-mighty-interesting/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I am in a bit over my head here, but take a look at &lt;a href="https://sites.google.com/site/haspworkshop2013/workshop-program"&gt;the first two presentations at the Workshop on Hardware and Architectural Support for Security and Privacy&lt;/a&gt;. Intel is preparing to introduce a new capability in their processors to support use of secure encrypted memory spaces on commodity CPUs. Their objective is to provide applications with a secure ‘enclave’ (their term) with a protected memory and execution space. It’s called &lt;em&gt;Intel Software Guard Extensions (SGX)&lt;/em&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Summary: Here’s to the Defenders</title><link>/blog/summary-heres-to-the-defenders-2/</link><pubDate>Fri, 12 Jul 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/summary-heres-to-the-defenders-2/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I was reading &lt;a href="http://m.infoworld.com/d/security/in-his-own-words-confessions-of-cyber-warrior-222266?mm_ref=http://m.slashdot.org/story/188575"&gt;Roger Grimes’ interview with an offensive cybersecurity operator&lt;/a&gt;, and one key quote really stood out:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I wish we spent as much time defensively as we do offensively. We have these thousands and thousands of people in coordinate teams trying to exploit stuff. But we don’t have any large teams that I know of for defending ourselves. In the real world, armies spend as much time defending as they do preparing for attacks. We are pretty one-sided in the battle right now.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>API Gateways: Implementation</title><link>/blog/api-gateways-implementation/</link><pubDate>Thu, 11 Jul 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/api-gateways-implementation/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;APIs go through a software lifecycle, just like any other application. The purchaser of the API develops, tests, and manages code as before, but when they publish new versions the API gateway comes into play. The gateway is what implements operational polices for APIs – serving as a proxy to enforce security, application throttling, event logging, and routing of API requests.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Continuous Security Monitoring: Classification</title><link>/blog/continuous-security-monitoring-classification/</link><pubDate>Thu, 11 Jul 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/continuous-security-monitoring-classification/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;As we discussed in &lt;a href="https://securosis.com/blog/continuous-security-monitoring-defining-csm"&gt;Defining CSM&lt;/a&gt;, identifying your critical assets and monitoring them continuously is a key success factor for your security program – at least if you are interested in figuring out what’s been compromised. But reality says you can’t watch everything all the time, even with these new security big data analytical thingies.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Living to fight another day…</title><link>/blog/living-to-fight-another-day-2/</link><pubDate>Thu, 11 Jul 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/living-to-fight-another-day-2/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Our man Dave Lewis has a great post on CSO Online, &lt;a href="http://blogs.csoonline.com/disaster-recovery/2703/when-disaster-comes-calling"&gt;When Disaster Comes Calling&lt;/a&gt;, about the importance of making sure your disaster recovery plan actually can help you when you have, uh, a disaster. Folks don’t always remember that sometimes success is living to fight another day.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>The Endpoint Security Buyer’s Guide [New Series]</title><link>/blog/the-endpoint-security-buyers-guide-new-series-2/</link><pubDate>Thu, 11 Jul 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/the-endpoint-security-buyers-guide-new-series-2/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Last year we documented our thoughts on buying &lt;a href="https://securosis.com/research/papers/the-endpoint-security-management-buyers-guide"&gt;Endpoint Security Management&lt;/a&gt; offerings, which basically include patch, configuration, device control, and file integrity monitoring – increasingly bundled in suites to simplify management. We planned to dig into the evolution of endpoint security suites earlier this year but the fates intervened and we got pulled into other research initiatives. Which is just as well because these endpoint security and management offerings have consolidated more quickly than we anticipated, so it makes sense to treat all these functions within a consistent model.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Tips on SQL Azure Security</title><link>/blog/tips-on-sql-azure-security/</link><pubDate>Thu, 11 Jul 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/tips-on-sql-azure-security/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://blog.binaryfactory.ca/2013/07/windows-azure-sql-database-security-management-limitations-and-workarounds/"&gt;@gepeto42 had a good post&lt;/a&gt;:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Windows Azure SQL Database, formely known as SQL Azure, is Microsoft’s managed database platform in Azure. While it is based on Microsoft SQL Server, it has various limitations that can impact how you secure and manage it. It also has some features that can help improve security.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Another Disclosure Debacle, with a Twist</title><link>/blog/another-disclosure-debacle-with-a-twist/</link><pubDate>Wed, 10 Jul 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/another-disclosure-debacle-with-a-twist/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://it.slashdot.org/story/13/07/10/1520245/vlc-and-secunia-fighting-over-vulnerability-reports"&gt;I picked this one up from Slashdot (yes, I still read it sometimes)&lt;/a&gt;:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Following a blog post by security company Secunia, VideoLAN (vendor of popular VLC media player) president Jean-Baptiste Kempf accuses Secunia of lying in a blog post titled ‘More lies from Secunia.’ It seems that Secunia and Jean-Baptiste Kempf have different views on whether a vulnerability has been patched.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Black Hat Preview: Automating Cloud Security Policy Compliance</title><link>/blog/black-hat-preview-automating-cloud-security-policy-compliance/</link><pubDate>Wed, 10 Jul 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/black-hat-preview-automating-cloud-security-policy-compliance/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Many people focus (&lt;a href="http://securosis.com/blog/multitenancy-is-the-least-interesting-security-property-of-cloud-computing"&gt;often wrongly&lt;/a&gt;) on the new risks of cloud computing, but I am far more interested in leveraging cloud computing to &lt;em&gt;improve security&lt;/em&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Incite 7/10/2013: Selfies</title><link>/blog/incite-7-10-2013-selfies/</link><pubDate>Wed, 10 Jul 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/incite-7-10-2013-selfies/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Before she left for camp XX1 asked me to download her iPhone photos to our computer, so she could free up some space. Evidently 16gb isn’t enough for these kids today. What would Ken Olson say about that? (Dog yummy for those catching the reference.) I happened to notice that a large portion of her pictures were these so-called selfies. Not in a creeper, micro-managing Dad way, but in a curious, so that’s what the kids are up to today way. A selfie is where you take a picture of yourself (and your friends) with your camera phone. Some were good, some were bad. But what struck me was the quantity. No wonder she needed to free up space – she had all these selfies on her phone.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Using Amazon IAM Roles to Distribute Security Credentials (for Chef)</title><link>/blog/using-amazon-iam-roles-to-distribute-security-credentials-for-chef/</link><pubDate>Wed, 10 Jul 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/using-amazon-iam-roles-to-distribute-security-credentials-for-chef/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;As I discussed in &lt;a href="http://securosis.com/blog/black-hat-preview-automating-cloud-security-policy-compliance"&gt;Black Hat Preview: Automating Cloud Security Policy Compliance&lt;/a&gt;, you can combine Amazon S3 and IAM roles to securely provision configuration files (or any other files) and credentials to Amazon EC2 or VPC instances. Here are the details.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Using cloud-init and s3cmd to Automatically Download Chef Credentials</title><link>/blog/using-cloud-init-and-s3cmd-to-automatically-download-chef-credentials/</link><pubDate>Wed, 10 Jul 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/using-cloud-init-and-s3cmd-to-automatically-download-chef-credentials/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://securosis.com/blog/using-amazon-iam-roles-to-distribute-security-credentials-for-chef"&gt;Our last post described how to use Amazon EC2, S3, and IAM as a framework to securely and automatically download security policies and credentials&lt;/a&gt;. That’s the infrastructure side of the problem, and this post will show what you need to do to the &lt;em&gt;instance&lt;/em&gt; to connect to this infrastructure, grab the credentials, install and configure Chef, and connect to the Chef server. The advantage of this structure is that you don’t need to embed credentials into your machine image, and you can use stock (generic) operating systems are on public clouds. In private clouds it is also useful because it reduces the number of machine images to maintain. These instructions can be modified to work in other cloud platforms, but your mileage &lt;em&gt;will&lt;/em&gt; vary. They also require an operating system that supports &lt;code&gt;cloud-init&lt;/code&gt; (Windows uses &lt;code&gt;ec2config&lt;/code&gt;, which I know very little about, but also appears to support user data scripts). I will walk through the details of &lt;em&gt;how&lt;/em&gt; this works, but you won’t use any of these steps manually. They are just explanation, to give you what you need to adapt this for other circumstances.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>How Not to Handle a Malware Outbreak</title><link>/blog/how-not-to-handle-a-malware-outbreak/</link><pubDate>Tue, 09 Jul 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/how-not-to-handle-a-malware-outbreak/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Malware is a pervasive problem in enterprises today. It can often be insidious as hell and difficult to ferret out. But sometimes the response to a malware outbreak defies basic common sense. The CIO for the Economic Development Administration (EDA) thought a scorched earth policy was the best approach…&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Kudos: Microsoft’s App Store Security Policy</title><link>/blog/kudos-microsofts-app-store-security-policy-2/</link><pubDate>Tue, 09 Jul 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/kudos-microsofts-app-store-security-policy-2/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.microsoft.com/security/msrc/app_management.aspx"&gt;Today on the Microsoft Security Response Center Blog:&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Under the policy, developers will have a maximum of 180 days to submit an updated app for security vulnerabilities that are not under active attack and are rated Critical or Important according to the Microsoft Security Response Center rating system. The updated app must be submitted to the store within 180 days of the first report that reproduces the issue. Microsoft reserves the right to take swift action in all cases, which may include immediate removal of the app from the store, and will exercise its discretion on a case-by-case basis.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Multitenancy is the Least Interesting Security Property of Cloud Computing</title><link>/blog/multitenancy-is-the-least-interesting-security-property-of-cloud-computing/</link><pubDate>Tue, 09 Jul 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/multitenancy-is-the-least-interesting-security-property-of-cloud-computing/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Today I was mildly snarky on the Security Metrics email list when a few people suggested that instead of talking about cloud computing we should talk about shared infrastructure. In their minds, ‘shared’ = ‘cloud’. I fully acknowledge that I may be misinterpreting their point, but this is a common thread I hear. Worse yet, very frequently when I discuss security risks, other security professionals key in on multitenancy as their biggest concern in cloud computing.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>RSA Acquires Aveksa</title><link>/blog/rsa-acquires-aveksa/</link><pubDate>Tue, 09 Jul 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/rsa-acquires-aveksa/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;EMC has announced the &lt;a href="http://www.emc.com/about/news/press/2013/20130708-01.htm"&gt;acquisition of Aveksa&lt;/a&gt;, one of the burgeoning players in the identity management space. Aveksa will be moved into the RSA security division, and no doubt merged with existing authentication products. &lt;a href="http://www.aveksa.com/blog/bid/302675/An-Ending-a-Beginning-and-the-Next-Phase-of-IAM"&gt;From the Aveksa blog:&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Continuous Security Monitoring: Defining CSM</title><link>/blog/continuous-security-monitoring-defining-csm/</link><pubDate>Mon, 08 Jul 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/continuous-security-monitoring-defining-csm/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;In our &lt;a href="https://securosis.com/blog/why.-continuous.-security.-monitoring-new-series"&gt;introduction to Continuous Security Monitoring&lt;/a&gt; we discussed the rapid advancement of attacks, and why that means you can never “get ahead of the threat”. That means you need to &lt;em&gt;react faster&lt;/em&gt; to what’s happening, which requires shortening the window of exposure by embracing extensive security monitoring. We tipped our hats to both PCI Council and the US government for requiring &lt;em&gt;monitoring&lt;/em&gt; as a key aspect of their mandates. The US government pushed it a step further by including &lt;em&gt;continuous&lt;/em&gt; in its definition of monitoring. We love the term ‘continuous’, but this one word has caused a lot of confusion in folks responsible for monitoring their environments.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Calendar Bites Google Security in the Ass</title><link>/blog/calendar-bites-google-security-in-the-ass/</link><pubDate>Fri, 05 Jul 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/calendar-bites-google-security-in-the-ass/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://peternbiddle.wordpress.com/2013/07/04/code-identity-and-the-android-master-key-bug/"&gt;Well, this is embarrassing:&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Blowing hash and signing functions so that the underlying code can be changed without the hash and sigs changing is horrifyingly atrocious. This is the code equivalent of impersonating a person with a mask so good nobody, not even the real person themselves, can tell the difference.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Proactive WebAppSec</title><link>/blog/proactive-webappsec/</link><pubDate>Fri, 05 Jul 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/proactive-webappsec/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Earlier this week rsnake blogged about the &lt;a href="https://blog.whitehatsec.com/top-10-proactive-web-application-security-measures/"&gt;Top 10 Proactive Web Application Security Measures&lt;/a&gt;. He has a very good set of recommendations, a highly recommended read for web application developers and webmasters alike:&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Database Denial of Service: Attacks</title><link>/blog/database-denial-of-service-the-attacks/</link><pubDate>Wed, 03 Jul 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/database-denial-of-service-the-attacks/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Today’s post will discuss database denial of service attacks so later we can consider how to stop them.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;From the security researcher’s perspective I cannot help but be impressed by the diversity of database DoS attacks. Many such attacks are pretty &lt;em&gt;dumb&lt;/em&gt; – they seem to be written by a person who does not understand SQL, writing horrible queries that are the opposite of efficient. Some exploits are so simple – yet clever – that we are amazed the targeted vulnerability was not found in quality assurance tests. But dumb or not, these attacks are effective. For example you could start a couple different searches on a website, choose a very broad list of values, and hit ‘search’. The backend relational system starts to look at every record in every table, chewing up memory and waiting for slow disk reads.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Incite 7/3/2013: Independence</title><link>/blog/incite-7-3-2013-independence/</link><pubDate>Wed, 03 Jul 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/incite-7-3-2013-independence/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;During the week of July 4th in the US we cannot help but think about independence. First of all, it’s a great excuse for a party and BBQ, right? To celebrate our escape from the tyranny of rulers from a far-off land, we eat and drink beer until we want to puke, and blow up fireworks made in other far-off lands. Being serious for a moment (but only a moment, we promise), independence means a lot of things to a lot of people, and now is a good time to revisit what it means to you, and make sure your choices reflect your beliefs.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>New Paper: Quick Wins with Website Protection Services</title><link>/blog/new-paper-quick-wins-with-website-protection-services/</link><pubDate>Wed, 03 Jul 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/new-paper-quick-wins-with-website-protection-services/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src="https://cdn.securosis.com/assets/library/main/QW-WPS-Cover_thumb.png" alt=""&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Simple website compromises can feel like crimes with no clear victims. Who cares if the Joey’s Bag of Donuts website gets popped? But that is not a defensible position any more. Attackers don’t just steal data from these websites – they also use them to host malware, command and control nodes, and proxies to defeat IP reputation systems.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Why. Continuous. Security. Monitoring? [New Series]</title><link>/blog/why-continuous-security-monitoring-new-series/</link><pubDate>Wed, 03 Jul 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/why-continuous-security-monitoring-new-series/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Remember the old marketing tagline, “Get Ahead of the Threat?” It seems pretty funny now, doesn’t it? Given the kinds of attacks we are facing and attackers’ increasing sophistication, we never see the threats coming and being even marginally reactive seems like a pipe dream. The bad news is that it will not get easier any time soon. Don’t shoot the messenger, but understand that is the reality of today’s information security landscape.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>OpenStack Security Guide Released</title><link>/blog/openstack-security-guide-released/</link><pubDate>Tue, 02 Jul 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/openstack-security-guide-released/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;An &lt;a href="http://justwriteclick.com/2013/07/01/book-sprint-for-openstack-security-guide/"&gt;OpenStack Security Guide epub&lt;/a&gt; was released this week, and among the contributors was our friend &lt;a href="http://twitter.com/andrewsmhay"&gt;Andrew Hay&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Trying to find this info before was like locating a piece of hay in a haystack (not an Andrew Hay – he would be considerably easier to find in a haystack). We use OpenStack for the Cloud Security Alliance training labs, and I had to figure out a lot of this myself through painful reading of barely-legible documentation.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>API Gateways: Key Management</title><link>/blog/api-gateways-key-management/</link><pubDate>Mon, 01 Jul 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/api-gateways-key-management/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;For developers one of the most visible API gateway operations is key management. But dear reader this is not your father’s key management – the kind laden with X.509, PKI, and baroque &lt;em&gt;foofaraw&lt;/em&gt; that security teams had to beg developers to implement. This is 2013 and the keys are &lt;em&gt;OAuth access keys&lt;/em&gt;! And developers are asking us for the keys too, so what should we do?&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>The Battle over Active Defense Continues</title><link>/blog/the-battle-over-active-defense-continues/</link><pubDate>Mon, 01 Jul 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/the-battle-over-active-defense-continues/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;One of our favorite friends, &lt;a href="http://blog.uncommonsensesecurity.com/2013/07/please-let-it-go.html"&gt;Jack Daniels, has a new post on Active Defense:&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;If you make the claim that “active defense” is only a euphemism for “hacking back”, you are either hyping an agenda, or selling a (probably outdated) security model. Or perhaps you’ve just been misled by the previously mentioned shysters. By my count that’s three flavors of wrong, although one may be slightly less bitter.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Want Privacy? Have Your Kids Browse for You</title><link>/blog/want-privacy-have-your-kids-browse-for-you/</link><pubDate>Mon, 01 Jul 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/want-privacy-have-your-kids-browse-for-you/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;The FTC &lt;a href="http://www.theverge.com/2013/7/1/4483198/ftc-puts-stricter-coppa-child-protection-rules-in-place"&gt;has issued new rules on data collection for minors:&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Now, the list of what counts as “personal information” has been expanded to include geolocation markers, IP addresses, pictures or audio of the child, and persistent cookies that can track users across sites. The rules also now apply to companies that make plug-ins or advertising networks, which often collect information but aren’t thought of as discrete sites that fall under the rules.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>The doctor is in the house (and knocking your site down)</title><link>/blog/the-dr-is-in-the-house-and-knocking-your-site-down/</link><pubDate>Sun, 30 Jun 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/the-dr-is-in-the-house-and-knocking-your-site-down/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Andy Ellis (yes, &lt;a href="http://www.twitter.com/csoandy"&gt;@csoandy&lt;/a&gt;) had a good educational post on &lt;a href="https://blogs.akamai.com/2013/06/dns-reflection-defense.html"&gt;DNS Reflection attacks&lt;/a&gt;. The DrDos (no, Digital Research DOS isn’t making a comeback – dating myself FTW) has proven an effective way for attackers to scale Denial of Service (DoS) attacks to over 100gbps. Andy explains how DNS Reflection works, why it’s hard to deal with, and what targets can do to defend themselves.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Black Hat Schedule</title><link>/blog/black-hat-schedule/</link><pubDate>Fri, 28 Jun 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/black-hat-schedule/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Our schedules are already filling up for Black Hat this year, so if you want to meet please drop us a line.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Friday Summary: June 28, 2013—“Summer’s here” edition</title><link>/blog/friday-summary-june-28-2013-summers-here-edition/</link><pubDate>Fri, 28 Jun 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/friday-summary-june-28-2013-summers-here-edition/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Normally by this time of year things slow down, people go on vacation, and we get to relax a bit, but not this year. At least not for me. It has been seven days a week here for a while, playing catch-up with all the freakin’ research projects going on. And I have wanted to comment on a ton of news items, but have not had the time. So this week’s summary consists of comments on a few headlines I have not had any other the chance to comment on. Here we go:&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Standards don't move fast enough</title><link>/blog/standards-dont-move-fast-enough/</link><pubDate>Fri, 28 Jun 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/standards-dont-move-fast-enough/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src="https://securosis.com/assets/library/Incite/too-little-too-late.jpg" alt=""&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Branden Williams is exactly right: &lt;a href="https://www.brandenwilliams.com/blog/2013/06/26/why-2013-is-a-pivotal-year-for-pci-dss/"&gt;2013 is a pivotal year for PCI DSS&lt;/a&gt;. A new version of the guidance will hit later this year.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Database Denial of Service [New Series]</title><link>/blog/database-denial-of-service-new-series/</link><pubDate>Thu, 27 Jun 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/database-denial-of-service-new-series/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;We have begun to see a shift in Denial of Service (DoS) tactics by attackers, moving up the stack from networks to servers and from servers to the application layer. Over the last 18 months we have also witnessed a new wave of vulnerabilities and isolated attacks against databases, all related to denial of service. We have seen recent issues with Oracle with &lt;a href="http://packetstormsecurity.com/files/121495/NGS00416.txt"&gt;invalid object pointers&lt;/a&gt;, a serious vulnerability in the &lt;a href="http://web.nvd.nist.gov/view/vuln/detail?vulnId=CVE-2013-1534"&gt;workload manager&lt;/a&gt;, the &lt;a href="http://www.checkpoint.com/defense/advisories/public/2013/cpai-30-dec6.html"&gt;TNS listener&lt;/a&gt; barfing on malformed packets, a &lt;a href="http://www.postgresql.org/support/security/faq/2013-04-04/"&gt;PostgreSQL issue with unrestricted networking access&lt;/a&gt; that was rumored to allow &lt;a href="http://arstechnica.com/security/2013/04/postgresql-database-fixes-persistent-denial-of-service-bug/"&gt;file corruption to crash the database&lt;/a&gt;, the IBM DB2 &lt;a href="http://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=swg21588098"&gt;XML feature&lt;/a&gt;, and &lt;a href="http://www.saintcorporation.com/cgi-bin/demo_tut.pl?tutorial_name=MySQL_vulnerabilities.html&amp;amp;fact_color=&amp;amp;tag="&gt;multiple vulnerabilities in MySQL&lt;/a&gt; including remote ability to &lt;a href="http://web.nvd.nist.gov/view/vuln/detail?vulnId=CVE-2012-2749"&gt;crash the database&lt;/a&gt;. A vulnerability does not mean that exploitation has occurred but we hear more off-the-record accounts of database attacks. We cannot quantify the risk or likelihood of attack, but this seems like a good time to describe these attacks briefly and offer some mitigation suggestions.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>API Gateways: Developer Tools</title><link>/blog/api-gateways-developer-tools/</link><pubDate>Wed, 26 Jun 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/api-gateways-developer-tools/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Our previous post discussed the first step in the development process: getting access to the API gateway through &lt;a href="https://securosis.com/blog/api-gateways-access-provisioning"&gt;access provisioning&lt;/a&gt;. Now that you have access it’s time to discuss how the gateway supports your code development and deployment processes. An API gateway must accomplish two primary functions: help developers build, test, and deploy applications; and help companies control use of their API. They are part development environment and part operational security tool.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Casting out SQLi</title><link>/blog/casting-out-sqli/</link><pubDate>Wed, 26 Jun 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/casting-out-sqli/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Ericka Chickowski posted &lt;a href="http://www.darkreading.com/database/new-tool-gives-developers-a-free-anti-sq/240157323?"&gt;an interview with the creators&lt;/a&gt; of the open source library &lt;a href="https://github.com/IronBox/AntiSQLi"&gt;AntiSQLi&lt;/a&gt; at Dark Reading. She is discussing a very interesting development tool, but the value proposition gets somewhat lost in the creators’ poor terminology.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Incite 6/26/2013: Camp Rules</title><link>/blog/incite-6-26-2013-camp-rules/</link><pubDate>Wed, 26 Jun 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/incite-6-26-2013-camp-rules/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;June is a special time for us. School is over and we take a couple weeks to chill before the kids head off to camp. Then we head up to the Delaware beach where the Boss and I met many moons ago, and then put the kids on the bus to sleepaway camp. This year they are all going for 6 1/2 weeks. Yes, it’s good to be our kids. We spend the rest of the summer living vicariously through the pictures we see on the camp’s website.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>iOS 7 Adds Major Data Security Improvements</title><link>/blog/ios-7-adds-major-data-security-improvements/</link><pubDate>Wed, 26 Jun 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/ios-7-adds-major-data-security-improvements/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.apple.com/ios/ios7/business/"&gt;Apple posted a page with some short details on the new business features of iOS 7.&lt;/a&gt; These security enhancements actually change the game for iOS security and BYOD:&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>The Black Hole of DLP</title><link>/blog/the-black-hole-of-dlp/</link><pubDate>Mon, 24 Jun 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/the-black-hole-of-dlp/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I was talking to yet &lt;em&gt;another&lt;/em&gt; contact today who reinforced that almost no one is sniffing SSL traffic when they deploy DLP.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Top 10 Stupid Sales/Press/Analyst Presentation Tricks</title><link>/blog/top-10-stupid-sales-press-analyst-presentation-tricks/</link><pubDate>Mon, 24 Jun 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/top-10-stupid-sales-press-analyst-presentation-tricks/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;If you see any of these in a vendor sales/analyst presentation, run fast.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;ol start="10"&gt;
&lt;li&gt;
&lt;p&gt;They open with, “this is under NDA” or “this is confidential” and you have never signed an NDA.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Automation Awesomeness and Your Friday Summary (June 21, 2013)</title><link>/blog/automation-awesomeness-and-your-friday-summary-june-21-2013/</link><pubDate>Fri, 21 Jun 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/automation-awesomeness-and-your-friday-summary-june-21-2013/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I am intensely lazy.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;If you read anything by &lt;a href="http://www.fourhourworkweek.com/blog/"&gt;Tim Ferris&lt;/a&gt; (the “4 Hour X” guy), you have heard him talk about Minimum Effective Dose. What is the least you can do to achieve your objective? In some ways that’s how I define my life.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Full Disk Encryption (FDE) Advice from a Reader</title><link>/blog/full-disk-encryption-fde-advice-from-a-reader/</link><pubDate>Thu, 20 Jun 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/full-disk-encryption-fde-advice-from-a-reader/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I am doing some work on FDE (if you are &lt;a href="http://nexus.securosis.com/"&gt;using the Securosis Nexus&lt;/a&gt;, I just added a small section on it), and during my research one of our readers sent in some great advice.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>How China Is Different</title><link>/blog/how-china-is-different/</link><pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/how-china-is-different/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://taosecurity.blogspot.com/2013/06/president-obama-is-right-on-us-china.html"&gt;Richard Bejtlich, on President Obama’s interview on Charlie Rose:&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This is an amazing development for someone aware of the history of this issue. President Obama is exactly right concerning the differences between espionage, practiced by all nations since the beginning of time, and massive industrial theft by China against the developed world, which the United States, at least, will not tolerate.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Microsoft Offers Six Figure Bounty for Bugs</title><link>/blog/microsoft-offers-six-figure-bounty-for-bugs/</link><pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/microsoft-offers-six-figure-bounty-for-bugs/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;From &lt;a href="http://blogs.technet.com/b/bluehat/archive/2013/06/19/heart-of-blue-gold-announcing-new-bounty-programs.aspx"&gt;the BlueHat blog&lt;/a&gt;, Microsoft’s security community outreach:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In short, we are offering cash payouts for the following programs:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;ul&gt;
&lt;li&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Mitigation Bypass Bounty – Microsoft will pay up to $100,000 USD for truly novel exploitation techniques against protections built into the latest version of our operating system (Windows 8.1 Preview). Learning about new exploitation techniques earlier helps Microsoft improve security by leaps, instead of one vulnerability at a time. This is an ongoing program and not tied to any event or contest.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Scamables</title><link>/blog/scamables/</link><pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/scamables/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;A post at PCI Guru got my attention this week, talking about a &lt;a href="http://pciguru.wordpress.com/2013/06/16/i-am-concerned-linkables/"&gt;type of rebate service called Linkables&lt;/a&gt;. They essentially provide coupon discounts without physical coupons: you get money off your purchases for promotional items &lt;em&gt;after&lt;/em&gt; you pay, rather than at the register. All you have to do is hand over your credit card. Really.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Security Analytics with Big Data: Deployment Issues</title><link>/blog/security-analytics-with-big-data-deployment-issues/</link><pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/security-analytics-with-big-data-deployment-issues/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;This is the last post in our Security Analytics with Big Data series. We will end with a discussion of deployment issues and concerns for any big data deployment, and focus on issues specific to leveraging SIEM. Please remember to post comments or ask questions and I will answer in the comments.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Talking Head Alert: Adrian on Key Management</title><link>/blog/talking-head-alert-adrian-on-key-management/</link><pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/talking-head-alert-adrian-on-key-management/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Tomorrow, June 20th, bright and early at 8:00am Pacific I will be talking about key management with the folks at Prime Factors. Actually, Prime Factors was kind enough to sponsor the educational webcast, but at this time I am flying solo on this one – no vendor presentation is on the agenda. I will look at key management a little differently that what we have presented in the past, more operationally than technically. Even if you know all about key management, dial in and let your boss think you’re getting continuing education while you space out. So grab a cup of coffee and listen in, and bring any questions you may have. You can &lt;a href="https://primefactorswebinars.webex.com/mw0307l/mywebex/default.do?nomenu=true&amp;amp;siteurl=primefactorswebinars&amp;amp;service=6&amp;amp;rnd=0.8443594973295211&amp;amp;main_url=https%3A%2F%2Fprimefactorswebinars.webex.com%2Fec0606l%2Feventcenter%2Fevent%2FeventAction.do%3FtheAction%3Ddetail%26confViewID%3D1003958727%26%26%26%26siteurl%3Dprimefactorswebinars"&gt;register here&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Network-based Malware Detection 2.0: Deployment Considerations</title><link>/blog/network-based-malware-detection-2-0-deployment-considerations/</link><pubDate>Mon, 17 Jun 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/network-based-malware-detection-2-0-deployment-considerations/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;As we wrap up Network-based Malware Detection 2.0, the areas of most rapid change have been &lt;a href="https://securosis.com/blog/network-based-malware-detection-2.0-scaling-nbmd"&gt;scalability&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href="https://securosis.com/blog/network-based-malware-detection-2.0-the-networks-place-in-the-malware-lifec"&gt;accuracy&lt;/a&gt;. That said, getting the greatest impact on your security posture from NBMD requires a number of critical decisions. You need to determine how the &lt;em&gt;cloud&lt;/em&gt; fits into your plans. Early NBMD devices evaluated malware within the device (on-box sandbox), but recent advances and new offerings have moved some or all the analysis to cloud compute farms. You also need to figure out whether to deploy the device inline, in order to block malware before it gets in. Blocking whatever you can may sound like an easy decision, but there are trade-offs to consider – as there always are.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Project Communications</title><link>/blog/project-communications/</link><pubDate>Mon, 17 Jun 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/project-communications/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;A note on project management: One client was quite disappointed with me for not showing progress as I went along and said “Fast iteration is better than delayed perfection,” while another client was mad at me because “you’re trickling again,” – showing progress but not a finished product (a\k\a delayed perfection)…&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>API Gateways: Access Provisioning</title><link>/blog/api-gateways-access-provisioning/</link><pubDate>Sun, 16 Jun 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/api-gateways-access-provisioning/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;What do we want? &lt;strong&gt;API Access!&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;When do we want it? &lt;strong&gt;Now!&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I’s time to change your entire mindset. We’re talking about API security, but not for traditional APIs. API gateways are a response to the “open API” movement, and create a very different development environment.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Friday Summary: June 14, 2013</title><link>/blog/friday-summary-june-14-2013/</link><pubDate>Fri, 14 Jun 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/friday-summary-june-14-2013/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Are you aware of a theft of big data? I will ask in a slightly different way: Do you know of any instance where a commercial big data cluster was exposed to an attacker who mined the cluster for fun or profit? Hackers are unlikely to copy a big data set – why bother &lt;em&gt;moving&lt;/em&gt; terabytes when they can use your cluster to store and process &lt;em&gt;your&lt;/em&gt; data. I am unaware of any occurrences, public or private. And no, &lt;a href="http://www.scmagazine.com/lexisnexis-admits-to-another-major-data-breach/article/136140/"&gt;LexisNexis&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href="http://www.scmagazine.com/choicepoint-settles-with-44-states-over-2005-breach/article/35070/"&gt;ChoicePoint&lt;/a&gt;, where the attackers had valid user credentials, don’t count. Please comment if you know of an example.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Risk Management: Proto-Science</title><link>/blog/risk-management-proto-science/</link><pubDate>Thu, 13 Jun 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/risk-management-proto-science/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Alex Hutton has been on the leading edge of IT security risk management as long as I have known him. He has a new blog, and if you don’t think we can ever quantify risk, you need to read this post &lt;a href="http://riskshokunin.com/post/52709790665/the-next-age-of-risk-management-science"&gt;The next age of risk management, science, &amp;amp; craftsmanship&lt;/a&gt;:&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>We are all guilty of something</title><link>/blog/we-are-all-guilty-of-something/</link><pubDate>Thu, 13 Jun 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/we-are-all-guilty-of-something/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.wired.com/opinion/2013/06/why-i-have-nothing-to-hide-is-the-wrong-way-to-think-about-surveillance/"&gt;Moxie Marlinspike has a must-read editorial over at Wired:&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;For instance, did you know that it is a federal crime to be in possession of a lobster under a certain size? It doesn’t matter if you bought it at a grocery store, if someone else gave it to you, if it’s dead or alive, if you found it after it died of natural causes, or even if you killed it while acting in self defense. You can go to jail because of a lobster.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Incite 6/12/2013: The Wall of Worry</title><link>/blog/incite-6-12-2013-the-wall-of-worry/</link><pubDate>Wed, 12 Jun 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/incite-6-12-2013-the-wall-of-worry/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Anxiety is something we all deal with on a daily basis. It is a feature of the human operating system. Maybe it’s that mounting pile of bills, or an upcoming doctor’s appointment, or a visit from your in-laws, or a big deadline at work. It could be anything but the anxiety triggers our fight or flight mechanisms, causes stress, and takes a severe toll over time on our health and well being. Culturally I come from a long line of worriers. Neuroses are just something we get used to, because everyone I know has them (including me) – some are just more vocal about it than others.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Talking Head Alert: Mike on Phishing Webcast</title><link>/blog/talking-head-alert-mike-on-phishing-webcast/</link><pubDate>Wed, 12 Jun 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/talking-head-alert-mike-on-phishing-webcast/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;If you have nothing better to do tomorrow at 2 pm EDT, and want to learn a bit about what’s new in phishing (there is a lot of it, but that’s not new) and how to use email-based threat intelligence to deal with it, join me and the folks from Malcovery Security on a webcast tomorrow. I will be covering the content in the &lt;a href="https://securosis.com/research/papers/email-based-threat-intelligence-to-catch-a-phish"&gt;Email-based Threat Intelligence paper&lt;/a&gt;, and the folks from Malcovery will be sharing a bunch of their research into phishing trends. It should be an interesting event, so don’t miss it…&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>DDoS: It’s FUD-eriffic!</title><link>/blog/fud-can-be-your-friend-when-trying-to-get-security-projects-funded-but-it-needs-to-be-wisely-used-and-you-only-have-one-bullet-in-the-proverbial-chamber-the-folks-at-prolexic-just-rolled-out-a-new-w/</link><pubDate>Tue, 11 Jun 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/fud-can-be-your-friend-when-trying-to-get-security-projects-funded-but-it-needs-to-be-wisely-used-and-you-only-have-one-bullet-in-the-proverbial-chamber-the-folks-at-prolexic-just-rolled-out-a-new-w/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://securosis.com/blog/categorizing-fud"&gt;FUD can be your friend&lt;/a&gt; when trying to get security projects funded. But it needs to be wisely used and you only have one bullet in the proverbial chamber. The folks at Prolexic just rolled out a &lt;a href="http://www.prolexic.com/knowledge-center-white-paper-the-broad-impact-of-ddos-attacks.html"&gt;new white paper on using FUD to make the case internally about DDoS&lt;/a&gt;. The paper requires registration, so I didn’t. I know all about the FUD involved in DDoS – I don’t need these guys &lt;em&gt;educating&lt;/em&gt; me about that.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Network-based Malware Detection 2.0: The Network’s Place in the Malware Lifecycle</title><link>/blog/network-based-malware-detection-2-0-the-networks-place-in-the-malware-lifecycle/</link><pubDate>Tue, 11 Jun 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/network-based-malware-detection-2-0-the-networks-place-in-the-malware-lifecycle/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;As we resume our Network-based Malware Detection (NBMD) 2.0 series, we need to dig into the malware detection/analysis lifecycle to provide some context on where network-based malware analysis fits in, and what an NBMD device needs to integrate with to protect against advanced threats. We have already exhaustively researched the malware analysis process. The process diagram below was built as part of &lt;a href="https://securosis.com/research/papers/malware-analysis-quant-report"&gt;Malware Analysis Quant&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Security Analytics with Big Data: Integration</title><link>/blog/security-analytics-with-big-data-integration/</link><pubDate>Tue, 11 Jun 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/security-analytics-with-big-data-integration/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Some of our first customer conversations about big data and SIEM centered on how to integrate the two platforms. Several customers wanted to know how they could pull data from different existing log management and analytics systems into a big data platform. Most were told by their vendors that big data was; and they wanted to know what that integration would look like and how it would affect operations. Likely you won’t be doing the integration, but you will need to live with the design choices of your vendor. The benefit depends on their implementation choices.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>The Securosis Nexus Beta 2 Begins!</title><link>/blog/the-securosis-nexus-beta-2-begins/</link><pubDate>Tue, 11 Jun 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/the-securosis-nexus-beta-2-begins/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;We realize it has been a while, but we are insanely excited to open up the next phase of the Securosis Nexus beta test. This is an open beta but we reserve the right to kick out anyone who annoys us.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Groupthink Kills Your Security Layers</title><link>/blog/groupthink-kills-your-security-layers/</link><pubDate>Mon, 10 Jun 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/groupthink-kills-your-security-layers/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src="bird-group.jpg" alt=""&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;As I continue working through my reading backlog I find interesting stuff that bears comment. When the folks over at &lt;a href="https://nsslabs.com/news/press-releases/are-security-professionals-overconfident-%E2%80%9Cdefense-depth%E2%80%9D"&gt;NSS Labs attempted to poke holes in the concept of security layers&lt;/a&gt; I got curious. Only 3% of over 606 combinations of firewall, IPS, and Endpoint Protection (EPP) actually successfully blocked their full suite of attacks?&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Quick thoughts on the iOS and OS X security updates</title><link>/blog/quick-thoughts-on-the-ios-and-os-x-security-updates/</link><pubDate>Mon, 10 Jun 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/quick-thoughts-on-the-ios-and-os-x-security-updates/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I am in the airport lounge after attending the WWDC keynote, and here are some quick thoughts on what we saw today:&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>A truism of security information sharing</title><link>/blog/a-truism-of-security-information-sharing/</link><pubDate>Sun, 09 Jun 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/a-truism-of-security-information-sharing/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;From &lt;a href="http://threatpost.com/share-and-share-alike-not-quite/"&gt;Share and share alike? Not Quite, by Mike Mimoso at Threatpost&lt;/a&gt;:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;“With retail, the challenge is that most of the companies we share with are direct competitors,” Phillips said. “From a security perspective, you have to get over that and share because we’re all facing the same challenges. There’s no way any of us will win the war on our own.”&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Getting to Know Your Adversary</title><link>/blog/getting-to-know-your-adversary/</link><pubDate>Fri, 07 Jun 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/getting-to-know-your-adversary/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src="mug-shot.jpg" alt=""&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;After a week of travel I am finally working through my reading list, and got around to RSnake’s awesome “Talk with a Black Hat” series. Check out &lt;a href="http://blog.whitehatsec.com/interview-with-a-blackhat-part-1/"&gt;Part 1&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://blog.whitehatsec.com/interview-with-a-blackhat-part-2/"&gt;Part 2&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href="http://blog.whitehatsec.com/interview-with-a-blackhat-part-3/"&gt;Part 3&lt;/a&gt;. He takes us behind the curtain – but instead of discussing impact, which your fraud and loss group can tell you – he documents tactics being used against us all the time.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>API Gateways: Security Enabling Innovation [New Series]</title><link>/blog/api-gateways-security-enabling-innovation-new-series/</link><pubDate>Thu, 06 Jun 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/api-gateways-security-enabling-innovation-new-series/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;So why are we talking about this? Because APIs are becoming the &lt;em&gt;de facto&lt;/em&gt; service interface – not only for cloud and mobile, but for just about every type of service. The need for security around these APIs is growing, which is why we have seen a rush of acquisitions to fill security product gaps. In what felt like a couple weeks Axway acquired Vordel, CA acquired Layer7, and &lt;a href="https://securosis.com/blog/intel-buys-mashery-or-why-you-need-to-pay-attention-to-api-security"&gt;Intel acquired Mashery&lt;/a&gt;. The acquirers all stated these steps were to accommodate security requirements stemming from steady adoption of APIs and associated web services. Our goal for this paper is to help you understand the challenges of securing APIs and to evaluate technology alternatives so you can make informed decisions about current trends in the market. We will start our discussion by mentioning what’s at stake, which should show why certain features are necessary.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Friday Summary: June 7, 2013</title><link>/blog/friday-summary-june-7-2013/</link><pubDate>Thu, 06 Jun 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/friday-summary-june-7-2013/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I haven’t been writing much over the past few weeks because I took a few weeks with the family back in Boulder. The plan was to work in the mornings, do fun mountain stuff in the afternoons with the kids, and catch up with friends in the evenings. But the trip ended up turning into a bit of medical tourism when a couple bugs nailed us on day one. For the record, I can officially state that microbrews do not seem to cure viruses. But the research continues…&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Security Analytics with Big Data: New Events and New Approaches</title><link>/blog/security-analytics-with-big-data-new-events-and-new-approaches/</link><pubDate>Thu, 06 Jun 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/security-analytics-with-big-data-new-events-and-new-approaches/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;So why are we looking at big data, and what problems can we expect it to solve that we couldn’t before? Most SIEM platforms struggle to keep up with emerging needs for two reasons. The first is that threat data does not come neatly packaged from traditional sources, such as syslog and netflow events. There are many different types of data, data feeds, documents, and communications protocols that contain diverse clues to a data breaches or ongoing attacks. We see clear demand to analyze a broader data set in order hopes of detecting advanced attacks. The second issue is that many types of analysis, correlation, and enrichment are computationally demanding. Much like traditional multi-dimensional data analysis platforms, crunching the data takes horsepower. More data is being generated; add more types of data we want, and multiply that by additional analysess – and you get a giant gap between what you need to do and what you can presently do.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Apple Expands Gatekeeper</title><link>/blog/apple-expands-gatekeeper/</link><pubDate>Wed, 05 Jun 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/apple-expands-gatekeeper/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.infoworld.com/d/security/apple-fixes-irritating-mountain-lion-bugs-firms-java-defenses-220081"&gt;I missed this when the update went out last night, but Gregg Keizer at Infoworld caught it&lt;/a&gt;:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;“Starting with OS X 10.8.4, Java Web Start applications downloaded from the Internet need to be signed with a Developer ID certificate,” Apple said. “Gatekeeper will check downloaded Java Web Start applications for a signature and block such applications from launching if they are not properly signed.”&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Incite 6/5/2013: Working in the House</title><link>/blog/incite-6-5-2013-working-in-the-house/</link><pubDate>Wed, 05 Jun 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/incite-6-5-2013-working-in-the-house/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Once, years ago, I made the mistake of saying the Boss didn’t work. I got that statement shoved deep into my gullet because she works harder than I do. She just works &lt;em&gt;in the house&lt;/em&gt;. My job is relatively easy – I can work from anywhere, with clients I enjoy, doing stuff that enjoy doing. Often it doesn’t feel like work at all.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Matters Requiring Attention: 100 million or so</title><link>/blog/matters-requiring-attention-100-million-or-so/</link><pubDate>Wed, 05 Jun 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/matters-requiring-attention-100-million-or-so/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Brian Krebs posted a detailed investigative piece on the &lt;a href="http://krebsonsecurity.com/2013/06/fdic-2011-fis-breach-worse-than-reported/"&gt;2011 breach of Fidelity National Information Services&lt;/a&gt; (FIS) and subsequent ATM thefts. I warn you that it’s long but worth the read. At least if your prescription for anti-depressants is current. Each paragraph seems to include some jaw-dropping fact about FAIL. A couple choice quotes from the article:&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Mobile Security Breaches</title><link>/blog/mobile-security-breaches/</link><pubDate>Wed, 05 Jun 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/mobile-security-breaches/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;From &lt;a href="http://www.net-security.org/secworld.php?id=15006"&gt;an article based on ‘work’ by Check Point&lt;/a&gt;:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;79% of businesses had a mobile security incident in the past year, in many cases incurring substantial costs, according to Check Point. The report found mobile security incidents cost over $100,000 for 42% of respondents, including 16% who put the cost at more than $500,000.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>A CISO needs to be a business person? No kidding…</title><link>/blog/a-ciso-needs-to-be-a-business-person-no-kidding/</link><pubDate>Tue, 04 Jun 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/a-ciso-needs-to-be-a-business-person-no-kidding/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;It amazes to me that articles like &lt;a href="http://www.cio.com/article/734273/CISOs_Must_Engage_the_Board_About_Information_Security"&gt;CISOs Must Engage the Board About Information Security&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href="http://blogs.forrester.com/andrew_rose/13-06-03-the_demise_of_the_playermanager_ciso"&gt;The Demise of the Player/Manager CISO&lt;/a&gt; even need to be written.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>New Google disclosure policy is quite good</title><link>/blog/new-google-disclosure-policy-is-quite-good/</link><pubDate>Tue, 04 Jun 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/new-google-disclosure-policy-is-quite-good/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://googleonlinesecurity.blogspot.com/2013/05/disclosure-timeline-for-vulnerabilities.html"&gt;Google has stated they will now disclose vulnerability details in 7 days under certain circumstances&lt;/a&gt;:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Based on our experience, however, we believe that more urgent action – within 7 days – is appropriate for critical vulnerabilities under active exploitation. The reason for this special designation is that each day an actively exploited vulnerability remains undisclosed to the public and unpatched, more computers will be compromised.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Oracle adopts Trustworthy Computing practices for Java</title><link>/blog/oracle-adopts-trustworthy-computing-practices-for-java/</link><pubDate>Tue, 04 Jun 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/oracle-adopts-trustworthy-computing-practices-for-java/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Okay, I had to troll a bit with that title.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;From &lt;a href="http://www.scmagazine.com/oracle-lays-out-java-security-facelift/article/296160/"&gt;a piece in SC Magazine&lt;/a&gt;:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Oracle formally has announced improvements in Java that are expected to harden a software line with a checkered security past.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>LinkedIn Rides the Two-Factor Train</title><link>/blog/linkedin-rides-the-two-factor-train/</link><pubDate>Mon, 03 Jun 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/linkedin-rides-the-two-factor-train/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Just last week we mentioned the addition of two-factor authentication at Evernote; then LinkedIn snuck a blog post on Friday, May 31st, telling the world about their new SMS authentication. We are glad to see these popular services upgrading their authentication from password-only to password and SMS. It’s not hacker-proof – there are ways to defeat two-factor – but this is much better than password-only.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Security Analytics with Big Data: Defining Big Data</title><link>/blog/security-analytics-with-big-data-defining-big-data/</link><pubDate>Mon, 03 Jun 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/security-analytics-with-big-data-defining-big-data/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Today we pick up our Security Analytics with Big Data series where we left off. But first it’s worth reiterating that this series was originally intended to describe how big data made security analytics better. But when we started to interview customers it became clear that they are just as concerned with how big data can make their &lt;em&gt;existing&lt;/em&gt; infrastructure better. They want to know how big data can augment SIEM and the impact of this transition on their organization. It has taken some time to complete our interviews with end users and vendors to determine current needs and capabilities. And the market is moving fast – vendors are pushing to incorporate big data into their platforms and leverage the new capabilities. I think we have a good handle on the state of the market, but as always we welcome comments and input.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Security Surrender</title><link>/blog/security-surrender/</link><pubDate>Mon, 03 Jun 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/security-surrender/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src="white-flag-surrender.jpg" alt=""&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Last week there was a #secchat on security burnout. Again. Yeah, it’s a bit like groundhog day – we keep having the same conversation over and over again. Nothing changes. And not much &lt;em&gt;will&lt;/em&gt; change. Security is not going to become the belle of the ball. That is not our job. It’s not our lot in life.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Finally! Lack of Security = Loss of Business</title><link>/blog/finally-lack-of-security-loss-of-business/</link><pubDate>Sun, 02 Jun 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/finally-lack-of-security-loss-of-business/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;For years security folks have been frustrated when trying to show real revenue impact for security. We used the TJX branding issue for years, but it didn’t really impact their stock or business much at all. Heartland Payment Systems is probably stronger now because of their breach. You can check out all the breach databases, and it’s hard to see how security has &lt;em&gt;really&lt;/em&gt; impacted businesses. Is it a pain in the butt? Absolutely. Does cleanup cost money? That’s clear.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Friday Summary: May 31, 2013</title><link>/blog/friday-summary-may-31-2013-2/</link><pubDate>Fri, 31 May 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/friday-summary-may-31-2013-2/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;It is starting to feel like summer. Both because the weather is getting warmer and because most of the Securosis team has been taking family time this week. I will keep the summary short – we have not been doing much writing and research this week.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Network-based Malware Detection 2.0: Scaling NBMD</title><link>/blog/network-based-malware-detection-2-0-scaling-nbmd/</link><pubDate>Fri, 31 May 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/network-based-malware-detection-2-0-scaling-nbmd/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;It is time to return to our Network-based Malware Detection (NBMD) 2.0 series. We have already covered how the attack space has changed over the past 18 months and how you can detect malware on the network. Let’s turn our attention to another challenge for this quickly evolving technology: scalability.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Evernote Business Edition Doubles up on Authentication</title><link>/blog/evernote-business-edition-doubles-up-on-authentication/</link><pubDate>Thu, 30 May 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/evernote-business-edition-doubles-up-on-authentication/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Joining the strong(er) authentication craze (which we enthusiastically support), along with recent entrants Twitter and &lt;a href="http://aws.amazon.com/mfa/faqs/#Is_there_a_fee_associated_with_using_AWS_MFA"&gt;Amazon Web Services&lt;/a&gt;, Evernote is &lt;a href="http://blog.evernote.com/blog/2013/05/30/evernotes-three-new-security-features/"&gt;now including two-factor authentication and access logging&lt;/a&gt; for its business edition. Two steps in the right direction for security.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Quick Wins with Website Protection Services: Deployment and Ongoing Management</title><link>/blog/quick-wins-with-website-protection-services-deployment-and-ongoing-management/</link><pubDate>Tue, 28 May 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/quick-wins-with-website-protection-services-deployment-and-ongoing-management/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;For this series focused on Quick Wins with Website Protection Services, the key is getting your sites protected quickly without breaking too much application functionality. Your public website is highly visible to both customers and staff. Most such public sites capture private information, so site integrity is important. Lastly, your organization spends a ton of money geting the latest and greatest functionality on the site, so they don’t take kindly to being told their shiny objects aren’t supported by security. All this adds up to a tightrope act to protect the website while maintaining performance, availability, and functionality. Navigating these tradeoffs is what makes security a tough job.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Friday Summary: May 24, 2013</title><link>/blog/friday-summary-may-24-2013/</link><pubDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/friday-summary-may-24-2013/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;This month Google announced a new five year plan for identity management, and update from 2008’s five year plan. Their look backward is as interesting as the revised roadmap. Google recognized their 2-factor auth was more like one-time 2-factor, and that the model has been largely abused in practice. They also concluded that risk-based authentication has worked. A risk-based approach means more sensitive or unusual operations, such as credential changes and connections from unusual locations, ratchet up security by activating additional authentication hurdles. This has been a recent trend, and Google’s success will convince other organizations to get on board.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Making Browsers Hard Targets</title><link>/blog/making-browsers-hard-targets/</link><pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/making-browsers-hard-targets/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src="view-target.jpg" alt=""&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Check out &lt;a href="http://www.stachliu.com/2013/05/securing-your-mac-a-guide-to-hardening-your-browser/"&gt;this great secure browser&lt;/a&gt; guide from the folks at Stach and Liu. The blog post is OK, but the PDF guide is comprehensive and awesome. Here is the intro:&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Quick Wins with Website Protection Services: Protecting the Website</title><link>/blog/quick-wins-with-website-protection-services-protecting-the-website/</link><pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/quick-wins-with-website-protection-services-protecting-the-website/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;In the &lt;a href="https://securosis.com/blog/QW-WPS-are-websites-still-the-path-of-least-resistance"&gt;introductory post&lt;/a&gt; in the Quick Wins with Website Protection Services series, we described the key attack vectors that usually result in pwnage of your site and possibly data theft, or an availability issue with your site falling down and not being able to get back up. Since this series is all about Quick Wins, we aren’t going to belabor the build-up, rather let’s jump right in and talk about how to address these issues.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Incite 5/22/2013: Picking Your Friends</title><link>/blog/incite-5-22-2013-picking-your-friends/</link><pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/incite-5-22-2013-picking-your-friends/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;This time of year neighborhoods are overrun with “Graduation 2013” signs. The banners hang at the entrance of every subdivision congratulating this year’s high school graduates. It’s a major milestone and they should celebrate. Three kids on our street are graduating, and two are youngests. So we will have a few empty nests on our street.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Network-based Malware Detection 2.0: Evolving NBMD</title><link>/blog/network-based-malware-detection-2-0-evolving-nbmd/</link><pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/network-based-malware-detection-2-0-evolving-nbmd/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;In the first post updating our research on Network-based Malware Detection, we talked about how attackers have evolved their tactics, even over the last 18 months, to defeat emerging controls like sandboxing and command &amp;amp; control (C&amp;amp;C;) network analysis. As attackers get more sophisticated defenses need to as well. So we are focusing this series on tracking the evolution of malware detection capabilities and addressing issues with early NBMD offerings – including scaling, accuracy, and deployment. But first we need to revisit how the technology works. For more detail on the technology you can always refer back to the original Network-based Malware Detection paper.&lt;br&gt;
Looking for Bad Behavior&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Solera puts on a Blue Coat</title><link>/blog/solera-puts-on-a-blue-coat/</link><pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/solera-puts-on-a-blue-coat/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Even after being in this business 20 years I still get surprised from time to time. When I saw this morning that &lt;a href="http://www.bluecoat.com/company/press-releases/blue-coat-acquire-solera-networks"&gt;Blue Coat is acquiring Solera Networks&lt;/a&gt; I was surprised, and not with a childlike sense of wonder. It was a WTF? type surprise.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>(Scape)goats travel under the bus</title><link>/blog/scapegoats-travel-under-the-bus-2/</link><pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/scapegoats-travel-under-the-bus-2/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;It’s funny how certain data points get manipulated to bolster the corporate message. At least how the trade press portrays they anyway. If you read &lt;a href="http://www.infosecurity-magazine.com/view/32453/ciso-chief-infosec-scapegoat-officer/"&gt;infosecurity-magazine.com’s coverage of Veracode’s State of Software Security report&lt;/a&gt;, you will see the subhead that the CISO is really the &lt;em&gt;Chief Information Scapegoat Officer&lt;/em&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Wendy Nather abandons the CISSP—good riddance</title><link>/blog/wendy-nather-abandons-the-cissp-good-riddance/</link><pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/wendy-nather-abandons-the-cissp-good-riddance/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Mood music: &lt;a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3tTtFdQe6iE"&gt;Abandono by Amalia Rodrigues…&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Wendy&lt;a href="http://idoneous-security.blogspot.com/2013/05/going-paperless.html"&gt; blogged about not renewing her CISSP&lt;/a&gt;. I never had one myself, but as Wendy said it is much less important if you’re not going through the cattle call HR process, which is majorly &lt;em&gt;gebrochen&lt;/em&gt; in infosec… but that’s another post.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Quick Wins with Website Protection Services: Are Websites Still the Path of Least Resistance?</title><link>/blog/quick-wins-with-website-protection-services-are-websites-still-the-path-of-least-resistance/</link><pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/quick-wins-with-website-protection-services-are-websites-still-the-path-of-least-resistance/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;In the sad but true files, the industry has become focused on advanced malware, state-sponsored attackers, and 0-day attacks, to the exclusion of everything else. Any stroll around a trade show floor makes that obvious. Which is curious because these ‘advanced’ attackers are not a factor for the large majority of companies. It also masks the fact that many compromises start with attacks against poorly-coded brittle web sites.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Spying on the Spies</title><link>/blog/spying-on-the-spies/</link><pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/spying-on-the-spies/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;The Washington Post says &lt;a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/chinese-hackers-who-breached-google-gained-access-to-sensitive-data-us-officials-say/2013/05/20/51330428-be34-11e2-89c9-3be8095fe767_story.html"&gt;US Officials claimed Chinese hackers breached Google to determine who the US wanted Google to spy on&lt;/a&gt;. In essence the 2010 Aurora attack was a counter-counter-espionage effort to determine who the US government was monitoring. From the Post’s post:&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Websense Going Private</title><link>/blog/websense-going-private/</link><pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/websense-going-private/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Websense announced today that they are &lt;a href="http://community.websense.com/blogs/websense-news-releases/archive/2013/05/20/websense-signs-definitive-agreement-to-be-acquired-by-vista-equity-partners.aspx"&gt;being acquired by Vista Equity Partners and will be going private&lt;/a&gt; when the transaction closes. From the press release:&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Awareness training extends to the top</title><link>/blog/awareness-training-extends-to-the-top/</link><pubDate>Sun, 19 May 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/awareness-training-extends-to-the-top/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src="board-meeting-1.jpg" alt=""&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://www.boardmember.com/Becoming-a-Victim-cyber-attacks.aspx"&gt;Trustwave’s Nicolas Percoco wrote an interesting article at boardmember.com&lt;/a&gt; describing a targeted attack at a senior executive. Who’dathunk sites catering to board members (and other mahogany row folks) would publish stuff from security folks. Oh, how the times have changed, eh?&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>This botnet is no Pushdo-ver</title><link>/blog/this-botnet-is-no-pushdo-ver/</link><pubDate>Fri, 17 May 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/this-botnet-is-no-pushdo-ver/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;In our recent little ditty on &lt;a href="https://securosis.com/research/papers/network-based-threat-intelligence-searching-for-the-smoking-gun"&gt;Network-based Threat Intelligence&lt;/a&gt;, we mentioned how resilience has become a major focus for command and control networks. The &lt;a href="https://threatpost.com/pushdo-malware-resurfaces-with-dga-capabilities/"&gt;Pushdo botnet’s recent rise from the ashes (for the fourth time!)&lt;/a&gt; illustrates this perfectly.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>A Friday Summary from Boulder: May 17, 2013</title><link>/blog/a-friday-summary-from-boulder-may-17-2013/</link><pubDate>Thu, 16 May 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/a-friday-summary-from-boulder-may-17-2013/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;They say you can’t go home.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;What a load of garbage.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;You can totally go home (unless you’re from Fukushima or Chernobyl). In fact I am writing this week’s Summary in Boulder, Colorado – on a three-week trip to catch up with old friends, play hipster in coffee shops, and change my attitude with a little altitude. Better yet, I am writing this sitting in the Boulder Library while my kids enjoy musical story time.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Network-based Malware Detection 2.0: Advanced Attackers Take No Prisoners</title><link>/blog/network-based-malware-detection-2-0-advanced-attackers-take-no-prisoners/</link><pubDate>Thu, 16 May 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/network-based-malware-detection-2-0-advanced-attackers-take-no-prisoners/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;It was simpler back then. You know, back in the olden days of 2003. Viruses were predictable, your AV vendor could provide virus signatures to catch malware, and severe outbreaks like Melissa and SQL*Slammer depended on brittle operating systems and poor patching practices. Those days are long gone, under an onslaught of innovative attacks which leverage professional software development tactics and take advantage of the path of least resistance – generally your employees.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>The Perimeter Won’t Be Rebuilt Overnight</title><link>/blog/the-perimeter-wont-be-rebuilt-overnight/</link><pubDate>Thu, 16 May 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/the-perimeter-wont-be-rebuilt-overnight/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src="forklift-safety.jpg" alt=""&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;It’s easy to believe the hype. You know, that NGFW (Next Generation Firewall) devices will take over the perimeter tomorrow. Get on the bandwagon now before it’s too late. And the anecdotal evidence leads in this direction as well. You see lines around the corners at trade shows to glimpse an NGFW Godbox, and local seminars are standing room only to hear all about application-aware policies which can help you control those pesky users who want to Facebook all day in the office.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Boundaries won’t help GRC</title><link>/blog/boundaries-wont-help-grc/</link><pubDate>Wed, 15 May 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/boundaries-wont-help-grc/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Amen to our buddy Paul Proctor, who starts a post, &lt;a href="http://blogs.gartner.com/paul-proctor/2013/05/13/why-i-hate-the-term-grc/"&gt;Why I hate the term GRC&lt;/a&gt;, with &lt;em&gt;“GRC is the most worthless term in the vendor lexicon.”&lt;/em&gt; I couldn’t agree more. 10 years later I &lt;em&gt;still&lt;/em&gt; don’t know what it means. Besides everything, as Paul explains:&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Incite 5/15/2013: Fraud Hits Close to Home</title><link>/blog/incite-5-15-2013-fraud-hits-close-to-home/</link><pubDate>Wed, 15 May 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/incite-5-15-2013-fraud-hits-close-to-home/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;We are in the school year endgame right now. The kids will be done for the year in 10 days, and then summer &lt;em&gt;officially&lt;/em&gt; begins. It is a frantic time in our house – the kids head off for camp in mid-June and we take family vacations before then. There is a lot of stuff to buy, a lot of packing to do, and a lot of quality time to squeeze in before The Boss and I become empty nesters for 7 weeks. One of those tasks is haircuts. It turns out the Boy has my hair. And that means he needs to get it cut. Frequently. I’m not complaining but it requires some planning.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>The Onion hack brings tears to my eyes</title><link>/blog/the-onion-hack-brings-tears-to-my-eyes/</link><pubDate>Tue, 14 May 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/the-onion-hack-brings-tears-to-my-eyes/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;OK, not really. But as Rich pointed out in last week’s Incite (&lt;a href="https://securosis.com/blog/incite-5-8-2013-one-step-at-a-time"&gt;Truth is stranger than satire&lt;/a&gt;), &lt;em&gt;The Onion&lt;/em&gt; getting hacked, and then the hackers posting stuff that seemed very &lt;em&gt;Onion&lt;/em&gt; -like, was one step short of &lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Proton_pack"&gt;crossing the streams&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>$45M Heist Used a 5 Year Old (at least) Technique</title><link>/blog/45m-heist-used-a-5-year-old-at-least-technique/</link><pubDate>Fri, 10 May 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/45m-heist-used-a-5-year-old-at-least-technique/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Big news, big money – &lt;a href="http://www.wired.com/threatlevel/2013/05/bank-cashing-suspect-killed/"&gt;hackers stole $45M in a flash attack&lt;/a&gt;. They hacked into the bank system, focused on debit and pre-paid cards that lack the usual credit card anti-fraud detection, then made massive rapid withdrawals using mules scattered around the world.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Bloomberg Pulls a News Corp on Goldman</title><link>/blog/bloomberg-pulls-a-news-corp-on-goldman/</link><pubDate>Fri, 10 May 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/bloomberg-pulls-a-news-corp-on-goldman/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;From the &lt;a href="http://m.nypost.com/p/news/business/goldman_outs_bloomberg_snoops_ed7SopzVLaO02p9foS7ncM"&gt;New York Post&lt;/a&gt;, of all places:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Goldman later learned that Bloomberg staffers could determine not only which of its employees had logged into Bloomberg’s proprietary terminals but how many times they had used particular functions, insiders said.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Friday Summary: May 10, 2013</title><link>/blog/friday-summary-may-10-2013/</link><pubDate>Fri, 10 May 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/friday-summary-may-10-2013/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I have never been a fan of large gatherings of people. You would never find me at a giant convention center listening to some evangelist, motivational speaker, politician, or business ‘guru’ tell me how to improve my life. I don’t stalk celebrities; participate in “million man marches”, tea party gatherings, promise-keepers, or any something-a-palooza to support a cause. I don’t have a cult-like appreciation of ‘successful’ people. It has nothing to do with a political or religious bent and I don’t fear crowds – it is a personality trait. To me group-think is a danger signal. I’m a skeptic. A contrarian. If everyone’s doing it, it must be wrong.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Database Breach Results in $45M Theft</title><link>/blog/database-breach-results-in-45m-theft/</link><pubDate>Thu, 09 May 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/database-breach-results-in-45m-theft/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Today’s big news is the hack against banking systems to pre-authenticate thousands of ATM and pre-paid debit cards. The attackers essentially modified debit card databases in several Middle Eastern banks, then leveraged their virtual cards into cash. From &lt;a href="http://www.boston.com/business/technology/2013/05/09/feds-nyc-hackers-stole-atm-card-breach/4AAiA7FIPjjHow5EoTS6iK/story-1.html"&gt;AP Newswire&lt;/a&gt;:&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>IaaS Encryption: How to Choose</title><link>/blog/iaas-encryption-how-to-choose/</link><pubDate>Thu, 09 May 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/iaas-encryption-how-to-choose/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;There is no single right way to pick the best encryption option. Which is ‘best’ depends on a ton of factors including the specifics of the cloud deployment, what you already have for key management or encryption, the nature of the data, and so on. That said, here are some guidelines that should work in most cases.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Security earnings season in full swing</title><link>/blog/security-earnings-season-in-full-swing/</link><pubDate>Thu, 09 May 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/security-earnings-season-in-full-swing/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Most folks think you need to be a day trading financial junkie to have any interest in quarterly earnings releases and/or conference call transcripts. But you can learn a lot from following the results of your strategic security vendors and companies you don’t do business with, but who would like to do business with you. You can glean stuff about overall market health, significant problem spaces, technology innovation, and business execution.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Incite 5/8/2013: One step at a time</title><link>/blog/incite-5-8-2013-one-step-at-a-time/</link><pubDate>Wed, 08 May 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/incite-5-8-2013-one-step-at-a-time/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Do you ever look at your To Do list and feel like you want to just run away and hide? Me too. I talk a lot about consistent effort and not trying to hit &lt;em&gt;home runs,&lt;/em&gt; but working for a bunch of singles and doubles. That works great for run rate activities like writing the Incite and my blog series. But I am struggling to move forward on a couple very important projects that are bigger than a breadbox and critical to the business. It is annoying the crap out of me, and I figure publicly airing my issues might help me push through them.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>McAfee Gets Some NGFW Stones</title><link>/blog/mcafee-gets-some-ngfw-stones/</link><pubDate>Wed, 08 May 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/mcafee-gets-some-ngfw-stones/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;In hindsight we should have seen this coming. I mean it’s not like McAfee even showed up for the most recent NSS Labs next-generation firewall (NGFW) test. They made noise about evolving their IPS, I mean Network Security Platform, to offer integrated firewall capabilities. But evidently it was either too hard or would have taken too long (or both) to provide a competitive product. So McAfee solved the problem by writing a $389MM check for Stonesoft.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Finger-pointing is step 1 of the plan</title><link>/blog/finger-pointing-is-step-1-of-the-plan/</link><pubDate>Tue, 07 May 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/finger-pointing-is-step-1-of-the-plan/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Dennis Fisher writes in &lt;a href="http://threatpost.com/finger-pointing-on-cyberespionage-does-little-good-without-plan/"&gt;Finger-Pointing on Cyberespionage does little good without a plan&lt;/a&gt;:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The acknowledgement from the Pentagon, in truth, feels fairly anticlimactic. It’s the equivalent of Mark McGwire admitting to using steroids-10 years after every fan in the country had already accepted that fact. At some point it becomes sort of silly to even mention it. Water is wet, ice cream is delicious and China is attacking our networks. It just is.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>IaaS Encryption: Object Storage</title><link>/blog/iaas-encryption-object-storage/</link><pubDate>Tue, 07 May 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/iaas-encryption-object-storage/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Sorry, but the title is a bit of a bait and switch. Before we get into object storage encryption we need to cover using proxies for volume encryption.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Some (re)assembly required</title><link>/blog/some-reassembly-required/</link><pubDate>Tue, 07 May 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/some-reassembly-required/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.theregister.co.uk/2013/04/29/japan_coast_guard_forgets_wipe_data_norks/"&gt;Japanese Coast Guard ship (indirectly) sold to North Korea&lt;/a&gt;:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;“The vessel was sold in a state in which information regarding operational patterns of the patrol vessel could have been obtained by some party,” an official told the paper. “We were on low security alert at that time.” That is certainly not the case these days, with heightened tensions on the Korean peninsula and the Japanese coast guard regularly involved in patrols around the disputed Diaoyu (Senkaku) islands.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>The CISO’s Guide to Advanced Attackers: Evolving the Security Program</title><link>/blog/the-cisos-guide-to-advanced-attackers-evolving-the-security-program-2/</link><pubDate>Mon, 06 May 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/the-cisos-guide-to-advanced-attackers-evolving-the-security-program-2/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;The tactics we have described so far are very useful for detecting and disrupting advanced attackers – even if used only in one-off situations. But you can and should establish a more structured and repeatable process – especially if you expect to be an ongoing target of advanced attackers. So you need to evolve your existing security program, including incident response capabilities. But what exactly does that mean?&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>2FA isn’t a big enough gun</title><link>/blog/2fa-isnt-a-big-enough-gun-2/</link><pubDate>Sun, 05 May 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/2fa-isnt-a-big-enough-gun-2/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;The arms race goes on and on. The folks at &lt;a href="http://www.trusteer.com/blog/perfectionism-fraudster-style"&gt;Trusteer recently found an evolved type of malware&lt;/a&gt; designed to game financial institutions’ two-factor authentication (2FA) mechanisms on compromised devices. This is Darwin at work, folks – why should attackers try to rob banks, when they can mug everyone who comes out with money? Whatever gun you have, they come back with a bigger one. This is fun, right?&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Now China is stealing our porn</title><link>/blog/now-china-is-stealing-our-porn/</link><pubDate>Fri, 03 May 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/now-china-is-stealing-our-porn/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Okay, it is entirely possible he paid for it, but HOW DO WE KNOW?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.businessweek.com/news/2013-05-01/chinese-nasa-spy-suspect-to-plead-to-breaking-computer-rule-1"&gt;U.S. Finds Porn Not Secrets on Suspected China Spy’s PC&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>The CISO’s Guide to Advanced Attackers: Breaking the Kill Chain</title><link>/blog/the-cisos-guide-to-advanced-attackers-breaking-the-kill-chain/</link><pubDate>Fri, 03 May 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/the-cisos-guide-to-advanced-attackers-breaking-the-kill-chain/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;In our &lt;a href="https://securosis.com/blog/the-cisos-guide-to-advanced-attackers-verify-the-alert"&gt;last post in the CISO’s Guide to Advanced Attacks&lt;/a&gt;, you verified the alert, so it’s time to spring into action. This is what you get paid for – and to be candid your longevity in the CISO role directly correlates to your ability to contain the damage and recover from the attacks as quickly and efficiently as possible. But no pressure, right? So let’s work through the steps involved in &lt;em&gt;breaking the kill chain,&lt;/em&gt; disrupting the attackers, taking counter measures, and/or getting law enforcement involved.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Friday Summary: May 3, 2013</title><link>/blog/friday-summary-may-3-2013/</link><pubDate>Thu, 02 May 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/friday-summary-may-3-2013/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I was weirdly interested in &lt;a href="http://www.theverge.com/2013/5/1/4279674/im-still-here-back-online-after-a-year-without-the-internet"&gt;Paul Miller’s year off the Internet&lt;/a&gt;. Paul is a writer for The Verge, and they actually paid him to keep writing (offline) through the year instead of kicking him to the curb like most publications would have.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Getting Logstalgic</title><link>/blog/getting-logstalgic/</link><pubDate>Thu, 02 May 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/getting-logstalgic/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Good tip here in &lt;a href="http://it.toolbox.com/blogs/securitymonkey/im-in-love-with-logstalgia-55946"&gt;a post from the Chief Monkey&lt;/a&gt; about a new open source log visualization tool called &lt;a href="https://code.google.com/p/logstalgia/"&gt;Logstalgia&lt;/a&gt;. It basically shows web access logs visualized as a pong game. So all of you folks in my age bracket will really appreciate it. Here is the description from the project page:&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Malware string in iOS app interesting, but probably not a risk</title><link>/blog/malware-string-in-ios-app-interesting-but-probably-not-a-risk/</link><pubDate>Thu, 02 May 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/malware-string-in-ios-app-interesting-but-probably-not-a-risk/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;From Macworld: &lt;a href="http://www.macworld.com/article/2037099/ios-app-contains-potential-malware.html"&gt;iOS app contains potential malware&lt;/a&gt;:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The app Simply Find It, a $2 game from Simply Game, seems harmless enough. But if you run Bitdefender Virus Scanner–a free app in the Mac App Store–it will warn you about the presence of a Trojan horse within the app. A reader tipped Macworld off to the presence of the malware, and we confirmed it.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Off topic: Cycling is the new golf</title><link>/blog/off-topic-cycling-is-the-new-golf/</link><pubDate>Thu, 02 May 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/off-topic-cycling-is-the-new-golf/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;From &lt;a href="http://www.economist.com/blogs/prospero/2013/04/business-networking"&gt;the Economist&lt;/a&gt;:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;TRADITIONALLY, business associates would get to know each other over a round of golf. But road cycling is fast catching up as the preferred way of networking for the modern professional. A growing number of corporate-sponsored charity bike rides and city cycle clubs are providing an ideal opportunity to talk shop with like-minded colleagues and clients while discussing different bike frames and tricky headwinds. Many believe cycling is better than golf for building lasting working relationships, or landing a new job, because it is less competitive.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>IaaS Encryption: External Key Manager Deployment and Feature Options</title><link>/blog/iaas-encryption-external-key-manager-deployment-and-feature-options/</link><pubDate>Wed, 01 May 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/iaas-encryption-external-key-manager-deployment-and-feature-options/</guid><description>&lt;h3 id="deployment-and-topology-options"&gt;Deployment and topology options&lt;/h3&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The first thing to consider is how you want deploy external key management. There are four options:&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Incite 5/1/2013: Trailblazing Equality</title><link>/blog/incite-5-1-2013-trailblazing-equality/</link><pubDate>Wed, 01 May 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/incite-5-1-2013-trailblazing-equality/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I recently took the Boy to see “&lt;a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0453562/"&gt;42&lt;/a&gt;,” which I highly recommend for everyone. It’s truly a great (though presumably dramatized) story about Jackie Robinson and Branch Rickey as they tore down the color line in major league baseball. My stepfather knew Jackie Robinson pretty well and always says great things about him. It seems the movie downplayed the abuse he took, alone, as he worked to overcome stereotypes, bigotry, and intolerance to move toward the ideal of the US founding fathers that “all men are created equal”. But importantly the movie successfully conveyed the significance of his actions and the courage of the main players.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Security Analytics with Big Data: Use Cases</title><link>/blog/security-analytics-with-big-data-use-cases/</link><pubDate>Wed, 01 May 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/security-analytics-with-big-data-use-cases/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Why do we use big data for security analytics? Aside from big data hype in the press, what motivates customers to look for new solutions? On the other side of the coin, why are vendors altering their products to use – or at least integrate with – big data? In our discussions with customers they cite performance and scalability, particularly for security event analysis. In fact this research project was originally outlined as a broad examination of the potential for big data for security analytics. The customers we speak with don’t care about generalities – they need to solve existing problems, specifically around installed SIEM and log management systems. We refocused this research on a focused need to scale beyond what they have today and get more from existing investments, and big data is a means to that end.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>IaaS Encryption: Encrypting Entire Volumes</title><link>/blog/iaas-encryption-encrypting-entire-volumes/</link><pubDate>Tue, 30 Apr 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/iaas-encryption-encrypting-entire-volumes/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;As we mentioned &lt;a href="https://securosis.com/blog/iaas-encryption-protecting-volume-storage"&gt;in our last post&lt;/a&gt;, there are three options for encrypting entire storage volumes:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;ul&gt;
&lt;li&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Instance-managed&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Externally-managed&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Proxy&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;
&lt;p&gt;We will start with the first two today, then cover proxy encryption and some deeper details on cloud key managers (including SaaS options) next.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Gaming the pirates—literally</title><link>/blog/gaming-the-pirates-literally/</link><pubDate>Mon, 29 Apr 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/gaming-the-pirates-literally/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;This is too good not to share, albeit only tangentially related to our usual SMB and enterprise focus:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.macrumors.com/2013/04/29/independent-game-developer-pranks-pirates-with-game-dev-tycoon"&gt;A software development company posted a cracked version of their new game to pirate sites, but with a twist:&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Google Glass Has Already Been Hacked By Jailbreakers</title><link>/blog/google-glass-has-already-been-hacked-by-jailbreakers/</link><pubDate>Mon, 29 Apr 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/google-glass-has-already-been-hacked-by-jailbreakers/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.forbes.com/sites/andygreenberg/2013/04/26/google-glass-has-already-been-hacked-by-jailbreakers/"&gt;Courtesy of Forbes:&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Freeman, who goes by the hacker handle “Saurik” and created the widely-used app store for jailbroken iOS devices known as Cydia, told me in a phone interview that he discovered yesterday that Glass runs Android 4.0.4, and immediately began testing previously-known exploits that worked on that version of Google’s mobile operating system. Within hours, he found that he could use an exploit released by a hacker who goes by the name B1nary last year to gain full control of Glass’s operating system.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Security Funding via Tin Cup</title><link>/blog/security-funding-via-tin-cup/</link><pubDate>Mon, 29 Apr 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/security-funding-via-tin-cup/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Folks struggling to get funding to implement security programs are a hot button of mine. I know it’s hard. I know we are expected to protect stuff with tighter budgets and fewer resources. A cornerstone of our research is effective prioritization so you can focus on the things most important to your organization. I get all that. But most folks aren’t a lot more sophisticated than passing around a tin cup during the budgeting process and hoping they get sufficient funding.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Twitter security for media companies</title><link>/blog/twitter-security-for-media-companies/</link><pubDate>Mon, 29 Apr 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/twitter-security-for-media-companies/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Twitter is worried about all the media company accounts being hacked, and has &lt;a href="http://www.theverge.com/2013/4/29/4283854/twitter-warns-news-organizations-about-ongoing-hacking-threats"&gt;released some guidance&lt;/a&gt;. These aren’t exploits of Twitter itself, but of media companies, typically through phishing.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Friday Summary, April 26, 2013: Birthday Edition</title><link>/blog/friday-summary-april-26-2013-the-birthday-edition/</link><pubDate>Fri, 26 Apr 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/friday-summary-april-26-2013-the-birthday-edition/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;On March 13th I received a birthday card. It was from my Dad. It was a nice card, it was clear he had put some thought into the card selection, and I was genuinely swayed by his thoughtful memento. On the Ides of March I received a birthday card from my grandmother. Another nice card and it was thoughtful that she remembered my birthday. Two weeks later a birthday gift arrived from my mother. Not for me, mind you, but for my wife. It was a beautiful gift, obviously expensive, and again a superbly wonderful gesture. We don’t get to keep in close contact, so I was both surprised and appreciative. April 1st a gift card arrived, this time for me, again from my mom.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Socially engineering (trading) bots</title><link>/blog/socially-engineering-trading-bots/</link><pubDate>Fri, 26 Apr 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/socially-engineering-trading-bots/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;It probably went unnoticed by most of the security community, but yet another Twitter hack this week exposed more flaws with high frequency trading systems. When someone took control of the Associated Press twitter account and &lt;a href="http://buzz.money.cnn.com/2013/04/23/ap-tweet-fake-white-house/"&gt;injected a fake news announcement&lt;/a&gt; that bombs had exploded in the White House, many people (unsurprisingly) believed the tweet without attempting to verify. That a 140-character message sent the &lt;a href="http://money.cnn.com/2013/04/24/investing/twitter-flash-crash/"&gt;stock market down in a “flash crash”&lt;/a&gt; – 140 points in a matter of minutes.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Incite 4/24/2013: F Perfect</title><link>/blog/incite-4-24-2013-f-perfect/</link><pubDate>Wed, 24 Apr 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/incite-4-24-2013-f-perfect/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Perfect is my least favorite word in the English language. Nothing is perfect. There are always things that can be improved upon, no matter how good they are. And striving for perfection is an express train to disappointment and unhappiness. I’m a card-carrying disciple of “good enough”. It doesn’t need to be perfect to add value. So I don’t obsess about typos, misplaced pixels, or any other such nonsense. Which can irritate certain business partners [and editors] at times. But I’m not going to change it. If I do work (or anything else), I get it to a point where I’m happy with it and move on.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Question everything, including the data</title><link>/blog/question-everything-including-the-data/</link><pubDate>Tue, 23 Apr 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/question-everything-including-the-data/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;The good news about being in security is that you don’t have to look too far for criticism of your work. Most of the time it’s constructive criticism, so overall interaction with the security community makes your work markedly better. Which is why we live by the &lt;a href="https://securosis.com/about/totally-transparent-research"&gt;Totally Transparent Research&lt;/a&gt; process. It makes our work better.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Teaching Updated Cloud Security Class at Black Hat USA</title><link>/blog/teaching-updated-cloud-security-class-at-black-hat-usa/</link><pubDate>Tue, 23 Apr 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/teaching-updated-cloud-security-class-at-black-hat-usa/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;This summer James Arlen and I are teaching the recently updated cloud security class we developed for the Cloud Security Alliance (CCSK Plus). We are pretty excited to teach this at Black Hat, and will be bringing a few extra tricks to handle the more advanced audience we expect.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Big Data Security Jazz</title><link>/blog/big-data-security-jazz/</link><pubDate>Mon, 22 Apr 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/big-data-security-jazz/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I tend to avoid “security jazz” blog posts – esoteric arguments contrasting what we should be doing in security against what we do today. These rants don’t really help IT professionals get their jobs done so I skip them. But this is going to be such a post because I need to talk about big data security approaches. Many of you will to stop reading at this point. But for you data architects, CISOs, and security product development teams learning about how to plan for big data security (particularly those of you who have been asking me lately) and wanting to understand the arcane research that influences my recommendations, read on.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>CipherCloud Loses Argument with Internet</title><link>/blog/ciphercloud-loses-argument-with-internet/</link><pubDate>Mon, 22 Apr 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/ciphercloud-loses-argument-with-internet/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;There are two ways to respond to criticism of your security product, especially when encryption is involved.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;ol&gt;
&lt;li&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Respond cautiously, openly, and positively &lt;a href="https://securosis.com/blog/on-password-hashing-and-how-to-reply-to-security-flaws"&gt;as demonstrated last week by AgileBits, the folks behind 1Password&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>How to Use the 2013 Verizon Data Breach Investigations Report</title><link>/blog/how-to-use-the-2013-verizon-data-breach-investigations-report/</link><pubDate>Mon, 22 Apr 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/how-to-use-the-2013-verizon-data-breach-investigations-report/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;A few hours after this post goes live, &lt;a href="http://www.verizonenterprise.com/DBIR/2013/"&gt;the Verizon Enterprise risk team will release their 2013 Data Breach Investigations Report&lt;/a&gt;. This is a watershed year for the report, as they are now up to &lt;em&gt;19 contributing organizations&lt;/em&gt; including law enforcement agencies, multiple emergency response teams (CERTs), and even potential competitors. The report covers 47,000 incidents, among which there were 621 confirmed data disclosures. This is the best data set since the start of the report, so it provides the best insight into what is going on out there.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>The CISO’s Guide to Advanced Attackers: Verify the Alert</title><link>/blog/the-cisos-guide-to-advanced-attackers-verify-the-alert/</link><pubDate>Mon, 22 Apr 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/the-cisos-guide-to-advanced-attackers-verify-the-alert/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;All the discussion so far in our CISO’s Guide to Advanced Attackers has been of preparation for the main event. The bell rings when an alert fires and it’s time for your incident response process to kick in. But as we have seen through our &lt;a href="https://securosis.com/blog/the-cisos-guide-to-advanced-attackers-sizing-up-the-adversary"&gt;adversary analysis&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href="https://securosis.com/blog/the-cisos-guide-to-advanced-attacks-intelligence-crystal-ball-of-security"&gt;intelligence gathering&lt;/a&gt;, “advanced attackers” present some unique challenges. In particular, they significant resources and time, which makes them difficult to deter – even if you successfully block one attack or stop a specific exfiltration, there will be more. A lot more.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Security Analytics with Big Data [New Series]</title><link>/blog/security-analytics-with-big-data-new-series/</link><pubDate>Sun, 21 Apr 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/security-analytics-with-big-data-new-series/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Big Data is being touted as a ‘transformative’ technology for security event analysis – promised to detect threats in the ever-increasing volume of event data generated from in-house, mobile, and cloud-based services. But a combination of PR hype, vendor positioning, and customer questions has pushed it to the top of my research agenda. Many customers are asking “Wait, don’t I already have SIEM for event analysis?” Yes, you do. And SIEM is designed and built solve the same problems – but 7-8 years ago – and it is failing to keep up with current problems. It’s not just that we’re trying to scale up to a much larger set of data, but we also need to react to events an order of magnitude faster than before. Still more troubling is that we are collecting multiple types of data, each requiring new and different analysis techniques to detect advanced attacks. Oh, and while all that slows down SIEM and log management systems, you are under the gun to identify attacks faster than before.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>The CISO’s Guide to Advanced Attackers: Mining for Indicators</title><link>/blog/the-cisos-guide-to-advanced-attackers-mining-for-indicators-2/</link><pubDate>Sun, 21 Apr 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/the-cisos-guide-to-advanced-attackers-mining-for-indicators-2/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;The key to dealing with advanced attackers is &lt;strong&gt;not&lt;/strong&gt; closing off every window of vulnerability. As we have discussed throughout this series, advanced attackers &lt;em&gt;will&lt;/em&gt; figure out a way to gain a foothold in your environment. Actually they will find multiple ways into your environment. So if you hope for any semblance of success, your goal cannot be to stop them – instead you need to work on shorteneing the window between compromise and detection. We have called that &lt;a href="https://securosis.com/blog/react-faster-and-better-with-the-a-b-cs"&gt;Reacting Faster and Better&lt;/a&gt; for years. 5 years to be exact, but who’s counting?&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Token Vaults and Token Storage Tradeoffs</title><link>/blog/token-vaults-and-token-storage-tradeoffs/</link><pubDate>Fri, 19 Apr 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/token-vaults-and-token-storage-tradeoffs/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Use of tokenization continues to expand as customers look to simplify PCI-DSS compliance. With this increased adoption comes a lot of vendor positioning and puffery, as they attempt to differentiate their products in an increasingly competitive market. Unfortunately this competitive positioning often causes confusion among buyers, which is why I have spent the last couple mornings answering questions on FPE vs. Tokenization, and the difference between a token vault and a database. Lately most questions center on differentiating tokenization data vaults, with the expected confusion caused by vendor hyperbole. In this post I will define a token vault and shed some light on their pros and cons. My goal is to help you determine as a consumer whether vaults are something to consider when selecting a tokenization solution.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Intel Buys Mashery, or Why You Need to Pay Attention to API Security</title><link>/blog/intel-buys-mashery-or-why-you-need-to-pay-attention-to-api-security/</link><pubDate>Thu, 18 Apr 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/intel-buys-mashery-or-why-you-need-to-pay-attention-to-api-security/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Intel acquired API management firm Mashery today. &lt;a href="http://readwrite.com/2013/04/17/intel-acquires-mashery"&gt;readwrite enterprise posted a very nice write-up&lt;/a&gt; on how Mashery fits into the greater Intel strategy:&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>No news is just plain good: Friday Summary, April 18, 2013</title><link>/blog/no-news-is-just-plain-good-friday-summary-april-18-2013/</link><pubDate>Thu, 18 Apr 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/no-news-is-just-plain-good-friday-summary-april-18-2013/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I know the exact moment I stopped watching local news.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;It was somewhere around 10-15 years ago. A toddler had died after being left locked in a car on a hot day. I wasn’t actually watching the news, but one of the screamers for the upcoming broadcast came on during a commercial break for whatever I was watching. A serious looking female reporter, in news voice, mentioned the death and how hot cars could get in the Colorado sun. Then she threw a big outdoor thermometer in a car, slammed the door, and reminded me to watch the news at 10 to see the results.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>On password hashing and how to respond to security flaws</title><link>/blog/on-password-hashing-and-how-to-reply-to-security-flaws/</link><pubDate>Thu, 18 Apr 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/on-password-hashing-and-how-to-reply-to-security-flaws/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I have been learning a lot lately about password hashing since we realized our own site used an inadequate mechanism (SHA256). I am also a major fan of 1Password for password generation and management. So I held my breath while reading &lt;a href="http://hashcat.net/forum/thread-2238.html"&gt;how to use Hashcat on 1Password data&lt;/a&gt;:&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Run faster or you’ll catch privacy</title><link>/blog/run-faster-or-youll-catch-privacy-2/</link><pubDate>Thu, 18 Apr 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/run-faster-or-youll-catch-privacy-2/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;One of the things that smacked me upside the head at a recent IANS Forum, where I run the CISO track, is the clear merging of the security and privacy functions under the purview of one executive. Of the 15 or so CISOs in the room, at least half also had responsibility for privacy. And many of them got this new responsibility as part of a recent reorganization.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Safari enables per-site Java blocking</title><link>/blog/safari-enables-per-site-java-blocking/</link><pubDate>Thu, 18 Apr 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/safari-enables-per-site-java-blocking/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I missed this during all my travels, but the &lt;a href="http://www.intego.com/mac-security-blog/apple-safari-now-offers-per-site-java-enabling/"&gt;team at Intego posted a great overview:&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Meanwhile, Apple also released Safari 6.0.4 for Mountain Lion and Lion, as well as Safari 5.1.9 for Snow Leopard. The new versions of Safari give users more granular control over which sites may run Java applets. If Java is enabled, the next time a site containing a Java applet is visited, the user will be asked whether or not to allow the applet to load, with buttons labeled Block and Allow:&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>The CISO’s Guide to Advanced Attacks: Intelligence, the Crystal Ball of Security</title><link>/blog/the-cisos-guide-to-advanced-attacks-intelligence-the-crystal-ball-of-security/</link><pubDate>Thu, 18 Apr 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/the-cisos-guide-to-advanced-attacks-intelligence-the-crystal-ball-of-security/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;As discussed in our first post in the &lt;a href="https://securosis.com/blog/the-cisos-guide-to-advanced-attackers-sizing-up-the-adversary"&gt;CISO’s Guide to Advanced Attackers&lt;/a&gt;, the first step is to determine what kind of attack would have the greatest impact on your environment (most likely mission), so you can infer which kinds of adversaries you are likely to face. Armed with context on likely adversaries, we can move into the intelligence gathering phase. This involves learning everything we can about possible and likely adversaries, profiling probable behaviors, and determining which kinds of defenses and controls make sense to address the higher probabilities.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Incite 4/17/2013: Tipping the balance between good and evil</title><link>/blog/incite-4-17-2013-tipping-the-balance-of-good-and-evil/</link><pubDate>Wed, 17 Apr 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/incite-4-17-2013-tipping-the-balance-of-good-and-evil/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;There are things you just can’t explain. No amount of dogma, perceived slights, or anything can excuse a senseless act of violence on unsuspecting, innocent people. Yes, I’m talking about the Boston Marathon attack, but it applies extends to any act of terrorism. I believe in karma, and the perpetrators will get their just rewards. Maybe out of the view of the public eye, but they will.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Sorry for Security Rocking</title><link>/blog/sorry-for-security-rocking/</link><pubDate>Tue, 16 Apr 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/sorry-for-security-rocking/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;How cool would it be if LMFAO (or a reasonable proximity – Beaker, anyone?) did a security version of “Sorry for Party Rocking,” because evidently the &lt;a href="http://www.darkreading.com/security/security-management/240152570/security-job-market-8216-rocking-8217-but-pressures-rise.html"&gt;security job market is rocking&lt;/a&gt;. But it offers a great perspective on the mind of the security professional. Check out the following quotes to get a feel for how things seem, which I can anecdotally validate based on the number of calls I get from CISO types looking to grow and retain their teams.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>The CISO’s Guide to Advanced Attackers: Sizing up the Adversary [New Series]</title><link>/blog/the-cisos-guide-to-advanced-attackers-sizing-up-the-adversary-new-series/</link><pubDate>Tue, 16 Apr 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/the-cisos-guide-to-advanced-attackers-sizing-up-the-adversary-new-series/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Every year there seems to be a new shiny object that works security marketeers into a frenzy. The Advanced Persistent Threat hype continues to run amok 3 years in, and doesn’t seem to be abating at all. Of course there is still lot of confusion about what the APT is, and &lt;a href="https://securosis.com/blog/some-apt-controls1"&gt;Rich’s post from early 2010&lt;/a&gt; does a good job explaining our view.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Why you still need security groups with host firewalls</title><link>/blog/why-you-still-need-security-groups-with-host-firewalls/</link><pubDate>Tue, 16 Apr 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/why-you-still-need-security-groups-with-host-firewalls/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;Security groups&lt;/em&gt; are the basic firewall rules associated with instances in various compute clouds. Different platforms may use different names but &lt;em&gt;security group&lt;/em&gt; is the most common so that’s the term we will use. Basically, it is a way of defining hypervisor firewall rules. Of course this is a gross simplification – different cloud platforms enforce groups at other layers of the virtual or physical network, but you get the point. You assign instances to a security group and they inherit that rule set, which applies at a &lt;em&gt;per instance&lt;/em&gt; level. This is key because you need to do some deeper thinking about what access rules &lt;em&gt;should&lt;/em&gt; apply to an individual instance, which is distinctly &lt;em&gt;not&lt;/em&gt; like a network segment with a firewall in front of it. For example you can set security group rules that restrict traffic between all instances assigned to the same security group. Thus it has traits of both a host firewall and network firewall, which is kinda cool.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Is it murder if the victim is already dead?</title><link>/blog/is-it-murder-if-the-victim-is-already-dead/</link><pubDate>Sun, 14 Apr 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/is-it-murder-if-the-victim-is-already-dead/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Sometimes seeing what you have known for years in print is helpful, even comforting. So &lt;a href="http://blogs.gartner.com/paul-proctor/2013/04/01/murdering-compliance-in-cold-blood/"&gt;Gartner’s Paul Proctor writing about killing compliance in cold blood&lt;/a&gt; is good. Paul has a bigger megaphone than the rest of us, so maybe folks will start getting on board with doing security (or risk, depending on your vernacular) and stop worrying so much about the checklists.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Friday Summary: April 12, 2013</title><link>/blog/friday-summary-april-12-2013/</link><pubDate>Fri, 12 Apr 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/friday-summary-april-12-2013/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Ever start a simple project – or perhaps ask for something simple to be done on your behalf – and get far more than you bargained for? Sometimes the seemingly simple things reach up and bite you. I was thinking about this two weeks ago, in the middle of some weekend gardening, expecting to tackle a small irrigation leak that popped up during the winter.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Unused security intelligence is, well… dumb</title><link>/blog/unused-security-intelligence-is-well-dumb/</link><pubDate>Fri, 12 Apr 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/unused-security-intelligence-is-well-dumb/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src="dumb-chapter.jpg" alt=""&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The hype cycle for Threat Intelligence is just getting going. It will soon join advanced malware, BYOD, and Big Data as terms that mean nothing because they have been poked, prodded, manipulated, and otherwise killed by vendor hyperbole. We have done a bunch of research into how to use threat intelligence (&lt;a href="https://securosis.com/research/papers/building-an-early-warning-system"&gt;Early Warning&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="https://securosis.com/research/papers/network-based-threat-intelligence-searching-for-the-smoking-gun"&gt;Network-based Threat Intelligence&lt;/a&gt;, and &lt;a href="https://securosis.com/research/papers/email-based-threat-intelligence-to-catch-a-phish"&gt;Email-based Threat Intelligence&lt;/a&gt;), so we get the value of benefiting from other folks’ misfortune and learning from how they were attacked. But I also know that our papers run 15-20 pages and usually fall into the category of tl;dr.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Gaming the Narcissist (to get what you want)</title><link>/blog/gaming-the-narcissist-to-get-what-you-want/</link><pubDate>Thu, 11 Apr 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/gaming-the-narcissist-to-get-what-you-want/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;We have each probably worked for a CEO who we’d just as soon meet in a dark alley (without video surveillance), while carrying a nightstick and a taser. So when I saw &lt;a href="http://www.securitycurve.com/archives/6689"&gt;Ed Moyle’s blog about Narcissistic CEOs&lt;/a&gt;, I was hoping it would end with “You’d better bring a mop. And a body bag.” Unfortunately Ed highlighted some research that these narcissistic douches adopt technology more aggressively (mostly due to their oversized egos) and are more likely to be successful. Humbug.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Incite 4/10/2013: 103</title><link>/blog/incite-4-10-2013-103/</link><pubDate>Wed, 10 Apr 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/incite-4-10-2013-103/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;My paternal grandmother passed away last week at 103. No, that is not a typo. One hundred and three. Ciento tres for you Spanish speakers out there. She would have been 104 in June. That’s a long time. To give you some perspective, per the &lt;a href="http://www.infoplease.com/year/1909.html"&gt;infoplease site&lt;/a&gt;, William Taft was president in 1909. Robert Peary and Matthew Henson reached the North Pole that year. And the big news in the medical community was finding a cure for syphilis. I’m sure that caused much rejoicing around the world. I guess before 1909 you could actually have gone blind, though my folks somehow forgot to tell me about the cure…&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Should the Red (Team) be dead?</title><link>/blog/should-the-red-team-be-dead/</link><pubDate>Tue, 09 Apr 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/should-the-red-team-be-dead/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I like to see stuff that challenges common wisdom. The inimitable professor Gene Spafford of Purdue goes far against the grain in &lt;a href="http://www.cerias.purdue.edu/site/blog/post/on_competitions_and_competence/"&gt;calling out the excitement of hacking competitions and red teams&lt;/a&gt; as counterproductive to training the next generation of security folks.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Security FUD hits investors</title><link>/blog/security-fud-hits-investors/</link><pubDate>Mon, 08 Apr 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/security-fud-hits-investors/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;We ve talked a bit about the need to “be careful what we wish for,” in terms of making security a higher profile issue with senior management. Well, it’s no longer just vendors throwing FUD balloons that can splat at any time. I was perusing the Seeking Alpha investor site over the weekend when I found an article called &lt;a href="http://seekingalpha.com/article/1324971-pandemic-cyber-security-failures-open-an-historic-opportunity-for-investors"&gt;Pandemic Cyber Security Failures Open An Historic Opportunity For Investors&lt;/a&gt;. Yes, I threw up a bit in my mouth when I read that headline.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Friday Summary, Gattaca Edition: April 5, 2012</title><link>/blog/friday-summary-gattaca-edition-april-5-2012/</link><pubDate>Thu, 04 Apr 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/friday-summary-gattaca-edition-april-5-2012/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi folks, Dave Lewis here, and it is my turn to pull the summary together this week. I’m glad for the opportunity. So, a random thought: I have made a lot of mistakes in my career and will more than likely make many more. I frequently refer to this as my well-honed ability to fall on spears.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>IaaS Encryption: Protecting Volume Storage</title><link>/blog/iaas-encryption-protecting-volume-storage/</link><pubDate>Thu, 04 Apr 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/iaas-encryption-protecting-volume-storage/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Now that we have covered all the pesky background information, we can start delving into the best ways to actually protect data.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Appetite for Destruction</title><link>/blog/appetite-for-destruction/</link><pubDate>Wed, 03 Apr 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/appetite-for-destruction/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;We (Rich and Gal) were chatting last week about the &lt;a href="http://www.scmagazine.com/south-korean-corporations-hit-by-widespread-attack-that-wiped-data-and-shut-down-systems/article/285315/"&gt;destructive malware attacks in South Korea&lt;/a&gt;. One popular theory is that &lt;a href="http://www.theregister.co.uk/2013/03/25/sk_data_wiping_malware_latest/"&gt;patch management systems were compromised and used to spread malware to affected targets&lt;/a&gt;, which deleted Master Boot Records and started wiping drives (including network connected drives), even on Linux.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Brian Krebs outs possible Flashback malware author</title><link>/blog/brian-krebs-outs-potential-flashback-malware-author/</link><pubDate>Wed, 03 Apr 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/brian-krebs-outs-potential-flashback-malware-author/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Brian Krebs &lt;a href="http://krebsonsecurity.com/2013/04/who-wrote-the-flashback-os-x-worm/"&gt;thinks he may have identified the author of the Flashback Mac malware&lt;/a&gt; that caused so much trouble last year. Brian is careful with accusations but displays his full investigative reporting chops as he lays out the case:&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Cybersh** just got real</title><link>/blog/cybersh-just-got-real/</link><pubDate>Wed, 03 Apr 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/cybersh-just-got-real/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.theverge.com/2013/4/3/4178778/huawei-not-expecting-us-growth-2013-national-security-concerns"&gt;Huawei not expecting growth in US this year due to national security concerns (The Verge)&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.pcworld.com/article/2032321/us-to-scrutinize-it-system-purchases-with-ties-to-china.html#tk.rss_all"&gt;U.S. to scrutinize IT system purchases with ties to China (PC World):&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Proposed California Data Law *Will* Affect Security</title><link>/blog/proposed-california-data-law-will-affect-security/</link><pubDate>Wed, 03 Apr 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/proposed-california-data-law-will-affect-security/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://threatpost.com/en_us/blogs/california-considers-pushing-data-disclosure-envelope-again-040213"&gt;Threatpost reports that California is considering a law requiring companies to show consumers what data is collected on them&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Known as the “Right to Know Act of 2013,” AB 1291 was amended this week to boost its chances of success after being introduced in February by state Assembly member Bonnie Lowenthal. If passed, it would require any business that retains customer data to give a copy of that information, including who it has been shared with, for the past year upon request. It applies to companies that are both on – and offline.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Get Ready for Phone Security and Regulations</title><link>/blog/get-ready-for-phone-security-and-regulations/</link><pubDate>Tue, 02 Apr 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/get-ready-for-phone-security-and-regulations/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.infoworld.com/t/cyber-crime/cyber-criminals-tying-emergency-phone-lines-through-tdos-attacks-215585"&gt;Emergency services providers and others are being hit with telephone-based denial of service attacks&lt;/a&gt;. Nasty stuff, powered by IP-based phone systems. This relates to SWATing (what &lt;a href="http://krebsonsecurity.com/2013/03/the-world-has-no-room-for-cowards/"&gt;hit Brian Krebs&lt;/a&gt;). It has become trivial to use computers to make and spoof phone calls.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>An article so bad, I have to trash it</title><link>/blog/an-article-so-bad-i-have-to-thrash-it/</link><pubDate>Mon, 01 Apr 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/an-article-so-bad-i-have-to-thrash-it/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I almost didn’t write this post since it’s about iOS, and I about defending iOS security too much. Not that I think I’m biased, but I worry about being misinterpreted as an apologetic defender (I’m not – Apple still has security issues they need to work on, but iOS is in really good shape these days).&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>IaaS Encryption: Understanding Encryption Systems</title><link>/blog/iaas-encryption-understanding-encryption-systems/</link><pubDate>Mon, 01 Apr 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/iaas-encryption-understanding-encryption-systems/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Now that we have covered the basics of how IaaS platforms store data, we need to spend a moment reviewing the parts of an encryption system that are relevant for protecting cloud data. Encryption isn’t our only security tool, as we &lt;a href="https://securosis.com/blog/defending-cloud-data-how-iaas-storage-works"&gt;mentioned in our last post&lt;/a&gt;, but it is one of the only &lt;em&gt;practical&lt;/em&gt; data-specific tools at our disposal in cloud computing.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>1 in 6 Amazon Web Services Users Can’t Read</title><link>/blog/1-in-6-amazon-web-services-users-cant-read-2/</link><pubDate>Fri, 29 Mar 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/1-in-6-amazon-web-services-users-cant-read-2/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Rapid7 reported this week on finding a ton of sensitive information in Amazon S3. They scanned public buckets (Amazon S3 containers) by enumerating names, and concluded that 1 in 6 had sensitive information in them. People cried, “Amazon should do something about this!!”&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Friday Summary: March 29, 2013</title><link>/blog/friday-summary-march-29-2013/</link><pubDate>Fri, 29 Mar 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/friday-summary-march-29-2013/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Our last nine months of research into identity and access management have yielded quite a few surprises – for me at least. Many of these new perspectives I have shared piecemeal in various blogs, and others not. But it occurred to me today, as we start getting feedback from the dozen or so IAM practitioners we have asked to critique our Cloud IAM research, that some key themes have been lost in the overall complexity of the content. I want to highlight a few points that really hit home with me, and which I think are critical for security professionals in general to understand.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>DDoS Attack Overblown</title><link>/blog/ddos-attack-overblown/</link><pubDate>Thu, 28 Mar 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/ddos-attack-overblown/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://gizmodo.com/5992652/that-internet-war-apocalypse-is-a-lie"&gt;Sam Biddle at Gizmodo says:&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This guy, Prince said, could back up CloudFlare’s claims. This really was Web Dresden, or something. After an inquiry, I was ready to face vindication. Instead, I received this note from a spokesperson for NTT, one of the backbone operators of the Internet:&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Defending Cloud Data: How IaaS Storage Works</title><link>/blog/defending-cloud-data-how-iaas-storage-works/</link><pubDate>Thu, 28 Mar 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/defending-cloud-data-how-iaas-storage-works/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Infrastructure as a Service storage can be insanely complex when you include operational and performance requirements. First you need to create a resource pool, which might itself be a pool of virtualized and abstracted storage, and then you need to tie it all together with orchestration to support the dynamic requirements of the cloud – such as moving running virtual machines between servers, instantly snapshotting multi-terabyte virtual drives, and other insanity.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Estimating Breach Impact</title><link>/blog/estimating-breach-impact/</link><pubDate>Thu, 28 Mar 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/estimating-breach-impact/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Russell Thomas and a bunch of his friends recently posted a research paper called &lt;a href="http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2233075"&gt;How Bad Is It? – A Branching Activity Model to Estimate the Impact of Information Security Breaches&lt;/a&gt;, which attempts to provide a structure for estimating the impact of a breach. This work is necessary – we have no benchmarks, or even consensus, about what breached organizations should even be counting.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Defending Cloud Data: IaaS Encryption</title><link>/blog/defending-cloud-data-iaas-encryption/</link><pubDate>Wed, 27 Mar 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/defending-cloud-data-iaas-encryption/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Infrastructure as a Service (IaaS) is often thought of as merely as a more efficient (outsourced) version of our traditional infrastructure. On the surface you still manage things that look like simple virtualized networks, computers, and storage. You ‘boot’ computers (launch instances), assign IP addresses, and connect (virtual) hard drives. But while the &lt;em&gt;presentation&lt;/em&gt; of IaaS resembles traditional infrastructure, the reality underneath is anything but business as usual.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Incite 3/27/2013: Office Space</title><link>/blog/incite-3-27-2013-office-space/</link><pubDate>Wed, 27 Mar 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/incite-3-27-2013-office-space/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;A lot of folks ask me how I work from home. My answer is simple: I don’t. I have a home office, but I do the bulk of my work from a variety of coffee shops in my local area. So I give a few minutes’ thought at night to where I want to work the following day. Sometimes I have a craving for a Willy’s Burrito Bowl, which means I drive 20 minutes to one of their coffee shops in Sandy Springs. Other times I just have to have the salad bar’s chocolate mousse at Jason’s Deli, which means there are three different places that I could work that day. Lunch drives office location. For me, anyway.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Superior Security Economics</title><link>/blog/superior-security-economics/</link><pubDate>Wed, 27 Mar 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/superior-security-economics/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.theverge.com/2013/3/27/4152602/mailchimp-rewarding-users-ten-percent-off-two-step-security"&gt;MailChimp is offering a 10% discount to customers who enable 2-factor authentication.&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Impressive. Time to finish migrating our lists over to MailChimp (we only use them for the Friday Summary right now). We need to reward efforts like this.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Who’s Responsible for Cloud Security? (NetworkWorld Roundtable)</title><link>/blog/whos-responsible-for-cloud-security-networkworld-roundtable-2/</link><pubDate>Wed, 27 Mar 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/whos-responsible-for-cloud-security-networkworld-roundtable-2/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I recently participated in a roundtable for NetworkWorld, tackling the question of &lt;a href="http://www.networkworld.com/news/2013/032513-roundtable-268052.html"&gt;Who is responsible for cloud security?&lt;/a&gt;. First of all the picture is hilarious, especially because it shows my head photoshopped onto some dude with a tie. Like I’d wear a tie.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Developers and Buying Decisions</title><link>/blog/developers-and-buying-decisions/</link><pubDate>Tue, 26 Mar 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/developers-and-buying-decisions/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Matt Asay wrote a very though provoking piece on &lt;a href="http://readwrite.com/2013/03/26/oracles-big-miss-the-end-of-an-enterprise-era?"&gt;Oracle’s Big Miss: The End Of The Enterprise Era&lt;/a&gt;. While this blog does not deal with security directly, it does highlight a couple of important trends that effect both what customers are buying, and who is making the decisions.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Server Side JavaScript Injection on MongoDB</title><link>/blog/server-side-javascript-injection-on-mongodb/</link><pubDate>Tue, 26 Mar 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/server-side-javascript-injection-on-mongodb/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;A couple years ago Brian Sullivan of Microsoft demonstrated &lt;a href="https://securosis.com/blog/nosql-and-no-security"&gt;blind SQLi and server-side JavaScript injection attacks&lt;/a&gt; on Mongo, Neo4j, and other big data engines, but this is the first time I have seen someone get a shell and bypass ASLR. From the &lt;a href="http://blog.scrt.ch/2013/03/24/mongodb-0-day-ssji-to-rce/"&gt;SCRT Information Security Team Blog&lt;/a&gt;, they found an 0-day to do just that:&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>How Cloud Computing (Sometimes) Changes Disclosure</title><link>/blog/how-cloud-computing-sometimes-changes-disclosure/</link><pubDate>Mon, 25 Mar 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/how-cloud-computing-sometimes-changes-disclosure/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;When writing about the &lt;a href="https://securosis.com/blog/apple-disables-account-resets-in-response-to-flaw"&gt;flaw in Apple’s account recovery process&lt;/a&gt; last week, something set my spidey sense tingling. Something about it seemed different than other similar situations, even though exploitation was blocked quickly and the flaw fixed within about 8 hours.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Identifying vs. Understanding Your Adversaries</title><link>/blog/identifying-vs-understanding-your-adversaries/</link><pubDate>Mon, 25 Mar 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/identifying-vs-understanding-your-adversaries/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;You read stories about badasses tracking down trolls and showing up at their houses, and you get fired up about attribution. The revenge gene is strong in humans and there is nothing like taking that Twitter gladiator out the woodshed for a little good old fashioned medieval treatment. Now, payback daydreams aside, &lt;a href="http://www.digital4rensics.com/blog/2013/03/understanding-your-adversary/"&gt;Keith Gilbert asks a pretty important question about attribution&lt;/a&gt;. Do you really need to know exactly who the attacker is?&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Apple Disables Account Resets in Response to Flaw</title><link>/blog/apple-disables-account-resets-in-response-to-flaw/</link><pubDate>Fri, 22 Mar 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/apple-disables-account-resets-in-response-to-flaw/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;According to The Verge, &lt;a href="http://www.theverge.com/2013/3/22/4136242/major-security-hole-allows-apple-id-passwords-reset-with-email-date-of-birth"&gt;someone discovered a way to take over Apple IDs using only the owner’s email address and date of birth&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Friday Summary: March 22, 2013, Rogue IT Edition</title><link>/blog/friday-summary-march-22-2013-the-rogue-it-edition/</link><pubDate>Fri, 22 Mar 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/friday-summary-march-22-2013-the-rogue-it-edition/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;What happened to the guru? The magician? The computer expert at your company who knew everything. I have worked at firms that had several who knew IT systems inside and out. They knew every quirky little trick of how applications worked and what made them fail, and they could tell you which page of the user manual discussed the exact feature you were interested in. If something went wrong you needed a guru, and with a couple keystrokes they could fix just about anything. You knew a guru by their long hair, shabby dress, and the Star Trek paperback in their back pocket. And when you needed something technical done, you went to see them. That now seems like a distant memory. I have lately been hearing a steady stream of complaints from non-IT folks that IT does not respond to requests and does not seem to know how to get out of their own way.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>New Paper: Email-based Threat Intelligence</title><link>/blog/new-paper-email-based-threat-intelligence/</link><pubDate>Thu, 21 Mar 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/new-paper-email-based-threat-intelligence/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;The next chapter in our Threat Intelligence arc, which started with &lt;a href="https://securosis.com/research/papers/building-an-early-warning-system"&gt;Building an Early Warning System&lt;/a&gt; and then delved down to the network in &lt;a href="https://securosis.com/research/papers/network-based-threat-intelligence-searching-for-the-smoking-gun"&gt;Network-based Threat Intelligence&lt;/a&gt;, now moves on to the content layer. Or at least one layer. Email continues to be the predominant initial attack mechanism. Whether it is to deliver a link to a malware site or a highly targeted spear phishing email, many attacks begin in the inbox.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Services are a startup’s friend</title><link>/blog/services-are-a-startups-friend/</link><pubDate>Thu, 21 Mar 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/services-are-a-startups-friend/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I try to read a variety of different non-security resources each week, to stay in touch with both technology and startup culture. Of course, we at Securosis are kind of a startup. We are small and we’re investing significantly in software (which is late and over budget, like all software projects). But we choose not to deal with outside investors and to have reasonable growth expectations, since ultimately we do this job because we love it. Not because we’re trying to retire any time soon.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>DHS raises the deflector shields</title><link>/blog/dhs-raises-the-deflector-shields/</link><pubDate>Wed, 20 Mar 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/dhs-raises-the-deflector-shields/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;All you IT professionals out there who want to divert attention, give your exec&amp;rsquo;s a warm and fuzzy feeling you&amp;rsquo;re saving money and making you&amp;rsquo;re users experience better, just do what the DHS did. Margaret Graves, DHS deputy CIO, pulled a page from Star Trek and flummoxed Congress with some Techno-Babble. From &lt;a href="http://www.networkworld.com/news/2013/032013-dhs-shifting-to-cloud-agile-267910.html"&gt;Network World&lt;/a&gt;:&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Incite 3/20/2013: Falling down</title><link>/blog/incite-3-20-2013-falling-down/</link><pubDate>Wed, 20 Mar 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/incite-3-20-2013-falling-down/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I read a &lt;a href="http://www.forbes.com/sites/kathycaprino/2012/05/23/10-lessons-i-learned-from-sara-blakely-that-you-wont-hear-in-business-school/"&gt;profile of Spanx’s Sara Blakely in Forbes Billionaires issue&lt;/a&gt;, and the tip that really resonated was that at dinner each night, her father would ask each child what they failed that day. Wait, what? He would be disappointed if the kids didn’t fail something because it meant they weren’t stretching far enough out of their comfort zone. Damn, I wish I thought of that.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>The World’s Most Targeted Critical Infrastructure</title><link>/blog/the-worlds-most-targeted-critical-infrastructure-2/</link><pubDate>Wed, 20 Mar 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/the-worlds-most-targeted-critical-infrastructure-2/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.theverge.com/2013/3/19/4125886/microsoft-confirms-high-profile-employee-xbox-live-accounts-hacked"&gt;Microsoft confirms ‘high-profile’ employee Xbox Live accounts hacked&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.theverge.com/2013/3/19/4124456/major-vulnerability-ea-origin-hackers-overtake-gamer-pcs"&gt;Major vulnerability in EA’s Origin platform lets hackers overtake PCs&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Anyone surprised? Games made an estimated $25.1B in 2010 in the US alone. This is an industry under constant attack – just ask Sony. I’d love to learn more security lessons from them.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Who comes up with this stuff?</title><link>/blog/who-comes-up-with-this-stuff/</link><pubDate>Wed, 20 Mar 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/who-comes-up-with-this-stuff/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.theverge.com/2013/3/20/4127438/galaxy-note-ii-security-flaw-disables-lockscreen-gives-complete-access"&gt;Galaxy Note II security flaw lets intruders gain full device access&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.iphoneincanada.ca/ios/confirmed-ios-6-1-3-has-another-passcode-security-flaw/"&gt;Confirmed: iOS 6.1.3 Has Another Passcode Security Flaw&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The iOS one in particular is very limited, but I am continuously astounded by the creativity of some of these passcode flaws. Give me SQL injection or heap sprays any day…&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>If you don’t know where you’re going…</title><link>/blog/if-you-dont-know-where-youre-going-2/</link><pubDate>Tue, 19 Mar 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/if-you-dont-know-where-youre-going-2/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;How will you know when you get there? That’s the point our pal Kevin Riggins made during his first RSA Conference talk. &lt;a href="http://www.symantec.com/connect/blogs/winchester-house-security-why-enterprise-security-architecture-matters"&gt;He wrote up the talk&lt;/a&gt; and allowed it to be posted on the Symantec blog. Kevin uses the metaphor of the &lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Winchester_Mystery_House"&gt;Winchester Mystery House&lt;/a&gt; as a clear (and rather painful) analogy for how far too many people operate their security environments.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>When Bad Tech Journalism Gets Worse</title><link>/blog/when-bad-tech-journalism-gets-worse/</link><pubDate>Tue, 19 Mar 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/when-bad-tech-journalism-gets-worse/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Writing is hard – I get it. Tech writing is hard – I get it. Tech journalism is hard, especially when you need to translate complex technological issues into prose that the common reader (depending on your demographic) can understand. Writing about security for TidBITS and Macworld for the past 6 or so years has been an amazing educational experience as I have had to learn exactly how to walk this tightrope and explain things like memory parsing vulnerabilities and ASLR to consumers.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>New Job Diligence</title><link>/blog/new-job-diligence/</link><pubDate>Mon, 18 Mar 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/new-job-diligence/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I am pretty upfront about my turbulent job history. Some of the issues were due to not doing enough homework up front before taking a job. But as I look back I am not sure I would have made different decisions about which jobs to take even if I had done more homework. A post at &lt;em&gt;SCMagazine&lt;/em&gt; by Justin Somaini makes a couple good points about &lt;a href="http://www.scmagazine.com/before-you-take-the-plunge/article/280940/"&gt;what questions to ask before taking a CISO job&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>The Right Guy; the Wrong Crime</title><link>/blog/the-right-guy-the-wrong-crime/</link><pubDate>Mon, 18 Mar 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/the-right-guy-the-wrong-crime/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2013/03/auernheimer-aka-weev-sentenced-to-41-months-for-attipad-hack/"&gt;Internet troll “weev” sentenced to 41 months for AT&amp;amp;T/iPad hack&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Weev is a total sociopath (not just a troll), and I have no sympathy for him. He wouldn’t know altruism if it kicked him in the nads, and I have little doubt his goal was to harm AT&amp;amp;T with his discovery. But, by all appearances, this is a weak case and a stretch of the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act with consequences not only for legitimate security research, but for Internet use in general.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Preparation Yields Results</title><link>/blog/preparation-yields-results/</link><pubDate>Sun, 17 Mar 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/preparation-yields-results/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;As a huge NFL fan with the DTs without a game to obsess about each week, I am constantly looking for parallels between football and my daily existence. Adrian talked a bit in one of his &lt;a href="https://securosis.com/blog/incite-3-13-13-get-shorty"&gt;Incite snippets last week&lt;/a&gt; about how &lt;a href="https://threatpost.com/en_us/blogs/how-facebook-prepared-be-hacked-030813"&gt;Facebook uses red team exercises to make sure they are prepared&lt;/a&gt; for the real thing.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>The Dangerous Dance of Product Reviews</title><link>/blog/the-dangerous-dance-of-product-reviews/</link><pubDate>Fri, 15 Mar 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/the-dangerous-dance-of-product-reviews/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;One of the things I miss least about doing marketing on a daily basis is product reviews. Of course when you win it’s awesome. You can then puff up your chest and take a victory lap as the sales folks use the review to beat down the competition. But when you lose it totally sucks. And depending on the culture of the company, unless it was a clear and decisive victory, it may be taken as a loss. Which requires damage control, forcing you to spin why the test was flawed. Then you need to question the integrity of the reviewer. That makes you many friends in the media community. Basically you have to figure out a way to make manure smell like roses. And no, it doesn’t usually work.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Limit Yourself, Not Your Kids—Friday Summary: March 15, 2013</title><link>/blog/limit-yourself-not-your-kids-friday-summary-march-15-2013-2/</link><pubDate>Thu, 14 Mar 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/limit-yourself-not-your-kids-friday-summary-march-15-2013-2/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Raising children in the age of the Internet is both exhilarating and terrifying.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;As a geek I am jealous of the technology my children will grow up with. You can make the argument that technology &lt;em&gt;always&lt;/em&gt; advances, and my children will feel the same way about their offspring, but I think the genesis of the Internet is a clear demarcation line in human history.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Ramping up the ‘Cyber’ Rhetoric</title><link>/blog/ramping-up-the-cyber-rhetoric/</link><pubDate>Thu, 14 Mar 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/ramping-up-the-cyber-rhetoric/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;The rhetoric about cyberattacks is nearly deafening. It seems like my Twitter timeline blows up every day about cyber-this or cyber-that. Makes me want to cyber-puke. Since Mandiant pointed the finger at China everyone seems to be jumping on the bandwagon of tough talk and posturing.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>A Brief Privacy Breach History Lesson</title><link>/blog/a-brief-privacy-breach-history-lesson/</link><pubDate>Wed, 13 Mar 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/a-brief-privacy-breach-history-lesson/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;The big &lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ChoicePoint#Major_security_breaches"&gt;ChoicePoint breach of 2004&lt;/a&gt; was the result of criminals creating false business accounts and running credit reports on hundreds of thousands of customers (probably). Every major credit/background company has experienced this kind of breach of service going back decades – just look at the &lt;a href="http://datalossdb.org/"&gt;Dataloss DB&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Incite 3/13/13: Get Shorty</title><link>/blog/incite-3-13-13-get-shorty/</link><pubDate>Wed, 13 Mar 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/incite-3-13-13-get-shorty/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;It’s hard to believe, but my family and I have been in Atlanta almost 9 years. The twins were babies; now they are people. Well, kind of. I grew up in the Northeast and spent many days shoveling our driveway during big snowstorms. Our 15 years in Northern Virginia provided a bit less shoveling time, but not much.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Compromising Cloud Managed Infrastructure</title><link>/blog/compromising-cloud-managed-infrastructure/</link><pubDate>Tue, 12 Mar 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/compromising-cloud-managed-infrastructure/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;The Nibble security blog had a very good post on &lt;a href="http://blog.nibblesec.org/2013/03/subverting-cloud-based-infrastructure.html"&gt;Subverting a Cloud-based Infrastructure with XSS and BEEF&lt;/a&gt;. They essentially constructed an XSS attack to issue network infrastructure management commands without user knowledge.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Could This Be the First Crack in the PCI Scam?</title><link>/blog/could-this-be-the-first-crack-in-the-pci-scam/</link><pubDate>Tue, 12 Mar 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/could-this-be-the-first-crack-in-the-pci-scam/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;A sports clothing retailer is &lt;a href="http://www.wired.com/threatlevel/2013/03/genesco-sues-visa"&gt;suing Visa to recover a $13M fine for a potential data breach&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The suit takes on the payment card industry’s powerful money-making system of punishing merchants and their banks for breaches, even without evidence that card data was stolen. It accuses Visa of levying legally unenforceable penalties that masquerade as fines and unsupported damages and also accuses Visa of breaching its own contracts with the banks, failing to follow its own rules and procedures for levying penalties and engaging in unfair business practices under California law, where Visa is based.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Email-based Threat Intelligence: Quick Wins</title><link>/blog/email-based-threat-intelligence-quick-wins/</link><pubDate>Tue, 12 Mar 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/email-based-threat-intelligence-quick-wins/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;We are big on Quick Wins at Securosis. Mostly because we know how hard it is to justify new technology (or processes or people), and that if you can’t show value &lt;em&gt;quickly&lt;/em&gt; on a new project, every subsequent request gets harder and harder to get through. Until you have a breach, that is. Then your successor gets &lt;em&gt;carte blanche&lt;/em&gt; for a honeymoon period to do the stuff you were trying to do the whole time.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>TripWire nCircles the Vulnerability Management Wagon</title><link>/blog/tripwire-ncircles-the-vulnerability-management-wagon/</link><pubDate>Tue, 12 Mar 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/tripwire-ncircles-the-vulnerability-management-wagon/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;It’s funny how you suddenly remember random conversations from months ago at the strangest times. I recall having breakfast with some of my pals at TripWire at RSA 2012 (yes, 13 months ago), and them peppering me about the vulnerability management market. Obviously they were shopping for deals, but most of the big players then seemed economically out of reach for TripWire. And there was nothing economically feasible I could recommend for them in good conscience.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Email-based Threat Intelligence: Analyzing the Phish Food Chain</title><link>/blog/email-based-threat-intelligence-analyzing-the-phish-food-chain/</link><pubDate>Mon, 11 Mar 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/email-based-threat-intelligence-analyzing-the-phish-food-chain/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;As we discussed in &lt;a href="https://securosis.com/blog/email-based-threat-intelligence-industrial-phishing-tactics"&gt;Industrial Phishing Tactics&lt;/a&gt;, phishing is a precursor to many attacks in the wild. Phishing attacks are designed to get victims to click something, then to share the victim’s account credentials and download malware; and of course they leave a trail like everything else. Following that trail can help you prioritize remediation activities, identify adversaries, and ultimately take action to protect both your environment and your customers. But first you must be able to analyze the email to identify the patterns to look for. And that requires a lot of email – a whole lot.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>The BYOD problem is what?</title><link>/blog/the-byod-problem-is-what/</link><pubDate>Mon, 11 Mar 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/the-byod-problem-is-what/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;In the immortal words of Jay-Z, you’ve got 99 problems but BYOD ain’t one of them. Colin Steele does a good job of putting the BYOD (and broader mobility) situation in proper context in &lt;a href="http://www.brianmadden.com/blogs/guestbloggers/archive/2013/03/07/you-can-t-solve-byod-because-it-s-not-a-problem.aspx"&gt;You can’t solve BYOD because it’s not a problem&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Untargeted Attack</title><link>/blog/untargeted-attack/</link><pubDate>Mon, 11 Mar 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/untargeted-attack/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I was perplexed by the wording of many initial reports on the recent attacks ‘against’ Apple, Facebook, Twitter, and Microsoft. Sure, maybe they were targeted, but it seems just as likely that the attackers just picked popular developer sites and harvested some big fish.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>In Search of ... Data Scientists</title><link>/blog/in-search-of-data-scientists/</link><pubDate>Sun, 10 Mar 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/in-search-of-data-scientists/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Shiny technology objects make us happy. Admit it – you want to believe the buzzword &lt;em&gt;du jour&lt;/em&gt; will make things better. Or less crappy. But if the capabilities and value of new technology are contingent on humans, eventually you run into the most debilitating of constraints: expertise limitations. It seems like everyone wants to talk about &lt;em&gt;Big Data Analytics,&lt;/em&gt; but the inconvenient truth is that without the math folks Big Data doesn’t do much.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Email-based Threat Intelligence: Industrial Phishing Tactics (New Series)</title><link>/blog/email-based-threat-intelligence-industrial-phishing-tactics/</link><pubDate>Fri, 08 Mar 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/email-based-threat-intelligence-industrial-phishing-tactics/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Threat Intelligence comes in many shapes and sizes, all of which are helpful for &lt;a href="https://securosis.com/research/papers/building-an-early-warning-system"&gt;Early Warning&lt;/a&gt; of imminent attack. After introducing the initial Early Warning concepts, we recently delved into how network telemetry and other information about your pipes can help to identify compromised devices in &lt;a href="https://securosis.com/research/papers/network-based-threat-intelligence-searching-for-the-smoking-gun"&gt;Network-based Threat Intelligence&lt;/a&gt;. We continue discussing all sorts of threat intel by focusing on phishing in our new series, &lt;em&gt;Email-based Threat Intelligence&lt;/em&gt;. We stay true to our naming conventions.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Encryption Spending up in 2012</title><link>/blog/encryption-spending-up-in-2012/</link><pubDate>Fri, 08 Mar 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/encryption-spending-up-in-2012/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Thales released a 2012 survey on &lt;a href="http://www.deepdiveintel.com/2013/02/26/encryption-spending-jumps/"&gt;encryption spending trends&lt;/a&gt; today. In a nutshell, spending was up a modest amount for the first time in several years. From the Deep Dive post:&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Security Education still an underused defense</title><link>/blog/security-education-still-an-underused-defense/</link><pubDate>Fri, 08 Mar 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/security-education-still-an-underused-defense/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;One trend we see coming on like a freight train is the rebirth of security awareness training. Folks are working on content that doesn’t suck and enterprises are finally starting to gather data about how stupid mistakes (such as clicking phishing messages) are decreasing after training sessions. NetworkWorld recently ran an article (in their Insider section, which requires registration – &lt;strong&gt;boo&lt;/strong&gt;!) providing &lt;a href="http://www.networkworld.com/news/2013/030613-spear-phishing-267409.html"&gt;some tips to deal with phishing&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Friday Summary: March 8, 2013.</title><link>/blog/friday-summary-march-8-2013/</link><pubDate>Thu, 07 Mar 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/friday-summary-march-8-2013/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I think I’m finally waking up. After a week at RSA where I basically don’t sleep – not all bad, mind you – it takes a while to recover. In fact Monday might as well not have happened – I certainly got nothing done. It was not for lack of trying, but I was simply part of the zombie apocalypse – but I don’t want brains, just some Captain Crunch and sleep. Today I had the ‘Oh crap!’ realization – I promised people things last week, and I need to deliver. As much as I’d like to shuffle this stuff onto Rich, he has got a new baby and won’t take my calls. Something about taking it easy and enjoying time with the family.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Understanding Cloud IAM: Buyers Guide</title><link>/blog/understanding-cloud-iam-buyers-guide/</link><pubDate>Thu, 07 Mar 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/understanding-cloud-iam-buyers-guide/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;With our last post in this series on Understanding and Selecting Cloud Identity and Access Management, we want to help guide you through product selection. No two customer environments or lists of requirements are the same, but key decision criteria will help you narrow down the field to suitable platforms. We will provide questions to help determine which vendors offer solutions that fit your architecture, a set of criteria to measure the appropriateness of a vendor solution to your design goals, and help walk you through the evaluation process.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Use cases are your friends</title><link>/blog/use-cases-are-your-friend/</link><pubDate>Thu, 07 Mar 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/use-cases-are-your-friend/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;As if the IBM Security Systems folks weren’t busy enough with the RSA Conference last week, they flew directly from San Francisco to Vegas for their annual Pulse Conference. Sure it’s a lot of back-patting and antennae rubbing, but there is usually a good nugget or two from their customer presentations.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Flash! And it’s gone…</title><link>/blog/flash-and-its-gone-2/</link><pubDate>Wed, 06 Mar 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/flash-and-its-gone-2/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;We all knew the Flash was fast. But it seems Apple has made Flash so fast you can’t even use it on your Macs. Well, actually, they put some new protections in to ensure &lt;a href="http://www.scmagazine.com/apple-wont-let-users-run-flash-unless-it-is-the-latest-version/article/282954/"&gt;only the latest version of Flash runs on Mac OS X 10.6 and later&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Incite 3/6/2013: Karmic Balance</title><link>/blog/incite-3-6-2013-karmic-balance/</link><pubDate>Wed, 06 Mar 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/incite-3-6-2013-karmic-balance/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;My career has been turbulent at times. I know that’s shocking to those of you who know me personally. When I was invited not to come to work at my last job in VA, I already had a good position at a hot start-up in Atlanta lined up. They were well aware of my situation, and once I was a free agent the deal got done quickly. I had one real estate agent selling a house in VA, and another looking for property in Atlanta. Full speed ahead.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Isolating the Security Skills Gap</title><link>/blog/isolating-the-security-skills-gap/</link><pubDate>Tue, 05 Mar 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/isolating-the-security-skills-gap/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;It looks like Ray Umerley had a good time at the RSA Conference. Besides seeing pics on the Tweeter of him at the Ju Jitsu gathering, he took some time to document his thoughts about what he saw at the show (&lt;a href="http://secjitsu.com/2013/03/02/rsa-conference-2013-my-takeaways/"&gt;RSA Conference 2013: My Takeways&lt;/a&gt;). Ray covers security intelligence, and how as you collect more security data, it becomes more important that it be used within a security/risk management program.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Announcing the CCSK UK Train the Trainer Class in April</title><link>/blog/announcing-the-ccsk-uk-train-the-trainer-class-in-april/</link><pubDate>Mon, 04 Mar 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/announcing-the-ccsk-uk-train-the-trainer-class-in-april/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Clearly the world is not enough. So I’ll be getting my 007 on in the UK in early April to deliver our Cloud Security Training. We have recently updated the curriculum to the Cloud Security Alliance Guidance V3.0, and I have to say it kicks butt. Many of the hands-on exercises have been overhauled, and if you are looking to get familiar with cloud security you will want to check out this class.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Be Careful What You Wish for…Now You’re CISO</title><link>/blog/be-careful-what-you-wish-fornow-youre-ciso-2/</link><pubDate>Mon, 04 Mar 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/be-careful-what-you-wish-fornow-youre-ciso-2/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Hat tip to our pals at TripWire, who do a good job of leveraging the security community to generate interesting and entertaining content. They have a guy named David Spark who roams around the floor at trade shows like RSA and captures video. A recent video asked, &lt;a href="http://www.tripwire.com/state-of-security/it-security-data-protection/connecting-security-to-the-business/what-would-you-do-if-you-became-ciso/"&gt;What would you do if you became CISO?&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>New Paper: Network-based Threat Intelligence</title><link>/blog/new-paper-network-based-threat-intelligence/</link><pubDate>Sun, 03 Mar 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/new-paper-network-based-threat-intelligence/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Hot on the heels of our &lt;a href="https://securosis.com/research/papers/building-an-early-warning-system"&gt;Building an Early Warning System&lt;/a&gt; paper, we have taken a much deeper look at the network aspect of threat intelligence in Network-based Threat Intelligence. We have always held to the belief that the network never lies (okay – almost never), and that provides a great basis on which to build an Early Warning System.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Friday Summary, RSA Edition: March 1, 2012</title><link>/blog/friday-summary-rsa-edition-march-1-2012/</link><pubDate>Fri, 01 Mar 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/friday-summary-rsa-edition-march-1-2012/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Rich here,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I need to apologize a bit for sending the Summary out a day late. As most of you know, this week is the big annual RSA Conference and we, Securosis, were busy as heck with conference activities. Between e10+, the Security Blogger’s Meetup, the Securosis Disaster Recovery Breakfast, and tons of conference meetings, it is the busiest week of our year.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Shattered Windows: the Impact of Attack Automation</title><link>/blog/shattered-windows-the-impact-of-attack-automation/</link><pubDate>Fri, 01 Mar 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/shattered-windows-the-impact-of-attack-automation/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;In 2011, our friend &lt;a href="http://blog.cognitivedissidents.com/2011/11/01/intro-to-hdmoores-law/"&gt;Josh Corman codified “HD Moore’s Law”&lt;/a&gt;:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Casual Attacker power grows at the rate of Metasploit&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;For those who don’t know, Metasploit, created by HD Moore, is a free penetration testing framework (it is now owned by Rapid7, who also sells a commercial version). Metasploit allows an attacker to rapidly combine an exploit with a payload and initiate attacks, dramatically reducing the complexity compared to hand-coding an attack yourself. Unlike other commercial tools such as Immunity Canvas and Core Impact, Metasploit has a large community, and when new vulnerabilities or exploits become public they are typically converted into Metasploit modules extremely quickly (sometimes within hours). Once a module is published, anyone using Metasploit can leverage that attack.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>About the Security Blogger’s Meetup</title><link>/blog/about-the-security-bloggers-meetup-2/</link><pubDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/about-the-security-bloggers-meetup-2/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Seven years ago I had recently started blogging and emailed a few other bloggers to see if we should get together at the RSA Conference. Some of these people I knew, many I didn’t, and I thought it would be fun to have face to face arguments with a beer in hand, instead of behind a keyboard (with a beer in hand). Very &lt;strong&gt;very&lt;/strong&gt; quickly we received offers to sponsor, and we turned it into an actual invite-only event organized by myself, Martin McKeay, and Alan Shimel, with Jennifer Leggio doing, literally, all the hard work.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Bit9 Details Breach</title><link>/blog/bit9-details-breach/</link><pubDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/bit9-details-breach/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://blog.bit9.com/2013/02/25/bit9-security-incident-update/"&gt;Bit9 released more details of how they were hacked.&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The level of detail is excellent, and there seems to be minimal or no spin. There are a couple additional details it might be valuable to see (specifics of the SQL injection and how user accounts were compromised), but overall the post is clear, with a ton of specifics on some of what they are finding.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Go buy Take Control of Your Passwords</title><link>/blog/go-buy-take-control-of-your-passwords/</link><pubDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/go-buy-take-control-of-your-passwords/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Joe Kissell, with whom I ‘work’ over at &lt;a href="http://tidbits.com/"&gt;TidBITS&lt;/a&gt;, just published &lt;a href="http://tidbits.com/article/13591"&gt;Take Control of Your Passwords&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Joe asked me to review the book ahead of time, and it should be mandatory reading (no, I don’t get a cut – that’s my honest opinion). Joe covers the range of password issues I have ranted on before, then includes specific strategies for managing them. Many of you who read this site might not need the book, but I guarantee nearly everyone you know will get something out of it, even if they only read some sections.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Looky here. Adaptive Authentication works…</title><link>/blog/looky-here-adaptive-authentication-works-2/</link><pubDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/looky-here-adaptive-authentication-works-2/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;It’s funny how some technologies fall out of the hype cycle and folks kind of forget about them. But that doesn’t mean these technologies don’t work any more. &lt;em&gt;Au contraire,&lt;/em&gt; it usually means a technology works too well, and just isn’t exciting to talk about any more. Let’s take the case of adaptive authentication: using analytics to determine when to implement stronger authentication. It appears &lt;a href="http://googleonlinesecurity.blogspot.com/2013/02/an-update-on-our-war-against-account.html"&gt;Google has started taking an adaptive approach to authentication for Gmail&lt;/a&gt; over the past 18 months:&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Everything I need to know about security, I learned in kindergarten</title><link>/blog/everything-i-need-to-know-about-security-i-learned-in-kindergarten/</link><pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/everything-i-need-to-know-about-security-i-learned-in-kindergarten/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Let’s just say I almost failed sharing back in kindergarten. Almost 40 years later I’m not a hell of a lot better at sharing (just ask my kids), but if you want to be good at security, you had better do better at sharing than me. Good points here by Don Srebnick (CISO of the City of NY) on using an &lt;a href="http://www.scmagazine.com/sharing-is-caring-take-advantage-of-isac/article/276464/"&gt;ISAC to your advantage&lt;/a&gt;:&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>The Nexus Is Live with the Cloud Security Alliance!</title><link>/blog/the-nexus-is-live-with-the-cloud-security-alliance1/</link><pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/the-nexus-is-live-with-the-cloud-security-alliance1/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;After two years of development, yesterday we flipped the switch and our Nexus product is officially live with our first partner, the Cloud Security Alliance. After all the stress of a nearly-failed launch (one of our security controls decided to filter the payment system) it is incredibly exciting to have this out there for paying customers. Here are some details:&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>When is a Hack a Breach?</title><link>/blog/when-is-a-hack-a-breach/</link><pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/when-is-a-hack-a-breach/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;As the hubbub over &lt;a href="https://securosis.com/blog/facebook-hacked-with-java-flaw"&gt;Apple, Twitter, and Facebook being hacked with the Java flaw&lt;/a&gt; slowly ebbs, word hit late last week that &lt;a href="https://blogs.technet.com/b/msrc/archive/2013/02/22/recent-cyberattacks.aspx?Redirected=true"&gt;Microsoft was also hit in the attack&lt;/a&gt;. Considering the nature of the watering hole attack, odds are that many many other companies have been affected.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>The end of MDM (as we know it). Or not.</title><link>/blog/the-end-of-mdm-as-we-know-it-or-not/</link><pubDate>Mon, 25 Feb 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/the-end-of-mdm-as-we-know-it-or-not/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;You know a technology is close to the top of the hype cycle when talking heads start calling for its demise. &lt;a href="http://www.networkworld.com/community/blog/beginning-end-byod-we-know-it?"&gt;Zeus Kerravala goes medieval on MDM&lt;/a&gt; in this NetworkWorld column:&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Attribution Meh. Indicators YEAH!</title><link>/blog/attribution-meh-indicators-yeah/</link><pubDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/attribution-meh-indicators-yeah/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;In addition to all the cycles we spent in our weekly research meeting trying to come up with cool t-shirt ideas featuring &lt;a href="https://www.mandiant.com/blog/mandiant-exposes-apt1-chinas-cyber-espionage-units-releases-3000-indicators/"&gt;APT1&lt;/a&gt;, we also spent a bunch of time talking about the real impact of the Mandiant report, and how hacking for the Chinese is just different than what the US (and most other governments) do.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Everything is a feature (in time)</title><link>/blog/everything-is-a-feature-in-time/</link><pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/everything-is-a-feature-in-time/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;In the least surprising news of the day, the guy who sold his start-up, Zenprise, to Citrix, concluded that &lt;a href="http://www.citeworld.com/mobile/21442/former-zenprise-ceo-says-standalone-mdm-tough-sell"&gt;selling standalone MDM was a tough sell&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Friday Summary: February 22, 2013—Snow edition</title><link>/blog/friday-summary-february-22-2013-snow-edition-2/</link><pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/friday-summary-february-22-2013-snow-edition-2/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I spent half an hour yesterday morning shoveling snow from the walkways around my house. Most of you reading this will think “so what”, as you see snow on an all-too-regular basis. For me, living in Phoenix, snow is something that happens once every 30 years or so. So for the first time in my life I got a snow day – and it was fun. Only 2 inches, but still, a totally alien experience here on the surface of the sun. Better still, the dogs &lt;em&gt;loved&lt;/em&gt; it:&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Why China’s Hacking is Different</title><link>/blog/why-chinas-hacking-is-different-2/</link><pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/why-chinas-hacking-is-different-2/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;One of the responses that keeps coming up as everyone discusses &lt;a href="https://securosis.com/blog/mandiant-verifies-but-dont-expect-the-floodgates-to-open"&gt;Mandiant’s report on APT1&lt;/a&gt; is, “yeah, but China isn’t the only threat, and even the U.S. engages in offensive hacking”.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>House of Cybercards</title><link>/blog/house-of-cybercards/</link><pubDate>Wed, 20 Feb 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/house-of-cybercards/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;We are in the middle of what may be the single most disruptive transition in the practice of information security. Not one of technology, threats, or practices, but of politics. It is occurring in the hallways of capitals and the planning rooms of militaries, instead of in boardrooms of enterprises and startups in California and Massachusetts. This transition will define our priorities for the coming decades, as well as the winners and losers of the future.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Incite 2/20/2013: Tartar Wars</title><link>/blog/incite-2-20-2013-tartar-wars/</link><pubDate>Wed, 20 Feb 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/incite-2-20-2013-tartar-wars/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;5 years. It doesn’t seem that long. It seems like yesterday I was on the phone screaming at the office manager of my (previous) dentist. He told the Boss something and then backtracked on it, and I had to write a check to fix the problem. I had just dropped my dental insurance and that little &lt;em&gt;optional&lt;/em&gt; procedure wasn’t going to be covered as he had said it would. I told them to pound sand, which was a good move – I settled for perhaps 30% of the cost 18 months later, before it went to collection.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Twitter and OAuth Access Loophole</title><link>/blog/twitter-and-oauth-access-loophole/</link><pubDate>Wed, 20 Feb 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/twitter-and-oauth-access-loophole/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Brent Simmons brought up a great issue regarding the Twitter hack and the way OAuth works. Twitter’s notification to users:&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Understanding Cloud IAM: Implementation Roadmap</title><link>/blog/understanding-cloud-iam-implementation-roadmap/</link><pubDate>Wed, 20 Feb 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/understanding-cloud-iam-implementation-roadmap/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;IAM projects are complex, encompassing most IT infrastructure, and can take years to fully implement and roll out. So trying to do everything at once is a recipe for failure. So we turn our discussion to how to deploy IAM without biting off more than you can chew. We will discuss how to approach building an architectural schema for your particular organization, based on the cloud service and deployment models you have selected. Then we will create different implementation roadmaps depending your project goals and most critical business requirements.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Cars, Babes, and Money: It’s RSAC Time</title><link>/blog/cars-babes-and-money-its-rsac-time-2/</link><pubDate>Tue, 19 Feb 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/cars-babes-and-money-its-rsac-time-2/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Now that we have posted our RSA Conference Guide, we can get back to lampooning the annual ritual of trying to get folks to scan their badges on the show floor. &lt;a href="http://www.ranum.com/security/computer_security/editorials/RSA_in_stripper_shoes/index.html"&gt;Great perspective here from Ranum&lt;/a&gt; on the bad behavior you’ll see next week, all in the name of lead generation. I’m not sure if I should be howling or repulsed by this idea:&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Mandiant Verifies, but Don’t Expect the Floodgates to Open</title><link>/blog/mandiant-verifies-but-dont-expect-the-floodgates-to-open-2/</link><pubDate>Tue, 19 Feb 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/mandiant-verifies-but-dont-expect-the-floodgates-to-open-2/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Unless you have been living in a cave, you know that earlier today &lt;a href="http://intelreport.mandiant.com/"&gt;Mandiant released a report with specific intelligence on the group they designate as APT1&lt;/a&gt;. No one has ever released this level of detail about state-sponsored Chinese hackers. Actually, “state-employed” is probably a better term. This is the kind of public report that could have political implications, and we will be discussing it for a long time.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>The 2013 Securosis Guide to RSA</title><link>/blog/the-2013-securosis-guide-to-rsa/</link><pubDate>Tue, 19 Feb 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/the-2013-securosis-guide-to-rsa/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;We have to admit, this year’s Securosis Guide to RSA is a little over the top.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src="35098961.jpg" alt=""&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A lot over the top.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>AV’s False Sense of Security (and a possible Mac hack?)</title><link>/blog/avs-false-sense-of-security-and-a-possible-mac-hack-2/</link><pubDate>Mon, 18 Feb 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/avs-false-sense-of-security-and-a-possible-mac-hack-2/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Oh F-Secure, how you amuse me.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In a &lt;a href="http://www.f-secure.com/weblog/archives/00002504.html"&gt;post about the hack of Facebook&lt;/a&gt;, F-Secure claims it is likely Macs were targeted, and that this could be related to the recent Twitter hack:&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Network-Based Threat Intelligence: Quick Wins with NBTI</title><link>/blog/network-based-threat-intelligence-quick-wins-with-nbti/</link><pubDate>Mon, 18 Feb 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/network-based-threat-intelligence-quick-wins-with-nbti/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;As we get back into Network-Based Threat Intelligence, let’s briefly revisit our first two posts. We started by highlighting the &lt;a href="https://securosis.com/blog/network-based-threat-intelligence-understanding-the-kill-chain"&gt;Kill Chain&lt;/a&gt;, which delved into the typical attack process used by advanced malware to achieve the attacker’s mission, which usually entails some kind of data exfiltration. Next we asked the 5 key questions (who, what, where, when, and how) to identify indicators of an advanced malware attack that can be captured by &lt;a href="https://securosis.com/blog/network-based-threat-intelligence-following-the-trail-of-bits"&gt;monitoring network traffic&lt;/a&gt;. With these indicators we can deploy sensors to monitor network traffic, and hopefully to identify devices exhibiting bad behavior, &lt;em&gt;before&lt;/em&gt; real damage and exfiltration occur. That’s the concept behind the &lt;a href="https://securosis.com/research/papers/building-an-early-warning-system"&gt;Early Warning System&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Facebook Hacked with Java Flaw</title><link>/blog/facebook-hacked-with-java-flaw-2/</link><pubDate>Fri, 15 Feb 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/facebook-hacked-with-java-flaw-2/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;It’s Friday, so here is a quick link to &lt;a href="http://www.theverge.com/2013/2/15/3993398/facebook-hacked-but-found-no-evidence-that-user-data-was-compromised"&gt;The Verge’s latest&lt;/a&gt;. Developers infected via Java in the browser from a developer info site.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>RSA Conference Guide 2013: Security Management and Compliance</title><link>/blog/rsa-conference-guide-2013-security-management-and-compliance/</link><pubDate>Fri, 15 Feb 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/rsa-conference-guide-2013-security-management-and-compliance/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Given RSA’s investment in security management technology (cough, NetWitness, cough) and the investments of the other big RSAC spenders (IBM, McAfee, HP), you will see a lot about the evolution of security management this year. We alluded to this a bit when talking about Security Big Data Analytics in our &lt;a href="https://securosis.com/blog/rsa-conference-guide-2013-key-themes"&gt;Key Themes&lt;/a&gt; piece, but let’s dig in a bit more…&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Trust us, our CA is secure</title><link>/blog/trust-us-our-ca-is-secure/</link><pubDate>Fri, 15 Feb 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/trust-us-our-ca-is-secure/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Given the number of recent high profile CA compromises, it seems some of the folks who milk the SSL cash cow figured they should do something to sooth customer concerns about integrity. So what to do? What to do? Put a &lt;em&gt;security council&lt;/em&gt; together to convince customers you take security seriously. From &lt;a href="http://www.darkreading.com/authentication/167901072/security/vulnerabilities/240148546/major-certificate-authorities-unite-in-the-name-of-ssl-security.html"&gt;Dark Reading’s coverage of the announcement&lt;/a&gt;:&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Big Data Holdup?</title><link>/blog/big-data-holdup/</link><pubDate>Thu, 14 Feb 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/big-data-holdup/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Computerworld UK ran an interesting article on how &lt;a href="http://www.computerworlduk.com/news/applications/3425725/deutsche-bank-big-data-plans-held-back-by-legacy-systems/"&gt;Deutsche Bank and HMRC are struggling to integrate Hadoop systems with legacy infrastructure&lt;/a&gt;. This is a very real problem for &lt;em&gt;very&lt;/em&gt; large enterprises with significant investments in mainframes, Teradata, Grids, MPP, EDW, whatever. From the post:&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Don’t Bring BS to a Data Fight</title><link>/blog/dont-bring-bs-to-a-data-fight-2/</link><pubDate>Thu, 14 Feb 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/dont-bring-bs-to-a-data-fight-2/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks to a heads-up from our Frozen Tundra correspondent, Jamie Arlen, I got to read this really awesome response by Elon Musk of Tesla refuting the findings of a NYT car reviewer, &lt;a href="http://www.teslamotors.com/blog/most-peculiar-test-drive"&gt;A Most Peculiar Test Drive&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>I’m losing track—is this ANOTHER Adobe 0-day?</title><link>/blog/im-losing-track-is-this-another-adobe-0-day-2/</link><pubDate>Thu, 14 Feb 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/im-losing-track-is-this-another-adobe-0-day-2/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;As reported on Tom’s Guide, FireEye reports they have discovered a &lt;a href="http://www.tomsguide.com/us/zero-day-Flash-PDF-Reader-FireEye-Adobe,news-16771.html"&gt;PDF 0-Day that is currently being exploited in the wild&lt;/a&gt;:&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Quantify Me: Friday Summary: February 15, 2013</title><link>/blog/quantify-me-friday-summary-february-15-2013/</link><pubDate>Thu, 14 Feb 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/quantify-me-friday-summary-february-15-2013/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Rich here.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;There are very few aspects of my life I don’t track, tag, analyze, and test. You could say I’m part of the “Quantified Self” movement if it weren’t for the fact that the only movement I like to participate in involves sitting down, usually with a magazine or newspaper.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>RSA Conference Guide 2013: Application Security</title><link>/blog/rsa-conference-guide-2013-application-security/</link><pubDate>Thu, 14 Feb 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/rsa-conference-guide-2013-application-security/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;So what hot trends in application security will you see at the RSA Conference? Mostly the same as last year’s trends, as lots of things are changing in security, but not much on the appsec front. Application security is a bit like security seasoning: Companies add a sprinkle of threat modeling here, a dash of static analysis there, marinate for a bit with some dynamic app testing (DAST), and serve it all up on a bed of WAF. The good news is that we see some growth in security adoption in every phase of application development (design, implementation, testing, deployment, developer education), with the biggest gains in WAF and DAST. Additionally, according to many studies – including the &lt;a href="https://www.sans.org/reading_room/analysts_program/sans_survey_appsec.pdf"&gt;SANS application security practices survey&lt;/a&gt; – better than 2/3 of software development teams have an application security program in place.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>ECC Certificates About More Than Speed</title><link>/blog/ecc-certificates-about-more-than-speed/</link><pubDate>Wed, 13 Feb 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/ecc-certificates-about-more-than-speed/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Major Update:&lt;/strong&gt; &lt;em&gt;I got a core fact incorrect, in a big way. Thanks to&lt;a href="http://twitter.cim/ivanristic"&gt;@ivanristic&lt;/a&gt; for catching it. It’s an obvious error and I wasn’t thinking things through. ECC is used at a different point than RC4 in establishing a connection, so this doesn’t necessarily affect the use of RC4. David Mortman seems to think it may be more about mobile support and speeding up SSL/TLS on smaller devices. My apologies, and I will leave the initial post up as a record of my error.&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Incite 2/13/2013: Baby(sitter) on Board</title><link>/blog/incite-2-13-2013-babysitter-on-board/</link><pubDate>Wed, 13 Feb 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/incite-2-13-2013-babysitter-on-board/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;The Boss and I don’t get out to see movies too often. At least for the last 12 years or so. It was hard to justify paying a babysitter for two extra hours so we could go see a movie. Quick dinner? Sure. Party with friends, absolutely. But a movie, not so much. We’d wait until Grandma came to visit, and then we’d do things like see movies and have date nights. But I’m happy to say that’s changing.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>RSA Conference Guide 2013: Endpoint Security</title><link>/blog/rsa-conference-guide-2013-endpoint-security/</link><pubDate>Wed, 13 Feb 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/rsa-conference-guide-2013-endpoint-security/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;The more things change, the more they stay the same. Endpoint security remains predominately focused on dealing with malware and the bundling continues unabated. Now we increasingly see endpoint systems management capabilities integrated with endpoint protection, since it finally became clear that an unpatched or poorly configured device may be more of a problem than fighting off a malware attack. And as we discuss below, mobile device management (MDM) is next on the bundling parade. But first things first: advanced malware remains the topic of every day, and vendors will have a lot to say about it at RSAC 2013.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Tuesday Patchapalooza</title><link>/blog/tuesday-patchapalooza/</link><pubDate>Wed, 13 Feb 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/tuesday-patchapalooza/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;“Wait, didn’t I effing just patch that?” That was my initial reaction this morning, when I read about another Adobe Flash security update. Having just updated my systems Sunday, I was about to ignore the alerts until I saw the headline from Threatpost: &lt;a href="http://threatpost.com/en_us/blogs/deja-vu-another-adobe-flash-player-security-update-released-021213"&gt;Deja Vu: Another Adobe Flash Player Security Update Released&lt;/a&gt;:&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Cycling, Baseball, and Known Unknowns</title><link>/blog/cycling-baseballand-known-unknowns/</link><pubDate>Tue, 12 Feb 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/cycling-baseballand-known-unknowns/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;This morning, not even thinking about security, I popped off a tweet on cycling:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src="Screen_Shot_2013-02-12_at_9.32.03_AM.png" alt=""&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I have been annoyed lately, as I keep hearing people write off cycling while ignoring the fact that, despite all its flaws, cycling has a far more rigorous testing regimen than most other professional sports – especially American football and baseball. (Although baseball is taking some decent baby steps).&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Directly Asking the Security Data</title><link>/blog/directly-asking-the-security-data/</link><pubDate>Tue, 12 Feb 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/directly-asking-the-security-data/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;We have long been fans of network forensics tools to provide a deeper and more granular ability to analyze what’s happening on the network. But most of these network forensics tools are still beyond the reach (in terms of both resources and expertise) of mass markets at this point. Rocky D of Visible Risk tackles the question, “I’m collecting packets, so what now?” in his &lt;a href="http://www.visiblerisk.com/blog/2013/2/11/getting-started-with-network-forensics-tools.html"&gt;Getting Started with Network Forensics Tools&lt;/a&gt; post.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>RSA Conference Guide 2013: Cloud Security</title><link>/blog/rsa-conference-guide-2013-cloud-security/</link><pubDate>Tue, 12 Feb 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/rsa-conference-guide-2013-cloud-security/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;2012 was a tremendous year for cloud computing and cloud security, and we don’t expect anything slowdown in 2013. The best part is watching the discussion slowly march past the hype and into the operational realities of securing the cloud. It is still early days, but things are moving along steadily as adoption rates continue to chug along.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>LinkedIn Endorsements Are Social Engineering</title><link>/blog/linkedin-endorsements-are-social-engineering/</link><pubDate>Mon, 11 Feb 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/linkedin-endorsements-are-social-engineering/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Today I &lt;a href="https://twitter.com/rmogull/status/301155154009419776"&gt;popped off a quick tweet&lt;/a&gt; after yet another email from LinkedIn:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Please please please…&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;… stop endorsing me.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Seriously.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Macworld: The Everyday Agony of Passwords</title><link>/blog/macworld-the-everyday-agony-of-passwords/</link><pubDate>Mon, 11 Feb 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/macworld-the-everyday-agony-of-passwords/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.macworld.com/article/2027760/the-everyday-agony-of-the-password.html"&gt;My very first Macworld op-ed:&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;It’s hard to imagine an idea more inane than passwords. That we protect many of the most important aspects of our lives with little more than a short string of text is an extreme absurdity.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>RSA Conference Guide 2013: Identity and Access Management</title><link>/blog/rsa-conference-guide-2013-identity-and-access-management/</link><pubDate>Mon, 11 Feb 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/rsa-conference-guide-2013-identity-and-access-management/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Usually at security events like the RSA Conference there isn’t much buzz about Identity and Access Management. Actually, identity is rarely thought of as a security technology; instead it is largely lumped in with general IT operational stuff. But 2013 feels different. Over the past year our not-so-friendly hacktivists (Anonymous) embarrassed dozens of companies by exposing private data, including account details and password information. Aside from this much more visible threat and consequence, the drive towards mobility and cloud computing/SaaS at best disrupts, and at worst totally breaks, traditional identity management concepts. These larger trends have forced companies to re-examine their IAM strategies. At the same time we see new technologies emerge, promising to turn IAM on its ear.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Saving Them from Themselves</title><link>/blog/today-i-popped-off-a-quick-tweet-after-yet-another-email-from-linkedin-please-please-please-stop-endorsing-me-seriously-i-barely-use-linkedin-for-me-it-is-little-more-than-a/</link><pubDate>Mon, 11 Feb 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/today-i-popped-off-a-quick-tweet-after-yet-another-email-from-linkedin-please-please-please-stop-endorsing-me-seriously-i-barely-use-linkedin-for-me-it-is-little-more-than-a/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;The early stages of the Internet felt a bit like the free love era, in that people could pretty much do what they wanted, even if it was bad for them. I remember having many conversations with telecom carriers about the issues of consumers doing stupid things, getting their devices pwned, and then wreaking havoc on other consumers on the same network. For years the carriers stuck their heads in the sand, basically offering endpoint protection suites for free and throwing bandwidth at the problem.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Low Risk Doesn’t Mean It Won’t Kill You</title><link>/blog/low-risk-doesnt-mean-it-wont-kill-you-2/</link><pubDate>Sun, 10 Feb 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/low-risk-doesnt-mean-it-wont-kill-you-2/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Got an interesting link from my friend Don, who prefers to stay behind the scenes, pointing out an interesting perspective on Jared Diamond, &lt;a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2013/01/29/science/jared-diamonds-guide-to-reducing-lifes-risks.html"&gt;an older guy evaluating the risks of his daily activities&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>TidBITS: Isolate Flash Using Google Chrome</title><link>/blog/tidbits-isolate-flash-using-google-chrome/</link><pubDate>Sun, 10 Feb 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/tidbits-isolate-flash-using-google-chrome/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://tidbits.com/article/13545"&gt;My latest TidBITS piece on Mac security:&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Under normal circumstances, we recommend updating immediately whenever an important security patch is released, but in this case, we have a somewhat different recommendation. Instead of leaving Flash on your Mac, you can instead isolate it and thus reduce the attack surface available to the bad guys. This is both easier and require far less fuss going forward than you might think, and it is how I’ve been using my Mac for the past year or so.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Flash actively exploited on Windows and Mac; how to contain, not just patch</title><link>/blog/flash-actively-exploited-on-windows-and-mac-how-to-contain-not-just-patch/</link><pubDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/flash-actively-exploited-on-windows-and-mac-how-to-contain-not-just-patch/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.adobe.com/support/security/bulletins/apsb13-04.html"&gt;Adobe just released a Flash update due to active exploitation on both Macs (yes, Macs) and Windows&lt;/a&gt;:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Adobe is also aware of reports that CVE-2013-0634 is being exploited in the wild in attacks delivered via malicious Flash (SWF) content hosted on websites that target Flash Player in Firefox or Safari on the Macintosh platform, as well as attacks designed to trick Windows users into opening a Microsoft Word document delivered as an email attachment which contains malicious Flash (SWF) content.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Karma is a Bit9h</title><link>/blog/karma-is-a-bit9h/</link><pubDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/karma-is-a-bit9h/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;First reported by Brian Krebs (as usual), &lt;a href="http://krebsonsecurity.com/2013/02/security-firm-bit9-hacked-used-to-spread-malware/"&gt;security vendor Bit9 was compromised and used to infect their customers.&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;But earlier today, Bit9 told a source for KrebsOnSecurity that their corporate networks had been breached by a cyberattack. According to the source, Bit9 said they’d received reports that some customers had discovered malware inside of their own Bit9-protected networks, malware that was digitally signed by Bit9’s own encryption keys.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Oracle takes another SIP of Hardware</title><link>/blog/oracle-takes-another-sip-of-hardware/</link><pubDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/oracle-takes-another-sip-of-hardware/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Evidently there aren’t any interesting software companies to buy, so &lt;a href="http://dealbook.nytimes.com/2013/02/04/oracle-to-buy-acme-packet-for-2-1-billion/"&gt;Oracle just dropped a cool $2B (as in Billion, sports fans) on Acme Packet&lt;/a&gt;. These guys build session border controllers (SBC), VoIP telecom gear. As &lt;a href="http://andyabramson.blogs.com/voipwatch/2013/02/acme-packet-bought-by-oracle.html"&gt;Andy Abramson says&lt;/a&gt;:&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>PCI Guidance on Cloud Computing</title><link>/blog/pcis-guidance-on-cloud-computing/</link><pubDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/pcis-guidance-on-cloud-computing/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;The PCI Security Standards Council released a &lt;a href="https://www.pcisecuritystandards.org/pdfs/PCI_DSS_v2_Cloud_Guidelines.pdf"&gt;Cloud Guidance&lt;/a&gt; (PDF) paper yesterday. Network World calls this &lt;a href="http://www.networkworld.com/news/2013/020713-security-pci-cloud-266504.html"&gt;Security standards council cuts through PCI cloud confusion&lt;/a&gt;. In some ways that’s true, but in several important areas it does the opposite. Here are a couple examples:&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Friday Summary, February 8, 2013: 3-dot Journalism Version</title><link>/blog/friday-summary-february-8-2013-3-dot-journalism-version/</link><pubDate>Thu, 07 Feb 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/friday-summary-february-8-2013-3-dot-journalism-version/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Every now and again I can’t decide what to discuss on the Friday summary, so this week I will mention all items on my mind.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Network-based Threat Intelligence: Following the Trail of Bits</title><link>/blog/network-based-threat-intelligence-following-the-trail-of-bits/</link><pubDate>Thu, 07 Feb 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/network-based-threat-intelligence-following-the-trail-of-bits/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Our first post in &lt;a href="https://securosis.com/blog/network-based-threat-intelligence-understanding-the-kill-chain"&gt;Network-based Threat Intelligence&lt;/a&gt; delved into the kill chain. We outlined the process attackers go through to compromise a device and steal its data. Attackers are very good at their jobs, so it’s best to assume any endpoint is compromised. But with recent advances in obscuring attacks (through tactics such as VM awareness) and the sad fact that many compromised devices lie in wait for instructions from their C&amp;amp;C network, you need to start thinking a bit differently about finding these compromised devices – &lt;em&gt;even if they don’t act compromised&lt;/em&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>RSA Conference Guide 2013: Network Security</title><link>/blog/rsa-conference-guide-2013-network-security/</link><pubDate>Thu, 07 Feb 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/rsa-conference-guide-2013-network-security/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;After many years in the wilderness of non-innovation, there has been a lot of activity in the network security space over the past few years. Your grand-pappy’s firewall is dead and a lot of organizations are in the process of totally rebuilding their perimeter defenses. At the same time, the perimeter gradually becomes even more a mythical beast of yesteryear, forcing folks to ponder how to enforce network isolation and segmentation while the underlying cloud and virtualized technology architectures are built specifically to break isolation and segmentation.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>The Increasing Irrelevance of Vulnerability Disclosure</title><link>/blog/the-increasing-irrelevance-of-vulnerability-disclosure/</link><pubDate>Thu, 07 Feb 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/the-increasing-irrelevance-of-vulnerability-disclosure/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Gunter Ollmann (now of IOActive) offers a very interesting analysis of why &lt;a href="http://blog.ioactive.com/2013/02/2012-vulnerability-disclosure.html"&gt;vulnerability disclosures don’t really matter any more&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;But I digress. The crux of the matter as to why annual vulnerability statistics don’t matter and will continue to matter less in a practical sense as times goes by is because they only reflect ‘Disclosures’. In essence, for a vulnerability to be counted (and attribution applied) it must be publicly disclosed, and more people are finding it advantageous to not do that.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Bamital botnet shut down</title><link>/blog/bamital-botnet-shut-down/</link><pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/bamital-botnet-shut-down/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Microsoft and Symantec today announced they have jointly taken down the command and control infrastructure of the Bamital botnet, which managed a massive click-fraud scheme. From &lt;a href="http://news.yahoo.com/exclusive-software-makers-disrupt-cyber-ring-halt-searches-201207523--finance.html"&gt;Yahoo news&lt;/a&gt;:&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Incite 2/6/2013: The Void</title><link>/blog/incite-2-6-2013-the-void/</link><pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/incite-2-6-2013-the-void/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;It’s over. Sunday night, when the confetti fell on the Ravens and we finished cleaning up the residual mess from the Super Bowl party, the reality set in. No NFL for months. Yeah, people will start getting fired up about spring training, but baseball just isn’t my thing. Not as a spectator sport. I can take some comfort that in the NFL being a 12-month enterprise now. In a few weeks the combine will give us a look at the next generation of football stars. Then we’ll start following free agency in early March to see who is going to be in and who is out. It’s like Project Runway, but with much higher stakes (and no Tim Gunn). I guess there are other sports to follow, like NCAA Basketball. The March Madness tournament is always fun. Until I’m blown out of all my brackets – then it’s not so fun anymore. But it’s not football.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Network-based Threat Intelligence: Understanding the Kill Chain</title><link>/blog/network-based-threat-intelligence-understanding-the-kill-chain/</link><pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/network-based-threat-intelligence-understanding-the-kill-chain/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Our recently published &lt;a href="https://securosis.com/research/papers/building-an-early-warning-system"&gt;Early Warning paper&lt;/a&gt; put forth the idea of leveraging external threat intelligence to better utilize internal data collection, further shortening the window between weaponized attack and ability to detect said attack. But of course, the Devil is in the details and taking this concept to reality means delving into actually putting these ideas into practice. There are number of different types of “threat intelligence” that can (and should) be utilized in an Early Warning context. We’ve already documented a detailed process map and metric model to undertaking malware analysis (check out our &lt;a href="https://securosis.com/research/papers/malware-analysis-quant-report"&gt;Malware Analysis Quant&lt;/a&gt; research). Being able to identify and search for those specific indicators of compromise on your devices can be invaluable to determine the extent of an outbreak.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>RSA Conference Guide 2013: Data Security</title><link>/blog/rsa-conference-guide-2013-data-security/</link><pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/rsa-conference-guide-2013-data-security/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Between WikiLeaks imploding, the LulzSec crew going to jail, and APT becoming business as usual, you might think data security was just &lt;em&gt;so&lt;/em&gt; 2011, but the war isn’t over yet.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>The Fifth Annual Securosis Disaster Recovery Breakfast</title><link>/blog/2013-recoverybreakfast/</link><pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/2013-recoverybreakfast/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src="RecoveryBreakfastInvite-2013.002_thumb.png" alt=""&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Game on!&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;It’s hard to imagine, but this year we are hosting the Fifth Annual RSA Conference Disaster Recovery Breakfast, in partnership with SchwartzMSL and Kulesa Faul (and possibly one more surprise guest).&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>The Problem with Android Patches</title><link>/blog/the-problem-with-android-patches/</link><pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/the-problem-with-android-patches/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;At the Kaspersky summit in San Juan, Puerto Rico, Chris Soghoian discussed the problem of Android user’s &lt;a href="http://threatpost.com/en_us/blogs/wireless-carriers-put-notice-about-providing-regular-android-security-updates-020413"&gt;not updating their mobile devices to current software revisions&lt;/a&gt;. From Threatpost:&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Great security analysis of the Evasi0n iOS jailbreak</title><link>/blog/great-security-analysis-of-the-evasi0n-ios-jailbreak/</link><pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/great-security-analysis-of-the-evasi0n-ios-jailbreak/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://blog.accuvantlabs.com/blog/bthomas/evasi0n-jailbreaks-userland-component"&gt;Thanks to your friends at Accuvant labs&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Very worth reading for security pros. Peter Morgan, Ryan Smith, Braden Thomas, and Josh Thomas did an excellent job breaking it down. Here’s the security risk:&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Latest to notice</title><link>/blog/latest-to-notice/</link><pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/latest-to-notice/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;In response to &lt;a href="http://www.scmagazine.com/energy-department-latest-to-be-struck-by-skilled-hackers/article/279178/"&gt;this SC Magazine article&lt;/a&gt; (thanks &lt;a href="http://twitter.com/pauljudge"&gt;@pauljudge&lt;/a&gt;), I tweeted:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src="Screen_Shot_2013-02-05_at_1.57.13_PM.png" alt=""&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;An important distinction to keep in mind when you read these articles.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>New Paper: Understanding and Selecting a Key Management Solution</title><link>/blog/new-paper-understanding-and-selecting-a-key-management-solution/</link><pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/new-paper-understanding-and-selecting-a-key-management-solution/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Yep – we are doing our very best to overload you with research this year. Here’s my latest. From &lt;a href="https://securosis.com/research/papers/understanding-and-selecting-a-key-management-solution"&gt;the paper’s home page&lt;/a&gt;:&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>RSA Conference Guide 2013: Key Themes</title><link>/blog/rsa-conference-guide-2013-key-themes/</link><pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/rsa-conference-guide-2013-key-themes/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;It’s that time of year again. Time to get ready for a week of mayhem, debauchery, and the hunt for tchotchkes. OK, there isn’t a lot of debauchery at the RSA Conference besides the Barracuda party at the Gold Club, which we hear is an establishment of high repute. Realistically, you’ll spend most of your week fending off sales droids, gawking at booth babes (much to the chagrin of the security echo chamber), and maybe learning something about what’s new and exciting in security.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>The Data Breach Triangle in Action</title><link>/blog/data-breach-triangle-in-action/</link><pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/data-breach-triangle-in-action/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I refer back to &lt;a href="https://securosis.com/blog/the-data-breach-triangle/"&gt;Rich’s Data Breach Triangle&lt;/a&gt; over and over again. It’s such a clear and concise way to describe a data breach – past or potential. And we continue to see examples of how focusing on breaking one leg of the triangle works. From &lt;a href="https://threatpost.com/en_us/blogs/how-rsa-attackers-swung-and-missed-lockheed-martin-020413"&gt;How the RSA Attackers Swung and Missed at Lockheed Martin&lt;/a&gt; on Threatpost:&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>If Not Java, What?</title><link>/blog/if-not-java-what/</link><pubDate>Mon, 04 Feb 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/if-not-java-what/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;You have probably noticed some &lt;a href="http://krebsonsecurity.com/2013/02/critical-java-update-fixes-50-security-holes/"&gt;security issues with Java&lt;/a&gt; lately. Some vendors – &lt;a href="https://securosis.com/blog/apple-blocks-vulnerable-java-plugin"&gt;including Apple&lt;/a&gt; – are blocking Java in order to close known and unforeseen security problems. And the claim that open source Java frameworks pose a &lt;a href="http://www.zdnet.com/java-open-source-frameworks-are-a-business-risk-study-7000010617/"&gt;business risk&lt;/a&gt;. But through this latest flame war, I have not seen an answer to the basic question:&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Improving the Hype Cycle</title><link>/blog/improving-the-hype-cycle/</link><pubDate>Mon, 04 Feb 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/improving-the-hype-cycle/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hype_cycle"&gt;Gartner’s Hype Cycle&lt;/a&gt; is one of my favorite market models. It very succinctly describes the ridiculous way PR and other external hype factors make more of a technology than it really is. When many of us show up at the RSA Conference at the end of the month, we will get our best view of the Hype Cycle in action. Most of the stuff very hyped at the show tends to be (roughly) 12 to 18 months from hitting, if it ever does.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Prepare for an iOS update in 5… 4… 3…</title><link>/blog/prepare-for-an-ios-update-in-5-4-3-2/</link><pubDate>Mon, 04 Feb 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/prepare-for-an-ios-update-in-5-4-3-2/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://evasi0n.com/"&gt;Evad3rs releases an iOS 6.1 jailbreak for all devices&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Update:&lt;/strong&gt; According to &lt;a href="http://twitter.com/@drscjmm"&gt;@drscjmm&lt;/a&gt; this will &lt;em&gt;not&lt;/em&gt; work when a passcode is set, which means we are still in pretty good shape from a security standpoint.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Understanding IAM for Cloud Services: Architecture and Design</title><link>/blog/understanding-iam-for-cloud-services-architecture-and-design/</link><pubDate>Mon, 04 Feb 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/understanding-iam-for-cloud-services-architecture-and-design/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;This post will discuss the architecture and deployment models for identity and access management for cloud services. This is obviously complex – we are covering three different cloud service models (SaaS, PaaS, &amp;amp; IaaS); in three different deployment options (public, private, &amp;amp; hybrid); with a variety of communication protocols to address authentication, authorization, and provisioning. The Cloud Security Alliance has cataloged many different identity ‘standards’, but the fact that we have dozens of standards to choose from illustrates how unresolved this whole field is. Worse, each cloud provider’s standards support is likely to vary (incompatibly) from others in the field – so you will likely need custom code to connect and share identity information.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Getting Lost in the Urgent and Forgetting the Important</title><link>/blog/getting-lost-in-the-urgent-and-forgetting-the-important/</link><pubDate>Sun, 03 Feb 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/getting-lost-in-the-urgent-and-forgetting-the-important/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;As usual, one of our friends has succinctly captured the heart of an issue far better than we can. Gunnar, while flattered to be considered for a Security Blogger Hall of Fame award, takes the opportunity to discuss &lt;a href="http://1raindrop.typepad.com/1_raindrop/2013/01/some-thoughts-on-security-blogging-hall-of-fame.html"&gt;the drop in real conversation&lt;/a&gt; as the Tweeter has taken time and attention from many folks who used to hold those real conversations in blogs.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>A New Kind of Commodity Hardware</title><link>/blog/a-new-definition-of-commodity-hardware/</link><pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/a-new-definition-of-commodity-hardware/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I was driving down the road the other day when I passed what I thought was a shipping container on the back of an 18-wheel truck. When I noticed data and power ports on the side, I realized it was a giant data center processing module. Supercomputing on wheels. Four trucks with two modules per truck, rolling down the highway. Inside reside thousands of stripped down motherboards stacked with tons of memory, packed side by side. Some of these are even designed to be filled with dielectric fluid to keep them cool. If you have not seen these things up close and personal, check out the latest article on &lt;a href="http://www.wired.com/wiredenterprise/2013/02/boydton"&gt;Microsoft’s new data center&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Apple blocks vulnerable Java plugin</title><link>/blog/apple-blocks-vulnerable-java-plugin/</link><pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/apple-blocks-vulnerable-java-plugin/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://discussions.apple.com/message/21090749#21%20090%20749"&gt;Apple uses XProtect to block the Java browser plugin due to security concerns&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Draconian, but a good move, I think. Still, they should have notified users better for the ones who need Java in the browser (whoever that may be). You can still manually enable it to run if you need to. This doesn’t block Java itself, just the browser plugin. If complaint levels stay low, it indicates how few people use Java in the browser, and will empower Apple to make similar moves in the future.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Oracle Patches Java. Again.</title><link>/blog/oracle-patches-java-again/</link><pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/oracle-patches-java-again/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.us-cert.gov/cas/techalerts/TA13-032A.html"&gt;What’s the over/under on this one working?&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Mac users – this means XProtect won’t block it in your web browser, so if you don’t want it active be careful.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Pointing fingers is misleading (and stupid)</title><link>/blog/pointing-fingers-is-misleading-and-stupid/</link><pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/pointing-fingers-is-misleading-and-stupid/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Everyone is all fired up that the APT is now targeting major media companies. Rich covered that in &lt;a href="https://securosis.com/blog/no-limits-new-york-times-hacked-by-china"&gt;yesterday’s post&lt;/a&gt;, and now it seems the &lt;a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424127887323926104578276202952260718.html"&gt;Wall Street Journal was also targeted by similar tactics&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Twitter Hacked</title><link>/blog/twitter-hacked1/</link><pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/twitter-hacked1/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Twitter announced this evening that some &lt;a href="http://blog.twitter.com/2013/02/keeping-our-users-secure.html"&gt;250k user accounts were compromised&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This week, we detected unusual access patterns that led to us identifying unauthorized access attempts to Twitter user data. We discovered one live attack and were able to shut it down in process moments later. However, our investigation has thus far indicated that the attackers may have had access to limited user information – usernames, email addresses, session tokens and encrypted/salted versions of passwords – for approximately 250,000 users.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Friday Summary: February 1, 2013</title><link>/blog/friday-summary-february-1-2013/</link><pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/friday-summary-february-1-2013/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Plan. Build. Run.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;It’s a pretty straightforward process. One of those things that is so simple we rarely need to even call it out. We tend to structure our research this way, even if we use different terms that are more consistent with the context at hand.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>It it was easy, everyone would be doing it…</title><link>/blog/it-it-was-easy-everyone-would-be-doing-it-2/</link><pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/it-it-was-easy-everyone-would-be-doing-it-2/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;We talk a lot about Big Data Security, and over the next couple years we will talk about it a &lt;em&gt;lot&lt;/em&gt; more. But I think articles like &lt;a href="http://www.csoonline.com/article/print/727702"&gt;Big Goals for Big Data&lt;/a&gt; are a bit misleading.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>No Limits—New York Times Hacked by China</title><link>/blog/no-limits-new-york-times-hacked-by-china-2/</link><pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/no-limits-new-york-times-hacked-by-china-2/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2013/01/31/technology/chinese-hackers-infiltrate-new-york-times-computers.html?hp&amp;amp;pagewanted=all&amp;amp;_r=0"&gt;A must-read reported by the Times itself:&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;For the last four months, Chinese hackers have persistently attacked The New York Times, infiltrating its computer systems and getting passwords for its reporters and other employees.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Incite 1/30/2013: Email autoFAIL</title><link>/blog/incite-1-30-2013-email-autofail/</link><pubDate>Wed, 30 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/incite-1-30-2013-email-autofail/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;It’s the end of January, which means my favorite day of the year is coming up. Yup, Super Bowl Sunday. It’s a huge bummer that the Falcons couldn’t close it out in the NFC Championship, but it was a great season nonetheless. But now on to the important stuff. We will be hosting our 8th Super Bowl party, and we get pretty festive. After this many years we have it down to a system. Pretty much.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Remember, every jailbreak is a security exploit</title><link>/blog/remember-every-jailbreak-is-a-security-exploit/</link><pubDate>Wed, 30 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/remember-every-jailbreak-is-a-security-exploit/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;See update at the bottom&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.techhive.com/article/2026548/ios-6-1-jailbreak-available-now-but-is-a-better-one-due-sunday-.html"&gt;TechHive’s piece on the new iOS 6.1 jailbreak&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Only works on the pre-A5 processors, which means the iPhone 4S and iPad 2 and later are safe. The device must be connected to a computer for it to work.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Understanding IAM for Cloud Services: Use Cases</title><link>/blog/understanding-iam-for-cloud-services-use-cases/</link><pubDate>Wed, 30 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/understanding-iam-for-cloud-services-use-cases/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;This post delves into why companies are looking at new Identity and Access Management technologies for cloud deployments. Cloud computing poses (sometimes subtly) different challenges and requires rethinking IAM deployments. The following use cases are the principal motivators listed by organizations moving existing applications to the cloud – both internal or external deployments – along with how they integrate with third party cloud services.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Universal Plug and Play Vulnerable to Remote Code Injection</title><link>/blog/universal-plug-and-play-vulnerable-to-remote-code-injection/</link><pubDate>Wed, 30 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/universal-plug-and-play-vulnerable-to-remote-code-injection/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Rapid7 has announced that the UPnP (Universal Plug and Play) service is vulnerable to remote code injection. Because this code is deployed in &lt;em&gt;millions&lt;/em&gt; of devices – that’s the ‘Universal’ part – there are a freakishly large number of people vulnerable to this simple attack. From &lt;a href="http://m.h-online.com/security/news/item/Millions-of-devices-vulnerable-via-UPnP-1794032.html?from-classic=1"&gt;The H Security&lt;/a&gt;:&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Gartner on Software Defined Security</title><link>/blog/gartner-on-software-defined-security/</link><pubDate>Tue, 29 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/gartner-on-software-defined-security/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://blogs.gartner.com/neil_macdonald/2013/01/29/software-defined-data-centers-and-securitywhats-in-a-name/"&gt;Neil MacDonald on Software Defined Security&lt;/a&gt;:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Here’s what I propose: “Software defined” is about the capabilities enabled as we decouple and abstract infrastructure elements that were previously tightly coupled in our data centers: servers, storage, networking, security and so on.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>The Graduate: 2013 Style</title><link>/blog/the-graduate-2013-style/</link><pubDate>Tue, 29 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/the-graduate-2013-style/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;When in doubt, throw money at the problem. From the Washington Post, &lt;a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/2013/01/19/d87d9dc2-5fec-11e2-b05a-605528f6b712_story.html"&gt;Pentagon to boost cybersecurity force&lt;/a&gt;:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The Pentagon has approved a major expansion of its cybersecurity force over the next several years, increasing its size more than fivefold to bolster the nation’s ability to defend critical computer systems and conduct offensive computer operations against foreign adversaries, according to U.S. officials.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>The Internet is for Pr0n</title><link>/blog/the-internet-is-for-pr0n/</link><pubDate>Tue, 29 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/the-internet-is-for-pr0n/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Apparently the folks at Twitter forgot the first rule of the Internet. As &lt;a href="http://www.avenueq.com/"&gt;Avenue Q&lt;/a&gt; so elegantly stated, &lt;a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T-TA57L0kuc"&gt;The Internet is for Porn&lt;/a&gt;. NetworkWorld points out a minor unintended consequence of Twitter’s new Vine video sharing application, &lt;a href="http://www.networkworld.com/community/blog/sex-and-nsfw-clips-flood-new-vine-app-twitter-will-apple-respond"&gt;Sex and NSFW clips flood new Vine app from Twitter. Will Apple respond?&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Java Moving from Ridiculous to Surreal</title><link>/blog/java-moving-from-ridiculous-to-surreal/</link><pubDate>Mon, 28 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/java-moving-from-ridiculous-to-surreal/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Adam Gowdiak in &lt;a href="http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2013/Jan/241"&gt;[SE-2012-01] An issue with new Java SE 7 security features&lt;/a&gt;:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;That said, recently made security “improvements” to Java SE 7 software don’t prevent silent exploits at all. Users that require Java content in the web browser need to rely on a Click to Play technology implemented by several web browser vendors in order to mitigate the risk of a silent Java Plugin exploit.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Marketers take the path of least resistance</title><link>/blog/marketers-take-the-path-of-least-resistance/</link><pubDate>Mon, 28 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/marketers-take-the-path-of-least-resistance/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Rich constantly reminds us that “&lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Correlation_does_not_imply_causation"&gt;correlation does not imply causation&lt;/a&gt;,” relevant when looking at &lt;a href="http://www.networkworld.com/news/2013/012213-spam-levels-plummet-as-industry-266035.html"&gt;a recent NetworkWorld article talking about the decrease in spam&lt;/a&gt;, which concludes that botnet takedowns and improved filtering have favorably impacted the amount of spam being sent out.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>The Inside Story of SQL Slammer</title><link>/blog/the-inside-story-of-sql-slammer/</link><pubDate>Mon, 28 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/the-inside-story-of-sql-slammer/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://threatpost.com/en_us/blogs/inside-story-sql-slammer-102010"&gt;A first person account at Threatpost by David Litchfield, who discovered the vulnerability which was later exploited.&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Looking at my phone, I excused myself from the table and took the call; it was my brother.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Threatpost on Active Defense</title><link>/blog/threatpost-on-active-defense/</link><pubDate>Mon, 28 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/threatpost-on-active-defense/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Mike Mimoso has a &lt;a href="http://threatpost.com/en_us/blogs/active-defense-drives-attack-costs-012413"&gt;very good article on active defense at Threatpost&lt;/a&gt;. (Yes, we are linking to them a lot today).&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Mobile Commerce Numbers Don’t Lie</title><link>/blog/mobile-commerce-numbers-dont-lie-2/</link><pubDate>Sun, 27 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/mobile-commerce-numbers-dont-lie-2/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;We all &lt;em&gt;want&lt;/em&gt; security to be front and center in terms of decisions on new applications. We all follow the researchers who show time and again how mobile apps, or web apps, or pretty much anything, can and will be gamed. Yet all that doesn’t matter, as security cannot get in the way of business. Branden Williams did a great job digging into &lt;a href="https://www.brandenwilliams.com/blog/2013/01/24/how-starbucks-is-revolutionizing-micropayments/"&gt;the economics of Starbucks’ stored value cards&lt;/a&gt; to make a pretty compelling case that this stuff &lt;em&gt;will&lt;/em&gt; happen, whether security likes it or not.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>In through the Barracuda Back Door</title><link>/blog/in-through-the-barracuda-back-door/</link><pubDate>Fri, 25 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/in-through-the-barracuda-back-door/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Given the angst, conspiracy theories, and tinfoil hats around any network/security products built in China, it’s curious to see Krebs’ story on the &lt;a href="http://krebsonsecurity.com/2013/01/backdoors-found-in-barracuda-networks-gear/"&gt;backdoors in Barracuda products&lt;/a&gt; found by Stefan Viehboeck of SEC Consult Vulnerability Lab.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Friday Summary: January 25, 2013</title><link>/blog/friday-summary-january-25-2013/</link><pubDate>Thu, 24 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/friday-summary-january-25-2013/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Will Hadoop be to NoSQL what Red Hat is to Linux? Will it become more known for commercial flavors than the open-source core? Lately I have been noticing similarities between the two life-cycles, with the embrace of packaged variants.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Symantec Realigns</title><link>/blog/symantec-realigns/</link><pubDate>Thu, 24 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/symantec-realigns/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Symantec released their quarterly earnings today, which is the sort of thing we usually ignore. Especially because it’s only the third quarter, and not even a playoff game (I really need to hang out with Mike less). However…&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>The Mid-market Security Squeeze</title><link>/blog/the-mid-market-security-squeeze/</link><pubDate>Thu, 24 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/the-mid-market-security-squeeze/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Most folks appreciate the challenges of securing a mid-sized company. They have important data and enough employees that someone is going to screw something up. They often don’t have the budget or infrastructure maturity to take security seriously. Many get by due more to obscurity (who is going to attack them?) than any active controls. And as automated tools make it easier to find chinks in any and &lt;em&gt;every&lt;/em&gt; company’s armor, the seriousness of the problem is going to become much higher-profile.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Incite 1/23/2013: Sustainability</title><link>/blog/incite-1-23-2013-sustainability/</link><pubDate>Wed, 23 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/incite-1-23-2013-sustainability/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;You know those overnight successes who toiled in the background for 10 years before they finally broke through? How did they get there? How did they work through &lt;a href="http://sethgodin.typepad.com/the_dip/"&gt;the Dip&lt;/a&gt; to reach the other side? I am fascinated by organizations which have success year after year. They seem to take the long view, set up the foundation, and stay committed to the plan. Even when other folks push for (and get) faster results, opting for short-term fixes. These band-aids may provide a short-term pop, but rarely result in longer-term results.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>HIPAA Omnibus, Meet Indifference</title><link>/blog/hipaa-omnibus-meet-indifference/</link><pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/hipaa-omnibus-meet-indifference/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Do you want to know what you will be reading about in the coming weeks? HIPAA. The Department of Health and Human Services has &lt;a href="http://www.healthsecuritysolutions.com/2013/01/alert-hipaa-omnibus-rule-posed-includes-significant-changes-to-security-and-privacy-requirements/"&gt;updated the HIPAA requirements&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>It’s just Dropbox. What’s the risk?</title><link>/blog/its-just-dropbox-whats-the-risk-2/</link><pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/its-just-dropbox-whats-the-risk-2/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;From Ben Kepes’ post: &lt;a href="http://diversity.net.nz/sure-dropbox-is-potentially-insecure-but-does-it-matter/2013/01/21/"&gt;Sure Dropbox is Potentially Insecure, but Does it Matter?&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;First, why do people go around IT to use Dropbox? In the majority of cases these are good, solid, hardworking employees that don’t want to introduce risk to their organization but that do want to get stuff done. For whatever reason (inflexible legacy systems, stubborn IT departments, need to be agile) they’ve decided that for a particular project, they want to introduce Dropbox into their workflow to quickly and easily share some content.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Don’t respond to a breach like this</title><link>/blog/dont-respond-to-a-breach-like-this-2/</link><pubDate>Mon, 21 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/dont-respond-to-a-breach-like-this-2/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;A student who legitimately reported a security breach &lt;a href="http://www.theverge.com/2013/1/21/3899084/canadian-student-expelled-for-probing-skytech-security-issues"&gt;was expelled from college for checking to see whether the hole was fixed&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>New Paper: Building an Early Warning System</title><link>/blog/new-paper-building-an-early-warning-system/</link><pubDate>Mon, 21 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/new-paper-building-an-early-warning-system/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;One topic that has resonated with the industry has been &lt;em&gt;Early Warning.&lt;/em&gt; Clearly looking through the rearview mirror and trying to contain the damage from attacks already in process hasn’t been good enough, so figuring out a way to continue shortening the window between attack and detection continues to be a major objective for fairly mature security programs. Early Warning is all about turning security management on its head, using threat intelligence on attacks against others to improve your own defenses.&lt;img src="EWS-Cover.png" alt=""&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>If the exception is the policy, you’re doing it wrong</title><link>/blog/if-the-exception-is-the-policy-youre-doing-it-wrong-2/</link><pubDate>Sun, 20 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/if-the-exception-is-the-policy-youre-doing-it-wrong-2/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;From &lt;a href="https://www.tufin.com/blog/posts/2013/january/nather%E2%80%99s-law-of-policy-management/"&gt;NATHER’S LAW OF POLICY MANAGEMENT&lt;/a&gt; on the Tufin blog:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;That last one is of particular interest to me today, as I saw a client recently with a rule base for his firewall that was around 1000 rules long. When looking at his compliance results for policy and risk he was showing me hundreds of rules he wanted to mark as exceptions. I was puzzled – almost two thirds of his rule base consisted of exceptions to the compliance policies they were trying to enforce.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Actually, I really was a criminal…</title><link>/blog/actually-i-really-was-a-criminal-2/</link><pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/actually-i-really-was-a-criminal-2/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;When Mike &lt;a href="https://securosis.com/blog/we-are-all-criminals"&gt;wrote his review of Rob Graham’s post&lt;/a&gt; on what &lt;em&gt;could&lt;/em&gt; define criminality on the Internet, he focused on the anonymization piece. Me? I was struck &lt;a href="http://erratasec.blogspot.com/2013/01/witchcraft-is-not-crime.html"&gt;more by Rob’s “Witchcraft is not a crime” post&lt;/a&gt; in a very personal way:&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Javapocolypse Part… Oh, I Give up Counting</title><link>/blog/javapocolypse-part-oh-i-give-up-counting-2/</link><pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/javapocolypse-part-oh-i-give-up-counting-2/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;It appears that &lt;a href="http://threatpost.com/en_us/blogs/latest-java-update-broken-two-new-sandbox-bypass-flaws-found-011813"&gt;Java is still vulnerable to exploit after the latest patch from Oracle&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Disabling Java completely probably isn’t possible for many of you, so I suggest you &lt;em&gt;at least&lt;/em&gt; use a good web gateway/network IPS/NGFW that filters for malware, and something cloud or VPN based to protect mobile users. Events like this are why I’m so interested (and have been for a long time) in browser virtualization technologies (Bromium, Invincea, anyone else?).&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>We are all criminals</title><link>/blog/we-are-all-criminals/</link><pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/we-are-all-criminals/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;In the anger and sorrow following Aaron Swartz’s suicide, Rob Graham makes an excellent point in &lt;a href="http://erratasec.blogspot.com/2013/01/i-conceal-my-identity-same-way-aaron.html"&gt;I conceal my identity the same way Aaron was indicted for&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>A different kind of APT</title><link>/blog/a-different-kind-of-apt/</link><pubDate>Thu, 17 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/a-different-kind-of-apt/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;What happens when you work for a US critical infrastructure company and see strange connections coming into your network from China? Using the real credentials of your top programmer? You crap your pants, that’s what you do. And you figure you have been compromised by the APT and pull the alarms. But what happens when it’s actually something else. &lt;a href="http://www.theregister.co.uk/2013/01/16/developer_oursources_job_china/"&gt;Security audit finds dev OUTSOURCED his JOB to China to goof off at work&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>CISO Rule #1: Don’t be a douche…</title><link>/blog/ciso-rule-1-dont-be-a-douche-2/</link><pubDate>Thu, 17 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/ciso-rule-1-dont-be-a-douche-2/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Let’s take a look at Adam Shostack’s recent post, &lt;a href="http://newschoolsecurity.com/2013/01/the-phoenix-project-may-be-uncomfortable/"&gt;“The Phoenix Project may be uncomfortable”&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;First of all, I haven’t gotten a chance to read Gene Kim’s new book “&lt;a href="http://itrevolution.com/books/phoenix-project-devops-novel/"&gt;The Phoenix Project&lt;/a&gt;,” but they were kind enough to send me an electronic copy and I will get to it soon. I love the idea of teaching important lessons via a fictional story, even for technology stuff. As much as I like technical books, I don’t read them. I consult them when I have a technical question. But I read stories, and learn by osmosis when plowing through a story I enjoy. In fact &lt;a href="http://www.pragmaticcso.com"&gt;I wrote one&lt;/a&gt; a while ago using a similar tactic.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Friday Summary: January 18, 2013</title><link>/blog/friday-summary-january-18-2013/</link><pubDate>Thu, 17 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/friday-summary-january-18-2013/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I will not write about Manti Te’o.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I will not write about Manti Te’o.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I will not write about Manti… ah hell, who am I kidding.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>My DHS Beats Your FDA</title><link>/blog/my-dhs-beats-your-fda/</link><pubDate>Thu, 17 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/my-dhs-beats-your-fda/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;As someone who has been part of the medical field my entire life (family business before I became a paramedic) the intersection between medicine and technology is of high personal interest. I still remember the time I got in trouble at work for hacking my boss’s password so we could get into the reporting application he accidentally locked everyone out of.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Understanding IAM for Cloud Services: Integration</title><link>/blog/understanding-iam-for-cloud-services-integration/</link><pubDate>Thu, 17 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/understanding-iam-for-cloud-services-integration/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;“The Cloud” is a term so overused and often misapplied that it has become meaningless without context. This series will discuss identity and access management as it pertains to the three major cloud service models (Infrastructure, Platform, and Software). Each of these models (SaaS, PaaS, and IaaS) presents its own unique challenge for IAM, because each model promotes different approaches and each vendor offers their own unique flavor. The cloud service model effectively acts as a set of constraints which the IAM architect must factor into their architecture.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Does Big Data Advance Security Analytics?</title><link>/blog/does-big-data-advance-security-analytics/</link><pubDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/does-big-data-advance-security-analytics/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;If you follow the security press, you know many predict that big data will transform information security. RSA recently released a security brief on &lt;a href="http://www.emc.com/collateral/industry-overview/big-data-fuels-intelligence-driven-security-io.pdf"&gt;security analytics with big data&lt;/a&gt; that mirrors the press. Depending on your perspective, security analytics with big data may be the concept that we’ll leverage big data clusters for actionable intel in coming years. Or if you talk to SIEM vendors who run on top of NoSQL repositories, the future has been here for 5 years. You may go with “none of the above”. To me it is simply a good idea that has yet to be fully implemented, which is currently just something we talk about in the security echo chamber.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Incite 1/16/2013: Emotional Whiplash</title><link>/blog/incite-1-16-2013-emotional-whiplash/</link><pubDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/incite-1-16-2013-emotional-whiplash/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;It started out great. Fantastic even. The Dome was fired up. The team started fast. Field goal. Forced punt. Matty Ice throws a pick. Then the Falcons force a fumble and get the ball back. Touchdown. Forced punt. Field goal. 13-0. Red zone stop on a huge 4th and 1. Touchdown on a bomb. Huge sack to end the half. The Falcons were up 20-0. This was it. The year they finally exorcise the playoff demons.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Beware of Self-Proclaimed Experts</title><link>/blog/beware-of-self-proclaimed-experts/</link><pubDate>Tue, 15 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/beware-of-self-proclaimed-experts/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://blog.uncommonsensesecurity.com/2013/01/experts-who-tell-you-to-do-dumb-things.html"&gt;“Experts” who tell you to do dumb things… are not experts&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Dump &lt;em&gt;anything&lt;/em&gt; you don’t use. Dump anything with a proven track record of failure which you don’t need (for example, if you don’t need Java, uninstall it). That’s the easy bit, the rest requires thought and effort. If you need Java for desktop apps, but don’t need Java in your browser – disable the browser plugins.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Time to Play Nice with SCADA Kids</title><link>/blog/time-to-play-nice-with-scada-kids/</link><pubDate>Tue, 15 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/time-to-play-nice-with-scada-kids/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-20984827"&gt;From the BBC:&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The US government has told thousands of companies to beef up protection of computers which oversee power plants and other utilities.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Bolting on Security—at Scale</title><link>/blog/bolting-on-security-at-scale-2/</link><pubDate>Mon, 14 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/bolting-on-security-at-scale-2/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;GigaOm offers a fascinating glimpse into Netflix’s EC2 architecture: &lt;a href="http://gigaom.com/2013/01/10/netflix-shows-off-its-hadoop-architecture/"&gt;Netflix shows off how it does Hadoop in the cloud&lt;/a&gt;:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;“Hadoop is more than a platform on which data scientists and business analysts can do their work. Aside from their 500-plus-nod[sic] cluster of Elastic MapReduce instances, there’s another equally sized cluster for extract-transform-load (ETL) workloads – essentially, taking data from other sources and making it easy to analyze within Hadoop. Netflix also deploys various “development” clusters as needed, presumably for ad hoc experimental jobs.”&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Happy Out of Cycle IE Patch Monday</title><link>/blog/happy-out-of-cycle-ie-patch-monday/</link><pubDate>Mon, 14 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/happy-out-of-cycle-ie-patch-monday/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.networkworld.com/news/2013/011413-microsoft-to-release-emergency-internet-265774.html"&gt;Microsoft to release emergency Internet Explorer patch on Monday&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The vulnerability, which is present in IE 6, 7 and 8, is a memory corruption issue. It can be exploited by an attacker via a drive-by download, a term for loading a website with attack code that delivers malware to a victim’s computer if the person merely visits the website.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Help Me Pick My Next Paper Topic</title><link>/blog/help-me-pick-my-next-paper/</link><pubDate>Mon, 14 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/help-me-pick-my-next-paper/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Hey folks,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Just a quick note that I am trying to decide between a few different topics for my next paper. If you have a moment, I could use your opinion.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Let’s Get Physical—Road Rules Edition</title><link>/blog/lets-get-physical-road-rules-edition-2/</link><pubDate>Mon, 14 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/lets-get-physical-road-rules-edition-2/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;It’s a new year, so let’s get physical and personal. I wondered what people do about physical security specifically – how do you protect your laptop while on business travel? Hotels, airports, cars, etc. We have all seen that “road rules” can be pretty different, so what precautions do &lt;em&gt;you&lt;/em&gt; take to ensure your laptop and devices return home safely?&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Mobile Identity—WTF?</title><link>/blog/mobile-identity-wtf-2/</link><pubDate>Mon, 14 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/mobile-identity-wtf-2/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Identity management on mobile devices: How do we do it?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I have been taking a lot of calls on mobile identity issues and solutions over the last three months, and I am just as confused now as when I started looking into this subject. And I think the vendors I have spoken with are reaching, in their assessments of the right course of action and where the market is heading. If you want to implement identity on a mobile device, what do you do?&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>You Can’t Handle the Truth</title><link>/blog/you-cant-handle-the-truth-2/</link><pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/you-cant-handle-the-truth-2/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://newschoolsecurity.com/2013/01/the-high-price-of-the-silence-of-cyberwar/"&gt;The High Price of the Silence of Cyberwar&lt;/a&gt;:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In today’s debate about cyberwar, all information disclosed seems to come with an agenda. Everyone evaluating the information is forced to look not only at the information, but the motivation for revealing that information. Worse, they can question if the information not revealed is shaped differently from what is revealed. A defender who reveals information regularly and in accordance with a policy will gain credibility, and with it, the ability to better influence the debate.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>$50K buys how much FDE?</title><link>/blog/50k-buys-how-much-fde/</link><pubDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/50k-buys-how-much-fde/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.scmagazine.com/feds-step-up-hipaa-enforcement-with-hospice-settlement/article/274916/?DCMP=EMC-SCUS_Newswire"&gt;Feds step up HIPAA enforcement with hospice settlement&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The Hospice of North Idaho (HONI) in Hayden will pay $50,000 to avoid more costly penalties if it would have been found in violation of the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 (HIPAA).&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Friday Summary: January 11, 2013</title><link>/blog/friday-summary-january-11-2013/</link><pubDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/friday-summary-january-11-2013/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Tina Slankas presented at the &lt;a href="http://phoenix.issa.org/about-us"&gt;Phoenix ISSA chapter&lt;/a&gt; this week on use of patterns for building security programs – slides can be downloaded &lt;a href="http://phoenix.issa.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/12/2013-Q1-Tina-Slankas_Patterns.pdf"&gt;here&lt;/a&gt; (PDF). The thrust of her idea was to use patterns – think design patterns if you like – for putting together control frameworks to define security efforts. Tina stated she was using the definition of ‘pattern’ in a very broad way, but the essence was reusable constructs for managing different aspects of enterprise security. For example: how identity management will function at a high level, and how will it fit with other systems.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Integration vs. Segregation</title><link>/blog/integration-vs-segregation/</link><pubDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/integration-vs-segregation/</guid><description>&lt;blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;But, he said, segregation of EHR data simply is not feasible or practical for integrated health systems such as Wellstar, …&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Java Sucks. Again.</title><link>/blog/java-sucks-again/</link><pubDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/java-sucks-again/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Zero-day in the wild, in a popular exploit kit.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://m.krebsonsecurity.com/2013/01/zero-day-java-exploit-debuts-in-crimeware/"&gt;From Brian Krebs&lt;/a&gt;:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The hackers who maintain Blackhole and Nuclear Pack – competing crimeware products that are made to be stitched into hacked sites and use browser flaws to foist malware — say they’ve added a brand new exploit that attacks a previously unknown and currently unpatched security hole in Java.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Most Consumers Don't Need Mac AV</title><link>/blog/most-consumers-dont-need-mac-av/</link><pubDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/most-consumers-dont-need-mac-av/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I can’t believe I forgot to post here when I put the article up on TidBITS, but here you go:&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>DDoS: Distributed, but not evenly</title><link>/blog/ddos-distributed-but-not-evenly/</link><pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/ddos-distributed-but-not-evenly/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;It shouldn’t come as any surprise, but &lt;a href="http://www.scmagazine.com.au/News/327875,ddos-attacks-on-banks-continue-into-the-new-year.aspx"&gt;big financials are still suffering a wave of DDoS attacks&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;DDoS is like an accidental amputation – there is no question whether it’s a problem. The trick is to know ahead of time if you are on the list, and the best thing to do is keep an eye on your peers. Not everyone needs to invest proactively in DDoS protection, but you sure as heck need a plan and a vendor contact just in case. Especially if you are big, handle money, work with (or piss off) governments located “East” (Europe, Asia, Middle, whatever), or like to poke Anonymous.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Incite 1/9/2013: Never Lost</title><link>/blog/incite-1-9-2013-never-lost/</link><pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/incite-1-9-2013-never-lost/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I was in the car the other day with one of the kids, and they asked me if I ever get lost. I have a pretty good sense of direction and have been able to read maps as long as I remember. I was probably compensating for my Mom’s poor sense of direction and my general anxiety at a young age about feeling lost. But it’s different today. With the advent of ever-present GPS and decent navigation, I can say it has been a long while since I have really been lost. I get misdirected sometimes, but that lasts maybe a minute and then I figure out my way. But these gadgets are no silver bullet.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Detection vs. Protection and the Game of Words</title><link>/blog/detection-vs-protection-and-the-game-of-words/</link><pubDate>Tue, 08 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/detection-vs-protection-and-the-game-of-words/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Any time you go after an entrenched technology, there will be pushback. So it’s not surprising that some folks believe that &lt;a href="http://anti-virus-rants.blogspot.com/2013/01/impervas-anti-virus-study-is-garbage.html"&gt;imperva’s anti-virus study is garbage&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>ENISA BYOD FTW</title><link>/blog/enisa-byod-ftw/</link><pubDate>Mon, 07 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/enisa-byod-ftw/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://www.enisa.europa.eu/activities/risk-management/evolving-threat-environment/COIT_Mitigation_Strategies_Final_Report"&gt;ENISA released a solid BYOD/Consumeriation of IT guide&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;At first I was turned off by phrases in the executive summary like:&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Prove It to Use It</title><link>/blog/prove-it-to-use-it/</link><pubDate>Mon, 07 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/prove-it-to-use-it/</guid><description>&lt;blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.worldcrunch.com/tech-science/in-romania-a-quiet-city-has-become-the-global-hub-for-hackers-and-online-crooks/hacking-hacker-romania-pirate-scam-internet-website/c4s10532/#.UOrCubYkit8"&gt;“Last year, one billion dollars was stolen in the U.S. by Romanian hackers,” says American ambassador in Bucharest, Mark Gitenstein.&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Pwn Ur Cisco Phone</title><link>/blog/pwn-ur-cisco-phone/</link><pubDate>Mon, 07 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/pwn-ur-cisco-phone/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.terminal23.net/2013/01/whats_the_deal_with_the_cisco.html"&gt;what’s the deal with the cisco phone eavesdropping hack?&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;These phones are basically little computers. If an attacker can take control of it, they can do the same things from it that they could by using a rogue or compromised system on a network. The “eavesdropping mic” is just one of many ways the compromised phone could be used.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Understanding Identity Management for Cloud Service: The Solution Space</title><link>/blog/understanding-identity-management-for-cloud-service-the-solution-space/</link><pubDate>Mon, 07 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/understanding-identity-management-for-cloud-service-the-solution-space/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Adrian and Gunnar here: After spending a few weeks getting updates from Identity and Access Management (IAM) service vendors – as well as a couple weeks for winter break – we have gathered the research we need to delve into the meat of our series on Understanding and Selecting Identity Management for Cloud Services. &lt;a href="https://securosis.com/blog/new-series-understanding-and-selecting-identity-management-for-cloud-servic"&gt;Our introductory post&lt;/a&gt; outlined the topics we will cover. This series is intended as a market overview, taking a broad look at issues you need to consider when evaluating cloud-based identity support systems. The intro hinted at the reasons cloud computing models force change in our approaches to access control, but today’s post will flesh out the problems of cloud IAM.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Bored? Set up your own CA</title><link>/blog/bored-set-up-your-own-ca/</link><pubDate>Sun, 06 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/bored-set-up-your-own-ca/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://lists.randombit.net/pipermail/cryptography/2013-January/003601.html"&gt;How much does it cost to start your own CA?&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The main thing you’re looking to do is to pass the WebTrust audit and associated practices that the platforms will require you to do. Microsoft has the most mature process. They have a set of rules and guidelines. If you follow them, you’re in. One of those, by the way, is that you have to be a retail CA, as opposed to an internal one or a government one. It’s best to work with Microsoft first, and once you’re in their root program move to the others. They are fair, disciplined, and helpful. Most of all, once you’ve gone through all that, it’s easier to get into the other important root stores.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Internet Explorer 8 0-Day Bypasses Patch</title><link>/blog/internet-explorer-8-0-day-bypasses-patch/</link><pubDate>Fri, 04 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/internet-explorer-8-0-day-bypasses-patch/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://threatpost.com/en_us/blogs/researchers-bypass-microsoft-fix-it-ie-zero-day-010413"&gt;A good update at Threatpost&lt;/a&gt;:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Their new exploit beat a fully patched Windows system running IE 8, the same version of the browser exploited by malware used in watering hole attacks against a number of political and manufacturing websites, including the Council on Foreign Relations in the U.S., and Chinese human rights site Uygur Haber Ajanski.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Friday Summary: January 3, 2013</title><link>/blog/friday-summary-january-3-2013/</link><pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/friday-summary-january-3-2013/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;2013?!? WTF?!?!&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I have this time dilation theory of aging. The older you get, the smaller a as a fraction of your existence each year is, so the shorter it feels.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Karmic Career Advancement</title><link>/blog/karmic-career-advancement/</link><pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/karmic-career-advancement/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://idoneous-security.blogspot.com/2012/12/levelling-up-in-real-world.html"&gt;Levelling up in the real world.&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;When you are looking out for the welfare of your organization instead of focusing on what you can get for yourself, that’s when you’ll be given the chance to do more and own more.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Responses to AV articles</title><link>/blog/responses-to-av-articles/</link><pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/responses-to-av-articles/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.technewsdaily.com/16177-imperva-malware-study-flaws.html"&gt;Technewsdaily has an interesting follow up to yesterday’s NYT article on AV effectiveness&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="https://securosis.com/blog/the-new-york-times-on-antivirus"&gt;as we covered&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I agree that using VirusTotal isn’t the best approach – far from it. But I have also heard AV-Test doesn’t use good criteria. I like the &lt;a href="https://www.nsslabs.com/"&gt;NSS Labs&lt;/a&gt; methodology myself, which shows higher numbers than Imperva, but much lower than most other tests. &lt;a href="https://www.nsslabs.com/reports/consumer-avepp-comparative-analysis-exploit-evasion-defenses"&gt;Their consumer report is free.&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href="https://www.nsslabs.com/reports/consumer-avepp-comparative-analysis-exploit-protection"&gt;they also offer a companion report&lt;/a&gt;. But consumer products are often more different from enterprise versions than you might expect, and the tests weren’t against 0-day like the Imperva ones. These reports by NSS tested effectiveness against &lt;em&gt;exploits using known vulnerabilities,&lt;/em&gt; rather than Imperva’s test of signature recognition of new virus variants.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>SSLpocalypse, part XXII</title><link>/blog/sslpocalypse-part-xxii/</link><pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/sslpocalypse-part-xxii/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;For the short version, &lt;a href="http://erratasec.blogspot.com/2013/01/dont-mess-with-google.html"&gt;read Rob Graham at Errata Security.&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Google &lt;a href="http://googleonlinesecurity.blogspot.com/2013/01/enhancing-digital-certificate-security.html"&gt;detected someone attempting a man in the middle attack&lt;/a&gt; using a certificate issued in Turkey. TURKTRUST &lt;a href="http://blogs.technet.com/b/msrc/archive/2013/01/03/security-advisory-2798897-released-certificate-trust-list-updated.aspx"&gt;issued two subsidiary Certificate Authority certs&lt;/a&gt; which allowed whoever had them to sign any certificate they wanted, for any domain they wanted. Yes, this is how SSL works and it’s a big mess (&lt;a href="https://securosis.com/blog/building-an-ssl-early-warning-system"&gt;I talked about it a little in 2011&lt;/a&gt;).&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Yes, honeypots are new again</title><link>/blog/yes-honeypots-are-new-again/</link><pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/yes-honeypots-are-new-again/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/to-thwart-hackers-firms-salting-their-servers-with-fake-data/2013/01/02/3ce00712-4afa-11e2-9a42-d1ce6d0ed278_story.html"&gt;The Washington Post sort-of covers honeypots, but mixes in national security issues&lt;/a&gt;. But one paragraph is out of place, because the article doesn’t really cover strike-back:&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Incite 1/2/13: Consistent Variety</title><link>/blog/incite-1-2-13-consistent-variety/</link><pubDate>Wed, 02 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/incite-1-2-13-consistent-variety/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Happy 2013 everybody! At the dawn of a new year, most folks think more proactively about what they want to change – and what they don’t. I have spoken many times about the need to embrace change and even to learn to love change. Change is good. Stagnation is bad. But the trouble lies in how you achieve that change – and how you react when change is forced upon you.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>The New York Times on Antivirus</title><link>/blog/the-new-york-times-on-antivirus/</link><pubDate>Wed, 02 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/the-new-york-times-on-antivirus/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2013/01/01/technology/antivirus-makers-work-on-software-to-catch-malware-more-effectively.html?pagewanted=1&amp;amp;_r=1&amp;amp;ref=nicoleperlroth"&gt;Outmaneuvered at Their Own Game, Antivirus Makers Struggle to Adapt&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The antivirus industry has a dirty little secret: its products are often not very good at stopping viruses.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Threatpost: What Have We Learned in 2012</title><link>/blog/threatpost-what-have-we-learned-in-2012/</link><pubDate>Wed, 02 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/threatpost-what-have-we-learned-in-2012/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://threatpost.com/en_us/blogs/2012-what-have-we-learned-010213"&gt;2012: What Have We Learned&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The biggest shift in 2012 was the emergence of state-sponsored malware and targeted attacks as major factors. The idea of governments developing and deploying highly sophisticated malware is far from new. Such attacks have been going on for years, but they’ve mainly stayed out of the limelight. Security researchers and intelligence analysts have seen many of these attacks, targeting both enterprises and government agencies, but they were almost never discussed openly and were not something that showed up on the front page of a national newspaper.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Friday Summary: 2012 Year End Wrap</title><link>/blog/friday-summary-2012-year-end-wrap/</link><pubDate>Thu, 20 Dec 2012 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/friday-summary-2012-year-end-wrap/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;It’s the holiday season, people are leaving for vacation, and most people have things other than security on their minds – including me – so I’ll keep today’s Friday Summary short.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Incite 12/19/2012: Celebration</title><link>/blog/incite-12-19-2012-celebration/</link><pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2012 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/incite-12-19-2012-celebration/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;As we say goodbye to Old Man 2012 and get ready to welcome Baby New Year 2013, it is time for some downtime and reflection. This will be the last Incite of the year. My focus over the next two weeks will be enjoying the accomplishments of the past 12 months. Which, by the way, is very hard for me. I came into the world with the unsatisfied gene. No matter how good it is, it can be better. No matter how much got done, I could have done more. With every accomplishment, I have already started looking towards the next goal because there are always more things to do, different windmills to tilt at, and another mountain to climb.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Friday Summary: December 13, 2012—You, Me, and Twitter</title><link>/blog/friday-summary-december-13-2012-you-me-and-twitter/</link><pubDate>Thu, 13 Dec 2012 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/friday-summary-december-13-2012-you-me-and-twitter/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I have an on again / off again, love/hate relationship with Twitter.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Those of you who follow me might have noticed I suddenly went from barely posting to fully re-engaging with the community. Sometimes I find myself getting fed up with the navel gazing of the echo chamber, as we seem to rehash the same issues over and over again, looking for grammatical and logical gotchas in 140 characters. Twitter lacks context and nuance, and so all too easily degrades into little more than a political talk show. When I’m in a bad mood, or am drowning at work, it’s one of the first things to go.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>The CloudSec Chicken or the DevOps Egg?</title><link>/blog/the-cloudsec-chicken-or-the-devops-egg/</link><pubDate>Thu, 13 Dec 2012 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/the-cloudsec-chicken-or-the-devops-egg/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I am on a plane headed home after a couple days of business development meetings in Northern California, and I am starting to notice a bit of a chasm in the cloud security world.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Incite 12/12/2012: Love the Grind</title><link>/blog/incite-12-12-2012-love-the-grind/</link><pubDate>Wed, 12 Dec 2012 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/incite-12-12-2012-love-the-grind/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;As I boarded the bus, which would take me to the train, which would take me into NYC to work my engineering co-op job at Mobil Oil, I had plenty of time to think. I mostly thought about how I never wanted to be one of those folks who do a 75-90 minute commute for 25 years. Day in, day out. Take the bus to the train to the job. Leave the job, get on the train and get home at 7 or 8 pm. I was 19 at the time. I would do cool and exciting things. I’d jet around the world as a Captain of Industry. Commuting in my suit and tie was not interesting. No thanks.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Selecting an Enterprise Key Manager</title><link>/blog/selecting-an-enterprise-key-manager/</link><pubDate>Wed, 12 Dec 2012 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/selecting-an-enterprise-key-manager/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Now that you have a better understanding of major key manager features and options we can spend some time outlining the selection process. This largely comes down to understanding your current technical and business requirements (including any pesky compliance requirements), and trying to plan ahead for future needs.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Building an Early Warning System: Deploying the EWS</title><link>/blog/building-an-early-warning-system-deploying-the-ews/</link><pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2012 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/building-an-early-warning-system-deploying-the-ews/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Now that we have covered the concepts behind the Early Warning System, it’s time to put them into practice. We start by integrating a number of disparate technology and information sources as the basis of the system – building the technology platform. We need the EWS to aggregate third-party intelligence feeds and scan for those indicators within your environment to highlight attack conditions. When we consider important capabilities of the EWS, a few major capabilities become apparent:&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Building an Early Warning System: Determining Urgency</title><link>/blog/building-an-early-warning-system-determining-urgency/</link><pubDate>Sun, 09 Dec 2012 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/building-an-early-warning-system-determining-urgency/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;The Early Warning series has leveraged your &lt;a href="https://securosis.com/blog/building-an-early-warning-system-internal-data-collection-and-baselining"&gt;existing internal data&lt;/a&gt; and integrated &lt;a href="https://securosis.com/blog/building-an-early-warning-system-external-threat-feeds"&gt;external threat feeds&lt;/a&gt;, in an effort to get out ahead of the inevitable attacks on your critical systems. This is all well and good, but you still have lots of &lt;em&gt;data&lt;/em&gt; without enough usable &lt;em&gt;information.&lt;/em&gt; So we now focus on the analysis aspect of the Early Warning System (EWS). You may think this is just rehashing a lot of the work done through our SIEM, Incident Response, and Network Forensics research – all those functions also leverage data in an effort to identify attacks. The biggest difference is that in an early warning context you don’t know what you’re looking for. Years ago, US Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld described this as looking for “unknown unknowns”.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Can we effectively monitor big data?</title><link>/blog/can-we-effectively-monitor-big-data/</link><pubDate>Fri, 07 Dec 2012 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/can-we-effectively-monitor-big-data/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;During the big data research project I found myself thinking about how I would secure a NoSQL database if I was responsible for a cluster. One area I can’t help thinking about is &lt;strong&gt;Database Activity Monitoring&lt;/strong&gt; ; how I would implement a solution for big databases? The only currently available solution I am aware of is &lt;em&gt;very&lt;/em&gt; limited in what it provides. And I think the situation to stay that way for a long time. The ways to collect data with big data clusters, and to deploy monitoring, are straightforward. But analyzing queries will remain a significant engineering challenge. NoSQL tasks are processed &lt;em&gt;very&lt;/em&gt; differently than on relational platforms, and the information at your disposal is significantly less.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Incite 12/5/2012: Travel Tribulations</title><link>/blog/incite-12-5-2012-travel-tribulations/</link><pubDate>Wed, 05 Dec 2012 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/incite-12-5-2012-travel-tribulations/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Travel is an occupational hazard for industry analysts. There are benefits to meeting face to face with clients, and part of the gig is speaking at events and attending conferences. That means planes, trains, and automobiles. I know there are plenty of folks who fly more than I do, but that was never a contest I wanted to win. As long as I make Platinum on Delta, I’m good. I get my upgrades and priority boarding, and it works.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Enterprise Key Manager: Management Features</title><link>/blog/enterprise-key-manager-management-features/</link><pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2012 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/enterprise-key-manager-management-features/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;It’s one thing to collect, secure, and track a wide range of keys; but doing so in a useful, manageable manner demonstrates the differences between key management products.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Friday Summary: November 29, 2012</title><link>/blog/friday-summary-november-29-2012/</link><pubDate>Thu, 29 Nov 2012 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/friday-summary-november-29-2012/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;When I visit the homes of friends who are Formula One fans on race day, I am amazed. At how fanatical they are – worse than NFL and college football fans. They have the TV on for pre-race action hours before it starts. And this year’s finale was at least in a friendly time zone – otherwise they would have been up all night. But what really amazes me is not the dedication – it’s how they watch.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>New Paper: Implementing and Managing Patch and Configuration Management</title><link>/blog/new-paper-implementing-and-managing-patch-and-configuration-management/</link><pubDate>Thu, 29 Nov 2012 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/new-paper-implementing-and-managing-patch-and-configuration-management/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;If you recall the &lt;a href="https://securosis.com/research/papers/the-endpoint-security-management-buyers-guide"&gt;Endpoint Security Management Buyer’s Guide&lt;/a&gt;, we identified 4 specific controls typically used to manage the security of endpoints, and divided them into periodic and ongoing controls. That paper is designed to help identify what is important, and guide you through the buying process. At the end of that process you face a key question: What now? It is time to implement and manage your new toys, so this paper provides a series of processes and practices for successfully implementing and managing patch and configuration management tools.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Incite 11/28/2012: Meet the Masters</title><link>/blog/incite-11-28-2012-meet-the-masters/</link><pubDate>Wed, 28 Nov 2012 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/incite-11-28-2012-meet-the-masters/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I am not a car guy. Nor do I need an ostentatious house with all sorts of fancy things in it. Give me a comfortable place to sleep, a big TV, and fast Internet and I’m pretty content. That said, I enjoy art. The Boss and I have collected a few pieces over the years, but that has slowed down as other expenses (like, uh, the kids) have ramped up. But if someone were to drop a bag of money in our laps, we would hit an art gallery first – not a Ferrari dealer.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Enterprise Key Managers: Technical Features, Part 2</title><link>/blog/enterprise-key-managers-technical-features-part-2/</link><pubDate>Tue, 27 Nov 2012 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/enterprise-key-managers-technical-features-part-2/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://securosis.com/blog/enterprise-key-manager-features-deployment-and-client-access-options"&gt;Our last post&lt;/a&gt; covered two of the main technical features of an enterprise key manager: deployment and client access options. Today we will finish up with the rest of the technical features – including physical security, standards support, and a discussion of Hardware Security Modules (HSMs).&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Enterprise Key Manager Features: Deployment and Client Access Options</title><link>/blog/enterprise-key-manager-features-deployment-and-client-access-options/</link><pubDate>Mon, 26 Nov 2012 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/enterprise-key-manager-features-deployment-and-client-access-options/</guid><description>&lt;h1 id="key-manager-technical-features"&gt;Key Manager Technical Features&lt;/h1&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Due to the different paths and use cases for encryption tools, key management solutions have likewise developed along varied paths, reflecting their respective origins. Many evolved from Hardware Security Managers (HSMs), some were built from the ground up, and others are offshoots from key managers developed for a single purpose, such as full disk or email encryption.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Building an Early Warning System: External Threat Feeds</title><link>/blog/building-an-early-warning-system-external-threat-feeds/</link><pubDate>Fri, 16 Nov 2012 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/building-an-early-warning-system-external-threat-feeds/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;So far we have talked about the &lt;a href="https://securosis.com/blog/building-an-early-warning-system-introduction"&gt;need for Early Warning&lt;/a&gt; and the &lt;a href="https://securosis.com/blog/building-an-early-warning-system-the-early-warning-process"&gt;Early Warning Process&lt;/a&gt; to set the stage for the details. We started with the internal side of the equation, gaining awareness of your environment via &lt;a href="https://securosis.com/blog/building-an-early-warning-system-internal-data-collection-and-baselining"&gt;internal data collection and baselining&lt;/a&gt;. This is a great beginning, but still puts you in a &lt;em&gt;reactive&lt;/em&gt; mode. Even if you can detect an anomaly in your environment – it’s already happened and you may be too late to prevent data loss.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Friday Summary: November 16, 2012</title><link>/blog/friday-summary-november-16-2012/</link><pubDate>Thu, 15 Nov 2012 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/friday-summary-november-16-2012/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;A few weeks ago I was out in California, transferring large sums of my personal financial worth to a large rodent. This was the third time in about as many years I engaged in this activity – spending a chunk of my young children’s college fund on churros, overpriced hotel rooms, and tickets for the privilege of walking in large crowds to stand in endless lines.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Implementing and Managing Patch and Configuration Management: Leveraging the Platform</title><link>/blog/implementing-and-managing-patch-and-configuration-management-leveraging-the/</link><pubDate>Thu, 15 Nov 2012 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/implementing-and-managing-patch-and-configuration-management-leveraging-the/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;This series has highlighted the intertwined nature of patch and configuration management. So we will wrap up by talking about leverage from using a common technology base (platform) for patching and configuration. Capabilities that can be used across both functions include:&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Incite 11/14/2012: 24 Hours</title><link>/blog/incite-11-14-2012-24-hours/</link><pubDate>Wed, 14 Nov 2012 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/incite-11-14-2012-24-hours/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Sometimes things don’t go your way. Maybe it’s a promotion you don’t get. Or a deal you don’t close. Or a part in the Nutcracker that goes to someone else. Whatever the situation, of course you’re disappointed. One of the Buddhist sayings I really appreciate is “suffering results from not getting what you want. Or from getting what you don’t want.” Substitute disappointment for suffering, and there you are. We have all been there. The real question is what you do next.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Building an Early Warning System: Internal Data Collection and Baselining</title><link>/blog/building-an-early-warning-system-internal-data-collection-and-baselining/</link><pubDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2012 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/building-an-early-warning-system-internal-data-collection-and-baselining/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Now that we have provided the reasons you need to start thinking about an Early Warning System, and a high-level idea of the process involved, it’s time to dig into the different parts of the process. Third-party intelligence, which we’ll discuss in the next post, will tell you what kinds of attacks you are &lt;em&gt;more likely&lt;/em&gt; to see, based on what else is happening in the world. But monitoring your own environment and looking for variation from normal activity tell you whether those attacks actually &lt;strong&gt;ARE&lt;/strong&gt; hitting you.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Implementing and Managing Patch and Configuration Management: Configuration Management Operations</title><link>/blog/implementing-and-managing-patch-and-configuration-management-configuration/</link><pubDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2012 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/implementing-and-managing-patch-and-configuration-management-configuration/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;The key high-level difference between configuration and patch management is that configuration management offers more opportunity for automation than patch management. Unless you are changing standard builds and/or reevaluating benchmarks – then operations are more of a high-profile monitoring function. You will be alerted to a configuration change, and like any other potential incident you need to investigate and determine the proper remediation as part of a structured response process.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Defending Against DoS Attacks [New Paper] and Index of Posts</title><link>/blog/defending-against-dos-attacks-new-paper-and-index-of-posts/</link><pubDate>Wed, 07 Nov 2012 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/defending-against-dos-attacks-new-paper-and-index-of-posts/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;We are pleased to put the finishing touches on our Denial of Service (DoS) research and distribute the paper. Unless you have had your head in the sand for the last year, you know DoS attacks are back with a vengeance, knocking down sites both big and small. It is no longer viable to ignore the threat, so we all need to think about what to do when we inevitably become a target.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Implementing and Managing Patch and Configuration Management: Patch Management Operations</title><link>/blog/implementing-and-managing-patch-and-configuration-management-patch-manageme/</link><pubDate>Wed, 07 Nov 2012 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/implementing-and-managing-patch-and-configuration-management-patch-manageme/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Now that we have gone through all the preparation, deployed the technology, and set up policies, we need to operate our patch management environment. That will be our focus in this post. As we discussed in the &lt;a href="https://securosis.com/blog/implementing-and-managing-patch-and-configuration-management-defining-polic"&gt;Policy Definition post&lt;/a&gt;, there isn’t a huge amount of monthly leverage to be gained for patch management. You need to do the work of monitoring for new patches, assessing each new patch for deployment, testing the patches prior to deployment, bundling installation packages, and then installing the patches on affected devices. You will be performing each of those activities each month whether you like them or not. We have already delved into those monthy activities within the context of defining policies, so let’s take things a step deeper.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Incite 11/7/2012: And the winner is… Math</title><link>/blog/incite-11-7-2012-and-the-winner-is-math-2/</link><pubDate>Wed, 07 Nov 2012 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/incite-11-7-2012-and-the-winner-is-math-2/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Yesterday was Election Day in the US. That means hundreds of millions of citizens braved the elements, long lines, voter suppression attempts, flaky voting machines, and other challenges to exercise our Constitutional right to choose our leaders. After waiting for about 3 hours in 2008, I got smart and voted early this year. It took me about 45 minutes and it was done.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Building an Early Warning System: The Early Warning Process</title><link>/blog/building-an-early-warning-system-the-early-warning-process/</link><pubDate>Mon, 05 Nov 2012 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/building-an-early-warning-system-the-early-warning-process/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;In the &lt;a href="https://securosis.com/blog/building-an-early-warning-system-introduction"&gt;Introduction to the Early Warning System series&lt;/a&gt;, we talked about the increasing importance of threat intelligence for combating advanced attackers by understanding the tactics they are using &lt;em&gt;right now&lt;/em&gt; against our defenses. With this intelligence, combined with information about what’s happening in your environment, you can more effectively prioritize your efforts and make better, more efficient use of your limited security resources.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Securing Big Data: Security Recommendations for Hadoop and NoSQL [New Paper]</title><link>/blog/securing-big-data-security-recommendations-for-hadoop-and-nosql-new-paper/</link><pubDate>Mon, 05 Nov 2012 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/securing-big-data-security-recommendations-for-hadoop-and-nosql-new-paper/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;We are pleased to announce the release of our white paper on securing big data environments. This research project provides a high-level overview of security challenges for big data environments. We cover the ways big data differs from traditional relational databases, both architecturally and operationally. We look at some of the built-in and third-party security solutions for big data clusters, and how they work with – and against – big data installations. Finally, we make a base set of recommendations for securing big data installations – we recommend several technologies to address specific threats to the data and the big data cluster itself, preferring options which can scale with the cluster. After all, security should &lt;em&gt;support&lt;/em&gt; big data clusters, not break or hamper them.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Implementing and Managing Patch and Configuration Management: Defining Policies</title><link>/blog/implementing-and-managing-patch-and-configuration-management-defining-polic/</link><pubDate>Thu, 01 Nov 2012 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/implementing-and-managing-patch-and-configuration-management-defining-polic/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;So far we have focused on all the &lt;a href="https://securosis.com/blog/implementing-and-managing-patch-and-configuration-management-preparation"&gt;preparatory work&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href="https://securosis.com/blog/implementing-and-management-patch-and-configuration-management-integrate-an"&gt;technology deployment&lt;/a&gt; that needs to happen before you can finally flip the switch and start using an endpoint security management tool in production. With the pieces in place it is now time to configure and deploy policies to prepare for the inevitable patch cycles, and to start monitoring configurations on your key devices. The first major choice is between the Quick Wins and Full Deployment processes – Quick Wins is focused on information gathering and refining priorities &amp;amp; policies – proving the tool’s value and making sure your results from initial testing weren’t misleading. Full Deployment is all about full coverage for all endpoint devices and users. We generally recommend you start with Quick Wins, which produces much more information and treads a bit more lightly, before jumping into Full Deployment. Who knows – you might even realign your priorities. But even after a few Quick Wins, a structured and (somewhat) patient path to Full Deployment makes the most sense.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Incite 10/31/2012: The Eye of the Goblin</title><link>/blog/incite-10-31-2012-the-eye-of-the-goblin/</link><pubDate>Wed, 31 Oct 2012 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/incite-10-31-2012-the-eye-of-the-goblin/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;My kids love Halloween. They obsess about their costumes for weeks ahead of the big day. They go back and forth with their friends to coordinate their looks. Sometimes it works (XX2 will be a candy corn with all her friends), sometimes it doesn’t (XX1 couldn’t gain consensus amongst her friends). They love to collect all sorts of candy they won’t eat and await the sugar rush when we let them partake in a few after trick or treating. They like to swing by the awesome haunted house in the neighborhood. It’s a day when they can forget about their issues, challenges, homework, and hormone drama, and just be kids.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Building an Early Warning System: Introduction [New Series]</title><link>/blog/building-an-early-warning-system-introduction/</link><pubDate>Tue, 30 Oct 2012 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/building-an-early-warning-system-introduction/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;Getting ahead of the attackers&lt;/em&gt; is the holy grail to security folks. A few years back some vendors sold their customers a bill of goods, claiming they could “get ahead of the threat.” That didn’t work out so well, and most of the world appreciates that security is a reactive situation. The realistic objective is to reduce the time it takes to react. We call this &lt;a href="https://securosis.com/research/papers/react-faster-and-better-new-approaches-for-advanced-incident-response"&gt;React Faster and Better&lt;/a&gt;. The foundation of the philosophy is an effective incident response process. But you can shrink the window of exploitation by leveraging cutting-edge research to help focus your efforts more effectively. You need an &lt;em&gt;early warning system&lt;/em&gt; for perspective on what’s coming at you.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Implementing and Managing Patch and Configuration Management: Integrate and Deploy Technologies</title><link>/blog/implementing-and-management-patch-and-configuration-management-integrate-an/</link><pubDate>Mon, 29 Oct 2012 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/implementing-and-management-patch-and-configuration-management-integrate-an/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;By this point planning should be complete. You have designed your patch and configuration management processes, defined priorities to manage the devices in your environment, figured out which high-level implementation process to start with, discovered the devices in your environment, and performed initial testing to make sure the new technology doesn’t break anything. Now it’s time to integrate the patch and configuration management tools into your environment. Enough of this planning stuff, let’s get down to business! But you won’t actually remediate anything yet – the initial focus is on integrating technical components, installing agents as necessary, and preparing to flip the switch.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Implementing and Managing Patch and Configuration Management: Preparation</title><link>/blog/implementing-and-managing-patch-and-configuration-management-preparation/</link><pubDate>Fri, 26 Oct 2012 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/implementing-and-managing-patch-and-configuration-management-preparation/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;As we described in the &lt;a href="https://securosis.com/blog/implementing-and-managing-patch-and-configuration-management-introduction"&gt;Introduction&lt;/a&gt; to Implementing and Managing Patch and Configuration Management, endpoint hygiene is key to endpoint security management. WIth the product (or service) in hand, it’s time to get the technology implemented and providing value as quickly as possible. You know the old saying, “if you fail to prepare, you prepare to fail.” It’s actually true, and the preparation in this situation involves ensuring your processes are solid, defining device coverage and roll-out priorities, figuring out what’s already out there, and finally going through a testing phase to make sure you are ready to deploy widely. So, let’s revisit the patch and configuration management processes.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Incite 2/24/2012: Fruit Salad</title><link>/blog/incite-2-24-2012-fruit-salad/</link><pubDate>Wed, 24 Oct 2012 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/incite-2-24-2012-fruit-salad/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Some days I miss when the kids were little. It’s not that I don’t appreciate being able to talk in full sentences, pick apart their arguments and have them understand what I’m talking about, or apply a heavy bit of sarcasm when I respond to some silly request. I don’t think I’d go back to the days of changing diapers, but there was a simplicity to child rearing back then. We don’t really appreciate how quickly time flies – at least I don’t. I blinked and the toddlers are little people. We were too busy making sure all the trains ran on time to appreciate those days.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>White Paper: Tokenization vs. Encryption</title><link>/blog/white-paper-tokenization-vs-encryption-2/</link><pubDate>Wed, 24 Oct 2012 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/white-paper-tokenization-vs-encryption-2/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;We are relaunching one of our more popular white papers, Tokenization vs. Encryption: Options for Compliance. The paper was originally written to close some gaps in our existing tokenization research coverage and address common user questions. Specifically, how does tokenization differ from encryption, and how can I decide which to use? We believe tokenization is particularly important, for several reasons. First, in an evolving regulatory landscape, we need a critical examination of tokenization’s suitability for compliance. There are many possible applications of tokenization, and it’s simpler and easier to use than many other security tools. Second, we wanted to dispel the myth that tokenization is a replacement technology for encryption, when in fact it’s a complimentary solution that – in some cases – makes regulatory compliance easier. Finally, not all of the claimed use cases for tokenization are practical at this time.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Implementing and Managing Patch and Configuration Management: Introduction [New Series]</title><link>/blog/implementing-and-managing-patch-and-configuration-management-introduction/</link><pubDate>Tue, 23 Oct 2012 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/implementing-and-managing-patch-and-configuration-management-introduction/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Endpoint devices have been the bane of security practitioners for as long as we can remember. Whether it’s unknowing users who click anything, folks who don’t think the rules apply to them, or the forgetful sorts who just leave their devices anywhere and everywhere, keeping control over endpoints causes heartburn at many organizations. To address these concerns, Securosis recently published our &lt;a href="https://securosis.com/research/papers/the-endpoint-security-management-buyers-guide"&gt;Endpoint Security Management Buyer’s Guide&lt;/a&gt;, which began with a list of the key issues complicating endpoint security management, including:&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Friday Summary: October 19, 2012</title><link>/blog/friday-summary-october-19-2012/</link><pubDate>Fri, 19 Oct 2012 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/friday-summary-october-19-2012/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Research. It’s what I do. And long before I started work at Securosis I had a natural inclination toward it. Researching platforms, software toolkits, hardware, whatever. I want to know all the facts, and most of the rumors and anecdotes as well. I research things &lt;em&gt;furiously&lt;/em&gt;. I’m obsessive about it. I will spend hour upon hour trying to answer every question I come up with, looking at all aspects of a product. This job lets me really indulge that facet of my personality – it makes the job enjoyable, and is the reason some research projects go a tad longer that I originally expected. And in an odd way it’s one of the reasons I really like the name Securosis – the name Rich chose for the company before I joined in. My research habits border a bit on neurosis, so it fits.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>New Paper: Pragmatic Key Management for Data Encryption</title><link>/blog/new-paper-pragmatic-key-management-for-data-encryption/</link><pubDate>Fri, 19 Oct 2012 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/new-paper-pragmatic-key-management-for-data-encryption/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Hey everyone,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I am pleased to finally announce the release of &lt;em&gt;Pragmatic Key Management for Data Encryption&lt;/em&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;If you didn’t follow the posts that lead to this paper, the focus is on key management strategies for data encryption – rather than on certificate management, signing, or other crypto operations. I was able to narrow things down to four key strategies, and I also spend a little time talking about data encryption systems, as opposed to crypto operations (hashing, algorithms, etc.).&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Defending Against DoS Attacks: the Process</title><link>/blog/defending-against-dos-attacks-the-process/</link><pubDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2012 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/defending-against-dos-attacks-the-process/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;As we have mentioned throughout this series, a strong underlying process is your best defense against a Denial of Service (DoS) attack. Tactics change and the attack volumes increase, but if you don’t know what to do when your site goes down it will be down for a while.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Incite 10/17/2012: Passion</title><link>/blog/incite-10-17-2012-passion/</link><pubDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2012 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/incite-10-17-2012-passion/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;One of the things about celebrating a birthday is the inevitable reflection. You can’t help but ask yourself: “Another year has gone by – am I where I’m supposed to be? Am I doing what I like to do? Am I moving in the right direction?” But what is that direction? How do you know?&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>New Series: Understanding and Selecting a Key Manager</title><link>/blog/new-series-understanding-and-selecting-a-key-manager/</link><pubDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2012 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/new-series-understanding-and-selecting-a-key-manager/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Between new initiatives like cloud computing, and new mandates due to the continuous onslaught of compliance, managing encryption keys is moving from something only big banks worried about to something popping up among organizations of all sizes and shapes. Whether it is to protect customer data in a new web application or to ensure that a lost backup tape doesn’t force you to file a breach report, more and more organizations are encrypting more data in more places than ever before. And tying all of this together is the ever-present shadow of managing all those keys.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Defending Against DoS Attacks: Defense, Part 2: Applications</title><link>/blog/defending-against-dos-attacks-defense-part-2-the-applications/</link><pubDate>Thu, 11 Oct 2012 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/defending-against-dos-attacks-defense-part-2-the-applications/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Whereas &lt;a href="https://securosis.com/blog/defending-against-dos-attacks-defense-part-1-the-network"&gt;defending against volumetric DoS attacks&lt;/a&gt; requires resilient network architectures and service providers, dealing with application-targeted DoS puts the impetus for defense back squarely on your shoulders. As discussed in Attacks, overwhelming an application entails messing with its ability to manage session state and targeting weaknesses in the application stack. These attacks don’t require massive bandwidth, bot armies or even more than a well crafted series of GET or POST requests.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Friday Summary: October 12, 2012</title><link>/blog/friday-summary-october-12-2012/</link><pubDate>Thu, 11 Oct 2012 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/friday-summary-october-12-2012/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Rich here.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;If memory serves, I completed my first First Aid/CPR certification when I was around 10. I followed up with lifeguard at 16, ensuring myself a few years of employment as a seasonal professional volleyball player. I completed my EMT and 19 after being dumped by my first girlfriend, when I needed a way to occupy my free time. For some reason it’s hard to get insurance for 19 year-old-males driving things with lights and sirens, so I didn’t get onto my first fire department or ambulance company until I was nearly 21. I followed that up with paramedic at 22, and since then have been trained, worked as, and/or certified in everything from dive rescue, mountain rescue, and ski patrol to WMD and national disaster medical response.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Incite 10/10/2012: A Perfect Day</title><link>/blog/incite-10-10-2012-a-perfect-day/</link><pubDate>Wed, 10 Oct 2012 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/incite-10-10-2012-a-perfect-day/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;It’s just another day. So what that, many years ago, you happened to be born on that day. Yes, I am talking about birthdays. Evidently when it’s your birthday it means people should treat you nicely, let you do what you want, write you cards, and shower you with gifts. We’d probably all like that treatment the other 364 days too, right? But on your birthday I guess everyone deserves a little special treatment. Well, my birthday was this past weekend, and it was pretty much perfect.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>US Returns Fire in Huawei/ZTE Report</title><link>/blog/us-returns-fire-in-huawei-zte-report/</link><pubDate>Wed, 10 Oct 2012 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/us-returns-fire-in-huawei-zte-report/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I had a call today with a Reuters reporter about the Huawei/ZTE deal being spiked by the US government. To be honest, there’s an aspect of this story I assumed someone else would mention first, but I haven’t noticed it being explicitly stated anywhere yet.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Defending Against DoS Attacks: Defense Part 1, the Network</title><link>/blog/defending-against-dos-attacks-defense-part-1-the-network/</link><pubDate>Tue, 09 Oct 2012 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/defending-against-dos-attacks-defense-part-1-the-network/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;In &lt;a href="https://securosis.com/blog/defending-against-dos-attacks-the-attacks"&gt;Attacks&lt;/a&gt;, we discussed both network-based and application-targeting Denial of Service (DoS) attacks. Given the radically different techniques between the types, it’s only logical that we use different defense strategies for each type. But be aware that aspects of both network-based and application-targeting DoS attacks are typically combined for maximum effect. So your DoS defenses need to be comprehensive, protecting against (aspects of) both types. Anti-DoS products and services you will consider defend against both. This post will focus on defending against network-based volumetric attacks.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Friday Summary: October 5, 2012</title><link>/blog/friday-summary-october-5-2012/</link><pubDate>Fri, 05 Oct 2012 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/friday-summary-october-5-2012/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Gunnar Peterson posted a presentation a while back on how being an investor makes him better at security, and conversely how being in security makes him better at investing. It’s a great concept, and my recent research on different investment techniques has made me realize how amazing his concept is. &lt;a href="http://1raindrop.typepad.com/1_raindrop/2012/05/i-am-a-better-security-pro-because-i-am-an-investor-i-am-a-better-investor-because-i-am-a-security-p.html"&gt;Gunnar’s presentation&lt;/a&gt; gets a handful of the big ideas (including defensive mindset, using data rather than anecdotes to make decisions, and understanding the difference between what is and what should be) right, but actually under-serves his concept – there are &lt;em&gt;many&lt;/em&gt; other comparisons that make his point. That crossed my mind when reading &lt;a href="http://www.fool.com/investing/general/2012/10/02/an-investors-guide-to-famous-last-words.aspx"&gt;An Investor’s Guide to Famous Last Words&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>New Series: Understanding and Selecting Identity Management for Cloud Services</title><link>/blog/new-series-understanding-and-selecting-identity-management-for-cloud-servic/</link><pubDate>Thu, 04 Oct 2012 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/new-series-understanding-and-selecting-identity-management-for-cloud-servic/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Adrian and Gunnar here, kicking off a new series on Identity Management for Cloud Services.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;We have been hearing about Federated Identity and Single Sign-On services for the last decade, but demand for these features has only fully blossomed in the last few years, as companies have needed to integrate their internal identity management systems. The meanings of these terms has been actively evolving, under the influence of cloud computing. The ability to manage what resources your users can access &lt;em&gt;outside&lt;/em&gt; your corporate network – on third party systems outside your control – is not just a simple change in deployment models; but a fundamental shift in how we handle authentication, authorization, and provisioning. Enterprises want to extend capabilities to their users of low-cost cloud service providers – while maintaining security, policy management, and compliance functions. We want to illuminate these changes in approach and technology. And if you have not been keeping up to date with these changes in the IAM market, you will likely need to unlearn what you know. We are not talking about making your old Active Directory accessible to internal &lt;em&gt;and&lt;/em&gt; external users, or running LDAP in your Amazon EC2 constellation. We are talking about the fusion of multiple identity and access management capabilities – possibly across multiple cloud services. We are gaining the ability to authorize users across multiple services, without distributing credentials to each and every service provider.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Incite 10/3/2012: Cash is King</title><link>/blog/incite-10-3-2012-cash-is-king/</link><pubDate>Wed, 03 Oct 2012 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/incite-10-3-2012-cash-is-king/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Last Friday was the end of the third calendar quarter. For you math majors out there, that’s the 3-month period ending September 30. Inevitably I had meetings and calls canceled at the last minute to deal with “end of quarter” issues. This happens every quarter, so it wasn’t surprising. Just funny.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Securing Big Data: Recommendations and Open Issues</title><link>/blog/securing-big-data-recommendations-and-open-issues/</link><pubDate>Mon, 01 Oct 2012 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/securing-big-data-recommendations-and-open-issues/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Our previous two posts outlined several security issues inherent to big data &lt;a href="https://securosis.com/blog/securing-big-data-operational-security-issues"&gt;architecture&lt;/a&gt;, and &lt;a href="https://securosis.com/blog/securing-big-data-architectural-issues"&gt;operational security issues&lt;/a&gt; common to big data clusters. With those in mind, how can one go about securing a big data cluster? What tools and techniques should you employ?&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Endpoint Security Management Buyer’s Guide Published (with the Index of Posts)</title><link>/blog/endpoint-security-management-buyers-guide-published-with-the-index-of-posts-2/</link><pubDate>Sun, 30 Sep 2012 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/endpoint-security-management-buyers-guide-published-with-the-index-of-posts-2/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;We have published the &lt;em&gt;Endpoint Security Management Buyer’s Guide&lt;/em&gt; paper, which provides a strategic view of Endpoint Security Management, addressing the complexities caused by malware’s continuing evolution, device sprawl, and mobility/BYOD. The paper focuses on periodic controls that fall under good endpoint hygiene (such as patch and configuration management) and ongoing controls (such as device control and file integrity monitoring) to detect unauthorized activity and prevent it from completing. The crux of our findings involve use of an endpoint security management platform to aggregate the capabilities of these individual controls, providing policy and enforcement leverage to decrease cost of ownership, and increasing the value of endpoint security management.&lt;img src="ESMG-Cover.png" alt=""&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Securing Big Data: Operational Security Issues</title><link>/blog/securing-big-data-operational-security-issues/</link><pubDate>Fri, 28 Sep 2012 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/securing-big-data-operational-security-issues/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Before I dig into today’s post I want to share a couple observations. First, my new copy of the Harvard Business Review just arrived. The cover story is “Getting Control of Big Data”. It’s telling that HBR thinks big data is a trend important enough to warrant a full spread, and feel business managers need to understand big data and the benefits and risks it poses to business. As soon as I finish this post I intend to dive into these articles. Now that I have just about finished this research effort, I look forward to contrasting what I have discovered with their perspective.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Defending Against DoS Attacks: Attacks</title><link>/blog/defending-against-dos-attacks-the-attacks/</link><pubDate>Thu, 27 Sep 2012 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/defending-against-dos-attacks-the-attacks/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://securosis.com/blog/defending-against-denial-of-service-dos-attacks-new-blog-series"&gt;Our first post&lt;/a&gt; built a case for considering availability as an aspect of security context, rather than only confidentiality and integrity. This has been driven by Denial of Service (DoS) attacks, which are used by attackers in many different ways, including extortion (using the threat of an attack), obfuscation (to hide exfiltration), hacktivism (to draw attention to a particular cause), or even friendly fire (when a promotion goes a little too well).&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Friday Summary: September 28, 2012 (A weird security week)</title><link>/blog/friday-summary-september-28-2012-a-weird-security-week/</link><pubDate>Thu, 27 Sep 2012 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/friday-summary-september-28-2012-a-weird-security-week/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;There was a lot of big news this week in the security world, most of it bad. Even if you skip the intro, make sure you read the Top News section.&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Incite 9/27/2012: They Own the Night</title><link>/blog/incite-9-27-2012-they-own-the-night/</link><pubDate>Thu, 27 Sep 2012 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/incite-9-27-2012-they-own-the-night/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Our days just keep getting longer and longer. When the kids were younger afternoons and early evenings were a blur of activities, homework, hygiene, meals, reading, and then bed. Most nights the kids were in bed by 8:30 and the Boss and I could eat in peace, watch a little TV, catch up, and basically take a breath. But since XX1 entered middle school, things have changed. The kids have adapted fine. The Boss and me, not so much.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>New Research Paper: Pragmatic WAF Management</title><link>/blog/new-research-paper-pragmatic-waf-management/</link><pubDate>Wed, 26 Sep 2012 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/new-research-paper-pragmatic-waf-management/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;We are proud to announce a new research paper on Pragmatic Web Application Firewall Management. This paper has been a long time coming – we have been researching this topic for three years, looking for the right time to discuss WAF’s issues.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>My Security Fail (and Recovery) for the Week</title><link>/blog/my-security-fail-and-recovery-for-the-week/</link><pubDate>Tue, 25 Sep 2012 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/my-security-fail-and-recovery-for-the-week/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I remember sitting at lunch with a friend and well-respected member of our security community as I described the architecture we used to protect our mail server. I’m not saying it’s perfect, but this person responded with, “that’s insane – I know people selling 0-days to governments that don’t go that far”. On another occasion I was talking with someone with vastly more network security knowledge and experience than me; someone who once protected a site attacked daily by very knowledgeable predators, and he was… confused as to why I architected the systems like I did.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Securing Big Data: Architectural Issues</title><link>/blog/securing-big-data-architectural-issues/</link><pubDate>Tue, 25 Sep 2012 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/securing-big-data-architectural-issues/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;In the &lt;a href="https://securosis.com/blog/securing-big-data-security-issues-with-hadoop-environments"&gt;previous post&lt;/a&gt; we went to some length to define what big data &lt;em&gt;is&lt;/em&gt; – because the architectural model is critical to understanding how it poses different security challenges than traditional databases, data warehouses, and massively parallel processing environments.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Another Inflection Point</title><link>/blog/another-inflection/</link><pubDate>Mon, 24 Sep 2012 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/another-inflection/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Rich Mogull recently posted a great stream of consciousness piece about how we are at an &lt;a href="https://securosis.com/blog/inflection"&gt;inflection point in information security&lt;/a&gt;. He covers how cloud and mobility are having, and will continue to have, a huge impact on how we practice security. Rich mentions four main areas of impact:&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Friday Summary: September 21, 2012</title><link>/blog/friday-summary-september-21-2012/</link><pubDate>Fri, 21 Sep 2012 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/friday-summary-september-21-2012/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Adrian here …&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I had a few surgical procedures over the past few weeks. They corrected some vascular defects that were causing several problems, some of which had been coming on for such a long time I was unaware that there was an issue. The whole &lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boiling_frog"&gt;boiling frog&lt;/a&gt; in a beaker concept. And with the slow progression I was ignorant of the extent of the damage it was causing. The good news is that procedures were successful and their positive benefit was far greater than I anticipated.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Incite 9/20/2012: Scabs</title><link>/blog/incite-9-20-2012-scabs/</link><pubDate>Thu, 20 Sep 2012 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/incite-9-20-2012-scabs/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;You will probably read this on Thursday or even Friday, and that’s late. This week got all screwed up. It’s a little matter of a bunch of things happening at the same time, mostly personal, all good. So Monday was a holiday for me and starts the fall renewal process where I don’t set goals and don’t worry about what I’m striving for any more. It also turns out Monday night was the Falcons home opener. Many of my ATL buddies consider me a sinner for going to a football game on the High Holy Days. As I told the Boss, “Football is my other religion,” so there was never a question whether I would go.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Inflection</title><link>/blog/inflection/</link><pubDate>Wed, 19 Sep 2012 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/inflection/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Hang with me as I channel my inner Kerouac (minus the drugs, plus the page breaks) and go all stream of consciousness. To call this post an “incomplete thought” would be more than a little generous.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Securing Big Data: Security Issues with Hadoop Environments</title><link>/blog/securing-big-data-security-issues-with-hadoop-environments/</link><pubDate>Wed, 19 Sep 2012 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/securing-big-data-security-issues-with-hadoop-environments/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;How do I secure “big data”? A simple and common question. But one without a direct answer – simple or otherwise.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Attend Gunnar’s Kick-A Mobile Security and Development Class</title><link>/blog/attend-gunnars-kick-a-mobile-security-and-development-class-2/</link><pubDate>Tue, 18 Sep 2012 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/attend-gunnars-kick-a-mobile-security-and-development-class-2/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Our very own Gunnar Peterson is co-presenting what looks like an insanely awesome mobile application security class.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;And with a name like &lt;em&gt;The Mobile App Sec Triathlon&lt;/em&gt; you know I am interested.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>It’s Time for Enterprises to Support a “Backup” Browser</title><link>/blog/its-time-for-enterprises-to-support-a-backup-browser-2/</link><pubDate>Tue, 18 Sep 2012 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/its-time-for-enterprises-to-support-a-backup-browser-2/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;In today’s news we see &lt;a href="http://arstechnica.com/security/2012/09/critical-zero-day-bug-in-microsoft-internet-explorer/"&gt;yet another zero-day Internet Explorer exploit being used in the wild&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;And once again, soon after becoming public, an exploit was added to Metasploit. Well, sort of. While the in-the-wild attack only works against Windows XP, the Metasploit version works against Windows 7 and Vista. (Note that IE 10 isn’t affected).&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Defending Against Denial of Service (DoS) Attacks—New Series</title><link>/blog/defending-against-denial-of-service-dos-attacks-new-series/</link><pubDate>Thu, 13 Sep 2012 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/defending-against-denial-of-service-dos-attacks-new-series/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;For years security folks have grumbled about the role compliance has assumed in driving investment and resource allocation in security. It has all been about mandates and regulatory oversight, which drive a focus on protection, ostensibly to prevent data breaches. We have spent years in the proverbial wilderness focused entirely on the “C” (Confidentiality) and “I” (Integrity) aspects of the CIA triad, mostly neglecting the “A” (Availability). But that hasn’t worked out too well.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Friday Summary: September 14, 2012</title><link>/blog/friday-summary-september-14-2012/</link><pubDate>Thu, 13 Sep 2012 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/friday-summary-september-14-2012/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Rich here.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Way &lt;strong&gt;way&lt;/strong&gt; back in my earliest Gartner days one of my first speaking engagements was a series of three-city tours where I was paired up with an extremely experienced telecom analyst. I was still in my twenties, and probably wasn&amp;rsquo;t qualified to wash my privates &amp;ndash; never mind advise anyone on their security strategy.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Incite 9/12/2012: Individuality</title><link>/blog/incite-9-12-2012-individuality/</link><pubDate>Wed, 12 Sep 2012 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/incite-9-12-2012-individuality/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;It seems like so long ago that I read the &lt;a href="http://www.amazon.com/Opposites-Sandra-Boynton/dp/0671449036"&gt;Opposites&lt;/a&gt; board books to the kids when they were toddlers. And it was. Today XX2 and the Boy turn 9. It’s hard to believe how quickly the time has flown. Just yesterday I was emailing with an old colleague and I figured his youngest daughter must be in college by now. Turns out she graduated last year and is now in a PhD program. I’m no spring chicken anymore, that’s for sure.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Friday Summary: September 7, 2012</title><link>/blog/friday-summary-september-7-2012/</link><pubDate>Fri, 07 Sep 2012 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/friday-summary-september-7-2012/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I thought &lt;a href="http://www.sacbee.com/2012/09/04/4783732/35-years-later-voyager-1-is-heading.html#storylink=omni_popular"&gt;35 years later, Voyager 1 is heading for the stars&lt;/a&gt; was &lt;em&gt;very&lt;/em&gt; cool. It brought back many memories of starting my career at Jet Propulsion Laboratories. Voyager had been in space for a decade when I started there, but these satellites were just starting to send the &lt;em&gt;stunning&lt;/em&gt; images back from Saturn and Jupiter. Every morning people got into work early just to see what data was sent back from the night before. Friends were processing the images, doing error and color corrections, and we were seeing other planets up close and personal for the first time. We used to get copies provided to us as employees, many with color enhancement to highlight certain features of the planets and moons. It added an element of excitement to my early career that almost made us forget we were &lt;em&gt;at work&lt;/em&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Incite 9/4/2012: Dealing with Dealers</title><link>/blog/incite-9-4-2012-dealing-with-dealers/</link><pubDate>Wed, 05 Sep 2012 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/incite-9-4-2012-dealing-with-dealers/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Back in March I mentioned it was about time for &lt;a href="https://securosis.com/blog/incite-3-21-2012-wheel-refresh"&gt;a new set of wheels&lt;/a&gt;. Of course nothing happens quickly in my world, so it wasn’t until mid-June that I got serious about a new car. You’d figure a guy like me would relish the opportunity to sit across from a car salesperson and beat them into submission to get the best deal. I’m not the kind of guy to blink, and I’d just as soon walk out if I don’t get what I want. Turns out I’ve been there and done that, and despite living to tell the tale, I have learned there is a better way to skin this specific cat.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Friday Summary: August 31, 2012</title><link>/blog/friday-summary-august-31-2012/</link><pubDate>Thu, 30 Aug 2012 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/friday-summary-august-31-2012/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Rich here.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Yesterday I published an article over at &lt;em&gt;Macworld&lt;/em&gt; on the &lt;a href="http://www.macworld.com/article/1168358/java_security_threats_what_you_need_to_know.html"&gt;New Java exploits, and why Mac users likely aren’t at risk.&lt;/a&gt; As with many previous articles on Mac security, I’m getting really positive feedback. Heck, I have even had people tell me that I’m currently writing the best stuff out there on Apple security overall.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Incite 8/29/2012: Always on the Run</title><link>/blog/incite-8-29-2012-always-on-the-run/</link><pubDate>Wed, 29 Aug 2012 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/incite-8-29-2012-always-on-the-run/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Wake up. Get the kids ready for school. Exercise (maybe). Drink some coffee. Write. Make calls. Eat (sometimes too much). Write some more. Make more calls. Drink more coffee. Think some big thoughts. Pick up the kids from some activity. Have dinner. Get the kids to bed. Maybe get back to writing. Maybe watch a little TV. Go to bed much too late. Wake up and do it again. That’s an oversimplified view of my life, but it’s not far off.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Friday Summary: August 24, 2012.</title><link>/blog/friday-summary-august-24-2012/</link><pubDate>Fri, 24 Aug 2012 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/friday-summary-august-24-2012/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;This will probably sound weird, but for the first time in many years I am bummed that summer is ending. This is odd because I’m not really into vacations. I have only taken a real vacation – which I define as my wife and myself leaving the house together for more than 24 hours – twice in the last twelve years. And one of those vacations was a disaster I would not care to relive – drunken friends and crashing houseboats onto rocks is something I can do without. Anyway, vacations are just not something we really do. And when you have as many critters as we do – each needing regular attention – going anywhere gets a bit difficult. I travel a lot as part of this job, so I have no need to “get away” for its own sake. I’m happy to putter around the house, and I have made my home a great place to take time off.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Pragmatic WAF Management: Securing the WAF</title><link>/blog/pragmatic-waf-management-securing-the-waf/</link><pubDate>Fri, 24 Aug 2012 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/pragmatic-waf-management-securing-the-waf/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;WAFs themselves are an application, and as such they provide additional attack surface for your adversaries. Their goal isn’t necessarily to compromise the WAF itself (though that’s sometimes a bonus) – the short-term need is evasion. If attackers can figure out how to get &lt;em&gt;around&lt;/em&gt; your WAF, many of its protections become moot. Your WAF needs to be secured, just like any other device sitting &lt;em&gt;out there&lt;/em&gt; and accessible to attackers. So let’s start by discussing device security, including deployment and provisioning entitlements. Then we can get into some evasion tactics you are likely to see, before wrapping up with a discussion of the importance of testing your WAFs on an ongoing basis.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Incite 8/22/2012: Cassette Legends</title><link>/blog/incite-8-22-2012-cassette-legends/</link><pubDate>Wed, 22 Aug 2012 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/incite-8-22-2012-cassette-legends/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;The impact of technology cannot be overstated. Not compared to when I was a kid. So we were having dinner over the weekend and XX2 started changing the lyrics to Michael Jackson’s &lt;em&gt;Beat It,&lt;/em&gt; by crooning out “Eat It.” Of course, I mentioned that she was creative but hardly original and that &lt;a href="http://www.ifc.com/fix/2012/05/10-essential-weird-al-yankovic-videos"&gt;Weird Al Yankovic&lt;/a&gt; recorded that exact song some 20 years ago. Then the Boy piped in with the chorus to Weird Al’s other Michael Jackson parody, “Fat.” Wait, what?&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Endpoint Security Management Buyer’s Guide: 10 Questions</title><link>/blog/endpoint-security-management-buyers-guide-10-questions-2/</link><pubDate>Tue, 21 Aug 2012 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/endpoint-security-management-buyers-guide-10-questions-2/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Normally we wrap up each blog series with a nice summary that goes through the high points of our research and summarizes what you need to know. But this is a Buyer’s Guide, so we figured it would be more useful to summarize with 10 questions. With apologies to Alex Trebek, here are the 10 key questions we would ask if we were buying an endpoint security management product or service.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Endpoint Security Management Buyer’s Guide: Platform Buying Considerations</title><link>/blog/endpoint-security-management-buyers-guide-platform-buying-considerations-2/</link><pubDate>Mon, 20 Aug 2012 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/endpoint-security-management-buyers-guide-platform-buying-considerations-2/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;As we wrap up the Endpoint Security Management Buyer’s Guide, we have already looked at the &lt;a href="https://securosis.com/blog/endpoint-security-management-buyers-guide-the-business-impact-of-managing-e"&gt;business impact of managing endpoint security&lt;/a&gt; and the &lt;a href="https://securosis.com/blog/endpoint-security-management-buyers-guide-the-esm-lifecycle"&gt;endpoint security management lifecycle&lt;/a&gt;, and dug into the &lt;a href="https://securosis.com/blog/endpoint-security-management-buyers-guide-periodic-controls"&gt;periodic controls&lt;/a&gt; (patch and configuration management) and ongoing controls (&lt;a href="https://securosis.com/blog/endpoint-security-management-buyers-guide-ongoing-controls-device-control"&gt;device control&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href="https://securosis.com/blog/endpoint-security-management-buyers-guide-ongoing-controls-file-integrity-m"&gt;file integrity monitoring&lt;/a&gt;). We have alluded to the &lt;em&gt;platform&lt;/em&gt; throughout the posts, but what exactly does that mean? What do you need the platform to do?&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>[New White Paper] Understanding and Selecting Data Masking Solutions</title><link>/blog/new-white-paperunderstanding-and-selecting-data-masking-solutions/</link><pubDate>Thu, 16 Aug 2012 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/new-white-paperunderstanding-and-selecting-data-masking-solutions/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Today we are launching a new research paper on Understanding and Selecting Data Masking Solutions.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;As we spoke with vendors, customers, and data security professionals over the last 18 months, we felt big changes occurring with masking products. We received many new customer inquires regarding masking, often for use cases outside the classic normal test data creation. We wanted to discuss these changes and share what we see with the community. Our goal has been to ensure the research addresses common questions from both technical and non-technical audiences. We did our best to cover the business applications of masking in a non-technical, jargon-free way. Not everyone who is interested in data security has a degree in data management or security, so we geared the first third of the paper to problems you can reasonably expect to solve with masking technologies. Those of you interested in the nut and bolts need not fear – we drill into the myriad of technical variables later in the paper.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Endpoint Security Management Buyer’s Guide: Ongoing Controls—File Integrity Monitoring</title><link>/blog/endpoint-security-management-buyers-guide-ongoing-controls-file-integrity-monitoring/</link><pubDate>Thu, 16 Aug 2012 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/endpoint-security-management-buyers-guide-ongoing-controls-file-integrity-monitoring/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;After hitting on the first of the ongoing controls, &lt;a href="https://securosis.com/blog/endpoint-security-management-buyers-guide-ongoing-controls-device-control"&gt;device control&lt;/a&gt;, we now turn to File Integrity Monitoring (FIM). Also called change monitoring, this entails monitoring files to see if and when files change. This capability is important for endpoint security management. Here are a few scenarios where FIM is particularly useful:&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Friday Summary: August 17, 2012</title><link>/blog/friday-summary-august-17-2012/</link><pubDate>Thu, 16 Aug 2012 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/friday-summary-august-17-2012/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Rich here…&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Some weeks I can’t decide if I should write something personal, professional, or technical in the Summary intro. Especially when I’m absolutely slammed and haven’t been blogging. This week I’ll err on the side of personal, and I’m sure you all will give me a little feedback if you prefer the geeky.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Pragmatic WAF Management: Application Lifecycle Integration</title><link>/blog/pragmatic-waf-management-application-lifecycle-integration/</link><pubDate>Thu, 16 Aug 2012 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/pragmatic-waf-management-application-lifecycle-integration/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;As we have mentioned throughout this series, the purpose of a WAF is to protect web facing applications from attacks. We can debate build-security-in versus bolt-security-on &lt;em&gt;ad infinitum,&lt;/em&gt; but ultimately the answer is &lt;em&gt;both&lt;/em&gt;. &lt;a href="https://securosis.com/blog/pragmatic-waf-management-policy-management"&gt;In the last post&lt;/a&gt; we discussed how to build and maintain WAF policies to protect applications, but you also need to adapt your development process to incorporate knowledge of typical attack tactics into code development practices to address application vulnerabilities over time. This involves a two-way discussion between WAF administrators and developers. Developers do their part helping security folks understand applications, what input values should look like, and what changes are expected in upcoming releases. This ensures the WAF rules remain in sync with the application.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Incite 8/15/2012: Fear (of the Unknown)</title><link>/blog/incite-8-15-2012-fear-of-the-unknown/</link><pubDate>Wed, 15 Aug 2012 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/incite-8-15-2012-fear-of-the-unknown/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;FDR was right. &lt;em&gt;We have nothing to fear, but fear itself.&lt;/em&gt; Of course, that doesn’t help much when you face the unknown and are scared. XX1 started middle school on Monday, so as you can imagine she was a bit anxious on Sunday night. The good news is that she made it through the first day. She even had a good attitude when her bus was over an hour late because of some issue at the high school. She could have walked the 3 miles home in a lot less time.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Endpoint Security Management Buyer’s Guide: Ongoing Controls—Device Control</title><link>/blog/endpoint-security-management-buyers-guide-ongoing-controls-device-control-2/</link><pubDate>Tue, 14 Aug 2012 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/endpoint-security-management-buyers-guide-ongoing-controls-device-control-2/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;As we discussed in the &lt;a href="https://securosis.com/blog/endpoint-security-management-buyers-guide-the-esm-lifecycle"&gt;Endpoint Security Management Lifecycle&lt;/a&gt;, there are controls you run periodically and others you need to use on an ongoing basis. We tackled the &lt;a href="https://securosis.com/blog/endpoint-security-management-buyers-guide-periodic-controls"&gt;periodic controls&lt;/a&gt; in the previous post, so now let’s turn to ongoing controls, which include device control and file integrity monitoring. The periodic controls post was pretty long, so we decided to break ongoing controls into two pieces. We will tackle device control in this post.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Pragmatic WAF Management: Policy Management</title><link>/blog/pragmatic-waf-management-policy-management/</link><pubDate>Mon, 13 Aug 2012 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/pragmatic-waf-management-policy-management/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;To get value out of your WAF investment – which means blocking threats, keeping unwanted requests and malware from hitting applications, and virtually patching known vulnerabilities in the application stack – the WAF must be tuned regularly. As we mentioned in our &lt;a href="https://securosis.com/blog/new-series-pragmatic-waf-management"&gt;introduction&lt;/a&gt;, WAF is not a “set and forget” tool – it’s a security platform which requires adjustment for new and evolving threats.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Friday Summary: August 10, 2012</title><link>/blog/friday-summary-august-10-2012/</link><pubDate>Fri, 10 Aug 2012 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/friday-summary-august-10-2012/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;This Summary is a short rant on how most firms appear baffled about how to handle mobile and cloud computing. Companies tend to view the cloud and mobile computing as wonderful new advancements, but unfortunately without thinking critically about how customers want to use these technologies – instead they tend to project their own desires onto the technology. Just as I imagine early automobiles were &lt;em&gt;saddled&lt;/em&gt; with legacy holdovers from horse-drawn carriages, when they were in fact something new. We are in that rough transition period, where people are still adjusting to these new technologies, and thinking of them in old and outmoded terms.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Tech media has fallen down, and it can’t get up</title><link>/blog/tech-media-has-fallen-down-and-it-cant-get-up-2/</link><pubDate>Thu, 09 Aug 2012 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/tech-media-has-fallen-down-and-it-cant-get-up-2/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I’m going to rant a bit this morning. I’m due. Overdue, in fact. I have been far too well behaved lately. But as I mentioned in this week’s Incite, summer is over and it’s time to stir the pot a bit.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Endpoint Security Management Buyer’s Guide: Periodic Controls</title><link>/blog/endpoint-security-management-buyers-guide-periodic-controls-2/</link><pubDate>Wed, 08 Aug 2012 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/endpoint-security-management-buyers-guide-periodic-controls-2/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;As we discussed in the &lt;a href="https://securosis.com/blog/endpoint-security-management-buyers-guide-the-esm-lifecycle"&gt;Endpoint Security Management Lifecycle&lt;/a&gt;, there are controls you use periodically and controls you need to run on an ongoing basis. This post will dig into the periodic controls, including patch and configuration management.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Incite 8/8/2012: The Other 10 Months</title><link>/blog/incite-8-8-2012-the-other-10-months/</link><pubDate>Wed, 08 Aug 2012 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/incite-8-8-2012-the-other-10-months/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;It’s hard to believe, but the summer is over. Not the brutally hot weather – that’s still around and will be for a couple more months in the ATL. But for my kids, it’s over. We picked the girls up at camp over the weekend and made the trek back home. They settled in pretty nicely, much better than the Boy.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Pragmatic WAF Management: the WAF Management Process</title><link>/blog/pragmatic-waf-management-the-waf-management-process/</link><pubDate>Fri, 03 Aug 2012 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/pragmatic-waf-management-the-waf-management-process/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;As we discussed previously in &lt;a href="https://securosis.com/blog/pragmatic-waf-management-the-trouble-with-waf"&gt;The Trouble with WAFs&lt;/a&gt;, there are many reasons WAFs frustrate both security and application developers. But thanks to the ‘gift’ of PCI, many organizations have a WAF in-house, and now they want to use it (more) effectively. Which is a good thing, by the way. We also pointed out that many of the WAF issues our research has discovered were not problems with technology. There is entirely too much failure to effectively manage WAF.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Endpoint Security Management Buyer’s Guide: the ESM Lifecycle</title><link>/blog/endpoint-security-management-buyers-guide-the-esm-lifecycle-2/</link><pubDate>Thu, 02 Aug 2012 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/endpoint-security-management-buyers-guide-the-esm-lifecycle-2/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;As we described in &lt;a href="https://securosis.com/blog/endpoint-security-management-buyers-guide-the-business-impact-of-managing-e"&gt;The Business Impact of Managing Endpoint Security&lt;/a&gt;, the world is complex and only getting more so. You need to deal with more devices, mobility, emerging attack vectors, and virtualization, among other things. So you need to graduate from the tactical view of endpoint security.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Friday Summary, TdF Edition: August 3, 2012</title><link>/blog/friday-summary-tdf-edition-august-3-2012/</link><pubDate>Thu, 02 Aug 2012 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/friday-summary-tdf-edition-august-3-2012/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Rich here.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Two weeks ago I got to experience something that wasn’t on the bucket list because it was so over the top I lacked the creativity to even think of putting it on the bucket list.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Incite 8/1/2012: Media Angst</title><link>/blog/incite-8-1-2012-media-angst/</link><pubDate>Wed, 01 Aug 2012 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/incite-8-1-2012-media-angst/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Obviously bad news sells. If you have any doubt about that, watch your local news. Wherever you are. The first three stories are inevitably bad news. Fires, murders, stupid political fiascos. Then maybe you’ll see a human interest story. Maybe. Then some sports and the weather and that’s it. Let’s just say I haven’t watched any newscast in a long time. But this focus on negativity has permeated every aspect of the media, and it’s nauseating.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Pragmatic WAF Management: The Trouble with WAF</title><link>/blog/pragmatic-waf-management-the-trouble-with-waf/</link><pubDate>Wed, 01 Aug 2012 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/pragmatic-waf-management-the-trouble-with-waf/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;We kicked off the Pragmatic WAF series by &lt;a href="https://securosis.com/blog/new-series-pragmatic-waf-management"&gt;setting the stage&lt;/a&gt; in the last post, highlighting the quandary WAFs represent to most enterprises. On one hand, compliance mandates have made WAF the path of least resistance for application security. Plenty of folks have devoted a ton of effort to making WAF work, and they are now looking for even more value, above and beyond the compliance checkbox.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>New Series: Pragmatic WAF Management</title><link>/blog/new-series-pragmatic-waf-management/</link><pubDate>Tue, 31 Jul 2012 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/new-series-pragmatic-waf-management/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Outside our posts on &lt;a href="https://securosis.com/blog/the-business-justification-for-data-security-data-valuation"&gt;ROI and ALE&lt;/a&gt;, nothing has prompted as much impassioned debate as Web Application Firewalls (WAFs). Every time someone on the Securosis team writes about Web App Firewalls, we create a mini firestorm. The catcalls come from all sides: “WAFs Suck”, “WAFs are useless”, and “WAFs are just a compliance checkbox product.” Usually this feedback comes from pen testers who easily navigate around the WAF during their engagements. The people we poll who manage WAFs – both employees and third party service providers – acknowledge the difficulty of managing WAF rules and the challenges of working closely with application developers. But at the same time, we constantly engage with dozens of companies dedicated to leveraging WAFs to protect applications. These folks get how WAFs impact their overall application security approach, and are looking for more value from their investment by optimizing their WAFs to reduce application compromises and risks to their systems.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Endpoint Security Management Buyer’s Guide: The Business Impact of Managing Endpoints</title><link>/blog/endpoint-security-management-buyers-guide-the-business-impact-of-managing-endpoints/</link><pubDate>Mon, 30 Jul 2012 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/endpoint-security-management-buyers-guide-the-business-impact-of-managing-endpoints/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Keeping track of 10,000+ of anything is a management nightmare. With ongoing compliance oversight, and evolving security attacks taking advantage of vulnerable devices, getting a handle on what’s involved in managing endpoints becomes more important every day. Complicating matters is the fact that &lt;em&gt;endpoints&lt;/em&gt; now include all sorts of devices – including a variety of PCs, mobiles, and even kiosks and other fixed function devices. We detailed our thoughts on &lt;a href="https://securosis.com/research/papers/white-paper-endpoint-security-fundamentals"&gt;endpoint security fundamentals&lt;/a&gt; a few years back, and much of that is still very relevant. But we didn’t continue to the next logical step: a deeper look at how to buy these technologies.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Incite 7/25/2012: Detox</title><link>/blog/incite-7-25-2012-detox2/</link><pubDate>Wed, 25 Jul 2012 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/incite-7-25-2012-detox2/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;What is normal? It changes most every day, especially when you are 8. We picked up the Boy from a month away at camp last weekend and we weren’t sure how he’d respond to, uh, real life. After seeing him on Visiting Day the week before, we knew he was having a great time. Maybe too great a time, as the downside is the inevitable adjustment period when times aren’t as fun or active or exciting or anything besides 16 hours of non-stop playtime.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Proxies—Meet the ‘Agents’ of Cloud Computing</title><link>/blog/proxies-meet-the-agents-of-cloud-computing/</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2012 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/proxies-meet-the-agents-of-cloud-computing/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;You remember agents, right? Those ‘lightweight’ pieces of code vendors provided to install on all your servers? The code you pushed out to endpoints? The stuff that gathered all sorts of data and provided analysis without any impact on server performance? Agents monitored activity, enforced policies, killed viruses, and foiled botnets, all from a central location, while making you a steaming espresso? Yeah, marketing hyperbole aside, agents are the ubiquitous pieces of code that got installed on every server to perform any and all security tasks on the local hosts. For tasks where network-based intelligence and protection were inappropriate – which are more common than not – agents do much of the heavy lifting. They’re installed on endpoints and servers. And they are a pain in the ass – many enterprises instituted “no more agents” moratoria when they were multiplying like rabbits, and once you get to say 20 or so agents on a machine, things get out of hand…&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>FireStarter: We Need a New Definition of Dead</title><link>/blog/firestarter-we-need-a-new-definition-of-dead/</link><pubDate>Mon, 23 Jul 2012 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/firestarter-we-need-a-new-definition-of-dead/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;At the Cloud Identity Summit last week, &lt;a href="http://www.linkedin.com/in/burtonian"&gt;Craig Burton&lt;/a&gt; stated the SAML – the security assertion language that helps thousands of enterprises address single sign-on – is unequivocably dead. Kaput. He presented the following data points to support his argument (I will link to his presentation when available):&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Heading out to Black Hat 2012!</title><link>/blog/heading-out-to-black-hat/</link><pubDate>Mon, 23 Jul 2012 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/heading-out-to-black-hat/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;It probably does not need to be said, but just about the entire Securosis team will be at &lt;a href="https://www.blackhat.com/html/bh-us-12/bh-us-12-schedule.html"&gt;Black Hat&lt;/a&gt; this week. And no, not just for the parties, but there will be some of that as well. I want to see a boatload of sessions this year – and I am betting Moss, Schneier, Shostack, Ranum, and Granick on stage together will be entertaining.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Takeaways from Cloud Identity Summit</title><link>/blog/takeaways-from-cloud-identity-summit/</link><pubDate>Mon, 23 Jul 2012 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/takeaways-from-cloud-identity-summit/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;“WTF? There are no security people here! I’m at a security conference without security folk. How weird is that?”&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I just got back from the &lt;a href="http://www.cloudidentitysummit.com/"&gt;Cloud Identity Summit&lt;/a&gt; in Vail, Colorado. Great conference, by the way. But as I walked around during the opening night festivities, I quickly realized I did not know anyone until Gunnar Peterson showed up. 400 people in attendance, and I did not know &lt;em&gt;anyone&lt;/em&gt;. I’ve been in security for something like 16 years. When I go to a security conference – say RSA or Black Hat – I see dozens of people I know. Hundreds I have met and spoken with. And hundreds more I’ve met over the years, whose names I can’t remember, but I know we have crossed paths.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Incite 7/18/2012: 21 Days</title><link>/blog/incite-7-18-2012-21-days/</link><pubDate>Wed, 18 Jul 2012 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/incite-7-18-2012-21-days/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;21 days. It doesn’t seem like a long time. In the day to day grind of my routine, 3 weeks is nothing. I basically blink and that much time passes. But when your kids are away at camp it is a long time. For us day 21 is a lifesaver because it’s the first visiting day. So last weekend we packed up the car and made the trek to Pennsylvania to see the kids.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Earning Quadrant Leadership</title><link>/blog/earning-quadrant-leadership/</link><pubDate>Tue, 17 Jul 2012 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/earning-quadrant-leadership/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Our friend Richard Stiennon put his promotional engine in gear this week to push his new book, &lt;a href="http://www.amazon.com/UP-RIGHT-Strategy-Influence-influence/dp/0985460709"&gt;UP and to the RIGHT&lt;/a&gt;. So my Twitter stream has been blown up by all sorts of folks praising Richard’s work. Which is great for Richard. I know what kind of commitment is required to write a book and what’s involved in self-publishing one. Including the Herculean task of getting your buddies to write glowing reviews and generating buzz in the echo chamber.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Heading out to the Cloud Identity Summit</title><link>/blog/heading-out-to-the-cloud-identity-summit/</link><pubDate>Mon, 16 Jul 2012 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/heading-out-to-the-cloud-identity-summit/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;The summer conference season has begun, and for those of us living in Phoenix, going to conferences is a great way to get out July’s blast furnace heat. I’m heading out tomorrow to the &lt;a href="http://www.cloudidentitysummit.com/"&gt;Cloud Identity Summit&lt;/a&gt; in Vail, Colorado. I’m not speaking – just going to hang out and learn. And there is a lot to lean about with new developments in identity management. Many of the basic tools are not actually new – SAML has been around for about a decade – but the rate of product evolution in this field is frankly staggering. How products are being deployed for cloud and mobile – and how authentication, authorization, and provisioning work together in these environments – are new. I expect to see wholesale changes in how we use and consume identity in the coming years – be it cloud, mobile, or whatever. So we have decided we need to increase coverage in this area, to aid IT in understanding how to approach identity management projects, and to dig into some of the technical details of how developers should approach implementation. Rich and I will be doing a lot of blogging on this topic in the coming months, and Gunnar Peterson and I plan to publish research on the ins and outs of cloud identity late this summer, so stay tuned.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Friday Summary: July 13, 2012</title><link>/blog/friday-summary-july-13-2012/</link><pubDate>Fri, 13 Jul 2012 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/friday-summary-july-13-2012/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Adrian here, and happy Friday the 13th! It’s been a week since Independence day, and it feels like it’s been a month. Mike wanted us to comment on our feelings about Independence Day and what freedom means to us. For me that was easy. As as I usually do, I worked on Independence Day. Always. It’s not a day off. To me, taking time off is anathema to independence. I celebrate independence by working, because working is what earns me the right to be free. I’m long past the age of military service to my country, so I serve it by trying to build and contribute. And at this moment I feel very lucky to have the opportunity to work and make a living, and great business partners to work with. There is always a boatload of stuff to do here at Securosis, so I have been quietly ‘celebrating’ my independence by finishing up a bunch of writing. It may sound weird, but that’s just me.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>[New White Paper] Evolving Endpoint Malware Detection (and Index of Posts)</title><link>/blog/new-white-paper-evolving-endpoint-malware-detection-and-index-of-posts/</link><pubDate>Thu, 12 Jul 2012 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/new-white-paper-evolving-endpoint-malware-detection-and-index-of-posts/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;As long last (OK, maybe not that long), we have assembled the Evolving Endpoint Malware Detection series and packaged it as a paper. You can check out the &lt;a href="https://securosis.com/research/papers/evolving-endpoint-malware-detection-dealing-with-advanced-and-targeted-atta"&gt;landing page&lt;/a&gt; to find out more, but this description sum it up:&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Incite 7/10/2012: Freedom</title><link>/blog/incite-7-10-2012-freedom/</link><pubDate>Wed, 11 Jul 2012 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/incite-7-10-2012-freedom/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Last week we celebrated Independence Day in the US. It’s a day when we reflect on the struggles of our forefathers establishing the country, the sacrifices of the Revolutionary War, and what Freedom means to us all. Actually, most folks gorge on BBQ, drink a ton of beer, and light fireworks imported from China. Which I guess is another interpretation of freedom.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Q1 Vendor Newsletter</title><link>/blog/q1-vendor-newsletter/</link><pubDate>Tue, 10 Jul 2012 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/q1-vendor-newsletter/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;We send a quarterly newsletter out to vendor clients as part of our &lt;a href="https://securosis.com/assets/library/main/Securosis_Retainer_Packages_2010-01.pdf"&gt;retainer program&lt;/a&gt;. Here’s the introduction, which describes how we view the newsletter:&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Friday Summary: June 29, 2012</title><link>/blog/friday-summary-june-29-2012/</link><pubDate>Thu, 28 Jun 2012 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/friday-summary-june-29-2012/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Rich here.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I’m starting to think I might be dealing with a bit of burnout. No, not the “security burnout” that keeps cropping up on Twitter and in blog posts, but a bit of a personal burnout. I just find myself lacking a bit of general enthusiasm and creativity that usually keeps me plowing away at a productive rate.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Can You Stop a Targeted Attack?</title><link>/blog/can-you-stop-a-targeted-attack/</link><pubDate>Wed, 27 Jun 2012 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/can-you-stop-a-targeted-attack/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;The question of stopping &lt;em&gt;targeted attacks&lt;/em&gt; has been on my mind for a while. Of course my partners and I have to suffer through far too many vendor briefings where they claim to stop an APT with fairy dust and assorted other black magic. But honestly, it is a legitimate and necessary question.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Incite 6/27/2012: Empty Nest</title><link>/blog/incite-6-27-2012-empty-nest/</link><pubDate>Wed, 27 Jun 2012 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/incite-6-27-2012-empty-nest/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Be quiet. Be vewy vewy quiet. Now listen. What do you hear? Listen very closely. Do you hear anything? No? That’s exactly the point. The Boss and I woke up yesterday morning to the sound of nothing. No grumbling about having to get ready for school. No kvetching about ill-fitting bathing suits, and no asking for this play date or that activity. No crappy Disney Tween shows blaring from the TV. No nothing. The house is quiet.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Understanding and Selecting Data Masking: Buyer’s Guide</title><link>/blog/understanding-and-selecting-data-masking-buyers-guide-2/</link><pubDate>Mon, 25 Jun 2012 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/understanding-and-selecting-data-masking-buyers-guide-2/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;The final installment in our masking series closes with a simplified buyer’s guide for product selection. As with most security product buyer’s guides, we offer a fairly involved process to help customers identify their needs and evaluate solutions against each other. These guides address the difficulty of getting all stakeholders to agree on a set of use cases and priorities, which is harder than it sounds. We also offer guidance on avoiding pitfalls and vendor BS. Of course you still need to ensure that your requirements are identified and prioritized &lt;em&gt;before&lt;/em&gt; you start testing, but the process with masking technologies is a bit less complicated than with other technologies.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Friday Summary: June 22, 2012</title><link>/blog/friday-summary-june-22-2012/</link><pubDate>Fri, 22 Jun 2012 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/friday-summary-june-22-2012/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I have been wanting to write a bunch of blog posts for the last few weeks. No, not the heavy research work we have been in up to our eyeballs, but about some of the strange and interesting stuff currently been reported. We used to do a lot more commentary and I miss it. I have a little time this Friday, so I though I would comment on a few of the past week’s articles I think warrant discussion – in many ways as interesting for what was &lt;em&gt;not&lt;/em&gt; discussed. Here we go:&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Thoughts on Active Defense, Intrusion Deception, and Counterstrikes</title><link>/blog/thoughts-on-active-defense-intrusion-deception-and-counter-strikes/</link><pubDate>Fri, 22 Jun 2012 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/thoughts-on-active-defense-intrusion-deception-and-counter-strikes/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Earlier this week Joseph Menn published a &lt;a href="http://www.reuters.com/assets/print?aid=USBRE85G07S20120617"&gt;confusing article over at Reuters&lt;/a&gt; that conflated “active defense” with “strike back” technologies. As &lt;a href="https://twitter.com/Beaker/status/215117250410201088"&gt;Chris Hoff said on Twitter&lt;/a&gt;:&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Choosing Your Key Management Strategy</title><link>/blog/choosing-your-key-management-strategy/</link><pubDate>Wed, 20 Jun 2012 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/choosing-your-key-management-strategy/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;In our last post we covered &lt;a href="https://securosis.com/blog/the-four-enterprise-key-management-strategies"&gt;the four enterprise key management strategies&lt;/a&gt;. Today we will finish off Pragmatic Key Management with recommendations on how to pick the right strategy for your project or organization.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Incite 6/20/2012: That Smell</title><link>/blog/incite-6-20-2012-that-smell/</link><pubDate>Wed, 20 Jun 2012 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/incite-6-20-2012-that-smell/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Most folks have sights, sounds, and smells that remind them of positive experiences. Maybe from happy childhood days or a great time of life. For me, it’s the smell of the ocean. My Dad always had a boat and I remember some great times sailing on his catamaran as I was growing up. I didn’t spend a lot of time with my Dad growing up, so I loved being out on the water. And we’d bring a bucket of KFC with us, which was also a highlight. Strange, the things you remember 35 years later, eh?&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Evolving Endpoint Malware Detection: Controls, Trade-offs and Compromises</title><link>/blog/evolving-endpoint-malware-detection-controls-trade-offs-and-compromises/</link><pubDate>Tue, 19 Jun 2012 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/evolving-endpoint-malware-detection-controls-trade-offs-and-compromises/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;As we wrap up our Evolving Endpoint Malware Detection series, it’s time to take it to the next level. We spent the first three posts on &lt;a href="https://securosis.com/blog/evolving-endpoint-malware-detection-control-lost"&gt;why detection is challenging&lt;/a&gt;, the types of &lt;a href="https://securosis.com/blog/evolving-endpoint-malware-detection-behavioral-indicators"&gt;behavioral indicators&lt;/a&gt; you should look for, and some &lt;a href="https://securosis.com/blog/evolving-endpoint-malware-detection-providing-context"&gt;additional data sources for added context&lt;/a&gt; to improve effectiveness and reduce false positives. Now we need to do something with the information we have gathered – basically to provide a &lt;em&gt;verdict&lt;/em&gt; on whether something is malware or not, and if it is to block it. Alas, this is where you need to understand the trade-offs between different controls and decide what is best for your environment.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>New Paper: Implementing and Managing a DLP Solution</title><link>/blog/new-paper-implementing-and-managing-a-dlp-solution/</link><pubDate>Tue, 19 Jun 2012 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/new-paper-implementing-and-managing-a-dlp-solution/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Yes, folks, at long last, here is my follow-up to &lt;em&gt;Understanding and Selecting a DLP Solution&lt;/em&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;As you might guess from the title, this one is focused on implementation and management. After you have picked a tool, this will help you get up and running, and then keep it running, with as little overhead as possible.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>The Four Enterprise Key Management Strategies</title><link>/blog/the-four-enterprise-key-management-strategies/</link><pubDate>Mon, 18 Jun 2012 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/the-four-enterprise-key-management-strategies/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;In our last post we covered &lt;a href="https://securosis.com/blog/pragmatic-key-management-understanding-data-encryption-systems"&gt;the components of data encryption systems and ran through some common examples&lt;/a&gt;. Now it’s time to move on to key management itself, and dig into the four different key management strategies.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Friday Summary: June 15, 2012</title><link>/blog/friday-summary-june-15-2012/</link><pubDate>Fri, 15 Jun 2012 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/friday-summary-june-15-2012/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Ah, summer. That time of year where our brains naturally start checking out, even if it’s inconvenient.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;You have probably noticed a bit of a slowdown on the blog as we succumb to the sweet call of adventure. And by ‘adventure’ I mean the delicate balance of being way freaking behind while trying to squeeze in family vacations and a few conferences.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Understanding and Selecting Data Masking: Use Cases</title><link>/blog/understanding-and-selecting-data-masking-use-cases/</link><pubDate>Fri, 15 Jun 2012 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/understanding-and-selecting-data-masking-use-cases/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;As we approach the end of this series, it has become clear that I should really have started with use cases. Not only because they are the primary driver of interest in masking products, but also because many advanced features and deployment models really only make sense in terms of particular use cases. The critical importance of clustered servers, and the necessity for post-masking validation for some applications, are really only clear in light of particular usage scenarios. I will sort this out in the final paper, putting use cases first, which will help with the more complex later discussions. But here they are.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Evolving Endpoint Malware Detection: Providing Context</title><link>/blog/evolving-endpoint-malware-detection-providing-context/</link><pubDate>Thu, 14 Jun 2012 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/evolving-endpoint-malware-detection-providing-context/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;As we discussed in the last post, detecting today’s advanced malware requires more than just looking at the file (the classic AV technique) – we now also need to leverage &lt;a href="https://securosis.com/blog/evolving-endpoint-malware-detection-behavioral-indicators"&gt;behavioral indicators&lt;/a&gt;. To make things more interesting, even suspiciuous behavior can be legitimate in certain circumstances. So for accurate and effective detection you need better context on what the code does, where it came from, and who it came from, in order to reach a reasonable verdict on whether to allow or block execution.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Market Share Nonsense</title><link>/blog/market-share-nonsense/</link><pubDate>Thu, 14 Jun 2012 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/market-share-nonsense/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;It was bound to become blindingly obvious &lt;em&gt;sometime&lt;/em&gt;. The ruse of anyone accurately tracking market share in any market has been a running joke for as long as I can remember. I guess some folks do argue with the so-called market share numbers, like &lt;a href="http://channelnomics.com/2012/06/12/mcafee-refutes-reports-share-revenue-slip/"&gt;McAfee recently did&lt;/a&gt;, but it is usually attributed to sour grapes for those with crappy numbers. I’d say that market share doesn’t matter for end users, but in reality it’s safer to go with a vendor with a large market share. And in today’s tough business environment, very few are willing to be &lt;em&gt;unsafe&lt;/em&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>New Paper: Defending Data on iOS</title><link>/blog/new-paper-defending-data-on-ios-2/</link><pubDate>Thu, 14 Jun 2012 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/new-paper-defending-data-on-ios-2/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;A while back we ran a show-of-hands survey at a conference of senior IT security pros. Nearly none of them &lt;em&gt;wanted&lt;/em&gt; to support iOS, but nearly all of them &lt;em&gt;needed&lt;/em&gt; to support iOS.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Incite 6/13/2012: Tweeting Idiocy</title><link>/blog/incite-6-13-2012-tweeting-idiocy/</link><pubDate>Wed, 13 Jun 2012 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/incite-6-13-2012-tweeting-idiocy/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;It’s easy to think that the main contribution of social media tools like Twitter and Facebook is to connect you more tightly to your friends, colleagues, and family. Which is true. But don’t underestimate the immediacy of using networks like Twitter to interact directly with the companies you do business with. I have two recent examples which highlight this trend.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Malware Analysis Quant [Final Paper]</title><link>/blog/malware-analysis-quant-final-paper/</link><pubDate>Tue, 12 Jun 2012 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/malware-analysis-quant-final-paper/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Those of you who have followed Securosis for a while know that our Quant research is the big daddy of all our projects. We build a very granular process map for a certain function, build a metrics model, and in some cases survey our community to figure out what they do and what they don’t. We have already tackled &lt;a href="https://securosis.com/projectquant/comments/project-quant-version-1.0-report-and-survey-results/"&gt;Patch Management&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="https://securosis.com/research/papers/network-security-operations-quant-report"&gt;Network Security Operations&lt;/a&gt;, and &lt;a href="https://securosis.com/research/papers/measuring-and-optimizing-database-security-operations-dbquant"&gt;Database Security Options&lt;/a&gt;. Our latest Quant study tackled Malware Analysis. Here’s an excerpt from the Introduction to provide some context:&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Understanding and Selecting Data Masking: Management and Advanced Features</title><link>/blog/understanding-and-selecting-data-masking-management-and-advanced-features/</link><pubDate>Tue, 12 Jun 2012 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/understanding-and-selecting-data-masking-management-and-advanced-features/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;In this post we will examine many of the features and functions of masking that go beyond the basics of data collection and transformation. The first, and most important, is the management interface for the masking product. Central management is the core addition that transforms masking from a simple tool into an enterprise data security platform. Central management is not new; but capabilities, and maturity, and integration are evolving rapidly. In the second part of today’s post we will discuss advanced masking functions we are beginning to see, to give you an idea of where these products are heading. Sure, all these products provide management of the basic functions, but the basics don’t fully encompass today’s principal use cases – the advanced feature set and management interfaces differentiate the various products, and are likely to drive your choice of product.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Evolving Endpoint Malware Detection: Behavioral Indicators</title><link>/blog/evolving-endpoint-malware-detection-behavioral-indicators/</link><pubDate>Mon, 11 Jun 2012 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/evolving-endpoint-malware-detection-behavioral-indicators/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;As we mentioned in the first post of the Evolving Endpoint Malware Detection series, &lt;a href="https://securosis.com/blog/evolving-endpoint-malware-detection-control-lost"&gt;Control Lost&lt;/a&gt;, attackers have gotten rather advanced. They don’t use the same file or malware delivery vehicle twice, constantly morph attacks, and make it very hard to use the fundamental file-based detection which underpins traditional anti-malware tools. So efforts to detect malware can no longer focus exclusively on what the malware looks like (basically a file hash or some other identifying factor) and must incorporate a number of new data sources for identification.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Upcoming: Tokenization Webcast This Week</title><link>/blog/upcoming-tokenization-webcast-this-week/</link><pubDate>Mon, 11 Jun 2012 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/upcoming-tokenization-webcast-this-week/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;If you are interested in discussing use cases and deployment models for Tokenization, you’re in luck! This Thursday (June 14th) at 1pm Eastern, I will be offering a webcast on Tokenization with Intel &amp;amp; McAfee. While many people are looking for scope reduction, reduced audit costs, and simplified security controls for PCI, that does not mean there is only one way to roll out a Tokenization system. There are several options, each with its own advantages, and the best fit depends entirely on your particular goals and how you manage your IT systems. In this webcast I will provide an overview of the three main deployment models and delve into the reasons customers choose each of them. If you are interested you can join us for free by registering: &lt;a href="http://cloudsecurity.intel.com/webinars/securosis-analyst"&gt;3 Core Tokenization Models - Choosing the Right PCI DSS Strategy&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Friday Summary: June 8th, 2012</title><link>/blog/friday-summary-june-8th-2012/</link><pubDate>Fri, 08 Jun 2012 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/friday-summary-june-8th-2012/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;For whatever reason, I picked up a copy of a magazine my wife received as part of her interior design study work. I was absent-mindedly thumbing through it, waiting for the microwave to heat my coffee, when suddenly one of the the pictures made me stop and pay attention. It was a picture of a woman in a red leather catsuit, posed seductively by a stove. WTF? What is this ad trying to tell me? I must really not be part of their target market – but who &lt;em&gt;is&lt;/em&gt; their target market? And another picture, this time a woman on top of a Mercedes, wearing a showgirl costume with lots of makeup. And then a woman with several ‘handymen’ fixing stuff around the house. And so on. Now, I bought a fancy Miele dishwasher, but I didn’t notice my wife responding with a racy outfit. In fact I’m pretty sure “sexy” and “kitchen appliance” are at opposite ends of her universe. I dug a bit deeper, and saw that the articles were on with topics such as: how to keep your junk drawer organized, and the best way to store linen napkins and flatware. I dove into the pile of magazines: &lt;em&gt;Architectural Digest&lt;/em&gt;. &lt;em&gt;Cote Sud&lt;/em&gt;. &lt;em&gt;English Country Living&lt;/em&gt;. They are filled with the same type of content, regardless of country. All I could think was, “Who are they selling this stuff to, exactly?”&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Incite 6/6/2012: Universally Awesome</title><link>/blog/incite-6-6-2012-universally-awesome/</link><pubDate>Wed, 06 Jun 2012 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/incite-6-6-2012-universally-awesome/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;With all the vacation I have planned this summer, finding time for work may be a challenge. We had 4 days at home after the Barcelona trip and then headed down to Orlando where the girls’ dance troupe did a performance at Downtown Disney. Yup, a 7-hour drive, a pair of 3-day Park Hopper tickets (which we didn’t use), costumes, hotel, and meals, so we could see the girls dance for less than 30 minutes – melting in 90+ degree weather.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Friday Summary: June 1, 2012</title><link>/blog/friday-summary-june-1-2012/</link><pubDate>Fri, 01 Jun 2012 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/friday-summary-june-1-2012/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;It’s the first of June, and I’m sure most of you are thinking about vacation, if not actually &lt;em&gt;on&lt;/em&gt; vacation at this point. I’m here holding down the fort while the rest of Securosis is visiting places cooler and more fun. I’m taking time to reflect on security topics and my research agenda.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Understanding and Selecting Data Masking: Technical Architecture</title><link>/blog/understanding-and-selecting-data-masking-technical-architecture/</link><pubDate>Fri, 01 Jun 2012 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/understanding-and-selecting-data-masking-technical-architecture/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Today we will discuss platform architectures and deployment models. Before I jump into the architectural models, it’s worth mentioning that these architectures are designed in response to how enterprises &lt;em&gt;use&lt;/em&gt; data. Data is valuable because we use it to support business functions. Data has value &lt;em&gt;in use&lt;/em&gt;. The more places we can leverage data to make decisions, the more valuable it is. However, as we have seen over the last decade, data propagation carries many risks. Masking architectures are designed to fit within existing data management frameworks and mitigate risks to information without sacrificing usefulness. In essence we are inserting controls into existing processes, using masking as a guardian, to identify risks and protect data as it migrates through the enterprise applications that automate business processes.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Pragmatic Key Management: Understanding Data Encryption Systems</title><link>/blog/pragmatic-key-management-understanding-data-encryption-systems/</link><pubDate>Thu, 31 May 2012 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/pragmatic-key-management-understanding-data-encryption-systems/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;One of the common problems in working with encryption is getting caught up with the intimate details of things like encryption algorithms, key lengths, cipher modes, and other minutiae. Not that these details aren’t important – depending on what you’re doing they might be critical – but in the larger scheme of things these aren’t the aspects most likely to trip up your implementation. Before we get into different key management strategies, let’s take a moment to look at crypto systems at the macro level. We will stick to data encryption for this paper, but these principles apply to other types of cryptosystems as well.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Incite 5/30/2012: Low Hanging Fruit</title><link>/blog/incite-5-30-2012-low-hanging-fruit/</link><pubDate>Wed, 30 May 2012 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/incite-5-30-2012-low-hanging-fruit/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;As you might have noticed, there was no Incite last week. Turns out the Boss and I were in Barcelona to celebrate 15 years of wedded bliss. We usually run about 6 months late on everything, so the timing was perfect. We had 3 days to ourselves and then two other couples from ATL joined us for the rest of the week. We got to indulge our appreciation for art – hitting the Dali, Miro, and Picasso museums. We also saw some &lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Antoni_Gaud%C3%AD"&gt;Gaudi&lt;/a&gt; structures that are just mind-boggling. Then we joked about how Americans are not patient enough to ever build anything like the &lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sagrada_Fam%C3%ADlia"&gt;Sagrada Familia&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Pragmatic Key Management: Introduction</title><link>/blog/pragmatic-key-management-introduction/</link><pubDate>Wed, 30 May 2012 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/pragmatic-key-management-introduction/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Few terms strike as much dread in the hearts of security professionals as &lt;strong&gt;key management&lt;/strong&gt;. Those two simple words evoke painful memories of massive PKI failures, with millions spent to send encrypted email to the person in the adjacent cube. Or perhaps it recalls the head-splitting migraine you got when assigned to reconcile incompatible proprietary implementations of a single encryption standard. Or memories of half-baked product implementations that worked fine on in isolation on a single system, but were effectively impossible to manage at scale. And by scale, I mean “more than one”.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>White Paper: Understanding and Selecting a Database Security Platform</title><link>/blog/new-report-understanding-and-selecting-a-database-security-platform/</link><pubDate>Wed, 30 May 2012 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/new-report-understanding-and-selecting-a-database-security-platform/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;We are pleased to announce the availability of a new research paper, &lt;a href="https://securosis.com/research/papers/report-understanding-and-selecting-a-database-security-platform"&gt;Understanding and Selecting Database Security Platforms&lt;/a&gt;. And this paper covers most of the facets for database security today. We started to refresh our original Database Activity Monitoring paper in October 2011, but stopped short when our research showed that platform evolution has stopped converging – and has instead diverged again to embrace independent visions of database security, and splintering customer requirements. We decided our original DAM research was becoming obsolete. Use cases have evolved and vendors have added dozens of new capabilities – they have covered the majority of database security requirements, and expanded out into other areas.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Understanding and Selecting Data Masking: How It Works</title><link>/blog/understanding-and-selecting-data-masking-how-it-works/</link><pubDate>Tue, 29 May 2012 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/understanding-and-selecting-data-masking-how-it-works/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;In this post I want to show how masking works, focusing on how masking platforms move and manipulate data. I originally intended to start with architectures and mechanics of masking systems; but it should be more helpful to start by describing the different masking models, how data flows through different systems, and the advantages and disadvantages of each. I will comment on common data sources and destinations, and the issues to consider when considering masking technology. There are many different types of data repositories and services which can be masked, so I will go into detail on these choices. For now we will stick to relational databases, to keep things simple. Let’s jump right in and discuss how the technology works.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Security, Metrics, Martial Arts, and Triathlon: a Meandering Friday Summary</title><link>/blog/security-metrics-martial-arts-and-triathlon-a-wandering-friday-summary/</link><pubDate>Thu, 24 May 2012 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/security-metrics-martial-arts-and-triathlon-a-wandering-friday-summary/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Rich here.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;One of the more fascinating – and unexpected – aspects of migrating from martial arts to triathlon as my primary sport has been importance role of metrics, and how they have changed my views on security.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Understanding and Selecting Data Masking: Defining Data Masking</title><link>/blog/understanding-and-selecting-data-masking-defining-data-masking/</link><pubDate>Wed, 23 May 2012 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/understanding-and-selecting-data-masking-defining-data-masking/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Before I start today’s post, thank you for all the letters saying that people are looking forward to this series. We have put a lot of work into this research to ensure we capture the state of currently available technology, and we are eager to address this under-served market. As always, we encourage blog comments because they help readers understand other viewpoints that we may not reflect in the posts proper. And for the record, I’m not knocking Twitter debates – they are useful as well, but they’re more ephemeral and less accessible to folks outside the Twitter cliques – not everybody wants to follow security geeks like me. And I also apologize for our slow start since initial launch – between meeting with vendors, some medical issues, and client off-site meetings, I’m a bit behind. But I have collected all the data I think is needed to do justice to this subject, so let’s get rolling!&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Evolving Endpoint Malware Detection: Control Lost</title><link>/blog/evolving-endpoint-malware-detection-control-lost/</link><pubDate>Tue, 22 May 2012 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/evolving-endpoint-malware-detection-control-lost/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Today we start our latest blog series, which we are calling &lt;em&gt;Evolving Endpoint Malware Detection: Dealing with Advanced and Targeted Attacks&lt;/em&gt; – a logical next step from much of the research we have already done around the evolution of malware and emerging controls to deal with it. We started a few years back by documenting &lt;a href="https://securosis.com/research/papers/white-paper-endpoint-security-fundamentals"&gt;Endpoint Security Fundamentals&lt;/a&gt;, and more recently looked at &lt;a href="https://securosis.com/research/papers/network-based-malware-detection-filling-the-gaps-of-av"&gt;network-based approaches to detect malware at the perimeter&lt;/a&gt;. Finally we undertook the Herculean task of decomposing the processes involved in confirming an infection, analyzing the malware, and tracking its proliferation with our &lt;a href="https://securosis.com/projectquant/malware-analysis-quant-index-of-posts"&gt;Malware Analysis Quant&lt;/a&gt; research.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Continuous Learning</title><link>/blog/continuous-learning/</link><pubDate>Fri, 18 May 2012 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/continuous-learning/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I referred back to the &lt;a href="http://www.pragmaticcso.com"&gt;Pragmatic CSO&lt;/a&gt; tips when I started the Vulnerability Management Evolution series (&lt;a href="https://securosis.com/blog/new-white-papervulnerability-management-evolution"&gt;the paper hit yesterday&lt;/a&gt;, by the way) and there was some good stuff in there, so let me once again dust off those old concepts and highlight another one. This one dealt with the reality that &lt;em&gt;you are a business person, not a security person.&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Friday Summary: May 18, 2012</title><link>/blog/friday-summary-may-18-2012/</link><pubDate>Fri, 18 May 2012 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/friday-summary-may-18-2012/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;A friend told me this week they were on &lt;a href="http://pinterest.com/"&gt;Pinterest&lt;/a&gt;. I responded, “I’m sorry! How long does your employer allow you to take off?” I was &lt;em&gt;seriously&lt;/em&gt; thinking this was something like paternity leave or one of those approved medical absence programs. I really wondered when he got sick, and what his prognosis was. He told me, “No, I’m on Pinterest to market my new idea.” WTF? Turns out it’s not a medical sabbatical, but another social media ‘tool’ for sharing photos and stuff.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>[New White Paper] Vulnerability Management Evolution</title><link>/blog/new-white-papervulnerability-management-evolution/</link><pubDate>Thu, 17 May 2012 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/new-white-papervulnerability-management-evolution/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Organizations have traditionally viewed vulnerability scanners as tactical products, largely commoditized and only valuable around audit time. How useful is a 100-page vulnerability report to an operations person trying to figure out what to fix next? Although those 100-page reports make auditors smile, as they offer a nice listing of audit deficiencies to address in the findings of fact. But the tide is definitely turning. We see a clear shift from a largely compliance-driven orientation to a more security-centric view. We document this evolution to a vulnerability/threat management &lt;em&gt;platform&lt;/em&gt; in our new &lt;strong&gt;Vulnerability Management Evolution&lt;/strong&gt; paper.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Incite 5/16/2012: Moving up Day</title><link>/blog/incite-5-16-2012-moving-up-day/</link><pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2012 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/incite-5-16-2012-moving-up-day/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Wasn’t it just yesterday that we put XX1 on the bus for her first day of kindergarten? I guess if yesterday was August of 2006, that would be correct. Man, six years have gone by fast! On Friday she &lt;em&gt;moves up&lt;/em&gt; to Middle School. As we watched the annual Field Day festivities with all the kids dressed up in their countries’ garb yesterday, the kindergartners seemed so small. And they are. Six years doesn’t seem so long, but against the growth of such a child it’s a lifetime.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Write Third</title><link>/blog/write-third/</link><pubDate>Tue, 15 May 2012 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/write-third/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;One of the things I truly love about writing for Securosis and &lt;a href="http://tidbits.com/"&gt;TidBITS&lt;/a&gt; is that I am rarely put in a position where I need to be first to write about something. As a writer, and occasionally a journalist, I consider time the ultimate luxury. Unfortunately, few journalists have this liberty, and even fewer appreciate it.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Understanding and Selecting Data Masking: Series Introduction</title><link>/blog/understanding-and-selecting-data-masking-series-introduction/</link><pubDate>Mon, 14 May 2012 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/understanding-and-selecting-data-masking-series-introduction/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Data masking has been around a long time. I have been masking since the early ’90s to create test data from production copies of customer insurance records, as well as to alter database columns before sending database exports out for “data cleansing”. At the time masking was little more than UNIX shell scripts or home grown Perl scripts to alter particular columns in &lt;code&gt;.csv&lt;/code&gt; files. A few years later I was giddy with excitement to have my first masking ‘program’, running on a paleolithic version of Windows, which actually had a ‘wizard’ for walking through the process. No, it did not help with extraction of information from a database, but it identified the columns to be altered, provided a list of masks to apply, and dumped an error file when it ran into trouble. That saved a lot of tweaking scripts and manually reviewing dump files. And all this was several years before I heard anyone mention ‘ETL’ (Extract, Transform, Load) because ODBC and JDBC drivers to connect to databases were just arriving on the scene, and nobody had automated bulk loads &lt;em&gt;back into&lt;/em&gt; another database. That was still science fiction.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Understanding and Selecting a Database Security Platform: Comments and Series Index</title><link>/blog/understanding-and-selecting-a-database-security-platform-comments-and-serie/</link><pubDate>Fri, 11 May 2012 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/understanding-and-selecting-a-database-security-platform-comments-and-serie/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Rich and I – with help from Chris Pepper – compiled the Understanding and Selecting a Database Security Platform series into a research paper, and provided it to a number of people for initial review. We got a &lt;em&gt;lot&lt;/em&gt; of valuable feedback and observations back. Commenters felt several topics were under-served, they believe others were over-emphasized, and more we failed to mention. We’re not too proud to admit when we’re wrong, or when we failed to capture the essence of customer buying decisions, so we are happy to revisit these topics. We believe their feedback improves the paper quite a bit. In keeping with our Totally Transparent Research process we want all discussions that affect the paper out in the open, so we are posting those comments here for review. If you have additional comments, or responses to anything here, we encourage you to chime in.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Friday Summary: May 10, 2012</title><link>/blog/friday-summary-may-10-2012/</link><pubDate>Thu, 10 May 2012 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/friday-summary-may-10-2012/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Rich here. It amazes me how something completely mundane can be utterly fascinating the first time you experience it.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This morning I woke up about 5:45 as I heard my younger daughter waking up herself. If history held, she had been up for a little while and was ready to get out of her crib. &lt;strong&gt;Now!!!&lt;/strong&gt; Nothing new there, and I started the painful process of getting out of bed (I d hammered my bad shoulder a little too much during my swim workout yesterday, leading to a painful night).&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Incite 2/9/2012: Swimming with Sharks</title><link>/blog/incite-2-9-2012-swimming-with-sharks/</link><pubDate>Wed, 09 May 2012 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/incite-2-9-2012-swimming-with-sharks/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;What ever happened to the sit-down family dinner? Maybe it’s just me, but growing up, the only time I really experienced it was watching TV. My Mom worked retail pharmacy, so normally I was pulling something out of the freezer to warm up for my kid brother and myself. And nowadays the only time we sit down for dinner is when we go out to a restaurant.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>FireStarter: Policy Wonks and Pests</title><link>/blog/firestarter-of-policy-wonks-and-pests/</link><pubDate>Thu, 03 May 2012 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/firestarter-of-policy-wonks-and-pests/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I’ve spent more hours than I can count studying compliance and governance. Reading and re-reading PCI requirements, Sarbanes-Oxley law, theory, and applied theory. Spent mind-numbing hours combing through BASEL and BASEL II docs. I’ve spent many long weeks with external auditors, internal auditors, assessors, risk management personnel, corporate governance officers, and government officials – trying to understand their jobs, their roles, and how the world functions from their perspectives. I’ve spent months mapping those ideas and processes into policy implementations, process modifications, and the rules that actually enforce policies. I’ve written audit reports for these various compliance and policy management frameworks to demonstrate policy compliance and efficacy. When you sell security and risk management software these efforts are necessary, because compliance drives your company’s revenue. So I feel I understand policy and compliance pretty darn well, but I am bothered by the trend toward policy being the focus – at the expense of the task it was originally designed to govern.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Friday Summary: May 4, 2012</title><link>/blog/friday-summary-may-4-2012/</link><pubDate>Thu, 03 May 2012 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/friday-summary-may-4-2012/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;My conversation started like this:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;“Do you know where the recorder is?” she asked.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;“The what?” I replied.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;“The tape recorder we bought you!”&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Incite 5/2/2012: Refi Madness</title><link>/blog/incite-5-2-2012-refi-madness/</link><pubDate>Wed, 02 May 2012 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/incite-5-2-2012-refi-madness/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;It all started with an innocent call from my mortgage broker. He started with, “What if I could shave 75 basis points off your note, with no cost to you?” As you might have noticed, I’m a skeptical type of fellow. I asked, “What’s the catch?” He laughed and said, “No catch, I can get you from 4.25% to 3.5% and I’ll pay the costs.” I responded again, “There must be a catch. What am I missing?” He maked some wise remark about Groundhog Day and then told me there really is no catch. I can save a couple hundred bucks a month I’m currently paying the bank.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Vulnerability Management Evolution: Evolution or Revolution?</title><link>/blog/vulnerability-management-evolution-evolution-or-revolution/</link><pubDate>Fri, 27 Apr 2012 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/vulnerability-management-evolution-evolution-or-revolution/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;We have discussed the evolution of vulnerability management from a tactical tool to a much more strategic platform providing decision support for folks to more effectively prioritize security operations and resource allocation. But some vendors may not manage to effectively broaden their platforms sufficiently to remain competitive and fully satisfy their customer requirements. So at some point you may face a replacement decision, or to put it more kindly, a decision of &lt;em&gt;evolution or revolution&lt;/em&gt; for your vulnerability/threat management platform.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>[New White Paper] Watching the Watchers: Guarding the Keys to the Kingdom</title><link>/blog/new-white-paper-watching-the-watchers-guarding-the-keys-to-the-kingdom/</link><pubDate>Thu, 26 Apr 2012 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/new-white-paper-watching-the-watchers-guarding-the-keys-to-the-kingdom/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Given the general focus on most organizations on the attackers &lt;em&gt;out there&lt;/em&gt; , they may miss the attackers that actually have the credentials and knowledge to do some &lt;strong&gt;real&lt;/strong&gt; damage. These are your so-call privileged users and far too many organizations don’t do much to protect themselves from an attack from that community. By the way, this doesn’t necessarily require a malicious insider. Rather it’s very possible (if not plausible) that a privileged user’s device gets compromised, therefore giving the attacker access to the administrator’s credentials. Right, that’s a bad day. Thus we’ve written a paper called &lt;em&gt;Watching the Watchers: Guarding the Keys to the Kingdom&lt;/em&gt; to describe the problem and offer some ideas on solutions.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Friday Summary, TSA Edition: April 26, 2012</title><link>/blog/friday-summary-tsa-edition-april-26-2012/</link><pubDate>Thu, 26 Apr 2012 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/friday-summary-tsa-edition-april-26-2012/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Rich here. I’m writing thi from an airport, so I will eschew my normal ‘personal’ intro and spend a little time on our favorite security show: Airport Screening Follies.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Incite 4/25/2012: Drafty Draft</title><link>/blog/incite-4-25-2012-drafty-draft/</link><pubDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2012 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/incite-4-25-2012-drafty-draft/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;It feels like Bizarro World to me. I woke up this morning freezing my backside off. We turned off the heat a few weeks ago and it was something like 65 this morning. Outside it was in the 40s, at the end of April. WTF? And the Northeast has snow. WTF? I had to bust out my sweatshirts, which I had hoped to shelve for the season. Again, WTF?&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Vulnerability Management Evolution: Enterprise Features and Integration</title><link>/blog/vulnerability-management-evolution-enterprise-features-and-integration/</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Apr 2012 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/vulnerability-management-evolution-enterprise-features-and-integration/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;We’re in the home stretch of the Vulnerability Management Evolution research project. After talking mostly about the transition from an audit-centric tactical tool to a much more strategic platform providing security decision support, it is now time to look critically at what’s required to make the platform work in your enterprise. That means providing both built-in tools to help manage your vulnerability management program, as well as supporting integration with existing security and IT management tools.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Vulnerability Management Evolution: Value-Add Technologies</title><link>/blog/vulnerability-management-evolution-value-add-technologies/</link><pubDate>Mon, 23 Apr 2012 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/vulnerability-management-evolution-value-add-technologies/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;So far we have talked about &lt;a href="https://securosis.com/blog/vulnerability-management-evolution-scanning-the-infrastructure"&gt;scanning infrastructure&lt;/a&gt; and the &lt;a href="https://securosis.com/blog/vulnerability-management-evolution-scanning-the-application-layer"&gt;application layer&lt;/a&gt;, before jumping into some &lt;a href="https://securosis.com/blog/vulnerability-management-evolution-core-technologies"&gt;technology decisions&lt;/a&gt; you face, such as how to deal with cloud delivery and agents. But as much as these capabilities increase the value of the vulnerability management system, it’s still not enough to really help focus security efforts and prioritize the hundreds (if not thousands) of vulnerabilities or configuration problems you’ll find. So let’s look at a few emerging capabilities that really help make the information gleaned from scans and assessment more impactful to the operational decisions you make every day.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Watching the Watchers: Integration</title><link>/blog/watching-the-watchers-integration/</link><pubDate>Fri, 20 Apr 2012 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/watching-the-watchers-integration/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;As we wrap up Watching the Watchers it’s worth reminding ourselves of the reality of enterprise security today. Nothing stands alone – not in the enterprise management stack anyway – so privileged user management functions need to play nicely with the other management tools. There are levels of integration required, as some functions need to be attached at the hip, while others can be mere acquaintances.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Vulnerability Management Evolution: Core Technologies</title><link>/blog/vulnerability-management-evolution-core-technologies/</link><pubDate>Thu, 19 Apr 2012 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/vulnerability-management-evolution-core-technologies/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;As we discussed in the last couple posts, any VM platform must be able to &lt;a href="https://securosis.com/blog/vulnerability-management-evolution-scanning-the-infrastructure"&gt;scan infrastructure&lt;/a&gt; and scan the &lt;a href="https://securosis.com/blog/vulnerability-management-evolution-scanning-the-application-layer"&gt;application layer&lt;/a&gt;. But that’s still mostly tactical stuff. Run the scan, get a report, fix stuff (or not), and move on. When we talk about a &lt;em&gt;strategic and evolved&lt;/em&gt; vulnerability management platform, the core technology needs to evolve to serve more than merely tactical goals – it must provide a foundation for a number of additional capabilities. Before we jump into the details we will reiterate the key requirements. You need to be able to scan/assess:&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Incite 4/18/2012: Camión de Calor</title><link>/blog/incite-4-18-2012-camion-de-calor-2/</link><pubDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2012 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/incite-4-18-2012-camion-de-calor-2/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;It was a Mr. Mom weekend, so I particularly appreciated settling in at the coffee shop on Monday morning and getting some stuff done. And it wasn’t just trucking the kids around to their various activities. It was a big weekend for all of us to catch up on work. XX1 has the CRCT standardized test this week, which is a big deal in GA, so there was much prep for that. Both XX2 and Boy have &lt;em&gt;How to&lt;/em&gt; presentations in class this week. So they each had to write and practice a presentation. And I had to finish up our taxes and update the Securosis financials. With the Boss in absentia, I was juggling knives trying to get everything done.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Understanding and Selecting DSP: Use Cases</title><link>/blog/understanding-and-selecting-dsp-use-cases/</link><pubDate>Mon, 16 Apr 2012 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/understanding-and-selecting-dsp-use-cases/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Database Security Platforms are incredibly versatile – offering benefits for security, compliance, and even operations. The following are some classic use cases and ways we often see them used:&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Watching the Watchers: Clouds Rolling in</title><link>/blog/watching-the-watchers-clouds-rolling-in/</link><pubDate>Mon, 16 Apr 2012 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/watching-the-watchers-clouds-rolling-in/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;As much as we enjoy being the masters of the obvious, we don’t really need to discuss the move to cloud computing. It’s happening. It’s disruptive. Blah blah blah. People love to quibble about the details but it’s obvious to everyone. And of course, when the computation and storage behind your essential IT services might not reside in a facility under your control, things change a bit. The idea of a privileged user morphs in the cloud context, by adding another layer of abstraction via the cloud management environment. So regardless of your current level of cloud computing adoption, you need to factor the cloud into your PUM (privileged user management) initiative.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Friday Summary: April 13th, 2012</title><link>/blog/friday-summary-april-13th-2012/</link><pubDate>Fri, 13 Apr 2012 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/friday-summary-april-13th-2012/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Happy Friday the 13th!&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I was thinking about superstition and science today, so I was particularly amused to notice that it’s Friday the 13th. Rich and I are both scientists of sorts; we both eschew superstition, but we occasionally argue about science. What’s real and what’s not. What’s science, what’s pseudoscience, and what’s just plain myth. It’s interesting to discuss root causes and what forces actually alter our surroundings. Do we have enough data to make an assertion about something, or is it just a statistical anomaly? I’m far more likely to jump to conclusions about stuff based on personal experience, and he’s more rigorous with the scientific method. And that’s true for work as well as life in general. For example he still shuns my use of Vitamin C, while I’m convinced it has a positive effect. And Rich chides as I make statements about things I don’t understand, or assertions that are completely ‘pseudoscience’ in his book. I’ll make an off-handed observation and he’ll respond with “Myth Busters proved that’s wrong in last week’s show”. And he’s usually right. We still have a fundamental disagreement about the probability of self-atomizing concrete, a story I’d rather not go into – but regardless, we are both serious tech geeks and proponents of science.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Incite 4/11/2012: Exchanging Problems</title><link>/blog/incite-4-11-2012-exchanging-problems/</link><pubDate>Wed, 11 Apr 2012 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/incite-4-11-2012-exchanging-problems/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I figured an afternoon flight to the midwest would be reasonably peaceful. I was wrong. Things started on the wrong foot when I got an email notification from Delta that the flight was delayed, even though it wasn’t. The resulting OJ sprint through the terminal to make the flight was agitating. Then the tons of screaming kids on the flight didn’t help matters. I’m thankful for noise isolating headphones, that’s for sure.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Pain Comes Instantly—Fixes Come Later</title><link>/blog/pain-comes-instantly-fixes-come-later-2/</link><pubDate>Tue, 10 Apr 2012 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/pain-comes-instantly-fixes-come-later-2/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Mary Ann Davidson’s recent post Pain Comes Instantly has been generating a lot of press. It’s being miscast by some of the media outlets as trashing PCI Data Security Standard, but it’s really about the rules for vendors who want to certify commercial payment software and related products. The debate is worth considering, so I recommend giving it a read. It’s a long post, but I encourage you to read it all the way through before forming opinions, as she makes many arguments and provides some allegories along the way.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Responsible or Irresponsible Disclosure?—NFL Style</title><link>/blog/responsible-or-irresponsible-disclosure-nfl-style-2/</link><pubDate>Tue, 10 Apr 2012 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/responsible-or-irresponsible-disclosure-nfl-style-2/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;It’s funny to contrast this April to last April, at least as an NFL fan. Last year the lockout was in force, the negotiations stalled, and fans wondered how billionaires could argue with millionaires when the economy was in the crapper. Between the Peyton Manning lottery, the upcoming draft, and the Saints Bounty situation, there hasn’t been a dull moment for pro football fans since the Super Bowl ended.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>The Myth of the Security-Smug Mac User</title><link>/blog/the-myth-of-the-security-smug-mac-user/</link><pubDate>Tue, 10 Apr 2012 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/the-myth-of-the-security-smug-mac-user/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I still consider myself a relative newcomer to the Mac community. Despite being the Security Editor at TidBITS and an occasional contributor to Macworld (print and online), and having spoken at Macworld Expo a couple times, I only really switched to Macs back in 2005. To keep this in perspective, &lt;a href="http://tidbits.com/"&gt;TidBITS&lt;/a&gt; has been published electronically since &lt;em&gt;1990&lt;/em&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>How to Tell If Your Cloud Provider Can Read Your Data (Hint: They Can)</title><link>/blog/how-to-tell-if-your-cloud-provider-can-read-your-data-hint-they-can/</link><pubDate>Mon, 09 Apr 2012 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/how-to-tell-if-your-cloud-provider-can-read-your-data-hint-they-can/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Over at TidBITS today I published a non-security-geek oriented article on &lt;a href="http://tidbits.com/article/12920"&gt;how to tell if your cloud provider can read your data&lt;/a&gt;. Since many of you &lt;em&gt;are&lt;/em&gt; security geeks, here’s the short version (mostly cut and paste) and some more technical info.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Understanding and Selecting DSP: Administration</title><link>/blog/understanding-and-selecting-dsp-administration/</link><pubDate>Mon, 09 Apr 2012 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/understanding-and-selecting-dsp-administration/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Today’s post focuses on the administering Database Security Platforms. Conceptually DSP is pretty simple: collect data from databases, analyze it according to established rules, and react when a rule has been violated. The administrative component of every DSP platform follows these three basic tasks: data management, policy management, and workflow management. In addition to these three basic functions, we also need to administer the platform itself, as we do with any other application platform.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Vulnerability Management Evolution: Scanning the Application Layer</title><link>/blog/vulnerability-management-evolution-scanning-the-application-layer/</link><pubDate>Mon, 09 Apr 2012 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/vulnerability-management-evolution-scanning-the-application-layer/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;In our last Vulnerability Management Evolution post we discussed &lt;a href="https://securosis.com/blog/vulnerability-management-evolution-scanning-the-infrastructure"&gt;scanning infrastructure&lt;/a&gt;, which remains an important part of vulnerability management. But we recognize that most attacks target applications directly, so we can no longer just scan the infrastructure and be done with it. We need to &lt;em&gt;climb the stack&lt;/em&gt; and pay attention to the application layer, looking for vulnerabilities in application as well as the supporting components. But that requires us to define an ‘application’, which is surprisingly difficult.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Watching the Watchers: Monitor Privileged Users</title><link>/blog/watching-the-watchers-monitor-privileged-users/</link><pubDate>Sun, 08 Apr 2012 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/watching-the-watchers-monitor-privileged-users/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;As we continue our march through the &lt;a href="https://securosis.com/blog/watching-the-watchers-the-privileged-user-lifecycle"&gt;Privileged User Lifecycle&lt;/a&gt;, we have locked down privileged accounts as tightly as needed. But that’s not the whole story, and the lifecycle ends with a traditional audit. Because verifying what the administrators do with their privileges is just as important as the other steps. Admittedly, some organizations have as large a cultural issue with granular user monitoring because they actually want to &lt;em&gt;trust&lt;/em&gt; their employees. Silly organizations, right? But in this case there is no monitoring slippery slope – we aren’t talking about recording an employee’s personal Facebook interactions or checking out pictures of Grandma. We’re talking about capturing what an administrator has done on a specific device.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Watching the Watchers: Enforce Entitlements</title><link>/blog/watching-the-watchers-enforce-entitlements/</link><pubDate>Fri, 06 Apr 2012 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/watching-the-watchers-enforce-entitlements/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;So far we have described the &lt;a href="https://securosis.com/blog/watching-the-watches-restrict-access"&gt;Restrict Access&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href="https://securosis.com/blog/watching-the-watchers-protect-credentials"&gt;Protect Credentials&lt;/a&gt; aspects of the &lt;a href="https://securosis.com/blog/watching-the-watchers-the-privileged-user-lifecycle"&gt;Privileged User Lifecycle&lt;/a&gt;. So far any administrator managing a device is authorized to be there and uses strong credentials. But what happens when they get there? Do they get free reign? Should you just give them &lt;code&gt;root&lt;/code&gt; or full &lt;code&gt;Administrator&lt;/code&gt; rights and have done with it? What could possibly go wrong with that?&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Friday Summary: April 6, 2012</title><link>/blog/friday-summary-april-6-2012/</link><pubDate>Thu, 05 Apr 2012 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/friday-summary-april-6-2012/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Rich here…&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Normally I like to open the Summary with a bit of something from my personal life. Some sort of anecdote with a message. In other words, I blatantly ripped off Mike’s format for the Security Incite… long before he took over half the company. (With Mike, even a partnership can probably be defined as a hostile takeover, based solely on his gruff voice and honesty of opinion).&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Vulnerability Management Evolution: Scanning the Infrastructure</title><link>/blog/vulnerability-management-evolution-scanning-the-infrastructure/</link><pubDate>Thu, 05 Apr 2012 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/vulnerability-management-evolution-scanning-the-infrastructure/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;As we discussed in the &lt;a href="https://securosis.com/blog/vulnerability-management-evolution-introduction"&gt;Vulnerability Management Evolution introduction&lt;/a&gt;, traditional vulnerability scanners, focused purely on infrastructure devices, do not provide enough context to help organizations prioritize their efforts. Those traditional scanners are the plumbing of threat management. You don’t appreciate the scanner until your proverbial toilet is overflowing with attackers and you have no idea what are they targeting. We will spend most of this series on the case for transcending device scanning, but infrastructure scanning remains a core component of any evolved threat management platform. So let’s look at some key aspects of a traditional scanner.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Incite 4/4/2012: Travel the Barbarian</title><link>/blog/incite-4-4-2012-travel-the-barbarian/</link><pubDate>Wed, 04 Apr 2012 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/incite-4-4-2012-travel-the-barbarian/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Flying into Milan to teach the CCSK class on Sunday morning, it really struck me how much we take this technology stuff for granted. The flight was uneventful (though that coach seat on a 9+ hour flight is the suxxor), except for the fact that the in-seat entertainment system didn’t work in our section. Wait. What? You mean you can’t see the movies and TV shows you want, or play the trivia game to pass the time? How barbaric! Glad I brought my iPad, so I enjoyed half the first season of &lt;em&gt;Game of Thrones&lt;/em&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Understanding and Selecting DSP: Extended Features</title><link>/blog/understanding-and-selecting-dsp-analysis-and-protection/</link><pubDate>Wed, 04 Apr 2012 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/understanding-and-selecting-dsp-analysis-and-protection/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;In the original &lt;a href="https://securosis.com/research/papers/selecting-a-database-activity-monitoring-solution"&gt;Understanding and Selecting a Database Activity Monitoring Solution&lt;/a&gt; paper we discussed a number of &lt;em&gt;Advanced Features&lt;/em&gt; for analysis and enforcement that have since largely become part of the standard feature set for DSP products. We covered monitoring, vulnerability assessment, and blocking, as the minimum feature set required for a Data Security Platform, and we find these in just about every product on the market. Today’s post will cover extensions of those core features, focusing on new methods of data analysis and protection, along with several operational capabilities needed for enterprise deployments. A key area where DSP extends DAM is in novel security features to protect databases and extend protection across other applications and data storage repositories.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Defining Your iOS Data Security Strategy</title><link>/blog/defining-your-ios-data-security-strategy/</link><pubDate>Tue, 03 Apr 2012 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/defining-your-ios-data-security-strategy/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Now that we’ve covered the different data security options for iOS it’s time to focus on building a strategy. In many ways figuring out the technology is the easy part of the problem – the problems start when you need to apply that technology in a dynamic business environment, with users who have already made technology choices.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>iOS Data Security: Managed Devices</title><link>/blog/ios-data-security-managed-devices/</link><pubDate>Mon, 02 Apr 2012 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/ios-data-security-managed-devices/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;In our last post, on &lt;a href="https://securosis.com/blog/ios-data-security-securing-data-on-partially-managed-devices"&gt;data security for partially-managed devices&lt;/a&gt;, I missed one option we need to cover before moving onto fully-managed devices:&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Understanding and Selecting DSP: Core Features</title><link>/blog/understanding-and-selecting-dsp-core-features/</link><pubDate>Mon, 02 Apr 2012 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/understanding-and-selecting-dsp-core-features/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;So far this series has introduced &lt;a href="https://securosis.com/blog/understanding-and-selecting-database-security-platforms"&gt;Database Security Platforms&lt;/a&gt;, provided a &lt;a href="https://securosis.com/blog/understanding-and-selecting-dsp-defining-dsp"&gt;full definition of DSP&lt;/a&gt;, discussed the &lt;a href="https://securosis.com/blog/understanding-and-selecting-dsp-core-components"&gt;origins and evolution&lt;/a&gt; of DAM to DSP, and described the &lt;a href="https://securosis.com/blog/understanding-and-selecting-dsp-technical-architecture"&gt;technical platform architecture&lt;/a&gt;. We have covered the basics of a Database Security Platform. It might seem like a short list compared to all the other extended features we will cover later, but these are the most important ares, and the primary reasons to buy these tools.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Watching the Watchers: Protect Credentials</title><link>/blog/watching-the-watchers-protect-credentials/</link><pubDate>Mon, 02 Apr 2012 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/watching-the-watchers-protect-credentials/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;As we continue our march through the &lt;a href="https://securosis.com/blog/watching-the-watchers-the-privileged-user-lifecycle"&gt;Privileged User Lifecycle&lt;/a&gt;, we have provisioned the privileged users and restricted access to only the devices they are authorized to manage. The next risk to address is the keys or credentials of these privileged users (P-Users) falling into the wrong hands. The best access and entitlements security controls fail if someone can impersonate a P-User.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Vulnerability Management Evolution: Introduction</title><link>/blog/vulnerability-management-evolution-introduction/</link><pubDate>Thu, 29 Mar 2012 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/vulnerability-management-evolution-introduction/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Back when &lt;em&gt;The Pragmatic CSO&lt;/em&gt; was published in 2007, I put together a set of tips for being a better CISO. In fact you can still get the tips (sent one per day for five days) if you register on the &lt;a href="http://www.pragmaticcso.com/"&gt;Pragmatic CSO&lt;/a&gt; site. Not to steal any thunder, but Tip #2 is &lt;em&gt;Prioritize Fiercely.&lt;/em&gt; Let’s take a look at what I wrote back then.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Incite 3/28/2012: Gone Tomorrow</title><link>/blog/incite-3-28-2012-gone-tomorrow/</link><pubDate>Wed, 28 Mar 2012 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/incite-3-28-2012-gone-tomorrow/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;A &lt;a href="https://twitter.com/#!/daveshackleford/status/179294665705660416"&gt;recent Tweet from Shack&lt;/a&gt; was pretty jarring.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Old friend from college died today. Got some insane rare lung disease out of nowhere, destroyed them. Terrifying. 37 years old. :/&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>iOS Data Security: Securing Data on Partially-Managed Devices</title><link>/blog/ios-data-security-securing-data-on-partially-managed-devices/</link><pubDate>Tue, 27 Mar 2012 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/ios-data-security-securing-data-on-partially-managed-devices/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Our last two posts covered iOS data security options on unmanaged devices; now it’s time to discuss &lt;em&gt;partially managed&lt;/em&gt; devices.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Watching the Watchers: Restrict Access</title><link>/blog/watching-the-watches-restrict-access/</link><pubDate>Sun, 25 Mar 2012 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/watching-the-watches-restrict-access/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;As we discussed in the &lt;a href="https://securosis.com/blog/watching-the-watchers-the-privileged-user-lifecycle"&gt;Privileged User Lifecycle&lt;/a&gt; post, there are a number of aspects to Watching the Watchers. Our first today is &lt;em&gt;Restricting Access&lt;/em&gt;. This is first mostly because it reduces your attack surface. We want controls to ensure administrators only access devices they are authorization to manage.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Friday Summary: March 23, 2012</title><link>/blog/friday-summary-march-23-2012/</link><pubDate>Fri, 23 Mar 2012 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/friday-summary-march-23-2012/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;This should not matter: The &lt;a href="http://www.wired.com/epicenter/2012/03/fun-beats-fugly-why-square-is-still-better-than-paypal/"&gt;Square Register&lt;/a&gt;. But it does. What do I mean by that? Check out the picture: There’s something catchy and slick about the set-up of an iPad cash register and the simple Square device. It looks like something Apple would produce. It seems right at home with – almost a natural extension of – the iPad. I run into small shop owners and independent business people who are using Square everywhere. It’s at Target, right next to the Apple products, and the salesperson said they have been flying off the shelves. People say “Wow, that’s cool.” And that’s how Square is going to win this part of the burgeoning personal payment space. The new competitor, &lt;a href="http://techland.time.com/2012/03/15/paypal-takes-on-square-with-paypal-here/"&gt;PayPal’s Here&lt;/a&gt;, is marketing the superiority of their device, better service, and lower costs. Much of that ‘superiority’ is in the device’s security features – such as encrypting data inside the device – which early Square devices currently deployed do not. That’s a significant security advantage. But it won’t matter – next to its competitor, ‘Here’ looks about as modern and relevant as a Zip drive.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>How to Read and Act on the 2012 Verizon Data Breach Investigations Report (DBIR)</title><link>/blog/how-to-read-and-act-on-the-2012-verizon-data-breach-investigations-report-d/</link><pubDate>Thu, 22 Mar 2012 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/how-to-read-and-act-on-the-2012-verizon-data-breach-investigations-report-d/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Verizon just published their excellent 2012 Data Breach Investigations Report, and as usual, it’s full of statistical goodness.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;(We will link to it once it’s formally released – we are writing this based on our preview copy).&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Watching the Watchers: The Privileged User Lifecycle</title><link>/blog/watching-the-watchers-the-privileged-user-lifecycle/</link><pubDate>Thu, 22 Mar 2012 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/watching-the-watchers-the-privileged-user-lifecycle/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;As we described in the &lt;a href="https://securosis.com/blog/watching-the-watchers-access-to-the-keys-to-the-kingdom"&gt;Introduction&lt;/a&gt; to this series, organizations can’t afford ignore the issue of privileged users (P-Users) any more. A compromised P-user (PUPwned) can cause all sorts of damage, and so needs to be actively managed. In the last post we presented the business drivers and threats – now let’s talk about solutions. As most analysts favor some kind of model to describe something, we’ll call ours the Privileged User Lifecycle.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Incite 3/21/2012: Wheel Refresh</title><link>/blog/incite-3-21-2012-wheel-refresh/</link><pubDate>Wed, 21 Mar 2012 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/incite-3-21-2012-wheel-refresh/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;It seems like a lifetime ago. June of 1999. Actually it was more than XX1’s lifetime ago. The Boss and I still lived in Northern Virginia. I was close to the top of the world. I started a software company, we raised a bunch of VC money, and the Internet Revolution was booming. The lease on my crappy 1996 Pathfinder was up, and I wanted some spiffy new wheels.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Understanding and Selecting DSP: Technical Architecture</title><link>/blog/understanding-and-selecting-dsp-technical-architecture/</link><pubDate>Wed, 21 Mar 2012 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/understanding-and-selecting-dsp-technical-architecture/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;One of the key strengths of DSP is its ability to scan and monitor multiple databases running on multiple database management systems (DBMSs) across multiple platforms (Windows, Unix, etc.). The DSP tool aggregates information from multiple collectors to a secure central server. In some cases the central server/management console also collects information while in other cases it serves merely as a repository for data from collectors.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>iOS Data Security: Secure File Apps for Unmanaged Devices</title><link>/blog/ios-data-security-secure-file-apps-for-unmanaged-devices/</link><pubDate>Tue, 20 Mar 2012 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/ios-data-security-secure-file-apps-for-unmanaged-devices/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;To finish our discussion of securing data on unmanaged devices, let’s focus on three categories of apps designed for secure file access:&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>iOS Data Security: Protecting Data on Unmanaged Devices</title><link>/blog/ios-data-security-protecting-data-on-unmanaged-devices/</link><pubDate>Mon, 19 Mar 2012 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/ios-data-security-protecting-data-on-unmanaged-devices/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;There are a whole spectrum of options available for securing enterprise data on iOS, depending on how much you want to manage the device and the data. ‘Spectrum’ isn’t quite the right word, though, because these options aren’t on a linear continuum – instead they fall into three major buckets:&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Talkin’ Tokenization</title><link>/blog/talkin-tokenization/</link><pubDate>Mon, 19 Mar 2012 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/talkin-tokenization/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I want to announce a couple webcasts I’ll be on this week regarding tokenization: one will focus on the grey areas of compliance with tokenization, and the other will offer buyers a list of key evaluation criteria.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Friday Summary: March 16, 2011 (a little late)</title><link>/blog/friday-summary-march-16-2011-a-little-late/</link><pubDate>Fri, 16 Mar 2012 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/friday-summary-march-16-2011-a-little-late/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;Sorry, folks, I wrote the Summary yesterday and got so caught up in CU beating UNLV for our first NCAA Tournament win in 15 years that I forgot to actually post this.&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Data Flow on iOS</title><link>/blog/data-flow-on-ios/</link><pubDate>Thu, 15 Mar 2012 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/data-flow-on-ios/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Continuing our series on iOS data security, we need to take some time to understand how data moves onto and around iOS devices before delving into security and management options.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Watching the Watchers: Access to the Keys (to the Kingdom)—New Series</title><link>/blog/watching-the-watchers-access-to-the-keys-to-the-kingdom-new-series/</link><pubDate>Thu, 15 Mar 2012 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/watching-the-watchers-access-to-the-keys-to-the-kingdom-new-series/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;We are happy to announce a new series, where for the first time we will research and document the issues around privileged user management (PUM). It may not sound as exciting as &lt;em&gt;cloud&lt;/em&gt; anything, or &lt;a href="https://securosis.com/blog/defending-enterprise-data-on-ios-introduction"&gt;iOS data protection&lt;/a&gt;, but it’s something you overlook at your own risk. Because administrators (those privileged users) have the keys to your kingdom. A sysadmin with malicious intent can cause a very bad day for you and your organization.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Defending Enterprise Data on iOS: Introduction</title><link>/blog/defending-enterprise-data-on-ios-introduction/</link><pubDate>Wed, 14 Mar 2012 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/defending-enterprise-data-on-ios-introduction/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;The numbers alone don’t tell the story. In 2011 &lt;a href="http://techcrunch.com/2012/03/07/tim-cook-talks-ios-device-stats-315-million-sold-62-million-in-q4-alone/"&gt;Apple sold 315 million iOS devices&lt;/a&gt; (62 million in the fourth quarter alone). There are over 100 million iCloud users – using a service less than a year old. And these numbers are for Apple alone – never mind all the other mobile devices. Apple calls this the dawn of the “post-PC era”, and with numbers like those it’s hard to argue. Even Microsoft is in the midst of what is shaping up to be the largest change in their platform strategy since Windows, in an attempt to address this market.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Defending iOS Data: iOS Security and Data Protection</title><link>/blog/defending-ios-data-ios-security-and-data-protection/</link><pubDate>Wed, 14 Mar 2012 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/defending-ios-data-ios-security-and-data-protection/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Before we delve into management options we need time to understand the iOS security and data protection models. These are the controls built into the platform – many utilized in the various enterprise options we will discuss in this series. We are focused on data but will also cover iOS security basics, as they play an important role in data security, and for those of you who aren’t familiar with the specifics.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Incite 3/14/2012: My Kind of People</title><link>/blog/incite-3-14-2012-my-kind-of-people/</link><pubDate>Wed, 14 Mar 2012 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/incite-3-14-2012-my-kind-of-people/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Like everyone else, I have a bunch of jobs. There is the day job and then my job at home. Well, it’s not really a job, it’s more a responsibility – to be a good husband and to teach my kids to be properly functioning adults. As most of you know, I take the parenting responsibility very seriously. I am constantly stressing hard work and best effort. Making the point constantly to my kids that the only thing they can truly control is their own effort.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Mr. Market Says Security Is Winning</title><link>/blog/proof-security-is-winning/</link><pubDate>Tue, 13 Mar 2012 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/proof-security-is-winning/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Today Dell announced its intention to &lt;a href="http://www.marketwatch.com/story/thoma-bravo-enters-agreement-to-sell-sonicwall-to-dell-2012-03-13"&gt;acquire SonicWALL from private equity firm Thoma Bravo&lt;/a&gt;. This is less than two years after &lt;a href="http://www.thomabravo.com/2010/07/23/thoma-bravo-and-ontario-teachers-pension-plan-acquire-sonicwall/"&gt;Thoma Bravo took SonicWALL private in a screaming deal&lt;/a&gt;, and with a deal size rumored up to $1.5 billion I think we can safely assume the bankers win again. As always.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Friday Summary: March 9, 2012</title><link>/blog/friday-summary-march-9-2012/</link><pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2012 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/friday-summary-march-9-2012/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;By Adrian Lane:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I learned something from the e10+ session during RSA. Usually it’s my least favorite event but this year was different – it was most favorite, and not just because Rich and Mike were instrumental in putting it together. The consumerization presentation was really informative – the audience responses surprised me – but the breach victim “fireside chat” was awesome. The only way we could mimic the human stress angle in a preparedness drill is to set part of your office on fire during a press conference, or taze IT personnel as they rummage through logs. Don’t discount the stress factor in breach planning.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Incite 3/7/2012: Perspective</title><link>/blog/incite-3-7-2012-perspective/</link><pubDate>Wed, 07 Mar 2012 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/incite-3-7-2012-perspective/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Life is a series of ebbs and flows. Highs and lows. Crests and troughs. It’s a yin/yang thing, and unfortunately most folks can’t appreciate that. Especially when they can’t see their way out of a down period. For a lot of security folks, the last two weeks have been such a contrast between those highs and lows that many are probably feeling whiplash.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Understanding and Selecting DSP: Data and Event Collection</title><link>/blog/understanding-and-selecting-dsp-data-and-event-collection/</link><pubDate>Wed, 07 Mar 2012 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/understanding-and-selecting-dsp-data-and-event-collection/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;In our previous post on &lt;a href="https://securosis.com/blog/understanding-and-selecting-dsp-core-components"&gt;DSP components&lt;/a&gt; we outlined the evolution of Database Activity Monitoring into Database Security Platforms. One of its central aspects is the evolution of event collection mechanisms from native audit, to monitoring network activity, to agent-based activity monitoring. These are all database-specific information sources. The evolution of DAM has been framed by these different methods of data collection. That’s important, because what you can do is highly dependent on the data you can collect. For example, the big &lt;em&gt;reason&lt;/em&gt; agents are the dominant collection model is that you need them to monitor administrators – network monitoring can’t do that (and is quite difficult in distributed environments).&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Burnout</title><link>/blog/burnout/</link><pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2012 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/burnout/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I feel fortunate that I’m not haunted by the images of what I have witnessed. If I don’t sleep well at night it’s due to stress at work or at home, not dark images from the years I spent working in emergency services.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Upcoming Cloud Security Training Courses</title><link>/blog/upcoming-cloud-security-training-courses/</link><pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2012 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/upcoming-cloud-security-training-courses/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Our world domination tour continues. At least if you consider training for the Certificate of Cloud Security Knowledge (CCSK) part of your plan to know all things Cloud Security. As authors of the training curriculum, we are the only folks who can train and certify instructors to deliver the training, so a couple times a year we deliver the courses, live and in person.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Bringing Sexy back (to Security): Mike’s RSAC 2012 Wrap-up</title><link>/blog/bringing-sexy-back-to-security-mikes-rsac-2012-wrap-up/</link><pubDate>Mon, 05 Mar 2012 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/bringing-sexy-back-to-security-mikes-rsac-2012-wrap-up/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Oh yeah. I’m back in the ATL after a week at the RSA Conference. Aside from severe sleep deprivation, major liver damage, and some con flu… I’m feeling great. It seems everyone else is as well. Something appeared at RSA that we haven’t seen for at least 3 years: smiles. Which I guess is to be expected, since in 2009 and 2010 everyone walked around with hard hats, expecting the sky to fall. In 2011 there were some positive signs but still a lot of skepticism, which was gone this year. Almost everyone I talked to was very optimistic for 2012 and beyond.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Objectivity Matters</title><link>/blog/objectivity-matters/</link><pubDate>Tue, 28 Feb 2012 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/objectivity-matters/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I owe a tremendous amount to social media. I wasn’t early to either blogging or Twitter (as my friends remind me), but once I got there a whole new world of opportunities opened. I created a boutique business (Security Incite) on the back of a blog and email newsletter. I met so many great people – many of whom became close friends – and even found a business partner or two.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Implementing DLP: Ongoing Management</title><link>/blog/implementing-dlp-ongoing-management/</link><pubDate>Thu, 23 Feb 2012 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/implementing-dlp-ongoing-management/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Managing DLP tends to not be overly time consuming unless you are running off badly defined policies. Most of your time in the system is spent on incident handling, followed by policy management.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>RSA Conference 2012 Guide: Cloud Security</title><link>/blog/rsa-conference-2012-guide-cloud-security/</link><pubDate>Thu, 23 Feb 2012 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/rsa-conference-2012-guide-cloud-security/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src="RSA-2012-logo.jpg" alt=""&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;We’ve renamed this section from “Virtualization and Cloud Security” to simply “Cloud Security” since if you listen to any of the marketing messages, you can’t tell the difference, even though it’s a big one. And virtualization is a hassle to type, so buh bye! Overall, as we mentioned in the &lt;a href="https://securosis.com/blog/rsa-conference-2012-guide-key-themes"&gt;key themes post&lt;/a&gt;, cloud security will be one of the biggest trends to watch during the conference and it also happens to be one area where you should focus since there is some real innovation, and you probably have real problems that need some help.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>The Last Friday before the 2012 RSA Conference</title><link>/blog/the-last-friday-before-the-2012-rsa-conference/</link><pubDate>Thu, 23 Feb 2012 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/the-last-friday-before-the-2012-rsa-conference/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;It’s here.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;No, not the new iPad. Not those test results. And most definitely not that other thing you were thinking about.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>The Securosis Guide to RSA 2012</title><link>/blog/the-securosis-guide-to-rsa-2012/</link><pubDate>Thu, 23 Feb 2012 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/the-securosis-guide-to-rsa-2012/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Managing DLP tends to not be overly time consuming unless you are running off badly defined policies. Most of your time in the system is spent on incident handling, followed by policy management.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Implementing DLP: Deploy</title><link>/blog/implementing-dlp-deploy/</link><pubDate>Wed, 22 Feb 2012 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/implementing-dlp-deploy/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Up until this point we’ve focused on all the preparatory work before you finally turn on the switch and start using your DLP tool in production. While it seems like a lot, in practice (assuming you know your priorities) you can usually be up and running with basic monitoring in a few days. With the pieces in place, now it’s time to configure and deploy policies to start your real monitoring and enforcement.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Incite 2/22/2012: Poop Flingers</title><link>/blog/incite-2-22-2012-poop-flingers/</link><pubDate>Wed, 22 Feb 2012 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/incite-2-22-2012-poop-flingers/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;It’s a presidential election year here in the US, and that means the master spin meisters, manipulators, and liars politicians are out in full force. Normally I just tune out, wait for the primary season to end, and then figure out who I want to vote for. But I know better than to discuss either religion or politics with people I like. And that means you. So I’m not going to go there. But this election cycle is different for me, and it will be strange.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>RSA Conference 2012 Guide: Data Security</title><link>/blog/rsa-conference-2012-guide-data-security/</link><pubDate>Wed, 22 Feb 2012 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/rsa-conference-2012-guide-data-security/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src="RSA-2012-logo-1-1.jpg" alt=""&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the the last twelve months we’ve witnessed the highest rates of data theft disclosures since the record setting year of 2008 (including, for the first time in public, Rich’s credit card). So predictably there will be plenty of FUD balloons flying at this year’s conference. From Anonymous to the never-ending Wikileaks fallout and cloud fears, there is no shortage of chatter about data security (or “data governance” for people who prefer to write about protecting stuff instead of actually protecting it).&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Malware Analysis Quant: Documenting Metrics (and survey is still going)</title><link>/blog/malware-analysis-quant-documenting-metrics-and-survey-is-still-going/</link><pubDate>Mon, 20 Feb 2012 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/malware-analysis-quant-documenting-metrics-and-survey-is-still-going/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Just a little President’s Day update on the Malware Analysis Quant project. At the end of last month we packaged up all the process descriptions into &lt;a href="https://securosis.com/blog/malware-analysis-quant-phase-1-the-process"&gt;a spiffy paper&lt;/a&gt;, which you can download and check out.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>RSA Conference 2012 Guide: Security Management and Compliance</title><link>/blog/rsa-conference-2012-guide-security-management-and-compliance/</link><pubDate>Mon, 20 Feb 2012 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/rsa-conference-2012-guide-security-management-and-compliance/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src="RSA-2012-logo-2.jpg" alt=""&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;As we continue with our tour through the RSA Conference, we’re in the home stretch. Today we’ll hit both security management and compliance, since the two are intrinsically linked.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Understanding and Selecting DSP: Core Components</title><link>/blog/understanding-and-selecting-dsp-core-components/</link><pubDate>Mon, 20 Feb 2012 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/understanding-and-selecting-dsp-core-components/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Those of you familiar with DAM already know that over the last four years DAM solutions have been bundled with assessment and auditing capabilities. Over the last two years we have seen near universal inclusion of discovery and rights management capabilities. DAM is the centerpiece of a database security strategy, but as a technology it is just one of a growing number of important database security tools. We have already defined &lt;a href="https://securosis.com/blog/understanding-and-selecting-dsp-defining-dsp"&gt;Database Security Platform&lt;/a&gt;, so now let’s spend a moment looking at the key components, how we got here, and where the technology and market are headed. We feel this will fully illustrate the need for the name change.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Webcast Wednesday 22nd: Tokenization Scope Reduction</title><link>/blog/webcast-wednesday-22nd-tokenization-scope-reduction/</link><pubDate>Mon, 20 Feb 2012 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/webcast-wednesday-22nd-tokenization-scope-reduction/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Just a quick announcement that this Wednesday I will be doing a webcast on how to reduce PCI-DSS scope and audit costs with tokenization. This will cover the meaty part of our &lt;a href="https://securosis.com/research/papers/tokenization-guidance"&gt;Tokenization Guidance&lt;/a&gt; paper from last year. In the past I have talked about issues with the PCI Council’s Tokenization supplement; now I will dig into how tokenization affects credit card processing systems, and how supplementary systems can fall out of scope. The webcast will start at 11am PST and run for an hour. You can &lt;a href="https://primefactorswebinars.webex.com/mw0306ld/mywebex/default.do?nomenu=true&amp;amp;siteurl=primefactorswebinars&amp;amp;service=6&amp;amp;rnd=0.14981073575898973&amp;amp;main_url=https%3A%2F%2Fprimefactorswebinars.webex.com%2Fec0605ld%2Feventcenter%2Fevent%2FeventAction.do%3FtheAction%3Ddetail%26confViewID%3D280302760%26siteurl%3Dprimefactorswebinars%26%26%26"&gt;sign up at the sponsor’s web site&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>RSA Conference 2012 Guide: Email &amp; Web Security</title><link>/blog/rsa-conference-2012-guide-email-web-security/</link><pubDate>Sun, 19 Feb 2012 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/rsa-conference-2012-guide-email-web-security/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src="RSA-2012-logo-3.jpg" alt=""&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;For a little bonus on a Sunday afternoon, let’s dig into the next section of the RSA Guide, Email and Web Security which remains a pretty hot area. This shouldn’t be surprising since these devices tend to be one of the only defenses against your typical attacks like phishing and drive-by downloads. We’ve decided to no longer call this market ‘content security’; that was a terrible name. Email and Web Security speaks to both the threat models as well as the deployment architectures of what started as the ‘email security gateway’ market. These devices screen email and web traffic moving in and out of your company at the application layer.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>RSA Conference Guide 2012: Endpoint Security</title><link>/blog/rsa-conference-guide-2012-endpoint-security/</link><pubDate>Fri, 17 Feb 2012 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/rsa-conference-guide-2012-endpoint-security/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src="RSA-2012-logo-3-1.jpg" alt=""&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Ah, the endpoint. Do you remember the good old days when endpoint devices were laptops? That made things pretty simple, but alas, times have changed and the endpoint devices you are tasked to protect have changed as well. That means it’s not just PC-type devices you have to worry about – it’s all varieties of smartphones and in some industries other devices including point of sale terminals, kiosks, control systems, etc. Basically anything with an operating system can be hacked, so you need to worry about it. Good times.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Friday Summary: February 17, 2012</title><link>/blog/friday-summary-february-17-2012/</link><pubDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2012 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/friday-summary-february-17-2012/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I managed to take a couple days off last week, and got out of town. I went camping with a group of friends, all from very different backgrounds, with totally unrelated day jobs – but we all love camping in the desert. Whenever we’re BSing by the camp fire, they ask me about current events in security. There’s almost always a current data breach, ‘Anonymous’ attack, or whatever. This group is decidedly non-technical and does not closely follow the events I do. This trip the question on their minds was “What ‘s the big deal with SOPA?” Staying away from the hyperbole and accusations on both sides, I explained that the bill would have given content creators the ability to shut down web sites without due process if they suspected they hosted or distributed pirated content. I went into some of the background around issues of content piracy; sharing of intellectual property; and how digital media, rights management, and parody make the entire discussion even more cloudy.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>OS X 10.8 Gatekeeper in Depth</title><link>/blog/os-x-10-8-gatekeeper-in-depth/</link><pubDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2012 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/os-x-10-8-gatekeeper-in-depth/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;As you can tell from my &lt;a href="http://tidbits.com/article/12795"&gt;TidBITS review of Gatekeeper&lt;/a&gt;, I think this is an important advancement in consumer security. There are a lot of in-depth technical aspects that didn’t fit in that article, so here’s an additional Q&amp;amp;A for those of you with a security background who care about these sorts of things. I’m skipping the content from the TidBITS article, so you might want to read that first.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>RSA Conference Guide 2012: Application Security</title><link>/blog/rsa-conference-guide-2012-application-security/</link><pubDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2012 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/rsa-conference-guide-2012-application-security/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src="RSA-2012-logo-3-2.jpg" alt=""&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Building security in? Bolting it on? If you develop in-house applications, it’s likely both. Application security will be a key theme of the show. But the preponderance of application security tools will block, scan, mask, shield, ‘reperimeterize’, reconfigure, or reset connections from the outside. Bolt-on is the dominant application security model for the foreseeable future. The good news is that you may not be the one managing it, as there is a whole bunch of new cloud security services and technologies available. Security as a service, anyone? Here’s what we expect to see at this year’s RSA Conference.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Implementing DLP: Deploying Storage and Endpoint</title><link>/blog/implementing-dlp-deploying-storage-and-endpoint/</link><pubDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/implementing-dlp-deploying-storage-and-endpoint/</guid><description>&lt;h1 id="storage-deployment"&gt;Storage deployment&lt;/h1&gt;
&lt;p&gt;From a technical perspective, deploying storage DLP is even easier than the most basic network DLP. You can simply point it at an open file share, load up the proper access rights, and start analyzing. The problem most people run into is figuring out which servers to target, which access rights to use, and whether the network and storage repository can handle the overhead.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Incite 2/15/2012: Brushfire</title><link>/blog/incite-2-15-2012-brushfire/</link><pubDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/incite-2-15-2012-brushfire/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I had this fraternity brother back in college named Lucas. We gave him a pretty hard time, mostly because he was the nicest guy you’d ever want to meet. Turns out he didn’t know what jobs just sucked. We’d ask Luke to clean the grease trap, a typical task when we were pledges. Not a problem for him, and that was probably the nicest thing we asked him to do. Remember that when you live in a house with 40+ guys, you tend to share a lot of things.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>RSA Conference 2012 Guide: Network Security</title><link>/blog/rsa-conference-2012-guide-network-security/</link><pubDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/rsa-conference-2012-guide-network-security/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src="RSA-2012-logo-3-3.jpg" alt=""&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Yesterday we posted the &lt;a href="https://securosis.com/blog/rsa-conference-2012-guide-key-themes"&gt;key themes&lt;/a&gt; we expect to see at the upcoming RSA Conference. Now we’ll starting digging into our main coverage areas. Today we’ll start with network security.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>RSA Conference 2012 Guide: Key Themes</title><link>/blog/rsa-conference-2012-guide-key-themes/</link><pubDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/rsa-conference-2012-guide-key-themes/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src="RSA-2012-logo-3-3.jpg" alt=""&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;It’s hard to believe, but we are two weeks out from the RSA Conference. As in previous years, your pals at Securosis have put together our 3rd annual RSA Guide, which we will distribute next week. But we will give you blog reading faithful, an early look at what we expect to see at the show. So let’s with the key themes…&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Implementing DLP: Deploying Network DLP</title><link>/blog/implementing-dlp-deploying-network-dlp/</link><pubDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/implementing-dlp-deploying-network-dlp/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Deploying on the network is usually very straightforward – especially since much of the networking support is typically built into the DLP server.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>[New White Paper] Network-Based Malware Detection: Filling the Gaps of AV</title><link>/blog/new-white-paper-network-based-malware-detectionfiling-the-gaps-of-av/</link><pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/new-white-paper-network-based-malware-detectionfiling-the-gaps-of-av/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;We know it’s a shock, but your endpoint protection suite isn’t doing a good enough job of blocking malware attacks. So the industry has resorted additional layers of inspection, detection, and even protection to address its shortcomings. One place focus is turning, which is seeing considerable innovation, is the network. We see a new set of devices and enhancements to existing perimeter platforms, focused on detecting and blocking malware. A paragraph from &lt;em&gt;Network-Based Malware Detection: Filling the Gaps of AV&lt;/em&gt; says it best:&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Friday Summary: February 10, 2012</title><link>/blog/friday-summary-february-10-2012/</link><pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/friday-summary-february-10-2012/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;They say it takes 10,000 hours of practice at a task to become an expert. This isn’t idle supposition, but something that’s been studied scientifically – if you believe in that sorts of things. (I’d like to provide a reference, but I’m in the process of becoming an expert at sitting in an Economy Class seat without wireless).&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Incite 2/7/2012: The Couch</title><link>/blog/incite-2-7-2012-the-couch/</link><pubDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/incite-2-7-2012-the-couch/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Do you ever stumble upon a show from the old days, perhaps on Boomerang or TVLand, where the doting wife meets the hubby as he comes home from work? It’s just like my deal. I come home from that tough day writing at Starbucks and the Boss is waiting with my smoking jacket, pipe, and slippers, and the trusty glass of brandy to take the edge off a tough day. And then I wake up.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Implementing and Managing a Data Loss Prevention (DLP) Solution: Index of Posts</title><link>/blog/implementing-and-managing-a-data-loss-prevention-dlp-index-of-posts/</link><pubDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/implementing-and-managing-a-data-loss-prevention-dlp-index-of-posts/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;We’re pretty deep into our series on Implementing DLP, so it’s time to put together an index to tie together all the posts. I will keep this up to date as new content goes up, and in the end it will be the master list for all eternity. Or until someone hacks our site and deletes everything. Whichever comes first.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Implementing DLP: Starting Your Integration</title><link>/blog/implementing-dlp-starting-your-integration/</link><pubDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/implementing-dlp-starting-your-integration/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;With priorities fully defined, it is now time to start the actual integration.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The first stop is deploying the DLP tool itself. This tends to come in one of a few flavors – and keep in mind that you often need to license different major features separately, even if they all deploy on the same box. This is the heart of your DLP deployment and needs to be in place before you do any additional integration.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Implementing DLP: Integration Priorities and Components</title><link>/blog/implementing-dlp-integration-priorities-and-components/</link><pubDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/implementing-dlp-integration-priorities-and-components/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;It might be obvious by now, but the following charts show which DLP components, integrated with which existing infrastructure, you need based on your priorities. I have broken this out into three different images to make them more readable. Why images? Because I have to dump all this into a white paper later, and building them in a spreadsheet and taking screenshots is a lot easier than mucking with HTML-formatted charts&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Understanding and Selecting a Database Security Platform: Defining DSP</title><link>/blog/understanding-and-selecting-dsp-defining-dsp/</link><pubDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/understanding-and-selecting-dsp-defining-dsp/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;As I stated in the intro, Database Security Platform (DSP, to save us writing time and piss off the anti-acronym crowd) differs from DAM in a couple ways. Let’s jump right in with a definition of DSP, and then highlight the critical differences between DAM and DSP.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Friday Summary: February 3, 2012</title><link>/blog/friday-summary-february-3-2012/</link><pubDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/friday-summary-february-3-2012/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Since Rich is vacationing working hard at a security conference in Mexico, I figure I would write this week’s Friday Summary. I am pretty jazzed about some upcoming white papers I’ll be writing on securing data and applications at scale, understanding and selecting masking technologies, and why log management &lt;em&gt;is not dead&lt;/em&gt;! And I am having a good time researching and writing the DAM 2.0 DSP series as well. I originally intended to write about our research agenda but changed my mind. Frankly, I have spring fever. Spring fever, you ask, in the first week of February? Yep. It’s 74 degrees here and sunny. WTF? &lt;a href="http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2012/02/120202-groundhog-day-2012-punxsutawney-phil-weeks-winter-weather-nation/"&gt;Punxsutawney Phil&lt;/a&gt; weighed in with his opinion, and after burning his retinas, it looks like we are going to have another six weeks of winter. I sure hope so! Another six weeks of this type of weather would be &lt;em&gt;awesome&lt;/em&gt;. I have been on the phone with dozens of people around the country, from Boston to San Diego, and they are all experiencing fantastic weather. Even Gunnar reports highs of 48 degrees in Minnesota. I guess the cold air jet stream has been staying &lt;a href="http://news.discovery.com/earth/weird-warm-weather-120110.html"&gt;north of the border&lt;/a&gt;. For me this means my peach trees are blooming. Blooming! On freakin’ January 30th! See for yourself:&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Bridging the Mobile Security Gap: Operational Consistency</title><link>/blog/bridging-the-mobile-security-gap-operational-consistency/</link><pubDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/bridging-the-mobile-security-gap-operational-consistency/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;We started the Bridging the Mobile Security Gap series by accepting that we &lt;a href="https://securosis.com/blog/bridging-the-mobile-security-gap-staring-down-network-anarchy-new-series"&gt;can’t control the devices&lt;/a&gt; that show up on our networks any more. We followed up with a diatribe on the &lt;a href="https://securosis.com/blog/bridging-the-mobile-security-gap-the-need-for-context"&gt;need for context&lt;/a&gt; to build and enforce policies which ensure that (only) the right users get to the right stuff at the right times.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Incite 2/1/2012: Bored to Tears</title><link>/blog/incite-2-1-2012-bored-to-tears/</link><pubDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/incite-2-1-2012-bored-to-tears/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;It’s unbelievable how different growing up today is. When I was in elementary school in the late 70s, Pong was state of the art and a handheld Coleco football game would keep a little kid occupied for hours. When they came up with the Head to Head innovation, &lt;em&gt;two&lt;/em&gt; kids would be occupied for hours. That was definitely a different type of &lt;em&gt;Occupy&lt;/em&gt; movement. We also didn’t have 300 channels on the boob tube. We had 5 channels, and the highlight of the year was Monster Week. At least for me.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Malware Analysis Quant: Take the Survey (and win fancy prizes!)</title><link>/blog/malware-analysis-quant-take-the-survey/</link><pubDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/malware-analysis-quant-take-the-survey/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src="surveys.jpg" alt=""&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;One of the coolest things about how we work at Securosis is our &lt;a href="https://securosis.com/about/totally-transparent-research"&gt;Totally Transparent Research&lt;/a&gt; approach. We always post our work to the blog first and let you folks have at it. In many cases it gets poked and prodded, ridiculed, and broken down. It’s certainly tough on the ego, but in the end makes the work better.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Implementing DLP: Integration, Part 1</title><link>/blog/implementing-dlp-integration-part-1/</link><pubDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/implementing-dlp-integration-part-1/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;At this point all planning should be complete. You have determined your incident handling process, started (or finished) cleaning up directory servers, defined your initial data protection priorities, figured out which high-level implementation process to start with, mapped our the environment so you know where to integrate, and performed initial testing and perhaps a proof of concept.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Bridging the Mobile Security Gap: The Need for Context</title><link>/blog/bridging-the-mobile-security-gap-the-need-for-context/</link><pubDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2012 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/bridging-the-mobile-security-gap-the-need-for-context/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;As we discussed in the first post of this series, consumerization and mobility will remain macro drivers of security for the foreseeable future, and force us to &lt;a href="https://securosis.com/blog/bridging-the-mobile-security-gap-staring-down-network-anarchy-new-series"&gt;stare down network anarchy&lt;/a&gt;. We can certainly go back into the security playbook and deal with an onslaught of unwieldy devices by implementing some kind of agentry on the devices to provide a measure of control. But results of this device-centric approach have been mixed. And that’s being kind.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Implementing DLP: Final Deployment Preparations</title><link>/blog/implementing-dlp-final-deployment-preparations/</link><pubDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2012 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/implementing-dlp-final-deployment-preparations/</guid><description>&lt;h2 id="map-your-environment"&gt;Map Your Environment&lt;/h2&gt;
&lt;p&gt;No matter which DLP process you select, before you can begin the actual implementation you need to map out your network, storage infrastructure, and/or endpoints. You will use the map to determine where to push out the DLP components.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Understanding and Selecting Database Security Platforms</title><link>/blog/understanding-and-selecting-database-security-platforms/</link><pubDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2012 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/understanding-and-selecting-database-security-platforms/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;We love the &lt;a href="https://securosis.com/about/totally-transparent-research"&gt;Totally Transparent Research&lt;/a&gt; process. Times like this – where we hit upon new trends, discover unexpected customer uses cases, or discover something going on behind the scenes – are when our open model really shows its value. We started a &lt;a href="https://securosis.com/blog/comments/new-series-understanding-and-selecting-database-activity-monitoring-2.0"&gt;Database Activity Monitoring 2.0 series last October&lt;/a&gt; and suddenly halted because our research showed that platform evolution has changed from convergence to independent visions of database security, with customer requirements splintering.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Malware Analysis Quant: Phase 1 - The Process [Check out the paper!]</title><link>/blog/malware-analysis-quant-phase-1-the-process/</link><pubDate>Sun, 29 Jan 2012 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/malware-analysis-quant-phase-1-the-process/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;We are well aware that the Quant research can be overwhelming. 70+ pages of process, metrics, and survey data is a lot to get through. So we have broken the Malware Analysis Quant project up into two phases. The first phase focuses on defining and describing the underlying process. In the second phase we get into metrics and run the survey to figure out who is actually doing which aspects of the process. In the end will still produce the big paper in all its glory. But we figured an interim deliverable at the end of Phase 1 would make a lot of sense. So that’s what we have done.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Friday Summary: January 27, 2012</title><link>/blog/friday-summary-january-27-2012/</link><pubDate>Thu, 26 Jan 2012 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/friday-summary-january-27-2012/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;This is the Securosis Friday Summary. For those of you who don’t know this is where Rich and I vent. When I started working with Rich I used to loathe writing this intro; now it’s therapeutic. It gives me a chance to talk about whatever is on my mind that I think people might find interesting. Sure, most Friday posts talk about security, but not always. If such things bother you – as one reader mentioned last week – search within the page for ‘Summary’ to avoid our ramblings.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Implementing DLP: Picking Priorities and a Deployment Process</title><link>/blog/implementing-dlp-picking-priorities-and-a-deployment-process/</link><pubDate>Thu, 26 Jan 2012 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/implementing-dlp-picking-priorities-and-a-deployment-process/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;At this point you should be in the process of cleaning your directory servers, with your incident handling process outlined in case you find any bad stuff early in your deployment. Now it’s time to determine your initial priorities to figure out whether you want to start with the Quick Wins process or jump right into full deployment.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Implementing DLP: Getting Started</title><link>/blog/implementing-dlp-getting-started/</link><pubDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2012 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/implementing-dlp-getting-started/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;In our &lt;a href="https://securosis.com/blog/implementing-and-managing-a-dlp-solution"&gt;Introduction to Implementing and Managing a DLP Solution&lt;/a&gt; we started describing the DLP implementation process. Now it’s time to put the pedal to the metal and start cranking through it in detail.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Incite 1/25/2011: Prized Possessions</title><link>/blog/incite-1-25-2011-prized-possessions/</link><pubDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2012 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/incite-1-25-2011-prized-possessions/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;So I was sitting in Dunkin Donuts Sunday morning, getting in a few hours of work while the kids were at Sunday school. You see the folks who come in and leave with two boxes of donuts. They are usually the skinny ones. Yeah, I hate them too. You see the families with young kids. What kid doesn’t totally love the donuts? You snicker at the rush at 11am when a local church finishes Sunday services and everyone makes a mad dash for Dunkin and coffee.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Bridging the Mobile Security Gap: Staring down Network Anarchy (new series)</title><link>/blog/bridging-the-mobile-security-gap-staring-down-network-anarchy-new-series/</link><pubDate>Mon, 23 Jan 2012 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/bridging-the-mobile-security-gap-staring-down-network-anarchy-new-series/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;No rest for the weary, it seems. As soon as we wrapped up last week’s blog series we start two more. Check out Rich’s &lt;a href="https://securosis.com/blog/implementing-and-managing-a-dlp-solution"&gt;new DLP series&lt;/a&gt;, and today I am starting to dig into the mobile security issue. We will also start up Phase 2 of the Malware Analysis Quant series this week. But don’t cry for us, Argentina. Being this busy is a good problem to have.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Implementing and Managing a DLP Solution</title><link>/blog/implementing-and-managing-a-dlp-solution/</link><pubDate>Mon, 23 Jan 2012 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/implementing-and-managing-a-dlp-solution/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I have been so tied up with the Nexus, CCSK, and other projects that I haven’t been blogging as much as usual… but not to worry, it’s time to start a nice, juicy new technical series. And once again I return to my bread and butter: DLP. As much as I keep thinking I can simply run off and play with pretty clouds, something in DLP always drags me back in. This time it’s a chance to dig in and focus on implementation and management (thanks to McAfee for sponsoring something I’ve been wanting to write for a long time). With that said, let’s dig in…&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>The 2012 Disaster Recovery Breakfast</title><link>/blog/2012-recoverybreakfast/</link><pubDate>Mon, 23 Jan 2012 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/2012-recoverybreakfast/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Really? It’s that time again? Time to prepare for the onslaught that is the RSA Conference. Well, we’re 5 weeks out, which means Clubber Lang was exactly right.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Baby Steps toward the New School</title><link>/blog/baby-steps-towards-the-new-school/</link><pubDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2012 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/baby-steps-towards-the-new-school/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Aside from our mutual admiration society with &lt;a href="http://newschoolsecurity.com/2012/01/please-vote-new-school/"&gt;Adam and the New School folks&lt;/a&gt;, clearly we as an industry have suffered because we don’t share data, or war stories, or shared experience, or much of everything. Hubris has killed security innovation. We, as an industry, cannot improve because we don’t learn from each other.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Friday Summary: January 20, 2012</title><link>/blog/friday-summary-january-20-2012/</link><pubDate>Thu, 19 Jan 2012 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/friday-summary-january-20-2012/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I think I need to ban Mike from Arizona.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Scratch that – from a hundred mile radius of me.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A couple weeks ago he was in town so we could do our 2012 Securosis strategic planning. He rotates between my screaming kids and Adrian’s pack ‘o dogs, and this was my turn to host. We woke up on time the next morning, hopped in my car, and headed out to meet Adrian for breakfast and planning.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Incite 1/19/2012: My Seat</title><link>/blog/incite-1-19-2012-my-seat/</link><pubDate>Thu, 19 Jan 2012 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/incite-1-19-2012-my-seat/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Before we get to the Incite we should probably explain why it’s a day late. Like many other sites we have huge issues with PIPA and SOPA, so &lt;a href="https://securosis.com/blog/censored"&gt;we took down our site yesterday&lt;/a&gt; in protest. We don’t expect the big companies with big lobbying budgets to give up, so we need to keep the pressure on. Copyright holders have a right to protect their content, but not at the cost of our freedom and liberty. Period. Now back to our regularly scheduled pot stirring.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Malware Analysis Quant: Process Descriptions</title><link>/blog/malware-analysis-quant-process-descriptions/</link><pubDate>Thu, 19 Jan 2012 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/malware-analysis-quant-process-descriptions/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I’m happy to report that we have finished the process description posts for the Malware Analysis Quant project. Not all of you follow our &lt;a href="https://securosis.com/blog/full"&gt;Heavy Feed&lt;/a&gt; (even though you should), so here is a list of all the posts.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Oracle SCN Flaw</title><link>/blog/oracle-scn-flaw/</link><pubDate>Thu, 19 Jan 2012 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/oracle-scn-flaw/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.infoworld.com/d/security/fundamental-oracle-flaw-revealed-184163-0?page=0,1"&gt;A flaw in the Oracle database&lt;/a&gt; has been disclosed, whereby the Oracle System Change Number (SCN) – a feature that helps synchronize database events – outgrows its defined limits. The SCN is an ever-increasing sequence number used to determine the ‘age’ of data. It is incremented automatically by 16k per second to provide a time reference, and again each time data is ‘committed’ (written to disk). This enables transactions to be referenced to the second, and ordered within each second. As you might imagine, this is a &lt;em&gt;very&lt;/em&gt; large number, with a maximum value and a maximum increase per day. If the SCN passes its maximum value the database completely &lt;strong&gt;stops&lt;/strong&gt;. The new discovery concerns the SCN.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Censored #sopa</title><link>/blog/censored/</link><pubDate>Tue, 17 Jan 2012 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/censored/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;We blacked out Securosis (mostly – it was a rush job) to protest SOPA, PIPA, and the future variants we are sure will appear now that everyone has targeted these two acronyms.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Network-based Malware Detection: The Impact of the Cloud</title><link>/blog/network-based-malware-detection-the-impact-of-the-cloud/</link><pubDate>Fri, 13 Jan 2012 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/network-based-malware-detection-the-impact-of-the-cloud/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Is it that time already? Yep, it’s time to wrap up our series on Network-based Malware Detection. We started with the need to &lt;a href="https://securosis.com/blog/network-based-malware-detection-introduction-new-blog-series"&gt;block malware more effectively on the perimeter&lt;/a&gt;, particularly because you know you have users who are not the sharpest tools in the shed. Then we discussed &lt;a href="https://securosis.com/blog/network-based-malware-detection-identifying-todays-malware"&gt;the different techniques involved in detecting malware&lt;/a&gt;. Finally we tackled &lt;a href="https://securosis.com/blog/network-based-malware-detection-where-to-detect-the-bad-stuff"&gt;location&lt;/a&gt;, assessing critically whether the traditional endpoint protection model has outlived its usefulness.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Friday Summary: January 13, 2012</title><link>/blog/friday-summary-january-13-2012/</link><pubDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2012 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/friday-summary-january-13-2012/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;You’ve probably noticed we have not been doing a lot of blogging lately. Sorry about that – we’ll start back up with a bang very soon. This will be a very exciting year for Securosis – we have a &lt;em&gt;bunch&lt;/em&gt; of projects in the pipe. I’ll be launching a re-start of the Database Activity Monitoring 2.0 series now that we have finally settled on the terminology and done sufficient research on the trends to actually convey what’s going on. Mike and I want to cover some Log Management topics, and I have a data masking research project underway as well. All that is over and above new developments with the Securosis Nexus, the Cloud Security Alliance Training, and our RSA Guide – so Q1 will be very busy and we will be writing a lot. I’ll publish my Q2 research agenda in the coming weeks, so if you have anything you want to talk about at RSA we can go into detail then. And I wanted to comment on a ton of great posts I have seen, but alas…&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Checking out a bootable Windows TPM thumb drive</title><link>/blog/checking-out-a-bootable-windows-tpm-thumb-drive/</link><pubDate>Wed, 11 Jan 2012 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/checking-out-a-bootable-windows-tpm-thumb-drive/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;It’s almost RSA time again. Which means one very important thing: I need to finally post the review of the very slick TPM-based Windows bootable thumb drive Jeff Jones (&lt;a href="http://twitter.com/securityjones"&gt;@securityjones&lt;/a&gt;) gave me at RSA 2011. I have been promising him this review since last March, and it would be just too embarrassing to not get it done before RSA 2012. So here we go.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Incite 1/11/2012: Spoilsport</title><link>/blog/incite-1-11-2012-spoil-sport/</link><pubDate>Wed, 11 Jan 2012 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/incite-1-11-2012-spoil-sport/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;The winter holidays aggravate me. They are a consumption binge, and I know we all want a healthier global economy (which includes folks spending money they don’t have on things they don’t need) but it still irks me. I grew up modestly in a single-parent home, and we did stuff, but not a lot. We didn’t have the fancy things, which forced me to go out and earn whatever I’ve gotten.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Social Security Blogger Awards: Voting Open!</title><link>/blog/social-security-blogger-awards-voting-opens/</link><pubDate>Tue, 10 Jan 2012 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/social-security-blogger-awards-voting-opens/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;It’s hard to believe, but the RSA Conference is almost upon us. We have a lot of very cool stuff planned, including an update to our RSA Guide, a few cool partnerships, and of course the Disaster Recovery Breakfast. We will have more details on all the above as we get closer to the show. In the meantime we want you to know that voting has opened for the &lt;a href="https://365.rsaconference.com/blogs/security-blogger-meetup/2012/01/06/and-the-nominees-are"&gt;2012 Social Security Blogger Awards&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Incite 1/4/2011: Shaking things up</title><link>/blog/incite-1-4-2011-shaking-things-up/</link><pubDate>Wed, 04 Jan 2012 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/incite-1-4-2011-shaking-things-up/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;For a football fan, there is nothing like the New Year holiday. You get to shake your hangover with a full day of football. This year was even better because the New Year fell on a Sunday, so we had a full slate of Week 17 NFL games (including a huge win for the G-men over the despised Cowboys) and then a bunch of college bowl games on Monday the 2nd.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Network-based Malware Detection: Where to Detect the Bad Stuff?</title><link>/blog/network-based-malware-detection-where-to-detect-the-bad-stuff/</link><pubDate>Wed, 04 Jan 2012 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/network-based-malware-detection-where-to-detect-the-bad-stuff/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;We spent the first two posts in this series on the &lt;em&gt;why&lt;/em&gt; (&lt;a href="https://securosis.com/blog/network-based-malware-detection-introduction-new-blog-series"&gt;Introduction&lt;/a&gt;) and &lt;em&gt;how&lt;/em&gt; (&lt;a href="https://securosis.com/blog/network-based-malware-detection-identifying-todays-malware"&gt;Detecting Today’s Malware&lt;/a&gt;) of detecting malware on the network. But that all assumes the network is the right place to detect malware. As Hollywood types tend to do, let’s divulge the answer at the beginning, in a transparent ploy. Drum roll please… You want to do malware detection &lt;em&gt;everywhere&lt;/em&gt; you can. On the endpoints, at the content layer, and also on the network. &lt;em&gt;It’s not an either/or decision.&lt;/em&gt; But of course each approach has strengths and weaknesses. Let’s dig into those pros and cons to give you enough information to figure out what mix of these options makes sense for you.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Network-based Malware Detection: Identifying Today’s Malware</title><link>/blog/network-based-malware-detection-identifying-todays-malware-2/</link><pubDate>Thu, 29 Dec 2011 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/network-based-malware-detection-identifying-todays-malware-2/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;As we discussed in the &lt;a href="http://securosis.com/blog/network-based-malware-detection-introduction-new-blog-series"&gt;Introduction&lt;/a&gt; to the Network-based Malware Detection series, traditional approaches to detecting malware cannot protect us any more. With rapidly morphing executables, increasingly sophisticated targeting, zero-day attacks, and innovative cloaking techniques, matching a file to a &lt;em&gt;known bad&lt;/em&gt; AV signature is simply inadequate as a detection mechanism. We need to think differently about how to detect these attacks, so our next step is to dig into each of these specific tactics to figure out exactly what a file is doing and determining whether it’s bad.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>The Last Friday Summary of 2011</title><link>/blog/the-last-friday-summary-of-2011/</link><pubDate>Thu, 22 Dec 2011 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/the-last-friday-summary-of-2011/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;A couple weeks ago we decided to change up the Friday Summary and update the format to something new and spiffy.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Incite 12/21/2011: Regret. Nothing.</title><link>/blog/incite-12-21-2011-regret-nothing/</link><pubDate>Wed, 21 Dec 2011 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/incite-12-21-2011-regret-nothing/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Around the turn of the New Year, I always love to see the cartoon where the old guy of the current year gives way to the toddler of the upcoming year. Each new year becomes a logical breakpoint to take stock of where you’re at, and where you want to be 12 months from now. Some of us (like me) aren’t so worried about setting overly specific goals anymore, but it’s a good opportunity to make sure things are moving in the right direction.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Network-Based Malware Detection: Introduction [new blog series]</title><link>/blog/network-based-malware-detection-introduction-new-blog-series/</link><pubDate>Wed, 21 Dec 2011 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/network-based-malware-detection-introduction-new-blog-series/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Evidently this is the month of anti-malware research for us – I’m adding to the &lt;a href="http://www.securosis.com/projectquant"&gt;Malware Analysis Quant&lt;/a&gt; project by starting a separate related series. We’re calling it &lt;em&gt;Network-based Malware Detection: Filling the Gaps of AV&lt;/em&gt; because that’s what we need to do as an industry.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Introducing the Malware Analysis Quant Project</title><link>/blog/introducing-the-malware-analysis-quant-project/</link><pubDate>Mon, 19 Dec 2011 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/introducing-the-malware-analysis-quant-project/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Yep, we’re launching another Quant research project – this time on Malware Analysis. Consider it our little holiday present to all of you.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Friday Summary: December 16, 2011</title><link>/blog/friday-summary-december-16-2011/</link><pubDate>Thu, 15 Dec 2011 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/friday-summary-december-16-2011/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Aspartame is toxic, so they renamed it &lt;a href="http://www.lifex.com/weight.html"&gt;AsparSweet&lt;/a&gt;(tm) to confuse consumers. GMAC was fined for mistreating customers and accused of violating state laws, so they renamed themselves &lt;a href="http://www.ally.com/about/company-structure/history/"&gt;Ally&lt;/a&gt;. Slumping sales of high fructose corn syrup, a substance many feel contributes to obesity and reduced brain function, inspired the new name “&lt;a href="http://well.blogs.nytimes.com/2010/09/14/a-new-name-for-high-fructose-corn-syrup/"&gt;corn sugar&lt;/a&gt;”. Euro bonds are now “&lt;a href="http://seekingalpha.com/article/310913-from-debt-redemption-fund-to-stability-bonds-a-potential-solution-to-the-eurozone-crisis"&gt;stability bonds&lt;/a&gt;”. Corn-fed stockyard beef can now be labelled ‘Organic’. And that is that whole weird discussion on whether &lt;a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/cifamerica/2011/nov/18/pizza-vegetable-congress-says-so?"&gt;pizza is legally a vegetable&lt;/a&gt; or not.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>New White Paper: Applied Network Security Analysis</title><link>/blog/new-white-paper-published-applied-network-security-analysis/</link><pubDate>Thu, 15 Dec 2011 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/new-white-paper-published-applied-network-security-analysis/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;We have been saying for years that you can’t assume your defenses are sufficient to stop a focused and targeted attacker. That’s what React Faster and Better is all about. But say you actually buy into this philosophy: what now? How do you figure out the bad guys are in your house? And more importantly how they got there and what they are doing? The network is your friend because it never lies.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Incite 12/14/2011: Family Matters</title><link>/blog/incite-12-14-2011-family-matters/</link><pubDate>Wed, 14 Dec 2011 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/incite-12-14-2011-family-matters/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;There are a couple calls you just don’t want to get. Like from the FBI when you’ve had some kind of breach and your secret recipe is listed on eBay. Or from the local cops because your kids did something stupid and you can only hope your umbrella policy will cover it. But those are relatively trivial in the grand scheme of things. I got a call Friday morning that my Uncle Mac had passed away suddenly. I can’t say we were very close, but he met my aunt when I was a kid, and has been present at good times and bad over the past 35 years.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Pontification Alert: Upcoming webcast appearances</title><link>/blog/pontification-alert-upcoming-webcast-appearances/</link><pubDate>Tue, 13 Dec 2011 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/pontification-alert-upcoming-webcast-appearances/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I figure our lack of blogging has created a vacuum of mostly-useless security snark and babble. Who else can put so little content in so many words? But all is not lost – we continue banging away building content for the &lt;a href="https://nexus.securosis.com/"&gt;Nexus&lt;/a&gt;. Thanks to a few of our excellent clients, you have the opportunity to hear me ramble on about two of my favorite topics this week. If you need some excuse to get out of your root canal appointment, need to postpone that audit findings meeting, or perhaps just choose not to grovel for 2012 budget on Wednesday or Thursday afternoon, do a little clicky-clicky and join me for the following webcasts…&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Tokenization Guidance White Paper Available</title><link>/blog/tokenization-guidance-whitepaper-available/</link><pubDate>Mon, 12 Dec 2011 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/tokenization-guidance-whitepaper-available/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;We are pleased to announce the availability of our latest white paper: Tokenization Guidance: How to Reduce PCI Compliance Costs. It discusses the dos and don’ts of replacing credit card data with tokens, to improve security while reducing PCI DSS auditing costs. Our primary goal was to help merchants understand how to employ tokenization to reduce PCI scope, as well as the costs of Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard audits. When we read the PCI supplement on tokenization guidelines we were shocked that it failed to provide concrete answers to the target audience’s most-asked question: How can I reduce audit scope? It felt like the paper was designed to lull us to sleep – it would raise topics we were interested in, but then ramble on without answers.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Friday Summary, December 9, 2011</title><link>/blog/friday-summary-december-9-2011/</link><pubDate>Thu, 08 Dec 2011 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/friday-summary-december-9-2011/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;As Rich announced, we are shaking up the Friday Summary a bit. We will still talk about what we are up to. And we’ll share some of our personal – possibly security related – stories in the Summary. But we will focus on fewer stories with more analysis of interesting news items. Honestly, we’ll likely sneak in security news as well – it just depends on whether we see interesting stuff.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Incite 12/6/11: Stinky</title><link>/blog/incite-12-6-11-stinky/</link><pubDate>Tue, 06 Dec 2011 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/incite-12-6-11-stinky/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I have a younger brother. It was just the two of us (and Mom) growing up, so I find myself ill suited to dealing with girl stuff. Thankfully the Boss is wonderful at working with the girls on how to deal with bullies/mean girls, and this physical maturation process that seems to happen to girls. One day they are all cute, young and innocent; the next day you’re shopping for bras. Thankfully the Boss handles that duty as well. I’d favor the model that is bolted onto their respective rib cages, and don’t get me started on chastity belts… But when it comes to the Boy, I’m all over that.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Friday Summary: Big Changes and Carrier IQ</title><link>/blog/friday-summary-big-changes-and-carrier-iq/</link><pubDate>Thu, 01 Dec 2011 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/friday-summary-big-changes-and-carrier-iq/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Back when we started the Friday Summary the world of blogs and social media was much different. RSS feeds were the primary means by which most of us sucked down our news, and we tended to communicate through cross-blog links and comments.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Incite 11/30/2011: An Introverted Thanks</title><link>/blog/incite-11-30-2011-an-introverted-thanks/</link><pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov 2011 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/incite-11-30-2011-an-introverted-thanks/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;As with most things, I have mixed feelings about the holidays. Who doesn’t enjoy a few days off to recharge for the end-of-year rush? But the holidays also mean family, and that’s a good thing &lt;em&gt;in limited doses.&lt;/em&gt; I’m one of the lucky few who gets along with my in-laws. They have an inexplicably high opinion of me, and who am I to say they are wrong?&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Changing Focus through the Holidays</title><link>/blog/changing-focus-through-the-holidays/</link><pubDate>Tue, 29 Nov 2011 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/changing-focus-through-the-holidays/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Hey everyone,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;As you may have noticed, we are pretty focused on this &lt;a href="https://nexus.securosis.com/"&gt;Securosis Nexus thing&lt;/a&gt; we have been working on for a while. The system is coming along great, but it’s time for us to start hammering on its content.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Fundamentals of Crowd Management</title><link>/blog/fundamentals-of-crowd-management/</link><pubDate>Tue, 22 Nov 2011 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/fundamentals-of-crowd-management/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I have joked over the years that I’m more qualified to run security at a stadium concert than an IT shop, and it’s somewhat true. My security career started way back at the young age of 18 when I started working on the event staff at CU Boulder, and for Contemporary Services Corporation (CSC), who managed most of the Denver venues. By 21 I was running security at CU and supervising for CSC – managing or supervising sports, music, and other events ranging from under 100 people to over 100,000. Sometimes I was in charge, sometimes I just managed one area, and I was often a rover/troubleshooter.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Occupy Work</title><link>/blog/occupy-work/</link><pubDate>Mon, 21 Nov 2011 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/occupy-work/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I don’t get this #occupy stuff. Maybe that’s an indication that I’m old. Maybe it means I’m selfish. It could be a sign that I have a lot of competing priorities and they don’t leave me a lot of time. But most of all, it’s because I don’t get it. Really.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Mobile Payments without Credit Cards</title><link>/blog/mobile-payments-without-credit-cards/</link><pubDate>Thu, 17 Nov 2011 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/mobile-payments-without-credit-cards/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;The San Francisco Chronicle ran an interesting story about a small payment processing firm that is trying to &lt;a href="http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/g/a/2011/11/10/businessinsiderthis-28-year-old-is-.DTL"&gt;disintermediate credit card companies&lt;/a&gt;. But they are doing it the old fashioned way – cutting out the middleman and going direct to banks to move money for them. Dwolla is a start-up payment processor providing person-to-person payment via mobile and social media outlets. Their hook is providing payment at a substantially reduced reduced commission – just twenty-five cents ($0.25) per transaction. Compare that to credit card companies that charge a flat 3%, or PayPal, who changes thirty cents per transaction &lt;em&gt;in addition to&lt;/em&gt; 2.9% (less 2.2% for volume sellers). Dwolla’s offering can be viewed as similar to PayPal’s or an ATM transaction, but ATM fees have escalated into the $3-10 range. With mobile payment in its infancy, this space is a greenfield for startups and established players to redefine what’s possible.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Incite 11/16/11: Blockage</title><link>/blog/incite-11-16-11-blockage/</link><pubDate>Wed, 16 Nov 2011 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/incite-11-16-11-blockage/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Most of the time, the words flow. I have a thought, and the next thing I know there are hundreds (if not thousands) of words on the screen. I’m a writer, so that shouldn’t be surprising. What may be surprising is that there are times I get writer’s block. Like now. At some point in the early part of the week, I get a flash of inspiration and bang out the Incite. It’s usually the easiest part of my job, but not this week.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Index of Posts: Security Management 2.0</title><link>/blog/index-of-posts-security-management-2-0/</link><pubDate>Wed, 16 Nov 2011 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/index-of-posts-security-management-2-0/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;We have finished and put a little bow around our &lt;em&gt;Security Management 2.0: Time to Replace Your SIEM?&lt;/em&gt; paper. So it’s time to post the series index, as well as a link to the completed paper.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>FireStarter: Looking the other way</title><link>/blog/firestarter-looking-the-other-way/</link><pubDate>Tue, 15 Nov 2011 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/firestarter-looking-the-other-way/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Over the past few weeks we have been inundated by the 24/7 media cycle, endlessly fascinated bythe &lt;a href="https://www.npr.org/2011/11/08/142111804/penn-state-abuse-scandal-a-guide-and-timeline"&gt;alleged child abuse by a Penn State football coach&lt;/a&gt;. I couldn’t bring myself to read the &lt;a href="http://www.npr.org/assets/news/2011/11/sandusky_presentment.pdf"&gt;grand jury findings&lt;/a&gt;, as I have a young son and the idea of anyone doing that to The Boy makes my blood boil. Regarding the perpetrator, I’m with &lt;a href="https://twitter.com/#!/JayGlazer/status/136285209707548672"&gt;Jay Glazer&lt;/a&gt;. But we Americans do take that innocent until proven guilty thing pretty seriously, so we need to let the legal system play it out.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Friday Summary: November 11, 2011</title><link>/blog/friday-summary-november-11-2011/</link><pubDate>Thu, 10 Nov 2011 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/friday-summary-november-11-2011/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Coupons. Frequent flyer miles. Rebates. Loyalty programs. Member specials. Double coupon days. Frequent buyer programs. Weekly drawings. Big sales events. Seasonal sales. Presidents day sales. Sales tax holiday sales. Going out of business sales. Private clearance sales. 2 for 1 sales. Buy 2 get 1 free.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Incite 11/9/11: Childlike Wonder</title><link>/blog/incite-11-9-11-childlike-wonder/</link><pubDate>Wed, 09 Nov 2011 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/incite-11-9-11-childlike-wonder/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Heading down into Atlanta last week for the BSides ATL conference, I got into my car and the magic began. I whipped out my magic box and pulled up the address on the Maps app, just to make sure I remembered where it is. Then I fired up Pandora, which dutifully streamed rocking music to my Bluetooth-equipped car stereo. I checked out the NaviGAtor mobile site for real-time traffic data; then I was set and on my way.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Managed Services in a Security Management 2.0 World</title><link>/blog/managed-services-in-a-security-management-2-0-world/</link><pubDate>Wed, 09 Nov 2011 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/managed-services-in-a-security-management-2-0-world/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;As we posted the Security Management 2.0 series, we focused heavily on replacing an on-premise option with another on-premise option. We paid a bit of lip service to the managed SIEM/Log Management option, but not enough – the reality is that, under the proper, circumstances a managed service presents an interesting alternative to racking and stacking another set of appliances. So consider this a primer for managed services in the context of our Security Management 2.0 discussion. We will go through the drivers, use cases, and deployment architectures for those considering managed services. And we will provide cautions for areas where a service offering might not meet your expectations.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Sucking less is not a brand position</title><link>/blog/sucking-less-is-not-a-brand-position/</link><pubDate>Wed, 09 Nov 2011 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/sucking-less-is-not-a-brand-position/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I guess if you have been around long enough, you have seen everything over and over again. I felt my age today when I saw yet another (lame) attempt to &lt;a href="http://www.cioupdate.com/financial-strategies/moving-security-from-cost-center-to-brand-differentiator-.html"&gt;Move Security from a Cost Center to a Brand Differentiator&lt;/a&gt;. How many times have we security folks wished for the day we could get project funding because it helped the business either to make more money or to spend less money? Gosh, that would make life a lot easier.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Breakdown of Trust and Privacy</title><link>/blog/breakdown-of-trust-and-privacy/</link><pubDate>Tue, 08 Nov 2011 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/breakdown-of-trust-and-privacy/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I try not to cover data privacy much any more, despite being an advocate, because we have already crossed the point of no return. We have allowed just about every piece of our personal data to be available on the Internet, making privacy effectively a dead issue, but in most cases the user makes the choice. But &lt;em&gt;many&lt;/em&gt; very large public firms have been promising consumers that carefully protect customer information, and fully anonymize any data before it’s sold. This is bull$&amp;amp;!#.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>A Public Call for eWallet Design Standards</title><link>/blog/a-public-call-for-ewallet-design-standards1/</link><pubDate>Mon, 07 Nov 2011 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/a-public-call-for-ewallet-design-standards1/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Last week StorefrontBacktalk ran an article on &lt;a href="http://storefrontbacktalk.com/securityfraud/mobile-walletsand-receipt-digitization-firmscould-send-your-data-right-to-your-rivals/"&gt;Mobile Wallets&lt;/a&gt;. It underscored my personal naivete in assuming that anyone who designed and built a digital wallet for ecommerce would first and foremost protect customer payment data and other private information. Reading this post I had one of those genuine “Oh $&amp;amp;!#” moments – what if the wallet provider was not interested in &lt;em&gt;my&lt;/em&gt; security or privacy? Duh!&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Applied Network Security Analysis: The Breach Confirmation Use Case</title><link>/blog/applied-network-security-analysis-the-breach-confirmation-use-case/</link><pubDate>Mon, 07 Nov 2011 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/applied-network-security-analysis-the-breach-confirmation-use-case/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;As our last use case in Applied Network Security Analysis, it’s time to consider breach confirmation: confirming and investigating a breach that has already happened. There are clear similarities to the forensics use case, but breach confirmation takes forensic analysis to the next level: you need to learn the extent of the breach, determining &lt;em&gt;exactly&lt;/em&gt; what was taken and from where. So let’s revisit our &lt;a href="http://securosis.com/blog/applied-network-security-analysis-the-forensics-use-case"&gt;Forensics scenario&lt;/a&gt; to look at how that can be extended to confirm a breach.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Tokenization Guidance: PCI Requirement Checklist</title><link>/blog/tokenization-guidance-pci-requirement-checklist/</link><pubDate>Fri, 04 Nov 2011 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/tokenization-guidance-pci-requirement-checklist/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;So far in this series on tokenization guidance for protecting payment data, we have covered &lt;a href="http://securosis.com/blog/comments/tokenization-guidance-pci-supplement-highlights"&gt;deficiencies in the PCI supplement&lt;/a&gt;, offered specific &lt;a href="http://securosis.com/blog/comments/tokenization-guidance-merchant-advice"&gt;advice for merchants&lt;/a&gt; to reduce audit scope, and provided specific &lt;a href="http://securosis.com/blog/comments/tokenization-guidance-audit-advice"&gt;tips on what to look for during an audit&lt;/a&gt;. In this final post we will provide a checklist of each PCI requirement affected by tokenization, with guidance on how to modify compliance efforts in light of tokenization. I have tried to be as brief as possible while still covering the important areas of compliance reporting you need to adjust.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Understanding and Selecting DAM 2.0: Market Drivers and Use Cases</title><link>/blog/understanding-and-selecting-dam-2-0-market-drivers-and-use-cases/</link><pubDate>Fri, 04 Nov 2011 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/understanding-and-selecting-dam-2-0-market-drivers-and-use-cases/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I was going to being this series talking about some of the architectural changes, but I’ve reconsidered. Since our initial coverage of Database Activity Monitoring technology in 2007, the products have fully matured into enterprise worthy platforms. What’s more, they’ve proven significant security and compliance benefits, as evidenced by market growth from $40M to revenues well north of $100M per year. This market is no longer dominated by small vendors, rather large vendors who have acquired six of the DAM startups. As such, DAM is being integrated with other security products into a blended platform. Because of this, I thought it best to go back and define what DAM is, and discuss market evolution first as it better frames the remaining topics we’ll discuss rest of this series.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Applied Network Security Analysis: The Malware Analysis Use Case</title><link>/blog/applied-network-security-analysis-the-malware-analysis-use-case/</link><pubDate>Thu, 03 Nov 2011 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/applied-network-security-analysis-the-malware-analysis-use-case/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;As we resume our tour of advanced use cases for Network Security Analysis, it’s time to consider malware analysis. Of course most successful attacks involve some kind of malware at some point during the attack. If only just to maintain a presence on the compromised device, some kind of bad stuff is injected. And once the bad stuff is on a device, it’s very very hard to get rid of it – and even harder to be sure. Most folks (including us) recommend you just re-image the device, as opposed to trying to clean the malware.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Friday Summary: November 4, 2011</title><link>/blog/friday-summary-november-4-2011/</link><pubDate>Thu, 03 Nov 2011 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/friday-summary-november-4-2011/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I wouldn’t say I’m a control freak, but I am definitely “control aligned”. If something is important to me I like to know what’s going on under the hood. I also hate to depend on someone else for something I’m capable of.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Incite 11/2/2011: Be Yourself</title><link>/blog/incite-11-2-2011-be-yourself/</link><pubDate>Wed, 02 Nov 2011 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/incite-11-2-2011-be-yourself/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Last week I was invited to speak at Kennesaw State University’s annual cybersecurity awareness day. They didn’t really give me much direction on the topic, so I decided to give my Happyness presentation. I figured there would be students and other employees who could benefit from my journey from total grump to fairly infrequent grump, and a lot of the stuff I’ve learned along the way.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Conspiracy Theories, Tin Foil Hats, and Security Research</title><link>/blog/conspiracy-theories-tin-foil-hats-and-security-research/</link><pubDate>Tue, 01 Nov 2011 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/conspiracy-theories-tin-foil-hats-and-security-research/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;It seems far too much of security research has become like Mel Gibson in “Conspiracy Theory.” Unbalanced, mostly crazy, but not necessarily wrong. But we created this situation, so we have to deal with it. I’m reacting to the media cycle around the Duqu virus, or &lt;em&gt;Son of Stuxnet,&lt;/em&gt; identified by F-Secure (among others).&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>How Regular Folks See Online Safety, and What It Says about Us</title><link>/blog/how-regular-folks-see-online-safety-and-what-it-says-about-us/</link><pubDate>Tue, 01 Nov 2011 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/how-regular-folks-see-online-safety-and-what-it-says-about-us/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I remember very clearly the day I vowed to stop watching local news. I was sitting at home cooking dinner or something, when a teaser report of a toddler who died after being left in a car in the heat aired during that “what we’re covering tonight” opening to the show. It wasn’t enough to report the tragedy – the reporter (a designation she surely didn’t deserve) seemed compelled to illustrate the story by locking a big thermometer in the car, to be pulled out during the actual segment.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Tokenization Guidance: Audit Advice</title><link>/blog/tokenization-guidance-audit-advice/</link><pubDate>Tue, 01 Nov 2011 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/tokenization-guidance-audit-advice/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;In this portion of our Tokenization Guidance series I want to offer some advice to auditors. I am addressing both internal auditors going through one of the self assessment questionnaires, as well as external auditors validating adherence to PCI requirements. For the most part auditors follow PCI DSS for the systems that process credit card information, just as they always have. But I will discuss how tokenization alters the environment, and how to adjust the investigation process in the select areas where tokenization systems supplants PAN processing. At the end of this paper, I will go section by section through the PCI DSS specification and talk about specifics, but here I just want to provide an overview.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Applied Network Security Analysis: The Advanced Security Use Case</title><link>/blog/applied-network-security-analysis-the-advanced-security-use-case/</link><pubDate>Mon, 31 Oct 2011 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/applied-network-security-analysis-the-advanced-security-use-case/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;The &lt;a href="http://securosis.com/blog/applied-network-security-analysis-the-forensics-use-case"&gt;forensics use case&lt;/a&gt; we discussed previously is about taking a look at &lt;em&gt;something that already happened&lt;/em&gt;. You presume the data is already lost, the horse is out of the barn, and Pandora’s Box is open. But what if we tried to look at some of these additional data types in terms of making security alerts better, with the clear goal of reducing the window between exploit and detection: reacting faster?&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Virtual USB? Not.</title><link>/blog/firestarter-virtual-usb/</link><pubDate>Mon, 31 Oct 2011 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/firestarter-virtual-usb/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Secure USB devices – ain’t they great? They offer us the ability to bring trusted devices into insecure networks, and perform trusted operations on untrusted computers. If I could drink out of one, maybe it would be the holy grail. Services like cryptographic key management, identity certificates and mutual authentication, sensitive document storage, and a pr0nsafe web browser platform. But over the last year, as I look at the mobile computing space – the place where people will want to use secure USB features – the more I think the secure USB market is in trouble. How many of you connect a USB stick to your Droid phone? How about your iPad?&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Applied Network Security Analysis: The Forensics Use Case</title><link>/blog/applied-network-security-analysis-the-forensics-use-case/</link><pubDate>Fri, 28 Oct 2011 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/applied-network-security-analysis-the-forensics-use-case/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Most organizations don’t really learn about the limitations of event logs, until forensic investigators hold up their hands and explain they know &lt;em&gt;what&lt;/em&gt; happened, but aren’t really sure &lt;em&gt;how&lt;/em&gt;. Huh? How could that happen? It’s pretty simple: logs are a backward-looking indicator. They can help you piece together what happened, but you can only &lt;em&gt;infer&lt;/em&gt; how.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Friday Summary: October 28, 2011</title><link>/blog/friday-summary-october-28-2011/</link><pubDate>Fri, 28 Oct 2011 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/friday-summary-october-28-2011/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I really enjoyed Marco Arment’s &lt;a href="http://www.marco.org/2011/10/23/the-apple-tv-set"&gt;I finally cracked it&lt;/a&gt; post, both because he captured the essence of Apple TV here and now, and because his views on media – as a consumer – are &lt;em&gt;exactly&lt;/em&gt; in line with mine. Calling DVRs “a bad hack” is spot-on. I went through this process 7 years ago when I got rid of television. I could not accept a 5 minute &lt;em&gt;American Idol&lt;/em&gt; segment in the middle of the 30 minute Fox ‘news’ broadcast. Nor the other 200 channels of crap surrounding the three channels I wanted. At the time people thought I was nuts, but now I run into people (okay – only a handful) who have pulled the plug on the broadcast media of cable and satellite. Most people are still frustrated with me when they say “Hey, did you see SuperJunk this weekend?” and I say “No, I don’t get television.” They mutter something like ‘Luddite’ and wonder off. Don’t get me wrong, I have a television. A very nice one in fact, but I have been calling it a ‘monitor’ for the last few years because it’s not attached to broadcast media. But not getting &lt;em&gt;broadcast&lt;/em&gt; television does not make me a Luddite – quite to the contrary, I am waiting for the future.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Next Generation != (Always) Better</title><link>/blog/next-generation-not-better-always/</link><pubDate>Thu, 27 Oct 2011 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/next-generation-not-better-always/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;It all started with &lt;a href="http://twitter.com/#!/rmogull/status/129252782862630913"&gt;a simple tweet&lt;/a&gt; from The Mogull, which succinctly summed up a lot of the meat grinder of high tech marketing. You see the industry is based on upgrades and refreshes, largely driven by planned obsolescence. Let’s just look at Microsoft Word. I haven’t really used any new functionality since Office 2003. You? They have overhauled the UI and added some cloudiness (which they call Office Live), but it’s really moving deck chairs around. A word processor is a word processor for 95% of the folks out there.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>A Kick-Ass Cloud Database Security Automation Example</title><link>/blog/a-kick-ass-cloud-database-security-automation-example/</link><pubDate>Wed, 26 Oct 2011 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/a-kick-ass-cloud-database-security-automation-example/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Yesterday I was in Vegas to participate in a panel at IBM’s Information on Demand Conference. To my amusement and frustration, I was already in Vegas that weekend, drove 4.5 hours home to Phoenix on Sunday, then flew back Monday evening (4 hours door to door).&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Applied Network Security Analysis: Collection and Analysis = A Fighting Chance</title><link>/blog/applied-network-security-analysis-collection-and-analysis-a-fighting-chance/</link><pubDate>Wed, 26 Oct 2011 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/applied-network-security-analysis-collection-and-analysis-a-fighting-chance/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;In the &lt;a href="http://securosis.com/blog/applied-network-security-analysis-introduction"&gt;introduction to our Applied Network Security Analysis series&lt;/a&gt;, we talked about monitoring everything and the limitations of a log-centric data collection approach, in our battle to improve security operational processes. Now let’s dig in a little deeper and understand what kind of data collection foundation makes sense, given the types of analysis we need to deal with our adversaries.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Incite 10/26/2011: The Curious Case of Flat Stanley</title><link>/blog/incite-10-26-2011-the-curious-case-of-flat-stanley/</link><pubDate>Wed, 26 Oct 2011 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/incite-10-26-2011-the-curious-case-of-flat-stanley/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Flat Stanley has it pretty good. If you have elementary school age kids, you probably know all about him. Flat Stanley is a cute story about a kid who gets flattened, and then spends most of the book trying to regain his natural form. Many teachers have kids do a Flat Stanley project, where they color a picture and send it to a friend or relative.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>New Series: Understanding and Selecting a Database Activity Monitoring Solution 2.0</title><link>/blog/new-series-understanding-and-selecting-database-activity-monitoring-2-0/</link><pubDate>Mon, 24 Oct 2011 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/new-series-understanding-and-selecting-database-activity-monitoring-2-0/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Back in 2007 we – it was actually just Rich back then – published Understanding and Selecting Database Activity Monitoring – the first in-depth examination of what was then a relatively new security technology. That paper is, and remains, the definitive guide for DAM, but a lot has happened in the past 4 years. The products – and the vendors who sell them – have all changed. The reasons customers bought four years ago are not the reasons they buy today. Furthermore, the advanced features of 2007 are now part of the baseline. Given the technology’s increased popularity and maturity, it is time to take a fresh look at Database Activity Monitoring – reassessing the technology, use cases, and market drivers.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Friday Summary: October 21, 2011</title><link>/blog/friday-summary-october-21-2011/</link><pubDate>Fri, 21 Oct 2011 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/friday-summary-october-21-2011/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;My wife and I are pretty big Jimmy Buffett fans. I first got hooked way back in high school, working as a lifeguard. The summer of my freshman year in college I went with a group of friends down to the Orange Bowl, and we snuck off for a day trip to Key West and a short visit to the very first Margaritaville.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Applied Network Security Analysis: Introduction</title><link>/blog/applied-network-security-analysis-introduction/</link><pubDate>Wed, 19 Oct 2011 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/applied-network-security-analysis-introduction/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Today we launch our next blog series, on a topic we believe is critical to success in today’s threat environment. It is network security analysis, a rather grand and nebulous term, but consider this the next step on the path which started with &lt;a href="http://securosis.com/blog/incident-response-fundamentals-index-of-posts"&gt;Incident Response Fundamentals&lt;/a&gt; and continued with &lt;a href="http://securosis.com/blog/new-white-paper-react-faster-and-better-new-approaches-for-advanced-inciden"&gt;React Faster and Better&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Incite 10/19/2011: The Inquisition</title><link>/blog/incite-10-19-2011-the-inquisition/</link><pubDate>Wed, 19 Oct 2011 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/incite-10-19-2011-the-inquisition/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;As my kids get older, fundamental aspects of their personalities become more apparent. XX1 won the “most inquisitive” award in kindergarten. 5 years later, she still asks questions. Lots of questions. A seemingly endless stream of questions.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Tokenization Guidance: Merchant Advice</title><link>/blog/tokenization-guidance-merchant-advice/</link><pubDate>Wed, 19 Oct 2011 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/tokenization-guidance-merchant-advice/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;The goal of tokenization is to reduce the scope of PCI database security assessment. This means a reduction in the time, cost, and complexity of compliance auditing. We want to remove the need to inspect every system for security settings, encryption deployments, network security, and application security, as much as possible. For smaller merchants tokenization can make self-assessment much more manageable. For large merchants paying 3rd-party auditors to verify compliance, the cost savings is huge.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Database Security Market Sizing and Guesstimation</title><link>/blog/database-security-market-sizing-and-guestimation/</link><pubDate>Tue, 18 Oct 2011 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/database-security-market-sizing-and-guestimation/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I read Ericka Chickowski’s Dark Reading post on &lt;a href="http://www.darkreading.com/database-security/167901020/security/news/231700002/database-security-market-to-grow-20-percent-through-2014.html"&gt;Database Security Market Growth&lt;/a&gt; today. While I generally agree with the estimated rate of growth, I am mystified by the market sizing. Where did this number come from? Is $755M wrong? I don’t know. But I am certain nobody else does either. I get asked about the size of the database security market every month. Simple question, impossible answer. Why? For starters, even if you agree on what constitutes database security, you would need to distinguish between databases specific products and general-purpose products with some database capabilities? Once you choose the ground rules for what’s in and what’s out, it’s basically a bunch of guesses about what vendors are earning. Understanding how much money a specific product earns is difficult with small firms that only have one or two products; and giant firms bundle many products, services, and maintenance together – making it impossible to assess what goes where. Was that money for the database licenses you purchased, the app and middleware stack, the user training, the professional services for customization, or the security? For an example of what I mean, let’s look at these facets in more depth:&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Friday Summary: October 14, 2011</title><link>/blog/friday-summary-october-14-2011/</link><pubDate>Fri, 14 Oct 2011 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/friday-summary-october-14-2011/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;It started with a corn chip. I was eating corn chips – a fresh bag – and they tasted like hell. I had a tomato and some strawberries, thinking eating healthy would be good, but my body said otherwise. They made me feel poorly. I was in the airport waiting for my flight to the Bay Area, thinking “What the hell are they putting in this stuff – it’s a freakin’ corn chip?”&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Incite 10/12/2011: Impact and Legacy</title><link>/blog/incite-10-12-2011-impact-and-legacy/</link><pubDate>Wed, 12 Oct 2011 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/incite-10-12-2011-impact-and-legacy/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;As have been overly reported over the past week, Steve Jobs is gone. As &lt;a href="http://securosis.com/blog/friday-summary-goodbye-to-the-crazy-one"&gt;Rich so adroitly pointed out&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;em&gt;“His death hit me harder than I expected. Because not only do we not have a Steve Jobs in security, we no longer have one at all.”&lt;/em&gt; You know, someone who seems to be the master of the universe. Perfection personified. Of course, the reality is never perfection. But what’s perfect is imperfection.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>The Securosis Nexus (and) Beta Test FAQ</title><link>/blog/the-securosis-nexus-and-beta-test-faq/</link><pubDate>Wed, 12 Oct 2011 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/the-securosis-nexus-and-beta-test-faq/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;We’ve been getting some questions about the beta test, so I decided to put an FAQ together which we will also post within the system. If you have any other questions, please feel free to ask:&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Tokenization Guidance: PCI Supplement Highlights</title><link>/blog/tokenization-guidance-pci-supplement-highlights/</link><pubDate>Wed, 12 Oct 2011 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/tokenization-guidance-pci-supplement-highlights/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;The &lt;a href="https://www.pcisecuritystandards.org/documents/Tokenization_Guidelines_Info_Supplement.pdf"&gt;PCI DSS Tokenization Guidelines Information Supplement&lt;/a&gt; – which I will refer to as “the supplement” for the remainder of this series – is intended to address how tokenization &lt;em&gt;may&lt;/em&gt; impact Payment Card Industry (PCI) Data Security Standard (DSS) scope. The supplement is divided into three sections: a discussion of the essential elements of a tokenization system, PCI DSS scoping considerations, and new risk factors to consider when using tokens as a surrogate for credit card numbers. It’s aimed at merchants who process credit card payment data and fall under PCI security requirements. At this stage, if you have not downloaded a copy, I recommend &lt;a href="https://www.pcisecuritystandards.org/documents/Tokenization_Guidelines_Info_Supplement.pdf"&gt;you do so now&lt;/a&gt;. It will provide a handy reference for the rest of this post.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Firestarter: On “Architectural Limbo”</title><link>/blog/firestarter-on-architectural-limbo/</link><pubDate>Tue, 11 Oct 2011 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/firestarter-on-architectural-limbo/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Yesterday Lori MacVittie posted another thoughtful article, &lt;a href="http://devcentral.f5.com/weblogs/macvittie/archive/2011/10/05/cloud-computing-architectural-limbo.aspx"&gt;Cloud Computing: Architectural Limbo&lt;/a&gt;, where she highlights percived problems with the NIST description. I usually agree with her cloud posts, but this is a rare case where I think she is wrong.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Good versus bad FAIL</title><link>/blog/good-fail-and-bad-fail/</link><pubDate>Tue, 11 Oct 2011 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/good-fail-and-bad-fail/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;On reflection I talk about failure a lot. As I look back at my own career experience, FAIL has commonly appeared at inopportune times. Though it’s hard to say you can pinpoint a good time to fail. It’s part of both the business and human experience, so to me failure can be positive and productive, and position you for future success. But not always, and a lot depends on the form it takes.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Isolated Computing</title><link>/blog/isolated-computing/</link><pubDate>Tue, 11 Oct 2011 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/isolated-computing/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;IBM, with researchers at North Carolina State University, has &lt;a href="http://www.tomshardware.com/news/cloud-computing-hypervisor-security,13641.html"&gt;annnounced&lt;/a&gt; an &lt;em&gt;effective&lt;/em&gt; way to protect information and processes in multi-tenant environments – such as cloud and virtual deployments. In what they are calling the &lt;a href="http://www.smartertechnology.com/c/a/Cloud-Computing/Cloud-Security-Guaranteed-by-SICE/"&gt;Strongly Isolated Computing Environment&lt;/a&gt;, installed below the hypervisor. The teaser is that the code is a mere 300 lines – a very small footprint means simplicity, which in turn implies both performance and security.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>New Series: Tokenization Guidance</title><link>/blog/new-series-tokenization-guidance/</link><pubDate>Mon, 10 Oct 2011 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/new-series-tokenization-guidance/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Tokenization Guidance. I have wanted to write this post since the middle of August. Every time I started writing another phone phone call came in from a merchant, payment processor, technology vendor, or someone loosely associated with a Payment Card Industry (PCI) task force or steering committee (SIG). And every conversation yielded some new sliver of information that changed what I wanted to say, or implied some research work had &lt;em&gt;already&lt;/em&gt; been conducted that was far more interesting and useful than &lt;em&gt;anything&lt;/em&gt; being provided to the public. This in turned prompted more calls, new conversations, more digging and – like a good mystery novel – prompted me to iteratively peel back another layer of the onion. I’ve finally reached a point where I believe I have enough of the story to understand what was published and why it’s &lt;em&gt;not&lt;/em&gt; what they should have published.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Paper Released: Fact-Based Network Security: Metrics and the Pursuit of Prioritization</title><link>/blog/paper-released-fact-based-network-security-metrics-and-the-pursuit-of-prior/</link><pubDate>Fri, 07 Oct 2011 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/paper-released-fact-based-network-security-metrics-and-the-pursuit-of-prior/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;What should you do right now?&lt;/em&gt; That’s one of the toughest questions for any security professional to answer. The list is endless, the priorities clear as mud, the risk of compromise ever present. But doing nothing is never the answer. We have been working with practitioners to answer that question for years, and we finally got around to documenting some of our approaches and concepts.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Friday Summary: Goodbye to the Crazy One</title><link>/blog/friday-summary-goodbye-to-the-crazy-one/</link><pubDate>Thu, 06 Oct 2011 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/friday-summary-goodbye-to-the-crazy-one/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Yesterday afternoon I decided to head out for my first run since my August health scare (which turned out to be pretty much nothing). I grabbed my iPhone, and as I was putting it into my armband case a news alert popped up.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Incite 10/5/2011: Time waits for no one</title><link>/blog/incite-10-5-2011-time-waits-for-no-one/</link><pubDate>Wed, 05 Oct 2011 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/incite-10-5-2011-time-waits-for-no-one/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Time is a funny thing. You don’t really think about it until it’s running out. Deadlines. Mortality. It’s all the same. Time just sneaks up on you, and then it’s gone. Yeah, I’m a little nostalgic this week because my birthday is Friday. And yes, there is some fodder for you social engineers out there. The kids get more excited about my birthday than I do. They want to know about cakes, parties, and the like. Personally, I’d take a day to sleep in, but who has time for that? There are things to do and places to be.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>The iPad-Enterprise-Data Security Spectrum</title><link>/blog/the-ipad-enterprise-data-security-spectrum/</link><pubDate>Wed, 05 Oct 2011 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/the-ipad-enterprise-data-security-spectrum/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;As I mentioned in the Incite yesterday, &lt;a href="http://www.marketwire.com/press-release/symantec-protect-confidential-information-from-leaving-ipadr-with-new-data-loss-prevention-nasdaq-symc-1568485.htm"&gt;Symantec announced DLP support for the iPad&lt;/a&gt;. I have been meaning to talk about this for a while, as various products have been popping onto the market, and now seems like the time.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>When to Use Amazon S3 Server Side Encryption</title><link>/blog/when-to-use-amazon-s3-server-side-encryption/</link><pubDate>Wed, 05 Oct 2011 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/when-to-use-amazon-s3-server-side-encryption/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;This week Amazon &lt;a href="http://searchcloudsecurity.techtarget.com/news/1280099955/Amazon-rolls-out-server-side-S3-encryption-service"&gt;announced that S3 now supports server side encryption&lt;/a&gt;. You can encrypt S3 items through either the API or web management console, or you can require encryption for S3 buckets. A few details:&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Nitro &amp; Q1: SIEM/Log Management vendors dropping right and left</title><link>/blog/nitro-q1-siem-log-management-vendors-dropping-right-and-left/</link><pubDate>Tue, 04 Oct 2011 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/nitro-q1-siem-log-management-vendors-dropping-right-and-left/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;It must be SIEM acquisition Tuesday. &lt;a href="http://www.nitrosecurity.com/company/press-releases/mcafee-inc-to-acquire-nitrosecurity-advances-security-risk-management/"&gt;McAfee hit first by announcing their expected deal with Nitro Security&lt;/a&gt;. But then &lt;a href="http://www-03.ibm.com/press/us/en/pressrelease/35544.wss"&gt;IBM surprised pretty much everyone by acquiring Q1 Labs&lt;/a&gt;. Don’t blink or you may miss another 2-3 SIEM/Log Management vendor acquisitions. Obviously we have been talking about consolidation in the SIEM/Log Management space for quite a while – there are about 20 vendors left now – but it’s strange that deals involving the two most significant independent vendors happened on the same day. Coincidence? Our pal and contributor James Arlen &lt;a href="http://twitter.com/#!/myrcurial/statuses/121207274810249216"&gt;doesn’t believe in it&lt;/a&gt;, and neither do we…&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Introducing the Securosis Nexus</title><link>/blog/introducing-the-securosis-nexus/</link><pubDate>Mon, 03 Oct 2011 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/introducing-the-securosis-nexus/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Rich, Adrian, and I have been hinting about our &lt;em&gt;sekret&lt;/em&gt; plans to launch a new research ‘product’ for a while. Today we are finally ready to let you guys in on our the scoop. We are very excited about this next step in the evolution of Securosis.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Force Attacker Perfection</title><link>/blog/force-attacker-perfection/</link><pubDate>Thu, 29 Sep 2011 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/force-attacker-perfection/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I will fully admit that I sometimes finding myself parroting standard industry tropes. For example, I can’t recall how many times I’ve said in presentations and interviews:&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Incite 9/28/2011: Renewal</title><link>/blog/incite-9-28-2011-renewal/</link><pubDate>Wed, 28 Sep 2011 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/incite-9-28-2011-renewal/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Tonight at sundown the holiday of Rosh Hashanah starts, and Jewish folks all over the world will celebrate the coming of the year 5772. Or so the story goes. But I know better than to discuss politics or religion on the blog. You believe what you believe and I believe what I believe, and it’s all good. But the coming of a new year is a time for reflection and renewal. At least for me.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Comment on the Next Version of the Cloud Security Alliance Guidance</title><link>/blog/comment-on-the-next-version-of-the-cloud-security-alliance-guidance/</link><pubDate>Tue, 27 Sep 2011 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/comment-on-the-next-version-of-the-cloud-security-alliance-guidance/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Two years ago I edited the Cloud Security Alliance’s Guidance (v2.1) with a couple other folks, and it nearly ended me. Pulling together a consensus with such a diverse group of global contributors, each running with very few constraints, lead to… certain quality issues.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Need a CISO cert? Got $200? Get one while they’re hot…</title><link>/blog/need-a-ciso-cert-got-200-get-one-while-theyre-hot/</link><pubDate>Mon, 26 Sep 2011 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/need-a-ciso-cert-got-200-get-one-while-theyre-hot/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Evidently it’s time to rethink our business model at Securosis. All you need to do is role out a certification program and wait for money to roll in. Actually prove skills? Bah, humbug. Actually require some sort of test? Screw that. Basically all you need is a CISO job and $200, and I have a certification for you.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Friday Summary: September 23, 2011</title><link>/blog/friday-summary-september-23-2011/</link><pubDate>Fri, 23 Sep 2011 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/friday-summary-september-23-2011/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;At 20 years old, you are on a precipice of perception: you are an adult but many adults view you as a kid. In the back of your mind you worry a bit about how adults will perceive you. It was with trepidation that I met my best friend’s Mom in college. My friend George – someone I had only known a couple months, but felt like we had known each other for years – invited me to dinner. I was surprised when his truck stopped in front of my house and he was not in it – instead his mother was. The truck screeched to a halt and out popped the highest energy person I have ever met; with a hearty “Hi there,” she was literally effervescent with energy. I was reserved, wondering how the famous ‘Doctor’ would treat me – as a child or as an adult. She waved again, told me to get my ass out of the street and in the truck. I obliged, somewhat taken aback, and hopped in the passenger seat. She rolled up to the red light, looked both ways, and &lt;em&gt;floored it&lt;/em&gt;! We screeched through the intersection, oncoming traffic be damned; up the street, fraternity boys racing for the sidewalks, we headed for home.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Home Invasion: What would you do?</title><link>/blog/home-invasion-what-would-you-do/</link><pubDate>Wed, 21 Sep 2011 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/home-invasion-what-would-you-do/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;This is a bit off topic, but indulge me. We had a little &lt;em&gt;situation&lt;/em&gt; in our neighborhood last week, involving a &lt;a href="http://www.ajc.com/news/north-fulton/alpharetta-police-investigating-violent-1184090.html"&gt;home invasion&lt;/a&gt;. A couple masked (evidently armed) guys tied up a family and ransacked their house. The father was in the garage when the intruders made their entrance. The mother and a teenage child were also in the house. This happened in my sleepy suburban neighborhood, so it can happen anywhere.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Incite 9/21/2011: Where’s Waldo?</title><link>/blog/incite-9-21-2011-wheres-waldo-2/</link><pubDate>Wed, 21 Sep 2011 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/incite-9-21-2011-wheres-waldo-2/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;It was a bit of a shock to us over two years ago, when we learned the Boy has a lazy eye. We found out when he got evaluated prior to entering kindergarten, and they said he needed to get his eyes examined. The Boss and I have very good vision, especially when we were growing up, so it was unexpected. Ultimately it’s not a big deal. He needs to wear glasses and we have to patch his good eye for a few hours every day to force his weaker eye to get stronger.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Security Management 2.0: Migration</title><link>/blog/security-management-2-0-migration/</link><pubDate>Mon, 19 Sep 2011 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/security-management-2-0-migration/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;As we wrap up our Security Management 2.0 series, we have completed quite a journey. You have undertaken a disciplined and objective process to determine if it’s worth moving to a new security management platform. Assuming that your decision is to move, now it gets real. You need to implement and migrate your existing environment to the new thing, while maintaining service levels and without opening your organization to any additional risk. Walk in the park, right? Let’s address these migration issues, so hopefully you can learn from some of my pain.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Friday Summary: September 16, 2011</title><link>/blog/friday-summary-september-16-2011/</link><pubDate>Fri, 16 Sep 2011 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/friday-summary-september-16-2011/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;It was the idea of a party that got me thinking about it: I loved the 1990’s. It was a great decade – for me at least. I had just graduated college and pretty much everything was new. During that decade I met my wife, got married, got my first place on my own, bought my first house, got my first promotion to CTO, was finally able to buy a car that cost more than a week’s salary, made good money, was best man at four friends’ weddings, started my first company, finally got to travel the US, and made many lasting friendships. The silicon valley was a great place to work back then – it seemed like every week there was some amazing new technology to work on, or an exciting new trend.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Security Management 2.0: Negotiation</title><link>/blog/security-management-2-0-negotiation/</link><pubDate>Thu, 15 Sep 2011 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/security-management-2-0-negotiation/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;You have made your &lt;a href="http://www.securosis.com/blog/security-management-2.0-making-the-decision"&gt;decision&lt;/a&gt; and recommended it up the food chain, so now the fun part begins. Well, fun for some folks, anyway. For this post we’ll assume you have decided to move to a new platform. We understand some people decide not to move, but use the question of switching as a negotiating tactic. But it bears repeating that it is no bad thing to stay with your existing platform, so long as you have done the work to determine it can meet your requirements. We’re writing this paper for the people who keep telling us how unhappy they are, and how their evolving requirements have not been met. So after asking all the right questions, if the best answer is to stay put, that’s a less disruptive path anyway.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Building an SSL Early Warning System</title><link>/blog/building-an-ssl-early-warning-system/</link><pubDate>Wed, 14 Sep 2011 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/building-an-ssl-early-warning-system/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Most security professionals have long understood at least some of the risks of the current ‘web’ or ‘chain’ of trust model for SSL security. To quickly recap for those of you who aren’t hip-deep in this day to day:&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Fact-Based Network Security: In Action</title><link>/blog/fact-based-network-security-in-action/</link><pubDate>Wed, 14 Sep 2011 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/fact-based-network-security-in-action/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;As we wrap up our series on Fact-Based Network Security, let’s run through a simple scenario to illustrate the concepts. Remember, the idea is to figure out &lt;strong&gt;what&lt;/strong&gt; on the list will provide the biggest impact for your organization, and then do it. We make trade-offs every day. Some things get done, others don’t. That’s the reality for everyone, so don’t feel bad that you can’t get everything done. Ever. But the difference between a successful security practitioner, and someone looking for a job, is that success is about consistently choosing the right things to get done.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Incite 9/14/2011: Mike and the Terrible, Horrible, No Good, Very Bad Day</title><link>/blog/incite-9-14-2011-mike-and-the-terrible-horrible-no-good-very-bad-day/</link><pubDate>Wed, 14 Sep 2011 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/incite-9-14-2011-mike-and-the-terrible-horrible-no-good-very-bad-day/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I have been looking forward to this day… well, since the Falcons’ season was abruptly cut short by a rampaging Pack last January. We had a little teaser with that great game Thursday, and although both teams couldn’t lose, having the Saints drop a tough one was pretty okay. I weathered a tumultuous lockout during the offseason. Even a bumpy pre-season for both my teams (NY Giants and ATL Falcons) couldn’t deter my optimism. Pro football started Sunday and I was fired up.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Payment Trends and Security Ramifications</title><link>/blog/payment-trends-and-security-ramifications/</link><pubDate>Wed, 14 Sep 2011 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/payment-trends-and-security-ramifications/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I write a lot about payment security. Mostly brief snippets embedded in our weekly Incite, but it’s a topic I follow very closely and remain deeply interested in. Early in my career, I developed electronic wallet and payment gateway software for Internet commerce sites, and application embedded payment options. In have been closely following the technical evolution of this market for over 15 years – back in the days of CyberCash, Paymatech, and JECF. But unlike many of the articles I write, payment security affects more than just IT users – it impacts pretty much everyone. And now is a very good time to start paying attention to the payment space because we are witnessing more changes, coming faster than ever.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Recently on the Heavy Feed</title><link>/blog/recently-on-the-heavy-feed/</link><pubDate>Tue, 13 Sep 2011 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/recently-on-the-heavy-feed/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Since we post most of the content for our blog series on the Heavy Feed (get it via &lt;a href="http://www.securosis.com/blog/full"&gt;the web&lt;/a&gt; or &lt;a href="/blog/"&gt;RSS&lt;/a&gt;), every so often we like to post links to our latest missives on the main feed. Within the next 10 days we’ll be wrapping both our Fact-based Network Security and Security Management 2.0 series. As always, we love feedback, discussion, dissension and the occasional troll to add comments, so fire away. We look forward to your participation.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Security Management 2.0: Making the Decision</title><link>/blog/security-management-2-0-making-the-decision/</link><pubDate>Tue, 13 Sep 2011 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/security-management-2-0-making-the-decision/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;It’s time – you are ready. You have done the work, including &lt;a href="http://www.securosis.com/blog/security-management-2.0-revisiting-requirements"&gt;revisiting your requirements&lt;/a&gt;, evaluating your current platform in terms of your &lt;a href="http://www.securosis.com/blog/security-management-2.0-platform-evaluation-part-1"&gt;current&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href="http://www.securosis.com/blog/security-management-2.0-platform-evaluation-part-2"&gt;emerging&lt;/a&gt; requirements, assessing new vendors/platforms to &lt;a href="http://www.securosis.com/blog/security-management-2.0-vendor-evaluation-culling-down-the-short-list"&gt;develop a short list&lt;/a&gt; and run &lt;a href="http://www.securosis.com/blog/security-management-2.0-vendor-evaluation-driving-the-poc"&gt;a comprehensive proof of concept&lt;/a&gt;. Now it’s time to make the call. We know this is an important decision – we are here because your first attempt at this project wasn’t as successful as it needed to be. So let’s break down the decision to ensure you can make a good recommendation and feel comfortable with it.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Friday Summary: September 9, 2011</title><link>/blog/friday-summary-september-9-2011/</link><pubDate>Thu, 08 Sep 2011 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/friday-summary-september-9-2011/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I suppose that, all things considered, I’m a pretty nice guy. I tip well, stop my car so people can cross the street, and &lt;em&gt;always&lt;/em&gt; put my laptop bag under the seat in front of me, instead of taking up valuable overhead luggage space.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Security Management 2.0: Vendor Evaluation - Driving the PoC</title><link>/blog/security-management-2-0-vendor-evaluation-driving-the-poc-2/</link><pubDate>Thu, 08 Sep 2011 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/security-management-2-0-vendor-evaluation-driving-the-poc-2/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;As we discussed in the &lt;a href="http://www.securosis.com/blog/security-management-2.0-vendor-evaluation-culling-down-the-short-list"&gt;last post&lt;/a&gt;, when considering new security management platforms, it’s critical to cull your short list based on your &lt;a href="http://www.securosis.com/blog/security-management-2.0-revisiting-requirements"&gt;requirements&lt;/a&gt;, and to then move into the next step of the evaluation process – the Proof of Concept (PoC). Our PoC process is somewhat controversial – mostly because vendors hate it. Why? Because it’s about &lt;strong&gt;you&lt;/strong&gt; and your needs, not them and their product. But you are the buyer, right? Always remember that.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Incite 9/7/2011: Decisions, Decisions</title><link>/blog/incite-9-7-2011-decisions-decisions/</link><pubDate>Wed, 07 Sep 2011 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/incite-9-7-2011-decisions-decisions/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Making decisions is very hard for most people. Not for me. The Boss and I constantly discuss a single issue over and over again as she debates all aspects of a big decision. I try to be patient, but patience is, uh, not my forte. I know it’s her process and to rush that usually lands me a spot in the doghouse, but it’s still hard to understand. Decisions are easy for me. I do the work, look at the upside and downside, and make the call. Next.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Speaking at OWASP: September 22 and 23</title><link>/blog/speaking-at-owasp-september-22-and-23/</link><pubDate>Wed, 07 Sep 2011 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/speaking-at-owasp-september-22-and-23/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Gunnar Peterson and I will be presenting at OWASP September 20-23rd. OWASP AppSec USA will be at the Minneapolis Convention center in – you guessed it – Minneapolis, Minnesota. This year’s theme is “Your life is in the cloud”, so there are plenty of talks on mobile app security and how to weave security into your cloud environment. Gunnar is presenting on &lt;a href="http://www.appsecusa.org/talks.html#mobilewebservices"&gt;Mobile Web Services&lt;/a&gt;, discussing mobile application vulnerabilities in the web services layer. I’ll be presenting &lt;a href="http://www.appsecusa.org/talks.html#cloudsec"&gt;CloudSec 12-Step&lt;/a&gt;, a look at foundational security precautions developers need to consider when building and deploying cloud applications.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Data Security Lifecycle 2.0</title><link>/blog/data-security-lifecycle-2-0/</link><pubDate>Tue, 06 Sep 2011 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/data-security-lifecycle-2-0/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;We reference this content a lot, so I decided to compile it all into a single post. This is the original content, including internal links, and has not been re-edited.&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Security Management 2.0: Vendor Evaluation—Culling the Short List</title><link>/blog/security-management-2-0-vendor-evaluation-culling-the-short-list/</link><pubDate>Tue, 06 Sep 2011 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/security-management-2-0-vendor-evaluation-culling-the-short-list/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;So far we have discussed a bit of how &lt;a href="http://www.securosis.com/blog/security-management-2.0-platform-evolution"&gt;security management platforms have evolved&lt;/a&gt;, how &lt;a href="http://www.securosis.com/blog/security-management-2.0-revisiting-requirements"&gt;your requirements have changed&lt;/a&gt; since you first deployed the platform, and how you need to evaluate your current platform (&lt;a href="http://www.securosis.com/blog/security-management-2.0-platform-evaluation-part-1"&gt;Part 1&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://www.securosis.com/blog/security-management-2.0-platform-evaluation-part-2"&gt;Part 2&lt;/a&gt;) in light of both. Now it’s time to get into the meat of the decision process by defining your selection criteria for your Security Management 2.0 platform.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>The New Path of Least Resistance</title><link>/blog/the-new-path-of-least-resistance/</link><pubDate>Tue, 06 Sep 2011 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/the-new-path-of-least-resistance/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;It’s hard to believe it has been 10 years since the 9/11 terrorist attacks on the US. I remember that day like it was yesterday. I actually flew into the Boston airport that morning. In hindsight, those attacks opened our eyes to a previously overlooked attack vector – using a passenger jet as a missile. The folks running national security for the US had all sorts of scenarios for how we could be attacked on our own soil, but I’m not sure that vector was on their lists.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Friday Summary: September 2, 2011</title><link>/blog/i-was-reading-martin-mckeays-post-fighting-a-bad-habit-martin-makes-a-dozen-or-so-points-in-the-post-and-shares-some-career-angst-but-there-is-a-key-theme-that-really-res/</link><pubDate>Fri, 02 Sep 2011 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/i-was-reading-martin-mckeays-post-fighting-a-bad-habit-martin-makes-a-dozen-or-so-points-in-the-post-and-shares-some-career-angst-but-there-is-a-key-theme-that-really-res/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I was reading Martin McKeay’s post &lt;a href="http://www.mckeay.net/2011/08/27/fighting-a-bad-habit/"&gt;Fighting a Bad Habit&lt;/a&gt;. Martin makes a dozen or so points in the post – and shares some career angst – but there is a key theme that really resonates with me. Most technology lifers I know have their own sense of self worth tied up in what they are able to contribute professionally. Without the feeling of building, contributing, or making things better, the job is not satisfying.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Making Bets</title><link>/blog/making-bets/</link><pubDate>Fri, 02 Sep 2011 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/making-bets/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Being knee deep in a bunch of research projects doesn’t give me enough time to comment on the variety of interesting posts I see each week. Of course we try to highlight them both in the Incite (with some commentary) and in the Friday Summary. But some posts deserve a better, more detailed treatment. We haven’t done an analysis, but I’d guess we find a pretty high percentage of what Richard Bejtlich writes interesting. Here’s a little hint: it’s because he’s a big brained dude.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Security Management 2.0: Platform Evaluation, Part 2</title><link>/blog/security-management-2-0-platform-evaluation-part-2/</link><pubDate>Thu, 01 Sep 2011 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/security-management-2-0-platform-evaluation-part-2/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;In the second half of Platform Evaluation for Security Management 2.0, we’ll cover evaluating other SIEM solutions. At this point in the process you have documented your requirements, and &lt;em&gt;rationally&lt;/em&gt; evaluated your current SIEM platform to determine what’s working and what’s not. This step is critical because a thorough understanding of your existing platform’s strengths and weaknesses is the yardstick against which all other options will be measured. As you evaluate new platforms, you can objectively figure out if it’s time to move on and select another platform. Again, at this point no decision has been made. You are doing your homework – no more, no less.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Fact-Based Network Security: Compliance Benefits</title><link>/blog/fact-based-network-security-compliance-benefits/</link><pubDate>Wed, 31 Aug 2011 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/fact-based-network-security-compliance-benefits/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;As we discussed in the last post, beyond the operational value of fact-based network security, compliance efforts can benefit greatly from gathering data, and being able to visualize and report on it. Why? Because compliance is all about substantiating your control set to meet the spirit of whatever regulatory hierarchy you need to achieve.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Incite 8/31/2011: The Glamorous Life</title><link>/blog/incite-8-31-2011-the-glamorous-life/</link><pubDate>Wed, 31 Aug 2011 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/incite-8-31-2011-the-glamorous-life/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;It was a Sunday like too many other Sundays. Get up, take the kids to Sunday school, grab lunch with friends, then take the kids to the pool. Head home, shower up, and then kiss the Boss and kids goodbye and head off to the airport. Again. Another week, another business trip. It’s a glamorous life.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Security Management 2.0: Platform Evaluation, Part 1</title><link>/blog/security-management-2-0-platform-evaluation-part-1/</link><pubDate>Wed, 31 Aug 2011 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/security-management-2-0-platform-evaluation-part-1/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;To understand the importance of picking a &lt;em&gt;platform,&lt;/em&gt; as opposed to a product, when discussing Security Management 2.0, let’s draw a quick contrast between what we see when talking to customers of either Log Management or SIEM. Most of the Log Management customers we speak with are relatively happy with their products. They chose a log-centric offering based on limited use cases – typically compliance-driven and requiring only basic log collection and reporting. These products keep day-to-day management overhead low, and if they support the occasional forensic audit customers are generally happy. Log Management is an important – albeit basic – business tool. Think of it like buying a can opener – it needs to perform a basic function and should always perform as expected. Customers don’t want their can opener to sharpen knives, tell time, or let the cat out – they just want to open cans. It’s not that hard. Log Management benefits from its functional simplicity – and even more from relatively modest expectations.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Detecting and Preventing Data Migrations to the Cloud</title><link>/blog/detecting-and-preventing-data-migrations-to-the-cloud/</link><pubDate>Tue, 30 Aug 2011 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/detecting-and-preventing-data-migrations-to-the-cloud/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;One of the most common modern problems facing organizations is managing data migrating to the cloud. The very self-service nature that makes cloud computing so appealing also makes unapproved data transfers and leakage possible. Any employee with a credit card can subscribe to a cloud service and launch instances, deliver or consume applications, and store data on the public Internet. Many organizations report that individuals or business units have moved (often sensitive) data to cloud services without approval from, or even notification to, IT or security.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Fact-Based Network Security: Operationalizing the Facts</title><link>/blog/fact-based-network-security-operationalizing-the-facts/</link><pubDate>Tue, 30 Aug 2011 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/fact-based-network-security-operationalizing-the-facts/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;In the &lt;a href="http://www.securosis.com/blog/fact-based-network-security-outcomes-and-operational-data"&gt;last post&lt;/a&gt;, we talked about outcomes important to the business, and what types of security metrics can help make decisions to achieve those outcomes. Most organizations do pretty well with the initial gathering of this data. You know, when the reports are new and the pie charts are shiny. Then the reality – of the amount of work and commitment required to implement a consistent measurement and metrics process – sets in. Which is when most organizations lose interest and the metrics program falls by the wayside.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>The Mobile App Sec Triathlon</title><link>/blog/the-mobile-app-sec-triathlon/</link><pubDate>Tue, 30 Aug 2011 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/the-mobile-app-sec-triathlon/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;A quick announcement for those of you interested in Mobile Application Security: Our very own Gunnar Peterson is putting on a 3 day class with Ken van Wyk this coming November. The &lt;a href="http://www.mobileappsectriathlon.com/Mobile_App_Sec_Triathlon/Course_Details.html"&gt;Mobile App Sec Triathlon&lt;/a&gt; will provide a cross-platform look at mobile application security issues, and spotlight critical areas of concern. The last two legs of the Triathlon cover specific areas of Android and iOS security that are commonly targeted by attackers. You’ll be learning from some of the best – Ken is well known for his work in secure coding, and Gunnar is one of the world’s best at Identity Management. Classes will be held at the eBay/PayPal campus in San Jose, California. Much more information is on the web site, including a picture of Gunnar with his ‘serious security’ face, so check it out. If you have specific questions or want to make sure specific topics are covered during the presentation, go ahead and email &lt;a href="mailto:info@mobileappsectriathlon.com"&gt;info@mobileappsectriathlon.com&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Friday Summary (Not Too Morbid Edition): August 26, 2011</title><link>/blog/friday-summary-not-too-morbid-edition-august-26-2011/</link><pubDate>Thu, 25 Aug 2011 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/friday-summary-not-too-morbid-edition-august-26-2011/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Last Thursday I thought I was dying.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Not a joke. Not an exaggeration. As in “approaching room temperature”.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I was just outside D.C. having breakfast with Mike before going to teach the CCSK instructors class. In the middle of a sentence I felt… something. Starting from my chest I felt a rush to my head. An incredibly intense feeling on the edge of losing consciousness. Literally out of nowhere, while sitting. I paused, told Mike I felt dizzy, and then the second wave hit. I said, “I think I’m going down”, told him to call 9-1-1, and had what we in the medical profession call “a feeling of impending doom”.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Security Management 2.0: Revisiting Requirements</title><link>/blog/security-management-2-0-revisiting-requirements/</link><pubDate>Thu, 25 Aug 2011 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/security-management-2-0-revisiting-requirements/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Given the &lt;a href="http://www.securosis.com/blog/security-management-2.0-platform-evolution"&gt;evolution of both the technology&lt;/a&gt; and the attacks, it’s time to revisit your specific requirements and use cases – both current and evolving. You also need to be brutally honest about what your existing product or service does and does not do, as well as your team’s ability to support and maintain it. This is essential – you need a fresh look at the environment to understand what you &lt;strong&gt;need&lt;/strong&gt; today and tomorrow, and what kind of resources and expertise you can bring to bear, unconstrained by what you need and do &lt;strong&gt;today&lt;/strong&gt;. Many of you have laundry lists of things you would like to be able to do with current systems, but can’t. Those are a good place to start, but you also need to consider the trends for your industry and look at what’s coming down the road in terms of security and business challenges that will emerge over the next couple years. Capturing the current and foreseeable needs is what our Security Management 2.0 process is all about.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Fact-based Network Security: Outcomes and Operational Data</title><link>/blog/fact-based-network-security-outcomes-and-operational-data/</link><pubDate>Wed, 24 Aug 2011 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/fact-based-network-security-outcomes-and-operational-data/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;In our first post on Fact-based Network Security, we talked about the need to &lt;a href="https://securosis.com/blog/new-blog-series-fact-based-network-security-metrics-and-the-pursuit-of-prio"&gt;make decisions based on data&lt;/a&gt;, as opposed to instinct. Then we went in search of &lt;a href="https://securosis.com/blog/fact-based-network-security-defining-risk"&gt;the context to know what’s important&lt;/a&gt;, because in order to prioritize effectively you need to know what presents the most value to your organization. Now let’s dig a little deeper into the next step, which is determining the operational metrics on which to base decisions.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Incite 8/24/2011: Living Binary</title><link>/blog/incite-8-24-2011-living-binary/</link><pubDate>Wed, 24 Aug 2011 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/incite-8-24-2011-living-binary/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;The Boss constantly reminds me I have no middle ground. On/Off. Black/White. No dimmer. No gray (besides on my head). Moderation is non-existent, which is why I never tried hard drugs. I knew myself well enough (even at a young age) to know it wouldn’t end well. Sure I’d be the best presenter in the crack den, but that would have impeded my plans for world domination.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Spotting That DAM(n) Fake</title><link>/blog/spotting-that-damn-fake/</link><pubDate>Wed, 24 Aug 2011 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/spotting-that-damn-fake/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I awoke at 2:30am to a 90-degree bedroom. Getting up to discover why the air conditioning was not working, I found a dog pooped on my couch. Neatly in the corner – perhaps hoping I would not notice. Depositing the aforementioned ‘present’ in the garbage can, I almost stepped on both a bark scorpion and a millipede – eyeing one another suspiciously – just outside the garage door. After a while, air conditioning on and couch thoroughly scrubbed, I returned to bed only to find my wife had laid claim to all the covers and pillows. Since I was up, what the heck – I made coffee, ran the laundry, and baked muffins while the sun came up. I must admit I started work today with a jaundiced eye, and a strong desire to share some of my annoyance publicly.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Beware Anti-Malware Snake Oil</title><link>/blog/beware-anti-malware-snake-oil/</link><pubDate>Tue, 23 Aug 2011 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/beware-anti-malware-snake-oil/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;It’s hard to believe, but over the past 24 hours I’ve had 3 separate briefings with companies &lt;em&gt;innovating&lt;/em&gt; in the area of anti-malware. Just ask them. Each started the discussion with the self-evident point that the existing malware detection model is broken. Then they each proceeded to describe (at a high level) how what they are doing isn’t anti-virus &lt;em&gt;per se,&lt;/em&gt; but something different. Something that detects the new malware we are seeing. They didn’t want to replace the anti-malware engine. They just think they address the areas where traditional anti-malware sucks. Yeah, that’s a big job.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Cloud Security Q&amp;A from the Field: Questions and Answers from the DC CCSK Class</title><link>/blog/cloud-security-qa-from-the-field-questions-and-answers-from-the-dc-ccsk-class/</link><pubDate>Mon, 22 Aug 2011 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/cloud-security-qa-from-the-field-questions-and-answers-from-the-dc-ccsk-class/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;One of the great things about running around teaching classes is all the feedback and questions we get from people actively working on all sorts of different initiatives. With the CCSK (cloud security) class, we find that a ton of people are grappling with these issues in active projects and different things in various stages of deep planning.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Security Management 2.0: Platform Evolution</title><link>/blog/security-management-2-0-platform-evolution/</link><pubDate>Mon, 22 Aug 2011 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/security-management-2-0-platform-evolution/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Our motivation for launching the &lt;a href="http://www.securosis.com/blog/security-management-2.0-siem-replacement"&gt;Security Management 2.0 research project&lt;/a&gt; lies in the general dissatisfaction with SIEM implementations – which in some cases have not delivered the expected value. The issues typically result from failure to scale, poor ease of use, excessive effort for care and feeding, or just customer execution failure. Granted some of the discontent is clearly navel-gazing – parsing and analyzing log files as part of your daily job is boring, mundane, and error-prone work you’d rather not do. But dissatisfaction with SIEM is largely legitimate and has gotten worse, as system load has grown and systems have been subjected to additional security requirements, driven by new and creative attack vectors. This all spotlights the fragility and poor architectural choices of some SIEM and Log Management platforms, especially early movers. Given that companies &lt;em&gt;need&lt;/em&gt; to collect more – not less – data, review and management just get harder. Exponentially harder.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Friday Summary: August 19, 2011</title><link>/blog/friday-summary-august-19-2011/</link><pubDate>Fri, 19 Aug 2011 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/friday-summary-august-19-2011/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Here’s to the neighbors.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I live in a rural area with a pretty low population density and 1.5 acre lot minimum. My closest neighbor is 60 feet away – most are over 300 feet or more. The area is really quiet. Usually all you can hear are birds. You can see the Milky Way at night. On any given day I may see javelina, coyotes, horny toads, road runners, vultures, hawks, barn owls, cottontails, jackrabbits, ground squirrels, mice, scorpions, one of a half-dozen varieties of snake, and a dozen varieties of birds. If you like nature, it’s a neat place to live.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Security Management 2.0: Time to Replace Your SIEM? (new series)</title><link>/blog/security-management-2-0-time-to-replace-your-siem-new-series/</link><pubDate>Thu, 18 Aug 2011 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/security-management-2-0-time-to-replace-your-siem-new-series/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Mike and I are launching our next blog series today, one we know is pretty timely from the conversations with have with organizations almost every day. The reality is that many organizations have spent millions and years trying to get productivity out of their SIEM – with mediocre results. Combined with a number of the large players being acquired by mega IT companies and taking their eyes off the ball a bit, most customers need to start asking themselves some key questions.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Incite 8/17/2011: Back to School</title><link>/blog/incite-8-17-2011-back-to-school/</link><pubDate>Wed, 17 Aug 2011 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/incite-8-17-2011-back-to-school/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;What would you do if you could go back to school? Seriously. If you could turn back the clock and go back to grade school or even high school? No real responsibility. No one depending on you for food and/or shelter. Gosh, I’d do so many things differently. I’d buy a few shares of Microsoft when they went public (and I’d also send a note to my 1999 self to sell it). Ah, the magic of hindsight.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>New White Paper: Tokenization vs. Encryption</title><link>/blog/new-white-paper-tokenization-vs-encryption/</link><pubDate>Wed, 17 Aug 2011 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/new-white-paper-tokenization-vs-encryption/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I am proud to announce the availability of our newest white paper, Tokenization vs. Encryption: Options for Compliance. The paper was written to close some gaps in our existing tokenization research coverage. I believe it is particularly important for two reasons. First, I was unable to find a critical examination of tokenization’s suitability for compliance. There are many possible applications of tokenization, but some of the claimed uses are not practical. Second, I wanted to dispel the myth that tokenization is a replacement technology for encryption, when in fact it’s a complimentary solution that – in &lt;em&gt;some&lt;/em&gt; cases – makes regulatory compliance easier.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Hammers and Homomorphic Encryption</title><link>/blog/hammers-and-homomorphic-encryption/</link><pubDate>Tue, 16 Aug 2011 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/hammers-and-homomorphic-encryption/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Researchers at Microsoft are presenting a prototype of &lt;a href="http://www.technologyreview.com/computing/38239/"&gt;encrypted data which can be used without decrypting&lt;/a&gt;. Called &lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Homomorphic_encryption"&gt;homomorphic&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://www.technologyreview.com/computing/37197/"&gt;encryption&lt;/a&gt;, the idea is to keep data in a protected state (encrypted) yet still useful. It may sound like Star Trek &lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Technobabble"&gt;technobabble&lt;/a&gt;, but this is a real working prototype. The set of operations you can perform on encrypted data is limited to a few things like addition and multiplication, but most analytics systems are limited as well. If this works, it would offer a new way to approach data security for publicly available systems.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Proxies and the Cloud (Public and Private)</title><link>/blog/proxies-and-the-cloud-public-and-private/</link><pubDate>Tue, 16 Aug 2011 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/proxies-and-the-cloud-public-and-private/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Recently I had a conversation with a security vendor offering a proxy-based solution for a particular problem (yes, I’m being deliberately obscure). Their technology is interesting, but fundamental changes in how we consume IT resources challenge the very idea that a proxy can effectively address this problem.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Friday Summary: August 12, 2011</title><link>/blog/friday-summary-august-12-2011/</link><pubDate>Thu, 11 Aug 2011 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/friday-summary-august-12-2011/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Believe it or not, I’m not the biggest fan of travel. Oh, I used to be, maybe 10+ years ago when I was just starting to travel as part of my career. Being in your 20’s and getting paid to literally circle the globe isn’t all bad… especially when you’re single.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Data Security Lifecycle 2.0: Functions, Actors, and Controls</title><link>/blog/10999/</link><pubDate>Wed, 10 Aug 2011 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/10999/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;In our last post we &lt;a href="http://www.securosis.com/blog/data-security-lifecycle-2.0-and-the-cloud-locations-and-access"&gt;added location and access attributes to the Data Security Lifecycle.&lt;/a&gt; Now let’s start digging into the data flow and controls.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Incite 8/10/2011: Back to the Future</title><link>/blog/incite-8-10-2011-back-to-the-future/</link><pubDate>Wed, 10 Aug 2011 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/incite-8-10-2011-back-to-the-future/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Getting old just sucks. OK, I’m not really &lt;em&gt;old&lt;/em&gt; , but I feel that way. I think I’m suffering from the fundamental problem &lt;a href="http://www.securosis.com/blog/friday-summary-july-14-2011"&gt;Rich described a few weeks ago&lt;/a&gt;. I think I’m 20, so I do these intense exercise programs and athletic pursuits. Lo and behold, I get hurt.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Say Hello to Chip and Pin</title><link>/blog/say-hello-to-chip-and-pin/</link><pubDate>Wed, 10 Aug 2011 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/say-hello-to-chip-and-pin/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;No, it’s not a Penn &amp;amp; Teller rip-off act – it’s a new credit card format. On August 9th Visa announced that they are going to &lt;a href="http://corporate.visa.com/media-center/press-releases/press1142.jsp"&gt;aggressively encourage merchants to switch over to Chip and Pin (CAP) ‘smart’ credit cards&lt;/a&gt;. Europay-Mastercard-Visa (EMV) developed a smart credit card format standard many years ago, and the technology was adopted by many other countries over the next decade. In the US adoption has never really happened. That’s &lt;a href="http://www.bankrate.com/financing/credit-cards/get-ready-for-emv-credit-cards/"&gt;about to change&lt;/a&gt;, because Visa will give merchants a pass on PCI compliance if they adopt smart cards, or let them assume 100% of fraud liability if they don’t.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Data Security Lifecycle 2.0 and the Cloud: Locations and Access</title><link>/blog/data-security-lifecycle-2-0-and-the-cloud-locations-and-access/</link><pubDate>Tue, 09 Aug 2011 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/data-security-lifecycle-2-0-and-the-cloud-locations-and-access/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;In &lt;a href="http://www.securosis.com/blog/introducing-the-data-security-lifecycle-2.0"&gt;our last post we reviewed the Data Security Lifecycle&lt;/a&gt;, but other than some minor wording changes (and a prettier graphic thanks to PowerPoint SmartArt) it was the same as our four-year-old original version.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Introducing the Data Security Lifecycle 2.0</title><link>/blog/introducing-the-data-security-lifecycle-2-0/</link><pubDate>Tue, 09 Aug 2011 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/introducing-the-data-security-lifecycle-2-0/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Four years ago I wrote the initial &lt;a href="http://securosis.com/blog/the-data-security-lifecycle-beta-1"&gt;Data Security Lifecycle&lt;/a&gt; and a &lt;a href="http://www.securosis.com/research/data-security"&gt;series of posts&lt;/a&gt; covering the constituent technologies. In 2009 I updated it to better fit cloud computing, and it was incorporated into the Cloud Security Alliance Guidance, but I have never been happy with that work. It was rushed and didn’t address cloud specifics nearly sufficiently.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>NoSQL and No Security</title><link>/blog/nosql-and-no-security/</link><pubDate>Tue, 09 Aug 2011 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/nosql-and-no-security/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Of all of the presentations at Black Hat USA 2011, I found Brian Sullivan’s presentation on “&lt;a href="https://www.blackhat.com/html/bh-us-11/bh-us-11-briefings.html#Sullivan"&gt;Server-Side JavaScript Injection: Attacking NoSQL and Node.js&lt;/a&gt;” the most startling. While I was aware of the poor security of most NoSQL database installations – especially their lack of support for authorization and authentication – I was not aware of their susceptibility to injection of both commands and code. Apparently Mongo and many of the NoSQL databases are nothing more than JavaScript processing engines, without the stigma of authentication. Most of these products are subject to several classes of attack, including injection, XSS, and CSRF. Brian demonstrated blind NoSQL injection scripts that can both discover database contents and run arbitrary commands. He cataloged an entire Mongo database with a couple lines of PHP.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Use THEIR data to tell YOUR story</title><link>/blog/use-their-data-to-tell-your-story/</link><pubDate>Tue, 09 Aug 2011 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/use-their-data-to-tell-your-story/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I’m in the air (literally) on the way to &lt;a href="http://metricon6.org/"&gt;Metricon 6&lt;/a&gt;; so I’m thinking a lot about metrics, quantification, and the like. Of course most of the discussion at Metricon will focus on how practitioners can build metrics programs to make their security programs more efficient, maybe more effective, and certainly more substantiated (with data, as opposed to faith). Justifiably so – to mature the practice of security we need to quantify it better.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Fact-Based Network Security: Defining ‘Risk’</title><link>/blog/fact-based-network-security-defining-risk-2/</link><pubDate>Wed, 03 Aug 2011 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/fact-based-network-security-defining-risk-2/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;As we mentioned when introducing this series on fact-based network security, we increasingly need to use data to determine our priorities. This enables us to focus on activities that will have the greatest business impact. But that begs the question: how you determine what’s important? The place to start is with your organization’s assets.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Incite 8/3/2011: The Kids Are Our Future</title><link>/blog/incite-8-3-2011-the-kids-are-our-future/</link><pubDate>Wed, 03 Aug 2011 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/incite-8-3-2011-the-kids-are-our-future/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;The Boss and I have been getting into &lt;a href="http://www.tnt.tv/series/fallingskies/"&gt;Fallen Skies&lt;/a&gt; lately. Yeah, it’s another sci-fi show with aliens trying to take down the human race and loot our planet for our resources. They’d better hurry up, since there may not be much left when the &lt;em&gt;real&lt;/em&gt; aliens show up, but that’s another story. In the last episode we saw, the main guy (Noah Wyle of &lt;em&gt;ER&lt;/em&gt;) made the point that our kids are our future, and we need to keep them safe. That thought resonates with me, and thankfully I’m not dealing with aliens trying to make them into drugged-out slaves.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Words matter: You stop attacks, not breaches</title><link>/blog/words-matter-you-stop-attacks-not-breaches/</link><pubDate>Tue, 02 Aug 2011 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/words-matter-you-stop-attacks-not-breaches/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Every so often, the way security marketeers manipulate words to mislead customers makes me cringe. I’m not going into specifics because that isn’t the point. I just want to clear up some terminology that many security companies misuse, which really makes them look silly.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Cloud Security Training: August 16-18, Washington DC</title><link>/blog/cloud-security-training-august-16-18-washington-dc/</link><pubDate>Mon, 01 Aug 2011 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/cloud-security-training-august-16-18-washington-dc/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Hey everyone,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Just a quick announcement that we are holding another CCSK training class in a few weeks. This one is in the DC area (Falls Church) and includes the Basic, Plus, and Train the Trainer options.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Security has always been a BigData problem</title><link>/blog/security-has-always-been-a-bigdata-problem/</link><pubDate>Mon, 01 Aug 2011 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/security-has-always-been-a-bigdata-problem/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;It seems like &lt;em&gt;BigData&lt;/em&gt; is all the rage. With things like NoSQL and Hadoop getting all the database wonks hot under the collar, smart forward-thinking folks like Amrit and Hoff increasingly point out the applicability of these techniques to security, and they’re right. I certainly agree that many of these new technologies will have a huge impact on our ability to figure out what’s happening in our environments. And not a moment too soon.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Friday Summary: July 29, 2011</title><link>/blog/friday-summary-july-29-2011/</link><pubDate>Fri, 29 Jul 2011 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/friday-summary-july-29-2011/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;It’s that time of year again. It’s time for me and most of the Securosis crew to travel to cooler climes and enjoy the refreshing breeze of the Nevada desert. Well, it’s cooler than Phoenix, anyway. Yes, I am talking about going to the &lt;a href="https://www.blackhat.com/html/bh-us-11/bh-us-11-home.html"&gt;Black Hat&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href="http://www.defcon.org/html/defcon-19/dc-19-index.html"&gt;Def Con&lt;/a&gt; security conferences in Las Vegas this August 1-7th. Every year I see something amazing – from shipping iPhones loaded with malware to hack whatever passes by to wicked database attacks. Always educational and usually a bit of fun too. It is Las Vegas after all!&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>New Blog Series: Fact-Based Network Security: Metrics and the Pursuit of Prioritization</title><link>/blog/new-blog-series-fact-based-network-security-metrics-and-the-pursuit-of-prio/</link><pubDate>Fri, 29 Jul 2011 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/new-blog-series-fact-based-network-security-metrics-and-the-pursuit-of-prio/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;As you can tell from our activity on the blog, we’ve been in the (relatively) slower summer season. Well, that’s over. Today we start one blog series, and another is hot on its heels (probably starting within 2 weeks). With our research pipeline, I suspect all three of us will be pretty busy through the fall.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Accept Apathy—Save Users from Themselves and You from Yourself</title><link>/blog/accept-apathy-save-users-from-themselves-and-you-from-yourself-2/</link><pubDate>Thu, 28 Jul 2011 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/accept-apathy-save-users-from-themselves-and-you-from-yourself-2/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;We’ve gone round and round on the challenges of doing security. As Shack says, &lt;a href="http://daveshackleford.com/?p=633"&gt;your users just don’t give a f***&lt;/a&gt;. Actually you need to read Dave’s post. It lays out a lot of the issues we face every day. I’ll rephrase Dave’s point a little differently: apathy rules, and always will. Your employees are not paid to worry about security. They are paid to do their jobs, and more often than not security gets in the way of their actual responsibilities. Remember – the cold, hard truth is that security necessarily restricts access to some degree because there is no other way to protect information.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Incite 7/27/11: Negotiating in front of the crowd</title><link>/blog/incite-7-27-11-negotiating-in-front-of-the-crowd/</link><pubDate>Wed, 27 Jul 2011 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/incite-7-27-11-negotiating-in-front-of-the-crowd/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;The NFL lockout is over. Hallelujah! I know nothing substantial was really lost, besides the Hall of Fame game, but the folly of billionaires bickering with millionaires annoyed pretty much everyone. I believe more folks were hanging on this negotiation than the crap going on in Washington over the debt ceiling. It seemed like a tug of war gone wild, with both sides digging in. Until they finally reached a critical point, when real money was at stake, and amazingly the deal got done. What’s interesting is how the negotiations played out in real time.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Incomplete Thought: The Scarlet (Security) Letter</title><link>/blog/incomplete-thought-the-scarlet-security-letter/</link><pubDate>Wed, 27 Jul 2011 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/incomplete-thought-the-scarlet-security-letter/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I know we all have compliance fatigue. Some worse than others, but we all rue the day security became more about compliance and getting the rubber stamp than actually protecting something. The pragmatist in me continues to accept our lot in life and try to be somewhat optimistic about it. But at the end of the day, we (as an industry) pretty much suck at protecting things, and there are no real catalysts to change that.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>How can you *not* understand the business?</title><link>/blog/how-can-you-not-understand-the-business/</link><pubDate>Tue, 26 Jul 2011 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/how-can-you-not-understand-the-business/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I usually agree with Jack Daniel. You know, we curmudgeons need to stick together. But one of the requirements of membership in the Curmudgeons Association is to call crap when we see it. And much as it pains me to say it, Jack’s latest rant on &lt;a href="http://blog.uncommonsensesecurity.com/2011/07/infosecs-misunderstanding-of-business.html"&gt;InfoSec’s misunderstanding of business&lt;/a&gt; is crap.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Question for Oracle Database Users</title><link>/blog/question-for-oracle-database-users/</link><pubDate>Tue, 26 Jul 2011 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/question-for-oracle-database-users/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://securosis.com/blog/comments/oracle-buys-secerno"&gt;Oracle purchased Secerno&lt;/a&gt; 14 months ago. It was advertised as a database firewall to block malicious queries and certain types of attacks. What they have presented looks like a plausible method of protecting databases once an attack is known but before the patch is applied. And as we know many Oracle shops don’t apply security (or any) patches on a quarterly basis. They may patch on a yearly basis. Secerno looks like a temporary fix to help these companies.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>FireStarter: The Time for Corporate Password Managers</title><link>/blog/firestarter-the-time-for-corporate-password-managers/</link><pubDate>Mon, 25 Jul 2011 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/firestarter-the-time-for-corporate-password-managers/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I talk a lot on Twitter about my password manager. I use &lt;a href="http://agilebits.com/products/1Password"&gt;1Password&lt;/a&gt; and love it. It auto-generates random passwords for me of any length I choose, auto-fills web forms for me, and remembers both the web page and the hideously complex password I have chosen. It automatically synchronizes across all my computers so I am never without all my current passwords. The file is encrypted with AES-128 and they handle encryption keys securely, so I believe the product is pretty secure. Now, rather than having a couple good passwords for the handful of sites I care about – and a single generic password for the 300 sites I don’t – every single one of my web accounts has its own strong password. Or I should say as strong a password as each site allows. I always worried about having the application crash and losing every single one of my passwords. Irrational fear. I back it up like any other application. In hindsight I can’t figure out what took me so long to change over.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Friday Summary: July 22, 2011</title><link>/blog/friday-summary-july-22-2011/</link><pubDate>Fri, 22 Jul 2011 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/friday-summary-july-22-2011/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I imagine with this heat wave covering most the country you’re likely on your way to the beach – or at least some place better than work. So with me traveling, Mike suffering through physical therapy, and Rich spending time with the family, this week’s summary will be a short one.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Hacking Spikes and the Real Time Media</title><link>/blog/hacking-spikes-and-the-real-time-media/</link><pubDate>Fri, 22 Jul 2011 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/hacking-spikes-and-the-real-time-media/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;The Freakonomics blog assembled an interesting &lt;a href="http://www.freakonomics.com/2011/07/19/why-has-there-been-so-much-hacking-lately-or-is-it-just-reported-more-a-freakonomics-quorum/"&gt;quorum on security&lt;/a&gt;. Industry heavyweights like Schneier weighed in on the following question:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Why has there been such a spike in hacking recently? Or is it merely a function of us playing closer attention and of institutions being more open about reporting security breaches?&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Incite 7/19/2011: The Case of the Disappearing Letters</title><link>/blog/incite-7-19-2011-the-case-of-the-disappearing-letters/</link><pubDate>Wed, 20 Jul 2011 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/incite-7-19-2011-the-case-of-the-disappearing-letters/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Something didn’t add up. We got a call from the girl’s camp literally 3 days after they got there saying XX2 needed more stationery. We hoped this meant she was a prolific writer, and we’d be getting a couple updates a week. Almost 3 weeks later, we got 1 postcard. That’s it. A few of her friends got letters, but not nearly enough to have depleted her stash of letters/postcards. And the longer we went without a letter, the more ornery The Boss got.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Rise of the Security Monkeys</title><link>/blog/rise-of-the-security-monkeys/</link><pubDate>Wed, 20 Jul 2011 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/rise-of-the-security-monkeys/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;As far back as I can remember, I have been a fan of testing your defenses. Some people call it pen testing, others refer to it as an &lt;em&gt;assurance&lt;/em&gt; process, but the point is the same either way. The bad folks test your defenses every day, and if you aren’t using the same tactics to find out what they can get, you’re going to have a bad day. Maybe not today, maybe not even tomorrow. But the clock is ticking.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Mitigating Software Vulnerabilities</title><link>/blog/mitigating-software-vulnerabilities/</link><pubDate>Mon, 18 Jul 2011 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/mitigating-software-vulnerabilities/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Matt Miller, Tim Burrell, and Michael Howard from the Microsoft Security Engineering Center published a paper last week on &lt;a href="http://blogs.technet.com/b/srd/archive/2011/07/12/mitigating-software-vulnerabilities.aspx"&gt;Mitigating Software vulnerabilities&lt;/a&gt;. In a nutshell, they advocate a set of tactics that limit – or outright block – known and emerging attack techniques. Rather than play catch-up and patch the &lt;em&gt;threat du jour,&lt;/em&gt; they outline use cases for the technologies that Microsoft employs within their own products to make it much harder to compromise code with canned attacks.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Donate Your Bone Marrow</title><link>/blog/donate-your-bone-marrow/</link><pubDate>Fri, 15 Jul 2011 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/donate-your-bone-marrow/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I’m going to keep this short. Dave Lewis (&lt;a href="http://twitter.com/#!/gattaca"&gt;@gattaca&lt;/a&gt;)’s wife was diagnosed with leukemia yesterday. Dave is one of our Contributing Analysts and a hell of a great guy, and while I haven’t met her, everyone says his wife is even better (seems to be a common trend).&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Friday Summary: July 14, 2011</title><link>/blog/friday-summary-july-14-2011/</link><pubDate>Thu, 14 Jul 2011 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/friday-summary-july-14-2011/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Some days I think that in fitness, I’m getting wrong everything I advise people in security.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I’ve been an athlete all my life – including some stints competing at a reasonably high (amateur) level. Like the time I went to nationals for my martial art. Cool, eh? Other than the part about getting my butt whipped by a 16-year-old. It seems cutting weight in a sport where knockouts aren’t the goal isn’t necessarily a good thing (me strong… me slow… puny teenager stand still so Hulk can kick in head, pleeze?).&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Security Marketing FAIL: Claims of Risk Reduction</title><link>/blog/security-marketing-fail-claims-of-risk-reduction/</link><pubDate>Thu, 14 Jul 2011 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/security-marketing-fail-claims-of-risk-reduction/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Every time I see the phrase “reduce your risk by X%,” I break out in hives. I agree that it is critical to think about risk (which to me is really about economic loss), but everyone has a different definition of &lt;em&gt;risk.&lt;/em&gt; And to say anyone can reduce risk by a certain percentage triggers my bullcrap filter.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Incite 7/13/2011: The King of the House</title><link>/blog/incite-7-13-2011-the-king-of-the-house/</link><pubDate>Wed, 13 Jul 2011 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/incite-7-13-2011-the-king-of-the-house/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;With the two girls at sleepaway camp, the Boss and I weren’t sure how the Boy would handle it. After all, he’s pretty much always surrounded by someone. Having a twin sister will do that to you. If he’s not at school, with his buddies, or doing an activity, he’s usually playing with one of his sisters. In fact, we think his ability to tune out almost everything directly correlates to always being around people.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Tokenization vs. Encryption: Healthcare Data Security</title><link>/blog/tokenization-vs-encryption-healthcare-data-security/</link><pubDate>Wed, 13 Jul 2011 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/tokenization-vs-encryption-healthcare-data-security/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Securing Personal Health Records (PHR) for healthcare providers is supposed to be the next frontier for many security technologies. Security vendors market solutions for Protected Health Information (PHI) because &lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Health_Insurance_Portability_and_Accountability_Act"&gt;HIPAA&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HIPAA#HITECH_Act:_Privacy_Requirements"&gt;HITECH&lt;/a&gt; impose data security and privacy requirements. Should a healthcare provider fail in their custodial duty to protect patient data, they face penalties – theoretically at least – so they are motivated to secure the data that fuels their business. Tokenization is one of the technologies being discussed to help secure medical information, based on its success with payment card data, but unfortunately protecting PHR is a &lt;em&gt;very&lt;/em&gt; different problem.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Friction and Security</title><link>/blog/friction-and-security/</link><pubDate>Mon, 11 Jul 2011 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/friction-and-security/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Every company I have worked for has had some degree of friction between sales and marketing teams. While their organizational charters are to support one another, sales always has some disagreement about how products are positioned, the quality of competitive intelligence, the quality of leads, and the lack of &lt;insert object here&gt; to grease the customer skids. Marketing complains that sales does not follow the product sales scripts, doesn’t call leads in a timely fashion, and don’t do a good job of collecting customer intelligence. Friction is a natural part of the relationship between the two organizations, so careful balancing is necessary.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>How to Encrypt or Tokenize for SaaS (and Some PaaS)</title><link>/blog/how-to-encrypt-or-tokenize-for-saas-and-some-paas/</link><pubDate>Mon, 11 Jul 2011 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/how-to-encrypt-or-tokenize-for-saas-and-some-paas/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;A few weeks ago I posted on &lt;a href="http://securosis.com/blog/comments/how-to-encrypt-iaas-volumes"&gt;different methods for encrypting IaaS volumes&lt;/a&gt;, which tends to be one of the top questions I get about data security in the cloud. Also high on that list is encrypting (or tokenizing) for SaaS and (some) PaaS. I call this the “Salesforce.com Problem”, because more often than not I’m talking to someone on the larger side, specifically about Salesforce.com.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Tokenization vs. Encryption: Personal Information Security</title><link>/blog/tokenization-vs-encryption-personal-information-security/</link><pubDate>Mon, 11 Jul 2011 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/tokenization-vs-encryption-personal-information-security/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;In my last post I discussed how tokenization is being deployed to solve payment data security issues. It is a niche technology used almost exclusively to solve a single problem: protecting credit card data. As a technology, data tokenization has yet to &lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crossing_the_Chasm"&gt;cross the chasm&lt;/a&gt;, but our research indicates it is being used to protect personal information. In this post I will talk about using tokens to protect PII – Social Security numbers, driver’s license numbers, and other sensitive personal information. Data tokenization has value beyond simple credit card substitution – protecting other Personally Identifiable Information (PII) is its next frontier.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Simple Isn’t Simple</title><link>/blog/simple-isnt-simple/</link><pubDate>Fri, 08 Jul 2011 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/simple-isnt-simple/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I have to admit that some days I have no idea what will resonate with readers. For example, my latest column over at Dark Reading seems to be generating a lot more interest than I expected.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Smart Card Laggards</title><link>/blog/smart-card-laggards/</link><pubDate>Fri, 08 Jul 2011 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/smart-card-laggards/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;The US is &lt;a href="http://threatpost.com/en_us/blogs/us-playing-catch-security-contactless-devices-062711?quicktabs_2=0"&gt;playing ‘catchup’ in contactless security&lt;/a&gt;. The US lags in &lt;a href="http://www.consumerreports.org/cro/magazine-archive/2011/june/money/credit-card-fraud/overview/index.htm?loginMethod=auto"&gt;smart identity card technology adoption&lt;/a&gt;. We lag in &lt;a href="http://www.cardratings.com/wells-fargo-smart-card-introduces-US-to-world-standard-emv-chip-technology.html"&gt;payment card security&lt;/a&gt;. It’s &lt;a href="http://travel.nytimes.com/2011/06/12/travel/how-to-avoid-credit-card-problems-abroad-practical-traveler.html"&gt;frustrating for Americans to travel in Europe&lt;/a&gt;. We have rudimentary ePassport technology, and it has been almost a decade since the first draft of the &lt;a href="http://www.va.gov/pivproject/faq.asp"&gt;HSPD-12 PIV&lt;/a&gt; standards. We’re behind. We are laggards.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Call off the (Attack) Dogs</title><link>/blog/call-off-the-attack-dogs/</link><pubDate>Wed, 06 Jul 2011 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/call-off-the-attack-dogs/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;As while back, I spent some time &lt;a href="http://securosis.com/blog/categorizing-fud"&gt;categorizing tactics vendors use to create Fear, Uncertainty, and Doubt (FUD)&lt;/a&gt; as a buying catalyst for their products. We followed up with a survey trying to understand what kinds of security marketing content is useful at different stages of the sales cycle.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Incite 7/6/2011: Reading Between the Lines</title><link>/blog/incite-7-6-2011-reading-between-the-lines/</link><pubDate>Wed, 06 Jul 2011 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/incite-7-6-2011-reading-between-the-lines/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;As mentioned last week, our girls are off at sleepaway camp. They seem to be having a great time, but you can’t really know. Obviously if there was a serious issue, the camp would call us. Since we dealt with the &lt;a href="http://securosis.com/blog/incite-6-28-2011-a-tough-nit-uation"&gt;nit-uation&lt;/a&gt;, we have heard from the guidance counselor that XX2 is doing great, and from the administrator that XX2 needs more stationary. Evidently she is a prolific writer, although our daily &lt;a href="http://securosis.com/blog/incite-7-7-2010-the-mailbox-vigil"&gt;mailbox vigil&lt;/a&gt; has yielded nothing thus far. We’ll save a spot for her at Securosis, since by the time she’s out of school, I’ll need someone else to pick up the mantle of the Incite.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Social Media Security 101</title><link>/blog/social-media-security-101/</link><pubDate>Wed, 06 Jul 2011 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/social-media-security-101/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;It won’t surprise any of you to learn that I don’t follow Fox News on Twitter. I know, I can see the shock in your eyes, but I’m not the biggest fan of our friends on the right. Actually, I hate all 24 hour news stations – Fox biased to the right, MSNBC to the left, and CNN to the stupid.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Friday Summary: July 1, 2011</title><link>/blog/friday-summary-july-1-2011/</link><pubDate>Fri, 01 Jul 2011 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/friday-summary-july-1-2011/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;How many of you had the experience as a child of wandering around your grandparents’ house, opening a cupboard or closet, and discovering &lt;em&gt;really old stuff&lt;/em&gt;? Cans with yellowed paper or some contraption where you had no idea of its purpose? I had that same experience today, only I was in public. I visited the store that time forgot. My wife needed some printer paper, and since we were in front of an Office Max, we stopped in. All I could say was “Wow – it’s a museum!”&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Cloud Security Lifecycle Management Mulligan</title><link>/blog/cloud-security-lifecycle-management-mulligan/</link><pubDate>Thu, 30 Jun 2011 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/cloud-security-lifecycle-management-mulligan/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Many really smart people helped author the &lt;a href="https://cloudsecurityalliance.org/csaguide.pdf"&gt;Cloud Security Alliance Security Guidance&lt;/a&gt;. Many of the original authors posses deep knowledge of security within their domains of expertise, and are widely considered the best in the business. And there are many who have deep &lt;em&gt;practical&lt;/em&gt; knowledge of operating in the cloud, and use cloud technologies on a daily basis. Unfortunately very few people have all three – especially the third. And perceptions have changed a lot since 2009 when the guide was originally drafted. Why is that important? After having set up and secured several different cloud instances, then working through the cloud security exercises Rich created, it’s obvious the guidance was drafted before the authors had much experience. It’s based on theoretical knowledge of what we expected, as opposed to what we do encounter in any given environment. Some of the guidance really hits the mark, some of it is awkward, and some of it is just not useful.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Incomplete Thought: HoneyClouds and the Confusion Control</title><link>/blog/incomplete-thought-honeyclouds-and-the-confusion-control/</link><pubDate>Thu, 30 Jun 2011 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/incomplete-thought-honeyclouds-and-the-confusion-control/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I was somewhat captivated by Lenny Zeltser’s recent post on a &lt;a href="http://blog.zeltser.com/post/6479619232/protean-information-security-architecture"&gt;Protean Information Security Architecture&lt;/a&gt;. His idea is that another set of controls can be based on confusing the attacker. If you open/close different potential attack vectors, you can somewhat obscure the real payload you are trying to protect.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Incite 6/28/2011: A Tough Nit-uation</title><link>/blog/incite-6-28-2011-a-tough-nit-uation/</link><pubDate>Wed, 29 Jun 2011 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/incite-6-28-2011-a-tough-nit-uation/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;As I saw the &lt;em&gt;Welcome to North Carolina&lt;/em&gt; sign, I started to relax. About 4 hours earlier, we waved to our girls as they left for this summer’s sleepover camp expedition. The family truckster was loaded up with the boy and XX1’s friend from GA, and it took a few hours but I was getting into a driving rhythm. The miles were passing easily with Pandora as my musical guide. So I thought nothing of it when my phone intruded, showing a (610) number. I figured it was the camp just giving us a ‘heads up’ that XX2 was doing great her first day away from home. I was wrong.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>When Closed Is Good</title><link>/blog/when-closed-is-good/</link><pubDate>Tue, 28 Jun 2011 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/when-closed-is-good/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I don’t really know how to take &lt;a href="http://www.macworld.com/article/150904/2010/04/iphone_prediction.html"&gt;this article on Eugene Kaspersky’s interview at InfoSec&lt;/a&gt; The iPhone will be niche in 5 years because it’s closed? We should have databases of smartphone users?&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>File Activity Monitoring Webinar This Wednesday</title><link>/blog/file-activity-monitoring-webinar-this-wednesday/</link><pubDate>Mon, 27 Jun 2011 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/file-activity-monitoring-webinar-this-wednesday/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Ever hear of File Activity Monitoring? You know, that cool new data security tech I published a &lt;a href="http://securosis.com/research/papers/understanding-and-selecting-a-file-activity-monitoring-solution"&gt;white paper on?&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This Wednesday at 11 PT I will be giving a webinar on FAM (sponsored by Imperva – a guy’s gotta eat). I’ll cover the basics of the technology, why it’s useful, and some deployment scenarios/use cases.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>How to Encrypt IaaS Volumes</title><link>/blog/how-to-encrypt-iaas-volumes/</link><pubDate>Mon, 27 Jun 2011 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/how-to-encrypt-iaas-volumes/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Encrypting IaaS storage is a hot topic, but it’s time to drop the esoterica and provide some technical details. I will use a lot of terminology from &lt;a href="http://securosis.com/blog/iaas-storage-101"&gt;last week’s post on IaaS storage options&lt;/a&gt;, so you should probably read that one first if you haven’t already.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>The Age of Security Specialization is Near!</title><link>/blog/the-age-of-security-specialization-is-near/</link><pubDate>Mon, 27 Jun 2011 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/the-age-of-security-specialization-is-near/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;First day back in the saddle after vacation is always interesting. I must have had a million ideas while lounging on the beach. I remember maybe 3, and probably won’t have time to do much of anything for a while – first I need to dig out of a week of inflow. But one thing I did want to revisit quickly is defining what security folks are, and more importantly what we need to move forward.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>7 Myths, Expanded</title><link>/blog/7-myths-expanded/</link><pubDate>Thu, 23 Jun 2011 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/7-myths-expanded/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I really enjoyed the &lt;a href="http://www.fourhourworkweek.com/blog/2011/06/07/whats-your-start-up-bus-count-7-myths-of-entrepreneurship-and-programming/?utm_source=feedburner&amp;amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;amp;utm_campaign=Feed%3A+timferriss+%28The+Blog+of+Author+Tim+Ferriss%29"&gt;7 myths of Entrepreneurship&lt;/a&gt; on Tim Ferriss’ site. The examples are from software development, but apply to most small tech firms. Having been through 6 startups of my own, I pretty much agree with everything said. More to the point, these ‘myths’ are the more common pitfalls I witnessed over and over again. That said, I think there is more to be gained here, and some important points were left on the cutting room floor. Specifically:&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Friday Summary (OS/2 Edition): June 24, 2011</title><link>/blog/friday-summary-os-2-edition-june-24-2011/</link><pubDate>Thu, 23 Jun 2011 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/friday-summary-os-2-edition-june-24-2011/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;There’s something I need to admit.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I’m not proud of it, but it’s time to get it off my chest and stop hiding, no matter how embarrassing it is.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>IaaS Storage 101</title><link>/blog/iaas-storage-101/</link><pubDate>Thu, 23 Jun 2011 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/iaas-storage-101/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I started writing up a post on IaaS encryption options and quickly realized I should probably precede it with a post outlining the IaaS storage options first. One slightly confusing bit is that IaaS storage really falls into two categories: storage as a service where the storage itself is the product, and storage for IaaS compute instances, where the storage is tied to running virtual machines.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Is Your Email Address Worth More Than Your Credit Card Number?</title><link>/blog/is-your-email-address-worth-more-than-your-credit-card-number/</link><pubDate>Wed, 22 Jun 2011 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/is-your-email-address-worth-more-than-your-credit-card-number/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;It used to be that we didn’t care too much if someone stole a pile of email addresses. At worst we’d end up on yet another spam list, and these days most folks have pretty decent spam filters. Sure, it’s annoying, but it was pretty low on the scale of security risks.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Tokenization vs. Encryption: Payment Data Security</title><link>/blog/tokenization-vs-encryption-payment-data-security/</link><pubDate>Wed, 22 Jun 2011 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/tokenization-vs-encryption-payment-data-security/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Continuing our series on tokenization for compliance, it’s time to look at how tokens are used to secure payment data. I will focus on how tokenization is employed for credit card security and helps with compliance because this model is driving adoption today.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>How to Encrypt Your Dropbox Files, at Least until Dropbox Wakes the F* up</title><link>/blog/how-to-encrypt-your-dropbox-files-at-least-until-dropbox-wakes-the-f-up/</link><pubDate>Tue, 21 Jun 2011 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/how-to-encrypt-your-dropbox-files-at-least-until-dropbox-wakes-the-f-up/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;With the news that &lt;a href="http://www.wired.com/threatlevel/2011/06/dropbox/"&gt;Dropbox managed to leave every single user account wide open for four hours&lt;/a&gt;, it’s time to review encryption options.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Friday Summary: June 17, 2011</title><link>/blog/friday-summary-june-17-2011/</link><pubDate>Fri, 17 Jun 2011 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/friday-summary-june-17-2011/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Where would you invest? The Reuters article about &lt;a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/2011/06/15/us-cybersecurity-venturecapital-idUSTRE75E3V220110615"&gt;Silicon Valley VCs betting on new technologies to protect computer networks&lt;/a&gt; got me thinking about where I would invest in computer security. This is a very tough question, because where I would invest in security technologies as a CIO is different than where I would invest as a venture capitalist. I can see security bets to address most CIOs’ need to spend money, or and quite different technologies address &lt;a href="http://securosis.com/blog/comments/the-two-kinds-of-security-threats-and-how-they-affect-your-life"&gt;noisy threats&lt;/a&gt;, which could make investors money. As Gunnar pointed out in &lt;a href="http://1raindrop.typepad.com/1_raindrop/2011/06/unfrozen-caveman-attacker.html"&gt;Unfrozen Caveman Attacker&lt;/a&gt; (my favorite post this week) firewalls, anti-virus, and anti-malware are &lt;a href="http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=S.S.D.D."&gt;SSDD&lt;/a&gt; – but clearly people are buying plenty of it.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>New White Paper: Security Benchmarking: Going Beyond Metrics</title><link>/blog/new-white-paper-security-benchmarking-going-beyond-metrics/</link><pubDate>Fri, 17 Jun 2011 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/new-white-paper-security-benchmarking-going-beyond-metrics/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Ever since I wrote the Pragmatic CSO a lifetime ago (okay, 4 years, but it feels like a lifetime), I have been evangelizing about better quantification of security programs. Even without context, quantification is valuable, but they are much more useful &lt;em&gt;together&lt;/em&gt;. So I have been pushing hard for finding a set of similar companies to compare your metrics against, to provide that needed &lt;em&gt;context&lt;/em&gt;. Alas, with the number of fires we have to fight every day, most security folks just don’t make the time to embrace metrics.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>The Hazards of Generic Communications</title><link>/blog/the-hazards-of-generic-communications/</link><pubDate>Thu, 16 Jun 2011 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/the-hazards-of-generic-communications/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Rich, Adrian, and I are pretty lucky. We are bombarded by data coming at us from every direction. What’s working, what’s not, who’s attacking who, what new widgets are out there – and that’s just the tip of the iceberg. For an information junkie like me, it’s a sort of nirvana.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Incite 6/15/2011: Shortcut to Hypocrisy</title><link>/blog/incite-6-15-2011-shortcut-to-hypocrisy/</link><pubDate>Wed, 15 Jun 2011 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/incite-6-15-2011-shortcut-to-hypocrisy/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I’m not a big basketball fan. I like the NCAA tournament. I may watch a game or two of the NBA playoffs/finals, but I don’t follow them. It seems nothing can get our nation to rise up like a common enemy. That enemy was the Miami Heat. My Tweeter exploded last night with all sorts of venom against the Heat, as they were losing to the Mavs. I could only laugh. Because it was a great example of the hypocrisy of so many sports fans.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Stop Asking for Crap You Don’t Need and Won’t Use</title><link>/blog/stop-asking-for-crap-you-dont-need-and-wont-use/</link><pubDate>Wed, 15 Jun 2011 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/stop-asking-for-crap-you-dont-need-and-wont-use/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I recently had a conversation with a vendor about a particular feature in their product:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Me: “So you just added XZY to the product?”&lt;br&gt;
Them: “Yep.”&lt;br&gt;
Me: “You know that no one uses it.”&lt;br&gt;
Them: “Yep.”&lt;br&gt;
Me: “But it’s on all the RFPs, isn’t it?”&lt;br&gt;
Them: “Yep.”&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>More Control Doesn’t Equal More Secure</title><link>/blog/more-control-doesnt-equal-more-secure/</link><pubDate>Tue, 14 Jun 2011 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/more-control-doesnt-equal-more-secure/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Last week, while teaching the CCSK (cloud security) class, the discussion reached a point I often find myself in these days. We were discussing the risk of cloud computing, and one of the students listed “less control” as a security risk.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>FireStarter: Truth and (Dis)Information</title><link>/blog/firestarter-truth-and-disinformation/</link><pubDate>Mon, 13 Jun 2011 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/firestarter-truth-and-disinformation/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;We all have our own truth. Think about it: two people can see exactly the same thing, but remember totally different situations. Remember the last argument you had with your significant other. It happens all the time. You see the world through your own lens, and whatever you believe: that’s your truth.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Secure Passwords Sans Sales Pitch</title><link>/blog/secure-passwords-sans-sales-pitch/</link><pubDate>Mon, 13 Jun 2011 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/secure-passwords-sans-sales-pitch/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I love my password manager. It enables me to use stronger passwords, unique passwords for every site, and even rotate passwords on select web services. You know, the sites that involve money. Because I can synch its data among all my computers and mobile devices, I am never without access. I believe this improves the security of my accounts, and as such, I am an advocate of this type of technology. I was encouraged when I saw the article &lt;a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2011/06/12/technology/12digi.html"&gt;Guard That Password&lt;/a&gt; in this Sunday’s New York Times. Educating users on the practical need for strong passwords in a mainstream publication is refreshing. Joe User should know how effective just a couple extra password characters can be for foiling attackers. On the downside, the article looks more like a vendor advertisement – in an attempt to reduce concerns over LastPass’s own security, the author seems to have missed describing the core values of a password manager.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Balancing the Short &amp; Long Term</title><link>/blog/balancing-the-short-long-term/</link><pubDate>Fri, 10 Jun 2011 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/balancing-the-short-long-term/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Our pal Eddie Schwartz was named CSO of RSA earlier this week, presumably with a big role at the mothership (EMC) as well. The Tweeter exploded with congratulations, as well as cautions about the difficulty of the job, given the various shoes that will inevitably continue to drop resulting from the April breach. Believe you me, Lockheed and L-3 are the tip of the iceberg.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Incite 6/8/2011: Failure to Launch</title><link>/blog/incite-6-8-2011-failure-to-launch/</link><pubDate>Wed, 08 Jun 2011 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/incite-6-8-2011-failure-to-launch/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Shipping anything is pretty easy nowadays. When someone buys the &lt;a href="http://www.pragmaticcso.com"&gt;P-CSO&lt;/a&gt;, I head over to the USPS website, fill out a form, and print out a label. If it takes 5 minutes, I need more coffee. Shipping via UPS and FedEx is similarly easy. Go to the website, log in, fill out the form, print out a paper label, tape it to the package, and drop it off. I remember (quite painfully) the days of filling out airbills (in triplicate) and then waiting in line to make sure everything was in order.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Security: the Cloud Bogeyman</title><link>/blog/security-the-cloud-bogeyman/</link><pubDate>Mon, 06 Jun 2011 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/security-the-cloud-bogeyman/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I clearly remember being a kid and scared there was a monster in my closet. I was pretty young, and all it took was my Mom wrapping a can of Right Guard in a “Monster Spray” label to allay my fears. My kids tend to get scared by stuff they can’t see as well, and movies like Monsters, Inc. haven’t done much to dispel the fear in today’s generation. When I went to sleepover camp, there were the stories of Cropsey to terrorize new campers, and the chain goes on and on. We continue to be scared by the stuff we don’t understand.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Friday Summary: June 3, 2011</title><link>/blog/friday-summary-june-3-2011/</link><pubDate>Fri, 03 Jun 2011 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/friday-summary-june-3-2011/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Speaking as someone who had to wipe several computers and reinstall the operating system because the &lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sony_BMG_copy_protection_rootkit_scandal"&gt;Sony/BMG rootkit&lt;/a&gt; disabled the DVD drive, I need to say I am deriving some satisfaction from this: &lt;a href="http://www.wired.com/threatlevel/2011/06/sony-lulzsec/"&gt;Lulzsec has hit Sony&lt;/a&gt;. Again. For like the, what, &lt;a href="http://blogs.forbes.com/andygreenberg/2011/05/24/sony-goes-silent-as-its-hacking-spree-snowballs/"&gt;10th incident in the last couple months&lt;/a&gt;? I’m not an anarchist and I am not cool with the vast majority of espionage, credit card fraud, hacking, and defacement that goes on. I pretty consistently come down on the other side of the fence on all that stuff. In fact I spend most of my time trying to teach people how to protect themselves from those intrusions. But just this once – and I am not too proud to admit it – I have this total case of &lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Schadenfreude"&gt;schadenfreude&lt;/a&gt; going. And not just because Sony intentionally wrote and distributed malware to their customers – it’s for &lt;em&gt;all&lt;/em&gt; the bad business practices they have engaged in. Like trying to stop the secondary market from reselling video games. It’s for spending huge amounts of engineering efforts to discourage customers from customizing PlayStations. It’s for watermarking that deteriorated video and audio quality. It’s for the CD: not the CD medium co-developed with Phillips, but telling us it sounded better than anything else. It’s for telling us Trinitron was better – and charging more for it – when it offered inferior picture quality. It’s for deteriorating the quality of their products while pushing prices higher. It’s for &lt;a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/10/04/sony-bmgs-head-lawyer-says-ripping-cds-is-stealing/"&gt;trying to make ‘ripping’ illegal&lt;/a&gt;. Sony has been fabulously successful financially, not by striving to make customers happy, but by identifying lucrative markets and owning them in a monopoly or bust model – think Betamax, Blu-ray, PlayStation, Walkman, etc.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>A Different Take on the Defense Contractor/RSA Breach Miasma</title><link>/blog/a-different-take-on-the-defense-contractor-rsa-breach-miasma/</link><pubDate>Thu, 02 Jun 2011 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/a-different-take-on-the-defense-contractor-rsa-breach-miasma/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I have been debating writing anything on the spate of publicly reported defense contractor breaches. It’s always risky to talk about breaches when you don’t have any direct knowledge about what’s going on. And, to be honest, unless your job is reporting the news it smells a bit like chasing a hearse.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Incite 6/1/2011: Cherries vs. M&amp;Ms</title><link>/blog/incite-6-1-2011-cherries-vs-mms/</link><pubDate>Wed, 01 Jun 2011 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/incite-6-1-2011-cherries-vs-mms/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Queue up the Alice Cooper and get ready. Last Friday was the last day of school for the kids. That means school’s out for summer, and it’s time to get ready for the heat in all its glory. Rich and Adrian live in the desert (literally), so I’m not going to complain about temperatures in the 90s, but thankfully there is no lack of air conditioning and pools to dissipate this global warming thing.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>New White Paper: DAM Software vs. Appliances</title><link>/blog/new-white-paper-dam-software-vs-appliances/</link><pubDate>Wed, 01 Jun 2011 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/new-white-paper-dam-software-vs-appliances/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I am pleased to announce our Database Activity Monitoring: Software vs. Appliance Tradeoffs research paper. I have been writing about Database Activity Monitoring for a long time, but only been within the last couple years have we seen strong adoption of the technology. While it’s not new to me, it is to most customers! I get many questions about basic setup and administration, and how to go about performing a proof of concept comparison of different technologies. Since wrapping up this research paper a couple weeks ago, I have been told by two separate firms that, “Vendor A says they don’t require agents for their Database Activity Monitoring platform, so we are leaning that way, but we would like your input on these solutions.” Another potential customer wanted to understand how blocking is performed without an in-line proxy. These are &lt;em&gt;exactly&lt;/em&gt; the reasons I believe this paper is important, so I’m glad this is clearly the right time to examine the deployment tradeoffs. And yes, these questions are answered in section 4 under &lt;em&gt;Data Collection,&lt;/em&gt; along with other common questions.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>New White Paper: Understanding and Selecting a File Activity Monitoring Solution</title><link>/blog/new-white-paper-understanding-and-selecting-a-file-activity-monitoring-solution/</link><pubDate>Wed, 01 Jun 2011 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/new-white-paper-understanding-and-selecting-a-file-activity-monitoring-solution/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;A while back I got the weird idea that Database Activity Monitoring is useful enough that it would make sense to do the same thing for file repositories. I’m not talking about full DLP – but about granular tracking of user access to major file servers and document management solutions. I added “File Activity Monitoring” to the Data Security Lifecycle and figured someone would develop it eventually.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Tokenization vs. Encryption: Options for Compliance</title><link>/blog/tokenization-vs-encryption-options-for-compliance/</link><pubDate>Tue, 31 May 2011 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/tokenization-vs-encryption-options-for-compliance/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;We get lots of questions about tokenization – particularly about substituting tokens for sensitive data. Many questions from would-be customers are based on misunderstandings about the technology, or the way the technology should be applied. Even more troublesome is the misleading way the technology is marketed as a replacement for data encryption. In most cases it’s not an either/or proposition. If you have sensitive information you will be using encryption &lt;em&gt;somewhere&lt;/em&gt; in your organization. If you want to use tokenization, the question becomes how much to supplant encrypted data with tokens, and how to go about it.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Friday Summary: May 27, 2011</title><link>/blog/friday-summary-may-27-2011/</link><pubDate>Thu, 26 May 2011 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/friday-summary-may-27-2011/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;In the 4 years since I started Securosis, this is absolutely the most bat-sh** crazy time I have experienced. Between cramming for the cloud security training class, managing a software development project, keeping our infrastructure up and running, hitting writing deadlines, and keeping up with prospects and clients, I barely have time to breathe. Add in a couple young kids who have done their best to ensure I don’t get a good night’s sleep at home for the past 6 months… and it’s no wonder I finished last week alternating between passing out and participating in commode-based religion.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Sowing the Seeds of Token Panic</title><link>/blog/sowing-the-seeds-of-token-panic/</link><pubDate>Thu, 26 May 2011 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/sowing-the-seeds-of-token-panic/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;It was just a matter of time. After the &lt;a href="http://securosis.com/blog/rsa-breached-secureid-affected"&gt;EMC/RSA breach&lt;/a&gt; in March, the clock started ticking relative to the seeds being used to gain access to something important. &lt;a href="http://www.cringely.com/2011/05/insecureid-no-more-secrets/"&gt;According to Bob Cringely&lt;/a&gt;, that has now happened with a &lt;em&gt;very large US defense contractor&lt;/em&gt; having their remote access network compromised.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>End Users, Fill out Our Security Marketing Content Survey</title><link>/blog/end-users-fill-out-our-security-marketing-content-survey/</link><pubDate>Wed, 25 May 2011 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/end-users-fill-out-our-security-marketing-content-survey/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;We got great response to our &lt;a href="http://securosis.com/blog/comments/categorizing-fud"&gt;Categorizing FUD&lt;/a&gt; post. Obviously many of you are as frustrated with marketing idiocy as we are. So let’s band together to prove to the vendor community that some of their security marketing tactics hurt them more than they help.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Incite 5/25/2011: Rapturing the Middle Ground</title><link>/blog/incite-5-25-2011-rapturing-the-middle-ground/</link><pubDate>Wed, 25 May 2011 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/incite-5-25-2011-rapturing-the-middle-ground/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;The sun rose today. As it has every day for a couple billion years. Though plenty of people thought they would not be around on Sunday for the sunrise. Yes, I’m talking about the Rapture. Either it didn’t happen or we all got left behind, which is fine by me – I still have stuff to do. You may think the whole concept is wacky, but I’m the last guy to criticize someone else’s beliefs. What you believe is your business. I’m certainly not going to try to convince you I’m right. Especially about matters of faith.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Cloud Security Training: June 8-9 in San Jose</title><link>/blog/cloud-security-training-june-8-9-in-san-jose/</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 May 2011 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/cloud-security-training-june-8-9-in-san-jose/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;You might have noticed I haven’t been blogging much for a couple months. That’s because I’m spending nearly every waking hour on our training class for the Cloud Security Alliance. This is a pretty big deal for us and I’m psyched it’s almost finished.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Planning vs. Acting</title><link>/blog/planning-vs-acting/</link><pubDate>Mon, 23 May 2011 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/planning-vs-acting/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I’m all for thought leadership. Folks driving our security thinking and activities forward benefit from it. Josh Corman is one of those leaders. He’s a &lt;em&gt;big thinker&lt;/em&gt; – he can suspend disbelief and reality long enough to envision a different outcome, and make his points with passion.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Friday Summary: May 20, 2011</title><link>/blog/friday-summary-may-20-2011/</link><pubDate>Fri, 20 May 2011 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/friday-summary-may-20-2011/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I stumbled on my last employer’s shutdown plans while rummaging around my old email archives. Those messages were from today’s date 3 years ago – not coincidentally the day Rich and I began to discuss me joining Securosis. At milestones like this I tend to get all philosophical and look back at the change, and what I like and dislike about the move. How do I feel about this change in my career? Where are we as a company, and is it anywhere near what we planned? I had no idea what an analyst really did – I just wanted to help people understand security technologies and be involved much more broadly than just database security. I kinda thought I was getting out of the startup game, but Securosis has the feel of a startup – the freedom to follow our vision, the pressure to focus on what’s most important, the agility in decision making and long hours. But it also feels like people appreciate our take on what analysts can be, which makes me think we have a shot at making this little shop a success.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Incite 5/18/2011: Trophies</title><link>/blog/incite-5-18-2011-trophies/</link><pubDate>Wed, 18 May 2011 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/incite-5-18-2011-trophies/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;As mentioned last week, I’ve been mired in the twins’ baseball/softball playoffs the past 2 weeks. That ended Saturday, with the Rothman clan going 1-1 in championship games. XX2’s team lost a close game and took the runner-up trophy. The Boy’s team eked out a win after dominating the league most of the year to take home the victory. It’s funny, you’d think there would be angst and disappointment coming from the girl, and happiness emanating from the boy. But that wasn’t exactly the case.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>BeyondTrust Acquires Lumigent Assets</title><link>/blog/beyondtrust-acquires-lumigent-assets/</link><pubDate>Tue, 17 May 2011 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/beyondtrust-acquires-lumigent-assets/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.beyondtrust.com/PressReleases/BeyondTrust_Unveils_PowerBroker_Database.aspx"&gt;BeyondTrust announced today&lt;/a&gt; that it has acquired the assets of Database Activity Monitoring vendor Lumigent. Some of you are saying “Who?” Others, who have been around the DAM space a few years, shake your heads in dismay at what might have been. There was a time – way back in the 2004-2005 timeframe – that Lumigent had a clear leadership position in the Database Activity Monitoring space. They won many head-to-head sales engagements. They had a good sales and marketing team, the best Sarbanes-Oxley reports in the industry, the only viable auditing tool for Sybase, and the only platform that provided “before and after” query values. The latter was &lt;em&gt;the&lt;/em&gt; hot feature for forensic audits and regulatory compliance, and every customer wanted it. Greylock, North Bridge, and NetIQ invested. Lumigent was a shining star in the nascent DAM market and they were making a name for themselves.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>VMWare Buys Shavlik: One Stop Shop for Virtual Infrastructure?</title><link>/blog/vmware-buys-shavlik-one-stop-shop-for-virtual-infrastructure/</link><pubDate>Tue, 17 May 2011 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/vmware-buys-shavlik-one-stop-shop-for-virtual-infrastructure/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;The M&amp;amp;A train gathers steam in the security space. With Lumigent’s assets off the table, the TripWire buy, Sophos/Astaro, and RSA/NetWitness, it seems the busiest guys in town are the investment bankers. &lt;a href="http://www.marketwire.com/press-release/vmware-to-acquire-shavlik-technologies-nyse-vmw-1514638.htm"&gt;VMware has joined the parade by buying configuration management player Shavlik&lt;/a&gt;, ostensibly to facilitate the adoption of virtualization in the SMB market segment, though we believe that oversimplifies VMware’s ambition to be a one-stop shop for all things virtual infrastructure.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Defining Failure</title><link>/blog/defining-failure/</link><pubDate>Mon, 16 May 2011 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/defining-failure/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Given the hard time we have defining success in the security field, you’d think we must have at least a firm handle on failure. But that isn’t entirely the case. As both an entrepreneur and a security guy, I may have a different perspective on failure, which influences how I look at pretty much all our business activities. I read a lot of VC and entrepreneur blogs, not because I want to raise money – in fact I’d rather hook my soft targets to a car battery than take outside investment. But I need to learn about how folks are screwing things up and try not to do that.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Cybersecurity’s RICO Suave: Assessing the Proposed Legislation</title><link>/blog/cybersecuritys-rico-suave-assessing-the-proposed-legislation/</link><pubDate>Fri, 13 May 2011 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/cybersecuritys-rico-suave-assessing-the-proposed-legislation/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;With some fanfare, the US executive branch (the White House) unveiled a &lt;a href="http://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2011/05/12/fact-sheet-cybersecurity-legislative-proposal"&gt;proposal for cybersecurity legislation&lt;/a&gt; &lt;em&gt;“focused on improving cybersecurity for the American people, our Nation’s critical infrastructure, and the Federal Government’s own networks and computers.”&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Friday Summary: May 13, 2011</title><link>/blog/friday-summary-may-13-2011/</link><pubDate>Thu, 12 May 2011 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/friday-summary-may-13-2011/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;If you follow me on Twitter (&lt;a href="http://twitter.com/#!/rmogull"&gt;@rmogull&lt;/a&gt;) you might suspect that last week I took a short vacation. And that said vacation started somewhat auspiciously. And said event really pissed me off to a degree I normally don’t let myself hit. And, just perhaps, American Airlines was responsible.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Thoma Bravo Trips the Wire Fantastic</title><link>/blog/thoma-bravo-trips-the-wire-fantastic/</link><pubDate>Thu, 12 May 2011 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/thoma-bravo-trips-the-wire-fantastic/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;With the global economy apparently warming and lots of IPOs hitting the Street, it was a bit surprising to see &lt;a href="http://www.tripwire.com/company/news/pressrelease/detail.cfm?press_id=549"&gt;TripWire opt for a buyout by Thoma Bravo&lt;/a&gt;, as opposed to continuing with their IPO plans. But I found an article by &lt;a href="http://www.bizjournals.com/portland/blog/2011/05/how-tripwires-ipo-plans-were-foiled.html?ana=e_pft"&gt;the local Portland OR Business Journal&lt;/a&gt; which explained things a bit.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Incite 5/11/2011: Generalists and Specialists</title><link>/blog/incite-5-11-2011-generalists-and-specialists/</link><pubDate>Wed, 11 May 2011 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/incite-5-11-2011-generalists-and-specialists/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Looking back over 30+ years, I realize my athletic career peaked at 10. I played First Base on the Monsey Orioles (“Minor League”). Our team was stacked, and we won the championship. I kept playing baseball for a few more years but my teams never made it to the championship, and when the bases moved out to 90 feet my lead feet became the beginning of the end. But it’s okay – I was pretty good with computers and in chess club too. Yep, I was fitted for my tool belt pretty early.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Incomplete Thought: Existential Identities (or: Who the F*** are You?)</title><link>/blog/incomplete-thought-existential-identities/</link><pubDate>Tue, 10 May 2011 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/incomplete-thought-existential-identities/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Do you ever think about how you could just disappear? Or become someone else? Maybe only I do that after reading one too many Jason Bourne novels. Given anyone’s ability, with a keyboard and an Internet connection, to become anyone (even Abraham Lincoln is spewing quotes on Twitter now), what does ‘identity’ mean now? In the future? And is your ‘identity’ singular, or will it become &lt;em&gt;identities&lt;/em&gt; moving forward?&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>SIEM: Out with the Old</title><link>/blog/siem-out-with-the-old/</link><pubDate>Tue, 10 May 2011 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/siem-out-with-the-old/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;About 4 years ago we saw the first big wave of replacements of older email security tools with a second generation we now call ‘content security’. Early email security products were deployed in-house and focused on anti-virus, anti-spam, and mail server integration. The current generation of products offered new SaaS and hybrid deployment models, technology advancements in web and content filtering, more elastic service sets, and centralized web management consoles. And let’s not forget the larger security firms with products lagging far behind the state of the art, milking their cash cows while smaller firms innovated.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Friday Summary: May 6, 2011</title><link>/blog/friday-summary-may-6-2011/</link><pubDate>Fri, 06 May 2011 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/friday-summary-may-6-2011/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;A few months back one my dogs knocked over one my speakers. Sent it flying, actually. 3’ 50lb wood cabinet speaker – as if it wasn’t there. The culprit is still a puppy, but when she gets ripping, she can pretty much take out any piece of furniture I own. And she has a big butt. She seems to run into everything butt first, which is impressive as she does not walk backwards. Wife calls her ‘J-Lo’. She learned how to spin from playing with my boxer, and now she spins out of control when she is amped up. Big ass, right into a chair… BANG! I miss having music in the living room, so I thought I would solve the problem by bringing out a pair of tower speakers from the back room. They are six feet tall and weigh 180lb &lt;em&gt;each&lt;/em&gt;. I thought that was the perfect solution, until she moved the piano a half of an inch with one of her spins. For the sake of the speakers, and my health, I removed all stereo components from the living room.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Sophos Wishes upon A-star-o</title><link>/blog/sophos-wishes-upon-a-star-o/</link><pubDate>Fri, 06 May 2011 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/sophos-wishes-upon-a-star-o/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;In the security industry successful companies need have breadth and scale. Security is and will remain an overhead function, so end users must strive to balance broad coverage against efficiency to control, and hopefully reduce, overhead. Scoff as you may, but integration at all levels of the stack does happen, and that favors bigger companies with broader product portfolios.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Earth to Symantec: AV doesn’t stop the APT</title><link>/blog/earth-to-symantec-av-doesnt-stop-the-apt/</link><pubDate>Wed, 04 May 2011 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/earth-to-symantec-av-doesnt-stop-the-apt/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;If you read saw the press release title &lt;a href="http://finance.yahoo.com/news/Symantec-Introduces-New-iw-2805478397.html?x=0&amp;amp;.v=1"&gt;Symantec Introduces New Security Solutions to Counter Advanced Persistent Threats&lt;/a&gt;, what would you expect? Perhaps a detailed security monitoring solution, or maybe they bought a full packet capture solution, or perhaps &lt;em&gt;really&lt;/em&gt; innovated with something interesting? Now what if told you that it’s actually about the latest version of Symantec’s endpoint protection product, with a management console for AV and DLP? You’d probably crap your pants from laughing so hard. I know that’s what I did, and my laundromat is not going to be happy.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Incite 5/4/2011: Free Agent Status Enabled</title><link>/blog/incite-5-4-2011-free-agent-mode-enabled/</link><pubDate>Wed, 04 May 2011 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/incite-5-4-2011-free-agent-mode-enabled/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Last weekend was a little oasis in the NFL desert that has been this offseason. It looked like there would be court-ordered peace, now maybe not so much. The draft reminded me of the possibilities of the new season, at least for a little while. One of the casualties of this non-offseason has been free agency. You know, where guys who have put in their time shop their services to the highest bidder.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Software vs. Appliance: Data Collection</title><link>/blog/software-vs-appliance-data-collection/</link><pubDate>Wed, 04 May 2011 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/software-vs-appliance-data-collection/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Wrapping up our Software vs. Appliance series, I want to remind the audience this series was prompted by my desire to spotlight the FUD in Database Activity Monitoring sales processes. I have mentioned data collection as one of the topics Data collection matters. As much as we would like to say the deployment architecture is paramount for performance and effectiveness, data collection is crucial too, and we need to cover a couple of the competitive topics that get lumped into bake-offs.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Software vs. Appliance: Virtual Appliances</title><link>/blog/software-vs-appliance-virtual-appliances/</link><pubDate>Tue, 03 May 2011 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/software-vs-appliance-virtual-appliances/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;For Database Activity Monitoring, Virtual Appliances result from hardware appliances not fitting into virtualization models. Management, hardware consolidation, resource and network abstraction, and even power savings don’t fit. Infrastructure as a Service (IaaS) disrupts the hardware model. So DAM vendors pack their application stacks into virtual machine images and sell those. It’s a quick win for them, as very few changes are needed, and they escape the limitations of hardware. A virtual appliance is ‘built’ and configured like a hardware appliance, but delivered without the hardware. That means all the software – both third party and vendor created – contained within the hardware appliances is now wrapped in a virtual machine image. This image is run and managed by a Virtual Machine Manager (VMware, Xen, Hyper-V, etc.), but otherwise functions the same as a physical appliance.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Standards: Should You Care? (Probably Not)</title><link>/blog/standards-should-you-care-probably-not/</link><pubDate>Tue, 03 May 2011 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/standards-should-you-care-probably-not/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I just wrote up my portions of tomorrow’s Incite, and talked a bit about the importance of standards in product selection. But it’s hard to treat cogently in 30 words, so let me dig into it a bit more here. Mostly because of prevailing opinion on the importance of standards, and to what degree standards support should be a key selection criteria.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>SDLC and Entropy</title><link>/blog/sdlc-and-entropy/</link><pubDate>Mon, 02 May 2011 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/sdlc-and-entropy/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I really enjoy having Gunnar Peterson on the team. Seems like every time we talk in our staff meeting I laugh and learn something – two rare outcomes in this profession. We were having a laugh Friday morning about the tendencies of software development organizations to trip over themselves in order to improve. Several different clients were having the same problem in understanding how to apply security to code development. Part of our discussion:&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>What’s Old Is New again</title><link>/blog/whats-old-is-new-again/</link><pubDate>Sat, 30 Apr 2011 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/whats-old-is-new-again/</guid><description>&lt;blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The entire credit card table was encrypted and we have no evidence that credit card data was taken. The personal data table, which is a separate data set, was not encrypted, but was, of course, behind a very sophisticated security system that was breached in a malicious attack.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Friday Summary: April 29, 2011</title><link>/blog/friday-summary-april-29-2011/</link><pubDate>Thu, 28 Apr 2011 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/friday-summary-april-29-2011/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I’ve taught a lot of different classes over the years, and always found the different structures to be pretty interesting.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Software vs. Appliance: Software</title><link>/blog/software-vs-appliance-software/</link><pubDate>Thu, 28 Apr 2011 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/software-vs-appliance-software/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;“It’s anything you want it to be – it’s software!” – Adrian.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Database Activity Monitoring software is deployed differently than DAM appliances. Whereas appliances are &lt;em&gt;usually&lt;/em&gt; two-tier event collector / manager combinations which divide responsibilities, software deployments are as diverse as customer environments. It might be stand-alone servers installed in multiple geographic locations, loosely coupled confederations each performing different types of monitoring, hub &amp;amp; spoke systems, everything on a single database server, all the way up to N-tier enterprise deployments. It’s more about how the software is configured and how resources are allocated by the customer to address their specific requirements. Most customers use a central management server communicating directly with software agents with collect events. That said, the management server configuration varies from customer to customer, and evolves over time.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Incite 4/27/2011: Just Write</title><link>/blog/incite-4-27-2011-just-write/</link><pubDate>Wed, 27 Apr 2011 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/incite-4-27-2011-just-write/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;All I wanted to do on Monday night was go to sleep. I had a flight in the morning and thought it would be a good idea to get some rest. So I sit down with the Boss and we catch up on the day, discuss some tactics to deal with issues the kids face, and I’m ready to hit the rack. Then I notice she’s watching a movie called &lt;a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1104806/"&gt;One Week&lt;/a&gt; (Netflix streaming FTW) where basically a guy is given a week to live and sets off on a cross-Canada jaunt on a motorcycle to discover himself, meet some interesting people, and do stuff that happens in movies.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Security Benchmarking, Beyond Metrics: Benchmarking in Action</title><link>/blog/security-benchmarking-beyond-metrics-benchmarking-in-action/</link><pubDate>Mon, 25 Apr 2011 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/security-benchmarking-beyond-metrics-benchmarking-in-action/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;As we wrap up our series on Security Benchmarking, we find it instructive to actually walk through a scenario and apply the process. Yes, the scenario is a bit contrived, but we’ll use it to hit the high points of the process, deciding where to start, collecting the data, establishing the peer group and communicate the findings. Keep in mind that we focus on getting &lt;em&gt;quick wins&lt;/em&gt; , showing immediate value, building momentum and leveraging that momentum for programatic success.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Security Benchmarking, Beyond Metrics: Index</title><link>/blog/security-benchmarking-beyond-metrics-index-of-posts/</link><pubDate>Mon, 25 Apr 2011 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/security-benchmarking-beyond-metrics-index-of-posts/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;As is (now) our custom, we post a set of links to each blog series as it wraps up. This both gives us an easy way to find all our posts, and acknowledges that not everyone wants our &lt;a href="http://www.securosis.com/blog/full"&gt;complete feed&lt;/a&gt; and may want to read posts once they’re all written.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Why We Didn’t Pick the Cloud (Mostly), and That’s Okay</title><link>/blog/why-we-didnt-pick-the-cloud-mostly-and-thats-okay-2/</link><pubDate>Mon, 25 Apr 2011 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/why-we-didnt-pick-the-cloud-mostly-and-thats-okay-2/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;It’s no secret that we are currently working on a new software platform to deliver actionable security research to a broader market, engage folks, and… umm… feed our families. As you might expect, like any software project, it’s running about 30% late and 70% over budget. I just can’t seem to stop making our developers find &lt;em&gt;exactly&lt;/em&gt; the right imagery and user experience to best represent the Securosis brand. Mike has coined a new term, ‘analness’, to describe the gyrations we’ve gone through, but I’m okay with that because we have spent years building our reputation and aren’t about to roll out a huge steaming pile of crap just to hit a delivery date.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Friday Summary: April 22, 2011</title><link>/blog/friday-summary-april-22-2011/</link><pubDate>Fri, 22 Apr 2011 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/friday-summary-april-22-2011/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;The Apple-ification of my home continues, as I got an Apple TV as an early birthday present. Tinkerer that I am, I thought “Wouldn’t it be great to hardwire it with Cat5 cable to the Airport Extreme? Download speeds will be &lt;em&gt;awesome&lt;/em&gt; ”. So I changed the existing phone lines (I’ll never use a POTS land line again) to Ethernet. Which meant changing all the phone jacks, and then the wall plates. And rewiring the central connections. And putting a new router in the closet. And adding new power to the closet. And wiring in a small low-voltage fan. It was the snowball effect, but this was one of the first times I have not minded, because I have Giant Freakin’ Toolbox!&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Data Security: Dropbox Should Mimic CrashPlan</title><link>/blog/data-security-dropbox-should-mimic-crashplan/</link><pubDate>Thu, 21 Apr 2011 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/data-security-dropbox-should-mimic-crashplan/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I love it when people froth at the mouth once they finally realize the blazingly obvious!&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;For today’s example let’s look at the big &lt;a href="http://www.macworld.com/article/159370/2011/04/dropbox_security.html"&gt;Dropbox data privacy controversy&lt;/a&gt;. There are a few serious problems with Dropbox, such as &lt;a href="http://www.iamit.org/blog/2011/04/the-curious-case-of-dropbox-security/"&gt;not requiring a password after a host is added&lt;/a&gt;, making it super easy for someone to pretend to be you (if they get your host ID) and access your data. That’s not great, but there are far worse things out there I worry about.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Oracle CVSS: ‘Partial+’ is ‘Useful-’</title><link>/blog/oracle-cvss-partial-is-useful/</link><pubDate>Thu, 21 Apr 2011 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/oracle-cvss-partial-is-useful/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Oracle announced the &lt;a href="http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/topics/security/cpuapr2011-301950.html"&gt;April 2011 CPU&lt;/a&gt; this week, with just a few moderate security issues for the database. Most DBAs monitor Oracle’s Critical Patch Updates (CPU) and are already familiar with the Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS). For those of you who are not, it’s a method of calculating the relative risk of software and hardware vulnerabilities, resulting in a score that describes the potential severity of the vulnerability if an attacker were to exploit the problem. The scores are provided to help IT and operations teams decide what to patch and when. Vendors are cagey about providing vulnerability information – under the belief that any information helps attackers create exploits – so CVSS is a compromise to help customers without overly helping adversaries.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Security Benchmarking, Beyond Metrics: You Can’t Benchmark everything</title><link>/blog/security-benchmarking-beyond-metrics-you-cant-benchmark-everything/</link><pubDate>Thu, 21 Apr 2011 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/security-benchmarking-beyond-metrics-you-cant-benchmark-everything/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;We have spent much of this series on why benchmarking is important. But we also need to point out some situations where benchmarking may &lt;em&gt;not&lt;/em&gt; be appropriate. There are clearly situations where you can’t benchmark, particularly is on granular operational data, which I call &lt;em&gt;Ninja Metrics&lt;/em&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Incite 4/20/2011: Family Parties</title><link>/blog/incite-4-20-2011-family-parties/</link><pubDate>Wed, 20 Apr 2011 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/incite-4-20-2011-family-parties/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;The last two nights, we have celebrated Passover. Basically, we have a big dinner commemorating the escape of our forefathers from bondage and slavery in Egypt. At least that’s how the story goes, although I wasn’t there, so I maintain a healthy skepticism regarding burning bushes, parting seas, and plagues. But the point remains whether or not the stories are true. It’s really an excuse to party with friends and family, and enjoy some time together outside the craziness of day-to-day existence.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Software vs. Appliance: Appliances</title><link>/blog/software-vs-appliance-appliances/</link><pubDate>Wed, 20 Apr 2011 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/software-vs-appliance-appliances/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I want to discuss deployment tradeoffs in Database Activity Monitoring, focusing on advantages and disadvantages of hardware appliances. It might seem minor, but the delivery model makes a big first impression on customers. It’s the first difference they notice when comparing DAM products, and it’s impressive – those racks of blinking whirring 1U &amp;amp; 2U machines, neatly racked, do stick with you. They cluster in groups in your data center, with lots of cool lights, logos, and deafening fans. Sometimes called “pizza boxes” by the older IT crowd, these are basic commodity computers with 1-2 processors, memory, redundant power supplies, and a disk drive or two. Inexpensive and fast, appliances are more than half the world’s DAM deployments.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Categorizing FUD</title><link>/blog/categorizing-fud/</link><pubDate>Tue, 19 Apr 2011 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/categorizing-fud/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;In a world full of TLAs (three letter acronyms), none resonates for security people as strongly as FUD. Or Fear, Uncertainty, and Doubt for you n00bs. Many of us rail at the offensive use of FUD in security sales. But let’s take a step back and acknowledge that security is like insurance. With very rare exceptions, security doesn’t help anyone sell more stuff. It doesn’t really help companies operate more efficiently. It’s basically about controlling downside risk.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>How to Read and Act on the 2011 Verizon Data Breach Investigations Report (DBIR)</title><link>/blog/how-to-read-and-act-on-the-2011-verizon-data-breach-investigations-report-dbir/</link><pubDate>Tue, 19 Apr 2011 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/how-to-read-and-act-on-the-2011-verizon-data-breach-investigations-report-dbir/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Today Verizon released the 2011 Data Breach Investigations Report: our single best source of actual incident data in the security industry, based on comprehensive metrics gathered during hundreds of incident investigations.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>New White Paper: React Faster and Better: New Approaches for Advanced Incident Response</title><link>/blog/new-white-paper-react-faster-and-better-new-approaches-for-advanced-incident-response/</link><pubDate>Mon, 18 Apr 2011 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/new-white-paper-react-faster-and-better-new-approaches-for-advanced-incident-response/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;If you don’t already have attackers in your environment you will soon enough, so we have been spending a lot of time with clients figuring out how to respond in this age of APT (Advanced Persistent Threat) attackers and other attacks you have no shot at stopping. You need to detect and respond more effectively. We call this philosophy “React Faster and Better”, and have finally documented and collected our thoughts on the topic. Here are a couple excerpts from the paper to give you a feel for the issue and how we deal with it:&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Security Benchmarking, Going Beyond Metrics: Continuous Improvement</title><link>/blog/security-benchmarking-going-beyond-metrics-continuous-improvement/</link><pubDate>Fri, 15 Apr 2011 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/security-benchmarking-going-beyond-metrics-continuous-improvement/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;So you have &lt;a href="http://securosis.com/blog/security-benchmarking-going-beyond-metrics-defining-peer-groups-and-analyzi"&gt;defined your peer groups and analysis&lt;/a&gt; and spent a bunch of time &lt;a href="http://securosis.com/blog/security-benchmarking-going-beyond-metrics-communications-strategies"&gt;communicating&lt;/a&gt; what you found to your security program’s key stakeholders. Now it’s time to shift focus internally. One of the cool things about security metrics and benchmarks is the ability to analyze trends over time and use that data to track progress against your key goals. Imagine that – managing people and programs based on &lt;strong&gt;data&lt;/strong&gt; , not just gut feel.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Weekend Reading: Security Benchmarking Series</title><link>/blog/weekend-reading-security-benchmarking-series/</link><pubDate>Fri, 15 Apr 2011 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/weekend-reading-security-benchmarking-series/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Just in case you had nothing to do over the weekend, I came up with some homework to catch you up on our Security Benchmarking series. We’re clicking right along and think the content is kickass. So check it out, comment, and let us know if we are smoking crack.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Friday Summary: April 15, 2011 (Tax Day!)</title><link>/blog/friday-summary-april-15-2011-tax-day/</link><pubDate>Thu, 14 Apr 2011 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/friday-summary-april-15-2011-tax-day/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;It’s tax day.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;You don’t have time to read this.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I don’t have time to write it.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Actually, my accountant is taking care of my taxes (I don’t trust myself with them). What’s really sucking down my time is preparing all the hands-on portions of the Cloud Security Alliance training.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Security Benchmarking, Going Beyond Metrics: Communications Strategies</title><link>/blog/security-benchmarking-going-beyond-metrics-communications-strategies/</link><pubDate>Thu, 14 Apr 2011 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/security-benchmarking-going-beyond-metrics-communications-strategies/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;The simple fact is that most folks senior security folks came from the technical side of the house. They started as competent (if not studly) sysadmins or security administrators, drew the short straw, and ended up with management responsibility. But very few of these folks ever studied management, gone through management training, or done anything but learned on the job. This creates a situation where senior security folks spend a lot of time doing stuff, but not enough time talking about it.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Incite 4/13/2011: Jonesing for Air</title><link>/blog/incite-4-13-2011-jonesing-for-air/</link><pubDate>Wed, 13 Apr 2011 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/incite-4-13-2011-jonesing-for-air/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;“Hi. I’m Mike. And I’m an addict.”&lt;/em&gt; I start every chapter of the &lt;a href="http://www.pragmaticcso.com/"&gt;Pragmatic CSO&lt;/a&gt; with those very words. There there are many things you can be addicted to. Thrills. Sex. Sugar. Booze. Drugs. Twitter. Pr0n. Caffeine. Food. Some are worse than others, though none of them really good for you. But now I have to face up to another addiction. The need for gadgets. I’m jonesing for a new MacBook Air. Big time. Like waking up in the middle of the night wanting some SSD goodness in a petite 2lb package. Jonesing, I say, and it’s not pretty.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Security Benchmarking, Going Beyond Metrics: Defining Peer Groups and Analyzing Data</title><link>/blog/security-benchmarking-going-beyond-metrics-defining-peer-groups-and-analyzing-data/</link><pubDate>Wed, 13 Apr 2011 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/security-benchmarking-going-beyond-metrics-defining-peer-groups-and-analyzing-data/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;So your &lt;a href="http://securosis.com/blog/security-benchmarking-going-beyond-metrics-security-metrics-from-40000-feet"&gt;key security metrics&lt;/a&gt; are &lt;a href="http://securosis.com/blog/security-benchmarking-going-beyond-metrics-collecting-data-systematically"&gt;collected&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href="http://securosis.com/blog/security-benchmarking-going-beyond-metrics-sharing-data-safely"&gt;shared safely&lt;/a&gt;. What comes next? Now we need to start deriving value from the data. Remember, metrics and numbers aren’t worth the storage to keep them, unless you use them &lt;em&gt;as management tools&lt;/em&gt;. You need to start comparing the data, drawing conclusions, and adjusting your security program based on the data. OMG, actually making changes based on data rather than shiny objects, breaches, airline magazine articles, and compliance mandate changes. How novel.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Database Trends</title><link>/blog/database-trends/</link><pubDate>Tue, 12 Apr 2011 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/database-trends/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;This is a non-security post, in case that matters to you. A few days ago I was reading about a &lt;a href="http://www.globes.co.il/serveen/globes/docview.asp?did=1000636459"&gt;failed Telcomm firm ‘refocusing’&lt;/a&gt; its business and technology to become a cloud database provider. I’m thinking that’s the last frackin’ thing we need. Some opportunistic serial start-up-tard can’t wait to fail the first time, and wants skip over onto not one but &lt;em&gt;two&lt;/em&gt; , hot trends. Smells like 1999. Of course they landed an additional $4M; couple Cloud with a modular database and it’s a no-lose situation – at least for landing venture funding.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>New Release: Our Insanely Comprehensive Database Security Framework and Metrics</title><link>/blog/new-release-our-insanely-comprehensive-database-security-framework-and-metrics/</link><pubDate>Tue, 12 Apr 2011 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/new-release-our-insanely-comprehensive-database-security-framework-and-metrics/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Some projects take us a few days. Others? More like 18 months.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Back before Mike even joined us, Adrian and I started a ‘quick’ project to develop a basic set of metrics for database security programs. As with most of our Project Quant efforts, we quickly realized there wasn’t even a starting framework out there, never mind any metrics. We needed to create a process for every database security task before we could define where people spent their time and money. Over the next year and a half we posted, reposted, designed, redesigned, and finally produced a framework we are pretty darn proud of.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Software vs. Appliance: Understanding DAM Deployment Tradeoffs</title><link>/blog/software-vs-appliance-understanding-dam-deployment-tradeoffs/</link><pubDate>Mon, 11 Apr 2011 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/software-vs-appliance-understanding-dam-deployment-tradeoffs/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;One thing I don’t miss from my vendor days in the Database Activity Monitoring market is the competitive infighting. Sure, I loved to do the competitive analyses to see how each vendor viewed itself, and how they were all trying to differentiate their products. I did not enjoy going into a customer shop after a competitor “poisoned the well” with misleading statements, evangelical pitches touting &lt;em&gt;the right way&lt;/em&gt; to tackle a problem, or flat-out lies. Being second into a customer account meant having to deal with the dozen land mines left in their minds, and explaining those issues just to get even. The common land mines were about performance, lack of impact on IT systems, and platform support. The next vendor in line countered with architectures that did not scale, difficulties in deployment, inability to collect important events, and management complexity of every &lt;em&gt;other&lt;/em&gt; product on the market. The customer often &lt;em&gt;cannot&lt;/em&gt; determine who’s lying until after they purchase something and see if it does what the vendor claimed, so this game continues until the market reaches a certain level of maturity.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Always Be Looking</title><link>/blog/always-be-looking/</link><pubDate>Thu, 07 Apr 2011 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/always-be-looking/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;You really should read Lee Kushner and Mike Murray’s &lt;a href="http://www.infosecleaders.com/"&gt;Information Security Leaders blog&lt;/a&gt;. Besides being good guys, they usually post good perspectives on career management each week. Like this post on &lt;a href="http://www.infosecleaders.com/2011/03/career-advice-tuesday-rats-and-ships/"&gt;Rats and Ships&lt;/a&gt;, where they basically address how to know your company is in trouble and when to start looking for what’s next. Obviously if the company is in turmoil and you don’t have your head in the sand, the writing will be on the wall.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Friday Summary: April 8, 2011</title><link>/blog/friday-summary-april-8-2011/</link><pubDate>Thu, 07 Apr 2011 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/friday-summary-april-8-2011/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I was almost Phished this week. Not by some Nigerian scammer, or Russian botnet, but by my own bank.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Bundled with both my checking and mortgage statements – with the bank’s name, logos, and phone number was the warning: “Notice: Credit Report Review Re: Suspicious activity detection”. The letter made it appear that there were ongoing suspicious activity reported by the credit agency, and I needed to take &lt;em&gt;immediate&lt;/em&gt; action. I thought “Crud, now I have to deal with this.” Enclosed was a signature sheet that looked like they wanted permission to investigate and take action. But wait a minute – when does my bank ask for permission? My suspicion awoke.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Incite 4/6/2011: Do Work</title><link>/blog/incite-4-6-2011-do-work/</link><pubDate>Wed, 06 Apr 2011 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/incite-4-6-2011-do-work/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;We spent last weekend up north visiting friends and family while the kids are on Spring Break. We decided to surprise them on Sunday by going to a baseball game. It was opening weekend and our home team was in town. We got cheap seats in the upper deck, but throughout the game we kept moving downwards, and by the 9th inning we were literally in the front row on the dugout. The Boss turned to me and asked if the kids had any idea how lucky they are. Yeah, right.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Security Benchmarking, Going Beyond Metrics: Sharing Data Safely</title><link>/blog/security-benchmarking-going-beyond-metrics-sharing-data-safely/</link><pubDate>Wed, 06 Apr 2011 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/security-benchmarking-going-beyond-metrics-sharing-data-safely/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;The best definition of a security benchmarking effort I am aware of is in Chapter 11 of my book, &lt;a href="http://www.pragmaticcso.com/"&gt;The Pragmatic CSO&lt;/a&gt;, which provides a good perspective on why benchmarking is important.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Less Innovation Please</title><link>/blog/less-innovation-please/</link><pubDate>Tue, 05 Apr 2011 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/less-innovation-please/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;It happens every time we have a series of breaches. The ‘innovators’ get press coverage with some brand-new idea for how to stop hackers and catch malicious employees trying to steal data. We are seeing yet another cycle right now, which Rich discussed yesterday in &lt;a href="http://securosis.com/blog/firestarter-now-what"&gt;FireStarter: Now What?&lt;/a&gt; The sheer idiocy of &lt;em&gt;Wired Magazine&lt;/em&gt; ’s &lt;a href="http://www.wired.com/dangerroom/2011/04/paranoia-meter-hbgarys-plot-to-find-the-next-pentagon-wikileaker/"&gt;Paranoia Meter&lt;/a&gt; made me laugh out loud. Not that monitoring should not be done, but the concept of monitoring users’ &lt;em&gt;physical&lt;/em&gt; traits to identify bad behavior is a lot more effort and is also error-prone. Looking at posture, mouse movements, and keystrokes to judge state of mind, then using that to predict data theft? Who could believe in that? It baffles me. User behavior in the IT realm does not need to be measured in terms of eye movement, typing speed, or shifting in one’s seat – if it did, we would need to round up all the 3rd graders in the world because we’d have a serious problem. Worse, the demand is clearly a marketing attempt to capitalize on WikiLeaks and HBGary – the whole thing reminds me more than a little of &lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Entity_%28South_Park%29"&gt;South Park’s ‘It’&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Security Benchmarking, Going Beyond Metrics: Collecting Data Systematically</title><link>/blog/security-benchmarking-going-beyond-metrics-collecting-data-systematically/</link><pubDate>Tue, 05 Apr 2011 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/security-benchmarking-going-beyond-metrics-collecting-data-systematically/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Once you have figured out &lt;a href="http://securosis.com/blog/security-benchmarking-going-beyond-metrics-security-metrics-from-40000-feet"&gt;what you want to count&lt;/a&gt; (security metrics), the next question is how to collect the data. Remember we look for metrics that are a) consistently and objectively measurable, and b) cheap to gather. That means some things we &lt;em&gt;want&lt;/em&gt; to count may not be feasible. So let’s go through each bucket of metrics and list out the places we can get that data.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>FireStarter: Now What?</title><link>/blog/firestarter-now-what/</link><pubDate>Mon, 04 Apr 2011 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/firestarter-now-what/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I have always believed that security – both physical and digital – is a self-correcting system.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;No one wants to invest any more into security than they need to. Locks, passwords, firewalls, well-armed ninja – they all take money, time, and effort we’d rather spend getting our jobs done, with our families, or on personal pursuits. Only the security geeks and the paranoid actually &lt;em&gt;enjoy&lt;/em&gt; spending on security. So the world only invests the minimum needed to keep things (mostly) humming.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Fool us once… EMC/RSA Buys NetWitness</title><link>/blog/fool-us-once-emc-rsa-buys-netwitness/</link><pubDate>Mon, 04 Apr 2011 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/fool-us-once-emc-rsa-buys-netwitness/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;To no one’s surprise (after NetworkWorld &lt;a href="http://www.networkworld.com/news/2011/032411-emc-netwitness.html"&gt;spilled the beans&lt;/a&gt; two weeks ago), &lt;a href="http://www.rsa.com/press_release.aspx?id=11353"&gt;RSA/EMC formalized its acquisition of NetWitness&lt;/a&gt;. I guess they don’t want to get fooled again the next time an APT comes to visit. Kidding aside, we have long been big fans of full packet capture, and believe it’s a critical technology moving forward. On that basis alone, this deal looks good for RSA/EMC.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Quick Wins with DLP Light: The Process</title><link>/blog/quick-wins-with-dlp-light-the-process/</link><pubDate>Mon, 04 Apr 2011 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/quick-wins-with-dlp-light-the-process/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;The objective of the Quick Wins process is to get results and show value as quickly as possible, while setting yourself up for long-term success. Quick Wins for DLP Light is related to the &lt;a href="http://securosis.com/research/papers/low-hanging-fruit-quick-wins-with-data-loss-prevention/"&gt;Quick Wins for DLP&lt;/a&gt; process, but heavily modified to deal both with the technical differences and the different organizational goals we see in DLP Light projects.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Quick Wins with DLP Light: Technologies and Architectures</title><link>/blog/quick-wins-with-dlp-light-technologies-and-architectures/</link><pubDate>Fri, 01 Apr 2011 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/quick-wins-with-dlp-light-technologies-and-architectures/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;DLP Light tools cover a wide range of technologies, architectures, and integration points. We can’t highlight them all, so here are the core features and common architectures. We have organized them by key features and deployment location (network, endpoint, etc.):&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Friday Summary: April 1, 2011</title><link>/blog/friday-summary-april-1-2011/</link><pubDate>Thu, 31 Mar 2011 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/friday-summary-april-1-2011/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Okay folks – raise your hands for this one. How many of you get an obvious spam message from a friend or family member on a weekly basis?&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>PROREALITY: Security is rarely a differentiator</title><link>/blog/proreality-security-is-rarely-a-differentiator/</link><pubDate>Thu, 31 Mar 2011 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/proreality-security-is-rarely-a-differentiator/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I’ve been in this business a long time – longer than most, though not as long as some. That longevity provides perspective, and has allowed me to observe the pendulum swinging back and forth more than once. This particular pendulum is the &lt;em&gt;security as an enabler&lt;/em&gt; concept – you know, positioning security not as an overhead function but as a revenue driver (either direct or indirect).&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>White Paper: Network Security in the Age of *Any* Computing</title><link>/blog/white-paper-network-security-in-the-age-of-any-computing/</link><pubDate>Thu, 31 Mar 2011 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/white-paper-network-security-in-the-age-of-any-computing/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;We all know about the challenges for security professionals posed by mobile devices, and by the need to connect to anything from anywhere. We have done some research on how to start securing those mobile devices, and have broadened that research with a network-centric perspective on these issues. Let’s set the stage for this paper:&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Incite 3/30/2011: The Silent Clipper</title><link>/blog/incite-3-30-2011-the-silent-clipper/</link><pubDate>Wed, 30 Mar 2011 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/incite-3-30-2011-the-silent-clipper/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I’m very fortunate to have inherited Rothman hair, which is gray but plentiful and grows fast. Like fungus. Given my schedule, I tend to wait until things get lost in my hair before I get it cut. Like birds; or yard debris; or Nintendo DS games. A few weeks back the Boss told me to get it cut when I lost my iPhone in my hair. So I arranged a day to hit the barber I have frequented for years.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>On Preboot Authentication and Encryption</title><link>/blog/on-preboot-authentication-and-encryption/</link><pubDate>Wed, 30 Mar 2011 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/on-preboot-authentication-and-encryption/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I am working on an encryption project – evaluating an upcoming product feature for a vendor – and the research is more interesting than I expected. Not that the feature is uninteresting, but I thought I knew all the answers going into this project. I was wrong.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Security Benchmarking, Going Beyond Metrics: Security Metrics (from 40,000 feet)</title><link>/blog/security-benchmarking-going-beyond-metrics-security-metrics-from-40000-feet/</link><pubDate>Wed, 30 Mar 2011 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/security-benchmarking-going-beyond-metrics-security-metrics-from-40000-feet/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;In &lt;a href="http://securosis.com/blog/security-benchmarking-going-beyond-metrics-introduction"&gt;our introduction to Security Benchmarking, Going Beyond Metrics&lt;/a&gt;, we spent some time defining metrics and pointing out that they have multiple consumers, which means we need to package and present the data to these different constituencies. As you’ll see, there is no lack of things to count. But in reality, just because you &lt;em&gt;can&lt;/em&gt; count something doesn’t mean you &lt;em&gt;should&lt;/em&gt;. So let’s dig a bit into what you can count.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Comments on Ponemon’s “What Auditors think about Crypto”</title><link>/blog/comments-on-ponemons-what-auditors-think-about-crypto/</link><pubDate>Tue, 29 Mar 2011 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/comments-on-ponemons-what-auditors-think-about-crypto/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;The Ponemon Institute has released a white paper, &lt;a href="http://www.thales-esecurity.com/en/Resources/White%20Papers/Ponemon%20Report%20-%20What%20auditors%20think%20about%20Crypto%20-%20March%202011.aspx"&gt;What auditors think about Crypto&lt;/a&gt; (registration required). I downloaded and took a cursory look at their results. My summary of their report is “IT auditors rely on encryption, but key management can be really hard”. No shock there. A client passed along a &lt;a href="http://searchsecurity.techtarget.com/news/article/0,289142,sid14_gci1528637,00.html"&gt;TechTarget blog post where Larry Ponemon is quoted as saying auditors prefer encryption &lt;/a&gt;, but worded to make their study sound like a comparison between encryption and tokenization. So I dove deep into their contents to see if I missed something. Nope. The study does not compare encryption to tokenization, and Larry’s juxtaposition implies it is.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>FAM: Selection Process</title><link>/blog/fam-selection-process/</link><pubDate>Tue, 29 Mar 2011 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/fam-selection-process/</guid><description>&lt;h2 id="define-needs"&gt;Define Needs&lt;/h2&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The first step in the process is to determine your needs, keeping in mind that there are two main drivers for File Activity Monitoring projects, and it’s important to understand the differences and priorities between them:&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>File Activity Monitoring Series Complete (Index)</title><link>/blog/file-activity-monitoring-series-complete-index/</link><pubDate>Tue, 29 Mar 2011 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/file-activity-monitoring-series-complete-index/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Once again, I have knocked off a series of posts for a new white paper. The title is “Understanding and Selecting a File Activity Monitoring Solution”. Although there are only a few vendors in the market, this is a technology I have been waiting a few years for, and I think it’s pretty useful.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>FAM: Policy Creation, Workflow, and Reporting</title><link>/blog/fam-policy-creation-workflow-and-reporting/</link><pubDate>Mon, 28 Mar 2011 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/fam-policy-creation-workflow-and-reporting/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Now that we have covered the base features it’s time to consider how these tie in with policies, workflow, and reporting. We’ll focus on the features needed to support these processes rather than defining the processes themselves.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Quick Wins with DLP Light</title><link>/blog/quick-wins-with-dlp-light/</link><pubDate>Mon, 28 Mar 2011 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/quick-wins-with-dlp-light/</guid><description>&lt;h2 id="introduction"&gt;Introduction&lt;/h2&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Our entire profession is called “information security”, but surprisingly few of our technologies focus on actually protecting the data itself, as opposed to the infrastructure surrounding it. Data Loss Prevention emerged nearly 10 years ago to address exactly this problem. By peering inside files, network traffic, and other sources – and understanding both content and context – DLP provides new capabilities comparable to when we first started looking inside network packets.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Security Benchmarking, Going Beyond Metrics: Introduction</title><link>/blog/security-benchmarking-going-beyond-metrics-introduction/</link><pubDate>Mon, 28 Mar 2011 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/security-benchmarking-going-beyond-metrics-introduction/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;At Securosis we tend to be passionate about security. We have the luxury of time (and lack of wingnuts yelling at us all day) to think about how security &lt;em&gt;should&lt;/em&gt; work, and make suggestions for how to get there. We also have our own pet projects – areas of research that get us excited. We usually focus on ‘hot’ topics, because they pay the bills. We rarely get to step back and think outside the box about a security process that really needs to change.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Captain Obvious Speaks: You Need Layers</title><link>/blog/captain-obvious-speaks-you-need-layers/</link><pubDate>Fri, 25 Mar 2011 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/captain-obvious-speaks-you-need-layers/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Driven by the continued noise about the RSA and Comodo breaches, we have spent a lot of time stating the obvious this week. But then I remember that what is obvious to us may not be to everyone else. And even if it is obvious to you, sometimes you need a reminder because you are probably too busy fighting fires and answering questions from senior management (like “Don’t I take dumps in a Comodo?”) to remember the obvious stuff.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Crisis Communications</title><link>/blog/crisis-communications/</link><pubDate>Thu, 24 Mar 2011 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/crisis-communications/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I realize that I have a tendency to overplay my emergency services background, but it does provide me with some perspective not common among infosec professionals. One example is crisis communications. While I haven’t gone through all the Public Information Officer (PIO) training, basic crisis communications is part of several incident management classes I have completed. I have also been involved in enough major meatspace and IT-related incidents to understand how the process goes.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>FAM: Additional Features</title><link>/blog/fam-additional-features/</link><pubDate>Thu, 24 Mar 2011 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/fam-additional-features/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Beyond the base FAM features, there are two additional functions to consider, depending on your requirements. We expect these to eventually join the base feature set, but for now they aren’t consistent across the available products.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Friday Summary: March 25, 2011</title><link>/blog/friday-summary-march-25-2011/</link><pubDate>Thu, 24 Mar 2011 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/friday-summary-march-25-2011/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I am probably in the minority, but when I buy something I think of it as mine. I paid for it so I own it.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Incite 3/23/2011: SEO Unicorns</title><link>/blog/incite-3-23-2011-seo-unicorns/</link><pubDate>Wed, 23 Mar 2011 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/incite-3-23-2011-seo-unicorns/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;It seems blog popularity is a double edged sword. Yes, thousands of folks read our stuff every day. But that also means we are a target for many &lt;em&gt;SEO Experts&lt;/em&gt; , who want to buy links from us. No, we don’t sell advertising on the site. But that doesn’t stop them from pummeling us with a bunch of requests each week. Most of the time we are pretty cordial, but not always.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>McAfee Acquires Sentrigo</title><link>/blog/mcafee-acquires-sentrigo/</link><pubDate>Wed, 23 Mar 2011 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/mcafee-acquires-sentrigo/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20110323005514/en/McAfee-Acquire-Sentrigo-Enhance-Database-Security-Portfolio"&gt;McAfee announced this morning its intention to acquire Sentrigo&lt;/a&gt;, a Database Activity Monitoring company. McAfee has had a partnership with Sentrigo for a couple years, and both companies have cooperatively sold the Sentrigo solution and developed high-level integration with McAfee’s security management software. McAfee’s existing enterprise customer base has shown interest in Database Activity Monitoring, and DAM is no longer as much of an evangelical sale as it used to be. Sentrigo is a small firm and integration of the two companies should go smoothly.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Agile and Hammers: They Don’t Fix Stupid</title><link>/blog/agile-and-hammers-they-dont-fix-stupid/</link><pubDate>Tue, 22 Mar 2011 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/agile-and-hammers-they-dont-fix-stupid/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I did not see the original &lt;a href="http://www.whattofix.com/blog/archives/2010/09/agile-ruined-my.php"&gt;Agile Ruined My Life&lt;/a&gt; post until I read Paul Krill’s &lt;a href="http://www.infoworld.com/d/application-development/agile-pioneer-versus-agile-ruined-my-life-critic-283?source=IFWNLE_nlt_stradev_2011-03-22"&gt;An agile pioneer versus an ‘agile ruined my life’ critic&lt;/a&gt; response today. I wish I had, as I would have used Mr. Markham’s post as an example of &lt;em&gt;the wrong way to look at Agile development&lt;/em&gt; in my OWASP and RSA presentations. Mr. Markham raises some very good points, but in general the post pissed me off: it reeks of irresponsibility and unwillingness to own up to failure. But rather than go off on a tirade covering the 20 reasons that post exhibits a lack of critical thinking, I’ll take the high road. Jon Kern’s quotes in the response hit the nail on the head, but did not include an adequate explanation of why, so I offer a couple examples.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Death, Taxes, and M&amp;A</title><link>/blog/death-taxes-and-ma/</link><pubDate>Mon, 21 Mar 2011 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/death-taxes-and-ma/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Ben Franklin was a pretty smart dude. My favorite quote of his is: “In this world nothing is certain but death and taxes.” For a couple hundred years, that was pretty good. But at this point, I’ll add mergers and acquisitions as the third certainty in this world. Maybe also that your NCAA bracket will get busted by some college you’ve never heard of (WTF VCU?).&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>FAM: Core Features and Administration, Part 1</title><link>/blog/fam-core-features-and-administration-part-1/</link><pubDate>Mon, 21 Mar 2011 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/fam-core-features-and-administration-part-1/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Now that we understand the technical architecture, let’s look at the principal features seen across most File Activity Monitoring tools.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>RSA Releases (Almost) More Information</title><link>/blog/rsa-releases-almost-more-information/</link><pubDate>Mon, 21 Mar 2011 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/rsa-releases-almost-more-information/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;As this is posting, RSA is releasing a new &lt;a href="https://knowledge.rsasecurity.com/cleartrust/ct_logon.asp"&gt;SecureCare note and FAQ for their clients&lt;/a&gt; (Login required). This provides more specific prioritized information on what mitigations they recommend SecurID clients take.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>How Enterprises Can Respond to the RSA/SecurID Breach</title><link>/blog/how-enterprises-can-respond-to-the-rsa-securid-breach/</link><pubDate>Fri, 18 Mar 2011 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/how-enterprises-can-respond-to-the-rsa-securid-breach/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;We have gotten a bunch of questions about what people should do, so I thought I would expand more on the advice in our last post, linked below.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Network Security in the Age of *Any* Computing: Index of Posts</title><link>/blog/network-security-in-the-age-of-any-computing-index-of-posts/</link><pubDate>Fri, 18 Mar 2011 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/network-security-in-the-age-of-any-computing-index-of-posts/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;It’s hard to believe, but we have wrapped up the initial research on this series dealing with how network security evolves, given the need to provide access to critical information at &lt;em&gt;any&lt;/em&gt; time, from &lt;em&gt;any&lt;/em&gt; where, on &lt;em&gt;any&lt;/em&gt; device. We call it &lt;em&gt;any&lt;/em&gt; computing. We’ve dealt with the risks and how enforcement and policies will change. And talked quite a bit about integrating these enforcement points into the existing network and security infrastructure. Finally, we wrapped the series yesterday with Quick Wins, about the process of selecting and implementing these technologies.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>**Updated** RSA Breached: SecurID Affected</title><link>/blog/updated-rsa-breached-securid-affected/</link><pubDate>Thu, 17 Mar 2011 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/updated-rsa-breached-securid-affected/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;You will see this all over the headlines during the next days, weeks, and maybe even months. &lt;a href="http://www.rsa.com/node.aspx?id=3872"&gt;RSA, the security division of EMC, announced they were breached and suffered data loss.&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>FAM: Technical Architecture</title><link>/blog/fam-technical-architecture/</link><pubDate>Thu, 17 Mar 2011 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/fam-technical-architecture/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;FAM is a relatively new technology, but we already see the emergence of consistent architectural models. The key components are a central management server, sensors, and connectors to the directory infrastructure.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Friday Summary: March 18, 2011—Preparing for the Worst</title><link>/blog/friday-summary-march-18-2011-preparing-for-the-worst/</link><pubDate>Thu, 17 Mar 2011 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/friday-summary-march-18-2011-preparing-for-the-worst/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I have been debating (in my head) whether or not to write anything about what’s going on in Japan. This is about as serious as it gets, and there is far too much under-informed material out there.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Network Security in the Age of *Any* Computing: Quick Wins</title><link>/blog/network-security-in-the-age-of-any-computing-quick-wins/</link><pubDate>Thu, 17 Mar 2011 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/network-security-in-the-age-of-any-computing-quick-wins/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;We have worked quickly through the main concepts of using network security tactics to provide access to the myriad of endpoint and mobile devices, so now let’s shift to a process to ensure success for your project. This is all about success, so we find the best path is to focus your project on establishing an initial quick win, and then gradually build momentum for the technology with expanded deployment.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>The Problem with Open Source in Commercial Software</title><link>/blog/the-problem-with-open-source-in-commercial-software/</link><pubDate>Thu, 17 Mar 2011 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/the-problem-with-open-source-in-commercial-software/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;One of the more interesting results from the Pwn2Own contest at CanSecWest was &lt;a href="http://www.darkreading.com/insider-threat/167801100/security/attacks-breaches/229300836/blackberry-cracked-in-hacking-contest.html"&gt;the exploitation of a Blackberry using a WebKit vulnerability&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Incite 3/16/2011: Random Act of Burrito</title><link>/blog/incite-3-16-2011-random-act-of-burrito/</link><pubDate>Wed, 16 Mar 2011 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/incite-3-16-2011-random-act-of-burrito/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;It’s easy to be cynical. If you want to look at the negative, things are bad. The economy isn’t great and in many parts of the world it is getting worse. Politics are divisive. The Earth is pushing back at 7.9 on the Richter scale, resulting in a generation of Japanese who may be glowing sooner rather than later. Why do we bother?&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Is the Virtual Desktop Hype Real?</title><link>/blog/is-the-virtual-desktop-hype-real/</link><pubDate>Wed, 16 Mar 2011 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/is-the-virtual-desktop-hype-real/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I’ve been hearing a lot about Virtual Desktops lately (VDIs), and am struggling to figure out how interested you all really are in using them.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Network Security in the Age of *Any* Computing: Integration</title><link>/blog/network-security-in-the-age-of-any-computing-integration/</link><pubDate>Wed, 16 Mar 2011 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/network-security-in-the-age-of-any-computing-integration/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Supporting &lt;em&gt;any&lt;/em&gt; computing – which we have defined as access to your critical information from anywhere, at any time, on any device – requires organizations to restrict access to specific communities of users/devices, based on &lt;a href="http://securosis.com/blog/network-security-in-the-age-of-any-computing-policy-granularity"&gt;organizational policies&lt;/a&gt;. In order to do this, you need to integrate with your existing installed base of security and networking technologies, ensuring management leverage and reducing complexity. No easy task, for sure. So let’s discuss how you can implement network access control to play nicely in the larger sandbox.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Technology Caste System</title><link>/blog/technology-caste-system/</link><pubDate>Wed, 16 Mar 2011 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/technology-caste-system/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;There is a caste system in technology. It’s an engineering caste system, or at least that’s what I call it. A feeling of superiority developers have over their QA, IT, product management, and release management brethren. Software developers at every firm I have ever worked for – large and small – share a condescending view of their co-workers when it comes to technology. They are at the top of the totem pole, and act as if their efforts are the most important.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>FAM: Market Drivers, Business Justifications, and Use Cases</title><link>/blog/fam-market-drivers-business-justifications-and-use-cases/</link><pubDate>Tue, 15 Mar 2011 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/fam-market-drivers-business-justifications-and-use-cases/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Now that we have &lt;a href="http://securosis.com/blog/introduction-to-file-activity-monitoring"&gt;defined File Activity Monitoring&lt;/a&gt; it’s time to talk about why people are buying it, how it’s being used, and why &lt;em&gt;you&lt;/em&gt; might want it.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Network Security in the Age of *Any* Computing: Policy Granularity</title><link>/blog/network-security-in-the-age-of-any-computing-policy-granularity/</link><pubDate>Tue, 15 Mar 2011 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/network-security-in-the-age-of-any-computing-policy-granularity/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;As &lt;a href="http://securosis.com/blog/network-security-in-the-age-of-any-computing-enforcement"&gt;we discussed in the last post&lt;/a&gt;, there are number of ways to enforce access policies for &lt;em&gt;any&lt;/em&gt; computing. Given the flexibility and dynamic nature of business, access policies should provide sufficient flexibility to meet business needs. To illustrate, let’s look at how an enforcement mechanism like network access control (NAC) can provide this kind of granularity. What you want is map out access models and design a set of policies to provide users with the right access at the right time from the right device.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Table Stakes</title><link>/blog/table-stakes/</link><pubDate>Tue, 15 Mar 2011 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/table-stakes/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;This morning I published a &lt;a href="http://darkreading.com/blog/229301009/table-stakes.html"&gt;column over at Dark Reading&lt;/a&gt; that kicked off some cool comments on Twitter. Since, you know, no one leaves blog comments anymore.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Incite 3/9/2011: Greed Is (fill in the blank)</title><link>/blog/incite-3-9-2011-greed-is-fill-in-the-blank/</link><pubDate>Wed, 09 Mar 2011 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/incite-3-9-2011-greed-is-fill-in-the-blank/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;As most of you know, I’m a huge NFL fan. In fact I made my kids watch the combine on NFL Network two weeks ago when the Boss was away. The frickin’ combine. I was on the edge of my seat watching some guy run a 4.34 40-yard dash. And heard the groans of the crowd when a top rated offensive tackle did only 21 bench presses of 225 pounds. That’s it? And some defensive lineman did 50 reps on the bench. &lt;strong&gt;50 reps&lt;/strong&gt;. If this DT thing doesn’t work out, I’m sure he’s got a future benching Pintos in the circus.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>The CIO Role and Security</title><link>/blog/the-cio-role-and-security/</link><pubDate>Wed, 09 Mar 2011 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/the-cio-role-and-security/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;During the e10+ event Monday at the RSA Conference, Rich and Mike moderated a panel on &lt;a href="http://www.rsaconference.com/2011/usa/e10plus.htm"&gt;Optimizing Your Security Program&lt;/a&gt;. One of the contested topics was how to position security to upper management. Every CIO and CISO falls into the trap of having to say ‘No’ to some new idea that occurs to executive management, and then take blame for being “Negative Nancy”, “Dr. No”, “The Knight who says NEE”, or some collection of the &lt;a href="https://secure.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/wiki/Seven_dirty_words"&gt;Seven Dirty Words&lt;/a&gt;. I was surprised that so little has changed, as these were &lt;em&gt;exactly&lt;/em&gt; the same problems I had a dozen years ago. While security threats were far simpler and fewer then, so was acknowledgement of the need for security. I guess it’s human nature that we still fall into the same traps.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Introduction to File Activity Monitoring</title><link>/blog/introduction-to-file-activity-monitoring/</link><pubDate>Tue, 08 Mar 2011 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/introduction-to-file-activity-monitoring/</guid><description>&lt;h1 id="a-new-approach-to-an-old-problem"&gt;A new approach to an old problem&lt;/h1&gt;
&lt;p&gt;One of the more pernicious problems in information security is allowing someone to perform something they are authorized to do, but catching when they do it in a potentially harmful way. For example, in most business environments it’s important to allow users broad access to sensitive information, but this exposes us to all sorts of data loss/leakage scenarios. We want to know when a sales executive crosses the line from accessing customer information as part of their job, to siphoning it for a competitor.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Network Security in the Age of *Any* Computing: Enforcement</title><link>/blog/network-security-in-the-age-of-any-computing-enforcement/</link><pubDate>Tue, 08 Mar 2011 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/network-security-in-the-age-of-any-computing-enforcement/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;As we continue with “Network Security in the Age of &lt;em&gt;Any&lt;/em&gt; Computing”, we have already hit the risks and the need for segmentation to restrict access to sensitive data. Now we focus on technologies that can help restrict access – which tend to be NAC, firewalls, and other network layer controls (such as VLANs and physical segmentation). Each technology has pros and cons. There are no ‘right’ answers – just a set of compromises that must be made b weighing the various available technology options.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Network Security in the Age of *Any* Computing: Containing Access</title><link>/blog/network-security-in-the-age-of-any-computing-containing-access/</link><pubDate>Mon, 07 Mar 2011 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/network-security-in-the-age-of-any-computing-containing-access/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;In &lt;a href="http://securosis.com/blog/network-security-in-the-age-of-any-computing-the-risks"&gt;the first post of this series&lt;/a&gt;, we talked about the risks inherent to this concept of &lt;em&gt;any computing&lt;/em&gt; , where those crazy users want to get at critical data at any time, from anywhere, on any device. And we all know it’s not pretty. Sure, there are things we can do at the device layer to protect the and ensure a proper configurations. But in this series we will focus on how to architect and secure the network to protect critical data. The first aspect of that is restricting access to key portions of your network to only those folks that need it.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Security Counter Culture</title><link>/blog/security-counter-culture/</link><pubDate>Mon, 07 Mar 2011 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/security-counter-culture/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;There’s nothing like a late-night phone call saying, “I think your email has been hacked,” to drop a security professional over the edge. My wife called me during the RSA Conference to tell me this, because some emails she got from me were duplicates that refused to be deleted. Weirdness like that always makes me question my security, and when I found the WiFi still enabled on my phone, I had my yearly conference ‘Oh $#(!’ moment early.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Friday Summary: March 4, 2011</title><link>/blog/friday-summary-march-4-2011/</link><pubDate>Thu, 03 Mar 2011 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/friday-summary-march-4-2011/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;The Friday summary is our chance to talk about whatever, and this week I am going to do just that. This week’s introduction has nothing to do with security, so skip it if you are offended by such things.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>On Science Projects</title><link>/blog/on-science-projects/</link><pubDate>Thu, 03 Mar 2011 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/on-science-projects/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I think anyone who writes for a living sometimes neglects to provide the proper context before launching into some big thought. I please guilty as charged on some aspects of the &lt;a href="http://securosis.com/blog/firestarter-risk-metrics-are-crap"&gt;Risk Metrics Are Crap&lt;/a&gt; FireStarter earlier this week. As I responded to some of the comments, I used the term &lt;em&gt;science project&lt;/em&gt; to describe some technologies like GRC, SIEM, and AppSec. Without context, some folks jumped on that. So let me explain a bit of what I mean.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>What No One Is Saying about That Big HIPAA Fine</title><link>/blog/what-no-one-is-saying-about-that-big-hipaa-fine/</link><pubDate>Thu, 03 Mar 2011 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/what-no-one-is-saying-about-that-big-hipaa-fine/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;By now you have probably seen that &lt;a href="https://threatpost.com/en_us/blogs/hipaa-bares-its-teeth-43m-fine-privacy-violation-022311"&gt;the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) fined Cignet healthcare a whopping $4.3M&lt;/a&gt; for, and I believe this is a legal term, being total egotistical assholes. (Because “willfull neglect” just doesn’t have a good ring to it).&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Incite 3/2/2011: Agent Provocateur</title><link>/blog/incite-3-2-2011-agent-provocateur/</link><pubDate>Wed, 02 Mar 2011 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/incite-3-2-2011-agent-provocateur/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;It’s been a while since I have gotten into a good old-fashioned Twitter fight. Actually the concept behind FireStarter was to throw some controversial thought balloons out there and let the community pick our stuff apart and help find the break points in our research positions. As &lt;a href="http://twitter.com/jeremiahg/status/42269454452797440"&gt;Jeremiah tweeted yesterday&lt;/a&gt;, “whatever the case, mission accomplished. Firestarter!” to my post &lt;a href="http://securosis.com/blog/firestarter-risk-metrics-are-crap"&gt;Risk Metrics Are Crap&lt;/a&gt;. It devolved into a bare-knuckled brawl pretty quickly, with some of the vociferous risk metrics folks.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Network Security in the Age of *Any* Computing: the Risks</title><link>/blog/network-security-in-the-age-of-any-computing-the-risks/</link><pubDate>Wed, 02 Mar 2011 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/network-security-in-the-age-of-any-computing-the-risks/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;We are pleased to kick off the next of our research projects, which we call “Network Security in the Age of &lt;em&gt;Any&lt;/em&gt; Computing.” It’s about how reducing attack surface, now that those wacky users expect to connect to critical resources from any device, at any time, from anywhere in the world. Thus &lt;em&gt;‘any’&lt;/em&gt; computing.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Random Thoughts on Securing Applications in the Cloud</title><link>/blog/random-thoughts-on-securing-applications-in-the-cloud/</link><pubDate>Wed, 02 Mar 2011 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/random-thoughts-on-securing-applications-in-the-cloud/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;How do you secure data in the cloud? The answer is “it depends”. What type of cloud are you talking about – IaaS, PaaS, or SaaS? Public or Private? What services or applications are you running? What data do you want to protect? Following up on the &lt;a href="http://securosis.com/blog/what-i-learned-at-rsac"&gt;things I learned at RSA&lt;/a&gt;, one statement I heard makes sense now. Specifically, a couple weeks ago &lt;a href="http://www.rationalsurvivability.com/blog/"&gt;Chris Hoff&lt;/a&gt; surprised me when, talking about data security in the cloud, he tweeted:&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>React Faster and Better: Index</title><link>/blog/react-faster-and-better-index/</link><pubDate>Tue, 01 Mar 2011 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/react-faster-and-better-index/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;With yesterday’s post, we have reached the end of the React Faster and Better series on advanced Incident Response. This series focuses a bit more on the tools and tactics than &lt;a href="http://securosis.com/blog/incident-response-fundamentals-index-of-posts/"&gt;Incident Response Fundamentals&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>FireStarter: Risk Metrics Are Crap</title><link>/blog/firestarter-risk-metrics-are-crap/</link><pubDate>Mon, 28 Feb 2011 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/firestarter-risk-metrics-are-crap/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I recently got into a debate with someone about cyber-insurance. I know some companies are buying insurance to protect against a breach, or to contain risk, or for some other reason. In reality, these folks are flushing money down the toilet. Why? Because the insurance companies are charging too much. We’ve already had some brave soul admit that &lt;a href="http://securosis.com/blog/pricing-cyber-policies/"&gt;the insurers have no idea how to price these policies&lt;/a&gt; because they have no data and as such they are making up the numbers. And I assure you, they are not going to put themselves at risk, so they are erring on the side of charging too much. Which means buyers of these policies are flushing money down the loo.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>React Faster and Better: Piecing It Together</title><link>/blog/react-faster-and-better-piecing-it-together/</link><pubDate>Mon, 28 Feb 2011 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/react-faster-and-better-piecing-it-together/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;We have been through all the pieces of our advanced incident response method, &lt;em&gt;React Faster and Better&lt;/em&gt; , so it is time to wrap up this series. The best way to do that is to actually run through a sample incident with some commentary to provide the context you need to apply the method to something tangible. It’s a bit like watching a movie while listening to the director’s commentary. But those guys are actually talented.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Could This Be WikiLeaks for the Criminal Computer Underground?</title><link>/blog/could-this-be-wikileaks-for-the-criminal-computer-underground/</link><pubDate>Thu, 24 Feb 2011 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/could-this-be-wikileaks-for-the-criminal-computer-underground/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;When Brian Krebs sent me a link &lt;a href="http://krebsonsecurity.com/2011/02/spamit-glavmed-pharmacy-networks-exposed/"&gt;to his latest article on illegal pharmacy networks&lt;/a&gt; my only response was:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Holy friggin’ awesomesauce!!!&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Friday Summary: February 25, 2011</title><link>/blog/friday-summary-february-25-2011/</link><pubDate>Thu, 24 Feb 2011 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/friday-summary-february-25-2011/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;In the relatively short period of time I have been on this planet, there are three time periods that really stand out to me as watershed moments in computing technology.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>React Faster and Better: Respond, Investigate, and Recover</title><link>/blog/react-faster-and-better-respond-investigate-and-recover/</link><pubDate>Thu, 24 Feb 2011 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/react-faster-and-better-respond-investigate-and-recover/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;After you have &lt;a href="http://securosis.com/blog/comments/react-faster-and-better-kicking-off-a-response"&gt;validated and filtered&lt;/a&gt; the initial alert, then escalated to &lt;a href="http://securosis.com/blog/comments/react-faster-and-better-contain-and-respond"&gt;contain and respond&lt;/a&gt; to the incident, you may need to escalate for further specialized response, investigation, and (hopefully) recovery.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Incite 2/23/2011: Giving up</title><link>/blog/incite-2-23-2011-giving-up/</link><pubDate>Wed, 23 Feb 2011 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/incite-2-23-2011-giving-up/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I’ve been in the security business a long time. I have enjoyed up cycles through the peaks, and back down the slope to the inevitable troughs. One of my observations getting back from RSAC 2011 is the level of sheer frustration on the part of many security professionals today. Frustration with management, frustration with users, frustration with vendors. Basically lots of folks are burnt out and mad at the world. Maybe it’s just the folks who show up at RSA, but I doubt it. This seems to be true across the industry.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>What I Learned at RSAC</title><link>/blog/what-i-learned-at-rsac/</link><pubDate>Wed, 23 Feb 2011 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/what-i-learned-at-rsac/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I was surprised at the negative tweets and blog posts after the RSA show this year, many by the security professionals at the core of this industry. I have been to RSA most years since 1997. This year, discontent and snarkiness seemed to be running high. “There is nothing new.” “There is no innovation.” “The vendors are all lying.” “These products don’t work as advertised.” “I have seen this presentation before.” “That attack won’t work in ‘the real world’.” I saw nobody excited about the concept of winning a car – what’s up with that!?! You know it’s bad when attendees complain about booth babes – &lt;em&gt;booth babes&lt;/em&gt;! – and then go to the Barracuda party. You know who you are.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>What You *Really* Need to Know about Oracle Database Firewall</title><link>/blog/what-you-really-need-to-know-about-oracle-database-firewall/</link><pubDate>Wed, 23 Feb 2011 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/what-you-really-need-to-know-about-oracle-database-firewall/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Nothing amuses me more than some nice vendor-on-vendor smackdown action. Well, plenty of things amuse me more, especially Big Bang Theory and cats on YouTube, but the vendor thing is still moderately high on my list.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>FireStarter: the New Cold War</title><link>/blog/firestarter-the-new-cold-war/</link><pubDate>Tue, 22 Feb 2011 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/firestarter-the-new-cold-war/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;It amuses me that folks were shocked by the latest treasure trove of goodies from the HBGary email spool. Basically these folks built custom malware on behalf of their government clients. &lt;a href="http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/news/2011/02/black-ops-how-hbgary-wrote-backdoors-and-rootkits-for-the-government.ars"&gt;Ars Technica digs in&lt;/a&gt; (with pretty impressive technical depth, I might add) and makes clear what you should already know.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>RSA: the Only Difference Between a Rut and a Grave Is the Depth</title><link>/blog/rsa-the-only-difference-between-a-rut-and-a-grave-is-the-depth/</link><pubDate>Wed, 16 Feb 2011 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/rsa-the-only-difference-between-a-rut-and-a-grave-is-the-depth/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I think Rich may still be sleep deprived, but on the upside his recap did elicit my loudest laugh of the day. See if you can spot the sentence that caused it.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>RSA: We Now Go Live to Our Reporters on the Scene</title><link>/blog/rsa-we-now-go-live-to-our-reporters-on-the-scene/</link><pubDate>Tue, 15 Feb 2011 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/rsa-we-now-go-live-to-our-reporters-on-the-scene/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;It’s worth noting that even sleep-deprived Rich is surprisingly coherent.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr&gt;
&lt;h2 id="rich"&gt;Rich&lt;/h2&gt;
&lt;p&gt;While the RSA show technically doesn’t start until tomorrow, there’s still a heck of a lot going on. For myself, the worst is actually over. And by “the worst”, I mean there are even odds I will actually sleep tonight.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>How to Encrypt Block Storage in the Cloud with SecureCloud</title><link>/blog/how-to-encrypt-block-storage-in-the-cloud-with-securecloud/</link><pubDate>Sat, 12 Feb 2011 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/how-to-encrypt-block-storage-in-the-cloud-with-securecloud/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;This is a bit of a different post for me. One exercise in the CCSK Enhanced Class which we are developing for the &lt;a href="http://www.cloudsecurityalliance.org/"&gt;Cloud Security Alliance&lt;/a&gt; is to encrypt a block storage (EBS) volume attached to an AWS instance. There are a few different ways to do this but we decided on Trend Micro’s &lt;a href="http://www.securecloud.com/"&gt;SecureCloud&lt;/a&gt; service for a couple reasons. First of all, setting it up is something we can handle within the time constraints of the class. The equivalent process with TrueCrypt or some other native encryption services within our AWS instance would take more time than we have, considering the CCSK Enhanced class is only one day and covers a ton of material. The other reason is that it supports my preferred architecture for encryption: the key server is separate from the encryption engine, which is separate from the data volume. This is actually pretty complex to set up using free/open source tools. Finally, they offer a free 60-day trial. The downside is that I don’t like using a vendor-specific solution in a class since it could be construed as endorsement. So please keep in mind that a) there are other options, and b) the fact that we use the tool for the class doesn’t mean this is the best solution for you. Ideally we will rotate tools as the class develops. For example, &lt;a href="http://www.porticor.com/"&gt;Porticor&lt;/a&gt; is a new company focusing on cloud encryption, and &lt;a href="http://www.vormetric.com/solutions/cloud_security.html"&gt;Vormetric&lt;/a&gt; is coming out with cloud-focused encryption. I think one of the other “V” companies is also bringing a cloud encryption product out this week. That said, SecureCloud does exactly what we need for this exercise. Especially since it’s SaaS based, which makes setting it up in the classroom much easier. Here’s how it works:&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>RSA 2011: A Few Pointers</title><link>/blog/rsa-2011-a-few-pointers/</link><pubDate>Fri, 11 Feb 2011 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/rsa-2011-a-few-pointers/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;It’s just a couple days until RSA Conference 2011. Is this your first time attending the security conference in San Francisco? Having attended for a few years now I can safely say that there are some things you should take into account before you show up. First of all, download the &lt;strong&gt;Securosis Guide to RSA 2011&lt;/strong&gt; (&lt;a href="http://securosis.com/reports/Securosis-GuidetoRSAC2011.pdf"&gt;PDF&lt;/a&gt;) or (&lt;a href="http://securosis.com/reports/Securosis-GuidetoRSAC2011.epub"&gt;ePub&lt;/a&gt;).&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>The Securosis Guide to RSA 2011: The Full Monty</title><link>/blog/the-securosis-guide-to-rsa-2011-the-full-monty/</link><pubDate>Fri, 11 Feb 2011 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/the-securosis-guide-to-rsa-2011-the-full-monty/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;With great pleasure we post the 2nd annual &lt;em&gt;Securosis Guide to the RSA Conference&lt;/em&gt; , 2011 edition. Last year’s guide we built as an experiment, but it has now effectively become an encyclopedia of all things RSA.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>RSA Guide 2011: Security Management and Compliance</title><link>/blog/rsa-guide-2011-security-management-and-compliance/</link><pubDate>Thu, 10 Feb 2011 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/rsa-guide-2011-security-management-and-compliance/</guid><description>&lt;h2 id="security-management"&gt;Security Management&lt;/h2&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Compliance is still driving most of what happens from a management standpoint, which is why have a specific compliance section below. On the security management front, there was still plenty of activity in 2010. But most customers continued to feel the same way: underwhelmed. It’s still very hard to keep control of much of anything, which is problematic as the number of devices and amount of sensitive data grow exponentially. Good times. Good times.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>See Securosis @ RSA Conference 2011</title><link>/blog/see-securosis-rsa-conference-2011/</link><pubDate>Thu, 10 Feb 2011 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/see-securosis-rsa-conference-2011/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;We keep pretty busy schedules at RSA every year. But the good news is we do a number of speaking sessions and make other appearances throughout the week. Here is where you can find us:&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Incite 2/9/2011: Loose Lips Sink Ships</title><link>/blog/incite-2-9-2011-loose-lips-sink-ships/</link><pubDate>Wed, 09 Feb 2011 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/incite-2-9-2011-loose-lips-sink-ships/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I think we’ve taken this instant gratification thing a bit too far. Do you remember in the olden days, when you didn’t know what you were getting for your birthday? Now we get no surprises, pretty much as a society. The combination of a 24-hour media cycle, increasingly outsourced manufacturing, and loose lips ensures that nothing remains a secret for long.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>RSA Guide 2011: Application Security</title><link>/blog/rsa-guide-2011-application-security/</link><pubDate>Wed, 09 Feb 2011 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/rsa-guide-2011-application-security/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;When we say application security, for we generally mean web application security. We probably could have cheated and simply reposted last year’s guide to application security and still been close. Yes, application security is still a nascent market. Last year the focus was anti-exploitation to prevent code injection attacks, and the value provided by integrating assessment and web application firewall technologies. While the threats remain the same, there are some new twists which deserve attention.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>RSA Guide 2011: Endpoint Security</title><link>/blog/rsa-guide-2011-endpoint-security/</link><pubDate>Wed, 09 Feb 2011 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/rsa-guide-2011-endpoint-security/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;In 2010, there was broad acknowledgement that most of the endpoint protection deployed was more about passing PCI (yes, it’s still a requirement) than actually stopping attacks. Unfortunately, at the show we’ll continue to hear about all the advances happening in malware detection, and we’ll laugh again. The traditional signature-based model is broken, no matter how many clouds we see inserted into the mix. But with the AV cash cow continuing to moo uncontrollably, the industry will continue trying to convince customers to maintain their investments. So the real question is: who will show some type of innovation in terms of endpoint malware detection. Anyone? Anyone? Bueller? Bueller?&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>RSA Guide 2011: Virtualization and Cloud</title><link>/blog/rsa-guide-2011-virtualization-and-cloud/</link><pubDate>Wed, 09 Feb 2011 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/rsa-guide-2011-virtualization-and-cloud/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;2010 was a fascinating year for cloud computing and virtualization. VMWare locked down the VMSafe program, spurring acquisition of smaller vendors in the program with access to the special APIs. Cloud computing security moved from hype to hyper-hype at the same time some seriously interesting security tools hit the market. Despite all the confusion, there was a heck of a lot of progress and growing clarity. And not all of it was from the keyboard of Chris Hoff.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>React Faster and Better: Contain and Respond</title><link>/blog/react-faster-and-better-contain-and-respond/</link><pubDate>Tue, 08 Feb 2011 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/react-faster-and-better-contain-and-respond/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://securosis.com/blog/react-faster-and-better-kicking-off-a-response"&gt;In our last post&lt;/a&gt;, we covered the first level of incident response: validating and filtering the initial alert. When that alert triggers and your frontline personnel analyze the incident, they’ll either handle it on the spot or gather essential data and send it up the chain.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>RSA Guide 2011: Data Security</title><link>/blog/rsa-guide-2011-data-security/</link><pubDate>Tue, 08 Feb 2011 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/rsa-guide-2011-data-security/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;As someone who has covered data security for nearly a decade, some days I wonder if I should send Bradley Manning, Julian Assange, whoever wrote the HITECH act, and the Chinese hacker community a personal note of gratitude. If the first wave of data security was driven by breach disclosure laws and a mixture of lost laptops and criminal exploits, this second wave is all about stopping leaks and keeping your pants on in public. This year I’ve seen more serious interest in large enterprises to protect more than merely credit card numbers than ever before. We also see PCI and the HITECH act (in healthcare) pushing greater investment in data security down to the mid-market. And while the technology is still far from perfect, it’s definitely maturing along nicely.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>RSA Guide 2011: Email/Web (Content) Security</title><link>/blog/rsa-guide-2011-email-web-content-security/</link><pubDate>Tue, 08 Feb 2011 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/rsa-guide-2011-email-web-content-security/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Global Threats. APT. Botnets. Infected Web Pages. Grannies with shotguns. We expect to see anything and everything it takes for vendors to get your attention, including never before seen awards and security metrics. Some ask “Why the hype?” The value of content security — both inbound filtering to prevent unwanted garbage from coming into the network, as well as detection of unwanted activity like surfing for porn or sending company secrets to your cousin as investment advice — is proven. All the major players and most mid-tier providers have closed the major holes in their products, provide unified management for all functions, and offer some type of SaaS service. The technology works. The problem is that the segment is both mature and saturated. To earn a new customer, a vendor must steal one from a competitor. Growing revenue means convincing customers they need a new service. It is increasingly difficult to differentiate the top tier from the mid-tier players, so that noise you hear is vendors trying to find an edge. For the most part, the vendors offer quality services at a price point that continues to drop with reduced cost cloud and SaaS based offerings. But you can’t blame the vendors from trying to “one up” the competition in a crowded market.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>RSA Guide 2011: Key Themes</title><link>/blog/rsa-guide-2011-key-themes/</link><pubDate>Tue, 08 Feb 2011 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/rsa-guide-2011-key-themes/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;OMG, it’s 6 days and counting to the 2011 RSA Conference. Yes, they moved the schedule up a few months, so you now can look forward to spending Valentine’s Day with cretins like us, as opposed to your loved ones. Send thank-you notes to…&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>RSA Guide 2011: Network Security</title><link>/blog/rsa-guide-2011-network-security/</link><pubDate>Tue, 08 Feb 2011 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/rsa-guide-2011-network-security/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;2010 was an interesting year for the network security space. There has been a resurgence in interest and budget projections for spending, largely for perimeter security. Part of this is a loosening of the budget purse strings, which is allowing frustrated network security folks to actually start dreaming about upgrading their perimeters. So there will be plenty of vendors positioning to benefit from the wave of 2011 spending.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>React Faster and Better: Kicking off a Response</title><link>/blog/react-faster-and-better-kicking-off-a-response/</link><pubDate>Mon, 07 Feb 2011 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/react-faster-and-better-kicking-off-a-response/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Everyone’s process is a bit different, but through our research we have found that the best teams tend to gear themselves through three general levels of response, each staffed with increasing expertise. Once the alert triggers, your goal is to filter out the day-to-day crud junior staffers are fully capable of handling, while escalating the most serious incidents through the response levels as quickly as possible. Having a killer investigation team doesn’t do any good if an incident never reaches them, or if their time is wasted on the daily detritus that can be easily handled by junior folks.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>The Analyst’s Dillema: Not Everything Sucks</title><link>/blog/the-analysts-dillema-not-everything-sucks/</link><pubDate>Mon, 07 Feb 2011 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/the-analysts-dillema-not-everything-sucks/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;There’s something I have always struggled with as an analyst. Because of the, shall we say, ‘aggressiveness’ of today’s markets and marketers, most of us in the analyst world are extremely cautious about ever saying anything positive about any vendors. This frequently extends to entire classes of technology, because we worry it will be misused or taken out of context to promote a particular product or company. Or, as every technology is complex and no blanket statement can possibly account for everyone’s individual circumstances, that someone will misinterpret what we say and get pissed it doesn’t work for them.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Why You Should Delete Your Twitter DMs, and How to Do It</title><link>/blog/why-you-should-delete-your-twitter-dms-and-how-to-do-it/</link><pubDate>Mon, 07 Feb 2011 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/why-you-should-delete-your-twitter-dms-and-how-to-do-it/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I’ve been on Twitter for a few years now, and over that time I’ve watched not only its mass adoption, but also how people changed their communication habits. One of the most unexpected changes (for me) is how many people now use Twitter Direct Messages as instant messaging.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Friday Summary: February 4, 2011</title><link>/blog/friday-summary-february-4-2011/</link><pubDate>Thu, 03 Feb 2011 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/friday-summary-february-4-2011/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;My wife says to me, “I seem to be getting your junk mail. Somebody just sent me Data Security Quiz results.” I have no idea what she means, so she forwarded me the email from the &lt;a href="http://nisassociation.org/"&gt;National Information Security Assocation&lt;/a&gt; (NISA). I confess that I had never heard of this organization before, and I really don’t know what they do. Apparently they quizzed a number of real estate agents and brokers around the country to find out how much they knew about data security. The results were emailed as a way of educating real estate professionals at large. Color me shocked. Actually, I thought the questions were pretty good to be asking for sales people. The Q&amp;amp;A was as follows:&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Good Programming Practices vs. Rugged Development</title><link>/blog/good-programming-practices-vs-rugged-development/</link><pubDate>Thu, 03 Feb 2011 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/good-programming-practices-vs-rugged-development/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I had a long chat with &lt;a href="http://451group.com/about/bio_detail.php?eid=407"&gt;Josh Corman&lt;/a&gt; yesterday afternoon about Rugged, especially as it applies to software development. I know this will be a continuing topic at the RSA conference, and we are both looking forward to a series of brainstorming sessions on the subject. One aspect that intrigues both of us is the overlap between Agile and Rugged as conceptual frameworks for guding developer decisions. I though this was important enough to blog up prior to the conference. The discussion went something like this:&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>You Made Your Bed, Now Sleep in It</title><link>/blog/you-made-your-bed-now-sleep-in-it/</link><pubDate>Thu, 03 Feb 2011 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/you-made-your-bed-now-sleep-in-it/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Twitter exploded last night with news that &lt;a href="http://www.thetechherald.com/article.php/201105/6775/Ligatt-Security-breached-company-emails-hijacked-and-sent-to-public"&gt;the self-proclaimed world’s #1 hacker’s email and Twitter accounts were compromised&lt;/a&gt;. Personally, the amount of time that good people spend feeding that troll annoys me. Which is why I’m not mentioning his name. Why give him any more SEO points for acting poorly? Since the beginning of time there have been charlatans, shysters, and frauds; this guy is no different. Major media outlets are too dumb and lazy to do the work required to vet their &lt;em&gt;experts&lt;/em&gt; , so they respond to his consistent PR efforts. Whatever.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Incite 2/2/2011: The End of Anonymity</title><link>/blog/incite-2-2-2011-the-end-of-anonymity/</link><pubDate>Wed, 02 Feb 2011 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/incite-2-2-2011-the-end-of-anonymity/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;“Hi Mike, how are you this morning?” When I heard those words I instinctively checked over my shoulder, since no one really calls me by name in any of the coffee and bagel shops I frequent. And that is intentional. I like to be the nondescript guy who may look familiar, but you don’t know from where. I don’t do small talk, and if I’m in a very good mood, maybe you’ll get a smirk. Other than that, I’m just the guy with his head down, inhaling coffee, and banging away at his Mac.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Friday Summary: January 28, 2011</title><link>/blog/friday-summary-january-28-2011/</link><pubDate>Thu, 27 Jan 2011 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/friday-summary-january-28-2011/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;At Cal, even though my major was software, I had to take several electronics courses. When I got to college I had programming experience, but not the first clue about electronics. Resistors, LEDs, logic gates, karnaugh maps, and EPROMs were well outside my understanding. But within the first few weeks of classes they had us building digital alarm clocks and television remote controls from scatch. The first iterations were all resistors on breadboards, then we moved to chips and EEPROMs… which certainly made the breadboards neater. Things got much more complex a couple semesters in, when we had to design and implement CPUs – and the design not only had to &lt;em&gt;work&lt;/em&gt; , but it actually had to meet design specifications for low power, low chip count, and high clock rates. Regardless, I loved the hardware classes, and I gave serious consideration to changing my major from software to hardware. But that pretty well died when I left college.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Intel’s Red Herring</title><link>/blog/intels-red-herring-2/</link><pubDate>Thu, 27 Jan 2011 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/intels-red-herring-2/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;It’s time for a good old fashion beatdown. Personally I’m working hard on not overreacting to stuff and letting most annoyances (which would normally set me off) pass on by. But sometimes, you know, a purge is required. It kind of reminds me of that great scene in &lt;a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0083511/"&gt;48 Hours&lt;/a&gt;, where Nick Nolte tells Eddie Murphy to be cool when they enter a bar to question someone. Nolte then proceeds to tear the place apart and when Murphy says “I thought you said to be cool,” the response is “That was cool.” Sometimes it’s cool to swing the clue bat.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Incite 1/25/2011: The Real-Time Peanut Gallery</title><link>/blog/incite-1-25-2011-the-real-time-peanut-gallery/</link><pubDate>Wed, 26 Jan 2011 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/incite-1-25-2011-the-real-time-peanut-gallery/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;For those of you who are not American Football fans, we’re in the middle of the playoffs over here. Teams work all year to get into the tournament and secure a high seeding. And of course the best laid plans sometimes end up at the wrong end of a blowout (yes, ATL Falcons, I’m talking about you). This past week’s NFC Championship provided a lot more drama than in the past, and not because it was a competitive, exciting game.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Microsoft, Oracle, or Other</title><link>/blog/microsoft-oracle-or-other/</link><pubDate>Wed, 26 Jan 2011 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/microsoft-oracle-or-other/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I ran across &lt;a href="http://storagemojo.com/2011/01/24/hyder-a-flash-based-scale-out-database/"&gt;Robin Harris’s analysis of the Hyder transaction database&lt;/a&gt; research project, and his subsequent analysis on how &lt;a href="http://www.zdnet.com/blog/storage/will-microsoft-tackle-oracle/1259?utm_source=feedburner&amp;amp;utm_medium=feed"&gt;Microsoft could threaten Oracle in the data center&lt;/a&gt; on his ZDNet blog. Mr. Harris is raising the issue of disruption in the database market, a topic I have covered in my Dark Reading posts, but he is also pointing out how he thinks this could erode Oracle’s position in the data center. I think looking at Hyder and like databases as disruptive is spot on, but I think the effects Mr. Harris outlines are off the mark. They both miss the current trends I am witnessing and seem to be couched in the traditional enterprise datacenter mind set.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>React Faster and Better: Organizing for Response</title><link>/blog/react-faster-and-better-organizing-for-response/</link><pubDate>Wed, 26 Jan 2011 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/react-faster-and-better-organizing-for-response/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Now that we have a sense of &lt;a href="http://securosis.com/blog/comments/react-faster-and-better-initial-incident-data"&gt;what data to focus on at the beginning of an incident&lt;/a&gt;, it’s time to start digging into the response and investigations process itself and talk specifically about what they entail. In larger enterprises, organizing the response process and teams can be extremely complex, due both to the volume of incidents and the complexity of the organizational structure (politics). Some teams align with business units, others with tools, and yet others are centralized.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Register for Our Cloud Security Training Class at RSA</title><link>/blog/register-for-our-cloud-security-training-class-at-rsa/</link><pubDate>Wed, 26 Jan 2011 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/register-for-our-cloud-security-training-class-at-rsa/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;As we &lt;a href="http://securosis.com/blog/comments/what-do-you-want-to-see-in-the-first-cloud-security-alliance-training-cours"&gt;previously mentioned&lt;/a&gt;, we will teach the very first CSA Cloud Computing Security Knowledge (Enhanced) class the Sunday before RSA. We finally have some more details and the registration link.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Rich at Macworld</title><link>/blog/rich-at-macworld/</link><pubDate>Mon, 24 Jan 2011 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/rich-at-macworld/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Just a quick note that I’m speaking at the &lt;a href="http://www.macworldexpo.com/sessions?s=QSHOWA001O7J"&gt;Macworld conference this Friday&lt;/a&gt; in San Francisco on iOS security.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This is one of the few times I get to talk about basics with a completely-consumer audience. Last year was my first time speaking (after attending for a few years), and you can’t spend any time there and still believe the stupid “Mac users think they are invulnerable and don’t care about security” meme.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>The Greenfield Project: How would you start over?</title><link>/blog/the-greenfield-project-how-would-you-start-over1/</link><pubDate>Mon, 24 Jan 2011 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/the-greenfield-project-how-would-you-start-over1/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Some days I wish I was a screenwriter. There, nothing is out of bounds. Physics? Bah. Logic? Who needs that? How cool was it that the writers of Dallas (the show, not the city) decided to take a mulligan… &lt;strong&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.ultimatedallas.com/episodeguide/dreamzonefaq.htm"&gt;on an entire season&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;? Pretty cool, I’d say.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Friday Summary: January 21, 2010</title><link>/blog/friday-summary-january-21-2010/</link><pubDate>Fri, 21 Jan 2011 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/friday-summary-january-21-2010/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;Quick note: Don’t forget to&lt;a href="mailto:rsvp@securosis.com"&gt;RSVP to the RSA Disaster Recovery Breakfast&lt;/a&gt;, and sign up for the &lt;a href="http://ccsk-training.eventbrite.com/"&gt;Inagural Cloud Security Alliance training class we are building &amp;amp; running&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Dueling Security Reports: Cisco vs. Intego</title><link>/blog/dueling-security-reports-cisco-vs-intego/</link><pubDate>Thu, 20 Jan 2011 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/dueling-security-reports-cisco-vs-intego/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Today, within a few minutes of each other, I read the latest 2010 security reports from &lt;a href="http://www.cisco.com/en/US/prod/collateral/vpndevc/security_annual_report_2010.pdf"&gt;Cisco&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href="http://www.intego.com/news/the-year-in-mac-security-2010.pdf"&gt;Intego&lt;/a&gt;. The Cisco report is very broad, while the Intego report is Mac specific. They really highlight the reality vs. hyperbole problem we often see in threat reports.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>The Appearance Myth</title><link>/blog/the-appearance-myth/</link><pubDate>Thu, 20 Jan 2011 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/the-appearance-myth/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;You can always tell whether you are at a &lt;em&gt;hacker&lt;/em&gt; con or a corporate-oriented conference in our business. The hacker cons have plenty of tattoos, piercings, fringe hairstyles, and the like. In fact, I’m usually more concerned that folks will think I’m a narc because I have none of the above. But this brings me around to the idea of appearance and its impact on your career.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Advanced Persistent Threat (APT) Defeated by Marketure</title><link>/blog/advanced-persistent-threat-apt-defeated-by-marketure/</link><pubDate>Wed, 19 Jan 2011 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/advanced-persistent-threat-apt-defeated-by-marketure/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Washington, D.C.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Officials today revealed that the “Advanced Persistent Threat” (APT) has been completely defeated by vendor marketure, analyst/pundit tweets, and PowerPoint presentations.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Incite 1/19/2011: Posturing Alpha Males</title><link>/blog/incite-1-19-2011-posturing-alpha-males/</link><pubDate>Tue, 18 Jan 2011 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/incite-1-19-2011-posturing-alpha-males/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;One of the terms you’ll likely hear at RSA this year is &lt;em&gt;security posture.&lt;/em&gt; Along with “situational awareness” and other terms which refer to your ability to understand if you are under attack and how your defenses are positioned to protect your assets. But I’m fascinated by the psychology of posturing, because we see that kind of behavior every single day.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>SMB isn’t ready for disaster. Are you?</title><link>/blog/smb-isnt-ready-for-disaster-are-you-2/</link><pubDate>Tue, 18 Jan 2011 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/smb-isnt-ready-for-disaster-are-you-2/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;You all know how much I like surveys. But I tend to think surveys targeted at SMB tend to be a little closer to reality, especially ones with 1,000+ responses. Our Big Yellow pals recently did a &lt;a href="http://www.symantec.com/about/news/resources/press_kits/detail.jsp?pkid=dpsurvey&amp;amp;om_ext_cid=biz_socmed_twitter_facebook_marketwire_linkedin_2011Jan_worldwide_dpsurvey"&gt;Disaster Preparedness Survey&lt;/a&gt; of 1,800+ small businesses, and the news isn’t very good, but not unexpected either. Here are a few soundbites:&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Fighting the Good Fight</title><link>/blog/fighting-the-good-fight/</link><pubDate>Mon, 17 Jan 2011 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/fighting-the-good-fight/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Here in the US, today is Martin Luther King, Jr. Day. For many this means a day off. For others it’s a continued call to arms to right the injustice we see. For me, it’s a reminder. A reminder of how one person’s efforts can make a difference against unsurmountable odds. How passion, focus, and a refusal to fail can change the world. Not overnight and not without setbacks, personal sacrifices, and a lot of angst. But it can be done.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>The 2011 Securosis Disaster Recovery Breakfast</title><link>/blog/2011-recoverybreakfast/</link><pubDate>Mon, 17 Jan 2011 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/2011-recoverybreakfast/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;The RSA Conference is just around the corner, and you know what that means.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Pain.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Pain in your head, and likely a sick feeling in your stomach. All induced by an inability to restrain your consumption when surrounded by oodles of fellow security geeks and free drinks.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Friday Summary, January 14, 2011</title><link>/blog/friday-summary-january-14-2011/</link><pubDate>Fri, 14 Jan 2011 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/friday-summary-january-14-2011/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Apparently I got out of New York just in time. The entire eastern seaboard got “Snowmageddon II, the Blanketing” a few hours after I left. Despite a four-legged return flight, I did actually make it back to Phoenix. And Phoenix was just about the only place in the US where it was not snowing, as I heard there was snow in &lt;a href="http://www.npr.org/blogs/thetwo-way/2011/01/12/132859529/new-england-buried-again-snow-now-on-ground-in-49-states?ft=1&amp;amp;f=100"&gt;48 states simultaneously&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Funding Security and Playing God</title><link>/blog/funding-security-and-playing-god/</link><pubDate>Thu, 13 Jan 2011 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/funding-security-and-playing-god/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I was reading shrdlu’s post on &lt;a href="http://layer8.itsecuritygeek.com/layer8/comments/connecting-the-risk-dots/"&gt;Connecting the risk dots&lt;/a&gt; over on the Layer 8 blog. I thought the point of contention was how to measure cost savings. Going back and reading the comments, that’s not it at all.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Incite 1/12/2011: Trapped</title><link>/blog/incite-1-12-2011-trapped/</link><pubDate>Wed, 12 Jan 2011 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/incite-1-12-2011-trapped/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I enjoy living in the South (of the US). I’m far enough North that we get seasons. But far enough South to not really be subjected to severe winter weather. It’s kind of like porridge in the story of the 3 bears. Living in ATL is &lt;em&gt;just right&lt;/em&gt; for me. Usually.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>What Do You Want to See in the First Cloud Security Alliance Training Course?</title><link>/blog/what-do-you-want-to-see-in-the-first-cloud-security-alliance-training-course/</link><pubDate>Wed, 12 Jan 2011 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/what-do-you-want-to-see-in-the-first-cloud-security-alliance-training-course/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;It leaked a bit over Twitter, but we are pretty excited that we hooked up with the Cloud Security Alliance to develop their first training courses. Better yet, we’re allowed to talk about it and solicit your input.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Friday Summary: January 7, 2011</title><link>/blog/friday-summary-january-7-2011/</link><pubDate>Fri, 07 Jan 2011 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/friday-summary-january-7-2011/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Compliance and security have hit the big time, and I have the proof.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Okay: all of us who live, eat, and breathe security already know that compliance is a big deal and a pain in the ass – but it isn’t as if “normal” people ever pay attention, right? Other than CEOs and folks who have to pay for our audits, right? And according to the meme that’s been circulating since I started in the business, no one actually &lt;em&gt;cares&lt;/em&gt; about security until they’ve been hit, right?&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Marketing Skills for Security Wonks: Leveraging Elmer FUDd</title><link>/blog/marketing-skills-for-security-wonks-leveraging-elmer-fudd/</link><pubDate>Fri, 07 Jan 2011 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/marketing-skills-for-security-wonks-leveraging-elmer-fudd/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;At the risk of having Rich yell at me again (like he did early last year) because I’m writing too much high-level stuff, let’s get back to a key soft skill of being a security manager. It’s not like we got a lot better at that in 2010, right? I talked about &lt;a href="http://securosis.com/blog/motivational-skills-for-security-wonks-2011-edition"&gt;motivating your team&lt;/a&gt; earlier this week, so now let’s turn to marketing and sales. Right – you are a security guy/gal, what do you need to know about sales?&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Mobile Device Security: 5 Tactics to Protect Those Buggers</title><link>/blog/mobile-device-security-5-tactics-to-protect-those-buggers/</link><pubDate>Fri, 07 Jan 2011 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/mobile-device-security-5-tactics-to-protect-those-buggers/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;In this series we’ve tackled &lt;a href="http://securosis.com/blog/mobile-data-security-i-can-haz-your-mobile/"&gt;the threats these new handheld computers mobile devices present&lt;/a&gt;, as well as &lt;a href="http://securosis.com/blog/mobile-device-security-saying-no-without-saying-no/"&gt;how we need to deal with folks culturally&lt;/a&gt; when they demand access to sensitive corporate information on mobile devices. As we wrap up this short series on mobile device security, let’s jump in and talk about a few things we can do to protect these devices.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>BSIMM meets Joe the Programmer</title><link>/blog/bsimm-and-joe-the-programmer/</link><pubDate>Thu, 06 Jan 2011 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/bsimm-and-joe-the-programmer/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I always read Gary McGraw’s research on &lt;a href="http://www.bsimm.com/"&gt;BSIMM&lt;/a&gt;. He posts plenty of very interesting data there, and we generally have so little good intelligence on secure code development that these reports are refreshing. His most recent post with Sammy Migues on &lt;a href="http://www.informit.com/articles/article.aspx?p=1671924&amp;amp;rll=1"&gt;Driving Efficiency and Effectiveness in Software Security&lt;/a&gt; raises some interesting questions, especially around the use of pen testing. The questions of where and how to best deploy resources are questions &lt;em&gt;every&lt;/em&gt; development team has, and I enjoyed his entire analysis of the results of different methods of resource allocation.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Incite 1/5/2011: It’s a Smaller World, after All</title><link>/blog/incite-1-5-2011-its-a-smaller-world-after-all-2/</link><pubDate>Wed, 05 Jan 2011 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/incite-1-5-2011-its-a-smaller-world-after-all-2/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I’m happy to say the holiday season was pretty eventful for the Boss and her family. Her brother (and his wife) welcomed twin boys into the world right after Xmas. The whole process of creating life still astounds, and the idea of two at a time boggles the mind – even if you’ve been through it. Turns out we were up North when the new guys showed up (a week early), so we got to meet them in person. We live 600 miles apart, so that was an unexpected bonus.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Mobile Device Security: Saying no without saying no</title><link>/blog/mobile-device-security-saying-no-without-saying-no/</link><pubDate>Wed, 05 Jan 2011 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/mobile-device-security-saying-no-without-saying-no/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;As we discussed in our first Mobile Device Security post (&lt;a href="http://securosis.com/blog/mobile-data-security-i-can-haz-your-mobile"&gt;I can haz your mobile&lt;/a&gt;), supporting smartphones isn’t really an choice. You aren’t going to tell your CEO or any other exec 5-6 pay grades above you that they can’t use their iPad to access the deal documents on that multi-billion dollar acquisition. You know it’s much easier to read an iPad on the can, than to lug the laptop around when taking care of business, right?&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>React Faster and Better: Initial Incident Data</title><link>/blog/react-faster-and-better-initial-incident-data/</link><pubDate>Wed, 05 Jan 2011 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/react-faster-and-better-initial-incident-data/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;In &lt;a href="http://securosis.com/blog/react-faster-and-better-new-data-for-new-attacks-part-1/"&gt;New Data for New Attacks&lt;/a&gt; we discussed why there is usually too much data early in the process. Then we talked about leveraging the right data to &lt;a href="http://securosis.com/blog/react-faster-and-better-alerts-triggers"&gt;alert and trigger&lt;/a&gt; the investigative process. But once the incident response process kicks in too much data is rarely the problem, so now let’s dig deeper into the most useful data for the initial stages of incident response. At this early stage, when we don’t yet know what we are dealing with, it’s all about triaging the problem. That usually means confirming the issue with additional data sources and helping to isolate the root cause.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>HP(en!s) Envy: Dell Buys SecureWorks</title><link>/blog/hpens-envy-dell-buys-secureworks/</link><pubDate>Tue, 04 Jan 2011 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/hpens-envy-dell-buys-secureworks/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Well, it didn’t take long to see the bankers and lawyers stayed busy over the holidays. &lt;a href="http://content.dell.com/us/en/corp/d/secure/2011-01-04-ir-shld-release.aspx"&gt;Dell announced they are acquiring SecureWorks&lt;/a&gt;, the MSSP, for an undisclosed sum. Yeah, you are probably thinking the same thing I did initially. Dell? WTF?&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Motivational Skills for Security Wonks: 2011 Edition</title><link>/blog/motivational-skills-for-security-wonks-2011-edition/</link><pubDate>Tue, 04 Jan 2011 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/motivational-skills-for-security-wonks-2011-edition/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Ah yes, 2011 is here. A new year, which means it’s time to put into action all of those wonderful plans you’ve been percolating over the holidays. Oh, you don’t have plans, besides getting through the day, that is? I get that. The truth is things aren’t likely to be better in 2011 – probably not even tolerable. But we persevere because that’s what we do, although a lot of folks (including AndyITGuy, among others) continue talking burnout risk. And that means we have to refocus.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>The Evolving Role of Vulnerability Assessment and Penetration Testing in Web Application Security</title><link>/blog/the-evolving-role-of-vulnerability-assessment-and-penetration-testing-in-we/</link><pubDate>Tue, 04 Jan 2011 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/the-evolving-role-of-vulnerability-assessment-and-penetration-testing-in-we/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Yesterday I got involved in an interesting Twitter discussion with Jeremiah Grossman, Chris Eng, Chris Wysopal, and Shrdlu that was inspired by &lt;a href="http://layer8.itsecuritygeek.com/layer8/you-say-potato-i-say-false-positive/"&gt;Shrdlu’s post on application security over at Layer8&lt;/a&gt;. I sort of suck at 140 character responses, so I figured a blog post was in order.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Mobile Device Security: I can haz your mobile</title><link>/blog/mobile-data-security-i-can-haz-your-mobile/</link><pubDate>Mon, 03 Jan 2011 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/mobile-data-security-i-can-haz-your-mobile/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;As we start 2011, a friend pointed out that my endpoint research agenda (including much of my work on &lt;a href="http://securosis.com/blog/infrastructure-security-research-agenda-2011-part-1-positivity/"&gt;Positivity&lt;/a&gt;) is pretty PC platform focused. And relative to endpoint security that is on point. But the reality is that nowadays we cannot assume that our only threat vectors remain PC-like devices. Given that pretty much all the smart phones out there are as powerful as the computers I used 5 years ago, we need to factor in that mobile devices are the next frontier for badness.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Coming Soon…</title><link>/blog/coming-soon/</link><pubDate>Sun, 02 Jan 2011 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/coming-soon/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src="home_thumb.jpg" alt=""&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Mr. Cranky Faces Reality</title><link>/blog/mr-cranky-faces-reality/</link><pubDate>Wed, 29 Dec 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/mr-cranky-faces-reality/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;There are some mornings I should not be allowed to look at the Internet. Those days when I think someone peed in my cornflakes. The mornings when every single media release, blog post, and news item, looks like total BS. I think maybe they are just struggling for news during the holiday season, or maybe I am just unsually snarky. I don’t know. Today was one of those days. I was combing through my feed reader and ran across Brian Prince’s article, &lt;a href="http://securitywatch.eweek.com/database_security/database_security_means_dont_let_down_your_guard.html"&gt;Database Security Reminder: Don’t Let Your Guard Down&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>React Faster and Better Chugging along</title><link>/blog/react-faster-and-better-chugging-along/</link><pubDate>Wed, 29 Dec 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/react-faster-and-better-chugging-along/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;As we described a while back, we have separated our heavier white paper research out into a &lt;a href="http://securosis.com/blog/full"&gt;&lt;em&gt;complete&lt;/em&gt; feed&lt;/a&gt;, and slimmed down the &lt;a href="http://www.securosis.com/blog"&gt;main feed&lt;/a&gt;. But that means folks subscribing only to the main feed may miss some of the outstanding blog series we do.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>React Faster and Better: Alerts &amp; Triggers</title><link>/blog/react-faster-and-better-alerts-triggers/</link><pubDate>Tue, 28 Dec 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/react-faster-and-better-alerts-triggers/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;In our last post &lt;a href="http://securosis.com/blog/react-faster-and-better-new-data-for-new-attacks-part-1/"&gt;New Data for New Attacks&lt;/a&gt;, we delved into the types of data we want to systematically collect, through both log record aggregation and full packet capture. As we’ve said many times, data isn’t the issue – it’s the lack of actionable information for prioritizing our efforts. That means we must more effectively automate analysis of this data and draw the proper conclusions about what is at risk and what isn’t.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Web Application Firewalls Really Work</title><link>/blog/web-application-firewalls-really-work/</link><pubDate>Mon, 27 Dec 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/web-application-firewalls-really-work/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;A couple months ago I decided to finally dig in and see whether WAFs (Web Application Firewalls) are really useful, or merely another crappy shiny object we spend a lot of money on to get the auditors off our backs.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Friday Summary: December 24, 2010</title><link>/blog/friday-summary-decemer-24-2010/</link><pubDate>Fri, 24 Dec 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/friday-summary-decemer-24-2010/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;It’s the holiday season and I should be taking some time off and relaxing, watching some movies and seeing friends. Sounds good. If only I had that ‘relax’ gene sequence I would probably be off having a good time rather than worrying about security on Giftmas eve. But here I am, reading George Hulme’s &lt;a href="http://threatpost.com"&gt;Threatpost&lt;/a&gt; article, &lt;a href="http://threatpost.com/en_us/blogs/2011-whats-your-it-security-plan-122210"&gt;2011: What’s Your IT Security Plan?&lt;/a&gt;. I got to thinking about this. Should I &lt;em&gt;wait&lt;/em&gt; to do security work for 2011? I mean, at your employer is one thing – who cares about &lt;em&gt;those&lt;/em&gt; systems when there is eggnog and pumpkin pie? I’m talkin’ about &lt;em&gt;your&lt;/em&gt; stuff! One point I make in the talks I give on software security is: don’t prioritize security out in favor of features when building code. And in this case, if I put off security in favor of fun, security won’t get done in 2011. So I went through the process of evaluating home computer and network security over the last couple days. I did the following:&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Dealtime 2010: Remembering the Departed</title><link>/blog/dealtime-2010-remembering-the-departed/</link><pubDate>Thu, 23 Dec 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/dealtime-2010-remembering-the-departed/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;As we approach Christmas time, quite a few folks will have gold bullion under their trees, courtesy of the security industry M&amp;amp;A machines. Of course, the investment bankers and lawyers had a banner year, but let’s also hear it for some fortunate entrepreneurs, their VCs, and even some public company shareholders who were able to share in the wealth this year.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Incite 12/22/2010: Resolution</title><link>/blog/incite-12-22-2010-resolution/</link><pubDate>Wed, 22 Dec 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/incite-12-22-2010-resolution/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Pretty much every year, I spend the winter holidays up north visiting the Boss’s family. I usually take that week and try to catch up on all the stuff I didn’t get done, working frantically on whatever will launch right when everyone returns from their December hangover. But as I have described here, I’m trying to evolve. I’m trying to take some time to smell the proverbial roses, and appreciate things a bit. I know, quite novel.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>2011 Research Agenda: Quantum Cloudiness, Supervillan Shields, and No-BS Risk</title><link>/blog/2011-research-agenda-quantum-cloudiness-supervillan-shields-and-no-bs-risk/</link><pubDate>Tue, 21 Dec 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/2011-research-agenda-quantum-cloudiness-supervillan-shields-and-no-bs-risk/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;In &lt;a href="https://securosis.com/blog/2011-research-agenda-quantum-cloudiness-supervillan-shields-and-no-bs-risk"&gt;my last post&lt;/a&gt; I covered the more practical items on my research agenda for the coming year. Today I will focus more on pure research: these topics are a bit more out there and aren’t as focused on guiding immediate action. While this is a smaller percentage of where I spend my time, overall I think it’s more important in the big picture.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>2011 Research Agenda: the Practical Bits</title><link>/blog/2011-research-agenda-the-practical-bits/</link><pubDate>Mon, 20 Dec 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/2011-research-agenda-the-practical-bits/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I always find it a bit of a challenge to fully plan out my research agenda for the coming year. Partly it’s due to being easily distracted, and partly my recognition that there are a lot of moving cogs I know will draw me in different directions over the coming year. This is best illustrated by the detritus of some blog series that never quite made it over the finish line.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>NSA Assumes Security Is Compromised</title><link>/blog/nsa-to-assume-security-is-compromised/</link><pubDate>Mon, 20 Dec 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/nsa-to-assume-security-is-compromised/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I saw an interesting news item: the NSA has changed their mindset and approach to data security. Their new(?) posture is that &lt;a href="http://www.dailytech.com/article.aspx?newsid=20424"&gt;Security Has Always Been Compromised&lt;/a&gt;. Debora Plunkett of the NSA’s “Information Assurance Directorate” stated:&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>React Faster and Better: New Data for New Attacks, Part 1</title><link>/blog/react-faster-and-better-new-data-for-new-attacks-part-1/</link><pubDate>Mon, 20 Dec 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/react-faster-and-better-new-data-for-new-attacks-part-1/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;As we discussed in our last post on &lt;a href="http://securosis.com/blog/react-faster-and-better-incident-response-gaps"&gt;Critical Incident Response Gaps&lt;/a&gt;, we tend to gather too much of the wrong kinds of information, too early in the process. To clarify that a little bit, we are still fans of collecting as much data as you can, because once you miss the opportunity to collect something you’ll never get another chance. Our point is that there is a tendency to try to boil the ocean with analysis of all sorts of data. That causes failure and has plagued technologies like SIEM, because customers try to do too much too soon.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Quantum Unicorns</title><link>/blog/quantum-unicorns/</link><pubDate>Fri, 17 Dec 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/quantum-unicorns/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Apparently we are supposed to fear the supercomputer of the future. According to Computerworld, &lt;a href="http://www.computerworld.com/s/article/9201281/The_clock_is_ticking_on_encryption?taxonomyId=17&amp;amp;pageNumber=2"&gt;the clock is ticking on encryption&lt;/a&gt;. Yes, you guessed it, the mythical “quantum computer” technology is back in the news again, casting its shadow over encryption. It will make breaking encryption much, much easier.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Friday Summary: December 17, 2010</title><link>/blog/friday-summary-december-17-2010/</link><pubDate>Thu, 16 Dec 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/friday-summary-december-17-2010/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I think we can firmly declare December 2010 the Month of Pwnage.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Between WikiLeaks, Gawker, McDonalds, and Anonymous DDoS attacks, I’m not sure infosec has been in the news this much since the early days of big data breaches. Heck, &lt;em&gt;I&lt;/em&gt; haven’t been in the news this much since I got involved with the Kaminsky DNS thing. To be honest, it’s a little refreshing to have a string of big stories that don’t involve Albert Gonzales.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Infrastructure Security Research Agenda 2011—Part 4: Egress and Endpoints</title><link>/blog/infrastructure-security-research-agenda-2011-part-4-egress-and-endpoints-2/</link><pubDate>Thu, 16 Dec 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/infrastructure-security-research-agenda-2011-part-4-egress-and-endpoints-2/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;In the first three posts of my 2011 Research Agenda (&lt;a href="http://securosis.com/blog/infrastructure-security-research-agenda-2011-part-1-positivity"&gt;Positivity&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://securosis.com/blog/infrastructure-security-research-agenda-2011-part-2-posturing-and-RFAB"&gt;Posturing and RFAB&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://securosis.com/blog/infrastructure-security-research-agenda-2011-part-3-vaulting-and-assurance"&gt;Vaulting and Assurance&lt;/a&gt;) I mostly talked about how we security folks need to protect our stuff from &lt;em&gt;them&lt;/em&gt;. You know, outside attackers trying to reach our &lt;em&gt;stuff&lt;/em&gt;. Now let’s move on to &lt;em&gt;people&lt;/em&gt; on the inside. Although most of us prefer to focus on folks trying to break in, it’s also important to put some forethought into protecting people inside the perimeter. Whether an employee loses a device (and compromises data), clicks the wrong link (resulting in a compromised device and giving attackers a foothold on the internal network), or even maliciously tries to exfiltrate data (WikiLeaks, anyone?) all of these attack scenarios are very real.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>React Faster and Better: Incident Response Gaps</title><link>/blog/react-faster-and-better-incident-response-gaps/</link><pubDate>Thu, 16 Dec 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/react-faster-and-better-incident-response-gaps/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;In &lt;a href="http://securosis.com/blog/react-faster-and-better-introduction"&gt;our introduction to this series&lt;/a&gt; we mentioned that the current practice of incident response isn’t up to dealing with the compromises and penetrations we see today. It isn’t that the incident response process itself is broken, but &lt;em&gt;how companies implement response&lt;/em&gt; is the problem.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Research Agenda 2011: the Open Research Version</title><link>/blog/research-agenda-2011-the-open-research-version/</link><pubDate>Thu, 16 Dec 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/research-agenda-2011-the-open-research-version/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;It’s time to post my research agenda for 2011. My long-winded Securosis compatriot has chosen a thematic approach to discussing coverage areas, and while it’s an excellent – and elegant – idea, I am getting lost amongst all of the elements presented. So unlike Mike, I won’t be presenting my coverage areas so artistically. Instead I will stick to a focus on the technology variants I hear customers askING about, as well as the trends I see within different sub-segments of the security industry.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Incite 12/15/2010: It’s not a sprint…</title><link>/blog/incite-12-15-2010-its-not-a-sprint-2/</link><pubDate>Wed, 15 Dec 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/incite-12-15-2010-its-not-a-sprint-2/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;One of the issues of being a &lt;em&gt;high achiever&lt;/em&gt; (at least in my own mind) is that you’re always in a rush. Half the time we don’t know where we’re going, but we need to get there fast. And it results in burn-out, grumpiness, and poor job performance – which is the worst thing for someone focused on achievement. A mentor of mine saw this tendency in me early on and imprinted a thought that I still think about often: “It’s not a sprint, Mike, it’s a marathon.” Man, those words speak the truth.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Infrastructure Security Research Agenda 2011—Part 3: Vaulting and Assurance</title><link>/blog/infrastructure-security-research-agenda-2011-part-3-vaulting-and-assurance-2/</link><pubDate>Wed, 15 Dec 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/infrastructure-security-research-agenda-2011-part-3-vaulting-and-assurance-2/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Getting back to our Infrastructure Security Research Agenda for 2011 (&lt;a href="http://securosis.com/blog/infrastructure-security-research-agenda-2011-part-1-positivity"&gt;Part 1: Positivity&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://securosis.com/blog/infrastructure-security-research-agenda-2011-part-2-posturing-and-RFAB"&gt;Part 2: Posturing and RFAB&lt;/a&gt;), let’s now turn our attention to two more areas of focus. The first is ‘vaulting’, a fancy way of talking about network segmentation with additional security controls based on what you are protecting. Then we’ll touch on assurance, another fancy term for testing your stuff.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Market Maturity and Security Competitive Advantage</title><link>/blog/market-maturity-and-security-competitive-advantage/</link><pubDate>Tue, 14 Dec 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/market-maturity-and-security-competitive-advantage/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;One advantage of my background is that I’ve used and marketed/sold security products, as well as followed the industry for a long time, so I see patterns over and over again. But before I jump into that, you all need to head over to Lenny Zeltser’s blog. He’s doing a lot of writing, and given the general lameness of the rest of us security bloggers, it’s nice that we have a new victim thought leader to peruse.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Get over It</title><link>/blog/get-over-it/</link><pubDate>Mon, 13 Dec 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/get-over-it/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Over the weekend I glanced at Twitter and saw a bit of hand-wringing inspired by something going on at (I think) the Baythreat in California. This is something that’s been popping up quite a bit on Twitter and in blog posts for a while now. The core of the comments centered on the problem of educating the unwashed security masses, combined with the problems induced by a compliance mentality, and the general “they don’t understand” and “security is failing” memes.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Infrastructure Security Research Agenda 2011—Part 2: Posturing and Reacting Faster/Better</title><link>/blog/infrastructure-security-research-agenda-2011-part-2-posturing-and-reacting-faster-better/</link><pubDate>Mon, 13 Dec 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/infrastructure-security-research-agenda-2011-part-2-posturing-and-reacting-faster-better/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;The first of my &lt;a href="http://securosis.com/blog/infrastructure-security-research-agenda-2011-part-1-positivity"&gt;Infrastructure Security Research Agenda 2011 posts&lt;/a&gt;, introducing the concept of positivity, generated a lot of discussion. Not only attached to the blog post (though the comments there were quite good), but in daily discussions with members of our extended network. Which is what a research agenda is really for. It’s a way to throw some crap against the wall and see what sticks.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Quick Wins with DLP Webinar</title><link>/blog/quick-wins-with-dlp-webinar/</link><pubDate>Mon, 13 Dec 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/quick-wins-with-dlp-webinar/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Back in April I published a slightly different take on DLP: &lt;a href="http://securosis.com/research/papers/low-hanging-fruit-quick-wins-with-data-loss-prevention/"&gt;Low Hanging Fruit: Quick Wins with Data Loss Prevention&lt;/a&gt;. It was all about getting immediate value out of DLP while setting yourself up for a full deployment.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Friday Summary: December 10, 2010</title><link>/blog/friday-summary-december-10-2010/</link><pubDate>Thu, 09 Dec 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/friday-summary-december-10-2010/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;The Securosis team is here in San Francisco, meeting with vendors and presenting at the &lt;a href="http://infosecuritydecisions.techtarget.com/data/html/eventataglance.html"&gt;TechTarget Data Protection event&lt;/a&gt;. Weather has been reasonable and the food was awesome. But since it’s been going non-stop since something like 3:00am to (What is it now? 11:01pm) – this summary will be a short one.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Where Are We? Nowhereville.</title><link>/blog/where-the-hell-are-we/</link><pubDate>Thu, 09 Dec 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/where-the-hell-are-we/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;It’s been about 11 months since the first time I ever spoke with Joshua Corman. He had this idea for a Rugged Software movement and wanted some feedback. After he filled me in on the concept, I told him I thought it was a good idea, and told him I was in. A few weeks later the Rugged Manifesto was published. There were a flurry of blog posts, and a bunch of email discussions, which ended February this year. Since then, I have heard … crickets. New stuff on &lt;a href="http://www.ruggedsoftware.org/"&gt;RuggedSoftware.org&lt;/a&gt;? No. &lt;a href="http://www.owasp.org/index.php/Rugged_Software"&gt;OWASP&lt;/a&gt;? Nada. Twitter? Presentations? Chat groups? Pretty much not a damned thing.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Edge Tokenization</title><link>/blog/edge-tokenization/</link><pubDate>Wed, 08 Dec 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/edge-tokenization/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;A couple months ago Akamai announced &lt;a href="http://www.akamai.com/html/solutions/security/edge_tokenization.html"&gt;Edge Tokenization&lt;/a&gt;, a service to tokenize credit card numbers for online payments. The technology is not Akamai’s – it belongs to &lt;a href="http://www.cybersource.com/products_and_services/payment_security/"&gt;CyberSource&lt;/a&gt;, a Visa-owned payment processing company. I have been holding off on this post for a couple months in order to get a full briefing from CyberSource, but that is not currently happening, and this application of tokenization technology is worth talking about, so it’s time to forge ahead. I preface this by stating that I don’t write much about specific vendor announcements – I prefer to comment on trends within a specific industry. That’s largely because most product announcements are about smaller iterative improvements or full-blown puffy marketing doublespeak. To avoid being accused of being in somebody’s pocket, I avoid product announcements, except the rare cases that are important enough to demand discussion. A new deployment model for payment processing and tokenization qualifies.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Incite 12/8/2010: the Nutcracker</title><link>/blog/incite-12-8-2010-the-nutcracker/</link><pubDate>Wed, 08 Dec 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/incite-12-8-2010-the-nutcracker/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;When I see the term ‘nutcracker’, I figure folks are talking about their significant others. There are times when the Boss takes on the role of my nutcracker, but usually I deserve it. At least that’s my story today because I’d rather not sleep in the doghouse for the rest of the year. But that’s not what I want to talk about. Let’s discuss the holiday show (and now movie) of the same name.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Infrastructure Security Research Agenda 2011—Part 1: Positivity</title><link>/blog/infrastructure-security-research-agenda-2011-part-1-positivity-2/</link><pubDate>Wed, 08 Dec 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/infrastructure-security-research-agenda-2011-part-1-positivity-2/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Ah yes, it’s that time of year. Time for predictions and pontification and soothsaying and all sorts of other year-end comedy. As I told the crowd at SecTOR, basically everyone is making sh*t up. Sure, some have somewhat educated opinions, but at the end of the day nobody knows what will kill us in 2011. Except for the certainty that it &lt;em&gt;will&lt;/em&gt; be something. We just don’t know what that something will be.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>My 2011 Security Predictions</title><link>/blog/my-2011-security-predictions/</link><pubDate>Wed, 08 Dec 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/my-2011-security-predictions/</guid><description>&lt;ol&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Someone will predict a big cyberattack someplace that may or may not happen.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Someone will predict a big SCADA attack/failure someplace that probably won’t happen, but I suppose it’s still possible.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Someone will predict that Apple will do something big that enterprises won’t adopt, but then they will.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Someone will predict some tech will die, which is usually when a lot of people will buy it.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Most people will renew every security product currently in their environment no matter how well they works (or don’t).&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Someone will predict that &lt;em&gt;this time&lt;/em&gt; it’s &lt;em&gt;really&lt;/em&gt; the year mobile attacks happen and steal everyone’s money and nekked photos off their phones. But it probably won’t happen, and if it does the press headlines will all talk about ‘iPhone’ even if it only affects Motorola StarTACs.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Vendors will scare customers into thinking 20 new regulations are right around the corner – all of which require their products.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;There will be a lot of predictions with the words “social networking”, “2.0”, “consumerization”, “Justin Bieber”, and whatever else is trending on Twitter the day they write the predictions.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Any time there’s a major global event or disaster, I will receive at least 8 press releases from vendors claiming bad guys are using it for spam/phishing.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Some botnet will be the biggest.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ol&gt;
&lt;p&gt;And a bonus:&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Speaking at NRF in January</title><link>/blog/speaking-at-nrf-in-january/</link><pubDate>Wed, 08 Dec 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/speaking-at-nrf-in-january/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I am presenting at the &lt;a href="http://events.nrf.com/annual2011/public/Content.aspx?ID=7593&amp;amp;sortMenu=103000&amp;amp;exp=12%2f7%2f2010+10%3a15%3a54+PM"&gt;National Retail Federation’s 100th annual convention&lt;/a&gt; in January 2011. I’ll be talking about the past, present, and future of data security, and how new threats and technologies affect payment card security. I am co-presenting with &lt;a href="http://events.nrf.com/annual2011/public/SpeakerDetails.aspx?FromPage=Calendar.aspx&amp;amp;ContactID=15266"&gt;Peter Engert&lt;/a&gt;, who is in charge of payment card acceptance at Rooms To Go furniture, and &lt;a href="http://events.nrf.com/annual2011/public/SpeakerDetails.aspx?FromPage=Calendar.aspx&amp;amp;ContactID=13092"&gt;Robert McMillon&lt;/a&gt; of RSA. Robert works with RSA’s tokenization product and manages the First Data/RSA partnership. We’ll each give a small slide presentation on what we are seeing in the industry, then we’ll spend the latter half of the session answering questions on any payment security issues you have. The bad news is that the presentation is on Sunday at 10:00 AM, on the first full day of the conference. The good news is both my co-presenters are very sharp guys and I expect this to be a very entertaining session.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>React Faster and Better: Introduction</title><link>/blog/react-faster-and-better-introduction/</link><pubDate>Tue, 07 Dec 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/react-faster-and-better-introduction/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;One of the cool things about Securosis is its transparency. We develop all our research positions in the open through our blog, and that means at times we’re wrong. &lt;em&gt;Wrong&lt;/em&gt; is such a harsh word, and one you won’t hear most analysts say. Of course, we aren’t like most analysts, and sometimes we need to recalibrate on a research project and recast the effort. Near the end of our &lt;a href="http://securosis.com/blog/incident-response-fundamentals-index-of-posts"&gt;Incident Response Fundamentals&lt;/a&gt; series, we realized we weren’t tracking with our project goals, so we split that off and get to start over.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>RIP Marty Martian</title><link>/blog/rip-marty-martian/</link><pubDate>Tue, 07 Dec 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/rip-marty-martian/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;OK, before you start leaving flowers and wreaths at Looney Toons HQ, our favorite animated Martian is not dead. But the product formerly known as Cisco MARS is. The &lt;a href="http://www.cisco.com/en/US/prod/collateral/vpndevc/ps5739/ps6241/eol_c51-636888.html"&gt;end of life announcement hit last week&lt;/a&gt;, so after June of 2011 you won’t be able to buy MARS and support will ebb away over the next 3 years. Of course, this merely formalize what we’ve all known for a long time. The carcass is mostly decomposed by the time you get the death notice.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>What Amazon AWS’s PCI Compliance Means to You</title><link>/blog/what-amazon-awss-pci-compliance-means-to-you-2/</link><pubDate>Tue, 07 Dec 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/what-amazon-awss-pci-compliance-means-to-you-2/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;This morning Amazon &lt;a href="http://aws.typepad.com/aws/2010/12/aws-achieves-pci-dss-20-validated-service-provider-status.html"&gt;announced that Amazon Web Services achieved PCI-DSS 2.0 Validated Service Provider compliance&lt;/a&gt;. This is both a very big deal, and no big deal at all. Here’s why:&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Incident Response Fundamentals: Index of Posts</title><link>/blog/incident-response-fundamentals-index-of-posts/</link><pubDate>Mon, 06 Dec 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/incident-response-fundamentals-index-of-posts/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;As we mentioned a few weeks ago, we are in the process of splitting out the heavy duty research we do for our blog series from the security industry tips and tactics. Here is a little explanation of why:&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>What Quantum Mechanics Teaches Us about Data Leaks</title><link>/blog/what-quantum-mechanics-teaches-us-about-data-leaks/</link><pubDate>Mon, 06 Dec 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/what-quantum-mechanics-teaches-us-about-data-leaks/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks to some dude who looks like a James Bond villain and rents rack space in a nuclear bomb resistant underground cavern, combined with a foreign nation running the equivalent of a Hoover mated with a Xerox over the entire country, “data leaks” are back in the headlines.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Friday Summary: December 3, 2010</title><link>/blog/friday-summary-december-3-2010/</link><pubDate>Thu, 02 Dec 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/friday-summary-december-3-2010/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;What a week.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Last Monday and Tuesday I was out meeting with clients and prospects and was totally psyched at all the cool opportunities coming up. I was a bit ragged on Wednesday, but figured it was the lack of sleep.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>I can haz ur email list</title><link>/blog/i-can-haz-ur-email-list/</link><pubDate>Thu, 02 Dec 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/i-can-haz-ur-email-list/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;We are a full disclosure shop here at Securosis. That means you get to see the good, the bad, and yes, the ugly too. We’ve been pretty up front about saying it was just a matter of time before our stuff got hacked. In fact, you can check out the last comment from &lt;a href="http://securosis.com/blog/never-bring-a-knife-to-a-gun-fight"&gt;this 2007 post&lt;/a&gt;, where Rich basically says so. Not that we are a high profile target or anything, but it happens to everyone at some point or another.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Are You off the Grid?</title><link>/blog/are-you-off-the-grid/</link><pubDate>Wed, 01 Dec 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/are-you-off-the-grid/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I got email from friends this week about a web site that creeped them out. It’s called &lt;a href="http://www.spokeo.com/"&gt;Spokeo&lt;/a&gt;, and it provides a Google-like search on personal information. Rather than creeped out, I was fascinated. Not to look for other people, but to see what the search found for me. I hate mentioning it as I am not endorsing the web site or service, but I can’t help my fascination at seeing what personal data has been collected and aggregated on me. I actually have a larger Internet fingerprint than I expected!&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Incite 12/1/10: Pay It Forward</title><link>/blog/incite-12-1-10-pay-it-forward/</link><pubDate>Wed, 01 Dec 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/incite-12-1-10-pay-it-forward/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I used to be a real TV head. Before the kids showed up, the Boss and I would spend a good deal of every Saturday watching the 5 or 10 shows we recorded on the VCR (old school, baby). Comedies, dramas, the whole ball of wax. Then priorities shifted and I had less and less time for TV. The Boss still watches a few shows, but I’m usually along for the ride, catching up on my reading while some drivel is on the boob tube (Praise iPad!).&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Grovel for Budget Time</title><link>/blog/grovel-for-budget-time/</link><pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/grovel-for-budget-time/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;One of the concepts I use in my Pragmatic CSO material is a &lt;em&gt;Day in the Life&lt;/em&gt; of a CISO. There are lots of firefighting and other assorted activities. I usually get a big laugh when I get to the part about &lt;em&gt;groveling to the CIO and CFO for budget&lt;/em&gt;. Yes, I call it like I see it. But after seeing a &lt;a href="http://www.technewsworld.com/story/71240.html"&gt;post on budgeting by Ed Moyle&lt;/a&gt; from before Thanksgiving, I think it’s time to dig a bit deeper.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Holiday Shopping and Security Theater</title><link>/blog/holiday-shopping-and-security-theater/</link><pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/holiday-shopping-and-security-theater/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;This is usually the time of year I write a how-to article on safe seasonal shopping. And some of it is the usual generic advice – use a credit card, don’t click email links, use merchants you trust, etc. – but I like to include specific advice to deal with new seasonal threats. Wading into the deluge of threat warnings about Black Friday shopping schemes this year, I found mostly noise. There are plenty of real attacks consumers should be worried about, but many which aren’t worth the attention. And every article seems to have a particular agenda. For example, I have a hard time believing &lt;a href="http://www.scmagazineus.com/fbi-warns-of-sms-and-phone-based-phishing-scams/article/191565/"&gt;SMS banking scams are a real threat&lt;/a&gt; to holiday shoppers, in the same way I can’t imagine someone falling for a Nigerian banking scam or turning off their refrigerator because of a crank call. Some are so &lt;a href="http://krebsonsecurity.com/2010/11/spear-phishing-attacks-snag-e-mail-marketers/"&gt;targeted at a small group&lt;/a&gt;, the news is only interesting to the most dedicated security researchers. Others attacks &lt;a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2010/11/28/business/28borker.html?_r=1&amp;amp;pagewanted=print"&gt;combine good old fashioned fraud with a few Search Engine Optimization shenanigans to game the system&lt;/a&gt;, causing a lot of people grief, but persist until law enforcement makes then a priority to investigate. Of the dozens of articles out there, they all seemed to feed the security theater, making it much harder to know what’s a real threat and what’s not.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Ranum’s Right, for the Wrong Reasons</title><link>/blog/ranums-right-for-the-wrong-reasons/</link><pubDate>Mon, 29 Nov 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/ranums-right-for-the-wrong-reasons/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://searchsecurity.techtarget.com/magazineFeature/0,296894,sid14_gci1523652,00.html"&gt;Information Security Magazine’s November issue&lt;/a&gt; is available. In it is an interesting rehash of the security monoculture debate between Bruce Schneier and Marcus Ranum some 8 years ago. Basically the hypothesis was that if all your software is provided by one vendor, a single security vulnerability means &lt;em&gt;everyone&lt;/em&gt; is vulnerable. The result is a worldwide cascade of failures. The term “domino effect” was thrown around to describe what would happen.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Incident Response Fundamentals: Phasing It in</title><link>/blog/incident-response-fundamentals-phasing-it-in/</link><pubDate>Fri, 26 Nov 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/incident-response-fundamentals-phasing-it-in/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;You may have noticed we’ve renamed the &lt;em&gt;React Faster and Better&lt;/em&gt; series to &lt;em&gt;Incident Response Fundamentals&lt;/em&gt;. Securosis shows you how the security research sausage gets made, and sometimes it’s messy. We started RFAB with the idea that it would focus on advanced incident response tactics and the like. As we started writing, it was clear we first had to document the fundamentals. We tried to do both in the series, but it didn’t work out. So Rich and I re-calibrated and decided to break RFAB up into two distinct series.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Incite 11/24/2010: Fan Appreciation</title><link>/blog/incite-11-24-2010-fan-appreciation/</link><pubDate>Wed, 24 Nov 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/incite-11-24-2010-fan-appreciation/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Though I have tailed off a bit from my ridiculous pace of two years ago, I still go see a lot of live music. Although many of these acts make a mint, it’s not an easy life. I can only imagine how difficult it is to be on the road for months at a time. It’s hard enough for me, and I’m only gone one or two nights at a time. Though it’s not like I’m staying at the Ritz every night (don’t tell Rich I’m staying at the Ritz, okay?).&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Availability and Assumptions</title><link>/blog/availability-and-assumptions/</link><pubDate>Tue, 23 Nov 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/availability-and-assumptions/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Skipped out of town for a much needed vacation Friday, and spent the weekend in a very remote section of desert. I spent my time hiking to the top of several peaks and overlooking vast areas of uninhabited country. I rode quads, wandered around a perfectly intact 100 year old mine shaft, did some target practice with a new rifle, built giant bonfires, and sat around BSing with friends. A total departure from everyday life. So I was in a semi-euphoric state, and trying to ease my way back into work. I was not planning on delving into complex security philosophy and splitting semantic hairs. But here I am … talking about Quantum Datum.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>I Am T-Comply</title><link>/blog/i-am-t-comply/</link><pubDate>Tue, 23 Nov 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/i-am-t-comply/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;As we all get ready for the turkey-induced food coma awaiting us Yanks in two days, let me expand a bit on an incomplete thought put forth by the Hoff. His Cloudiness wonders aloud if &lt;a href="http://www.rationalsurvivability.com/blog/?p=2737"&gt;Compliance is the Autotune of the Security Industry&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Meatspace Phishing Encounter</title><link>/blog/meatspace-phishing-encounter/</link><pubDate>Tue, 23 Nov 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/meatspace-phishing-encounter/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I had an insanely early flight this morning for some client work in the Bay Area, so last night I hopped out to fill up on gas and grab some pizza for family movie night (&lt;em&gt;The Muppets Take Manhattan,&lt;/em&gt; in case you were wondering).&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Cash, Coke &amp; Stuxnet: an Alternative Perspective</title><link>/blog/cash-coke-stuxnet-an-alternative-perspective/</link><pubDate>Mon, 22 Nov 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/cash-coke-stuxnet-an-alternative-perspective/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Now that the media has feasted on the Stuxnet carcass, it gives me a moment of pause. What of a different perspective? I know – madness, right? But seriously, we have seen the media in a lather over this story for some time now. Let’s be honest – to someone who has worked in the SCADA community, this really is nothing new. It’s just one incident that happened to come to light.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Counterpoint: Availability Is Job #1</title><link>/blog/availability-is-job-1/</link><pubDate>Mon, 22 Nov 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/availability-is-job-1/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Rich makes the case that &lt;a href="http://securosis.com/blog/a-is-not-for-availability"&gt;A Is Not for Availability&lt;/a&gt; in this week’s FireStarter. Basically his thinking is that the A in the CIA triad needs to be &lt;em&gt;attribution&lt;/em&gt; , rather than availability. At least when thinking about security information (as opposed to infrastructure). Turns out that was a rather controversial position within the Securosis band.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Firestarter: A Is Not for Availability</title><link>/blog/a-is-not-for-availability/</link><pubDate>Mon, 22 Nov 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/a-is-not-for-availability/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;It’s drilled into us as soon as we first cut our help-desk umbilical cords and don our information security diapers:&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Criminal Key Management Fail</title><link>/blog/criminal-key-management-fail/</link><pubDate>Fri, 19 Nov 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/criminal-key-management-fail/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Lin Mun Poo of Malaysia sounds like a pretty bad-ass criminal hacker. He &lt;a href="http://www.nydailynews.com/news/ny_crime/2010/11/19/2010-11-19_hacker_nabbed_after_cracking_into_fed_reserve_network.html"&gt;cracked into the Federal Reserve&lt;/a&gt;, and snagged hundreds of thousands of card numbers from a bank in Cleveland. But perhaps his intellectual skills don’t extend quite as far as they should for criminal survival.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>No More Flat Networks</title><link>/blog/no-more-flat-networks/</link><pubDate>Fri, 19 Nov 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/no-more-flat-networks/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;As I continue working through the nuances of my 2011 research agenda, I’ve been throwing trial balloons at anyone and everyone I can. I posted an initial concept I called &lt;a href="http://securosis.com/blog/comments/vaults-within-vaults/"&gt;Vaults within Vaults&lt;/a&gt; and got some decent feedback. At this point, I’ve got a working concept for the philosophies we’ll need to embrace to stand a chance moving forward.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Friday Summary: November 19, 2010</title><link>/blog/friday-summary-november-19-2010/</link><pubDate>Thu, 18 Nov 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/friday-summary-november-19-2010/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I got distracted by email. The Friday Summary was going to be about columnar databases. I think. Maybe it’s the flu I have had all week, or my memory is going, or just perhaps the subject was not all that interesting to begin with. But the email that distracted me was kind of funny and kinda sad. A former friend and co-worker contacted me for the first time is something like 10 years. Out of the blue.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Datum Entanglement</title><link>/blog/datum-entanglement/</link><pubDate>Wed, 17 Nov 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/datum-entanglement/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I’m hanging out in the Red Carpet Club at the Orlando airport, waiting to head home from the Cloud Security Alliance Congress. Yesterday &lt;a href="http://rationalsurvivability.com/"&gt;Chris Hoff&lt;/a&gt; and I presented a three part series – first our joint presentation on disruptive innovation and cloud computing (WINnovation), then his awesome presentation on cloud computing infrastructure security issues (and more: Cloudinomicon), and finally Quantum Datum, my session on information-centric security for cloud computing.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Incite 11/17/2010: Hitting for Average</title><link>/blog/incite-11-17-2010-hitting-for-average/</link><pubDate>Wed, 17 Nov 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/incite-11-17-2010-hitting-for-average/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;We all need some way to measure ourselves. Are we doing better? Worse? Are we winning or losing? What game are we playing again? It’s all about this mentality of needing to beat the average.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Rethinking Security</title><link>/blog/rethinking-security/</link><pubDate>Mon, 15 Nov 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/rethinking-security/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Security is broken. Captain Obvious here. We all know that but it doesn’t really help, does it? I came across a &lt;a href="http://www.bobbydominguez.com/blog/2010/10/time-to-rethink-security/"&gt;good post by Bobby Dominguez&lt;/a&gt;, who I met through Shimmy (but I won’t hold that against Bobby), which talks about rethinking security. To provide the proper context check out this excerpt, which beautifully highlights our futility:&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Incident Response Fundamentals: Mop up, Analyze, and QA</title><link>/blog/incident-response-fundamentals-mop-up-analyze-and-qa/</link><pubDate>Fri, 12 Nov 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/incident-response-fundamentals-mop-up-analyze-and-qa/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;You did well. &lt;a href="http://securosis.com/blog/incident-response-fundamentals-contain-investigate-and-mitigate"&gt;You followed your incident response plan and the fire is out.&lt;/a&gt; Too bad that was the easy part, and you now get to start the long journey from ending a crisis all the way back to normal. If we get back to our &lt;em&gt;before, during, and after&lt;/em&gt; segmentation, this is the ‘after’ part.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>What You Need to Know about DLP for PCI 2.0</title><link>/blog/what-you-need-to-know-about-dlp-for-pci-2-0/</link><pubDate>Fri, 12 Nov 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/what-you-need-to-know-about-dlp-for-pci-2-0/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;As I mentioned &lt;a href="http://securosis.com/blog/pci-2.0-the-quicken-of-security-standards"&gt;in my PCI 2.0 post&lt;/a&gt;, one of the new version’s most significant changes is that organizations now must not only confirm that they know where all their cardholder data is, but document &lt;em&gt;how&lt;/em&gt; they know this and keep it up to date between assessments.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Friday Summary: November 11, 2010</title><link>/blog/friday-summary-november-11-2010/</link><pubDate>Thu, 11 Nov 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/friday-summary-november-11-2010/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;When we came up with the Friday Summary, the idea was we’d share something personal that was either humorous or relevant to security, then highlight our content from the week, the best thing’s we read on other sites, and any major industry news. The question is always where to draw the line on the personal stuff. I mean, it isn’t like this is Twitter.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Incite 11/10/2010: Hallowreck (My Diet)</title><link>/blog/incite-11-10-2010-hallowreck-my-diet/</link><pubDate>Wed, 10 Nov 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/incite-11-10-2010-hallowreck-my-diet/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I fancy myself to have significant willpower. I self-motivate to work out pretty religiously, and in the blink of an eye gave up meat two and a half years ago – cold turkey (no pun intended). But I’m no superhero – in fact over the past few weeks I’ve been abnormally human. You see I have a weakness for chips. Well I actually have a number of food weaknesses, but chips are close to the top of the list. And it’s not like a few potato chips or tortilla chips will kill me in moderation. But that’s the rub – I don’t do ‘moderation’ very well.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>LinkedIn Password Reset FAIL</title><link>/blog/linkedin-password-reset-fail/</link><pubDate>Wed, 10 Nov 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/linkedin-password-reset-fail/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;It’s never a good day when you lose control over a significant account. First, it goes to show that none of us are perfect and we can all be pwned as a matter of course, regardless of how careful we are. This story has a reasonably happy ending, but there are still important lessons.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Incident Response Fundamentals: Contain, Investigate, and Mitigate</title><link>/blog/incident-response-fundamentals-contain-investigate-and-mitigate/</link><pubDate>Tue, 09 Nov 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/incident-response-fundamentals-contain-investigate-and-mitigate/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;In our last post, &lt;a href="http://securosis.com/blog/incident-response-fundamentals-trigger-escalate-and-size-up"&gt;we covered the first steps of incident response – the trigger, escalation, and size up.&lt;/a&gt; Today we’re going to move on to the next three steps – containment, investigation, and mitigation.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>MS Atlanta: Protection Is Not Security</title><link>/blog/ms-atlanta-protection-is-not-security/</link><pubDate>Tue, 09 Nov 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/ms-atlanta-protection-is-not-security/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Microsoft has announced the beta release of something called &lt;a href="http://www.microsoft.com/systemcenter/en/us/atlanta.aspx"&gt;Microsoft Codename “Atlanta”&lt;/a&gt;, which is being described as a “Cloud-Based SQL Server Monitoring tool”. Atlanta is deployed as an agent that embeds into SQL Server 2008 databases and sends telemetry information back to the Microsoft ‘cloud’ on your behalf. This data is analyzed and compared against a set of configuration policies, generating alerts when Microsoft discovers database misconfiguration.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>PCI 2.0: the Quicken of Security Standards</title><link>/blog/pci-2-0-the-quicken-of-security-standards/</link><pubDate>Tue, 09 Nov 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/pci-2-0-the-quicken-of-security-standards/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;A long time ago I tried to be one of those Quicken folks who track all their income and spending. I loved all the pretty spreadsheets, but given my income at the time it was more depressing than useful. I don’t need a bar graph to tell me that I’m out of beer money.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Baa Baa Blacksheep</title><link>/blog/baa-baa-blacksheep/</link><pubDate>Mon, 08 Nov 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/baa-baa-blacksheep/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Action and reaction. They have been the way of the world since olden times, and it looks like they will continue &lt;em&gt;ad infinitum&lt;/em&gt;. Certainly they are the way of information security practice. We all make our living from the action/reaction cycle, so I guess I shouldn’t bitch too much. But it’s just wrong, though we seem powerless to stop it.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Incident Response Fundamentals: Trigger, Escalate, and Size up</title><link>/blog/incident-response-fundamentals-trigger-escalate-and-size-up/</link><pubDate>Mon, 08 Nov 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/incident-response-fundamentals-trigger-escalate-and-size-up/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Okay, your incident response process is in place, you have a team, and you are &lt;a href="http://securosis.com/blog/incident-response-fundamentals-before-the-attack"&gt;hanging out in the security operations center, watching for Bad Things to happen&lt;/a&gt;. Then, surprise surprise, an alert triggers: what’s next?&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Friday Summary: November 5, 2010</title><link>/blog/friday-summary-november-5-2010/</link><pubDate>Fri, 05 Nov 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/friday-summary-november-5-2010/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;November already. Time to clean up the house before seasonal guests arrive. Part of my list of tasks is throwing away magazines. Lots of magazines. For whatever perverse reason, I got free subscriptions to all sorts of security and technology magazines. CIO Insight. Baseline. CSO. Information Week. Dr. Dobbs. Computer XYZ and whatever else was available. They are sitting around unread so it’s time to get rid of them. While I was at it I got rid of all the virtual subscriptions to electronic magazines as well. I still read Information Security Magazine, but I download that, and only because I know most of the people who write for it. For the first time since I entered the profession there will be no science, technology, or security magazines – paper or otherwise – coming to my door.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Security Metrics: Do Something</title><link>/blog/security-metrics-do-something/</link><pubDate>Fri, 05 Nov 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/security-metrics-do-something/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I was pleased to see &lt;a href="http://cisecurity.org/en-us/?route=announcements.pressreleases.11-01-10"&gt;the next version of the Center for Internet Security’s Consensus Security Metrics&lt;/a&gt; earlier this week. Even after some groundbreaking work in this area in terms of &lt;a href="http://www.amazon.com/Security-Metrics-Replacing-Uncertainty-Doubt/dp/0321349989"&gt;building a metrics program&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href="http://www.amazon.com/Applied-Security-Visualization-Raffael-Marty/dp/0321510100/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&amp;amp;s=books&amp;amp;qid=1288967702&amp;amp;sr=1-1"&gt;visualizing the data&lt;/a&gt;, most practitioners still can’t answer the simple question: “How good are you at security?”&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Download the Securosis 2010 Data Security Survey Report (and Raw Data!)</title><link>/blog/download-the-securosis-2010-data-security-survey-report-and-raw-data/</link><pubDate>Thu, 04 Nov 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/download-the-securosis-2010-data-security-survey-report-and-raw-data/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Guess what? Back in September we &lt;a href="http://securosis.com/blog/comments/the-securosis-2010-data-security-survey-report-rates-the-top-5-data-securit/"&gt;promised to release both the full Data Security Survey results and the raw data&lt;/a&gt;, and today is the day.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Please Read: Major Change to the Securosis Feeds</title><link>/blog/please-read-major-change-to-the-securosis-feeds/</link><pubDate>Thu, 04 Nov 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/please-read-major-change-to-the-securosis-feeds/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;For those of you who don’t want to read the full post, we’re changing our feeds.&lt;a href="/blog/"&gt;Click here to subscribe to the new feed with all the content you are used to&lt;/a&gt;. Our existing blog feed will include ‘highlights’ only as of next week.&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Storytellers</title><link>/blog/storytellers/</link><pubDate>Thu, 04 Nov 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/storytellers/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Last week I was in Toronto, speaking at the &lt;a href="http://www.sector.ca/"&gt;SecTor&lt;/a&gt; conference. My remote hypnotic trance must have worked, because they gave me a lunch keynote and let me loose on a crowd of a couple hundred Canucks stuffing their faces. Of course, not having anything interesting to say myself, I hijacked one of Rich’s presentations called “Involuntary Case Studies in Data Breaches.” It’s basically a great history of data breaches, including some data about what went wrong and what folks are doing now. The idea is to learn from our mistakes and take some lessons from other folks’ pain. You know, the definition of a genius: someone who learns from other people’s mishaps.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>The Question of Agile’s Success</title><link>/blog/the-question-of-agiles-success/</link><pubDate>Thu, 04 Nov 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/the-question-of-agiles-success/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;10 years since the creation of the Manifesto for Agile Software Development, Paul Krill of Developer World asks: &lt;a href="http://infoworld.com/d/developer-world/agile-programming-10-years-did-it-deliver-761"&gt;Did it deliver&lt;/a&gt;? Unfortunately I don’t think he adequately answered the question in his article. So let me say that the answer is an emphatic “Yes”, as it has provided several templates and tools for solving problems with people and process. And it has to be judged a success because it has provided a means to conquer problems other development methodologies could not.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Incident Response Fundamentals: Before the Attack</title><link>/blog/incident-response-fundamentals-before-the-attack/</link><pubDate>Wed, 03 Nov 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/incident-response-fundamentals-before-the-attack/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;We spent the first few posts in this series on understanding what our &lt;a href="http://securosis.com/blog/incident-response-fundamentals-data-collection-monitoring-infrastructure/"&gt;data collection infrastructure&lt;/a&gt; should look like and how we need to organize our incident response capability in terms of &lt;a href="http://securosis.com/blog/incident-response-fundamentals-incident-command-principles/"&gt;incident command&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://securosis.com/blog/incident-response-fundamentals-roles-and-org-structure/"&gt;roles and organizational structure&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href="http://securosis.com/blog/incident-response-fundamentals-response-infrastructure-and-preparatory-steps"&gt;Response Infrastructure&lt;/a&gt;. Now we’ll turn to getting ready to &lt;strong&gt;detect&lt;/strong&gt; an attack. It turns out many of your operational activities are critical to incident response, and this post is about providing the context to show why.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Incite 11/3/2010: 10 Years Gone</title><link>/blog/incite-11-3-2010-10-years-gone/</link><pubDate>Wed, 03 Nov 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/incite-11-3-2010-10-years-gone/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;A decade seems like a lifetime. And in the case of XX1 it is. You see I’m a little nostalgic this week because on Monday XX1 turned 10. I guess I could confuse her and say “XX1 turns X,” mixing metaphors and throwing some pre-algebraic confusion in for good measure – but that wouldn’t be any fun. For her – it would be plenty fun for me. 10 years. Wow. You see, I don’t notice my age. I passed 40 a few years back and noticed that my liver’s ability to deal with massive amounts of drink and my hair color seemed to be the only outward signs of aging. But to have a 10 year old kid? I guess I’m not a spring chicken anymore.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Cool Sidejacking Security Scorecard (and a MobileMe Update)</title><link>/blog/cool-sidejacking-security-scorecard-and-a-mobileme-update/</link><pubDate>Tue, 02 Nov 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/cool-sidejacking-security-scorecard-and-a-mobileme-update/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;First, for our non-technical readers who want to know more about this Firesheep/sidejacking thing, &lt;a href="http://db.tidbits.com/article/11701"&gt;check out my relatively non-geeky article over at TidBITS&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Incident Response Fundamentals: Response Infrastructure and Preparatory Steps</title><link>/blog/incident-response-fundamental-response-infrastructure-and-preparatory-steps/</link><pubDate>Tue, 02 Nov 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/incident-response-fundamental-response-infrastructure-and-preparatory-steps/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://securosis.com/blog/incident-response-fundamentals-roles-and-org-structure"&gt;In our last post we covered organizational structure options for incident response&lt;/a&gt;. Aside from the right org structure and incident response process, it’s important to have a few infrastructure pieces (tools) in place, and take some preparatory steps ahead of time. As with all our recommendations in this series, remember that one size &lt;em&gt;doesn’t&lt;/em&gt; fit all, and those of you in smaller companies will probably skip some of the tools or not need some of the prep steps.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>White Paper Release: Monitoring up the Stack</title><link>/blog/white-paper-release-monitoring-up-the-stack/</link><pubDate>Tue, 02 Nov 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/white-paper-release-monitoring-up-the-stack/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Yep, another white paper is in the can. As you all know, we turn a lot of the research we post on the blog into comprehensive white papers after we gather feedback from the community on our research. You may remember the Monitoring up the Stack series Adrian and Gunnar drove last month, which has now been packaged, edited, and (with the help of our editor Chris Pepper) turned into English.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>IBM Dances with Fortinet—Maybe…</title><link>/blog/ibm-dances-with-fortinet-maybe-2/</link><pubDate>Mon, 01 Nov 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/ibm-dances-with-fortinet-maybe-2/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Ah, the investment bankers are circling again. Late Friday rumors started circulating about IBM discussions of acquiring Fortinet. With a weekend to stew and the gap open for Fortinet stock, it makes sense to think about what a potential deal means, right?&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>SQL Azure and 3 Pieces of Flair</title><link>/blog/sql-azure-and-3-pieces-of-flair/</link><pubDate>Mon, 01 Nov 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/sql-azure-and-3-pieces-of-flair/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I have very little social life, so I spent my weekend researching trends in database security. Part of my Saturday was spent looking at Microsoft’s security model for the Azure SQL database platform. Specifically I wanted to know how they plan to address database and content security issues with their cloud-based offering. I certainly don’t follow all things cloud to the degree our friend Chris Hoff over at &lt;a href="http://www.rationalsurvivability.com/blog/"&gt;RationalSurvivability&lt;/a&gt; does, but I do attempt to stay current on database security trends as they pertain to cloud and virtual environments.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Friday Summary: October 29, 2010</title><link>/blog/friday-summary-october-29-2010/</link><pubDate>Thu, 28 Oct 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/friday-summary-october-29-2010/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;What a wild few weeks. Talk about been there, done that, got the t-shirt.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;It all started October 9th, when I finally achieved a goal I’ve been chasing for well over a decade, and completed my first Olympic-distance triathlon. (1.5K swim, 40K bike, 10K run – those are distances, not dollar values).&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Incident Response Fundamentals: Roles and Organizational Structure</title><link>/blog/incident-response-fundamentals-roles-and-org-structure/</link><pubDate>Thu, 28 Oct 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/incident-response-fundamentals-roles-and-org-structure/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;In our last post &lt;a href="http://securosis.com/blog/incident-response-fundamentals-incident-command-principles"&gt;we introduced some of the key principles of incident response&lt;/a&gt;. Today we will focus on the major roles and organizational structure.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>The Thing about Espionage</title><link>/blog/the-thing-about-espionage/</link><pubDate>Thu, 28 Oct 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/the-thing-about-espionage/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Imagine you’re a young, skilled techie just starting your career. Maybe you’re fresh out of school, or still in an internship program. Or maybe you’ve been out of school for a few years, working your way up through various companies in the industry. You came from a normal background – possibly you thought about the military at some point, but the allure of working in technology drew you into the private sector. Your skills are solid, you produce at work, and you don’t get into any trouble beyond the usual for your age.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Incite 10/27/2010: Traffic Ahead</title><link>/blog/incite-10-27-2010-traffic-ahead/</link><pubDate>Wed, 27 Oct 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/incite-10-27-2010-traffic-ahead/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I saw an old friend last week, and we were talking about the business of Securosis a bit. One of the questions he asked was whether it’s a &lt;em&gt;lifestyle&lt;/em&gt; business. The answer is that of course it is. Rich, Adrian, and I have done lots of things over the years and we all have independently come to the conclusion that we don’t want to work for big machines any more. We all have different reasons for that, and I was reminded of one of mine on Monday.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>SunSec Rises on November 3rd</title><link>/blog/sunsec-rises-on-november-3rd/</link><pubDate>Wed, 27 Oct 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/sunsec-rises-on-november-3rd/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;For those of you in the Phoenix area, or with &lt;strong&gt;way&lt;/strong&gt; too many frequent flier miles and too much spare time, the Phoenix OWASP chapter is organizing a SunSec meetup after their meeting on November 3rd.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Incident Response Fundamentals: Incident Command Principles</title><link>/blog/incident-response-fundamentals-incident-command-principles/</link><pubDate>Tue, 26 Oct 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/incident-response-fundamentals-incident-command-principles/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I know what you’re thinking to yourself right now: “They promised me a cool series of posts on the cutting edge of incident response, and now we’re talking management principles and boxes on an org chart? What a rip.”&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>NSO Quant: The Report and Metrics Model</title><link>/blog/nso-quant-the-report-and-metrics-model/</link><pubDate>Mon, 25 Oct 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/nso-quant-the-report-and-metrics-model/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;It has been a long slog, but the &lt;a href="http://securosis.com/research/papers/network-security-operations-quant-report/"&gt;final report on the Network Security Operations (NSO) Quant research project&lt;/a&gt; has been published. We are also releasing the raw data we collected in the survey at this point.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Can we ever break IT?</title><link>/blog/can-we-ever-break-it/</link><pubDate>Fri, 22 Oct 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/can-we-ever-break-it/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I was reading one of RSnake’s posts on how our security devolves to the &lt;a href="http://ha.ckers.org/blog/20101020/least-common-denominator/"&gt;lowest common denominator&lt;/a&gt; because we can’t break IT – which means we can’t make changes to systems, applications, and endpoints in order to protect them. He was talking specifically about the browser, but it got me thinking a bit bigger: when/if it’s OK to break IT. To clarify, by &lt;em&gt;breaking IT&lt;/em&gt; , I mean changing the user experience adversely in some way to more effectively protect critical data/information.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Everything You Ever Wanted to Know about DLP</title><link>/blog/everything-you-ever-wanted-to-know-about-dlp/</link><pubDate>Fri, 22 Oct 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/everything-you-ever-wanted-to-know-about-dlp/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Way back when I converted Securosis from a blog into a company, my very first paper was (no surprise) &lt;em&gt;Understanding and Selecting a DLP Solution&lt;/em&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Friday Summary: October 22, 2010</title><link>/blog/friday-summary-october-22-2010/</link><pubDate>Fri, 22 Oct 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/friday-summary-october-22-2010/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Facebook is for old people. Facebook will ultimately make us more secure.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I have learned these two important lessons over the last few weeks. Saying Facebook is for old people is not like saying it’s dead – far from it. But every time I talk computers with people 10-15 years older than me, all they do is talk about Facebook. They love it! They can’t believe they found high school acquaintances they have not seen for 30+ years. They love the convenience of keeping tabs on family and friends from their Facebook page. They are amazed to find relatives who have been out of touch for decades. It’s their favorite web site by far. And they are shocked that I don’t use it. Obviously I will want to once I understand it, so they all insist on telling me about all the great things I could do with Facebook and the wonderful things I am missing. They even give me that &lt;em&gt;look&lt;/em&gt; , like I am a complete computer neophyte. One said “I thought you were &lt;em&gt;into&lt;/em&gt; computers?” Any conversation about security and privacy went in one ear and out the other because, as I have been told, Facebook is awesome.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Incident Response Fundamentals: Data Collection/Monitoring Infrastructure</title><link>/blog/incident-response-fundamentals-data-collection-monitoring-infrastructure/</link><pubDate>Thu, 21 Oct 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/incident-response-fundamentals-data-collection-monitoring-infrastructure/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;In &lt;a href="http://securosis.com/blog/incident-response-fundamentals-introduction"&gt;Incident Response Fundamentals: Introduction&lt;/a&gt; we talked about the philosophical underpinnings of our approach and how you need to look at stuff before, during, and after an attack. Regardless of where in the attack lifecycle you end up, there is a common requirement: for data. As we mentioned, you only get one opportunity to capture the data, and then it’s gone. So in order to react faster and better in your environment, you will need lots of data.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Incite 10/20/2010: The Wrongness of Being Right</title><link>/blog/incite-10-20-2010-the-wrongness-of-being-right/</link><pubDate>Wed, 20 Oct 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/incite-10-20-2010-the-wrongness-of-being-right/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;One of my favorite sayings is “Don’t ask the question if you don’t want the answer.” Of course, when I say &lt;em&gt;answer&lt;/em&gt; , what I really mean is &lt;em&gt;opinion&lt;/em&gt;. It makes no difference what we are talking about, I probably have an opinion. In fact, a big part of my job is to have opinions and share them with however will listen (and even some who won’t). But to have opinions means you need to judge.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>White Paper Goodness: Understanding and Selecting an Enterprise Firewall</title><link>/blog/white-paper-goodness-understanding-and-selecting-an-enterprise-firewall/</link><pubDate>Wed, 20 Oct 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/white-paper-goodness-understanding-and-selecting-an-enterprise-firewall/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;What? A research report on enterprise firewalls. Really? Most folks figure firewalls have evolved about as much over the last 5 years as ant traps. They’re wrong, of course, but people think of firewalls as old, static, and generally uninteresting. But this is unfounded. Firewalls continue to evolve, and their new capabilities can and should impact your perimeter architecture and firewall selection process. That doesn’t mean we will be advocating yet another rip and replace job at the perimeter (sorry, vendors), but there are definitely new capabilities that warrant consideration – especially as the maintenance renewals on your existing gear come due.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Vaults within Vaults</title><link>/blog/vaults-within-vaults/</link><pubDate>Tue, 19 Oct 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/vaults-within-vaults/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;My session for the Atlanta BSides conference was about what I expected in 2011. I might as well have thrown a dart at the wall. But the exercise got me thinking about the newest attacks (like Stuxnet) and the realization of how state-sponsored attackers have penetrated our networks with impunity. Clearly we have to shake up the status quo in order to keep up.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Incident Response Fundamentals: Introduction</title><link>/blog/incident-response-fundamentals-introduction/</link><pubDate>Mon, 18 Oct 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/incident-response-fundamentals-introduction/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Over the past year, as an industry we have come to realize that we are dealing with different adversaries using different attack techniques with different goals. Yes, the folks looking for financial gain by compromising devices are still out there. But add a well-funded, potentially state-sponsored, persistent and patient adversary to the mix, and we need to draw a new conclusion. &lt;em&gt;Basically, we now must assume our networks and systems are compromised&lt;/em&gt;. That is a tough realization, but any other conclusion doesn’t really jive with reality, or at least the reality of everyone we talk to.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Monitoring up the Stack: Climbing the Stack</title><link>/blog/monitoring-up-the-stack-climbing-the-stack/</link><pubDate>Mon, 18 Oct 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/monitoring-up-the-stack-climbing-the-stack/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;As we have discussed through this series, monitoring additional data types can extend the capabilities of SIEM in a number of different ways. But you have lots of options for which direction to go. So the real question is: where do you start? Clearly you are not going to start monitoring all of these data types at once, particularly because most forms require some integration work on your part – often a great deal. Honestly, there are no hard and fast answers on where to start, or what type of monitoring is most important. Those decisions must be based on your specific requirements and objectives. But we can describe a couple common approaches for climbing the monitoring stack.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Monitoring up the Stack: Platform Considerations</title><link>/blog/monitoring-up-the-stack-platform-considerations/</link><pubDate>Fri, 15 Oct 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/monitoring-up-the-stack-platform-considerations/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;So far in the Monitoring up the Stack series, we have focused on a number of additional data types and analysis techniques that extend security monitoring to gain a deeper and better perspective of what’s happening. We have been looking at the added value that is all good, but we all know there is no free lunch. So now let’s look at some of the problems, challenges, and extra work that come along with deeper monitoring goodness. We know most of you who have labored with scalability and configuration challenges with your SIEM product were waiting for the proverbial other shoe to drop. Each new data type and the associated analysis impact the platform. So in this post we will discuss some of these considerations and think a bit about how to work around the potential issues.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>New Blog Series: Incident Response Fundamentals</title><link>/blog/new-blog-series-incident-response-fundamentals/</link><pubDate>Fri, 15 Oct 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/new-blog-series-incident-response-fundamentals/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Our “beat our readers into a content coma” plan is working perfectly. Just when you thought you had enough of NSO Quant, Enterprise Firewall, Monitoring up the Stack, and DLP (just in the last month) – we will be starting another series Monday. Rich and I will begin the &lt;em&gt;“Incident Response Fundamentals: Understanding Threats Before, During, and After the Attack”&lt;/em&gt; series. &lt;a href="http://securityincite.com/blog/mike-rothman/2007-doi-day-9-help-wanted-fortune-teller"&gt;React Faster&lt;/a&gt; is something I’ve been talking about for years (literally) and Rich improved it by &lt;a href="http://securosis.com/blog/comments/react-faster-and-better-with-the-a-b-cs/"&gt;integrating the importance of incident response&lt;/a&gt; to the mix. Now we are going to bring all those aspects together into a very focused view on how you can keep pace with the rapidly evolving attack space.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Dead or Alive: Pen Testing</title><link>/blog/dead-or-alive-pen-testing/</link><pubDate>Thu, 14 Oct 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/dead-or-alive-pen-testing/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Remember the dead or alive game Howard Stern used to do? I think it was Stern. Not sure if he’s still doing it because I’m too cheap to subscribe to Sirius for the total of 5 minutes I spend in the car driving between coffee shops. Pen testing has been under fire lately. Ranum has been talking for years about how &lt;a href="http://www.ranum.com/security/computer_security/editorials/point-counterpoint/pentesting.html"&gt;pen testing sucks&lt;/a&gt;. Brian Chess also called &lt;a href="http://www.csoonline.com/article/468766/penetration-testing-dead-in-2009"&gt;pen testing dead&lt;/a&gt; at the end of 2008.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Incite 10/13/2010: the Rise of the Cons</title><link>/blog/incite-10-13-2010-the-rise-of-the-cons/</link><pubDate>Wed, 13 Oct 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/incite-10-13-2010-the-rise-of-the-cons/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;No we aren’t going to talk about jailbreaks or other penal system trials and tribulations. This one is about how the conference circuit is evolving in a really positive way. Most folks attend the big security shows – you know, RSA and BlackHat and maybe some others. Most folks also hate these shows. I hear a lot of complaints about weak content and vendor whoring putting a damper on the experience. Of course, since myself and my ilk tend to speak at most of these shows, we can only point the finger at ourselves. Personally, unless I’m speaking I tend to skip all but the biggest shows, which I attend for networking purposes. But that’s just me.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>FireStarter: Consumer Internet Penalty Box</title><link>/blog/firestarter-consumer-internet-penalty-box/</link><pubDate>Tue, 12 Oct 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/firestarter-consumer-internet-penalty-box/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;A few weeks back, the fine folks at Microsoft used a healthcare analogy to describe a possible solution to the Internet’s bot infestation. &lt;a href="http://www.networkworld.com/community/blog/microsoft-proposes-each-pc-needs-health-certi"&gt;Scott Charney suggested that every PC should have a &lt;em&gt;health certificate&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt; which would provide access to the Internet. No health certificate, no access. Kind of like a penalty box for consumer Internet users. It’s an interesting idea, and clearly we need some kind of solution to the reality that Aunt Bessie has no idea her machine has been pwned and is blasting spam and launching DDoS attacks.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>IT Debt: Real or FUD?</title><link>/blog/it-debt-real-or-fud/</link><pubDate>Tue, 12 Oct 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/it-debt-real-or-fud/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I just ran across &lt;a href="http://developers.slashdot.org/story/10/10/11/1331223/NSF-Wants-To-Know-How-Much-Software-Really-Costs"&gt;Slashdot&lt;/a&gt;’s mention of the &lt;a href="http://www.gartner.com/it/page.jsp?id=1439513"&gt;Measuring and Monitoring Technical Debt&lt;/a&gt; study funded by a &lt;a href="http://www.nsf.gov/awardsearch/showAward.do?AwardNumber=0916699&amp;amp;version=noscript"&gt;research grant&lt;/a&gt;. Their basic conclusion is that a failure to modernize software is a form of debt obligation, and companies ultimately must pay off that debt moving forward. And until the modernization process happens, software degrades towards obsolescence or failure.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Monitoring up the Stack: User Activity Monitoring</title><link>/blog/monitoring-up-the-stack-user-activity-monitoring/</link><pubDate>Mon, 11 Oct 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/monitoring-up-the-stack-user-activity-monitoring/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;The previous Monitoring up the Stack post examined &lt;a href="http://securosis.com/blog/monitoring-up-the-stack-identity-monitoring"&gt;Identity Monitoring&lt;/a&gt;, which is a set of processes to monitor events around provisioning and managing accounts. The Identity Monitor is typically blind to one very important aspect of accounts: how they are used at runtime. So you know who the user is, but not what they are doing. User Activity Monitoring addresses this gap through reporting not on how the accounts were created and updated in the directory, but by examining user actions on systems and applications, and linking them to assigned roles.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Friday Summary: October 8, 2010</title><link>/blog/friday-summary-october-8-2010/</link><pubDate>Fri, 08 Oct 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/friday-summary-october-8-2010/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Chris Pepper was kind enough to forward this &lt;a href="http://www.basementcoders.com/transcripts/James_Gosling_Transcript.html"&gt;interview with James Gosling&lt;/a&gt; on the Basement Coders blog earlier in the week. I seldom laugh out loud when reading blogs, but his “Java, Just Free It” &amp;amp; “Set Java Free” t-shirts that were pissing off Oracle got me going. And the “Google is kind of a funny company because a lot of them have this peace love and happiness version of evil” quote had me rolling on the floor. In fact I found the entire article entertaining, so I recommend reading it all the way through if you have a chance. James Gosling is an interesting guy, and for someone I have never met, he has had more impact on my career than any other person on the planet.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Monitoring up the Stack: Identity Monitoring</title><link>/blog/monitoring-up-the-stack-identity-monitoring/</link><pubDate>Thu, 07 Oct 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/monitoring-up-the-stack-identity-monitoring/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;As we continue up the Monitoring stack, we get to Identity Monitoring, which is a distinct set of concerns from User Activity Monitoring (the subject of the next post). In Monitoring Identity, the SIEM/Log Management systems gain visibility into the provisioning and Identity Management processes that enterprise use to identify, store and process user accounts to prepare the user to use the system. Contrast that with User Activity Monitoring, where SIEM/Log Management systems focus on monitoring how the user interacts with the system at runtime and looks for examples of bad behavior. As an example, do you remember when you got your driver’s license? All the processes that you went through at the DMV: Getting your picture taken, verifying your address, and taking the driving tests. All of those activities are related to provisioning an account, getting credentials created; that’s Identity Management. When you are asked to provide your driver’s license, say when checking in at a hotel, or by a police officer for driving too fast; that’s User Activity Monitoring. Identity Monitoring is an important first step because we need to associate a user’s identity with network events and system usage in order to perform User Activity Monitoring. Each requires a different type of Monitoring and different type of report, today we tackle Identity Management (and no, we won’t make you wait in line like the DMV).&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Incite 10/6/2010: The Answer is 42</title><link>/blog/incite-10-6-2010-the-answer-is-42/</link><pubDate>Wed, 06 Oct 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/incite-10-6-2010-the-answer-is-42/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;One of my favorite passages in literature is when Douglas Adams proclaims the Ultimate Answer to the Ultimate Question of Life, The Universe, and Everything to be 42 in &lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Hitchhiker%27s_Guide_to_the_Galaxy"&gt;Hitchhiker’s Guide to the Galaxy&lt;/a&gt;. Of course, we don’t know the Ultimate Question. Details. This week I plan to discover he was right as I finish my 42nd year on the planet. That seems old. It’s a big number. But I don’t feel old. In fact, I feel like a big kid. Sometimes I look at my own kids and my house and snicker a bit. Can you believe they’ve entrusted any responsibility to me? These kids think I actually know something? Ha, that’s a laugher…&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Monitoring up the Stack: App Monitoring, Part 2</title><link>/blog/monitoring-up-the-stack-app-monitoring-part-2/</link><pubDate>Mon, 04 Oct 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/monitoring-up-the-stack-app-monitoring-part-2/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;In the last post on &lt;a href="http://securosis.com/blog/monitoring-up-the-stack-app-monitoring-part-1/"&gt;application monitoring&lt;/a&gt;, we looked at why applications are an essential “context provider” and interesting data source for SIEM/Log Management analysis. In this post, we’ll examine how to get started with the application monitoring process, and how to integrate that data into your existing SIEM/Log Management environment.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Friday Summary: September 30, 2010</title><link>/blog/friday-summary-september-30-2010/</link><pubDate>Thu, 30 Sep 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/friday-summary-september-30-2010/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;So you might have heard there’s this thing called ‘Stuxnet’. I was thinking it’s like the new Facebook or something. Or maybe more like Twitter, since the politicians seem to like it, except Sarah Palin who is totally more into Facebook.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Monitoring up the Stack: Application Monitoring, Part 1</title><link>/blog/monitoring-up-the-stack-app-monitoring-part-1/</link><pubDate>Thu, 30 Sep 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/monitoring-up-the-stack-app-monitoring-part-1/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;As we continue to investigate additional data sources to make our monitoring more effective, let’s now turn our attention to applications. At first glance, many security practitioners may think applications have little to offer SIEM and Log Management systems. After all, applications are built on mountains of custom code and security and development teams often lack a shared collaborative approach for software security. However, application monitoring for security should not be dismissed out of hand. Closed-minded security folks miss the fact that applications offer an opportunity to resolve some of the key challenges to monitoring. How? It comes back to a key point we’ve been making through this series, &lt;em&gt;the need for context&lt;/em&gt;. If knowing that Node A talked to Node B helps pinpoint a potential attack, then network monitoring is fine. But both monitoring and forensics efforts can leverage information about what transaction executed, who signed off on it, who initiated it, and what the result was – and you need to tie into to the application to get that context.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>A Wee Bit on DLP SaaS</title><link>/blog/a-wee-bit-on-dlp-saas/</link><pubDate>Wed, 29 Sep 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/a-wee-bit-on-dlp-saas/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Here’s some more content that’s going into the updated version of &lt;a href="http://securosis.com/research/papers/report-data-loss-prevention-whitepaper/"&gt;Understanding and Selecting a Data Loss Prevention Solution&lt;/a&gt; (hopefully out next week). Every now and then I get questions on DLP SaaS, so here’s what I’m seeing now…&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Incite 9/29/2010: Reading Is Fundamental</title><link>/blog/incite-9-29-2010-reading-is-fundamental/</link><pubDate>Wed, 29 Sep 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/incite-9-29-2010-reading-is-fundamental/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;For those of you with young kids, the &lt;em&gt;best practice&lt;/em&gt; is to spend some time every day reading to them. so they learn to love books. When our kids were little, we dutifully did that, but once XX1 got proficient she would just read by herself. What did she need us for? She has inhaled hundreds of books, but none resonate like Harry Potter. She mowed through each Potter book in a matter of days, even the hefty ones at the end of the series. And she’s read each one multiple times. In fact, we had to remove the books from her room because she wasn’t reading anything else.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Monitoring up the Stack: DAM, part 2</title><link>/blog/monitoring-up-the-stack-dam-part-2/</link><pubDate>Wed, 29 Sep 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/monitoring-up-the-stack-dam-part-2/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;The odds are, if you already have a SIEM/Log Management platform in place, you already look at some database audit logs. So why would you consider DAM in addition? The real question when thinking about how far up the stack (and where) to go with your monitoring strategy, is whether adding database activity monitoring data will help with threat detection and other security efforts. To answer that question, consider that DAM collects important events which are &lt;em&gt;not&lt;/em&gt; in log files, provides real-time analysis and detection of database attacks, and &lt;em&gt;blocks&lt;/em&gt; dangerous queries from reaching the database. These three features together are greater than the sum of their parts.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Understanding DLP Solutions, “DLP Light”, and DLP Features</title><link>/blog/understanding-dlp-solutions-dlp-light-and-dlp-features-2/</link><pubDate>Wed, 29 Sep 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/understanding-dlp-solutions-dlp-light-and-dlp-features-2/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I’m nearly done with a major revision to the very first whitepaper I published here at Securosis: &lt;a href="http://securosis.com/research/papers/report-data-loss-prevention-whitepaper/"&gt;Understanding and Selecting a Data Loss Prevention Solution&lt;/a&gt;, and one of the big additions is an expanded section talking about DLP integration and “DLP Light” solutions.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Attend the Securosis/SearchSecurity Data Security Event on Oct 26</title><link>/blog/attend-the-securosis-searchsecurity-data-security-event-on-oct-26/</link><pubDate>Mon, 27 Sep 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/attend-the-securosis-searchsecurity-data-security-event-on-oct-26/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;We may not run our own events, but we managed to trick the folks at Information Security Magazine/SearchSecurity into letting us take over the content at the Insider Data Threats seminar in San Francisco.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Monitoring up the Stack: DAM, Part 1</title><link>/blog/monitoring-up-the-stack-dam-part-1/</link><pubDate>Mon, 27 Sep 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/monitoring-up-the-stack-dam-part-1/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Database Activity Monitoring (DAM) is a form of application monitoring by looking at the database specific transactions, and integration of DAM data into SIEM and Log Management platforms is becoming more prevalent. Regular readers of this blog know that we have covered this topic many times, and gone into gory technical detail in order to help differentiate between products. If you need that level of detail, I’ll refer you to the &lt;a href="http://securosis.com/research/database-security"&gt;database security page&lt;/a&gt; in the &lt;a href="http://securosis.com/research"&gt;Securosis Research Library&lt;/a&gt;. Here I will give the “cliff notes” version, describing what the technology is and some of the problems it solves. The idea is to explain how DAM augments SIEM and Log Management analysis, and outfit end users with an understanding of how DAM extends the analysis capabilities of your monitoring strategy.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>NSO Quant: The End is Near!</title><link>/blog/nso-quant-the-end-is-near/</link><pubDate>Mon, 27 Sep 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/nso-quant-the-end-is-near/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;As mentioned last week, we’ve pulled the NSO Quant posts out of the main feed because the volume was too heavy. So I have been doing some cross-linking to let you who don’t follow that &lt;a href="http://securosis.com/projectquant"&gt;feed&lt;/a&gt; know when new stuff appears over there.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Proposed Internet Wiretapping Law Fundamentally Incompatible with Security</title><link>/blog/proposed-internet-wiretapping-law-fundamentally-incompatible-with-security/</link><pubDate>Mon, 27 Sep 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/proposed-internet-wiretapping-law-fundamentally-incompatible-with-security/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;It’s been a while since I waded in on one of these government-related privacy thingies, but &lt;a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2010/09/27/us/27wiretap.html"&gt;a report this morning from the New York Times reveals yet another profound, and fundamental, misunderstanding of how technology and security function&lt;/a&gt;. The executive branch is currently crafting a legislative proposal to require Internet-based communications providers to support wiretap capabilities in their products.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Friday Summary: September 24, 2010</title><link>/blog/friday-summary-september-24-2010/</link><pubDate>Fri, 24 Sep 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/friday-summary-september-24-2010/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;We are wrapping up a pretty difficult summer here at Securosis. You have probably noticed from the blog volume as we have been swamped with research projects. Rich, Mike, and I have barely spoken with one another over the last couple months as we are head-down and researching and writing as fast as we can. No time for movies, parties, or vacation travel. These Quant projects we have been working on make us feel like we have been buried in sand. I have been this busy several times during my career, but I can’t say I have ever been busier. I don’t think that would be possible, as there are not enough hours in the day! Mike’s been hiding at undisclosed coffee shops to the point his family had his face put on a milk carton. Rich has taken multitasking to a new level by blogging in the shower with his iPad. Me? I hope to &lt;em&gt;see&lt;/em&gt; the shower before the end of the month.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Government Pipe Dreams</title><link>/blog/government-pipe-dreams/</link><pubDate>Thu, 23 Sep 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/government-pipe-dreams/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;General Keith Alexander heads the U.S. Cyber Command and is the Director of the NSA. In prepared testimony today he &lt;a href="http://thehill.com/blogs/hillicon-valley/technology/120565-alexander-wants-a-secure-network-for-businesses"&gt;said the government should set up a secure zone for themselves and critical infrastructure, walled off from the rest of the Internet.&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>NSO Quant: Clarifying Metrics (and some more links)</title><link>/blog/nso-quant-clarifying-metrics/</link><pubDate>Thu, 23 Sep 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/nso-quant-clarifying-metrics/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;We had a great comment by Dan on one of the metrics posts, and it merits an answer with explanation, because in the barrage of posts the intended audience can certainly get lost. Here is Dan’s comment:&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Incite 9/22/2010: The Place That Time Forgot</title><link>/blog/incite-9-22-2010-the-place-that-time-forgot/</link><pubDate>Wed, 22 Sep 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/incite-9-22-2010-the-place-that-time-forgot/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I don’t give a crap about my hair. Yeah, it’s gray. But I have it, so I guess that’s something. It grows fast and looks the same, no matter what I do to it. I went through a period maybe 10 years ago where I got my hair styled, but besides ending up a bit lighter in the wallet (both from a $45 cut and all the product they pushed on me), there wasn’t much impact. I did get to listen to some cool music and see good looking stylists wearing skimpy outfits with lots of tattoos and piercings. But at the end of the day, my hair looked the same. And the Boss seems to still like me regardless of what my hair looks like, though I found cutting it too short doesn’t go over very well.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Monitoring up the Stack: File Integrity Monitoring</title><link>/blog/monitoring-up-the-stack-file-integrity-monitoring/</link><pubDate>Wed, 22 Sep 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/monitoring-up-the-stack-file-integrity-monitoring/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;We kick off our discussion of additional monitoring technologies with a high-level overview of file integrity monitoring. As the name implies, file integrity monitoring detects changes to files – whether text, configuration data, programs, code libraries, critical system files, or even Windows registries. Files are a common medium for delivering viruses and malware, and detecting changes to key files can provide an indication of machine compromise.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>New Paper (+ Webcast): Understanding and Selecting a Tokenization Solution</title><link>/blog/new-paper-webcast-understanding-and-selecting-a-tokenization-solution/</link><pubDate>Tue, 21 Sep 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/new-paper-webcast-understanding-and-selecting-a-tokenization-solution/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Around the beginning of the year Adrian and I released our big database encryption paper: &lt;a href="http://securosis.com/research/papers/understanding-and-selecting-a-database-encryption-or-tokenization-solution/"&gt;Understanding and Selecting a Database Encryption or Tokenization Solution&lt;/a&gt;. We realized pretty quickly there was no way we could do justice to tokenization in that paper, so we are now excited to release &lt;a href="http://securosis.com/research/papers/understanding-and-selecting-a-tokenization-solution/"&gt;Understanding and Selecting a Tokenization Solution&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>NSO Quant: Manage Process Metrics, Part 1</title><link>/blog/nso-quant-manage-process-metrics-part-1/</link><pubDate>Tue, 21 Sep 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/nso-quant-manage-process-metrics-part-1/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;We realized last week that we may have hit the saturation point for activity on the blog. Right now we have three ongoing blog series and NSO Quant. All our series post a few times a week, and Quant can be up to 10 posts. It’s too much for us to keep up with, so I can’t even imagine someone who actually has to do something with their days.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>FireStarter: It’s Time to Talk about APT</title><link>/blog/firestarter-its-time-to-talk-about-apt-2/</link><pubDate>Mon, 20 Sep 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/firestarter-its-time-to-talk-about-apt-2/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;There’s a lot of hype in the press (and vendor pitches) about APT – the Advanced Persistent Threat. Very little of it is informed, and many parties within the security industry are quickly trying to co-opt the term in order to advance various personal and corporate agendas. In the process they’ve bent, manipulated and largely tarnished what had been a specific description of a class of attacker. I’ve generally tried to limit how much I talk about it – mostly restricting myself to the occasional Summary/Incite comment, or &lt;a href="http://securosis.com/blog/comments/yes-virginia-china-is-spying-and-stealing-our-stuff/"&gt;this post when APT first hit the hype stage&lt;/a&gt;, and &lt;a href="http://securosis.com/blog/comments/some-apt-controls1/"&gt;a short post with some high level controls&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Monitoring up the Stack: Threats</title><link>/blog/monitoring-up-the-stack-threats/</link><pubDate>Mon, 20 Sep 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/monitoring-up-the-stack-threats/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;In our &lt;a href="http://securosis.com/blog/monitoring-up-the-stack-introduction"&gt;introductory post&lt;/a&gt; we discussed how customers are looking to derive additional value form their SIEM and log management investments by looking at additional data types to &lt;em&gt;climb the stack&lt;/em&gt;. Part of the dissatisfaction we hear from customers is the challenge of turning collected data into actionable information for operational efficiency and compliance requirements. This challenge is compounded by the clear focus on application-oriented attacks. For the most part, our detection only pays attention to the network and servers, while the attackers are flying above that. It’s kind of like repeatedly missing the bad guys because they are flying at 45,000 feet, but you cannot get above 20,000 feet. You aren’t looking where the attacks are actually happening, which obviously presents problems. At its core SIEM can fly at 45,000’ and monitor application components looking for attacks, but it will take work to get there. Though given the evolution of the attack space, we don’t believe keeping monitoring focused on infrastructure is an option, even over the middle term.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Understanding and Selecting an Enterprise Firewall: Selection Process</title><link>/blog/understanding-and-selecting-efw-selection-process/</link><pubDate>Sun, 19 Sep 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/understanding-and-selecting-efw-selection-process/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Now that we’ve been through the drivers for evolved, application-aware firewalls, and a lot of the technology enabling them, how does the selection process need to evolve to keep pace? As with most of our research at Securosis, we favor mapping out a &lt;em&gt;very&lt;/em&gt; detailed process, and leaving you to decide which steps make sense in your situation. So we don’t expect every organization to go through every step in this process. Figure out which are appropriate for your organization and use those.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Friday Summary: September 17, 2010</title><link>/blog/friday-summary-september-17-2010/</link><pubDate>Fri, 17 Sep 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/friday-summary-september-17-2010/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Reality has a funny way of intruding into the best laid plans.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Some of you might have noticed I haven’t been writing that much for the past couple weeks and have been pretty much ignoring Twitter and the rest of the social media world. It seems my wife had a baby, and since this isn’t my personal blog anymore I was able to take some time off and focus on the family. Needless to say, my “paternity leave” didn’t last nearly as long as I planned, thanks to the work piling up.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Understanding and Selecting an Enterprise Firewall: to UTM or Not to UTM?</title><link>/blog/understanding-and-selecting-efw-to-utm-or-not-to-utm/</link><pubDate>Fri, 17 Sep 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/understanding-and-selecting-efw-to-utm-or-not-to-utm/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Given how much time we’ve spent discusing application awareness and how these new capabilities pretty much stomp all over existing security products like IDS/IPS and web filters, does that mean standalone network security devices go away? Should you just quietly accept that unified threat management (UTM) is the way to go because the enterprise firewall provides multiple functions? Not exactly.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Upcoming Webinar: Selecting SIEM</title><link>/blog/upcoming-webinar-selecting-siem/</link><pubDate>Fri, 17 Sep 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/upcoming-webinar-selecting-siem/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Tuesday, September 21st, at 11am PST / 2pm EST, I will be presenting a webinar: “Keys to Selecting SIEM and Log Management”, hosted by &lt;a href="http://www.nitrosecurity.com/"&gt;NitroSecurity&lt;/a&gt;. I’ll cover the basics of SIEM, including data collection and deployment, then dig into use cases, enrichment, data management, forensics, and advanced features.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>DLP Selection: Infrastructure Integration Requirements</title><link>/blog/dlp-selection-infrastructure-integration-requirements/</link><pubDate>Thu, 16 Sep 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/dlp-selection-infrastructure-integration-requirements/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://securosis.com/blog/dlp-selection-process-protection-requirements"&gt;In our last post we detailed content protection requirements&lt;/a&gt;, so now it’s time to close out our discussion of technical requirements with infrastructure integration.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Understanding and Selecting an Enterprise Firewall: Advanced Features, Part 2</title><link>/blog/understanding-and-selecting-efw-advanced-features-part-2/</link><pubDate>Thu, 16 Sep 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/understanding-and-selecting-efw-advanced-features-part-2/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;After digging into application awareness features in Part 1, let’s talk about non-application capabilities. These new functions are really about dealing with today’s attacks. Historically, managing ports and protocols has sufficed to keep the bad guys outside the perimeter; but with today’s bumper crop of zombies &amp;amp; bots, the old ways don’t cut it any more.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>DLP Selection Process: Protection Requirements</title><link>/blog/dlp-selection-process-protection-requirements/</link><pubDate>Wed, 15 Sep 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/dlp-selection-process-protection-requirements/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Now that you’ve &lt;a href="http://securosis.com/blog/dlp-selection-process-defining-the-content"&gt;figured out what information you want to protect,&lt;/a&gt; it’s time to figure out how to protect it. In this step we’ll figure out your high-level monitoring and enforcement requirements.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Incite 9/15/2010: Up, down, up, down, Repeat</title><link>/blog/incite-9-15-2010-up-down-up-down-repeat/</link><pubDate>Wed, 15 Sep 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/incite-9-15-2010-up-down-up-down-repeat/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;It was an eventful weekend at &lt;em&gt;chez&lt;/em&gt; Rothman. The twins (XX2 and XY) had a birthday, which meant the in-laws were in town and for the first time we had separate parties for the kids. That meant one party on Saturday night and another Sunday afternoon. We had a ton of work to do to get the house ready to entertain a bunch of rambunctious 7 year olds. But that’s not all – we also had a soccer game and tryouts for the holiday dance performance on Saturday.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Monitoring up the Stack: Introduction</title><link>/blog/monitoring-up-the-stack-introduction/</link><pubDate>Wed, 15 Sep 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/monitoring-up-the-stack-introduction/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;The question that came up over and over again during our SIEM research project: “How do I derive more value from my SIEM installation?” As we discussed throughout that report, plenty of data gets collected, but extracting actionable information remains a challenge. In part this is due to the “drinking from the fire-hose” effect, where the speed and volume of incoming data make it difficult to process effectively. Additionally, data needs to be pieced together with sufficient reference points from multiple event sources before analysis. But we found a major limiting factor was also the network-centric perspective on data collection and analysis. We were looking at traffic, rather than transactions. We were looking at packet density, not services. We were looking at IP addresses instead of user identity. We didn’t have context to draw conclusions.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>The Securosis 2010 Data Security Survey Report Rates the Top 5 Data Security Controls</title><link>/blog/the-securosis-2010-data-security-survey-report-rates-the-top-5-data-securit/</link><pubDate>Wed, 15 Sep 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/the-securosis-2010-data-security-survey-report-rates-the-top-5-data-securit/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Over the summer we initiated what turned out to be a pretty darn big data security survey. Our primary goal was to assess what data security controls people find most effective; and get a better understanding of how they are using the controls, what’s driving adoption, and a bit on what kinds of incidents they are experiencing.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>DLP Selection Process: Defining the Content</title><link>/blog/dlp-selection-process-defining-the-content/</link><pubDate>Tue, 14 Sep 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/dlp-selection-process-defining-the-content/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://securosis.com/blog/dlp-selection-process-step-1"&gt;In our last post we kicked off the DLP selection process by putting the team together.&lt;/a&gt; Once you have them in place, it’s time to figure out which information you want to protect. This is extremely important, as it defines which content analysis techniques you require, which is at the core of DLP functionality.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Understanding and Selecting an Enterprise Firewall: Advanced Features, Part 1</title><link>/blog/understanding-and-selecting-efw-advanced-features-part-1/</link><pubDate>Tue, 14 Sep 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/understanding-and-selecting-efw-advanced-features-part-1/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Since our main contention in the Understanding and Selecting an Enterprise Firewall series is the movement toward application aware firewalls, it makes sense to dig a bit deeper into the technology that will make this happen and the major uses for these capabilities. With an understanding of what to look for, you should be in a better position to judge whether a vendor’s application awareness capabilities will match your requirements.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>DLP Selection Process, Step 1</title><link>/blog/dlp-selection-process-step-1/</link><pubDate>Mon, 13 Sep 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/dlp-selection-process-step-1/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;As I mentioned previously, I’m working on &lt;a href="http://securosis.com/blog/comments/have-dlp-questions-or-feedback-want-free-answers/"&gt;an update to Understanding and Selecting a DLP Solution.&lt;/a&gt; While much of the paper still stands, one area I’m adding a bunch of content to is the selection process. I decided to buff it up with more details, and also put together a selection worksheet to help people figure out their requirements. This isn’t an RFP, but a checklist to help you figure out major requirements – which you will use to build your RFP – and manage the selection process.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>FireStarter: Automating Secure Software Development</title><link>/blog/firestarter-security-automation/</link><pubDate>Mon, 13 Sep 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/firestarter-security-automation/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I just got back from the &lt;a href="http://www.owasp.org/index.php/AppSec_US_2010,_CA#tab=September_9th"&gt;AppSec 2010 OWASP conference&lt;/a&gt; in Irvine, California. As you might imagine, it was all about web application security. We security practitioners and coders generally agree that we need to “bake security in” to the development process. Rather than tacking security onto a product like a band-aid after the fact, we actually attempt to deliver code that is secure from the get-go. We are still figuring out how to do this effectively and efficiently, but it seems to me a very good idea.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>HP Sets Its ArcSights on Security</title><link>/blog/hp-sets-its-arcsights-on-security/</link><pubDate>Mon, 13 Sep 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/hp-sets-its-arcsights-on-security/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;When there’s smoke, there’s usually fire. I’ve been pretty vocal over the past two weeks, stating that users need to forget what they are hearing about various rumored acquisitions, or how these deals will impact them, and focus on doing their jobs. They can’t worry about what deal may or may not happen until it’s announced. Well, this morning &lt;a href="http://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20100913006082/en"&gt;HP announced the acquisition of ArcSight&lt;/a&gt;, after some more detailed speculation appeared over the weekend. So is it time to worry yet?&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Understanding and Selecting an Enterprise Firewall: Management</title><link>/blog/understanding-and-selecting-efw-management/</link><pubDate>Mon, 13 Sep 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/understanding-and-selecting-efw-management/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;The next step in our journey to understand and select an enterprise firewall has everything to do with management. During procurement it’s very easy to focus on shiny objects and blinking lights. By that we mean getting enamored with speeds, feeds, and features – to the exclusion of what you do with the device once it’s deployed. Without focusing on management &lt;em&gt;during procurement&lt;/em&gt; , you may miss a key requirement – or even worse, sign yourself up to a virtual lifetime of inefficiency and wasted time struggling to manage the secure perimeter.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Friday Summary: September 10, 2010</title><link>/blog/friday-summary-september-10-2010/</link><pubDate>Fri, 10 Sep 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/friday-summary-september-10-2010/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I attended the &lt;a href="http://www.owasp.org/index.php/Phoenix"&gt;OWASP Phoenix chapter meeting&lt;/a&gt; earlier this week, talking about database encryption. The crowd was small as the meeting was the Tuesday after Labor day, rather than the normal Thursday slot. Still, I had a good time, especially with the discussion afterwards. We talked about a few things I know very little about. Actually, there are several areas of security that I know very well. There are a few that I know reasonably well, but as I don’t practice them day to day I really don’t consider myself an expert. And there are several that I don’t know at all. And I find this odd, as it seemed that 15 years ago a single person could ‘know’ computer security. If you understood netword security, access controls, and crypto, you had a pretty good handle on things. Throw in some protocol design, injection, and pen test concepts and you were a freakin’ guru.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Understanding and Selecting an Enterprise Firewall: Deployment Considerations</title><link>/blog/understanding-and-selecting-efw-deployment-considerations/</link><pubDate>Fri, 10 Sep 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/understanding-and-selecting-efw-deployment-considerations/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Now that we’ve been through technical architecture considerations for the evolving firewall (&lt;a href="http://securosis.com/blog/understanding-and-selecting-EFW-technical-architecture-part-1/"&gt;Part 1&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://securosis.com/blog/understanding-and-selecting-an-EFW-application-awareness-part-2/"&gt;Part 2&lt;/a&gt;), let’s talk about deployment considerations. Depending on requirements, there many different ways to deploy enterprise firewalls. Do this wrong and you end up with either too many or too few boxes, single points of failure, suboptimal network access, and/or crappy application performance.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Incite 9/7/2010: Iconoclastic Idealism</title><link>/blog/incite-9-7-2010-iconoclastic-idealism/</link><pubDate>Wed, 08 Sep 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/incite-9-7-2010-iconoclastic-idealism/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Tonight starts the Jewish New Year celebration – &lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rosh_Hashanah"&gt;Rosh Hashanah&lt;/a&gt;. So L’Shana Tova to my Jewish peeps out there. I send my best wishes for a happy and healthy 5771. At this time of year, I usually go through my goals and take a step back to evaluate what I’ve accomplished and what I need to focus on for the next year. It’s a logical time to take stock of where I’m at. But as I’ve described, I’m moving toward a &lt;a href="http://securosis.com/blog/incite-8-11-2010-no-goal/"&gt;&lt;em&gt;No Goal&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt; philosophy, which means the annual goal setting ritual must be jettisoned.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Understanding and Selecting an Enterprise Firewall: Technical Architecture, Part 2</title><link>/blog/understanding-and-selecting-efw-technical-architecture-part-2/</link><pubDate>Wed, 08 Sep 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/understanding-and-selecting-efw-technical-architecture-part-2/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;In the first part of our &lt;a href="http://securosis.com/blog/understanding-and-selecting-EFW-technical-architecture-part-1"&gt;Enterprise Firewall technical discussion&lt;/a&gt;, we talked about the architectural changes required to support this application awareness stuff. But the reality is most of the propaganda pushed by the firewall vendors still revolves around speeds and feeds. Of course, in the hands of savvy marketeers (in mature markets), it seems less than 10gbps magically becomes 40gbps, 20gbps becomes 100gbps, and software on an industry-standard blade becomes a purpose-built appliance. No wonder buying anything in security remains such a confusing and agonizing endeavor.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>FireStarter: Market for Lemons</title><link>/blog/firestarter-market-for-lemons/</link><pubDate>Tue, 07 Sep 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/firestarter-market-for-lemons/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;During BlackHat I proctored a session on “&lt;a href="http://www.blackhat.com/html/bh-us-10/bh-us-10-briefings.html#ExecCSO"&gt;Optimizing the Security Researcher and CSO relationship&lt;/a&gt;. From the title and outline most of us assumed that this presentation would get us away from the “responsible disclosure” quagmire by focusing on the views of the customer. Most of the audience was IT practitioners, and most were interested in ways research findings might &lt;em&gt;help&lt;/em&gt; the end customer, rather than giving them another mess to clean up while exploit code runs rampant. Or just as importantly, which threat is &lt;a href="http://blogs.computerworld.com/16666/google_android_wallpaper_apps"&gt;hype&lt;/a&gt;, and which threat is &lt;a href="http://www.tbray.org/ongoing/When/201x/2010/08/04/Security-Reportage"&gt;serious&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>New Release: Data Encryption 101 for PCI</title><link>/blog/new-release-data-encryption-101-for-pci/</link><pubDate>Tue, 07 Sep 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/new-release-data-encryption-101-for-pci/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;We are happy to announce the availability of &lt;a href="http://securosis.com/research/papers/data-encryption-101-a-pragmatic-approach-to-pci/"&gt;Data Encryption 101: A Pragmatic Approach to PCI Compliance&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src="https://cdn.securosis.com/assets/library/reports/PCI_101.png" alt="PCI_101.png"&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;It struck Rich and myself that data storage is a central topic for PCI compliance which has not gotten a lot of coverage. The security community spends a lot of time discussing the merits of end-to-end encryption, tokenization, and other topics, but meat and potatoes stuff like encryption for data storage is hardly ever mentioned. We feel there is enough ambiguity in the standard to warrant deeper inspection into what merchants are doing to meet the PCI DSS requirements. For those of you who followed along with the blog series, this is a compilation of that content, but it has been updated to reflect all the comments we received and additional research, and the entire report was professionally edited.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Understanding and Selecting an Enterprise Firewall: Technical Architecture, Part 1</title><link>/blog/understanding-and-selecting-efw-technical-architecture-part-1/</link><pubDate>Tue, 07 Sep 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/understanding-and-selecting-efw-technical-architecture-part-1/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;In the first part of our series on Understanding and Selecting an Enterprise Firewall, we talked mostly about use cases and new requirements (&lt;a href="http://securosis.com/blog/understanding-and-selecting-an-enterprise-firewall-introduction"&gt;Introduction&lt;/a&gt;, Application Awareness &lt;a href="http://securosis.com/blog/understanding-and-selecting-EFW-application-awareness-part-1"&gt;Part 1&lt;/a&gt;, and &lt;a href="http://securosis.com/blog/understanding-and-selecting-an-EFW-application-awareness-part-2"&gt;Part 2&lt;/a&gt;) driving a fundamental re-architecting of the perimeter gateway.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Friday Summary: September 3, 2010</title><link>/blog/friday-summary-september-3-2010/</link><pubDate>Fri, 03 Sep 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/friday-summary-september-3-2010/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I bought the iPhone 4 a few months ago and I still love it. And luckily there is a cell phone tower 200 yards north of me, so even if I use my left handed kung fu grip on the antenna, I don’t drop calls. But I decided to keep my older Verizon account as it’s kind of a family plan deal, and I figured just in case the iPhone failed I would have a backup. And I could get rid of all the costly plan upgrades and have just a simple phone. But not so fast! Trying to get rid of the data and texting features on the old Blackberry is apparently not an option. If you use a Blackberry I guess you are obligated to get a bunch of stuff you don’t need because, from what the Verizon tech told me, they can’t centrally disable data features native to the phone. WTF?&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Understanding and Selecting an Enterprise Firewall: Application Awareness, Part 2</title><link>/blog/understanding-and-selecting-an-efw-application-awareness-part-2/</link><pubDate>Fri, 03 Sep 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/understanding-and-selecting-an-efw-application-awareness-part-2/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;In our last post on application awareness as a key driver for firewall evolution, we talked about the need and use cases for advanced firewall technologies. Now let’s talk a bit about some of the challenges and overlap of this kind of technology. Whether you want to call it &lt;em&gt;disruptive&lt;/em&gt; or &lt;em&gt;innovative&lt;/em&gt; or something else, introducing new capabilities on existing gear tends to have a ripple effect on everything else. Application awareness on the firewall is no exception.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Understanding and Selecting an Enterprise Firewall: Application Awareness, Part 1</title><link>/blog/understanding-and-selecting-efw-application-awareness-part-1/</link><pubDate>Thu, 02 Sep 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/understanding-and-selecting-efw-application-awareness-part-1/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;As mentioned in the &lt;a href="http://securosis.com/blog/understanding-and-selecting-an-enterprise-firewall-introduction"&gt;Introduction to Understanding and Selecting an Enterprise Firewall&lt;/a&gt;, we see three main forces driving firewall evolution. The first two are pretty straightforward and don’t require a lot of explanation or debate: networks are getting faster and thus the perimeter gateways need to get faster. That’s not brain surgery.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Incite 9/1/2010: Battle of the Bandz</title><link>/blog/incite-9-1-2010-battle-of-the-bandz/</link><pubDate>Wed, 01 Sep 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/incite-9-1-2010-battle-of-the-bandz/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Hard to believe it’s September already. As we steam through yet another year, I like to step back and reflect on the technical achievements that have literally changed our life experience. Things like the remote control and pay at the pump. How about the cell phone, which is giving way to a mini-computer that I carry in my pocket? Thankfully it’s much lighter than a PDP-11. And networks, yeah man, always on baby! No matter where you are, you can be connected. But let’s not forget the wonders of silicone and injection molding, which has enabled the phenomena known as &lt;a href="http://www.sillybandz.com/"&gt;Silly Bandz&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Understanding and Selecting an Enterprise Firewall: Introduction</title><link>/blog/understanding-and-selecting-an-enterprise-firewall-introduction/</link><pubDate>Tue, 31 Aug 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/understanding-and-selecting-an-enterprise-firewall-introduction/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Today we begin the our next blog series: Understanding and Selecting an Enterprise Firewall.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Yes, really. Shock was the first reaction from most folks. They figure firewalls have evolved about as much over the last 5 years as ant traps. They’re wrong, of course, but most people think of firewalls as old, static, and generally uninteresting. In fact, most security folks begin their indentured servitude looking after the firewalls, where they gain seasoning before anyone lets them touch important gear like the IPS.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Data Encryption for PCI 101: Selection Criteria</title><link>/blog/data-encryption-for-pci-101-selection-criteria/</link><pubDate>Mon, 30 Aug 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/data-encryption-for-pci-101-selection-criteria/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;As a merchant your goal is to protect stored credit card numbers (PAN), as well as other card data such as card-holder name, service code, and expiration date. You need to protect these fields from both unwanted physical (&lt;em&gt;e.g.,&lt;/em&gt; disk, tape backup, USB) and logical (&lt;em&gt;e.g.,&lt;/em&gt; database queries, file reads) inspection. And detect and stop misuse if possible, as well.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Have DLP Questions or Feedback? Want Free Answers?</title><link>/blog/have-dlp-questions-or-feedback-want-free-answers/</link><pubDate>Mon, 30 Aug 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/have-dlp-questions-or-feedback-want-free-answers/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Back when I started Securosis my first white paper was &lt;a href="http://securosis.com/research/papers/report-data-loss-prevention-whitepaper/"&gt;Understanding and Selecting a DLP Solution&lt;/a&gt;. It has been downloaded many thousands of times (about 400 times a month for the first couple years), and I still see it showing up all the time when I talk with clients. (Some people call it the DLP Bible, but if I said that it would be really pretentious). Although the paper is still accurate, it’s time for an update.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Data Encryption for PCI 101: Supporting Systems</title><link>/blog/data-encryption-for-pci-101-supporting-systems/</link><pubDate>Fri, 27 Aug 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/data-encryption-for-pci-101-supporting-systems/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Continuing our series on PCI Encryption basics, we delve into the supporting systems that make encryption work. Key management and access controls are important building blocks, and subject to audit to ensure compliance with the Data Security Standard.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Friday Summary: August 27, 2010</title><link>/blog/friday-summary-august-27-2010/</link><pubDate>Fri, 27 Aug 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/friday-summary-august-27-2010/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;My original plan for this week’s summary was to geek out a bit and talk about my home automation setup. Including the time I recently discovered that even household electrical is powerful enough to arc weld your wire strippers if you aren’t too careful.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Home Security Alarm Tips</title><link>/blog/home-security-alarm-tips/</link><pubDate>Fri, 27 Aug 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/home-security-alarm-tips/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;This is one of those posts I’ve been thinking about writing for a while – ever since I saw one of those dumb-ass ADT commercials with the guy with the black knit cap breaking in through the front door while some ‘helpless’ woman was in the kitchen.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>White Paper Released: Understand and Selecting SIEM/Log Management</title><link>/blog/starting-the-understanding-and-selecting-an-enterprise-firewall-project/</link><pubDate>Thu, 26 Aug 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/starting-the-understanding-and-selecting-an-enterprise-firewall-project/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;In this report we spotlight both the grim realities and real benefits of SIEM/Log Management platforms. The vendors are certainly not going to tell you about the bad stuff in their products – they just shout out the same fantastic advantages touted in the latest quadrant report. Trust us when we say there are many pissed-off SIEM users, but plenty of happy ones as well. We focused this paper on resetting expectations and making sure you know enough to focus on success, which will save you much heartburn later.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Incite 8/25/2010: Let Freedom Ring</title><link>/blog/summary-june-10-2016-2/</link><pubDate>Wed, 25 Aug 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/summary-june-10-2016-2/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;It’s funny how different folks have totally different perceptions of the same things. Obviously the idea of freedom for someone living under an oppressive regime is different than my definition. My good fortune to be born in a certain place to a certain family is not lost on me.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Starting the Understanding and Selecting an Enterprise Firewall Project</title><link>/blog/starting-the-understanding-and-selecting-an-enterprise-firewall-project-2/</link><pubDate>Wed, 25 Aug 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/starting-the-understanding-and-selecting-an-enterprise-firewall-project-2/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I joined Securosis back in January and took on coverage of network and endpoint security. My goal this year was to lay the foundation by doing fairly in-depth research projects on the key fundamental areas in each patch. I started with &lt;a href="http://securosis.com/research/papers/white-paper-endpoint-security-fundamentals/"&gt;Endpoint Security Fundamentals&lt;/a&gt; (I’m doing some &lt;a href="http://securosis.com/blog/webcasts-on-endpoint-security-fundamentals"&gt;webcasts&lt;/a&gt; next month) and continued with the &lt;a href="http://securosis.com/projectquant"&gt;Network Security Operations Quant&lt;/a&gt; project (which I’m now working through) to focus on the processes to manage network security devices. But clearly selecting the anchor device in the perimeter – the firewall – demands a full and detailed analysis.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Backtalk Doublespeak on Encryption</title><link>/blog/backtalk-doublespeak-on-encryption/</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Aug 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/backtalk-doublespeak-on-encryption/</guid><description>&lt;ul&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&lt;em&gt;Updated:&lt;/em&gt;* 8/25/2010&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Storefront-Backtalk magazine had an interesting post on &lt;a href="http://www.storefrontbacktalk.com/securityfraud/too-much-encrypt-cyberthief-gift/"&gt;Too Much Encrypt = Cyberthief Gift&lt;/a&gt;. And when I say ‘interesting’, I mean the topics are interesting, but the author (Walter Conway) seems to have gotten most of the facts wrong in an attempt to hype the story. The basic scenario the author describes is correct: when you encrypt a very small range of numbers/values, it is possible to pre-compute (encrypt) all of those values, then match them against the encrypted values you see in the wild. The data may be encrypted, but you know the contents because the encrypted values match. The point the author is making is that if you encrypt the expiration date of a credit card, an attacker can easily guess the value.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Webcasts on Endpoint Security Fundamentals</title><link>/blog/webcasts-on-endpoint-security-fundamentals/</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Aug 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/webcasts-on-endpoint-security-fundamentals/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Starting in early September, I’ll be doing a series of webcasts digging into the &lt;a href="http://securosis.com/research/papers/white-paper-endpoint-security-fundamentals/"&gt;Endpoint Security Fundamentals paper&lt;/a&gt; we published over the summer. Since there is a lot of ground to cover, we’ll be doing three separate webcasts, each focused on a different aspect.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Data Encryption for PCI 101: Encryption Options</title><link>/blog/data-encryption-for-pci-101-encryption-options/</link><pubDate>Mon, 23 Aug 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/data-encryption-for-pci-101-encryption-options/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;In the &lt;a href="http://securosis.com/blog/data-encryption-for-pci-101-introduction/"&gt;introductory post&lt;/a&gt; of the Data Encryption for PCI series, there were a lot of good comments on the value of hashing functions. I wanted to thank the readers for participating and raising several good points. Yes, hashing is a good way to match a credit card number you currently have determine if it matches one you have already been provided – without huge amounts of overhead. You might even call it a token. For the purpose of this series, as we have already &lt;a href="http://securosis.com/blog/comments/tokenization-series-index/"&gt;covered tokenization&lt;/a&gt;, I will remain focused on use cases where I need to keep the original credit card data.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>FireStarter: Certifications? We don’t need no stinkin’ certifications…</title><link>/blog/firestarter-certifications-we-dont-need-no-stinkin-certifications-2/</link><pubDate>Mon, 23 Aug 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/firestarter-certifications-we-dont-need-no-stinkin-certifications-2/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;It’s time that the security industry stopped trying to play paramilitary games and started trying to do a good job (aka “best practices”.) It would be a very pleasant change.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Friday Summary: August 20, 1010</title><link>/blog/friday-summary-august-20-1010-2/</link><pubDate>Fri, 20 Aug 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/friday-summary-august-20-1010-2/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Before I get into the Summary, I want to lead with some pretty big news: the &lt;a href="http://www.liquidmatrix.org/blog/"&gt;Liquidmatrix&lt;/a&gt; team of Dave Lewis and James Arlen has joined Securosis as Contributing Analysts! By the time you read this Rich’s &lt;a href="http://securosis.com/blog/liquidmatrix-securosis-dave-lewis-and-james-arlen-join-securosis-as-contrib"&gt;announcement&lt;/a&gt; should already be live, but what the heck – we are happy enough to coverage it here as well. Over and above what Rich mentioned, this means we will continue to expand our coverage areas. It also means that our research goes through a more rigorous shredding process before launch. Actually, it’s the egos that get peer shredding – the research just gets better. And on a personal note I am very happy about this as well, as a long-time reader of the Liquidmatrix blog, and having seen both Dave and James present at conferences over the years. They should bring great perspective and ‘Incite’ to the blog. Cheers, guys!&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Another Take on McAfee/Intel</title><link>/blog/another-take-on-mcafee-intel/</link><pubDate>Thu, 19 Aug 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/another-take-on-mcafee-intel/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;A few moments ago &lt;a href="http://securosis.com/blog/mcafee-a-secure-chip-on-intels-block"&gt;Mike posted his take on the McAfee/Intel acquisition&lt;/a&gt;, and for the most part I agree with him. “For the most part” is my nice way of saying I think Mike nailed the surface but missed some of the depths.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Data Encryption for PCI 101: Introduction</title><link>/blog/data-encryption-for-pci-101-introduction/</link><pubDate>Thu, 19 Aug 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/data-encryption-for-pci-101-introduction/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Rich and I are kicking off a short series called “Data Encryption 101: A Pragmatic Approach for PCI Compliance”. As the name implies, our goal is to provide actionable advice for PCI compliance as it relates to encrypted data storage. We write a lot about PCI because we get plenty of end-user questions on the subject. Every PCI research project we produce talks specifically about the need to protect credit cards, but we have never before dug into the details of how. This really hit home during the tokenization series – even when you are trying to get rid of credit cards you still need to encrypt data in the token server, but choosing the best way to employ encryption is varies depending upon the users environment and application processing needs. It’s not like we can point a merchant to the PCI specification and say “Do that”. There is no &lt;em&gt;practical&lt;/em&gt; advice in the Data Security Standard for protecting PAN data, and I think some of the acceptable ‘approaches’ are, honestly, a waste of time and effort.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Liquidmatrix + Securosis: Dave Lewis and James Arlen Join Securosis as Contributing Analysts</title><link>/blog/liquidmatrix-securosis-dave-lewis-and-james-arlen-join-securosis-as-contrib/</link><pubDate>Thu, 19 Aug 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/liquidmatrix-securosis-dave-lewis-and-james-arlen-join-securosis-as-contrib/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;In our ongoing quest for world domination, we are excited to announce our formal partnership with &lt;a href="http://liquidmatrix.org"&gt;our friends over at Liquidmatrix&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>McAfee: A (Secure) Chip on Intel’s Block</title><link>/blog/mcafee-a-secure-chip-on-intels-block/</link><pubDate>Thu, 19 Aug 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/mcafee-a-secure-chip-on-intels-block/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Ah, the best laid plans. I had my task list all planned out for today and was diving in when my pal Adrian pinged me in our internal chat room about &lt;a href="http://finance.yahoo.com/news/Intel-to-Acquire-bw-1892904611.html?x=0&amp;amp;.v=1"&gt;Intel buying McAfee for $7.68 billion&lt;/a&gt;. Crap, evidently my alarm didn’t go off and I’m stuck in some Hunter S. Thompson surreal situation where security and chips and clean rooms and men in bunny suits are all around me.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Acquisition Doesn’t Mean Commoditization</title><link>/blog/friday-summary-august-20-1010/</link><pubDate>Wed, 18 Aug 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/friday-summary-august-20-1010/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;There has been plenty of discussion of what &lt;a href="http://securosis.com/blog/hp-acquires-fortify"&gt;HP’s recent acquisition of Fortify&lt;/a&gt; means in terms of commoditization and consolidation in the market. The reality is that most acquisitions by large vendors are about &lt;a href="http://securosis.com/blog/the-yin-and-yang-of-security-commoditization"&gt;covering&lt;/a&gt; perceived holes in their product line. In other words this is really just the market acknowledging the legitimacy of the product or feature set. Don’t get me wrong – legitimization is very important, but it doesn’t necessarily mean either consolidation or commoditization, though they both indicate some level of legitimization.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Incite 8/18/2010: Smokey and the Speed Gun</title><link>/blog/incite-8-18-2010-smokey-and-the-speed-gun/</link><pubDate>Wed, 18 Aug 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/incite-8-18-2010-smokey-and-the-speed-gun/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;What ever happened to the human touch? And personal service? Those seem to be hallmarks of days gone by. It’s too bad. Since I don’t like people, I tend not to develop &lt;em&gt;relationships&lt;/em&gt; with my bankers or pharmacists or clergy – or pretty much anyone, come to think of it. But I guess a lot of other people did and they likely miss that person to person interaction.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>HP (Finally) Acquires Fortify</title><link>/blog/hp-acquires-fortify/</link><pubDate>Tue, 17 Aug 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/hp-acquires-fortify/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;One of the great things about Twitter and iChat is their ability to fuel the rumor mill. The back-office chatter for the last couple months, both within and outside Securosis, has been about rumors of HP buying Fortify Software. So we weren’t surprised when &lt;a href="http://www8.hp.com/us/en/hp-news/article_detail.html?compURI=tcm:245-590591&amp;amp;pageTitle="&gt;HP announced this morning that they are acquiring Fortify Software&lt;/a&gt; for an “undisclosed sum.” Well, not publicly disclosed anyway. In our best KGB voice, “Ve have vays of making dem talk.” And talk they did.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Tokenization: Selection Criteria</title><link>/blog/tokenization-selection-criteria/</link><pubDate>Mon, 16 Aug 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/tokenization-selection-criteria/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;To wrap up our Understanding and Selecting a Tokenization Solution series, we now focus on the selection criteria. If you are looking at tokenization we can assume you want to reduce the exposure of sensitive data while saving some money by reducing security requirements across your IT operation. While we don’t want to oversimplify the complexity of tokenization, the selection process itself is fairly straightforward. Ultimately there are just a handful of questions you need to address: Does this meet my business requirements? Is it better to use an in-house application or choose a service provider? Which applications need token services, and how hard will they be to set up?&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Friday Summary: August 13, 2010</title><link>/blog/friday-summary-august-13-2010/</link><pubDate>Thu, 12 Aug 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/friday-summary-august-13-2010/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;A couple days ago I was talking with the masters swim coach I’ve started working with (so I will, you know, drown less) and we got to that part of the relationship where I had to tell him what I do for a living.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Gunnar Peterson Joins Securosis As a Contributing Analyst</title><link>/blog/gunnar-peterson-joins-securosis-as-a-contributing-analyst/</link><pubDate>Thu, 12 Aug 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/gunnar-peterson-joins-securosis-as-a-contributing-analyst/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;We are ridiculously excited to announce that Gunnar Peterson is the newest member of Securosis, joining us as a Contributing Analyst. For those who don’t remember, our Contributor program is our way of getting to work with extremely awesome people without asking them to quit their day jobs (contributors are full members of the team and covered under our existing contracts/NDAs, but aren’t full time). Gunnar joins David Mortman and officially doubles our Contributing Analyst team.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Identity and Access Management Commoditization: a Tale of Two Cities</title><link>/blog/identity-and-access-management-commoditization-a-tale-of-two-cities/</link><pubDate>Wed, 11 Aug 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/identity-and-access-management-commoditization-a-tale-of-two-cities/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Identity and access management are generally 1) staffed out of the same IT department, 2) sold in vendor suites, and 3) covered by the same analysts. So this naturally lumps them together in people’s minds. However, their capabilities are quite different. Even though identity and access management capabilities are frequently bought as a package, what identity management and access management offer an enterprise are quite distinct. More importantly, successfully implementing and operating these tools requires different organizational models.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Incite 8/11/2010: No Goal!</title><link>/blog/incite-8-11-2010-no-goal/</link><pubDate>Wed, 11 Aug 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/incite-8-11-2010-no-goal/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;The Boss is a saint. Besides putting up with me every day, she recently reconnected with a former student of hers. She taught him in 5th grade and now the kid is 23. He hasn’t had the opportunities that I (or the Boss) had, and she is working with him to help define what he wants to do with his life and the best way to get there. This started me thinking about my own perspectives on goals and achievement.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>The Yin and Yang of Security Commoditization</title><link>/blog/the-yin-and-yang-of-security-commoditization/</link><pubDate>Tue, 10 Aug 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/the-yin-and-yang-of-security-commoditization/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Continuing our thread on commoditization, I want to extend some of Rich’s thoughts on commoditization and apply them to back-office data center products. In all honesty I did not want to write this post, as I thought it was more of a philosophical FireStarter with little value to end users. But as I thought about it I realized that some of these concepts might help people make better buying decisions, especially the “we need to solve this security problem right now!” crowd.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Tokenization: Use Cases, Part 3</title><link>/blog/tokenization-use-cases-part-3/</link><pubDate>Tue, 10 Aug 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/tokenization-use-cases-part-3/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Not every use case for tokenization involves PCI-DSS. There are equally compelling implementation options, several for personally identifiable information, that illustrate different ways to deploy token services. Here we will describe how tokens are used to replace Social Security numbbers in human resources applications. These services must protect the SSN during normal use by employees and third party service providers, while still offering authorized access for Human Resources personnel, as well as payroll and benefits services.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Commoditization and Feature Parity on the Perimeter</title><link>/blog/commoditization-and-feature-parity-on-the-perimeter/</link><pubDate>Mon, 09 Aug 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/commoditization-and-feature-parity-on-the-perimeter/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Following up on Rich’s &lt;a href="http://securosis.com/blog/why-you-should-care-about-commoditization-and-feature-parity/"&gt;FireStarter on Security Commoditization&lt;/a&gt; earlier today, I’m going to apply a number of these concepts to the network security space. As Rich mentioned innovation brings copycats, and with network-based application control we have seen them come out of the woodwork.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>FireStarter: Why You Care about Security Commoditization</title><link>/blog/why-you-should-care-about-commoditization-and-feature-parity/</link><pubDate>Mon, 09 Aug 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/why-you-should-care-about-commoditization-and-feature-parity/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;This is the first in a series we will be posting this week on security markets. In the rest of this series we will look at individual markets, and discuss how these forces work to help with buying decisions.&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>iOS Security: Challenges and Opportunities</title><link>/blog/ios-security-challenges-and-opportunities/</link><pubDate>Mon, 09 Aug 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/ios-security-challenges-and-opportunities/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I just posted an &lt;a href="http://db.tidbits.com/article/11505"&gt;article on iOS (iPhone/iPad) security&lt;/a&gt; that I’ve been thinking about for a while over at TidBITS.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Here are excerpts from the beginning and ending:&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Tokenization Topic Roundup</title><link>/blog/tokenization-topic-mashup/</link><pubDate>Mon, 09 Aug 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/tokenization-topic-mashup/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Tokenization has been one of our more interesting research projects. Rich and I thoroughly understood tokenization server functions and requirements when we began this project, but we have been surprised by the depth of complexity underlying the different implementations. The variety of variations and different issues that reside ‘under the covers’ really makes each vendor unique. The more we dig, the more interesting tidbits we find. Every time we talk to a vendor we learn something new, and we are reminded how each development team must make design tradeoffs to get their products to market. It’s not that the products are flawed – more that we can see ripples from each vendor’s biggest customers in their choices, and this effect is amplified by how new the tokenization market still is.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>When Writing on iOS Security, Stop Asking AV Vendors Whether Apple Should Open the Platform to AV</title><link>/blog/when-writing-on-ios-security-stop-asking-av-vendors-if-apple-should-open-th/</link><pubDate>Mon, 09 Aug 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/when-writing-on-ios-security-stop-asking-av-vendors-if-apple-should-open-th/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;A long title that almost covers everything I need to write about &lt;a href="http://www.usatoday.com/tech/products/software/2010-08-09-apple09_ST_N.htm"&gt;this article and many others like it&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The more locked down a platform, the easier it is to secure. Opening up to antivirus is about 987 steps down the priority list for how Apple could improve the (already pretty good) iOS security. You want email and web filtering for your iPhone? Get them from the cloud…&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Friday Summary: August 6th, 2010</title><link>/blog/friday-summary-august-6th-2010/</link><pubDate>Fri, 06 Aug 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/friday-summary-august-6th-2010/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I started running when I was 10. I started because my mom was talking a college PE class, so I used to tag along and no one seemed to care. We ran laps three nights a week. I loved doing it and by twelve I was lapping the field in the 20 minutes allotted. I lived 6 miles from my junior high and high school so I used to run home. I could have walked, ridden a bike, or taken rides from friends who offered, but I chose to run. I was on the track team and I ran cross country – the latter had us running 10 miles a day before I ran home. And until I discovered weight lifting, and added some 45 lbs of upper body weight, I was pretty fast.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Tokenization: Use Cases, Part 2</title><link>/blog/tokenization-use-cases-part-2/</link><pubDate>Fri, 06 Aug 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/tokenization-use-cases-part-2/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;In our last use case we presented an &lt;a href="http://securosis.com/blog/comments/tokenization-series-index/"&gt;architecture for securely managing credit card numbers in-house&lt;/a&gt;. But in response to a mix of breaches and PCI requirements, some payment processors now offer tokenization as a service. Merchants can subscribe in order to avoid any need to store credit cards in their environment – instead the payment processor provides them with tokens as part of the transaction process. It’s an interesting approach, which can almost completely remove the PAN (Primary Account Number) from your environment.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Tokenization: Use Cases, Part 1</title><link>/blog/tokenization-use-cases-part-1/</link><pubDate>Thu, 05 Aug 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/tokenization-use-cases-part-1/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;We have now discussed most of the relevant bits of technology for token server construction and deployment. Armed with that knowledge we can tackle the most important part of the tokenization discussion: use cases. Which model is right for your particular environment? What factors should be considered in the decision? The following three or four uses cases cover most of the customer situations we get calls asking for advice on. As PCI compliance is the overwhelming driver for tokenization at this time, our first two use cases will focus on different options for PCI-driven deployments.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Incite 8/4/2010: Letters for Everyone</title><link>/blog/incite-8-4-2010-letters-for-everyone/</link><pubDate>Wed, 04 Aug 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/incite-8-4-2010-letters-for-everyone/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;As I mentioned in the &lt;a href="http://securosis.com/blog/comments/incite-7-7-2010-the-mailbox-vigil/"&gt;Mailbox Vigil&lt;/a&gt;, we don’t put much stock in snail mail anymore. Though we did get a handful of letters from XX1 (oldest daughter) from sleepaway camp, aside from that it’s bills and catalogs. That said, every so often you do get entertained by the mail. A case in point happened when we got back from our summer pilgrimage to the Northern regions this weekend (which is why there was no Incite last week).&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>What Do We Learn at Black Hat/DefCon?</title><link>/blog/what-do-we-learn-at-black-hat-defcon/</link><pubDate>Tue, 03 Aug 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/what-do-we-learn-at-black-hat-defcon/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Actually I learned nothing because I wasn’t there. Total calendar fail on my part, as a family vacation was scheduled during Black Hat week. You know how it goes. The Boss says, “how is the week of July 26 for our week at the beach?” BH is usually in early August, so I didn’t think twice.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>GSM Cell Phones to Be Intercepted in Defcon Demonstration</title><link>/blog/gsm-cell-phones-to-be-intercepted-in-defcon-demonstration/</link><pubDate>Mon, 26 Jul 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/gsm-cell-phones-to-be-intercepted-in-defcon-demonstration/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;This hit Slashdot today, and I expect the mainstream press to pick it up fairly soon. &lt;a href="http://www.tombom.co.uk/blog/?p=195"&gt;Chris Paget will be intercepting cell phone communications at Defcon during a live demonstration&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Tokenization: Series Index</title><link>/blog/tokenization-series-index/</link><pubDate>Mon, 26 Jul 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/tokenization-series-index/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Understanding and Selecting a Tokenization Solution:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;ol&gt;
&lt;li&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://securosis.com/blog/understanding-and-selecting-a-tokenization-solution-introduction"&gt;Introduction&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://securosis.com/blog/tokenization-the-business-justification"&gt;Business Justification&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://securosis.com/blog/tokenization-architecture-the-basics"&gt;Token System Basics&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://securosis.com/blog/tokenization-the-tokens"&gt;The Tokens&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://securosis.com/blog/tokenization-token-servers"&gt;Token Servers, Part 1, Internal Functions&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Tokenization: Token Servers, Part 3, Deployment Models</title><link>/blog/tokenization-deployment-models/</link><pubDate>Mon, 26 Jul 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/tokenization-deployment-models/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;We have covered the internals of token servers and talked about architecture and integration of token services. Now we need to look at some of the different deployment models and how they match up to different types of businesses. Protecting medical records in multi-company environments is a very different challenge than processing credit cards for thousands of merchants.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Death, Irrelevance, and a Pig Roast</title><link>/blog/death-irrelevance-and-a-pig-roast/</link><pubDate>Fri, 23 Jul 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/death-irrelevance-and-a-pig-roast/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;There is nothing like a good old-fashioned mud-slinging battle. As long as you aren’t the one covered in mud, that is. I read about the &lt;a href="http://www.networkworld.com/news/2010/072010-is-snort-dead.html"&gt;Death of Snort&lt;/a&gt; and started laughing. The first thing they teach you in marketing school is when no one knows who you are, go up to the biggest guy in the room and kick them in the nuts. You’ll get your ass kicked, but at least everyone will know who you are.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Friday Summary: July 23, 2010</title><link>/blog/friday-summary-july-23-2010/</link><pubDate>Fri, 23 Jul 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/friday-summary-july-23-2010/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;A couple weeks ago I was sitting on the edge of the hotel bed in Boulder, Colorado, watching the immaculate television. A US-made 30” CRT television in “standard definition”. That’s cathode ray tube for those who don’t remember, and ‘standard’ is the marketing term for ‘low’. This thing was freaking horrible, yet it was perfect. The color was correct. And while the contrast ratio was not great, it was not terrible either. Then it dawned on me that the problem was not the picture, as this is the quality we used to get from televisions. Viewing an old set, operating exactly the same way they always did, I knew the problem was me. High def has so much more information, but the experience of watching the game is the same now as it was then. It hit me just how much our brains were filling in missing information, and we did not mind this sort of performance 10 years ago because it was the best available. We did not really &lt;em&gt;see&lt;/em&gt; the names on the backs of football jerseys during those Sunday games, we just thought we did. Heck, we probably did not often make out the numbers either, but somehow we knew who was who. We knew where our favorite players on the field were, and the red streak on the bottom of the screen pounding a blue colored blob &lt;em&gt;must&lt;/em&gt; be number 42. Our brain filled in and sharpened the picture for us.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Tokenization: Token Servers, Part 2 (Architecture, Integration, and Management)</title><link>/blog/tokenization-token-server-usage/</link><pubDate>Fri, 23 Jul 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/tokenization-token-server-usage/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://securosis.com/blog/tokenization-token-servers"&gt;Our last post covered the core functions of the tokenization server.&lt;/a&gt; Today we’ll finish our discussion of token servers by covering the externals: the primary architectural models, how other applications communicate with the server(s), and supporting systems management functions.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Tokenization: Token Servers</title><link>/blog/tokenization-token-servers/</link><pubDate>Thu, 22 Jul 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/tokenization-token-servers/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;In our previous post we covered &lt;a href="http://securosis.com/blog/tokenization-the-tokens/"&gt;token creation&lt;/a&gt;, a core feature of token servers. Now we’ll discuss the remaining behind-the-scenes features of token servers: securing data, validating users, and returning original content when necessary. Many of these services are completely invisible to end users of token systems, and for day to day use you don’t need to worry about the details. But how the token server works internally has significant effects on performance, scalability, and security. You need to assess these functions during selection to ensure you don’t run into problems down the road.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Incite 7/20/2010: Visiting Day</title><link>/blog/incite-7-20-2010-visiting-day/</link><pubDate>Wed, 21 Jul 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/incite-7-20-2010-visiting-day/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Back when I went to sleepaway camp as a kid I always looked forward to Visiting Day. Mostly for the food, because after a couple weeks of camp food anything my folks brought up was a &lt;em&gt;big&lt;/em&gt; improvement. But I admit it was great to see the same families year after year (especially the family that brought enough KFC to feed the entire camp) and to enjoy a day of R&amp;amp;R with your own family before getting back to the serious business of camping.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>The Cancer within Evidence Based Research Methodologies</title><link>/blog/the-cancer-within-evidence-based-research-methodologies/</link><pubDate>Wed, 21 Jul 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/the-cancer-within-evidence-based-research-methodologies/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://securityblog.verizonbusiness.com/2010/07/20/successful-evidence-based-risk-management-the-value-of-a-great-csirt/"&gt;Alex Hutton has a wonderful must-read post on the Verizon security blog&lt;/a&gt; on Evidence Based Risk Management.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Alex and I (along with others including Andrew Jaquith at Forrester, as well as Adam Shostack and Jeff Jones at Microsoft) are major proponents of improving security research and metrics to better inform the decisions we make on a day to day basis. Not just generic background data, but the kinds of numbers that can help answer questions like “Which security controls are most effective under XYZ circumstances?”&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>FireStarter: an Encrypted Value Is *Not* a Token!</title><link>/blog/firestarter-encryption-is-not-tokenization/</link><pubDate>Mon, 19 Jul 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/firestarter-encryption-is-not-tokenization/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;We’ve been writing a lot on tokenization as we build the content for our next white paper, and in &lt;a href="http://securosis.com/blog/comments-on-visas-tokenization-best-practices"&gt;Adrian’s response to the PCI Council’s guidance on tokenization&lt;/a&gt;. I want to address something that’s really been ticking me off…&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Pricing Cyber-Policies</title><link>/blog/pricing-cyber-policies/</link><pubDate>Mon, 19 Jul 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/pricing-cyber-policies/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Every time I think I’m making progress on controlling my cynical gene, I see something that sets me back almost to square one. I’ve been in this game for a long time, and although I think subconsciously I know some things are going on, it’s still a bit shocking to see them in print.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Tokenization: The Tokens</title><link>/blog/tokenization-the-tokens/</link><pubDate>Sun, 18 Jul 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/tokenization-the-tokens/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;In this post we’ll dig into the technical details of tokens. What they are and how they are created; as well as some of the options for security, formatting, and performance. For those of you who read our stuff and tend to skim the more technical posts, I recommend you stop and pay a bit more attention to this one. Token generation and structure affect the security of the data, the ability to use the tokens as surrogates in other applications, and the overall performance of the system. In order to differentiate the various solutions, it’s important to understand the basics of token creation.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Comments on Visa’s Tokenization Best Practices</title><link>/blog/comments-on-visas-tokenization-best-practices/</link><pubDate>Fri, 16 Jul 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/comments-on-visas-tokenization-best-practices/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;If you are interested in tokenization, check out &lt;a href="http://usa.visa.com/download/merchants/tokenization_best_practices.pdf"&gt;Visa’s Tokenization Best Practices guide&lt;/a&gt;, released this week. The document is a very short four pages. It highlights the basics and is helpful in understanding minimum standards for deployment. That said, I think some simple changes would make the recommendations much better and deployments more secure.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Color-blind Swans and Incident Response</title><link>/blog/color-blind-swans-and-incident-response/</link><pubDate>Thu, 15 Jul 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/color-blind-swans-and-incident-response/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I read &lt;a href="http://www.fooledbyrandomness.com/"&gt;Nassim Taleb&lt;/a&gt;’s “Black Swan” a few years ago and it was very instructive for me. I wrote about it a few times in a variety of old Incites (&lt;a href="http://securityincite.com/TDI-2008-09-24#TBP3"&gt;here&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href="http://securityincite.com/blog/mike-rothman/incite-redux-day-1-express-your-inner-bean-counter"&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;), and the key message I took away was the futility of trying to build every scenario into a threat model, defensive posture, or security strategy.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Friday Summary: July 15, 2010</title><link>/blog/friday-summary-july-15-2010/</link><pubDate>Thu, 15 Jul 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/friday-summary-july-15-2010/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I’ve been living full time in Phoenix, Arizona for about 5 years now, and about 2 years part time before that. This was after spending my entire adult life in Boulder Colorado thanks to parole at the age of 18 from New Jersey. Despite still preferring the Broncos over the Cardinals, I think I’ve mostly adjusted to the change.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Home Business Payment Security</title><link>/blog/home-business-security/</link><pubDate>Wed, 14 Jul 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/home-business-security/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;We have covered this before, but every now and again I run into a new slant on who bears responsibility for online transaction safety. Bank? Individual? If both, where do the responsibilities begin and end?&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Incite 7/14/2010: Mello Yello</title><link>/blog/incite-7-14-2010-mello-yello/</link><pubDate>Wed, 14 Jul 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/incite-7-14-2010-mello-yello/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I’m discovering that you do mellow with age. I remember when I first met the Boss how mellow and laid back her Dad was. Part of it is because he doesn’t hear too well anymore, which makes him blissfully unaware of what’s going on. But he’s also mellowed, at least according to my mother in law. He was evidently quite a hothead 40 years ago, but not any more. She warned me I’d mellow too over time, but I just laughed. Yeah, yeah, sure I will.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Simple Ideas to Start Improving the Economics of Cybersecurity</title><link>/blog/simple-ideas-to-start-improving-the-economics-of-cybersecurity/</link><pubDate>Wed, 14 Jul 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/simple-ideas-to-start-improving-the-economics-of-cybersecurity/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Today &lt;a href="http://thehill.com/blogs/hillicon-valley/technology/108203-white-house-meeting-will-stress-economic-side-of-cybersecurity"&gt;Howard Schmidt meets with Secretary of Commerce Gary Locke and Department of Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano to discuss ideas for changing the economics of cybersecurity&lt;/a&gt;. Howard knows his stuff, and recognizes that this isn’t a technology problem, nor something that can be improved with some new security standard or checklist. Crime is a function of economics, and electronic crime is no exception.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Tokenization Architecture: The Basics</title><link>/blog/tokenization-architecture-the-basics/</link><pubDate>Tue, 13 Jul 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/tokenization-architecture-the-basics/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Fundamentally, tokenization is fairly simple. You are merely substituting a marker of limited value for something of greater value. The token isn’t &lt;em&gt;completely&lt;/em&gt; valueless – it is important within its application environment – but that value is limited to the environment, or even a subset of that environment.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Preliminary Results from the Data Security Survey</title><link>/blog/preliminary-results-from-the-data-security-survey/</link><pubDate>Mon, 12 Jul 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/preliminary-results-from-the-data-security-survey/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;We’ve seen an absolutely tremendous response to &lt;a href="http://www.surveymonkey.com/s/datasec2010"&gt;the data security survey we launched last month&lt;/a&gt;. As I write this we are up to 1,154 responses, with over 70% of respondents completing the entire survey. Aside from the people who took the survey, we also received some great help building the survey in the first place (especially from the Security Metrics community). I’m really loving this entire open research thing.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Friday Summary: July 9, 2010</title><link>/blog/friday-summary-july-9-2010/</link><pubDate>Fri, 09 Jul 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/friday-summary-july-9-2010/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Today is the deadline for RSA speaker submissions, so the entire team was scrambling to get our presentation topics submitted before the server crash late rush. One of the things that struck me about the submission suggestions is that general topics are discouraged. RSA notes in the submission guidelines that 60% of the attendees have 10 or more years of security experience. I think the idea is that, if your audience is more advanced, introductory or general audience presentations don’t hold the audience’s attention so intermediate and advanced sessions are encouraged. And I bet they are right about that, given the success of other venues like BlackHat, Defcon, and Security B-Sides. Still, I wonder if that is the right course of action. Has security become a private club? Are we so caught up in the security ‘echo chamber’ we forget about the mid-market folks without the luxury of full-time security experts on staff? Perhaps security just is not very interesting without some novel new hack. Regardless, it seems like it’s the same group of us, year after year, talking about the same set of issues and problems.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Taking the High Road</title><link>/blog/taking-the-high-road/</link><pubDate>Fri, 09 Jul 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/taking-the-high-road/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;This is off topic but I need to vent a bit. I’ve followed the LeBron James free-agency saga with amusement. Thankfully I was in the air last night during the “Decision” TV special, so I didn’t have any temptation to participate in the narcissistic end of a self-centered two weeks. LeBron and his advisors did a masterful job of playing the media, making them believe anything was possible, and then doing the smartest thing and heading to Miami to join the Heat.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Top 3 Steps to Simplify DLP without Compromise</title><link>/blog/top-3-steps-to-simplify-dlp-without-compromise/</link><pubDate>Fri, 09 Jul 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/top-3-steps-to-simplify-dlp-without-compromise/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Just when I thought I was done talking about DLP, interest starts to increase again. Below is an article I wrote up on how to minimize the complexity of a DLP deployment. This was for the &lt;a href="http://community.websense.com/blogs/websense-features/archive/2010/07/06/top-3-steps-to-simplify-dlp-without-compromise-by-rich-mogull-securosis-l-l-c.aspx?cmpid=pr"&gt;Websense customer newsletter/site&lt;/a&gt;, but is my usual independent perspective.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>School’s out for Summer</title><link>/blog/schools-out-for-summer/</link><pubDate>Thu, 08 Jul 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/schools-out-for-summer/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I saw an interesting post on InformationWeek about &lt;a href="http://www.informationweek.com/blog/main/archives/2010/06/summer_worker_s.html"&gt;protecting your network and systems from the influx of summer workers&lt;/a&gt;. The same logic goes for the December holidays – when additional help is needed to stock shelves, pack boxes, and sell things. These temporary folks can do damage – more because they have no idea what they can/should do rather than thanks to any malicious intent.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Incite 7/7/2010: The Mailbox Vigil</title><link>/blog/incite-7-7-2010-the-mailbox-vigil/</link><pubDate>Wed, 07 Jul 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/incite-7-7-2010-the-mailbox-vigil/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;The postman (or postwoman) doesn’t really get any love. Not any more. In the good old days, we’d always look forward to what goodies the little white box truck, with the steering wheel on the wrong side, would bring. Maybe it was a birthday card (with a check from Grandma). Or possibly a cool catalog. Or maybe even a letter from a friend.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Understanding and Selecting SIEM/LM: Selection Process</title><link>/blog/understanding-and-selecting-siem-lm-selection-process/</link><pubDate>Fri, 02 Jul 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/understanding-and-selecting-siem-lm-selection-process/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Now that you thoroughly understand the use cases and technology underpinning of SIEM and Log Management platforms, it’s time to flex your knowledge and actually buy one. As with most of our research at Securosis, we favor mapping out a &lt;em&gt;very&lt;/em&gt; detailed process, and leaving you to decide which steps make sense in your situation. So we don’t expect every organization to go through every step in this process. Figure out what will work for your organization and do that.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Friday Summary: July 1, 2010</title><link>/blog/friday-summary-july-1-2010/</link><pubDate>Thu, 01 Jul 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/friday-summary-july-1-2010/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Earlier this week I was at the gym. I’d just finished a pretty tough workout and dropped down to the cafe area to grab one of those adult candy bars that tastes like cardboard and claims to give you muscles, longer life, and sexual prowess while climbing mountains. At least, that’s what I think they claim based on the pictures on the box. (And as a former mountain rescue professional, the technical logistics of the last claim aren’t worth the effort and potential injuries to sensitive bits).&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>IBM gets a BigFix for Tivoli Endpoint Management</title><link>/blog/ibm-gets-a-bigfix-for-tivoli-endpoint-management/</link><pubDate>Thu, 01 Jul 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/ibm-gets-a-bigfix-for-tivoli-endpoint-management/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;IBM continues to be aggressive with acquisitions, &lt;a href="http://www.ibm.com/press/us/en/pressrelease/32026.wss"&gt;grabbing BigFix today for an undisclosed amount&lt;/a&gt;. Given BigFix’s aspirations (they were moving toward a public offering), I’m a bit surprised the economics weren’t disclosed, but it was likely a decent sized deal.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Know Your Adversary</title><link>/blog/know-your-adversary/</link><pubDate>Thu, 01 Jul 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/know-your-adversary/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I spent some time on the road this week, and it was great to see some old friends, meet some new ones, come up to speed on some topics, and more than anything take some time to listen. With my head full of dancing fairies relative to what’s really going on out there, I was interested when I came across Jack Freund’s post on the RiskAnalysis blog called “&lt;a href="http://riskmanagementinsight.com/riskanalysis/?p=758"&gt;Executives are not Stupid&lt;/a&gt;.” Jack leads off the discussion by mentioned that &lt;em&gt;“You don’t fall into a job to run a company or a line of business.”&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Tokenization: the Business Justification</title><link>/blog/tokenization-the-business-justification/</link><pubDate>Thu, 01 Jul 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/tokenization-the-business-justification/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Justifying an investment in tokenization is actually two separate steps – first justifying an investment to protect the data, and then choosing to use tokenization.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Understanding and Selecting SIEM/LM: Integration</title><link>/blog/understanding-and-selecting-siem-lm-integration/</link><pubDate>Thu, 01 Jul 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/understanding-and-selecting-siem-lm-integration/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;They say that no man is an island, and in the security space that’s very true. No system is, either – especially those tasked with some kind of security management. We get caught up in SIEM and Log Management platforms to suck in every piece of information they can to help with event correlation and analysis, but when it comes down to it security management is just one aspect of an enterprise’s management stack. SIEM/Log Management is only one discipline in the security management chain, and must feed some portion of its analysis to supporting systems. So clearly integration is key, both to getting value from SIEM/LM, and to making sure the rest of the organization is on board with buying and deploying the technology.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Incite 6/30/2010: Embrace Individuality</title><link>/blog/incite-6-30-2010-embrace-individuality/</link><pubDate>Wed, 30 Jun 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/incite-6-30-2010-embrace-individuality/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I still go see a lot of live music. Yes, it’s a luxury, but I’d rather give something else up than my handful (OK, maybe two handfuls) of shows every year. On Monday night we saw Sting with his big orchestra. It was definitely a more mellow show than when we saw him a few years ago with his band (right, The Police), but it was a good show nonetheless.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Understanding and Selecting a Tokenization Solution: Introduction</title><link>/blog/understanding-and-selecting-a-tokenization-solution-introduction/</link><pubDate>Wed, 30 Jun 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/understanding-and-selecting-a-tokenization-solution-introduction/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Updated:&lt;/strong&gt; 06/30/2010&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;One of the most daunting tasks in information security is protecting sensitive data in (often complex and distributed) enterprise applications. Even the most hardened security professionals enters these projects with at least a modicum of trepidation. Coordinating effective information protection across application, database, storage, and server teams is challenging under the best of circumstances – and much tougher when also facing the common blend of legacy systems and conflicting business requirements.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Understanding and Selecting SIEM/LM: Advanced Features</title><link>/blog/understanding-and-selecting-siem-lm-advanced-features/</link><pubDate>Wed, 30 Jun 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/understanding-and-selecting-siem-lm-advanced-features/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;We’ve already discussed the basic features of a SIEM/Log Management platform, including &lt;a href="http://securosis.com/blog/understanding-and-selecting-siem-lm-data-collection"&gt;collection&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://securosis.com/blog/understanding-and-selecting-siem-lm-aggregation-normalization-and-enrichmen"&gt;aggregation and normalization&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://securosis.com/blog/understanding-and-selecting-a-siem-lm-correlation-and-alerting"&gt;correlation and alerting&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://securosis.com/blog/understanding-and-selecting-siem-lm-reporting-and-forensics"&gt;reporting and forensics&lt;/a&gt;, and &lt;a href="http://securosis.com/blog/understanding-and-selecting-siem-lm-deployment-models"&gt;deployment architectures&lt;/a&gt;. But these posts cover the core functions, and are part of what each products in the space will bring to the table.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Understanding and Selecting SIEM/LM: Data Management</title><link>/blog/understanding-and-selecting-siem-lm-data-management/</link><pubDate>Tue, 29 Jun 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/understanding-and-selecting-siem-lm-data-management/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;We covered &lt;a href="http://securosis.com/blog/understanding-and-selecting-siem-lm-deployment-models"&gt;SIEM and Log Management deployment architectures&lt;/a&gt; in depth to underscore how different models are used to deal with scalability and data management issues. In some cases these deployment choices are driven by the underlying data handling mechanism within the product. In other words each platform stores and manages data differently – these decisions have significant impact on product scalability, data management, and reporting &amp;amp; forensics capabilities. Here we discuss the different internal data storage models, with advantages and disadvantages of each.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>DB Quant: Manage Metrics, Part 3, Change Management</title><link>/blog/db-quant-manage-metrics-part-3-change-management/</link><pubDate>Fri, 25 Jun 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/db-quant-manage-metrics-part-3-change-management/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Believe it or not, we are down to our final metrics post! We’re going to close things out today with change management – something that isn’t specific to security, but comes with security implications.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Friday Summary: June 25, 2010</title><link>/blog/friday-summary-june-25-2010/</link><pubDate>Fri, 25 Jun 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/friday-summary-june-25-2010/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Thursday was totally shot. I wasted the entire day standing around. Eight hours and twenty nine minutes standing in line. I got in line at 5:50 AM and did not get back in my car until 3:00.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Are Secure Web Apps Possible?</title><link>/blog/are-secure-web-apps-possible/</link><pubDate>Thu, 24 Jun 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/are-secure-web-apps-possible/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;We security folks are a tough crowd, and we have trouble understanding why stuff that is obvious to us isn’t so obvious to everyone else. We wonder why app developers can’t understand how to develop a secure application. Why can’t they grok SDL or run a damn scanner against the application before it goes live? Q/A? Ha. Obviously that’s for losers. And those sentiments aren’t totally misplaced. There is a tremendous amount of apathy regarding software security, and the incentives for developers to do it right just aren’t there.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Incite 6/23/2010: Competitive Fire</title><link>/blog/incite-6-23-2010-competitive-fire/</link><pubDate>Wed, 23 Jun 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/incite-6-23-2010-competitive-fire/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I’ve always been pretty competitive. For instance, back in high school my friends and I would make boasts about how we’d have more of this or that, and steal the other’s wife, etc. Yes, it was silly high school ego run rampant, but I thought life was a zero sum game back then. Win/win was not in my vocabulary. I win, you lose, that’s it.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>The Open Source Database Security Project</title><link>/blog/open-database-security-project/</link><pubDate>Wed, 23 Jun 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/open-database-security-project/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I am thinking about writing a guide to secure open source databases, including verification queries. Do you all think that would be useful?&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Trustwave, Acquisitions, PCI, and Navigating Conflicts of Interest</title><link>/blog/trustwave-acquisitions-pci-and-navigating-conflicts-of-interest/</link><pubDate>Tue, 22 Jun 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/trustwave-acquisitions-pci-and-navigating-conflicts-of-interest/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;This morning Trustwave announced &lt;a href="https://www.trustwave.com/pressReleases.php?n=062210"&gt;their acquisition of Breach Security&lt;/a&gt;, the web application firewall vendor.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Trustwave’s been on an acquisition streak for a while now, picking up companies such as Mirage (NAC), Vericept (DLP), BitArmor (encryption), and Intellitactics (log management/SIEM). Notice any trends? All these products have a strong PCI angles, none of the companies were seeing strong sales (Trustwave doesn’t do acquisitions for large multiples of sales), and all were more mid-market focused.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Understanding and Selecting SIEM/LM: Deployment Models</title><link>/blog/understanding-and-selecting-siem-lm-deployment-models/</link><pubDate>Tue, 22 Jun 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/understanding-and-selecting-siem-lm-deployment-models/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;We have covered the major features and capabilities of SIEM and Log Management tools, so now let’s discuss architecture and deployment models. Each architecture addresses a specific issue, such as coverage for remote devices, scaling across hundreds of thousands of devices, real-time analysis, or handling millions of events per second. Each has advantages and disadvantages in analysis performance, reporting performance, scalability, storage, and cost.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>FireStarter: Is Full Disk Encryption without Pre-Boot Secure?</title><link>/blog/firestarter-is-full-disk-encryption-without-pre-boot-secure/</link><pubDate>Mon, 21 Jun 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/firestarter-is-full-disk-encryption-without-pre-boot-secure/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;This FireStarter is more of a real conversation starter than a definitive statement designed to rile everyone up.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Over the past couple months I’ve talked with a few organizations – some of them quite large – deploying full disk encryption for laptops but skipping the pre-boot environment.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Return of the Security Start-up?</title><link>/blog/return-of-the-security-start-up/</link><pubDate>Mon, 21 Jun 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/return-of-the-security-start-up/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;As Rich &lt;a href="http://www.securosis.com/blog/friday-summary-june-18-2009"&gt;described on Friday&lt;/a&gt;, he, Adrian, and I were sequestered at the end of last week working on our evil plans for world domination. But we did take some time for meetings, and we met up with a small company, the proverbial “last company standing” in a relatively mature market. All their competitors have been acquired and every deal they see involves competing with a multi-billion dollar public company.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Friday Summary: June 18, 2009</title><link>/blog/friday-summary-june-18-2009/</link><pubDate>Fri, 18 Jun 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/friday-summary-june-18-2009/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Dear Securosis readers,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The Friday Summary is currently unavailable. Our staff is at an offsite in an undisclosed location completing our world domination plans. We apologize for the inconvenience, and instead of our full summary of the week’s events here are a few links to keep you busy. If you need more, Mike Rothman suggests you “find your own &amp;amp;%^ news”.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Doing Well by Doing Good (and Protecting the Kids)</title><link>/blog/doing-well-by-doing-good-and-protecting-the-kids/</link><pubDate>Thu, 17 Jun 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/doing-well-by-doing-good-and-protecting-the-kids/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;My kids are getting more sophisticated in their computer usage. I was hoping I could put off the implementation of draconian security controls on their computers for a while. More because I’m lazy and it will dramatically increase the amount of time I spend supporting the in-house computers. But hope is not a strategy, my oldest will be 10 this year, and she is curious – so it’s time.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Incite 6/16/2010: Fenced in</title><link>/blog/incite-6-16-2010-fenced-in/</link><pubDate>Wed, 16 Jun 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/incite-6-16-2010-fenced-in/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I spent last weekend at my 20th college reunion. I dutifully flew into Ithaca, NY to see many Cornell friends and (fraternity) brothers. It was a great trip, but I did have an experience that reminded me I’m no spring chicken any more.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Take Our Data Security Survey &amp; Win an iPad</title><link>/blog/take-our-data-security-survey-win-an-ipad/</link><pubDate>Wed, 16 Jun 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/take-our-data-security-survey-win-an-ipad/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;One of the biggest problems in security is that we rarely have a good sense of which controls actually improve security outcomes. This is especially true for newer areas like data security, filled with tools and controls that haven’t been as well tested or widely deployed as things like firewalls.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Need to know the time? Ask the consultant.</title><link>/blog/need-to-know-the-time-ask-the-consultant/</link><pubDate>Tue, 15 Jun 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/need-to-know-the-time-ask-the-consultant/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;You all know the story. If you need to know the time, ask the consultant, who will then proceed to tell you the time from your own watch. We all laugh, but there is a lot of truth in this joke – as there usually is. Consultants are a necessary evil for many of us. We don’t have the leeway to hire full time employees (especially when Wall Street is still watching employee rolls like hawks), but we have too much work to do. So we bring in some temporary help to get stuff done.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Top 5 Security Tips for Small Business</title><link>/blog/top-5-security-tips-for-small-business/</link><pubDate>Tue, 15 Jun 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/top-5-security-tips-for-small-business/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;We in the security industry tend to lump small and medium businesses together into “SMB”, but there are massive differences between a 20-person retail outlet and even a 100-person operation. These suggestions are specifically for small businesses with limited resources, based on everything we know about the latest threats and security defenses.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>If You Had a 3G iPad Before June 9, Get a New SIM</title><link>/blog/if-you-had-a-3g-ipad-before-june-9-get-a-new-sim/</link><pubDate>Mon, 14 Jun 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/if-you-had-a-3g-ipad-before-june-9-get-a-new-sim/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;If you keep up with the security news at all, &lt;a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601204&amp;amp;sid=aUw5rWIt9X0Y"&gt;you know that on June 9th the email addresses and the device ICC-ID for at least 114,000 3G iPad subscribers were exposed&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Friday Summary: June 11, 2010</title><link>/blog/friday-summary-june-11-2010/</link><pubDate>Fri, 11 Jun 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/friday-summary-june-11-2010/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;This Monday’s &lt;a href="http://www.securosis.com/blog/firestarter-get-ready-for-oracles-new-waf"&gt;FireStarter&lt;/a&gt; prompted a few interesting behind-the-scenes conversations with a handful of security vendors centering on product strategy in the face of the recent acquisitions in Database Activity Monitoring. The questions were mostly around the state of the database activity monitoring market, where it is going, and how the technology complements and competes with other security technologies. But what I consider a common misconception came up in all of these exchanges, having to do with the motivation behind Oracle &amp;amp; IBMs recent acquisitions. The basic premise went something like: “Of course IBM and Oracle made investments into DAM – they are database vendors. They needed this technology to secure databases and monitor transactions. Microsoft will be next to step up to the plate and acquire one of the remaining DAM vendors.”&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Insider Threat Alive and Well</title><link>/blog/insider-threat-alive-and-well/</link><pubDate>Fri, 11 Jun 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/insider-threat-alive-and-well/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Is it me or has the term “insider threat” disappeared from security marketing vernacular? Clearly insiders are still doing their thing. Check out a recent example of &lt;a href="http://www.networkworld.com/news/2010/060710-bofa-call-center-worker-pleads.html"&gt;insider fraud at Bank of America&lt;/a&gt;. The perpetrator was a phone technical support rep, who would steal account records when someone called for help. Awesome.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Understanding and Selecting SIEM/LM: Reporting and Forensics</title><link>/blog/understanding-and-selecting-siem-lm-reporting-and-forensics/</link><pubDate>Thu, 10 Jun 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/understanding-and-selecting-siem-lm-reporting-and-forensics/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Reporting and Forensics are the principal products of a SIEM system. We have pushed, prodded, and poked at the data to get it into a manageable format, so now we need to put it to use. Reports and forensic analysis are the features most users work with on a day to day basis. Collection, normalization, correlation and all the other things we do are just to get us to the point where we can conduct forensics and report on our findings. These features play a big part in customer satisfaction, so while we’ll dig in to describe how the technology works, we will also discuss what to look for when making buying decisions.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Incite 6/9/2010: Creating Excitement</title><link>/blog/incite-6-9-2010-creating-excitement/</link><pubDate>Wed, 09 Jun 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/incite-6-9-2010-creating-excitement/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Some businesses are great at creating excitement. Take Apple, for instance. They create demand for their new (and upgraded) products, which creates a feeding frenzy when the public can finally buy the newest shiny object. 2 million iPads in 60 days is astounding. I suspect they’ll move a bunch of iPhone 4 units on June 24 as well (I know I’ll be upgrading mine and the Boss’). They’ve created a cult around their products, and it generates unbelievable excitement whenever there is a new toy to try.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Draft Data Security Survey for Review</title><link>/blog/draft-data-security-survey-for-review/</link><pubDate>Mon, 07 Jun 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/draft-data-security-survey-for-review/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Hey everyone,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;As mentioned the other day, I’m currently &lt;a href="http://securosis.com/blog/comments/help-build-the-mother-of-all-data-security-surveys/"&gt;putting together a big data security survey&lt;/a&gt; to better understand what data security technologies you are using, and how effective they are.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>FireStarter: Get Ready for Oracle’s New WAF</title><link>/blog/firestarter-get-ready-for-oracles-new-waf-2/</link><pubDate>Mon, 07 Jun 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/firestarter-get-ready-for-oracles-new-waf-2/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;We have written a lot about Oracle’s acquisition of Secerno: &lt;a href="http://securosis.com/blog/comments/oracle-buys-secerno/"&gt;the key points of the acquisition&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://securosis.com/blog/comments/the-secerno-technology/"&gt;the Secerno technology&lt;/a&gt;, and &lt;a href="http://www.darkreading.com/database_security/blog/archives/2010/05/what_the_secern.html"&gt;some of the business benefits Oracle gets with the Secerno purchase&lt;/a&gt;. We did so mainly because Database Activity Monitoring (DAM) is a technology that Rich and I are intimately familiar with, and this acquisition shakes up the entire market. But we suspect there is more. Rich and I have a feeling that this purchase signals Oracle’s mid-term security strategy, and the Secerno platforms will comprise the key component. We don’t have any inside knowledge, but there are too many signals to go unnoticed so we are making a prediction, and our analysis goes something like this:&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Friday Summary: June 4, 2010</title><link>/blog/friday-summary-june-4-2010/</link><pubDate>Thu, 03 Jun 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/friday-summary-june-4-2010/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;There’s nothing like a crisis to bring out the absolute stupidity in a person… especially if said individual works for a big company or government agency. This week alone we’ve had everything from the ongoing BP disaster (the one that really scares me) to the Israeli meltdown. And I’m sure Sarah Palin is in the mix there someplace.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>The Public/Private Pendulum Keeps Swinging</title><link>/blog/the-public-private-pendulum-keeps-swinging/</link><pubDate>Thu, 03 Jun 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/the-public-private-pendulum-keeps-swinging/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;They say the grass is always greener on the other side, and I guess for some folks it is. Most private companies (those which believe they have sustainable businesses, anyway) long for the day when they will be able to trade on the public markets. They know where the Ferrari deal is, and seem to dismiss the angst of Sarbanes-Oxley. On the other hand, most public companies would love the freedom of not having to deal with the quarterly spin cycle and those pesky shareholders who want growth &lt;strong&gt;now&lt;/strong&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>White Paper Released: Endpoint Security Fundamentals</title><link>/blog/whitepaper-released-endpoint-security-fundamentals/</link><pubDate>Thu, 03 Jun 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/whitepaper-released-endpoint-security-fundamentals/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Endpoint Security is a pretty broad topic. Most folks associate it with traditional anti-virus or even the newfangled &lt;em&gt;endpoint security suites&lt;/em&gt;. In our opinion, looking at the issue just from the perspective of the endpoint agent is myopic. To us, endpoint security is as much a program as anything else.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Incite 6/2/2010: Smuggler’s Blues</title><link>/blog/incite-6-2-2010-smugglers-blues-2/</link><pubDate>Wed, 02 Jun 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/incite-6-2-2010-smugglers-blues-2/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Given the craziness of my schedule, I don’t see a lot of movies in the theater anymore. Hard to justify the cost of a babysitter for a movie, when we can sit in the house and watch movies (thanks, Uncle Netflix!). But the Boss does take the kids to the movies because it’s a good activity, burns up a couple hours (especially in the purgatory period between the end of school and beginning of camp), and most of the entertainment is pretty good.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Thoughts on Privacy and Security</title><link>/blog/thoughts-on-privacy-and-security/</link><pubDate>Wed, 02 Jun 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/thoughts-on-privacy-and-security/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I was catching up on my reading today, and &lt;a href="http://taosecurity.blogspot.com/2010/05/privacy-vs-security-or-privacy-and.html"&gt;this post by Richard Bejtlich&lt;/a&gt; reminded me of the tension we sometimes see between security and privacy. Richard represents the perspective of a Fortune 5 security operator who is tasked with securing customer information and intellectual property, while facing a myriad of international privacy laws – some of which force us to reduce security for the sake of privacy (read the comments).&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Understanding and Selecting a SIEM/LM: Correlation and Alerting</title><link>/blog/understanding-and-selecting-a-siem-lm-correlation-and-alerting/</link><pubDate>Wed, 02 Jun 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/understanding-and-selecting-a-siem-lm-correlation-and-alerting/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Continuing our discussion of core SIEM and Log Management technology, we now move into event correlation. This capability was the holy grail that drove most investment in early SIEM products, and probably the security technology creating the most consistent disappointment amongst its users. But ultimately the ability to make sense of the wide variety of data streams, and use them to figure out what is under attack or compromised, is essential to any security practice. This means that despite the disappointments, there will continue to be plenty of interest in correlation moving forward.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>FireStarter: In Search of… Solutions</title><link>/blog/firestarter-in-search-of-solutions-2/</link><pubDate>Tue, 01 Jun 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/firestarter-in-search-of-solutions-2/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;A holy grail of technology marketing is to &lt;em&gt;define a product category.&lt;/em&gt; Back in the olden days of 1998, it was all about establishing a new category with interesting technology and going public, usually on nothing more than a crapload of VC money and a few million eyeballs.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>On “Security engineering: broken promises”</title><link>/blog/on-security-engineering-broken-promises-2/</link><pubDate>Tue, 01 Jun 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/on-security-engineering-broken-promises-2/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Recently Michael Zalewski posted a rant about the state of security engineering in &lt;a href="http://www.zdnet.com/blog/security/security-engineering-broken-promises/6503"&gt;Security engineering: broken promises&lt;/a&gt;. I posted my initial response to this on Twitter: “Great explanation of the issue, zero thoughts on solutions. Bored now.” I still stand behind that response. As a manager, problems without potential solutions are useless to me. The solutions don’t need to be deep technical solutions – sometimes the solution is to monitor or audit. Sometimes the solution is to do nothing, accept the risk, and make a note of it in case it comes up in conversation or an audit.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Friday Summary: May 28, 2010</title><link>/blog/friday-summary-may-28-20101/</link><pubDate>Fri, 28 May 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/friday-summary-may-28-20101/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;We get a lot of requests to sponsor this blog. We got several this week. Not just the spammy “Please link with us,” or “Host our content and make BIG $$$” stuff. And not the PR junk that says “We are absolutely positive your readers would just love to hear what XYZ product manager thinks about data breaches,” or “We just released 7.2.2.4 version of our product, where we changed the order of the tabs in our web interface!” Yeah, we get fascinating stuff like that too. Daily. But that’s not what I am talking about. I am talking about really nice, personalized notes from vendors and others interested in supporting the Securosis site. They like what we do, they like that we are trying to shake things up a bit, and they like the fact that we are honest in our opinions. So they write really nice notes, and they ask if they can give us money to support what we do.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>The Hidden Costs of Security</title><link>/blog/the-hidden-costs-of-security/</link><pubDate>Fri, 28 May 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/the-hidden-costs-of-security/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;When I was abroad on vacation recently, the conversation got to the relative cost of petrol (yes, gasoline) in the States versus pretty much everywhere else. For those of you who haven’t travelled much, fuel tends to be 70-80% more expensive elsewhere. Why is that?&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Understanding and Selecting SIEM/LM: Aggregation, Normalization, and Enrichment</title><link>/blog/understanding-and-selecting-siem-lm-aggregation-normalization-and-enrichmen/</link><pubDate>Thu, 27 May 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/understanding-and-selecting-siem-lm-aggregation-normalization-and-enrichmen/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;In the last post on &lt;a href="http://securosis.com/blog/understanding-and-selecting-siem-lm-data-collection"&gt;Data Collection&lt;/a&gt; we introduced the complicated process of gathering data. Now we need to understand how to put it into a manageable form for analysis, reporting, and long-term storage for forensics.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Code Re-engineering</title><link>/blog/code-re-engineering/</link><pubDate>Wed, 26 May 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/code-re-engineering/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I just ran across a really interesting blog post by Joel Spolsky from last April: &lt;a href="http://www.joelonsoftware.com/articles/fog0000000069.html"&gt;Things You Should Never Do, Part 1&lt;/a&gt;. Actually. the post pissed me off. This is one of those hot-button topics that I have had to deal with several times in my career, and have had to manage in the face of entrenched beliefs. His statement is t hat you should &lt;em&gt;never&lt;/em&gt; rewrite a code base from scratch. The reasoning is “No major firm has ever successfully survived a product rewrite. Just look at Netscape … ” Whatever.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Gaming the Tetragon</title><link>/blog/gaming-the-tetragon/</link><pubDate>Wed, 26 May 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/gaming-the-tetragon/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Rich highlighted a great post from Rocky DiStefano of &lt;a href="http://www.visiblerisk.com"&gt;Visible Risk&lt;/a&gt; in today’s Incite:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Blame the addicts –&lt;/strong&gt; When I was working at Gartner, nothing annoyed me more than those client calls where all they wanted me to do was read them the Magic Quadrant and confirm that yes, that vendor really is in the upper right corner. I could literally hear them checking their “talked to the analyst” box. An essential part of the due diligence process was making sure their vendor was a Leader, even if it was far from the best option for them. I guess no one gets fired for picking the upper right. &lt;a href="http://www.visiblerisk.com/blog/2010/5/20/tetragon-of-prestidigitation.html"&gt;Rocky DeStefano nails how people see the Magic Quadrant in his Tetragon of Prestidigitation post&lt;/a&gt;. Don’t blame the analyst for giving you what you demand – they are just giving you your fix, or you would go someplace else. – RM&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Incite 5/26/2010: Funeral for a Friend</title><link>/blog/incite-5-26-2010-funeral-for-a-friend/</link><pubDate>Wed, 26 May 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/incite-5-26-2010-funeral-for-a-friend/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I don’t like to think of myself as a sentimental guy. I have very few possessions that I really care about, and I don’t really fall into the nostalgia trap. But I was shaken this week by the demise of a close friend. We were estranged for a while, but about a year ago we got back in touch and now that’s gone.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Quick Wins with DLP Presentation</title><link>/blog/quick-wins-with-dlp-presentation/</link><pubDate>Wed, 26 May 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/quick-wins-with-dlp-presentation/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Yesterday I gave this presentation as a webcast for McAfee, but somehow my last 8 slides got dropped from the deck. So, as promised, here is a PDF of the slides.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>A Phish Called Tabby</title><link>/blog/a-phish-called-tabby/</link><pubDate>Tue, 25 May 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/a-phish-called-tabby/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks to Aza Raskin, this week we learned of a &lt;a href="http://www.azarask.in/blog/post/a-new-type-of-phishing-attack/"&gt;new phishing attack&lt;/a&gt;, dubbed “tabnabbing” by Brian Krebs. It opening a tab (unbeknownst to the user), changes the favicon, and does a great job of impersonating a web page – or a bank account, or any other phishing target. Through the magic of JavaScript, the tabs can be controlled and the attack made very hard to detect since it preys on the familiarity of users with common webmail and banking interfaces.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Thoughts on Diversity and False Diversity</title><link>/blog/thoughts-on-diversity-and-false-diversity/</link><pubDate>Tue, 25 May 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/thoughts-on-diversity-and-false-diversity/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://blog.skeptikal.org/2010/05/why-diversity-is-mostly-bad.html"&gt;Mike Bailey highlights a key problem with web applications in his post on diversity&lt;/a&gt;. Having dealt with these issues as a web developer (a &lt;em&gt;long&lt;/em&gt; time ago), I want to add a little color.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Understanding and Selecting SIEM/LM: Data Collection</title><link>/blog/understanding-and-selecting-siem-lm-data-collection/</link><pubDate>Tue, 25 May 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/understanding-and-selecting-siem-lm-data-collection/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;The first four posts our the SIEM series dealt with understanding what SIEM is, and what problems it solves. Now we move into how to select the right product/solution/service for your organization, and that involves digging into the technology behind SIEM and log management platforms. We start with the foundation of every SIEM and Log Management platform: data collection. This is where we collect data from the dozens of different types of devices and applications we monitor. ‘Data’ has a pretty broad meaning – here it typically refers to event and log records but can also include flow records, configuration data, SQL queries, and any other type of standard data we want to pump into the platform for analysis.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>FireStarter: The Only Value/Loss Metric That Matters</title><link>/blog/firestarter-the-only-value-loss-metric-that-matters/</link><pubDate>Mon, 24 May 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/firestarter-the-only-value-loss-metric-that-matters/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;As some of you know, I’ve always been pretty critical of quantitative risk frameworks for information security, especially the Annualized Loss Expectancy (ALE) model taught in most of the infosec books. It isn’t that I think quantitative is bad, or that qualitative is always materially better, but I’m not a fan of funny math.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>The Laziest Phisher in the World</title><link>/blog/the-laziest-phisher-in-the-world/</link><pubDate>Fri, 21 May 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/the-laziest-phisher-in-the-world/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I seriously got this last night and just had to share. It’s the digital equivalent of sending someone a letter that says, “Hello, this is a robber. Please put all your money in a self addressed stamped envelope and mail it to…”&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>The Secerno Technology</title><link>/blog/the-secerno-technology/</link><pubDate>Fri, 21 May 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/the-secerno-technology/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I ran long on yesterday’s &lt;a href="http://securosis.com/blog/oracle-buys-secerno"&gt;Oracle Buys Secerno&lt;/a&gt;, but it is worth diving into Secerno’s technology to understand why this is a good fit for Oracle. I get a lot of questions about Secerno product, from customers unclear how the technology works. Even other database activity monitoring vendors ask – some because they want to know what the product is really capable of, others who merely want to vent their frustration at me for calling Secerno unique. And make no mistake – Secerno &lt;em&gt;is&lt;/em&gt; unique, despite competitor claims to the contrary. Unlike every other vendor in the market, Secerno analyzes the SQL query construct. They profile valid queries, and accept only queries that have the right &lt;em&gt;structure&lt;/em&gt;. This is not content monitoring, not traditional behavioral monitoring, not context monitoring, and not even attribute-based monitoring, but looking at the the query language itself. Consider that any SQL query (&lt;em&gt;e.g.,&lt;/em&gt; &lt;code&gt;SELECT&lt;/code&gt;, &lt;code&gt;INSERT&lt;/code&gt;, &lt;code&gt;UPDATE&lt;/code&gt;, &lt;code&gt;CREATE&lt;/code&gt;, etc.) has dozens of different options, allowing hundreds of variations. You can build very complex logic, including embedding other queries and special characters. Consider an Oracle &lt;code&gt;INSERT&lt;/code&gt; operation as an example. The (pseudo) code might look like:&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Australian Border Security Insanity</title><link>/blog/australian-border-security-insanity/</link><pubDate>Thu, 20 May 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/australian-border-security-insanity/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Australia is my second-favorite place on the planet to visit (New Zealand is first). But it’s a darn good thing I’m not a porn fiend, since they now &lt;a href="http://www.smh.com.au/technology/technology-news/travellers-to-be-searched-for-porn-20100520-vh09.html"&gt;require you to declare porn at the border&lt;/a&gt;, and, well, here’s a quote:&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Friday Summary: May 21, 2010</title><link>/blog/friday-summary-may-21-2010/</link><pubDate>Thu, 20 May 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/friday-summary-may-21-2010/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;For a while now I’ve been lamenting the decline in security blogging. In talking with other friends/associates, I learned I wasn’t the only one. So I finally got off my rear and &lt;a href="http://securosis.com/blog/is-twitter-making-us-dumb-bloggers-please-come-back"&gt;put together a post in an effort to try kickstarting the community&lt;/a&gt;. I don’t know if the momentum will last, but it seems to have gotten a few people back on the wagon.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Lessons from LifeLock’s Lucky 13</title><link>/blog/lessons-from-lifelocks-lucky-13-2/</link><pubDate>Thu, 20 May 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/lessons-from-lifelocks-lucky-13-2/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Much of the buzz around the security industry this week revolved around &lt;a href="http://www.wired.com/threatlevel/2010/05/lifelock-identity-theft/"&gt;Wired’s story about LifeLock’s CEO getting his identity stolen&lt;/a&gt; not once (which we knew about), but an additional 12 times. Guess 13 is not Todd Davis’ lucky number.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Oracle Buys Secerno</title><link>/blog/oracle-buys-secerno/</link><pubDate>Thu, 20 May 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/oracle-buys-secerno/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;This morning &lt;a href="http://www.marketwatch.com/story/oracle-buys-secerno-2010-05-20?d=nbkt"&gt;Oracle announced that it has entered into an agreement to acquire Secerno&lt;/a&gt;, the UK-based Database Activity Monitoring firm. &lt;a href="http://www.oracle.com/secerno/secerno-faq.pdf"&gt;Oracle posted a FAQ&lt;/a&gt; on the acquisition with some generic data points. Terms of the deal have not been disclosed and, knowing Oracle, won’t be.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Privacy Is (Still) Personal</title><link>/blog/privacy-is-still-personal/</link><pubDate>Thu, 20 May 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/privacy-is-still-personal/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I want to respond to &lt;a href="http://emergentchaos.com/archives/2010/05/facebook-heres-looking-at-you-kid.html"&gt;something Adam wrote about Facebook over at Emergent Chaos&lt;/a&gt;, but first I’m going to excerpt &lt;a href="http://db.tidbits.com/article/11282"&gt;my own article from TidBITS&lt;/a&gt;:&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Quick Wins with DLP Webcast Next Week</title><link>/blog/quick-wins-with-dlp-webcast-next-week/</link><pubDate>Thu, 20 May 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/quick-wins-with-dlp-webcast-next-week/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Next week I will be giving a webcast to complement my &lt;a href="http://securosis.com/research/papers/low-hanging-fruit-quick-wins-with-data-loss-prevention/"&gt;Quick Wins with Data Loss Prevention&lt;/a&gt; paper. This is a bit different than when I usually talk about DLP – it’s focused on showing immediate value, while also positioning for long term success.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>How to Survey Data Security Outcomes?</title><link>/blog/data-security-survey-questions-needs-feedback/</link><pubDate>Wed, 19 May 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/data-security-survey-questions-needs-feedback/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I received a ton of great responses to &lt;a href="http://securosis.com/blog/data-security-survey-questions-needs-feedback/"&gt;my initial post looking for survey input&lt;/a&gt; on what people want to see in a data security survey. The single biggest request is to research control effectiveness: which tools actually prevent incidents.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Incite 5/19/2010: Benefits of Bribery</title><link>/blog/incite-5-19-2010-benefits-of-bribery/</link><pubDate>Wed, 19 May 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/incite-5-19-2010-benefits-of-bribery/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Don’t blink – you might miss it. No I’m not talking about my prowess in the bedroom, but the school year. It’s hard to believe, but Friday is the last day of school here in Atlanta. What the hell? It feels like a few weeks ago we put the twins’ name tags on, and put them on the bus for their first day of kindergarten.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Symantec’s Identity Crisis</title><link>/blog/symantecs-identity-crisis/</link><pubDate>Wed, 19 May 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/symantecs-identity-crisis/</guid><description>&lt;ul&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&lt;em&gt;Updated:&lt;/em&gt;* 8/25/2010&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Storefront-Backtalk magazine had an interesting post on &lt;a href="http://www.storefrontbacktalk.com/securityfraud/too-much-encrypt-cyberthief-gift/"&gt;Too Much Encrypt = Cyberthief Gift&lt;/a&gt;. And when I say ‘interesting’, I mean the topics are interesting, but the author (Walter Conway) seems to have gotten most of the facts wrong in an attempt to hype the story. The basic scenario the author describes is correct: when you encrypt a very small range of numbers/values, it is possible to pre-compute (encrypt) all of those values, then match them against the encrypted values you see in the wild. The data may be encrypted, but you know the contents because the encrypted values match. The point the author is making is that if you encrypt the expiration date of a credit card, an attacker can easily guess the value.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Understanding and Selecting SIEM/LM: Business Justification</title><link>/blog/understanding-and-selecting-siem-lm-business-justification/</link><pubDate>Tue, 18 May 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/understanding-and-selecting-siem-lm-business-justification/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;It’s time to resume our series on Understanding and Selecting a SIEM/Log Management solution. We have already discussed what problems this technology solves, with &lt;a href="http://securosis.com/blog/understanding-and-selecting-siem-lm-use-cases-part-1/"&gt;Use Cases 1&lt;/a&gt; &amp;amp; &lt;a href="http://securosis.com/blog/understanding-and-selecting-siem-lm-use-cases-part-2/"&gt;Use Cases 2&lt;/a&gt;, but that doesn’t get a project funded. Next we need to focus on making the business case for the project and examine how to justify the investment in bean counter lingo.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>FireStarter: Killing the Next Generation</title><link>/blog/firestarter-killing-the-next-generation/</link><pubDate>Mon, 17 May 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/firestarter-killing-the-next-generation/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;As a former marketing guy, I’m sensitive to meaningless descriptors that obfuscate the value a product brings to a customer. Seeing Larry Walsh’s piece on &lt;a href="http://blogs.channelinsider.com/secure_channel/content/network_security/debating_ngfws_vs_utms.html"&gt;next generation firewalls versus UTM&lt;/a&gt; got my blood boiling because it’s such a meaningless argument. It’s time we slay the entire concept of ‘next generation’ anything.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Is Twitter Making Us Dumb? Bloggers, Please Come Back</title><link>/blog/is-twitter-making-us-dumb-bloggers-please-come-back/</link><pubDate>Mon, 17 May 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/is-twitter-making-us-dumb-bloggers-please-come-back/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;When I first started the Securosis blog back in 2006 I didn’t really know what to expect. I already had access to a publishing platform (Gartner), and figured blogging would let me talk about the sorts of things that didn’t really fit my day job.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Talking Database Assessment with Imperva</title><link>/blog/talking-database-assessment-with-imperva/</link><pubDate>Mon, 17 May 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/talking-database-assessment-with-imperva/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I will be presenting a webinar: “Understanding and Selecting a Database Assessment Solution” with Imperva this Wednesday, May 19th at 11am PST / 2pm EST. I’ll cover the deployment models, key features, and ways to differentiate assessment platforms. I’ll spend a little more time on applicability for compliance, as that is the key driver for adoption now, but cover other use cases as well.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Friday Summary: May 14, 2010</title><link>/blog/friday-summary-may-14-2010/</link><pubDate>Fri, 14 May 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/friday-summary-may-14-2010/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I was rummaging through the closet yesterday, when I came across some old notebooks from college. Yes, I am a pack rat. One of the books contained notes from Computer Science 110: Algorithm Design. Most of the coursework was looking for ways to make algorithms more efficient, and to select the right algorithm to get the job done. I remember spending weeks on sorting routines: bubble sort, merge sort, heap sort, sorts based upon the Fibonacci sequence, Quicksort, and a few others. All of which we ran against sample data sets; comparing performance; and collecting information on best case, median, and worst case results. Obviously with a pre-sorted list they all ran fast, but depending on the size and distribution of the data set our results were radically different.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Unintended Consequences of Consumerization</title><link>/blog/unintended-consequences-of-consumerization/</link><pubDate>Thu, 13 May 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/unintended-consequences-of-consumerization/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;The ripple effect, of how a small change creates a major exposure down the line, continues to amaze me. That’s why I enjoyed the NetworkWorld post on how the &lt;a href="http://www.networkworld.com/news/2010/051010-security-managers-journal-ipad-intro.html"&gt;iPad brings a nasty surprise&lt;/a&gt;. The story is basically how the ability for iPads to connect to the corporate network exposed a pretty serious hole in one organization’s network defenses.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Incite 5/12/2010: the Power of Unplugging</title><link>/blog/incite-5-12-2010-the-power-of-unplugging/</link><pubDate>Wed, 12 May 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/incite-5-12-2010-the-power-of-unplugging/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I’m crappy at vacations. It usually takes me a few days to unwind and relax, and then I blink and it’s time to go home and get back into the mess of daily life. But it’s worse than that – even when I’m away, I tend to check email and wade through my blog posts and basically not &lt;em&gt;really&lt;/em&gt; disconnect. So the guilt is always there. As opposed to enjoying what I’m doing, I’m worried about what I’m &lt;em&gt;not&lt;/em&gt; doing and how much is piling up while I’m away. This has to stop. It’s not fair to the Boss or the kids or even me. I drive pretty hard and I’ve always walked the fine line between passion and burnout. I’m happy to say I’m making progress, slowly but surely.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>SAP Buys Sybase</title><link>/blog/sap-buys-sybase/</link><pubDate>Wed, 12 May 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/sap-buys-sybase/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I am sitting on the porch reading a Sybase ASE document on transparent database encryption, so it’s ironic that a few minutes ago I got word that &lt;a href="http://www.businessweek.com/news/2010-05-12/sap-buys-sybase-for-5-8-billion-to-step-up-rivalry-with-oracle.html%20in%20cash"&gt;SAP bought Sybase for $5.8 billion&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;a href="http://www.sap.com/about/newsroom/press-releases/press.epx?pressid=13202"&gt;SAP posted a press release&lt;/a&gt;. This announcement is right on the heels of their &lt;a href="http://www.eweek.com/c/a/Enterprise-Applications/SAP-Announces-Sybase-Partnership-Mobile-Business-Suite-7/"&gt;partnership announcement&lt;/a&gt; last March.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>We Have Ways of Making You ... Use a Password</title><link>/blog/we-have-ways-of-making-you-use-a-password/</link><pubDate>Wed, 12 May 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/we-have-ways-of-making-you-use-a-password/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;MSNBC has an interesting news item: a &lt;a href="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/37107291/ns/technology_and_science-security/"&gt;German court is ordering all wireless routers to have a password&lt;/a&gt;, or the owners will be fined if it is discovered that someone used their connection illegally. From the post:&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>FireStarter: Secure Development Lifecycle—You’re Doing It Wrong</title><link>/blog/firestarter-secure-development-lifecycle-youre-doing-it-wrong/</link><pubDate>Mon, 10 May 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/firestarter-secure-development-lifecycle-youre-doing-it-wrong/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I wrote last Monday’s FireStarter on &lt;a href="http://securosis.com/blog/firestarter-for-secure-code-process-is-a-placebo-its-all-about-peer-pressur"&gt;Process and Peer Pressure&lt;/a&gt; because there were a few things bothering me that I needed to get out of my system, but I saved a lot for later. I didn’t really intend to write this followup so soon, but I saw that Cisco announced their own &lt;a href="http://blogs.cisco.com/security/comments/the_cisco_secure_development_lifecycle_an_overview/"&gt;Software Development Lifecycle&lt;/a&gt;. I wanted to make some statements on SDL later this year when I begin publishing more concrete Secure Software Development Lifecycle (SSDL in Securosis parlance, SDL for most organizations) guidelines, but Cisco’s announcement changes things. I worry that sheer inertia will prompt the industry as a whole to rubber-stamp SDLs. Before you know it, HR reps will be including “SDL certification” requirements on every engineering job description, without a clue what they are demanding or why, so let’s stop this train before it runs too far off the tracks.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Friday Summary: May 7, 2010</title><link>/blog/friday-summary-may-7-2010/</link><pubDate>Thu, 06 May 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/friday-summary-may-7-2010/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Yesterday I finished up a presentation for the &lt;a href="http://www.secure360.org/"&gt;Secure360 Conference&lt;/a&gt;: “Putting the Fun in Dysfunctional – How the Security Industry Works, and Why It’s Your Fault”. This is a combination of a bunch of things I’ve been thinking about for a while, mostly focused on cognitive science and economics. Essentially, security makes a heck of a lot more sense once you start trying to understand why people make the decisions they do, which is a combination of their own internal workings and external forces. Since it’s very hard to change how people think (in terms of process, not opinion), the best way to induce change is to modify the forces that drive their decision making.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Help Build the Mother of All Data Security Surveys</title><link>/blog/help-build-the-mother-of-all-data-security-surveys/</link><pubDate>Thu, 06 May 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/help-build-the-mother-of-all-data-security-surveys/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I spend a heck of a lot of time researching, writing, and speaking about data security. One area that’s been very disappointing is the quality of many of the surveys. Most either try to quantify losses (without using a verifiable loss model), measure general attitudes to inspire some BS hype press release, or assess some other fuzzy aspect you can spin any way you want.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Download Our Kick-Ass Database Encryption and Tokenization Paper</title><link>/blog/download-our-kick-ass-database-encryption-and-tokenization-paper/</link><pubDate>Wed, 05 May 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/download-our-kick-ass-database-encryption-and-tokenization-paper/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;It’s kind of weird, but our first white paper to remain unsponsored is also the one I consider our best yet. Adrian and I have spent nearly two years pulling this one together – with more writes, re-writes, and do-overs than I care to contemplate.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Database Security Fundamentals: Encryption</title><link>/blog/database-security-fundamentals-encryption/</link><pubDate>Tue, 04 May 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/database-security-fundamentals-encryption/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Continuing our theme of quick and effective database security measures, we now move into the data protection phase. The most common (and potentially most effective) security measure for data at rest is encryption. Since we are shooting for fast and effective, we are looking at some form of transparent encryption. Almost every database has transparent encryption built in, and it is effective for securing data files and archives from snooping. Several vendors also offer forms of transparent encryption at the OS/file system level, which behave in a very similar manner, so we will consider those options as well. It’s ironic that I am writing this post today, as I just completed the final editorial sweep through the Securosis Database Encryption &amp;amp; Tokenization paper. Rich and I will be releasing it tomorrow (Cinco de Mayo), so if you want a much deeper dive into the technology tradeoffs and variations, check it paper out when it becomes available (Shameless plug: If you are interested in sponsoring the paper, let us know).&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Thoughts on Data Breach History</title><link>/blog/thoughts-on-data-breach-history/</link><pubDate>Tue, 04 May 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/thoughts-on-data-breach-history/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I’ve been writing about data breaches for a long time now – ever since I received my first notification (from egghead.com) in 2002. For about 4 or 5 years now I’ve been giving various versions of my “Involuntary Case Studies in Data Breaches” presentation, where we dig into the history of data breaches and spend time detailing some of the more notable ones, from breach to resolution.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>FireStarter: For Secure Code, Process Is a Placebo—It’s All about Peer Pressure</title><link>/blog/firestarter-for-secure-code-process-is-a-placebo-its-all-about-peer-pressure/</link><pubDate>Mon, 03 May 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/firestarter-for-secure-code-process-is-a-placebo-its-all-about-peer-pressure/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;The other day it hit me: Process is not that important to secure code development. Waterfall? Doesn’t matter. Agile process? Secondary. They only frame the techniques that create success. Saying a process helps create secure code is like saying a cattle chute tames a wild Brahma bull. Guidelines, steps, and procedures do little to alter code security, only which code gets worked on. To motivate developers to improve security, try less carrot and more stick. Heck, process is not even a carrot – it’s more like those nylon dividers at the airport to keep polite people from pushing and shoving to the front of the line. No, if you want to developers to write secure code, use peer pressure.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Optimism and Cautions on OpenDLP</title><link>/blog/optimism-and-cautions-on-opendlp/</link><pubDate>Mon, 03 May 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/optimism-and-cautions-on-opendlp/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I’m starting to think I shouldn’t take vacations. Aside from the Symantec acquisition of PGP and GuardianEdge last week, someone went off and released the first open source DLP tool.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Understanding and Selecting SIEM/LM: Use Cases, Part 2</title><link>/blog/understanding-and-selecting-siem-lm-use-cases-part-2/</link><pubDate>Mon, 03 May 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/understanding-and-selecting-siem-lm-use-cases-part-2/</guid><description>&lt;h2 id="use-case-2-improve-efficiency"&gt;Use Case #2: Improve Efficiency&lt;/h2&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Turn back the clock about 5 months – you were finalizing your 2010 security spending, and then you got the news: budgets are going down &lt;em&gt;again&lt;/em&gt;. At least they didn’t make you cut staff during the “right-sizing” at the end of 2008, eh? Of course, budget and resources be damned, you are still on the hook to secure the new applications, which will require some new security gadgets and generate more data.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>You Should Ignore the NetworkWorld DLP Review</title><link>/blog/you-should-ignore-the-networkworld-dlp-review/</link><pubDate>Mon, 03 May 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/you-should-ignore-the-networkworld-dlp-review/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I’m catching up on my reading, and finally got a chance to peruse the &lt;a href="http://www.networkworld.com/reviews/2010/041910-data-loss-prevention-test.html"&gt;NetworkWorld DLP Review&lt;/a&gt;. Here’s why I think you need to toss this one straight into the hopper:&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Friday Summary: April 30, 2010</title><link>/blog/friday-summary-april/</link><pubDate>Fri, 30 Apr 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/friday-summary-april/</guid><description>&lt;h2 id="project-management-judo"&gt;Project Management Judo&lt;/h2&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In &lt;a href="http://layer8.itsecuritygeek.com/layer8/its-not-about-risk/"&gt;It’s not about risk&lt;/a&gt;, Shrdlu got me thinking about the problem of perception. A few years back, I noticed one of my IT staff doing something odd. Every couple weeks, over a period of many months, I would see this person walk into a room with marketing and sales people to attend a half-hour meeting. I was pretty sure the IT staffer did not know these people and had nothing to do with marketing or sales efforts. We were not running any joint projects at the time, so I could not figure out why he was meeting with these other teams. At some point curiosity overcame me and I asked what was going on and the IT guy told me they were figuring out how to set up credit card purchases for online software sales. Uh, what?&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Understanding and Selecting SIEM/LM: Use Cases, Part 1</title><link>/blog/understanding-and-selecting-siem-lm-use-cases-part-1/</link><pubDate>Fri, 30 Apr 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/understanding-and-selecting-siem-lm-use-cases-part-1/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;When you think about it, security success in today’s environment comes down to a handful of key imperatives. First we need to improve the security of our environment. We are losing ground to the bad guys, and we’ve got to make some inroads on more quickly figuring out what’s being attacked and stopping it.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Symantec Bets on Data Protection with PGP and GuardianEdge</title><link>/blog/symantec-to-acquire-pgp-guardianedge/</link><pubDate>Thu, 29 Apr 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/symantec-to-acquire-pgp-guardianedge/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Symantec has once again flexed its wallet, and bought a spot in the data protection market. By acquiring &lt;a href="http://www.marketwatch.com/story/symantec-to-offer-broadest-data-protection-capabilities-with-acquisition-of-pgp-corporation-and-guardianedge-2010-04-29"&gt;PGP Corporation for $300MM and GuardianEdge for $70MM&lt;/a&gt; in cash, Symantec basically bought the marketshare lead in endpoint encryption. Whatever that means, since encryption is a number of different markets with distinct buying constituencies and market leaders. We estimate PGP got a multiple of around 4x bookings, and GuardianEdge got between 3-4x as well, which is pretty generous but not crazy like some of Symantec’s past deals (Vontu, MessageLabs).&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Incite 4/27/2010: Dishwasher Tales</title><link>/blog/incite-4-27-2010-dishwasher-tales/</link><pubDate>Wed, 28 Apr 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/incite-4-27-2010-dishwasher-tales/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;After being married for coming up on 14 years, some things about your beloved you just need to accept. They aren’t changing. The Boss would like me to be more affectionate. As much as I’d like to, it just doesn’t occur to me. It’s not an intentional slight – the thought of giving an unprompted hug, etc., just never enters my mind. It causes her some angst, but she knows I love her and that I’m not likely to change.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Understanding and Selecting SIEM/Log Management: Introduction</title><link>/blog/understanding-and-selecting-siem-log-management-introduction/</link><pubDate>Tue, 27 Apr 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/understanding-and-selecting-siem-log-management-introduction/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Over the past decade business processes have been changing rapidly. We focus on collaboration, both inside and outside our own organizations. We have to support more devices in different form factors, many of which IT doesn’t directly control. We add new applications on a monthly basis, and are currently witnessing the decomposition of monolithic applications into dozens of smaller loosely connected application stacks. We add virtualization technologies and SaaS for increased efficiency. Now we are expected to provide anywhere access while maintaining accountability, but we have less control. &lt;em&gt;A lot less control.&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>FireStarter: Centralize or Decentralize the Security Organization?</title><link>/blog/firestarter-centralize-or-decentralize-the-security-organization/</link><pubDate>Mon, 26 Apr 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/firestarter-centralize-or-decentralize-the-security-organization/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;The pendulum swings back and forth. And back and forth. And back and forth again. In the early days of security, there was a network security team and they dealt with authentication tokens and the firewall. Then there was an endpoint security team, who dealt with AV. Then the messaging security team, who dealt with spam. The database security team, the application security team, and so on and so forth.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Friday Summary: April 23, 2010</title><link>/blog/friday-summary-april-23-2010/</link><pubDate>Fri, 23 Apr 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/friday-summary-april-23-2010/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;“Don’t worry about that 5 and 1 Adjustable Rate Mortgage. 5 years from now your house will be worth twice what you paid, and you can re-finance.” It’s worth half, and you can’t get a new loan. “That’s a great interest rate!” It wasn’t, and points were padded on the back end. “Collateralzied debt obligations are a great investment – they are Triple A rated!” Terrible investment, closer to Triple B value, and a root cause of the financial collapse. “Rates have never been lower so you should refinance now!” The reappraisal that is a part of refinancing often resets the equity proportions and amortization percentage, so you can pay an extra $100k in interest, plus PMI to protect the bank. “This credit card gives you 1 air mile for every dollar you spend!” And a 31.5% interest rate, plus a fee for the privilege. Haven’t heard these? How about &lt;a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/04/22/chase-urges-customers-to_n_547670.html"&gt;“Don’t use your PIN number with your Debit Card: it’s less secure”&lt;/a&gt;? Are you kidding me?&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Database Security Fundamentals: Auditing Events</title><link>/blog/database-security-fundamentals-auditing-events/</link><pubDate>Thu, 22 Apr 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/database-security-fundamentals-auditing-events/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I realized from my last post that I made a mistake. In my previous post on &lt;a href="http://securosis.com/blog/comments/database-security-fundamentals-auditing-transactions/"&gt;Auditing Transactions&lt;/a&gt;, attempting to simplify database auditing, I instead made it more complicated. What I &lt;em&gt;want&lt;/em&gt; to do is to differentiate between database auditing through the native database transactional audit trail, from other forms of logging and event collection. The reason is that the native database audit trail provides a sequence of associated events, and whether and when those events were committed to disk. Simple events do not provide the same degree of context and are not as capable of providing database state. If you need application context and state – perhaps for Sarbanes-Oxley – you need the audit log. Make no mistake: there are simpler and less invasive ways of collecting data. They also provide an alternative – and in some cases clearer – picture of events. For example, it’s a heck of a lot easier to get data from syslog that native audit. And if all you are interested in is when patches are installed, syslog is a better source of information. If you are only interested in failed login attempts, a login trigger is far more efficient.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Whitepaper Released: Quick Wins with Data Loss Prevention</title><link>/blog/whitepaper-released-quick-wins-with-data-loss-prevention/</link><pubDate>Thu, 22 Apr 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/whitepaper-released-quick-wins-with-data-loss-prevention/</guid><description>&lt;blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Two of the most common criticisms of Data Loss Prevention (DLP) that comes up in user discussions are a) its complexity and b) the fear of false positives. Security professionals worry that DLP is an expensive widget that will fail to deliver the expected value – turning into yet another black hole of productivity. But when used properly DLP provides rapid assessment and identification of data security issues not available with any other technology.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Who DAT McAfee Fail?</title><link>/blog/who-dat-mcafee-fail/</link><pubDate>Thu, 22 Apr 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/who-dat-mcafee-fail/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;There are a lot of grumpy McAfee customers out there today. Yesterday, &lt;a href="http://lastwatchdog.com/mcafee-error-triggers-massive-manual-pc-clean-up"&gt;little Red issued a faulty DAT file update&lt;/a&gt; that mistakenly thought &lt;code&gt;svchost.exe&lt;/code&gt; was a bad file and blew it away. This, of course, results in all sorts of badness on Windows XP SP3, causing an endless reboot loop and rendering those machines inoperable.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Incite 4/21/2010: Picky Picky</title><link>/blog/incite-4-21-2010-picky-picky/</link><pubDate>Wed, 21 Apr 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/incite-4-21-2010-picky-picky/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;My kids are picky eaters. Two out of the three anyway. XX1 (oldest daughter) doesn’t like pizza or hamburgers. How do you not like pizza or hamburgers? Anyway, she let us know over the weekend her favorite foods are cake frosting and butter. Awesome.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Google: An Example of Why Single Sign on Sucks</title><link>/blog/google-an-example-of-why-single-sign-on-sucks/</link><pubDate>Tue, 20 Apr 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/google-an-example-of-why-single-sign-on-sucks/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;According to the &lt;a href="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/36655005"&gt;New York Times&lt;/a&gt;, when Google was hacked during the recent China incident, their single sign on system was specifically targeted. The attackers may have accessed the source code, which gives them some good intel to look for other vulnerabilities. There’s speculation they could have also added a back door to the source code, but I suspect that even if they did this, given how quickly Google detected the intrusion, any back doors probably didn’t make it into backups and might be easy for Google to spot and remove.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>FireStarter: You Don’t Need Central Key Management</title><link>/blog/firestarter-you-dont-need-central-key-management-2/</link><pubDate>Mon, 19 Apr 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/firestarter-you-dont-need-central-key-management-2/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;If you are using encryption, somewhere you have encryption keys. Where you store them, and how they are managed and shared, are legitimate concerns. It is fashionable to store all keys in a single centralized key management server. Much as the name implies, this means storing all of your keys, of different types, for multiple use cases into a single key management server. Rich likes to call these ‘uber’ key manager, that handle any and all key functions; and are distinct from external key management servers that unify instances of single application, or provide key services across the disks in your storage array. Conceptually, a single product that handles all my key needs from a unified interface sounds great. But the real question is: why do you need it?&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Level 4 Apathy</title><link>/blog/level-4-apathy/</link><pubDate>Mon, 19 Apr 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/level-4-apathy/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I was perusing some of my saved links from the past few weeks and came across &lt;a href="http://www.ashimmy.com/2010/04/the-wild-wild-west-of-pci.html"&gt;Shimmy’s dispatch from the ETA&lt;/a&gt; (Electronic Transaction Association) show, which is a big conference for payment processors. As Alan summarized, here are the key takeaways from the processors:&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>ESF: Endpoint Incident Response</title><link>/blog/esf-endpoint-incident-response/</link><pubDate>Fri, 16 Apr 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/esf-endpoint-incident-response/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Nowadays, the endpoint is the path of least resistance for the bad guys to get a foothold in your organization. Which means we have to have a structured plan and process for dealing with endpoint compromises. The high level process we’ll lay out here focuses on: confirming the attack, containing the damage, and then performing a post-mortem.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Friday Summary: April 16, 2010</title><link>/blog/friday-summary-april-16-2010/</link><pubDate>Fri, 16 Apr 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/friday-summary-april-16-2010/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I am sitting here staring at power supplies and empty cases. Cleaning out the garage and closets, looking at the remnants from my PC building days. I used to love going out to select new motherboard and chipset combinations, hand-selecting each component to build just the right database server or video game machine. Over the years one sad acknowledgement needed to be made: after a year or so, the only pieces worth a nickel were the power supply and the case. Sad, but you spend $1,500.00 and after a few months the freaking box that housed the parts was the only remaining item of value.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Public Goods</title><link>/blog/public-goods/</link><pubDate>Fri, 16 Apr 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/public-goods/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Chris Pepper tweeted a very cool post on &lt;a href="http://elmyra.livejournal.com/497297.html"&gt;Why Content is a Public Good&lt;/a&gt;. The author, Milena Popova, provides an economist’s perspective on market forces and digital goods. Her premise is that in economic terms, many types of electronic content are “public goods” – that being a technical term for objects with infinite supply and no good way to control consumption. She makes the economic concepts of ‘rival’ and ‘excludable’ very easy to understand, and by breaking it down into rudimentary components, makes a compelling argument that content is a public good:&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>ESF: Endpoint Compliance Reporting</title><link>/blog/esf-endpoint-compliance-reporting/</link><pubDate>Thu, 15 Apr 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/esf-endpoint-compliance-reporting/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;You didn’t think we could get through an 11-part series about &lt;em&gt;anything&lt;/em&gt; without discussing compliance, did you? No matter what we do from a security context – whatever the catalyst, budget center, or end goal – we need to substantiate implemented controls. We can grind out teeth and curse the gods all we want, but security investments are contingent on some kind of compliance driver.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>ESF: Building the Endpoint Security Program</title><link>/blog/esf-building-the-endpoint-security-program/</link><pubDate>Wed, 14 Apr 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/esf-building-the-endpoint-security-program/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Over the previous 8 posts in this Endpoint Security Fundamentals series, we’ve looked at the problem from the standpoint of what to do right awat (Prioritize and Triage) and the Controls (update software and patch, secure configuration, anti-malware, firewall, HIPS and device control, and full disk encryption). But every experienced security professional knows a set of widgets doesn’t make a repeatable process, and it’s really the process and the people that makes the endpoints secure.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Incite 4/14/2010: Just Think</title><link>/blog/incite-4-14-2010-just-think/</link><pubDate>Wed, 14 Apr 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/incite-4-14-2010-just-think/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;As numb as we are to most advertising (since we are hit with thousands of advertising exposures every day), sometimes an ad campaign is memorable and really resonates. No, seeing Danica Patrick on a massage table doesn’t qualify. But Apple’s &lt;em&gt;Think Different&lt;/em&gt; campaign really did. At that point, Apple was positioning to the counter-culture, looking for folks who didn’t want to conform. Those who had their own opinions, but needed a way to set them loose on the world.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>ESF: Controls: Full Disk Encryption</title><link>/blog/esf-controls-full-disk-encryption/</link><pubDate>Tue, 13 Apr 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/esf-controls-full-disk-encryption/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;It happens quickly. An end user just needed to pick up something at the corner store or a big box retailer. He was in the store for perhaps 15 minutes, but that was plenty of time for a smash and grab. And then your phone rings, a laptop is gone, and it had information on about 15,000 customers. You sigh, hang up the phone and call the general counsel – it’s disclosure time.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>ESF: Controls: Firewalls, HIPS, and Device Control</title><link>/blog/esf-controls-firewalls-hips-device-control/</link><pubDate>Mon, 12 Apr 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/esf-controls-firewalls-hips-device-control/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Popular perception of endpoint security revolves around &lt;a href="http://securosis.com/blog/esf-controls-anti-malware/"&gt;anti-malware&lt;/a&gt;. But they are called &lt;em&gt;suites&lt;/em&gt; for a reason – other security components ship in these packages, which provide additional layers of protection for the endpoint. Here we’ll talk about firewalls, host intrusion prevention, and USB device control.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>FireStarter: No User Left Behind</title><link>/blog/firestarter-leave-no-user-behind/</link><pubDate>Mon, 12 Apr 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/firestarter-leave-no-user-behind/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Not to bring politics into a security blog, but I think it’s time we sit down and discuss the state of education in this country… I mean industry.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>ESF: Controls: Anti-Malware</title><link>/blog/esf-controls-anti-malware/</link><pubDate>Fri, 09 Apr 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/esf-controls-anti-malware/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;As we’ve discussed throughout the Endpoint Security Fundamentals series, adequately protecting endpoint devices entails more than just an endpoint security suite. That said, we still have to defend against malware, which means we’ve got to figure out what is important in an endpoint suite and how to get the most value from the investment.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Database Security Fundamentals: Auditing Transactions</title><link>/blog/database-security-fundamentals-auditing-transactions/</link><pubDate>Thu, 08 Apr 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/database-security-fundamentals-auditing-transactions/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I am now switching gears to talk about some of the ‘detective’ measures that help with forensic analysis of transactions and activity. The preventative measures discussed previously are great for protecting your system from known attacks, but they don’t help detect fraudulent misuse or failure of business processes. For that we need to capture the events that make up the business processes and analyze them. Our basic tool is database auditing, and they provide plenty of useful information.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>ESF: Controls: Secure Configurations</title><link>/blog/esf-controls-secure-configurations/</link><pubDate>Thu, 08 Apr 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/esf-controls-secure-configurations/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Now that we’ve established a process to make sure our software is sparkly new and updated, let’s focus on the configurations of the endpoint devices that connect to our networks. Silly configurations present another path of least resistance for the hackers to compromise your devices. For instance, there is no reason to run FTP on an endpoint device, and your standard configuration should factor that in.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Friday Summary: April 9, 2010</title><link>/blog/friday-summary-april-9-2010/</link><pubDate>Thu, 08 Apr 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/friday-summary-april-9-2010/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;So I’m turning 39 in a couple of weeks. Not that 39 is one of those milestone birthdays, but it leaves me with only 365 days until I can not only no longer trust myself (as happened when I turned 30), but I supposedly can’t even trust my bladder anymore.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Incite 4/7/2010: Everybody Loves the Underdog</title><link>/blog/incite-4-7-2010-everybody-loves-the-underdog/</link><pubDate>Wed, 07 Apr 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/incite-4-7-2010-everybody-loves-the-underdog/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Come on, admit it. Unless you have Duke Blue Devil blood running through your veins (and a very expensive diploma on the wall) or had Duke in your tournament bracket with money on the line, you were pulling for the Butler Bulldogs to prevail in Monday night’s NCAA Men’s Basketball final. &lt;em&gt;Of course&lt;/em&gt; you were – everyone loves the underdog.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Anti-Malware Effectiveness: The Truth Is out There</title><link>/blog/anti-malware-effectiveness-the-truth-is-out-there/</link><pubDate>Tue, 06 Apr 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/anti-malware-effectiveness-the-truth-is-out-there/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;One of the hardest things to do in security is to discover what really works. It’s especially hard on the endpoint, given the explosion of malware and the growth of social-engineering driven attack vectors. Organizations like ICSA Labs, av-test.org, and VirusBulletin have been testing anti-malware suites for years, though I don’t think most folks put much stock in those results. Why? Most of the tests yield similar findings, which means all the products are equally good. Or more likely, equally bad.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>ESF: Controls: Update and Patch</title><link>/blog/esf-controls-update-and-patch/</link><pubDate>Tue, 06 Apr 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/esf-controls-update-and-patch/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Running old software is bad. Bad like putting a new iPad in a blender. Bad because all software is vulnerable software, and with old software even unsophisticated bad guys have weaponized exploits to compromise the software. So the first of the Endpoint Security Fundamentals technical controls is to make sure you run updated software.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Who to Recruit for Security, How to Get Started, and Career Tracks</title><link>/blog/who-to-recruit-for-security-how-to-get-started-and-career-tracks/</link><pubDate>Tue, 06 Apr 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/who-to-recruit-for-security-how-to-get-started-and-career-tracks/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Today I read two very different posts on what to look for when hiring, and how to get started in the security field. Each clearly reflects the author’s experiences, and since I get asked both sides of this question a lot, I thought I’d toss my two cents in.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Database Virtualization and Abstraction</title><link>/blog/database-virtualization-and-abstraction/</link><pubDate>Mon, 05 Apr 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/database-virtualization-and-abstraction/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;When you think of database virtualization, do you think this term means:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;a) Abstracting the database installation/engine from the application and storage layers.&lt;br&gt;
b) Abstracting the database instance across multiple database installations or engines.&lt;br&gt;
c) Abstracting the data and tables from a specific database engine/type, to make the dependent application interfaces more generic.&lt;br&gt;
d) Abstracting the data and tables across multiple database installations/engines.&lt;br&gt;
e) Moving your database to the cloud.&lt;br&gt;
f) All of the above.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>ESF: Triage: Fixing the Leaky Buckets</title><link>/blog/esf-triage-fixing-the-leaky-buckets/</link><pubDate>Mon, 05 Apr 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/esf-triage-fixing-the-leaky-buckets/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;As we discussed in the last ESF post on &lt;a href="http://securosis.com/blog/esf-prioritize-finding-the-leaky-buckets"&gt;prioritizing the most significant risks&lt;/a&gt;, the next step is to build, communicate, and execute on a triage plan to fix those &lt;em&gt;leaky buckets.&lt;/em&gt; The plan consists of the following sections: Risk Confirmation, Remediation Plan, Quick Wins, and Communication&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>ESF: Prioritize: Finding the Leaky Buckets</title><link>/blog/esf-prioritize-finding-the-leaky-buckets/</link><pubDate>Fri, 02 Apr 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/esf-prioritize-finding-the-leaky-buckets/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;As we start to dig into the Endpoint Security Fundamentals series, the first step is &lt;em&gt;always&lt;/em&gt; to figure out where you are. Since hope is not a strategy, you can’t just make assumptions about what’s installed, what’s configured correctly, and what the end users actually know. So we’ve got to figure that out, which involves using some of the same tactics our adversaries use.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Friday Summary: April 2, 2010</title><link>/blog/friday-summary-april-2-2010/</link><pubDate>Fri, 02 Apr 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/friday-summary-april-2-2010/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;It’s the new frontier. It’s like the “Wild West” meets the “Barbary Coast”, with hostile Indians and pirates all rolled into one. And like those places, lawless entrepreneurialism a major part of the economy. That was the impression I got reading Robert Mullins’ &lt;a href="http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/58829"&gt;The biggest cloud on the planet is owned by … the crooks&lt;/a&gt;. He examines the resources under the control of Conficker-based worms and compares them to the legitimate cloud providers. I liked his post, as considering botnets in terms of their position as cloud computing leaders (by resources under management) is a startling concept. Realizing that botnets offer &lt;em&gt;18 times&lt;/em&gt; the computational power of Google and over &lt;em&gt;100 times&lt;/em&gt; Amazon Web Services is astounding. It’s fascinating to see how the shady and downright criminal have embraced technology – and in many cases drive innovation. I would also be interested in comparing total revenue and profitability between, say, AWS and a botnet. We can’t, naturally, as we don’t really know the amount of revenue spam and bank fraud yield. Plus the business models are different and botnets provide abnormally low overhead – but I am willing to bet criminals are much more efficient than Amazon or Google.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Database Security Fundamentals: Configuration</title><link>/blog/database-security-fundamentals-configuration/</link><pubDate>Thu, 01 Apr 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/database-security-fundamentals-configuration/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;It’s tough for me to write a universal quick configuration management guide for databases, because the steps you take will be based upon the size, number, and complexity of the databases you manage. Every DBA works in a slightly different environment, and configuration settings get pretty specific. Further, when I got started in this industry, the cost of the database server and the cost of the database software were more than a DBA’s yearly salary. It was fairly common to see one database admin for one database server. By the time the tech bubble burst in 2001, it was common to see one database administrator tending to 15-20 databases. Now that number may approach 100, and it’s not just a single database type, but several. The greater complexity makes it harder to detect and remedy simple mistakes that lead to database compromises.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Endpoint Security Fundamentals: Introduction</title><link>/blog/endpoint-security-fundamentals-introduction/</link><pubDate>Thu, 01 Apr 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/endpoint-security-fundamentals-introduction/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;As we continue building out coverage on more traditional security topics, it’s time to focus some attention on the endpoint. For the most part, many folks have just given up on protecting the endpoint. Yes, we all go through the motions of having endpoint agents installed (on Windows anyway), but most of us have pretty low expectations for anti-malware solutions. Justifiably so, but that doesn’t mean it’s game over. There are lots of things we can do to better protect the endpoint, some of which were discussed in &lt;a href="http://securosis.com/blog/comments/low-hanging-fruit-endpoint-security/"&gt;Low Hanging Fruit: Endpoint Security&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Hit the Snooze on Lancope’s Data Loss Alarms</title><link>/blog/hit-the-snooze-on-lancopes-data-loss-alarms-2/</link><pubDate>Thu, 01 Apr 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/hit-the-snooze-on-lancopes-data-loss-alarms-2/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Update&lt;/strong&gt; - Lanscope &lt;a href="http://netflowninjas.lancope.com/blog/2010/04/lightweight-extrusion-detection-with-netflow-and-stealthwatch-5101.html"&gt;posted some new information positioning this as a compliment, not substitute, to DLP&lt;/a&gt;. Looks like the marketing folks might have gotten a little out of control.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Help a Reader: PCI Edition</title><link>/blog/help-a-reader/</link><pubDate>Wed, 31 Mar 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/help-a-reader/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;One of our readers recently emailed me with a major dilemma. They need to keep their website PCI compliant in order to keep using their payment gateway to process credit card transactions. Their PCI scanner is telling them they have vulnerabilities, while their hosting provider tells them they are fine. Meanwhile our reader is caught in the middle, paying fines.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Incite 3/31/2010: Attitude Is Everything</title><link>/blog/incite-3-31-2010-attitude-is-everything/</link><pubDate>Wed, 31 Mar 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/incite-3-31-2010-attitude-is-everything/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;There are people who suck the air out of the room. You know them – they rarely have anything good to say. They are the ones always pointing out the problems. They are half-empty type folks. No matter what it is, it’s half-empty or even three-quarters empty.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>How Much Is Your Organization Telling Google?</title><link>/blog/how-much-is-your-company-telling-google/</link><pubDate>Tue, 30 Mar 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/how-much-is-your-company-telling-google/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Palo Alto Networks just released their latest &lt;a href="http://www.paloaltonetworks.com/literature/AUR_spring2010.php"&gt;Application Usage and Risk Report&lt;/a&gt; (registration required), which aggregates anonymous data from their client base to analyze Internet-based application usage among their clients. For those of you who don’t know, one of their product’s features is monitoring applications tunneling over other protocols – such as P2P file sharing over port 80 (normally used for web browsing). A ton of different applications now tunnel over ports 80 and 443 to get through corporate firewalls.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>FireStarter: Nasty or Not, Jericho Is Irrelevant</title><link>/blog/firestarter-nasty-or-not-jericho-is-irrelevant/</link><pubDate>Mon, 29 Mar 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/firestarter-nasty-or-not-jericho-is-irrelevant/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;It seems the Jericho Forum is at it again. I’m not sure what &lt;em&gt;it&lt;/em&gt; is, but they are hitting the PR circuit talking about their latest document, a &lt;a href="https://www.opengroup.org/jericho/self-assessment.htm"&gt;Self-Assessment Guide&lt;/a&gt;. Basically this is a list of “nasty” questions end users should ask vendors to understand if their products align with the Jericho Commandments.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Friday Summary: March 26, 2010</title><link>/blog/friday-summary-march-26-2010/</link><pubDate>Fri, 26 Mar 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/friday-summary-march-26-2010/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;It’s been a bit of a busy week. We finished up 2 major projects and I made a quick out of town run to do a little client work. As a result, you probably noticed we were a bit light on the posting. For some silly reason we thought things might slow down after RSA.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Security Innovation Redux: Missing the Forest for the Trees</title><link>/blog/security-innovation-redux-missing-the-forest-for-the-trees/</link><pubDate>Fri, 26 Mar 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/security-innovation-redux-missing-the-forest-for-the-trees/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;There was a great level of discourse around Rich’s FireStarter on Monday: &lt;a href="http://securosis.com/blog/firestarter-there-is-no-market-for-security-innovation"&gt;There is No Market for Security Innovation&lt;/a&gt;. Check out the comments to get a good feel for the polarization of folks on both sides of the discussion.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Hello World. Meet Pwn2Own.</title><link>/blog/hello-world-meet-pwn2own/</link><pubDate>Wed, 24 Mar 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/hello-world-meet-pwn2own/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I’m currently out on a client engagement, but early results over Twitter say that Internet Explorer 8 on Windows 7, Firefox on Windows 7, Safari on Mac OS X, and Safari on iPhone were all exploited within seconds in the Pwn2Own contest at the CanSecWest conference. While these exploits took the developers weeks or months to complete, that’s still a clean sweep.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Announcing NetSec Ops Quant: Network Security Metrics Suck. Let’s Fix Them.</title><link>/blog/announcing-netsec-ops-quant-network-security-metrics-suck-lets-fix-them/</link><pubDate>Mon, 22 Mar 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/announcing-netsec-ops-quant-network-security-metrics-suck-lets-fix-them/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;The lack of credible and relevant network security metrics has been a thorn in my side for years. We don’t know how to define success. We don’t know how to communicate value. And ultimately, we don’t even know what we should be tracking operationally to show improvement (or failure) in our network security activities.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>FireStarter: There is No Market for Security Innovation</title><link>/blog/firestarter-there-is-no-market-for-security-innovation/</link><pubDate>Mon, 22 Mar 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/firestarter-there-is-no-market-for-security-innovation/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I often hear that there is no innovation left in security.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;That’s complete bullshit.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;There is plenty of innovation in security – but more often than not there’s no &lt;em&gt;market&lt;/em&gt; for that innovation.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Some DLP Metrics</title><link>/blog/some-dlp-metrics/</link><pubDate>Mon, 22 Mar 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/some-dlp-metrics/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;One of our readers, Jon Damratoski, is putting together a DLP program and asked me for some ideas on metrics to track the effectiveness of his deployment. By ‘ask’, I mean he sent me a great list of starting metrics that I completely failed to improve on.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Bonus Incite 3/19/2010: Don’t be LHF</title><link>/blog/bonus-incite-3-19-2010-dont-be-lhf-2/</link><pubDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/bonus-incite-3-19-2010-dont-be-lhf-2/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I got a little motivated this AM (it might have something to do with blowing off this afternoon to watch NCAA tourney games) and decided to double up on the Incite this week.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Friday Summary: March 19, 2010</title><link>/blog/friday-summary-march-19-2010/</link><pubDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/friday-summary-march-19-2010/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/35928898/ns/local_news-san_francisco_bay_area_ca/"&gt;Your Facebook account gets compromised&lt;/a&gt;. Your browser flags your favorite sports site as a &lt;a href="http://www.sportsbybrooks.com/"&gt;malware distributor&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/technology/2010/feb/26/twitter-hack-spread-phishing"&gt;Your Twitter account is hacked through a phishing scam&lt;/a&gt;. You get AV pop-ups on your machine, but cannot tell which are real and which are &lt;a href="http://www.trustedsource.org/blog/393/Scareware-Poses-Danger-to-Consumers"&gt;scareware&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;a href="http://www.pbs.org/newshour/extra/features/july-dec05/idtheft_8-29.html"&gt;Your identify gets stolen&lt;/a&gt;. You try to repair the damage and make sure it doesn’t happen again, only to get ripped off by the credit agency (you know who I am talking about). Exasperated, you just want to go home, relax, and catch up on March Madness. But it turns out the bracket email from your friend was probably &lt;a href="http://www.techradar.com/news/internet/sophos-warns-of-twitter-phishing-attack-673038?src=rss&amp;amp;attr=all"&gt;another phishing attempt&lt;/a&gt;, and your alma mater suspends a star player while it investigates &lt;a href="http://www.footballoutsiders.com/walkthrough/2010/walkthrough-click-your-own-risk"&gt;derogatory public comments – which it eventually discovers were forged&lt;/a&gt;. Man, it sucks to be &lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Generation_Y"&gt;Generation Y&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Network Security Fundamentals: Egress Filtering</title><link>/blog/network-security-fundamentals-egress-filtering/</link><pubDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/network-security-fundamentals-egress-filtering/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;As we wrap up our initial wave of Network Security Fundamentals, we’ve already discussed &lt;a href="http://securosis.com/blog/network-security-fundamentals-default-deny/"&gt;Default Deny&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://securosis.com/blog/network-security-fundamentals-monitor-everything/"&gt;Monitoring everything&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://securosis.com/blog/network-security-fundamentals-correlation/"&gt;Correlation&lt;/a&gt;, and &lt;a href="http://securosis.com/views/outsidelinks/network-security-fundamentals-looking-for-not-normal/"&gt;Looking for Not Normal&lt;/a&gt;. Now it’s time to see if we can actually get in the way of some of these nasty attacks.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Incite 3/17/2010: Seeing the Enemy</title><link>/blog/incite-3-17-2010-seeing-the-enemy/</link><pubDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/incite-3-17-2010-seeing-the-enemy/</guid><description>&lt;blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;“WE HAVE MET THE ENEMY AND HE IS US.” POGO (1970)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I’ve worked for companies where we had to spend so much time fighting each other, the market got away. I’ve also worked at companies where internal debate and strife made the organization stronger and the product better. But there are no pure absolutes – as much as I try to be binary, most companies include both sides of the coin.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>LHF: Quick Wins with DLP—the Conclusion</title><link>/blog/lhf-quick-wins-with-dlp-the-conclusion-2/</link><pubDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/lhf-quick-wins-with-dlp-the-conclusion-2/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;In the last two posts we covered the main preparation you need to get quick wins with your DLP deployment. First you need &lt;a href="http://securosis.com/blog/low-hanging-fruit-quick-wins-with-data-loss-prevention/"&gt;to put a basic enforcement process in place&lt;/a&gt;, then you need &lt;a href="http://securosis.com/blog/lhf-quick-wins-in-dlp-part-2"&gt;to integrate with your directory servers and major infrastructure&lt;/a&gt;. With these two bits out of the way, it’s time to roll up our sleeves, get to work, and start putting that shiny new appliance or server to use.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Mogull’s Law</title><link>/blog/mogulls-law-2/</link><pubDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/mogulls-law-2/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I’m about to commit the single most egotistical act of my blogging/analyst career. I’m going to make up my own law and name it after myself. Hopefully I’m almost as smart as everyone says I think I am.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Database Activity Analysis Survey</title><link>/blog/database-activity-analysis-survey/</link><pubDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/database-activity-analysis-survey/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I ran into Slavik Markovich of Sentrigo, and David Maman of GreenSQL, on the vendor floor at the RSA Conference. I probably startled them with my negative demeanor – having just come from one vendor who seems to deliberately misunderstand preventative and detective controls, and another who thinks regular expression checks for content analysis are cutting edge. Still, we got to chat for a few minutes before rushing off to another product briefing. During that conversation it dawned on me that we continue to see refinement in the detection of malicious database queries and deployment methods to block database activity by database activity monitoring vendors. Not just from these vendors – others are improving as well.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>FireStarter: IP Breach Disclosure, No-Way, No-How</title><link>/blog/firestarter-ip-breach-disclosure-no-way-no-how/</link><pubDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/firestarter-ip-breach-disclosure-no-way-no-how/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;On Monday March 1st, the Experienced Security Professionals Program (ESPP) was held at the RSA conference, gathering 100+ practitioners to discuss and debate a few topics. The morning session was on “The Changing Face of Cyber-crime”, and discussed the challenges facing law enforcement to prosecute electronic crimes, as well as some of the damage companies face when attackers steal data. As could be expected, the issue of breach disclosure came up, and of course several corporate representatives pulled out the tired argument of “protecting their company” as their reason to not disclose breaches. The FBI and US Department of Justice representatives on the panel referenced several examples where public firms have gone so far as to file an injunction against the FBI and other federal entities to stop investigating breaches. Yes, you read that correctly. Companies sued to &lt;strong&gt;stop&lt;/strong&gt; the FBI from investigating.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>LHF: Quick Wins in DLP, Part 2</title><link>/blog/lhf-quick-wins-in-dlp-part-2/</link><pubDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/lhf-quick-wins-in-dlp-part-2/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;In &lt;a href="http://securosis.com/blog/low-hanging-fruit-quick-wins-with-data-loss-prevention/"&gt;Part 1 of this series on Low Hanging Fruit: Quick Wins with DLP&lt;/a&gt;, we covered how important it is to get your process in place, and the two kinds of violations you should be immediately prepared to handle. Trust us – you &lt;em&gt;will&lt;/em&gt; see violations once you turn your DLP tool on.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Friday Summary: March 11, 2010</title><link>/blog/friday-summary-march-11-2010/</link><pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/friday-summary-march-11-2010/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I love the week after RSA. Instead of being stressed to the point of cracking I’m basking in the glow of that euphoria you only experience after passing a major milestone in life.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Low Hanging Fruit: Quick Wins with Data Loss Prevention</title><link>/blog/low-hanging-fruit-quick-wins-with-data-loss-prevention/</link><pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/low-hanging-fruit-quick-wins-with-data-loss-prevention/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Two of the most common criticisms of DLP that comes up in user discussions are a) its complexity and b) the fear of false positives. Security professionals worry that DLP is an expensive widget that will fail to deliver the expected value – turning into yet another black hole of productivity. But when used properly DLP provides rapid assessment and identification of data security issues not available with any other technology.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Upcoming Webinar: Database Assessment</title><link>/blog/upcoming-webinar-database-assessment/</link><pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/upcoming-webinar-database-assessment/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Tuesday, March 16th at 11am PST / 2pm EST, I will be presenting a webinar: “Understanding and Selecting a Database Assessment Solution” with Application Security, Inc. I’ll cover the basic value proposition of database assessment, several use cases, deployment models, and key technologies that differentiate each platform; and then go through a basic product evaluation process.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Database Security Fundamentals: Patching</title><link>/blog/database-security-fundamentals-patching/</link><pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/database-security-fundamentals-patching/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Patching is a critical security operation for databases, just like for any other application. The vast majority of security concerns and logic flaws within the database will be addressed by the database vendor. While the security and IT communities are made aware of critical security flaws in databases, and may even understand the exploits, the details of the fix are never made public except for open source databases. That means the vendor is your only option for fixes and workarounds. Most of you will not be monitoring CVE notifications or penetration testing new versions of the database as they are released. Even if you have the in-house expertise do so, &lt;em&gt;very very very few&lt;/em&gt; people have the time to conduct serious investigations. Database vendors have dedicated security teams to analyze attacks against the database, and small firms must leverage their expertise.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Incite 3/9/2010 - Ten Reasons I Love the RSAC</title><link>/blog/incite-3-9-2010-ten-reasons-i-love-the-rsac/</link><pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/incite-3-9-2010-ten-reasons-i-love-the-rsac/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;To stir the pot a bit before the RSA Conference, I did a FireStarter wondering out loud if &lt;a href="http://securosis.com/blog/firestarter-will-social-media-kill-the-conference-star"&gt;social media would ever replace big industry conferences&lt;/a&gt;. Between the comments and my experiences last week, I’d say no. Though I can say social media provides the opportunity to make business acquaintances into friends and let loudmouths like Rich, Adrian and myself make a living having on an opinion (often 3 or 4 between us).&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Is It Wireless Security or Secure Wireless?</title><link>/blog/is-it-wireless-security-or-secure-wireless/</link><pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/is-it-wireless-security-or-secure-wireless/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;As I’ve been digesting all I saw and heard last week at the RSA show, the major topic of wireless security re-emerged with a vengeance. To be honest, wireless security had kind of fallen off my radar for a while. Between most of the independent folks being acquired (both on the wireless security and wireless infrastructure sides) and lots of other shiny objects, there just wasn’t that much to worry about.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>SecurosisTV: Low Hanging Fruit - Endpoint Security</title><link>/blog/securosistv-low-hanging-fruit-endpoint-security/</link><pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/securosistv-low-hanging-fruit-endpoint-security/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;We’re happy to post the next SecurosisTV episode, in which yours truly goes through the Low Hanging Fruit of Endpoint Security. This is a pretty high-level view of the 7 different tactics (discussed in much more detail in the &lt;a href="http://securosis.com/blog/low-hanging-fruit-endpoint-security/"&gt;post&lt;/a&gt;), intended to give you a quick (6 minute) perspective on how to improve endpoint security posture with minimal effort.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>RSA Tomfoolery: APT is the Fastest Way to Identify Fools and Liars</title><link>/blog/rsa-tomfoolery-apt-is-the-fastest-way-to-identify-fools-and-liars/</link><pubDate>Mon, 08 Mar 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/rsa-tomfoolery-apt-is-the-fastest-way-to-identify-fools-and-liars/</guid><description>&lt;blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;It is better to stay silent and let people think you are an idiot than to open your mouth and remove all doubt.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>FireStarter: Will Social Media Kill the Conference Star?</title><link>/blog/firestarter-will-social-media-kill-the-conference-star/</link><pubDate>Mon, 01 Mar 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/firestarter-will-social-media-kill-the-conference-star/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;On the eve of perhaps the biggest conference we security folks have (RSA Conference), we wanted to bait the echo chamber a bit, and wonder what the future of conferences is – especially given the amount and depth of information that is available via blogs and social media. Interestingly enough, we don’t necessarily have a consistent opinion here, but we want to hear what the community has to say.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Securosis at RSA Conference 2010</title><link>/blog/securosis-at-rsa-conference-2010/</link><pubDate>Mon, 01 Mar 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/securosis-at-rsa-conference-2010/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Rich, Mike, and Adrian keep pretty busy schedules at RSA each year, so we are likely to be quiet on the blog this week. If you happen to be at the show, here are the speaking sessions and other appearances we’ll be doing throughout the week. Hopefully you’ll come up and say “Hi.” Rich and Adrian don’t bite.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>RSAC 2010 Guide: Compliance</title><link>/blog/rsac-2010-guide-compliance/</link><pubDate>Fri, 26 Feb 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/rsac-2010-guide-compliance/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;And this is &lt;em&gt;it&lt;/em&gt; : the final piece of the Securosis Guide to the RSA Conference 2010. Yes, there will be a lot to see at the show, and we hope this guide has been helpful for those planning to be in San Francisco. For those of you not able to attend, we’d like to think getting a feel for the major trends in each of our coverage areas wasn’t a total waste of time.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Friday Summary: February 26, 2010</title><link>/blog/friday-summary-february-26-2010/</link><pubDate>Thu, 25 Feb 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/friday-summary-february-26-2010/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Next week is the RSA conference. You might have noticed from some of our recent blog entries. And I am really looking forward to it. It’s one of my favorite events, but I am especially anxious for good food. Yes, I want to see a bunch of friends, and yes, I have a lot of vendors I am anxious to catch up with to chat ‘bout some of their products. But honestly, all that takes a back seat to food. I like living in Arizona, but the food here sucks. Going to San Francisco, even the small hole-in-the-wall lunch places are excellent. In Phoenix, if you want a decent steak or good Mexican food, you’re covered. If you want Thai, Greek, Japanese or &lt;em&gt;quality&lt;/em&gt; Chinese (and by that I mean a restaurant with less than two health code violations), you are out of luck. San Francisco? Every other block you find great places. And Italian. Really good Italian.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Retro Buffoonery</title><link>/blog/retro-buffoonery/</link><pubDate>Thu, 25 Feb 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/retro-buffoonery/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I’m probably not supposed to do this, as I took the security marketer’s oath to get my first VP Marketing gig. But I’m going to pull the curtain back on some of the wacky stuff vendors do to sell their product/services. Today’s specific tactic is what I’ll dub &lt;strong&gt;retro buffoonery,&lt;/strong&gt; which is when a vendor looks back in time, and states that they could have stopped attack X, Y and Z – if only their products were deployed before the attack.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>RSAC 2010 Guide: Content Security</title><link>/blog/rsac-2010-guide-content-security/</link><pubDate>Thu, 25 Feb 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/rsac-2010-guide-content-security/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Two business days and counting, so today and tomorrow we’ll be wrapping up our Securosis Guide to the RSA Conference 2010. This morning let’s hit what the industry calls “content security,” which is really email and web filtering. Rich just loves the term content security, so let’s see how many times we can say it.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>RSAC 2010 Guide: Security Management</title><link>/blog/rsac-2010-guide-security-management/</link><pubDate>Thu, 25 Feb 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/rsac-2010-guide-security-management/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;To end a fine day, let’s continue through the Securosis Guide to the RSA Conference 2010 and discuss something that has been plaguing most of us since we started in this business: security management.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>RSAC 2010 Guide: Virtualization and Cloud Security</title><link>/blog/rsac-2010-guide-virtualization-and-cloud-security/</link><pubDate>Thu, 25 Feb 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/rsac-2010-guide-virtualization-and-cloud-security/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Now that we are at the end of the major technology areas covered in the Securosis Guide to the RSA Conference 2010, let’s discuss one of the &lt;a href="http://securosis.com/blog/rsac-2010-guide-top-three-themes"&gt;3 big themes&lt;/a&gt; of the show: Virtualization and Cloud Security.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Answering Dan Geer: It’s Time to Reexamine Priorities and Revisit Paradigms</title><link>/blog/answering-dan-geer-its-time-to-reexamine-priorities-and-revisit-paradigms/</link><pubDate>Wed, 24 Feb 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/answering-dan-geer-its-time-to-reexamine-priorities-and-revisit-paradigms/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Dan Geer wrote an article for SC Magazine on &lt;a href="http://www.scmagazineus.com/the-enterprise-information-protection-paradigm/article/164341/"&gt;The enterprise information protection paradigm&lt;/a&gt;, discussing the fundamental disconnect between the derived value of data and the investment to protect information. He asks the important question: If we reap ever increasing returns on information, where is the investment to protect the data? Dan has an eloquent take on a long-standing viewpoint in the security community that Enterprise Information Protection (EIP) is a custodial responsibility of corporations, as it is core to generation of revenue and thus the company’s value.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>RSAC 2010 Guide: Endpoint Security</title><link>/blog/rsac-2010-guide-endpoint-security/</link><pubDate>Wed, 24 Feb 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/rsac-2010-guide-endpoint-security/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;The fun is just beginning. We continue our trip through the Securosis Guide to the RSA Conference 2010 by discussing what we expect to see relative to Endpoint Security.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Webcast on Thursday: Pragmatic Database Compliance and Security</title><link>/blog/webcast-on-thursday-pragmatic-database-compliance-and-security/</link><pubDate>Wed, 24 Feb 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/webcast-on-thursday-pragmatic-database-compliance-and-security/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Auditors got you down? Struggling to manage all those pesky database-related compliance issues?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Thursday I’m presenting a webcast on Pragmatic Database Compliance and Security. It builds off the base of Pragmatic Database Security, but is more focused on compliance, with top tips for your favorite regulations.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Incite 2/23/10: Flexibility</title><link>/blog/incite-2-23-10-flexibility/</link><pubDate>Tue, 23 Feb 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/incite-2-23-10-flexibility/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;It is said that unhappiness results from either not getting what you want, or getting what you don’t want. I’m pretty sure strep throat qualifies as something you don’t want, and it certainly is causing some unhappiness in Chez Rothman. Yesterday, I picked up 4 different antibiotics for everyone in the house except me, which must qualify me for some kind of award at the Publix pharmacy.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>RSAC 2010 Guide: Application Security</title><link>/blog/rsac-2010-guide-application-security/</link><pubDate>Tue, 23 Feb 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/rsac-2010-guide-application-security/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Over the next 3 days, we’ll be posting the content from the Securosis Guide to the RSA Conference 2010. We broke the market into 8 different topics: Network Security, Data Security, Application Security, Endpoint Security, Content (Web &amp;amp; Email) Security, Cloud and Virtualization Security, Security Management, and Compliance. For each section, we provide a little history and what we expect to see at the show. Next up is Data Security.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>RSAC 2010 Guide: Data Security</title><link>/blog/rsac-2010-guide-data-security/</link><pubDate>Tue, 23 Feb 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/rsac-2010-guide-data-security/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Over the next 3 days, we’ll be posting the content from the Securosis Guide to the RSA Conference 2010. We broke the market into 8 different topics: Network Security, Data Security, Application Security, Endpoint Security, Content (Web &amp;amp; Email) Security, Cloud and Virtualization Security, Security Management, and Compliance. For each section, we provide a little history and what we expect to see at the show. Next up is Data Security.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>RSAC 2010 Guide: Network Security</title><link>/blog/rsac-2010-guide-network-security/</link><pubDate>Tue, 23 Feb 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/rsac-2010-guide-network-security/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Over the next 3 days, we’ll be posting the content from the Securosis Guide to the RSA Conference 2010. We broke the market into 8 different topics: Network Security, Data Security, Application Security, Endpoint Security, Content (Web &amp;amp; Email) Security, Cloud and Virtualization Security, Security Management, and Compliance. For each section, we provide a little history and what we expect to see at the show. First up is Network Security.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>RSVP for the Securosis and Threatpost Disaster Recovery Breakfast</title><link>/blog/rsvp-for-the-securosis-and-threatpost-disaster-recovery-breakfast/</link><pubDate>Tue, 23 Feb 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/rsvp-for-the-securosis-and-threatpost-disaster-recovery-breakfast/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;We quite enjoy all the free evening booze at the RSA conference, but most days what we’d really like is just a nice, quiet breakfast. Seriously, what’s with throwing massive parties for people to network, then blasting the music so loud that all we can do is stand around and stare at the mostly-all-dude crowd?&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>FireStarter: IT-GRC: The Paris Hilton of Unicorns</title><link>/blog/firestarter-it-grc-the-paris-hilton-of-unicorns/</link><pubDate>Mon, 22 Feb 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/firestarter-it-grc-the-paris-hilton-of-unicorns/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Like any analyst, I spend a lot of time on vendor briefings and meeting with very early-stage startups. Sometimes it’s an established vendor pushing a new product or widget, and other times it’s a stealth idea I’m evaluating for one of our investor clients. Usually I can tell within a few minutes if the idea has a chance, assuming the person on the other side is capable of articulating what they actually do (an all too common problem).&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Introducing SecurosisTV: RSAC Preview</title><link>/blog/introducing-securosistv-rsa-preview/</link><pubDate>Mon, 22 Feb 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/introducing-securosistv-rsa-preview/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I know what you are thinking. “Oh god, they should stick to podcasting.” You’re probably right about that – it’s no secret that Rich and I have faces made for radio. But since we hang around with Adrian, we figured maybe he’d be enough of a distraction to not focus on us. You didn’t think we keep Adrian around for his brains, do you?&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>RSAC 2010 Guide: Top Three Themes</title><link>/blog/rsac-2010-guide-top-three-themes/</link><pubDate>Mon, 22 Feb 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/rsac-2010-guide-top-three-themes/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;As most of the industry gets ramped up for the festivities of the 2010 RSA Conference next week in San Francisco, your friends at Securosis have decided to make things a bit easier for you. We’re putting the final touches on our first &lt;em&gt;Securosis Guide to the RSA Conference&lt;/em&gt;. As usual, we’ll preview the content on the blog and have the piece packaged in its entirety as a paper you can carry around at the conference. We’ll post the entire PDF tomorrow, and through the rest of this week we’ll be highlighting content from the guide. To kick things off, let’s tackle what we expect to be the key themes of the show this year.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Upcoming Webinar: Database Activity Monitoring</title><link>/blog/upcoming-webinar-database-activity-monitoring/</link><pubDate>Mon, 22 Feb 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/upcoming-webinar-database-activity-monitoring/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;February 23rd (this Tuesday) at 12:00pm EST, I will be presenting “Understanding and Selecting a Database Activity Monitoring Solution” in a Webinar with Netezza. I’ll cover the basic value propositions of platforms, go over some of the key functional components to understand prior to an evaluation, and discuss some key deployment questions to address during a proof of concept.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Friday Summary: February 19, 2010</title><link>/blog/friday-summary-february-19-2010/</link><pubDate>Fri, 19 Feb 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/friday-summary-february-19-2010/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I’d like some fail, with a little fail, and a side of fail.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Rothman was out in Phoenix this week for some internal meetings and to record some video segments that we will be putting out fairly soon. I have a slightly weird video recording and production setup, designed to make it super-fast and dirt easy for us to put segments together. I’ve tested most of it before, although I did add a new time saver right before Mike showed up.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>What is Your Plan B?</title><link>/blog/what-is-your-plan-b/</link><pubDate>Thu, 18 Feb 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/what-is-your-plan-b/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;In what remains a down economy, you may be suspicious when I tell you to think about leaving your job. But ultimately in order to survive, you always need to have Plan B or Plan C in place, &lt;em&gt;just in case&lt;/em&gt;. Blind loyalty to an employer (or to employees) died a horrendous death many years ago.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Incite 2/17/2010 - Open Your Mind</title><link>/blog/incite-2-17-2010-open-your-mind/</link><pubDate>Tue, 16 Feb 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/incite-2-17-2010-open-your-mind/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I was in the car the other day with my oldest daughter. She’s 9 (going on 15, but that’s another story) and blurted out: “Dad, I don’t want to go to Georgia Tech.” Huh? Now she is the princess of non-sequiturs, but even this one was surprising to me. Not only does she have an educational plan (at 9), but she knows that GA Tech is not part of it.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Network Security Fundamentals: Looking for Not Normal</title><link>/blog/network-security-fundamentals-looking-for-not-normal/</link><pubDate>Mon, 15 Feb 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/network-security-fundamentals-looking-for-not-normal/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;To state the obvious (as I tend to do), we all have too much to protect. No one gets through their list every day, which means perhaps the most critical skill for any professional is the ability to prioritize. We’ve got to focus on the issues that present the most significant risk to the organization (whatever you mean by risk) and act accordingly. I have’t explicitly said it, but the key to network security fundamentals is figuring out how to prioritize. And to be clear, though I’m specifically talking about network security in this series, the tactics discussed can (and need to) be applied to all the other security domains.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>New Release: Understanding and Selecting a Database Assessment Solution</title><link>/blog/new-release-understanding-and-selecting-a-database-assessment-solution/</link><pubDate>Mon, 15 Feb 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/new-release-understanding-and-selecting-a-database-assessment-solution/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;The Securosis team is proud to announce the availability of our latest white paper: &lt;a href="http://securosis.com/research/papers/report-database-assessment/"&gt;Understanding and Selecting a Database Assessment Solution&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;img src="Assessment_Cover-2.png" alt=""&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Database Security Fundamentals: Database Access Methods</title><link>/blog/database-security-fundamentals-database-access-methods/</link><pubDate>Thu, 11 Feb 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/database-security-fundamentals-database-access-methods/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;It’s tough to talk about securing database access methods in a series designed to cover database security basics, because the access attacks are not &lt;em&gt;basic&lt;/em&gt;. They tend to exploit either communications media or external functions – taking advantage of subtleties or logic flaws – capitalizing on trust relationships, or just being very unconventional and thus hard to anticipate. Still, some of the attacks are right through an open front door, like forgetting to set a TNS Listener password on Oracle. I will cover the basics here, as well as a few more involved things which can be addressed with a few hours and minimal third party tools.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Friday Summary: February 12, 2010</title><link>/blog/friday-summary-february-12-2010/</link><pubDate>Thu, 11 Feb 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/friday-summary-february-12-2010/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Chris was kind enough to forward me &lt;a href="http://gwaredd.blogspot.com/2010/02/game-development-in-post-agile-world.html"&gt;Game Development in a Post-Agile World&lt;/a&gt; this week. What I know about game development could fit on the the head of a pin. Still, one of the software companies I worked for was incubated inside a much larger video game development company. I was always very interested in watching the game team dynamics, and how they differed from the teams I ran. The game developers did not have a lot of overlapping skills and the teams were – whether they knew it or not – built around the classical “surgical team” structure. They was always a single and clear leader of the team, and that person was usually both technically and creatively superior. The teams were small, and if they had a formalized process, I was unaware of it. It appeared that they figured out their task, built the tools they needed to support the game, and then built the game. There was consistency across the teams, and they appeared to be very successful in their execution.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>The Death of Product Reviews</title><link>/blog/death-of-product-reviews/</link><pubDate>Thu, 11 Feb 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/death-of-product-reviews/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;As a security practitioner, it has always been difficult to select the ‘right’ product. You (kind of) know what problem needs to be solved, yet you often don’t have any idea how any particular product will work and scale in your production environment. Sometimes it is difficult to identify the right vendors to bring in for an evaluation. Even when you do, no number of vendor meetings, SE demos, or proof of concept installations can tell you what you need to know.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Choose Your Own Whitepaper Adventure (and Upcoming Papers)</title><link>/blog/choose-your-own-whitepaper-adventure-and-upcoming-papers/</link><pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/choose-your-own-whitepaper-adventure-and-upcoming-papers/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;We are in the process of finalizing some research planning for the next few months, so I want to see if there are any requests for research out there.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Counterpoint: Correlation Is Useful, but Threat Assessment Is Fundamental</title><link>/blog/counterpoint-correlation-is-useful-but-threat-assessment-is-fundamental/</link><pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/counterpoint-correlation-is-useful-but-threat-assessment-is-fundamental/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;So it’s probably apparent that Mike and I have slightly different opinions on some security topics, such as Monitoring Everything (or not). But sometimes we have exactly the same viewpoint, for slightly different reasons. Correlation is one of these later examples.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Incite 2/10/2010: Comfortably Numb</title><link>/blog/incite-2-10-2010-comfortably-numb/</link><pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/incite-2-10-2010-comfortably-numb/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;You may not know it, but lots of folks you know are zombies. It seems that life has beaten them down, and miraculously two weeks later they don’t say ‘hi’ – they just give you a blank stare and grin as the spittle drips out of the corners of their mouths. Yup, a sure sign they’ve been to see Dr. Feelgood, who heard for an hour how hard their lives are, and as opposed to helping to deal with the pain, they got their friends Prozac, Lexapro, and Zoloft numb it. These billion dollar drugs build on the premise that life is hard, so it’s a good idea to take away the ability to feel because it hurts too much. Basically we, as a society, are increasingly becoming comfortably numb.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Misconceptions of a DMZ</title><link>/blog/misconceptions-of-a-dmz/</link><pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/misconceptions-of-a-dmz/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;A &lt;a href="http://danielmiessler.com/blog/segmented-web-browsing-will-be-the-dmz-of-the-2010s"&gt;recent post tying segmented web browsing to DMZs&lt;/a&gt; by Daniel Miessler got me thinking more about the network segmentation that is lacking in most organizations. The concept behind that article is to establish a &lt;em&gt;browser network&lt;/em&gt; in a DMZ, wherein nothing is trusted. When a user wants to browse the web, the article implies that the user fires up a connection into the browser network for some kind of proxy out onto the big, bad Internet. The transport for this connection is left to the user’s imagination, but it’s easy to envision something along the lines of Citrix Xenapp filling this gap. Fundamentally this may offset some risk initially, but don’t get too excited just yet.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Network Security Fundamentals: Correlation</title><link>/blog/network-security-fundamentals-correlation/</link><pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/network-security-fundamentals-correlation/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;In the last Network Security Fundamentals post, we talked about &lt;a href="http://securosis.com/blog/network-security-fundamentals-monitor-everything"&gt;monitoring (almost) everything&lt;/a&gt; and how that drives a data/log aggregation and collection strategy. It’s great to have all that cool data, but now what?&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Counterpoint: Admin Rights Don’t Matter the Way You Think They Do</title><link>/blog/counterpoint-admin-rights-dont-matter-the-way-you-think-they-do/</link><pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/counterpoint-admin-rights-dont-matter-the-way-you-think-they-do/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Update&lt;/strong&gt; – &lt;em&gt;Based on feedback, I failed to distinguish that I’m referring to normal users running as admin. Sysadmins and domain admins definitely shouldn’t be running with their admin privileges except for when they need them. As you can read in the comments, that’s a huge risk.&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>FireStarter: Admin access, buh bye</title><link>/blog/firestarter-admin-access-buh-bye-2/</link><pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/firestarter-admin-access-buh-bye-2/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;It seems I’ve been preoccupied lately with telling all of you about the things you shouldn’t do anymore. Between blowing away firewall rules and killing security technologies, I guess I’ve become that guy. Now get off my lawn!&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Litchfield Discloses Oracle 0-Day at Black Hat</title><link>/blog/litchfield-discloses-oracle-0-day-at-black-hat/</link><pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/litchfield-discloses-oracle-0-day-at-black-hat/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;During &lt;a href="http://www.blackhat.com/html/bh-dc-10/bh-dc-10-archives.html"&gt;Black Hat&lt;/a&gt; last week, &lt;a href="http://www.networkworld.com/news/2010/020310-black-hat-zero-day-hack-oracle.html"&gt;David Litchfield disclosed that he had discovered an 0-day&lt;/a&gt; in Oracle 11G which allowed him to acquire administrative level credentials. Until today, I was unaware that the attack details were made available as well, meaning anyone can bounce the exploit off your database server to see if it is vulnerable.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Rock Beats Scissors, and People Beat Process</title><link>/blog/rock-beats-scissors-people-beat-process/</link><pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/rock-beats-scissors-people-beat-process/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;My mentors in engineering management used to define their job as managing people, process, and technology. Those three realms, and how they interact, are a handy way to conceptualize organizational management responsibilities. We use process to frame how we want people to behave – trying to promote productivity, foster inter-group cooperation, and minimize mistakes. The people are the important part of the equation, and the process is there to help make them better as a group. How you set up process directly impacts productivity, arranges priority, and creates or reduces friction. Subtle adjustments to process are needed to account for individuals, group dynamics, and project specifics.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Kill. IE6. Now.</title><link>/blog/kill-ie6-now/</link><pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/kill-ie6-now/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I tend to be master of the obvious. Part of that is overcoming my own lack of cranial horsepower (especially when I hang out with serious security rock stars), but another part is the reality that we need someone to remind us of the things we should be doing. Work gets busy, shiny objects beckon, and the simple blocking and tackling falls by the wayside.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Comments on Microsoft Simplified SDL</title><link>/blog/comments-on-microsoft-simplified-sdl/</link><pubDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/comments-on-microsoft-simplified-sdl/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I spent the last couple hours pouring over the Simplified Implementation of the Microsoft SDL. I started taking notes and making comments, and realized that I have so much to say on the topic it won’t fit in a single post. I have been yanking stuff out of this one and trying to just cover the highlights, but I will have a couple follow-ups as well. But before I jump into the details and point out what I consider are a few weaknesses, let me just say that this is a good outline. In fact, I will go so far as to say that if you perform each of these steps (even half-assed), your applications will more secure. Much more secure, because the average software development shop is not performing these functions. There is a lot to like here but full adoption will be difficult, due to the normal resistance to change of any software development organization. Before I come across as too negative, let’s take a quick look at the outline and what’s good about it.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Friday Summary: February 5, 2010</title><link>/blog/friday-summary-february-5-2010/</link><pubDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/friday-summary-february-5-2010/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I think I need to stop feeling guilty for trying to run a business.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Yesterday we announced that we’re trying to put together a list of end users we can run the occasional short survey past. I actually felt guilty that we will derive some business benefit from it, even though we give away a ton of research and advice for free, and the goal of the surveys isn’t to support marketing, but primary research.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>The NSA Isn’t Evil (Even Working with Google)</title><link>/blog/the-nsa-isnt-evil-even-working-with-google-2/</link><pubDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/the-nsa-isnt-evil-even-working-with-google-2/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;The NSA is going to work with Google to help analyze the recent Chinese (probably) hack. Richard Bejtlich predicted this, and I consider it a very positive development.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Analysis of Trustwave’s 2010 Breach Report</title><link>/blog/analysis-of-trustwaves-2010-breach-report-2/</link><pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/analysis-of-trustwaves-2010-breach-report-2/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Trustwave just released their latest breach (and penetration testing) report, and it’s chock full of metrics goodness. Like the Verizon Data Breach Investigations Report, it’s a summary of information based on their responses to real breaches, with a second section on results from their penetration tests.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Database Security Fundamentals: Access &amp; Authorization</title><link>/blog/database-security-fundamentals-access-authorization/</link><pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/database-security-fundamentals-access-authorization/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;This is part 2 of the Database Security Fundamentals series. In part 1, I provided an overview. Here I will cover basic access and authorization issues.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Need Brains. User Brains</title><link>/blog/need-brains-user-brains/</link><pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/need-brains-user-brains/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;As part of our support for the Open Web Application Security Project (OWASP), we participate in their survey program which runs quarterly polls on various application security issues. The idea is to survey a group of users to gain a better understanding of how they are managing or perceiving web application security.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>What Do DLP and Condoms Have in Common?</title><link>/blog/what-do-dlp-and-condoms-have-in-common/</link><pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/what-do-dlp-and-condoms-have-in-common/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;They both work a heck of a lot better if you use them ahead of time.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I just finished reading the Trustwave Global Security Report, which summarizes their findings from incident response and penetration tests during 2009.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Incite 2/2/2010: The Life of the Party</title><link>/blog/incite-2-2-2010-the-life-of-the-party/</link><pubDate>Tue, 02 Feb 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/incite-2-2-2010-the-life-of-the-party/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Good Morning:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I was at dinner over the weekend with a few buddies of mine, and one of my friends asked (again) which AV package is best for him. It seems a few of my friends know I do security stuff and inevitably that means when they do something stupid, I get the call.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>FireStarter: Agile Development and Security</title><link>/blog/agile-development-and-security/</link><pubDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/agile-development-and-security/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I am a big fan of the &lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Agile_programming"&gt;Agile&lt;/a&gt; project development methodology, especially &lt;a href="http://www.controlchaos.com/"&gt;Agile with Scrum&lt;/a&gt;. I love the granularity and focus the approach requires. I love that at any given point in time you are working on the most important feature or function. I love the derivative value of communication and subtle form of peer pressure that Scrum meetings produce. I love that if mistakes are made you do not go too far in the wrong direction, resulting in higher productivity and few software projects that are total disasters. I think Agile is the biggest advancement in code development in the last decade as it addresses issues of complexity, scalability, focus and bureaucratic overhead.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Network Security Fundamentals: Monitor Everything</title><link>/blog/network-security-fundamentals-monitor-everything/</link><pubDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/network-security-fundamentals-monitor-everything/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;As we continue on our journey through the fundamentals of network security, the idea of network monitoring must be integral to any discussion. Why? Because we don’t know where the next attack is coming, so we need to get better at compressing the window between successful attack and detection, which then drives remediation activities. It’s a concept I coined back at Security Incite in 2006 called React Faster, which Rich subsequently improved upon by advocating Reacting Faster and Better.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Pragmatic Data Security: Discover</title><link>/blog/pragmatic-data-security-discover/</link><pubDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/pragmatic-data-security-discover/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;In the Discovery phase we figure where the heck our sensitive information is, how it’s being used, and how well it’s protected. If performed manually, or with too broad an approach, Discovery can be quite difficult and time consuming. In the pragmatic approach we stick with a very narrow scope and leverage automation for greater efficiency. A mid-sized organization can see immediate benefits in a matter of weeks to months, and usually finish a comprehensive review (including all endpoints) within a year or less.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>You Have to Buy Data Security Tools</title><link>/blog/you-have-to-buy-data-security-tools/</link><pubDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/you-have-to-buy-data-security-tools/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;When Mike was reviewing the latest Pragmatic Data Security post he nailed me on being too apologetic for telling people they need to spend money on data-security specific tools. (The line isn’t in the published post).&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Network Security Fundamentals: Default Deny (UPDATED)</title><link>/blog/network-security-fundamentals-default-deny-updated/</link><pubDate>Fri, 29 Jan 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/network-security-fundamentals-default-deny-updated/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;(&lt;strong&gt;Update&lt;/strong&gt; : Based on a comment, I added some caveats regarding business critical applications.)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Since I’m getting my coverage of Network and Endpoint Security, as well as Security Management, off the ground, I’ll be documenting a lot of fundamentals. The research library is bare from the perspective of infrastructure content, so I need to build that up, one post at a time.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>The Network Forensics (Full Packet Capture) Revival Tour</title><link>/blog/the-network-forensics-full-packet-capture-revival-tour/</link><pubDate>Fri, 29 Jan 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/the-network-forensics-full-packet-capture-revival-tour/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I hate to admit that of all the various technology areas, I’m probably best known for my work covering DLP. What few people know is that I ‘fell’ into DLP, as one of my first analyst assignments at Gartner was network forensics. Yep – the good old fashioned “network VCRs” as we liked to call them in those pre-TiVo days.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Friday Summary: January 29, 2010</title><link>/blog/friday-summary-january-29-2010/</link><pubDate>Thu, 28 Jan 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/friday-summary-january-29-2010/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I really enjoy making fun of marketing and sales pitches. It’s a hobby. At my previous employer, I kept a book of stupid and nonsense sales sayings I heard sales people make – kind of my &lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/I_Ching"&gt;I Ching&lt;/a&gt; by sociopaths. I would even parrot back nonsense slogans and jargon at opportune moments. Things like “No excuses,” “Now step up to the plate and meet your commitments,” “Hold yourself accountable,” “The customer is first, don’t forget that,” “We must find ways to support these efforts,” “The hard work is done, now you need to complete a discrete task,” “All of your answers are YES YES YES!” and “Allow us to position for success!” Usually these were thrown out in a desperate attempt to get the engineering team to spend $200k to close a $40k deal.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Database Security Fundamentals: Introduction</title><link>/blog/database-security-fundamentals-introduction/</link><pubDate>Wed, 27 Jan 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/database-security-fundamentals-introduction/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I have been part of 5 different startups, not including my own, over the last 15 years. Every one of them has sold, or attempted to sell, enterprise software. So it is not surprising that when I provide security advice, by default it is geared toward an enterprise audience. And oddly, when it comes to security, large enterprises are a little further ahead of the curve. They have more resources and people dedicated to the subject than small and medium sized businesses, and their coverage is much more diverse. But security advice does not always transfer well from one audience to the other. The typical SMB IT security team is one person. Or in the case or database security, the DBA and the security practitioner are one and the same. The time they have to spend on learning and performing security tasks are significantly less, and the money they have to spend for security tools and automation is typically minimal.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Pragmatic Data Security- Define Phase</title><link>/blog/pragmatic-data-security-define-phase/</link><pubDate>Wed, 27 Jan 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/pragmatic-data-security-define-phase/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Now that we’ve described the &lt;a href="http://securosis.com/blog/pragmatic-data-security-the-cycle"&gt;Pragmatic Data Security Cycle&lt;/a&gt;, it’s time to dig into the phases. As we roll through each of these I’m going to break it into three parts: the process, the technologies, and a case study. For the case study we’re going to follow a fictional organization through the entire process. Instead of showing you every single data protection option at each phase, we’ll focus on a narrow project that better represents what you will likely experience.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Incite 1/27/2010: Depending on the Kids</title><link>/blog/incite-1-27-2010-depending-on-the-kids/</link><pubDate>Tue, 26 Jan 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/incite-1-27-2010-depending-on-the-kids/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Good Morning:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Maybe it’s the hard-wired pessimist in me, but I never thought I’d live a long life. I know that’s kind of weird to think about, but with my family history of health badness (lots of the &lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cancer"&gt;Big C&lt;/a&gt;), I didn’t give myself much of a chance.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Security Strategies for Long-Term, Targeted Threats</title><link>/blog/security-strategies-for-long-term-targeted-threats/</link><pubDate>Tue, 26 Jan 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/security-strategies-for-long-term-targeted-threats/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;After writing up the &lt;a href="http://securosis.com/blog/firestarter-apt-its-called-espionage-not-information-warfare/"&gt;Advanced Persistent Threat in this week’s FireStarter&lt;/a&gt;, a few people started asking for suggestions on managing the problem.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>FireStarter: APT—It’s Called “Espionage”, not “Information Warfare”</title><link>/blog/firestarter-apt-its-called-espionage-not-information-warfare/</link><pubDate>Mon, 25 Jan 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/firestarter-apt-its-called-espionage-not-information-warfare/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;There’s been a lot of talk on the Interwebs recently about the whole Google/China thing. While there are a few bright spots (like anything from the keyboard of &lt;a href="http://taosecurity.blogspot.com/"&gt;Richard Bejtlich&lt;/a&gt;), most of it’s pretty bad.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Low Hanging Fruit: Security Management</title><link>/blog/low-hanging-fruit-security-management/</link><pubDate>Mon, 25 Jan 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/low-hanging-fruit-security-management/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;To wrap up my low hanging fruit series (I believe Rich and Adrian will be doing their own takes), let’s talk about security management. Yes, there were lots of components of each in the previous LHF posts (&lt;a href="http://securosis.com/blog/low-hanging-fruit-network-security"&gt;network security&lt;/a&gt; &amp;amp; &lt;a href="http://securosis.com/blog/low-hanging-fruit-endpoint-security"&gt;endpoint security&lt;/a&gt;) that had “management” components, but now let’s talk about the &lt;em&gt;discipline&lt;/em&gt; of management, not necessarily the tools.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Some APT Controls</title><link>/blog/some-apt-controls/</link><pubDate>Mon, 25 Jan 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/some-apt-controls/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Now, all of that said, the world isn’t coming to an end. Just because we can’t eliminate a threat doesn’t mean we can’t contain it. The following strategies aren’t specific to any point technology, but can help reduce the impact when your organization is targeted:&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>The Certification Myth</title><link>/blog/the-certification-myth/</link><pubDate>Fri, 22 Jan 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/the-certification-myth/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Back when I was the resident security management expert over at TechTarget (a position since occupied by Mort), it was amazing &lt;a href="http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&amp;amp;q=rothman+certifications+site%3Atechtarget.com"&gt;how many questions&lt;/a&gt; I got about the value of certifications. &lt;a href="http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&amp;amp;q=mortman+certifications+site%3Atechtarget.com"&gt;Mort confirms nothing has changed&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Friday Summary: January 22, 2010</title><link>/blog/friday-summary-january-22-2010/</link><pubDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/friday-summary-january-22-2010/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;One of the most common criticisms of analysts is that, since they are no longer practitioners, they lose their technical skills and even sometimes their ability to understand technology.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Low Hanging Fruit: Endpoint Security</title><link>/blog/low-hanging-fruit-endpoint-security/</link><pubDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/low-hanging-fruit-endpoint-security/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Getting back to the Low Hanging Fruit series, let’s take a look at the endpoint and see what kinds of stuff we can do to increase security with a minimum of pain and (hopefully) minor expense. To be sure we are consistent from a semantic standpoint, I’m generally considering computing devices used by end users as “endpoints.” They come in desktop and laptop varieties and run some variant of Windows. If we had all Mac endpoints, I’d have a lot less to do, eh?&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Pragmatic Data Security: The Cycle</title><link>/blog/pragmatic-data-security-the-cycle/</link><pubDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/pragmatic-data-security-the-cycle/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Back in &lt;a href="http://securosis.com/blog/pragmatic-data-security-introduction"&gt;Part 1 of our series on Pragmatic Data Security&lt;/a&gt; we covered some of the guiding concepts of the process, and now it’s time to dig in and show you the process itself.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Data Discovery and Databases</title><link>/blog/data-discovery-and-databases/</link><pubDate>Wed, 20 Jan 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/data-discovery-and-databases/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I periodically write for Dark Reading, contributing to their Database Security blog. Today I posted &lt;a href="http://www.darkreading.com/blog/archives/2010/01/data_discovery.html?cid=nl_DR_DAILY_2010-01-20_h"&gt;What Data Discovery Tools Really Do&lt;/a&gt;, introducing how data discovery works within relational database environments. As is the case with many of the posts I write for them, I try not to use the word ‘database’ to preface every description, as it gets repetitive. But sometimes that context is &lt;em&gt;really&lt;/em&gt; important.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Pragmatic Data Security: Groundwork</title><link>/blog/pragmatic-data-security-groundwork/</link><pubDate>Wed, 20 Jan 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/pragmatic-data-security-groundwork/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Back in &lt;a href="http://securosis.com/blog/pragmatic-data-security-introduction"&gt;Part 1 of our series on Pragmatic Data Security&lt;/a&gt;, we covered some guiding concepts. Before we actually dig in, there’s some more groundwork we need to cover. There are two important fundamentals that provide context for the rest of the process.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>The Rights Management Dilemma</title><link>/blog/the-rights-management-dilemma/</link><pubDate>Wed, 20 Jan 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/the-rights-management-dilemma/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Over the past few months I’ve seen a major uptick in the number of user inquiries I’m taking on enterprise digital rights management (or enterprise rights management, but I hate that term). Having covered EDRM for something like 8 years or so now, I’m only slightly surprised.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>FireStarter: Security Endangered Species List</title><link>/blog/firestarter-security-endangered-species-list/</link><pubDate>Tue, 19 Jan 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/firestarter-security-endangered-species-list/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Our weekly research meeting started with an optimistic plea from yours truly. Will 2010 finally be the year the signature dies? I mean, &lt;em&gt;come on now&lt;/em&gt; , we all know endpoint AV using only signatures is an accident waiting to happen. And everywhere else signatures are used (predominantly IPS &amp;amp; anti-spam) those technologies are heavily supplemented with additional behavioral and heuristic techniques to improve detection.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Incite 1/20/2010 - Thanks Mr. Internet</title><link>/blog/incite-1-20-2010-thanks-mr-internet/</link><pubDate>Tue, 19 Jan 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/incite-1-20-2010-thanks-mr-internet/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Good Morning:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I love the Internet. In fact, I can’t imagine how I got anything done before it was there at all times to help. Two examples illustrate my point. On Monday, I went to lunch with the family at Fuddrucker’s, since they had off from school. They say a big poster of Elvis with a title “The King” underneath. They had heard of Elvis, but didn’t know much about him.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>ReputationDefender</title><link>/blog/reputationdefender/</link><pubDate>Mon, 18 Jan 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/reputationdefender/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;We’ve all heard the stories: employee gets upset, says something about their boss online, boss sees it, and &lt;strong&gt;BAM, fired&lt;/strong&gt;. As information continues to stick around, people find it increasingly beneficial to think before launching a raging tweet. Here lies the opportunity: what if I can pay someone to gather that information and potentially get rid of it? Enter ReputationDefender.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Friday Summary: January 14, 2010</title><link>/blog/friday-summary-january-14-2010/</link><pubDate>Thu, 14 Jan 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/friday-summary-january-14-2010/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;As I sit here writing this, scenes of utter devastation play on the television in the background.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;It’s hard to keep perspective in situations like this. Most of us are in our homes, with our families, with little we can do other than donate some money as we carry on with our lives. The scale of destruction is so massive that even those of us who have worked in disasters can barely comprehend its enormity. Possibly 45-55,000 dead, which is enough bodies to fill a small to medium sized college football stadium. 3 million homeless, and what may be one of the most complete destructions of a city in modern history.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Low Hanging Fruit: Network Security</title><link>/blog/low-hanging-fruit-network-security/</link><pubDate>Thu, 14 Jan 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/low-hanging-fruit-network-security/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;During my first two weeks at Securosis, I’ve gotten soundly thrashed for being too “touchy-feely.” You know, talking about how you need to &lt;a href="http://securosis.com/blog/getting-your-mindset-straight-for-2010"&gt;get your mindset right&lt;/a&gt; and set the &lt;a href="http://securosis.com/blog/revisiting-security-priorities"&gt;right priorities&lt;/a&gt; for success in 2010. So I figure I’ll get down in the weeds a bit and highlight a couple of tactics that anyone can use to ensure their existing equipment is optimized.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Management by Complaint</title><link>/blog/management-by-complaint/</link><pubDate>Thu, 14 Jan 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/management-by-complaint/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;In Mike’s &lt;a href="http://securosis.com/blog/low-hanging-fruit-network-security"&gt;post this morning on network security&lt;/a&gt; he made the outlandish suggestion that rather than trying to fix your firewall rules, you could just block everything and wait for the calls to figure out what &lt;em&gt;really&lt;/em&gt; needs to be open.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Incite 1/13/2010: Taking the Long View</title><link>/blog/incite-1-13-2010-taking-the-long-view/</link><pubDate>Wed, 13 Jan 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/incite-1-13-2010-taking-the-long-view/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Good Morning:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Now that I’m two months removed from my [last] corporate job, I have some perspective on the ‘quarterly’ mindset. Yes, the pressure to deliver financial results on an arbitrary quarterly basis, which guides how most companies run operations. Notwithstanding your customer’s problems don’t conveniently end on the last day of March, June, September or December – those are the days when stuff is supposed to happen.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Pragmatic Data Security- Introduction</title><link>/blog/pragmatic-data-security-introduction/</link><pubDate>Wed, 13 Jan 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/pragmatic-data-security-introduction/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Over the past 7 years or so I’ve talked with thousands of IT professionals working on various types of data security projects. If I were forced to pull out one single thread from all those discussions it would have to be the sheer &lt;em&gt;intimidating potential&lt;/em&gt; of many of these projects. While there are plenty of self-constrained projects, in many cases the security folks are tasked with implementing technologies or changes that involve monitoring or managing on a pretty broad scale. That’s just the nature of data security – unless the information you’re trying to protect is already in isolated use, you have to cast a pretty wide net.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Yes Virginia, China Is Spying and Stealing Our Stuff</title><link>/blog/yes-virginia-china-is-spying-and-stealing-our-stuff/</link><pubDate>Wed, 13 Jan 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/yes-virginia-china-is-spying-and-stealing-our-stuff/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Guess what, folks – not only is industrial espionage rampant, but sometimes it’s supported by nation-states. Just ask Boeing about Airbus and France, or New Zealand about French operatives sinking a Greenpeace ship (and killing a few people in the process) on NZ territory.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Revisiting Security Priorities</title><link>/blog/revisiting-security-priorities/</link><pubDate>Tue, 12 Jan 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/revisiting-security-priorities/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Yesterday’s &lt;a href="http://securosis.com/blog/firestarter-the-grand-unified-theory-of-risk-management"&gt;FireStarter&lt;/a&gt; was one of the two concepts we discussed during our research meeting last week. The other was to get folks to revisit their priorities, as we run headlong into 2010.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Database Password Pen Testing</title><link>/blog/database-password-pen-testing/</link><pubDate>Mon, 11 Jan 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/database-password-pen-testing/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;A few years back I worked on a database password checker at the request of my employer. A handful of customers wanted to periodically audit passwords, verifying that they complied with their password policies. As databases can use internal password management – outside the scope of primary access control systems like LDAP – they wanted auditing capabilities across the database systems. The goal was to identify weak passwords for service and general database user accounts. This was purely a research effort, but as I was recently approached by yet another IT person on this subject, I thought it was worth discussing the practical merits of doing this.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>FireStarter: The Grand Unified Theory of Risk Management</title><link>/blog/firestarter-the-grand-unified-theory-of-risk-management/</link><pubDate>Mon, 11 Jan 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/firestarter-the-grand-unified-theory-of-risk-management/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;The FireStarter is something new we are starting here on the blog. The idea is to toss something controversial out into the echo chamber first thing Monday morning, and let people bang on some of our more abstract or non-intuitive research ideas.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Mercenary Hackers</title><link>/blog/mercenary-hackers/</link><pubDate>Mon, 11 Jan 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/mercenary-hackers/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Dino Dai Zovi (&lt;a href="http://twitter.com/dinodaizovi"&gt;@DinoDaiZovi&lt;/a&gt;) posted the following tweets this Saturday:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Food for thought: What if &lt;vendor&gt; didn’t patch bugs that weren’t proven exploitable but paid big bug bounties for proven exploitable bugs?&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Friday Summary - January 8th, 2010</title><link>/blog/friday-summary-january-8th-2010/</link><pubDate>Thu, 07 Jan 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/friday-summary-january-8th-2010/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I was over at Rich’s place this week while we were recording the network security podcast. When finished we were just hanging out and Riley, Rich’s daughter, came walking down the hall. At 9 months old I was more shocked to see her walking than she was at seeing me standing there in the hall. She looked up at me and sat down. I extended my hand thinking that she would grab hold of my fingers, but she just sat there looking at me. I heard Rich pipe up … “She’s not a dog, Adrian. You don’t need to let her sniff your hand to make friends. Just say hello.” Yeah. I guess I spend too much time with dogs and not much time with kids. I’ll have to work on my little people skills. And the chew toy I bought her for Christmas was, in hindsight, a poor choice.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Getting Your Mindset Straight for 2010</title><link>/blog/getting-your-mindset-straight-for-2010/</link><pubDate>Thu, 07 Jan 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/getting-your-mindset-straight-for-2010/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Speaking as a “master of the obvious,” it’s worth mentioning the importance of having a correct mindset heading into the new year. Odds are you’ve just gotten back from the holiday and that sinking “beaten down” feeling is setting in. Wow, that didn’t take long.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Google, Privacy, and You</title><link>/blog/google-privacy-and-you/</link><pubDate>Thu, 07 Jan 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/google-privacy-and-you/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;A lot of my tech friends make fun of me for my minimal use of Google services. They don’t understand why I worry about the information Google collects on me. It isn’t that I don’t use &lt;em&gt;any&lt;/em&gt; Google services or tools, but I do minimize my usage and never use them for anything sensitive. Google is not my primary search engine, I don’t use Google Reader (despite the excellent functionality), and I don’t use my Gmail account for anything sensitive. Here’s why:&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Incite - 1/6/2009 - The Power of Contrast</title><link>/blog/incite-1-6-2009-the-power-of-contrast/</link><pubDate>Wed, 06 Jan 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/incite-1-6-2009-the-power-of-contrast/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Good Morning:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;It’s been quite a week, and it’s only Wednesday. The announcement of &lt;a href="http://securosis.com/blog/introducing-securosis-plus-now-with-100-more-incite"&gt;Securosis “Plus”&lt;/a&gt; went extremely well, and I’m settling into my new digs. Seems like the last two days just flew by. As I was settling in to catch some zzzz’s last night, I felt content. I put in a good day’s work, made some progress, and was excited for what the next day had to bring. Dare I say it? I felt happy. (I’m sure I’ve jinxed myself for another 7 years.)&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>RSA Treks to Sherwood Forest and Buys the Archer</title><link>/blog/rsa-archer/</link><pubDate>Tue, 05 Jan 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/rsa-archer/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/emc-to-acquire-archer-technologies-leading-provider-of-it-governance-risk-and-compliance-software-80630982.html"&gt;EMC/RSA announced the acquisition of Archer Technologies&lt;/a&gt; for an undisclosed price. The move adds an IT GRC tool to EMC/RSA’s existing technologies for configuration management (Ionix) and SIEM/Log Management (EnVision).&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Introducing Securosis Plus: Now with 100% More Incite!</title><link>/blog/introducing-securosis-plus-now-with-100-more-incite/</link><pubDate>Mon, 04 Jan 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/introducing-securosis-plus-now-with-100-more-incite/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I’m incredibly excited to finally announce that as of today, Mike Rothman is joining Securosis. This is a full merger of Security Incite and Securosis, and something I’ve been looking forward to for years.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Mike Rothman Joins Securosis</title><link>/blog/mike-rothman-joins-securosis/</link><pubDate>Mon, 04 Jan 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/mike-rothman-joins-securosis/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Technology start-ups are unique organisms that affect employees very differently than other types of companies. Tech start-ups are about bringing new ideas to market. They are about change, and often founded on an alternative perspective of how to conduct business. They are more likely to leverage new technologies, hire unique people, and try different approaches to marketing, sales, and solving business problems. People who work at start-ups put more of themselves into their jobs, work a little harder, and are more impassioned about achievement and success. The entire frenetic experience is accelerated to the point where you compress years into months, providing an intimate level of participation not available at larger firms – the experience is addictive.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Password Policy Disclosure</title><link>/blog/password-policy-disclosure/</link><pubDate>Mon, 04 Jan 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/password-policy-disclosure/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I am no fan of “security through obscurity”. Peer review and open discourse on security have proven essential in development of network protocols and cryptographic algorithms. Regardless, that does not mean I choose to disclose everything. I may disclose protocols and approach, but certain details I choose to remit.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Securosis + Security Incite Merger FAQ</title><link>/blog/securosis-incite-merger-faq/</link><pubDate>Mon, 04 Jan 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/securosis-incite-merger-faq/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;What are you announcing?&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Today, we are announcing that Mike Rothman is joining Securosis as Analyst/President (Rich remains Analyst/CEO). This is a full merger of Securosis and Security Incite.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>2009 Wrap: Changes in Perspective</title><link>/blog/2009-wrap-changes-in-perspective/</link><pubDate>Wed, 30 Dec 2009 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/2009-wrap-changes-in-perspective/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;It’s easy to say that every year’s been a big year, but in our case we’ve got the goods to back it up. Aside from doubling the size of the Securosis team, I added a new member to my family and managed to still keep things running. With all our writing and speaking we managed to hit every corner of the industry. We created a new model for patch management, started our Pragmatic series of presentations, popped off a few major whitepapers on application and data security, launched a new design for the site, played a big role in pushing out the 2.0 version of the Cloud Security Alliance Guidance, and… well, a lot of stuff. And I won’t mention certain words I used at the RSA Conference (where we started our annual Disaster Recovery Breakfast), or certain wardrobe failures at Defcon. On the personal front, aside from starting my journey as a father, I met Jimmy Buffett, finally recovered enough from my shoulder surgery to start martial arts again, knocked off a half-marathon and a bunch of 10K races, spent 5 days in Puerto Vallarta with my wife, and installed solar in our home (just in time for a week of cloudy weather).&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>My Personal Security Guiding Principles</title><link>/blog/my-personal-security-guiding-principles/</link><pubDate>Wed, 30 Dec 2009 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/my-personal-security-guiding-principles/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Fall of 2009 marks the 20th anniversary of the start of my professional security career. That was the first day someone stuck a yellow shirt on my back and sent me into a crowd of drunk college football fans at the University of Colorado (later famous for its student riots). I’m pretty sure someone screwed up, since it was my first day on the job and I was assigned a rover position – which normally goes to someone who knows what the f&amp;amp;%$ they are doing, not some 18 year old, 135-lb kid right out of high school. And yes, I was breaking up fights on my first day (the stadium wasn’t dry until a few years later).&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Prison Computer ‘Hacker’ Sentenced</title><link>/blog/prison-computer-hacker-sentenced-2/</link><pubDate>Wed, 30 Dec 2009 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/prison-computer-hacker-sentenced-2/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I just noticed this story in my feed reader from before Christmas. I don’t know why I found the Computerworld story on the Massachusetts &lt;a href="http://www.computerworld.com/s/article/9142628/Inmate_gets_18_months_for_hacking_prison_computer"&gt;inmate ‘hacker’&lt;/a&gt; so funny, but I do. Perhaps it is because I envision the prosecutor struggling to come up with a punishable crime. In fact I am not totally sure what law Janosko violated. An additional 18 month sentence for ‘abusing’ a computer provided by the correctional facility … I was unaware such a law existed. Does the state now have to report the breach?&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Hosting Providers and Log Security</title><link>/blog/hosting-providers-and-log-security/</link><pubDate>Sat, 26 Dec 2009 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/hosting-providers-and-log-security/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;An interesting discussion popped up on Slashdot this Saturday afternoon about &lt;a href="http://ask.slashdot.org/story/09/12/26/1520255/Preventing-My-Hosting-Provider-From-Rooting-My-Server"&gt;Preventing My Hosting Provider From Rooting My Server&lt;/a&gt;. ‘&lt;a href="http://blog.gnu-designs.com/"&gt;hacker&lt;/a&gt;’ is claiming that when he accuses his hosting provider of service interruption, they assume root access on his machines without permission.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Friday Summary- December 18, 2009 - Hiatus Alert!</title><link>/blog/friday-summary-december-18-2009-hiatus-alert/</link><pubDate>Thu, 17 Dec 2009 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/friday-summary-december-18-2009-hiatus-alert/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;This is going to be a pretty short summary. If you noticed, we were were a little light on content this week, due to out-of-town travel for client engagements and in-town client meetings. On a personal note, early this week I had a front tire blow out on my car, throwing me airborne and backwards across four lanes of traffic during the afternoon commute. A driver who witnessed the spectacle said it looked like pole vaulting with cars, and could not figure out how I landed on the wheels, backwards or not. Somehow I did not hit anything and walked away unscathed, but truth be told, I am a little shaken up by the experience. Thank you to those of you who sent well wishes, but everything is fine here.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Akamai Implements WAF</title><link>/blog/akamai-implements-waf/</link><pubDate>Tue, 15 Dec 2009 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/akamai-implements-waf/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.akamai.com/html/about/press/releases/2009/press_121409.html"&gt;Akamai announced&lt;/a&gt; that they are adding Web Application Firewall (WAF) capabilities into their distributed EdgePlatform netwok. I usually quote from the articles I reference, but there is simply too much posturing and fluffy marketing-ese about value propositions for me to extract an insightful fragment of information on what they are doing and why it is important, so I will paraphrase. In a nutshell they have ported ModSecurity onto/into the Akamai Edge Server. They are using the &lt;a href="http://www.owasp.org/index.php/Category:OWASP_ModSecurity_Core_Rule_Set_Project"&gt;Core Rule Set&lt;/a&gt; to form the basis of their policy set. As content is pulled from the Akamai cache servers, the request is examined for XSS, SQL Injection, response splitting, and other injection attacks, as well as some error conditions indicative of tampering.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>MacBook Holiday Sales Report</title><link>/blog/macbook-holiday-sales-report/</link><pubDate>Tue, 15 Dec 2009 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/macbook-holiday-sales-report/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;This is my MacBook sale progress report. For those of you who have not followed my tweets on the subject, I listed my MacBook for sale on Craigslist. After Bruce Schneier’s eye-opening and yet somehow humorous report on selling his &lt;a href="http://www.schneier.com/blog/archives/2009/06/fraud_on_ebay.html"&gt;laptop on eBay&lt;/a&gt;, I figured I would shoot for a face to face sale. I chose Craigslist in Phoenix and specified a cash-only sale. The results have been less than impressive. The first time I listed the laptop:&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Friday Summary - December 11, 2009</title><link>/blog/friday-summary-december-11-2009/</link><pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/friday-summary-december-11-2009/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I have had friends and family in town over the last eight days. Some of them wanted the ‘Arizona Experience’, so we did the usual: Sedona, Pinnacle Peak Steak House, Cave Creek, a Cardinals game, and a few other local attractions. Part of the tour was the big Crossroads Gun Show out at the fairgrounds. It was the first time I had been to such a show in 9 or 10 years. Speaking with merchants, listening to their sales pitches, and overhearing discussions around the fairgrounds, everything was centered on security. Personal security. Family security. Home security. Security when they travel. They talk about preparedness and they are planning for many possibilities: everything from burglars to Armageddon. Some events they plan for have small statistical probability, while others border on the fantastic. Still, the attendees were there to do more than just speculate and engage in idle talk – they train, plan, meet with peers, and prepare for they threats they perceive.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Verizon 2009 DBIR Supplement</title><link>/blog/verizon-2009-dbir-supplement/</link><pubDate>Wed, 09 Dec 2009 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/verizon-2009-dbir-supplement/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Today Verizon released their &lt;a href="http://www.verizonbusiness.com/resources/security/reports/rp_2009-data-breach-investigations-supplemental-report_en_xg.pdf"&gt;Supplement to the 2009 Data Breach Investigations Report&lt;/a&gt;. As with previous reports, it is extremely well written, densely loaded with data, and an absolute must read. The bulk of the report gives significantly more information on the breakdown of attacks, by both how often attacks occurred, and how many records were lost as a result of each attack.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>DNS Resolvers and You</title><link>/blog/dns-resolvers-and-you/</link><pubDate>Tue, 08 Dec 2009 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/dns-resolvers-and-you/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;As you are already well aware (&lt;a href="http://googleblog.blogspot.com/2009/12/introducing-google-public-dns.html"&gt;if not, see the announcement – we’ll wait&lt;/a&gt;), Google is now offering a free DNS resolver service. Before we get into the players, though, let’s first understand the reasons to use one of these free services.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Security Controls vs. Outcomes</title><link>/blog/security-controls-vs-outcomes/</link><pubDate>Tue, 08 Dec 2009 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/security-controls-vs-outcomes/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;One of the more difficult aspects of medical research is correlating treatments/actions with outcomes. This is a core principle of science based medicine (if you’ve never worked in the medical field, you might be shocked at the lack of science at the practitioner level).&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>In Violent Agreement</title><link>/blog/in-violent-agreement/</link><pubDate>Mon, 07 Dec 2009 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/in-violent-agreement/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;My &lt;a href="http://securosis.com/blog/changing-the-game/"&gt;Friday post&lt;/a&gt; generated some great discussion in the comments. I encourage you to go back and read through them. Rocky in particular wrote an extended comment that should be a blog post in itself which reveals that he and I are, in fact, in violent agreement on the issues. Case in point, his first paragraph:&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Possibility is not Probability</title><link>/blog/possibility-is-not-probability/</link><pubDate>Mon, 07 Dec 2009 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/possibility-is-not-probability/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;On Friday I asked a simple question over Twitter and then let myself get dragged into a rat-hole of a debate that had people pulling out popcorn and checking the latest odds in Vegas. (Not the odds on who would win – that was clear – but rather on the potential for real bloodshed).&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Changing The Game?</title><link>/blog/changing-the-game/</link><pubDate>Fri, 04 Dec 2009 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/changing-the-game/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://blog.decurity.com/"&gt;Rocky DeStefano&lt;/a&gt; had a great post today on FudSec, &lt;a href="http://fudsec.com/liberate-yourself-change-the-game-to-suit-you"&gt;Liberate Yourself: Change The Game To Suit Your Needs&lt;/a&gt;, which you should read if you haven’t already. It nicely highlights many of the issues going on in the industry today. However, I just can’t agree with all of his assertions. In particular, he had two statements that really bothered me.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Class Action Against Express Scripts Dismissed</title><link>/blog/class-action-against-express-scripts-dismissed/</link><pubDate>Fri, 04 Dec 2009 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/class-action-against-express-scripts-dismissed/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Jaikumar Vijayam has posted an article at ComputerWorld regarding the &lt;a href="http://www.computerworld.com/s/article/9141772/No_harm_no_foul_says_judge_in_Express_Script_data_breach_case?taxonomyId=17"&gt;Express Scripts Data Breach&lt;/a&gt; class action suit. This is the case where, in 2008, Express Scripts received a letter demanding money from the company under the threat of exposing records of millions of patients. The letter included personal information on people covered by Express Scripts, including birth dates, Social Security numbers and prescription information. Many of the insured were seeking damages, and the judge has thrown the case out citing lack of evidence.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Friday Summary- December 4, 2009</title><link>/blog/friday-summary-december-4-2009/</link><pubDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2009 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/friday-summary-december-4-2009/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I had one of those weird moments today where I found an unrelated part of my life unexpectedly influenced by my martial arts background.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Clientless SSL VPN Redux</title><link>/blog/clientless-ssl-vpn-redux/</link><pubDate>Tue, 01 Dec 2009 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/clientless-ssl-vpn-redux/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Let’s try this again. Obviously I didn’t do a very good job of defining what ‘clientless’ means, creating some confusion. In part, this is because there’s a lot of documentation that confuses ‘thin client’ with ‘clientless’. Cisco actually has a &lt;a href="http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/ps6120/products_configuration_example09186a00806ea271.shtml"&gt;good set of definitions&lt;/a&gt;, but in case you don’t want to click through I’ll just reiterate them (with a little added detail):&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Cloud Risk Thoughts: Deciding What, When, and How to Move to the Cloud</title><link>/blog/cloud-risk-thoughts-deciding-what-when-and-how-to-move-to-the-cloud/</link><pubDate>Tue, 01 Dec 2009 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/cloud-risk-thoughts-deciding-what-when-and-how-to-move-to-the-cloud/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I’ve been working with the Cloud Security Alliance on the next revision of their official &lt;a href="http://www.cloudsecurityalliance.org/csaguide.pdf"&gt;Security Guidance document&lt;/a&gt;, and we decided to include a short note on risk in the beginning, to help add some context. Although we are deep in the editorial process, I realized this is the sort of thing I should put out for some public comment, as it’s at the beginning of the document and will help frame how it’s read.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Quick Thoughts on the Point of Sale Security Fail Lawsuit</title><link>/blog/quick-thoughts-on-the-point-of-sale-security-fail-lawsuit/</link><pubDate>Tue, 01 Dec 2009 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/quick-thoughts-on-the-point-of-sale-security-fail-lawsuit/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Let the games begin.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;It seems that Radiant Systems, a point of sale terminal company, and Computer World, the company that sold and maintained the Radiant system, &lt;a href="http://www.wired.com/threatlevel/2009/11/pos/"&gt;are in a bit of a pickle&lt;/a&gt;. Seven restaurants are suing them for producing insecure systems that led to security breaches, which led to fines for the breached companies, chargebacks, card replacement costs, and investigative costs. These are real costs, people, none of that silly “lost business and reputation” garbage.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Sign Up To Drop Comment Moderation</title><link>/blog/sign-up-to-drop-comment-moderation/</link><pubDate>Tue, 01 Dec 2009 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/sign-up-to-drop-comment-moderation/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;We hate that we have to moderate comments, but the spammers are relentless and there’s no way we’ll let those jerks ruin our site.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Top Questions Regarding Guardium Acquisition</title><link>/blog/top-questions-regarding-guardium-acquisition/</link><pubDate>Tue, 01 Dec 2009 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/top-questions-regarding-guardium-acquisition/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I spent about 8 hours on the phone yesterday discussing the Guardium acquisition with press, analysts, security vendors, and former associates in the Database Activity Monitoring space. The breadth of questions was surprising, even from people who work with these products – enough that I thought we should do a quick recap for those who have questions. First, for those of you looking for a really quick overview of Database Activity Monitoring, I just completed an introductory series for Dark Reading on &lt;a href="http://www.darkreading.com/blog/archives/2009/10/what_is_databas.html"&gt;The ABCs of DAM&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href="http://www.darkreading.com/blog/archives/2009/11/use_cases_for_d.html"&gt;What DAM Does&lt;/a&gt;. Here are some specific questions I have gotten pertaining to the acquisition, in no particular order:&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Christmas Wish</title><link>/blog/christmas-wish/</link><pubDate>Mon, 30 Nov 2009 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/christmas-wish/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;When there is good news in holiday retail, we usually hear. In this economic climate, it’s headline news. When there is bad news, we don’t hear much. The news from PayPal, according to PC Magazine’s article on &lt;a href="http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,2817,2356389,00.asp"&gt;Record Breaking Black Friday&lt;/a&gt;, was that total transactions were way up – in some cases by 20%. What they are not disclosing is the total dollar volume. In fact, most of the quotes I saw from individual retailers are along the lines of “We did well”, but we don’t know how low their expectations were, and I have yet to see hard sales numbers. Which is annoying because they have the data, so I typically assume the worst.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Coming Soon: Bit.ly Adding Real Time Security Scanning for All Links</title><link>/blog/coming-soon-bit-ly-adding-real-time-security-scanning-for-all-links/</link><pubDate>Mon, 30 Nov 2009 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/coming-soon-bit-ly-adding-real-time-security-scanning-for-all-links/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Like many of you, for a long time I really couldn’t see the use of those URL shortener service thingies. Sure, when I was designing sites I tried to avoid long, ugly URLs, but I never saw slapping some random characters after a common base URL as being any more useful. I considered my awareness of the existence of these obscure services as an aberration induced by my geek genes, rather than validation of their existence or popularity.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Serious Flaw in Clientless SSL VPNs</title><link>/blog/your-clientless-ssl-vpn-sucks/</link><pubDate>Mon, 30 Nov 2009 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/your-clientless-ssl-vpn-sucks/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Good job! You paid tens of thousands of dollars for that shiny new name-brand VPN, and then decided to deploy its web VPN functionality because, well, it was just easier than deploying software clients.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Guardium Acquired by IBM</title><link>/blog/guardium-acquired-by-ibm/</link><pubDate>Sun, 29 Nov 2009 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/guardium-acquired-by-ibm/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Tel Aviv newspaper TheMarker reports that &lt;a href="http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20091129/bs_nm/us_guardium_ibm"&gt;IBM will complete its acquisition of database activity monitoring company Guardium Monday, November 30th&lt;/a&gt;. While it is early, and I have yet to confirm the number with anyone at IBM or Guardium, the sale price is being listed at $225 million. This is by far the largest acquisition in the DAM space to date! I had estimated Guardium’s revenue for 2008 at $35-38M, and $38-40M for 2009. If the $225M acquisition price is accurate, at a standard 5x multiple, it would suggest that they were closer to $45M. But my guess is, with an impressive customer list like Citigroup and BofA, the bookings multiple is a little higher than standard.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>We Give Thanks</title><link>/blog/we-give-thanks/</link><pubDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/we-give-thanks/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I admit it’s not even 2:00 in the afternoon and my mind has already gone on vacation. Apple pies are in the oven, and pumpkin pies are queued up and waiting to go in.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>M86 Acquires Finjan</title><link>/blog/m86-acquires-finjan/</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/m86-acquires-finjan/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Given how much PR email I get on a daily basis – which does help keep me up to date on what’s happening in the market segments I cover – I seldom miss newsworthy security events. On occasion I totally miss something of interest, like the &lt;a href="http://www.m86security.com/i/M86-Security-Acquires-Finjan,news.1155~.asp"&gt;M86 acquisition of Finjan&lt;/a&gt; … three freakin’ weeks ago! For those of you interested in email and web security, big firms don’t offer a lot of interesting tidbits to write about, which makes the smaller firms more fun to watch. In a mature market segment like email and web security, small security businesses need to innovate with technology and sales. To compete with established players like Google and Symantec, where “follow the leader” is a bad business strategy, you need to employ creative thinking in order to survive. This acquisition makes me think M86 has a slightly different vision than their competitors.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Health Net Asked to Explain Disclosure Delay</title><link>/blog/health-net-asked-to-explain-disclosure-delay/</link><pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/health-net-asked-to-explain-disclosure-delay/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;There was a tiny blurb in the Sunday Arizona Republic regarding a &lt;a href="http://www.azcentral.com/news/articles/2009/11/21/20091121goddardsecurity-ON.html"&gt;request by the Arizona Attorney General to Health Net regarding a data breach notification&lt;/a&gt;. It seems they delayed telling anyone that data was stolen or missing for six months or so:&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Microsoft IE Issues Reported</title><link>/blog/microsoft-ie-issues-reported/</link><pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/microsoft-ie-issues-reported/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Over the weekend 0-day exploit was reported in Microsoft Internet Explorer 6 and 7. Both &lt;a href="http://threatpost.com/en_us/blogs/new-zero-day-flaw-discovered-ie7-112209"&gt;Threatpost&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href="http://www.h-online.com/security/news/item/New-critical-vulnerability-in-Internet-Explorer-866155.html"&gt;Heise Security&lt;/a&gt; posted that the &lt;a href="http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms536439%28VS.85%29.aspx"&gt;getElementsByTagName()&lt;/a&gt; JavaScript method within Microsoft’s HTML viewer has a dangling pointer. This leaves the browser susceptible to code injection; which in the best case crashes the browser, and in a worse case directs you to a malicious site.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Friday Summary - November 20, 2009</title><link>/blog/friday-summary-november-20-2009/</link><pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/friday-summary-november-20-2009/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Ironically, I was calling to activate my new credit card yesterday – as the number was considered compromised by BofA – when I read about the credit card scam in Spain. Very little information is coming out about the &lt;a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/business/8366204.stm"&gt;EU Credit Card Breach&lt;/a&gt;. Seems to be Visa specific; some 100k cards are being recalled in Germany, and police efforts are focused in Spain. And it seems every news agency and security blog in the country is reliant on this tiny amount of data provided by the BBC. Given this is a multi-country effort, I would have bet some tangible news would have slipped out somewhere, but nothing more than these nuggets of almost nothing yet. On the home front it is pretty much the same: no news of what happened. I was pretty sure that BofA recalling the Visa card meant a serious breach because this is a card I have not used in more than a year. Yes, I am making some assumptions here, but this was not an issue with skimming at a local restaurant or gas station. So someone was breached; going back through two years of records of very limited use, as there are two large firms who had this number in their databases (without my consent) and I am guessing one of them leaked it. This is not directly related to the Citigroup/BofA &lt;a href="http://www.privacyrights.org/ar/ChronDataBreaches.htm"&gt;breach&lt;/a&gt;. I was trying to find out what their disclosure responsibilities were here in Arizona, but you could drive a big truck full o’ sensitive data through the holes in the &lt;a href="http://www.azleg.state.az.us/FormatDocument.asp?inDoc=/ars/44/07501.htm&amp;amp;Title=44&amp;amp;DocType=ARS"&gt;Breach Notification Bill&lt;/a&gt;. And the &lt;a href="https://www.bankofamerica.com/privacy/Control.do?body=privacysecur_data_comp&amp;amp;cm_mmc=General-_-vanity-_-ZZ01VN0015_compinfo-_-NA"&gt;BofA Disclosure Page&lt;/a&gt; basically says “we don’t know ‘nuthin ‘bout ‘nuthin’”, but don’t worry, your money will be returned to you. Let’s hope the Europeans get more data than we do. On a more lighthearted note, this video is pretty &lt;a href="http://www.techflash.com/seattle/2009/11/inexplicable_dancing_in_microsoft_store.html#disqus_thread"&gt;funny&lt;/a&gt;, but I bring it up because I want a third opinion. Do you think a crime was committed? The Mogull pointed something out to me after I watched this … that the girl in the white shirt appears to shoplift in the video. I was skeptical but I think he’s right. At 2:14 in, the girl drops a shopping bag off he shoulder, grabs something off the table, and it places into the bag. She then shoves what looks like a pad of paper on top, pulls the strap back on her shoulder, dancing the entire time. She even performs this maneuver the moment the rest of the ‘dance troupe’ has their backs turned. She is one of a few without a badge and so I assume she was not an employee. Anyway, the whole thing is a little like a car wreck … it’s hard to look away. On to the Summary:&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Critical Infrastructure, 60 Minutes, and Missing the Point</title><link>/blog/critical-infrastructure-60-minutes-and-missing-the-point/</link><pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/critical-infrastructure-60-minutes-and-missing-the-point/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Here’s the thing about that &lt;a href="http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2009/11/06/60minutes/main5555565.shtml"&gt;60 Minutes report on cybersecurity from the other week&lt;/a&gt;. Yes, some of the facts were clearly wrong. Yes, there are &lt;strong&gt;massive&lt;/strong&gt; political fights under way to see who ‘controls’ cybersecurity, and how much money they get. Some .gov types &lt;em&gt;might have&lt;/em&gt; steered the reporters/producers in the wrong direction. The &lt;a href="http://erratasec.blogspot.com/2009/11/brazil-outage-not-caused-by-hackers.html"&gt;Brazilian power outage &lt;em&gt;probably&lt;/em&gt; wasn’t caused by hackers&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Microsoft Encryption and the Cloud</title><link>/blog/microsoft-encryption-and-the-cloud/</link><pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/microsoft-encryption-and-the-cloud/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I was reading PC Magazine’s recap of Ray Ozzie’s announcement of the &lt;a href="http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,2817,2356016,00.asp"&gt;Azure cloud computing platform&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The vision of Azure, said Ozzie, is “… three screens and a cloud,” meaning Internet-based data and software that plays equally well on PCs, mobile devices, and TVs.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Three acquisitions, two visions</title><link>/blog/three-acquisitions-two-visions/</link><pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/three-acquisitions-two-visions/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I had to laugh when I read Alan Shimel’s post “&lt;a href="http://www.ashimmy.com/2009/11/where-does-tipping-point-fit-in-the-post-3com-procurve.html"&gt;Where does Tipping Point fit in the post-3Com ProCurve&lt;/a&gt;”? His comment:&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>What the Renegotiation Bug Means to You</title><link>/blog/what-the-renegotiation-bug-means-to-you/</link><pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/what-the-renegotiation-bug-means-to-you/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;A few weeks ago a new &lt;a href="http://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2009-3555"&gt;TLS and SSLv3 renegotiation vulnerability&lt;/a&gt; was disclosed, and there’s been a fair bit of confusion around it. When the first reports of the bug hit the wire, my initial impression was that the exploit was too complex to be practical, but as more information comes to light I’m starting to think it’s worth paying attention to. Since every web browser and most other kinds of encrypted Internet connections – such as between mail servers – use TLS or SSLv3 to protect traffic, the potential scope for this is massive.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>ADMP Market Acceptance</title><link>/blog/admp-market-acceptance/</link><pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/admp-market-acceptance/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Rich and I were on a data security Q&amp;amp;A podcast today. I was surprised when the audience asked questions about Application &amp;amp; Database Monitoring and Protection (ADMP), as it was not on our agenda, nor have we written about it in the last year. When Rich first sketched out the concept, he listed specific &lt;a href="http://securosis.com/blog/comments/the-future-of-application-and-database-security-part-1-setting-the-stage/"&gt;market forces behind ADMP&lt;/a&gt;, and presented a couple of &lt;a href="http://securosis.com/blog/comments/the-future-of-application-and-database-security-part-2-browser-to-wafgatewa/"&gt;ADMP&lt;/a&gt; models. But these are really technical challenges to management and security and the projected synergies if they are linked. When we were asked about ADMP today, I was able to name a half dozen vendors implementing parts of the model, each with customers who deployed their solution. ADMP is no longer a philosophical discussion of technical synergies but a reality, due to customer acceptance.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Why Successful Risk Management is Still a Failure</title><link>/blog/why-successful-risk-management-is-still-a-failure/</link><pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/why-successful-risk-management-is-still-a-failure/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks to my wife’s job at a hospital, yesterday I was able to finally get my H1N1 flu shot. While driving down, I was also listening to a science podcast talking about the problems when the government last rolled out a big flu vaccine program in the 1970s. The epidemic never really hit, and there was a much higher than usual complication rate with that vaccine (don’t let this scare you off – we’ve had 30 years of improvement since then). The public was justifiably angry, and the Ford administration took a major hit over the situation.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>New Thoughts On The CIO Is Your Friend</title><link>/blog/the-cio-is-your-friend/</link><pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/the-cio-is-your-friend/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I recently had the pleasure to present at a local CIO conference. There were about 50 CIOs in the room, ranging from .edu folks, to start-ups, to the CIOs of major enterprises including a large international bank and a similarly large insurance company. While the official topic for the event was “the cloud”, there was a second underlying theme – that CIOs needed to learn how to talk to the business folks on their terms and also how to make sure that IT wasn’t being a roadblock but rather an enabler of the business. There was a lot of discussion and concern about the cloud in general – driven by business’ ability to take control of infrastructure away from IT – so while everybody agreed that communicating with the business should always have been a concern, the cloud has brought this issue to the fore.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Ur C0de Sux</title><link>/blog/ur-c0de-sux/</link><pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/ur-c0de-sux/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I was working at Unisys two decades ago when I first got into the discussion of what traits, characteristics, or skills to look for in programmer candidates we interviewed. One of the elder team members shocked me when he said he tried to hire musicians regardless of prior programming experience. His feeling was that anyone could learn a language, but people who wrote music understood composition and flow, far harder skills to teach. At the time I thought I understood what he meant, that good code has very little to do with individual statements or programing language used. And the people he hired did make mistakes with the language, but their applications were well thought out. Still, it took 10 years before I fully grasped why this approach worked.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Why You Should Take the Adobe Flash Origin Issues Seriously</title><link>/blog/why-you-should-take-the-flash-origin-issues-seriously/</link><pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/why-you-should-take-the-flash-origin-issues-seriously/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I was talking with security researcher Mike Bailey over the weekend, and there’s a lot of confusion around his disclosure last week of a combination of issues with Adobe Flash that lead to some worrisome exploit possibilities. Mike &lt;a href="http://www.foregroundsecurity.com/MyBlog/flash-origin-policy-issues.html"&gt;posted his original information&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href="http://skeptikal.org/2009/11/flash-origin-attack-faq.html"&gt;an FAQ&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;a href="http://blogs.adobe.com/asset/2009/11/flash_content_and_the_same-ori.html"&gt;Adobe responded&lt;/a&gt;, and Mike followed up with &lt;a href="http://skeptikal.org/2009/11/adobe-responds-sort-of.html"&gt;more details&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>The Anonymization of Losses: A Market Forces Failure</title><link>/blog/the-anonymization-of-losses-a-market-forces-failure/</link><pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/the-anonymization-of-losses-a-market-forces-failure/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;We talk a lot about the role of anonymization on the Internet. On one hand, it’s a powerful tool for freedom of speech. On the other, it creates massive security challenges by greatly reducing attackers’ risk of apprehension.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Always Assume</title><link>/blog/always-assume/</link><pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/always-assume/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;How often have you heard the phrase, “Never assume” (insert the cheesy catch phrase that was funny in 6th grade here)?&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Friday Summary: November 13, 2009</title><link>/blog/friday-summary-november-13-2009/</link><pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/friday-summary-november-13-2009/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I have to be honest. I’m getting tired of this whole “security is failing, security professionals suck” meme.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;If the industry was failing &lt;em&gt;that&lt;/em&gt; badly all our bank accounts would be empty, we’d be running on generators, our kids would all be institutionalized due to excessive exposure to porn, email would be dead, and all our Amazon orders would be rerouted to Liberia… but would never show up because of all the falling planes crashing into sinking cargo ships.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Layman’s view of X.509</title><link>/blog/laymans-view-of-x-509-2/</link><pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/laymans-view-of-x-509-2/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;A couple weeks ago, we began an internal discussion about DNS security and X.509 certificates. It dawned on me that those of you who have never worked with certificates may not understand what they are or what they are for. Sure, you can go to the &lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/X.509"&gt;X.509 Wiki&lt;/a&gt;, where you get the rules for usage and certificate structure, but that’s a little like trying to figure out football by reading the rule book. If you are asking, “What the heck is it and what is it used for?”, you are not alone.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Mobile Phone Worms Don’t Need Carriers Anymore</title><link>/blog/mobile-phone-worms-dont-need-carriers-anymore-2/</link><pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/mobile-phone-worms-dont-need-carriers-anymore-2/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I just read about &lt;a href="http://www.networkworld.com/news/2009/111109-smartphone-security-georgia-tech.html?hpg1=bn"&gt;some Georgia Tech researchers working on remote security techniques that carriers could use to help manage attacks on cell phones&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>2010 Services Update</title><link>/blog/2010-services-update/</link><pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/2010-services-update/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;You can ignore this post if you aren’t interested in the for-pay side of Securosis (in other words, if you don’t want to give us any cash).&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Welcome to Oceania</title><link>/blog/welcome-to-oceania/</link><pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/welcome-to-oceania/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;At lunch last week, location-based privacy came up. I actively opt in to a monitoring service, which gets me a discount on insurance for a vehicle I own. My counterpart stated that they would never agree to anything of the sort because of the inherent breach of personal privacy and &lt;em&gt;security&lt;/em&gt;. I responded that the privacy statement explicitly reads that the device does not contain GPS, nor does the company track the vehicle’s location. But even if the privacy statement said the opposite – should I care? Is location directly tied to some aspect of my life that might negatively impact me? And ultimately is security really tied to privacy in this context?&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Compliance vs. Security</title><link>/blog/compliance-vs-security/</link><pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/compliance-vs-security/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Reading Bill Brenner’s &lt;a href="http://www.csoonline.com/article/print/506635"&gt;PCI Security a Devil, ‘Like No Child Left Behind’&lt;/a&gt;, I had the impression Brenner’s summary of Joshua Corman’s presentation would be: Joshua was %#!*$ crazy. In a nutshell:&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Google Dashboard Comments</title><link>/blog/google-dashboard-comments/</link><pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/google-dashboard-comments/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I was playing around with Google Dashboard this morning. After reading the cnet post on &lt;a href="http://news.cnet.com/8301-30684_3-10351979-265.html"&gt;Google’s Data Liberation Project&lt;/a&gt;, and Google’s announcement of &lt;a href="http://googlepublicpolicy.blogspot.com/2009/09/introducing-dataliberationorg-liberate.html"&gt;DataLiberation.org&lt;/a&gt;, I could not help but get a excited about what they were doing. Trying to be ‘open’ and ‘liberate’ data sounds great!&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Two Random Security Rules</title><link>/blog/two-random-security-rules/</link><pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/two-random-security-rules/</guid><description>&lt;ol&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Do not expect human behavior to change. You can affect habits, but not behavior.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;No security problem ever goes away. People have always hit each other over the heads with rocks and cracked safes since they existed (which is why safes were invented, of course), and will continue to hit each other with rocks and crack safes. Problems get better or worse, but never disappear.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ol&gt;</description></item><item><title>Friday Summary - November 6, 2009</title><link>/blog/friday-summary-november-6-2009/</link><pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/friday-summary-november-6-2009/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;When I was in college, I figured every professor assumed I had only one class: the one they were teaching. They seemed to assume I dedicated days and nights solely to their coursework, and was no less interested in the subject they had dedicated their lives to. And they allocated my time accordingly, giving me enough work to do to consume 40 hours a week. But I was taking 5 classes! WTF! Berkeley was especially bad this way. By noon each Monday I felt like I was a week behind the curve. For the first few weeks I was quite angry about the selfishness of those professors: how could they possibly be so callous as to give us far more work than any two people could perform? Were they encouraging shoddy work? Were they nuts?!?&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Major SSL Flaw Discovered</title><link>/blog/major-ssl-flaw-discovered/</link><pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/major-ssl-flaw-discovered/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;A major flaw has been found that enables a man-in-the-middle attacks against SSL connections. Several other media outlets are reporting, but Kelly Jackson Higgins has a nice summary over at &lt;a href="http://www.darkreading.com/security/vulnerabilities/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=221600523"&gt;Dark Reading&lt;/a&gt;, and &lt;a href="http://www.betanews.com/article/Indiscreet-tweet-trips-awareness-of-Web-SSL-vulnerability/1257452450"&gt;betanews has a much more detailed discussion&lt;/a&gt;. According to Marsh Ray at PhoneFactor:&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Verizon Has Most of the Web Application Security Pieces… But Do They Know It?</title><link>/blog/verizon-has-most-of-the-web-application-security-pieces-but-do-they-know-it/</link><pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/verizon-has-most-of-the-web-application-security-pieces-but-do-they-know-it/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Last week Verizon Business announced that &lt;a href="http://www.lightreading.com/document.asp?doc_id=183888&amp;amp;"&gt;they now offer web application vulnerability assessment software as a service&lt;/a&gt;. Specifically, they are reselling a full version of WhiteHat Security’s offering, customized for Verizon business customers.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Myths Surrounding Databases in Virtual Environments</title><link>/blog/myths-surrounding-databases-in-virtual-environments/</link><pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/myths-surrounding-databases-in-virtual-environments/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Every now and again I run into an article that totally baffles me. It’s as if the author had a bunch of somewhat related quotes sitting around, and then stitched a Frankenstein article together. In this case the article was in the October 5th edition of &lt;a href="http://www.eweek.com/"&gt;eWeek&lt;/a&gt;, and the topic was “Databases: The next big virtualization thing”. The intention seems to be sketching out some hazy future projections about virtualized databases, and what wonderful things virtualization can do for you. But if you closely examine the assertions, not only are they are based on bad assumptions, they are flat-out misleading. I am not sure there is a single point in the article I wholly agree with. Rather than wallow in this mess, I will offer you what I consider to be 7 myths surrounding databases in virtual environments:&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Friday Summary- October 30, 2009</title><link>/blog/friday-summary-october-30-2009/</link><pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/friday-summary-october-30-2009/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;This week’s Friday Summary is sponsored by &lt;a href="http://securosis.com/blog/comments/evilsquirrel-enterprises-announces-north-american-expansion/"&gt;Evilsquirrel Enterprises, your World Domination Specialists&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;My absolute favorite holiday of the year is Halloween. More than Christmas (possibly because I’m a non-practicing Jew), more than my birthday, and even more than &lt;a href="http://www.talklikeapirate.com/"&gt;Talk Like a Pirate Day&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Name of the Game: Vested Interest</title><link>/blog/name-of-the-game-vested-interest/</link><pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/name-of-the-game-vested-interest/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;It seems as though lately a lot of heated conversations revolve around X.509. Whether it’s implementations using IPsec or SSL/TLS certificates, someone always ends up frustrated. Why? Because it really does suck when you think about it.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Penetration Testing Market Grows and Matures, but Faces Challenges</title><link>/blog/penetration-testing-market-grows-and-matures-but-faces-challenges/</link><pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/penetration-testing-market-grows-and-matures-but-faces-challenges/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;With last week’s acquisition of &lt;a href="http://securosis.com/blog/rapid7-acquires-metasploit/"&gt;Metasploit by Rapid7&lt;/a&gt;, I thought it might be a good time to do a review of the penetration testing market and the evolving role of pen testing in the security arsenal. We’ve seen a few different shifts over the past few years in how organizations use pen testing, and I believe this acquisition – combined with changes in enterprise infrastructure – indicates that pen testing is becoming more essential, more closely tied to vulnerability assessment, and generally more mature.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Penetration Testing Market Update, Part 2</title><link>/blog/penetration-testing-market-update-part-21/</link><pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/penetration-testing-market-update-part-21/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://securosis.com/blog/penetration-testing-market-grows-and-matures-but-faces-challenges"&gt;This is part 2 of a series, click here for Part 1&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;h2 id="penetration-testing-solution-and-market-changes"&gt;Penetration testing solution and market changes&lt;/h2&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I’m not exactly sure when Core Security Technologies and Immunity started business, but before then there were no dedicated commercial penetration testing tools. There were a number of vulnerability scanners, and plenty of different “micro” tools to help with different parts of a pen test, but no dedicated exploitation tools. Metasploit also changed this on the non-commercial side. For those who aren’t experts in this area, it’s important to remember that a vulnerability assessment is not a penetration test – vulnerability assessment determines if a system may be vulnerable to an attack, while penetration testing determines if that vulnerability is exploitable.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Add Anti Exploitation to Applications You Didn’t Write</title><link>/blog/add-anti-exploitation-to-applications-you-didnt-write-2/</link><pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/add-anti-exploitation-to-applications-you-didnt-write-2/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;This morning Dan Goodin over at The Register dropped me a line to get my take on a new tool from Microsoft that lets you apply anti-exploitation controls to existing applications. &lt;a href="http://www.theregister.co.uk/2009/10/27/microsoft_security_tool/"&gt;Here’s Dan’s article with my quote&lt;/a&gt;, and &lt;a href="http://blogs.technet.com/srd/archive/2009/10/27/announcing-the-release-of-the-enhanced-mitigation-evaluation-toolkit.aspx"&gt;more information directly from Microsoft&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Amazon RDS Announced</title><link>/blog/amazon-rds-announced/</link><pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/amazon-rds-announced/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Amazon announced a &lt;a href="http://aws.amazon.com/rds"&gt;Relational Database Service&lt;/a&gt; today:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Amazon RDS gives you access to the full capabilities of a familiar MySQL database. This means the code, applications, and tools you already use today with your existing MySQL databases work seamlessly with Amazon RDS. Amazon RDS automatically patches the database software and backs up your database, storing the backups for a user-defined retention period.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>IDM: Identity?</title><link>/blog/idm-identity/</link><pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/idm-identity/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;For Adam after harassing me on irc:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Calling ‘accounts’ ‘identities’ is broken. Discuss.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Friday Summary - October 23, 2009</title><link>/blog/friday-summary-october-23-2009/</link><pubDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2009 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/friday-summary-october-23-2009/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;The First 90 Days.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;When you take a new position, what is it you will do in the first 90 days? What do you want to learn? What do you wish to accomplish? Is it enough to plan a course of action or do you immediately need to fix something? “What is your plan for your first 90 days?” is a common interview question for executives. The candidate’s answer tells the prospective employer a few things about the person’s grasp of the challenges ahead, how they operate typically, the efficiency of their approach, and how well their expectations align. Most candidates are under no illusion about taking a new role. In the best case they are filling a gap in a growing company, but more often than not they are there to fix something broken. The question cements in the mind of the candidate what is expected of them stepping in the door. And more than any other point during your tenure with a company, your first 90 days sets your boss’ and coworkers’ impressions of your effectiveness.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Hacking Envelopes</title><link>/blog/hacking-envelopes/</link><pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2009 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/hacking-envelopes/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;This story begins early last week with a phone call from a bank I hold accounts with. I didn’t actually answer the call but a polite voice mail informed me of possible fraudulent activity and stated I should call them back as soon as possible. First and foremost I thought this part of my story was a social engineering exercise, but I quickly validated the phone number as being legit, unless of course this was some fantastic setup that was either man-in-the-middling the bank’s site (which would allow them to publish the number as valid) or the number itself had been hijacked. Tinfoil hat aside, I called the bank.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Rapid7 Acquires Metasploit</title><link>/blog/rapid7-acquires-metasploit/</link><pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2009 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/rapid7-acquires-metasploit/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.rapid7.com/metasploit-announcement.jsp"&gt;Rapid7 acquires&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://metasploit.org/"&gt;Metasploit&lt;/a&gt;, the open source penetration testing platform. Wow. All I can say is ‘Wow’. I had been hearing rumors that Rapid7 was going to make an acquisition for weeks, but this was a surprise to both Rich and myself. Still coming to terms with what it means, and I have no clue what the financial terms look like, but almost certainly this is a cash+stock deal. On the surface, it is a very smart move for Rapid7.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Splunk and Unstructured Data</title><link>/blog/splunk-and-unstructured-data/</link><pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2009 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/splunk-and-unstructured-data/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;“What the heck is up with Splunk”? It’s a question I have been getting a lot lately. From end users &lt;em&gt;and&lt;/em&gt; SIEM vendors. Larry Walsh posted a nice article on how &lt;a href="http://blogs.channelinsider.com/secure_channel/content/governance_and_regulatory_compliance/splunk_disrupts_security_log_auditing.html"&gt;Splunk Disrupts Security Log Auditing&lt;/a&gt;. His post prodded me into getting off my butt and blogging about this question.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>IDM: Roles, Authorization and Data Centric Security</title><link>/blog/idm-roles-authorization-and-data-centric-security/</link><pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/idm-roles-authorization-and-data-centric-security/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;There were some great comments on my last post, which bring to light a serious problem with the way authorization is done today and how roles don’t help as much as we’d like. First we hear from LonerVamp:&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>The First Phishing Email I Almost Fell For</title><link>/blog/the-first-phishing-email-i-almost-fell-for/</link><pubDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2009 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/the-first-phishing-email-i-almost-fell-for/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Like many of you, I get a ton of spam/phishing email to my various accounts. Since my email is very public, I get a little more than most people. It’s so bad I use 3 layers of spam/virus filtering, and still have some messages slip through (1 cloud based filter [Postini, which will probably change soon], one on-premise UTM [Astaro], and SpamSieve on my Mac). If something gets through all of that, I still have some additional precautions I take on my desktop to (hopefully) help against targeted malware. Despite all that, I assume that someday I’ll be compromised, and it will probably be ugly.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Friday Summary - October 16, 2009</title><link>/blog/friday-summary-october-16-2009/</link><pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/friday-summary-october-16-2009/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;All last week I was out of the office on vacation down in Puerto Vallarta. It was a trip my wife and I won in a raffle at the Phoenix Zoo, which was pretty darn cool.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>IDM: Reality Sets In</title><link>/blog/idm-reality-sets-in/</link><pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2009 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/idm-reality-sets-in/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;IDM fascinates me, if only because it is such an important base for a good security program. Despite this, many organizations (even ones with cutting edge technology) haven’t really focused on solving the issues around managing users’ identity. This is, no doubt, in part due to the fact that IDM is hard in the real world. Businesses can have hundreds if not thousands of applications (GM purportedly had over 15,000 apps at one point) and each application itself can have hundreds or thousands of roles within it. Combine this with multiple methods of authentication and authorization, and you have a major problem on your hands which makes digging into the morass challenging to say the least.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>It Isn’t Risk Management If You Can’t Lose</title><link>/blog/it-isnt-risk-management-if-you-cant-lose-2/</link><pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2009 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/it-isnt-risk-management-if-you-cant-lose-2/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I was reviewing the recent &lt;a href="http://blog.cdt.org/2009/09/11/hhs%E2%80%99-new-harm-standard-for-breach-notification/"&gt;Health and Human Services guidance on medical data breach notifications&lt;/a&gt; and it’s clear that the HHS either was bought off, or doesn’t understand the fundamentals of risk assessment. Having a little bit of inside experience within HHS, my vote is for willful ignorance.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Where Art Thou, Security Logging?</title><link>/blog/where-art-thou-security-logging/</link><pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2009 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/where-art-thou-security-logging/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Today you’d be hard pressed to find a decent sized network that doesn’t have some implementation of Security Event Management (SEM). It’s just a fact of modern regulation that a centralized system to collect all that logolicious information makes sense (and may be mandatory). Part of the problem with architecting and managing these systems is that one runs into the issue of securely collecting the information and subsequently verifying its authenticity.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Which Bits Are the Right Bits?</title><link>/blog/which-bits-are-the-right-bits/</link><pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2009 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/which-bits-are-the-right-bits/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;(The following post covers some rather esoteric bits of security philosophy, or what Rich has affectionately called “Security Jazz” in the past. Unless you are into obscure data-centric security minutiae, you will probably not be interested).&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Barracuda Networks Acquires Purewire</title><link>/blog/barracuda-networks-acquires-purewire/</link><pubDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2009 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/barracuda-networks-acquires-purewire/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Today &lt;a href="http://www.purewire.com/press_releases/Barracuda_Networks_Acquires_Purewire.php"&gt;Barracuda Networks announced their acquisition of Purewire&lt;/a&gt;. Barracuda has an incredibly broad product suite, including AV, WAF, Anti-spam, anti-malware, SSL gateways, and so on, but are behind their competition in web filtering and seriously lacking in solutions delivered as SaaS. The Purewire product set closes Barracuda’s biggest product gap, giving them URL filtering and some basic content inspection. But most importantly it can be delivered as SaaS. This is important for two reasons: first, Barracuda has been losing market share to email and web security vendors with comprehensive SaaS product lines. SaaS offers flexible deployment and extends the usable lifespan of existing appliance/software security investments. Second, SaaS can be sold ‘up-market’ or ‘down-market’, as pricing is simply adjusted for the desired capacity. This will keep the handful of Barracuda enterprise customers happy, and provide SME customers the ability to add capacity as needed, hopefully keeping them from bolting to other providers.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Microsoft Security Updates for October 2009</title><link>/blog/microsoft-security-updates-for-october-2009/</link><pubDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2009 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/microsoft-security-updates-for-october-2009/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;We don’t normally cover Patch Tuesday unless there is something unusual, but the &lt;a href="http://www.microsoft.com/technet/security/bulletin/ms09-oct.mspx"&gt;October 2009 advanced notification&lt;/a&gt; appears to be just that. It lists patches for 13 different security bulletins, for what looks like 30 separate security problems. Eight of the bulletins are for critical vulnerabilities with the possibility of remote code execution. The majority of the patches are for Windows itself, with a couple for SQL Server, Office, and Forefront, but it looks like just about every production version of Windows is affected. Given the scope of this security patch and the seriousness of the bugs, it looks like IT departments are going to be working overtime for a while.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Personal Information Dump</title><link>/blog/personal-information-dump/</link><pubDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2009 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/personal-information-dump/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Interesting story of a San Francisco commercial landlord who found &lt;a href="http://www.nbcbayarea.com/news/local-beat/How-One-Man-Averted-an-Identity-Theft-Epidemic-63927072.html"&gt;46 boxes of personal information and financial data for thousands of people&lt;/a&gt; left behind by a failed title company.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Friday Summary - October 9, 2009</title><link>/blog/friday-summary-october-9-2009/</link><pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2009 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/friday-summary-october-9-2009/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;A lot of &lt;em&gt;not&lt;/em&gt; this week. I was &lt;em&gt;not&lt;/em&gt; at &lt;a href="http://www.sector.ca/schedule.htm"&gt;SECtor&lt;/a&gt;, although I understand it was a good time. I am &lt;em&gt;not&lt;/em&gt; going to &lt;a href="http://www.oracle.com/us/openworld/index.htm"&gt;Oracle Open World&lt;/a&gt;. I should be going, but too many projects are either beginning or remain unfinished for me to travel to the Bay Area, visiting old friends and finding a good bar to hang out at. That is lots of fun I will &lt;em&gt;not&lt;/em&gt; be having. I will &lt;em&gt;not&lt;/em&gt; be going to Atlanta in November as the Tech Target event for data security has been knocked off the calendar. And I am &lt;em&gt;not&lt;/em&gt; taking a free Mexican holiday in Peurta de Cancun or wherever Rich is enjoying himself. Oh well, weather has been &lt;em&gt;awesome&lt;/em&gt; in Phoenix.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Online Fraud Report: What Would You Want To See?</title><link>/blog/online-fraud-report-what-would-you-want-to-see/</link><pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2009 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/online-fraud-report-what-would-you-want-to-see/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;So a buddy of mine back from when I was on the customer side contacted me recently. He’s at a new company doing some very interesting work on detecting certain classes of online fraud and amounts of malware on websites. So far he’s gathered some fascinating data on just how bad the problem is, and I’m trying to convince him that he should start publishing some of his aggregate data in a quarterly or semi-annual report. He is very interested but would love some community input on what the report should look like, which brings me to you.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Database Audit Events</title><link>/blog/database-audit-events/</link><pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2009 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/database-audit-events/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I have attended a lot of database developer events and DBA forums around the country in the last 6 years. One benefit of attending lectures by database administrators for database administrators is the wealth of information on tools, tricks, and tips for managing databases. And not just the simple administrative tasks, but clever ways to accomplish more complex tasks. A lot of these tricks never seem to make it into the mainstream, instead remaining part of the DBA’s exclusive repertoire. I wish I had kept better notes. And unfortunately I am not going to &lt;a href="http://www.oracle.com/us/openworld/index.htm"&gt;Oracle Open World&lt;/a&gt;, but I wanted to for this very reason.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Visa’s Data Field Encryption</title><link>/blog/visas-data-field-encryption-2/</link><pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2009 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/visas-data-field-encryption-2/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I was reading &lt;a href="http://www.mckeay.net/"&gt;Martin McKeay’s blog&lt;/a&gt; this morning and saw his reference to &lt;a href="http://corporate.visa.com/_media/best-practices.pdf"&gt;Visa’s Data Field Encryption white paper&lt;/a&gt;. Martin’s point that Visa is the author, rather than the PCI council, is a good one. Now that I’ve read the paper, I don’t think Visa is putting it out as a sort of &lt;a href="http://www.thefreedictionary.com/litmus+test"&gt;litmus test&lt;/a&gt; on behalf of the council, but instead Visa is taking a stand on what technologies they want endorsed. And if that is the case, Rich’s feeling prediction that “&lt;a href="http://securosis.com/blog/tokenization-will-become-the-dominant-payment-transaction-architecture/"&gt;Tokenization Will Become the Dominant Payment Transaction Architecture&lt;/a&gt;” will happen far faster than we anticipated.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Friday Summary- October 2, 2009</title><link>/blog/friday-summary-october-2-2009/</link><pubDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2009 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/friday-summary-october-2-2009/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I hate to admit it, but I have a bad habit of dropping administrative tasks or business development to focus on the research. It’s kind of like programmer days – I loved coding, but hated debugging or documentation. But eventually I realize I haven’t invoiced for a quarter, or forgot to tell prospects we have stuff they can pay for. Those are the nights I don’t sleep very well.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>SQL Injection Prevention</title><link>/blog/sql-injection-prevention/</link><pubDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2009 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/sql-injection-prevention/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;The team over at Dark Reading was kind enough to invite me to blog on their Database Security portal. This week I started a mini-series on threat detection and prevention by leveraging native database features. This week’s post is on &lt;a href="http://www.darkreading.com/database_security/blog/archives/2009/10/stored_procedur.html"&gt;using stored procedures to combat SQL injection attacks&lt;/a&gt;. But those posts are fairly short and written for a different audience. Here, I will be cross-posting additional points and advanced content I left out of those articles.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Tokenization Will Become the Dominant Payment Transaction Architecture</title><link>/blog/tokenization-will-become-the-dominant-payment-transaction-architecture/</link><pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2009 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/tokenization-will-become-the-dominant-payment-transaction-architecture/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I realize I might be dating myself a bit, but to this day I still miss the short-lived video arcade culture of the 1980’s. Aside from the excitement of playing on “big hardware” that far exceeded my Atari 2600 or C64 back home (still less powerful than the watch on my wrist today), I enjoyed the culture of lining up my quarters or piling around someone hitting some ridiculous level of Tempest.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Digital Ant Swarms</title><link>/blog/digital-ant-swarms/</link><pubDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2009 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/digital-ant-swarms/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;A friend of mine emailed yesterday, admonishing me for not writing about the &lt;a href="http://www.dailytech.com/article.aspx?newsid=16354"&gt;Digital Ants&lt;/a&gt; concept discussed on &lt;a href="http://www.dailytech.com/"&gt;Dailytech&lt;/a&gt;. I think it’s because he wanted me to call B.S. on the story. It seems that some security researchers are trying to mimic the behavior of ants in computer defenses to thwart attackers. From the article:&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Realistic Security</title><link>/blog/realistic-security-2/</link><pubDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2009 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/realistic-security-2/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Finally, it’s here: my first post! Although I doubt anyone has been holding their breath, I have had a much harder than anticipated time trying to nail down my first topic. This is probably due in part to the much larger and more focused audience at Securosis than I have ever written for in the past. That said, I’d like to thank Rich and Adrian for supporting me in this particular role and I hope to bring a different perspective to Securosis with increased frequency as I move forward.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>IDM: It’s A Process</title><link>/blog/idm-its-a-process/</link><pubDate>Mon, 28 Sep 2009 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/idm-its-a-process/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;IDM fascinates me, if only because it is such an important base for a good security program. Despite this, many organizations (even ones with cutting edge technology) haven’t really focused on solving the issues around managing users’ identity. This is, no doubt, in part due to the fact that IDM is hard in the real world. Businesses can have hundreds if not thousands of applications (GM purportedly had over 15,000 apps at one point) and each application itself can have hundreds or thousands of roles within it. Combine this with multiple methods of authentication and authorization, and you have a major problem on your hands which makes digging into the morass challenging to say the least.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Friday Summary - September 25, 2009</title><link>/blog/friday-summary-september-25-2009/</link><pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2009 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/friday-summary-september-25-2009/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I get some priceless email on occasion, and I thought this one was too good not to pass along. Today’s Friday summary introduction is an anonymous guest post … if it missed any cliches I apologize in advance.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>A Bit on the State of Security Metrics</title><link>/blog/a-bit-on-the-state-of-security-metrics/</link><pubDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2009 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/a-bit-on-the-state-of-security-metrics/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Everyone in the security industry seems to agree that metrics are important, but we continually spin our wheels in circular debates on how to go about them. During one such email debate I sent the following. I think it does a reasonable job of encapsulating where we’re at:&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Database Encryption Benchmarking</title><link>/blog/database-encryption-benchmarking/</link><pubDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2009 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/database-encryption-benchmarking/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Database benchmarking is hard to do. Any of you who followed the performance testing wars of the early 90’s, or the adoption and abuse of TPC-C and &lt;a href="http://www.tpc.org/tpcd/faq.asp"&gt;TPC-D&lt;/a&gt;, know that the accuracy of database performance testing is a long-standing sore point. With database encryption the same questions of how to measure performance rear their heads. But in this case &lt;em&gt;there are no standards&lt;/em&gt;. That’s not to say the issue is not important to customers – it is. You tell a customer encryption will reduce throughput by 10% or more, and your meeting is over. End of discussion. Just the fear of potential performance issues has hindered the adoption of database encryption.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Stupid FUD: Weird Nominum Interview</title><link>/blog/stupid-fud-weird-nominum-interview/</link><pubDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2009 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/stupid-fud-weird-nominum-interview/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;We see a lot of FUD on a daily basis here in the security industry, and it’s rarely worth blogging about. But for whatever reason this one managed to get under my skin.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Database Encryption Misconceptions</title><link>/blog/database-encryption-misconceptions/</link><pubDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2009 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/database-encryption-misconceptions/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I have not been blogging much this week, as I have been up to my eyeballs in a couple different research projects. But as with any research effort, I always learn a lot and it alters my perceptions and recommendations on the security subjects I cover. Sometimes the revelations are not revelatory at all, but because I misunderstood the vendor solution (d’oh!), or I was unable to keep pace with the continuous advancements across the 125+ vendors I attempt to track. Regardless, I wanted to share a couple observations concerning database encryption I think are worth mentioning.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Cloud Data Security: Archive and Delete (Rough Cut)</title><link>/blog/cloud-data-security-archive-and-delete-rough-cut/</link><pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2009 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/cloud-data-security-archive-and-delete-rough-cut/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;In &lt;a href="http://securosis.com/blog/cloud-data-security-use-rough-cut/"&gt;our last post in this series, we covered the cloud implications of the &lt;em&gt;Share&lt;/em&gt; phase of Data Security Cycle&lt;/a&gt;. In this post we will move on to the &lt;em&gt;Archive&lt;/em&gt; and &lt;em&gt;Destroy&lt;/em&gt; phases.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Cloud Data Security: Share (Rough Cut)</title><link>/blog/cloud-data-security-share-rough-cut/</link><pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2009 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/cloud-data-security-share-rough-cut/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;In our &lt;a href="http://securosis.com/blog/cloud-data-security-use-rough-cut/"&gt;last post in this series, we covered the cloud implications of the &lt;em&gt;Use&lt;/em&gt; phase of our Data Security Cycle&lt;/a&gt;. In this post we will move on to the &lt;em&gt;Share&lt;/em&gt; phase. Please remember that we are only covering technologies at a high level in this series on the cycle; we will run a second series on detailed technical implementations of data security in the cloud a little later.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>FCC Wants ‘Open Internet’ Rules for Wireless</title><link>/blog/fcc-wants-open-internet-rules-for-wireless-2/</link><pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2009 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/fcc-wants-open-internet-rules-for-wireless-2/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Well, this is interesting: the FCC Chairman announced that they do not believe wireless carriers should be able to block certain types of Internet traffic, according to the &lt;a href="http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5j7zvEbTdrfaVvQLIKpy5dy4bmufQD9AROS583"&gt;AP release&lt;/a&gt; a few hours ago. The thrust of the comments seems to be that they want to extend Internet usage rights over the wireless carrier networks.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Incomplete Thought: Why Is Identity and Access Management Hard?</title><link>/blog/incomplete-thought-why-is-identity-and-access-management-hard/</link><pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2009 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/incomplete-thought-why-is-identity-and-access-management-hard/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks to the opportunity to be the Securosis Contributing Analyst, I’m back to blogging here on Securosis even though Rich isn’t off getting bits of his body operated on. I’ve decided to revive an old Identity and Access Management (IDM) research project of mine to kick off my work here at Securosis.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Cloud Data Security: Use (Rough Cut)</title><link>/blog/cloud-data-security-use-rough-cut/</link><pubDate>Fri, 18 Sep 2009 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/cloud-data-security-use-rough-cut/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;In our last post in this series, we covered the &lt;a href="http://securosis.com/blog/cloud-data-security-store-rough-cut/"&gt;cloud implications of the Store phase of Data Security Cycle&lt;/a&gt; (our first post was on the &lt;a href="http://securosis.com/blog/cloud-data-security-store-rough-cut/"&gt;Create phase&lt;/a&gt;). In this post we’ll move on to the &lt;em&gt;Use&lt;/em&gt; phase. Please remember we are only covering technologies at a high level in this series – we will run a second series on detailed technical implementations of data security in the cloud a little later.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Friday Summary - September 18, 2009</title><link>/blog/friday-summary-september-18-2009/</link><pubDate>Fri, 18 Sep 2009 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/friday-summary-september-18-2009/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Last week, a friend loaned me his copy of &lt;a href="http://www.amazon.com/Emergency-This-Book-Will-Save/dp/0060898771"&gt;&lt;em&gt;Emergency&lt;/em&gt; , by Neil Strauss&lt;/a&gt;, and I couldn’t put it down.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;It’s a non-fiction book about the author’s slow transformation from wussy city dweller to full-on survival and disaster expert. And I mean &lt;em&gt;full on&lt;/em&gt; ; we’re talking everything from normal disaster preparedness, to extensive training in weapons, wilderness and urban survival, developing escape routes from his home to other countries, planting food and fuel caches, and gaining dual citizenship… “just in case”. There’s even a bit with a goat, but not in the humorous/deviant way.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Cloud Data Security: Store (Rough Cut)</title><link>/blog/cloud-data-security-store-rough-cut/</link><pubDate>Thu, 17 Sep 2009 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/cloud-data-security-store-rough-cut/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;In our &lt;a href="http://securosis.com/blog/cloud-data-security-cycle-create"&gt;last post in this series, we covered the cloud implications of the Create phase of the Data Security Cycle&lt;/a&gt;. In this post we’re going to move on to the &lt;em&gt;Store&lt;/em&gt; phase. Please remember that we are only covering technologies at a high level in this series on the cycle; we will run a second series on detailed technical implementations of data security in the cloud a little later.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>XML Security Overview</title><link>/blog/xml-security-overview/</link><pubDate>Tue, 15 Sep 2009 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/xml-security-overview/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;As part of the interview process for our intern program, we asked candidates to prepare a couple slides and write a short blog post on a technical subject. Rich and I debated different subjects for the candidates to research and report on, but we both chose “XML Security”. It is a very broad subject that gave the candidates some latitude, and there was not too much research out there to read up on. It also happened to be a subject that neither Rich nor I had researched prior to the interviews. We did not want to bring biases to the subject, and we wanted to focus on presentation rather than content, to see where the candidates led us. This was not to be a full-blown research effort where we expected the candidate to take a month to dig into the subject, but rather meant a cursory effort to identify the highlights. We figured it would take between 2-10 hours depending upon the candidate’s background.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Google and Micropayment</title><link>/blog/google-and-micropayment/</link><pubDate>Mon, 14 Sep 2009 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/google-and-micropayment/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;For a security blog, this is a little off topic. I recommend you stop reading if you consider my fascination with payment processing tiresome.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>New Definition: Vendor Myopia</title><link>/blog/new-definition-vendor-myopia/</link><pubDate>Mon, 14 Sep 2009 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/new-definition-vendor-myopia/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Vendor Myopia&lt;/strong&gt; (ven.dor my.o.pi.a) n.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;ul&gt;
&lt;li&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Inability to perceive competitive objects clearly.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Abnormality in judgement resulting from drinking one’s own kool-aid.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>There Are No Trusted Sites: New York Times Edition</title><link>/blog/there-are-no-trusted-sites-new-york-times-edition/</link><pubDate>Mon, 14 Sep 2009 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/there-are-no-trusted-sites-new-york-times-edition/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Continuing our seemingly endless &lt;a href="http://securosis.com/blog/comments/reminder--there-are-no-trusted-sites/"&gt;series&lt;/a&gt; on “trusted” sites that are compromised and then used to attack visitors, this week’s parasitic host is the venerable &lt;em&gt;New York Times&lt;/em&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Friday Summary - September 11, 2009</title><link>/blog/friday-summary-september-11-2009/</link><pubDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2009 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/friday-summary-september-11-2009/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;We announced the launch of the &lt;a href="http://securosis.com/blog/say-hello-to-the-new-old-guys/"&gt;Contributing Analyst and Intern program&lt;/a&gt; earlier this week, with David Mortman and David Meier filling these respective roles. I think the very first Securosis blog comment I read was from Windexh8r (Meier), and Chris Hoff introduced me to David Mortman a couple years ago at RSA, so I am fortunately familiar with both our new team members. We are lucky to have people with such solid backgrounds wanting to join our open source research firm. Rich and I put up a blog post a few weeks ago and said, “Hey, want to learn how to be an analyst?” and far more people signed up than we thought, but the quality and and the depth of security experience of our applicants shocked us. That, and why they want to be analysts.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Data Protection Decisions Seminar in DC next week!</title><link>/blog/data-protection-decisions-seminar-in-dc-next-week/</link><pubDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2009 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/data-protection-decisions-seminar-in-dc-next-week/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Rich and I are going to be at TechTarget’s Washington DC &lt;a href="http://infosecuritydecisions.techtarget.com/dataprotectiondecisions/html/index.html"&gt;Data Protection Decisions Seminar&lt;/a&gt; on September 15th. We will be presenting on the following subjects:&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Format and Datatype Preserving Encryption</title><link>/blog/format-and-datatype-preserving-encryption/</link><pubDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2009 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/format-and-datatype-preserving-encryption/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;That ‘pop’ you heard was my head exploding after trying to come to terms with &lt;a href="http://www.cs.ucdavis.edu/~rogaway/papers/subset.pdf"&gt;this proof&lt;/a&gt; on why Format Preserving Encryption (FPE) variants are no less secure than AES. I admitted defeat many years ago as a cryptanalyst because, quite frankly, my math skills are nowhere near good enough. I must rely on the experts in this field to validate this claim. Still, I am interested in FPE because it was touted as a way to save all sorts of time and money with database encryption as, unlike other ciphers, if you encrypted a small number, you got a small number or hex value back. This means that you did not need to alter the database to handle some big honkin’ string of ciphertext. While I am not able to tell you if this type of technology really provides ‘strong’ cryptography, I can tell you about some of the use cases, how you might derive value, and things to consider if you investigate the technology. And as I am getting close to finalizing the database encryption paper, I wanted to post this information before closing that document for review.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Say Hello to the New (Old) Guys</title><link>/blog/say-hello-to-the-new-old-guys/</link><pubDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2009 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/say-hello-to-the-new-old-guys/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;A little over a month ago we decided to try opening up an &lt;a href="http://securosis.com/blog/comments/the-securosis-intern-and-contributing-analysts-programs/"&gt;intern and Contributing Analyst program&lt;/a&gt;. Somewhat to our surprise, we ended up with a bunch of competitive submissions, and we’ve been spending the past few weeks performing interviews and running candidates through the ringer. We got all mean and even made them present some research on a nebulous topic, just to see what they’d come up with.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Cloud Data Security Cycle: Create (Rough Cut)</title><link>/blog/cloud-data-security-cycle-create/</link><pubDate>Tue, 08 Sep 2009 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/cloud-data-security-cycle-create/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Last week I started talking about &lt;a href="http://securosis.com/blog/musings-on-data-security-in-the-cloud"&gt;data security in the cloud&lt;/a&gt;, and I referred back to our &lt;a href="http://securosis.com/2007/09/24/the-data-security-lifecycle-beta-1/"&gt;Data Security Lifecycle&lt;/a&gt; from back in 2007. Over the next couple of weeks I’m going to walk through the cycle and adapt the controls for cloud computing. After that, I will dig in deep on implementation options for each of the potential controls. I’m hoping this will give you a combination of practical advice you can implement today, along with a taste of potential options that may develop down the road.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Critical MS Vulnerabilities - September 2009</title><link>/blog/critical-ms-vulnerabilities-september-2009/</link><pubDate>Tue, 08 Sep 2009 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/critical-ms-vulnerabilities-september-2009/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Got an IM from Rich today: “nasty windows flaw out there – worst in a long time”. I looked over the &lt;a href="http://www.microsoft.com/technet/security/bulletin/MS07-048.mspx"&gt;Microsoft September Security Bulletin&lt;/a&gt; and what was posted this morning on their &lt;a href="http://blogs.technet.com/srd/archive/2009/09/08/assessing-the-risk-of-the-september-critical-security-bulletins.aspx"&gt;Security Research and Defense blog&lt;/a&gt;, and it was clear he is right.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Friday Summary - September 4, 2009</title><link>/blog/friday-summary-september-4-2009/</link><pubDate>Fri, 04 Sep 2009 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/friday-summary-september-4-2009/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;As much as I love what I do, it’s turned me into a cynical bastard. And no, I don’t mean skeptical, &lt;a href="http://securosis.com/blog/comments/science-skepticism-and-security/"&gt;which we’ve talked about before&lt;/a&gt; (the application of critical thinking to determine truth), but truly cynical (everyone is a right bastard who will fleece you for everything you’re worth if given the opportunity).&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Understanding and Choosing a Database Assessment Solution, Part 6: Administration</title><link>/blog/understanding-and-choosing-a-database-assessment-solution-part-6-administra/</link><pubDate>Thu, 03 Sep 2009 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/understanding-and-choosing-a-database-assessment-solution-part-6-administra/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Reporting for compliance and security, job scheduling, and integration with other business systems are the topics this post will focus on. These are the features outside the core scanning function that make managing a database vulnerability assessment product easier. Most database assessment vendors have listed these features for years, but they were implemented in a marketing “check the box” way, not really to provide ease of use and not particularly intended to help customers. Actually, that comment applies to the products in general. In the 2003-2005 time frame, database assessment products pretty much sucked. There really is no other way to capture the essence of the situation. They had basic checks for vulnerabilities, but most lacked security best practices and operational policies, and were insecure in their own right. Reliability, separation of duites, customization, result set management, trend analysis, workflow, integration with reporting or trouble-ticketing – for any of these, you typically had to look elsewhere. &lt;a href="http://www.appsecinc.com/"&gt;Application Security’s&lt;/a&gt; product was the best of a bad lot, which included crappy offerings from &lt;a href="https://www.iplocks.com"&gt;IPLocks&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://www.ngssoftware.com/"&gt;NGS&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://www.iss.net/"&gt;ISS&lt;/a&gt;, nTier, and a couple others.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Sentrigo and MS SQL Server Vulnerability</title><link>/blog/sentrigo-and-sql-server-vulnerability/</link><pubDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2009 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/sentrigo-and-sql-server-vulnerability/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;We do not cover press releases. We are flooded with them and, quite frankly, most are not very interesting. You can only read “We’re the market leader in Mumblefoo” or “We’re the only vendor to offer revolutionary widget X” so many times without spitting up. Neither is true, and even if it was, I still wouldn’t care. This morning I am making an exception to the rule as I got a press release that caught my attention: it announces a database vulnerability, touches on issues of vulnerability disclosure, and was discovered by one of the DAM vendors who product is a little different than most. Most of the press releases I read this morning didn’t cover some of the areas I feel need to be discussed and analyzed, so think release gets a pass for.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Musings on Data Security in the Cloud</title><link>/blog/musings-on-data-security-in-the-cloud/</link><pubDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2009 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/musings-on-data-security-in-the-cloud/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;So I’ve written about data security, and I’ve written about cloud security, thus it’s probably about time I wrote something about data security in the cloud.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Friday Summary - August 28, 2009</title><link>/blog/friday-summary-august-28-2009/</link><pubDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2009 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/friday-summary-august-28-2009/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I got my first CTO promotion at the age of 29, and though I was very strong in technology, it’s shocking how little I knew back them in terms of process, communication, presentation, leadership, business, and a dozen other important things. However, I was fortunate to learn one management lesson early that really helped me define the role. It turned out that my personal productivity was no longer relevant in the big picture. Intead by taking the time to communicate vision, intent, process, and tools – and to educate my fellow development team members – their resultant rise in productivity dwarfed anything that I could produce. Even on my first small team, making every staff member 10% better, in productivity or quality, the power of leadership and communication was demonstrable in lines of code produced, reduced bug counts, reusable code, and other ways.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>OWASP and SunSec Announcement</title><link>/blog/owasp-and-sunsec-announcement/</link><pubDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2009 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/owasp-and-sunsec-announcement/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Rich wanted me to put up a reminder that he will be speaking at OWASP next Tuesday (September 1, 2009). I’d say where this was located, but I honestly don’t know. He said it was a secret.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Burden of Online Fraud</title><link>/blog/burden-of-online-fraud/</link><pubDate>Thu, 27 Aug 2009 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/burden-of-online-fraud/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;One of my favorite posts of the last week, and one of the scariest, is Brian Krebs’ Washington Post article on &lt;a href="http://voices.washingtonpost.com/securityfix/2009/08/businesses_reluctant_to_report.html?wprss=securityfix"&gt;Businesses Are Reluctant to Report Online Fraud&lt;/a&gt;. This is not a report on a single major bank heist, but instead what many of us have worried about for a long time in Internet fraud: automated, distributed and repeatable theft. The worry has never been the single million-dollar theft, but scalable, repeatable theft of electronic funds. We are going to be hearing &lt;em&gt;a lot&lt;/em&gt; more about this in the coming year. The question that will be discussed is who’s to blame in these situations? The customer for having almost no security on their small business computer and being completely ignorant of basic security precautions? The bank, both for having crummy authentication and fraud detection, with an understanding the security threats as part of their business model? Is it contributory negligence? This issue will gain more national attention as more businesses have their bank say “too bad, your computer was hacked!” Let’s face it, the bank has your money. They are the scorekeeper and if they say you withdrew your money, the burden of proof is on you to show they are wrong. And no one wants to make them mad for fear they might tell you to piss off. The lines of responsibility need to be drawn.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Database Assessment Solutions, Part 5: Operations and Compliance policies</title><link>/blog/database-assessment-solution-part-5-operations-and-compliance-policies/</link><pubDate>Thu, 27 Aug 2009 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/database-assessment-solution-part-5-operations-and-compliance-policies/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Technically speaking, the market segment we are talking about is “Database Vulnerability Assessment”. You might have noticed that we titled this series “Database Assessment”. No, it was not just because the titles of these posts are too long (they are). The primary motivation for this name was to stress that this is not just about vulnerabilities and security. While the genesis of this market is security, compliance with regulatory mandates and operations policies are what drives the buying decisions, as noted in &lt;a href="http://securosis.com/blog/understanding-and-choosing-a-database-assessment-solution-part-2-buying-dec/"&gt;part 2&lt;/a&gt;. (For easy reference, here are &lt;a href="http://securosis.com/blog/understanding-and-selecting-a-database-assessment-part-1-introduction"&gt;Part 1&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://securosis.com/blog/understanding-and-choosing-a-database-assessment-solution-part-3-data-colle"&gt;Part 3&lt;/a&gt;, and &lt;a href="http://securosis.com/blog/database-assessment-solutions-part-4-vulnerability-and-security-policies/"&gt;Part 4&lt;/a&gt;). In many ways, compliance and operational consistency are harder problems to solve because they requires more work and tuning on your part, and that need for customization is our focus in this post.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Some Follow-Up Questions for Bob Russo, General Manager of the PCI Council</title><link>/blog/some-follow-up-questions-for-bob-russo-general-manager-of-the-pci-council/</link><pubDate>Thu, 27 Aug 2009 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/some-follow-up-questions-for-bob-russo-general-manager-of-the-pci-council/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I just finished reading a &lt;a href="http://searchsecurity.techtarget.com/news/column/0,294698,sid14_gci1366236,00.html?"&gt;TechTarget editorial by Bob Russo, the General Manager of the PCI Council&lt;/a&gt; where he responded to an &lt;a href="http://searchsecurity.techtarget.com/news/column/0,294698,sid14_gci1365304,00.html"&gt;article by Eric Ogren&lt;/a&gt; Believe it or not, I don’t intend this to be some sort of snarky anti-PCI post. I’m happy to see Mr. Russo responding directly to open criticism, and I’m hoping he will see this post and maybe we can also get a response.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>We Know How Breaches Happen</title><link>/blog/we-know-how-breaches-happen/</link><pubDate>Wed, 26 Aug 2009 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/we-know-how-breaches-happen/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I first started tracking data breaches back in December of 2000 when I received my very first breach notification email, from Egghead Software. When Egghead wen bankrupt in 2001 and was acquired by Amazon, rather than assuming the breach caused the bankruptcy, I did some additional research and learned they were on a downward spiral long before their little security incident. This broke with the conventional wisdom floating around the security rubber-chicken circuit at the time, and was a fine example of the differences between correlation and causation.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Database Assessment Solutions, Part 4: Vulnerability and Security Policies</title><link>/blog/database-assessment-solutions-part-4-vulnerability-and-security-policies/</link><pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2009 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/database-assessment-solutions-part-4-vulnerability-and-security-policies/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Understanding and Choosing a Database Assessment Solution, Part 4: Vulnerability and Security Policies&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I was always fascinated by the Sapphire/Slammer worm. The simplicity of the attack and &lt;a href="http://www.caida.org/publications/papers/2003/sapphire/sapphire.html"&gt;how quickly it spread&lt;/a&gt; were astounding. Sure, it didn’t have a malicious payload, but the simple fact that it could have created quite a bit of panic. This event is what I consider the dawn of database vulnerability assessment tools. From that point on it seemed like every couple of weeks we were learning of new database vulnerabilities on every platform. Compliance may drive today’s assessment purchase, but the vulnerabilities are always what grabs the media’s attention, and it remains a key feature for any database security product.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Friday Summary - August 21, 2009</title><link>/blog/friday-summary-august-21-2009/</link><pubDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2009 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/friday-summary-august-21-2009/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I’m a pretty typical guy. I like beer, football, action movies, and power tools. I’ve never been overly interested in kids, even though I wanted them eventually. It isn’t that I don’t like kids, but until they get old enough to challenge me in Guitar Hero, they don’t exactly hold my attention. And babies? I suppose they’re cute, but so are puppies and kittens, and they’re actually fun to play with, and easier to tell apart.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>The Ranting Roundtable, PCI Edition</title><link>/blog/the-ranting-roundtable-pci-edition/</link><pubDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2009 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/the-ranting-roundtable-pci-edition/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Sometimes you just need to let it all out.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;With all the recent events around breaches and PCI, I thought it might be cathartic to pull together a few of our favorite loudmouths and spend a little time in a no-rules roundtable. There’s a little bad language, a bit of ranting, and a little more productive discussion than I intended.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Understanding and Choosing a Database Assessment Solution, Part 3: Data Collection</title><link>/blog/understanding-and-choosing-a-database-assessment-solution-part-3-data-colle/</link><pubDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2009 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/understanding-and-choosing-a-database-assessment-solution-part-3-data-colle/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;In the &lt;a href="http://securosis.com/blog/understanding-and-selecting-a-database-assessment-part-1-introduction"&gt;first part&lt;/a&gt; of this series we introduced database assessment as a fully differentiated form of assessment scan, and in &lt;a href="http://securosis.com/blog/understanding-and-choosing-a-database-assessment-solution-part-2-buying-dec/"&gt;part two&lt;/a&gt; we discussed some of the use cases and business benefits database assessment provides. In this post we will begin dissecting the technology, and take a close look at the deployment options available. What and how your requirements are addressed is more a function of the way the product is implemented than the policies it contains. Architecturally, there is little variation in database assessment platforms. Most are two-tiered systems, either appliances or pure software, with the data storage and analysis engine located away from the target database server. Many vendors offer remote credentialed scans, with some providing an optional agent to assist with data collection issues we will discuss later. Things get interesting around how the data is collected, and that is the focus of this post.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>New Details, and Lessons, on Heartland Breach</title><link>/blog/new-details-and-lessons-on-heartland-breach/</link><pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2009 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/new-details-and-lessons-on-heartland-breach/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks to an anonymous reader, we may have some additional information on how the Heartland breach occurred. Keep in mind that this isn’t fully validated information, but it does correlate with other information we’ve received, including public statements by Heartland officials.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Smart Grids and Security (Intro)</title><link>/blog/smart-grids-and-security-intro/</link><pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2009 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/smart-grids-and-security-intro/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;It’s not often, but every now and then there are people in our lives we can clearly identify as having a massive impact on our careers. I don’t mean someone we liked to work with, but someone who gave us that big break, opportunity, or push in the right direction that leads you to where you are today.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Understanding and Choosing a Database Assessment Solution, Part 2: Buying Decisions</title><link>/blog/understanding-and-choosing-a-database-assessment-solution-part-2-buying-dec/</link><pubDate>Tue, 18 Aug 2009 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/understanding-and-choosing-a-database-assessment-solution-part-2-buying-dec/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;If you were looking for a business justification for database assessment, the joint &lt;a href="http://usa.visa.com/download/merchants/20090212-usss_fbi_advisory.pdf"&gt;USSS/FBI advisory&lt;/a&gt; referenced in Rich’s last post on &lt;a href="http://securosis.com/blog/recent-breaches-we-may-have-all-the-answers/"&gt;Recent Breaches&lt;/a&gt; should be more than sufficient. What you are looking at is not a checklist of exotic security measures, but fairly basic security that should be implemented in every production database. All of the preventative controls listed in the advisory are, for the most part, addressed with database assessment scanners. Detection of known SQL injection vulnerabilities, detecting use of external stored procedures like &lt;code&gt;xp_cmdshell&lt;/code&gt;, and avenues for obtaining Windows credentials from a compromised database server (or &lt;em&gt;vice-versa&lt;/em&gt;) are basic policies included with all database vulnerability scanners – some freely available for download. It is amazing that large firms like Heartland, Hannaford, and TJX – who rely on databases for core business functions – get basic database security so wrong. These attacks are a template for anyone who cares to break into your database servers. If you don’t think you are a target because you are not storing credit card numbers, think again! There are plenty of ways for attackers to earn money or commit fraud by extracting or altering the contents of your databases. As a very basic security first step, scan your databases!&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Heartland Hackers Caught; Answers and Questions</title><link>/blog/heartland-hackers-caught-answers-and-questions/</link><pubDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2009 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/heartland-hackers-caught-answers-and-questions/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;UPDATE:&lt;a href="http://securosis.com/blog/recent-breaches-we-may-have-all-the-answers"&gt;follow up article with what may be the details of the attacks&lt;/a&gt;, based on the FBI/Secret Service advisory that went out earlier this year.&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Recent Breaches: We May Have All the Answers</title><link>/blog/recent-breaches-we-may-have-all-the-answers/</link><pubDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2009 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/recent-breaches-we-may-have-all-the-answers/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;You know how sometimes you read something and then forget about it until it smacks you in the face again?&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Friday Summary - August 14, 2009</title><link>/blog/friday-summary-august-14-2009/</link><pubDate>Thu, 13 Aug 2009 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/friday-summary-august-14-2009/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Rich and I have been really surprised at the quality of the resumes we have been getting for the intern and associate analyst roles. We are going to cut off submissions some time next week, so send one along if you are interested. The tough part comes in the selection process. Rich is already planning out the training, cooperative research, and how to set everything up. I have been working with Rich for a year now and we are having fun, and I am pretty sure you will learn a lot as well as have a good time doing it. I look forward to working with whomever as any of the people who have sent over their credentials are going to be good.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>It’s Thursday the 13th—Update Adobe Flash Day</title><link>/blog/its-thursday-the-13th-update-adobe-flash-day/</link><pubDate>Thu, 13 Aug 2009 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/its-thursday-the-13th-update-adobe-flash-day/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Over at &lt;a href="http://www.tidbits.com"&gt;TidBITS&lt;/a&gt;, Friday the 13th has long been “Check Your Backups Day”.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I’d like to expand that a bit here at Securosis and declare Thursday the 13th “Update Adobe Flash Day”.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>An Open Letter to Robert Carr, CEO of Heartland Payment Systems</title><link>/blog/an-open-letter-to-robert-carr-ceo-of-heartland-payment-systems/</link><pubDate>Wed, 12 Aug 2009 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/an-open-letter-to-robert-carr-ceo-of-heartland-payment-systems/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Mr. Carr,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I read your &lt;a href="http://www.csoonline.com/article/499527/Heartland_CEO_on_Data_Breach_QSAs_Let_Us_Down?page=1"&gt;interview with Bill Brenner in CSO magazine today&lt;/a&gt;, and I sympathize with your situation. I completely agree that the current system of standards and audits contained in the Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard is flawed and unreliable as a breach-prevention mechanism. The truth is that our current transaction systems were never designed for our current threat environment, and I applaud your push to advance the processing system and transaction security. PCI is merely an attempt to extend the life of the current system, and while it is improving the state of security within the industry, no best practices standard can ever fully repair such a profoundly defective transaction mechanism as credit card numbers and magnetic stripe data.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Not All Design Flaws Are “Features”</title><link>/blog/not-all-design-flaws-are-features-2/</link><pubDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2009 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/not-all-design-flaws-are-features-2/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Yesterday I published an article over at TidBITS describing how &lt;a href="http://db.tidbits.com/article/10468"&gt;Apple’s implementation of encryption on the iPhone 3GS is flawed, and as a result you can circumvent it merely by jailbreaking the device&lt;/a&gt;. In other words, it’s almost like having no encryption at all.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Understanding and Choosing a Database Assessment Solution, Part 1: Introduction</title><link>/blog/understanding-and-selecting-a-database-assessment-part-1-introduction/</link><pubDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2009 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/understanding-and-selecting-a-database-assessment-part-1-introduction/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Last week I provided some advice regarding database security to a friend’s company, which who is starting a database security program. Based on the business requirements they provided, I made several recommendations on products and processes they need to consider to secure their repositories. As some of my answers were not what they expected, I had to provide a lot of detailed analysis of why I provided the answers I did. At the end of the discussion I began asking some questions about their research and how they had formed some of their opinions. It turns out they are a customer of some of the larger research firms and they had been combing the research libraries on database security. These white papers formed the basis for their database security program and identified the technologies they would consider. They allowed me to look at one of the white papers that was most influential in forming their opinions, and I immediately saw why we had a disconnect in our viewpoints.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Database Encryption, Part 7: Wrapping Up.</title><link>/blog/database-encryption-part-7-wrapping-up/</link><pubDate>Mon, 10 Aug 2009 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/database-encryption-part-7-wrapping-up/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;In our previous posts on database encryption, we presented three use cases as examples of how and why you’d use database encryption. These are &lt;em&gt;not&lt;/em&gt; examples you will typically find cited. In fact, in most discussions and posts on database encryption, you will find experts and and analysts claiming this is a “must have” technology, a “regulatory requirement”, and critical to securing “data at rest”. Conceptually this is a great idea, as when we are not using data we would like to keep it secure. In practice, I call this “The Big Lie”: Enterprise databases are not “data at rest”. Rather the opposite is true, and databases contain information that is continuously in use. You don’t invest in a relational database just to have a place to store your data; there are far cheaper and easier ways to do that. You use relational database technology to facilitate transactional consistency, analytics, reports, and operations that continuously alter and reference data.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Friday Summary - August 7, 2009</title><link>/blog/friday-summary-august-7-2009/</link><pubDate>Fri, 07 Aug 2009 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/friday-summary-august-7-2009/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;My apologies for getting the Friday Summary out late this week. Needless to say, I’m still catching up from the insanity of Black Hat and DefCon (the workload, not an extended hangover or anything).&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Size Doesn’t Matter</title><link>/blog/size-doesnt-matter-2/</link><pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2009 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/size-doesnt-matter-2/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;A few of us had a bit of a discussion via Twitter on the size of a particular market today. Another analyst and I disagreed on the projected size for 2009, but by a margin that’s basically a rounding error when you are looking at tech markets (even though it was a big percentage of the market in question).&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>The Network Security Podcast, Episode 161</title><link>/blog/the-network-security-podcast-episode-161/</link><pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2009 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/the-network-security-podcast-episode-161/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;This week we wrap up our coverage of &lt;a href="http://defcon.org/html/defcon-17"&gt;Defcon&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href="http://www.blackhat.com"&gt;Black Hat&lt;/a&gt; with a review of some of our favorite sessions, followed by a couple quick news items. But rather than a boring after-action report, we enlisted &lt;a href="http://rationalsurvivability.com"&gt;Chris Hoff&lt;/a&gt; to provide his &lt;em&gt;psychic&lt;/em&gt; reviews. That’s right, Chris couldn’t make the event, but he was there with us in spirit, and on tonight’s show he proves it. Chris also debuts his first single, “I Want to Be a Security Rock Star”. Your ears will never be the same.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Upcoming Webinar: Consensus Audit Guidelines</title><link>/blog/upcoming-webinar-consensus-audit-guidelines/</link><pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2009 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/upcoming-webinar-consensus-audit-guidelines/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Next week I’ll be joining Ron Gula of &lt;a href="http://www.tenablesecurity.com"&gt;Tenable&lt;/a&gt; and Eric Cole of &lt;a href="http://www.sans.org"&gt;SANS&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href="http://www.secure-anchor.com/"&gt;Secure Anchor&lt;/a&gt; to talk about the (relatively) recently released &lt;a href="http://www.sans.org/cag/"&gt;SANS Consensus Audit Guidelines&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>McAfee Acquires MX Logic</title><link>/blog/mcafee-acquires-mx-logic/</link><pubDate>Tue, 04 Aug 2009 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/mcafee-acquires-mx-logic/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;During the week of Black Hat/Defcon, McAfee acquired MX Logic for about $140M plus incentives, adding additional email security and web filtering services to their product line. I had kind of forgotten about McAfee and email security, and not just because of the conferences. Seriously, they were almost an afterthought in this space. Despite their anti-virus being widely used in mail security products, and the vast customer base, their own email &amp;amp; web products have not been dominant. Because they’re one of the biggest security firms in the industry it’s difficult to discount their presence, but honestly, I thought McAfee would have made an acquisition last year because their email security offering was seriously lacking. In the same vein, MX Logic is not the first name that comes to mind with email security either, but not because of product quality issues – they simply focus on reselling through managed service providers and have not gotten the same degree of attention as many of the other vendors.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Mini Black Hat/Defcon 17 recap</title><link>/blog/mini-black-hat-defcon-17-recap/</link><pubDate>Mon, 03 Aug 2009 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/mini-black-hat-defcon-17-recap/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;At Black Hat/Defcon, Rich and I are always convinced we are going to be completely hacked if we use any connection anywhere in Las Vegas. Heck, I am pretty sure someone was fuzzing my BlackBerry even though I had Bluetooth, WiFi, and every other function locked down. It’s too freakin’ dangerous, and as we were too busy to get back to the hotel for the EVDO card, neither Rich or I posted anything last week during the conference. So it’s time for a mini BH/Defcon recap.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>The Securosis Intern and Contributing Analyst Programs</title><link>/blog/the-securosis-intern-and-contributing-analysts-programs/</link><pubDate>Mon, 03 Aug 2009 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/the-securosis-intern-and-contributing-analysts-programs/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;Update: based on questions over email- this is only part time and we expect you to have another job, and we are looking for 1-2 people to test the idea out. Also, if you are on the Contributing Analyst track, we’ll focus more on research and writing, and you won’t be asked to do much of normal intern-level stuff.&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Friday Summary - July 24, 2009</title><link>/blog/friday-summary-july-24-2009/</link><pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2009 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/friday-summary-july-24-2009/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;“Hi, my name is Adrian, and, uh … I am a technologist” …&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Yep. I am. I like technology. Addicted to it in fact. I am on ‘&lt;a href="http://hackaday.com/"&gt;Hack A Day&lt;/a&gt;’ almost once a day. I want to go buy a PC and over-clock it and I don’t even use PCs any more. I can get distracted by an interesting new technology or tool faster than a kid at &lt;a href="http://www.toysrus.com/"&gt;Toys R Us&lt;/a&gt;. I have had a heck of a time finishing the database encryption paper as I have this horrible habit of dropping right down into the weeds. Let’s look at a code sample! What does the API look like? What algorithms can I choose from? How fast is the response in key creation? Can I force a synch across key servers manually, or is that purely a scheduled job? How much of the API does each of the database vendors support? Yippee! Down the rabbit hole I go …&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Sorry, Data Labeling is *Not* the Same as DRM/ERM</title><link>/blog/sorry-forrester-data-labeling-is-not-the-same-as-drm-erm/</link><pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2009 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/sorry-forrester-data-labeling-is-not-the-same-as-drm-erm/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;First, a bit of a caveat. Andrew Jaquith of Forrester is an excellent analyst and someone I know and respect. This is a criticism of a single piece of his research, and nothing more.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Amazon’s SimpleDB</title><link>/blog/amazons-simpledb/</link><pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2009 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/amazons-simpledb/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I have always felt the punctuated equilibrium of database technology is really slow, with long periods between the popularity of simple relational ‘desktop’ databases (Access, Paradox, DBIII+, etc) and ‘enterprise’ platforms (DB2, Oracle, SQL Server, etc). But for the first time in my career, I am beginning to believe we are seeing a genuine movement away from relational database technology altogether. I don’t really study trends of relational database management platforms like I did a decade or so ago, so perhaps I have been slightly ignorant of the progression, but I am somewhat surprised by the rapidity with which programmers and product developers are moving away from relational DB platforms and going to simple indexed flat files for data storage. Application developers need data storage and persistence as much as ever, but it seems simpler is better. Yes, they still use tables, and they may use indices, but complex relational schemata, foreign keys, stored procedures, normalization, and triggers seem to be unwanted and irrelevant.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Electron Fraud, Central American Style</title><link>/blog/electron-fraud-central-american-style/</link><pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2009 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/electron-fraud-central-american-style/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;When I was a kid, the catchphrase “Computers don’t lie” was very common, implying that machines were unbiased and accurate, in order to engender faith in the results they produced. Maybe that’s why I am in security – because I found the concept to be very strange. Machines, and certainly computers, do pretty much exactly what we tell them to do, and implicit trust is misguided. As their inner workings are rarely transparent, they are perfectly suited to hiding all sorts of shenanigans, especially when under the control of &lt;a href="http://news.slashdot.org/story/09/07/19/1646201/Computerized-Election-Results-With-No-Election?from=rss"&gt;power hungry despots&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Premature Cyberjaculation: Security, Skepticism, and the Press</title><link>/blog/premature-cyberjaculation-security-skepticism-and-the-press/</link><pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2009 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/premature-cyberjaculation-security-skepticism-and-the-press/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Over the past few weeks we’ve seen yet two more security stories get completely blown out of proportion in the press. The first was, of course, the DDoS attacks that were improperly attributed by most commentators to North Korea. The second, no surprise, was the Great Twitter Hack of 2009, which might also be referred to the Great Cloud Security Collapse.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>FTC Requirements for Customer Data</title><link>/blog/ftc-requirements-on-customer-data/</link><pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2009 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/ftc-requirements-on-customer-data/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;There was an article in Sunday’s &lt;a href="http://www.azcentral.com/business/articles/2009/07/19/20090719biz-Wiles0719.html"&gt;Arizona Republic&lt;/a&gt; regarding to the Federal Trade Commission’s requirements for &lt;em&gt;any&lt;/em&gt; company handling sensitive customer information. Technically this law went into effect back in January 2008, but it was enforced due to lack of awareness. Now that the FTC has completed their education and awareness program, and enforcement will begin August 1st of this year, it’s time to begin discussing these guidelines. This means that any business that collects, stores, or uses sensitive customer data needs a plan to protect data use and storage.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Friday Summary - July 17, 2009</title><link>/blog/friday-summary-july-17-2009/</link><pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2009 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/friday-summary-july-17-2009/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I apologize to those of you reading this on Saturday morning – with the stress of completing some major projects before Black Hat, I forgot that to push the Summary out Friday morning, we have to finish it off Thursday night. So much for the best laid plans and all.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Oracle Critical Patch Update, July 2009</title><link>/blog/oracle-critical-patch-update-july-2009/</link><pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/oracle-critical-patch-update-july-2009/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;If you have read my overviews of Oracle database patches long enough, you probably are aware of my bias against the CVSS scoring system. It’s a yardstick to measure the relative risk of the vulnerability, but it’s a generic measure, and a confusing one at that. You have to start somewhere, but it’s just a single indicator, and you do need to take the time to understand how the threats apply (or don’t) to your environment. In cases where I have had complete understanding of the nature of a database threat, and felt that the urgency was great enough to disrupt patching cycles to rush the fix into production, CVSS has only jibed with my opinion around 60% of the time. This is because access conditions typically push the score down, and most developers have pre-conceived notions about how a vulnerability would be exploited. They fail to understand how attackers turn all of your assumptions upside down, and are far more creative in finding avenues to exploit than developers anticipate. CVSS scores reflect this overconfidence.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Technology vs. Practicality</title><link>/blog/technology-vs-practicality/</link><pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/technology-vs-practicality/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I am kind of a car nut. Have been since I was little when my dad took me to my first auto race at the age of four (It was at Laguna Seca, a Can-Am race. Amazing!). I tend to get emotionally attached to my vehicles. I buy them based upon how they perform, how they look, and how they drive. I am fascinated by the technology of everything from tires to turbos. I am a tinkerer, and I do weird things like change bushings that don’t need to be changed, rebuild a perfectly good motor or tweak engine management computer settings just because I can make them better. I have heavily modified every vehicle I have ever owned except the current one. I acknowledge it’s not rational, but I like cars, and this has been a hobby now for many years.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Microsoft Patched; Firefox’s Turn</title><link>/blog/microsoft-patched-firefoxs-turn-2/</link><pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2009 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/microsoft-patched-firefoxs-turn-2/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;While &lt;a href="http://threatpost.com/blogs/microsoft-plugs-critical-windows-ie-vulnerabilities"&gt;Microsoft releases patches for various vulnerabilities&lt;/a&gt;, including the two active zero day attacks, Firefox is being actively exploited.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;According to the &lt;a href="http://blog.mozilla.com/security/2009/07/14/critical-javascript-vulnerability-in-firefox-35/"&gt;Mozilla Security Blog&lt;/a&gt;, there is a flaw in how Firefox handles JavaScript. We suggest you follow the instructions in that post to mitigate the flaw until they release a patch (which should be soon).&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Database Encryption, Part 6: Use Cases</title><link>/blog/database-encryption-part-6-use-cases/</link><pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/database-encryption-part-6-use-cases/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Encrypting data within a database doesn’t always present a clear-cut value proposition. Many of the features/functions of database encryption are also available through external tools, creating confusion as to why (or even whether) database encryption is needed. In many cases, past implementations have left DBAs and IT staff with fears of degraded performance and broken applications – creating legitimate wariness the moment some security manager mentions encryption. Finally, there is often a blanket assumption that database encryption disrupts business processes and mandates costly changes to applications (which isn’t necessarily the case). To make good database encryption decisions, you’ll first need to drill down into the details of what threats you want to address, and how your data is used. Going back to our decision tree from &lt;a href="http://securosis.com/blog/comments/database-encryption-part-2-selection-process-overview/"&gt;Part 2&lt;/a&gt;, look at the two basic options for database encryption, as well the value of each variation, and apply that to your situation to see what you need. Only then can you make an educated decision on which database encryption best suits your situation, if you even need it at all.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Second Unpatched Microsoft Flaw Being Exploited</title><link>/blog/second-unpatched-microsoft-flaw-being-exploited/</link><pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/second-unpatched-microsoft-flaw-being-exploited/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Microsoft released an advisory today that an unpatched vulnerability in the Office Web Components ActiveX control allows an attacker to run arbitrary code as the logged-in user. Worse yet, this is being actively exploited in the wild. Fortunately it is easy to protect against.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>browser session/ms project</title><link>/blog/browser-session-ms-project/</link><pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2009 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/browser-session-ms-project/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;hold&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Friday Summary: July 10, 2009</title><link>/blog/friday-summary-july-10-20091/</link><pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2009 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/friday-summary-july-10-20091/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;We have a few Securosis news items that hopefully you will find useful. We get a lot of feedback and ideas from readers about how they want to use our site, or when and how they view the posts. It’s an amazingly diverse group of preferences, scattered like a shotgun blast across the spectrum of options. We hear you, so in our quest to deliver the blog content through every new media medium we think you might like, we have implemented a couple new ways to read the blog and the research library.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Pure Extortion</title><link>/blog/pure-extorsion/</link><pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2009 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/pure-extorsion/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://threatpost.com/blogs/there-value-paying-vulnerabilities"&gt;Threatpost has an interesting article up&lt;/a&gt; on the latest disclosure slime-fest (originally from &lt;a href="http://www.educatedguesswork.org/"&gt;Educated Guesswork&lt;/a&gt;). It seems VoIPShield decided vendors should pay them for vulnerabilities – or else.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Subscribe to the Friday Summary Mailing List</title><link>/blog/subscribe-to-the-friday-summary-mail-list/</link><pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2009 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/subscribe-to-the-friday-summary-mail-list/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi folks,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Sorry if I’m getting all corporate on you, but I wanted to highlight one of the new thingamajigs over here. We decided to create an email list for people who are interested in the Friday Summary. We know we pump out a ton of junk compelling content every week, but it might be a bit overwhelming in these constrained times. We try to focus on the week’s highlights every Friday and point out some of the more interesting content out there (as well as our own stuff, of course).&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>The Securosis and Threatpost Black Hat Disaster Recovery Breakfast</title><link>/blog/the-securosis-and-threatpost-black-hat-disaster-recovery-breakfast/</link><pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2009 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/the-securosis-and-threatpost-black-hat-disaster-recovery-breakfast/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Sure, the RSA Recovery Breakfast was a huge hit, but let’s be honest – if there’s any conference that &lt;em&gt;really&lt;/em&gt; needs a recovery breakfast it has to be Black Hat.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Dark Reading Column: Cloud Security</title><link>/blog/dark-reading-column-cloud-security/</link><pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2009 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/dark-reading-column-cloud-security/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I’ve been a bit erratic with my Dark Reading posts, but finally have a new one up. This one is dedicated to the topic &lt;em&gt;du jour&lt;/em&gt; – cloud computing security. The article is &lt;a href="http://darkreading.com/blog/archives/2009/07/the_only_two_re.html"&gt;The Only Two Reliable Cloud Security Controls&lt;/a&gt; and here’s an excerpt:&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Data Labels Suck</title><link>/blog/data-labels-suck/</link><pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2009 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/data-labels-suck/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I had a weird discussion with someone who was firmly convinced that you couldn’t possibly have data security without starting with classification and labels. Maybe they read it in a book or something.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>The Network Security Podcast, Episode 157</title><link>/blog/the-network-security-podcast-episode-157/</link><pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2009 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/the-network-security-podcast-episode-157/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I can’t entirely promise tonight’s episode makes a lot of sense. Martin is back from Kyoto, and seriously jetlagged, and I don’t think I was a whole lot better. Sure, we cover the usual collection of security news, but the episode is filled with non-sequitors and other dissociated transitions. On the other hand, we do stick fairly closely to security related topics. In other words, listen at your own risk.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Social Security Number Code Cracked</title><link>/blog/social-security-number-code-cracked/</link><pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2009 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/social-security-number-code-cracked/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;An interesting news item on how social security numbers can be guessed with surprising accuracy made this morning’s paper. Researchers say they can determine much of someone’s social security number from birth date and location. Hopefully this will shine yet another spotlight on our over-reliance on social security numbers as a method of identification. From the &lt;a href="http://www.mercurynews.com/businessheadlines/ci_12763920"&gt;San Jose Mercury news&lt;/a&gt;:&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Database Security: The Other First Steps</title><link>/blog/database-security-the-other-first-steps/</link><pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2009 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/database-security-the-other-first-steps/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Going through my feed reader this morning when I ran across this post on Dark Reading about &lt;a href="http://www.darkreading.com/database_security/security/app-security/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=218101607&amp;amp;cid=RSSfeed"&gt;Your First Three Steps&lt;/a&gt; for database security. As these are supposed to be your &lt;em&gt;first steps&lt;/em&gt; with database security,&lt;br&gt;
the suggestions not only struck me as places I would not start, it offered a method that I would not employ. I believe that there there is a better way to proceed, so I offer you my alternative set of recommendations.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Securosis: On Holiday</title><link>/blog/securosis-on-holiday/</link><pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2009 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/securosis-on-holiday/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;As it’s the middle of summer, it’s freakin’ hot here. Rich and I have been cranking away like crazy since RSA on a couple different projects and are in need of a break. Now it’s time for a little R&amp;amp;R, so like you, we going on a mini summer break. That means no Friday Summary this week. We’ll be back around the 7th, and return to normal Friday posts on the 10th. Until then, enjoy yourself over the July 4th holiday (even if you’re not in the U.S.)! If you haven’t yet taken the Project Quant survey, go ahead and stop by &lt;a href="http://www.surveymonkey.com/s.aspx?sm=SjehgbiAl3mR_2b1gauMibQw_3d_3d"&gt;SurveyMonkey&lt;/a&gt; on your way out for the long weekend.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Cracking a 200 Year Old Cipher</title><link>/blog/cracking-a-200-year-old-cipher/</link><pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/cracking-a-200-year-old-cipher/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I have a half dozen books on Thomas Jefferson’s life, but this is a pretty cool story I had never heard before. The Wall Street Journal this morning has a story about a Professor Robert Patterson, who had developed what appears to be a reasonably advanced cipher, and sent an &lt;a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB124648494429082661.html#mod=article-outset-box"&gt;enciphered message to President Jefferson in 1801&lt;/a&gt;. He provided Jefferson with the the message, the cipher, and hints as to how it worked, but it is assumed that Jefferson was never able to decrypt the message. The message was only recently decrypted by Dr. Lawren Smithline, a 36-year-old mathematician who works at the Center for Communications Research in Princeton, N.J., a division of the Institute for Defense Analyses.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Three Database Roles: Programmer, DBA, Architect</title><link>/blog/three-database-roles-programmer-dba-architect/</link><pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/three-database-roles-programmer-dba-architect/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;When I interview database candidates, I want to asses their skills in three different areas; how well they can set-up and maintain a database, how well they can program to a database, and how well they can design database systems. These coincide with the three roles I would typically hire: database administrator, database programmer and database architect. Even though I am hiring for just one of these roles, and I don’t expect any single candidate to be fully proficient in all three areas, I do want to understand the breadth of their exposure. It is an indicator of how much empathy they will have for their team members when working on database projects, and understand the sometimes competing challenges each faces. While there will always be some overlap, the divisions of responsibility are broken down as follows&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Database Encryption, Part 5: Key Management</title><link>/blog/database-encryption-part-5-key-management/</link><pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/database-encryption-part-5-key-management/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;This is Part 5 of our Database Encryption Series. &lt;a href="http://securosis.com/blog/comments/introduction-to-database-encryption-the-reboot/"&gt;Part 1&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://securosis.com/blog/comments/database-encryption-part-2-selection-process-overview/"&gt;Part 2&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://securosis.com/blog/comments/database-encryption-part-3-transparent-encryption/"&gt;Part 3&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://securosis.com/blog/comments/database-encryption-part-4-credentialed-user-protection/"&gt;Part 4&lt;/a&gt;, and the supporting posts on &lt;a href="http://securosis.com/blog/comments/application-vs.-database-encryption/"&gt;Database vs. Application Encryption&lt;/a&gt;, &amp;amp; &lt;a href="http://securosis.com/blog/comments/database-encryption-fact-vs.-fiction/"&gt;Database Encryption: Fact or Fiction&lt;/a&gt; are online.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>The Network Security Podcast, Episode 156</title><link>/blog/the-network-security-podcast-episode-156/</link><pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/the-network-security-podcast-episode-156/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Martin is off in Japan this week, so I’m joined by our good friend &lt;a href="http://techbuddha.wordpress.com"&gt;Amrit Williams from BigFix and the Techbuddha blog&lt;/a&gt;. Amrit and I start off by talking about the rolling blackouts in California and disaster preparedness, before jumping into the week’s security news.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Things To Do In Encryption When You’re Dead</title><link>/blog/things-to-do-in-encryption-when-youre-dead-2/</link><pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/things-to-do-in-encryption-when-youre-dead-2/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;Technically the title should be Things to do With Encryption…, but then I wouldn’t have a semi-obscure movie reference.&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Cory Doctorow of &lt;a href="http://boingboing.net"&gt;BoingBoing&lt;/a&gt; linked to a column of his over at The Guardian entitled &lt;a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/technology/2009/jun/30/data-protection-internet"&gt;If I’m dead how will my loved ones break my password?&lt;/a&gt;. As a new father myself, I recently went through the estate planning process with my lawyer, and this is one issue I’ve long thought needed more attention. A few years ago I even considered building a startup around it.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Creating a Standard for Data Breach Costs</title><link>/blog/creating-a-standard-for-data-breach-costs/</link><pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/creating-a-standard-for-data-breach-costs/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;One thing that’s really tweaked me over the years when evaluating data breaches is the complete lack of consistency in costs reporting. On one side we have reports and surveys coming up with “per record” costs, often without any transparency as to where the numbers came from. On the other side are those that try and look at lost share value, or directly reported losses from public companies in their financial statements, but I think we all know how inconsistent those numbers are as well.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Friday Summary, July 10, 2009</title><link>/blog/friday-summary-july-10-2009/</link><pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2009 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/friday-summary-july-10-2009/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;*&lt;em&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;strong&gt;intro&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;And one more time, in case you wanted to take the Project Quant survey and just have not had time: Stop what you are doing and hit the &lt;a href="http://www.surveymonkey.com/s.aspx?sm=SjehgbiAl3mR_2b1gauMibQw_3d_3d"&gt;SurveyMonkey&lt;/a&gt;. We are at over 70 responses, and will release the raw data when we hit 100.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Friday Summary: June 26, 2009</title><link>/blog/friday-summary-june-26-2009/</link><pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2009 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/friday-summary-june-26-2009/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Yesterday I had the opportunity to speak at a joint ISSA and ISACA event on cloud computing security down in Austin (for the record, when I travel I never expect it to be hotter &lt;strong&gt;AND&lt;/strong&gt; more humid than Phoenix).&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>You Don’t Own Yourself</title><link>/blog/you-dont-own-yourself-2/</link><pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2009 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/you-dont-own-yourself-2/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Gee, is anyone out there surprised by this?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.networkworld.com/news/2009/062609-out-of-business-clear-may.html"&gt;Out of business, Clear may sell customer data&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Here’s the thing – when you share your information with a company – &lt;em&gt;any&lt;/em&gt; company, they view that information as one of their assets. As far as they are concerned, they own it, not you. This also includes any information any company can collect on you through legal means. Our laws (in the U.S. – it isn’t as bad in Europe and a few other regions) fully support this business model.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Database Patches, Ad Nauseum</title><link>/blog/database-patches-ad-nauseum/</link><pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2009 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/database-patches-ad-nauseum/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;When I lived in the Bay Area, each Spring we had the same news repeat. Like clockwork, every year, year after year, and often by the same reporter. The story was the huge, looming danger of forest or grass fires. And the basis for the story was &lt;em&gt;either&lt;/em&gt; because the rainfall totals were above normal and had created lots of fuel, or that the below-average rainfall had dried everything out. For Northern California, there really are no other outcomes. Pretty much they were saying you’re screwed no matter what. And no one on their editorial staff considered this contradiction because there it was, every spring, and I guess they had nothing else all that interesting to report.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Mildly Off Topic: How I Use Social Media</title><link>/blog/mildly-off-topic-how-i-use-social-media/</link><pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2009 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/mildly-off-topic-how-i-use-social-media/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;This post doesn’t have a whole heck of a lot to do with security, but it’s a topic I suspect all of us think about from time to time.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Cyberskeptic: Cynicism vs. Skepticism</title><link>/blog/cyberskeptic-cynicism-vs-skepticism/</link><pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2009 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/cyberskeptic-cynicism-vs-skepticism/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;Note: This is the first part of a two part series on skepticism in security;&lt;a href="https://securosis.com/blog/science-skepticism-and-security"&gt;click here for part 2&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Securosis: A mental disorder characterized by paranoia, cynicism, and the strange compulsion to defend random objects.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Mike Andrews Releases Free Web and Application Security Series</title><link>/blog/mike-andrews-releases-free-web-and-application-security-series/</link><pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2009 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/mike-andrews-releases-free-web-and-application-security-series/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I first met Mike Andrews about 3 years ago at a big Black Hat party. Turns out we both worked in the concert business at the same time. Despite being located nowhere near each other, we each worked some of the same tours and had a bit of fun swapping stories.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Science, Skepticism, and Security</title><link>/blog/science-skepticism-and-security/</link><pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2009 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/science-skepticism-and-security/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;This is part 2 of our series on skepticism in security. You can&lt;a href="https://securosis.com/blog/cyberskeptic-cynicism-vs.-skepticism"&gt;read part 1 here&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/em&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Being a bit of a science geek, over the past year or so I’ve become addicted to &lt;a href="http://www.theskepticsguide.org/"&gt;The Skeptics’ Guide to the Universe&lt;/a&gt; podcast, which is now the only one I never miss. It’s the &lt;em&gt;Skeptics’ Guide&lt;/em&gt; that first really exposed me to the &lt;em&gt;scientific skeptical movement&lt;/em&gt; , which is well aligned with what we do in security.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>SIEM, Today and Tomorrow</title><link>/blog/siem-today-and-tomorrow/</link><pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2009 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/siem-today-and-tomorrow/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Last week, Mike Rothman of eIQ wrote a thoughtful piece on the &lt;a href="http://blog.eiqnetworks.com/2009/06/18/siem-still-struggles-and-its-our-own-fault/"&gt;struggles of the SIEM industry&lt;/a&gt;. He starts the post by saying the Security Information and Event Management space has struggled over the last decade because the platforms were too expensive, too hard to implement, and (paraphrasing) did not scale well without investing a pound of flesh. All accurate points, but I think these items are secondary to the real issues that plagued the SIEM market.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Database Encryption: Fact vs. Fiction</title><link>/blog/database-encryption-fact-vs-fiction/</link><pubDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2009 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/database-encryption-fact-vs-fiction/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;A good friend of mine has, for many years, said “Don’t let the facts get in the way of a good story.” She has led a very interesting life and has thousands of funny anecdotes, but is known to embellish a bit. She always describes real life events, but uses some imagination and injects a few spurious details to spice things up a little bit. Not false statements, but tweaking the facts to make a more engaging story. Several of the comments on the blog in regards to our series on Database Encryption, as well as some of those made during product briefings, fall into the later category. Not completely false, but true only from a limited perspective, so I am calling them ‘fiction’.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Kindle and DRM Content</title><link>/blog/kindle-and-drm-content/</link><pubDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2009 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/kindle-and-drm-content/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Rich forwarded me this article on Boing Boing regarding “&lt;a href="http://www.boingboing.net/2009/06/22/some-kindle-books-ha.html"&gt;Kindle Books having download caps&lt;/a&gt;” on content. That just shattered my enthusiasm.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Friday Summary - June 19, 2009</title><link>/blog/friday-summary-june-19-2009/</link><pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2009 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/friday-summary-june-19-2009/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I’ve spent way too much time surfing the Internet over the last few evenings. I have read just about everything I can on AT&amp;amp;T pricing, new iPhone features, 3.0 software updates, SIM cards, jailbreaking, smart phone reliability &amp;amp; customer satisfaction surveys, SIM card compatibility, different cellular technologies, cellular service provider customer satisfaction in different regions of the country, Skype on the iPod, and just about every other thing I could find. I have spent more time online researching calling options in the last week than I have spent using my cell phone in the last 6 months. I don’t even own one of the damned things, so yeah, I am a little obsessive when it comes to research.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Database Encryption, Part 4: Credentialed User Protection</title><link>/blog/database-encryption-part-4-credentialed-user-protection/</link><pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2009 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/database-encryption-part-4-credentialed-user-protection/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;In this post we will detail the other half of the decision tree for selecting a database encryption strategy: securing data from credentialed database users. Specifically, we are concerned with preventing misuse of data through individual or group accounts that provide access to data either directly or through another application. For the purpose of this discussion, we will be most interested in differentiating between accounts assigned users &lt;em&gt;who use the data&lt;/em&gt; stored within the database, from accounts assigned to users &lt;em&gt;who administer the database system&lt;/em&gt; itself. These are the two primary types of credentialed database users, and each needs to be treated differently because their access to database functions is radically different. As administrative accounts have far more capabilities and tools at their disposal, those threats are more varied and complex, making it much more difficult to insulate sensitive data. Also keep in mind that a ‘user’ in context of database accounts may be a single person, or it may be a group account associated with a number of users, or it may be an account utilized by a service or program.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Virtual Identities</title><link>/blog/virtual-identities/</link><pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2009 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/virtual-identities/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I am starting to hear stories from friends in the Phoenix area more and more about identity theft and account hijacking. Two weeks ago we got a phone call from a friend in the wee hours of the morning. She called to ask if we knew if a mutual friend, we’ll call her ‘Stacy’ for the purpose of this post, was in England. Our friend had received an email from Stacy stating she was in trouble and asking for money. We know Stacy pretty well and we assured out friend that she was not in England and was certainly not requesting $2000.00 be wired to her. Seems that everyone Stacy knew received a similar email claiming distress and requesting significant sums of money.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Database Encryption, Part 3: Transparent Encryption</title><link>/blog/database-encryption-part-3-transparent-encryption/</link><pubDate>Mon, 15 Jun 2009 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/database-encryption-part-3-transparent-encryption/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;In our previous post in this Database Encryption series (&lt;a href="http://securosis.com/blog/introduction-to-database-encryption-the-reboot"&gt;Introduction&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://securosis.com/blog/database-encryption-part-2-selection-process-overview"&gt;Part 2&lt;/a&gt;) we provided a decision tree for selecting a database encryption strategy. Our goal in this process is to map the encryption selection process to the security threats to protect against. Yes, that sounds simple enough, but it is tough to wade through vendor claims, especially when everyone from network storage to database vendors claims to provide the same value. We need to understand how to deal with the threats conceptually before we jump into the more complex technical and operational issues that can confuse your choices. In this post we are going to dig into the first branch of the tree, Non-credentialed threats – protecting against attacks from the outside, rather than from authenticated database users. We call this “Transparent/External Encryption”, since we don’t have to muck with database user accounts, and the encryption can sometimes occur outside the datbase. Transparent Encryption won’t protect sensitive content in the database if someone has access to it thought legitimate credentials, but it will protect the information on storage and in archives, and provides a significant advantage as it is deployed independent of your business applications. If you need to protect things like credit card numbers where you need to restrict even an administrator’s ability to see them, this option isn’t for you. If you are only worried about lost media, stolen files, a compromised host platform, or insecure storage, then Transparent Encryption is a good option. By not having to muck around with the internal database structures and application logic, it often provides huge savings in time and investment over more involved techniques.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Elephants, the Grateful Dead, and the Friday Summary - June 12, 2009</title><link>/blog/elephants-the-grateful-dead-and-the-friday-summary-june-12-2009/</link><pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2009 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/elephants-the-grateful-dead-and-the-friday-summary-june-12-2009/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Back before Jerry Garcia moved on to the big pot cloud in the sky, I managed security at a couple of Dead shows in Boulder/Denver. In those days I was the assistant director for event security at the University of Colorado (before a short stint as director), and the Dead thought it would be better to bring us Boulder guys into Denver to manage the show there since we’d be less ‘aggressive’. Of course we all also worked as regular staff or supervisors for the company running the shows in Denver, but they never really asked about that.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Application vs. Database Encryption</title><link>/blog/application-vs-database-encryption/</link><pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2009 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/application-vs-database-encryption/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;There’s a bit of debate brewing in the comments on &lt;a href="https://securosis.com/blog/database-encryption-part-2-selection-process-overview"&gt;the latest post in our database encryption series&lt;/a&gt;. That series is meant to focus only on database encryption, so we weren’t planning about talking much about other options, but it’s an important issue.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Database Encryption, Part 2: Selection Process Overview</title><link>/blog/database-encryption-part-2-selection-process-overview/</link><pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/database-encryption-part-2-selection-process-overview/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;In the selection process for database encryption solutions, too often the discussion devolves straight into the encryption technologies: the algorithms, computational complexity, key lengths, merits of public vs. private key cryptography, key management, and the like.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>How Market Forces Will Alter Payment Processing</title><link>/blog/how-market-forces-will-alter-payment-processing/</link><pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2009 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/how-market-forces-will-alter-payment-processing/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I was drafting a post last week on credit card security when I read Rich’s piece on &lt;a href="http://securosis.com/blog/how-market-forces-can-fix-pci/"&gt;How Market Forces Can Fix PCI&lt;/a&gt;. Rather than looking at improving PCI-DSS from a specification-centric perspective, he presented some ideas on improving its effectiveness through &lt;em&gt;incentivizing&lt;/em&gt; auditors differently. A few of the points he raised clarified for me why looking at market drivers such as this are the only way we are going to understand the coming security changes to this industry. It’s a good post and highly relevant given the continuing rises in notable breaches and PCI compliance costs for merchants. But more than anything else, for me the post solidified why I think we are having the wrong discussion about the advancement of payment security. We are riding a 20th century credit card processing system that was great at the dawn of the POS terminal, but is simply broken from a security perspective for ‘card not present’ and Internet electronic commerce situations.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>iPhone Security Updates</title><link>/blog/iphone-security-updates/</link><pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2009 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/iphone-security-updates/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Like many potential iPhone buyers, I have been checking the news releases from the Apple WWDC every hour or so. Faster speed, better camera, better OS, new apps. What’s not to like? From a security standpoint, the two features that were intriguing for me and (probably) many IT organizations are the &lt;a href="http://www.macworld.com/article/141042/2009/06/iphone_security.html?lsrc=rss_main"&gt;data encryption and automatic remote data wipe options&lt;/a&gt;. From MacWorld:&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>The Laws of Emergency Medicine—Security Style</title><link>/blog/the-laws-of-emergency-medicine-security-style-2/</link><pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2009 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/the-laws-of-emergency-medicine-security-style-2/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks to some bad timing on the part of our new daughter, I managed to miss the window to refresh my EMT certification and earned the privilege of spending two weekends in a refresher class. The class isn’t bad, but I’ve been riding this horse for nearly 20 years (and have the attention span of a garden gnome), so it’s more than a little boring.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Facebook Monetary System</title><link>/blog/facebook-monetary-system/</link><pubDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2009 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/facebook-monetary-system/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Ran across this article on CNN last Friday about how &lt;a href="http://www.cnn.com/2009/TECH/biztech/05/26/cnet.facebook.payments/index.html"&gt;Facebook was going to launch a micro-payment service&lt;/a&gt;. Facebook wants to introduce its own virtual currency system that involves credits, coupons, and other types of widgets that can be redeemed for goods or cash.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Friday Summary - June 5, 2009</title><link>/blog/friday-summary-june-5-2009/</link><pubDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2009 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/friday-summary-june-5-2009/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;If you have ever listened to Rich or myself present on data centric security or endpoint encryption, we typically end by saying “Encrypt your freakin’ laptops.” It works. The performance is not terrible and it’s pretty much “set and forget”. We should also throw in “Encrypt your freakin’ USB keys” as well. The devices are lost on a regular basis and still very few have encrypted data on them. I confess that I am fairly lazy and have not been doing this, but started to look into encryption when I realized that I had brought a stick with me to Boston that had a bunch of sensitive stuff I was moving between computers and forgot to delete … oops. I am not different than anyone else in that I am not really interested in taking on more work if I can avoid it, but as I am moving documents I do not want public, I looked into solving this security gap. While at RSA I dropped by the &lt;a href="https://www.ironkey.com/"&gt;IronKey&lt;/a&gt; booth; in nutshell, they sell USB sticks with hardware encryption. After a product demo I was provided a 1gb version to sample, which I finally unpacked this morning and put to use. This is a dead simple way to have USB files encrypted without much thought, so I am pretty happy moving the stuff I travel with onto this device.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Hackers 1, Marketing 0</title><link>/blog/hackers-1-marketing-0/</link><pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2009 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/hackers-1-marketing-0/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;You ever watch a movie or TV show where you &lt;strong&gt;know&lt;/strong&gt; you know the ending, but you keep viewing in suspense to find out &lt;strong&gt;how&lt;/strong&gt; it actually happens?&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Introduction To Database Encryption - The Reboot!</title><link>/blog/introduction-to-database-encryption-the-reboot/</link><pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2009 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/introduction-to-database-encryption-the-reboot/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Updated June 4th to reflect terminology change.&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This is the &lt;em&gt;Re&lt;/em&gt; -Introduction to our Database Encryption series. Why are we re-introducing this series? I’m glad you asked. The more we worked on the separation of duties and key management sections, the more dissatisfied we became. Rich and I got some really good feedback from vendors and end users, and we felt we were missing the mark with this series. And not just because the stuff I drafted when I was sick completely lacked clarity of thought, but there are three specific reasons we were unhappy. The advice we were giving was not particularly pragmatic, the terminology we thought worked didn’t, and we were doing a poor job of aligning end-user goals with available options. So yeah, this is an apology to our audience as the series was not up to our expectations and we failed to achieve some of our own &lt;a href="https://securosis.com/about/totally-transparent-research"&gt;Totally Transparent Research&lt;/a&gt; concepts. But we’re ‘fessing up to the problem and starting from scratch.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Boaz Nails It- The Encryption Dilemma</title><link>/blog/boaz-nails-it-the-encryption-dillema/</link><pubDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2009 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/boaz-nails-it-the-encryption-dillema/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.boazgelbord.com/2009/06/encryption-myth.html"&gt;Boaz Gelbord wrote a thoughtful response&lt;/a&gt; (&lt;a href="http://www.mikeandrews.com/2009/06/02/the-state-of-web-application-and-data-security-securosis/"&gt;as did Mike Andrews&lt;/a&gt;) to &lt;a href="http://securosis.com/blog/the-state-of-web-application-and-data-security-mid-2009/"&gt;my post earlier this week on the state of web application and data security&lt;/a&gt;. In it was one key tidbit on encryption:&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Five Ways Apple Can Improve Their Security Program</title><link>/blog/five-ways-apple-can-improve-their-security-program/</link><pubDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2009 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/five-ways-apple-can-improve-their-security-program/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;This is an article I’ve been thinking about for a long time. Sure, we security folks seem to love to bash Apple, but I thought it would be interesting to take a more constructive approach.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Join the Open Patch Management Survey—Project Quant</title><link>/blog/join-the-open-patch-management-survey-project-quant-2/</link><pubDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2009 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/join-the-open-patch-management-survey-project-quant-2/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Are you tired of all those BS vendor surveys designed to sell products, and they don’t ever even show you the raw data?&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Piracy Fighting Dog FUD</title><link>/blog/piracy-fighting-dog-fud/</link><pubDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2009 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/piracy-fighting-dog-fud/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;OK, I have to call Bull$%} on this: &lt;a href="http://news.yahoo.com/s/afp/20090603/wl_asia_afp/malaysiacrimecounterfeitfilmanimaloffbeat_20090603122643"&gt;Anti-piracy pup sniffs out 35,000 illegal DVDs&lt;/a&gt;. A piracy fighting dog. Really. From Yahoo! News:&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>How Market Forces Can Fix PCI</title><link>/blog/how-market-forces-can-fix-pci/</link><pubDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2009 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/how-market-forces-can-fix-pci/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;It’s no secret that &lt;a href="http://securosis.com/blog/comments/a-very-revealing-statement-by-the-pci-coucil/"&gt;I haven’t always been the biggest fan of PCI&lt;/a&gt; (the Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard). I believe that rather than blowing massive amounts of cash trying to lock down an inherently insecure system, we should look at building a more fundamentally secure way of performing payment transactions. Not that I think anything is ever perfectly secure, but there is a heck of a lot of room for progress, and our current focus has absolutely no chance of doing more than slightly staving off the inevitable. It’s like a turtle trying to outrun the truck that’s about to crush it- the turtle might buy itself an extra microsecond or two, but the outcome won’t change.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Macworld Security Article Up- The Truth About Apple Security</title><link>/blog/macworld-security-article-up-the-truth-about-apple-security/</link><pubDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2009 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/macworld-security-article-up-the-truth-about-apple-security/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Right when the &lt;a href="http://securosis.com/blog/the-government-must-save-our-children-from-apple/"&gt;Macalope was sending along his take&lt;/a&gt; on the recent ComputerWorld editorial calling for the FTC to investigate Apple, &lt;a href="http://www.macworld.com/article/140873/2009/06/apple_java_security.html"&gt;Macworld asked me to write a more somber take&lt;/a&gt;. Here’s an excerpt:&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>The State of Web Application and Data Security—Mid 2009</title><link>/blog/the-state-of-web-application-and-data-security-mid-2009-2/</link><pubDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2009 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/the-state-of-web-application-and-data-security-mid-2009-2/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;One of the more difficult aspects of the analyst gig is sorting through all the information you get, and isolating out any inherent biases. The kinds of inquiries we get from clients can all too easily skew our perceptions of the industry, since people tend to come to us for specific reasons, and those reasons don’t necessarily represent the mean of the industry. Aside from all the vendor updates (and customer references), our end user conversations usually involve helping someone with a specific problem – ranging from vendor selection, to basic technology education, to strategy development/problem solving. People call us when they need help, not when things are running well, so it’s all too easy to assume a particular technology is being used more widely than it really is, or a problem is bigger or smaller than it really is, because everyone calling us is asking about it. Countering this takes a lot of outreach to find out what people are really doing even when they aren’t calling us.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Database Security Mass-Market Update and Friday Summary - May 29, 2009</title><link>/blog/friday-summary-may-29-2009/</link><pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2009 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/friday-summary-may-29-2009/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I ran across a lot of little tidbits in the world of database security this week, so I figured I would share this for the Friday Summary:&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Sarbanes-Oxley Is Here to Stay</title><link>/blog/sarbanes-oxley-the-sequel/</link><pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2009 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/sarbanes-oxley-the-sequel/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;This is an off-topic post. It has a bit to do with Compliance, but nothing to do with Security, so read no further if you are offended by such things.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>The Government Must Save Our Children from Apple!</title><link>/blog/the-government-must-save-our-children-from-apple/</link><pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2009 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/the-government-must-save-our-children-from-apple/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;Editors Note: This morning I awoke in my well-secured hotel room to find a sticky note on my laptop that said, “The Securosis site is now under my control. Do not attempt to remove me our you will suffer my wrath. Best regards,&lt;a href="https://www.macalope.com"&gt;The Macalope&lt;/a&gt;.”&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Acquisitions and Strategy</title><link>/blog/acquisitions-and-strategy/</link><pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2009 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/acquisitions-and-strategy/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;There have been a couple of acquisitions in the last two weeks that I wanted to comment on; one by Oracle and one by McAfee. But between a minor case of food poisoning followed shortly by a major case of influenza, pretty much everything I wanted to do in the last 12 days, blogging notwithstanding, was halted. I am feeling better and trying to catch up on the stuff I wanted to talk about. At face value, neither of the acquisitions I want to mention are all that interesting. In the big picture, the investments do spotlight product strategy, so I want to comment on that. But before I do, I wanted to make some comments about how I go about assessing the value of an acquisition. I always try to understand the basic value proposition to the acquiring company, as well as other contributing factors. There are always a set of reasons why company A acquires company B, but understanding these reasons is much harder than you might expect. The goals of the buyers and the seller are not always clear. The market strategy and self-perception of each firm come into play when considering what they buy, why they bought it, and how much they were willing to pay. The most common motivators are as follows:&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>The CIS Consensus Metrics and Project Quant</title><link>/blog/the-cis-consensus-metrics-and-project-quant/</link><pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2009 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/the-cis-consensus-metrics-and-project-quant/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Just before release, the Center for Internet Security sent us a preview copy of the &lt;a href="http://www.cisecurity.org/metrics"&gt;CIS Consensus Metrics&lt;/a&gt;. I’m a longtime fan of the Center, and, once I heard they were starting on this project, was looking forward to the results.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Is the Term “DLP” Finally Meaningless?</title><link>/blog/is-the-term-dlp-finally-meaningless-2/</link><pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2009 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/is-the-term-dlp-finally-meaningless-2/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;As most of you know, I’ve been covering DLP for entirely too long. It’s a major area of our research, with an entire &lt;a href="http://securosis.com/research/data-loss-prevention"&gt;section of our site&lt;/a&gt; dedicated to it.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Smile!</title><link>/blog/smile/</link><pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2009 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/smile/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Normally, when a company buys software that does not work, the IT staff gets in trouble, they try to get your money back, purchase different software or some other type of corrective action. When a state or local government buys software that does not work, what do they do? Attempt to alter human behavior of course! &lt;img src="smiley.jpg" alt=""&gt; Taking a page from the TSA playbook, the department of motor vehicles in four states adopt a &lt;a href="http://www.usatoday.com/news/nation/2009-05-25-licenses_N.htm?se=yahoorefer"&gt;‘No Smiles’ policy&lt;/a&gt; when taking photos. Why? Because their facial recognition software don’t work none too good:&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Fakes and Fraud</title><link>/blog/fakes-and-fraud/</link><pubDate>Fri, 22 May 2009 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/fakes-and-fraud/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I got acquainted with something new this week: Women’s fashion and knock-offs. And before you get the wrong idea, it’s close to my wife’s birthday and she found a designer dress she really wanted. These things are freakishly expensive for a piece of fabric, but if that is what she wants, that is what she will have. I have been too busy to leave the house, so I found what she wanted on eBay at a reasonable price, made a bid and won the item. When we received our purchase, there was something really weird … the tag said the dress was “100% Silk”. But the dress, whatever it was made out of, was certainly not silk, rather some form of Rayon. And when we went to the manufacturer’s web site, we learned that the dress is not supposed to be made from silk. I began a stitch by stitch examination of the dress and there were a dozen tell-tales that the dress was not legitimate. A couple Internet searches confirmed what we suspected. We took the dress to a professional appraiser who knew it was a fake before she got within three feet of it. We contacted the seller who assured us the item is legitimate, and all of her other customers were satisfied so she &lt;strong&gt;MUST&lt;/strong&gt; be legitimate, but she would happily accept the item and return our money.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Friday Summary - May 22, 2009</title><link>/blog/friday-summary-may-22-2009/</link><pubDate>Fri, 22 May 2009 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/friday-summary-may-22-2009/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Adrian has been out sick with the flu all week. He &lt;em&gt;claims&lt;/em&gt; it’s just the normal flu, but I swear he caught it from those bacon bits I saw him putting on his salad the other day. Either that, or he’s still recovering from last week’s Buffett outing. He also &lt;em&gt;conveniently&lt;/em&gt; timed his recovery with his wife’s birthday, which I consider to be entirely too suspicious for mere coincidence.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>I Heart Creative Spam</title><link>/blog/i-heart-creative-spam/</link><pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2009 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/i-heart-creative-spam/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I hate to admit it, but I often delight in the sometimes brilliant creativity of those greedy assholes trying to sell me various products to improve the functioning of my rod or financial portfolio. I used to call this “spam haiku” and kept a running file to entertain audiences during presentations.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>NAC Isn’t About User Authentication</title><link>/blog/nac-isnt-about-user-authentication-2/</link><pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2009 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/nac-isnt-about-user-authentication-2/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I was reading &lt;a href="http://www.stillsecureafteralltheseyears.com/ashimmy/2009/05/in-search-of-unicorns.html"&gt;a NAC post by Alan Shimel&lt;/a&gt; (gee, what a shock), and it brought up one of my pet peeves about NAC. Now I will fully admit that NAC isn’t an area I spend nearly as much time on as data and application security, but I still consider it one of our more fundamental security technologies that’s gotten a bad rap for the wrong reasons, and will eventually be widely deployed.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>The Network Security Podcast, Episode 151</title><link>/blog/the-network-security-podcast-episode-151/</link><pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2009 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/the-network-security-podcast-episode-151/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;We probably more the doubled the number of stories we talked about this week, but we only added about 8 minutes to the length of the podcast. You can consider this the “death by a thousand cuts” podcasts as we cover a string of shorter stories, ranging from a major IIS vulnerability, through breathalyzer spaghetti code, to how to get started in security.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>The Pragmatic Data (Information-Centric) Security Cycle</title><link>/blog/the-pragmatic-data-information-centric-security-cycle/</link><pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2009 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/the-pragmatic-data-information-centric-security-cycle/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Way back when I started Securosis, I came up with &lt;a href="http://securosis.com/blog/comments/the-data-security-lifecycle-beta-1/"&gt;something called the Data Security Lifecycle&lt;/a&gt;, which I later renamed the Information-Centric Security Cycle. While I think it does a good job of capturing all the components of data security, it’s also somewhat dense. That lifecycle was designed to be a comprehensive outline of protective controls and information management, but I’ve since realized that if you have a specific data security problem, it isn’t the best place to start.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Using a Mac? Turn Off Java in Your Browser</title><link>/blog/using-a-mac-turn-off-java-in-your-browser/</link><pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2009 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/using-a-mac-turn-off-java-in-your-browser/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;One of the great things about Macs is how they leverage a ton of Open Source and other freely available third-party software. Rather than running out and having to install all this stuff yourself, it’s built right into the operating system.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Security Requirements for Electronic Medical Records</title><link>/blog/security-requirements-for-electronic-medical-records/</link><pubDate>Tue, 19 May 2009 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/security-requirements-for-electronic-medical-records/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Although security is my chosen profession, I’ve been working in and around the healthcare industry for literally my entire life. My mother was (is) a nurse and I grew up in and around hospitals. I later became an EMT, then paramedic, and still work in emergency services on the side. Heck, even my wife works in a hospital, and one of my first security gigs was analyzing a medical benefits system, while another was as a contract CTO for an early stage startup in electronic medical records/transcription.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Securing Cloud Data with Virtual Private Storage</title><link>/blog/securing-cloud-data-with-virtual-private-storage/</link><pubDate>Mon, 18 May 2009 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/securing-cloud-data-with-virtual-private-storage/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;For a couple of weeks I’ve had a tickler on my to do list to write up the concept of virtual private storage, since everyone seems all fascinated with virtualization and clouds these days. Luck for me, Hoff unintentionally gave me a &lt;a href="http://www.rationalsurvivability.com/blog/?p=891"&gt;kick in the ass with his post today on EMC’s ATMOS&lt;/a&gt;. Not that he mentioned me personally, but I’ve had “baby brain” for a couple of months now and sometimes need a little external motivation to write something up. (I’ve learned that “baby brain” isn’t some sort of lovely obsession with your child, but a deep seated combination of sleep deprivation and continuous distraction).&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Friday Summary - May 15, 2009</title><link>/blog/friday-summary-may-15-2009/</link><pubDate>Fri, 15 May 2009 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/friday-summary-may-15-2009/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Securosis is a funny company. We have a very different work objectives and time requirements compared to, say, a software company. And the work we do as analysts is way different than an IT admin or security job. We don’t punch the clock, and we don’t have bosses or corporate politics to worry about. We don’t have a ‘commute’ &lt;em&gt;per se&lt;/em&gt; , either, so all of the changes since I left my last company and joined have been for the better and do not take long to adapt to. Another oddity I recently learned was that our vacations days are allocated in a very unusual way: it turns out that our holiday calendar is completely variable. Yes, it is based upon important external events, but only of quasi-religious significance. Last week I learned that all Star Trek premier days are holidays, with a day off to ‘clear your mind’ and be ready to enjoy yourself. This week I learned we get 1/2 days off the afternoon of a Jimmy Buffet concert, and most of the day off following a Jimmy Buffet concert. You see the wisdom in this policy the morning after the show.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Database Encryption: Option 2, Enforcing Separation of Duties</title><link>/blog/database-encryption-option-2-enforcing-separation-of-duties/</link><pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2009 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/database-encryption-option-2-enforcing-separation-of-duties/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;This is the next installment in what is now officially the longest running blog series in Securosis history: Database Encryption. In case you have forgotten, Rich provided the &lt;a href="http://www.securosis.com/blog/introduction-to-database-encryption"&gt;Introduction&lt;/a&gt; and the first section on &lt;a href="http://securosis.com/blog/comments/database-encryption-option-1-media-protection/"&gt;Media Protection&lt;/a&gt;, and I covered the &lt;a href="http://securosis.com/blog/comments/comments-on-database-media-protection/"&gt;threat analysis&lt;/a&gt; portion to help you determine which threats to consider when developing a database encryption strategy. You may want to peek back at those posts as a refresher if this is a subject that interests you, as we like to use our own terminology. It’s for clarity, not because we’re arrogant. Really!&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Open Invitation to the University of California at Berkeley IT Dept.</title><link>/blog/open-invitation-to-the-university-of-california-at-berkeley-it-dept/</link><pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2009 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/open-invitation-to-the-university-of-california-at-berkeley-it-dept/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;You probably heard the news last week that &lt;a href="http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/n/a/2009/05/08/state/n112408D69.DTL&amp;amp;hw=data+breach&amp;amp;sn=001&amp;amp;sc=1000"&gt;hackers have infiltrated restricted computer databases&lt;/a&gt; at Cal Berkeley. 160,000 current and former students and alumni personal information “may” have been stolen. The University says social security numbers, health insurance information and non-treatment medical records dating back to 1999 were stolen. Within that data set was 97,000 Social Security Numbers, from both Berkeley and Mills College students who were eligible for medical treatment. I am going to make an educated guess that this was a database either for or located at &lt;a href="http://www.uhs.berkeley.edu/home/news/100.htm"&gt;Cowell Hospital&lt;/a&gt;, but there are [very few other &lt;a href="http://datatheft.berkeley.edu/"&gt;details available&lt;/a&gt;. Not unusual in data breach cases, but annoyingly understandable and the reason I do not post comments on most data breaches.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Project Quant: Draft Survey Questions</title><link>/blog/project-quant-draft-survey-questions/</link><pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2009 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/project-quant-draft-survey-questions/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Hey folks,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;While we aren’t posting everything related to Project Quant here on the site, I will be putting up some major milestones. One of the biggies is to develop a survey to gain a better understanding of how organizations manage their patching processes.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>The Network Security Podcast Hits Episode 150 and 500K Downloads</title><link>/blog/the-network-security-podcast-hits-episode-150-and-500k-downloads/</link><pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2009 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/the-network-security-podcast-hits-episode-150-and-500k-downloads/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I first got to know &lt;a href="http://www.mckeay.net"&gt;Martin McKeay&lt;/a&gt; back when I started blogging. &lt;a href="http://www.mckeay.net"&gt;The Network Security Blog&lt;/a&gt; was one of the first blogs I found, and Martin and I got to know each other thanks to blogging. Eventually, we started the Security Blogger’s Meetup together. After I left Gartner, Martin invited me to join him as a guest-host on &lt;a href="http://netsecpodcast.com"&gt;the Network Security Podcast&lt;/a&gt;, and it eventually turned into a permanent position. I’ve really enjoyed both podcasting, and getting to know Martin better as we moved from acquaintances to friends.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Consumer Protection and Software</title><link>/blog/consumer-protection-and-software/</link><pubDate>Tue, 12 May 2009 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/consumer-protection-and-software/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.cnet.com/"&gt;CNET&lt;/a&gt; is reporting that last week the &lt;a href="http://news.cnet.com/8301-1001_3-10237212-92.html"&gt;European Commission is proposing consumer protection laws be applied to software&lt;/a&gt;. Mentioning specifically anti-virus and video game software, commissioners Viviane Reding and Meglena Kuneva have proposed that EU consumer protections for physical products be extended to software in an effort to protect customers and implying that consumers would use more and buy more if the software was better.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>The Data Breach Triangle</title><link>/blog/the-data-breach-triangle/</link><pubDate>Tue, 12 May 2009 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/the-data-breach-triangle/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I’d like to say I first became familiar with fire science back when I was in the Boulder County Fire Academy, but it really all started back in the Boy Scouts. One of the first things you learn when you’re tasked with starting, or stopping, fires is something known as the &lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fire_triangle"&gt;fire triangle&lt;/a&gt;. Fire is a pretty fascinating process when you dig into it. It demonstrates many of the characteristics of life (consumption, reproduction, waste production, movement), but is just a nifty chemical reaction that’s all sorts of fun when you’re a kid with white gas and a lighter (sorry Mom). The fire triangle is a simple model used to describe the elements required for fire to exist: heat, fuel, and oxygen. Take away any of the three, and fire can’t exist. (In recent years the triangle was updated to a tetrahedron, but since that would ruin my point, I’m ignoring it). In wildland fires we create backburns to remove fuel, in structure fires we use water to remove heat, and with fuel fires we use chemical agents to remove oxygen.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Data Harvesting and Privacy</title><link>/blog/data-harvesting-and-privacy/</link><pubDate>Mon, 11 May 2009 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/data-harvesting-and-privacy/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Someone has finally captured my vision of what a data centric society without privacy rights looks like. &lt;a href="http://aclu.org/pizza/images/screen.swf"&gt;This video is really funny … and scary&lt;/a&gt;. Law enforcement and drug companies have been doing this for years. And even if it is not public knowledge, many insurance companies are doing this as well. Orwell had no idea how deep the rabbit hole goes.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Friday Summary - May 8, 2009</title><link>/blog/friday-summary-may-8-2009/</link><pubDate>Fri, 08 May 2009 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/friday-summary-may-8-2009/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;A lot of security related news this week in the mainstream press. What with &lt;a href="http://www.nationalterroralert.com/updates/2009/05/07/hard-drive-sold-on-ebay-held-us-missile-defence-system-secrets/"&gt;Nuclear Secrets being a fringe benefit to eBay&lt;/a&gt; shopping. Other big names like &lt;a href="http://risky.biz/news_and_opinion/patrick-gray/2009-05-05/mcafee-gets-worked-hard"&gt;McAfee exposing users to a CSRF&lt;/a&gt; and MI-6’s operations nixed on a &lt;a href="http://www.securecomputing.net.au/News/143493,mi6-scrapped-major-drug-operation-after-data-loss.aspx"&gt;missing memory stick&lt;/a&gt;. With security &lt;a href="http://arstechnica.com/security/news/2009/04/chinese-hackers-nick-joint-strike-fighter-plans.ars"&gt;this bad&lt;/a&gt;, who needs Chinese hackers? What gets me is the simple stuff that gets missed. Unencrypted hard drives and memory sticks. WTF? Fighter jet plans and power grid control systems on networks, directly or indirectly attached to the Internet? Whoever thought that was a good idea needs to be discovered and fired. Anyway, enough negativity, and you don’t need to read my rants when there are this many good articles to read this week.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Get the iPhone or Not?</title><link>/blog/get-the-iphone-or-not/</link><pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2009 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/get-the-iphone-or-not/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;It’s kind of Apple Day here. Rich has been stuck in a ‘Genius Bar’ time warp all morning with a handful of dead Mac minis (Probably died from processor envy when the new Mac Pro arrived). Despite the recession, if you lose your appointment slot, you are going to be waiting a long time, as the AZ Apple stores are always packed. I would gladly have switched places with him, as I have spent all morning trying to decipher &lt;del&gt;alien runes&lt;/del&gt; AT&amp;amp;T iPhone pricing plans. My cell phone provider, &lt;del&gt;Quest&lt;/del&gt; Qwest, is dropping all its cellular services and I now need two new phones. I thought this would be an easy decision as everyone I know seems to have an iPhone. Most people I know in the security profession have had their iPhones for a year or more and they love them. They really like to show off their eye-candy apps and what a powerful mobile computer the iPhone really is. But if 95% of your use is going to be phone calls, is it worth it?&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Spam Levels and Anti-Spam SaaS</title><link>/blog/spam-levels-and-anti-spam-saas/</link><pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2009 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/spam-levels-and-anti-spam-saas/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I was reading the Network World coverage last night of the &lt;a href="http://www.networkworld.com/news/2009/050509-mcafee-spam-drop.html"&gt;McAfee Spam Report&lt;/a&gt; stating spam rates were down 20%. While McAfee’s numbers are probably accurate, my initial reaction was “Bull$#(&amp;amp;”, because I personally am not seeing a drop in spam. If the McAfee report, as well as &lt;a href="http://voices.washingtonpost.com/securityfix/2009/04/google_spam_levels_back_to_pre.html"&gt;Brian Krebs’ posts&lt;/a&gt;, show the totals are down, why am I getting a &lt;strong&gt;lot&lt;/strong&gt; more spam, increasing weekly to the point where I am becoming actively annoyed again? I was wondering how much was due to the launch of the new Securosis web site, which was the ‘cat and mouse’ cyclical changing of spam techniques, and how much was an anti-spam provider not keeping up.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>The Network Security Podcast, Episode 149</title><link>/blog/the-network-security-podcast-episode-149/</link><pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2009 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/the-network-security-podcast-episode-149/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;It’s been a bit of a strange week on the security front, with good guys hacking a botnet, a major security vendor called to the carpet for some vulnerabilities, and yet another set of Adobe 0days. But being Cinco de Mayo, we can just margarita our worries away.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>We’re All Gonna Get Hacked</title><link>/blog/were-all-gonna-get-hacked-2/</link><pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2009 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/were-all-gonna-get-hacked-2/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Kelly at Dark Reading posted &lt;a href="http://darkreading.com/security/intrusion-prevention/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=217300227"&gt;an interesting article&lt;/a&gt; today, based on a survey done by BT around hacking and penetration testing. I tend to take most of the stats in there with a bit of skepticism (as I do any time a vendor publishes numbers that favor their products), but I totally agree with the first number:&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>There Are No Trusted Sites: Security Edition</title><link>/blog/there-are-no-trusted-sites-security-edition/</link><pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2009 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/there-are-no-trusted-sites-security-edition/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;If you’ve been &lt;a href="https://securosis.com/blog/comments/reminder--there-are-no-trusted-sites/"&gt;following this series&lt;/a&gt;, we’ve highlighted some of the breaches of trusted sites that were, or could have been, used to attack visitors. There’s nothing like hitting a major media or &lt;a href="https://securosis.com/blog/comments/there-are-no-trusted-sites-amex-edition/"&gt;financial site&lt;/a&gt; and using it to hack anyone who wanders by that day.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Comments on Oracle’s Acquisition of Sun</title><link>/blog/comments-on-oracles-acquisition-of-sun/</link><pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2009 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/comments-on-oracles-acquisition-of-sun/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;On Monday at the RSA conference I learned that &lt;a href="http://www.boston.com/jobs/news/articles/2009/04/21/oracle_acquires_sun_for_74b/"&gt;Oracle is purchasing Sun Microsystems&lt;/a&gt;. I was so busy/exhausted from the conference that I forgot about it until this week. This is pretty exciting! Whether it’s really a good or a bad thing depends upon your perspective. Technology-wise it’s a good match, but the corporate cultures are very dissimilar. I have spoken with a few current Sun employees who are really worried about what life will be like at the Big-O. However I heard very much the same concern from many PeopleSoft employees, and the catastrophic fallout anticipated as part of that merger never happened; with the current economic situation, it probably won’t happen this time either. I also have to say this is a much better fit, with Oracle being the acquirer, than it would have been with IBM or HP. The product lines are more complimentary than IBM’s or HP’s, and I suspect there will be fewer layoffs than if either of those companies had made the acquisition. Sun’s people may not like the culture, but I have been hearing complaints from current and ex-Sun employees for years that they were unable to win market share despite having really innovative technologies, and there will be a sense of pride in having the products you worked on effectively marketed and sold.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>How Do You Deploy Your Patches?</title><link>/blog/how-do-you-deploy-your-patches/</link><pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2009 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/how-do-you-deploy-your-patches/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Last week I &lt;a href="https://securosis.com/projectquant/project-quant-patch-management-cycle/"&gt;posted an outline for a patch management cycle&lt;/a&gt; to base Project Quant metrics on. Based on some feedback, I think we need to hear from those of you who actually do this for a living (you really don’t want to know the crappy process we used back in my sysadmin days).&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Innovation, the RSA Conference, and Leap Years</title><link>/blog/innovation-the-rsa-conference-and-leap-years/</link><pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2009 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/innovation-the-rsa-conference-and-leap-years/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;On Thursday at the RSA Conference, I had the opportunity to attend a lunch with the conference advisory board: Benjamin Jun of Cryptography Research, Tim Mather of RSA, Ari Juels of RSA Laboratories, and Asheem Chandna of Greylock Partners. It was an interesting event, and &lt;a href="http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/it-compliance/rsa-conference-advisory-board-highlights-cybersecurity-threats-trends/"&gt;Alex Howard of TechTarget did a good job of covering the discussion in a recent article&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>LogLogic acquires Exaprotect</title><link>/blog/loglogic-acquires-exaprot/</link><pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2009 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/loglogic-acquires-exaprot/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Another interesting news item during the RSA show that I am just getting time to comment on is LogLogic’s announcement they have &lt;a href="http://www.loglogic.com/news/news-releases/2009/04/loglogic-signs-agreement-to-acquire-exaprotect/"&gt;acquired Exaprotect&lt;/a&gt;. When LogLogic announced a partnership with Exaprotect a few months back, my initial reaction was “Who”? Actually, I had heard of the company, but knew very little about the technology. I had not heard any of the companies I speak with on a regular basis mention them, so I had not been paying very close attention to this small firm. When I went to Exaprotect’s website to see what products they offered, I really was unable to tell. It looked like a carbon copy of the LogLogic product benefits summary! It is amazingly difficult to understand what differentiates one product from another on corporate web sites when they are all attempting to cover the current market drivers, and do so at the expense of explaining what they actually &lt;em&gt;do&lt;/em&gt;. The company is not very well known by those of you who do not follow this space closely, but they do offer a security event management product, along with a couple of other interesting pieces in the areas of configuration management and policy management.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Friday Summary: May 1, 2009</title><link>/blog/friday-summary-may-1-2009/</link><pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2009 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/friday-summary-may-1-2009/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Sometimes the most energizing thing you can do is absolutely nothing.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Last week at RSA was absolutely insane, in a good way. It’s kind of like being a kid and going to summer camp. You get to see all the friends who live in other towns, you all go nuts for a week with minimal supervision, and then everyone staggers home all excited. Between the Recovery Breakfast, 4 official RSA panels, a Jericho panel, my 160+ slide Friday morning session with Chris Hoff, and the nonstop speed-dating during the day, and parties at night, I should really be in much worse shape. But I found this year’s RSA to be incredibly motivating on multiple levels.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Project Quant: Patch Management Cycle</title><link>/blog/project-quant-patch-management-cycle/</link><pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2009 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/project-quant-patch-management-cycle/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;While we don’t plan on posting every Project Quant update here on the main blog, we will be cross-posting some of the more significant project updates, as well as other content we relevant to our broader readership. (For these posts we will turn off comments to&lt;a href="https://securosis.com/projectquant/project-quant-patch-management-cycle/"&gt;consolidate them all in the Project Quant area&lt;/a&gt;.)&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>The Security Industry Anti-Disambiguation Movement</title><link>/blog/the-security-industry-anti-disambiguation-movement-2/</link><pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2009 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/the-security-industry-anti-disambiguation-movement-2/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;With all the recent talk about cloud security, I’ve really been struck by the blatant deliberate confusion promulgated by various industry stakeholders. For example, last week around RSA I saw a nonstop stream of press releases containing the word “cloud” for products and services that were merely the same old beloved security tools, now rebranded to ride the froth of the cloud marketing wave. But ‘cloud’ is only the latest example – from NAC to DLP to GRC and other technologies of yore, we see often-deliberate message dilution and confusion so certain poorly-positioned individuals or companies can avoid being left behind by market innovators.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>RSA Recap</title><link>/blog/rsa-recap/</link><pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2009 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/rsa-recap/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Wanted to post my highlights of the RSA show. Rich and I meant to post daily updates about our experiences during the show, but we were quite literally in meetings or gatherings from 8:30 AM until we went to bed each night. No chance of writing and posting from a secure connection. I have a stack of 70+ business cards sitting here on my desk, and I gave out almost all of the 200 I brought with me. I can barely remember talking to that many people over the course of the week.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Project Quant Town Hall at RSA</title><link>/blog/project-quant-town-hall-at-rsa/</link><pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2009 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/project-quant-town-hall-at-rsa/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Hey folks,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Just a quick note that we had a few people ask if we were going to hold a meeting on Project Quant out here at RSA.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Friday Summary - April 17 2009</title><link>/blog/friday-summary-april-17-2009/</link><pubDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2009 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/friday-summary-april-17-2009/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;The big news at Securosis this week was the launching of &lt;a href="http://securosis.com/research/project-quant"&gt;Project Quant&lt;/a&gt;! Not only are we excited about working with some of the team members at Microsoft, but we are going to be really pushing the boundaries of our &lt;a href="http://securosis.com/about/totally-transparent-research"&gt;Totally Transparent Research&lt;/a&gt; process. Rich has been furiously setting up the infrastructure all week to support the public discourse for the project, and he just got it finished in time for launch. We are grateful that there is a ton of interest out there as we have been getting numerous tweets and email on the subject, and well as a ton of press on the project from &lt;a href="http://www.eweek.com/c/a/Security/Microsoft-Analysts-Team-Up-to-Improve-Patch-Management-372087/"&gt;eWeek&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://www.darkreading.com/security/management/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=216500918"&gt;Dark Reading&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://blogs.zdnet.com/security/?p=3151"&gt;ZDNet&lt;/a&gt;, and Dennis Fisher at &lt;a href="http://threatpost.com/blogs/microsoft-unveil-patch-management-metrics-project"&gt;ThreatPost&lt;/a&gt;. Jeff Jones posted an announcement on his &lt;a href="http://blogs.technet.com/security/archive/2009/04/16/project-quant.aspx"&gt;Security Blog&lt;/a&gt;, plus there is coverage by Peter Galli on Microsoft’s &lt;a href="https://securosis.com/blog/friday-summary-april-17-2009"&gt;Port 25&lt;/a&gt; blog as well! There won’t be a lot of content pushed out next week as we are crazy-busy next week, but this will be a full time effort come May.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Guest Post: Once Again, Security Market Consolidation is Coming</title><link>/blog/guest-post-once-again-security-market-consolidation-is-coming/</link><pubDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2009 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/guest-post-once-again-security-market-consolidation-is-coming/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Yesterday, our friends over at &lt;a href="http://markeradvisors.com"&gt;Marker Advisors&lt;/a&gt; shared some information on what they see on the financial side of the IT security world. Today they follow up with a brief conclusion about how this is playing out.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Guest Post: It’s Not Just the Economy (A Financial Analyst’s Perspective)</title><link>/blog/guest-post-its-not-just-the-economy-a-financial-analysts-perspective/</link><pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2009 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/guest-post-its-not-just-the-economy-a-financial-analysts-perspective/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;When I first started Securosis I was a little surprised at the number of due diligence and other investor-related projects that started flowing through the door. At Gartner we couldn’t engage in these kinds of projects (for some &lt;em&gt;very&lt;/em&gt; good reasons), but being independent allowed me more flexibility. Since then we’ve continued to work closely with a variety of investment partners and clients.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Marshal8e6 Buys Avinti</title><link>/blog/marshal8e6-buys-avinti/</link><pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2009 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/marshal8e6-buys-avinti/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;eWeek is reporting that &lt;a href="http://www.eweek.com/c/a/Security/Marshal8e6-Buys-Avinti-for-Behavioral-Technology-432234/?kc=rss"&gt;Avinti is being acquired by Marshal8e6&lt;/a&gt; this week. There has not been a lot of news in this sector of late, but this one is a little different, so what exactly do we have here? A web security appliance vendor merged with an email security software vendor, buying another vendor who leverages virtual environments to isolate code behavior. Marshal8e6 is the recent merger of the Mail Marshal email security guys with 8e6, the web security firm. Avinti provides a sort of application &lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Habitrail"&gt;Habitrail&lt;/a&gt; to monitor code in its natural habitat, watch how it works and (since I am already running with this analogy) spot the evil hamster at play. From Avinti CEO William Kilmer:&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>“PIN Crackers” and Data Security</title><link>/blog/pin-crackers-and-data-security-2/</link><pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2009 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/pin-crackers-and-data-security-2/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Really excellent article by Kim Zetter on the &lt;a href="http://blog.wired.com/27bstroke6/2009/04/pins.html"&gt;Wired Threat Level site in regards to “PIN cracking”&lt;/a&gt;, and some of the techniques being employed to gather large amounts of consumer financial data. I know Rich referenced this post &lt;a href="http://securosis.com/blog/our-financial-system-is-under-a-coordinated-sophisticated-attack/"&gt;earlier today&lt;/a&gt;, but since I already wrote about it and have a few other points I think should be mentioned, hopefully you will not mind the duplicated reference.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Announcing Project Quant: New Security Metrics Project (with Microsoft)</title><link>/blog/announcing-project-quant-new-security-metrics-project-with-microsoft/</link><pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2009 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/announcing-project-quant-new-security-metrics-project-with-microsoft/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;We spend a lot of time talking about security metrics over here, and I’ve been pretty critical of both overly-broad initiatives that don’t help people get their day to day jobs done, and “fluffy” models that try to put hard numbers on risks/threats and such. Well, it looks like it’s time for me to put up or shut up.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Oracle CPU for April 2009</title><link>/blog/oracle-cpu-for-april-2009/</link><pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2009 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/oracle-cpu-for-april-2009/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Oracle released the &lt;a href="http://www.oracle.com/technology/deploy/security/critical-patch-updates/cpuapr2009.html"&gt;April 2009 Critical Patch Update&lt;/a&gt;; a couple serious issues are addressed with the database, and a couple more that concern web application developers.&lt;br&gt;
For the database server, there are two vulnerabilities that can be remotely exploited without user credentials. As is typical, some of information that would help provide enough understanding or insight to devise a workaround is absent, but a couple are serious enough that you really do need to patch, and I will forgo a zombie DBA patching rant here. If you are an Oracle 9.2 user, and there are a lot of you out there still, there is a vulnerability with the resource manager. Basically, any user with create session privileges, and as all users are required to have this in order to connect to the database, it is only going to take one “Scott/Tiger”, default account or brute forced user account to exercise the bug and take control of the resource manager. Very few details are being published, and the CVSS “Base Score” system is misleading at best, but a score of 9 indicates a takeover of the resource manager, which is often used to enforce polices to stop DoS and other security/continuity policies, and possibly leveraged into other serious attacks I am not clever enough to come up with in my sleep deprived state. If this can be implemented by any valid user, it is likely a hacker will locate one and take advantage.&lt;br&gt;
The second serious issue, referenced in &lt;a href="http://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2009-0985"&gt;CVE-2009-0985&lt;/a&gt;, is with the IMP_FULL_DATABASE procedure created by &lt;code&gt;catexp.sql&lt;/code&gt;, which runs automatically when you run &lt;code&gt;catalog.sql&lt;/code&gt; after the database installation. This means you probably have this functionality and role installed, and have a database import tool that runs under admin privileges- which a hacker can use on any schema. Attack scenarios over and above a straight DoS may not be obvious, but this would be pretty handy for surreptitious alteration and insertion, and the hacker would be able to then exercise this imported database. As I have mentioned in previous Oracle CPU posts, these packages tend to be built with the same set of assumptions and coding behaviors, so I would not be surprised if we discover that EMP_DATABASE_FULL and EXECUTE_CATALOG_ROLE have similar exploits, but this is conjecture on my part. This is serious enough that you need to patch ASAP! And if you have not already done so, you’ll want to review separation of user responsibilities across admin roles as well. I know it is a pain in the @$$ for smaller firms, but it avoids cascaded privileges in the event of a breach/hack.&lt;br&gt;
Finally, CVE-2009-1006 for JRockit and CVE-2009-1012 for the WebLogic Server are in response to complete compromises (Base Score 10) to the system, and should be considered emergency patch items if you are using either product/platform. If we get enough information to provide any type of WAF signature I will, but it will be faster and safer to download and patch.&lt;br&gt;
Red Database Security has been &lt;a href="http://blog.red-database-security.com/2009/04/14/oracle-critical-patch-update-april-2009-is-out/"&gt;covering many of the details&lt;/a&gt; on these attacks, and there are some additional comments on the &lt;a href="http://searchsecurity.techtarget.com/news/article/0,289142,sid14_gci1353795,00.html"&gt;Tech Target&lt;/a&gt; site as well.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Our Financial System is Under a Coordinated, Sophisticated Attack</title><link>/blog/our-financial-system-is-under-a-coordinated-sophisticated-attack/</link><pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2009 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/our-financial-system-is-under-a-coordinated-sophisticated-attack/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;This is a great day for security researchers, and a bad day for anyone with a bank account.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;First up is the release of the &lt;a href="http://www.verizonbusiness.com/products/security/risk/databreach/"&gt;2009 Verizon Data Breach Investigations Report&lt;/a&gt;. This is now officially my favorite breach metrics source, and it’s chock full of incredibly valuable information. I love the report because it’s not based on bullshit surveys, but on real incident investigations. The results are slowly spreading throughout the blogosphere, and we won’t copy them all here, but a few highlights:&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>The Network Security Podcast, Episode 146</title><link>/blog/the-network-security-podcast-episode-146/</link><pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2009 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/the-network-security-podcast-episode-146/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Things are so crazy this week, getting ready for RSA, that I nearly forgot we record this little podcast thing every week. Sure, I’ve only been doing it every week for over a year, but you’d think I’d learn to remember.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Security Inevitabilities</title><link>/blog/security-inevitabilities/</link><pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2009 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/security-inevitabilities/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Despite my intensive research into cryonics, I have to accept that someday I will die. Permanently. I don’t know when, where, or how, but someday I will cease to exist. Heck, even if I do manage to freeze myself (did you know one of the biggest cryonincs companies is only 20 minutes from my house?), get resurrected into a cloned 20-year-old version of myself, and eventually upload my consciousness into a supercomputer (so I can play Skynet, since I don’t really like most people) I have to accept that someday Mother Entropy will bitch slap me with the end of the universe.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>The Securosis Recovery Breakfast at RSA: RSVP to Win a Chumby</title><link>/blog/the-securosis-recovery-breakfast-at-rsa-rsvp-to-win-a-chumby/</link><pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2009 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/the-securosis-recovery-breakfast-at-rsa-rsvp-to-win-a-chumby/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;We’ve been hinting at it over Twitter and in other blog posts, but it’s official. We’re sponsoring our First Annual Recovery Breakfast Wednesday morning at the RSA conference (8-11 am at Jillian’s). We’ll have hot and cold food, a selection of over-the-counter recovery items, and the hair of the dog of your choice. No marketing, speeches, or anything else (especially since we’ll be in rough shape ourselves).&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Friday Summary: April 10, 2009</title><link>/blog/friday-summary-april-10-2009/</link><pubDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2009 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/friday-summary-april-10-2009/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;It was nearly three years ago that I started the Securosis blog. At the time I was working at Gartner, and curious about participating in this whole &amp;ldquo;social media&amp;rdquo; thing. Not to sound corny, but I had absolutely no idea what I was getting myself into. Sure, I knew it was called social media, but I didn’t realize there was an actual social component. That by blogging, linking to others, and participating in comments, we are engaging in a massive community dialogue. Yes, since becoming an analyst I’ve had access to all the little nooks of the industry, but there’s just something about a public conversation you can’t get in a closed ecosystem. Don’t get me wrong- I’m not criticizing the big research model- I could never do what I am now without having spent time there, and I think it offers customers tremendous value. But for me personally, as I started blogging, I realized there were new places to explore. At Gartner I learned an incredible amount, had an amazingly good time, and made some great friends. But part of me (probably my massive ego) wanted to engage the community beyond those who paid to talk to me.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Sudo Reboot Securosis</title><link>/blog/sudo-reboot-securosis/</link><pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2009 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/sudo-reboot-securosis/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;If you can read this, you’ve found the brand spanking new Securosis! We’d call it Securosis 2.0, but we hate all that “2.0” stupidity. (We also hate “next generation”, for the record).&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>We’re Moving! Site and Subscriptions Update</title><link>/blog/were-moving-site-and-subscriptions-update/</link><pubDate>Wed, 08 Apr 2009 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/were-moving-site-and-subscriptions-update/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;We are putting the final touches on the new site and should be launching it within the next 24 hours. Being the eternal optimists, we’re pretty sure &lt;em&gt;something&lt;/em&gt; will go wrong, but maybe we’ll luck out and those beers we bought the migration gods will pay off.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>RSA Conference: For Real?</title><link>/blog/rsa-conference-for-real/</link><pubDate>Mon, 06 Apr 2009 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/rsa-conference-for-real/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Did anyone else get this email?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;You are receiving this email because you are registered for RSA® Conference 2009. Your account information needs to be activated so that you can take full advantage of all the Conference activities including access to the Conference Personal Scheduler and access to the Conference wireless network while on-site. … Please take a moment now to log-in and complete your account activation at&lt;a href="https://sso.rsaconference.com/sso/LogIn.jsp"&gt;https://sso.rsaconference.com/sso/LogIn.jsp&lt;/a&gt; &lt;strong&gt;using the following temporary password&lt;/strong&gt; - %_DWqwet(M. You will then be prompted to confirm your profile information and reset your password. Your username is not included in this email for security purposes. If you are unsure of what your username is, you can retrieve it online at &lt;a href="https://sso.rsaconference.com/sso/RetrieveUserName.jsp"&gt;https://sso.rsaconference.com/sso/RetrieveUserName.jsp&lt;/a&gt;. You can log in to your account anytime at &lt;a href="https://sso.rsaconference.com/sso/LogIn.jsp"&gt;https://sso.rsaconference.com/sso/LogIn.jsp&lt;/a&gt;. … For more information on RSA Conference Single Sign-on, please visit &lt;a href="https://rsa-email.rsa.com/servlet/cc6?jkHQBUBBQSVsjpklpQgPIjhxnuHptQJhuVaVT"&gt;our website&lt;/a&gt; or contact us at&lt;a href="mailto:loginhelp@rsaconference.com"&gt;loginhelp@rsaconference.com&lt;/a&gt;. Sincerely, RSA® Conference Team&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Friday Summary, April 3, 2009</title><link>/blog/friday-summary-april-3-2009/</link><pubDate>Fri, 03 Apr 2009 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/friday-summary-april-3-2009/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;The big news at Securosis this week centered around the Conficker worm. As Rich &lt;a href="http://securosis.com/2009/03/30/easily-detect-conficker-infections-over-the-network/"&gt;blogged earlier in the week&lt;/a&gt;, he got a call from Dan Kaminsky on Saturday with the outline of what was going on. Rich and I scrambled Saturday to reach as many AV vendors as we could to get the word out. While some were initially a little annoyed at getting called on their cell phones Saturday afternoon, everyone was really eager to see what Tillmann Werner and Felix Leder had discovered and get their scanning tools updated. I expected things to be quiet on April 1st. A lot of security researchers have been watching and studying the worm’s behavior, and devising plans for detecting and containing the threat. I imagine the authors of the worm are reading every bit of news they can get their hands on and learning how to improve their code in response. This has been fascinating to watch. Thanks again to the Honeynet Project and Dan Kaminsky for doing a great job, and for involving us in the effort.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Dino Dai Zovi on The Network Security Podcast</title><link>/blog/dino-dai-zovi-on-the-network-security-podcast/</link><pubDate>Wed, 01 Apr 2009 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/dino-dai-zovi-on-the-network-security-podcast/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Just a quick note today since I’m totally distracted by having some family in town.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Episode 144 is up and features Dino Dai Zovi… co-author of &lt;a href="http://www.amazon.com/Mac-Hackers-Handbook-Charles-Miller/dp/0470395362"&gt;The Mac Hackers Handbook&lt;/a&gt;. It’s a great interview, especially if you are interested in Mac security issues. We also discuss the No More Free Bugs meme.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>New Application Security Certification Launched</title><link>/blog/new-application-security-certification-launched/</link><pubDate>Wed, 01 Apr 2009 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/new-application-security-certification-launched/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;We’ve been talking a lot about application security since we started this blog, and one thing we’ve been tracking closely are training and certification programs. &lt;img src="http://securosis.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/03/200903312137.jpg" alt="200903312137.jpg"&gt; While we couldn’t talk about it, we’ve been quietly involved with the Institute for Certified Application Security Specialists. We reviewed the program during development, and were overall pretty impressed. It has very &lt;a href="http://www.veracode.com/blog/2008/09/isc2s-newest-cash-cow-csslp/"&gt;similar requirements to the CSSLP&lt;/a&gt;, but is more cost effective for security practitioners… something we can all appreciate in this economy. Believe it or not, despite my not-infrequent diatribes against various certifications, I actually went through the process myself and am fully certified. What I really appreciate is how pragmatic the program is, and how it really reflects the operational realities of application security.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>(Updated) Easily Detect Conficker Infections- Over the Network</title><link>/blog/updated-easily-detect-conficker-infections-over-the-network/</link><pubDate>Mon, 30 Mar 2009 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/updated-easily-detect-conficker-infections-over-the-network/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;Update: Dan just let me know that Tillmann Werner and Felix Leder have been working on this for 5 months! Dan came in (and then brought me in) only on Friday. They deserve major credit and thanks for this impressive work. Also, Nmap (which is still free) and the free feed of Nessus have their signatures out for those of you that don’t have an enterprise product.&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Comments on “Containing Conficker”</title><link>/blog/comments-on-containing-conficker/</link><pubDate>Mon, 30 Mar 2009 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/comments-on-containing-conficker/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;As you have probably read, a method for remotely detecting systems infected with the Conficker worm was discovered by Felix Leder and Tillmann Werner. They have been working with &lt;a href="http://www.doxpara.com/"&gt;Dan Kaminisky,&lt;/a&gt; amongst others, to come up with a tool to detect the worm and give IT organizations the ability to protect themselves. This is excellent news. The bad news is how unprepared most applications are to handle threats like this. Earlier this morning, the guys at &lt;a href="http://www.honeynet.org/"&gt;The Honeynet Project&lt;/a&gt; were kind enough to forward Rich and myself a copy of their &lt;a href="https://www.honeynet.org/papers/conficker/"&gt;Know Your Enemy: Containing Conficker&lt;/a&gt; paper. This is a very thorough analysis of how the worm operates. I want keep my comments on this short, and simply recommendation strongly that you read the paper. If you are in software development, you &lt;em&gt;need&lt;/em&gt; to read this paper.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Friday Summary: March 27, 2009</title><link>/blog/friday-summary-march-27-2009/</link><pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2009 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/friday-summary-march-27-2009/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;It is absolutely amazing how quickly time can rush past during the most momentous moments of your life. It was over three weeks ago that my daughter was born, and I’m still trying to figure out what the f&amp;amp;*% just happened. A lot of people made it sound like my life would suddenly crash to a halt as I vaulted into some other dimension of existence, but the changes, while massive, are also far more subtle and confusing. Needless to say, I blame the reduced sleep (which still isn’t as bad as it was in paramedic school).&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Webcast on Endpoint Encryption Today</title><link>/blog/webcast-on-endpoint-encryption-today/</link><pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2009 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/webcast-on-endpoint-encryption-today/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I’ve been out at the Phoenix SANS event so I almost forgot to post this…&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I’ll be presenting on endpoint encryption from 2-3 ET today. The event is sponsored by WinMagic, &lt;a href="http://www.xtalks.com/events/xto331winmagic/reg1.html"&gt;and you can register here&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Network Security Podcast, Episode 143</title><link>/blog/network-security-podcast-episode-143/</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/network-security-podcast-episode-143/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;With the CanSecWest conference last week, right on the heels of Black Hat Europe, there have been many happenings in the security world. On top of that, our favorite investigative reporter managed to take down yet another group of bad guys by shining his flashlight in the right direction.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Security Speed-bumps</title><link>/blog/security-speed-bumps/</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/security-speed-bumps/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Reading yet another comment on yet another blog about “what good is ABC technology because I can subvert the process” or “we should not use XYZ technology because it does not stop the threats” … I feel a rant coming on. I get seriously annoyed when I hear these blanket statements about how some technologies are no good because they can be subverted. I appreciate zeal in researchers, but am shocked by people’s myopia in applied settings. Seriously, is there any technology that cannot be compromised?&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>CanSecWest Highlights</title><link>/blog/cansecwest-highlights/</link><pubDate>Mon, 23 Mar 2009 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/cansecwest-highlights/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I have been reading about the highlights of the &lt;a href="http://cansecwest.com/"&gt;CanSecWest&lt;/a&gt; show all over the net, and it seems like there were a lot of really cool presentations. TippingPoint’s ‘Pwn2Own’ contest at CanSecWest that started late last week concluded over the weekend. The contest awarded $5,000 to each hacker would could uncover an exploit for any of the major browser platforms (Firefox, Internet Explorer, Chrome, &amp;amp; Safari). Firefox, IE, &amp;amp; Safari were all exploited at least once during the contest, with Chrome the only browser to make it through the trials. Perhaps that is to be expected given its newness. Lots more wrap-up details on the &lt;a href="http://dvlabs.tippingpoint.com/blog/2009/03/18/pwn2own-2009-day-1---safari-internet-explorer-and-firefox-taken-down-by-four-zero-day-exploits" title="DV Labs"&gt;DV Labs&lt;/a&gt; site.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Friday Summary, March 20th, 2009</title><link>/blog/friday-summary-march-20th-2009/</link><pubDate>Fri, 20 Mar 2009 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/friday-summary-march-20th-2009/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Happy Friday! Rich is off with the family today and probably sneaking in some time to play with his new Mac Pro as well. If I know him, at the first opportunity he will be in the garage, soldering iron in hand, making his own 9’ mini-DVI cable to hook up his new monitor. Family, new baby, and cool new hardware mean I have Friday blog duties. But as I just got back from the &lt;a href="http://www.sourceconference.com/index.php/source-boston-2009"&gt;Source Boston&lt;/a&gt; show, there is much to talk about this week. Across the board, the presentations at Source were really excellent, and some of the finest minds in security were in attendance, so Stacy Thayer and her team get very high marks from me for putting on a great event.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Immutable Log Files</title><link>/blog/immutable-log-files/</link><pubDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2009 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/immutable-log-files/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I have been working on a project lately that I don’t really get to talk about much, but it is a technology that I am quite fond of: Immutable Log Files. For those of you who do not know what these are, immutable logs are log files protected from tampering and erroneous insertion. Depending upon the implementation, the files can have additional protections from poisoning and fictional recreation/forgery as well. There are many other names for this type of technology, such as content integrity verification, court admissible evidentiary data, incontrovertible data, and even “signed and sequenced” data. Regardless of name, the intent is to create a tamper-resistant archive of events. A high level overview of the process might look like the following:&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Securosis at RSA</title><link>/blog/securosis-at-rsa/</link><pubDate>Tue, 17 Mar 2009 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/securosis-at-rsa/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Ah yes, as spring approaches, so does Sundance for Ugly People (as a friend likes to call the RSA Security Conference).&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>SANS Webcast Tomorrow - Business Justification for Data Security</title><link>/blog/sans-webcast-tomorrow-business-justification-for-data-security/</link><pubDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2009 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/sans-webcast-tomorrow-business-justification-for-data-security/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi everyone,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Just a quick note that tomorrow we’ll be giving a webcast about our research behind &lt;a href="http://securosis.com/publications/TheBusinessJustificationForDataSecurity.V.1.0.pdf"&gt;The Business Justification for Data Security&lt;/a&gt; paper we recently released. For those of you with too much ADD to read all 30+ pages, we’ll be covering all the core material and walking through an example case.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Sprint Customer Data Leaked … again</title><link>/blog/sprint-customer-data-leaked-again/</link><pubDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2009 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/sprint-customer-data-leaked-again/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Brian Krebs posted last week that Sprint is &lt;a href="http://voices.washingtonpost.com/securityfix/2009/03/sprint_employee_stole_customer.html" title="Krebs on Sprint Data Loss"&gt;claiming an employee has stolen customer data&lt;/a&gt;, including pin numbers and the “security question” you can use to recover a password. This is a vendor I have been following for a long time, and I’m surprised we have not seen this type of activity before. From Brian’s blog:&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>No Friday Summary This Week</title><link>/blog/no-friday-summary-this-week/</link><pubDate>Fri, 13 Mar 2009 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/no-friday-summary-this-week/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi everyone,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;With me adapting to the new baby and holding the fort here at Securosis Central, and Adrian out at the Source conference, I wasn’t able to get our usual weekly summary together.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Go Vote for the Social Security Awards</title><link>/blog/go-vote-for-the-social-security-awards/</link><pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2009 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/go-vote-for-the-social-security-awards/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;No, we don’t mean vote for your favorite geriatric patriarch or matriarch, but for your &lt;a href="http://www.socialsecurityawards.com/"&gt;favorite security blog&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.socialsecurityawards.com/"&gt;&lt;img src="http://securosis.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/03/200903111627.jpg" alt="200903111627.jpg"&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;While I’m a little late posting this (I blame being distracted by the impending, then final, arrival of my incredibly cute daughter), there’s still plenty of time to vote. The awards are all part of the &lt;a href="https://365.rsaconference.com/blogs/blogger_meetup"&gt;Security Blogger’s Meetup&lt;/a&gt;, which started as a little gathering put together by &lt;a href="http://www.mckeay.net"&gt;Martin&lt;/a&gt; and myself 3 years ago, and is now a pretty big &amp;amp; impressive event, with an actual budget. At least I think it’s impressive- it’s hard to remember after all the free booze.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>New Release: Building a Web Application Security Program</title><link>/blog/new-release-building-a-web-application-security-program/</link><pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2009 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/new-release-building-a-web-application-security-program/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Adrian and I are proud to release our latest whitepaper: &lt;a href="http://securosis.com/research/papers/web-application-security-program/"&gt;Building a Web Application Security Program&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src="http://securosis.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/03/paper.png" alt="Paper.png"&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;For those of you who followed along with the blog series, this is a compilation of that content, but it’s been updated to reflect all the comments we received, with additional research, and the entire report was professionally edited. We even added a couple pretty pictures!&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Friday Summary, March 6 2009</title><link>/blog/friday-summary-march-6-2009/</link><pubDate>Sat, 07 Mar 2009 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/friday-summary-march-6-2009/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;With Rich pretty much out of commission this week and my very last minute preparation for Source Boston underway, this week’s post with be a short one. Plus I need to install the current Mac &lt;a href="http://infosecurity.us/?p=6806" title="Mac OS X patches"&gt;OS X patches&lt;/a&gt; and reboot all of the computers in the house. That little bouncing icon is finally going to get it’s way. On that note, has anyone out there ever looked at the viability of polluting the Apple downloads? Every time I click one of these I am always uncertain why I trust it or how I could verify the contents if I really wanted to. But at the moment, that sounds like too much work to investigate. Perhaps I should simply remain happy and ignorant of the process.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Director of National Cyber-Security Center Resigns</title><link>/blog/director-of-national-cyber-security-center-resigns/</link><pubDate>Fri, 06 Mar 2009 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/director-of-national-cyber-security-center-resigns/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;A couple days ago I posted some thoughts on &lt;a href="http://securosis.com/2009/03/03/perspective-on-data-security-and-the-us-government/" title="Data Security and the US Government"&gt;Data Security and the US Government&lt;/a&gt;, how I perceive the role of Cybersecurity, and what I suspected would be a difficult challenge as the Cybersecurity team was set up at cross-purposes with the intelligence community. Today the &lt;a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB123638468860758145.html" title="WSJ"&gt;Wall Street Journal&lt;/a&gt; released an article on the resignation of National Cybersecurity Chief Rod Beckstrom. In a case of “even a blind squirrel occasionally finds a nut”, my estimate of internal conflict appears to already be going on. In his resignation letter, Mr. Beckstrom stated that the “NSA currently dominates most national cyber efforts” and “The intelligence culture is very different than a network operations or security culture”. The WSJ focuses on privacy and separation of power issues with additional comments from Mr. Beckstrom: “the threats to our democratic process … if all top level network security and monitoring are handled by any one organization”.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Gmail CSRF Flaw</title><link>/blog/gmail-csrf-flaw/</link><pubDate>Fri, 06 Mar 2009 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/gmail-csrf-flaw/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Yesterday morning I read the article on &lt;a href="http://www.thetechherald.com/article.php/200910/3104/Google-denies-CSRF-vulnerability-in-Gmail" title="The Tech Herald"&gt;The Tech Herald&lt;/a&gt; about the demonstration of a CSRF flaw for ‘Change Password’ in Google Mail. While the vulnerability report has been known for some time, this is the first public proof of concept I am aware of.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>More on PDF /JBIGS2Decode Issue</title><link>/blog/more-on-pdf-jbigs2decode-issue/</link><pubDate>Fri, 06 Mar 2009 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/more-on-pdf-jbigs2decode-issue/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Via &lt;a href="http://it.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=09/03/05/1328244&amp;amp;from=rss" title="Slashdot: PDF Vuln"&gt;Slashdot&lt;/a&gt;, I just ran across &lt;a href="http://blog.didierstevens.com/2009/03/04/quickpost-jbig2decode-trigger-trio/" title="Didier Stevens"&gt;Didier Stevens post on how to automate the JBIG2decode&lt;/a&gt; vulnerability in PDF documents. There is a video on the site where he runs through three scenarios to exercise the vulnerability - Manually starting up Reader, viewing a thumbnail PDF, and then automatic execution by simply visiting the page with the malicious document through Windows Explorer Shell Extensions, and shows you the results in the debugger. It’s worth the view.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Source Boston Next Week</title><link>/blog/source-boston-next-week/</link><pubDate>Fri, 06 Mar 2009 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/source-boston-next-week/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I am going to be in Boston Tuesday through Friday at the &lt;a href="http://www.sourceconference.com/index.php/source-boston-2009/boston-2009-sessions" title="Source Boston 2009"&gt;Source Boston&lt;/a&gt; event that runs March 11th through the 13th. I am presenting on Encryption and Enterprise Data Security on Thursday afternoon right after Jeremiah Grossman. This is my first Source Boston event, so I am looking forward to it. Let me know if you are going to be in town!&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>My Perspective on Data Security and the US Government</title><link>/blog/my-perspective-on-data-security-and-the-us-government/</link><pubDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2009 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/my-perspective-on-data-security-and-the-us-government/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;During the recent &lt;a href="http://cdn2.libsyn.com/mckeay/nsp-021009-ep137.mp3?nvb=20090303231706&amp;amp;nva=20090304232706&amp;amp;t=0e91ec420fcd2840a9b0f" title="Podcast "&gt;podcast&lt;/a&gt; I did with Rich, I made a couple throw-away comments about the selection of Melissa Hathaway as cybersecurity advisor. A lot of ideas went into those comments and a few articles that I have read that brought to the fore several issues I have had ideas rolling around in my head for the last couple of years. In fact I have written this post a couple of times over the last year and deleted it because I thought it would be perceived as too political. My goal is not political commentary rather trying to provide perspective about the evolution of data security, but sometimes the two are linked so tightly together it is difficult to fully separate.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Cash Only</title><link>/blog/cash-only/</link><pubDate>Tue, 03 Mar 2009 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/cash-only/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Off-topic post …&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;My wife is constantly reading about the banks and lending institutions, and likes to read to me every gory detail she learns. Occasionally I do listen. About a month ago she made the comment “If the banks do go under, we’ll have to go back to cash. That will be strange.” I thought about it for a while and I realized just how true that was. I seldom carry cash. I do a lot of my shopping on the Internet. Can’t really do that with cash very well. I used the credit card for everything … even the occasional Starbucks triple-shot-Hoff-inspired-venti-iced-coffee-with-splenda-shaken-not-stirred gets a credit card swipe. Then my wife says “Let’s see if we can go for a month without spending on the credit card. Just cash!” Being the contrarian that I am, I decided “What the heck, let’s try it.”&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>The Nugget has Landed</title><link>/blog/the-nugget-has-landed/</link><pubDate>Tue, 03 Mar 2009 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/the-nugget-has-landed/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Securosis has expanded. Just got an email from Rich:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;“Say hello to Riley Marie Mogull. 6lbs 15oz. Sharon made it without meds- she’s my hero”&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Friday Summary: Feb 27, 2009</title><link>/blog/friday-summary-feb-27-2009/</link><pubDate>Sat, 28 Feb 2009 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/friday-summary-feb-27-2009/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;It’s Friday again and time for the summary. It’s been a yin &amp;amp; yang kind of week for me, with mixed blessings and curses all around.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>A Very Revealing Statement by the PCI Council</title><link>/blog/a-very-revealing-statement-by-the-pci-council/</link><pubDate>Fri, 27 Feb 2009 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/a-very-revealing-statement-by-the-pci-council/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I was getting a little excited when I read &lt;a href="http://www.networkworld.com/news/2009/022509-pci-council-security.html?hpg1=bn"&gt;this article over at NetworkWorld&lt;/a&gt; about how the PCI council will be releasing a prioritized roadmap for companies facing compliance. It’s a great idea- instead of flogging companies with a massive list of security controls, it will prioritize those controls and list specific milestones.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Netezza Buys Tizor</title><link>/blog/netezza-buys-tizor/</link><pubDate>Fri, 27 Feb 2009 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/netezza-buys-tizor/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;While both &lt;a href="http://securosis.com/2008/10/15/my-take-on-the-database-security-market-challenges/"&gt;Rich&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://securosis.com/2008/10/15/will-database-security-vendors-disappear/"&gt;and I&lt;/a&gt; predicted this would happen, I admit I am still slightly surprised: &lt;a href="http://www.netezza.com"&gt;Netezza&lt;/a&gt; has acquired &lt;a href="http://64.78.11.84/" title="tizor"&gt;Tizor&lt;/a&gt; for $3.1M in cash. &lt;a href="http://www.netezza.com/releases/2009/release022409.htm"&gt;Netezza press release here&lt;/a&gt;, and While I do not see a press release issued from either vendor &lt;a href="http://www.xconomy.com/boston/2009/02/25/netezza-buys-tizor-systems-for-3m-song/" title="Netezza Buys Tizor"&gt; xconomy has the story here&lt;/a&gt;. Surprising in the sense that I would not have expected a data warehousing vendor to acquire a database monitoring &amp;amp; auditing company. My guess is it’s the auto-discovery features that most interest them. But like many companies that provide data management and analysis, Netezza may be finding that their customers are asking for security and even compliance facilities around the data they manage. In that case, this move could really pay off.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Workers “stealing company data”?</title><link>/blog/workers-stealing-company-data/</link><pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2009 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/workers-stealing-company-data/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Just ran across this article on workers “&lt;a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/technology/7902989.stm" title="BBC Stealing Company Data"&gt;stealing company data&lt;/a&gt;” on the BBC news web site. The story is based upon a recent Ponemon study (who else?) of former employees and the likelihood they will steal company information. It turns out that most of those polled will in fact take something with them. The Ponemon numbers are not surprising as this tracks closely with traditional forms of employee theft across most industries. What got me shaking my head was the sheer quantity of FUD being thrown out with the raw data.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Is There Any DLP or Data Security On Mac/Linux?</title><link>/blog/is-there-any-dlp-or-data-security-on-mac-linux/</link><pubDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2009 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/is-there-any-dlp-or-data-security-on-mac-linux/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Had a very interesting call today with a client in the pharma research space. They would like to protect clinical study data as it moves to researcher’s computers, but are struggling with the best approach. On the call, I quickly realized that DLP, or a content tracking tool like Verdasys (who also does endpoint DLP) would be ideal. The only problem? They need Windows, Mac, and Linux support.&lt;img src="http://securosis.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/02/200902241153.jpg" alt="200902241153.jpg"&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Top 10 Web Hacking Technique of 2008</title><link>/blog/top-10-web-hacking-technique-of-2008/</link><pubDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2009 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/top-10-web-hacking-technique-of-2008/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;A month or so I go I was invited by Jeremiah Grossman to help judge the Top 10 Web Hacking Techniques of 2008 (my fellow judges were Hoff, H D Moore, and Jeff Forristal).&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Friday Summary, February 20, 2009</title><link>/blog/friday-summary-february-20-2009/</link><pubDate>Sat, 21 Feb 2009 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/friday-summary-february-20-2009/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&amp;lt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;div class=”wiki_entry”&amp;gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Last Friday Adrian sent me an IM that he was just about finished with the Friday summary. The conversation went sort of like this:&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Will This Be The Next PCI Requirement Addition?</title><link>/blog/will-this-be-the-next-pci-requirement-addition/</link><pubDate>Sat, 21 Feb 2009 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/will-this-be-the-next-pci-requirement-addition/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I’m almost willing to bet money on this one…&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Due to the nature of the recent breaches, such as Hannaford, where data was exfiltrated over the network, I highly suspect we will see outbound monitoring and/or filtering in the next revision of the PCI DSS. For more details on what I mean, &lt;a href="http://securosis.com/2009/02/11/recent-data-breaches-how-to-limit-malicious-outbound-connections/"&gt;refer back to this post.&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>A Small, Necessary, Legal Change For National Cybersecurity</title><link>/blog/a-small-necessary-legal-change-for-national-cybersecurity/</link><pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2009 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/a-small-necessary-legal-change-for-national-cybersecurity/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I loved being a firefighter. In what other job do you get to speed around running red lights, chops someone’s door down with an axe, pull down their ceiling, rip down their walls, cut holes in their roof with a chainsaw, soak everything they own with water, and then have them stop by the office a few days later to give you the cookies they baked for you.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>New Database Configuration Assessment Options</title><link>/blog/new-database-configuration-assessment-options/</link><pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2009 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/new-database-configuration-assessment-options/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Oracle has &lt;a href="http://www.oracle.com/mvalent/index.html" title="mValent"&gt;acquired mValent&lt;/a&gt;, the configuration management vendor. mValent provides an assessment tool to examine the configuration of applications. Actually, they do quite a bit more than that, but I wanted to focus on the value to database security and compliance in this post. This is a really good move on Oracle’s part as it fills a glaring hole that they have had for some time in their security and compliance offerings. I have never understood why Oracle did not provide this as part of OEM as every Oracle event I have been to in the last 5 years has sessions where DBA’s are swapping scripts to assess their database. Regardless, they have finally filled the gap. It provides them with a platform to implement their own best practice guidelines, and gives customers a way to implement their own security, compliance and operational policies around the database and (I assume) other application platforms. Sadly, many companies have not automated their database configuration assessments, and the market remains wide open, and this is a &lt;a href="http://online.wsj.com/article_email/SB123483057830695641-lMyQjAxMDI5MzE0NzgxMzcwWj.html" title="WSJ on Oracle Acquisitions"&gt;timely acquisition&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Selective Inverse Recency Bias In Security</title><link>/blog/selective-inverse-recency-bias-in-security/</link><pubDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2009 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/selective-inverse-recency-bias-in-security/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Nate Silver is one of those rare researchers with the uncanny ability to send your brain spinning off on unintended tangents totally unrelated to the work he’s actually documenting. His work is fascinating more for its process than its conclusions, and often generates new introspections applicable to our own areas of expertise. Take &lt;a href="http://www.esquire.com/features/data/nate-silver-on-economy-0309?src=digg"&gt;this article in Esquire&lt;/a&gt; where he discusses the concept of recency bias as applied to financial risk assessments.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Friday Summary, 13th of February, 2009</title><link>/blog/friday-summary-13th-of-february-2009/</link><pubDate>Sat, 14 Feb 2009 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/friday-summary-13th-of-february-2009/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;It’s Friday the 13th, and I am in a good mood. I probably should not be, given that every conversation seems to center around some negative aspect of the economy. I started my mornings this week talking with one person after another about a possible banking collapse, and then moved to a discussion of &lt;a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/02/11/technology/companies/11radio.html"&gt;Sirius/XM going under&lt;/a&gt;. Others are furious about the banking bailout as it’s rewarding failure. Tuesday of this week I was invited to speak at a business luncheon on data security and privacy, so I headed down the hill to find the side of the roads filled with cars and ATV’s for sale. Cheap. I get to the parking lot and find it empty but for a couple of pickup trucks, all are for sale. The restaurant we are supposed to meet at shuttered its doors the previous night and went out of business. We move two doors down to the pizza joint where the TV is on and the market is down 270 points and will probably be worse by the end of the day. Still, I am in a good mood. Why? Because I feel like I was able to help people.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Adrian Appears on the Network Security Podcast</title><link>/blog/adrian-appears-on-the-network-security-podcast/</link><pubDate>Fri, 13 Feb 2009 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/adrian-appears-on-the-network-security-podcast/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I can’t believe I forgot to post this, but Martin was off in Chicago for work this week and Adrian joined me as guest host for the Network Security Podcast. We recorded live at my house, so the audio may sound a little different. If you listen really carefully, you can hear an appearance by Pepper the Wonder Cat, our Chief of Everything Officer here at Securosis.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Los Alamos Missing Computers</title><link>/blog/los-alamos-missing-computers/</link><pubDate>Fri, 13 Feb 2009 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/los-alamos-missing-computers/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Yahoo! News is reporting that the Los Alamos nuclear weapons research facility reportedly is &lt;a href="http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20090212/ap_on_go_ca_st_pe/los_alamos_computers" title="Los Alamos missing computers"&gt;missing some 69 computers&lt;/a&gt; according to a watchdog group who released an internal memo. Either they have really bad inventory controls, or they have a kleptomaniac running around the lab. Even for a mid-sized organization, this is a lot, especially given the nature of their business. Granted the senior manager says this does not mean there was a breach of classified information, and I guess I should give him the benefit of the doubt, but I have never worked at a company where sensitive information did not flow like water around the organization regardless of policy. The requirement may be to keep classified information off unclassified systems, but unless those systems are audited, how would you know? How could you verify if they are missing.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>The Business Justification for Data Security: Additional Positive Benefits</title><link>/blog/the-business-justification-for-data-security-additional-positive-benefits/</link><pubDate>Fri, 13 Feb 2009 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/the-business-justification-for-data-security-additional-positive-benefits/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;So far in this series we have discussed how to assess both the value of the information your company uses, and some potential losses should your data be stolen. The bad news is that security spending only mitigates some portion of the threats, but cannot eliminate them. While we would like our solutions to eradicate threats, it’s usually more complicated than that. Fortunately there is some good news, that being security spending commonly addresses other areas of need and has additional tangible benefits that should be factored into the overall evaluation. For example, the collection, analysis, and reporting capabilities built into most data security products – when used with a business processing perspective – supplement existing applications and systems in management, audit and analysis. Security investment can also be readily be leveraged to reduce compliance costs, improve systems management, efficiently analyze workflows, and gain a better understanding of how data is used and where it is located. In this post, we want make short mention of some of the positive &amp;amp; tangible aspects of security spending that you should consider. We will put this into the toolkit at the end of the series, but for now, we want to discuss cost savings and other benefits.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>An Analyst Conundrum</title><link>/blog/an-analyst-conundrum/</link><pubDate>Thu, 12 Feb 2009 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/an-analyst-conundrum/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;Since we’ve jumped on the&lt;a href="http://securosis.com/2008/12/11/totally-transparent-research-and-sponsorship/"&gt;Totally Transparent Research&lt;/a&gt; bandwagon, sometimes we want to write about how we do things over here, and what leads us to make the recommendations we do. Feel free to ignore the rest of this post if you don’t want to hear about the inner turmoil behind our research…&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Recent Data Breaches- How To Limit Malicious Outbound Connections</title><link>/blog/recent-data-breaches-how-to-limit-malicious-outbound-connections/</link><pubDate>Thu, 12 Feb 2009 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/recent-data-breaches-how-to-limit-malicious-outbound-connections/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Word is slowly coming through industry channels that the attackers in the Heartland breach exfiltrated sniffed data via an outbound network connection. While not surprising, I did hear that the connection wasn’t encrypted- the bad guys sent the data out in cleartext (I’ll leave it to the person who passed this on to identify themselves if they want). Rumor from 2 independent sources is the bad guys are an organized group out of St. Petersburg (yes, Russia, as cliche as that is).&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Do You Use DLP? We Should Talk</title><link>/blog/do-you-use-dlp-we-should-talk/</link><pubDate>Tue, 10 Feb 2009 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/do-you-use-dlp-we-should-talk/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;As an analyst, I’ve been covering DLP since before there was anything called DLP. I like to joke that I’ve talked with more people that have evaluated and deployed DLP than anyone else on the face of the planet. Yes, it’s &lt;em&gt;exactly&lt;/em&gt; as exciting as it sounds.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>The Business Justification for Data Security: Understanding Potential Loss</title><link>/blog/the-business-justification-for-data-security-understanding-potential-loss/</link><pubDate>Tue, 10 Feb 2009 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/the-business-justification-for-data-security-understanding-potential-loss/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Rich posted the full research paper last week, but as not everyone wants to read the full 30 pages, we decided to continue posting excepts here. We still encourage comments as this will be a living document for us, and we will expand in the future. Here is Part Four:&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Database Security for DBAs</title><link>/blog/database-security-for-dbas/</link><pubDate>Sat, 07 Feb 2009 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/database-security-for-dbas/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I think I’ve discovered the perfect weight loss technique- a stomach virus. In 48 hours I managed to lose 2 lbs, which isn’t too shabby. Of course I’m already at something like 10% body fat, so I’m not sure how needed the loss was, but I figure if I just write a book about this and hock it in some informercial I can probably retire. My wife, who suffered through 3 months of so-called “morning” sickness, wasn’t all that sympathetic for some strange reason.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Friday Summary: February 6, 2009</title><link>/blog/friday-summary-february-6-2009/</link><pubDate>Sat, 07 Feb 2009 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/friday-summary-february-6-2009/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Here it is Friday again, and it feels like just a few minutes ago that I was writing the last Friday summary. This week has been incredibly busy for both of us. Rich has been out for the count most of this week with a stomach virus and wandering his own house like a deranged zombie. This was &lt;a href="http://www.i-hacked.com/content/view/274/48/" title="Zombies"&gt;not really a hack&lt;/a&gt;, they were just warning Rich’s neighborhood. As the county cordoned off his house with yellow tape and flagged him as a temporary bio-hazard, I thought it best to forgo this week’s face to face Friday staff meeting, and get back on track with our blogging. Between the business justification white paper that we launched this week, and being on the road for client meetings, we’re way behind. A few items of interest …&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>The Business Justification for Data Security- Version 1.0</title><link>/blog/the-business-justification-for-data-security-version-1-0/</link><pubDate>Fri, 06 Feb 2009 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/the-business-justification-for-data-security-version-1-0/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;We’ve been teasing you with previews, but rather than handing out more bits and pieces, we are excited to &lt;a href="http://securosis.com/publications/TheBusinessJustificationForDataSecurity.V.1.0.pdf"&gt;release the complete version of the Business Justification for Data Security&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>The Business Justification for Data Security: Risk Estimation</title><link>/blog/the-business-justification-for-data-security-risk-estimation/</link><pubDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2009 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/the-business-justification-for-data-security-risk-estimation/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;This is the third part of our Business Justification for Data Security series (&lt;a href="http://securosis.com/2009/01/27/the-business-justification-for-data-security-data-valuation/" title="Part 1 Bus Justification"&gt;Part 1&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://securosis.com/2009/01/27/the-business-justification-for-data-security-information-valuation-examples/" title="Part 2"&gt;Part 2&lt;/a&gt;), and if you have been following the series this far, you know that Rich and I have complained about how difficult this paper was to write. Our biggest problem was fitting risk into the model. In fact we experimented and ultimately rejected a couple models because the reduction of risk vs. any given security investment was non-linear. And there were many threats and many different responses, few of which were quantifiable, making the whole effort ‘guestimate’ soup. In the end , risk became our ‘witching rod’; a guide as to how we balance value vs loss, but just one of the tools we use to examine investment decisions.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Friday Summary - Jan 30, 2009</title><link>/blog/friday-summary-jan-30-2009/</link><pubDate>Sat, 31 Jan 2009 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/friday-summary-jan-30-2009/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;A couple of people forwarded me &lt;a href="http://philosecurity.org/2009/01/12/interview-with-an-adware-author"&gt;this interview&lt;/a&gt;, and if you have not read it, it is really worth your time. It’s an amazing interview with Matt Knox, a developer with Direct Revenue who authored adware during his employ with them. For me this is important as it highlights stuff I figured was going on but really could not prove. It also exposes much of the thought process behind the developers at Micosoft, and it completely altered my behavior for ’sanitizing’ my PC’s. For me, this all started a few years ago (2005?) when my Windows laptop was infected with this stuff. I discovered something was going on because there was ongoing activity in the background when the machine was idle and started to affect machine responsiveness.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Heartland Payment Systems Attempts To Hide Largest Data Breach In History Behind Inauguration</title><link>/blog/heartland-payment-systems-attempts-to-hide-largest-data-breach-in-history-behind-inauguration/</link><pubDate>Fri, 30 Jan 2009 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/heartland-payment-systems-attempts-to-hide-largest-data-breach-in-history-behind-inauguration/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Brian Krebs of the Washington Post dropped me a line this morning on a new article he posted. &lt;a href="http://voices.washingtonpost.com/securityfix/2009/01/payment_processor_breach_may_b.html"&gt;Heartland Payment Systems, a credit card processor, announced today, January 20th, that up to 100 Million credit cards may have been disclosed in what is likely the largest data breach in history&lt;/a&gt;. From Brian’s article:&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Policies and Security Products</title><link>/blog/policies-and-security-products/</link><pubDate>Fri, 30 Jan 2009 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/policies-and-security-products/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Where do the policies in your security product come from? With the myriad of tools and security products on the market, where do the pre-built policies come from? I am not speaking of AV in this post- rather looking at IDS, VA, DAM, DLP, WAF, pen testing, SIEM, and many others that use a set of policies to address security and compliance problems. The question is who decides what is appropriate? On every sales engagement, customer and analyst meeting I have ever participated in for security products, this was a question.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Submit A Top Ten Web Hacking Technique</title><link>/blog/submit-a-top-ten-web-hacking-technique/</link><pubDate>Fri, 30 Jan 2009 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/submit-a-top-ten-web-hacking-technique/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Last week Jeremiah Grossman asked if I’d be willing to be a judge to help &lt;a href="http://jeremiahgrossman.blogspot.com/2009/01/calling-all-researchers-send-in-top-web.html"&gt;select the Top Ten Web Hacking Techniques for 2008&lt;/a&gt;. Along with Chris Hoff (not sure who that is), H D Moore, and Jeff Forristal.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>The Most Powerful Evidence That PCI Isn’t Meant To Protect Cardholders, Merchants, Or Banks</title><link>/blog/the-most-powerful-evidence-that-pci-isnt-meant-to-protect-cardholders-merchants-or-banks/</link><pubDate>Fri, 30 Jan 2009 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/the-most-powerful-evidence-that-pci-isnt-meant-to-protect-cardholders-merchants-or-banks/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I just read a &lt;a href="http://www.storefrontbacktalk.com/securityfraud/heartland-sniffer-hid-in-unallocated-portion-of-disk/"&gt;great article on the Heartland breach&lt;/a&gt;, which I’ll talk more about later. There is one quote in there that really stands out:&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Inherent Role Conflicts In National Cybersecurity</title><link>/blog/inherent-role-conflicts-in-national-cybersecurity/</link><pubDate>Thu, 29 Jan 2009 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/inherent-role-conflicts-in-national-cybersecurity/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I spent a lot of time debating with myself if I should wade into this topic. Early in my analyst career I loved to talk about national cybersecurity issues, but I eventually realized that, as an outsider, all I was doing was expending ink and oxygen, and I wasn’t actually contributing anything. That’s why you’ve probably noticed we spend more time on this blog talking about pragmatic security issues and dispensing practical advice than waxing poetic about who should get the Presidential CISO job or dispensing advice to President Obama (who, we hate to admit, probably doesn’t read the blog). Unless or until I, or someone I know, gets “the job”, I harbor no illusions that what I write and say reaches the right ears.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>The Network Security Podcast, Episode 136</title><link>/blog/the-network-security-podcast-episode-136/</link><pubDate>Thu, 29 Jan 2009 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/the-network-security-podcast-episode-136/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I managed to constrain my rants this week, staying focused on the issue as Martin and I covered our usual range of material. I think we were in top form in the first part of the show where we focus on the economics of breaches and discussed loss numbers, vs. breach notification statistics.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>The Business Justification For Data Security: Data Valuation</title><link>/blog/the-business-justification-for-data-security-data-valuation/</link><pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2009 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/the-business-justification-for-data-security-data-valuation/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Man, nothing feels better than finishing off a few major projects. Yesterday we finalized the first draft of the Business Justification paper this series is based on, and I also squeezed out my presentation for IT Security World (in March) where I’m talking about major enterprise software security. Ah, the thrills and spills of SAP R/3 vs. Netweaver security!&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>The Business Justification for Data Security: Information Valuation Examples</title><link>/blog/the-business-justification-for-data-security-information-valuation-examples/</link><pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2009 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/the-business-justification-for-data-security-information-valuation-examples/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;In our last post, we mentioned that we’d be giving a few examples for data valuation. This is the part of the post where I try and say something pithy, but I’m totally distracted by the White House press briefing on MSNBC, so I’ll cut to the chase:&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Credit Card (Paper) Security Fail</title><link>/blog/credit-card-paper-security-fail/</link><pubDate>Tue, 27 Jan 2009 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/credit-card-paper-security-fail/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I’m consistently impressed with the stupidity of certain financial institutions. Take credit card companies and the issuing banks. We’re in the middle of a financial meltdown driven by failures in the credit system and easy credit, yet you still can’t check out at Target (or nearly anyplace else) without the annoying offer for your 10% discount if you just apply for a card on the spot.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Friday Summary- January 23, 2009</title><link>/blog/friday-summary-january-23-2009/</link><pubDate>Sat, 24 Jan 2009 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/friday-summary-january-23-2009/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;Warning- today’s introduction includes my political views.&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;History&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Whatever your political persuasion, there’s no denying the magnitude of this week. While we are far from eliminating racism and bias in this country, or the world at large, we passed an incredibly significant milestone in civil rights. My (pregnant) wife and I were sitting on the couch, watching a replay of President Obama’s speech, when she turned to me and said, “you know, our child will never know a world where we &lt;em&gt;didn’t&lt;/em&gt; have a black president”.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>How Much Security Will You Tolerate?</title><link>/blog/how-much-security-will-you-tolerate/</link><pubDate>Sat, 24 Jan 2009 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/how-much-security-will-you-tolerate/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I have found a unique way to keep anyone from using my iMac. While family &amp;amp; friends love the display, they do not use my machine. Many are awed that they can run Windows in parallel to the Mac OS, and the sleek appearance and minimal footprint has created many believers- but after a few seconds they step away from the keyboard. Why? Because they cannot browse the Internet. My copy of Firefox has &lt;a href="http://noscript.net/" title="NoScript"&gt;NoScript&lt;/a&gt;, Flashblock, cookie acknowledgement, and a couple of other security related ad-ons. But having to click the Flash logo, or to acknowledge a cookie, is enough to make them leave the room. “I was going to read email, but I think I will wait until I fly home”.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>The Business Justification For Data Security</title><link>/blog/the-business-justification-for-data-security/</link><pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2009 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/the-business-justification-for-data-security/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;You’ve probably noticed that we’ve been a little quieter than usual here on the blog. After blasting out our series on &lt;a href="http://securosis.com/2009/01/06/building-a-web-application-security-program-part-8-putting-it-all-together/"&gt;Building a Web Application Security Program&lt;/a&gt;, we haven’t been putting up much original content.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Heartland Payment Systems Attempts To Hide Largest Data Breach In History Behind Inauguration</title><link>/blog/heartland-payment-systems-attempts-to-hide-largest-data-breach-in-history-behind-inauguration-2/</link><pubDate>Tue, 20 Jan 2009 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/heartland-payment-systems-attempts-to-hide-largest-data-breach-in-history-behind-inauguration-2/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Brian Krebs of the Washington Post dropped me a line this morning on a new article he posted. &lt;a href="http://voices.washingtonpost.com/securityfix/2009/01/payment_processor_breach_may_b.html"&gt;Heartland Payment Systems, a credit card processor, announced today, January 20th, that up to 100 Million credit cards may have been disclosed in what is likely the largest data breach in history&lt;/a&gt;. From Brian’s article:&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Friday Summary - Jan 16, 2009</title><link>/blog/friday-summary-jan-16-2009/</link><pubDate>Fri, 16 Jan 2009 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/friday-summary-jan-16-2009/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;It has been a very trying week, between all our current projects- both Rich and I have had untimely home repair work, Rich is recovering from the flu, and we are both scrambling to get work done before deadlines. We have been focused on a series for security spending justification, which we will be mostly posting in blog entries. This is one of the tougher projects I have ever worked on, especially when your goal is to provide pragmatic advice that does not require dusting off calculus. While I was never particularly comfortable with many of the economic models that have been bastardized adapted for security spending justification, I had never spent this much time examining them closely. Having now done so, wow, what a crock of s^&amp;amp;! ROI, NPV, IRR, ALE, ROSI: these things are worthless in terms of security justification. They just completely miss the concept of the value of information, and the careful balancing act between risk and security. Many concepts treated as orthogonal are not, and some of the loss calculations are non-linear. Typically half the relevant data cannot be quantified, and some is simply unavailable. I am happy to say that both Rich and I have had a few ‘ah ha!’ moments, and a few areas where we have disposed of some BS, and I look forward to posting and getting some comments on the subject.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>The Network Security Podcast, Episode 134</title><link>/blog/the-network-security-podcast-episode-134/</link><pubDate>Thu, 15 Jan 2009 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/the-network-security-podcast-episode-134/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;It’s just Martin and myself on the podcast this week. Originally Martin sent out a bunch of stories and we figured, knowing our verbosity, that we would only get through about 3. But totally against our normal natures we managed to roll through them with nary a non-sequitur.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Oracle January 2009 CPU</title><link>/blog/oracle-january-2009-cpu/</link><pubDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2009 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/oracle-january-2009-cpu/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Just finished a review of the Oracle January 2009 Critical Patch Update/advisory (&lt;a href="http://www.oracle.com/technology/deploy/security/critical-patch-updates/cpujan2009.html" title="Oracle CPU Jan 2009"&gt;CPU&lt;/a&gt;).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;There are two issues that you need to pay attention to with this release: If you are using Oracle Secure Backup or Weblogix Server plugins, you will want to download and patch ASAP. Here is why:&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Phil Collins is the Mel Torme of my generation</title><link>/blog/phil-collins-is-the-mel-torme-of-my-generation/</link><pubDate>Tue, 13 Jan 2009 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/phil-collins-is-the-mel-torme-of-my-generation/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;This post is deeply off topic, has nothing to do with security, and everything to do with my personal realizations about music.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>There Are No Trusted Sites: Paris Hilton Edition</title><link>/blog/there-are-no-trusted-sites-paris-hilton-edition/</link><pubDate>Tue, 13 Jan 2009 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/there-are-no-trusted-sites-paris-hilton-edition/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;While not on the scale of &lt;a href="http://securosis.com/2008/12/24/there-are-no-trusted-sites-amex-edition/"&gt;Amex&lt;/a&gt; or &lt;a href="http://securosis.com/2008/09/18/reminder-there-are-no-trusted-sites/"&gt;BusinessWeek&lt;/a&gt;, I just find this one amusing.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Paris Hilton’s official website was hacked and is serving up a trojan (the malware kind, not what you’d expect from her*). From &lt;a href="http://www.networkworld.com/news/2009/011309-paris-hiltons-web-site-being.html"&gt;Network World&lt;/a&gt;:&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Friday Summary - January 9, 2009</title><link>/blog/friday-summary-january-9-2009/</link><pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/friday-summary-january-9-2009/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Here it is, our first Friday Summary of 2009. While it’s Adrian’s week to put the summary together, we thought it would be better if I handled the intro since I was at Macworld looking at cool stuff all week while he was manning the fort and cleaning my gutters (if he ever reads his employment contract, I’m totally screwed).&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Contingency Planning</title><link>/blog/contingency-planning/</link><pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/contingency-planning/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;‘I was a bit shocked to read about &lt;a href="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/28522036/" title="Merckle suicide"&gt;Adolf Merckle’s suicide &lt;/a&gt;yesterday. You just don’t see this sort of thing coming and I cannot even fathom the reasoning behind it. This has sent tremors through the market and certainly his holding company into dis-array for a while. It also reminded me of other similar events surrounding the last economic downturn , and that was kind of the ‘final straw’ that prompted this post. With many of the same signs and issues occurring as they did in the tech collapse of 2000-2002, few are eager to look at the downside, but it is time to spend a few minutes and verify contingency plans within your organization. It is a New Year, and what’s more a bright sunny day in Phoenix, so while it feels a bit incongruous to be talking about disaster recovery and such, it is a good time for you to give it a little thought. I am not really going into the issues of natural disaster, rather economic disaster. Nor am I focused on executives who need to consider change in management, but for the general well being of the people who work in your company whose livelihood and personal information may be dependent upon some degree of continuity.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Building a Web Application Security Program, Part 8: Putting It All Together</title><link>/blog/building-a-web-application-security-program-part-8-putting-it-all-together/</link><pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/building-a-web-application-security-program-part-8-putting-it-all-together/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;‘Whew! This is our final post in this series on Building a Web Application Security Program (&lt;a href="http://securosis.com/2008/11/19/building-a-web-application-security-program-part-1-introduction/" title="Part 1"&gt;Part 1&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://securosis.com/2008/12/02/building-a-web-application-security-program-part-2-the-business-justification/" title="Part 2"&gt;Part 2&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://securosis.com/2008/12/04/bulding-a-web-application-security-program-part-3-why-web-applications-are-different/" title="Part 3"&gt;Part 3&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://securosis.com/2008/12/09/building-a-web-application-security-program-part-4-the-web-application-lifecycle/" title="Part 4"&gt;Part 4&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://securosis.com/2008/12/11/building-a-web-application-security-program-part-4-web-application-development-lifecycle/" title="Part 5"&gt;Part 5&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://securosis.com/2008/12/16/building-a-web-application-security-program-part-6-secure-deployment/" title="Part 6"&gt;Part 6&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://securosis.com/2008/12/29/building-a-web-application-security-program-part-7-secure-operations/" title="Part 7"&gt;Part 7&lt;/a&gt;), and it’s time to put all the pieces together. Here are our guidelines for designing a program that meets the needs of your particular organization. Web application security is not a “one size fits all” problem. The risks, size, and complexity of the applications differ, the level of security awareness among team members varies, and most importantly the goals of each organization are different.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Macworld Coverage</title><link>/blog/macworld-coverage/</link><pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/macworld-coverage/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Macworld Expo may no longer be good enough for Apple, but it’s still one of my conference highlights of the year. I’ll be out there today through Thursday while Adrian manages the fort in Phoenix (I’ve managed to convince him that cleaning the cat litter while my wife is at work is a formal job responsibility, please don’t tell him that’s illegal and stuff).&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Twitter Phish Alert</title><link>/blog/twitter-phish-alert/</link><pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/twitter-phish-alert/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Update&lt;/strong&gt; : Some additional information was just posted on the &lt;a href="http://blog.twitter.com/2009/01/monday-morning-madness.html" title="Twitter Phish Damage"&gt;Twitter Blog&lt;/a&gt;. Along with some comments on how their soon to be Beta ‘0auth’ would not have prevented this attack, there is also some information on the extent of the scam. Seems that Barack Obama’s account was hacked along with a few others. Did this strike anyone else as odd: if Obama has not been twittering since being elected, does that mean a staffer logged in on his behalf?&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>What Regular Users Need To Know About The SSL/Root Certificate Authority Exploit</title><link>/blog/what-regular-users-need-to-know-about-the-ssl-root-certificate-authority-exploit/</link><pubDate>Tue, 30 Dec 2008 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/what-regular-users-need-to-know-about-the-ssl-root-certificate-authority-exploit/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Update&lt;/strong&gt; : &lt;a href="https://blogs.verisign.com/ssl-blog/2008/12/on_md5_vulnerabilities_and_mit.php"&gt;Verisign already closed the hole&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This morning (in the US- afternoon in Europe), a team of security researchers revealed that they are in &lt;a href="http://www.phreedom.org/research/rogue-ca/"&gt;possession of a forged Certificate Authority digital certificate&lt;/a&gt; that pretty much breaks the whole idea of a trusted website. It allows them to create a fake SSL certificate that your browser will accept for &lt;em&gt;any&lt;/em&gt; website.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Building A Web Application Security Program: Part 7, Secure Operations</title><link>/blog/building-a-web-application-security-program-part-7-secure-operations/</link><pubDate>Mon, 29 Dec 2008 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/building-a-web-application-security-program-part-7-secure-operations/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;We’ve been covering a heck of a lot of territory in our series on Building a Web Application Security Program (see &lt;a href="http://securosis.com/2008/11/19/building-a-web-application-security-program-part-1-introduction/"&gt;Part 1&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://securosis.com/2008/12/02/building-a-web-application-security-program-part-2-the-business-justification/"&gt;Part 2&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://securosis.com/2008/12/04/bulding-a-web-application-security-program-part-3-why-web-applications-are-different/"&gt;Part 3&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://securosis.com/2008/12/09/building-a-web-application-security-program-part-4-the-web-application-lifecycle/"&gt;Part 4&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://securosis.com/2008/12/11/building-a-web-application-security-program-part-4-web-application-development-lifecycle/"&gt;Part 5&lt;/a&gt;, and &lt;a href="http://securosis.com/2008/12/16/building-a-web-application-security-program-part-6-secure-deployment/"&gt;Part 6&lt;/a&gt;). So far we’ve covered &lt;em&gt;secure development&lt;/em&gt; and &lt;em&gt;secure deployment&lt;/em&gt; , now it’s time to move on to &lt;em&gt;secure operations&lt;/em&gt;. This is the point where the application moves out of development and testing and into production.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Responding To The SQL Server Zero Day: Security Advisory 961040</title><link>/blog/responding-to-the-sql-server-zero-day-security-advisory-961040/</link><pubDate>Mon, 29 Dec 2008 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/responding-to-the-sql-server-zero-day-security-advisory-961040/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;A &lt;a href="http://www.microsoft.com/technet/security/advisory/961040.mspx"&gt;Microsoft Security Advisory for SQL Server (961040)&lt;/a&gt; was posted on the 22nd of December. Microsoft has done a commendable job and provided a lot of information on this page, with a cross reference of the CVE number (CVE-2008-4270) so you can find more details if you need it. Any stored procedure that provide remote code execution can be dangerous and is a target for hackers. You want to patch as soon as Microsoft releases a patch. Microsoft states that “… MSDE 2000 or SQL Server 2005 Express are at risk of remote attack if they have modified the default installation to accept remote connections, if they allow untrusted users access to MSDE 2000 or SQL Server 2005 Express …” But I rate the risk higher than they say because of the following: MSDE 2000 and SQL Server Express 2005 are often bundled/embedded into applications and so their presence is not immediately apparent. There may be copies around that IT staff are not fully aware of, and/or these applications may be delivered with open permissions because the developer of the application was not concerned with these functions. Second, replication is an administrative function. &lt;code&gt;sp_replwritetovarbin&lt;/code&gt;, along with other stored procedures like &lt;code&gt;sp_resyncexecutesql&lt;/code&gt; and &lt;code&gt;sp_resyncexecute&lt;/code&gt;, functions run as DBO, or Database Owner, so if they are compromised they expose permissions as well as functions. Finally, as MSDE 2000 and SQL Server Express 2005 get used by web developers who run the database on the same machine with the same OS/DBA credentials, you server could be completely compromised with this one. So follow their advice and run the command:&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>MIT Students Now Helping MBTA- Like They Always Should Have</title><link>/blog/mit-students-now-helping-mbta-like-they-always-should-have/</link><pubDate>Wed, 24 Dec 2008 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/mit-students-now-helping-mbta-like-they-always-should-have/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://securosis.com/2008/08/25/guest-editorial-the-mbtamit-disclosure-fail/"&gt;Remember our guest post from Jesse Krembs on the MIT students put under a gag order during DefCon this year for hacking the rail system&lt;/a&gt;? And I quote:&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>SQL Server Security Advisory (961040)</title><link>/blog/sql-server-security-advisory-961040/</link><pubDate>Wed, 24 Dec 2008 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/sql-server-security-advisory-961040/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;‘The &lt;a href="http://www.microsoft.com/technet/security/advisory/961040.mspx"&gt;Microsoft Security Advisory (961040)&lt;/a&gt; for SQL Server was posted on the 22nd of December. Microsoft has done a commendable job and provided a lot of information on this page, with the cross reference of the CVE number (CVE-2008-4270) so you can find more details if you need it. Like any of the store procedures that provide remote code execution, they can be dangerous and are targets for hackers.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>SQL Server Zero Day: Security Advisory (961040)</title><link>/blog/sql-server-zero-day-security-advisory-961040/</link><pubDate>Wed, 24 Dec 2008 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/sql-server-zero-day-security-advisory-961040/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;The &lt;a href="http://www.microsoft.com/technet/security/advisory/961040.mspx"&gt;Microsoft Security Advisory (961040)&lt;/a&gt; for SQL Server was posted on the 22nd of December. Microsoft has done a commendable job and provided a lot of information on this page, with the cross reference of the CVE number (CVE-2008-4270) so you can find more details if you need it. Like any of the store procedures that provide remote code execution, they can be dangerous and are targets for hackers.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>There Are No Trusted SItes: AMEX Edition</title><link>/blog/there-are-no-trusted-sites-amex-edition/</link><pubDate>Wed, 24 Dec 2008 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/there-are-no-trusted-sites-amex-edition/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Remember our first post &lt;a href="http://securosis.com/2008/06/11/there-are-no-safe-web-sites-2/"&gt;that there are no trusted sites&lt;/a&gt;? Followed by &lt;a href="http://securosis.com/2008/09/18/reminder-there-are-no-trusted-sites/"&gt;our second one&lt;/a&gt;? Now I suppose it’s time to start naming names in the post titles, since this seems to be a popular trend.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Friday Summary: The 2008 Finale- 12-19-2008</title><link>/blog/friday-summary-the-2008-finale-12-19-2008/</link><pubDate>Fri, 19 Dec 2008 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/friday-summary-the-2008-finale-12-19-2008/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;This will be our last Friday Summary for 2008. This afternoon Adrian and I are off to &lt;a href="http://cyberfork.com/theoffice_desert_ridge/"&gt;The Office&lt;/a&gt; for our Securosis Annual Staff Festivus Party (sorry Chris, but we can drunk dial you if that makes you feel included).&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>You Can Go Back To Stealing Music Now</title><link>/blog/you-can-go-back-to-stealing-music-now/</link><pubDate>Fri, 19 Dec 2008 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/you-can-go-back-to-stealing-music-now/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Looks like the RIAA has finally realized that treating customers like criminals isn’t the best strategy in the world. &lt;a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB122966038836021137.html?mod=rss_whats_news_technology"&gt;According to the Wall Street Journal&lt;/a&gt; (via &lt;a href="http://slashdot.org"&gt;Slashdot&lt;/a&gt;) they are ending their campaign of suing individual file sharers to focus on working with ISPs to reduce illegal sharing.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>External Database Procedures</title><link>/blog/external-database-procedures/</link><pubDate>Wed, 17 Dec 2008 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/external-database-procedures/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Just ran across this &lt;a href="http://isc.sans.org/diary.html?storyid=5485" title="SANS"&gt;‘new’ SQL Server vulnerability&lt;/a&gt; in my news feed. This should not be an issue because you should not be using this set of functions. If you are using external stored procedures on a production database, &lt;strong&gt;stop&lt;/strong&gt;. In fact, you want to stop using them altogether by either &lt;a href="http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms164755(SQL.90).aspx" title="tip on xp rmoval"&gt;locking them down or removing them entirely&lt;/a&gt;. Not just because of this reported instance. External stored procedures exploits are favorites of database hackers, and have been used to alter database functionality and to run arbitrary code, both externally and internally launched attacks! SQL Server has historically had issues with buffer overflow attacks (See Microsoft Technical Bulletin &lt;a href="http://www.microsoft.com/technet/security/bulletin/ms02-020.mspx" title="MS02-020"&gt;MS02-020&lt;/a&gt;) against the pre-built procedures, and while known issued have been cleared up, XP’s are a complex and powerful extension ripe for exploits.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Building a Web Application Security Program: Part 6, Secure Deployment</title><link>/blog/building-a-web-application-security-program-part-6-secure-deployment/</link><pubDate>Tue, 16 Dec 2008 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/building-a-web-application-security-program-part-6-secure-deployment/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;In our &lt;a href="http://securosis.com/2008/12/11/building-a-web-application-security-program-part-4-web-application-development-lifecycle/"&gt;last episode&lt;/a&gt;, we continued our series on building a web application security program by looking at the &lt;em&gt;secure development&lt;/em&gt; stage (see also &lt;a href="http://securosis.com/2008/11/19/building-a-web-application-security-program-part-1-introduction/" title="Part One"&gt;Part 1&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://securosis.com/2008/12/02/building-a-web-application-security-program-part-2-the-business-justification/" title="Part 2"&gt;Part 2&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://securosis.com/2008/12/04/bulding-a-web-application-security-program-part-3-why-web-applications-are-different/"&gt;Part 3&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://securosis.com/2008/12/09/building-a-web-application-security-program-part-4-the-web-application-lifecycle/"&gt;Part 4, and &lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href="http://securosis.com/2008/12/11/building-a-web-application-security-program-part-4-web-application-development-lifecycle/"&gt;Part 5&lt;/a&gt;).&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Database Security Webcast Tomorrow</title><link>/blog/database-security-webcast-tomorrow/</link><pubDate>Tue, 16 Dec 2008 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/database-security-webcast-tomorrow/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Tomorrow I’ll be giving the first webcast in a three part series I’m presenting for Oracle. It’s actually a cool concept (the series) and I’m having a bit more fun than usual putting it together. The first session is &lt;em&gt;Database Security for Security Professionals.&lt;/em&gt; If you are a security professional and want to learn more about databases, this is targeted right between your eyes. Rather than rehashing the same old issues, we’re going to start with an overview of some database principles and how they mess up our usual approaches to security. Then we’ll dig into those things that the security team can control and influence, and how to work with DBAs. Although we are focusing on Oracle, all the core principles will apply to any database management system.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>I Do Not Have A Relationship With GDS International Or Business Management Magazine (Updated With GD</title><link>/blog/i-do-not-have-a-relationship-with-gds-international-or-business-management-magazine-updated-with-gd/</link><pubDate>Tue, 16 Dec 2008 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/i-do-not-have-a-relationship-with-gds-international-or-business-management-magazine-updated-with-gd/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;It came to my attention today that Business Management Magazine (&lt;a href="https://www.busmanagement.com"&gt;www.busmanagement.com&lt;/a&gt;- not linked on purpose), part of GDS International, is using my name to sell sponsorship of their publication and some roundtable event at the RSA conference.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Securosis Hits Macworld (And San Francisco)</title><link>/blog/securosis-hits-macworld-and-san-francisco/</link><pubDate>Tue, 16 Dec 2008 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/securosis-hits-macworld-and-san-francisco/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Just a quick note that I’ll be out in San Francisco for Macworld on January 5-8. While most of my time is dedicated to the conference, I will be able to take some meetings in the SF area. You can drop me a line at &lt;a href="mailto:rmogull@securosis.com"&gt;rmogull@securosis.com&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Structured Security Program, meet Agile Process</title><link>/blog/structured-security-program-meet-agile-process/</link><pubDate>Tue, 16 Dec 2008 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/structured-security-program-meet-agile-process/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Bryan Sullivan’s thought-provoking post on &lt;a href="http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/magazine/dd153756.aspx" title="MSDN SDL/A"&gt;Streamlining Security Practices for Agile Development&lt;/a&gt; caught my attention this morning. Reading it gave me the impression of a genuine generational divide. If you have ever witnessed a father and son talk about music, while they are talking about the same subject, there is little doubt the two are incompatible.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Database Security, Statistics and You</title><link>/blog/database-security-statistics-and-you/</link><pubDate>Mon, 15 Dec 2008 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/database-security-statistics-and-you/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;‘Doing some research on business justification stuff for several project Rich and I are working on. Ran across the Aberdeen Group research paper reference on the &lt;a href="http://blog.imperva.com/2008/12/protecting-the-database-less-i.html" title="Imperva Sponsored Aberdeen Paper"&gt;Imperva Blog,,&lt;/a&gt; which talks about business justification for database security spending. You can download a copy for free. It’s worth a read, but certainly needs to be kept in perspective.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Friday Summary: 12-12-2008</title><link>/blog/friday-summary-12-12-2008/</link><pubDate>Fri, 12 Dec 2008 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/friday-summary-12-12-2008/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;When I was little, I remember seeing an interview on television of a Chicago con man who made his living by scheming people out of their money. Back when the term was in vogue, the con man was asked to define what a ‘Hustle’ was. His reply was “Get get as much as you can, as fast as you can for as little as you can”. December is the month when the hustlers come to my neighborhood.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Stop Using Internet Explorer 7 (For Now), Or Deploy Workarounds</title><link>/blog/stop-using-internet-explorer-7-for-now-or-deploy-workarounds/</link><pubDate>Fri, 12 Dec 2008 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/stop-using-internet-explorer-7-for-now-or-deploy-workarounds/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;There is an &lt;a href="http://isc.sans.org/diary.html?storyid=5458"&gt;unpatched vulnerability for Internet Explorer 7 being actively exploited in the wild&lt;/a&gt;. The details are public, so any bad guy can take advantage of this. It’s a heap overflow in the XML parser, for you geeks out there. It affects all current versions of Windows.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>How The Cloud Destroys Everything I Love (About Web App Security)</title><link>/blog/how-the-cloud-destroys-everything-i-love-about-web-app-security/</link><pubDate>Thu, 11 Dec 2008 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/how-the-cloud-destroys-everything-i-love-about-web-app-security/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;On Tuesday, &lt;a href="http://securosis.com/2008/12/10/the-hoff-co-hosts-the-network-security-podcast/"&gt;Chris Hoff joined me to guest host the Network Security Podcast&lt;/a&gt; and we got into a deep discussion on cloud security. And as you know, for the past couple of weeks we’ve been &lt;a href="http://securosis.com/2008/12/11/building-a-web-application-security-program-part-4-web-application-development-lifecycle/"&gt;building our series on web application security&lt;/a&gt;. This, of course, led to all sorts of impure thoughts about where things are headed. I wouldn’t say I’m ready to run around in tattered clothes screaming about the end of the Earth, but the company isn’t called Securosis just because it has a nice ring to it.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Totally Transparent Research And Sponsorship</title><link>/blog/totally-transparent-research-and-sponsorship/</link><pubDate>Thu, 11 Dec 2008 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/totally-transparent-research-and-sponsorship/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Things seem a little strange over here at Securosis HQ- we’re getting a ton of feedback on an &lt;a href="http://securosis.com/2006/11/09/gds-international-and-business-management-magazine-are-illegally-using-my-name/"&gt;old post from November of 2006&lt;/a&gt;, but so far only one person has left us any real comments on our &lt;a href="http://securosis.com/2008/12/11/building-a-web-application-security-program-part-4-web-application-development-lifecycle/"&gt;Building a Web Application Security Program&lt;/a&gt; series.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>A Good (Potential) Risk Management IQ Test For Management</title><link>/blog/a-good-potential-risk-management-iq-test-for-management/</link><pubDate>Wed, 10 Dec 2008 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/a-good-potential-risk-management-iq-test-for-management/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;It looks like &lt;a href="http://www.liquidmatrix.org/blog/2008/12/09/china-stirring-the-pot-over-security-rules/"&gt;China is thinking about requiring in-depth technical information on all foreign technology products before they will be allowed into China&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Building a Web Application Security Program, Part 5: Secure Development</title><link>/blog/building-a-web-application-security-program-part-5-secure-development/</link><pubDate>Wed, 10 Dec 2008 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/building-a-web-application-security-program-part-5-secure-development/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Now that we’ve laid out the big picture for a web application security program, it’s time to dig into the individual details. In this part (see also &lt;a href="http://securosis.com/2008/11/19/building-a-web-application-security-program-part-1-introduction/" title="Part One"&gt;Part 1&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://securosis.com/2008/12/02/building-a-web-application-security-program-part-2-the-business-justification/" title="Part 2"&gt;Part 2&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://securosis.com/2008/12/04/bulding-a-web-application-security-program-part-3-why-web-applications-are-different/"&gt;Part 3&lt;/a&gt;, and &lt;a href="http://securosis.com/2008/12/09/building-a-web-application-security-program-part-4-the-web-application-lifecycle/"&gt;Part 4&lt;/a&gt;) we’re going to discuss how to implement security during the development phases of the web application lifecycle, including which tools we recommend.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>The Hoff Co-Hosts The Network Security Podcast</title><link>/blog/the-hoff-co-hosts-the-network-security-podcast/</link><pubDate>Wed, 10 Dec 2008 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/the-hoff-co-hosts-the-network-security-podcast/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Martin was out of town this week and put our fine show into my trustworthy hands. A trust I quickly dashed as I invited Chris Hoff to join the show. We managed to avoid any significantly bad language, and both of use were completely sober. I think.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Building a Web Application Security Program: Part 4, The Web Application Security Lifecycle</title><link>/blog/building-a-web-application-security-program-part-4-the-web-application-security-lifecycle/</link><pubDate>Tue, 09 Dec 2008 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/building-a-web-application-security-program-part-4-the-web-application-security-lifecycle/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;{blog_body}&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Mortality, Integrity, and Risk Management</title><link>/blog/mortality-integrity-and-risk-management/</link><pubDate>Tue, 09 Dec 2008 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/mortality-integrity-and-risk-management/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I despise the very concept of mortality. That everything we were, are, and can be comes to a crashing close at some arbitrary deadline. I’ve never been one to accept someone telling me to do something just because “that’s the way it is”, and I feel pretty much the same way about death. Having seen far more than my fair share of it, I consider it nothing but random and capricious.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>The Biggest Difference Between Web Applications And Traditional Applications.</title><link>/blog/the-biggest-difference-between-web-applications-and-traditional-applications/</link><pubDate>Tue, 09 Dec 2008 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/the-biggest-difference-between-web-applications-and-traditional-applications/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Adrian and I have been hard at work on our web application security overview series, and in a discussion we realized we left something off &lt;a href="http://securosis.com/2008/12/04/bulding-a-web-application-security-program-part-3-why-web-applications-are-different/"&gt;part 3 of the series&lt;/a&gt; when we dig into the differences between web applications and traditional applications.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>WebAppSec: Part4, The Web Application Lifecycle</title><link>/blog/webappsec-part4-the-web-application-lifecycle/</link><pubDate>Tue, 09 Dec 2008 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/webappsec-part4-the-web-application-lifecycle/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Just prior to this post, it dawned on us just how much ground we are covering. We’re looking at business justification, people, process, tools and technology, training, security mindset and more. Writing is an exercise in constraint- often pulling more content out than we are putting in. This hit home when we got lost within our own outline this morning. So before jumping into the technology discussion, we need to lay out our roadmap and show you the major pieces of a web application security program that we’ll be digging into.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Focus &amp; Priorities</title><link>/blog/focus-priorities/</link><pubDate>Mon, 08 Dec 2008 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/focus-priorities/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;This scene I ran across last week captured the essence of one of the points I want to make regarding security programs. This is a picture from a foreclosed home that I walked into Friday. The view is from the throne room master bedroom door, and you can see the shower stall off to the left, the bed to the right. It appears that the owners spent a great deal of time buying tile at Home Depot and making ‘improvements’, what with pretty much the entire house being self expression in fired clay and strategically placed mood lights. Rather than focusing on the basics, like say, paying the mortgage, they spend hundreds of hours and thousands of dollars in materials building a shrine to some toilet deity I am unfamiliar with.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Friday Summary: 12-03-2008</title><link>/blog/friday-summary-12-03-2008/</link><pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/friday-summary-12-03-2008/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Adrian and I are hard at work on our Building a Web Application Program series, and it led to an interesting discussion this morning on writing and writing styles. I’m fortunate that I’ve always been a pretty good writer; likely because I was a total bookworm as a kid. As with many things in life, if you are good at writing you often gain the opportunity to write more frequently. And the more you write, the better you write, and the more likely you are to develop and understand writing styles.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Analysis Of The Microsoft/RSA Data Loss Prevention Partnership</title><link>/blog/analysis-of-the-microsoft-rsa-data-loss-prevention-partnership/</link><pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/analysis-of-the-microsoft-rsa-data-loss-prevention-partnership/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;By the time I post this you won’t be able to find a tech news site that isn’t covering this one. I know, since my name was on the list of analysts the press could contact and I spent a few hours talking to everyone covering the story yesterday. Rather than just reciting the press release, I’d like to add some analysis, put things into context, and speculate wildly. For the record, this is a big deal in the long term, and will likely benefit all of the major DLP vendors, even though there’s nothing earth shattering in the short term.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>WebAppSec: Part 3, Why Web Applications Are Different</title><link>/blog/webappsec-part-3-why-web-applications-are-different/</link><pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/webappsec-part-3-why-web-applications-are-different/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;By now you’ve probably noticed that we’re spending a lot of time discussing the non-technical issues of web application security. We felt we needed to start more on the business side of the problem since many organizations really struggle to get the support they need to build out a comprehensive program. We have many years invested in understanding network and host security issues, and have built nearly all of our security programs to focus on them. But as we’ve laid out, web application security is &lt;em&gt;fundamentally different&lt;/em&gt; than host or network security, and requires a different approach. Web application security is also different from traditional software security, although it has far more in common with that discipline. In today’s post we’re going to get a little (just a little) more technical and talk about the specific technical and non-technical reasons web application security is different, before giving an overview of our take on the web application security lifecycle in the next post.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Apple Antivirus Thing: Much Ado About Nothing</title><link>/blog/apple-antivirus-thing-much-ado-about-nothing/</link><pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/apple-antivirus-thing-much-ado-about-nothing/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;All right, people, here’s the deal.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I just published &lt;a href="http://db.tidbits.com/article/9902"&gt;my take on the whole “Apple he said/she said you do/don’t need antivirus” thing over at TidBITS&lt;/a&gt;. Here’s my interpretation of what happened:&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Building A Web Application Security Program: Part 2, The Business Justification</title><link>/blog/building-a-web-application-security-program-part-2-the-business-justification/</link><pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/building-a-web-application-security-program-part-2-the-business-justification/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;‘In our last post in this series we introduced some of the key reasons web application security is typically underfunded in most organizations. The reality is that it’s often difficult to convince management why they need additional protections for an application that seems to be up and running just fine. Or to change a development process the developers themselves are happy with. While building a full business justification model for web application security is beyond the scope of this post (and worthy of its own series), we can’t talk about building a program without providing at least some basic tools to determine how much you should invest, and how to convince management to support you. The following list isn’t a comprehensive business justification model, but provides typical drivers we commonly see used to justify web application security investments:&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>The Network Security Podcast, Episode 130</title><link>/blog/the-network-security-podcast-episode-130/</link><pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/the-network-security-podcast-episode-130/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;It’s just Martin and myself again this week as we discuss PCI, online identities, telecom immunity, and one wacky data breach.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Holiday Bargain Shopping</title><link>/blog/holiday-bargain-shopping/</link><pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/holiday-bargain-shopping/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;‘Did you buy one of the deeply discounted Plasma Televisions this weekend? How about a new digital camera? How about eBay? No, not something being sold there, but the company itself. Chris O’Brien over at the San Jose Merc speculates on what it would take to buy the auction site as there have been some rumors floating around on this subject, and indirectly points out why cash is king. Meanwhile while the London times claims Microsoft was doing a little Black Friday shopping of it’s own, another rumor that probably will not die until it is no longer a rumor. What the heck, take half off and let the Holiday rush begin!&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Home Equity Fraud</title><link>/blog/home-equity-fraud/</link><pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/home-equity-fraud/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;‘This Sunday’s Arizona Republic picked up Brian Krebs article in the Washington Post about thieves tapping into home equity lines of credit. This is a very interesting, and just because their are people out there who actually still have home equity, but that this is a very simple con with potentially devastating affect. One of which is there was no data theft here, rather the information was mined legally. Second is that when the bank falls for the con, since they believe it was the borrower who made the withdrawal, the borrower has to detect the fraud and provide some form of evidence that it was not they that made the withdrawal.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Local Politics</title><link>/blog/local-politics/</link><pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/local-politics/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;‘It’s official- Arizona Governor Janet Napolitano is President-Elect Obama’s choice for Secretary of Homeland Security.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I’ve only been living in Arizona for about 5 years now and have been consistently impressed with Napolitano. She’s a Democratic gove or in a mostly-red state and well respected by everyone except the extreme end of the GOP. Very pragmatic, organized, and level headed. I realize most of you readers aren’t very familiar with her, but as a local constituent she’s a strong choice, known for teaming up with California, New Mexico, and the great nation of Texas to work on plugging some of the federal failures in managing border security.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>The Asset Recovery/Phone Home Software Algorithm</title><link>/blog/the-asset-recovery-phone-home-software-algorithm/</link><pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/the-asset-recovery-phone-home-software-algorithm/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Happy Monday everyone. This year I broke with tradition and actually ventured outside of the house of Black Friday. We didn’t see too many deals, but I did manage to grab a new rolling tool chest for the garage. That was before I heard about the disgusting hoard of lowlifes that killed some poor temp worker in Long Island because he had the gall to stand between them and a plasma TV at Wal-Mart. That incident represents everything that can go wrong with a capitalist society, and this is the last year I’ll be feeding the beast with any Black Friday purchases.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Our Annual Black Friday/Safe Shopping Post</title><link>/blog/our-annual-black-friday-safe-shopping-post/</link><pubDate>Wed, 26 Nov 2008 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/our-annual-black-friday-safe-shopping-post/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Hard to believe we’ve been around to post this yet a third time, but here you go. Our list of advice for shopping safely online this year; and we even updated it this time:&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>PayPal Mobile</title><link>/blog/paypal-mobile/</link><pubDate>Wed, 26 Nov 2008 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/paypal-mobile/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;PayPal announced their Mobile PayPal offering this week. Really nothing new here from a technology standpoint as it leverages existing services and the Verisign/PayPal security key. Why I was interested in the release was the signal that they are putting more resources behind this market. I am still shocked that payment via cell phone did not catch on like wildfire in US. Look at adoption rates of cell phones, SMS, twitter and the like, and I would have bet that payment would have been right there with them. Small dollar, in context, person to person, embedded payments could be easily provided. I saw my first payment via cell phone method in 1996 through one of the major European cell phone providers. Built a system capable of providing ‘micro-payment’ over the phone in 1997. Nada. No interest from the public.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>The Network Security Podcast, Episode 129</title><link>/blog/the-network-security-podcast-episode-129/</link><pubDate>Wed, 26 Nov 2008 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/the-network-security-podcast-episode-129/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Martin and I are preparing for Thanksgiving, just like everyone else in America right now. I don’t know about you, but that primarily means I have five days of work to accomplish in three days of the week. So we didn’t organize a guest this week- instead we sat down together (1000 miles apart) and talked about some of the stories that caught our attention over the last couple of weeks. It’s a good show, and we’re out of here until after Turkey Day.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>More On Why I Think Free Microsoft AV Will Be Good For Consumers</title><link>/blog/more-on-why-i-think-free-microsoft-av-will-be-good-for-consumers/</link><pubDate>Tue, 25 Nov 2008 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/more-on-why-i-think-free-microsoft-av-will-be-good-for-consumers/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Last week I talked a bit on the decision by Microsoft to kill OneCare and release a new, free antivirus package later in 2009. Overall, I stated that I believe this will be good for consumers:&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Selling Security To The Government</title><link>/blog/selling-security-to-the-government/</link><pubDate>Tue, 25 Nov 2008 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/selling-security-to-the-government/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;When I was with IPLocks in the 2004 time frame, we were exploring the possibility of selling our monitoring and assessment suite into the government. Friends and contacts made introductions, and we began investigating if there was a need for the solution, and if so, how we would approach tackling that type of relationship. While we knew dealing with the government would be tough, we felt that any organization that is sitting on piles of personally identifiable information and literally hundreds of thousands of databases would be a natural fit for our technology.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Politics And Protocols</title><link>/blog/politics-and-protocols/</link><pubDate>Mon, 24 Nov 2008 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/politics-and-protocols/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Catching up from last week I saw this article in Techworld (from NetworkWorld) about an IETF meeting to discuss the impact of Dan Kaminsky’s DNS exploit and potential strategies for hardening DNS.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Upgrading to Parallels 4.0</title><link>/blog/upgrading-to-parallels-4-0/</link><pubDate>Mon, 24 Nov 2008 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/upgrading-to-parallels-4-0/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I installed Parallels 4.0 on the iMac last week, upgraded my licenses and converted my bootable images to the new format. It took a while to do as the conversion process takes a long time. While the installation was trivial, I had 4 different bootable images to convert, which took a good 3 hours to migrate even though they were only a couple of gigabytes a piece and only have a handful of applications installed. But I had no problems and everything worked fine. There are a couple subtle changes to the interface that make management of the images a little easier. I have not witnessed the performance enhancements that are claimed to be present, but I have not had performance issues in the past, so your mileage may vary.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>How To Become An Analyst</title><link>/blog/how-to-become-an-analyst/</link><pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2008 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/how-to-become-an-analyst/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Since I get asked this question a lot:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Call yourself an analyst.&lt;br&gt;
Convince someone to call you an analyst.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Business cards don’t hurt.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Friday Summary - 11-21-08</title><link>/blog/friday-summary-11-21-08/</link><pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/friday-summary-11-21-08/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;After this week, Rich and I are “Home for the Holidays”, with the last of the year’s travel behind us.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Idiocy</title><link>/blog/idiocy/</link><pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/idiocy/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Experts: Cyber-crime as Destructive as Credit Crisis&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Bullshit.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Security Bloggers Network Revived</title><link>/blog/security-bloggers-network-revived/</link><pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/security-bloggers-network-revived/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Last week the SBN died as Google decided to drop support for Feedburner groups during their transition of Feedburner to Google’s platform.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Sensitive Data Dumped</title><link>/blog/sensitive-data-dumped/</link><pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/sensitive-data-dumped/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I swore that I was not going to cover data ‘breach’ events unless there was something that was really interesting or unique about it. There are too many and the general public has grown desensitized as the number of records and the overall number of breaches is, well, mind numbing. But this caught my eye as I think I may have taken photos of this house when it went back to the bank:&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Building a Web Application Security Program: Part 1, Introduction</title><link>/blog/building-a-web-application-security-program-part-1-introduction/</link><pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2008 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/building-a-web-application-security-program-part-1-introduction/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I realize this might shock our fair readers, but once upon a time I used to get my hands dirty with a little hands on web application development. Back in the heady early days of the mid-1990’s Internet I accidentally transitioned from a systems and network administrator to a web application developer and DBA at the University of Colorado’s Graduate School of Business. It all started when I made the mistake of making an incredibly ugly home page for the school, complete with a tiled background of my Photoslop-embossed version of the CU logo (but, thankfully, no BLINK tag). The University took note, and I slowly migrated out of keeping the network running into developing database driven web applications for a few thousand users. Eventually I ran my own department before setting off into the big bad world of private consulting. To this day I’m still proud of our online education tools that could totally kick Blackboard’s ass, but I think I developed my last application around 2001.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>The Impact Of Free Antivirus From Microsoft</title><link>/blog/the-impact-of-free-antivirus-from-microsoft/</link><pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2008 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/the-impact-of-free-antivirus-from-microsoft/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Well, they’ve finally done it. Microsoft announced they will be dropping OneCare and start providing antivirus for free to all Windows users late next year in a product called Morro.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Going On The Offense</title><link>/blog/going-on-the-offense/</link><pubDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2008 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/going-on-the-offense/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Brian Krebs posted a follow up article on the takedown of fraudulent hosting provider McColo (facilitated by his initial reporting last week). If you think all the nasties out there are hosted in Russia or China, you should really read his article.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Pumping Out Noise</title><link>/blog/pumping-out-noise/</link><pubDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2008 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/pumping-out-noise/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I kind of get a chuckle from articles like this recent series at Dark Reading on phishing, spam and malware. First came the contradictory posts, both posting that Phishing Attacks are reaching record highs, while simultaneously trumpeting that the king of spam and botnets had been shut down. I don’t suppose it dawned on the editors that if the channel that conveys the phishing attacks is “shut down”, then we are not likely to see “Record Highs.”&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>An Amusing Use For DLP</title><link>/blog/an-amusing-use-for-dlp/</link><pubDate>Mon, 17 Nov 2008 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/an-amusing-use-for-dlp/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Here’s a valuable lesson for you college students out there, from Dave Meizlik: if your professor is married to one of the leads at a DLP vendor, think twice before plagiarizing a published dissertation.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Common Applications Are Now The Weakest Link</title><link>/blog/common-applications-are-now-the-weakest-link/</link><pubDate>Mon, 17 Nov 2008 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/common-applications-are-now-the-weakest-link/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Edited: I stupidly credited Nate Lawson for Mark Dowd’s work with Sotirov. Dumb mistake, and I apologize.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Since my travel is slowing down a bit, I’m finally able catch up a little on my reading. Two articles this week reminded me of something I’ve been meaning to talk about. First, Chris Wysopal talks about how we’ve reached an application security tipping point. How the OS vendors are doing such a (relatively) good job at hardening the operating system that it’s become easier and more lucrative for attackers to go after common applications. Since nearly everyone online has a reasonably common set of Internet-enabled desktop apps running, it’s nearly as effective as targeting the OS. Heck, in some cases these apps are cross platform, and in a few cases we even see cross platform exploits.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Everything Old Is New Again In The Fog Of The Cloud</title><link>/blog/everything-old-is-new-again-in-the-fog-of-the-cloud/</link><pubDate>Fri, 14 Nov 2008 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/everything-old-is-new-again-in-the-fog-of-the-cloud/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Look I understand too little too late I realize there are things you say and do You can never take back But what would you be if you didn’t even try You have to try So after a lot of thought I’d like to reconsider Please If it’s not too late Make it a… cheeseburger&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Friday Summary</title><link>/blog/friday-summary-2/</link><pubDate>Fri, 14 Nov 2008 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/friday-summary-2/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I have to say, Moscow was definitely one of the more interesting, and difficult, places I’ve traveled to. The city wasn’t what I expected at all- everywhere you look there’s a park or big green swatch down major streets. The metro was the cleanest, most fascinating of any city (sorry NY). I never waited more than 45 seconds for a car, and many of the stations are full of beautiful Soviet-era artwork.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Brian Krebs: Ultimate Spam Filter</title><link>/blog/brian-krebs-ultimate-spam-filter/</link><pubDate>Thu, 13 Nov 2008 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/brian-krebs-ultimate-spam-filter/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;First he exposes the Russian Business Network and forces them to go underground, now he &lt;a href="http://voices.washingtonpost.com/securityfix/2008/11/spam_volumes_drop_by_23_after.html"&gt;nearly single-handedly stops 2/3rds of spam&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Comments on Database Media Protection</title><link>/blog/comments-on-database-media-protection/</link><pubDate>Thu, 13 Nov 2008 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/comments-on-database-media-protection/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Rich posted an article on &lt;a href="http://securosis.com/2008/11/10/database-encryption-option-1-media-protection/" title="Database Encryption- Option 1, Media Protection"&gt;database and media encryption&lt;/a&gt; (aka Data at Rest) earlier this week, discussing the major alternatives for keeping database media safe. Prior to posting it, he asked me to preview the contents for accuracy, which I did, and I think Rich covers the major textbook approaches one needs to consider. I did want to add a little color to this discussion in terms of threat models and motivation- regarding why these options should be considered, as well as some additional practical considerations in the use and selection of encryption for data at rest.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Healthcare In The Cloud</title><link>/blog/healthcare-in-the-cloud/</link><pubDate>Thu, 13 Nov 2008 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/healthcare-in-the-cloud/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Google is launching a cooperative program between Google and Medicare of Arizona. They are teaming up to put patient &amp;amp; health care records onto Google servers so it can be shared with doctors, labs and pharmacies.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>1 In 4 DNS Servers Still Vulnerable? More Like 4 in 4</title><link>/blog/1-in-4-dns-servers-still-vulnerable-more-like-4-in-4/</link><pubDate>Wed, 12 Nov 2008 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/1-in-4-dns-servers-still-vulnerable-more-like-4-in-4/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I was reading this &lt;a href="http://www.networkworld.com/news/2008/111008-dns-server-kaminsky.html?fsrc=rss-security"&gt;article over at NetworkWorld today&lt;/a&gt; on a study by a commercial DNS vendor that concluded 1 in 4 DNS servers is still vulnerable to the big &lt;a href="http://securosis.com/2008/07/08/dan-kaminsky-discovers-fundamental-issue-in-dns-massive-multivendor-patch-released/"&gt;Kaminsky vulnerability&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Cloud Security Macro Layers</title><link>/blog/cloud-security-macro-layers/</link><pubDate>Wed, 12 Nov 2008 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/cloud-security-macro-layers/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;There’s been a lot of discussion on cloud computing in the blogosphere and general press lately, and although I’ll probably hate myself for it, it’s time to jump in beyond some &lt;a href="http://securosis.com/2008/10/28/the-five-stages-of-cloud-computing-grief/"&gt;sophomoric (albeit really funny) humor&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Data Discovery &amp; Classification</title><link>/blog/data-discovery-classification/</link><pubDate>Tue, 11 Nov 2008 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/data-discovery-classification/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I was reading the &lt;a href="http://www.rsa.com/blog/blog_entry.aspx?id=1378" title="RSA report on data theft trojan"&gt;RSA report on the Torpig/Sinowal trojan&lt;/a&gt; while stuck at the airport for several hours last Thursday. During my many hours of free time I overheard some IT executive discussing the difficulties of implementing data discovery and classification with his peers. I did not catch the name of the company, and probably would not pass it along even if I had, but the tired and whiny rant about their associated failures was not unique. Perhaps I was a bit testy about having to sit in an airport lobby for eight hours, but all I could think was “What is wrong with you? If hackers can navigate your data center, why can’t you?”&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Database Encryption- Option 1, Media Protection</title><link>/blog/database-encryption-option-1-media-protection/</link><pubDate>Tue, 11 Nov 2008 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/database-encryption-option-1-media-protection/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I do believe I am officially setting a personal best for the most extended blog series. Way back in February, before my shoulder surgery, &lt;a href="http://securosis.com/2008/02/12/introduction-to-database-encryption/"&gt;I started a series on database encryption&lt;/a&gt;. I not only don’t expect you to remember this, but I’d be seriously concerned about your mental well being if you did. In that first post I described the two categories of database encryption- media protection, and separation of duties. Today we’re going to talk more about media encryption, and the advantages of combining it with database activity monitoring.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>The Two Kinds Of Security Threats, And How They Affect Your Life</title><link>/blog/the-two-kinds-of-security-threats-and-how-they-affect-your-life/</link><pubDate>Sun, 09 Nov 2008 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/the-two-kinds-of-security-threats-and-how-they-affect-your-life/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;When we talk about security threats we tend to break them down into all sorts of geeky categories. Sometimes we use high level terms like &lt;em&gt;clientside, targeted attack,&lt;/em&gt; or &lt;em&gt;web application vulnerability.&lt;/em&gt; Other times we dig in and talk about &lt;em&gt;XSS, memory corruption,&lt;/em&gt; and so on. You’ll notice we tend to mix in vulnerabilities when we talk about threats, but when we do that hopefully in our heads we’re following the proper taxonomy and actually thinking about that vulnerability being exploited, which is closer to a threat.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Friday Summary - Post-Election</title><link>/blog/friday-summary-post-election/</link><pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2008 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/friday-summary-post-election/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I was in Chicago this week for the &lt;a href="http://infosecurityconference.techtarget.com/conference/index.html"&gt;Tech Target ISD&lt;/a&gt; event giving a presentation on Information Centric Security. Like most of the people who flew in from other parts of the country for this event, we were so focused on the election and getting out to vote before we flew in, that we completely missed the fact that Obama would be speaking about a mile from the Hyatt Regency at McCormick Place. Most of us simply forgot that this was Obama’s home, and that Grant Park would be the likely place for any speeches that were to be given.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>“Felon” Database</title><link>/blog/felon-database/</link><pubDate>Tue, 04 Nov 2008 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/felon-database/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Most of you probably have a friend like mine, someone who forward you every joke, video and picture they find amusing to their friends list. Sometimes humorous, I still look through all of the emails. Buried in the daily offering was the following link for a site called &lt;a href="http://www.felonspy.com/" title="FelonSpy"&gt;FelonSpy&lt;/a&gt; that I found somewhat fascinating. It was kind of like a reality TV show; insipid, but just different enough I had to check it out.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>How the Death of Privacy and the Long Archive May Forever Alter Politics</title><link>/blog/how-the-death-of-privacy-and-the-long-archive-may-forever-alter-politics/</link><pubDate>Tue, 04 Nov 2008 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/how-the-death-of-privacy-and-the-long-archive-may-forever-alter-politics/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Way back in November of 2006 I wrote a post on the impact of our electronic personas on the political process. I was thinking about re-writing the post, but after reviewing it realized the situation is the exact same two years later… if not a bit worse. As a generation raised on MySpace, FaceBook, and other social media starts becoming the candidates, rather than the electorate, I think we will see profound changes in our political process.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Database Activity Monitoring &amp; Event Collection Options</title><link>/blog/database-activity-monitoring-event-collection-options/</link><pubDate>Mon, 03 Nov 2008 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/database-activity-monitoring-event-collection-options/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;‘During several recent briefings, chats with customers, and discussions with existing clients, the topic of data collections methods for Database Activity Monitoring has come up. While Rich provided a good overview for the general buyer of DAM products his white paper, he did not go into great depth. I was nonetheless surprised that some people I was discussing the pros and cons of various platforms with, were unaware of the breadth of data collection options available. More shocking was a technical briefing with a vendor in the DAM space who did not appear to be aware of the limitations of their own technology choices … or at least they would not admit to it. Regardless, I thought it might be beneficial to examine the available options in a little greater detail, and talk about some of the pros and cons here.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Friday Summary: Happy Halloween!</title><link>/blog/friday-summary-happy-halloween/</link><pubDate>Fri, 31 Oct 2008 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/friday-summary-happy-halloween/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Man, I love Halloween; it is the ultimate hacker holiday. When else do we have an excuse to build home animatronics, scare the pants off people, and pretend to be someone else (outside of a penetration test)? Last year I built something I called “The Hanging Man” using a microcontroller, some windshield wiper motors, wireless sensors, my (basic) home automation system, and streaming audio. When trick or treaters walked up to the house it would trigger a sensor, black out the front of the house, spotlight a hooded pirate hanging from a gallows, push out some audio of a screaming guy, drop him 15 feet so he was right over the visitors, and then slowly hoist him back up for the next group.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>State Department Data Theft</title><link>/blog/state-department-data-theft/</link><pubDate>Fri, 31 Oct 2008 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/state-department-data-theft/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;‘This story has it all … theft of State Department data, forged credit cards, multi-government branch conspiracy, and murdered suspects. Sounds like an afternoon soap opera more than a &lt;a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/10/30/AR2008103004716.html?" title="Washington Post Article"&gt;Stolen Passport Data&lt;/a&gt; story from the Washington Post:&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Attacking The Law With Photing</title><link>/blog/attacking-the-law-with-photing/</link><pubDate>Thu, 30 Oct 2008 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/attacking-the-law-with-photing/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;As a security pro I tend to be a bit paranoid and cynical even outside the domain of technology. Heck, I can’t even get past a nice simple election without picking up on some interesting fraudulent twist.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Thriving In An Economic Crisis- And Supporting Hackers For Charity</title><link>/blog/thriving-in-an-economic-crisis-and-supporting-hackers-for-charity/</link><pubDate>Thu, 30 Oct 2008 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/thriving-in-an-economic-crisis-and-supporting-hackers-for-charity/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I was pretty honored a couple months ago when Johnny Long asked me to participate in a new project for &lt;a href="http://www.hackersforcharity.org/"&gt;Hackers for Charity&lt;/a&gt; called &lt;a href="http://informer.ihackstuff.com/"&gt;The HFC Security Informer&lt;/a&gt;. Johnny is a seriously cool guy who founded Hackers for Charity, which provides a mix of services and financial support in underdeveloped countries. I think most geeks that aren’t running evil botnets have a bit of altruism in them, and HFC is a great way we can use our technical backgrounds (&lt;a href="http://www.hackersforcharity.org/what-we-do/"&gt;and swag&lt;/a&gt;) to help out the rougher parts of the world.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Debix Study: Fraudsters Stealing Your Kids (Identities That Is)</title><link>/blog/debix-study-fraudsters-stealing-your-kids-identities-that-is/</link><pubDate>Wed, 29 Oct 2008 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/debix-study-fraudsters-stealing-your-kids-identities-that-is/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I’m very excited to announce a new project I’ve been working on for some time with Debix. Yesterday, they released a &lt;a href="http://debix.com/children.php"&gt;new study&lt;/a&gt; today on &lt;a href="http://news.debix.com/index.php/2008/10/new-research-on-child-identity-theft/"&gt;child identity theft.&lt;/a&gt; I was astounded to discover that on average one out of twenty kids has their identity compromised in some way before they reach adulthood. That’s essentially one kid in every classroom. And those kids had on average almost $12,800 of debt fraudulenly associated with them. Talk about a nightmare to clean up! Anyway, there are more details over on their blog which just happens to be written by your truly. I’d love to hear your comments either here or over there. Looking forward to hearing from you all.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Network Security Podcast, Episode 125</title><link>/blog/network-security-podcast-episode-125/</link><pubDate>Wed, 29 Oct 2008 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/network-security-podcast-episode-125/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;The Skype gods definitely worked against us last night as David Mortman from Debix joined us to to talk about a new study the released on identity theft and children. No, you’re 8 month old is stealing identities like I suspect that creepy kid from the ETrade commercials is, but due to both error and fraud a surprising number of children have financial histories they didn’t know about. We also discuss last week’s Microsoft emergency update, Bono frolicking on MySpace, and the usual TSA foibles. We had some audio issues today so we kept the podcast short to spare your ears as much as possible.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>The “Good Enough/Woe Is Me” Dissociation Postulate</title><link>/blog/the-good-enough-woe-is-me-dissociation-postulate/</link><pubDate>Wed, 29 Oct 2008 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/the-good-enough-woe-is-me-dissociation-postulate/</guid><description>&lt;blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I don’t get it. I mean I really don’t get it. I can’t &lt;strong&gt;possibly&lt;/strong&gt; imagine why it isn’t so obvious to everyone else!! Don’t you see what’s happening!!! Soylent Green is QSAs!!!&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>The Five Stages Of Cloud Computing Grief</title><link>/blog/the-five-stages-of-cloud-computing-grief/</link><pubDate>Wed, 29 Oct 2008 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/the-five-stages-of-cloud-computing-grief/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src="http://securosis.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/10/picture-2.png" alt="Picture 2.png"&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;ol&gt;
&lt;li&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Denial&lt;/strong&gt; : There is no cloud.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Anger&lt;/strong&gt; : Why the f&amp;amp;*k is this sales guy trying to sell me a cloud?&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>A Simple Question The TSA Seems To Refuse To Answer</title><link>/blog/a-simple-question-the-tsa-seems-to-refuse-to-answer/</link><pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2008 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/a-simple-question-the-tsa-seems-to-refuse-to-answer/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I just read over at &lt;a href="http://www.computerworld.com/action/article.do?command=viewArticleBasic&amp;amp;articleId=9117980&amp;amp;source=rss_topic84"&gt;Computerworld that the TSA will start requiring gender and date of birth&lt;/a&gt; when we buy plane tickets. This is part of Secure Flight, and meant to increase the accuracy of matches to the terrorist watch list(s).&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Minor Online Banking FAIL?</title><link>/blog/minor-online-banking-fail/</link><pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2008 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/minor-online-banking-fail/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I was amused today when I logged into my business account bank (Wells Fargo) and they had me set up a new set of security questions. The variety wasn’t bad and the questions were reasonably original. After setting them, I was asked to confirm my contact information.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Wireless Security Survey</title><link>/blog/wireless-security-survey/</link><pubDate>Mon, 27 Oct 2008 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/wireless-security-survey/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;‘Rich forwarded me the &lt;a href="http://www.rsa.com/go/wireless" title="RSA Wireless Survey"&gt;RSA Wireless Security Survey for 2008&lt;/a&gt; that was just released this morning. The cities that they scanned were Paris, London &amp;amp; New York.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Friday Update: It’s 0day Week!</title><link>/blog/friday-update-its-0day-week/</link><pubDate>Fri, 24 Oct 2008 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/friday-update-its-0day-week/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Holy 0day Batman!&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;What started as a quiet week definitely got a little more interesting yesterday as Microsoft released an out-of-band patch for a critical vulnerability affecting most versions of Windows. It’s been a while since MS had to push out an emergency fix like this, and boy was it a whacky vulnerability. For those of you who haven’t kept up on it, it is a flaw in the RPC service that allows remote code execution without authentication. What’s &lt;em&gt;really&lt;/em&gt; interesting is that this flaw is in a part of the code base that was patched already for a very similar problem.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Oracle APEX Vulnerability Comment</title><link>/blog/oracle-apex-vulnerability-comment/</link><pubDate>Fri, 24 Oct 2008 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/oracle-apex-vulnerability-comment/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I was asked about the recent post by Pete Finnigan regarding the APEX vulnerability that he discovered, was part of the recent Oracle CPU, and Pete elaborated upon in a &lt;a href="http://www.petefinnigan.com/Advisory_CPU_Oct_2008.htm" title="APEX Vuln"&gt;recent post&lt;/a&gt;. Pete is one of the best in the business at Oracle security, so when he lists something as a vulnerability, people usually react. The question was why had I recommended applying the new Oracle CPU under normal patch cycles when this looked like a reasonably serious vulnerability. Why wait? You don’t need to wait, but if you are vulnerable to this attack, you probably have bigger issues that should have been addressed already. Specifically:&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Microsoft Critical Update Today- **Updated- Details Released**</title><link>/blog/microsoft-critical-update-today-updated-details-released/</link><pubDate>Thu, 23 Oct 2008 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/microsoft-critical-update-today-updated-details-released/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;If you don’t already know, Microsoft is releasing an out of band critical update today. Rumor is it &lt;em&gt;is not&lt;/em&gt; related to the TCP DoS issue, and may involve an 0day with remote code execution.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Network Security Podcast, Episode 124</title><link>/blog/network-security-podcast-episode-124/</link><pubDate>Wed, 22 Oct 2008 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/network-security-podcast-episode-124/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Want to talk about electronic voting? We did. So we invited &lt;a href="http://extra.fortifysoftware.com/blog/bloggers.html#jacob"&gt;Jacob West&lt;/a&gt; from &lt;a href="http://fortify.com/"&gt;Fortify&lt;/a&gt; to talk with us about a paper he just published with a couple of engineers at Fortify. Guess what- they found electronic voting using DRE voting machines are the least secure way to vote. Makes me feel good going into the election. It’s a good thing we’re fairly self-policing when it comes to time; this is a conversation that could have gone on for a couple of hours.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>WAF vs. Secure Code vs. Dead Fish</title><link>/blog/waf-vs-secure-code-vs-dead-fish/</link><pubDate>Wed, 22 Oct 2008 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/waf-vs-secure-code-vs-dead-fish/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I’ve been slowly catching up on my reading after months of near-nonstop travel, and &lt;a href="http://blog.imperva.com/2008/09/securesphere-vs-securecoding.html"&gt;this post over at Imperviews&lt;/a&gt; caught my eye. Ignoring the product promotion angle, it raises one of my major pet peeves these days. I’m really tired of the Web Application Firewall vs. secure coding debate, never mind using PCI 6.6 to justify one over the other for &lt;em&gt;security effectiveness&lt;/em&gt;. It’s like two drunk cajuns arguing over the relative value of shrimp or pork in gumbo- you need both, and if either is spoiled the entire thing tastes like sh&amp;amp;t. You also can’t dress up the family dog and fish in a pinch, use them as substitutes, and expect your kids to appreciate either the results or use of resources (resulting gumbo or the loss of Rover).&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>EFF Challenges Telecom Immunity</title><link>/blog/eff-challenges-telecom-immunity/</link><pubDate>Mon, 20 Oct 2008 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/eff-challenges-telecom-immunity/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I missed including this in the Friday summary. The Electronic Frontier Foundation is &lt;a href="http://www.eff.org/press/archives/2008/10/17" title="EFF"&gt;challenging the legality&lt;/a&gt; of telecom’s being granted immunity in their participation of NSA’s warrant-less &lt;a href="http://www.eff.org/issues/nsa-spying" title="NSA spying"&gt;spying&lt;/a&gt; on US citizens, claiming the executive branch of the government has overstepped it’s authority. Indirectly they will open the entire program up for scrutiny as well.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Three Steps Forward, One Back</title><link>/blog/three-steps-forward-one-back/</link><pubDate>Mon, 20 Oct 2008 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/three-steps-forward-one-back/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;What did you think of the new &lt;a href="http://www.apple.com/macbook/?sr=hotnews?sr=hotnews.rss" title="New MacBook"&gt;MacBook&lt;/a&gt;? I think they are nice, I don’t want a new one bad enough to upgrade. I bought my MacBook last month knowing full well that they were going to release the new models on the 14th of this month, but the advancements would not be enough for me to wait. Most of the articles &amp;amp; analysis I read were a little harsh, with much of the focus on the price drop, or lack of drop, when I was focused on usability. Maybe they are right, and with the economic slowdown the price reduction is not enough to capture larger appeal and Apple will get hammered.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Your Simple Guide To Endpoint Encryption Options</title><link>/blog/your-simple-guide-to-endpoint-encryption-options/</link><pubDate>Mon, 20 Oct 2008 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/your-simple-guide-to-endpoint-encryption-options/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;On the surface endpoint encryption is pretty straightforward these days (WAY better than when I first covered it 8 years ago), but when you start matching all the options to your requirements it can be a tad confusing.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Friday Summary 10-17-08</title><link>/blog/friday-summary-10-17-08/</link><pubDate>Fri, 17 Oct 2008 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/friday-summary-10-17-08/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Rich is off to see Jimmy Buffet in southern California and get some R&amp;amp;R, so I have blog duties this week. It’s briefing season in the analyst community. I probably should not be surprised given we typically launched our PR tours with my previous employers this time of year, but even Rich has been a little surprised with the volume of discussions. We have been in full swing with a packed calendar during the last couple of weeks and it shows no sign of letting up through November. If I am a little slow returning your email in the morning that is why. And I got to admit it is more interesting being on the receiving end of the equation that delivering the same information 100 times. The breadth of technologies and companies is very exciting, for me at least, and as a result I am digging deep into a number of technologies I have not had a chance to play with while working for a vendor. I have been seeing a lot of solid advancements from several companies, so that makes the calls interesting as well.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>My Take On The Database Security Market Challenges</title><link>/blog/my-take-on-the-database-security-market-challenges/</link><pubDate>Wed, 15 Oct 2008 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/my-take-on-the-database-security-market-challenges/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Yesterday, &lt;a href="http://securosis.com/2008/10/15/will-database-security-vendors-disappear/"&gt;Adrian posted his take&lt;/a&gt; on a conversation we had last week. We were headed over to happy hour, talking about the usual dribble us analyst types get all hot and bothered about, when he dropped the bombshell that one of our favorite groups of products could be in serious trouble.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Oracle Critical Patch Update, October 2008</title><link>/blog/oracle-critical-patch-update-october-2008/</link><pubDate>Wed, 15 Oct 2008 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/oracle-critical-patch-update-october-2008/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;The Oracle Critical &lt;a href="http://www.oracle.com/technology/deploy/security/critical-patch-updates/cpuoct2008.html" title="Oracle CPU Oct 2008"&gt;Patch Update for October 2008&lt;/a&gt; was released today. On the database side there are a lot of the usual suspects; DMSYS.ODM_MODEL_UTIL seems to be patched in every CPU during the last few years. All in all the database modifications appear minor so patch the databases according to your normal deployment schedules.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Will Database Security Vendors Disappear?</title><link>/blog/will-database-security-vendors-disappear/</link><pubDate>Wed, 15 Oct 2008 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/will-database-security-vendors-disappear/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Rich and I got into a conversation Friday about database security, and the fate of vendors in this subsegment, in light of recent financial developments. Is it possible that this entire database security sub-market could vanish? Somewhat startled by the thought, we started going down the list of names, guessing who would be acquired, who was profitable, and who will probably not make it through the current economic downturn without additional investment- it seems plausible that the majority of today’s companies may disappear.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Trio Arrested on WalMart Error</title><link>/blog/trio-arrested-on-walmart-error/</link><pubDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2008 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/trio-arrested-on-walmart-error/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Thankfully most criminals are not that bright. Article in the &lt;a href="http://www.azcentral.com/arizonarepublic/local/articles/2008/10/14/20081014evcreditfraud1014.html" title="AZ Republic"&gt;Arizona Republic&lt;/a&gt; this morning about a group of three Mexican nationals who were on a little shopping spree in the Valley of the Sun. The trio was going to various electronic retailers and making purchased with fake credit cards. The cards appeared to be legitimate card stock from legitimate Mexican banks, but account numbers from valid U.S. accounts.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Your WPA-PSK Wireless Network Is At Risk… If You Are An Idiot</title><link>/blog/your-wpa-psk-wireless-network-is-at-risk-if-you-are-an-idiot/</link><pubDate>Mon, 13 Oct 2008 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/your-wpa-psk-wireless-network-is-at-risk-if-you-are-an-idiot/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;There was some great hype in the wireless security world this weekend thanks to &lt;a href="http://securityandthe.net/2008/10/12/russian-researchers-achieve-100-fold-increase-in-wpa2-cracking-speed/"&gt;an article that made it on to Slashdot&lt;/a&gt;, and some FUD pumping so-called security consultants. Elcomsoft issued a press release that they can now crack WPA keys WAY faster using the GPUs (Graphics Processing Units) on the latest video cards.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Friday Summary, 10-10-2008</title><link>/blog/friday-summary-10-10-2008/</link><pubDate>Fri, 10 Oct 2008 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/friday-summary-10-10-2008/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;What a wild, wacky, crazy week. I have a funny suspicion a lot of stock brokers and investors are scraping together their spare change for some major liquid escapes this weekend. As a small business we haven’t felt the impact yet, but we are keeping a close eye on things and preparing to adjust our strategy as needed. Security deals are definitely slowing- we sense an impending rush of acquisitions, and a general feeling of nervousness. The need for security never goes away, but if you aren’t making plans to protect yourself through this crisis, &lt;em&gt;you&lt;/em&gt; might go away. Someone responded to a Twitter post of mine that this will be over before the next president takes office; I can’t possibly imagine that happening.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Mail Goggles</title><link>/blog/mail-goggles/</link><pubDate>Thu, 09 Oct 2008 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/mail-goggles/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Someone at Google has created &lt;a href="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/27071685/" title="Mail Goggles"&gt;Mail Goggles&lt;/a&gt;. It’s a little Gmail utility to keep you from sending out email while, uh, under the influence. Jon Perlow, the author, had this to say …&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>There’s Always a Double Standard</title><link>/blog/theres-always-a-double-standard/</link><pubDate>Thu, 09 Oct 2008 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/theres-always-a-double-standard/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I don’t remember the exact quote from King of the Hill (an animated series here in the US), but it went something like this.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Symantec Buys MessageLabs</title><link>/blog/symantec-buys-messagelabs/</link><pubDate>Wed, 08 Oct 2008 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/symantec-buys-messagelabs/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Well, &lt;a href="https://securosis.com/blog/(http://www.symantec.com/about/news/release/article.jsp?prid=20081008_02" title="Symantec Buys MessageLabs"&gt;I did not see this coming&lt;/a&gt;. Today Symantec Corp has agreed to acquire Message Labs for $695 million. That represents close to a 5x multiple on $145M in revenue. While market conditions are not rosy, this price is not out of line for a segment leader who is seeing growth in the highly competitive email security market. This appears to be a good strategic move; they address their largest weakness in email security (SaaS), they can leverage the continued convergence of security offerings in messaging and data protection, and there is a substantial cross-selling opportunity. If memory serves, the 19,000 customers of MessageLabs represents an order of magnitude larger customer base Brightmail brought to the table in the 2004 acquisition. It’s hard for me to fault this acquisition.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Clickjacking Details, Analysis, and Advice</title><link>/blog/clickjacking-details-analysis-and-advice/</link><pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2008 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/clickjacking-details-analysis-and-advice/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Looks like the cat is out of the bag. Someone managed to figure out the details of clickjacking and released a proof of concept against Flash. With the information out in public, Jeremiah and Robert are free to discuss it.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Outsourced Email Security</title><link>/blog/outsourced-email-security/</link><pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2008 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/outsourced-email-security/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;In the last post on Email Security, I commented on how easy it was to add outsourced email security services onto your existing email security deployment. That adding on an extra layer of anti-spam filtering on top of what you have not only provides an increase in the effectiveness of filtering, but also reduced the processing load on your existing hardware. But email security service vendors have been adding outbound email, data and web security offerings to their portfolio on top of their existing offerings, and these services solve different problems and offer different value propositions.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Policies vs. Plans vs. Procedures vs. Standards</title><link>/blog/policies-vs-plans-vs-procedures-vs-standards/</link><pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2008 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/policies-vs-plans-vs-procedures-vs-standards/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I was catching up with Rob Newby’s blog and this post on dealing with security policies vs. standards/processes caught my eye. Although policies form the foundation for our security programs (at least they should), I find that more often than not they are completely misused by many of my clients. While I’ve noticed definite improvement over the past few years, I still often walk into organizations and see big 3 inch binders full of their security policies.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>FAIL!</title><link>/blog/fail/</link><pubDate>Mon, 06 Oct 2008 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/fail/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Say you are an on-line retailer: Do you ever check to make sure your web site functions? If you don’t, start! Here are a few examples of why this is a good idea:&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Friday Summary</title><link>/blog/friday-summary-4/</link><pubDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2008 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/friday-summary-4/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;The Securosis team is attempting to regroup and prepare for a busy Q4. It took three full days, but I am fully migrated into the Mac Universe and engaged in a couple of research projects. Now productive, I can finally start work on a couple research projects. Rich has left HQ in search of coffee, quiet and a security muse while he catches up on writing projects and white papers. But even though we have a short term ban on travel and conferences, there is a lot to talk about. Here is our summary of this weeks blogs, news and events.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Why The TCP Attack Is Likely Bad, But Not That Bad</title><link>/blog/why-the-tcp-attack-is-likely-bad-but-not-that-bad/</link><pubDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2008 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/why-the-tcp-attack-is-likely-bad-but-not-that-bad/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;There’s been a bunch of new information coming out the past few days about the potential big TCP denial of service flaw. The three most informative posts I’ve read are:&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Get Rich Quick With Network Security</title><link>/blog/get-rich-quick-with-network-security/</link><pubDate>Wed, 01 Oct 2008 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/get-rich-quick-with-network-security/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Greg Young over at Gartner has a humorous post on possibly the best way to make money in network security- the “Security Silly Jar”. Just drop in a quarter anytime someone says something stupid from the list. My favorite is number 9:&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Massive TCP Flaw Looming</title><link>/blog/massive-tcp-flaw-looming/</link><pubDate>Wed, 01 Oct 2008 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/massive-tcp-flaw-looming/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Yesterday, following up after recording the podcast on clickjacking, I was talking with Robert Hansen about the TCP flaw some contacts of his found over in Sweden. He wrote it up in his column on Dark Reading, and Dennis Fisher over at TechTarget also has some information up.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Clickjacking The Network Security Podcast</title><link>/blog/clickjacking-the-network-security-podcast/</link><pubDate>Tue, 30 Sep 2008 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/clickjacking-the-network-security-podcast/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;We had a killer episode of the Network Security Podcast this week as Jeremiah Grossman and Robert “Rsnake” Hansen joined us to talk a bit about their new clickjacking exploit. I definitely had some fun on this one, even though Jeremiah and Robert couldn’t dig too deeply into the details.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Let’s Play: Name That Regulation!</title><link>/blog/lets-play-name-that-regulation/</link><pubDate>Tue, 30 Sep 2008 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/lets-play-name-that-regulation/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;What do you think our new financial law will be? What piece of legislation will be enacted by our government to protect us from the greed that caused this current financial crisis? Last time it was Sarbanes-Oxley. Who will be the poster child for our current financial crisis? Who will be the “Keating 5” this time around? You know it is coming. It has every other time greed has torpedoed our economy. And it is an easy target for any politician when there is only one side to an issue. I mean, how many voters are pro-financial crisis?&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Oracle DBAs and Security</title><link>/blog/oracle-dbas-and-security/</link><pubDate>Tue, 30 Sep 2008 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/oracle-dbas-and-security/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;‘This is a very interesting article by Robert Westervelt over at Tech Target, and I wanted to make a couple of follow-on comments.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Statistical Distractions</title><link>/blog/statistical-distractions/</link><pubDate>Tue, 30 Sep 2008 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/statistical-distractions/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Last night I managed to pull a serious Munson. My car battery was dead, so I jumped it from my wife’s car. Then both batteries were dead (her car literally shut down when I tried to start mine). Then my brother in law came over, and managed to jump both cars. We left them running, then turned them off- and both were dead again. One more trip from my brother in law and we were up and running. We drove around for a bit and then stopped to run an errand. We stopped, and restarted, one car at a time so we always had one running vehicle. Both restarted, so we ran them for a minute longer and then ran our errand. Come back, and both are dead. Mall security jumped her car, drove on the highways for 20 minutes, parked it at home. Dead. Dead. Dead. Her car is a hybrid, and we think my battery is dead and something about jumping it blew something in her electrical system.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>What to Buy: Part Three</title><link>/blog/what-to-buy-part-three/</link><pubDate>Tue, 30 Sep 2008 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/what-to-buy-part-three/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Finally took the plunge last week- I went out and bought a Mac. Actually, I bought a couple of them. That was not what I originally intended, as my plan was to get a top-of-the-line MacBook Pro and a high-end monitor to go with it. But every time I sat down in front of my wife’s iMac, I was really impressed with the quality of the display and the simplicity of the machine itself. When I learned the 24-inch version had the Core 2 Duo at 3GHz, I was sold. Given the amount of travel I do I needed a laptop, so I picked up an entry-level MacBook as well. It worked out about even money as far as hardware costs, and it will only cost me a little more for software, so I kind of feel like I got two for one.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Email Security</title><link>/blog/email-security/</link><pubDate>Mon, 29 Sep 2008 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/email-security/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;When was the last time you thought about your email security? Have you reviewed the vendors or the market lately? If not, it may be time. It is no surprise that the market is mature; read the collateral and the discussion has long since moved away from technology nuances- rather it is reputational risk reduction &amp;amp; business function continuity. It is no longer startups but some of the largest firms in security. And while not seeing a lot of growth in the segment, we are starting to see changes in how the services are delivered, and that is leading to some vendor swapping. What’s more, these changes are so transparent that the effect on privacy and security is not always obvious.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Impact of the Economic Crisis on Security</title><link>/blog/impact-of-the-economic-crisis-on-security/</link><pubDate>Mon, 29 Sep 2008 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/impact-of-the-economic-crisis-on-security/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;As I write this, the Dow is down nearly 600, Congress struggles to pass a bailout bill, and both the Broncos and Buffs lost over the weekend.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Friday Summary</title><link>/blog/friday-summary/</link><pubDate>Fri, 26 Sep 2008 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/friday-summary/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;As most of you know, Adrian and I have been pretty slammed lately; bouncing all over the inter-tubes (and airports) on our quest to save freedom and not default on our mortgages. One thing we’ve been wanting to do for a while is summarize everything that’s been going on through the week in a bit more of a structured format, a la &lt;a href="http://securityincite.com/"&gt;Rothman’s Daily Incite&lt;/a&gt;. But we’re not nearly as motivated as Mike, but we figure we can handle once a week before we attend the official Securosis Weekly Research Offsite (happy hour). It’s a summary of what we’ve been up to, and our top post selections for the week.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Political Information Warfare?</title><link>/blog/political-information-warfare/</link><pubDate>Fri, 26 Sep 2008 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/political-information-warfare/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Over at the &lt;a href="http://voices.washingtonpost.com/thefix/2008/09/mccain_wins_debate.html"&gt;Washington Post they note that it looks like a “McCain Wins Debate”&lt;/a&gt; ad and quote accidently leaked before the… you know… debate &lt;em&gt;actually happens&lt;/em&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>On Oracle World and Inference Attacks</title><link>/blog/on-oracle-world-and-inference-attacks/</link><pubDate>Thu, 25 Sep 2008 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/on-oracle-world-and-inference-attacks/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Some days I feel the suffocating weight of travel more than others. Typically, those days are near the end of a long travel binge; one lasting about 3 months this time.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>PDF Security Pain: We Told You So</title><link>/blog/pdf-security-pain-we-told-you-so/</link><pubDate>Tue, 23 Sep 2008 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/pdf-security-pain-we-told-you-so/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks to &lt;a href="http://it.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=08/09/23/1320258&amp;amp;from=rss"&gt;Slashdot&lt;/a&gt;, here’s a story on A&lt;a href="http://www.trustedsource.org/blog/153/Rise-Of-The-PDF-Exploits"&gt;dobe PDF vulnerabilities&lt;/a&gt;:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The Portable Document Format (PDF) is one of the file formats of choice commonly used in today”s enterprises, since it’s widely deployed across different operating systems. But on a down-side this format has also known vulnerabilites which are exploited in the wild.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>The Breach Reporting Dillema</title><link>/blog/the-breach-reporting-dillema/</link><pubDate>Tue, 23 Sep 2008 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/the-breach-reporting-dillema/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Over at &lt;a href="http://www.emergentchaos.com/archives/2008/09/2008_breaches_more_or_mor.html"&gt;Emergent Chaos, Adam raises the question&lt;/a&gt; of whether we are seeing more data breaches, or just more data breach &lt;em&gt;reporting&lt;/em&gt;. His post is inspired by a &lt;a href="http://www.pogowasright.org/blogs/dissent/?p=1059"&gt;release from the Identity Theft Resource Center&lt;/a&gt; stating that they’ve already matched the 2007 breach numbers this year.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Behavioral Monitoring</title><link>/blog/behavioral-monitoring/</link><pubDate>Mon, 22 Sep 2008 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/behavioral-monitoring/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;A number of months ago when Rich released his paper on Database Activity Monitoring, one of the sections was on Alerting. Basically this is the analysis phase, where the collected data stream is analyzed in context of the policies that are to be enforced, and the generation of an alert when a policy is violated. In that section he mentioned the common types of analysis, and one other that is not typically available but makes a valuable addition: Heuristics. I feel this is an important tool for policy enforcement- not just for DAM, but also for DLP, SIM, and other security platforms- so I wanted to elaborate on this topic.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Our Take On The McAfee Acquisitions</title><link>/blog/our-take-on-the-mcafee-acquisitions/</link><pubDate>Mon, 22 Sep 2008 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/our-take-on-the-mcafee-acquisitions/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I’ll be honest- it’s been a bit tough to stay up to date on current events in the security world over the past month or so. There’s something about nonstop travel and tight project deadlines that isn’t very conducive to keeping up with the good old RSS feed, even when said browsing is a major part of your job. Not that I’m complaining about being able to pay the bills.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Stealth Photography</title><link>/blog/stealth-photography/</link><pubDate>Sun, 21 Sep 2008 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/stealth-photography/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;This is an off topic post.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Most people don’t think of me as a photographer, but it’s true, I am. Not a good one, mind you, but a photographer. I take a lot of photos. Some days I take hundreds, and they all pretty much look the same. Crappy. Nor am I interested in any of the photos I take, rather I delete them from the camera as soon as possible. I don’t even own a camera; rather I borrow my wife’s cheap Canon with the broken auto-cover lens cap, and I take that little battery sucking clunker with me every few days, taking photos all over Phoenix. Some days it even puts my personal safety in jeopardy, but I do it, and I have gotten very stealthy at it. I am a Stealth Photographer.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>How To Tell If Your PCI Scanning Vendor Is Dangerous</title><link>/blog/how-to-tell-if-your-pci-scanning-vendor-is-dangerous/</link><pubDate>Fri, 19 Sep 2008 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/how-to-tell-if-your-pci-scanning-vendor-is-dangerous/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I got an interesting email right before I ran off on vacation from Mark on a &lt;a href="http://markremark.blogspot.com/2008/09/pci-gaping-hole-in-your-idsips.html"&gt;PCI issue he blogged about&lt;/a&gt;:&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Design for Failure</title><link>/blog/design-for-failure/</link><pubDate>Thu, 18 Sep 2008 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/design-for-failure/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;A very thought-provoking &lt;a href="http://1raindrop.typepad.com/1_raindrop/2008/09/assets-good-until-reached-for.html" title="Gunnar Peterson"&gt;‘Good until Reached For’ &lt;/a&gt;post over on Gunnar Peterson’s site this week. Gunnar is tying together a number of recent blog threads to exemplify through the current financial crisis of how security and risk management best practices were not applied. There are many angles to this post, and Gunnar is covering a lot of ground, but the concept that really resonated with me is automation of process without verification.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Reminder- There Are No Trusted Sites</title><link>/blog/reminder-there-are-no-trusted-sites/</link><pubDate>Thu, 18 Sep 2008 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/reminder-there-are-no-trusted-sites/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Just a short, friendly reminder that there is no such thing as a trusted website anymore, as &lt;a href="http://blogs.zdnet.com/security/?p=1902"&gt;demonstrated by BusinessWeek&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;We continue to see trusted websites breached, and rather than leaving a little graffiti on the site the attackers now use that as a platform to attack browsers. It’s one reason I use FireFox with &lt;a href="http://noscript.net/"&gt;NoScript&lt;/a&gt; and only enable the absolute minimum to get a site running.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Jay Beale, Kevin Johnson, and Justin Searle Join the Network Security Podcast</title><link>/blog/jay-beale-kevin-johnson-and-justin-searle-join-the-network-security-podcast/</link><pubDate>Wed, 17 Sep 2008 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/jay-beale-kevin-johnson-and-justin-searle-join-the-network-security-podcast/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Boy am I behind on my blog posts! I have a ton of stuff to get up/announce, and first up is episode 120 of the Network Security Podcast. Martin and I were joined by Justin Searle, Kevin Johnson and Jay Beale from &lt;a href="http://www.intelguardians.com"&gt;Intelguardians&lt;/a&gt;. As well as discussing the news stories of the week, the guys were here to tell us about a new LiveCD they’ve developed, &lt;a href="http://samurai.intelguardians.com/"&gt;Samurai&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>The Fallacy of Complete and Accurate Risk Quantification</title><link>/blog/wow-the-american-taxpayer-now-owns-aig-does-that-mean-i-can-get-a-cheap-rate-the-economic-events-of-the-past-few-days-transitioned-the-months-long-saga-of-financial-irresponsibility-past-merely-st/</link><pubDate>Wed, 17 Sep 2008 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/wow-the-american-taxpayer-now-owns-aig-does-that-mean-i-can-get-a-cheap-rate-the-economic-events-of-the-past-few-days-transitioned-the-months-long-saga-of-financial-irresponsibility-past-merely-st/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Wow. The American taxpayer now owns AIG. Does that mean I can get a cheap rate?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The economic events of the past few days transitioned the months-long saga of financial irresponsibility past merely sturn ing into the realm of truly terrifying. We’ve leaped past the predictable into a maelstrom of uncertainty edging on a black hole of unknowable repercussions. True, the system could stabilize soon; allowing us to rebuild before the shock waves topple the relatively stable average family. But right now it seems the global economy is so convoluted we’re all moving forward like a big herd navigating K2 in a blinding snowstorm with the occasional avalanche.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Did They Violate Breach Disclosure Laws?</title><link>/blog/did-they-violate-breach-disclosure-laws/</link><pubDate>Tue, 16 Sep 2008 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/did-they-violate-breach-disclosure-laws/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;There’s been an extremely interesting, and somewhat surprising, development in the TJX case the past couple weeks. No, I’m not talking about one of the defendants pleading guilty (and winning the prisoners dilemma), but the scope of the breach.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>DRM In The Cloud</title><link>/blog/drm-in-the-cloud/</link><pubDate>Mon, 15 Sep 2008 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/drm-in-the-cloud/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I have a well-publicized love-hate opinion of Digital Rights Management. DRM can solve some security problems but will fail outright if applied in other areas, most notably consumer media protection. I remain an advocate and believe that an Information Centric approach to data security has a future, and I am continually looking for new uses for this model. Still, few things get me started on a rant like someone who says that DRM is going to secure consumer media, and &lt;a href="http://blogs.verisign.com/innovation/2008/09/the_digital_content_cloud_last.php" title="DRM for Media Protection"&gt;DRM in the Cloud&lt;/a&gt; is predicting just that.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Tumbleweed Acquired</title><link>/blog/tumbleweed-acquired/</link><pubDate>Sun, 07 Sep 2008 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/tumbleweed-acquired/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Sopra Group, through its &lt;a href="http://www.axway.com/" title="Axway"&gt;Axway&lt;/a&gt; subsidiary, has acquired Tumbleweed Communications for $143 million. &lt;a href="http://www.tumbleweed.com/news/press_releases/2008/2008-09-04.html" title="Press release"&gt;The press release is here&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;With Tumbleweed’s offerings for email security, secure file transport, and certificate validation, there were just not enough tools in that chest to build a compelling story- either for messaging security or secure transaction processing. And it provides just one more example of why &lt;a href="http://securityincite.com/blog/mike-rothman/revisiting-big-is-the-new-small" title="Big is new small"&gt;Rothman is right on target&lt;/a&gt;. Given that Tumbleweed’s stock price has been &lt;a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?q=TMWD" title="Stock History"&gt;flat&lt;/a&gt; for the entirety of this decade, this is probably both a welcome change of scenery from the stockholders’ perspective, and a sign of new vision on how best to utilize these technology elements. There are lots of fine email/content security products out there having a very difficult time of expanding their revenue and market share. Without some of the other pieces that most of their competitors have, I am frankly impressed that Tumbleweed has made it this far. Dropping this product line into the Axway suite makes sense as it will add value to most of their solutions, from retail to healthcare, so this looks like a positive outcome.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>I Don’t Get It</title><link>/blog/i-dont-get-it/</link><pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2008 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/i-dont-get-it/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;From the “I really don’t get it” files:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;First I read that Google’s new &lt;a href="http://www.redherring.com/Home/24782" title="Google Chrome"&gt;Chrome&lt;/a&gt; browser &amp;amp; &lt;a href="http://www.redherring.com/Home/24763" title="IE Additions"&gt;Internet Explorer modifications&lt;/a&gt; are threats to existing advertising models. And this is news? I have been using Firefox with NoScript and other add-ons in a VMWare partition that gets destroyed after use for a couple years now. Is there a difference? What’s more, there is an interesting parallel in that both are cleansing browsing history and not allowing certain cookie types, but rather than dub these ‘privacy advancements’, they are being negatively marketed as ‘porn mode’. What’s up with that?&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Demobilized and Remotivated</title><link>/blog/demobilized-and-remotivated/</link><pubDate>Mon, 01 Sep 2008 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/demobilized-and-remotivated/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;After a hectic week of being locked away in a warehouse in Denver, I’m sitting in a hotel room in Vancouver getting ready to board a ship to Alaska. Now that’s it’s all over I can give a few more details as to what I was up to last week.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Vector Bids for Aladdin</title><link>/blog/vector-bids-for-aladdin/</link><pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/vector-bids-for-aladdin/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Very nice &lt;a href="http://www.redherring.com/Home/24758" title="Vector Bids Aladdin"&gt;article&lt;/a&gt; by Ken Schachter over on the Red Herring site yesterday. &lt;a href="http://www.aladdin.com/" title="Aladdin Home"&gt;Aladdin Knowledge Systems&lt;/a&gt;, the Israeli security firm that was recently in the news after acquiring the Secure Computing SafeWord product, was itself the target of a takeover bid. The bid comes from &lt;a href="http://www.vectorcapital.com/" title="Vector Home"&gt;Vector Capital&lt;/a&gt;, the backers of &lt;a href="http://www.safenet-inc.com/" title="SafeNet"&gt;SafeNet&lt;/a&gt;. The opening bid was rejected, but this looks like the typical negotiating dance, so I expect we will see more activity in the coming weeks.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Punished for Purchases</title><link>/blog/punished-for-purchases/</link><pubDate>Tue, 26 Aug 2008 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/punished-for-purchases/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Nice article over on MSN about data mining and &lt;a href="http://articles.moneycentral.msn.com/Banking/YourCreditRating/YourLifestyleMayHurtCreditScore.aspx" title="Credit Purchases Inspected"&gt;analysis of credit card purchases &lt;/a&gt;to adjust people’s credit score. In a nutshell, some of the card issuers are looking at specifically what people are purchasing, not just payment history, in determining credit worthiness. Worse, they will adjust the credit score over time. So the FTC has file suit against at least one company, CompuCredit, for ‘deceptive’ marketing practices, which does not really capture the essence of the problem. I am not sure if it can be legally called a privacy violation, but it my mind this is exactly the heart of the issue.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Guest Editorial- The MBTA/MIT Disclosure Failure</title><link>/blog/guest-editorial-the-mbta-mit-disclosure-failure/</link><pubDate>Mon, 25 Aug 2008 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/guest-editorial-the-mbta-mit-disclosure-failure/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Securosis Guest Editorial&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;On occasion we invite some of our non-blogging friends to steal our thunder. Jesse Krembs, known as Agent X to those of us at DefCon, is a network engineer at undisclosed locations out East. He’s one of the guys who keeps the tubes running, and, on occasion, loves a good rant.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>What’s Next?</title><link>/blog/whats-next/</link><pubDate>Mon, 25 Aug 2008 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/whats-next/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;For the record, yes, those hazmat suits are really freaking hot and sweaty. I guess that’s what they mean by, “vapor barrier”.&lt;img src="https://securosis.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/08/random-021-2.jpg" alt="Random 021_2.jpg"&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Uniform Time</title><link>/blog/uniform-time/</link><pubDate>Fri, 22 Aug 2008 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/uniform-time/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;As many of you know, I’m more a washed -up paramedic than a security analyst. My youthful indiscretions tended to involve ambulances and fire trucks (you’d be amazed at all the fun things you can do with them when no one is looking).&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>The Best Incident Response Training You Can Buy. For Free.</title><link>/blog/the-best-incident-response-training-you-can-buy-for-free/</link><pubDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2008 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/the-best-incident-response-training-you-can-buy-for-free/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Next week I’ll be out of the office on one of my occasional stints as a federal emergency responder. I haven’t had the opportunity to do much since we responded to Katrina, and, to be honest, am surprised the team still lets me hang on (it’s in Colorado, I’m in Arizona, and I don’t get to train much anymore). Who knows how much longer I’ll get to put a uniform on- the politics of domestic response are a freaking mess these days, with all the cash funding the war, and I won’t be surprised if some of the more expensive (and thus capable) parts of the system are dismantled. Hopefully we can hang on through the next election.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Control Your Identity</title><link>/blog/control-your-identity/</link><pubDate>Tue, 19 Aug 2008 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/control-your-identity/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;One of the sessions I enjoyed at DefCon was Nathan Hamiel and Shawn Moyer’s, “Satan is on My Friends List”. Aside from directly hacking the security of some of these sites, they experimented with creating fake profiles of known individuals and seeing who they could fool. Notably, they created a profile (with permission) for Marcus Ranum on LinkedIn, then tried to see how many people they could fool into connecting to it. Yes, folks, I fell for it.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Do We Need A New Internet?</title><link>/blog/do-we-need-a-new-internet/</link><pubDate>Tue, 19 Aug 2008 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/do-we-need-a-new-internet/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I ran across &lt;a href="http://www.azcentral.com/arizonarepublic/business/articles/2008/08/09/20080809tech-bits0809.html" title="GENI and New Internet"&gt;this&lt;/a&gt; article last week in the Arizona Republic regarding redesign of the Internet. This was very much in line with one of the recurring &lt;a href="http://pcworld.about.com/news/May242006id125865.htm" title="Internet Redesign"&gt;topics&lt;/a&gt; that seemed to be discussed in the halls at Caesars Palace during Black Hat: how might we change the Internet if we were to start from a clean slate? There are clearly many motivating factors to do so, from the fragility and dependency issues of the Internet on DNS as discussed by &lt;a href="http://www.blackhat.com/html/bh-usa-08/bh-usa-08-speakers.html#Kaminsky" title="DNS Flaw"&gt;Kaminisky&lt;/a&gt; , &lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/E-mail_spam" title="Spam"&gt;email spam&lt;/a&gt; , &lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DDoS#Distributed_attack" title="DDoS"&gt;DDOS&lt;/a&gt;, use of a basically insecure connectionless protocol for the vast majority of transactions, to encrypting &lt;a href="http://newteevee.com/2008/07/09/the-pirate-bay-wants-to-encrypt-the-entire-internet/" title="Encrypt the Internet"&gt;all Internet traffic&lt;/a&gt; to keep government and other entities from spying on us, and the list goes on and on.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Network Security Podcast, Episode 116 (With A Lot Of Bad Words)</title><link>/blog/network-security-podcast-episode-116-with-a-lot-of-bad-words/</link><pubDate>Tue, 19 Aug 2008 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/network-security-podcast-episode-116-with-a-lot-of-bad-words/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;A bit of a different episode this week. Since Martin is traveling, rather than a guest host this week we’re posting the last of the interviews recorded at DefCon- but this one is a doozy. David Mortman, Dave Maynor, Chris Hoff, Robert “Rsnake” Hanson, and Larry Pesce join us immediately after we all finished our DefCon panel. Martin, as the sober one, interviews us as we record what is our first clearly explicit podcast. Yes folks, we hit all 7 dirty words plus a few bonuses. Not to worry, we do include some content as we discuss what we covered in the panel and whatever other topics flew into our adult-beverage-addled brains. We had a heck of a lot of fun putting the DefCon back into DefCon, and we hope you enjoy this little slice of the unfiltered.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Overly Paranoid?</title><link>/blog/overly-paranoid/</link><pubDate>Tue, 19 Aug 2008 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/overly-paranoid/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;During a recent eBay auction, when clicking the “Pay Now” button for an item I had won, I was taken off the eBay site, to a third party merchant site. The merchant site was attempting to verify address information and shipping options, and then forward me to PayPal. I tried going back into my eBay account and making the payment directly to PayPal several times, in an attempt to avoid the third-party site, without success. It appears that eBay is allowing third party merchants to insert their own code and web sites into the checkout process. What’s more, this particular merchant page was a mixture of secure and insecure content and some JavaScript. &lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NoScript" title="NoScript is awesome"&gt;NoScript&lt;/a&gt; took care of the issue for me, but it leaves me wondering.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Visual Forensic Analysis</title><link>/blog/visual-forensic-analysis/</link><pubDate>Tue, 19 Aug 2008 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/visual-forensic-analysis/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;During the second day at Black Hat, somewhat depressed by yet another futile attempt to locate coffee and fighting human gridlock, I decided that it was no longer worth the effort and simply sat down in the nearest conference. And I am glad I did as that random selection of presentations turned out to be one of my favorites of the week. The presentation was called Visual Forensic Analysis and Reverse Engineering, presented by Gregory Conti and Erik Dean. I would offer a link for you, but I have been unable to find the slide deck on line. It is on the CD that was included in the Black Hat goodie bag for those of you who attended, and some of the discussion points are located here (&lt;a href="http://lcamtuf.coredump.cx/oldtcp/tcpseq.html"&gt;http://lcamtuf.coredump.cx/oldtcp/tcpseq.html&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Don’t Sell “Compliance” If It Isn’t A Checkbox</title><link>/blog/dont-sell-compliance-if-it-isnt-a-checkbox/</link><pubDate>Mon, 18 Aug 2008 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/dont-sell-compliance-if-it-isnt-a-checkbox/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Perusing my blogs this morning I caught a p&lt;a href="http://chuvakin.blogspot.com/2008/08/few-more-words-on-dlp-and-compliance.html"&gt;ost by Anton on DLP and compliance&lt;/a&gt;. That’s the blogging equivalent of chaining a nice fat bunny to a stake in the middle of coyote territory here in Phoenix (in other words, the park behind our house). I, as the rabid coyote of DLP-ness, am compelled to respond.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Transparency</title><link>/blog/transparency/</link><pubDate>Thu, 14 Aug 2008 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/transparency/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;There’s been a bit of debate on the blogs recently over the role of analysts, and how they pay their bills. It &lt;a href="http://rationalsecurity.typepad.com/blog/2008/07/security-analys.html"&gt;started with the Hoff&lt;/a&gt;, and Alan Shimel followed up (no link right now due to Alan’s blog issues). I know Chris wasn’t calling me out on this one (because he told me), but I do recognize I put a lot of content out there that people trust to help make decisions, and it’s only fair they know of any potential conflicts of interest I might have.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>New Whitepaper: Best Practices For Endpoint DLP</title><link>/blog/new-whitepaper-best-practices-for-endpoint-dlp/</link><pubDate>Tue, 12 Aug 2008 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/new-whitepaper-best-practices-for-endpoint-dlp/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;We’re proud to announce a new whitepaper dedicated to best practices in endpoint DLP. It’s a combination of our series of posts on the subject, enhanced with additional material, diagrams, and editing. The title is (no surprise) &lt;a href="http://securosis.com/publications/BestPracticesforEndpointDLP.pdf"&gt;Best Practices for Endpoint Data Loss Prevention&lt;/a&gt;. It was actually complete before Black Hat, but I’m just getting a chance to put it up now.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>The Network Security Podcast Pwns Black Hat And DefCon!</title><link>/blog/the-network-security-podcast-pwns-black-hat-and-defcon/</link><pubDate>Mon, 11 Aug 2008 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/the-network-security-podcast-pwns-black-hat-and-defcon/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;No, we didn’t hack any networks or laptops, but we absolutely dominated when it comes to podcast coverage. This was our second series of microcasts since RSA, and we really like the format. Short, to the point interviews, posted nearly as fast as we can record them.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>What to Buy, Part Two</title><link>/blog/what-to-buy-part-two/</link><pubDate>Mon, 11 Aug 2008 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/what-to-buy-part-two/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;So we took the plunge at the Lane household and bought an iMac. That is the good news. The bad news: it was my wife, and not me, who made the purchase.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Black Hat: The Risks Of Trusting Content</title><link>/blog/black-hat-the-risks-of-trusting-content/</link><pubDate>Thu, 07 Aug 2008 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/black-hat-the-risks-of-trusting-content/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I’m sitting in the Extreme Client-side exploitation talk here at Black Hat and it’s highlighting a major website design risk that takes on even more significance in mashups and other web 2.0-style content.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Insurers Mining Consumer Data</title><link>/blog/insurers-mining-consumer-data/</link><pubDate>Thu, 07 Aug 2008 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/insurers-mining-consumer-data/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I saw &lt;a href="http://www.azcentral.com/news/articles/2008/08/04/20080804health-privacy0804.html" title="Insurance Data Mining"&gt;this&lt;/a&gt; article in the Arizona Republic Monday about how the insurance companies are able to save money by gathering health care records electronically, make more accurate analyses of patients (also saving money) and be able to adjust premiums (&lt;em&gt;i.e.,&lt;/em&gt; make more money) based upon your poor health or various other things. You know, like ‘pre-existing’ conditions, or whatever concept they choose to make up.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Network vs. Application Security</title><link>/blog/network-vs-application-security/</link><pubDate>Wed, 06 Aug 2008 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/network-vs-application-security/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Should network and application security proceed along separate, independent tracks?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Should software security focus solely on the in-context business issues concerning security, and have network security focus on not allowing the software and infrastructure to be undermined?&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Clear Database Stolen</title><link>/blog/clear-database-stolen/</link><pubDate>Tue, 05 Aug 2008 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/clear-database-stolen/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://cbs5.com/local/tsa.security.clear.2.788083.html" title="Clear DB stolen"&gt;Nice&lt;/a&gt;! The Clear database was on a laptop that was stolen at SFO.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;What a great database breach to shed light on this implied-security-related-but-really-not revenue opportunity known as Clear. I guess I am chuckling about this, but as I don’t know what is contained in that data set, I do not know how dangerous this leak is to the members who signed up for it.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>UMG Piracy Trial</title><link>/blog/umg-piracy-trial/</link><pubDate>Tue, 05 Aug 2008 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/umg-piracy-trial/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;The &lt;a href="http://www.azcentral.com/arizonarepublic/business/articles/2008/08/05/20080805biz-mktsector0805.html" title="Piracy Trial"&gt;piracy trial&lt;/a&gt; is getting interesting. Vivendi SA’s Universal Music Group won a $222,000.00 verdict against defendant Jammie Thomas for making songs available via Kazaa. The problem is that no one downloaded the songs; they were only discovered by &lt;a href="http://www.mediasentry.com/index2.html" title="Mediasentry"&gt;MediaSentry&lt;/a&gt;. The entire case hangs what constitutes “making available”, and how it differs from distribution. The judge in the case actually stated he may have committed a “manifest error of law” by instructing the jury that making files available is the same as distribution. Oops.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Must Be DefCon Time</title><link>/blog/must-be-defcon-time/</link><pubDate>Mon, 04 Aug 2008 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/must-be-defcon-time/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;My kitchen table: &lt;img src="photo.jpg" alt="photo.jpg"&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>New Poll (And Article) At Dark Reading</title><link>/blog/new-poll-and-article-at-dark-reading/</link><pubDate>Mon, 04 Aug 2008 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/new-poll-and-article-at-dark-reading/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks to the unorthodox release of the DNS bug, there’s been a lot of debate in the past few weeks over disclosure. I &lt;a href="http://securosis.com/2008/07/24/a-question/"&gt;posed a question here on the blog&lt;/a&gt;, and reading through the responses it became obvious that all of us base our positions on gut instinct, not empirical evidence. Andrew Jaquith, in the comments, suggested we take a more scientific approach to the problem, and this &lt;a href="http://www.darkreading.com/document.asp?doc_id=160415&amp;amp;WT.svl=tease3_2"&gt;inspired my latest Dark Reading article&lt;/a&gt;, and a poll. Here’s an excerpt:&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Securosis Hits Black Hat and DefCon</title><link>/blog/securosis-hits-black-hat-and-defcon/</link><pubDate>Fri, 01 Aug 2008 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/securosis-hits-black-hat-and-defcon/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;It won’t come as a surprise to anyone, but Adrian and I will be out in Vegas for Black Hat and DefCon. I arrive Tuesday morning and Adrian arrives Tuesday night. He’s there through Saturday morning, and I’m around to the bitter end.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Security Researchers Discover ... 5 Stages of Disclosure Grief</title><link>/blog/security-researchers-discover-5-stages-of-disclosure-grief/</link><pubDate>Wed, 30 Jul 2008 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/security-researchers-discover-5-stages-of-disclosure-grief/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Denial&lt;/strong&gt; : &lt;a href="http://securosis.com/2008/07/08/dan-kaminsky-discovers-fundamental-issue-in-dns-massive-multivendor-patch-released/" title="Denial"&gt;“Dan may be smart, but Tom Ptacek states the obvious that this isn’t a new threat. Maybe a new spin on an old flaw.”&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>The Art of Dysfunction</title><link>/blog/the-art-of-dysfunction/</link><pubDate>Tue, 29 Jul 2008 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/the-art-of-dysfunction/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Another off-topic post.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;They say when you are frustrated, especially with someone in an email dialog, write-delete-rewrite. That means write the reply that you want to write, chock full of expletives and politically incorrect things you &lt;em&gt;really&lt;/em&gt; want to say, and then delete it. Once you are finished with that cleansing process, start from scratch, writing the politically correct version of your reply. This has always been effective for me and kept me out of trouble.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>A Question</title><link>/blog/a-question/</link><pubDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2008 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/a-question/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;If you can tell, with absolute certainty, that systems are vulnerable to an exploit without needing to test the mechanism, what good is served by releasing weaponized attack code immediately after patches are released, but before most enterprises can patch?&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Best Practices For Endpoint DLP: Use Cases</title><link>/blog/best-practices-for-endpoint-dlp-use-cases/</link><pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2008 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/best-practices-for-endpoint-dlp-use-cases/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;We’ve covered a lot of ground over the past few posts on endpoint DLP. Our last post finished our discussion of best practices and I’d like to close with a few short fictional use cases based on real deployments.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Pure Genius</title><link>/blog/pure-genius/</link><pubDate>Tue, 22 Jul 2008 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/pure-genius/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/typepad/beaker/blog/~3/343197628/the-dns-debacle.html"&gt;There is nothing else to say.&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;(Hoff claims he wrote it in 8 minutes).&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Individual Privacy vs. Business Drivers</title><link>/blog/individual-privacy-vs-business-drivers/</link><pubDate>Mon, 21 Jul 2008 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/individual-privacy-vs-business-drivers/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;‘I ended a recent &lt;a href="https://securosis.com/blog/comments-on-security-breach-statistics"&gt;Breach Statistics post&lt;/a&gt; with “I start to wonder if the corporations and public entities of the world have already effectively wiped out personal privacy.” It was just a thowaway idea that had popped into my head, but the more I thought about it over the next couple of days, the more it bothered me. It is probably because that idea was germinating while reading a series of news events during the past couple of weeks made me grasp the sheer momentum of privacy erosion that is going on. It is happening now, with little incentive for the parties involved to change their behavior, and there is seemingly little we can do about it.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>NitroSecurity’s Acquisition of RippleTech</title><link>/blog/nitrosecuritys-acquisition-of-rippletech/</link><pubDate>Mon, 21 Jul 2008 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/nitrosecuritys-acquisition-of-rippletech/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;‘I was reading through the &lt;a href="http://www.nitrosecurity.com/news/pr/2008/20080715.psp" title="Nitro Acquires RippleTech"&gt;NitroSecurity press release&lt;/a&gt; last week, thinking about the implications of their RippleTech purchase. This is an interesting move and not one of the Database Activity Monitoring acquisitions I was &lt;a href="http://infocentric.typepad.com/blog/2008/05/database-security-market.html" title="Database Security Market"&gt;predicting&lt;/a&gt;. So what do we have here? IPS, DAM, SIM, and log management under one umbrella. Some real time solutions, some forensic solutions. They are certainly casting a broad net of offerings for compliance and security.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Move to New Zealand, Get Out Of Jail Free</title><link>/blog/move-to-new-zealand-get-out-of-jail-free/</link><pubDate>Fri, 18 Jul 2008 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/move-to-new-zealand-get-out-of-jail-free/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;New Zealand is absolutely my favorite place on the face of the planet. I’ve made it down there twice, once for a month before I met my wife, and once for just under 3 weeks with her as we drove thousands of kilometers exploring as much of both islands as we could. As much as I love it, I don’t think I’d want to live there full time (I kind of like the US, despite our current administration).&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Best Practices for Endpoint DLP: Part 5, Deployment</title><link>/blog/best-practices-for-endpoint-dlp-part-5-deployment/</link><pubDate>Thu, 17 Jul 2008 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/best-practices-for-endpoint-dlp-part-5-deployment/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;In &lt;a href="http://securosis.com/2008/07/15/best-practices-for-endpoint-dlp-part-4-best-practices-for-deployment/"&gt;our last post&lt;/a&gt; we talked about prepping for deployment- setting expectations, prioritizing, integrating with the infrastructure, and defining workflow. Now it’s time to get out of the lab and get our hands dirty.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>San Francisco Needs A Really Good Pen Tester</title><link>/blog/san-francisco-needs-a-really-good-pen-tester/</link><pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2008 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/san-francisco-needs-a-really-good-pen-tester/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;‘Direct from the “you can’t make this up” department, &lt;a href="http://www.darkreading.com/blog.asp?blog_sectionid=342&amp;amp;f_src=drdaily"&gt;this news&lt;/a&gt; started floating around a couple days ago:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;JULY 15, 2008 | 11:55 AM – Right now, San Francisco computer experts are frantically trying to crack an exclusive administrative password of one of their former computer engineers who”s sitting in jail for basically holding the city”s new multimillion-dollar network hostage. Terry Childs, 43, is cooling his heels in the slammer on charges of computer tampering for configuring sole admin control of the city”s new FiberWAN network so that no other IT officials can have administrative rights to the network, which contains email, payroll, law enforcement, and inmate booking files’ apps and data, according to a published report. Childs apparently gave some passwords to police that didn”t work, and refused to give up his magic credentials when they threatened to arrest him. Seems he set up the password lockout to ensure he didn”t get fired after he was cited for poor performance on the job.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Stolen Data Cheaper</title><link>/blog/stolen-data-cheaper/</link><pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2008 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/stolen-data-cheaper/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;‘It’s rare I laugh out loud when reading the paper, but I did on &lt;a href="http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20080715/wr_nm/cybercrime_finjan_dc" title="Stolen Data Cheaper"&gt;this&lt;/a&gt; story. It is a great angle on a moribund topic, saying that there is such a glut of stolen finance and credit data for sale that it is driving prices down.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Upcoming: Database Encryption Whitepaper</title><link>/blog/upcoming-database-encryption-whitepaper/</link><pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2008 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/upcoming-database-encryption-whitepaper/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;We are going to be working on another paper with SANS- this time on database encryption. This is a technology that offers consumers considerable advantages in meeting security and compliance challenges, and we have been getting customer inquiries on what the available options are. As encryption products have continued to mature over the last few years, we think it is a good time to delve into this subject. If you’re on the vendor side and interested in sponsorship, drop us a line. You don’t get to influence the content, but we get really good exposure with these SANS papers.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>After Action Report: What Fortinet Should Do With IPLocks</title><link>/blog/after-action-report-what-fortinet-should-do-with-iplocks/</link><pubDate>Tue, 15 Jul 2008 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/after-action-report-what-fortinet-should-do-with-iplocks/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;When &lt;a href="http://fortinet.com/"&gt;Fortinet&lt;/a&gt; acquired parts of IPLocks it was a bit of a bittersweet moment. When I started my career as an analyst, IPLocks was the first vendor client I worked with. I was tasked with covering database security and spent a fair bit of time walking clients through methods of improving their database monitoring; mostly for security in those days, since auditors hadn’t yet invaded the data center. It was all really manual, using things like triggers and stored procedures since native auditing sucked on every platform. After a few months of this I was connected with IPLocks- a small database security vendor with a tool to do exactly what I was trying to figure out how to do manually. They’d been around for a few years, but since everyone at this time thought database security was “encryption”, they bounced around the market more than usual.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Best Practices For Endpoint DLP: Part 4, Best Practices for Deployment</title><link>/blog/best-practices-for-endpoint-dlp-part-4-best-practices-for-deployment/</link><pubDate>Tue, 15 Jul 2008 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/best-practices-for-endpoint-dlp-part-4-best-practices-for-deployment/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;We started this series with an &lt;a href="http://securosis.com/2008/06/30/best-practices-for-endpoint-dlp-part-1/"&gt;overview of endpoint DLP&lt;/a&gt;, and then &lt;a href="http://securosis.com/2008/07/02/best-practices-for-endpoint-dlp-part-2/"&gt;dug into endpoint agent technology.&lt;/a&gt; We closed out our discussion of the technology with &lt;a href="http://securosis.com/2008/07/07/best-practices-for-endpoint-dlp-part-3/"&gt;agent deployment, management, policy creation, enforcement workflow, and overall integration&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Oracle Critical Patch Update- Patch OAS Now!!!</title><link>/blog/oracle-critical-patch-update-patch-oas-now/</link><pubDate>Tue, 15 Jul 2008 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/oracle-critical-patch-update-patch-oas-now/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I was just in the process of reviewing the details on the latest &lt;a href="http://www.oracle.com/technology/deploy/security/critical-patch-updates/cpujul2008.html#AppendixA" title="Critical Patch July 2008"&gt;Oracle Critical Patch Advisory&lt;/a&gt; for July 2008 and found something a bit frightening. As in could let any random person own your database frightening.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>ADMP: A Policy Driven Example</title><link>/blog/a-friend-of-mine-and-i-were-working-on-a-project-recently-to-feed-the-results-of-a-vulnerability-assessment-or-discovery-scans-into-a-behavioral-monitoring-tool-he-was-working-on-a-series-of-policies/</link><pubDate>Sun, 13 Jul 2008 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/a-friend-of-mine-and-i-were-working-on-a-project-recently-to-feed-the-results-of-a-vulnerability-assessment-or-discovery-scans-into-a-behavioral-monitoring-tool-he-was-working-on-a-series-of-policies/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;A friend of mine and I were working on a project recently to feed the results of a vulnerability assessment or discovery scans into a behavioral monitoring tool. He was working on a series of policies that would scan database tables for specific metadata signatures and content signatures that had a high probability of being personally identifiable information. The goal was to scan databases for content types, and send back a list of objects that looked important or had a high probability of being sensitive information.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Google AdWords</title><link>/blog/google-adwords/</link><pubDate>Fri, 11 Jul 2008 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/google-adwords/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;This is not a ‘security’ post.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Has anyone had a problem with Google AdWords continuing to bill their credit cards after their account is terminated? Within the last two months, four people have complained to me that their credit cards continued to be changed even though they cancelled their accounts. In fact, the charges were slightly higher than normal. In a couple of cases they had to cancel their credit cards in order to get the charges to stop, resulting in letters from “The Google AdWords Team” threatening to pursue with the issuing bank … and, no, I am not talking about the current spam floating around out there but a legitimate email. All this despite having the email acknowledgement that the AdWords account had been cancelled.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Upcoming Webcast- DLP and DAM Together</title><link>/blog/upcoming-webcast-dlp-and-dam-together/</link><pubDate>Fri, 11 Jul 2008 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/upcoming-webcast-dlp-and-dam-together/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;On July 29th I’ll be giving a webcast entitled Using Data Leakage Prevention and Database Activity Monitoring for Data Protection. It’s a mix of my content on DLP, DAM and Information Centric security, designed to show you how to piece these technologies together.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>ADMP and Assessment</title><link>/blog/admp-and-assessment/</link><pubDate>Thu, 10 Jul 2008 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/admp-and-assessment/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Application and Database Monitoring and Protection. ADMP for short.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In Rich’s previous post, under &lt;a href="http://securosis.com/2008/06/27/the-future-of-application-and-database-security-part-2-browser-to-wafgateway/" title="ADMP Part 2"&gt;“Enter ADMP”&lt;/a&gt;, he discussed coordination of security applications to help address security issues. They may gather data in different ways, from different segments within the IT infrastructure, and cooperate with other applications based upon the information they have gathered or gleaned from analysis. What is being described is &lt;em&gt;not&lt;/em&gt; shoving every service into an appliance for one stop shopping; that is decidedly not what we are getting at. Conceptually it is far closer to DLP ‘suites’ that offer endpoint and network security, with consolidated policy management.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Dark Reading Column: Attack Of The Consumers (And Those Pesky iPhones)</title><link>/blog/dark-reading-column-attack-of-the-consumers-and-those-pesky-iphones/</link><pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2008 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/dark-reading-column-attack-of-the-consumers-and-those-pesky-iphones/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I have a sneaking suspicion my hosting provider secretly hates me after getting &lt;a href="http://slashdot.org"&gt;Slashdotted&lt;/a&gt; twice this week. But I don’t care, because in less than 48 hours it’s &lt;strong&gt;iPhone Day!!!&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>More On The DNS Vulnerability</title><link>/blog/more-on-the-dns-vulnerability/</link><pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2008 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/more-on-the-dns-vulnerability/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Okay- it’s been a crazy 36 hours since Dan Kaminsky &lt;a href="http://securosis.com/2008/07/08/dan-kaminsky-discovers-fundamental-issue-in-dns-massive-multivendor-patch-released/"&gt;released his information on the massive multivendor patch&lt;/a&gt; and DNS issue. I want to give a little background on how I’ve been involved (for full disclosure) as well as some additional aspects of this. If you hate long stories, the short version is he just walked me through the details, this is a very big deal, and you need to patch immediately.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Dan Kaminsky Discovers Fundamental Issue In DNS: Massive Multivendor Patch Released</title><link>/blog/dan-kaminsky-discovers-fundamental-issue-in-dns-massive-multivendor-patch-released/</link><pubDate>Tue, 08 Jul 2008 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/dan-kaminsky-discovers-fundamental-issue-in-dns-massive-multivendor-patch-released/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Today, CERT is issuing an advisory for a massive multivendor patch to resolve a major issue in DNS that could allow attackers to easily compromise any name server (it also affects clients). &lt;a href="http://www.doxpara.com/"&gt;Dan Kaminsky&lt;/a&gt; discovered the flaw early this year and has been working with a large group of vendors on a coordinated patch.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Best Practices for Endpoint DLP: Part 3</title><link>/blog/best-practices-for-endpoint-dlp-part-3/</link><pubDate>Mon, 07 Jul 2008 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/best-practices-for-endpoint-dlp-part-3/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;In our last post &lt;a href="http://securosis.com/2008/07/02/best-practices-for-endpoint-dlp-part-2/"&gt;we discussed the core functions of an endpoint DLP tool&lt;/a&gt;. Today we’re going to talk more about agent deployment, management, policy creation, enforcement workflow, and overall integration.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Comments on Security Breach Statistics</title><link>/blog/comments-on-security-breach-statistics/</link><pubDate>Mon, 07 Jul 2008 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/comments-on-security-breach-statistics/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I still have not quite reached complete apathy regarding breach statistics, but I am really close. The &lt;a href="http://www.idtheftcenter.org/"&gt;Identity Theft Resource Center &lt;/a&gt;statistics made their way into the &lt;a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/01/01/AR2008010101714.html"&gt;Washington Post&lt;/a&gt; last week, and were reposted on the front page of &lt;a href="http://www.azcentral.com/business/articles/2008/07/05/20080705biz-databreach0705.html"&gt;The Arizona Republic&lt;/a&gt; business section this morning. In a nutshell they are saying the number of breaches was up 69% for the first half of 2008 over the first half of 2007.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Mozilla Project In Open Document Format</title><link>/blog/mozilla-project-in-open-document-format/</link><pubDate>Mon, 07 Jul 2008 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/mozilla-project-in-open-document-format/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Due to popular demand, there’s now an OpenOffice format (.ods) file for the Mozilla security metrics project.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://securosis.com/publications/MozillaProject2.ods"&gt;You can pick up the file here…&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>What To Buy?</title><link>/blog/what-to-buy/</link><pubDate>Sat, 05 Jul 2008 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/what-to-buy/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;This is a non-security post… I did not get a lot of work done Thursday afternoon. I was shopping. Specifically, I am shopping for a new laptop. I have a four year old Fujitsu running XP. The MTBF on this machine is about 20 months, so I am a little beyond laptop shelf life. A friend lent me a nice laptop with Vista for a week, and I must say, I really do not like it. Don’t like the performance. Don’t like the DRM. Don’t like the new arrangement of the UI. Don’t like the lowest-common-denominator approach to design. Don’t like an OS that thinks it knows what I want and shoves the wrong things at me. The entire direction it’s heading seems to be the antithesis of fast, efficient, &amp;amp; friendly. So what to buy? If you do not choose Windows, there really are not a lot of options for business laptops. Do you really have a choice?&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>The Mozilla Metrics Project</title><link>/blog/the-mozilla-metrics-project/</link><pubDate>Thu, 03 Jul 2008 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/the-mozilla-metrics-project/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Ryan Naraine just &lt;a href="http://blogs.zdnet.com/security/?p=1424"&gt;posted an article over at ZDNet&lt;/a&gt; about a project I’m extremely excited to be involved with.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Just before RSA I was invited by Window Snyder over at Mozilla to work with them on a project to take a new look at software security metrics. &lt;a href="http://blog.mozilla.com/security/2008/07/02/mozilla-security-metrics-project/"&gt;Window has posted the details of the project over on the Mozilla security blog&lt;/a&gt;, and here’s an excerpt:&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>YouTube, Viacom, And Why You Should Fear Google More Than The Government</title><link>/blog/youtube-viacom-and-why-you-should-fear-google-more-than-the-government/</link><pubDate>Thu, 03 Jul 2008 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/youtube-viacom-and-why-you-should-fear-google-more-than-the-government/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Reading Wired this morning (and a bunch of other blogs), I learned that a &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/wired27b/~3/325294369/judge-orders-yo.html"&gt;judge ordered Google/YouTube to turn over ALL records of who watched what on YouTube.&lt;/a&gt; To Viacom of all organizations, as part of their lawsuit against Google for hosting copyrighted content. The data transfered over includes IP address and what was watched.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Best Practices For Endpoint DLP: Part 2</title><link>/blog/best-practices-for-endpoint-dlp-part-2/</link><pubDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2008 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/best-practices-for-endpoint-dlp-part-2/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://securosis.com/2008/06/30/best-practices-for-endpoint-dlp-part-1/"&gt;In Part 1&lt;/a&gt; I talked about the definition of endpoint DLP, the business drivers, and how it integrates with full-suite solutions. Today (and over the next few days) we’re going to start digging into the technology itself.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Defining (Blog) Content Theft</title><link>/blog/defining-blog-content-theft/</link><pubDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2008 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/defining-blog-content-theft/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;My &lt;a href="http://securosis.com/2008/07/02/securityratty-is-slimey-content-stealing-thief/"&gt;posts&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://securosis.com/2008/07/02/i-win/"&gt;today&lt;/a&gt; on SecurityRatty inspired a bit more debate than I expected. A number of commenters asked if someone still links back to my site, how can I consider it theft? What makes it different than other content aggregators?&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>I Win</title><link>/blog/i-win/</link><pubDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2008 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/i-win/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Guess they don’t bother to review the content they steal…&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src="https://securosis.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/07/ratty.jpg" alt="Ratty.png"&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Update- I think I’ll call this attack “Rat Phucking”.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Pre-Black Hat/DefCon SunSec And Inagural Phoenix Security Slam</title><link>/blog/pre-black-hat-defcon-sunsec-and-inagural-phoenix-security-slam/</link><pubDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2008 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/pre-black-hat-defcon-sunsec-and-inagural-phoenix-security-slam/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I’ve talked to some of the local crew, and we’ve decided to hold a special pre-BH/DefCon SunSec on July 31st (location TBD).&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>SecurityRatty Is A Slimy, Content-Stealing Thief</title><link>/blog/securityratty-is-a-slimy-content-stealing-thief/</link><pubDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2008 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/securityratty-is-a-slimy-content-stealing-thief/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Like most other security blogs in the world, my content is regularly abused by a particular site that just shovels out my posts as if it was theirs. This is an experiment to see if they bother reading what they steal.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>ATM PIN Thefts</title><link>/blog/atm-pin-thefts/</link><pubDate>Tue, 01 Jul 2008 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/atm-pin-thefts/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;The &lt;a href="http://www.examiner.com/a-1468003~Citibank_ATM_breach_reveals_PIN_security_problems.html" title="ATM Fraud"&gt;theft of Citibank ATM PINs&lt;/a&gt; is in the news again as it appears that indictments have been handed down on the three suspects. This case will be interesting to watch, to see what the fallout will be. It is not still really clear if the PINs were leaked in transit, or if the clearing house servers were breached.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>What’s My Motivation?</title><link>/blog/whats-my-motivation/</link><pubDate>Tue, 01 Jul 2008 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/whats-my-motivation/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;‘Or more appropriately, “Why are we talking about ADMP?” In his first post on the future of application and database security, Rich talked about &lt;a href="http://securosis.com/2008/06/25/the-future-of-application-and-database-security-part-1-setting-the-stage/"&gt;Forces and Assumptions&lt;/a&gt; heading us down an evolutionary path towards ADMP. I want to offer a slightly different take on my motivation, or belief, in this strategy.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Best Practices For Endpoint DLP: Part 1</title><link>/blog/best-practices-for-endpoint-dlp-part-1/</link><pubDate>Mon, 30 Jun 2008 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/best-practices-for-endpoint-dlp-part-1/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;As the first analyst to ever cover Data Loss Prevention, I’ve had a bit of a tumultuous relationship with endpoint DLP. Early on I tended to exclude endpoint only solutions because they were more limited in functionality, and couldn’t help at all with protecting data loss from unmanaged systems. But even then I always said that, eventually, endpoint DLP would be a critical component of any DLP solution. When we’re looking at a problem like data loss, no individual point solution will give us everything we need.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>The Future Of Application And Database Security: Part 2, Browser To WAF/Gateway</title><link>/blog/the-future-of-application-and-database-security-part-2-browser-to-waf-gateway/</link><pubDate>Fri, 27 Jun 2008 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/the-future-of-application-and-database-security-part-2-browser-to-waf-gateway/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Since Friday is usually “trash” day (when you dump articles you don’t expect anyone to read) I don’t usually post anything major. But thanks to some unexpected work that hit yesterday, I wasn’t able to get part 2 of this series out when I wanted to. If you can tear yourself away from those LOLCatz long enough, we’re going to talk about web browsers, WAFs, and web application gateways. These are the first two components of Application and Database Monitoring and Protection (ADMP), which I define as:&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Don’t Use chmod To Block Mac OS X ARDAgent Vulnerability</title><link>/blog/dont-use-chmod-to-block-mac-os-x-ardagent-vulnerability/</link><pubDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2008 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/dont-use-chmod-to-block-mac-os-x-ardagent-vulnerability/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Just a quick note- if you used chmod to change the permissions of ARDAgent to block the privilege escalation vulnerability being used by the new trojans you should still go compress or remove it. Repairing permissions restores ARDAgent and opens the vulnerability again.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Let’s Start At The Very Beginning</title><link>/blog/lets-start-at-the-very-beginning/</link><pubDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2008 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/lets-start-at-the-very-beginning/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;‘Last week Jeremiah “Purple Belt” Grossman posted the &lt;a href="http://jeremiahgrossman.blogspot.com/2008/06/day-1-starting-at-beginning.html"&gt;following question&lt;/a&gt;:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;“You’re hired on at a new company placed in charge of securing their online business (websites). You know next to nothing about the technical details of the infrastructure other than they have no existing web/software security program and a significant portion of the organizations revenues are generated through their websites. What is the very first thing do on day 1?”&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Network Security Podcast, Episode 109</title><link>/blog/network-security-podcast-episode-109/</link><pubDate>Wed, 25 Jun 2008 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/network-security-podcast-episode-109/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;This week, Martin and I are joined by Adam Shostack, bandleader of the &lt;a href="http://www.emergentchaos.com/"&gt;Emergent Chaos Jazz Combo of the Blogosphere&lt;/a&gt; and co-author of &lt;a href="http://www.amazon.com/New-School-Information-Security/dp/0321502787/"&gt;The New School of Information Security&lt;/a&gt;. (And he sorta works for a big software company, but that’s not important right now).&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>The Future Of Application And Database Security: Part 1, Setting The Stage</title><link>/blog/the-future-of-application-and-database-security-part-1-setting-the-stage/</link><pubDate>Wed, 25 Jun 2008 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/the-future-of-application-and-database-security-part-1-setting-the-stage/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I’ve been spending the past few weeks wandering around the country for various shows, speaking to some of the best and brightest in the world of application and database security. Heck, I &lt;a href="http://securosis.com/2008/06/11/adrian-lane-joining-securosis/"&gt;even hired one of them&lt;/a&gt;. During some of my presentations I laid out my vision for where I believe application (especially web application) and database security are headed. I’ve hinted at it here on the blog, discussing the concepts of ADMP, the information-centric security lifecycle, and DAM, but it’s long past time I detailed the big picture.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Improving OS X Security</title><link>/blog/improving-os-x-security/</link><pubDate>Mon, 23 Jun 2008 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/improving-os-x-security/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;There’s been a bunch of news on the Mac security front in the past couple of weeks. From the Safari carpet bombing attack, to a couple trojans popping up. Over the weekend I submitted an email response to a press interview where I outlined my recommended improvements to OS X to keep Macs safer than Windows. On the technical side they included elements like completing implementation of library randomization (ASLR), adding more stack protection to applications, enhancing and extending sandboxing to most major OS X applications, running fewer processes as root/system, and more extensive use of DEP. I’m not bothering to lay this out in any more depth, because &lt;a href="http://blog.trailofbits.com/2008/06/22/ardagent-exploit-macos-x-malware-and-snow-leopard-oh-my/"&gt;Dino Dai Zovi did a much better job of describing them over on his blog&lt;/a&gt;. Dino’s one of the top Mac security researchers out there, so I highly suggest you &lt;a href="http://blog.trailofbits.com/2008/06/22/ardagent-exploit-macos-x-malware-and-snow-leopard-oh-my/"&gt;read his post&lt;/a&gt; if you’re interested in OS X security.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>I’m With Ptacek- I Run My Mac As Admin</title><link>/blog/im-with-ptacek-i-run-my-mac-as-admin/</link><pubDate>Fri, 20 Jun 2008 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/im-with-ptacek-i-run-my-mac-as-admin/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I’m still in New York for the FISD conference, listening to Team Cymru talk about the state of cybercrime as I wait for my turn at the podium (to talk about information-centric security and DLP). One problem with travel is keeping up with the news, so I pretty much missed the Applescript vulnerability and now have to write it up for TidBITS on the plane before Monday.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>I’m Not The Only Blogger Here!</title><link>/blog/im-not-the-only-blogger-here/</link><pubDate>Thu, 19 Jun 2008 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/im-not-the-only-blogger-here/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I’ve been absolutely flattered by some of the positive comments on our posts this week, especially the database posts. But as much as I enjoy the credit for someone else’s work, I’d like to remind everyone that I’m not the only blogger here at Securosis anymore.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Database Connections and Trust</title><link>/blog/database-connections-and-trust/</link><pubDate>Wed, 18 Jun 2008 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/database-connections-and-trust/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Your Web application connects to a database. You supply the user name and password, establish the connection, and run your query. A very simple, easy to use, and essential component to web applications.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Code Development and Security</title><link>/blog/code-development-and-security/</link><pubDate>Tue, 17 Jun 2008 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/code-development-and-security/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;How do we know our code is bug free? What makes us believe that our application is always going to work?&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Pink Slip Virus 2008</title><link>/blog/pink-slip-virus-2008/</link><pubDate>Tue, 17 Jun 2008 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/pink-slip-virus-2008/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.tomshardware.com/news/computer-windows-virus,5686.html" title="EmployeeFired"&gt;This&lt;/a&gt; is a very scary thing. I wrote a blog post last year about this type of thing in response to Rich’s post on &lt;a href="http://securosis.com/2008/01/10/why-you-shouldnt-run-an-open-wireless-network-like-bruce-or-chuck-norris/" title="LaxWirelessSecurityIssues"&gt;lax wireless security&lt;/a&gt;. I was trying to think up scenarios where this would be a problem, and the best example I thought of is what I am going to call the “Pink Slip Virus 2008”.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Don’t Forget To Download/Upgrade Firefox 3 Today!</title><link>/blog/dont-forget-to-download-upgrade-firefox-3-today/</link><pubDate>Mon, 16 Jun 2008 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/dont-forget-to-download-upgrade-firefox-3-today/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.spreadfirefox.com/en-US/worldrecord/"&gt;Mozilla is trying to set a world download record&lt;/a&gt;. Then &lt;a href="http://noscript.net/"&gt;add in NoScript&lt;/a&gt;, and enjoy some (more) secure browsing.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;(I think it starts at 10 PT).&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Speaking in Seattle And New York This Week</title><link>/blog/speaking-in-seattle-and-new-york-this-week/</link><pubDate>Mon, 16 Jun 2008 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/speaking-in-seattle-and-new-york-this-week/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;It’s a good thing Adrian joined when he did, because I’m slammed with speaking events this week and he gets to mind the blog.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Crime, Communication, and Statistics</title><link>/blog/crime-communication-and-statistics/</link><pubDate>Fri, 13 Jun 2008 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/crime-communication-and-statistics/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;‘I’m not sure if it’s the innate human desire to recognize patterns even when they don’t exist, or if the stars really do align on occasion, but sometimes a series of random events hit at just the right time to inspire a little thought.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Separation of Duties/Functions &amp; SQL Injection</title><link>/blog/separation-of-duties-functions-sql-injection/</link><pubDate>Fri, 13 Jun 2008 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/separation-of-duties-functions-sql-injection/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;In a previous &lt;a href="http://infocentric.typepad.com/blog/2008/05/stored-procedur.html"&gt;post &lt;/a&gt; I have noted that ultimately SQL Injection is a database attack through a web application proxy, and that the Database and the associated Database Administrators need to play a larger part in the defense of data and applications. I recommended a couple steps to assist in combating attacks through the use of stored procedures to help in input parameter validation. I also want to make additional recommendations in the areas of separation of duties and compartmentalization of functions.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Adrian Lane Joining Securosis</title><link>/blog/adrian-lane-joining-securosis/</link><pubDate>Wed, 11 Jun 2008 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/adrian-lane-joining-securosis/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Earlier today I had a bit of a shock when our fearless editor Chris Pepper congratulated me on our 500th post. I started this blog just under two years ago to test the waters of this whole new media thing. Much to my surprise, almost exactly a year after that I took the plunge, quit a heck of a good job, and turned Securosis into a company, not just a place for my random rants. Over that time Chris joined me as editor, and David Mortman as an occasional contributor.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>The Rumor Is True ... I’m Joining Rich At Securosis.</title><link>/blog/the-rumor-is-true-im-joining-rich-at-securosis/</link><pubDate>Wed, 11 Jun 2008 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/the-rumor-is-true-im-joining-rich-at-securosis/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Believe it or not, I’m going to work with Rich Mogull at Securosis. Worse yet, I’m excited about it!&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;On the outside looking in, Rich and I have dissimilar backgrounds. I have been working in product development and IT over the last ten years, and Rich has been an analyst and market strategist. But during the four years I have known Rich, we have shown an uncanny similarity in our views on data security across the board. We are both tech guys at the core, and have independently arrived at the same ideas and conclusions about security and what it will look like in the years to come.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>There Are No Safe Web Sites</title><link>/blog/there-are-no-safe-web-sites/</link><pubDate>Wed, 11 Jun 2008 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/there-are-no-safe-web-sites/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I spend a reasonable amount of time writing security articles for the consumer audience over at &lt;a href="http://www.tidbits.com" title="TidBITS"&gt;TidBITS&lt;/a&gt;, never mind this site. When I talk about browser security, one of my top tips is to avoid risky behavior and “those” sites. Although that’s pretty standard advice, it’s become a load of bollocks, and I can no longer give it in good conscience.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Is Rootkit Detection Worth It?</title><link>/blog/is-rootkit-detection-worth-it/</link><pubDate>Mon, 09 Jun 2008 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/is-rootkit-detection-worth-it/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.matasano.com/log/1050/rootkits-are-top-of-mind-bottom-of-pile/"&gt;An interesting debate/panel over at Matasano&lt;/a&gt; with perspectives from a pundit, researcher, and honest-to-goodness in the trenches security pro.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>New Identity Theft Stats</title><link>/blog/new-identity-theft-stats/</link><pubDate>Mon, 09 Jun 2008 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/new-identity-theft-stats/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;One of my biggest annoyances in the industry is the lack of good metrics for making informed decisions, and the overuse of crappy metrics (like ROI) that drive poor decisions. Of those valid metrics that wistfully dance with rainbows, unicorns, and pony-unicorns in my happiest dreams, those that correlate real-world fraud with real-world incidents stand alone on the peak of the rainbow bridge to metrics nirvana. &lt;a href="http://securosis.com/2008/04/18/its-about-the-fraud-not-the-breaches/"&gt;I’ve written about our need for fraud statistics, not breach statistics&lt;/a&gt;, but often feel like I’m just banging my head against the hard, thick walls of big money.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>A Most Concise, Accurate Description Of The Problem With GRC</title><link>/blog/a-most-concise-accurate-description-of-the-problem-with-grc/</link><pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2008 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/a-most-concise-accurate-description-of-the-problem-with-grc/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Good &lt;a href="http://srmsblog.burtongroup.com/2008/06/its-all-grc-to.html"&gt;post to read over at the Burton Blog&lt;/a&gt;. A snippet:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Of course, the elements of G, R, C are not dead. Governing, managing risk, and responding to compliance obligations are ongoing and critical organizational tasks. The problem is conflating them into a single term. As Burton Group is inclined to say, GRC is a four-letter word that shouldn’t be spoken among polite company. Each function is deserving of its own, complete, and separate word. There’s no organization in which compliance activities, risk management, and executive governance are rolled into a single person, group, or tool. No sense creating an acronym that implies it.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Making The Move To Multiple Browsers</title><link>/blog/making-the-move-to-multiple-browsers/</link><pubDate>Tue, 03 Jun 2008 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/making-the-move-to-multiple-browsers/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;For a while now I’ve been using different web browsers to compartmentalize my risk. Most of my primary browsing is in one browser, but I use another for potentially risky activities I want to isolate more. Running different browsers for different sessions isolates certain types of attacks. For example, unless someone totally pwns you with malware, they can’t execute a CSRF attack if you’re on the malicious site in one browser, but using a totally separate browser to check your bank balance. Actually, to be totally safe you shouldn’t even run both browsers at the same time.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>The Good (Yes, Good) And Bad Of PCI</title><link>/blog/the-good-yes-good-and-bad-of-pci/</link><pubDate>Tue, 03 Jun 2008 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/the-good-yes-good-and-bad-of-pci/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I’m still out at SANS, in a session dedicated to PCI and web application security.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Now, as you readers know, &lt;a href="http://securosis.com/2008/03/19/is-pci-worthless/"&gt;I’m not the biggest fan of PCI&lt;/a&gt;. The truth is (this is the “bad” part) it’s mostly a tool to minimize the risk of the credit card companies by transferring as much risk and cost as possible to the merchants and processors.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Live at SANS WhatWorks: App Sec and Pen Testing</title><link>/blog/live-at-sans-whatworks-app-sec-and-pen-testing/</link><pubDate>Mon, 02 Jun 2008 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/live-at-sans-whatworks-app-sec-and-pen-testing/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I’m out in Vegas at the &lt;a href="http://www.sans.org/pentesting08_summit/?utm_source=web&amp;amp;utm_medium=text-ad&amp;amp;utm_content=text-link_pentesting08summit_FElist&amp;amp;utm_campaign=SANS_WhatWorks_in_Penetration_Testing_&amp;amp;_Ethical_Hacking_Summit&amp;amp;ref=22104"&gt;SANS WhatWorks Summits&lt;/a&gt; on application security and penetration testing. I like the format of these events, which mix a few expert talks with a whole slew of user panels. I’ve previously spoken at the DLP and Mobile Encryption Summits.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Web Application Security: We Need Web Application Firewalls To Work. Better.</title><link>/blog/web-application-security-we-need-web-application-firewalls-to-work-better/</link><pubDate>Mon, 02 Jun 2008 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/web-application-security-we-need-web-application-firewalls-to-work-better/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://jeremiahgrossman.blogspot.com/"&gt;Jeremiah Grossman&lt;/a&gt; is just finishing up his keynote at the SANS conference on web application security. Jeremiah and I have talked a few times about the future of web application security, and we both agree that many current approaches just can’t solve the problem. It’s increasingly clear that no matter how good we are at secure programming (SDLC) , and no matter how effective our code scanning and vulnerability analysis tools are, neither approach can “solve” our web application security problem.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Emergency SunSec This Wednesday! Rothman Hits Phoenix!</title><link>/blog/emergency-sunsec-this-wednesday-rothman-hits-phoenix/</link><pubDate>Sun, 01 Jun 2008 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/emergency-sunsec-this-wednesday-rothman-hits-phoenix/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;The legendary Mike Rothman will be in Phoenix this week, so we’re going to call an emergency session of SunSec on Wednesday to celebrate the occasion. Rumor is we might also have another surprise guest or two.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Webcast June 4th: DLP Content Discovery</title><link>/blog/webcast-june-4th-dlp-content-discovery/</link><pubDate>Sun, 01 Jun 2008 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/webcast-june-4th-dlp-content-discovery/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Yes, it’s one of those weeks, with two webcasts and a conference (SANS Pen Testing and Application Security in Vegas).&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Webcast On Tuesday: Encryption And Key Management</title><link>/blog/webcast-on-tuesday-encryption-and-key-management/</link><pubDate>Sun, 01 Jun 2008 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/webcast-on-tuesday-encryption-and-key-management/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;This Tuesday I’ll be giving a webcast for RSA on encryption and key management. It’s heavy on the data center side; focusing on SAN/NAS/Tape, Databases, and Applications. Not much discussion of mobile or email, but a bit of file and folder (server based).&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Cyberterror! Cyberterror! Pfffft..Sputter…Gak!!</title><link>/blog/cyberterror-cyberterror-pfffft-sputtergak/</link><pubDate>Fri, 30 May 2008 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/cyberterror-cyberterror-pfffft-sputtergak/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Kevin Poulson over at &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/wired27b/~3/301033048/did-hackers-cau.html"&gt;Wired reports that a new National Journal report claims that Chinese hackers may have been responsible for a recent power outage in Florida and the big 2003 northeast blackout&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>When To Layer Encryption</title><link>/blog/when-to-layer-encryption/</link><pubDate>Wed, 28 May 2008 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/when-to-layer-encryption/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Sorry for the general lack of updates the past few days, but I managed to get sick while down in Mexico for a friend’s wedding. No, not that kind of sick, just some flu I picked up from one of the many children running around. Aside from setting me back at work, it makes me a bit sad since my copy of Wii Fit showed up while we were gone and I’ve been too out of it to start my Nintendo-inspired workout regimen. Yeah, I’m just that geeky.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Adrian Lane Visits The Network Security Podcast</title><link>/blog/adrian-lane-visits-the-network-security-podcast/</link><pubDate>Wed, 21 May 2008 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/adrian-lane-visits-the-network-security-podcast/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;This week we had a special guest on the podcast, Adrian Lane from IPLocks and the &lt;a href="http://infocentric.typepad.com/"&gt;Information Centric Security blog&lt;/a&gt;. We spend some time talking about the latest security news, then dive deep for a bit into information-centric security, one of our favorite topics.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Formatting An iPhone To Wipe Data</title><link>/blog/formatting-an-iphone-to-wipe-data/</link><pubDate>Tue, 20 May 2008 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/formatting-an-iphone-to-wipe-data/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;It appears people are &lt;a href="http://feeds.engadget.com/~r/weblogsinc/engadget/~3/294512250/"&gt;recovering data off old iPhones&lt;/a&gt;. Whoops- looks like you can pull data out of memory using forensics tools, just like any other platform. While your Mac includes the ability to overwrite old data when formatting your hard drive to prevent recovery (very cool that this is included in a consumer operating system), there is no equivalent mechanism to clear off that “ancient” original iPhone when you trade up to the 3G version next month.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>SANS Webcast Tomorrow: Database Activity Monitoring</title><link>/blog/sans-webcast-tomorrow-database-activity-monitoring/</link><pubDate>Tue, 20 May 2008 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/sans-webcast-tomorrow-database-activity-monitoring/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Tomorrow I’ll be giving a free webcast through &lt;a href="https://www.sans.org/webcasts/show.php?webcastid=91913"&gt;SANS on Understanding and Selecting a Database Activity Monitoring Solution&lt;/a&gt;. Here’s the description:&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>New Whitepaper: Best Practices For DLP Content Discovery</title><link>/blog/new-whitepaper-best-practices-for-dlp-content-discovery/</link><pubDate>Mon, 19 May 2008 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/new-whitepaper-best-practices-for-dlp-content-discovery/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;One of the most under-appreciated aspects of DLP solutions is content discovery- scanning stored data to identify sensitive content, classify information, and (in some cases) even protect the data. Major DLP tools have long evolved past just scanning network traffic for credit card and Social Security Numbers.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>The Two Laws Of Rootkits</title><link>/blog/the-two-laws-of-rootkits/</link><pubDate>Mon, 19 May 2008 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/the-two-laws-of-rootkits/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I loved Mike Rothman’s &lt;a href="http://securityincite.com/TDI-2008-05-19#TSN2"&gt;title to his take on the Cisco IOS rootkit&lt;/a&gt; (&lt;a href="http://www.networkworld.com/news/2008/051408-hacker-writes-rootkit-for-ciscos.html"&gt;original article here&lt;/a&gt;).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;What about “everything is vulnerable” didn’t sink in?&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Don’t Drop That Landline</title><link>/blog/dont-drop-that-landline/</link><pubDate>Thu, 15 May 2008 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/dont-drop-that-landline/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/05/15/cellphone-only-households-on-the-rise-landlines-crying-a-river/"&gt;Engadget is reporting&lt;/a&gt; some stats that households are increasingly dropping their landline phone service for mobiles only. For safety reasons, I highly recommend against this.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Shimel Wants To Sell You A Dead Parrot. On An Iceberg. Slathered In GRC</title><link>/blog/shimel-wants-to-sell-you-a-dead-parrot-on-an-iceberg-slathered-in-grc/</link><pubDate>Thu, 15 May 2008 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/shimel-wants-to-sell-you-a-dead-parrot-on-an-iceberg-slathered-in-grc/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Blog War!!&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;It’s been a while since Alan and I got into it; I think we both appreciate a little healthy debate. As friends, we don’t really have to worry about offending each other or taking things out of context. Unless, of course, it will get us a laugh. In this case I think Alan is more confused than wrong.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Database Activity Monitoring Is As Big As, Or Bigger Than, DLP</title><link>/blog/database-activity-monitoring-is-as-big-as-or-bigger-than-dlp/</link><pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2008 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/database-activity-monitoring-is-as-big-as-or-bigger-than-dlp/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Last night I had this recurring dream I seem to have a few times a year. It involves a plane crash, but not one that I’m on. The dream always changes, but in every case I’m out and about someplace, I look up and see a struggling plane, it crashes, and I rush over to help. The dream almost always end before I do anything, and since I’m no longer a field medic portions of it usually involve me figuring out how I can help. Must be my overblown, currently unused hero complex or something. Never doubt the bounds of my ego.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>GRC, Average Deal Size, And The Dangers Of Venture Capital</title><link>/blog/grc-average-deal-size-and-the-dangers-of-venture-capital/</link><pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2008 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/grc-average-deal-size-and-the-dangers-of-venture-capital/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Hot on the heels of my &lt;a href="http://securosis.com/2008/05/13/grc-is-dead"&gt;GRC is Dead post&lt;/a&gt;, an associate sent me a private rant on a past experience where the investors drove his company down a similar rathole.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Network Security Podcast, Episode 104</title><link>/blog/network-security-podcast-episode-104/</link><pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2008 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/network-security-podcast-episode-104/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Martin and I were all over the map this week, but still managed to keep things under 30 minutes. We talk about the Dave and Buster’s hack, data exposure in Chile, and browser virtualization, among other things. The show is up over at &lt;a href="http://netsecpodcast.com/?p=40"&gt;netsecpodcast.com&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>New Nessus Licensing: NSP Interview With Ron Gula, CEO Of Tenable</title><link>/blog/new-nessus-licensing-nsp-interview-with-ron-gula-ceo-of-tenable/</link><pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2008 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/new-nessus-licensing-nsp-interview-with-ron-gula-ceo-of-tenable/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;If you didn’t catch the news today, Tenable is changing the Nessus license and enabling the real-time signature/plugin feed for the free version. Martin and I managed to snag Ron Gula for a short interview we &lt;a href="http://netsecpodcast.com/?p=41"&gt;posted over at NetSecPodcast.com&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>GRC is Dead</title><link>/blog/grc-is-dead/</link><pubDate>Tue, 13 May 2008 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/grc-is-dead/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I have to admit, I don’t really understand greedy desperation. Or desperate greed. For example, although I enjoy having a decent income, I don’t obsess about the big score. Someday I’d like a moderate score for a little extra financial security, but I’m not about to compromise my lifestyle or values to get it. As a business I know who my customers are and I make every effort to provide them with as much value as possible.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Train Like You Fight</title><link>/blog/train-like-you-fight/</link><pubDate>Mon, 12 May 2008 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/train-like-you-fight/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Ah, Monday. And not just the usual Monday, but a Monday after a perfect 5-day trip with my wife to Sonoma. A Monday where, right after we get back, the hot water heater in our old house (that we now rent) dies. Sigh. I really don’t like this whole “real world” thing.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Webcast of Thursday: Web Application Vulnerabilities</title><link>/blog/webcast-of-thursday-web-application-vulnerabilities/</link><pubDate>Mon, 12 May 2008 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/webcast-of-thursday-web-application-vulnerabilities/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;This Thursday I’ll be giving a webcast for Core Security on &lt;em&gt;Integrating Web Applications into Your Vulnerability Management Program&lt;/em&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;You can register for it &lt;a href="https://whitehatworldevents.webex.com/mw0305l/mywebex/default.do?nomenu=true&amp;amp;siteurl=whitehatworldevents&amp;amp;service=6&amp;amp;main_url=https%3A%2F%2Fwhitehatworldevents.webex.com%2Fec0600l%2Feventcenter%2Fevent%2FeventAction.do%3FtheAction%3Ddetail%26confViewID%3D277942811%26siteurl%3Dwhitehatworldevents%26%26%26"&gt;over here at WhiteHatWorld.com&lt;/a&gt;, and here’s the description:&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Off the Grid</title><link>/blog/off-the-grid/</link><pubDate>Tue, 06 May 2008 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/off-the-grid/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;For the next 5 days my wife and I are heading to Sonoma to celebrate our anniversary. I am, to say the least, one lucky #&amp;amp;^(&lt;em&gt;&amp;amp; ^#&lt;/em&gt; to have her.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Information-Centric Security Tip: Know Your Users and Infrastructure</title><link>/blog/information-centric-security-tip-know-your-users-and-infrastructure/</link><pubDate>Mon, 05 May 2008 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/information-centric-security-tip-know-your-users-and-infrastructure/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I was on a client reference today learning about someone’s DLP deployment, and it highlighted one of the biggest issues we often face when moving to an information-centric model. No, it’s not a failure of content analysis techniques, data classification, or over-hyped tools, it’s that we often don’t even know who owns what, who’s supposed to have access to what, or our own infrastructure.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>React Faster, And Better, With The A B Cs</title><link>/blog/react-faster-and-better-with-the-a-b-cs/</link><pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2008 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/react-faster-and-better-with-the-a-b-cs/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I’ve had a bit of a weird week. As I mentioned on Monday, I was driving to physical therapy (physio for my Australian and European friends) when &lt;a href="http://securosis.com/2008/05/01/best-practices-for-dlp-content-discovery-use-cases/"&gt;there was an accident in front of me and I stopped to help out&lt;/a&gt;. Wednesday night I was coming home from PT and there was another accident right as I was going through the intersection.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Back from Washington D.C. (No thanks to SuperShuttle)</title><link>/blog/back-from-washington-d-c-no-thanks-to-supershuttle/</link><pubDate>Thu, 01 May 2008 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/back-from-washington-d-c-no-thanks-to-supershuttle/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;This past Monday, I had the privilege of speaking (along with several peers) to the &lt;a href="http://www.csis.org/tech/cyber/"&gt;Commission on Cyber Security for the 44th Presidency&lt;/a&gt; about issues on identity theft, breach disclosure and personal privacy in general. It was an honor to present with such a great group of folks. There were some great discussions/debates and I look forward to the opportunity to present again as the Commission works to streamline its recommendations. My written testimony is below. A special thanks to the folks at &lt;a href="http://www.emergentchaos.com"&gt;Emergent Chaos&lt;/a&gt; and to Rich for their comments, which made this a much better piece. Any errors or logical fallacies are, of course, my own.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Best Practices for DLP Content Discovery: Part 5</title><link>/blog/best-practices-for-dlp-content-discovery-part-5/</link><pubDate>Thu, 01 May 2008 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/best-practices-for-dlp-content-discovery-part-5/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;In our last post we finished our review of DLP content discovery best practices by discussion rolling out and maintaining your deployment. Today we’re going to focus on a couple of use cases that illustrate how it all works together. I’m writing these as fake case studies, which is probably really obvious considering my lack of creativity in the names.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Update To The iPhone Security Tip</title><link>/blog/update-to-the-iphone-security-tip/</link><pubDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2008 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/update-to-the-iphone-security-tip/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.extrapepperoni.com/"&gt;Chris Pepper&lt;/a&gt;, Master Editor, pointed out something I missed. If you memorize an encrypted network, your iPhone won’t connect to an unencrypted one with the same name, or one with a different password. Thus unless the bad guy knows your WPA passphrase (you’re not dumb enough to use WEP, are you?), you can memorize your home network and not worry about accidentally connecting while wandering around, even if it’s still called “tsunami”.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Best Practices For DLP Content Discovery: Part 3</title><link>/blog/best-practices-for-dlp-content-discovery-part-3/</link><pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2008 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/best-practices-for-dlp-content-discovery-part-3/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;In &lt;a href="http://securosis.com/2008/04/17/best-practices-for-dlp-content-discovery-part-3/"&gt;Part 3 of our series&lt;/a&gt; we finished our review of the technical architecture and selection; now we’re going to delve into best practices for deployment. We will focus on setting expectations, prioritization, and defining your internal processes. The main obstacle to successful deployments isn’t a technology weakness, but rather the failure of the enterprise to understand what to protect, decide how to protect it, and recognize what’s reasonable in a real-world environment.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>iPhone Security Tip: Never Memorize Wireless Networks</title><link>/blog/iphone-security-tip-never-memorize-wireless-networks/</link><pubDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2008 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/iphone-security-tip-never-memorize-wireless-networks/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Update: See &lt;a href="http://securosis.com/2008/04/30/update-to-the-iphone-security-tip/"&gt;Update To The iPhone Security Tip&lt;/a&gt;. Encrypted networks are safe to remember.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The other day I was wandering around San Francisco on a work trip, and I freaked out when I noticed the WiFi indicator on my iPhone was showing an active connection to some random network. I never have my phone set to connect to unknown networks, so I quickly jumped into the settings to see what the heck was going on.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Just Because You’re An Expert Doesn’t Make You An Expert</title><link>/blog/just-because-youre-an-expert-doesnt-make-you-an-expert/</link><pubDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2008 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/just-because-youre-an-expert-doesnt-make-you-an-expert/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Had another one of those real world experiences today that was just begging for a blog post. A couple hours ago I was driving down the highway on my way to my physical therapy appointment when I saw a rollover car accident on the side of the road near an on-ramp. There were a bunch of bystanders, but the first police officer was just pulling up and there was no fire or ambulance in sight.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Risk Management and Car Talk</title><link>/blog/risk-management-and-car-talk/</link><pubDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2008 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/risk-management-and-car-talk/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I was driving around listening to &lt;a href="http://www.cartalk.com/"&gt;Car Talk on NPR&lt;/a&gt; this weekend, and it was an incredibly insightful lesson on risk tolerance and risk perception. I tend to do a lot of errands over the weekend around that time, so I usually catch 20-40 minutes of it every week as I’m in and out of stores. Pretty much every week you’ll hear things like:&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Announcing Winners of Debix Contest</title><link>/blog/announcing-winners-of-debix-contest/</link><pubDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2008 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/announcing-winners-of-debix-contest/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;It took a little longer than expected, thanks to me being totally swamped post-surgery until now, but let’s congratulate our &lt;a href="http://securosis.com/2008/02/27/want-to-win-free-debix-identity-theft-protection-for-a-year/"&gt;winners of a free year of Debix identity theft protection&lt;/a&gt;: myemailisvalid, Jay, and Brett.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Cybercrime: Same Crimes, Different Days</title><link>/blog/cybercrime-same-crimes-different-days/</link><pubDate>Thu, 24 Apr 2008 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/cybercrime-same-crimes-different-days/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I was reading one of &lt;a href="http://www.stillsecureafteralltheseyears.com/ashimmy/2008/04/an-oldnew-kind.html"&gt;Alan’s posts over at StillSecure&lt;/a&gt;, based on the Lending Tree debacle. He starts with a bit I totally agree with:&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Data Classification Is Dead</title><link>/blog/data-classification-is-dead/</link><pubDate>Wed, 23 Apr 2008 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/data-classification-is-dead/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I know what’s running through your head right now.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;“WTF?!? Mogull’s totally lost it. Isn’t he that data/information-centric security dude?”&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>It’s About The Fraud, Not The Breaches</title><link>/blog/its-about-the-fraud-not-the-breaches/</link><pubDate>Fri, 18 Apr 2008 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/its-about-the-fraud-not-the-breaches/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks in large part to the &lt;a href="http://attrition.org/dataloss/dldos.html"&gt;Attrition.org data loss database&lt;/a&gt;, there’s recently been some great work on analyzing breaches. I’ve used it myself to produce some slick looking presentation graphs and call attention to the ever-growing data breach epidemic.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Come Attend Database Security School</title><link>/blog/come-attend-database-security-school/</link><pubDate>Thu, 17 Apr 2008 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/come-attend-database-security-school/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I was fortunate enough to be invited by TechTarget to put together their, “&lt;a href="http://searchsecurity.techtarget.com/guide/securitySchool/category/0,296296,sid14_tax310529,00.html"&gt;Database Security School&lt;/a&gt;”. It’s a compilation of four online educational components: a webcast, podcast, article, and online quiz.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>VMware: Please Hire The Hoff</title><link>/blog/vmware-please-hire-the-hoff/</link><pubDate>Thu, 17 Apr 2008 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/vmware-please-hire-the-hoff/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Do you care about virtualization security?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;No?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Then get out of the security &lt;em&gt;or&lt;/em&gt; virtualization biz.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Yes?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://rationalsecurity.typepad.com/blog/2008/04/the-four-horsem.html"&gt;Then go read this.&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Network Security Podcast, Episode 101 Up</title><link>/blog/network-security-podcast-episode-101-up/</link><pubDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2008 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/network-security-podcast-episode-101-up/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Ah, RSA. Not much more to say, but we managed to squeeze out a good 30 minutes of recap and conclusions. We spent most of our time on a few issues, especially some of the lessons from our Security Groundhog Day panel, and tried to avoid too many frat-boyish, “I was so drunk at that party dude!”-isms.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Best Practices For DLP Content Discovery: Part 2</title><link>/blog/best-practices-for-dlp-content-discovery-part-2/</link><pubDate>Tue, 15 Apr 2008 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/best-practices-for-dlp-content-discovery-part-2/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Someone call the Guinness records people- I’m actually posting the next part of this series when I said I would!&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Debix Contest Ending This Week</title><link>/blog/debix-contest-ending-this-week/</link><pubDate>Tue, 15 Apr 2008 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/debix-contest-ending-this-week/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I really owe you readers (and Debix) an apology. My shoulder knocked me back more than expected, and I let the contest to win a year’s subscription to Debix for identity theft prevention linger.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Best Practices For Reducing Risks With DLP Content Discovery: Part 1</title><link>/blog/best-practices-for-reducing-risks-with-dlp-content-discovery-part-1/</link><pubDate>Mon, 14 Apr 2008 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/best-practices-for-reducing-risks-with-dlp-content-discovery-part-1/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;‘Boy, RSA was sure a blur this year. No, not because of the alcohol, and not because the event was any more hectic than usual. My schedule, on the other hand, was more packed than ever. I barely walked the show floor and was only able to wave in passing to people I fully intended on sitting down with over a beer or coffee and having deep philosophical conversations with.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Whitepaper: Understanding and Selecting a Database Activity Monitoring Solution</title><link>/blog/whitepaper-understanding-and-selecting-a-database-activity-monitoring-solution/</link><pubDate>Mon, 14 Apr 2008 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/whitepaper-understanding-and-selecting-a-database-activity-monitoring-solution/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Today, in cooperation with &lt;a href="http://sans.org/"&gt;SANS&lt;/a&gt;, Securosis is releasing Understanding and Selecting a Database Activity Monitoring Solution. This is a compilation of my multipart series on DAM, fully edited with expanded content.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>And this year’s theme at RSA is…</title><link>/blog/and-this-years-theme-at-rsa-is/</link><pubDate>Wed, 09 Apr 2008 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/and-this-years-theme-at-rsa-is/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Nothing. Nada. Zip.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;While we’ve seen themes emerge most years at RSA; such as DLP, PKI, and compliance; there really doesn’t seem to be any particular preference this year. Sure, we see data security and PCI on every booth, but I don’t see any particular technology or theme consistently highlighted. This could indicate a maturation, or simply that market demands are so all over the place that vendors are using either shotguns or lasers to target buyers.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>An Inconvenient Lack Of Truth</title><link>/blog/an-inconvenient-lack-of-truth/</link><pubDate>Sun, 06 Apr 2008 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/an-inconvenient-lack-of-truth/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;On Tuesday morning I’ll be giving a breakfast session at RSA sponsored by &lt;a href="http://vericept.com"&gt;Vericept&lt;/a&gt; entitled &lt;em&gt;Understanding and Preventing Data Breaches&lt;/em&gt;. This is the latest update to my keynote presentation where I dig into all things data breaches to make a best effort at determining what’s really going on out there. Since the system itself is essentially designed to hide the truth and shift risk like a token ring network, digging to the heart of the matter is no easy task.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Predictions and Coverage for RSA 2008</title><link>/blog/predictions-and-coverage-for-rsa-2008/</link><pubDate>Fri, 04 Apr 2008 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/predictions-and-coverage-for-rsa-2008/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;This morning Dr. Rothman was kind enough to set me up for my last pre-RSA blog post with his &lt;a href="http://securityincite.com/blog/mike-rothman/the-daily-incite-april-4-2008-rsa-preview"&gt;Top 3 RSA Themes&lt;/a&gt;. It seems that every year there’s some big theme among the show floor vendors. I also can’t make it through a call, especially with VCs, without someone asking, “What’s exciting?”&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Securosis is Now PCI Certified</title><link>/blog/securosis-is-now-pci-certified/</link><pubDate>Tue, 01 Apr 2008 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/securosis-is-now-pci-certified/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.scanlesspci.com"&gt;&lt;img src="http://doiop.com/scan_lesspci.gif" alt=""&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I was talking with Jeremiah Grossman out at the SOURCE Conference in Boston, lamenting the state of PCI certification. Although ASVs continue to drop their rates and reduce the requirements for compliance by issuing exceptions, it’s still a costly and intrusive process. Sure, pretty much anyone who signs up and completes payment achieves certification, but adoption rates are still low and only a fraction of the retail community, especially the online community, is compliant.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Understanding and Selecting a Database Activity Monitoring Solution: Part 6, The Selection Process</title><link>/blog/understanding-and-selecting-a-database-activity-monitoring-solution-part-6-the-selection-process/</link><pubDate>Tue, 01 Apr 2008 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/understanding-and-selecting-a-database-activity-monitoring-solution-part-6-the-selection-process/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;At long last, thousands of words and 5 months later, it’s time to close out our series on Database Activity Monitoring. Today we’ll cover the selection process.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Understanding and Selecting a Database Activity Monitoring Solution: Part 5, Advanced Features</title><link>/blog/understanding-and-selecting-a-database-activity-monitoring-solution-part-5-advanced-features/</link><pubDate>Mon, 31 Mar 2008 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/understanding-and-selecting-a-database-activity-monitoring-solution-part-5-advanced-features/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;We’re going to be finishing the series off this week, in large part so I can get it compiled together into a whitepaper with SANS, sponsored by Imperva, Guardium, and Sentrigo, before the big RSA show. I won’t be sleeping much this week as I compile and re-write the posts, add additional content that didn’t make it into the blog, create some images, and toss it back and forth with my editor. What? You didn’t think all I did was cut and paste this stuff, did you?&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Prepping for RSA</title><link>/blog/prepping-for-rsa/</link><pubDate>Fri, 28 Mar 2008 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/prepping-for-rsa/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;There’s only one week left until RSA and it’s looking to be a doozy this year. For me that is, not really sure about the entire information security market.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Separation of Duties vs. Concept of Least Privilege</title><link>/blog/separation-of-duties-vs-concept-of-least-privilege/</link><pubDate>Thu, 27 Mar 2008 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/separation-of-duties-vs-concept-of-least-privilege/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;When I’m preparing for a webcast I usually send the sponsor a copy of the presentation so they can prepare their section. While I’m a huge stickler for keeping my content objective, they also usually provide feedback. Some of it I have to ignore, since I don’t endorse products and won’t “tune” content in ways that break objectivity (I’m quickly worthless if I do that), but I often get good general feedback ranging from spelling errors to legitimate content mistakes.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Uh Oh- Time To Take Cold Boot Encryption Attacks VERY Seriously</title><link>/blog/uh-oh-time-to-take-cold-boot-encryption-attacks-very-seriously/</link><pubDate>Thu, 27 Mar 2008 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/uh-oh-time-to-take-cold-boot-encryption-attacks-very-seriously/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Reports are flying in over Twitter about the latest Cold Boot attack demonstrations at &lt;a href="http://cansecwest.com/agenda.html"&gt;CanSecWest&lt;/a&gt;. Looks like the folks over at &lt;a href="http://www.intelguardians.com/"&gt;Intelguardians&lt;/a&gt; are showing practical exploits using different techniques, including USB devices and iPods.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Webcast: Database Security; Preventative Controls for Separation of Duties</title><link>/blog/webcast-database-security-preventative-controls-for-separation-of-duties/</link><pubDate>Mon, 24 Mar 2008 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/webcast-database-security-preventative-controls-for-separation-of-duties/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;This Friday I’ll be giving another webcast with ZDNet/Oracle. This time we’re focusing in on preventative controls for separation of duties. The formal title is &lt;a href="http://www.eseminarslive.com/c/a/Security/Oracle032808/"&gt;Enforcing Separation of Duties for Database and Security Administrators&lt;/a&gt;, and &lt;a href="http://www.eseminarslive.com/c/a/Security/Oracle032808/"&gt;registration is open&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Webcast: Web Application Vulnerability Management with Core Security</title><link>/blog/webcast-web-application-vulnerability-management-with-core-security/</link><pubDate>Mon, 24 Mar 2008 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/webcast-web-application-vulnerability-management-with-core-security/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Yep, it’s all webcasts all the time for me this week. I wonder if I can get my own TV channel?&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Fighting Back Against Fraud; A True Story Part 2</title><link>/blog/fighting-back-against-fraud-a-true-story-part-2/</link><pubDate>Fri, 21 Mar 2008 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/fighting-back-against-fraud-a-true-story-part-2/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Yesterday, Jay shared with us his experience with eBay fraud and his attempts to work with law enforcement, Today, he takes matters (legally) into his own hands and… well, you’ll just have to read the story…&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Fighting Back Against Fraud; A True Story</title><link>/blog/fighting-back-against-fraud-a-true-story/</link><pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/fighting-back-against-fraud-a-true-story/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;As part of our &lt;a href="http://securosis.com/2008/02/27/want-to-win-free-debix-identity-theft-protection-for-a-year/"&gt;Debix contest&lt;/a&gt; (which is open for a few more days, if you want to enter) one reader relayed a great story on how he was scammed on eBay, and fought back. With a little ingenious detective work, he… well, I’ll just let Jay tell his own story (split into two parts)…&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Another PCI Suggestion</title><link>/blog/another-pci-suggestion/</link><pubDate>Wed, 19 Mar 2008 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/another-pci-suggestion/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Make the list of who is compliant (and by default, not compliant) public. Allow consumers to decide if they want value security enough to do something about it.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Is PCI Worthless?</title><link>/blog/is-pci-worthless/</link><pubDate>Wed, 19 Mar 2008 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/is-pci-worthless/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;Update&lt;/em&gt; &lt;em&gt;: Yes, I know it’s the QSAs not ASVs that certify. Dumb mistake on my part.&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Yesterday I posted an &lt;a href="http://securosis.com/2008/03/18/picking-apart-the-hannaford-breach-what-might-have-happened/"&gt;analysis of the Hannaford breach&lt;/a&gt; in which I made a contentious statement.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Network Security Podcast, Episode 98 Up</title><link>/blog/network-security-podcast-episode-98-up/</link><pubDate>Wed, 19 Mar 2008 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/network-security-podcast-episode-98-up/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;The conference season is upon us. This week we discuss SOURCE in Boston and RSA with our guest, Jennifer Leggio. We spend a bit of time on the Hannaford breach and my Mac antivirus article.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Do Mac Users Need Antivirus?</title><link>/blog/do-mac-users-need-antivirus/</link><pubDate>Tue, 18 Mar 2008 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/do-mac-users-need-antivirus/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I just published &lt;a href="http://db.tidbits.com/article/9511"&gt;an article on TidBITS&lt;/a&gt; on this very issue.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Basically, I don’t think the average Mac user needs it yet. AV comes at a performance cost that isn’t justified by the risks it addresses. It isn’t that Macs are more secure than Windows- it’s that they aren’t as big a target yet, and I’m not convinced that &lt;em&gt;desktop&lt;/em&gt; antivirus will help much once Mac malware really starts proliferating.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Picking Apart The Hannaford Breach- What Might Have Happened</title><link>/blog/picking-apart-the-hannaford-breach-what-might-have-happened/</link><pubDate>Tue, 18 Mar 2008 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/picking-apart-the-hannaford-breach-what-might-have-happened/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;There goes another one.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;According to multiple sources, the &lt;a href="http://apnews.myway.com/article/20080317/D8VFDD180.html"&gt;Hannaford Brothers grocery chain suffered a major breach&lt;/a&gt; with 4.2 million credit cards exposed. Hannaford had published an &lt;a href="http://www.hannaford.com/Contents/News_Events/News/QA.shtml"&gt;FAQ for their customers&lt;/a&gt;. Odds are it will be months until we find out what really happened, but I’m going to speculate anyway, pick apart the press coverage and FAQ, and see if we can learn something from this now.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>We Don’t Need No Education</title><link>/blog/we-dont-need-no-education/</link><pubDate>Fri, 14 Mar 2008 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/we-dont-need-no-education/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;David here again. Chris Hoff, in his often imitated but never duplicated way, recently reopened the massive &lt;a href="http://rationalsecurity.typepad.com/blog/2008/02/mcgoverns-ten-m.html"&gt;can of worms&lt;/a&gt; that is &lt;a href="http://rationalsecurity.typepad.com/blog/2008/02/why-security-aw.html"&gt;security awareness training.&lt;/a&gt; Go ahead and read the comments on both posts — they are energizing to say the least. I’ve included a paper that I wrote for our customers below. Given the original audience, it’s on the more formal side. Let me know what you think….&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Quick Note From SOURCE: Information Governance</title><link>/blog/quick-note-from-source-information-governance/</link><pubDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2008 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/quick-note-from-source-information-governance/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I’m out in Boston for the SOURCE conference where &lt;a href="http://rationalsecurity.typepad.com/"&gt;Hoff&lt;/a&gt; and I just presented on Disruptive Innovation and the Future of Security. It went well, but we’re only giving ourselves a 6 out of 10. We tried to stuff in too much content and didn’t focus as much as we should. We’ve already mapped out the next version and I wish we were giving it before June (our next scheduled show).&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Database Security Rule: Use System Generated Primary Keys</title><link>/blog/database-security-rule-use-system-generated-primary-keys/</link><pubDate>Fri, 07 Mar 2008 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/database-security-rule-use-system-generated-primary-keys/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I was reading an article by Rsnake this morning on the &lt;a href="http://ha.ckers.org/blog/20080305/username-based-primary-key-issues/"&gt;problems of using a username as a primary key&lt;/a&gt;, and it reminded me of something I’ve been meaning to write about for a while.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Speaking At Source In Boston Next Week</title><link>/blog/speaking-at-source-in-boston-next-week/</link><pubDate>Thu, 06 Mar 2008 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/speaking-at-source-in-boston-next-week/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I’m pretty excited about speaking at the &lt;a href="http://sourceboston.com/"&gt;Source conference in Boston next week,&lt;/a&gt; despite the expected 6 hours of agony while flying with this damn shoulder.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Network Security Podcast, Episode 96</title><link>/blog/network-security-podcast-episode-96/</link><pubDate>Wed, 05 Mar 2008 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/network-security-podcast-episode-96/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I thought it was a slow news week, but once we got recording there was a heck of a lot to talk about this week. Martin and I spend a little time on two hardware-based attacks- a bit of a redux on the cold boot encryption attack, and discussion of the firewire Direct Memory Access attack. Seems like your RAM is taking a beating these days. We update the WikiLeaks coverage and Martin spends a little time on PCI.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Principles of Information-Centric Security</title><link>/blog/principles-of-information-centric-security/</link><pubDate>Wed, 05 Mar 2008 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/principles-of-information-centric-security/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;In my last post on the DLP side of information-centric security, Adrian rightfully &lt;a href="http://securosis.com/2008/03/03/the-future-of-information-centric-security-from-data-loss-prevention-to-content-monitoring-and-protection-part-1/"&gt;dropped a comment&lt;/a&gt; criticizing my narrow view. Since this is something he’s been &lt;a href="http://www.iplocks.com:80/blog/2008/02/20/1203523800000.html"&gt;talking about himself&lt;/a&gt;, I feel I owe a little clarification. I only meant that post to reflect how a portion of information-centric security technology will evolve; the truth is it’s much broader than that.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Heads Up: Cold Boot Encryption Attack In The Wild</title><link>/blog/heads-up-cold-boot-encryption-attack-in-the-wild/</link><pubDate>Tue, 04 Mar 2008 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/heads-up-cold-boot-encryption-attack-in-the-wild/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Remember that &lt;a href="http://securosis.com/2008/02/25/evaluating-and-protecting-yourself-from-the-cold-boot-encryption-attack/"&gt;cold boot encryption attack we talked about last week&lt;/a&gt;? Looks like someone &lt;a href="http://mcgrewsecurity.com/projects/msramdmp/"&gt;went out and released a public tool&lt;/a&gt; that replicates part of the functionality of the Princeton tool. I thought it would take a little longer; guess I was wrong. Does this change my advice? Not really- your best bet is still to maintain physical control of your laptop, and the odds are still pretty low you’ll have to deal with this in the real world. But keep asking your vendors how you need to configure your encryption product to limit the attack. Still, I’m always impressed with how quickly those Internets are able to recreate this stuff; talk about the end of security by obscurity. It’s almost as if there are an infinite number of really smart monkeys out there with computer science degrees.Thanks to &lt;a href="http://www.hackaday.com/2008/03/03/bootable-usb-ram-capture/"&gt;Hack A Day&lt;/a&gt; for the link…&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>The Future Of Information-Centric Security: From Data Loss Prevention to Content Monitoring and Prot</title><link>/blog/the-future-of-information-centric-security-from-data-loss-prevention-to-content-monitoring-and-prot/</link><pubDate>Mon, 03 Mar 2008 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/the-future-of-information-centric-security-from-data-loss-prevention-to-content-monitoring-and-prot/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Over the past couple of weeks Mike Rothman has been posting his &lt;a href="http://securityincite.com/blog/mike-rothman/2008-security-incites"&gt;Security Incites, a series of predictions for 2008&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;a href="http://securityincite.com/blog/mike-rothman/2008-doi-day-9-get-the-jumper-cables-for-dlp"&gt;Prediction number 9 was titled, “Get the Jumper Cables for DLP”&lt;/a&gt;, and I, of course, have to disagree with at least some of it.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Ask Securosis: Is Safari Less Secure?</title><link>/blog/ask-securosis-is-safari-less-secure/</link><pubDate>Fri, 29 Feb 2008 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/ask-securosis-is-safari-less-secure/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;This week, our question is courtesy of Allen:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;… As a long time Mac user and an inspiring security professional (i am in the process of completing my CISSP certification), I found this article on Macworld’s web site to be very fascinating. If you could please comment on this on your web site and/or on your podcast would be very grateful.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Understanding and Selecting a Database Activity Monitoring Solution: Part 4, Alerts, Workflow, and R</title><link>/blog/understanding-and-selecting-a-database-activity-monitoring-solution-part-4-alerts-workflow-and-r/</link><pubDate>Fri, 29 Feb 2008 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/understanding-and-selecting-a-database-activity-monitoring-solution-part-4-alerts-workflow-and-r/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;It seems that every time I write the next part of this multipart series I find myself apologizing for taking too long between posts. I swear I have a good excuse this time- with the whole doctor sticking cameras into my shoulder, shaving out bits, cutting tendons and tying them to new places, putting in plastic anchors, and sewing torn parts of muscles together thing. I’m 11 days into my recovery and while the days are fine, despite learning not to use my arm for the next three months, the nights… let’s just say I fear the nights. I think I’m getting closer to figuring out the right combination of drugs, body position, and pillows that will let me get a little closer to some functional sleep.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Curphey on BPM</title><link>/blog/curphey-on-bpm/</link><pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2008 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/curphey-on-bpm/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Today, Mark Curphey posted about &lt;a href="http://securitybuddha.com/2008/02/28/tenets-of-effective-bpm/"&gt;Tenets of Effective BPM.&lt;/a&gt; He lays out five high level principles for doing business process management. This is really great stuff. It’s so good, in fact, that I’m going to quote a huge chunk of his post here:&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Network Security Podcast, Episode 95 Up</title><link>/blog/network-security-podcast-episode-95-up/</link><pubDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2008 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/network-security-podcast-episode-95-up/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Boy- never get shoulder surgery if you can avoid it. Although I can type, the pain, lack of sleep, and other restrictions probably have me down to 50% productivity. No fun when you work for yourself. Trying to not use my right arm for any lifting, pulling, pushing, or reaching for the next 3 month swill be an interesting prospect.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Want To Win Free Debix Identity Theft Protection For A Year?</title><link>/blog/want-to-win-free-debix-identity-theft-protection-for-a-year/</link><pubDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2008 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/want-to-win-free-debix-identity-theft-protection-for-a-year/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Securosis is &lt;em&gt;very&lt;/em&gt; pleased to announce that &lt;a href="http://www.debix.com/prevent_identity_theft.php"&gt;Debix&lt;/a&gt; is providing a year of free credit protection to three lucky readers.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Those of you who read this site and listen to the Network Security Podcast know that I’m a big fan of preventative credit protection instead of just passive monitoring. I’ve been using &lt;a href="http://www.debix.com/prevent_identity_theft.php"&gt;Debix&lt;/a&gt; for a few months now and am extremely pleased with the service. Normally I never pick one vendor over the other, but there are only two providers in this market, and LifeLock has a sordid history.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>DLP Article In Information Security Magazine Now Online</title><link>/blog/dlp-article-in-information-security-magazine-now-online/</link><pubDate>Mon, 25 Feb 2008 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/dlp-article-in-information-security-magazine-now-online/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I really don’t see the appeal of the whole drug thing. I’ve never been into recreational drugs other than alcohol, and even that I prefer in moderation. By “never been into” I mean never tried. Nope- didn’t hold it, didn’t inhale.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Evaluating And Protecting Yourself From The Cold-Boot Encryption Attack</title><link>/blog/evaluating-and-protecting-yourself-from-the-cold-boot-encryption-attack/</link><pubDate>Mon, 25 Feb 2008 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/evaluating-and-protecting-yourself-from-the-cold-boot-encryption-attack/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Even in my drug-addled state last week it was hard to miss the &lt;a href="http://citp.princeton.edu/memory/"&gt;cold boot encryption attack released by Ed Felten and the Princeton Center for Information Technology Policy&lt;/a&gt;. This is some seriously impressive work with major implications, but despite all the articles I’ve seen there has been little information on how to evaluate and mitigate your personal or organizational risk.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Off Topic: Quick Update</title><link>/blog/off-topic-quick-update/</link><pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2008 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/off-topic-quick-update/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Just a quick update to say all is well, if a bit painful.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;On Monday I had shoulder surgery to repair a moderate tear to my cartilage in the shoulder (the superior labrum, to be specific). Turns out the tear was a series of tears and I also managed to injure my rotator cuff. The 20 minute procedure took about an hour (still minor in the scheme of things) and my recovery will take a little longer than expected. The worst part is this week as I get past the initial pain, after that everything should be on track.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Interview With Mike Rothman, Part 2</title><link>/blog/interview-with-mike-rothman-part-2/</link><pubDate>Wed, 20 Feb 2008 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/interview-with-mike-rothman-part-2/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;It’s Wednesday, and if my doctor’s predictions are correct I might be in front of the keyboard for an hour at a time today. Odds are I’m now in a recliner, watching bad TV, staring wistfully at my Guitar Hero Les Paul leaning against the entertainment center. You may think you’ve won Slash, but once my recovery is complete I’ll be more powerful than you can possibly imagine.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Interview With Mike Rothman, Part 1</title><link>/blog/interview-with-mike-rothman-part-1/</link><pubDate>Mon, 18 Feb 2008 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/interview-with-mike-rothman-part-1/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Right now I’m probably lying in bed with some weird motorized ice pack strapped to my shoulder, and (hopefully) some pain meds running amok in my system.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Leveraging Compliance For Security</title><link>/blog/leveraging-compliance-for-security/</link><pubDate>Mon, 18 Feb 2008 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/leveraging-compliance-for-security/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;One of the big issues facing companies these days is compliance – Sarbanes-Oxley, GLBA, PCI, and there will undoubtedly be more in the coming years. As a result, vendors are pushing all sorts of products that purport to help solve the compliance problem. However, compliance is not a technology problem – it’s a business problem which needs a business solution. By instituting sustainable business processes that effectively leverage people and technology, enterprises will become not just more secure but also compliant with current and emerging regulations.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Mogull Home Safe and Sound</title><link>/blog/mogull-home-safe-and-sound/</link><pubDate>Mon, 18 Feb 2008 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/mogull-home-safe-and-sound/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;For all of you who are curious, Rich is back home and “All is good.”&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Mogull on the Injured Reserve</title><link>/blog/mogull-on-the-injured-reserve/</link><pubDate>Sun, 17 Feb 2008 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/mogull-on-the-injured-reserve/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;So somehow Rich has managed to hurt his shoulder. He swears that it happened while helping blind nuns cross the street in an ice storm, but I don’t believe it. As he mentioned on Friday, he’s having surgery this morning to have it fixed, so everyone think happy thoughts towards Phoenix. Since he’s going to be out of commission for a while, he’s asked me and a few others to jump in and post while he’s on the mend. If I’m lucky, he’ll even forget to change the password once he’s recovered and I’ll keep on posting. For those of you who don’t know me already, I’m the CSO-in-Residence for &lt;a href="http://www.echelonone.net"&gt;Echelon One&lt;/a&gt;, where I run the research and analysis program and before that I was the CISO at Siebel Systems. Best of luck to Rich and hopefully he’ll be back to posting before you know it.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Off Topic: Friday Humor, Negotiating Tactics</title><link>/blog/off-topic-friday-humor-negotiating-tactics/</link><pubDate>Fri, 15 Feb 2008 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/off-topic-friday-humor-negotiating-tactics/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.5min.com/Video/How-to-negotiate---Tips-for-Yahoo-5794173"&gt;This is very amusing&lt;/a&gt;. Everything you need to know about negotiating with Microsoft for $44B.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I’m off for the weekend and in surgery on Monday (a minor shoulder thing). I have some guests on the site next week and some other surprises to keep the content running. Have a great weekend…&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Network Security Podcast, Episode 94</title><link>/blog/network-security-podcast-episode-94/</link><pubDate>Thu, 14 Feb 2008 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/network-security-podcast-episode-94/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;A strange thing happened Tuesday night. Martin and I logged into Skype for our regular podcast recording session and we noticed two different, but familiar, voices on the line babbling about being &lt;a href="http://www.stillsecureafteralltheseyears.com/ashimmy/2008/02/stillsecure-aft.html"&gt;Still Secure After All These Years&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Quick Wireless Tip- Change Channels To Improve Reliability</title><link>/blog/quick-wireless-tip-change-channels-to-improve-reliability/</link><pubDate>Thu, 14 Feb 2008 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/quick-wireless-tip-change-channels-to-improve-reliability/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I have a moderately complex network at home, with multiple WiFi base stations (running at 5 GHz and 2.4 GHz), a hacked WRT54G gateway router for firewall/VPN, and a couple of AirPort Express units for music streaming.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Introduction To Database Encryption</title><link>/blog/introduction-to-database-encryption/</link><pubDate>Tue, 12 Feb 2008 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/introduction-to-database-encryption/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Database encryption is like a home repair project- either it’s really easy and goes exactly as planned, or about five minutes in you realize you might not want to make any weekend plans for the next 2-3 years, and perhaps you should take a trip to the flower store before trying to explain why your family will be living with exposed wall studs and dangling wires for a while.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Predictions Galore: Analyst vs. Researchers</title><link>/blog/predictions-galore-analyst-vs-researchers/</link><pubDate>Tue, 12 Feb 2008 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/predictions-galore-analyst-vs-researchers/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I normally make fun of predictions, but two sets issued this week are well worth the reading.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The first come from Mike Rothman, &lt;a href="http://securityincite.com/blog/mike-rothman/2008-security-incites"&gt;who just issued his 2008 Security Incites&lt;/a&gt;. Mike mixes in both technical and general market trends. Some predictions are clearly measurable, and others are there just to make a point. Mike covers everything from metrics and audits, to NAC and DLP.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Stupid Vendor FUD Of The Day</title><link>/blog/stupid-vendor-fud-of-the-day/</link><pubDate>Mon, 11 Feb 2008 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/stupid-vendor-fud-of-the-day/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I’m sitting in a Starbucks in Vegas (on my EVDO card, not some risky open WiFi, of course) and nearly snort my coffee when I &lt;a href="http://security.itworld.com/4341/encryption-makes-you-more-vulnerable-080211/page_1.html"&gt;read the latest assault against reason by desperate vendors&lt;/a&gt;. (&lt;a href="http://it.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=08/02/11/1659232&amp;amp;from=rss"&gt;Via Slashdot&lt;/a&gt;, adding their own FUD).&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Ask Securosis: Is Common Criteria Certification Worth Anything?</title><link>/blog/ask-securosis-is-common-criteria-certification-worth-anything/</link><pubDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2008 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/ask-securosis-is-common-criteria-certification-worth-anything/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;This week’s question comes from Rob, who works for a security vendor. It’s one that comes up a lot on both the vendor and the end user sides.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>If You Are A Blogger And Going To RSA And Don’t Know Why I’m Posting This</title><link>/blog/if-you-are-a-blogger-and-going-to-rsa-and-dont-know-why-im-posting-this/</link><pubDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2008 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/if-you-are-a-blogger-and-going-to-rsa-and-dont-know-why-im-posting-this/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="mailto:rmogull@securosis.com"&gt;Email me.&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>How Data Loss Prevention and Database Activity Monitoring Will Connect</title><link>/blog/how-data-loss-prevention-and-database-activity-monitoring-will-connect/</link><pubDate>Thu, 07 Feb 2008 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/how-data-loss-prevention-and-database-activity-monitoring-will-connect/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;There was a &lt;a href="http://feeds.ziffdavisenterprise.com/~r/RSS/eweeksecurity/~3/230657928/"&gt;pretty good article over at eWeek today&lt;/a&gt; talking about the similarities and differences between DLP and DAM. It was kind of strange to read it, since I used to be the lead analyst covering those markets and I might have been the first person to use the DAM term.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Rob Graham Drops 5 Ton Anchor To Cut Undersea Cable</title><link>/blog/rob-graham-drops-5-ton-anchor-to-cut-undersea-cable/</link><pubDate>Thu, 07 Feb 2008 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/rob-graham-drops-5-ton-anchor-to-cut-undersea-cable/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Wired reports that while repairing one of the undersea cables between the UAE and Oman they discovered it was &lt;a href="http://blog.wired.com/27bstroke6/2008/02/five-ton-anchor.html"&gt;cut by an abandoned anchor&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Fifth Cable Down, Iran Offline, Coincidence Meter Drops</title><link>/blog/fifth-cable-down-iran-offline-coincidence-meter-drops/</link><pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2008 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/fifth-cable-down-iran-offline-coincidence-meter-drops/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Update: Thanks to Windexh8er (who provides good information despite being far more inflammatory than he needs to, what’s up with that?) &lt;a href="http://www.renesys.com/blog/2008/02/attention_iran_is_not_disconne_1.shtml"&gt;Iran is up and the traffic report is wrong&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Most Amusing Security Breach Of The Week</title><link>/blog/most-amusing-security-breach-of-the-week/</link><pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2008 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/most-amusing-security-breach-of-the-week/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Oops, over in England an HSBC branch forgot to lock the doors and turn on the alarm. A 5-year-old accidentally wandered in while his dad was using the ATM.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Network Security Podcast- The Conspiracy Episode</title><link>/blog/network-security-podcast-the-conspiracy-episode/</link><pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2008 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/network-security-podcast-the-conspiracy-episode/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;This week on the Network Security Podcast, we discuss cut cables, government monitoring, and sea monsters. Okay, maybe not sea monsters, but there seem to be strange happenings out in the world.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Reminder- SunSec Is *TONIGHT*</title><link>/blog/reminder-sunsec-is-tonight/</link><pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2008 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/reminder-sunsec-is-tonight/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;6pm, at Furio in Scottsdale.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.furio.tv/"&gt;Website/directions here&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Happy hour runs to 7, and you don’t want to miss it (the food is better, tasty pasta dishes).&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>The DLP Guys Will Have A Field Day With This One</title><link>/blog/the-dlp-guys-will-have-a-field-day-with-this-one/</link><pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2008 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/the-dlp-guys-will-have-a-field-day-with-this-one/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;It seems that an attorney at Eli Lilly’s outside legal firm &lt;a href="http://www.portfolio.com/news-markets/top-5/2008/02/05/Eli-Lilly-E-Mail-to-New-York-Times"&gt;accidentally sent an email with confidential information over government settlement talks to a reporter at the New York Times&lt;/a&gt;. The Times reporter then started poking around, eventually breaking the story far before anyone was prepared.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Three Applications That Will Cause Us Security Headaches For At Least Three Years</title><link>/blog/three-applications-that-will-cause-us-security-headaches-for-at-least-three-years/</link><pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2008 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/three-applications-that-will-cause-us-security-headaches-for-at-least-three-years/</guid><description>&lt;ol&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Internet Explorer/ActiveX&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;QuickTime&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Adobe Acrobat Reader&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ol&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Each of these applications has plugin architectures and inadequate security models. Actually, IE 7 + Vista is a good model, but it will take 3 years for it to hit wide enough deployment.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Arizona Has Undocumented Voting Requirements</title><link>/blog/arizona-has-undocumented-voting-requirements/</link><pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2008 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/arizona-has-undocumented-voting-requirements/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I’m pretty angry right now.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I just went to vote in the primary. In hand was my driver’s license and voter ID card. Because the addresses didn’t match, I wasn’t allowed to vote until I showed another form of ID with matching addresses. I, of course, didn’t have one. None of the materials mailed to us or displayed in our polling place mention this requirement.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Understanding and Selecting a Database Activity Monitoring Solution: Part 3, Central Management</title><link>/blog/understanding-and-selecting-a-database-activity-monitoring-solution-part-3-central-management/</link><pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2008 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/understanding-and-selecting-a-database-activity-monitoring-solution-part-3-central-management/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;There are a lot of things I love about working for myself, but I have to admit sometimes it’s hard to keep everything balanced. For a while there I was taking whatever work came in the door that aligned with my goals and didn’t violate my objectivity requirements. Needless to say, the past few months have been absolutely insane; deadline after deadline, 2-3 trips a month, and a heck of a lot of writing.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Why Vulnerability Counts Are Down</title><link>/blog/why-vulnerability-counts-are-down/</link><pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2008 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/why-vulnerability-counts-are-down/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;According to &lt;a href="http://securitywatch.eweek.com/vulnerability_research/whats_behind_drop_in_2007_vulnerability_counts.html"&gt;IBM’s ISS (via eWeek), the number of publicly reported vulnerabilities dropped&lt;/a&gt; in 2007.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Pete Lindstrom cautiously (unusual for him) &lt;a href="http://spiresecurity.typepad.com/spire_security_viewpoint/2008/02/getting-over-th.html"&gt;wonders if this means we’re over the hump&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Network World Article Up</title><link>/blog/network-world-article-up/</link><pubDate>Mon, 04 Feb 2008 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/network-world-article-up/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;A short piece I wrote for Network World just went up today. “&lt;a href="http://www.networkworld.com/columnists/2008/020408insider.html?fsrc=rss-security"&gt;Avoiding data-loss prevention pitfalls&lt;/a&gt;”.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;What are the barriers to DLP? I’ve heard it can take a lot of time and the costs add up. Is there a way to get around this? It’s always daunting to consider deployment of a new security technology, but with the proper preparation Data Loss Prevention (DLP) is less painful to deploy than many of our other tools. The keys to a successful DLP deployment are setting the right expectations, proper planning during the selection process, and a controlled roll-out.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Reminder: SunSec Is THIS Wednesday</title><link>/blog/reminder-sunsec-is-this-wednesday/</link><pubDate>Mon, 04 Feb 2008 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/reminder-sunsec-is-this-wednesday/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Per requests from a few people, and no one has complained about the move yet. 6 PM at Furio in Old Town Scottsdale.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Ask Securosis: Security vs. Productivity</title><link>/blog/ask-securosis-security-vs-productivity/</link><pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2008 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/ask-securosis-security-vs-productivity/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;This week’s question in our Ask Securosis series moves past a technology question into the realm of management and statistical research.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Could Yahoo!/Microsoft Affect Web 2.0 Security?</title><link>/blog/could-yahoo-microsoft-affect-web-2-0-security/</link><pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2008 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/could-yahoo-microsoft-affect-web-2-0-security/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;It’s no surprise that I’m a big fan of Microsoft’s Trustworthy Computing Initiative- something I was skeptical of when it was first announced. MS proved me wrong, and years later we’ve seen a very positive impact. Vulnerabilities are down, response times are up, and products ship in more secure configurations. Yes, they still screw up every now and then, but it’s overall been a huge improvement. Just because I don’t like to use Vista doesn’t mean I don’t appreciate all the security work that went into it, and let’s not forget all the benefits across the rest of the product line. Go count SQL Server 2005 vulnerabilities if you want any proof. You’ll only need one hand, and you’ll have 4 fingers left over (5, if you really look where the vuln came from).&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>John Moltz 0day Pwns All Macs In Microsoft Plot</title><link>/blog/john-moltz-0day-pwns-all-macs-in-microsoft-plot/</link><pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2008 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/john-moltz-0day-pwns-all-macs-in-microsoft-plot/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Securosis is in possession of damning documentation that proves, without a doubt, that John Moltz of &lt;a href="http://www.crazyapplerumors.com/"&gt;Crazy Apple Rumors&lt;/a&gt; has taken control of all Macs through his ingenious use of the, “woe is me, I lost my funding, come to my site and cry your goodbyes” scam.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>41% Of Enterprises Mask Test And Development Data</title><link>/blog/41-of-enterprises-mask-test-and-development-data/</link><pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2008 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/41-of-enterprises-mask-test-and-development-data/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Last week I gave a webinar on database security for ZDNet, sponsored by Oracle. We had an exceptionally good turnout and ran a couple of polls during the session.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>SunSec- Next Week!</title><link>/blog/sunsec-next-week/</link><pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2008 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/sunsec-next-week/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I got a few emails from people asking to push SunSec up to next week due to upcoming travel, conferences, and training.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Watch A Replay Of My DLP Webcast</title><link>/blog/watch-a-replay-of-my-dlp-webcast/</link><pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2008 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/watch-a-replay-of-my-dlp-webcast/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Websense posted a replay link for my webcast on DLP.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://connect.websense.com/system/content/folder/listing?date=2008-01-31T16%3A56%3A21.560%2B00%3A00&amp;amp;sco-id=3022088&amp;amp;set-lang=en"&gt;Here ya go…&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Why Laptop Remote-Destruction/Lojack Doesn’t Work, And Encryption Does</title><link>/blog/why-laptop-remote-destruction-lojack-doesnt-work-and-encryption-does/</link><pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2008 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/why-laptop-remote-destruction-lojack-doesnt-work-and-encryption-does/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;While I sometimes get annoyed with various security technologies, there are very few I consider to be complete snake oil.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Dark Reading Article: Poking Things With Sticks</title><link>/blog/dark-reading-article-poking-things-with-sticks/</link><pubDate>Wed, 30 Jan 2008 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/dark-reading-article-poking-things-with-sticks/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Dark Reading just posted my &lt;a href="http://www.darkreading.com/document.asp?doc_id=144600&amp;amp;WT.svl=tease3_2"&gt;column for this month, entitled, “11 Truths We Hate To Admit”&lt;/a&gt;. Due to a miscommunication with my editor it reads as if I still live in Boulder, Colorado. I’m really down in Phoenix, but spent most of my adult life in Boulder.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Latest Network Security Podcast Up</title><link>/blog/latest-network-security-podcast-up/</link><pubDate>Wed, 30 Jan 2008 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/latest-network-security-podcast-up/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;While I was traveling home, Martin posted the &lt;a href="http://netsecpodcast.com/?p=15"&gt;latest episode of the Network Security Podcast&lt;/a&gt;. Our guests this week are Marcin and Andre from &lt;a href="http://www.tssci-security.com/"&gt;http://www.tssci-security.com/&lt;/a&gt;. We spend most of the episode talking about web application security issues.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Speaking at Open Group Forum in SF Tomorrow</title><link>/blog/speaking-at-open-group-forum-in-sf-tomorrow/</link><pubDate>Mon, 28 Jan 2008 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/speaking-at-open-group-forum-in-sf-tomorrow/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;If any of you are involved with the Open Group, I’ll be giving a &lt;a href="http://www.opengroup.org/sf2008/mogull.html"&gt;presentation at the Forum tomorrow in San Francisco&lt;/a&gt;. The topic ias:&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>The Secret Origin of NAC</title><link>/blog/the-secret-origin-of-nac/</link><pubDate>Mon, 28 Jan 2008 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/the-secret-origin-of-nac/</guid><description>&lt;blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Once upon a time, an evil virus struck the land. But the people were prepared, and they stopped the virus before too many became sick… or so they thought. The virus really learned to hide, finding a home among wayward travelers outside the gates of the city. Weeks later these travelers returned home and unknowingly infected the cities. And weeks after that the next wave of travelers came to the cities, and more were infected. And then some scientists said, “Enough! No more will we let our cities become infected by these travelers. Now is the time to protect ourselves from the threats within!” The scientists created a new defense, called NAC, which would check the health of anyone before entering the city, and all was good. But NAC was new, and the first versions didn’t work as well as everyone would have liked. Then, two famous alchemists decided that &lt;em&gt;they&lt;/em&gt; should control NAC. Rather than providing it to the people to use, they decided to &lt;em&gt;tell&lt;/em&gt; everyone they would provide it. Eventually. And maybe it wouldn’t work quite as expected, but &lt;em&gt;it would be good because it would be big.&lt;/em&gt; And then other alchemists decided that the people wanted NAC, but didn’t know what NAC was, so they removed the old labels from their elixirs and put on &lt;em&gt;new NAC labels&lt;/em&gt;. And the people were confused. And they waited.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>The Five Laws Of Data Masking</title><link>/blog/the-five-laws-of-data-masking/</link><pubDate>Thu, 24 Jan 2008 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/the-five-laws-of-data-masking/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Tomorrow I’ll be giving a webcast over at ZDNet (sponsored by Oracle) on the Top 5 Database Security Resolutions for 2008. The resolutions have changed a bit since I first posted about them over here, and I decided to swap in data masking for the last one. I almost pulled it back out after I found out my sponsor (Oracle) just released a data masking product (I try to avoid being too promotional in my webinars), but it’s something I’ve been talking about for a while and it’s too important to pull just because a few people might think I was being biased.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Cory Has It Wrong, We Should Free The Data</title><link>/blog/cory-has-it-wrong-we-should-free-the-data/</link><pubDate>Wed, 23 Jan 2008 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/cory-has-it-wrong-we-should-free-the-data/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Over on BoingBoing, Cory Doctorow is doing his best to raise awareness of data breaches in a post entitled, “&lt;a href="http://www.boingboing.net/2008/01/22/database-leaks-are-a.html"&gt;Database leaks are as immortal and toxic as nuclear spills – let’s start acting like it&lt;/a&gt;”.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>The Last I’ll Ever Need To Write Proving SCADA Risks</title><link>/blog/the-last-ill-ever-need-to-write-proving-scada-risks/</link><pubDate>Mon, 21 Jan 2008 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/the-last-ill-ever-need-to-write-proving-scada-risks/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Supervisory Control and Data Acquisition systems are the technology connection between control systems and the switches, pumps, and motors that run our automated physical world. SCADA is the basis of everything from power plants to train systems. It’s also one heck of a security risk.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Excel Sort-of-0day Affects Mac And Windows</title><link>/blog/excel-sort-of-0day-affects-mac-and-windows/</link><pubDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2008 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/excel-sort-of-0day-affects-mac-and-windows/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Remember the good old days when vulnerabilities would just affect one platform? Back when there was NO WAY my Commodore 64 could be infected by your TRS-80?&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>On My Curious Relationship With Apple And Security</title><link>/blog/on-my-curious-relationship-with-apple-and-security/</link><pubDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2008 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/on-my-curious-relationship-with-apple-and-security/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Security professionals seem to have a strained relationship with Apple these days. Any trip to a security conference shows that more and more security professionals are using Macs on a regular basis. A not-insignificant percentage of the high-end industry types I know shows they all use Macs and iPhones; at home if not at work, often against corporate policy.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>QuickTime Patched, But Still Vulnerable On Mac And Windows</title><link>/blog/quicktime-patched-but-still-vulnerable-on-mac-and-windows/</link><pubDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2008 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/quicktime-patched-but-still-vulnerable-on-mac-and-windows/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Just a quick note-&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Yesterday, Apple &lt;a href="http://isc.sans.org/diary.html?storyid=3852&amp;amp;rss"&gt;released a QuickTime patch to cover a couple of vulnerabilities&lt;/a&gt;, but this does &lt;strong&gt;not&lt;/strong&gt; patch the new RTSP flaw revealed last week.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Macworld Keynote Impressions</title><link>/blog/macworld-keynote-impressions/</link><pubDate>Tue, 15 Jan 2008 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/macworld-keynote-impressions/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Just finished up attending the Steve Jobs keynote for the first time. From a security perspective, as expected there wasn’t anything worth noting. Being a product-launch event we really weren’t planning on seeing any discussion of security, and the other updates don’t seem to have many obvious security ramifications.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>I Was Wrong. Sensitive Data *Does* Fall Off The Back Of Trucks</title><link>/blog/i-was-wrong-sensitive-data-does-fall-off-the-back-of-trucks/</link><pubDate>Mon, 14 Jan 2008 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/i-was-wrong-sensitive-data-does-fall-off-the-back-of-trucks/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;From the&lt;a href="http://breachblog.com/2008/01/14/pru.aspx"&gt; Breach Blog&lt;/a&gt;:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Victims: “wealthy investors” Number Affected: 200 Types of Data: Financial details Breach Description: A box containing sensitive paperwork related to 200 wealthy investors was found on the side of the road near Reading in Berkshire (UK). The box was in transit from a Prudential building in Reading to a secure storage facility in Essex when it apparently fell out of the DHL courier van. Among the 200 wealthy investors that were affected were three UK national lottery winners.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Please Patch Your Freaking Database Servers!</title><link>/blog/please-patch-your-freaking-database-servers/</link><pubDate>Mon, 14 Jan 2008 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/please-patch-your-freaking-database-servers/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;This morning, database security company &lt;a href="http://sentrigo.com/"&gt;Sentrigo&lt;/a&gt; released some results from in informal survey they performed at a series of Oracle User Group meetings.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Marathon Down, Macworld Up</title><link>/blog/marathon-down-macworld-up/</link><pubDate>Sun, 13 Jan 2008 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/marathon-down-macworld-up/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Okay, it was only a half-marathon, but considering I hurt my knee and wasn’t able to train for a month I feel pretty darn good about finishing. In my head that is; legs aren’t quite as pleased.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>14 Year Old Boy Hacks, And Derails, Trains</title><link>/blog/14-year-old-boy-hacks-and-derails-trains/</link><pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2008 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/14-year-old-boy-hacks-and-derails-trains/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;(Thanks to Marcin)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Thanks to some good old hardware hacking, a &lt;a href="http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2008/01/11/wschool111.xml"&gt;Polish teen built an infrared device that let him switch around the tracks&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Ask Securosis: Setting Up A Home Lab</title><link>/blog/ask-securosis-setting-up-a-home-lab/</link><pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2008 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/ask-securosis-setting-up-a-home-lab/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Our question this week comes from Lee:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Say you”re doing security research, what machines and OSes do you recommend for a home lab and why?&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>SunSec Declared</title><link>/blog/sunsec-declared/</link><pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2008 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/sunsec-declared/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;SunSec last night was a roaring success- although my liver crawled under a small table and refuses to come out.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>SunSec Rises Tonight!</title><link>/blog/sunsec-rises-tonight/</link><pubDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2008 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/sunsec-rises-tonight/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;We’ve got people flying in from other states and I’m even getting a haircut!&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Tonight at 6pm at&lt;a href="http://www.furio.tv/"&gt; Furio in Scottsdale&lt;/a&gt; we’re reviving that most noble of institutions- security geeks hanging out, drinking, and lying about their l33t skilz.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Top Five Database Resultions- Registration Open And Looking For Reviewers</title><link>/blog/top-five-database-resultions-registration-open-and-looking-for-reviewers/</link><pubDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2008 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/top-five-database-resultions-registration-open-and-looking-for-reviewers/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;Updated&lt;/em&gt; &lt;em&gt;: Forgot to list the date, it’s January 25th.&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;Update 2&lt;/em&gt; &lt;em&gt;: Fixed stupid mistake in mailto link. Bad ex-web programmer. Bad!&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Why You Shouldn’t Run An Open Wireless Network Like Bruce (Or Chuck Norris)</title><link>/blog/why-you-shouldnt-run-an-open-wireless-network-like-bruce-or-chuck-norris/</link><pubDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2008 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/why-you-shouldnt-run-an-open-wireless-network-like-bruce-or-chuck-norris/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Bruce Schneier is one of the more venerated figures in the information security world, and rightfully so. But reading his article in Wired today, I think he might want to stick to encryption. (I know and like Bruce, so this isn’t a personal attack.)&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Yes, I’m Giving A DLP Webcast. No, I Won’t Post The Picture</title><link>/blog/yes-im-giving-a-dlp-webcast-no-i-wont-post-the-picture/</link><pubDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2008 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/yes-im-giving-a-dlp-webcast-no-i-wont-post-the-picture/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I hate it when &lt;a href="http://infosecplace.com/blog/2008/01/08/pimping-for-accuvant-websense-and-the-mogull/"&gt;Farnum scoops me on my own presentation&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;On January 22nd I’m giving a live webcast on DLP. The topic is Demystifying Data Loss Prevention, and I’ll be covering everything from defining DLP, through the top features to look for, to running the selection process.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>No Fly List Protects Airplane From 5-Year Old Security Risk</title><link>/blog/no-fly-list-protects-airplane-from-5-year-old-security-risk/</link><pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2008 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/no-fly-list-protects-airplane-from-5-year-old-security-risk/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I mean a literal 5-year-old child, not some obscure threat.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;According to &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/boingboing/iBag/~3/214019034/tsa-searches-detains.html"&gt;BoingBoing the child’s name is the same as someone else on the list&lt;/a&gt;, but according to &lt;a href="http://www.schneier.com/blog/archives/2007/08/conversation_wi_5.html"&gt;this interview with the head of TSA&lt;/a&gt; by Schneier, you should only get a hit if the name and date of birth match. He was considered such a threat his mother wasn’t allowed to console him/touch him during the process.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>You’d Better Prepare For MS08-001</title><link>/blog/youd-better-prepare-for-ms08-001/</link><pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2008 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/youd-better-prepare-for-ms08-001/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I generally try and avoid short posts on the blindingly obvious, but it’s clear there’s a lot of focus on the Microsoft IGMP vulnerability- from both sides (good guys and bad guys).&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Network Security Podcast, Episode 89 Up</title><link>/blog/network-security-podcast-episode-89-up/</link><pubDate>Tue, 08 Jan 2008 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/network-security-podcast-episode-89-up/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://netsecpodcast.com/?p=12"&gt;You can find the episode and the show notes over at NetSecPodcast.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This week we dedicate the show to the loving memory of privacy.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Reminder: SunSec is this Thursday in Phoenix</title><link>/blog/reminder-sunsec-is-this-thursday-in-phoenix/</link><pubDate>Mon, 07 Jan 2008 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/reminder-sunsec-is-this-thursday-in-phoenix/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;If you’re a geek, interested in security, or both, the official revival of SunSec is this Thursday!&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Let’s shoot for 5:30-6 pm at &lt;a href="http://www.furio.tv/"&gt;Furio&lt;/a&gt;, in Old Town Scottsdale. It’s a funky little place, has a good happy hour (until 7), and is more conducive to conversation (and parking) than Four Peaks in Tempe (another suggestion, but we tried that a while back).&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Your Top Five Database Security Resolutions For 2008</title><link>/blog/your-top-five-database-security-resolutions-for-2008/</link><pubDate>Mon, 07 Jan 2008 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/your-top-five-database-security-resolutions-for-2008/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;On January 25th I’ll be giving a ZDNet webcast (sponsored by Oracle, but objective content, as always!) on database security resolutions for 2008.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Are You A Hacker? Want To Crash The 787 You’re Flying On?</title><link>/blog/are-you-a-hacker-want-to-crash-the-787-youre-flying-on/</link><pubDate>Sat, 05 Jan 2008 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/are-you-a-hacker-want-to-crash-the-787-youre-flying-on/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;This one comes to us thanks to Rob:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.wired.com/politics/security/news/2008/01/dreamliner_security"&gt;http://www.wired.com/politics/security/news/2008/01/dreamliner_security&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;And I quote:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Boeing’s new 787 Dreamliner passenger jet may have a serious security vulnerability in its onboard computer networks that could allow passengers to access the plane’s control systems, according to the U.S. Federal Aviation Administration. The computer network in the Dreamliner’s passenger compartment, designed to give passengers in-flight internet access, is connected to the plane’s control, navigation and communication systems, an FAA report reveals. … Gunter wouldn’t go into detail about how Boeing is tackling the issue but says it is employing a combination of solutions that involves some physical separation of the networks, known as “air gaps,” and software firewalls. Gunter also mentioned other technical solutions, which she said are proprietary and didn’t want to discuss in public.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Announcing</title><link>/blog/announcing/</link><pubDate>Fri, 04 Jan 2008 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/announcing/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Have a security question? Want a straight answer? Even if you’re not a geek?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I get a random assortment of security questions on a fairly regular basis and it seems like a good time to open the blog up a little more to covering what you’re interested in, not just what I feel like rambling about.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Ask Securosis: Logging Home Router Firewall Activity</title><link>/blog/ask-securosis-logging-home-router-firewall-activity/</link><pubDate>Fri, 04 Jan 2008 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/ask-securosis-logging-home-router-firewall-activity/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Our first question comes from Tom, who is security minded but not a full-on security geek:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;“In my Dlink 4300 there is functionality to log fire wall rules to a outside logging server (I’ve seen this functionality in my old WRT54G’s as well). At the same time Linux has logging functionality that you can setup to receive outside log messages. How do I get my dlink/linksys/brand X router to talk to my Linux at server and log all of the messages?&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Credit Card Fraud Is Not Identity Theft</title><link>/blog/credit-card-fraud-is-not-identity-theft/</link><pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2008 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/credit-card-fraud-is-not-identity-theft/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://securosis.com/2008/01/03/from-monitoring-to-prevention-switching-to-debix/"&gt;I just posted on switching to Debix&lt;/a&gt;, and it reminded me there’s something I keep forgetting to cover.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;When reading the news, both mainstream and industry, I’m appalled at the abuse of the term “identity theft”. And don’t get me started on vendor marketing materials.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>From Monitoring To Prevention: Switching To Debix</title><link>/blog/from-monitoring-to-prevention-switching-to-debix/</link><pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2008 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/from-monitoring-to-prevention-switching-to-debix/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Credit monitoring services, especially those from the credit agencies themselves, leave a bad taste in my mouth. I find it unconscionable that I need to pay to gain access to personal information on me that affects my life at the deepest levels. In our modern society, a good credit rating is as important for our future safety and stability (and sex, to be honest) as a sharp spear and 20/10 vision were to early man. It sucks, but money makes the world go round and we can’t feed &lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maslow's_hierarchy_of_needs"&gt;Maslow&lt;/a&gt; without it (nor can most of us afford homes without good credit).&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Second Major Privacy Breach At Sears: Very Bad Logical Flaw</title><link>/blog/second-major-privacy-breach-at-sears-very-bad-logical-flaw/</link><pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2008 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/second-major-privacy-breach-at-sears-very-bad-logical-flaw/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Sears isn’t having much luck these days.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;First, they &lt;a href="http://community.ca.com/blogs/securityadvisor/archive/2007/12/20/sears-com-join-the-community-get-spyware.aspx"&gt;install spyware on their customers’ computers&lt;/a&gt;. If you “join the Sears community”, they install a proxy on your computer and intercept all web traffic.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>It’s Time To Move Past Vulnerability Scanning To Anti-Exploitation</title><link>/blog/its-time-to-move-past-vulnerability-scanning-to-anti-exploitation/</link><pubDate>Wed, 02 Jan 2008 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/its-time-to-move-past-vulnerability-scanning-to-anti-exploitation/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Wow. It’s 2008. How did &lt;strong&gt;that&lt;/strong&gt; happen?!?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;When I was younger I couldn’t wait for the future. What geek can? We all grew up on entirely too much science fiction; far more of which is now reality than I expected (other than the space program; hello? NASA? Anyone home?). Now that I get older I realize that while the future is great in concept, the reality is eventually I won’t be around for it anymore. Every year is a smaller fraction of life, and thus every year passes relatively more quickly.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Off Topic: Welcome to 2008</title><link>/blog/off-topic-welcome-to-2008/</link><pubDate>Wed, 02 Jan 2008 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/off-topic-welcome-to-2008/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I was debating about writing anything personal about 2008, but after reading &lt;a href="http://securityincite.com/blog/mike-rothman/the-daily-incite-january-2-2008"&gt;Mike’s Security Incite today&lt;/a&gt; I figure a little personalization on the site won’t hurt. If you’re not interested in what I’m up to professionally and personally, this is a good post to skip.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Your Holiday Family Security Checklist</title><link>/blog/your-holiday-family-security-checklist/</link><pubDate>Mon, 24 Dec 2007 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/your-holiday-family-security-checklist/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;If you read this blog, odds are today and tomorrow you’ll be responsible for “fixing” the computers of your extended family. It’s also a great excuse to get you some much-needed web browsing time if the family conversations get boring. Here’s my (very short) checklist:&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Database Logging: Option Number 3</title><link>/blog/database-logging-option-number-3/</link><pubDate>Fri, 21 Dec 2007 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/database-logging-option-number-3/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;When it comes to logging, I won’t even step on the same court as Anton. But a couple weeks ago (while I was on the road, thus the late response) he &lt;a href="http://chuvakin.blogspot.com/2007/12/how-to-do-database-loggingmonitoring.html"&gt;posted on the options for database logging&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>SunSec Rising From The Ashes</title><link>/blog/sunsec-rising-from-the-ashes/</link><pubDate>Thu, 20 Dec 2007 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/sunsec-rising-from-the-ashes/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Live in Phoenix? Interested in Security? Like beer?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;On January 10th we’re going to revive SunSec. Keep an eye out here and I’ll post more details when we get them. Tentatively plan for 6pm somewhere in the Old Town Scottsdale-Tempe area.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>My First MacWorld Article Is Up!</title><link>/blog/my-first-macworld-article-is-up/</link><pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2007 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/my-first-macworld-article-is-up/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I have to admit, although Apple’s handling of security issues is often a train wreck, I’m still a big fan of Macs and other Apple products.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Network Security Podcast: The Hoff</title><link>/blog/network-security-podcast-the-hoff/</link><pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2007 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/network-security-podcast-the-hoff/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Chris Hoff returned to the podcast this week to discuss the little awareness campaign we cooked up (no, he didn’t really hack me) and talk about the future of security over the next few years.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Definitions: Content Monitoring and Protection And Application and Database Monitoring and Protection</title><link>/blog/definitions-content-monitoring-and-protection-and-application-and-database-monitoring-and-protectio/</link><pubDate>Sun, 16 Dec 2007 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/definitions-content-monitoring-and-protection-and-application-and-database-monitoring-and-protectio/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;More on this later, but I’m starting to see the data security market splitting along two lines. One focused on protecting content in user workspaces and productivity applications. It’s starting with DLP but moving towards what I call Content Monitoring and Protection.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>End Of Year Humor And Awareness: No Folks, Hoff Didn’t Pwn Me</title><link>/blog/end-of-year-humor-and-awareness-no-folks-hoff-didnt-pwn-me/</link><pubDate>Sat, 15 Dec 2007 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/end-of-year-humor-and-awareness-no-folks-hoff-didnt-pwn-me/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Chris Hoff and I decided to have a little fun and fake some back and forth exploits to highlight some security risks. It’s nearing the end of the year; either crunch time for some of you, or boring time for the rest. We figured a little humor couldn’t hurt in either case. We decided to blow this open early so it doesn’t get away from us.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Dark Reading Column Up- The Perils of Predictions &amp; Predicting Perils</title><link>/blog/dark-reading-column-up-the-perils-of-predictions-predicting-perils/</link><pubDate>Thu, 13 Dec 2007 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/dark-reading-column-up-the-perils-of-predictions-predicting-perils/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;My second monthly column is up over at Dark Reading; &lt;a href="http://www.darkreading.com/document.asp?doc_id=141258&amp;amp;f_src=drdaily"&gt;The Perils of Predictions &amp;amp; Predicting Perils&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This is not your ordinary year-end prediction special. Here’s an excerpt:&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Never Bring A Knife To A Gun Fight</title><link>/blog/never-bring-a-knife-to-a-gun-fight/</link><pubDate>Thu, 13 Dec 2007 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/never-bring-a-knife-to-a-gun-fight/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Oh no he didn’t!&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://rationalsecurity.typepad.com/blog/2007/12/breaking-news-s.html"&gt;http://rationalsecurity.typepad.com/blog/2007/12/breaking-news-s.html&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I should be crossing the border back to the US in about 12 hours.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Off Topic: Argh! Smart House Went Stupid</title><link>/blog/off-topic-argh-smart-house-went-stupid/</link><pubDate>Thu, 13 Dec 2007 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/off-topic-argh-smart-house-went-stupid/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Here I am, about 30 hours away from home, and my home automation system is freaking out. Why does stuff like this only happen when I’m on the road? Time to whip out my copy of &lt;a href="http://www.amazon.com/How-Survive-Robot-Uprising-Defending/dp/1582345929/ref=pd_bbs_1?ie=UTF8&amp;amp;s=books&amp;amp;qid=1197577625&amp;amp;sr=8-1"&gt;How To Prepare For The Robot Uprising&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Network Security Podcast Up: With Special Guest Chris Hoff</title><link>/blog/network-security-podcast-up-with-special-guest-chris-hoff/</link><pubDate>Wed, 12 Dec 2007 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/network-security-podcast-up-with-special-guest-chris-hoff/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Ah, the wonders of year end predictions.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;We just couldn’t help ourselves, so we invited Chris Hoff, our favorite prognosticator, to join us. This week focuses on the negative trends affecting security, and Chris will be joining us again next week to finish up with the positive.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Permanent Link For ipfw Rules</title><link>/blog/permanent-link-for-ipfw-rules/</link><pubDate>Wed, 12 Dec 2007 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/permanent-link-for-ipfw-rules/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Looks like the ipfw rules project that Chris is leading is pretty popular. We’ve set up a permanent link that we’ll redirect to the latest version as we keep refining this thing.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Data Security Lifecycle- Technologies, Part 3</title><link>/blog/data-security-lifecycle-technologies-part-3/</link><pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2007 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/data-security-lifecycle-technologies-part-3/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;There’s been a lot going on in the industry since we last covered the Data Security Lifecycle, and it’s been far too long since the previous post. Today we’ll finish off our discussion of the controls technologies, and in our next post we’ll discuss supportive technologies, like Identity and Access Management and network encryption, that don’t fit neatly into the lifecycle itself. Since it’s been a while, here are links to the rest of the series:&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>ipfw Rules, v2007/12/12</title><link>/blog/ipfw-rules-v2007-12-12/</link><pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2007 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/ipfw-rules-v2007-12-12/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Based on &lt;a href="http://securosis.com/2007/11/15/ipfw-rules/#comments"&gt;extensive&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://securosis.com/2007/11/16/ipfw-rules-20071116-revision/#comments"&gt;feedback&lt;/a&gt;, these rules are now much improved over the initial draft. Thanks, all!&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;All the versions of this post are getting out of hand, so Rich has provided a &lt;a href="http://securosis.com/publications/ipfw.html"&gt;permanent URL for the current Leopard &lt;code&gt;ipfw&lt;/code&gt; post&lt;/a&gt; for future reference. Please use that link, so future visitors get the latest and greatest.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Data And Application Security Will Drive Most Security Growth For The Next 3-5 Years</title><link>/blog/data-and-application-security-will-drive-most-security-growth-for-the-next-3-5-years/</link><pubDate>Mon, 10 Dec 2007 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/data-and-application-security-will-drive-most-security-growth-for-the-next-3-5-years/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I’m working on a project where I’m having to codify some of my thoughts on the rise of the data security markets, and I’m lumping in application security since I consider the line between those two disciplines far grayer than we usually admit.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Predicting Security Markets</title><link>/blog/predicting-security-markets/</link><pubDate>Thu, 06 Dec 2007 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/predicting-security-markets/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Ah, the silly season of predictions. &lt;a href="http://securityincite.com/TDI-2007-12-06#TBP1"&gt;Rothman has a round up of the early entries&lt;/a&gt;, and I’ll have more to say on that particular subject in my monthly Dark Reading column (should be up next week).&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Sorry, My Readers Are Worth More Than $35</title><link>/blog/sorry-my-readers-are-worth-more-than-35/</link><pubDate>Thu, 06 Dec 2007 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/sorry-my-readers-are-worth-more-than-35/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I was amused to get this in the mail today. Since I’m not a total bastard, I’ve removed the header and sender’s name.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>MPAA Violated Copyright And Issued Takedown Notice</title><link>/blog/mpaa-violated-copyright-and-issued-takedown-notice/</link><pubDate>Tue, 04 Dec 2007 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/mpaa-violated-copyright-and-issued-takedown-notice/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;This is just awesome.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://gizmodo.com/gadgets/irony/mpaas-university-toolkit-taken-down-for-violating-copyright-329648.php"&gt;The MPAA illegally used GPL licensed code in their University Toolkit&lt;/a&gt; (the license required release of the source code for any derivatives). They refused to respond to requests to comply with the license, and a developer issued a DMCA takedown notice to the MPAA’s internet service provider, who shut down the site.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Reader Poll: Forget Breach Stats- We Need Root Cause Analysis</title><link>/blog/reader-poll-forget-breach-stats-we-need-root-cause-analysis/</link><pubDate>Tue, 04 Dec 2007 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/reader-poll-forget-breach-stats-we-need-root-cause-analysis/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Adrian Lane, frequent commenter on this blog, &lt;a href="http://www.iplocks.com:80/blog/2007/12/03/1196708040000.html"&gt;wrote about the desire for real case studies of breaches&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I’ve been spending a lot of time digging through breach statistics and all the public information on some major breaches in order to come as close as possible to root cause analysis. While I love the &lt;a href="http://attrition.org/dataloss/"&gt;Attrition database&lt;/a&gt; and the &lt;a href="http://www.privacyrights.org/"&gt;Privacy Rights Clearing House&lt;/a&gt;, they are only able to enter what little data makes it into the public light. It makes for a nice &lt;a href="http://securosis.com/2007/12/02/data-breach-wars/"&gt;Star Wars spoof,&lt;/a&gt; and is absolutely helpful, but it’s time we took it to the next step.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Whitepaper: Understanding and Selecting a DLP Solution</title><link>/blog/whitepaper-understanding-and-selecting-a-dlp-solution/</link><pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2007 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/whitepaper-understanding-and-selecting-a-dlp-solution/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Today, in cooperation with SANS, Securosis is releasing &lt;a href="https://cdn.securosis.com/assets/library/publications/DLP-Whitepaper.pdf" title="Understanding and Selecting a Data Loss Prevention Solution"&gt;Understanding and Selecting a Data Loss Prevention Solution&lt;/a&gt;. This is a compilation of my 7 part series on DLP, fully edited with expanded content, just like one of those DVD boxed sets!&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Data Breach Wars</title><link>/blog/data-breach-wars/</link><pubDate>Sun, 02 Dec 2007 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/data-breach-wars/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;On Monday I’m giving a presentation on data breaches at the &lt;a href="http://www.sans.org/encryption07_summit/?portal=864d9f434246c00c2d89e205805f9945"&gt;SANS Encryption Summit&lt;/a&gt; (only a couple of hours after I &lt;a href="http://www.sans.org/leakage07_summit/agenda.php?portal=a08b5f77aa012106e62c8b9eb4d79e98"&gt;keynote the DLP Summit&lt;/a&gt;).&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>The Perfect Example Of Worthless Compliance</title><link>/blog/the-perfect-example-of-worthless-compliance/</link><pubDate>Sun, 02 Dec 2007 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/the-perfect-example-of-worthless-compliance/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I was talking with someone recently who rolled out whole-disk encryption to meet a compliance need. Someone told them they needed to encrypt, so they encrypted.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>QuickTime Flaw- Exploit Code For OS X And Windows; What Apple Can Do (Other Than Patching)</title><link>/blog/quicktime-flaw-exploit-code-for-os-x-and-windows-what-apple-can-do-other-than-patching/</link><pubDate>Thu, 29 Nov 2007 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/quicktime-flaw-exploit-code-for-os-x-and-windows-what-apple-can-do-other-than-patching/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Yesterday I published &lt;a href="http://db.tidbits.com/article/9333"&gt;a quick TidBITS article&lt;/a&gt; on the QuickTime RTSP vulnerability. It’s a true 0day, with exploit code in the wild and no patch available. At the time, the proof of concept code was only for Windows, but over at &lt;a href="http://www.milw0rm.com/exploits/4673"&gt;Milw0rm it’s been updated to include Macs&lt;/a&gt;. The original &lt;a href="http://www.kb.cert.org/vuls/id/659761"&gt;CERT advisory is here&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Should Iron Mountain Finally Pay For Losing Customer Data?</title><link>/blog/should-iron-mountain-finally-pay-for-losing-customer-data/</link><pubDate>Thu, 29 Nov 2007 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/should-iron-mountain-finally-pay-for-losing-customer-data/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Iron Mountain has&lt;a href="http://www.google.com/search?client=safari&amp;amp;rls=en-us&amp;amp;q=iron+mountain+lost+tape&amp;amp;ie=UTF-8&amp;amp;oe=UTF-8"&gt; lost their fair share of backup tapes&lt;/a&gt; over the years. Enough to end up in the headlines more than once, but it hasn’t seemed to affect their business. Heck, they even &lt;a href="http://www.ironmountain.com/news/2005/impr09262005.asp"&gt;issued a press release&lt;/a&gt; calling for their clients (and everyone else) to encrypt their tapes.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Latest Network Security Podcast Up</title><link>/blog/latest-network-security-podcast-up-2/</link><pubDate>Wed, 28 Nov 2007 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/latest-network-security-podcast-up-2/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I’ve been a little slow on blogging due to a couple of killer deadlines, but things should be getting back to normal here over the next few days. Much to my surprise, this independent consulting thing is actually working out!&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>The Best Gift for Non-Geeks That Isn’t On Their List (And They Won’t Appreciate, But Really Need)</title><link>/blog/the-best-gift-for-non-geeks-that-isnt-on-their-list-and-they-wont-appreciate-but-really-need/</link><pubDate>Mon, 26 Nov 2007 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/the-best-gift-for-non-geeks-that-isnt-on-their-list-and-they-wont-appreciate-but-really-need/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;Author’s Note:&lt;/em&gt; &lt;em&gt;This was originally posted last year, but nothing ever changes:&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Backup&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Backup&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Backup&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Did I say backup yet?&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Follow Up: DBAs Should *Not* Own Database Activity Monitoring</title><link>/blog/follow-up-dbas-should-not-own-database-activity-monitoring/</link><pubDate>Wed, 21 Nov 2007 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/follow-up-dbas-should-not-own-database-activity-monitoring/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Based on the comments in my &lt;a href="http://securosis.com/2007/11/20/who-owns-database-security/#comments"&gt;last post on DAM&lt;/a&gt;, especially the one from Mike Spiers, I want to make it clear that if you are performing Database Activity Monitoring it should be owned and managed by security.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>In San Mateo/Palo Alto Area Next Week</title><link>/blog/in-san-mateo-palo-alto-area-next-week/</link><pubDate>Wed, 21 Nov 2007 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/in-san-mateo-palo-alto-area-next-week/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I’m heading out to San Mateo and possibly Palo Alto next week, with a couple openings Thursday afternoon if anyone is around.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Should EMC Buy Neoscale?</title><link>/blog/should-emc-buy-neoscale/</link><pubDate>Wed, 21 Nov 2007 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/should-emc-buy-neoscale/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Uh Oh.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;According to &lt;a href="http://www.c.com/storage/203103256"&gt;this article in CRN&lt;/a&gt;, encryption vendor Neoscale is insolvent and no longer selling maintenance contracts.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;NeoScale has stopped selling maintenance contracts for its data encryption appliance, effectively killing the line, while exploring “strategic alternatives” in the wake of the bankruptcy of storage VAR MTI, one of its largest solution providers. That “strategic alternative” could be an acquisition of all or part of the company by storage and security giant EMC (NYSE:EMC), or even Hewlett-Packard (NYSE:HPQ), according to former employees.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Who</title><link>/blog/who/</link><pubDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2007 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/who/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Back in the &lt;a href="http://securosis.com/2007/11/06/understanding-and-selecting-a-database-activity-monitoring-solution-part-2-technical-architecture/#comments"&gt;comments to one of my posts on Database Activity Monitoring&lt;/a&gt;, Rani asked the question of who should own DAM? I’m going to expand the question to cover all of database security.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>The Dirty Little Secret Of DLP</title><link>/blog/the-dirty-little-secret-of-dlp/</link><pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2007 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/the-dirty-little-secret-of-dlp/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;As most of you have probably figured out by now I tend to expend a lot of hot air trying to define DLP/CMF/CMP (Data Loss Prevention, Content Monitoring and Filtering, or Content Monitoring and Protection). I often take vendors to task for abusing the terms, since they are just increasing market confusion.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>First Leopard Update Is Out- Some Of Firewall Fixed; Skype Works</title><link>/blog/first-leopard-update-is-out-some-of-firewall-fixed-skype-works/</link><pubDate>Thu, 15 Nov 2007 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/first-leopard-update-is-out-some-of-firewall-fixed-skype-works/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Apple just &lt;a href="http://docs.info.apple.com/article.html?artnum=306907"&gt;released an update to Leopard&lt;/a&gt;, version 10.5.1.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The support document says the following:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Addresses a code signing issue; third-party applications can now run when included in the Application Firewall or when whitelisted in Parental Controls. In Security preferences’ Firewall tab, the “Block All” option is now called “Allow Only essential services”&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>ipfw Rules, 2007/11/15 revision</title><link>/blog/ipfw-rules-2007-11-15-revision/</link><pubDate>Thu, 15 Nov 2007 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/ipfw-rules-2007-11-15-revision/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://securosis.com/publications/ipfw.html"&gt;Rules revised&lt;/a&gt;. As suggested by windexh8er, here’s a set of &lt;code&gt;ipfw&lt;/code&gt; rules to customize for your own Macs or FreeBSD systems. Note that your private home network should have a non-standard IP range, both to support VPN across standard IP ranges, and for improved security, so your personal &lt;code&gt;allow&lt;/code&gt; rules don’t match other networks you may find yourself wandering through. The rules are below, but you’ll probably have an easier time if you download the rule file from &lt;a href="https://securosis.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/11/ipfw-securosis.txt" title="Securosis: ipfw starter rule set"&gt;http://securosis.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/11/ipfw-securosis.txt&lt;/a&gt;. In &lt;a href="http://www.hanynet.com/waterroof/"&gt;WaterRoof&lt;/a&gt;, you can import these rules with “Tools &amp;gt; Rules Configuration &amp;gt; Import rules from file..”. To check your &lt;code&gt;ipfw&lt;/code&gt; rules, use “&lt;code&gt;sudo ipfw list&lt;/code&gt;”. When you’re satisfied with your rules, install them for future reboots with “Tools &amp;gt; Rules Configuration &amp;gt; Save to startup configuration” and “Tools &amp;gt; Startup Script &amp;gt; Install Startup Script”.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Network Security Podcast- Latest Episode Up And A New Site</title><link>/blog/network-security-podcast-latest-episode-up-and-a-new-site/</link><pubDate>Thu, 15 Nov 2007 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/network-security-podcast-latest-episode-up-and-a-new-site/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;While I was off traveling, Martin posted the &lt;a href="http://netsecpodcast.com/?p=5"&gt;latest episode of the Network Security Podcast&lt;/a&gt;. Rather than posting the show notes here, I’d like to redirect you to our new site: &lt;a href="http://netsecpodcast.com"&gt;NetSecPodcast.com&lt;/a&gt;. This is where we’ll be posting all the show notes, taking feedback on episodes, and posting any content and updates directly related to the show.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Upcoming Speaking Events: SANS DLP and Encryption in December</title><link>/blog/upcoming-speaking-events-sans-dlp-and-encryption-in-december/</link><pubDate>Thu, 15 Nov 2007 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/upcoming-speaking-events-sans-dlp-and-encryption-in-december/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I’ve been invited to give the keynotes at both the SANS &lt;a href="http://www.sans.org/leakage07_summit/?utm_source=web-sans&amp;amp;utm_medium=text-ad&amp;amp;utm_content=text-link_featured,_homepage,_text&amp;amp;utm_campaign=WhatWorks_in_Stopping_Data_Leakage_and_Insider_Threat_Summit&amp;amp;ref=15921"&gt;Data Leakage Summit&lt;/a&gt; and the &lt;a href="http://www.sans.org/encryption07_summit/?utm_source=web-sans&amp;amp;utm_medium=text-ad&amp;amp;utm_content=text-link_homepage,_Featured,_text&amp;amp;utm_campaign=WhatWorks_in_Mobile_Encryption_Summit&amp;amp;ref=15926"&gt;Mobile Encryption Summit&lt;/a&gt;. Both are at the Dolphin hotel at Disney in Orlando. The DLP event is on December 3rd and 4th, and the encryption event on the 5th and 6th.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Sorry Google, Regular Expressions Don’t Make You A DLP Solution</title><link>/blog/sorry-google-regular-expressions-dont-make-you-a-dlp-solution/</link><pubDate>Tue, 13 Nov 2007 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/sorry-google-regular-expressions-dont-make-you-a-dlp-solution/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I was quite bemused today to read &lt;a href="http://www.networkworld.com/news/2007/111307-google-postini-data-leak-prevention.html?fsrc=rss-security"&gt;this article in NetworkWorld that Google’s Postini is jumping into DLP&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Google”s Postini division today announced that its e-mail-content-filtering service has been enhanced to detect “logical expressions,” such as credit-card data and Social Security numbers. … Adam Swidler, Postini senior product manager, says the e-mail security service includes filtering of more “sophisticated expressions” that extend beyond Postini”s earlier limits to keywords. “This is for compliance and content-policy management, with content-based inspection for inbound and outbound traffic,” he says. “Today it’s for companies using Gmail, but we expect to extend this to instant messaging, the Web and the rest of Google Apps, like Google Spreadsheets.”&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Speaking At Oracle OpenWorld Tomorrow (Wednesday)</title><link>/blog/speaking-at-oracle-openworld-tomorrow-wednesday/</link><pubDate>Tue, 13 Nov 2007 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/speaking-at-oracle-openworld-tomorrow-wednesday/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I’ll be on the “Threats Jeopardy” panel at 11:15 over in &lt;a href="http://www.ybca.org/visit/"&gt;Yerba Buena Theater&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Meetings are booked up for the day, but I’ll be back in the area on the 29th.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>It’s The Enforcement, Not The Penalties</title><link>/blog/its-the-enforcement-not-the-penalties/</link><pubDate>Mon, 12 Nov 2007 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/its-the-enforcement-not-the-penalties/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Amrit Williams dropped a &lt;a href="http://techbuddha.wordpress.com/2007/11/11/federal-wiretapping-law-used-to-indict-botnet-operator/"&gt;post on some of the new cases, and new penalties, for certain kinds of cybercrime&lt;/a&gt;. In it he states:&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Remember- Today Is Veteran’s Day</title><link>/blog/remember-today-is-veterans-day/</link><pubDate>Mon, 12 Nov 2007 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/remember-today-is-veterans-day/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;This isn’t a shopping holiday. It’s time to give thanks to those who defend us all, regardless of your feelings towards any officials (elected or otherwise).&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Data Protection Isn’t A Network Security Or Endpoint Problem</title><link>/blog/data-protection-isnt-a-network-security-or-endpoint-problem/</link><pubDate>Fri, 09 Nov 2007 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/data-protection-isnt-a-network-security-or-endpoint-problem/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I woke up in a pretty good mood this morning. First of all, it’s Friday and I can just feel the weekend oozing around the corners of the neighborhood. Sure, every day is either a Friday or a Monday when you’re self employed, but there’s still something special about the official weekend.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>(Updated) DLP Acquisitions: The Good, The Bad, And The Whatever</title><link>/blog/updated-dlp-acquisitions-the-good-the-bad-and-the-whatever/</link><pubDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2007 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/updated-dlp-acquisitions-the-good-the-bad-and-the-whatever/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;Updated-&lt;/em&gt; &lt;em&gt;based on a challenge in email, and redoing some math, I’m going out on a limb and revising my market projections down. My best guess is the market will do closer to $80M this year, unless Q4 is unusually strong.&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>DLP Acquisitions: The Good, The Bad, And The Whatever</title><link>/blog/dlp-acquisitions-the-good-the-bad-and-the-whatever/</link><pubDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2007 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/dlp-acquisitions-the-good-the-bad-and-the-whatever/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I’ve been covering the Data Loss Prevention/Content Monitoring and Filtering space pretty much since before it existed and it’s been pretty wild to watch a market grow from it’s inception to early mainstream. It’s also a weird experience to stand on the sidelines and watch as all the incredibly hard work of contacts in various vendors finally pays off.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Off Topic: SSL Certificate Updated</title><link>/blog/off-topic-ssl-certificate-updated/</link><pubDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2007 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/off-topic-ssl-certificate-updated/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Sorry it took me so long, but the cert is updated for the next 3 years and set to the correct domain name.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Help Build The Best IPFW Firewall Rules Sets Ever</title><link>/blog/help-build-the-best-ipfw-firewall-rules-sets-ever/</link><pubDate>Wed, 07 Nov 2007 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/help-build-the-best-ipfw-firewall-rules-sets-ever/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Updated: See &lt;a href="https://securosis.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/11/ipfw-securosis.txt"&gt;https://securosis.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/11/ipfw-securosis.txt&lt;/a&gt;. I need to completely thank and acknowledge windexh8er for suggesting this post in the &lt;a href="http://securosis.com/2007/11/01/investigating-the-leopard-firewall/"&gt;comments on the Leopard firewall post&lt;/a&gt;, and providing the starting content. In his (or her) own words:&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Leopard Firewall- Apple Documents And Potentially Good News</title><link>/blog/leopard-firewall-apple-documents-and-potentially-good-news/</link><pubDate>Wed, 07 Nov 2007 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/leopard-firewall-apple-documents-and-potentially-good-news/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Updated: See &lt;a href="http://securosis.com/2007/11/15/ipfw-rules/"&gt;http://securosis.com/2007/11/15/ipfw-rules/&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Thanks to an email from John Baxter via &lt;a href="http://www.macintouch.com/"&gt;MacInTouch&lt;/a&gt;, it looks like Apple &lt;a href="http://docs.info.apple.com/article.html?artnum=306938"&gt;posted some documentation on the new firewall&lt;/a&gt; that contains some really good news:&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Network Security Podcast, Episode 83</title><link>/blog/network-security-podcast-episode-83/</link><pubDate>Wed, 07 Nov 2007 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/network-security-podcast-episode-83/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Martin returns in this episode as we discuss a bunch of totally unrelated security news, from security camera screen savers to breaking into data centers with movie-style techniques:&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Dark Reading Column Up- Tylenol As A Breach Disclosure</title><link>/blog/dark-reading-column-up-tylenol-as-a-breach-disclosure/</link><pubDate>Tue, 06 Nov 2007 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/dark-reading-column-up-tylenol-as-a-breach-disclosure/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;My first semi-regular column is up over at Dark Reading, “&lt;a href="http://www.darkreading.com/document.asp?doc_id=138130"&gt;Lea ing From Tylenol&lt;/a&gt;”.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Ignore the background stuff on me in the beginning that I had to write; the meat starts about a third of the way through.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Understanding And Selecting A Database Activity Monitoring Solution: Part 2, Technical Architecture</title><link>/blog/understanding-and-selecting-a-database-activity-monitoring-solution-part-2-technical-architecture/</link><pubDate>Tue, 06 Nov 2007 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/understanding-and-selecting-a-database-activity-monitoring-solution-part-2-technical-architecture/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;In Part 1 of our series we introduced Database Activity Monitoring (DAM) and discussed some of its use cases. In this post we’ll discuss current technical architectures.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Heading to San Francisco</title><link>/blog/heading-to-san-francisco/</link><pubDate>Mon, 05 Nov 2007 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/heading-to-san-francisco/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;It’s a bit last minute, but I’ll be out in San Francisco next week for a panel at &lt;a href="http://www.oracle.com/openworld/2007/index.html"&gt;Oracle OpenWorld&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I’m still working on my plans, but the panel is on Wednesday the 14th. I’m trying to decide how long to stay, so if you’re interested in meeting drop me a line…&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>It’s Official- Symantec Really Buying Vontu</title><link>/blog/its-official-symantec-really-buying-vontu/</link><pubDate>Mon, 05 Nov 2007 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/its-official-symantec-really-buying-vontu/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;From the &lt;a href="http://vontu.com/news/releases/595_release.asp"&gt;press release&lt;/a&gt;:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;CUPERTINO, Calif. – November 5, 2007 – Symantec Corp. (Nasdaq: SYMC) today announced it has signed a definitive agreement to acquire Vontu, the leader in Data Loss Prevention (DLP) solutions, for $350 million, which will be paid in cash and assumed options. The acquisition is expected to close in the fourth calendar quarter of 2007, subject to receiving regulatory approvals and satisfaction of other customary closing conditions.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>TidBITS Article on Leopard Up</title><link>/blog/tidbits-article-on-leopard-up/</link><pubDate>Mon, 05 Nov 2007 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/tidbits-article-on-leopard-up/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;You Apple geeks may have noticed I’ve been writing more over at &lt;a href="http://db.tidbits.com/"&gt;TidBITS&lt;/a&gt;, that’s where I tend to put my less-technical Mac articles, especially those that aren’t about security.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Understanding And Selecting A DLP Solution: Part 7, The Selection Process</title><link>/blog/understanding-and-selecting-a-dlp-solution-part-7-the-selection-process/</link><pubDate>Mon, 05 Nov 2007 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/understanding-and-selecting-a-dlp-solution-part-7-the-selection-process/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Welcome to the last part of our series on understanding and selecting a data loss prevention/content monitoring and filtering solution. Over the past 6 entries we’ve focused on the different components of solutions and the technologies that underlie them. Today, we’ll close the series with recommendations on how to run the selection process and pick the right solution for your organization.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Investigating the Leopard Firewall</title><link>/blog/investigating-the-leopard-firewall/</link><pubDate>Thu, 01 Nov 2007 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/investigating-the-leopard-firewall/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Updated: See &lt;a href="http://securosis.com/2007/11/15/ipfw-rules/"&gt;http://securosis.com/2007/11/15/ipfw-rules/&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I just spent entirely too much time digging into the Leopard firewall, and here’s what I’ve found. The less geeky version will be out on TidBITS (probably tomorrow); this is just the summary of actual behavior:&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Leopard Firewall + Code Signing Breaks Skype (And Other Applications)</title><link>/blog/leopard-firewall-code-signing-breaks-skype-and-other-applications/</link><pubDate>Thu, 01 Nov 2007 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/leopard-firewall-code-signing-breaks-skype-and-other-applications/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I’m almost done with my deeper review of the firewall, but discovered something ugly in the process of podcasting and firewall testing.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Good SSL Resources, And A Congrats To Chris Pepper</title><link>/blog/good-ssl-resources-and-a-congrats-to-chris-pepper/</link><pubDate>Wed, 31 Oct 2007 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/good-ssl-resources-and-a-congrats-to-chris-pepper/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;From Chris Pepper:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;ol&gt;
&lt;li&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.reppep.com/~pepper/writing/tidbits/ssl-article/"&gt;His TidBITS article on SSL&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A post on some &lt;a href="http://www.extrapepperoni.com/2007/10/28/openssl-handy-commands/"&gt;handy commands&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ol&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Chris is my first resource when I need help with the command line.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Network Security Podcast, Episode 82: The Scary Halloween/Mac Episode</title><link>/blog/network-security-podcast-episode-82-the-scary-halloween-mac-episode/</link><pubDate>Wed, 31 Oct 2007 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/network-security-podcast-episode-82-the-scary-halloween-mac-episode/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Okay, it’s not that scary, other than the fact Martin isn’t even in the episode this week. That’s right, I flew solo and invited Glenn Fleishman from &lt;a href="http://db.tidbits.com/"&gt;TidBITS&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href="http://wifinetnews.com/"&gt;Wi-Fi Networking News &lt;/a&gt;to join me in an episode dedicated to the security issues around the release of Mac OS X 10.5 Leopard.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Short DLP Article Up At Network World</title><link>/blog/short-dlp-article-up-at-network-world/</link><pubDate>Wed, 31 Oct 2007 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/short-dlp-article-up-at-network-world/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Just a quick note that I have a &lt;a href="http://www.networkworld.com/columnists/2007/102907insider.html?fsrc=rss-security"&gt;short article up on Network World on DLP&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I answered the question, “With all the recent news about acquisitions in the DLP space, I’m unsure if now is the time to select a solution or if I should wait. How can I tell the right time to get into DLP?”&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>The Insider Threat Will Eat Your Babies</title><link>/blog/the-insider-threat-will-eat-your-babies/</link><pubDate>Wed, 31 Oct 2007 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/the-insider-threat-will-eat-your-babies/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I was reading &lt;a href="http://taosecurity.blogspot.com/2007/10/wake-up-corporate-america.html"&gt;this post by Richard Bejtlich&lt;/a&gt; and it reminded me of a little pet peeve.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;It seems some people out there criticize Richard for focusing more on external threats than the big bad, “internal threat”. I’ll admit I used to use the term frequently when I was a little naive, but I finally realized it became code for “scary stuff you’ll never be able to protect yourself from without spending a lot of money on our products.”&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Quick Leopard Update</title><link>/blog/quick-leopard-update/</link><pubDate>Mon, 29 Oct 2007 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/quick-leopard-update/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;We have some guests in town so it will be a couple more days until I’m back to the regular blogging schedule, but I did manage to install Leopard this weekend.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>DLP Happenings: Trend Grabs Provilla</title><link>/blog/dlp-happenings-trend-grabs-provilla/</link><pubDate>Thu, 25 Oct 2007 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/dlp-happenings-trend-grabs-provilla/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.eweek.com/article2/0,1759,2207358,00.asp?kc=EWRSS03129TX1K0000614"&gt;Good news for Provilla&lt;/a&gt;, but this one could go either way on the whole good/bad scale.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I’d heard some good things about Provilla’s technology, but if Trend thinks they can solve this with an endpoint-only solution they won’t succeed and those with hybrid solutions will trounce them. Thoroughly.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Twitter For Disasters</title><link>/blog/twitter-for-disasters/</link><pubDate>Thu, 25 Oct 2007 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/twitter-for-disasters/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;It hasn’t taken long, but I’m a Twitter convert. I didn’t realize how useful a short-message broadcast tool could be, especially one linked to mobile phones and IM with a persistent web page. No, I don’t really care what people are eating for lunch, but as &lt;a href="http://blog.wired.com/27bstroke6/2007/10/in-disasters-ev.html"&gt;Threat Level reports, it’s become amazingly useful in dealing with the California fires&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Information Security vs. Information Survivability: Retaking Our Vocabulary</title><link>/blog/information-security-vs-information-survivability-retaking-our-vocabulary/</link><pubDate>Wed, 24 Oct 2007 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/information-security-vs-information-survivability-retaking-our-vocabulary/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Chris Hoff and I (and a few others, like &lt;a href="http://www.iplocks.com:80/blog/2007/10/11/1192135560000.html"&gt;Adrian Lane&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href="http://1raindrop.typepad.com/1_raindrop/2007/10/network-securit.html"&gt;Gu&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://1raindrop.typepad.com/1_raindrop/2007/10/network-securit.html"&gt;er Peterson&lt;/a&gt;) have started waxing philosophic quite a bit lately. From debates over Jericho to&lt;a href="http://securosis.com/2007/10/17/an-optimistically-fatalistic-view-on-the-futility-of-security/"&gt; emotional rants on staying motivated in security&lt;/a&gt;, to the security vs. survivability debate, we’ve strayed from our more practical advice and wandered into the land of coffee shops, security jazz, and stupid black berets on our heads.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>What Drives Security Innovation?</title><link>/blog/what-drives-security-innovation/</link><pubDate>Tue, 23 Oct 2007 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/what-drives-security-innovation/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;According to the time tracking feature of my Wii (which you can’t disable, nice parental feature), I played 3 hours and 46 minutes of Guitar Hero III last night after picking it up at Target. I have to fully admit I was skeptical of the whole Guitar Hero thing when it first came out, but it’s incredibly addictive. And not just when I’m drunk at a Christmas party. Not that I’d drink at a Christmas party and play video games. That wouldn’t be proper behavior for a non-practicing Jew.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Data Security Lifecycle- Technologies, Part 2</title><link>/blog/data-security-lifecycle-technologies-part-2/</link><pubDate>Mon, 22 Oct 2007 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/data-security-lifecycle-technologies-part-2/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;In our &lt;a href="http://securosis.com/2007/10/04/data-security-lifecycle-technologies-part-1/"&gt;last post on this topic&lt;/a&gt; we covered the technologies that encompass the Create and Store stages of the &lt;a href="http://securosis.com/2007/09/24/the-data-security-lifecycle-beta-1/"&gt;Data Security Lifecycle&lt;/a&gt;. Today we’ll detail out the tools for Use and Share.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Latest TidBITS Article Posted- Leopard Security</title><link>/blog/latest-tidbits-article-posted-leopard-security/</link><pubDate>Mon, 22 Oct 2007 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/latest-tidbits-article-posted-leopard-security/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I just posted &lt;a href="http://db.tidbits.com/article/9251"&gt;an explanation of Leopard Security (that’s Mac OS X 10.5 for you non-Apple geeks) up on TidBITS&lt;/a&gt;. It’s based on my &lt;a href="http://securosis.com/2007/10/16/mac-security-updates-in-os-x-105-leopard/"&gt;original blog post here&lt;/a&gt;, but expanded and simplified to appeal to a more general audience.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Vormetric Encrypts IBM Databases. Sort Of.</title><link>/blog/vormetric-encrypts-ibm-databases-sort-of/</link><pubDate>Fri, 19 Oct 2007 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/vormetric-encrypts-ibm-databases-sort-of/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.easyir.com/easyir/prssrel.do?easyirid=783DCFD251E65B75&amp;amp;version=live&amp;amp;prid=317060&amp;amp;releasejsp=release_13"&gt;IBM and Vormetric announces a deal yesterday&lt;/a&gt; where… well, I’ll let them say it:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;LAS VEGAS, NV – (MARKET WIRE) – 10/18/2007 – Vormetric, Inc. today announced that it has partnered with IBM to deliver database encryption capabilities for DB2 on Windows, Linux and Unix. IBM will offer Vormetric’s highly acclaimed data security solution as part of its data server portfolio, addressing customer demand for increased protection of sensitive data. This new capability is delivered in IBM Database Encryption Expert, initially available for the new DB2 9.5 “Viper 2” data server.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Network Security Podcast, Episode 81</title><link>/blog/network-security-podcast-episode-81/</link><pubDate>Thu, 18 Oct 2007 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/network-security-podcast-episode-81/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Martin is on the road starting up his new job as a PCI auditor for Trustwave so I made my best attempt to record the podcast. More than a few technical difficulties later, we finally completed recording. Sorry about the extra reverb, I’m still figuring out my setup and accidentally left it a little high. For the record, Audio Hijack Pro rocks and I regret trying to record without it.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>When Software Bugs Kill: Robotic Cannon Kills 9</title><link>/blog/when-software-bugs-kill-robotic-cannon-kills-9/</link><pubDate>Thu, 18 Oct 2007 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/when-software-bugs-kill-robotic-cannon-kills-9/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;No, this isn’t science fiction. According to Wired’s Danger Room, an &lt;a href="http://blog.wired.com/defense/2007/10/robot-cannon-ki.html"&gt;automatic defense system went out of control in South Africa&lt;/a&gt; during a live fire exercise. Nine soldiers lost their lives, and fourteen were injured.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>An Optimistically Fatalistic View Of The Futility Of Security</title><link>/blog/an-optimistically-fatalistic-view-of-the-futility-of-security/</link><pubDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2007 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/an-optimistically-fatalistic-view-of-the-futility-of-security/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Hoff (and some others) &lt;a href="http://rationalsecurity.typepad.com/blog/2007/10/sacred-cows-mea.html"&gt;have been talking a lot about hope&lt;/a&gt; and the future.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Chris has dedicated most of his recent posts to making us think differently about security. To drop our archaic models of the past and look towards solutions for the future. It’s a noble goal, one I support completely. Dr. Eugene Spafford, a seminal figure in information security, is also &lt;a href="http://www.cerias.purdue.edu/weblogs/spaf/kudos-opinions-rants/post-124/solving-some-of-the-wrong-problems/"&gt;dedicating effort to the cause&lt;/a&gt;. I’m firmly in their camp and believe that while we don’t need an entirely new model for security, we definitely need to evolve. Information Security has been little more than basic network security and antivirus ever since Code Red and Melissa hit.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Apple Opening iPhone!!! Still Scared Of Evil Hax0rs.</title><link>/blog/apple-opening-iphone-still-scared-of-evil-hax0rs/</link><pubDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2007 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/apple-opening-iphone-still-scared-of-evil-hax0rs/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Honey? My Blackberry broke. What? I don’t know, it just stopped working. Yeah, I know it looks like it fell off the roof, but I don’t know how that could have happened.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Flashback To 2005- Home Depot and Iron Mountain Lose Laptops And Tapes; Another Encryption Rant</title><link>/blog/flashback-to-2005-home-depot-and-iron-mountain-lose-laptops-and-tapes-another-encryption-rant/</link><pubDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2007 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/flashback-to-2005-home-depot-and-iron-mountain-lose-laptops-and-tapes-another-encryption-rant/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;This is such a straightforward problem to solve it’s annoying that it &lt;a href="http://searchsecurity.techtarget.com/originalContent/0,289142,sid14_gci1277471,00.html?track=sy160&amp;amp;asrc=RSS_RSS-10_160"&gt;still makes the headlines&lt;/a&gt;. Laptop and tape encryption are the low hanging fruit of data security. Not that they are click-box easy, but it’s pretty straightforward for most organizations to protect this stuff.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Product News And Two Misjudgments I’ve Made On DLP (Reconnex and Vontu)</title><link>/blog/product-news-and-two-misjudgments-ive-made-on-dlp-reconnex-and-vontu/</link><pubDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2007 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/product-news-and-two-misjudgments-ive-made-on-dlp-reconnex-and-vontu/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;One of the reasons I spend so much time talking about DLP around here is that it’s one of the first markets I covered as an analyst and I’ve been able to watch it grow from the start.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Up On Twitter</title><link>/blog/up-on-twitter/</link><pubDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2007 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/up-on-twitter/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;As &lt;a href="http://twitter.com/rmogull"&gt;rmogull&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Adam Engst got me started &lt;a href="http://db.tidbits.com/article/9228"&gt;with this article&lt;/a&gt;. Seems more useful than I expected. I’ve added it to the contact links on the home page of the blog.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Mac Security Updates In OS X 10.5</title><link>/blog/mac-security-updates-in-os-x-10-5/</link><pubDate>Tue, 16 Oct 2007 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/mac-security-updates-in-os-x-10-5/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Apple has finally released the full list of updates in the next version of the Mac operating system, including a &lt;a href="http://www.apple.com/macosx/features/300.html#security"&gt;section detailing all the security updates&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Metasploit Includes Exploit For iPhone 1.1.1- Using Same Vulnerability As Jailbreak</title><link>/blog/metasploit-includes-exploit-for-iphone-1-1-1-using-same-vulnerability-as-jailbreak/</link><pubDate>Tue, 16 Oct 2007 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/metasploit-includes-exploit-for-iphone-1-1-1-using-same-vulnerability-as-jailbreak/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;H D Moore &lt;a href="http://blog.metasploit.com/2007/10/cracking-iphone-part-21.html"&gt;published details on exploiting the iPhone&lt;/a&gt; today using the same vulnerability as the jailbreaks/unlockers. It takes advantage of a vulnerability in the libtiff library for processing TIFF image files.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>The Irish Government Needs Database Activity Monitoring</title><link>/blog/the-irish-government-needs-database-activity-monitoring/</link><pubDate>Tue, 16 Oct 2007 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/the-irish-government-needs-database-activity-monitoring/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Over at &lt;a href="http://www.boingboing.net/2007/10/15/irish-bureaucrats-ra.html"&gt;BoingBoing they have&lt;/a&gt; a&lt;a href="http://www.boingboing.net/2007/10/16/more-irish-bureaucra.html"&gt; couple of articles&lt;/a&gt; describing how Irish government employees are abusing their access to government systems for personal gain. Everything from idle curiosity about a neighbor, to aiding and abetting burglary.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Understanding And Selecting A DLP Solution: Part 6, Central Administration, Policy Management, and W</title><link>/blog/understanding-and-selecting-a-dlp-solution-part-6-central-administration-policy-management-and-w/</link><pubDate>Tue, 16 Oct 2007 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/understanding-and-selecting-a-dlp-solution-part-6-central-administration-policy-management-and-w/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Welcome to the second to last post in my series on DLP. You can find the other parts here: &lt;a href="http://securosis.com/2007/09/07/understanding-and-selecting-a-data-loss-prevention-dlpcmfcmp-solution-part-1/"&gt;Part 1&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://securosis.com/2007/09/13/understanding-and-selecting-a-dlp-solution-part-2-content-awareness/"&gt;Part 2&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://securosis.com/2007/09/18/understanding-and-selecting-a-dlp-solution-part-3-data-in-motion-technical-architecture/"&gt;Part 3&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://securosis.com/2007/10/02/understanding-and-selecting-a-dlp-solution-part-4-data-at-rest-technical-architecture/"&gt;Part 4&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://securosis.com/2007/10/08/understanding-and-selecting-a-dlp-solution-part-5-data-in-use-endpoint-technical-architecture/"&gt;Part 5.&lt;/a&gt; In this post we’ll be covering the major features of the central management server. Our final post will cover recommendations for evaluating and selecting the best tool for your environment.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Trust Your Tools. Use Your Head.</title><link>/blog/trust-your-tools-use-your-head/</link><pubDate>Mon, 15 Oct 2007 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/trust-your-tools-use-your-head/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;This weekend I was doing a little electrical work at my house, which is probably the riskiest area of Do-It-Yourself home repair. You only need to cross a couple of live AC wires once and see the “pop” (and smell the ozone) before the point hits home.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Securosis Announces Increase In Cybercrime</title><link>/blog/securosis-announces-increase-in-cybercrime/</link><pubDate>Fri, 12 Oct 2007 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/securosis-announces-increase-in-cybercrime/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;October 12, 2007, Phoenix, AZ&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Securosis, L.L.C., the world’s leading provider of security consulting services, announces that cybercrime has reached record levels since the dawn of history.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Securosis Now Protected With Quantum Cryptography</title><link>/blog/securosis-now-protected-with-quantum-cryptography/</link><pubDate>Fri, 12 Oct 2007 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/securosis-now-protected-with-quantum-cryptography/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;October 12, 2007, Phoenix, AZ&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Securosis, the world’s leading security blog, is proud to announce that it is now being protected by quantum cryptography.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Symantec to Acquire Vontu (According To InfoWorld)</title><link>/blog/symantec-to-acquire-vontu-according-to-infoworld/</link><pubDate>Fri, 12 Oct 2007 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/symantec-to-acquire-vontu-according-to-infoworld/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://securosis.com/2007/10/02/movement-in-the-dlp-market/"&gt;Remember this post&lt;/a&gt;?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;If &lt;a href="http://www.infoworld.com/printthis/article/07/10/12/Symantec-to-buy-DLP-specialist-Vontu_1.html"&gt;InfoWorld is accurate, Symantec will announce next week&lt;/a&gt; that they are acquiring Vontu. This would be consistent with the industry rumors that inspired my earlier post. I have no inside knowledge of this deal. The article states:&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Understanding And Selecting A Database Activity Monitoring Solution: Part 1, Introduction</title><link>/blog/understanding-and-selecting-a-database-activity-monitoring-solution-part-1-introduction/</link><pubDate>Fri, 12 Oct 2007 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/understanding-and-selecting-a-database-activity-monitoring-solution-part-1-introduction/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Database Activity Monitoring may not carry the same burden of hype as Data Loss Prevention, but it is one of the most significant data and application security tools on the market. With an estimated market size of $40M last year, and predictions of $60M to $80M this year, it rivals DLP in spending. Database Activity Monitoring also carries the best DAM acronym in the industry&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Off Topic: Whoa- This Is Worse For The Record Industry Than Pirating Ever Could Be</title><link>/blog/off-topic-whoa-this-is-worse-for-the-record-industry-than-pirating-ever-could-be/</link><pubDate>Thu, 11 Oct 2007 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/off-topic-whoa-this-is-worse-for-the-record-industry-than-pirating-ever-could-be/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;As my readers know, I’m &lt;a href="http://securosis.com/2006/11/26/are-consumer-drm-and-consumer-security-compatible/"&gt;not the biggest fan of consumer DRM&lt;/a&gt;. I hate being treated like a criminal when I’m not, and I don’t believe anyone has the right to control more of my systems than I do. Something about &lt;a href="http://securosis.com/2006/11/26/are-consumer-drm-and-consumer-security-compatible/"&gt;my security being compromised&lt;/a&gt; to provide better security for some corporate entity whose products I may or may not purchase just bugs me.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>On Trust</title><link>/blog/on-trust/</link><pubDate>Thu, 11 Oct 2007 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/on-trust/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I was &lt;a href="http://layer8.itsecuritygeek.com/index/layer8/we-want-your-information-to-be-free/"&gt;reading a post over at Layer8&lt;/a&gt; and it got me thinking about trust. Shrdlu attended a talk by Larry Ponemon where he took away this little tidbit:&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Everything You Need To Know About Security And Risk Is In This Post (Humor)</title><link>/blog/everything-you-need-to-know-about-security-and-risk-is-in-this-post-humor/</link><pubDate>Wed, 10 Oct 2007 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/everything-you-need-to-know-about-security-and-risk-is-in-this-post-humor/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.guerilla-ciso.com/archives/268"&gt;Meerkat Manor, via the Guerilla CISO&lt;/a&gt;. Here’s an excerpt:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;09 October 2007: Dear diary, I drew sentry duty for the third day this week. I know it’s my solemn duty to protect the clan, but my risk assessment has determined that, although a predator is a high-impact event, it is a low rate-of-occurance activity and so I think a better use of my time is in foraging for stray eggs. Besides, if the predators come and eat us all, it’s not like I’ll have to face the Meerkat Manor Board of Directors. 10 October 2007: Dear diary, I grow tired of the incessant looking for predators. I mean, why do us meerkats focus exclusively on detective controls which use up to 15% of our available manpower when we could just as easily reduce the sentries to 5% of our efforts and put in place corrective controls such as trap holes and punji sticks to reduce the threats to our home? The true cost savings is that the effort for corrective controls is a one-time installation where sentry duty is a recurring bill. Didn”t the alpha-pair learn anything in their Masters in Meerkat Administration classes? 11 October 2007: Dear diary, today I instituted a metrics program to gauge the effectiveness of our sentry program and to determine if we are getting the best level of risk for the time that we are investing. So far, I”ve made a bar chart to analyze the total number of predator alerts versus the total number of predator intrusions. I think I have a business case to slowly reduce the ratio of sentries to foragers during the day.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Network Security Podcast: Episode 80</title><link>/blog/network-security-podcast-episode-80/</link><pubDate>Wed, 10 Oct 2007 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/network-security-podcast-episode-80/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Once again Martin and I recorded late enough in the day that I could enjoy a fine beer during the taping (Moose Drool this week). I also need to shout out to &lt;a href="http://pauldotcom.com/"&gt;Paul and Larry and Pauldotcom Security Weekly&lt;/a&gt;; based on their advice I picked up a WRTSL54GS for some wireless access point hacking. Too bad I bricked it… by opening the box. Needless to say that one is on its way back to the online store, and a new one is headed to me. I’ve been working on this pet project of mine for a year and really hope this is the right box to get the job done.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Practical Data Classification: Type 1, The Hasty Classification</title><link>/blog/practical-data-classification-type-1-the-hasty-classification/</link><pubDate>Wed, 10 Oct 2007 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/practical-data-classification-type-1-the-hasty-classification/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;In over thirteen years with mountain rescue and five years as a ski patroller I participated in countless search and avalanche drills, and a fair number of real incidents. Search in the real world, as in the computing world, is difficult due to the need to balance performance with thoroughness. In a rescue situation you need to find the victim as quickly as possible; a thorough search has a higher Probability of Detection (POD), but takes longer. Assuming you’re looking for a live victim this time can mean the difference between a rescue and a recovery.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Product Happenings: Guardium, SafeBoot, Palo Alto, and Vontu</title><link>/blog/product-happenings-guardium-safeboot-palo-alto-and-vontu/</link><pubDate>Wed, 10 Oct 2007 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/product-happenings-guardium-safeboot-palo-alto-and-vontu/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Despite my departure from the analyst world, thanks to the blog some of the vendors out there are still keeping me updated on their products. I also still have to track big swaths of the market to support my consulting work. While I don’t intend to this blog to just spew PR dribble, I do see some cool stuff every now and then that’s worth mentioning.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>The Five Problems With Data Classification, And Introduction To Practical Data Classification</title><link>/blog/the-five-problems-with-data-classification-and-introduction-to-practical-data-classification/</link><pubDate>Wed, 10 Oct 2007 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/the-five-problems-with-data-classification-and-introduction-to-practical-data-classification/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Data classification is one of the most essential tools of data security. It enables us to leverage business priorities into technical and physical controls over the management and protection of data. Applying data security controls without data classification is like trying to protect a pile of cash in an open field filled with piles of leaves by air dropping concrete barricades from 10,000 feet. At night.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Encryption: The Maginot Line of Data Security</title><link>/blog/encryption-the-maginot-line-of-data-security/</link><pubDate>Tue, 09 Oct 2007 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/encryption-the-maginot-line-of-data-security/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;History is a funny thing. It’s amazing that what many children see in early schooling as a boring collection of facts is neither boring nor factual. On a good day we might get some dates correct, but there isn’t a “fact” in history that isn’t open to interpretation. This is as it should be; think about all the factors that went into a major life decision- say a marriage or picking your college. Now distill everything involved in that decision into a paragraph, stick it in a drawer for a couple decades, pull it out, and see if it still matches your memories and accurately reflects the situation. If you don’t have a few decades to spare, the answer is, “it doesn’t.”&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Some Answers for Jeremiah: Website Vulnerabilities</title><link>/blog/some-answers-for-jeremiah-website-vulnerabilities/</link><pubDate>Tue, 09 Oct 2007 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/some-answers-for-jeremiah-website-vulnerabilities/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Jeremiah &lt;a href="http://jeremiahgrossman.blogspot.com/2007/10/some-unanswered-website-vulnerability.html"&gt;posted these questions&lt;/a&gt; on dealing with website vulnerabilities. Here are my quick answers (I have to run- sorry for the lack of links, but you can Google the examples):&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Understanding and Selecting a DLP Solution: Part 5, Data-In-Use (Endpoint) Technical Architecture</title><link>/blog/understanding-and-selecting-a-dlp-solution-part-5-data-in-use-endpoint-technical-architecture/</link><pubDate>Mon, 08 Oct 2007 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/understanding-and-selecting-a-dlp-solution-part-5-data-in-use-endpoint-technical-architecture/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Welcome to Part 5 of our series on DLP/CMF/CMP; look here for: &lt;a href="http://securosis.com/2007/09/07/understanding-and-selecting-a-data-loss-prevention-dlpcmfcmp-solution-part-1/"&gt;Part 1&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://securosis.com/2007/09/13/understanding-and-selecting-a-dlp-solution-part-2-content-awareness/"&gt;Part 2&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://securosis.com/2007/09/18/understanding-and-selecting-a-dlp-solution-part-3-data-in-motion-technical-architecture/"&gt;Part 3&lt;/a&gt;, and &lt;a href="http://securosis.com/2007/10/02/understanding-and-selecting-a-dlp-solution-part-4-data-at-rest-technical-architecture/"&gt;Part 4&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I like to describe the evolution of the DLP/CMF market as a series of questions a CEO/CIO asks the CISO/SGIC (Security Guy In Charge). It runs something like this:&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Retailers B*tch Slap PCI Security Standards Council, If You Believe Them</title><link>/blog/retailers-btch-slap-pci-security-standards-council-if-you-believe-them/</link><pubDate>Fri, 05 Oct 2007 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/retailers-btch-slap-pci-security-standards-council-if-you-believe-them/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;From &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/SecurityBytes/~3/165730575/"&gt;Bill Brenner at TechTarget &lt;/a&gt;(who never calls anymore now that I’m independent- where’s the love?).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;From the letter, written by NRF Chief Information Officer David Hogan: “All of us – merchants, banks, credit card companies and our customers – want to eliminate credit card fraud. But if the goal is to make credit card data less vulnerable, the ultimate solution is to stop requiring merchants to store card data in the first place. With this letter, we are officially putting the credit card industry on notice. Instead of making the industry jump through hoops to create an impenetrable fortress, retailers want to eliminate the incentive for hackers to break into their systems in the first place.” The letter notes that credit card companies typically require retailers to store credit card numbers anywhere from one year to 18 months to satisfy card company retrieval requests. According to NRF, retailers should have a choice as to whether or not they want to store credit card numbers at all.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Slashdot Bias And Much Ado About Nothing (PGP Encryption Issue)</title><link>/blog/slashdot-bias-and-much-ado-about-nothing-pgp-encryption-issue/</link><pubDate>Fri, 05 Oct 2007 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/slashdot-bias-and-much-ado-about-nothing-pgp-encryption-issue/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I’m sitting here working out of the library (it’s closer to the bars for happy hour), when &lt;a href="http://it.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=07/10/04/1639224&amp;amp;from=rss"&gt;a headline on Slashdot&lt;/a&gt; catches my eye:&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Data Security Lifecycle- Technologies, Part 1</title><link>/blog/data-security-lifecycle-technologies-part-1/</link><pubDate>Thu, 04 Oct 2007 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/data-security-lifecycle-technologies-part-1/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;A week or so ago I published the &lt;a href="http://securosis.com/2007/09/24/the-data-security-lifecycle-beta-1/"&gt;Data Security Lifecycle&lt;/a&gt;, and so far the feedback has been very positive. The lifecycle is a high-level list of controls, but now we need to dig into the technologies to support those controls.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Network Security Podcast, Episode 79: SCADA!</title><link>/blog/network-security-podcast-episode-79-scada/</link><pubDate>Wed, 03 Oct 2007 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/network-security-podcast-episode-79-scada/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Martin and I finally recorded our first podcast in the wee hours of the afternoon, improving both our coherence and my ability to have a beer. There were a few technical difficulties so the quality is a little off, and we’re working on figuring out how to record with high quality across state lines.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Off Topic: Must See Video On The FCC</title><link>/blog/off-topic-must-see-video-on-the-fcc/</link><pubDate>Wed, 03 Oct 2007 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/off-topic-must-see-video-on-the-fcc/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I just saw this over at &lt;a href="http://radar.oreilly.com/archives/2007/09/penn_and_teller.html"&gt;O’Reilly Radar&lt;/a&gt; (they &lt;a href="http://lists.elistx.com/archives/interesting-people/200709/maillist.html"&gt;picked it up here&lt;/a&gt;). It’s short segment from Penn &amp;amp; Teller, probably a little old, and a must-see.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Home Security Tip: Nuke It From Orbit</title><link>/blog/home-security-tip-nuke-it-from-orbit/</link><pubDate>Tue, 02 Oct 2007 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/home-security-tip-nuke-it-from-orbit/</guid><description>&lt;blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I say we take off and nuke the entire site from orbit. It’s the only way to be sure. -Ripley (Sigourney Weaver) in &lt;em&gt;Aliens&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Movement In The DLP Market?</title><link>/blog/movement-in-the-dlp-market/</link><pubDate>Tue, 02 Oct 2007 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/movement-in-the-dlp-market/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Rumors are a major deal in the DLP market might drop soon. As in an acquisition.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Being just a rumor I’ll keep the names to myself for now, but it’s an interesting development. One that will probably stir the market and maybe get things moving, even if the acquisition itself fails.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Understanding and Selecting a DLP Solution: Part 4, Data-At-Rest Technical Architecture</title><link>/blog/understanding-and-selecting-a-dlp-solution-part-4-data-at-rest-technical-architecture/</link><pubDate>Tue, 02 Oct 2007 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/understanding-and-selecting-a-dlp-solution-part-4-data-at-rest-technical-architecture/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Welcome to part 4 of our series on Data Loss Prevention/Content Monitoring and Filtering solutions. If you’re new to the series, you should check out &lt;a href="http://securosis.com/2007/09/07/understanding-and-selecting-a-data-loss-prevention-dlpcmfcmp-solution-part-1/"&gt;Part 1&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://securosis.com/2007/09/13/understanding-and-selecting-a-dlp-solution-part-2-content-awareness/"&gt;Part 2&lt;/a&gt;, and &lt;a href="http://securosis.com/2007/09/18/understanding-and-selecting-a-dlp-solution-part-3-data-in-motion-technical-architecture/"&gt;Part 3&lt;/a&gt; first.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Woops- Comments Should Really Be Open Now</title><link>/blog/woops-comments-should-really-be-open-now/</link><pubDate>Tue, 02 Oct 2007 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/woops-comments-should-really-be-open-now/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;A while back I opened up the comments so you didn’t have to register, but somewhere along the lines that setting was reset.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Lessons On Software Updates: Microsoft and Apple Both Muck It Up</title><link>/blog/lessons-on-software-updates-microsoft-and-apple-both-muck-it-up/</link><pubDate>Mon, 01 Oct 2007 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/lessons-on-software-updates-microsoft-and-apple-both-muck-it-up/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I know this is going to sound intensely weird, or somewhat disturbing, but I’m fascinated by how we treat software as a product. It’s kind of a mashup between content like movies and music, which we sort of purchase, but are really just licensing to use, and “hard” products like TVs, hammers, and decorative toilet paper dispensers. Most software companies just sell us a license to use their product, with all sorts of onerous (and potentially unenforceable) restrictions is what we politely refer to as “End User License Agreements”, or EULAs. We only call them that because “Non-Consentual Ass Fuck” doesn’t have as legitimate a ring to it.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Yes, Hackers Can Take Down The Power Grid. Maybe.</title><link>/blog/yes-hackers-can-take-down-the-power-grid-maybe/</link><pubDate>Thu, 27 Sep 2007 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/yes-hackers-can-take-down-the-power-grid-maybe/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I didn’t plan on writing about the &lt;a href="http://www.cnn.com/2007/US/09/26/power.at.risk/"&gt;DHS blowing up a power generator on CNN&lt;/a&gt;, but I’m in my hotel room in Vegas waiting for a conference call and it’s all over the darn TV. &lt;a href="http://www.mckeay.net/secure/2007/09/oh_fud.html"&gt;Martin&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href="http://techbuddha.wordpress.com/2007/09/27/seek-and-destroy-enhancing-americas-digital-first-strike-capabilities/"&gt;Amrit&lt;/a&gt; also talked about it, and I hate to be late to a party.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Metasploit Is Ready For Your iPhone Exploits</title><link>/blog/metasploit-is-ready-for-your-iphone-exploits/</link><pubDate>Wed, 26 Sep 2007 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/metasploit-is-ready-for-your-iphone-exploits/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://blog.metasploit.com/2007/09/root-shell-in-my-pocket-and-maybe-yours.html"&gt;H D Moore got an iPhone&lt;/a&gt;. This is both good news and bad news for Apple.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The bad news is that once some remote vulnerabilities appear (including clientside vulns), and get coded into exploits, the Metasploit Framework is ready for them with some iPhone-specific payloads. Let the iPhone pwnage begin.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>The Internet Isn’t Still Running Because Bad Guys Don’t Want To Burn Their Houses Down</title><link>/blog/the-internet-isnt-still-running-because-bad-guys-dont-want-to-burn-their-houses-down/</link><pubDate>Wed, 26 Sep 2007 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/the-internet-isnt-still-running-because-bad-guys-dont-want-to-burn-their-houses-down/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Richard Bejtlich, &lt;a href="http://taosecurity.blogspot.com/2007/09/wisdom-from-ranum.html"&gt;commenting on a Marcus Ranum article&lt;/a&gt;, said:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;“Continuing to function” is an interesting concept. The reason the “Internet” hasn’t been destroyed by terrorists, organized crime, or others is that doing so would cut off a major communication and funding resource. Criminals and other adversaries have a distinct interest in keeping computing infrastructure working just well enough to exploit it.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Heading to Vegas for SANS</title><link>/blog/heading-to-vegas-for-sans/</link><pubDate>Tue, 25 Sep 2007 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/heading-to-vegas-for-sans/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I get in early Wednesday morning and head home Friday. If you want to meet up, drop me a line at &lt;a href="mailto://rmogull@securosis.com"&gt;rmogull@securosis.com&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Network Security Podcast, Episode 78</title><link>/blog/network-security-podcast-episode-78/</link><pubDate>Tue, 25 Sep 2007 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/network-security-podcast-episode-78/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I think Martin and I have definitively proven that recording a podcast at 8 am isn’t the smartest idea in the world. Sure, the content is still there, but there are quite a few more “ums” and “ahs” than usual. Martin had to run to San Francisco today, and we had to push recording from last night due to a stray cat problem at my house.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Go Check Your Gmail Settings… XSS Vulnerability</title><link>/blog/go-check-your-gmail-settings-xss-vulnerability/</link><pubDate>Mon, 24 Sep 2007 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/go-check-your-gmail-settings-xss-vulnerability/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I always wonder what I’ll wake up to on a Monday morning.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Today it was a nice new cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability over in Google. The details are over at bedford. org (link broken since it’s a little risky), and the focus is on Google Mail.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>The Data Security Lifecycle: Beta 1</title><link>/blog/the-data-security-lifecycle-beta-1/</link><pubDate>Mon, 24 Sep 2007 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/the-data-security-lifecycle-beta-1/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I never meant to become that “data security” dude.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Back when I first transitioned from a consultant to an analyst I was given a hodgepodge of technologies to cover. Since I’d been a DBA and programmer I picked up database security. No one was covering encryption, so that fell in my lap. We’d recently lost the person covering forensics and acceptable use, so I ended up with that as well. This was all about 5 or so years ago, and at the time it seemed like a random collection of technologies.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>TD Ameritrade: Making Life Harder For Themselves</title><link>/blog/td-ameritrade-making-life-harder-for-themselves/</link><pubDate>Fri, 21 Sep 2007 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/td-ameritrade-making-life-harder-for-themselves/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Sheesh… just when you think they’re over the hump, more details leak on the TD Ameritrade breach and they aren’t looking quite so competent anymore.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Ahhh. Marketing Desperation.</title><link>/blog/ahhh-marketing-desperation/</link><pubDate>Thu, 20 Sep 2007 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/ahhh-marketing-desperation/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;You can always smell desperation.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;It has a certain… quality that gently waifs into the nasal cavity, tickling those very nerves that are too oft neglected in our sanitary society.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Anyone Going To SANS Vegas Next Week?</title><link>/blog/anyone-going-to-sans-vegas-next-week/</link><pubDate>Thu, 20 Sep 2007 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/anyone-going-to-sans-vegas-next-week/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I’m probably going to swing out to Vegas for a day or two, but haven’t figured out what days yet.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Microsoft Can’t Manage Third-Party Patches, Even Though It’s A Good Idea</title><link>/blog/microsoft-cant-manage-third-party-patches-even-though-its-a-good-idea/</link><pubDate>Thu, 20 Sep 2007 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/microsoft-cant-manage-third-party-patches-even-though-its-a-good-idea/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Cutaway has a &lt;a href="http://www.cutawaysecurity.com/blog/archives/191"&gt;good post up today&lt;/a&gt; over at Security Ripcord. In it, he suggests that Microsoft should… well, I’ll let him say it:&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Orchestria Enters DLP Market- Underestimates Competition With Totally Inaccurate Marketing</title><link>/blog/orchestria-enters-dlp-market-underestimates-competition-with-totally-inaccurate-marketing/</link><pubDate>Thu, 20 Sep 2007 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/orchestria-enters-dlp-market-underestimates-competition-with-totally-inaccurate-marketing/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Orchestria &lt;a href="http://biz.yahoo.com/bw/070919/20070919005643.html?.v=1"&gt;finally announced their first “true” general DLP product&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;For those of you who don’t know, Orchestria has danced around this space for a few years now. They started with a product narrowly focused on helping certain financial services firms, particularly broker/dealers, manage compliance issues around insider trading and privacy. Basically you can think about it as a client-centric (with some networking monitoring) DLP solution focused on one category of violations. It didn’t work well as a general DLP solution, but that wasn’t their market.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Raytheon/Oakley, Probably A Good Fit</title><link>/blog/raytheon-oakley-probably-a-good-fit/</link><pubDate>Thu, 20 Sep 2007 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/raytheon-oakley-probably-a-good-fit/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Fresh off today’s &lt;a href="http://securityincite.com/blog/mike-rothman/"&gt;Daily Incite&lt;/a&gt; I saw that &lt;a href="http://www.oakleynetworks.com/news/raytheon.php"&gt;Raytheon acquired Oakley Networks.&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Oakley is a bit of a strange bird- it’s not really DLP, but they have some interesting monitoring technology that’s well suited for certain environments- especially the federal sector that Raytheon plays in so strongly. Oakley started with an endpoint monitoring tool that’s like keystroke capture on steroids (and centrally manageable), and then bought a network tool vendor for monitoring acceptable use on the wire. It doesn’t have the advanced content awareness of DLP, nor some of the integration required for the filtering and discovery sides, but that’s not really what it’s used for. DLP records only on violations; Oakley is better described as “user activity forensics” (it’s more than that, but that’s the closest bucket).&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Avast! Ye Scurvy Dogs!</title><link>/blog/avast-ye-scurvy-dogs/</link><pubDate>Wed, 19 Sep 2007 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/avast-ye-scurvy-dogs/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Yarr!&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Today be &lt;a href="http://www.talklikeapirate.com/"&gt;Talk Like A Pirate Day&lt;/a&gt;, and we’ll not be having no landlubber speak on this here vessel.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;So grab ye cutlass, man yer station, and PREPARE TO REPEL BOARDERS!!!&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Yes, The World Has Changed And So Must We</title><link>/blog/yes-the-world-has-changed-and-so-must-we/</link><pubDate>Wed, 19 Sep 2007 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/yes-the-world-has-changed-and-so-must-we/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Boy, Chris is &lt;a href="http://rationalsecurity.typepad.com/blog/2007/09/captains-obviou.html"&gt;all riled up&lt;/a&gt; over my &lt;a href="http://securosis.com/2007/09/18/jericho-needs-assistance-restating-the-obvious/"&gt;criticism of Jericho&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Let me put this bad boy to bed, at least from my side. Chris missed the point of my last post, and my editor tells me it might be because of how I wrote it. Thus I’ll be a little clearer in this one.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Jericho Needs Assistance Restating The Obvious</title><link>/blog/jericho-needs-assistance-restating-the-obvious/</link><pubDate>Tue, 18 Sep 2007 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/jericho-needs-assistance-restating-the-obvious/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Sometimes it’s not even worth the effort.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;First &lt;a href="http://securityincite.com/TDI-2007-09-17#TSN2"&gt;Rothman&lt;/a&gt;, then &lt;a href="http://rationalsecurity.typepad.com/blog/2007/09/the-british-are.html"&gt;Hoff&lt;/a&gt; decide to bring up our favorite red headed stepchild (a term I use with fondness, since I have red hair and a stepfather); all based on an &lt;a href="http://www.scmagazine.com/uk/news/article/544827/world-without-frontiers/"&gt;SC magazine article&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Network Security Podcast, Episode 77</title><link>/blog/network-security-podcast-episode-77/</link><pubDate>Tue, 18 Sep 2007 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/network-security-podcast-episode-77/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Martin’s recruited me to co-host indefinitely, and I think we’re finally working out the kinks. This one is all over the map but there were some interesting things to talk about:&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Repeat After Me: P2P Is For Stealing Music, Not Sharing Employee Records</title><link>/blog/repeat-after-me-p2p-is-for-stealing-music-not-sharing-employee-records/</link><pubDate>Tue, 18 Sep 2007 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/repeat-after-me-p2p-is-for-stealing-music-not-sharing-employee-records/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Well, we finally know how Pfizer lost all those employee records. An employee installed P2P file sharing software on her laptop, and probably shared her entire drive. Oops. I bet I know one person that’s eating alone in the corporate lunchroom.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Understanding and Selecting a DLP Solution: Part 3, Data-In-Motion Technical Architecture</title><link>/blog/understanding-and-selecting-a-dlp-solution-part-3-data-in-motion-technical-architecture/</link><pubDate>Tue, 18 Sep 2007 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/understanding-and-selecting-a-dlp-solution-part-3-data-in-motion-technical-architecture/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Welcome to part 3 of our series on Data Loss Prevention/Content Monitoring and Filtering. You should go read &lt;a href="http://securosis.com/2007/09/07/understanding-and-selecting-a-data-loss-prevention-dlpcmfcmp-solution-part-1/"&gt;Part 1&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href="http://securosis.com/2007/09/13/understanding-and-selecting-a-dlp-solution-part-2-content-awareness/"&gt;Part 2&lt;/a&gt; before digging into this one.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>What We Have Here Is A Failure To Communicate</title><link>/blog/what-we-have-here-is-a-failure-to-communicate/</link><pubDate>Tue, 18 Sep 2007 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/what-we-have-here-is-a-failure-to-communicate/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Sigh.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Again.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;More Jericho?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Yep. Can’t let Hoff go without a retort, not after &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/typepad/beaker/blog/~3/158381957/captain-stupend.html"&gt;this&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I’d like to quote &lt;a href="http://securosis.com/2007/09/18/jericho-needs-assistance-restating-the-obvious/"&gt;my last post&lt;/a&gt; for a moment:&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>My Home Office Security Defense System</title><link>/blog/my-home-office-security-defense-system/</link><pubDate>Mon, 17 Sep 2007 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/my-home-office-security-defense-system/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;It sweeps across a defined field of fire and launches its (un)deadly projectile at anything that invades it’s defined perimeter (3 feet).&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Send Your Friends and Family To</title><link>/blog/send-your-friends-and-family-to/</link><pubDate>Mon, 17 Sep 2007 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/send-your-friends-and-family-to/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Big Bad Mike Rothman over at Security Incite just &lt;a href="http://securityincite.com/blog/mike-rothman/introducing-security-mikes-guide-to-internet-security"&gt;announced a new program&lt;/a&gt; he’s launching next months for consumers. Mike told me about this a while ago, and I think it’s a great idea.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>TD Ameritrade- Perhaps It Was Malware?</title><link>/blog/td-ameritrade-perhaps-it-was-malware/</link><pubDate>Mon, 17 Sep 2007 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/td-ameritrade-perhaps-it-was-malware/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;TD Ameritrade &lt;a href="http://www.amtd.com/newsroom/releasedetail.cfm?ReleaseID=264044"&gt;issued a press release &lt;/a&gt;Friday with another nugget of information in it.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;TD AMERITRADE Holding Corporation (NASDAQ:AMTD) has discovered and eliminated unauthorized code from its systems that allowed access to an internal database. The discovery was made as the result of an internal investigation of stock-related SPAM.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>TD Ameritrade Breached- Let’s Take A Poll</title><link>/blog/td-ameritrade-breached-lets-take-a-poll/</link><pubDate>Fri, 14 Sep 2007 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/td-ameritrade-breached-lets-take-a-poll/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Looks like we’ve had another data breach. TD Ameritrade is now notifying 6.3 million customers. If we use my ridiculously low estimate of $2 per notification, they just erased $12.6M from the books. I can think of a lot of good security technologies (and people) that cost less.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>What To Look For In A Risk Management Framework</title><link>/blog/what-to-look-for-in-a-risk-management-framework/</link><pubDate>Fri, 14 Sep 2007 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/what-to-look-for-in-a-risk-management-framework/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;There’s been a bit of debate lately between the &lt;a href="http://riskmanagementinsight.com/riskanalysis/?p=262"&gt;quantitative&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href="http://taosecurity.blogspot.com/2007/09/final-question-on-fair.html"&gt;qualitative&lt;/a&gt; camps of the risk management world. The good news is that both camps recognize the need for an organized way to approach risk, rather than the “wave your hands and prognosticate” approach that’s been so popular over the years.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Article Published On TidBITS</title><link>/blog/article-published-on-tidbits/</link><pubDate>Thu, 13 Sep 2007 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/article-published-on-tidbits/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Just a quick note that I just published an article over at &lt;a href="http://tidbits.com/"&gt;TidBITS&lt;/a&gt; called &lt;a href="http://db.tidbits.com/article/9176"&gt;The Ghost in My FileVault&lt;/a&gt;. It’s a tale of terror from a recent trip to Asia. Here’s an excerpt:&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Off Topic: Every Time You Buy A Ringtone A Kitten Dies</title><link>/blog/off-topic-every-time-you-buy-a-ringtone-a-kitten-dies/</link><pubDate>Thu, 13 Sep 2007 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/off-topic-every-time-you-buy-a-ringtone-a-kitten-dies/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;My title, but must-read content at &lt;a href="http://daringfireball.net/2007/09/the_ringtones_racket"&gt;Daring Fireball&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Remember, the media companies are trying to condition you into paying more for every piece of content you use. More money for every device, every viewing, every time you make a mix tape with those perfect songs to bring back your lost love. Heck, the RIAA is &lt;a href="http://gear.ign.com/articles/749/749883p1.html"&gt;actively petitioning to pay artists less&lt;/a&gt; (if at all) for ringtones and other uses of the artists’ content, so it’s not like your favorite drug-deprived musician is missing out on getting a fix meal when you buy these things.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>The Pink Taco Claims Another Victim</title><link>/blog/the-pink-taco-claims-another-victim/</link><pubDate>Thu, 13 Sep 2007 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/the-pink-taco-claims-another-victim/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://blogs.zdnet.com/threatchaos/"&gt;Richard Stiennon&lt;/a&gt; was in town last night, so I took him out for &lt;a href="http://techbuddha.wordpress.com/2007/06/13/scorpions-pink-tacos-and-sun-tzu-under-a-desert-sun/"&gt;everyone’s favorite&lt;/a&gt; local Mexican food. No, it’s not obscene, it’s a normal place with an amusing name.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Understanding and Selecting a DLP Solution: Part 2, Content Awareness</title><link>/blog/understanding-and-selecting-a-dlp-solution-part-2-content-awareness/</link><pubDate>Thu, 13 Sep 2007 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/understanding-and-selecting-a-dlp-solution-part-2-content-awareness/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Welcome to part 2 of our series on helping you better understand Data Loss Prevention solutions. In &lt;a href="http://securosis.com/2007/09/07/understanding-and-selecting-a-data-loss-prevention-dlpcmfcmp-solution-part-1/"&gt;Part 1&lt;/a&gt; I gave an overview of DLP, and based on follow-up questions it’s clear that one of the most confusing aspects of DLP is &lt;em&gt;content awareness&lt;/em&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Repeat After Me: These Loss Numbers Are Meaningless</title><link>/blog/repeat-after-me-these-loss-numbers-are-meaningless/</link><pubDate>Wed, 12 Sep 2007 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/repeat-after-me-these-loss-numbers-are-meaningless/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.darkreading.com/document.asp?doc_id=133658&amp;amp;f_src=darkreading_sitedefault"&gt;Article on the latest CSI/FBI study&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The study does not use a consistent loss model, thus the loss numbers over time are meaningless. I’m all for numbers, but we need an accurate model that won’t just reflect who wants more money this year for more tools/people. Just estimating a lump sum for losses is a load of crap.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Tutorial: How To Use Mac FileVault Safely</title><link>/blog/tutorial-how-to-use-mac-filevault-safely/</link><pubDate>Wed, 12 Sep 2007 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/tutorial-how-to-use-mac-filevault-safely/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Welcome &lt;a href="http://www.tidbits.com/"&gt;TidBITS&lt;/a&gt; readers and other Mac fans.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;While for the most part &lt;a href="http://securosis.com/2006/08/26/experiences-with-filevault-mac-encryption/"&gt;I’ve had great luck encrypting my Mac&lt;/a&gt;, there are definitely a few things to be aware of and extra precautions to take. I’ve learned some lessons over the past 18 months or so of encrypting my drive, and here are my recommendations for safely using FileVault.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Network Security Podcast, Episode 76</title><link>/blog/network-security-podcast-episode-76/</link><pubDate>Tue, 11 Sep 2007 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/network-security-podcast-episode-76/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Martin was gracious enough to ask me back again this week. We’re still working out the kinks, but are definitely getting into the groove of things. &lt;strong&gt;Martin’s Show Notes:&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Update Your Wordpress Blog Immediately! New Exploit Tool Released</title><link>/blog/update-your-wordpress-blog-immediately-new-exploit-tool-released/</link><pubDate>Tue, 11 Sep 2007 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/update-your-wordpress-blog-immediately-new-exploit-tool-released/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;More to follow &lt;em&gt;New exploit tool released for old vulnerabilities, make sure you update since versions up to 2.2.2 are affected…&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Security Catalyst Has A New Home</title><link>/blog/security-catalyst-has-a-new-home/</link><pubDate>Mon, 10 Sep 2007 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/security-catalyst-has-a-new-home/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;If you haven’t checked out the Security Catalyst Community, and are an operational security person, I highly recommend it. It’s a good forum (and chat channel) for discussing security issues ranging from different people’s experiences with various products, to career advice.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Consumer Security Tip: Use Multiple Email Accounts To Reduce Fraud And Spam</title><link>/blog/consumer-security-tip-use-multiple-email-accounts-to-reduce-fraud-and-spam/</link><pubDate>Fri, 07 Sep 2007 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/consumer-security-tip-use-multiple-email-accounts-to-reduce-fraud-and-spam/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I spend a fair bit of time helping friends and family keep their computers up and running. At the local coffee shop I’m known as “the security guy”, which usually means answering questions about which antivirus software to buy. But some of the best ways to protect yourself don’t involve spending any money, or buying any software.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Turning Bad Security Into Competitive Advantage</title><link>/blog/turning-bad-security-into-competitive-advantage/</link><pubDate>Fri, 07 Sep 2007 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/turning-bad-security-into-competitive-advantage/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Back when I used to do physical security in Boulder, Colorado, there was a core group of us that were often called in by various bars, hotels, or concert venues when they needed help for a special event or to buffer up their staff. Sometimes I ended up working a few nights as a contract bouncer at random bars I was much more likely to be drinking than working at.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Understanding and Selecting a Data Loss Prevention (DLP/CMF/CMP) Solution: Part 1</title><link>/blog/understanding-and-selecting-a-data-loss-prevention-dlp-cmf-cmp-solution-part-1/</link><pubDate>Fri, 07 Sep 2007 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/understanding-and-selecting-a-data-loss-prevention-dlp-cmf-cmp-solution-part-1/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Data Loss Prevention is one of the most hyped, and least understood, tools in the security arsenal. With at least a half-dozen different names and even more technology approaches, it can be difficult to understand the ultimate value of the tools and which products best suit which environments. This series of posts will provide the necessary background in DLP to help you understand the technology, know what to look for in a product, and find the best match for your organization. I won’t be providing product ratings, I suggest the Gartner Magic Quadrant for that, but will provide you the tools you need for the selection process.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>About Securosis</title><link>/blog/about-securosis/</link><pubDate>Thu, 06 Sep 2007 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/about-securosis/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Securosis, L.L.C. is a security consulting practice dedicated to thought leadership, objectivity, and transparency. Our consultants have all held executive level positions and are dedicated to providing the highest value strategic consulting available.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Christopher Hoff, Security Poet Laureate</title><link>/blog/christopher-hoff-security-poet-laureate/</link><pubDate>Thu, 06 Sep 2007 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/christopher-hoff-security-poet-laureate/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Mr. Rothman &lt;a href="http://securityincite.com/TDI-2007-09-06#TBP1"&gt;was concerned&lt;/a&gt; that Mr. Hoff may, perhaps, have a little too much spare time on his hands. I’ve seen Senior Hoff at work, and he definitely isn’t winning any Slacker of the Year awards. I personally have a theory that he’s really just the earthly expression of a multidimensional being beyond our comprehension.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Have a Small Business? Use Quickbooks Online? Better Upgrade… NOW!!!</title><link>/blog/have-a-small-business-use-quickbooks-online-better-upgrade-now/</link><pubDate>Thu, 06 Sep 2007 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/have-a-small-business-use-quickbooks-online-better-upgrade-now/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Computerworld yesterday &lt;a href="http://www.computerworld.com/action/article.do?command=viewArticleBasic&amp;amp;articleId=9034519"&gt;reported on a US-CERT advisory&lt;/a&gt; for the popular Quickbooks Online Edition.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I know it’s popular because I use it. And I’m popular. Aren’t I? Really? Oh… Don’t tell my mom, okay?&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>My Editor Also Blogs, And Has 1300 OS X Bugs</title><link>/blog/my-editor-also-blogs-and-has-1300-os-x-bugs/</link><pubDate>Thu, 06 Sep 2007 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/my-editor-also-blogs-and-has-1300-os-x-bugs/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;For those of you who don’t know, this is a blog with an editor. Chris Pepper is a long-time friend, UNIX wizard, web host, and tech writer himself. You can track his work at &lt;a href="http://www.extrapepperoni.com/"&gt;Extra Pepperoni&lt;/a&gt;, his somewhat-recently revamped blog.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>My Stalker is a Newby Again</title><link>/blog/my-stalker-is-a-newby-again/</link><pubDate>Thu, 06 Sep 2007 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/my-stalker-is-a-newby-again/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;If you read the security blogs, you may have seen that I have a stalker- Rob Newby over at &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/ITSTVFH/~3/153187952/full-disclosure.html"&gt;IT Security, The View From Here&lt;/a&gt;. Rob’s a data security weenie like myself.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Security Isn’t Rocket Science</title><link>/blog/security-isnt-rocket-science/</link><pubDate>Thu, 06 Sep 2007 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/security-isnt-rocket-science/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;There’s been a lot of debate lately on quantitative vs. qualitative risk, frameworks, models, metrics, certifications, standards, and all sorts of other organizational junk we seem to burden ourselves with. Oh, I’m no better, having authored a risk management framework, data security hierarchy, and similar tools in my past.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Securosis, The Company, Is Up And Running</title><link>/blog/securosis-the-company-is-up-and-running/</link><pubDate>Thu, 06 Sep 2007 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/securosis-the-company-is-up-and-running/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Since most of you blog readers don’t care about how I feed myself I don’t intend on using the blog for boring corporate updates, but I’m going to indulge myself for a moment.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Tying Security To The Business: Guerilla CISO Style</title><link>/blog/tying-security-to-the-business-guerilla-ciso-style/</link><pubDate>Thu, 06 Sep 2007 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/tying-security-to-the-business-guerilla-ciso-style/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I had a little back and forth with rybolov in the &lt;a href="http://securosis.com/2007/09/04/learn-from-the-military-dont-emulate-it/"&gt;comments on my military post&lt;/a&gt;, and he introduced me to something called the Business Reference Model right out of some government publications and &lt;a href="http://csrc.nist.gov/publications/nistpubs/index.html"&gt;NIST 800-60&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Co-Hosting The Network Security Podcast</title><link>/blog/co-hosting-the-network-security-podcast/</link><pubDate>Wed, 05 Sep 2007 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/co-hosting-the-network-security-podcast/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Back when I started this blog one of the only security blogs I knew about was Martin McKeay’s Network Security Blog. As can happen in the blogging community, Martin and I eventually got in touch and developed a friendship. Heck, anyone I’ve gone drinking with in 3 different cities in less than a year is definitely a friend.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Infinite Switching Costs: When Market Forces Fail</title><link>/blog/infinite-switching-costs-when-market-forces-fail/</link><pubDate>Wed, 05 Sep 2007 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/infinite-switching-costs-when-market-forces-fail/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Just a day after I talked about how&lt;a href="http://securosis.com/2007/09/04/a-short-take-on-why-good-security-isnt-a-competitive-advantage/"&gt; it takes sustained failures for consumers to leave a company and go to a competitor&lt;/a&gt;, we have an example where switching isn’t really an option.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>A Short Take On Why Good Security Isn’t A Competitive Advantage</title><link>/blog/a-short-take-on-why-good-security-isnt-a-competitive-advantage/</link><pubDate>Tue, 04 Sep 2007 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/a-short-take-on-why-good-security-isnt-a-competitive-advantage/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Stepping between &lt;a href="http://rationalsecurity.typepad.com/blog/2007/09/generalizing-ab.html"&gt;Hoff&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href="http://securitybuddha.com/2007/09/04/security-and-privacy-are-not-competitive-advantages/"&gt;Curphey&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Consumers always lie in surveys and claim that if a company loses their credit card or other personal info, they’ll go someplace else. In reality, they almost never do.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Learn From The Military, Don’t Emulate It</title><link>/blog/learn-from-the-military-dont-emulate-it/</link><pubDate>Tue, 04 Sep 2007 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/learn-from-the-military-dont-emulate-it/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I haven’t met Richard Bejtlich yet, but I have a feeling we’d get along just fine. We’re both fans of the &lt;a href="http://history.com/"&gt;History Channel&lt;/a&gt;, have backgrounds in martial arts, love the show &lt;a href="http://www.history.com/minisites/humanweapon/"&gt;Human Weapon&lt;/a&gt; (martial arts AND the History Channel!), and have a background in the military (four years on a Navy ROTC scholarship, but I ended up becoming a paramedic instead of going active duty).&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Why I’m Not a CISS</title><link>/blog/why-im-not-a-ciss/</link><pubDate>Tue, 04 Sep 2007 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/why-im-not-a-ciss/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Over at the Network Security Blog, Martin’s been &lt;a href="http://www.mckeay.net/secure/2007/09/only_testing_for_10_domains.html"&gt;doing a great job of putting the CISSP certification (Certified Information Systems Security Professional for you non-security-geeks) in proper context.&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>“Certified” Site Hacked; No Compliance Checklist or “Certification” Can Ever Make You Totall</title><link>/blog/certified-site-hacked-no-compliance-checklist-or-certification-can-ever-make-you-totall/</link><pubDate>Mon, 03 Sep 2007 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/certified-site-hacked-no-compliance-checklist-or-certification-can-ever-make-you-totall/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;If you’ve ever worked as a front-line security professional in any organization, at some point in time you’ve been asked what certification or standards compliance would guarantee security. Then, away from the office, you’ve probably directed countless friends and family members to protect themselves using some of the various anti-phishing toolbars like Netcraft, or those built into your antivirus suite.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>DLP/ILP/Extrusion Prevention &lt; CMF &lt; CMP &lt; SILM: A Short Evolution of Data Loss Prevention</title><link>/blog/dlp-ilp-extrusion-prevention-cmf-cmp-silm-a-short-evolution-of-data-loss-prevention/</link><pubDate>Wed, 29 Aug 2007 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/dlp-ilp-extrusion-prevention-cmf-cmp-silm-a-short-evolution-of-data-loss-prevention/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;As I mentioned &lt;a href="http://securosis.com/2007/08/26/dlp-is-a-feature-cmf-or-whatever-well-call-it-is-a-solution/"&gt;just a couple days ago&lt;/a&gt;, there’s a bit of debate and confusion surrounding leak/loss prevention technologies and what the heck to call these things.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Sorry Cutaway, Hacking is Still For Fun</title><link>/blog/sorry-cutaway-hacking-is-still-for-fun/</link><pubDate>Wed, 29 Aug 2007 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/sorry-cutaway-hacking-is-still-for-fun/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;In a &lt;a href="http://www.cutawaysecurity.com/blog/archives/184"&gt;recent post at Security Ripcord&lt;/a&gt;, Cutaway says:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Let me elaborate on the second topic a little more. The days of hacking for fun are over. I think it is safe to say that nearly everybody has come to that realization (there may be a few holdouts in upper management but they will not last long). This means that the stakes are higher for the good guys and the bad guys.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Opened Up The Comments</title><link>/blog/opened-up-the-comments/</link><pubDate>Tue, 28 Aug 2007 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/opened-up-the-comments/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;No registration required anymore. If the trolls and spam get too bad I’ll have to turn it back on, but we’ll see how this goes…
*[Email:]: Email
*[Twitter:]: Twitter
*[Phone:]: Phone&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Why the “$182 Per Record” Lost Number is Garbage, And You Don’t Need It Anyway</title><link>/blog/why-the-182-per-record-lost-number-is-garbage-and-you-dont-need-it-anyway/</link><pubDate>Tue, 28 Aug 2007 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/why-the-182-per-record-lost-number-is-garbage-and-you-dont-need-it-anyway/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I’m still catching up on my blogroll, and caught this article over at &lt;a href="http://www.emergentchaos.com/archives/2007/08/cost_of_a_breach_3_not_18.html" title="Emergent Chaos"&gt;Emergent Chaos&lt;/a&gt;, which also referenced &lt;a href="http://thurston.halfcat.org/blog/2007/08/17/why-tjx-and-ponemon-disagree/" title="Thurston"&gt;this one by Thurston&lt;/a&gt;. Both articles discuss the infamous Ponemon &lt;a href="http://searchsecurity.techtarget.com/originalContent/0,289142,sid14_gci1227119,00.html"&gt;study that claimed&lt;/a&gt; the average losses in a breach were $182 per record.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>I Guess I Asked For This</title><link>/blog/i-guess-i-asked-for-this/</link><pubDate>Mon, 27 Aug 2007 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/i-guess-i-asked-for-this/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://layer8.itsecuritygeek.com/index/layer8/if-he-isnt-careful/" title="http://layer8.itsecuritygeek.com/index/layer8/if-he-isnt-careful/"&gt;Read here&lt;/a&gt;, safe for work, but very disturbing.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Double entendre title fully intended.
*[Email:]: Email
*[Twitter:]: Twitter
*[Phone:]: Phone&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Virtualization Security: Are Ptacek/Lawson and Joanna Fighting the Wrong Battle?</title><link>/blog/virtualization-security-are-ptacek-lawson-and-joanna-fighting-the-wrong-battle/</link><pubDate>Mon, 27 Aug 2007 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/virtualization-security-are-ptacek-lawson-and-joanna-fighting-the-wrong-battle/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I’m getting caught up on my blog reading after my big APAC (that’s Asia Pacific) tour with a half-busted Mac, and noticed Tom’s post at Matasano on &lt;a href="http://www.matasano.com/log/930/side-channel-detection-attacks-against-unauthorized-hypervisors/" title="http://www.matasano.com/log/930/side-channel-detection-attacks-against-unauthorized-hypervisors/"&gt;detecting unauthorized hypervisors&lt;/a&gt;. Tom and Nate have been going back and &lt;a href="http://theinvisiblethings.blogspot.com/2007/08/virtualization-detection-vs-blue-pill.html" title="http://theinvisiblethings.blogspot.com/2007/08/virtualization-detection-vs-blue-pill.html"&gt;forth with Joanna Rutkowska&lt;/a&gt; on how detectable these things might be. For those of you less familiar with all this virtualization stuff, let’s review a little bit.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Yes Chris, It’s a Circle Jerk of Pain</title><link>/blog/yes-chris-its-a-circle-jerk-of-pain/</link><pubDate>Mon, 27 Aug 2007 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/yes-chris-its-a-circle-jerk-of-pain/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/typepad/beaker/blog/~3/148957737/hyperjackstacki.html"&gt;Hoff owned me&lt;/a&gt;. In an email he claimed he pwned me, but he totally didn’t earn that p.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Apparently I’m slightly late to the game in talking about hyperjackstacks (we’re back on virtualization, in case I lost you). That’s something I’m totally willing to concede, especially since I’m more of a data and applications guy.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>DLP Is A Feature, CMF (Or Whatever We’ll Call It) Is A Solution</title><link>/blog/dlp-is-a-feature-cmf-or-whatever-well-call-it-is-a-solution/</link><pubDate>Sun, 26 Aug 2007 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/dlp-is-a-feature-cmf-or-whatever-well-call-it-is-a-solution/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Here I am, just off the bench after six months of watching from the sidelines, and when I’m still two feet away from the darn batter’s box &lt;a href="http://rationalsecurity.typepad.com/blog/2007/08/i-know-its-been.html"&gt;Hoff lets loose&lt;/a&gt; with a hundred mile per hour fastball right at my head.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>New Feature: LiveChat</title><link>/blog/new-feature-livechat/</link><pubDate>Sun, 26 Aug 2007 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/new-feature-livechat/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Got questions? Think I might know the answer? Just bored and need someone to pretend to be your friend?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;All you have to do is look on the sidebar and click on the LiveChat link. If you’re running AIM, that will connect you to the account I’ve set up to support the site.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Going Where the Weather Suits My Soul</title><link>/blog/going-where-the-weather-suits-my-soul/</link><pubDate>Fri, 24 Aug 2007 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/going-where-the-weather-suits-my-soul/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;If you’re reading this, I’m no longer a Gartner analyst.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;For the past 7 years or so I’ve had the best experience of my professional (and often personal) career. The product of a bad acquisition and short stint in consulting, Gartner gave a young unknown hothead the opportunity to become an industry analyst.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Australia Report: Now Tell Me Why We Can’t Have Healthcare Like This?</title><link>/blog/australia-report-now-tell-me-why-we-cant-have-healthcare-like-this/</link><pubDate>Thu, 16 Aug 2007 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/australia-report-now-tell-me-why-we-cant-have-healthcare-like-this/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Like many frequent travelers, I tend to rely on sleeping pills to help me out with the jetlag. One 30 pill prescription for Ambien CR usually lasts me about 9 months, and definitely gets the job done.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Out of the country for the next 2 weeks…</title><link>/blog/out-of-the-country-for-the-next-2-weeks/</link><pubDate>Wed, 08 Aug 2007 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/out-of-the-country-for-the-next-2-weeks/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I’m estimating around 60 hours in planes and airports, assuming no flight delays.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Can I go back to the dentist instead?&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Securosis- Now with SSL!</title><link>/blog/securosis-now-with-ssl/</link><pubDate>Wed, 08 Aug 2007 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/securosis-now-with-ssl/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;For those that are interested, you can now browse and post comments by going to &lt;a href="https://securosis.com/"&gt;https://securosis.com&lt;/a&gt;. The cert may show up at securiosis.com, which was the original (short lived) name of this domain. I’m working on getting that fixed.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Oh, the Drama!</title><link>/blog/oh-the-drama/</link><pubDate>Tue, 31 Jul 2007 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/oh-the-drama/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I’m on the 40 minute flight from Phoenix to Vegas for two back-to-back conferences any reader of this blog better already know about. As usual, the drama is already starting with rumors, innuendo, on-stage battles between presentations, the ever-elusive hunt for the next *-gate, and the always popular feats of strength.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Heading to Vegas Next Week</title><link>/blog/heading-to-vegas-next-week/</link><pubDate>Thu, 26 Jul 2007 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/heading-to-vegas-next-week/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;If you read this, you know why. Arriving Tuesday, departing Monday. Probably at Hotel Paris since I didn’t get my stuff together in time.
*[Email:]: Email
*[Twitter:]: Twitter
*[Phone:]: Phone&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Things You Really Don’t Like To Hear</title><link>/blog/things-you-really-dont-like-to-hear/</link><pubDate>Thu, 19 Jul 2007 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/things-you-really-dont-like-to-hear/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Dentist: You shouldn’t feel any pain.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Me: Great.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Dentist: Now close your eyes to keep the debris out.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Me: What?&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Damn. And I Thought SPAM Was Bad!</title><link>/blog/damn-and-i-thought-spam-was-bad/</link><pubDate>Mon, 16 Jul 2007 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/damn-and-i-thought-spam-was-bad/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;As I may have mentioned, we moved into a new home about 3 weeks ago.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This isn’t the first home I’ve owned, so either things have changed since I bought my last house, or it’s different when you buy a new build. According to our postal carrier, we’ve been getting mail here since long before we moved in. Technically before we knew our physical address (we just had a lot number). What kind of mail you ask?&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Don’t Let the Rules Define Your Capabilities</title><link>/blog/dont-let-the-rules-define-your-capabilities/</link><pubDate>Thu, 12 Jul 2007 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/dont-let-the-rules-define-your-capabilities/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;As I’ve mentioned before, I’ve been doing martial arts for a while; most of my life if you count high school wrestling. I recently switched from Traditional Taekwon-Do to Karate after moving to Phoenix.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Proof My Roomba is Out to Get Me</title><link>/blog/proof-my-roomba-is-out-to-get-me/</link><pubDate>Tue, 10 Jul 2007 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/proof-my-roomba-is-out-to-get-me/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;We’re in the new house and I just fired the Roomba off for the first time. This house is a lot bigger than our last one, and the Roomba was basically roaming the entire first floor.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>In the New House, But the Toll Brothers’ Love is Gone</title><link>/blog/in-the-new-house-but-the-toll-brothers-love-is-gone/</link><pubDate>Mon, 02 Jul 2007 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/in-the-new-house-but-the-toll-brothers-love-is-gone/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I’ve been pretty quiet for a couple weeks since we were getting ready for the new house, moving into the new house, and dealing with all the fun new house issues.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Then There Was The Time I Sort Of Kidnapped Someone</title><link>/blog/then-there-was-the-time-i-sort-of-kidnapped-someone/</link><pubDate>Wed, 13 Jun 2007 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/then-there-was-the-time-i-sort-of-kidnapped-someone/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I was one shit hot paramedic.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;All you had to do was ask me.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I was smart; no question about that. So smart that I was accepted to paramedic school (p-school) due to some really high test scores, despite being a year or so short of the required amount of field experience. I started school when I was 21, basically the earliest you can drive an ambulance in Colorado due to insurance requirements, and was one cocky 22 year old by the time I graduated and went on the job. I think I graduated number 2 from my class- on test scores at least.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Now That’s Planned Parenthood!</title><link>/blog/now-thats-planned-parenthood/</link><pubDate>Wed, 30 May 2007 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/now-thats-planned-parenthood/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Over the holiday weekend my wife were walking across a big mall parking lot as we made our way from dinner to the only bar in our area carrying the big UFC fight. (Way more fun to watch than boxing anymore).&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Playing for Real: Getting Started</title><link>/blog/playing-for-real-getting-started/</link><pubDate>Wed, 23 May 2007 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/playing-for-real-getting-started/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;By the time I pulled back into the parking lot after lunch at home, I knew something was wrong.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The first sign was the ambulance racing out towards the hospital with full lights and sirens.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Boing</title><link>/blog/boing/</link><pubDate>Mon, 14 May 2007 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/boing/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;In the Chicago airport bouncing off to Germany after a week in New Orleans. Only getting 2 days home over 2 weeks or so.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Jazz Anyone?</title><link>/blog/jazz-anyone/</link><pubDate>Thu, 03 May 2007 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/jazz-anyone/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Tomorrow my wife and I leave for New Orleans. We’re taking in the Jazz Fest, and celebrating our 1-year anniversary.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>It’s Magically Terroristic!</title><link>/blog/its-magically-terroristic/</link><pubDate>Wed, 02 May 2007 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/its-magically-terroristic/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;(From &lt;a href="http://yro.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=07/05/02/1839251&amp;amp;from=rss"&gt;Slashdot&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;So a student creates a map of his school for a video game mod, and &lt;a href="http://www.fortbendnow.com/news/2847/chinese-community-rallies-behind-student-removed-from-clements-over-pc-game-map"&gt;gets arrested and kicked out of school&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Geeking the New House</title><link>/blog/geeking-the-new-house/</link><pubDate>Thu, 26 Apr 2007 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/geeking-the-new-house/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Much to our own surprise, last August my wife and I decided to buy our first new “new” house in the Desert RIdge area of Phoenix. The closest I’ve ever come to having a house built was helping build a house.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Unexpected Sign of Aging</title><link>/blog/unexpected-sign-of-aging/</link><pubDate>Fri, 20 Apr 2007 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/unexpected-sign-of-aging/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I turn 36 today. I’m not really sure how that happened. Neither are a lot of other people.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I realize 36 is still fairly young, but it’s definitely not my 20’s anymore. My father died around age 64, so technically I’m past mid-life by his standard, although I’m pretty darn certain I can stretch well past that. With cryogenic freezing advances I might even make it to “indefinite”.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Will the Media Please Stop Encouraging Murder?!?</title><link>/blog/will-the-media-please-stop-encouraging-murder/</link><pubDate>Thu, 19 Apr 2007 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/will-the-media-please-stop-encouraging-murder/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I really don’t mean to turn this blog into a media rant, but I’m on a roll today and will keep it short.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Is There Any News Channel Worth Watching Anymore?</title><link>/blog/is-there-any-news-channel-worth-watching-anymore/</link><pubDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2007 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/is-there-any-news-channel-worth-watching-anymore/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;The 24 hour news cycle has officially killed the Fourth Estate.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Seriously, if there is, tell us in the comments. I’m sick of the exploitation, just give me the damn news.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Question for Writers</title><link>/blog/question-for-writers/</link><pubDate>Thu, 12 Apr 2007 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/question-for-writers/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Do you ever have days where you feel that you’re not so much writing as you are psychically channeling the obscure hallucinations of an illiterate eight year old?&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Everything You Need To Know About Security Is In This Film</title><link>/blog/everything-you-need-to-know-about-security-is-in-this-film/</link><pubDate>Mon, 09 Apr 2007 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/everything-you-need-to-know-about-security-is-in-this-film/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;(Physical security, that is)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://securosis.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/04/28m.jpg"&gt;&lt;img src="http://securosis.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/04/AustraliaZoo28m-tm.jpg" alt="28M"&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://imdb.com/title/tt0098206/"&gt;Road House&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;“Be Nice.” “Until when?” “Until it’s time to not be nice.”&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Don’t forget the rest of &lt;a href="http://imdb.com/title/tt0098206/quotes"&gt;the quotes&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>AZ Declares 14 Year Old Boy as Dangerous as Bin Laden</title><link>/blog/az-declares-14-year-old-boy-as-dangerous-as-bin-laden/</link><pubDate>Tue, 03 Apr 2007 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/az-declares-14-year-old-boy-as-dangerous-as-bin-laden/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.azcentral.com/news/articles/0403evterrorism0403.html"&gt;This is so stupid&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Terrorism is a tactic, which is also defined as a particularly nasty crime. There are a lot of definitions, but I tend to use various versions of the U.S. Code of Federal Regulations:&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Seen at the Library</title><link>/blog/seen-at-the-library/</link><pubDate>Fri, 30 Mar 2007 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/seen-at-the-library/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://securosis.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/03/noweapons.jpg"&gt;&lt;img src="http://securosis.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/03/AustraliaZoonoweapons-tm.jpg" alt="Noweapons"&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Working from the library today and they have this on every door. Boulder was pretty liberal, but even they didn’t have a gun check at the library.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Stomp the Trolls: The Troll Eradication Project</title><link>/blog/stomp-the-trolls-the-troll-eradication-project/</link><pubDate>Wed, 28 Mar 2007 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/stomp-the-trolls-the-troll-eradication-project/</guid><description>&lt;blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;troll 1 |trōl| noun: 1. A cowardly creature that hides behind anonymity to demean, harass, or threaten others (sometimes illegally) because they lack the intelligence to engage in real dialog or debate. 2. A pathetic, almost-life form that leaches off society without contributing anything of value.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>We Cannot Tolerate This</title><link>/blog/we-cannot-tolerate-this/</link><pubDate>Tue, 27 Mar 2007 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/we-cannot-tolerate-this/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I read a few posts today on the deplorable harassment of Kathy Sierra (read &lt;a href="http://scobleizer.com/2007/03/26/taking-the-week-off/"&gt;Scoble&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/FeldThoughts/~3/104633310/002246.html"&gt;Feld&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://headrush.typepad.com/creating_passionate_users/2007/03/as_i_type_this_.html"&gt;Kathy’s Site&lt;/a&gt;). Basically, Kathy is giving up on blogging and public speaking out of fear due to a series of death threats and online sexual harassment.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>If You Have HDTV Check This Out</title><link>/blog/if-you-have-hdtv-check-this-out/</link><pubDate>Mon, 26 Mar 2007 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/if-you-have-hdtv-check-this-out/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I watched &lt;a href="http://dsc.discovery.com/guides/planetearth/planetearth.html"&gt;Planet Earth&lt;/a&gt; on the HD version of the Discovery Channel last night.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;It’s friggen awesome- the best use of my HDTV since the World Cup. I mean, where else can you watch a 20 foot Great White shark launch itself out of the water in slow motion in high definition as it munches on a sea lion fur seal? Only thing better would be sharks with freaking lasers on their heads.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>BeanSec with the Hoff</title><link>/blog/beansec-with-the-hoff/</link><pubDate>Thu, 22 Mar 2007 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/beansec-with-the-hoff/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Nope, not the lifeguard dude. Someone a bit more interesting. I bet that Night Rider dude never climbed Kilimanjaro despite some serious leg injuries.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Heading to the Boston Area</title><link>/blog/heading-to-the-boston-area/</link><pubDate>Mon, 19 Mar 2007 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/heading-to-the-boston-area/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Not the city, but just outside.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Drop me a line if you are in the area- I’m out there for 2 days so actually have a free evening.
*[Email:]: Email
*[Twitter:]: Twitter
*[Phone:]: Phone&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Worthless Security Theater at the Empire State Building</title><link>/blog/worthless-security-theater-at-the-empire-state-building/</link><pubDate>Mon, 19 Mar 2007 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/worthless-security-theater-at-the-empire-state-building/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Last week was one of those crazy travel ones. I headed to NYC for some client work, and since my wife had never done the tourist route there she came along and I took some time off to show her around. I’m not from NYC, but I’m from the part of Jersey that likes to think we are (technically, I lived closer to Manhattan than some of the other boroughs). After a few days in the city we headed down to Richmond, VA to catch up with my family.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>If You Want to Kill All Humans, This is a Good Start</title><link>/blog/if-you-want-to-kill-all-humans-this-is-a-good-start/</link><pubDate>Wed, 07 Mar 2007 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/if-you-want-to-kill-all-humans-this-is-a-good-start/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://politics.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=07/03/04/1836223&amp;amp;from=rss"&gt;From /.&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;No, not some discussion on something controversial like global warming. Just the &lt;a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/03/03/AR2007030301311.html"&gt;FDA approving&lt;/a&gt; use of a potent antibiotic in cattle against warnings by the AMA and other medical and scientific studies. You know, one of those drugs that the nasty bugs are becoming resistant to.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Black Belt Brain + White Belt Body = Pain</title><link>/blog/black-belt-brain-white-belt-body-pain/</link><pubDate>Fri, 02 Mar 2007 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/black-belt-brain-white-belt-body-pain/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I’m really hurting today. And it’s not a hangover.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;As I think I’ve mentioned before I’m back into martial arts after a 2 year gap (the result of moving across state lines and getting married). It’s pretty amazing how much you can forget when you take a 2 year break from anything.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Alarm Ads That Lie- Is a False Sense of Security Dangerous?</title><link>/blog/alarm-ads-that-lie-is-a-false-sense-of-security-dangerous/</link><pubDate>Tue, 27 Feb 2007 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/alarm-ads-that-lie-is-a-false-sense-of-security-dangerous/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I was catching up on some old TiVo and saw an ADT commercial that really tweaked me. You know the one, it has a woman alone in the kitchen when the bad guy smashes the window to pop the door and do all sorts of nastiness. Her alarm starts blaring, scares off the bad guy, and it’s ADT to the rescue.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>I Want a Gazillion Dollars</title><link>/blog/i-want-a-gazillion-dollars/</link><pubDate>Tue, 27 Feb 2007 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/i-want-a-gazillion-dollars/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Six months ago fellow blogger (and recent friend) Martin McKeay posted that he wanted to be a “Security Evangelist”.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.mckeay.net/secure/2007/02/feeling_welcome_at_stillsecure.html"&gt;As of today, he is&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Unintentional Economics: How a Drunk Driver and Low-Bid Contractor Caused the Boulder Riots</title><link>/blog/unintentional-economics-how-a-drunk-driver-and-low-bid-contractor-caused-the-boulder-riots/</link><pubDate>Fri, 23 Feb 2007 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/unintentional-economics-how-a-drunk-driver-and-low-bid-contractor-caused-the-boulder-riots/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Back in May 1997 I was running security for the annual “Kinetic Sculpture Challenge” in Boulder; a big costume party/concert/race/BBQ/festival/rite of spring sponsored by the local radio station. It’s about a 30,000 person event and I ran a staff of about 90 paid and volunteers. It was one of the more enjoyable events to work every year (the year I was working out East as a paramedic I even flew back just for that weekend).&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>We Can’t Afford Doctrine</title><link>/blog/we-cant-afford-doctrine/</link><pubDate>Wed, 21 Feb 2007 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/we-cant-afford-doctrine/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I almost used the title, “we can’t afford religion”, but figured that might hit Digg a little too fast and piss a lot of people off.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Writing Checks I Can’t Cash</title><link>/blog/writing-checks-i-cant-cash/</link><pubDate>Wed, 21 Feb 2007 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/writing-checks-i-cant-cash/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Sorry folks, this has nothing to do with bank fraud or anything like that.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;Your ego’s writing checks your body can’t cash. -Iceman (you better know the movie)&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>More Than</title><link>/blog/more-than/</link><pubDate>Mon, 19 Feb 2007 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/more-than/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;(Yes, as promised I’m still blogging, just not on the technology or information security industries).&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Look I understand too little too late I realize there are things you say and do You can never take back But what would you be if you didn’t even try You have to try So after a lot of thought I’d like to reconsider Please If it’s not too late Make it a cheeseburger&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>I’m a Professional- Don’t Try This At Home</title><link>/blog/im-a-professional-dont-try-this-at-home/</link><pubDate>Tue, 16 Jan 2007 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/im-a-professional-dont-try-this-at-home/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I love Mythbusters; and before every show there’s the obligatory warning, “Don’t try this at home. We’re what you call professionals”. Which is really disappointing since I now have no idea what to do with the 500 lbs of explosives, the crash test dummy, and the balistics gel sitting in my garage.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Securosis Will No Longer Cover Technology</title><link>/blog/securosis-will-no-longer-cover-technology/</link><pubDate>Tue, 16 Jan 2007 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/securosis-will-no-longer-cover-technology/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I have been told to no longer cover technology issues on my personal blog (that’s this).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Unless/until circumstances change I won’t be posting anything related to technology or that could be construed in a way to potentially violate this policy.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Capital One Wants to Give My Dead Business a Credit Card</title><link>/blog/capital-one-wants-to-give-my-dead-business-a-credit-card/</link><pubDate>Mon, 15 Jan 2007 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/capital-one-wants-to-give-my-dead-business-a-credit-card/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Back before Gartner I ran my own consulting/development business for a while. It was reasonably successful, but when a better opportunity came up I shut down operations and joined the company that Gartner eventually acquired.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Running Vista Without a Net</title><link>/blog/running-vista-without-a-net/</link><pubDate>Mon, 15 Jan 2007 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/running-vista-without-a-net/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I’ve been running my eval copy of Vista (as a virtual machine) for a couple of weeks now and it’s a strange feeling. No, it has nothing to do with the new user interface (most of which won’t run in my virtual machine anyway), User Account Protection (UAP), or any of the new features.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>How Full Disclosure is Like Torture</title><link>/blog/how-full-disclosure-is-like-torture/</link><pubDate>Fri, 12 Jan 2007 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/how-full-disclosure-is-like-torture/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;No, I’m not calling all security researchers torturers. Before you flame me, read the post…&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Not that I have any personal experience (beyond sitting through &lt;a href="http://imdb.com/title/tt0120610/"&gt;Black Dog&lt;/a&gt; the day my girlfriend dumped me), but torture is one of those things that rarely seems to give you the results you want, and even when it seems to work comes at an incredibly high cost&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>On the Month of Apple Bugs, Backdoor Drama, and Why Security Researches Need Exceptional Ethics</title><link>/blog/on-the-month-of-apple-bugs-backdoor-drama-and-why-security-researches-need-exceptional-ethics/</link><pubDate>Thu, 11 Jan 2007 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/on-the-month-of-apple-bugs-backdoor-drama-and-why-security-researches-need-exceptional-ethics/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Being on the road this week, I missed the latest drama at the &lt;a href="http://applefun.blogspot.com/"&gt;Month of Apple Bugs&lt;/a&gt; pointed out in &lt;a href="http://www.extrapepperoni.com/2007/01/11/moab-feh/"&gt;this post&lt;/a&gt; by Chris Pepper. (One thing Chris doesn’t mention is that this backdoor was only included in a pre-release version of the exploit, not the released proof of concept code).&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Defending My Privacy- One Beer at a Time</title><link>/blog/defending-my-privacy-one-beer-at-a-time/</link><pubDate>Mon, 08 Jan 2007 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/defending-my-privacy-one-beer-at-a-time/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;The BCS Championship is in Phoenix tonight (that’s the college football championship game for our overseas and raging-geek readers) and Ohio State seems to have brought around 60,000 of their fans into town.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Heading to MA</title><link>/blog/heading-to-ma/</link><pubDate>Mon, 08 Jan 2007 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/heading-to-ma/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Tomorrow morning I’m off on the wonderful 6 hour flight from Phoenix to Boston&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I probably don’t have time to meet up, but if any of you are in the area and want to give it a shot let me know.
*[Email:]: Email
*[Twitter:]: Twitter
*[Phone:]: Phone&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Keeping it Real</title><link>/blog/keeping-it-real/</link><pubDate>Fri, 05 Jan 2007 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/keeping-it-real/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I had the opportunity to review Rothman’s &lt;a href="http://www.pragmaticcso.com/"&gt;Pragmatic CSO&lt;/a&gt; before the holidays, and it got me thinking about complexity.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;(Oh yeah, and it’s really good, but I’m not allowed to endorse anything so that’s all I’ll say.)&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Maynor is Free… And Blogging</title><link>/blog/maynor-is-free-and-blogging/</link><pubDate>Fri, 05 Jan 2007 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/maynor-is-free-and-blogging/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I’m catching up from being out (or sick) most of the holidays, so this is a bit of old news.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>SAS 70 Has Nothing To Do With Security</title><link>/blog/sas-70-has-nothing-to-do-with-security/</link><pubDate>Fri, 05 Jan 2007 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/sas-70-has-nothing-to-do-with-security/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Richard &lt;a href="http://taosecurity.blogspot.com/2006/12/thoughts-on-sas-70-and-other-standards.html"&gt;expresses a little shock&lt;/a&gt; upon discovering that SAS 70 audits don’t evaluate security.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I’d be shocked if any service provider, or other organization for that matter, claimed to me a SAS 70 made them secure. As in I’d consider them totally fracking worthless.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Privacy Update- No Warrant Needed to Open Mail</title><link>/blog/privacy-update-no-warrant-needed-to-open-mail/</link><pubDate>Thu, 04 Jan 2007 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/privacy-update-no-warrant-needed-to-open-mail/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;To be honest, this is just a signing statement and, from what little constitutional law I know, kind of illegal. Basically, when Bush signed a law into effect that prohibited warrantless reading of citizens email, he added a statement that said the feds can still read email without a warrant. Wacky, huh?&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>February is</title><link>/blog/february-is/</link><pubDate>Wed, 03 Jan 2007 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/february-is/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Securosis is officially declaring February as the “Month of No Bugs”.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This follows the trend started by HD Moore with the &lt;a href="http://browser.blogspot.com/"&gt;Month of Browser Bugs&lt;/a&gt;, then continued by LMH with the &lt;a href="http://kernelfun.blogspot.com/"&gt;Month of Kernel Bugs&lt;/a&gt;, and now the &lt;a href="http://applefun.blogspot.com/"&gt;Month of Apple Bugs&lt;/a&gt;. During the month of February no security researcher will release any vulnerabilities on any systems, giving IT departments and vendors valuable time to make a dent in their backlog of existing vulnerabilities to fix and patch. All cybercriminals will refrain from using any of their 0-day exploits and limit themselves to previously reported public vulnerabilities.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Welcome to 2007: ‘06 Recap and Predictions</title><link>/blog/welcome-to-2007-06-recap-and-predictions/</link><pubDate>Tue, 02 Jan 2007 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/welcome-to-2007-06-recap-and-predictions/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Yep, I’m usually late to parties.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The holidays were pretty intense with various family events this year, so I blogged and worked less than expected on my vacation. I’ve also managed to come down with a nasty case of strep, which is an annoying way to start the year. Thus it’s only now, on January 2nd, that I can finally respond to Alex’s challenge/tag for my 2007 predictions. Let’s start with the 2006 recap:&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>HTTP Authentication: a Primer</title><link>/blog/http-authentication-a-primer/</link><pubDate>Sun, 24 Dec 2006 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/http-authentication-a-primer/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;The HTTP protocol includes encryption features, such as “Basic HTTP Authentication” and “Digest HTTP Authentication”, which are well supported by current browsers. Using either, every time you log your browser into a website with a username &amp;amp; password, the browser stores three pieces of information: the site’s hostname, your username, and your password. From then on, until you quit your browser, every time you visit any page on that site, your browser sends that username &amp;amp; password to the server. This is the same via both HTTP &amp;amp; HTTPS, but doesn’t apply to custom login code, such as forms and cookies; normally the easiest way to recognize Basic or Digest authentication is the separate window that pops up over the web page, prompting for username and password, and possibly “realm”; if it has logos or is inside a web page, it isn’t basic or digest authentication.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>When Community Is Bad: Community and Commerce—Don’t Cross the Streams!</title><link>/blog/when-community-is-bad-community-and-commerce-dont-cross-the-streams/</link><pubDate>Sun, 24 Dec 2006 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/when-community-is-bad-community-and-commerce-dont-cross-the-streams/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Note: For some background on HTTP authentication and username/password caching, see &lt;a href="http://securosis.com/2006/12/24/http-authentication-a-primer/"&gt;HTTP Authentication: a Primer&lt;/a&gt;. I was reading &lt;a href="http://www.schneier.com/blog/archives/2006/12/realworld_passw.html"&gt;Schneier&lt;/a&gt; yesterday, and it reminded me of all those MySpace and similar worms going around. Why are they so bad? How will they get worse in the future? Their biggest problem is that they welcome everyone, making it easy for bad people to establish themselves. The second is that even though the sites themselves are not high-security, they have security implications for other sites, including high-security sites. MySpace is scary because it enables a &lt;a href="http://forevergeek.com/articles/debunking_the_myspace_myth_of_100_million_users.php"&gt;very large number of people&lt;/a&gt; to post content your browser will parse and &lt;a href="http://blog.outer-court.com/archive/2005-10-14-n81.html"&gt;possibly execute&lt;/a&gt;. Further, they’re casual sites, so don’t have the same level of security urgency or corporate paranoia as a bank obviously needs (the &lt;em&gt;reality&lt;/em&gt; of bank security is a different matter, but the &lt;em&gt;expectation&lt;/em&gt; is higher for Citibank than MySpace). The other concern is that people and their browsers (often on auto-pilot, for both people and browsers) enter login information routinely to access these sites. This makes community sites a rich target for attackers – especially since many people use the same username &amp;amp; password for MySpace and electronic banking (and everything else)! Those people who get hacked on MySpace, and then immediately on their electronic banking sites, are screwed. But at least everybody can say “You should have known better.” It doesn’t help much, but is important to both MySpace and the banks for liability reasons. And it’s true – in 2006 you’re asking for trouble if you use the same password for your bank as a low-security site like MySpace. This isn’t to confuse the victim with the perpetrator, but we have to expect more self-defense than that. We can’t provide &lt;strong&gt;all&lt;/strong&gt; the security everybody needs – they have to help! But site developers must make the assumption that every user has exactly one username and password, which they use &lt;strong&gt;everywhere&lt;/strong&gt; , and make every effort to protect that password (this means not storing accounts in a plaintext MySQL table, not showing passwords to customer service/support staff, and not emailing passwords on request – reset them and email the new random password to the address on file).&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>The Three Laws of Data Encryption</title><link>/blog/the-three-laws-of-data-encryption/</link><pubDate>Thu, 21 Dec 2006 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/the-three-laws-of-data-encryption/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Lately (as in, most of the year) I’ve been seeing a lot of &lt;a href="http://securityincite.com/TDI-2006-12-21#TSN1"&gt;chatter&lt;/a&gt; around encryption- driven primarily by PCI and concerns about landing on the front page of every major newspaper in the .&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Security Often Has Little To Do With Safety</title><link>/blog/security-often-has-little-to-do-with-safety/</link><pubDate>Tue, 19 Dec 2006 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/security-often-has-little-to-do-with-safety/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I’m catching up after all of last week’s travel and saw a good post by Dave over at Matasano on &lt;a href="http://www.matasano.com/log/644/safety-vs-security-2/" title="http://www.matasano.com/log/644/safety-vs-security-2/"&gt;Safety vs. Security&lt;/a&gt;. Dave basically states that although one operating system might have better security than another, it doesn’t really matter if it’s more of a target. Vista might be more inherently secure than OS X, but it doesn’t matter if you are less likely to be attacked on your Mac. At least until someone decides it’s time to change targets.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>If You Are a Security Blogger…</title><link>/blog/if-you-are-a-security-blogger/</link><pubDate>Mon, 18 Dec 2006 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/if-you-are-a-security-blogger/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;…and I haven’t already contacted you about RSA, please email me at rmogull at securosis.com.
*[Email:]: Email
*[Twitter:]: Twitter
*[Phone:]: Phone&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>What a Silly Search</title><link>/blog/what-a-silly-search/</link><pubDate>Mon, 18 Dec 2006 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/what-a-silly-search/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I went to the Broncos vs. Cardinals game yesterday here in Phoenix (Broncos won, in case you were wondering). On the way in we were subject to a pat down of the type I &lt;a href="http://securosis.com/2006/12/05/we-dont-enjoy-touching-you/" title="http://securosis.com/2006/12/05/we-dont-enjoy-touching-you/"&gt;discussed here.&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Do Not Open Any Unexpected Microsoft Word Files</title><link>/blog/do-not-open-any-unexpected-microsoft-word-files/</link><pubDate>Fri, 15 Dec 2006 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/do-not-open-any-unexpected-microsoft-word-files/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I wasn’t planning on writing about this, but with the release of a &lt;a href="http://rss.slashdot.org/~r/Slashdot/slashdot/~3/61575874/article.pl"&gt;third unpatched MS Word vulnerability&lt;/a&gt; it’s time to be extra careful.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>If You Release It You Can’t Control It.</title><link>/blog/if-you-release-it-you-cant-control-it/</link><pubDate>Tue, 12 Dec 2006 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/if-you-release-it-you-cant-control-it/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I’m on yet another airplane, this time up to Seattle for another client meeting. I felt really bad for the non-English-speaker being berated by security at the airport for daring to bring 4.2 full ounces of liquid in his bag, as opposed to the 3 ounce limit.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Quiet for a Few Days</title><link>/blog/quiet-for-a-few-days/</link><pubDate>Thu, 07 Dec 2006 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/quiet-for-a-few-days/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I’m out in Colorado with the wife to catch up with friends (I used to live here) and test the snow for proper friction (snowboarding up at Copper, where I used to patrol).&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>We Don’t Enjoy Touching You</title><link>/blog/we-dont-enjoy-touching-you/</link><pubDate>Tue, 05 Dec 2006 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/we-dont-enjoy-touching-you/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Adam at Emergent Chaos has a &lt;a href="http://www.emergentchaos.com/archives/2006/12/the_patdowns_at_public_st.html" title="http://www.emergentchaos.com/archives/2006/12/the_patdowns_at_public_st.html"&gt;quick post&lt;/a&gt; on the lawsuit against the Seattle Seahawks over physical searches at the stadium.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Barenaked- Stripping DRM</title><link>/blog/barenaked-stripping-drm/</link><pubDate>Mon, 04 Dec 2006 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/barenaked-stripping-drm/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I travel a lot, and on occasion I’ll run Nmap or some other scanner from my hotel room to get an idea of what’s out there, and how dangerous these hotel networks really are. To be honest it’s not something I do all that much anymore since even scanning an open network is running the risk of being considered over the line.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>NIST Recommending Decertification of DRE E-Voting?</title><link>/blog/nist-recommending-decertification-of-dre-e-voting/</link><pubDate>Thu, 30 Nov 2006 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/nist-recommending-decertification-of-dre-e-voting/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.internetnews.com/bus-news/article.php/3646231"&gt;Reported over at Internetnews.com&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) is recommending that the 2007 version of the Voluntary Voting Systems Guidelines (VVSG) decertify direct record electronic (DRE) machines&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Registered Traveler Program is a Security Scam</title><link>/blog/registered-traveler-program-is-a-security-scam/</link><pubDate>Thu, 30 Nov 2006 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/registered-traveler-program-is-a-security-scam/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Electronic voting seems to be popping up again thanks to our &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/boingboing/iBag/~3/21874784/princeton_researcher.html" title="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/boingboing/iBag/~3/21874784/princeton_researcher.html"&gt;favorite digital ostrich, Diebold&lt;/a&gt;. Martin Mckeay’s also writing on this a bit, and it’s &lt;a href="http://www.mckeay.net/secure/2006/09/my_computerworld_rant_against.html" title="http://www.mckeay.net/secure/2006/09/my_computerworld_rant_against.html"&gt;well worth reading&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Security Mindset: You Won’t Think of Everything</title><link>/blog/security-mindset-you-wont-think-of-everything/</link><pubDate>Wed, 29 Nov 2006 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/security-mindset-you-wont-think-of-everything/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I’m out on the road this week, right now spending two days at a strategic planning session with a large energy company. This is the kind of trip I actually enjoy- working with an end-user on strategic issues at the executive level where they really want to solve the problem.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>The Security Mindset</title><link>/blog/the-security-mindset/</link><pubDate>Wed, 29 Nov 2006 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/the-security-mindset/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;A few months ago I picked up a Western Digital external hard drive at Costco since my MacBook’s internal drive was a bit stuffed with digital photos. The WD drive is a pretty nice USB drive and really portable.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>A City Dedicated to Social Engineering</title><link>/blog/a-city-dedicated-to-social-engineering/</link><pubDate>Tue, 28 Nov 2006 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/a-city-dedicated-to-social-engineering/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I have a love-hate relationship with Vegas.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;As someone who’s not the biggest fan of crowds (after way too many years of events security) this isn’t exactly the most relaxing environment. As someone who hates to lose… well, if you think you can win here you’re fooling yourself.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Speaking in Vegas</title><link>/blog/speaking-in-vegas/</link><pubDate>Mon, 27 Nov 2006 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/speaking-in-vegas/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I’m heading out to Vegas tomorrow morning to speak at the Data Center conference.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;If any readers are there and want to meet up, just email…
*[Email:]: Email
*[Twitter:]: Twitter
*[Phone:]: Phone&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Take the Latest OS X Disk Image (DMG) Vulnerability and Possible Exploit Seriously</title><link>/blog/take-the-latest-os-x-disk-image-dmg-vulnerability-and-possible-exploit-seriously/</link><pubDate>Wed, 22 Nov 2006 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/take-the-latest-os-x-disk-image-dmg-vulnerability-and-possible-exploit-seriously/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;For some reason I think I often end up the middle on some of these vulnerability issues; trying to bring reasonable advice to both technical and less-technical users on hyped security issues.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Disable Storing Passwords in Firefox 2.0</title><link>/blog/disable-storing-passwords-in-firefox-2-0/</link><pubDate>Tue, 21 Nov 2006 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/disable-storing-passwords-in-firefox-2-0/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;There’s a &lt;a href="http://it.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=06/11/21/2319243&amp;amp;from=rss" title="http://it.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=06/11/21/2319243&amp;amp;from=rss"&gt;new bug&lt;/a&gt;, which can reveal your password to any other page on the same domain. Even if you have a master password set, you should clear out all your Firefox stored passwords until this is fixed. There are a lot of ways to take advantage of this, especially on Web 2.14.168.42 sites.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>If a Safe Vulnerability Scan Breaks Stuff, Better Have Good Backups and a Resume</title><link>/blog/if-a-safe-vulnerability-scan-breaks-stuff-better-have-good-backups-and-a-resume/</link><pubDate>Tue, 21 Nov 2006 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/if-a-safe-vulnerability-scan-breaks-stuff-better-have-good-backups-and-a-resume/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Jim at DCS has &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/DcsSecurity/~3/51781092/scanning-vs-not-scanning-this-deserves.html" title="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/DcsSecurity/~3/51781092/scanning-vs-not-scanning-this-deserves.html"&gt;this post on scanning SCADA networks&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Here’s the thing. If you’re so scared you’ll break your stuff by running a simple Nessus scan with safe settings, you have a serious problem. Just imagine how screwed you’ll be the first time an attacker decides to scan your systems for you.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Repost: The Securosis Top 6 Tips for Safe Online Holiday Shopping</title><link>/blog/repost-the-securosis-top-6-tips-for-safe-online-holiday-shopping/</link><pubDate>Tue, 21 Nov 2006 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/repost-the-securosis-top-6-tips-for-safe-online-holiday-shopping/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;Today is the last day some of you will be in front of your computers before the horror of Black Friday. Thus, we are reposting our safe holiday shopping advice.&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Mac vs. Windows Security- It’s a Whole New Game, and Doesn’t Matter</title><link>/blog/mac-vs-windows-security-its-a-whole-new-game-and-doesnt-matter/</link><pubDate>Mon, 20 Nov 2006 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/mac-vs-windows-security-its-a-whole-new-game-and-doesnt-matter/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I’m about to tread, yet again, on religious ground.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://daringfireball.net/2006/11/jackass_larry_seltzer" title="http://daringfireball.net/2006/11/jackass_larry_seltzer"&gt;John Gruber&lt;/a&gt;, attacking an eWeek article, &lt;a href="http://www.matasano.com/log/609/five-reasons-to-ignore-john-grubers-os-x-security-pundity/" title="http://www.matasano.com/log/609/five-reasons-to-ignore-john-grubers-os-x-security-pundity/"&gt;incited a response&lt;/a&gt; by Tom Ptacek over at Matasano. I suggest you read those articles, especially the Matasano response, because they highlight very clearly some of the technical differences between OS X and Windows Vista.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>The Best Gift for Non-Geeks That Isn’t On Their List (And They Won’t Appreciate, But Really Need)</title><link>/blog/the-best-gift-for-non-geeks-that-isnt-on-their-list-and-they-wont-appreciate-but-really-need-2/</link><pubDate>Mon, 20 Nov 2006 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/the-best-gift-for-non-geeks-that-isnt-on-their-list-and-they-wont-appreciate-but-really-need-2/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;Author’s Note:&lt;/em&gt; &lt;em&gt;This was originally posted last year, but nothing ever changes:&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Backup&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Backup&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Backup&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Did I say backup yet?&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>More Wireless Kernel Bugs With Exploits: This Time It’s Netgear</title><link>/blog/more-wireless-kernel-bugs-with-exploits-this-time-its-netgear/</link><pubDate>Fri, 17 Nov 2006 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/more-wireless-kernel-bugs-with-exploits-this-time-its-netgear/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;The Month of Kernel Bugs has released their&lt;a href="http://kernelfun.blogspot.com/" title="http://kernelfun.blogspot.com/"&gt; latest vulnerability&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;There’s also a Metasploit exploit module.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I’m not going to &lt;a href="http://securosis.com/2006/10/21/its-time-to-turn-off-wifi-and-bluetooth-when-not-in-use-mac-or-pc/" title="http://securosis.com/2006/10/21/its-time-to-turn-off-wifi-and-bluetooth-when-not-in-use-mac-or-pc/"&gt;post&lt;/a&gt; every time one of these pops up, but hopefully this puts some of the wireless flaw debates to bed.
*[Email:]: Email
*[Twitter:]: Twitter
*[Phone:]: Phone&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Bad Math- No ROI for You</title><link>/blog/bad-math-no-roi-for-you/</link><pubDate>Thu, 16 Nov 2006 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/bad-math-no-roi-for-you/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;To follow up on metrics, &lt;a href="http://techbuddha.wordpress.com/" title="http://techbuddha.wordpress.com/"&gt;Amrit&lt;/a&gt; pointed out in the &lt;a href="http://securosis.com/2006/11/15/no-metrics-no-budget-or-paycheck/#comments"&gt;comments&lt;/a&gt; that we can’t use totally imaginary numbers.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;There’s some myth out there that assumes risk models can track directly to ROI models. I’ll save the full rant for later, but here’s a little math.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Good Thing for Backups! But Why Can’t They…?</title><link>/blog/good-thing-for-backups-but-why-cant-they/</link><pubDate>Thu, 16 Nov 2006 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/good-thing-for-backups-but-why-cant-they/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;My work day had a bit of an unplanned interruption today. I shut down my computer to head from the home office to a nice quiet coffee shop for a change of scenery and a little time off the Internet to get some research done.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Things Not To Do If You’re A Security Company</title><link>/blog/things-not-to-do-if-youre-a-security-company/</link><pubDate>Thu, 16 Nov 2006 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/things-not-to-do-if-youre-a-security-company/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Guidance Software sells one of the best computer forensics tools on the market. Their largest client base is law enforcement and other types who perform investigations.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>No Metrics, No Budget (or Paycheck)</title><link>/blog/no-metrics-no-budget-or-paycheck/</link><pubDate>Wed, 15 Nov 2006 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/no-metrics-no-budget-or-paycheck/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Oh goodie- another religious security debate! We do love our religious arguments so.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This time it’s &lt;a href="http://techbuddha.wordpress.com/2006/11/15/you-can-measure-security/" title="http://techbuddha.wordpress.com/2006/11/15/you-can-measure-security/"&gt;Amrit&lt;/a&gt; taking on &lt;a href="http://securityincite.com/TDI-2006-11-14#TBP2" title="http://securityincite.com/TDI-2006-11-14#TBP2"&gt;Rothman&lt;/a&gt; over security metrics. Amrit likes them, Rothman doesn’t. Both of them are funny looking (sorry, it’s not germane to this post, but I figure people should know).&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Firefox 2 vs. IE 7 Anti-Phishing: Who Cares? Use Multiple Layers</title><link>/blog/firefox-2-vs-ie-7-anti-phishing-who-cares-use-multiple-layers/</link><pubDate>Tue, 14 Nov 2006 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/firefox-2-vs-ie-7-anti-phishing-who-cares-use-multiple-layers/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks to an &lt;a href="http://searchsecurity.techtarget.com/originalContent/0,289142,sid14_gci1229888,00.html" title="http://searchsecurity.techtarget.com/originalContent/0,289142,sid14_gci1229888,00.html"&gt;independent evaluation&lt;/a&gt; we now know that Firefox 2.0 is slightly better than IE 7 at detecting phishing sites. Firefox detected 243 sites missed by IE while IE “only” detected 117 sites missed by Firefox.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Finally- a Phisher Makes the Effort for My Business (New Ebay Scam)</title><link>/blog/finally-a-phisher-makes-the-effort-for-my-business-new-ebay-scam/</link><pubDate>Mon, 13 Nov 2006 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/finally-a-phisher-makes-the-effort-for-my-business-new-ebay-scam/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;A while back I started to wonder if my phishing providers &lt;a href="http://securosis.com/2006/10/17/are-phishers-getting-lazy/" title="http://securosis.com/2006/10/17/are-phishers-getting-lazy/"&gt;really cared about my business&lt;/a&gt;. They were getting seriously lazy- using generic “Your Online Bank” instead of a real bank name, no longer personalizing my emails, and using links practically entitled, “stealmyinfo.com”.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Upgrade to Firefox 2.0 Manually- It’s Not Automatic, and Change This Security Setting Today!</title><link>/blog/upgrade-to-firefox-2-0-manually-its-not-automatic-and-change-this-security-setting-today/</link><pubDate>Mon, 13 Nov 2006 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/upgrade-to-firefox-2-0-manually-its-not-automatic-and-change-this-security-setting-today/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;After posting our &lt;a href="http://securosis.com/2006/11/11/the-securosis-top-6-tips-for-safe-online-holiday-shopping/" title="http://securosis.com/2006/11/11/the-securosis-top-6-tips-for-safe-online-holiday-shopping/"&gt;Top Six Hints for Safe Online Holiday Shopping&lt;/a&gt;, Chris Pepper notified me that Firefox 2.0 is not an automatic upgrade, and Firefox 1.5 doesn’t prompt you at all to download the new version.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>New Wireless Exploit- Very Nasty, Patch or Shutoff Now!</title><link>/blog/new-wireless-exploit-very-nasty-patch-or-shutoff-now/</link><pubDate>Sat, 11 Nov 2006 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/new-wireless-exploit-very-nasty-patch-or-shutoff-now/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;A new wireless exploit was released today over at the &lt;a href="http://kernelfun.blogspot.com/" title="http://kernelfun.blogspot.com/"&gt;Month of Kernel Bugs&lt;/a&gt; affecting the Broadcom wireless chip set (one of the most widely used in the industry).&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>The 100th Post, and a Note to My Editor</title><link>/blog/the-100th-post-and-a-note-to-my-editor/</link><pubDate>Sat, 11 Nov 2006 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/the-100th-post-and-a-note-to-my-editor/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;It&amp;rsquo;s hard to believe this little side project has hit 100 posts. We&amp;rsquo;re averaging 600+ unique visitors a day, which isn&amp;rsquo;t bad for a blog that&amp;rsquo;s only been around for three months, and even hit the front page of &lt;a href="http://digg.com"&gt;Digg&lt;/a&gt; once.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>The Securosis Top 6 Tips for Safe Online Holiday Shopping</title><link>/blog/the-securosis-top-6-tips-for-safe-online-holiday-shopping/</link><pubDate>Sat, 11 Nov 2006 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/the-securosis-top-6-tips-for-safe-online-holiday-shopping/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Yes folks, Black Friday is less than two weeks away and the silly season is upon us. As someone born and bred in good old North Jersey (until I could legally escape), land of honey and shopping malls, this is a time so deeply ingrained into my subconscious that I’ve occasionally found myself sleepwalking around the nearest parking lot, looking for our old wood-paneled station wagon.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Database Security Vulnerability Stats</title><link>/blog/database-security-vulnerability-stats/</link><pubDate>Fri, 10 Nov 2006 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/database-security-vulnerability-stats/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;These numbers are totally fascinating- check it out &lt;a href="http://blogs.technet.com/security/archive/2006/11/07/sql-server-2005-1-year-and-not-yet-counting.aspx" title="http://blogs.technet.com/security/archive/2006/11/07/sql-server-2005-1-year-and-not-yet-counting.aspx"&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Keep in mind that some database systems (like SQL Server) only run on a single platform, while the others (you know who) run all over the place.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Mac FileVault Encryption Update</title><link>/blog/mac-filevault-encryption-update/</link><pubDate>Fri, 10 Nov 2006 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/mac-filevault-encryption-update/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Back in August I finally broke down and &lt;a href="http://securosis.com/2006/08/26/experiences-with-filevault-mac-encryption/" title="http://securosis.com/2006/08/26/experiences-with-filevault-mac-encryption/"&gt;encrypted my computer&lt;/a&gt; using the built in FileVault feature in Mac OS X.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Music Labels and Microsoft Assume You Are a Criminal- and Charge You For It</title><link>/blog/music-labels-and-microsoft-assume-you-are-a-criminal-and-charge-you-for-it/</link><pubDate>Thu, 09 Nov 2006 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/music-labels-and-microsoft-assume-you-are-a-criminal-and-charge-you-for-it/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;As a security professional I admit that I normally assume someone I’m dealing with isn’t necessarily honest; especially if they’ve done something to draw my attention. I learned early on that most humans have an unbelievable capacity for deceit, and they use it on a daily basis. In many cases the individual is so believable because they’ve convinced themselves that what they’re doing/saying is either the truth (when it’s clearly not), or they’re justified for some bullshit reason (like “the man” has been keeping them down). No- you really don’t deserve to steal my bike out of the garage because I make more money than you (despite coming from a bankrupt family as a kid) or because I was dumb enough to leave the door open. (Yep, even us pros screw up sometimes and pay the price).&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>How the Death of Privacy and the Long Archive May Forever Alter Politics</title><link>/blog/how-the-death-of-privacy-and-the-long-archive-may-forever-alter-politics-2/</link><pubDate>Tue, 07 Nov 2006 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/how-the-death-of-privacy-and-the-long-archive-may-forever-alter-politics-2/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;As the silly season comes to a close with today’s election (at least for, like, a week or so) there’s a change to the political process I’ve been thinking about a lot. And it’s not e-voting, election fraud, or other issues we’ve occasionally discussed.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Report Voting Machine Problems to 1-866-OUR-VOTE</title><link>/blog/report-voting-machine-problems-to-1-866-our-vote/</link><pubDate>Tue, 07 Nov 2006 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/report-voting-machine-problems-to-1-866-our-vote/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;From &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/boingboing/iBag/~3/46113089/report_votemachine_p.html" title="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/boingboing/iBag/~3/46113089/report_votemachine_p.html"&gt;BoingBoing&lt;/a&gt;:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;If you experience any irregularities in voting today, call 1-866-OUR-VOTE, the hotline for the National Campaign for Fair Elections. EFF lawyers and many others are standing by across the country to take legal action to remove malfunctioning voting machines, keep polls open, etc.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Stop Using IE… Umm… Again… For Now. Anyone on Lynx?</title><link>/blog/stop-using-ie-umm-again-for-now-anyone-on-lynx/</link><pubDate>Mon, 06 Nov 2006 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/stop-using-ie-umm-again-for-now-anyone-on-lynx/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;An unpatched vulnerability being &lt;a href="http://www.symantec.com/enterprise/security_response/weblog/2006/11/new_vulnerability_affecting_in.html" title="http://www.symantec.com/enterprise/security_response/weblog/2006/11/new_vulnerability_affecting_in.html"&gt;exploited in the wild&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;When I’m on a Windows system (I run it virtualized on my Mac for work) I tend to use multiple browsers since even Firefox has issues at times.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Update: No Bluetooth 0day Vulnerability, but a New Exploit</title><link>/blog/update-no-bluetooth-0day-vulnerability-but-a-new-exploit/</link><pubDate>Sat, 04 Nov 2006 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/update-no-bluetooth-0day-vulnerability-but-a-new-exploit/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;After reviewing the materials I could find online I directly contacted Thierry Zoller and he was kind enough to respond with more details. In his words (with permission). Short version is the flaw is well patched, but the exploit is a new technique of getting a remote shell. No kernel bugs this time:&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Don’t Panic: Bluetooth 0Day on Mac: Probably Patched</title><link>/blog/dont-panic-bluetooth-0day-on-mac-probably-patched/</link><pubDate>Fri, 03 Nov 2006 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/dont-panic-bluetooth-0day-on-mac-probably-patched/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I have no details, but am investigating.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://isc.sans.org/diary.php?storyid=1817"&gt;http://isc.sans.org/diary.php?storyid=1817&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I know there are some Bluetooth 0days floating around for various platforms, but this one wasn’t on my list.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>E-voting Can be More Secure When Done Right</title><link>/blog/e-voting-can-be-more-secure-when-done-right/</link><pubDate>Fri, 03 Nov 2006 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/e-voting-can-be-more-secure-when-done-right/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;In the comments of my last post, bkwatch reminds me that paper ballots are from from perfect.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I totally agree.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Site Updates This Weekend</title><link>/blog/site-updates-this-weekend/</link><pubDate>Fri, 03 Nov 2006 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/site-updates-this-weekend/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I’ll be updating the look and feel of the site slightly, and performing some other system updates.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;There shouldn’t be any outages, but if you do notice anything strange or some HTML/CSS issues please let me know&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>E-voting: Democracy is Dead. Dead and Rotted. Unless we Stop this Insanity</title><link>/blog/e-voting-democracy-is-dead-dead-and-rotted-unless-we-stop-this-insanity/</link><pubDate>Thu, 02 Nov 2006 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/e-voting-democracy-is-dead-dead-and-rotted-unless-we-stop-this-insanity/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I don’t know a single security expert that supports any current implementation of electronic voting.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;It’s too late for this election, but if we don’t take action before 2008, we might as well kiss what’s left of democracy in the United States goodbye.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Former CEO of CA Gets 12 Years in Jail</title><link>/blog/former-ceo-of-ca-gets-12-years-in-jail/</link><pubDate>Thu, 02 Nov 2006 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/former-ceo-of-ca-gets-12-years-in-jail/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I don’t cover industry issues here, but this is just too good to pass up.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Sanjay Kumar, former CEO of CA, is &lt;a href="http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20061102/ap_on_bi_ge/software_sentence" title="http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20061102/ap_on_bi_ge/software_sentence"&gt;sentenced to 12 years and $8M in fines.&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>I Admit it: on E-Voting Hyperbole and Optimism;—Also, Diebold Fights HBO</title><link>/blog/i-admit-it-on-e-voting-hyperbole-and-optimism-also-diebold-fights-hbo/</link><pubDate>Thu, 02 Nov 2006 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/i-admit-it-on-e-voting-hyperbole-and-optimism-also-diebold-fights-hbo/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Now there’s something I need to admit here. Hopefully it won’t scare you courageous readers away. You see, as much as I (and fortunately, my employer) consider myself a security expert it wasn’t exactly my major. Nope, wasn’t computer science either. History, you ask? With a bit of molecular biology? Yep, you got it.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>More SCADA News- Water Plant Hacked</title><link>/blog/more-scada-news-water-plant-hacked/</link><pubDate>Thu, 02 Nov 2006 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/more-scada-news-water-plant-hacked/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I’m linking to Jim at DCS Security- he has the best SCADA background in the blog community and hopefully he’ll dig into this particular hack a little more:&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Month of Kernel Bugs Starts With Apple: November Should be Fun</title><link>/blog/month-of-kernel-bugs-starts-with-apple-november-should-be-fun/</link><pubDate>Wed, 01 Nov 2006 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/month-of-kernel-bugs-starts-with-apple-november-should-be-fun/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;The first flaw isn’t all that interesting (affecting older PowerBooks, and only under certain conditions) but methinks November will be pretty darn interesting:&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Top Five Steps to Prevent Data Loss and Information Leaks</title><link>/blog/top-five-steps-to-prevent-data-loss-and-information-leaks/</link><pubDate>Wed, 01 Nov 2006 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/top-five-steps-to-prevent-data-loss-and-information-leaks/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;One of the great things about the Internet is that it allows isolated assholes to connect and communicate like never before. Thus Rothman and I, mere professional acquaintances and friendly faces at a few industry events, can engage in deeper dialog, dragging any of our loyal readers down with us. (Mike and I are the assholes, not you guys. Except maybe for Will). I like it when smart guys like Mike push me, it makes for better analysis.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Evilsquirrel Enterprises Announces North American Expansion</title><link>/blog/evilsquirrel-enterprises-announces-north-american-expansion/</link><pubDate>Tue, 31 Oct 2006 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/evilsquirrel-enterprises-announces-north-american-expansion/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://securosis.com/wp-content/uploads/2006/10/EvilsquirrelBlackBack.jpg"&gt;&lt;img src="http://securosis.com/wp-content/uploads/2006/10/AustraliaZooEvilsquirrelBlackBack-tm.jpg" alt="Evilsquirrelblackback"&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Evilsquirrel Enterprises Announces North American Expansion&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;Leaders in world domination to expand geographic services.&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Undisclosed HQ, USA, Oct. 31, 2006&lt;/strong&gt; – Evilsquirrel Enterprises, the leading provider of world domination services, announced today that they are leveraging their best-in-class international infrastructure to expand into the North American market. As the preeminent world domination specialists, enterprises now have a truly global provider offering unmatched services and support.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>If You Think Boarding Passes and IDs Improve Security, You Shouldn’t Be In Security</title><link>/blog/if-you-think-boarding-passes-and-ids-improve-security-you-shouldnt-be-in-security/</link><pubDate>Tue, 31 Oct 2006 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/if-you-think-boarding-passes-and-ids-improve-security-you-shouldnt-be-in-security/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;There’s been a &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/boingboing/iBag/~3/43063570/ceci_nest_pas_un_fak.html" title="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/boingboing/iBag/~3/43063570/ceci_nest_pas_un_fak.html"&gt;lot of hubbub&lt;/a&gt; the past couple of days over Christopher Soghoian &lt;a href="http://www.emergentchaos.com/archives/2006/10/on_printing_boarding_pass.html" title="http://www.emergentchaos.com/archives/2006/10/on_printing_boarding_pass.html"&gt;posting a tool&lt;/a&gt; to let anyone print their own boarding pass. While I’m all for publicizing security silliness, I personally try and avoid things that might invite 2 a.m. non-social visits from the FBI.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Security = Compliance, Compliance Rarely = Security</title><link>/blog/security-compliance-compliance-rarely-security/</link><pubDate>Mon, 30 Oct 2006 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/security-compliance-compliance-rarely-security/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Good security will almost always make you compliant (or pretty darn close, not counting all the documentation). Compliance alone will pretty much never make you secure.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Risk Management: Set Your Domain Experts Free</title><link>/blog/risk-management-set-your-domain-experts-free/</link><pubDate>Fri, 27 Oct 2006 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/risk-management-set-your-domain-experts-free/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;The blogoshpere is kind of funny sometimes as we all run around referencing each other constantly, so you’ll have to excuse the “my sister’s best friend’s 2nd cousin twice removed’s boyfriends bookie” path for this post. (Actually, I really dig all our cross referencing, I think it creates a cool community of experts).&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>The Three Types of Best Practices</title><link>/blog/the-three-types-of-best-practices/</link><pubDate>Thu, 26 Oct 2006 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/the-three-types-of-best-practices/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Jim over at &lt;a href="http://dcssec.blogspot.com/" title="http://dcssec.blogspot.com/"&gt;DCS Security&lt;/a&gt; (a great new blog) just finished his &lt;a href="http://dcssec.blogspot.com/2006/10/layers-100-compliance-final-of-4.html" title="http://dcssec.blogspot.com/2006/10/layers-100-compliance-final-of-4.html"&gt;last in a series&lt;/a&gt; of good posts on security layers.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>How I Know There Are Very Few</title><link>/blog/how-i-know-there-are-very-few/</link><pubDate>Wed, 25 Oct 2006 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/how-i-know-there-are-very-few/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Anton Chuvakin eviscerates me &lt;a href="http://chuvakin.blogspot.com/2006/10/and-how-do-you-know.html" title="http://chuvakin.blogspot.com/2006/10/and-how-do-you-know.html"&gt;here&lt;/a&gt; for claiming there are very few 0days (what Shimel is starting to call Less than Zero Days).&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>My Last Pitch for Defining</title><link>/blog/my-last-pitch-for-defining/</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Oct 2006 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/my-last-pitch-for-defining/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Alan Shimel is reviving the zero day debate and coins a term “&lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Less_Than_Zero"&gt;less than zero&lt;/a&gt; day” for vulnerabilities that are unknown from the public at large. Check out his series starting &lt;a href="http://www.stillsecureafteralltheseyears.com/ashimmy/2006/10/less_then_zero_.html" title="http://www.stillsecureafteralltheseyears.com/ashimmy/2006/10/less_then_zero_.html"&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;, then &lt;a href="http://www.stillsecureafteralltheseyears.com/ashimmy/2006/10/less_then_zero__1.html" title="http://www.stillsecureafteralltheseyears.com/ashimmy/2006/10/less_then_zero__1.html"&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;, and finally &lt;a href="http://www.stillsecureafteralltheseyears.com/ashimmy/2006/10/more_on_less_th.html" title="http://www.stillsecureafteralltheseyears.com/ashimmy/2006/10/more_on_less_th.html"&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;. Rothman mostly agrees &lt;a href="http://securityincite.com/blog/mike-rothman/less-than-zero-requires-intelligence" title="http://securityincite.com/blog/mike-rothman/less-than-zero-requires-intelligence"&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;, but (like me) isn’t enamored of the name.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Off Topic: Taking Customer Service to the Next Level</title><link>/blog/off-topic-taking-customer-service-to-the-next-level/</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Oct 2006 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/off-topic-taking-customer-service-to-the-next-level/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;John Girard (a coworker) sent me this.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I sometimes criticize vendors for bad practices. This is the opposite- taking customer service well beyond the customer’s expectations
*[Email:]: Email
*[Twitter:]: Twitter
*[Phone:]: Phone&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>This is not the Mac security you’re looking for.</title><link>/blog/this-is-not-the-mac-security-youre-looking-for/</link><pubDate>Mon, 23 Oct 2006 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/this-is-not-the-mac-security-youre-looking-for/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Arthur over at Emergent Chaos &lt;a href="http://www.emergentchaos.com/archives/2006/10/use_the_logo_luke.html" title="http://www.emergentchaos.com/archives/2006/10/use_the_logo_luke.html"&gt;posted an amusing story&lt;/a&gt; on an organization’s reason for switching to Macs.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;It’s security. Just not necessarily what we mean when we say Macs are more secure.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>It’s Time to Turn Off WiFi and Bluetooth When Not In Use (Mac or PC)</title><link>/blog/its-time-to-turn-off-wifi-and-bluetooth-when-not-in-use-mac-or-pc/</link><pubDate>Sat, 21 Oct 2006 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/its-time-to-turn-off-wifi-and-bluetooth-when-not-in-use-mac-or-pc/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;A little birdie pointed me to the &lt;a href="http://metasploit.blogspot.com/2006/10/kernel-mode-payloads-in-metasploit-30.html" title="http://metasploit.blogspot.com/2006/10/kernel-mode-payloads-in-metasploit-30.html"&gt;latest post over at the Metasploit blog&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;For those of you that don’t know, Metasploit is the best thing to hit penetration testing since sliced bread. To oversimplify, it’s a framework for connecting vulnerability exploits to payloads. Before Metasploit it was a real pain to convert a new vulnerability into an actual exploit. You had to figure out how to trigger the vulnerability, figure out what you could actually do once you took advantage of the vulnerability, and inject the right code into the remote system to actually do something. It was all custom programming, so script kiddies had to sit idly by until someone who actually knew how to program made a tool for them.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Apple, Security, and Trust</title><link>/blog/apple-security-and-trust/</link><pubDate>Wed, 18 Oct 2006 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/apple-security-and-trust/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Before I delve into this topic I’d like to remind readers that I’m a Mac user and Apple fan. We are a 2 person, 2 Mac, 3 iPod, 2 Airport Express household, with another Mac in the plans this spring. By the same token I don’t think Microsoft is evil and consider some of their products to be quite good. That said I prefer OS X and have no plans to switch to Vista, although I’ll probably run it in a virtual machine on my Mac.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Are Phishers Getting Lazy?</title><link>/blog/are-phishers-getting-lazy/</link><pubDate>Tue, 17 Oct 2006 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/are-phishers-getting-lazy/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I’ve noticed a marked decrease in the customer service from my phishers. Lately spam messages have been originating from “On-line Bank” and other generic addresses. Spelling mistakes are returning, and links no longer even pretend to go to a real bank’s site.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Data Protection- it’s More than A + B + C</title><link>/blog/data-protection-its-more-than-a-b-c/</link><pubDate>Mon, 16 Oct 2006 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/data-protection-its-more-than-a-b-c/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Stiennon &lt;a href="http://blogs.zdnet.com/threatchaos/?p=421" title="http://blogs.zdnet.com/threatchaos/?p=421"&gt;covered the McAfee/Onigma&lt;/a&gt; deal over at Threat Chaos this weekend. Although I knew about the deal I try and avoid vendor/industry coverage here at Securosis, and, to be honest, it really isn’t worth covering. (Onigma is tiny and agent based, not really the direction the market is heading, and by the time McAfee integrates the tech they’ll be WAY behind the ball).&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Microsoft Partially Caves to Symantec and McAfee.</title><link>/blog/microsoft-partially-caves-to-symantec-and-mcafee/</link><pubDate>Fri, 13 Oct 2006 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/microsoft-partially-caves-to-symantec-and-mcafee/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Microsoft is &lt;a href="http://news.zdnet.com/2100-3513_22-6125560.html?tag=nl.e589" title="http://news.zdnet.com/2100-3513_22-6125560.html?tag=nl.e589"&gt;making key changes&lt;/a&gt; to Vista to avoid antirust problems.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;They’re adding an API to PatchGuard, and loosening control on the Security Center.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>The Real Definition of a Zero Day</title><link>/blog/the-real-definition-of-a-zero-day/</link><pubDate>Fri, 13 Oct 2006 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/the-real-definition-of-a-zero-day/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Shimel has a &lt;a href="http://www.stillsecureafteralltheseyears.com/ashimmy/2006/10/zero_day_attack.html" title="http://www.stillsecureafteralltheseyears.com/ashimmy/2006/10/zero_day_attack.html"&gt;good post&lt;/a&gt; on the whole 0day vulnerability thing.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;He nails it. This has been a pet peeve of mine for a long time. A real 0day isn’t the time from when a vulnerability is announced until a patch is released.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Those Kooky Kids</title><link>/blog/those-kooky-kids/</link><pubDate>Fri, 13 Oct 2006 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/those-kooky-kids/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;While I was out running around the country, turns out there was an &lt;a href="http://www.azcentral.com/news/articles/1007hacker1007.html" title="http://www.azcentral.com/news/articles/1007hacker1007.html"&gt;interesting security article&lt;/a&gt; in my own backyard.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Seems the local school system can’t keep up with those innovative students exploring their network. A students was caught after hacking a teacher’s computer to steal a copy of an upcoming test.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Cybercrime- You Can’t Win Only With Defense</title><link>/blog/cybercrime-you-cant-win-only-with-defense/</link><pubDate>Thu, 12 Oct 2006 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/cybercrime-you-cant-win-only-with-defense/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I picked up the ever-ubiquitous USA Today sitting in front of my hotel room door this morning and noticed an interesting article by Jon Swartz and Byron Acohido on &lt;a href="http://www.usatoday.com/money/industries/technology/2006-10-11-cybercrime-hacker-forums_x.htm" title="http://www.usatoday.com/money/industries/technology/2006-10-11-cybercrime-hacker-forums_x.htm"&gt;cybercrime markets&lt;/a&gt;. (Full disclosure, I’ve served as a source for Jon in the past in other security articles). Stiennon over at Threat Chaos is also &lt;a href="http://blogs.zdnet.com/threatchaos/?p=420" title="http://blogs.zdnet.com/threatchaos/?p=420"&gt;writing on it&lt;/a&gt;, as are a few others. About 2-3 years ago I started talking about the transition from experimentation to true cybercrime. It’s just one of those unfortunate natural evolutions- bad guys follow the money, then it takes them a little bit of time to refine their techniques and understand new technologies. I can guarantee that before banks started buying safes and storing cash in them, the only safecrackers were bored 13 year old pimply faced boys trying to impress girls. Or the guys who make the safes and spend all their time breaking the other guy’s stuff. Trust me, I have a history degree.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>McKeay’s Right- There’s Always Someone Smarter</title><link>/blog/mckeays-right-theres-always-someone-smarter/</link><pubDate>Thu, 12 Oct 2006 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/mckeays-right-theres-always-someone-smarter/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Martin McKeay has a &lt;a href="http://www.mckeay.net/secure/2006/10/a_lesson_i_learned_the_hard_wa.html" title="http://www.mckeay.net/secure/2006/10/a_lesson_i_learned_the_hard_wa.html"&gt;great addition&lt;/a&gt; to my post on experts.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I’d like to add one point to this: There’s always going to be someone who knows more about the subject than you do. I don’t care how good you are, somewhere there’s someone who understands what you’re working on better than you do&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Security and Risk Management Are Lovers; Don’t Mistake Them for Twins</title><link>/blog/security-and-risk-management-are-lovers-dont-mistake-them-for-twins/</link><pubDate>Thu, 12 Oct 2006 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/security-and-risk-management-are-lovers-dont-mistake-them-for-twins/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I’m on the plane heading back home from Symposium and have to admit I noticed a really weird trend this week. Maybe not a trend per se, but something I haven’t heard before, and I heard it more than once.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Enterprise DRM- Not Dead, Just in Suspended Animation</title><link>/blog/enterprise-drm-not-dead-just-in-suspended-animation/</link><pubDate>Wed, 11 Oct 2006 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/enterprise-drm-not-dead-just-in-suspended-animation/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I just finished up my last of 4 presentations here in Orlando and am enjoying a nice PB&amp;amp;J and merlot here in my room. Too much travel really kills the taste buds for hotel food.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>There’s a Reason We Have Security (or any) Experts</title><link>/blog/theres-a-reason-we-have-security-or-any-experts/</link><pubDate>Wed, 11 Oct 2006 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/theres-a-reason-we-have-security-or-any-experts/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I’m on a break here in Orlando and made the mistake of checking my work email. A coworker from another team is pushing a prediction around data security that, depending on how you interpret it, is either:&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>IE7 Coming This Month (Maybe as a Security Update?)- If You’re Staying on MS, Better Get It</title><link>/blog/ie7-coming-this-month-maybe-as-a-security-update-if-youre-staying-on-ms-better-get-it/</link><pubDate>Mon, 09 Oct 2006 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/ie7-coming-this-month-maybe-as-a-security-update-if-youre-staying-on-ms-better-get-it/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Over at the Washington Post, &lt;a href="http://blog.washingtonpost.com/securityfix/2006/10/microsoft_to_push_out_internet.html" title="http://blog.washingtonpost.com/securityfix/2006/10/microsoft_to_push_out_internet.html"&gt;Krebs is reporting&lt;/a&gt; that Microsoft is releasing Internet Explorer 7 this month. At first it sounded like it might be released as a security update (part of Patch Tuesday, when Microsoft releases all their security patches every month). Now it looks like it might just be released as a regular old update.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>SCADA- It’s Probably Cheaper to Keep Those Networks Separate</title><link>/blog/scada-its-probably-cheaper-to-keep-those-networks-separate/</link><pubDate>Mon, 09 Oct 2006 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/scada-its-probably-cheaper-to-keep-those-networks-separate/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks to a missing arrival I’m blogging live from the “Analyst Hamster Maze” at Symposium in Orlando. That’s how we refer to the One-on-One area in the Swan hotel- there’s really no other way to describe about 100 temporary booths in a big conference room filled with poorly fed and watered analysts. If you’ve never been to a Gartner conference, any paying attendee can sign up for a 30 minute face to face analyst meeting for Q&amp;amp;A on pretty much anything. I like to call it “Stump the Analyst”, and it’s a good way for us to interact with a lot of end users. (You vendors need to stop abusing the system with veiled briefings and inane “face time”). It does, however, get pretty brutal by day 5.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Speaking at the Gartner Symposium</title><link>/blog/speaking-at-the-gartner-symposium/</link><pubDate>Fri, 06 Oct 2006 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/speaking-at-the-gartner-symposium/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I’m packing up my bags and heading down to Orlando for the Gartner Symposium and IT Expo.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;It’s a busy year, with 3 presentations and a panel:&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Fox News, Information Warfare, and Public Perception</title><link>/blog/fox-news-information-warfare-and-public-perception/</link><pubDate>Thu, 05 Oct 2006 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/fox-news-information-warfare-and-public-perception/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Despite living in Boulder Colorado for 16 years I’m neither a hippie nor a conspiracy theorist. I don’t use patchouli oil, wear a beanie, or ingest any mood-altering substances you can’t buy in a grocery store. I don’t think the Masons control our destiny, black helicopters molest cattle, or the NSA monitors all our communications. Oh, really? Okay, but the cattle thing definitely isn’t real. Except maybe in Nebraska, but that’s not the CIA, not that there’s anything wrong with it…&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>How To: Clone a VeriChip</title><link>/blog/how-to-clone-a-verichip/</link><pubDate>Mon, 02 Oct 2006 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/how-to-clone-a-verichip/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;For those that don’t know, &lt;a href="http://www.verichipcorp.com/" title="http://www.verichipcorp.com/"&gt;VeriChips&lt;/a&gt; are implantable RFID tags “for people”. That way you can be tagged and tracked like cattle or &lt;a href="http://www.boycottgillette.com/spychips.html" title="http://www.boycottgillette.com/spychips.html"&gt;Gillette razors&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>A Unique Problem with Password Aging</title><link>/blog/a-unique-problem-with-password-aging/</link><pubDate>Fri, 29 Sep 2006 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/a-unique-problem-with-password-aging/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;This is just too good.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A friend who recently moved from the business side to the IT side just reported this.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Bad Policy vs. Bad Decisions and the Role of Individual Judgement</title><link>/blog/bad-policy-vs-bad-decisions-and-the-role-of-individual-judgement/</link><pubDate>Fri, 29 Sep 2006 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/bad-policy-vs-bad-decisions-and-the-role-of-individual-judgement/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Pete Lindstrom just &lt;a href="http://spiresecurity.typepad.com/spire_security_viewpoint/2006/09/in_support_of_t.html" title="http://spiresecurity.typepad.com/spire_security_viewpoint/2006/09/in_support_of_t.html"&gt;posted a missive&lt;/a&gt; in support of the TSA.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Pete makes some good points about the limitations of policy- while you always need hard rules, you also always need exceptions and judgement.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Maynor Pulled from ToorCon</title><link>/blog/maynor-pulled-from-toorcon/</link><pubDate>Fri, 29 Sep 2006 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/maynor-pulled-from-toorcon/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Statement from SecureWorks:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;SecureWorks and Apple are working together in conjunction with the CERT Coordination Center on any reported security issues. We will not make any additional public statements regarding work underway until both companies agree, along with CERT/CC , that it is appropriate.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Privacy’s Death Knell: My Life for $40</title><link>/blog/privacys-death-knell-my-life-for-40/</link><pubDate>Thu, 28 Sep 2006 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/privacys-death-knell-my-life-for-40/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I read an &lt;a href="http://blog.washingtonpost.com/securityfix/2006/09/shopadmins_and_the_id_theft_cy.html" title="http://blog.washingtonpost.com/securityfix/2006/09/shopadmins_and_the_id_theft_cy.html"&gt;interesting article by Brian Krebs&lt;/a&gt; over at the Washington Post on ID theft. Brian did a little hunting on some underground IRC channels and witnessed a large amount of stolen personal data being exchanged, then went out and talked with around two dozen victims.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>The Official Securosis</title><link>/blog/the-official-securosis/</link><pubDate>Thu, 28 Sep 2006 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/the-official-securosis/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I now know that $40 and a &lt;a href="http://securosis.com/2006/09/28/privacys-death-knell-my-life-for-40/" title="http://securosis.com/2006/09/28/privacys-death-knell-my-life-for-40/"&gt;quick web search&lt;/a&gt; will let any doofus figure out most of my former addresses, neighbors, home values, roommates, birthday, etc.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>The ATM Hacks: Disclosure at Work</title><link>/blog/the-atm-hacks-disclosure-at-work/</link><pubDate>Wed, 27 Sep 2006 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/the-atm-hacks-disclosure-at-work/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Last week the guys over at &lt;a href="http://www.matasano.com/log/" title="http://www.matasano.com/log/"&gt;Matasano&lt;/a&gt; did some seriously great work on ATM hacking. So many blogs were running with it at the time, and I was on the road dealing with a family emergency, that I didn’t cover it here, but I think this is such an excellent example of disclosure working that it deserves a mention. It’s also just a cool story.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Do We Have A Right to Privacy in the Constitution?</title><link>/blog/do-we-have-a-right-to-privacy-in-the-constitution/</link><pubDate>Tue, 26 Sep 2006 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/do-we-have-a-right-to-privacy-in-the-constitution/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;In a brief &lt;a href="http://securityincite.com/blog/mike-rothman/the-daily-incite-september-26-2006" title="http://securityincite.com/blog/mike-rothman/the-daily-incite-september-26-2006"&gt;analysis/link&lt;/a&gt; to my &lt;a href="http://securosis.com/2006/09/23/sorry-logging-is-a-privacy-risk/" title="http://securosis.com/2006/09/23/sorry-logging-is-a-privacy-risk/"&gt;privacy post&lt;/a&gt; Mike Rothman states we have a right to privacy in the Constitution, but the problem is enforcement.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Amrit Loves Cowbell</title><link>/blog/amrit-loves-cowbell/</link><pubDate>Mon, 25 Sep 2006 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/amrit-loves-cowbell/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://techbuddha.wordpress.com/" title="http://techbuddha.wordpress.com/"&gt;Amrit Williams&lt;/a&gt; is a coworker over at Gartner and he’s &lt;a href="http://techbuddha.wordpress.com/2006/09/25/the-industry-needs-more-cowbell/" title="http://techbuddha.wordpress.com/2006/09/25/the-industry-needs-more-cowbell/"&gt;obsessed with cowbell&lt;/a&gt; and security tools that go to 11. Let’s just say this post isn’t the first time he’s brought it up.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>How to Smell Security Snake Oil in One Sentence or Less</title><link>/blog/how-to-smell-security-snake-oil-in-one-sentence-or-less/</link><pubDate>Mon, 25 Sep 2006 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/how-to-smell-security-snake-oil-in-one-sentence-or-less/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;If someone ever tells you something like the following:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;“We defend against all zero day attacks using a holistic solution that integrates the end-to-end synergies in security infrastructure with no false positives.”&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>It Ain’t Over- Apple Responds to Ou/Toorcon Showdown?</title><link>/blog/it-aint-over-apple-responds-to-ou-toorcon-showdown/</link><pubDate>Mon, 25 Sep 2006 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/it-aint-over-apple-responds-to-ou-toorcon-showdown/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I swear, every time I think this thing is dead, its pale desiccated hand reaches from the grave, grabbing at our innocent ankles.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Why Someone Will Eventually Hack This Site (and Maybe Your Computer in the Process)</title><link>/blog/why-someone-will-eventually-hack-this-site-and-maybe-your-computer-in-the-process/</link><pubDate>Mon, 25 Sep 2006 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/why-someone-will-eventually-hack-this-site-and-maybe-your-computer-in-the-process/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I hate to admit it, but someone will probably hack this site at some point. And they may even use it to hack your computer.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Sorry, Logging IS a Privacy Risk</title><link>/blog/sorry-logging-is-a-privacy-risk/</link><pubDate>Sat, 23 Sep 2006 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/sorry-logging-is-a-privacy-risk/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;In a post titled “&lt;a href="http://chuvakin.blogspot.com/2006/09/access-or-accessaudit_22.html" title="http://chuvakin.blogspot.com/2006/09/access-or-accessaudit_22.html"&gt;Access of Access + Audit&lt;/a&gt;” Dr. Anton Chuvakin discusses the importance of logging, well pretty much everything. When it comes to working in the enterprise environment I tend to agree- audit logs are some of the most useful security, troubleshooting, and performance management tools we have. Back when I was operational I had two kinds of bad log days- those hair pulling, neurotic-in-a-here’s-johnny-way days spent combing, manually, through massive logs, and (even worse) those really I’m-so-screwed days where we didn’t have the logs at all. Since, thanks to better search and analysis tools, those former days are much rarer, we can focus on the latter.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>The NYT on the Increase in the Terrorist Threat</title><link>/blog/the-nyt-on-the-increase-in-the-terrorist-threat/</link><pubDate>Sat, 23 Sep 2006 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/the-nyt-on-the-increase-in-the-terrorist-threat/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;An &lt;a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2006/09/24/world/middleeast/24terror.html?ex=1316750400&amp;amp;en=da252be85d1b39fa&amp;amp;ei=5088&amp;amp;partner=rssnyt&amp;amp;emc=rss" title="http://www.nytimes.com/2006/09/24/world/middleeast/24terror.html?ex=1316750400&amp;amp;en=da252be85d1b39fa&amp;amp;ei=5088&amp;amp;partner=rssnyt&amp;amp;emc=rss"&gt;article just posted by the New York Times&lt;/a&gt; reveals that the latest National Intelligence Estimate on terrorism concludes that our involvement in Iraq has increased the global terror threat.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>The Non-Geeks Guide to Consumer DRM: Why Your New TV Might Not Work With Tomorrow’s DVD player</title><link>/blog/the-non-geeks-guide-to-consumer-drm-why-your-new-tv-might-not-work-with-tomorrows-dvd-player/</link><pubDate>Fri, 22 Sep 2006 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/the-non-geeks-guide-to-consumer-drm-why-your-new-tv-might-not-work-with-tomorrows-dvd-player/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;There’s a lot going on in the world of Digital Rights Management (DRM) these days and I realized not everyone understands exactly what DRM is, how it works, and what the implications are. This has popped up a few times recently among friends and family as (being the alpha geek) I’ve been asked to explain why certain music or movie files don’t work on various players. Before digging into some of the security issues around DRM I thought it would be good to post a (relatively) brief overview.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Sore Apples- Apple Updates Mac Wireless Drivers (With Prejudice)</title><link>/blog/sore-apples-apple-updates-mac-wireless-drivers-with-prejudice/</link><pubDate>Thu, 21 Sep 2006 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/sore-apples-apple-updates-mac-wireless-drivers-with-prejudice/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;So Apple&lt;a href="http://www.macworld.com/news/2006/09/21/wireless/index.php" title="http://www.macworld.com/news/2006/09/21/wireless/index.php"&gt; issued an update for the Mac wireless drivers&lt;/a&gt; to prevent a buffer overflow, but denies SecureWorks provided them anything useful.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>We Did Warn You, Didn’t We…</title><link>/blog/we-did-warn-you-didnt-we/</link><pubDate>Wed, 20 Sep 2006 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/we-did-warn-you-didnt-we/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://ct.zdnet.com/clicks?t=10519581-61758ae4905f373befaa4e2264d3c07b-bf&amp;amp;s=5&amp;amp;fs=0" title="http://ct.zdnet.com/clicks?t=10519581-61758ae4905f373befaa4e2264d3c07b-bf&amp;amp;s=5&amp;amp;fs=0"&gt;New IE Flaw Exploited on Porn Sites&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Now we did &lt;a href="http://securosis.com/2006/09/16/stop-using-internet-explorer-for-now-today-seriously/" title="http://securosis.com/2006/09/16/stop-using-internet-explorer-for-now-today-seriously/"&gt;warn you,&lt;/a&gt; and I quote:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Especially if you go to “those” sites. Yes, you. Stop pretending you don’t know what I’m talking about.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Thank You for Your Medical Records</title><link>/blog/thank-you-for-your-medical-records/</link><pubDate>Tue, 19 Sep 2006 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/thank-you-for-your-medical-records/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;To whom it may concern,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;While, as a security professional, I take great care to protect all of my systems and data, I cannot guarantee that I am fully compliant with both the HIPAA security and privacy requirements. I have never undergone a HIPAA audit, nor any official HIPAA training or evaluations of any kind beyond those provided to first responders. For your information I &lt;em&gt;do&lt;/em&gt; take extensive security precautions including:&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Stop Using Internet Explorer (for now)! Today! Seriously!</title><link>/blog/stop-using-internet-explorer-for-now-today-seriously/</link><pubDate>Sat, 16 Sep 2006 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/stop-using-internet-explorer-for-now-today-seriously/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.symantec.com/enterprise/security_response/weblog/2006/09/new_internet_explorer_0day_vul.html" title="http://www.symantec.com/enterprise/security_response/weblog/2006/09/new_internet_explorer_0day_vul.html"&gt;Symantec has just reported&lt;/a&gt; a new 0day security vulnerability in Internet Explorer that could allow someone to take over your computer.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>iTunes 7- the New Nmap?</title><link>/blog/itunes-7-the-new-nmap/</link><pubDate>Fri, 15 Sep 2006 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/itunes-7-the-new-nmap/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I travel a lot, and on occasion I’ll run Nmap or some other scanner from my hotel room to get an idea of what’s out there, and how dangerous these hotel networks really are. To be honest it’s not something I do all that much anymore since even scanning an open network is running the risk of being considered over the line.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Treat Voting Systems Like Gambling Systems</title><link>/blog/treat-voting-systems-like-gambling-systems/</link><pubDate>Thu, 14 Sep 2006 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/treat-voting-systems-like-gambling-systems/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Electronic voting seems to be popping up again thanks to our &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/boingboing/iBag/~3/21874784/princeton_researcher.html" title="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/boingboing/iBag/~3/21874784/princeton_researcher.html"&gt;favorite digital ostrich, Diebold&lt;/a&gt;. Martin Mckeay’s also writing on this a bit, and it’s &lt;a href="http://www.mckeay.net/secure/2006/09/my_computerworld_rant_against.html" title="http://www.mckeay.net/secure/2006/09/my_computerworld_rant_against.html"&gt;well worth reading&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Liars Always Lose- Eventually (or: Why Lying is Like Crack)</title><link>/blog/liars-always-lose-eventually-or-why-lying-is-like-crack/</link><pubDate>Tue, 12 Sep 2006 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/liars-always-lose-eventually-or-why-lying-is-like-crack/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I’m out on the road this week, right now spending two days at a strategic planning session with a large energy company. This is the kind of trip I actually enjoy- working with an end-user on strategic issues at the executive level where they really want to solve the problem.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Five Years Ago</title><link>/blog/five-years-ago/</link><pubDate>Sun, 10 Sep 2006 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/five-years-ago/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;From &lt;a href="http://www.september11victims.com/september11victims/victims_list.htm"&gt;http://www.september11victims.com/september11victims/victims_list.htm&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;WORLD TRADE CENTER&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Gordon McCannel Aamoth, 32, New York, N.Y. Maria Rose Abad, 49, Syosset, N.Y. Edelmiro (Ed) Abad, 54, New York, N.Y. Andrew Anthony Abate, 37, Melville, N.Y. Vincent Abate, 40, New York, N.Y. Laurence Christopher Abel, 37 William F. Abrahamson, 58, Cortland Manor, N.Y. Richard Anthony Aceto, 42, Wantagh, N.Y. Erica Van Acker, 62, New York, N.Y. Heinrich B. Ackermann, 38, New York, N.Y. Paul Andrew Acquaviva, 29, Glen Rock, N.J. Donald L. Adams, 28, Chatham, N.J. Shannon Lewis Adams, 25, New York, N.Y. Stephen Adams, 51, New York, N.Y. Patrick Adams, 60, New York, N.Y. Ignatius Adanga, 62, New York, N.Y. Christy A. Addamo, 28, New Hyde Park, N.Y. Terence E. Adderley, 22, Bloomfield Hills, Mich. Sophia B. Addo, 36, New York, N.Y. Lee Adler, 48, Springfield, N.J. Daniel Thomas Afflitto, 32, Manalapan, N.J. Emmanuel Afuakwah, 37, New York, N.Y. Alok Agarwal, 36, Jersey City, N.J. Mukul Agarwala, 37, New York, N.Y. Joseph Agnello, 35, New York, N.Y. David Scott Agnes, 46, New York, N.Y. Joao A. Aguiar Jr., 30, Red Bank, N.J. Lt. Brian G. Ahean, 43, Huntington, N.Y. Jeremiah J. Ahen, 74, Cliffside Park, N.J. Joanne Ahladiotis, 27, New York, N.Y. Shabbir Ahmed, 47, New York, N.Y. Terrance Andre Aiken, 30, New York, N.Y. Godwin Ajala, 33, New York, N.Y. Gertrude M. Alagero, 37, New York, N.Y. Andrew Alameno, 37, Westfield, N.J. Margaret Ann (Peggy) Jezycki Alario, 41, New York, N.Y. Gary Albero, 39, Emerson, N.J. Jon L. Albert, 46, Upper Nyack, N.Y. Peter Craig Alderman, 25, New York, N.Y. Jacquelyn Delaine Aldridge, 46, New York, N.Y. Grace Alegre-Cua, 40, Glen Rock, N.J. David D. Alger, 57, New York, N.Y. Ernest Alikakos, 43, New York, N.Y. Edward L. Allegretto, 51, Colonia, N.J. Eric Allen, 44, New York, N.Y. Joseph Ryan Allen, 39, New York, N.Y. Richard Lanard Allen, 30, New York, N.Y. Richard Dennis Allen, 31, New York, N.Y. Christopher Edward Allingham, 36, River Edge, N.J. Janet M. Alonso, 41, Stony Point, N.Y. Anthony Alvarado, 31, New York, N.Y. Antonio Javier Alvarez, 23, New York, N.Y. Telmo Alvear, 25, New York, N.Y. Cesar A. Alviar, 60, Bloomfield, N.J. Tariq Amanullah, 40, Metuchen, N.J. Angelo Amaranto, 60, New York, N.Y. James Amato, 43, Ronkonkoma, N.Y. Joseph Amatuccio, 41, New York, N.Y. Christopher Charles Amoroso, 29, New York, N.Y. Kazuhiro Anai, 42, Scarsdale, N.Y. Calixto Anaya, 35, Suffern, N.Y. Jorge Octavio Santos Anaya, 25, Aguascalientes, Aguascalientes, Mexico Joseph Peter Anchundia, 26, New York, N.Y. Kermit Charles Anderson, 57, Green Brook, N.J. Yvette Anderson, 53, New York, N.Y. John Andreacchio, 52, New York, N.Y. Michael Rourke Andrews, 34, Belle Harbor, N.Y. Jean A. Andrucki, 42, Hoboken, N.J. Siew-Nya Ang, 37, East Brunswick, N.J. Joseph Angelini, 38, Lindenhurst, N.Y. Joseph Angelini, 63, Lindenhurst, N.Y. Laura Angilletta, 23, New York, N.Y. Doreen J. Angrisani, 44, New York, N.Y. Lorraine D. Antigua, 32, Middletown, N.J. Peter Paul Apollo, 26, Hoboken, N.J. Faustino Apostol, 55, New York, N.Y. Frank Thomas Aquilino, 26, New York, N.Y. Patrick Michael Aranyos, 26, New York, N.Y. David Gregory Arce, 36, New York, N.Y. Michael G. Arczynski, 45, Little Silver, N.J. Louis Arena, 32, New York, N.Y. Adam Arias, 37, Staten Island, N.Y. Michael J. Armstrong, 34, New York, N.Y. Jack Charles Aron, 52, Bergenfield, N.J. Joshua Aron, 29, New York, N.Y. Richard Avery Aronow, 48, Mahwah, N.J. Japhet J. Aryee, 49, Spring Valley, N.Y. Carl Asaro, 39, Middletown, N.Y. Michael A. Asciak, 47, Ridgefield, N.J. Michael Edward Asher, 53, Monroe, N.Y. Janice Ashley, 25, Rockville Centre, N.Y. Thomas J. Ashton, 21, New York, N.Y. Manuel O. Asitimbay, 36, New York, N.Y. Lt. Gregg Arthur Atlas, 45, Howells, N.Y. Gerald Atwood, 38, New York, N.Y. James Audiffred, 38, New York, N.Y. Kenneth W. Van Auken, 47, East Brunswick, N.J. Louis F. Aversano, Jr, 58, Manalapan, N.J. Ezra Aviles, 41, Commack, N.Y. Ayodeji Awe, 42, New York, N.Y Samuel (Sandy) Ayala, 36, New York, N.Y. Arlene T. Babakitis, 47, Secaucus, N.J. Eustace (Rudy) Bacchus, 48, Metuchen, N.J. John James Badagliacca, 35, New York, N.Y. Jane Ellen Baeszler, 43, New York, N.Y. Robert J. Baierwalter, 44, Albertson, N.Y. Andrew J. Bailey, 29, New York, N.Y. Brett T. Bailey, 28, Bricktown, N.J. Tatyana Bakalinskaya, 43, New York, N.Y. Michael S. Baksh, 36, Englewood, N.J. Sharon Balkcom, 43, White Plains, N.Y. Michael Andrew Bane, 33, Yardley, Pa. Kathy Bantis, 44, Chicago, Ill. Gerard Jean Baptiste, 35, New York, N.Y. Walter Baran, 42, New York, N.Y. Gerard A. Barbara, 53, New York, N.Y. Paul V. Barbaro, 35, Holmdel, N.J. James W. Barbella, 53, Oceanside, N.Y. Ivan Kyrillos Fairbanks Barbosa, 30, Jersey City, N.J. Victor Daniel Barbosa, 23, New York, N.Y. Colleen Ann Barkow, 26, East Windsor, N.J. David Michael Barkway, 34, Toronto, Ontario, Canada Matthew Barnes, 37, Monroe, N.Y. Sheila Patricia Barnes, 55, Bay Shore, N.Y. Evan J. Baron, 38, Bridgewater, N.J. Renee Barrett-Arjune, 41, Irvington, N.J. Arthur T. Barry, 35, New York, N.Y. Diane G. Barry, 60, New York, N.Y. Maurice Vincent Barry, 49, Rutherford, N.J. Scott D. Bart, 28, Malverne, N.Y. Carlton W. Bartels, 44, New York, N.Y. Guy Barzvi, 29, New York, N.Y. Irna Basina, 43, New York, N.Y. Alysia Basmajian, 23, Bayonne, N.J. Kenneth William Basnicki, 48, Etobicoke, Ontario, Canada Lt. Steven J. Bates, 42, New York, N.Y. Paul James Battaglia, 22, New York, N.Y. W. David Bauer, 45, Rumson, N.J. Ivhan Luis Carpio Bautista, 24, New York, N.Y. Marlyn C. Bautista, 46, Iselin, N.J. Jasper Baxter, 45, Philadelphia, Pa. Michele (Du Berry) Beale, 37, Essex, Britain Paul F. Beatini, 40, Park Ridge, N.J. Jane S. Beatty, 53, Belford, N.J. Larry I. Beck, 38, Baldwin, N.Y. Manette Marie Beckles, 43, Rahway, N.J. Carl John Bedigian, 35, New York, N.Y. Michael Beekman, 39, New York, N.Y. Maria Behr, 41, Milford, N.J. Yelena Belilovsky, 38, Mamaroneck, N.Y. Nina Patrice Bell, 39, New York, N.Y. Andrea Della Bella, 59, Jersey City, N.J. Debbie S. Bellows, 30, East Windsor, N.J. Stephen Elliot Belson, 51, New York, N.Y. Paul Michael Benedetti, 32, New York, N.Y. Denise Lenore Benedetto, 40, New York, N.Y. Bryan Craig Bennett, 25, New York, N.Y. Oliver Duncan Bennett, 29, London, England Eric L. Bennett, 29, New York, N.Y. Margaret L. Benson, 52, Rockaway, N.J. Dominick J. Berardi, 25, New York, N.Y. James Patrick Berger, 44, Lower Makefield, Pa. Steven Howard Berger, 45, Manalapan, N.J. John P. Bergin, 39, New York, N.Y. Alvin Bergsohn, 48, Baldwin Harbor, N.Y. Daniel D. Bergstein, 38, Teaneck, N.J. Michael J. Berkeley, 38, New York, N.Y. Donna Bernaerts-Keanns, 44, Hoboken, N.J. David W. Bernard, 57, Chelmsford, Mass. William Bernstein, 44, New York, N.Y. David M. Berray, 39, New York, N.Y. David S. Berry, 43, New York, N.Y. Joseph J. Berry, 55, Saddle River, N.J. William Reed Bethke, 36, Hamilton, N.J. Timothy D. Betterly, 42, Little Silver, N.J. Edward F. Beyea, 42, New York, N.Y. Paul Michael Beyer, 37, New York, N.Y. Anil T. Bharvaney, 41, East Windsor, N.J. Bella Bhukhan, 24, Union, N.J. Shimmy D. Biegeleisen, 42, New York, N.Y. Peter Alexander Bielfeld, 44, New York, N.Y. William Biggart, 54, New York, N.Y. Brian Bilcher, 36, New York, N.Y. Carl Vincent Bini, 44, New York, N.Y. Gary Bird, 51, Tempe, Ariz. Joshua David Birnbaum, 24, New York, N.Y. George Bishop, 52, Granite Springs, N.Y. Jeffrey D. Bittner, 27, New York, N.Y. Balewa Albert Blackman, 26, New York, N.Y. Christopher Joseph Blackwell, 42, Patterson, N.Y. Susan L. Blair, 35, East Brunswick, N.J. Harry Blanding, 38, Blakeslee, Pa. Janice L. Blaney, 55, Williston Park, N.Y. Craig Michael Blass, 27, Greenlawn, N.Y. Rita Blau, 52, New York, N.Y. Richard M. Blood, 38, Ridgewood, N.J. Michael A. Boccardi, 30, Bronxville, N.Y. John Paul Bocchi, 38, New Vernon, N.J. Michael L. Bocchino, 45, New York, N.Y. Susan Mary Bochino, 36, New York, N.Y. Bruce Douglas (Chappy) Boehm, 49, West Hempstead, N.Y. Mary Katherine Boffa, 45, New York, N.Y. Nicholas A. Bogdan, 34, Browns Mills, N.J. Darren C. Bohan, 34, New York, N.Y. Lawrence Francis Boisseau, 36, Freehold, N.J. Vincent M. Boland, 25, Ringwood, N.J. Alan Bondarenko, 53, Flemington, N.J. Andre Bonheur, 40, New York, N.Y. Colin Arthur Bonnett, 39, New York, N.Y. Frank Bonomo, 42, Port Jefferson, N.Y. Yvonne L. Bonomo, 30, New York, N.Y. Sean Booker, 35, Irvington, N.J. Sherry Ann Bordeaux, 38, Jersey City, N.J. Krystine C. Bordenabe, 33, Old Bridge, N.J. Martin Boryczewski, 29, Parsippany, N.J. Richard E. Bosco, 34, Suffern, N.Y. John Howard Boulton, 29, New York, N.Y. Francisco Bourdier, 41, New York, N.Y. Thomas H. Bowden, 36, Wyckoff, N.J. Kimberly S. Bowers, 31, Islip, N.Y. Veronique (Bonnie) Nicole Bowers, 28, New York, N.Y. Larry Bowman, 46, New York, N.Y. Shawn Edward Bowman, 28, New York, N.Y. Kevin L. Bowser, 45, Philadelphia, Pa. Gary R. Box, 37, North Bellmore, N.Y. Gennady Boyarsky, 34, New York, N.Y. Pamela Boyce, 43, New York, N.Y. Michael Boyle, 37, Westbury, N.Y. Alfred Braca, 54, Leonardo, N.J. Sandra Conaty Brace, 60, New York, N.Y. Kevin H. Bracken, 37, New York, N.Y. David Brian Brady, 41, Summit, N.J. Alexander Braginsky, 38, Stamford, Conn. Nicholas W. Brandemarti, 21, Mantua, N.J. Michelle Renee Bratton, 23, Yonkers, N.Y. Patrice Braut, 31, New York, N.Y. Lydia Estelle Bravo, 50, Dunellen, N.J. Ronald Michael Breitweiser, 39, Middletown Township, N.J. Edward A. Brennan, 37, New York, N.Y. Frank H. Brennan, 50, New York, N.Y. Michael Emmett Brennan, 27, New York, N.Y. Peter Brennan, 30, Ronkonkoma, N.Y. Thomas M. Brennan, 32, Scarsdale, N.Y. Capt. Daniel Brethel, 43, Farmingdale, N.Y. Gary L. Bright, 36, Union City, N.J. Jonathan Eric Briley, 43, Mount Vernon, N.Y. Mark A. Brisman, 34, Armonk, N.Y. Paul Gary Bristow, 27, New York, N.Y. Victoria Alvarez Brito, 38, New York, N.Y. Mark Francis Broderick, 42, Old Bridge, N.J. Herman C. Broghammer, 58, North Merrick, N.Y. Keith Broomfield, 49, New York, N.Y. Janice J. Brown, 35, New York, N.Y. Lloyd Brown, 28, Bronxville, N.Y. Capt. Patrick J. Brown, 48, New York, N.Y. Bettina Browne, 49, Atlantic Beach, N.Y. Mark Bruce, 40, Summit, N.J. Richard Bruehert, 38, Westbury, N.Y. Andrew Brunn, 28 Capt. Vincent Brunton, 43, New York, N.Y. Ronald Paul Bucca, 47, Tuckahoe, N.Y. Brandon J. Buchanan, 24, New York, N.Y. Greg Joseph Buck, 37, New York, N.Y. Dennis Buckley, 38, Chatham, N.J. Nancy Bueche, 43, Hicksville, N.Y. Patrick Joseph Buhse, 36, Lincroft, N.J. John E. Bulaga, 35, Paterson, N.J. Stephen Bunin, 45, New York, N.Y. Thomas Daniel Burke, 38, Bedford Hills, N.Y. Capt. William F. Burke, 46, New York, N.Y. Matthew J. Burke, 28, New York, N.Y. Donald James Burns, 61, Nissequogue, N.Y. Kathleen A. Burns, 49, New York, N.Y. Keith James Burns, 39, East Rutherford, N.J. John Patrick Burnside, 36, New York, N.Y. Irina Buslo, 32, New York, N.Y. Milton Bustillo, 37, New York, N.Y. Thomas M. Butler, 37, Kings Park, N.Y. Patrick Byrne, 39, New York, N.Y. Timothy G. Byrne, 36, Manhattan, N.Y. Jesus Cabezas, 66, New York, N.Y. Lillian Caceres, 48, New York, N.Y. Brian Joseph Cachia, 26, New York, N.Y. Steven Cafiero, 31, New York, N.Y. Richard M. Caggiano, 25, New York, N.Y. Cecile M. Caguicla, 55, Boonton, N.J. Michael John Cahill, 37, East Williston, N.Y. Scott W. Cahill, 30, West Caldwell, N.J. Thomas J. Cahill, 36, Franklin Lakes, N.J. George Cain, 35, Massapequa, N.Y. Salvatore B. Calabro, 38, New York, N.Y. Joseph Calandrillo, 49, Hawley, Pa. Philip V. Calcagno, 57, New York, N.Y. Edward Calderon, 44, Jersey City, N.J. Kenneth Marcus Caldwell, 30, New York, N.Y. Dominick E. Calia, 40, Manalapan, N.J. Felix (Bobby) Calixte, 38, New York, N.Y. Capt. Frank Callahan, 51, New York, N.Y. Liam Callahan, 44, Rockaway, N.J. Luigi Calvi, 34, East Rutherford, N.J. Roko Camaj, 60, Manhasset, N.Y. Michael Cammarata, 22, Huguenot, N.Y. David Otey Campbell, 51, Basking Ridge, N.J. Geoffrey Thomas Campbell, 31, New York, N.Y. Sandra Patricia Campbell, 45, New York, N.Y. Jill Marie Campbell, 31, New York, N.Y. Robert Arthur Campbell, 25, New York, N.Y. Juan Ortega Campos, 32, New York, N.Y. Sean Canavan, 39, New York, N.Y. John A. Candela, 42, Glen Ridge, N.J. Vincent Cangelosi, 30, New York, N.Y. Stephen J. Cangialosi, 40, Middletown, N.J. Lisa B. Cannava, 30, New York, N.Y. Brian Cannizzaro, 30, New York, N.Y. Michael R. Canty, 30, Schenectady, N.Y. Louis A. Caporicci, 35, New York, N.Y. Jonathan N. Cappello, 23, Garden City, N.Y. James Christopher Cappers, 33, Wading River, N.Y. Richard M. Caproni, 34, Lynbrook, N.Y. Jose Cardona, 32, New York, N.Y. Dennis M Carey, 51, Wantagh, N.Y. Edward Carlino, 46, New York, N.Y. Michael Scott Carlo, 34, New York, N.Y. David G. Carlone, 46, Randolph, N.J. Rosemarie C. Carlson, 40, New York, N.Y. Mark Stephen Carney, 41, Rahway, N.J. Joyce Ann Carpeneto, 40, New York, N.Y. Alicia Acevedo Carranza, Teziutlan, Puebla, Mexico Jeremy M. Carrington, 34, New York, N.Y. Michael T. Carroll, 39, New York, N.Y. Peter Carroll, 42, New York, N.Y. James J. Carson, 32, Massapequa, N.Y. James Marcel Cartier, 26, New York, N.Y. Vivian Casalduc, 45, New York, N.Y. John F. Casazza, 38, Colts Neck, N.J. Paul Cascio, 23, Manhasset, N.Y. Kathleen Hunt Casey, 43, Middletown, N.J. Margarito Casillas, 54, Guadalajara, Jalisco, Mexico Thomas Anthony Casoria, 29, New York, N.Y. William Otto Caspar, 57, Eatontown, N.J. Alejandro Castano, 35, Englewood, N.J. Arcelia Castillo, 49, Elizabeth, N.J. Leonard M. Castrianno, 30, New York, N.Y. Jose Ramon Castro, 37, New York, N.Y. Richard G. Catarelli, 47, New York, N.Y. Christopher Sean Caton, 34, New York, N.Y. Robert J. Caufield, 48, Valley Stream, N.Y. Mary Teresa Caulfield, 58, New York, N.Y. Judson Cavalier, 26, Huntington, N.Y. Michael Joseph Cawley, 32, Bellmore, N.Y. Jason D. Cayne, 32, Morganville, N.J. Juan Armando Ceballos, 47, New York, N.Y. Marcia G. Cecil-Carter, 34, New York, N.Y. Jason Cefalu, 30, West Hempstead, N.Y. Thomas J. Celic, 43, New York, N.Y. Ana M. Centeno, 38, Bayonne, N.J. Joni Cesta, 37, Bellmore, N.Y. Jeffrey M. Chainoff, 35, West Windsor, N.J. Swarna Chalasani, 33, Jersey City, N.J. William Chalcoff, 41, Roslyn, N.Y. Eli Chalouh, 23, New York, N.Y. Charles Lawrence (Chip) Chan, 23, New York, N.Y. Mandy Chang, 40, New York, N.Y. Mark L. Charette, 38, Millburn, N.J. Gregorio Manuel Chavez, 48, New York, N.Y. Jayceryll M. de Chavez, 24, Carteret, N.J. Pedro Francisco Checo, 35, New York, N.Y. Douglas MacMillan Cherry, 38, Maplewood, N.J. Stephen Patrick Cherry, 41, Stamford, Conn. Vernon Paul Cherry, 49, New York, N.Y. Nestor Chevalier, 30, New York, N.Y. Swede Joseph Chevalier, 26, Locust, N.J. Alexander H. Chiang, 51, New City, N.Y. Dorothy J. Chiarchiaro, 61, Glenwood, N.J. Luis Alfonso Chimbo, 39, New York, N.Y. Robert Chin, 33, New York, N.Y. Wing Wai (Eddie) Ching, 29, Union, N.J. Nicholas P. Chiofalo, 39, Selden, N.Y. John Chipura, 39, New York, N.Y. Peter A. Chirchirillo, 47, Langhorne, Pa. Catherine E. Chirls, 47, Princeton, N.J. Kyung (Kaccy) Cho, 30, Clifton, N.J. Abul K. Chowdhury, 30, New York, N.Y. Mohammed Salahuddin Chowdhury, 38, New York, N.Y. Kirsten L. Christophe, 39, Maplewood, N.J. Pamela Chu, 31, New York, N.Y. Steven Paul Chucknick, 44, Cliffwood Beach, N.J. Wai-ching Chung, 36, New York, N.Y. Christopher Ciafardini, 30, New York, N.Y. Alex F. Ciccone, 38, New Rochelle, N.Y. Frances Ann Cilente, 26, New York, N.Y. Elaine Cillo, 40, New York, N.Y. Edna Cintron, 46, New York, N.Y. Nestor Andre Cintron, 26, New York, N.Y. Lt. Robert Dominick Cirri, 39, Nutley, N.J. Juan Pablo Alvarez Cisneros, 23, Weehawken, N.J. Gregory Alan Clark, 40, Teaneck, N.J. Mannie Leroy Clark, 54, New York, N.Y. Thomas R. Clark, 37, Summit, N.J. Eugene Clark, 47, New York, N.Y. Benjamin Keefe Clark, 39, New York, N.Y. Christopher Robert Clarke, 34, Philadelphia, Pa. Donna Clarke, 39, New York, N.Y. Michael Clarke, 27, Prince’s Bay, N.Y. Suria R.E. Clarke, 30, New York, N.Y. Kevin Francis Cleary, 38, New York, N.Y. James D. Cleere, 55, Newton, Iowa Geoffrey W. Cloud, 36, Stamford, Conn. Susan M. Clyne, 42, Lindenhurst, N.Y. Steven Coakley, 36, Deer Park, N.Y. Jeffrey Coale, 31, Souderton, Pa. Patricia A. Cody, 46, Brigantine, N.J. Daniel Michael Coffey, 54, Newburgh, N.Y. Jason Matthew Coffey, 25, Newburgh, N.Y. Florence Cohen, 62, New York, N.Y. Kevin Sanford Cohen, 28, Edison, N.J. Anthony Joseph Coladonato, 47, New York, N.Y. Mark J. Colaio, 34, New York, N.Y. Stephen J. Colaio, 32, Montauk, N.Y. Christopher M. Colasanti, 33, Hoboken, N.J. Michel Paris Colbert, 39, West New York, N.J. Kevin Nathaniel Colbert, 25, New York, N.Y. Keith Eugene Coleman, 34, Warren, N.J. Scott Thomas Coleman, 31, New York, N.Y. Tarel Coleman, 32 Liam Joseph Colhoun, 34, Flushing, N.Y. Robert D. Colin, 49, West Babylon, N.Y. Robert J. Coll, 35, Glen Ridge, N.J. Jean Marie Collin, 42, New York, N.Y. John Michael Collins, 42, New York, N.Y. Michael L. Collins, 38, Montclair, N.J. Thomas J. Collins, 36, New York, N.Y. Joseph Collison, 50, New York, N.Y. Patricia Malia Colodner, 39, New York, N.Y. Linda M. Colon, 46, Perrineville, N.J. Soledi Colon, 39, New York, N.Y. Ronald Comer, 56, Northport, N.Y. Jaime Concepcion, 46, New York, N.Y. Albert Conde, 62, Englishtown, N.J. Denease Conley, 44, New York, N.Y. Susan Clancy Conlon, 41, New York, N.Y. Margaret Mary Conner, 57, New York, N.Y. John E. Connolly, 46, Allenwood, N.J. Cynthia L. Connolly, 40, Metuchen, N.J. James Lee Connor, 38, Summit, N.J. Jonathan (J.C.) Connors, 55, Old Brookville, N.Y. Kevin P. Connors, 55, Greenwich, Conn. Kevin Francis Conroy, 47, New York, N.Y. Brenda E. Conway, 40, New York, N.Y. Dennis Michael Cook, 33, Colts Neck, N.J. Helen D. Cook, 24, New York, N.Y. John A. Cooper, 40, Bayonne, N.J. Joseph J. Coppo, 47, New Canaan, Conn. Gerard J. Coppola, 46, New Providence, N.J. Joseph Albert Corbett, 28, Islip, N.Y. Alejandro Cordero, 23, New York, N.Y. Robert Cordice, 28, New York, N.Y. Ruben D. Correa, 44, New York, N.Y. Danny A. Correa-Gutierrez, 25, Fairview, N.J. James Corrigan, 60, New York, N.Y. Carlos Cortes, 57, New York, N.Y. Kevin M. Cosgrove, 46, West Islip, N.Y. Dolores Marie Costa, 53, Middletown, N.J. Digna Alexandra Rivera Costanza, 25, New York, N.Y. Charles Gregory Costello, 46, Old Bridge, N.J. Michael S. Costello, 27, Hoboken, N.J. Conrod K.H. Cottoy, 51, New York, N.Y. Martin Coughlan, 54, New York, N.Y. Sgt. John Gerard Coughlin, 43, Pomona, N.Y. Timothy John Coughlin, 42, New York, N.Y. James E. Cove, 48, Rockville Centre, N.Y. Andre Cox, 29, New York, N.Y. Frederick John Cox, 27, New York, N.Y. James Raymond Coyle, 26, New York, N.Y. Michelle Coyle-Eulau, 38, Garden City, N.Y. Anne M. Cramer, 47, New York, N.Y. Christopher Seton Cramer, 34, Manahawkin, N.J. Denise Crant, 46, Hackensack, N.J. Robert James Crawford, 62, New York, N.Y. James L. Crawford, 33, Madison, N.J. Joanne Mary Cregan, 32, New York, N.Y. Lucia Crifasi, 51, Glendale, N.Y. Lt. John Crisci, 48, Holbrook, N.Y. Daniel Hal Crisman, 25, New York, N.Y. Dennis A. Cross, 60, Islip Terrace, N.Y. Helen Crossin-Kittle, 34, Larchmont, N.Y. Kevin Raymond Crotty, 43, Summit, N.J. Thomas G. Crotty, 42, Rockville Centre, N.Y. John Crowe, 57, Rutherford, N.J. Welles Remy Crowther, 24, Upper Nyack, N.Y. Robert L. Cruikshank, 64, New York, N.Y. Francisco Cruz, 47, New York, N.Y. John Robert Cruz, 32, Jersey City, N.J. Kenneth John Cubas, 48, Woodstock, N.Y. Richard Joseph Cudina, 46, Glen Gardner, N.J. Neil James Cudmore, 38, Port Washington, N.Y. Thomas Patrick Cullen, 31, New York, N.Y. Joan McConnell Cullinan, 47, Scarsdale, N.Y. Joyce Cummings, 65 Brian Thomas Cummins, 38, Manasquan, N.J. Nilton Albuquerque Fenao Cunha, 41 Michael Joseph Cunningham, 39, Princeton Junction, N.J. Robert Curatolo, 31, New York, N.Y. Laurence Curia, 41, Garden City, N.Y. Paul Dario Curioli, 53, Norwalk, Conn. Beverly Curry, 41, New York, N.Y. Sgt. Michael Curtin, 45, Medford, N.Y. Gavin Cushny, 47, Hoboken, N.J. Caleb Arron Dack, 39, Montclair, N.J. Carlos S. DaCosta, 41, Elizabeth, N.J. John D’Allara, 47, Pearl River, N.Y. Vincent D’Amadeo, 36, East Patchoque, N.Y. Thomas A. Damaskinos, 33, Matawan, N.J. Jack L. D’Ambrosi, 45, Woodcliff Lake, N.J. Jeannine Marie Damiani-Jones, 28, New York, N.Y. Patrick W. Danahy, 35, Yorktown Heights, N.Y. Nana Kwuku Danso, 47, New York, N.Y. Mary D’Antonio, 55, New York, N.Y. Vincent G. Danz, 38, Farmingdale, N.Y. Dwight Donald Darcy, 55, Bronxville, N.Y. Elizabeth Ann Darling, 28, Newark, N.J. Anette Andrea Dataram, 25, New York, N.Y. Lt. Edward Alexander D’Atri, 38, New York, N.Y. Michael D. D’Auria, 25, New York, N.Y. Lawrence Davidson, 51, New York, N.Y. Michael Allen Davidson, 27, Westfield, N.J. Scott Matthew Davidson, 33, New York, N.Y. Titus Davidson, 55, New York, N.Y. Niurka Davila, 47, New York, N.Y. Clinton Davis, 38, New York, N.Y. Wayne Terrial Davis, 29, Fort Meade, Md. Calvin Dawson, 46, New York, N.Y. Anthony Richard Dawson, 32, Southampton, Hampshire, England Edward James Day, 45, New York, N.Y. Emerita (Emy) De La Pena, 32, New York, N.Y. Melanie Louise De Vere, 30, London, England William T. Dean, 35, Floral Park, N.Y. Robert J. DeAngelis, 48, West Hempstead, N.Y. Thomas P. Deangelis, 51, Westbury, N.Y. Tara Debek, 35, Babylon, N.Y. Anna Debin, 30, East Farmingdale, N.Y. James V. DeBlase, 45, Manalapan, N.J. Paul DeCola, 39, Ridgewood, N.Y. Simon Dedvukaj, 26, Mohegan Lake, N.Y. Jason Christopher DeFazio, 29, New York, N.Y. David A. Defeo, 37, New York, N.Y. Jennifer DeJesus, 23, New York, N.Y. Monique E. DeJesus, 28, New York, N.Y. Nereida DeJesus, 30, New York, N.Y. Donald A. Delapenha, 37, Allendale, N.J. Vito Joseph Deleo, 41, New York, N.Y. Danielle Delie, 47, New York, N.Y. Colleen Ann Deloughery, 41, Bayone, N.J. Francis (Frank) Albert DeMartini, 49, New York, N.Y. Anthony Demas, 61, New York, N.Y. Martin DeMeo, 47, Farmingville, N.Y. Francis X. Deming, 47, Franklin Lakes, N.J. Carol K. Demitz, 49, New York, N.Y. Kevin Dennis, 43, Peapack, N.J. Thomas F. Dennis, 43, Setauket, N.Y. Jean C. DePalma, 42, Newfoundland, N.J. Jose Nicolas Depena, 42, New York, N.Y. Robert J. Deraney, 43, New York, N.Y. Michael DeRienzo, 37, Hoboken, N.J. David Paul Derubbio, 38, New York, N.Y. Jemal Legesse DeSantis, 28, Jersey City, N.J. Christian L. DeSimone, 23, Ringwood, N.J. Edward DeSimone, 36, Atlantic Highlands, N.J. Lt. Andrew Desperito, 44, Patchogue, N.Y. Michael Jude D’Esposito, 32, Morganville, N.J. Cindy Ann Deuel, 28, New York, N.Y. Jerry DeVito, 66, New York, N.Y. Robert P. Devitt, 36, Plainsboro, N.J. Dennis Lawrence Devlin, 51, Washingtonville, N.Y. Gerard Dewan, 35, New York, N.Y. Simon Suleman Ali Kassamali Dhanani, 62, Hartsdale, N.Y. Michael L. DiAgostino, 41, Garden City, N.Y. Matthew Diaz, 33, New York, N.Y. Nancy Diaz, 28, New York, N.Y. Obdulio Ruiz Diaz, 44, New York, N.Y. Lourdes Galletti Diaz, 32, New York, N.Y. Michael Diaz-Piedra, 49 Judith Belguese Diaz-Sierra, 32, Bay Shore, N.Y. Patricia F. DiChiaro, 63, New York, N.Y. Joseph Dermot Dickey, 50, Manhasset, N.Y. Lawrence Patrick Dickinson, 35, Morganville, N.J. Michael David Diehl, 48, Brick, N.J. John DiFato, 39, New York, N.Y. Vincent F. DiFazio, 43, Hampton, N.J. Carl DiFranco, 27, New York, N.Y. Donald J. DiFranco, 43, New York, N.Y. Debra Ann DiMartino, 36, New York, N.Y. Stephen P. Dimino, 48, Basking Ridge, N.J. William J. Dimmling, 47, Garden City, N.Y. Christopher Dincuff, 31, Jersey City, N.J. Jeffrey M. Dingle, 32, New York, N.Y. Anthony DiOnisio, 38, Glen Rock, N.J. George DiPasquale, 33, New York, N.Y. Joseph DiPilato, 57, New York, N.Y. Douglas Frank DiStefano, 24, Hoboken, N.J. Ramzi A. Doany, 35, Bayone, N.J., Jordanian John J. Doherty, 58, Hartsdale, N.Y. Melissa C. Doi, 32, New York, N.Y. Brendan Dolan, 37, Glen Rock, N.J. Neil Dollard, 28, Hoboken, N.J. James Joseph Domanico, 56, New York, N.Y. Benilda Pascua Domingo, 37, New York, N.Y. Charles (Carlos) Dominguez, 34, East Meadow, N.Y. Geronimo (Jerome) Mark Patrick Dominguez, 37, Holtsville, N.Y. Lt. Kevin W. Donnelly, 43, New York, N.Y. Jacqueline Donovan, 34, New York, N.Y. Stephen Dorf, 39, New Milford, N.J. Thomas Dowd, 37, Monroe, N.Y. Lt. Kevin Christopher Dowdell, 46, New York, N.Y. Mary Yolanda Dowling, 46, New York, N.Y. Raymond M. Downey, 63, Deer Park, N.Y. Joseph M. Doyle, 25, New York, N.Y. Frank Joseph Doyle, 39, Englewood, N.J. Randy Drake, 37, Lee’s Summit, Mo. Stephen Patrick Driscoll, 38, Lake Carmel, N.Y. Mina A. Duarte, 31, New York, N.Y. Luke A. Dudek, 50, Livingston, N.J. Christopher Michael Duffy, 23, New York, N.Y. Gerard Duffy, 53, Manorville, N.Y. Michael Joseph Duffy, 29, Northport, N.Y. Thomas W. Duffy, 52, Pittsford, N.Y. Antoinette Duger, 44, Belleville, N.J. Jackie Sayegh Duggan, 34 Sareve Dukat, 53, New York, N.Y. Christopher Joseph Dunne, 28, Mineola, N.Y. Richard A. Dunstan, 54, New Providence, N.J. Patrick Thomas Dwyer, 37, Nissequogue, N.Y. Joseph Anthony Eacobacci, 26, New York, N.Y. John Bruce Eagleson, 53, Middlefield, Conn. Robert D. Eaton, 37, Manhasset, N.Y. Dean P. Eberling, 44, Cranford, N.J. Margaret Ruth Echterma, 33, Hoboken, N.J. Paul Robert Eckna, 28, West New York, N.J. Constantine (Gus) Economos, 41, New York, N.Y. Dennis Michael Edwards, 35, Huntington, N.Y. Michael Hardy Edwards, 33, New York, N.Y. Lisa Egan, 31, Cliffside Park, N.J. Capt. Martin Egan, 36, New York, N.Y. Michael Egan, 51, Middletown, N.J. Christine Egan, 55, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada Samantha Egan, 24, Jersey City, N.J. Carole Eggert, 60, New York, N.Y. Lisa Caren Weinstein Ehrlich, 36, New York, N.Y. John Ernst (Jack) Eichler, 69, Cedar Grove, N.J. Eric Adam Eisenberg, 32, Commack, N.Y. Daphne F. Elder, 36, Newark, N.J. Michael J. Elferis, 27, College Point, N.Y. Mark J. Ellis, 26, South Huntington, N.Y. Valerie Silver Ellis, 46, New York, N.Y. Albert Alfy William Elmarry, 30, North Brunswick, N.J. Edgar H. Emery, 45, Clifton, N.J. Doris Suk-Yuen Eng, 30, New York, N.Y. Christopher S. Epps, 29, New York, N.Y. Ulf Ramm Ericson, 79, Greenwich, Conn. Erwin L. Erker, 41, Farmingdale, N.Y. William J. Erwin, 30, Verona, N.J. Sarah (Ali) Escarcega, 35, New York, N.Y. Jose Espinal, 31 Fanny M. Espinoza, 29, Teaneck, N.J. Francis Esposito, 32, New York, N.Y. Lt. Michael Esposito, 41, New York, N.Y. William Esposito, 51, Bellmore, N.Y. Brigette Ann Esposito, 34, New York, N.Y. Ruben Esquilin, 35, New York, N.Y. Sadie Ette, 36, New York, N.Y. Barbara G. Etzold, 43, Jersey City, N.J. Eric Brian Evans, 31, Weehawken, N.J. Robert Edward Evans, 36, Franklin Square, N.Y. Meredith Emily June Ewart, 29, Hoboken, N.J. Catherine K. Fagan, 58, New York, N.Y. Patricia M. Fagan, 55, Toms River, N.J. Keith G. Fairben, 24, Floral Park, N.Y. William Fallon, 38, Coram, N.Y. William F. Fallon, 53, Rocky Hill, N.J. Anthony J. Fallone, 39, New York, N.Y. Dolores B. Fanelli, 38, Farmingville, N.Y. John Joseph Fanning, 54, West Hempstead, N.Y. Kathleen (Kit) Faragher, 33, Denver, Colo. Capt. Thomas Farino, 37, Bohemia, N.Y. Nancy Carole Farley, 45, Jersey City, N.J. Elizabeth Ann (Betty) Farmer, 62, New York, N.Y. Douglas Farnum, 33, New York, N.Y. John W. Farrell, 41, Basking Ridge, N.J. Terrence Patrick Farrell, 45, Huntington, N.Y. John G. Farrell, 32, New York, N.Y. Capt. Joseph Farrelly, 47, New York, N.Y. Thomas P. Farrelly, 54, East Northport, N.Y. Syed Abdul Fatha, 54, Newark, N.J. Christopher Faughnan, 37, South Orange, N.J. Wendy R. Faulkner, 47, Mason, Ohio Shannon M. Fava, 30, New York, N.Y. Bernard D. Favuzza, 52, Suffern, N.Y. Robert Fazio, 41, Freeport, N.Y. Ronald C. Fazio, 57, Closter, N.J. William Feehan, 72, New York, N.Y. Francis J. (Frank) Feely, 41, Middletown, N.Y. Garth E. Feeney, 28, New York, N.Y. Sean B. Fegan, 34, New York, N.Y. Lee S. Fehling, 28, Wantagh, N.Y. Peter Feidelberg, 34, Hoboken, N.J. Alan D. Feinberg, 48, New York, N.Y. Rosa Maria Feliciano, 30, New York, N.Y. Edward T. Fergus, 40, Wilton, Conn. George Ferguson, 54, Teaneck, N.J. Henry Fernandez, 23, New York, N.Y. Judy H. Fernandez, 27, Parlin, N.J. Jose Manuel Contreras Fernandez, El Aguacate, Jalisco, Mexico Elisa Giselle Ferraina, 27, London, England Anne Marie Sallerin Ferreira, 29, Jersey City, N.J. Robert John Ferris, 63, Garden City, N.Y. David Francis Ferrugio, 46, Middletown, N.J. Louis V. Fersini, 38, Basking Ridge, N.J. Michael David Ferugio, 37, New York, N.Y. Bradley James Fetchet, 24, New York, N.Y. Jennifer Louise Fialko, 29, Teaneck, N.J. Kristen Fiedel, 27, New York, N.Y. Samuel Fields, 36, New York, N.Y. Michael Bradley Finnegan, 37, Basking Ridge, N.J. Timothy J. Finnerty, 33, Glen Rock, N.J. Michael Curtis Fiore, 46, New York, N.Y. Stephen J. Fiorelli, 43, Aberdeen, N.J. Paul M. Fiori, 31, Yorktown Heights, N.Y. John Fiorito, 40, Stamford, Conn. Lt. John R. Fischer, 46, New York, N.Y. Andrew Fisher, 42, New York, N.Y. Thomas J. Fisher, 36, Union, N.J. Bennett Lawson Fisher, 58, Stamford, Conn. John Roger Fisher, 46, Bayonne, N.J. Lucy Fishman, 37, New York, N.Y. Ryan D. Fitzgerald, 26, New York, N.Y. Thomas Fitzpatrick, 35, Tuckahoe, N.Y. Richard P. Fitzsimons, 57, Lynbrook, N.Y. Salvatore A. Fiumefreddo, 47, Manalapan, N.J. Christina Donovan Flannery, 26, New York, N.Y. Eileen Flecha, 33, New York, N.Y. Andre G. Fletcher, 37, North Babylon, N.Y. Carl Flickinger, 38, Conyers, N.Y. John Joseph Florio, 33, Oceanside, N.Y. Joseph W. Flounders, 46, East Stroudsburg, Pa. David Fodor, 38, Garrison, N.Y. Lt. Michael N. Fodor, 53, Warwick, N.Y. Steven Mark Fogel, 40, Westfield, N.Y. Thomas Foley, 32, West Nyack, N.Y. David Fontana, 37, New York, N.Y. Chih Min (Dennis) Foo, 40, Holmdel, N.J. Del Rose Forbes-Cheatham, 48, New York, N.Y. Godwin Forde, 39, New York, N.Y. Donald A. Foreman, 53, New York, N.Y. Christopher Hugh Forsythe, 44, Basking Ridge, N.J. Claudia Alicia Martinez Foster, 26, New York, N.Y. Noel J. Foster, 40, Bridgewater, N.J. Ana Fosteris, 58, Coram, N.Y. Robert J. Foti, 42, Albertson, N.Y. Jeffrey L. Fox, 40, Cranbury, N.J. Virginia Fox, 58, New York, N.Y. Virgin (Lucy) Francis, 62, New York, N.Y. Pauline Francis, 57, New York, N.Y. Joan Francis Gary J. Frank, 35, South Amboy, N.J. Morton Frank, 31, New York, N.Y. Peter Christopher Frank, 29, New York, N.Y. Richard K. Fraser, 32, New York, N.Y. Kevin Joseph Frawley, 34, Bronxville, N.Y. Clyde Frazier, 41, New York, N.Y. Lillian I. Frederick, 46, Teaneck, N.J. Andrew Fredericks, 40, Suffern, N.Y. Tamitha Freemen, 35, New York, N.Y. Brett O. Freiman, 29, Roslyn, N.Y. Lt. Peter L. Freund, 45, Westtown, N.Y. Arlene E. Fried, 49, Roslyn Heights, N.Y. Alan Wayne Friedlander, 52, Yorktown Heights, N.Y. Andrew K. Friedman, 44, Woodbury, N.Y. Gregg J. Froehner, 46, Chester, N.J. Peter Christian Fry, 36, Wilton, Conn. Clement Fumando, 59, New York, N.Y. Steven Elliot Furman, 40, Wesley Hills, N.Y. Paul James Furmato, 37, Colts Neck, N.J. Fredric Gabler, 30, New York, N.Y. Richard S. Gabrielle, 50, West Haven, Conn. James Andrew Gadiel, 23, New York, N.Y. Pamela Gaff, 51, Robinsville, N.J. Ervin Vincent Gailliard, 42, New York, N.Y. Deanna L. Galante, 32, New York, N.Y. Grace Galante, 29, New York, N.Y. Anthony Edward Gallagher, 41, New York, N.Y. Daniel James Gallagher, 23, Red Bank, N.J. John Patrick Gallagher, 31, Yonkers, N.Y. Cono E. Gallo, 30, New York, N.Y. Vincenzo Gallucci, 36, Monroe Township, N.J. Thomas Edward Galvin, 32, New York, N.Y. Giovanna (Genni) Gambale, 27, New York, N.Y. Thomas Gambino, 48, Babylon, N.Y. Giann F. Gamboa, 26, New York, N.Y. Peter J. Ganci, 55, North Massapequa, N.Y. Claude Michael Gann, 41, Roswell, Ga. Lt. Charles William Garbarini, 44, Pleasantville, N.Y. Cesar Garcia, 36, New York, N.Y. David Garcia, 40, Freeport, N.Y. Jorge Luis Morron Garcia, 38, New York, N.Y. Juan Garcia, 50, New York, N.Y. Marlyn C. Garcia, 21, New York, N.Y. Christopher Gardner, 36, Darien, Conn. Douglas B. Gardner, 39, New York, N.Y. Harvey J. Gardner, 35, Lakewood, N.J. Thomas A. Gardner, 39, Oceanside, N.Y. Jeffrey B. Gardner, 36, Hoboken, N.J. William Arthur Gardner, 45, Lynbrook, N.Y. Francesco Garfi, 29, New York, N.Y. Rocco Gargano, 28, Bayside, N.Y. James M. Gartenberg, 36, New York, N.Y. Matthew David Garvey, 37 Bruce Gary, 51, Bellmore, N.Y. Palmina Delli Gatti, 33, New York, N.Y. Boyd A. Gatton, 38, Jersey City, N.J. Donald Richard Gavagan, 35, New York, N.Y. Terence D. Gazzani, 24, New York, N.Y. Gary Geidel, 44, New York, N.Y. Paul Hamilton Geier, 36, Farmingdale, N.Y. Julie M. Geis, 44, Lees Summit, Mo. Peter Gelinas, 34, New York, N.Y. Steven Paul Geller, 52, New York, N.Y. Howard G. Gelling, 28, New York, N.Y. Peter Victor Genco, 36, Rockville Centre, N.Y. Steven Gregory Genovese, 37, Basking Ridge, N.J. Alayne F. Gentul, 44, Mountain Lakes, N.J. Edward F. Geraghty, 45, Rockville Centre, N.Y. Suzanne Geraty, 30, New York, N.Y. Ralph Gerhardt, 33, New York, N.Y. Robert J. Gerlich, 56, Monroe, Conn. Denis P. Germain, 33, Tuxedo Park, N.Y. Marina R. Gertsberg, 25, New York, N.Y. Susan M. Getzendanner, 57, New York, N.Y. James Gerard Geyer, 41, Rockville Centre, N.Y. Joseph M. Giaccone, 43, Monroe, N.J. Lt. Vincent Francis Giammona, 40, Valley Stream, N.Y. Debra L. Gibbon, 43, Hackettstown, N.J. James A. Giberson, 43, New York, N.Y. Craig Neil Gibson, 37, New York, N.Y. Ronnie Gies, 43, Merrick, N.Y. Laura A. Giglio, 35, Oceanside, N.Y. Andrew Clive Gilbert, 39, Califon, N.J. Timothy Paul Gilbert, 35, Lebanon, N.J. Paul Stuart Gilbey, 39, Chatham, N.J. Paul John Gill, 34, New York, N.Y. Mark Y. Gilles, 33, New York, N.Y. Evan H. Gillette, 40, New York, N.Y. Ronald Gilligan, 43, Norwalk, Conn. Sgt. Rodney C. Gillis, 34, New York, N.Y. Laura Gilly, 32, New York, N.Y. Lt. John F. Ginley, 37, Warwick, N.Y. Jeffrey Giordano, 46, New York, N.Y. John Giordano, 46, Newburgh, N.Y. Donna Marie Giordano, 44, Parlin, N.J. Steven A. Giorgetti, 43, Manhasset, N.Y. Martin Giovinazzo, 34, New York, N.Y. Kum-Kum Girolamo, 41, New York, N.Y. Salvatore Gitto, 44, Manalapan, N.J. Cynthia Giugliano, 46, Nesconset, N.Y. Mon Gjonbalaj, 65, New York, N.Y. Dianne Gladstone, 55, New York, N.Y. Keith Alexander Glascoe, 38, New York, N.Y. Thomas I. Glasser, 40, Summit, N.J. Harry Glenn , 38, Piscataway, N.J. Barry H. Glick, 55, Wayne, N.J. Steven Lawrence Glick, 42, Greenwich, Conn. John T. Gnazzo, 32, New York, N.Y. William (Bill) Robert Godshalk, 35, New York, N.Y. Michael Gogliormella, 43, New Providence, N.J. Brian Fredric Goldberg, 26, Union, N.J. Jeffrey Grant Goldflam, 48, Melville, N.Y. Michelle Herman Goldstein, 31, New York, N.Y. Monica Goldstein, 25, New York, N.Y. Steven Goldstein, 35, Princeton, N.J. Andrew H. Golkin, 30, New York, N.Y. Dennis James Gomes, 40, New York, N.Y. Enrique Antonio Gomez, 42, New York, N.Y. Jose Bienvenido Gomez, 45, New York, N.Y. Manuel Gomez, 42, New York, N.Y. Wilder Gomez, 38, New York, N.Y. Jenine Gonzalez, 27, New York, N.Y. Joel Guevara Gonzalez, 23, Aguascalientes, Aguascalientes, Mexico Rosa J. Gonzalez, 32, Jersey City, N.J. Mauricio Gonzalez, 27, New York, N.Y. Calvin J. Gooding, 38, Riverside, N.Y. Harry Goody, 50, New York, N.Y. Kiran Reddy Gopu, 24, Bridgeport, Conn. Catherine Carmen Gorayeb, 41, New York, N.Y. Kerene Gordon, 43, New York, N.Y. Sebastian Gorki, 27, New York, N.Y. Thomas E. Gorman, 41, Middlesex, N.J. Kieran Gorman, 35, Yonkers, N.Y. Michael Edward Gould, 29, Hoboken, N.J. Yugi Goya, 42, Rye, N.Y. Jon Richard Grabowski, 33, New York, N.Y. Christopher Michael Grady, 39, Cranford, N.J. Edwin John Graf, 48, Rowayton, Conn. David M. Graifman, 40, New York, N.Y. Gilbert Granados, 51, Hicksville, N.Y. Elvira Granitto, 43, New York, N.Y. Winston Arthur Grant, 59, West Hempstead, N.Y. Christopher Stewart Gray, 32, Weehawken, N.J. James Michael Gray, 34, New York, N.Y. Linda Mair Grayling, 44, New York, N.Y. John Michael Grazioso, 41, Middletown, N.J. Timothy Grazioso, 42, Gulf Stream, Fla. Derrick Arthur Green, 44, New York, N.Y. Wade Brian Green, 42, Westbury, N.Y. Elaine Myra Greenberg, 56, New York, N.Y. Gayle R. Greene, 51, Montville, N.J. James Arthur Greenleaf, 32, New York, N.Y. Eileen Marsha Greenstein, 52, Morris Plains, N.J. Elizabeth (Lisa) Martin Gregg, 52, New York, N.Y. Donald H. Gregory, 62, Ramsey, N.J. Florence M. Gregory, 38, New York, N.Y. Denise Gregory, 39, New York, N.Y. Pedro (David) Grehan, 35, Hoboken, N.J. John M. Griffin, 38, Waldwick, N.J. Tawarna Griffin, 30, New York, N.Y. Joan D. Griffith, 39, Willingboro, N.J. Warren Grifka, 54, New York, N.Y. Ramon Grijalvo, 58 Joseph F. Grillo, 46, New York, N.Y. David Grimner, 51, Merrick, N.Y. Kenneth Grouzalis, 56, Lyndhurst, N.J. Joseph Grzelak, 52, New York, N.Y. Matthew J. Grzymalski, 34, New Hyde Park, N.Y. Robert Joseph Gschaar, 55, Spring Valley, N.Y. Liming (Michael) Gu, 34, Piscataway, N.J. Jose A. Guadalupe, 37, New York, N.Y. Yan Zhu (Cindy) Guan, 25, New York, N.Y. Geoffrey E. Guja, 47, Lindenhurst, N.Y. Lt. Joseph Gullickson, 37, New York, N.Y. Babita Guman, 33, New York, N.Y. Douglas B. Gurian, 38, Tenafly, N.J. Philip T. Guza, 54, Sea Bright, N.J. Barbara Guzzardo, 49, Glendale, N.Y. Peter Gyulavary, 44, Warwick, N.Y. Gary Robert Haag, 36, Ossining, N.Y. Andrea Lyn Haberman, 25, Chicago, Ill. Barbara M. Habib, 49, New York, N.Y. Philip Haentzler, 49, New York, N.Y. Nizam A. Hafiz, 32, New York, N.Y. Karen Hagerty, 34, New York, N.Y. Steven Hagis, 31, New York, N.Y. Mary Lou Hague, 26, New York, N.Y. David Halderman, 40, New York, N.Y. Maile Rachel Hale, 26, Cambridge, Mass. Richard Hall, 49, Purchase, N.Y. Vaswald George Hall, 50, New York, N.Y. Robert John Halligan, 59, Basking Ridge, N.J. Lt. Vincent Gerard Halloran, 43, North Salem, N.Y. James D. Halvorson, 56, Greenwich, Conn. Mohammad Salman Hamdani, 23, New York, N.Y. Felicia Hamilton, 62, New York, N.Y. Robert Hamilton, 43, Washingtonville, N.Y. Frederic Kim Han, 45, Marlboro, N.J. Christopher James Hanley, 34, New York, N.Y. Sean Hanley, 35, New York, N.Y. Valerie Joan Hanna, 57, Freeville, N.Y. Thomas Hannafin, 36, New York, N.Y. Kevin James Hannaford, 32, Basking Ridge, N.J. Michael L. Hannan, 34, Lynbrook, N.Y. Dana Hannon, 29, Suffern, N.Y. Vassilios G. Haramis, 56, New York, N.Y. James A. Haran, 41, Malverne, N.Y. Jeffrey P. Hardy, 46, New York, N.Y. Timothy John Hargrave, 38, Readington, N.J. Daniel Harlin, 41, Kent, N.Y. Frances Haros, 76, New York, N.Y. Lt. Harvey L. Harrell, 49, New York, N.Y. Lt. Stephen Gary Harrell, 44, Warwick, N.Y. Stewart D. Harris, 52, Marlboro, N.J. Aisha Harris, 22, New York, N.Y. John Patrick Hart, 38, Danville, Calif. John Clinton Hartz, 64, Basking Ridge, N.J. Emeric J. Harvey, 56, Montclair, N.J. Capt. Thomas Theodore Haskell, 37, Massapequa, N.Y. Timothy Haskell, 34, Seaford, N.Y. Joseph John Hasson, 34, New York, N.Y. Capt. Terence S. Hatton, 41, New York, N.Y. Leonard William Hatton, 45, Ridgefield Park, N.J. Michael Helmut Haub, 34, Roslyn Heights, N.Y. Timothy Aaron Haviland, 41, Oceanside, N.Y. Donald G. Havlish, 53, Yardley, Pa. Anthony Hawkins, 30, New York, N.Y. Nobuhiro Hayatsu, 36, Scarsdale, N.Y. Philip Hayes, 67, Northport, N.Y. William Ward Haynes, 35, Rye, N.Y. Scott Hazelcorn, 29, Hoboken, N.J. Lt. Michael K. Healey, 42, East Patchogue, N.Y. Roberta Bernstein Heber, 60, New York, N.Y. Charles Francis Xavier Heeran, 23, Belle Harbor, N.Y. John Heffernan, 37, New York, N.Y. Howard Joseph Heller, 37, Ridgefield, Conn. JoAnn L. Heltibridle, 46, Springfield, N.J. Mark F. Hemschoot, 45, Red Bank, N.J. Ronnie Lee Henderson, 52, Newburgh, N.Y. Janet Hendricks, 48, New York, N.Y. Brian Hennessey, 35, Ringoes, N.J. Michelle Marie Henrique, 27, New York, N.Y. Joseph P. Henry, 25, New York, N.Y. William Henry, 49, New York, N.Y. John Henwood, 35, New York, N.Y. Robert Allan Hepburn, 39, Union, N.J. Mary (Molly) Herencia, 47, New York, N.Y. Lindsay Coates Herkness, 58, New York, N.Y. Harvey Robert Hermer, 59, New York, N.Y. Claribel Hernandez, 31, New York, N.Y. Norberto Hernandez, 42, New York, N.Y. Raul Hernandez, 51, New York, N.Y. Gary Herold, 44, Farmingdale, N.Y. Jeffrey A. Hersch, 53, New York, N.Y. Thomas Hetzel, 33, Elmont, N.Y. Capt. Brian Hickey, 47, New York, N.Y. Ysidro Hidalgo-Tejada, 47, New York, N.Y., Dominican Republic Lt. Timothy Higgins, 43, Farmingville, N.Y. Robert D. Higley, 29, New Fairfield, Conn. Todd Russell Hill, 34, Boston, Mass. Clara Victorine Hinds, 52, New York, N.Y. Neal Hinds, 28, New York, N.Y. Mark D. Hindy, 28, New York, N.Y. Richard Bruce Van Hine, 48, Greenwood Lake, N.Y. Katsuyuki Hirai, 32, Hartsdale, N.Y. Heather Malia Ho, 32, New York, N.Y. Tara Yvette Hobbs, 31, New York, N.Y. Thomas A. Hobbs, 41, Baldwin, N.Y. James L. Hobin, 47, Marlborough, Conn. Robert Wayne Hobson, 36, New Providence, N.J. DaJuan Hodges, 29, New York, N.Y. Ronald George Hoerner, 58, Massapequa Park, N.Y. Patrick Aloysius Hoey, 53, Middletown, N.J. Stephen G. Hoffman, 36, Long Beach, N.Y. Marcia Hoffman, 52, New York, N.Y. Frederick J. Hoffmann, 53, Freehold, N.J. Michele L. Hoffmann, 27, Freehold, N.J. Judith Florence Hofmiller, 53, Brookfield, Conn. Thomas Warren Hohlweck, 57, Harrison, N.Y. Jonathan R. Hohmann, 48, New York, N.Y. Joseph Francis Holland, 32, Glen Rock, N.J. John Holland, 30 Elizabeth Holmes, 42, New York, N.Y. Thomas P. Holohan, 36, Chester, N.Y. Bradley Hoorn, 22, New York, N.Y. James P. Hopper, 51, Farmingdale, N.Y. Montgomery McCullough Hord, 46, Pelham, N.Y. Michael Horn, 27, Lynbrook, N.Y. Matthew D. Horning, 26, Hoboken, N.J. Robert L. Horohoe, 31, New York, N.Y. Aaron Horwitz, 24, New York, N.Y. Charles J. Houston, 42, New York, N.Y. Uhuru G. Houston, 32, Englewood, N.J. George Howard, 45, Hicksville, N.Y. Steven L. Howell, 36, New York, N.Y. Michael C. Howell, 60, New York, N.Y. Jennifer L. Howley, 34, New Hyde Park, N.Y. Milagros “Millie” Hromada, 35, New York, N.Y. Marian Hrycak, 56, New York, N.Y. Stephen Huczko, 44, Bethlehem, N.J. Kris R. Hughes, 30, Nesconset, N.Y. Melissa Harrington Hughes, 31, San Francisco, Calif. Thomas F. Hughes, 46, Spring Lake Heights, N.J. Timothy Robert Hughes, 43, Madison, N.J. Paul R. Hughes, 38, Stamford, Conn. Robert T. “Bobby” Hughes, 23, Sayreville, N.J. Susan Huie, 43, Fair Lawn, N.J. Mychal Lamar Hulse, 30, New York, N.Y. William C. Hunt, 32, Norwalk, Conn. Joseph G. Hunter, 31, South Hempstead, N.Y. Robert Hussa, 51, Roslyn, N.Y. Capt. Walter Hynes, 46, Belle Harbor, N.Y. Thomas E. Hynes, 28, Norwalk, Conn. Joseph Anthony Ianelli, 28, Hoboken, N.J. Zuhtu Ibis, 25, Clifton, N.J. Jonathan Lee Ielpi, 29, Great Neck, N.Y. Michael Patrick Iken, 37, New York, N.Y. Daniel Ilkanayev, 36, New York, N.Y. Capt. Frederick Ill, 49, Pearl River, N.Y. Abraham Nethanel Ilowitz, 51, New York, N.Y. Anthony P. Infante, 47, Chatham, N.J. Louis S. Inghilterra, 45, New Castle, N.Y. Christopher N. Ingrassia, 28, Watchung, N.J. Paul Innella, 33, East Brunswick, N.J. Stephanie V. Irby, 38, New York, N.Y. Douglas Irgang, 32, New York, N.Y. Todd A. Isaac, 29, New York, N.Y. Erik Hans Isbrandtsen, 30, New York, N.Y. Taizo Ishikawa, 50 Aram Iskenderian, 41, Merrick, N.Y. John Iskyan, 41, Wilton, Conn. Kazushige Ito, 35, New York, N.Y. Aleksandr Valeryerich Ivantsov, 23, New York, N.Y. Virginia Jablonski, 49, Matawan, N.J. Brooke Alexandra Jackman, 23, New York, N.Y. Aaron Jacobs, 27, New York, N.Y. Jason Kyle Jacobs, 32, Mendham, N.J. Michael Grady Jacobs, 54, Danbury, Conn. Ariel Louis Jacobs, 29, Briarcliff Manor, N.Y. Steven A. Jacobson, 53, New York, N.Y. Ricknauth Jaggernauth, 58, New York, N.Y. Jake Denis Jagoda, 24, Huntington, N.Y. Yudh V.S. Jain, 54, New City, N.Y. Maria Jakubiak, 41, Ridgewood, N.Y. Gricelda E. James, 44, Willingboro, N.J. Ernest James, 40, New York, N.Y. Mark Jardim, 39, New York, N.Y. Mohammed Jawara, 30, New York, N.Y. Francois Jean-Pierre, 58, New York, N.Y. Maxima Jean-Pierre, 40, Bellport, N.Y. Paul E. Jeffers, 39, New York, N.Y. Joseph Jenkins, 47, New York, N.Y. Alan K. Jensen, 49, Wyckoff, N.J. Prem N. Jerath, 57, Edison, N.J. Farah Jeudy, 32, Spring Valley, N.Y. Hweidar Jian, 42, East Brunswick, N.J. Eliezer Jimenez, 38, New York, N.Y. Luis Jimenez, 25, New York, N.Y. Charles Gregory John, 44, New York, N.Y. Nicholas John, 42, New York, N.Y. Scott M. Johnson, 26, New York, N.Y. LaShawana Johnson, 27, New York, N.Y. William Johnston, 31, North Babylon, N.Y. Arthur Joseph Jones, 37, Ossining, N.Y. Allison Horstmann Jones, 31, New York, N.Y. Brian L. Jones, 44, New York, N.Y. Christopher D. Jones, 53, Huntington, N.Y. Donald T. Jones, 39, Livingston, N.J. Donald W. Jones, 43, Fairless Hills, Pa. Linda Jones, 50, New York, N.Y. Mary S. Jones, 72, New York, N.Y. Andrew Jordan, 35, Remsenburg, N.Y. Robert Thomas Jordan, 34, Williston, N.Y. Ingeborg Joseph, 60, Germany Karl Henri Joseph, 25, New York, N.Y. Stephen Joseph, 39, Franklin Park, N.J. Albert Joseph, 79 Jane Eileen Josiah, 47, Bellmore, N.Y. Lt. Anthony Jovic, 39, Massapequa, N.Y. Angel Luis Juarbe, 35, New York, N.Y. Karen Susan Juday, 52, New York, N.Y. The Rev. Mychal Judge, 68, New York, N.Y. Paul W. Jurgens, 47, Levittown, N.Y. Thomas Edward Jurgens, 26, Lawrence, N.Y. Kacinga Kabeya, 63, McKinney, Texas Shashi Kiran Lakshmikantha Kadaba, 25, Hackensack, N.J. Gavkharoy Mukhometovna Kamardinova, 26, New York, N.Y. Shari Kandell, 27, Wyckoff, N.J. Howard Lee Kane, 40, Hazlet, N.J. Jennifer Lynn Kane, 26, Fair Lawn, N.J. Vincent D. Kane, 37, New York, N.Y. Joon Koo Kang, 34, Riverdale, N.J. Sheldon R. Kanter, 53, Edison, N.J. Deborah H. Kaplan, 45, Paramus, N.J. Alvin Peter Kappelmann, 57, Green Brook, N.J. Charles Karczewski, 34, Union, N.J. William A. Karnes, 37, New York, N.Y. Douglas G. Karpiloff, 53, Mamaroneck, N.Y. Charles L. Kasper, 54, New York, N.Y. Andrew Kates, 37, New York, N.Y. John Katsimatides, 31, East Marion, N.Y. Sgt. Robert Kaulfers, 49, Kenilworth, N.J. Don Jerome Kauth, 51, Saratoga Springs, N.Y. Hideya Kawauchi, 36, Fort Lee, N.J. Edward T. Keane, 66, West Caldwell, N.J. Richard M. Keane, 54, Wethersfield, Conn. Lisa Kearney-Griffin, 35, Jamaica, N.Y. Karol Ann Keasler, 42, New York, N.Y. Paul Hanlon Keating, 38, New York, N.Y. Leo Russell Keene, 33, Westfield, N.J. Joseph J. Keller, 31, Park Ridge, N.J. Peter Rodney Kellerman, 35, New York, N.Y. Joseph P. Kellett, 37, Riverdale, N.Y. Frederick H. Kelley, 57, Huntington, N.Y. James Joseph Kelly, 39, Oceanside, N.Y. Joseph A. Kelly, 40, Oyster Bay, N.Y. Maurice Patrick Kelly, 41, New York, N.Y. Richard John Kelly, 50, New York, N.Y. Thomas Michael Kelly, 41, Wyckoff, N.J. Thomas Richard Kelly, 38, Riverhead, N.Y. Thomas W. Kelly, 51, New York, N.Y. Timothy C. Kelly, 37, Port Washington, N.Y. William Hill Kelly, 30, New York, N.Y. Robert C. Kennedy, 55, Toms River, N.J. Thomas J. Kennedy, 36, Islip Terrace, N.Y. John Keohane, 41, Jersey City, N.J. Lt. Ronald T. Kerwin, 42, Levittown, N.Y. Howard L. Kestenbaum, 56, Montclair, N.J. Douglas D. Ketcham, 27, New York, N.Y. Ruth E. Ketler, 42, New York, N.Y. Boris Khalif, 30, New York, N.Y. Sarah Khan, 32, New York, N.Y. Taimour Firaz Khan, 29, New York, N.Y. Rajesh Khandelwal, 33, South Plainfield, N.J. SeiLai Khoo, 38, Jersey City, N.J. Michael Kiefer, 25, Hempstead, N.Y. Satoshi Kikuchihara, 43, Scarsdale, N.Y. Andrew Jay-Hoon Kim, 26, Leonia, N.J. Lawrence Don Kim, 31, Blue Bell, Pa. Mary Jo Kimelman, 34, New York, N.Y. Andrew Marshall King, 42, Princeton, N.J. Lucille T. King, 59, Ridgewood, N.J. Robert King, 36, Bellerose Terrace, N.Y. Lisa M. King-Johnson, 34, New York, N.Y. Takashi Kinoshita, 46, Rye, N.Y. Chris Michael Kirby, 21, New York, N.Y. Howard (Barry) Kirschbaum, 53, New York, N.Y. Glenn Davis Kirwin, 40, Scarsdale, N.Y. Richard J. Klares, 59, Somers, N.Y. Peter A. Klein, 35, Weehawken, N.J. Alan D. Kleinberg, 39, East Brunswick, N.J. Karen J. Klitzman, 38, New York, N.Y. Ronald Philip Kloepfer, 39, Franklin Square, N.Y. Yevgeny Kniazev, 46, New York, N.Y. Thomas Patrick Knox, 31, Hoboken, N.J. Andrew Knox, 30, Adelaide, Australia Rebecca Lee Koborie, 48, Guttenberg, N.J. Deborah Kobus, 36, New York, N.Y. Gary Edward Koecheler, 57, Harrison, N.Y. Frank J. Koestner, 48, New York, N.Y. Ryan Kohart, 26, New York, N.Y. Vanessa Lynn Kolpak, 21, New York, N.Y. Irina Kolpakova, 37, New York, N.Y. Suzanne Kondratenko, 27, Chicago, Ill. Abdoulaye Kone, 37, New York, N.Y. Bon-seok Koo, 42, River Edge, N.J. Dorota Kopiczko, 26, Nutley, N.J. Scott Kopytko, 32, New York, N.Y. Bojan Kostic, 34, New York, N.Y. Danielle Kousoulis, 29, New York, N.Y. John J. Kren, 52 William Krukowski, 36, New York, N.Y. Lyudmila Ksido, 46, New York, N.Y. Shekhar Kumar, 30, New York, N.Y. Kenneth Kumpel, 42, Cornwall, N.Y. Frederick Kuo, 53, Great Neck, N.Y. Patricia Kuras, 42, New York, N.Y. Nauka Kushitani, 44, New York, N.Y. Thomas Joseph Kuveikis, 48, Carmel, N.Y. Victor Kwarkye, 35, New York, N.Y. Kui Fai Kwok, 31, New York, N.Y. Angela R. Kyte, 49, Boonton, N.J. Amarnauth Lachhman, 42, Valley Stream, N.Y. Andrew LaCorte, 61, Jersey City, N.J. Ganesh Ladkat, 27, Somerset, N.J. James P. Ladley, 41, Colts Neck, N.J. Daniel M. Van Laere, 46, Glen Rock, N.J. Joseph A. Lafalce, 54, New York, N.Y. Jeanette LaFond-Menichino, 49, New York, N.Y. David LaForge, 50, Port Richmond, N.Y. Michael Patrick LaForte, 39, Holmdel, N.J. Alan Lafrance, 43 Juan Lafuente, 61, Poughkeepsie, N.Y. Neil K. Lai, 59, East Windsor, N.J. Vincent A. Laieta, 31, Edison, N.J. William David Lake, 44, New York, N.Y. Franco Lalama, 45, Nutley, N.J. Chow Kwan Lam, 48, Maywood, N.J. Stephen LaMantia, 38, Darien, Co. Amy Hope Lamonsoff, 29, New York, N.Y. Robert T. Lane, 28, New York, N.Y. Brendan M. Lang, 30, Red Bank, N.J. Rosanne P. Lang, 42, Middletown, N.J. Vanessa Langer, 29, Yonkers, N.Y. Mary Lou Langley, 53, New York, N.Y. Peter J. Langone, 41, Roslyn Heights, N.Y. Thomas Langone, 39, Williston Park, N.Y. Michele B. Lanza, 36, New York, N.Y. Ruth Sheila Lapin, 53, East Windsor, N.J. Carol Ann LaPlante, 59, New York, N.Y. Ingeborg Astrid Desiree Lariby, 42, New York, N.Y. Robin Larkey, 48, Chatham, N.J. Christopher Randall Larrabee, 26, New York, N.Y. Hamidou S. Larry, 37, New York, N.Y. Scott Larsen, 35, New York, N.Y. John Adam Larson, 37, Colonia, N.J. Gary E. Lasko, 49, Memphis, Tenn. Nicholas C. Lassman, 28, Cliffside Park, N.J. Paul Laszczynski, 49, Paramus, N.J. Jeffrey Latouche, 49, New York, N.Y. Cristina de Laura Oscar de Laura Charles Laurencin, 61, New York, N.Y. Stephen James Lauria, 39, New York, N.Y. Maria Lavache, 60, New York, N.Y. Denis F. Lavelle, 42, Yonkers, N.Y. Jeannine M. LaVerde, 36, New York, N.Y. Anna A. Laverty, 52, Middletown, N.J. Steven Lawn, 28, West Windsor, N.J. Robert A. Lawrence, 41, Summit, N.J. Nathaniel Lawson, 61, New York, N.Y. Eugen Lazar, 27, New York, N.Y. James Patrick Leahy, 38, New York, N.Y. Lt. Joseph Gerard Leavey, 45, Pelham, N.Y. Neil Leavy, 34, New York, N.Y. Leon Lebor, 51, Jersey City, N.J. Kenneth Charles Ledee, 38, Monmouth, N.J. Alan J. Lederman, 43, New York, N.Y. Elena Ledesma, 36, New York, N.Y. Alexis Leduc, 45, New York, N.Y. Myung-woo Lee, 41, Lyndhurst, N.J. David S. Lee, 37, West Orange, N.J. Gary H. Lee, 62, Lindenhurst, N.Y. Hyun-joon (Paul) Lee, 32, New York, N.Y. Jong-min Lee, 24, New York, N.Y. Juanita Lee, 44, New York, N.Y. Lorraine Lee, 37, New York, N.Y. Richard Y.C. Lee, 34, Great Neck, N.Y. Yang Der Lee, 63, New York, N.Y. Kathryn Blair Lee, 55, New York, N.Y. Stuart (Soo-Jin) Lee, 30, New York, N.Y. Linda C. Lee, 34, New York, N.Y. Stephen Lefkowitz, 50, Belle Harbor, N.Y. Adriana Legro, 32, New York, N.Y. Edward J. Lehman, 41, Glen Cove, N.Y. Eric Andrew Lehrfeld, 32, New York, N.Y. David Ralph Leistman, 43, Garden City, N.Y. David Prudencio LeMagne, 27, North Bergen, N.J. Joseph A. Lenihan, 41, Greenwich, Conn. John J. Lennon, 44, Howell, N.J. John Robinson Lenoir, 38, Locust Valley, N.Y. Jorge Luis Leon, 43, Union City, N.J. Matthew Gerard Leonard, 38, New York, N.Y. Michael Lepore, 39, New York, N.Y. Charles Antoine Lesperance, 55 Jeffrey Earle LeVeen, 55, Manhasset, N.Y. John D. Levi, 50, New York, N.Y. Alisha Caren Levin, 33, New York, N.Y. Neil D. Levin, 47, New York, N.Y. Robert Levine, 56, West Babylon, N.Y. Robert M. Levine, 66, Edgewater, N.J. Shai Levinhar, 29, New York, N.Y. Adam J. Lewis, 36, Fairfield, Conn Margaret Susan Lewis, 49, Elizabeth, N.J. Ye Wei Liang, 27, New York, N.Y. Orasri Liangthanasa, 26, Bayonne, N.J. Daniel F. Libretti, 43, New York, N.Y. Ralph M. Licciardi, 30, West Hempstead, N.Y. Edward Lichtschein, 35, New York, N.Y. Steven B. Lillianthal, 38, Millburn, N.J. Carlos R. Lillo, 37, Babylon, N.Y. Craig Damian Lilore, 30, Lyndhurst, N.J. Arnold A. Lim, 28, New York, N.Y. Darya Lin, 32, Chicago, Ill. Wei Rong Lin, 31, Jersey City, N.J. Nickie L. Lindo, 31, New York, N.Y. Thomas V. Linehan, 39, Montville, N.J. Robert Thomas Linnane, 33, West Hempstead, N.Y. Alan Linton, 26, Jersey City, N.J. Diane Theresa Lipari, 42, New York, N.Y. Kenneth P. Lira, 28, Paterson, N.J. Francisco Alberto Liriano, 33, New York, N.Y. Lorraine Lisi, 44, New York, N.Y. Paul Lisson, 45, New York, N.Y. Vincent Litto, 52, New York, N.Y. Ming-Hao Liu, 41, Livingston, N.J. Nancy Liz, 39, New York, N.Y. Harold Lizcano, 31, East Elmhurst, N.Y. Martin Lizzul, 31, New York, N.Y. George A. Llanes, 33, New York, N.Y. Elizabeth Claire Logler, 31, Rockville Centre, N.Y. Catherine Lisa Loguidice, 30, New York, N.Y. Jerome Robert Lohez, 30, Jersey City, N.J. Michael W. Lomax, 37, New York, N.Y. Laura M. Longing, 35, Pearl River, N.Y. Salvatore P. Lopes, 40, Franklin Square, N.Y. Daniel Lopez, 39, New York, N.Y. Luis Lopez, 38, New York, N.Y. Manuel L. Lopez, 54, Jersey City, N.J. George Lopez, 40, Stroudsburg, Pa. Joseph Lostrangio, 48, Langhorne, Pa. Chet Louie, 45, New York, N.Y. Stuart Seid Louis, 43, East Brunswick, N.J. Joseph Lovero, 60, Jersey City, N.J. Michael W. Lowe, 48, New York, N.Y. Garry Lozier, 47, Darien, Conn. John Peter Lozowsky, 45, New York, N.Y. Charles Peter Lucania, 34, East Atlantic Beach, N.Y. Edward (Ted) H. Luckett, 40, Fair Haven, N.J. Mark G. Ludvigsen, 32, New York, N.Y. Lee Charles Ludwig, 49, New York, N.Y. Sean Thomas Lugano, 28, New York, N.Y. Daniel Lugo, 45, New York, N.Y. Marie Lukas, 32, New York, N.Y. William Lum, 45, New York, N.Y. Michael P. Lunden, 37, New York, N.Y. Christopher Lunder, 34, Wall, N.J. Anthony Luparello, 62, New York, N.Y. Gary Lutnick, 36, New York, N.Y. Linda Luzzicone, 33, New York, N.Y. Alexander Lygin, 28, New York, N.Y. Farrell Peter Lynch, 39, Centerport, N.Y. James Francis Lynch, 47, Woodbridge, N.J. Louise A. Lynch, 58, Amityville, N.Y. Michael Lynch, 34, New York, N.Y. Michael F. Lynch, 33, New Hyde Park, N.Y. Michael Francis Lynch, 30, New York, N.Y. Richard Dennis Lynch, 30, Bedford Hills, N.Y. Robert H. Lynch, 44, Cranford, N.J. Sean Patrick Lynch, 36, Morristown, N.J. Sean Lynch, 34, New York, N.Y. Michael J. Lyons, 32, Hawthorne, N.Y. Patrick Lyons, 34, South Setauket, N.Y. Monica Lyons, 53, New York, N.Y. Robert Francis Mace, 43, New York, N.Y. Jan Maciejewski, 37, New York, N.Y. Catherine Fairfax MacRae, 23, New York, N.Y. Richard B. Madden, 35, Westfield, N.J. Simon Maddison, 40, Florham Park, N.J. Noell Maerz, 29, Long Beach, N.Y. Jeannie Ann Maffeo, 40, New York, N.Y. Joseph Maffeo, 30, New York, N.Y. Jay Robert Magazine, 48, New York, N.Y. Charles Wilson Magee, 51, Wantagh, N.Y. Brian Magee, 52, Floral Park, N.Y. Joseph Maggitti, 47, Abingdon, Md. Ronald E. Magnuson, 57, Park Ridge, N.J. Daniel L. Maher, 50, Hamilton, N.J. Thomas Anthony Mahon, 37, East Norwich, N.Y. William Mahoney, 38, Bohemia, N.Y. Joseph Maio, 32, Roslyn Harbor, N.Y. Takashi Makimoto, 49, New York, N.Y. Abdu Malahi, 37, New York, N.Y. Debora Maldonado, 47, New York, N.Y. Myra T. Maldonado-Agosto, 49, New York, N.Y. Alfred R. Maler, 39, Convent Station, N.J. Gregory James Malone, 42, Hoboken, N.J. Edward Francis (Teddy) Maloney, 32, Darien, Conn. Joseph E. Maloney, 46, Farmingville, N.Y. Gene E. Maloy, 41, New York, N.Y. Christian Maltby, 37, Chatham, N.J. Francisco Miguel (Frank) Mancini, 26, New York, N.Y. Joseph Mangano, 53, Jackson, N.J. Sara Elizabeth Manley, 31, New York, N.Y. Debra M. Mannetta, 31, Islip, N.Y. Terence J. Manning, 36, Rockville Centre, N.Y. Marion Victoria (vickie) Manning, 27, Rochdale, N.Y. James Maounis, 42, New York, N.Y. Joseph Ross Marchbanks, 47, Nanuet, N.Y. Peter Edward Mardikian, 29, New York, N.Y. Edward Joseph Mardovich, 42, Lloyd Harbor, N.Y. Lt. Charles Joseph Margiotta, 44, New York, N.Y. Kenneth Joseph Marino, 40, Monroe, N.Y. Lester Vincent Marino, 57, Massapequa, N.Y. Vita Marino, 49, New York, N.Y. Kevin D. Marlo, 28, New York, N.Y. Jose J. Marrero, 32, Old Bridge, N.J. John Marshall, 35, Congers, N.Y. James Martello, 41, Rumson, N.J. Michael A. Marti, 26, Glendale, N.Y. Lt. Peter Martin, 43, Miller Place, N.Y. William J. Martin, 35, Rockaway, N.J. Brian E. Martineau, 37, Edison, N.J. Betsy Martinez, 33, New York, N.Y. Edward J. Martinez, 60, New York, N.Y. Jose Angel Martinez, 49, Hauppauge, N.Y. Robert Gabriel Martinez, 24, New York, N.Y. Lizie Martinez-Calderon, 32, New York, N.Y. Lt. Paul Richard Martini, 37, New York, N.Y. Joseph A. Mascali, 44, New York, N.Y. Bernard Mascarenhas, 54, Newmarket, Ontario, Canada Stephen F. Masi, 55, New York, N.Y. Nicholas G. Massa, 65, New York, N.Y. Patricia A. Massari, 25, Glendale, N.Y. Michael Massaroli, 38, New York, N.Y. Philip W. Mastrandrea, 42, Chatham, N.J. Rudolph Mastrocinque, 43, Kings Park, N.Y. Joseph Mathai, 49, Arlington, Mass. Charles William Mathers, 61, Sea Girt, N.J. William A. Mathesen, 40, Morristown, N.J. Marcello Matricciano, 31, New York, N.Y. Margaret Elaine Mattic, 51, New York, N.Y. Robert D. Mattson, 54, Green Pond, N.J. Walter Matuza, 39, New York, N.Y. Charles A. (Chuck) Mauro, 65, New York, N.Y. Charles J. Mauro, 38, New York, N.Y. Dorothy Mauro, 55, New York, N.Y. Nancy T. Mauro, 51, New York, N.Y. Tyrone May, 44, Rahway, N.J. Keithroy Maynard, 30, New York, N.Y. Robert J. Mayo, 46, Morganville, N.J. Kathy Nancy Mazza-Delosh, 46, Farmingdale, N.Y. Edward Mazzella, 62, Monroe, N.Y. Jennifer Mazzotta, 23, New York, N.Y. Kaaria Mbaya, 39, Edison, N.J. James J. McAlary, 42, Spring Lake Heights, N.J. Brian McAleese, 36, Baldwin, N.Y. Patricia A. McAneney, 50, Pomona, N.Y. Colin Richard McArthur, 52, Howell, N.J. John McAvoy, 47, New York, N.Y. Kenneth M. McBrayer, 49, New York, N.Y. Brendan McCabe, 40, Sayville, N.Y. Michael J. McCabe, 42, Rumson, N.J. Thomas McCann, 46, Manalapan, N.J. Justin McCarthy, 30, Port Washington, N.Y. Kevin M. McCarthy, 42, Fairfield, Conn. Michael Desmond McCarthy, 33, Huntington, N.Y. Robert Garvin McCarthy, 33, Stony Point, N.Y. Stanley McCaskill, 47, New York, N.Y. Katie Marie McCloskey, 25, Mount Vernon, N.Y. Tara McCloud-Gray, 30, New York, N.Y. Charles Austin McCrann, 55, New York, N.Y. Tonyell McDay, 25, Colonia, N.J. Matthew T. McDermott, 34, Basking Ridge, N.J. Joseph P. McDonald, 43, Livingston, N.J. Brian G. McDonnell, 38, Wantagh, N.Y. Michael McDonnell, 34, Red Bank, N.J. John F. McDowell, 33, New York, N.Y. Eamon J. McEneaney, 46, New Canaan, Conn. John Thomas McErlean, 39, Larchmont, N.Y. Daniel F. McGinley, 40, Ridgewood, N.J. Mark Ryan McGinly, 26, New York, N.Y. Lt. William E. McGinn, 43, New York, N.Y. Thomas H. McGinnis, 41, Oakland, N.J. Michael Gregory McGinty, 42, Foxboro, Mass. Ann McGovern, 68, East Meadow, N.Y. Scott Martin McGovern, 35, Wyckoff, N.J. William J. McGovern, 49, Smithtown, N.Y. Stacey S. McGowan, 38, Basking Ridge, N.J. Francis Noel McGuinn, 48, Rye, N.Y. Patrick J. McGuire, 40, Madison, N.J. Thomas M. McHale, 33, Huntington, N.Y. Keith McHeffey, 31, Monmouth Beach, N.J. Denis J. McHugh, 36, New York, N.Y. Dennis P. McHugh, 34, Sparkill, N.Y. Michael Edward McHugh, 35, Tuckahoe, N.Y. Ann M. McHugh, 35, New York, N.Y. Robert G. McIlvaine, 26, New York, N.Y. Donald James McIntyre, 38, New City, N.Y. Stephanie McKenna, 45, New York, N.Y. Barry J. McKeon, 47, Yorktown Heights, N.Y. Evelyn C. McKinnedy, 60, New York, N.Y. Darryl Leron McKinney, 26, New York, N.Y. Robert C. McLaughlin, 29, Westchester, N.Y. George Patrick McLaughlin, 36, Hoboken, N.J. Gavin McMahon, 35, Bayonne, N.J. Robert Dismas McMahon, 35, New York, N.Y. Edmund M. McNally, 41, Fair Haven, N.J. Daniel McNeal, 29, Towson, Md. Walter Arthur McNeil, 53, Stroudsburg, Pa. Sean Peter McNulty, 30, New York, N.Y. Christine Sheila McNulty, 42, Peterborough, England Robert William McPadden, 30, Pearl River, N.Y. Terence A. McShane, 37, West Islip, N.Y. Timothy Patrick McSweeney, 37, New York, N.Y. Martin E. McWilliams, 35, Kings Park, N.Y. Rocco A. Medaglia, 49, Melville, N.Y. Abigail Cales Medina, 46, New York, N.Y. Ana Iris Medina, 39, New York, N.Y. Deborah Medwig, 46, Dedham, Mass. William J. Meehan, 49, Darien, Conn. Damian Meehan, 32, Glen Rock, N.J. Alok Kumar Mehta, 23, Hempstead, N.Y. Raymond Meisenheimer, 46, West Babylon, N.Y. Manuel Emilio Mejia, 54, New York, N.Y. Eskedar Melaku, 31, New York, N.Y. Antonio Melendez, 30, New York, N.Y. Mary Melendez, 44, Stroudsburg, Pa. Yelena Melnichenko, 28, Brooklyn, N.Y. Stuart Todd Meltzer, 32, Syosset, N.Y. Diarelia Jovannah Mena, 30, New York, N.Y. Charles Mendez, 38, Floral Park, N.Y. Lizette Mendoza, 33, North Bergen, N.J. Shevonne Mentis, 25, New York, N.Y. Steve Mercado, 38, New York, N.Y. Wesley Mercer, 70, New York, N.Y. Ralph Joseph Mercurio, 47, Rockville Centre, N.Y. Alan H. Merdinger, 47, Allentown, Pa. George C. Merino, 39, New York, N.Y. Yamel Merino, 24, Yonkers, N.Y. George Merkouris, 35, Levittown, N.Y. Deborah Merrick, 45 Raymond J. Metz, 37, Trumbull, Conn. Jill A. Metzler, 32, Franklin Square, N.Y. David Robert Meyer, 57, Glen Rock, N.J. Nurul Huq Miah, 35, New York, N.Y. William Edward Micciulli, 30, Matawan, N.J. Martin Paul Michelstein, 57, Morristown, N.J. Luis Clodoaldo Revilla Mier, 54 Peter T. Milano, 43, Middletown, N.J. Gregory Milanowycz, 25, Cranford, N.J. Lukasz T. Milewski, 21, New York, N.Y. Craig James Miller, 29, Va. Corey Peter Miller, 34, New York, N.Y. Douglas C. Miller, 34, Port Jervis, N.Y. Henry Miller, 52, Massapequa, N.Y. Michael Matthew Miller, 39, Englewood, N.J. Phillip D. Miller, 53, New York, N.Y. Robert C. Miller, 55, Hasbrouck Heights, N.J. Robert Alan Miller, 46, Matawan, N.J. Joel Miller, 55, Baldwin, N.Y. Benjamin Millman, 40, New York, N.Y. Charles M. Mills, 61, Brentwood, N.Y. Ronald Keith Milstein, 54, New York, N.Y. Robert Minara, 54, Carmel, N.Y. William G. Minardi, 46, Bedford, N.Y. Louis Joseph Minervino, 54, Middletown, N.J. Thomas Mingione, 34, West Islip, N.Y. Wilbert Miraille, 29, New York, N.Y. Domenick Mircovich, 40, Closter, N.J. Rajesh A. Mirpuri, 30, Englewood Cliffs, N.J. Joseph Mistrulli, 47, Wantagh, N.Y. Susan Miszkowicz, 37, New York, N.Y. Lt. Paul Thomas Mitchell, 46, New York, N.Y. Richard Miuccio, 55, New York, N.Y. Frank V. Moccia, 57, Hauppauge, N.Y. Capt. Louis Joseph Modafferi, 45, New York, N.Y. Boyie Mohammed, 50, New York, N.Y. Lt. Dennis Mojica, 50, New York, N.Y. Manuel Mojica, 37, Bellmore, N.Y. Manuel Dejesus Molina, 31, New York, N.Y. Kleber Rolando Molina, 44, New York, N.Y. Fernando Jimenez Molinar, 21, Oaxaca, Mexico Carl Molinaro, 32, New York, N.Y. Justin J. Molisani, 42, Middletown Township, N.J. Brian Patrick Monaghan, 21, New York, N.Y. Franklin Monahan, 45, Roxbury, N.Y. John Gerard Monahan, 47, Wanamassa, N.J. Kristen Montanaro, 34, New York, N.Y. Craig D. Montano, 38, Glen Ridge, N.J. Michael Montesi, 39, Highland Mills, N.Y. Cheryl Ann Monyak, 43, Greenwich, Conn. Capt. Thomas Moody, 45, Stony Brook, N.Y. Sharon Moore, 37, New York, N.Y. Krishna Moorthy, 59, Briarcliff Manor, N.Y. Abner Morales, 37, New York, N.Y. Carlos Morales, 29, New York, N.Y. Paula Morales, 42, New York, N.Y. Luis Morales, 46, New York, N.Y. John Moran, 43, Rockaway, N.Y. John Christopher Moran, 38, Haslemere, Surrey, England Kathleen Moran, 42, New York, N.Y. Lindsay S. Morehouse, 24, New York, N.Y. George Morell, 47, Mount. Kisco, N.Y. Steven P. Morello, 52, Bayonne, N.J. Vincent S. Morello, 34, New York, N.Y. Arturo Alva Moreno, 47, Mexico City, Mexico Yvette Nicole Moreno, 25, New York, N.Y. Dorothy Morgan, 47, Hempstead, N.Y. Richard Morgan, 66, Glen Rock, N.J. Nancy Morgenstern, 32, New York, N.Y. Sanae Mori, 27, Tokyo, Japan Blanca Morocho, 26, New York, N.Y. Leonel Morocho, 36, New York, N.Y. Dennis G. Moroney, 39, Eastchester, N.Y. Lynne Irene Morris, 22, Monroe, N.Y. Seth A. Morris, 35, Kinnelon, N.J. Stephen Philip Morris, 31, Ormond Beach, Fla. Christopher M. Morrison, 34, Charlestown, Mass. Ferdinand V. Morrone, 63, Lakewood, N.J. William David Moskal, 50, Brecksville, Ohio Manuel Da Mota, 43, Valley Stream, N.Y. Marco Motroni, 57, Fort Lee, N.J. Iouri A. Mouchinski, 55, New York, N.Y. Jude J. Moussa, 35, New York, N.Y. Peter C. Moutos, 44, Chatham, N.J. Damion Mowatt, 21, New York, N.Y. Christopher Mozzillo, 27, New York, N.Y. Stephen V. Mulderry, 33, New York, N.Y. Richard Muldowney, 40, Babylon, N.Y. Michael D. Mullan, 34, New York, N.Y. Dennis Michael Mulligan, 32, New York, N.Y. Peter James Mulligan, 28, New York, N.Y. Michael Joseph Mullin, 27, Hoboken, N.J. James Donald Munhall, 45, Ridgewood, N.J. Nancy Muniz, 45, New York, N.Y. Carlos Mario Munoz, 43 Francisco Munoz, 29, New York, N.Y. Theresa (Terry) Munson, 54, New York, N.Y.
*[Email:]: Email
*[Twitter:]: Twitter
*[Phone:]: Phone&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Almost Forgot to (Virtually) Smash That Hard Drive</title><link>/blog/almost-forgot-to-virtually-smash-that-hard-drive/</link><pubDate>Fri, 08 Sep 2006 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/almost-forgot-to-virtually-smash-that-hard-drive/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;A few months ago I picked up a Western Digital external hard drive at Costco since my MacBook’s internal drive was a bit stuffed with digital photos. The WD drive is a pretty nice USB drive and really portable.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>It’s All About the Users (Interface)</title><link>/blog/its-all-about-the-users-interface/</link><pubDate>Thu, 07 Sep 2006 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/its-all-about-the-users-interface/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I’m sitting in the &lt;a href="http://www.yelp.com/biz/-KTMpdobOKwDLSgabGBowg" title="http://www.yelp.com/biz/-KTMpdobOKwDLSgabGBowg"&gt;Martini Monkey&lt;/a&gt; in San Jose airport, by far the best airport bar in history and possibly my favorite bar anywhere in the US. This place is a seriously funky oasis for those of us banished to the purgatory of airport terminals and solitary $10 crap beers in our hotel rooms.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Security is My Business, and Business is Good</title><link>/blog/security-is-my-business-and-business-is-good/</link><pubDate>Wed, 06 Sep 2006 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/security-is-my-business-and-business-is-good/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;It’s been a while since &lt;a href="http://blogs.zdnet.com/threatchaos" title="http://blogs.zdnet.com/threatchaos"&gt;Richard Stiennon&lt;/a&gt; and I worked together, and I’m learning one of the more enjoyable aspects of blogging is the opportunity to pick on him again.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Disclosure Humor</title><link>/blog/disclosure-humor/</link><pubDate>Tue, 05 Sep 2006 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/disclosure-humor/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Really amusing considering our current discussions:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.sockpuppet.org/tqbf/bug-reports.html" title="http://www.sockpuppet.org/tqbf/bug-reports.html"&gt;How to Handle Security Problems in Your Products&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This is from &lt;a href="http://www.sockpuppet.org/~tqbf/" title="http://www.sockpuppet.org/~tqbf/"&gt;Thomas H. Ptacek &lt;/a&gt;who’s blogging at &lt;a href="http://www.matasano.com/log/" title="http://www.matasano.com/log/"&gt;matasano.com&lt;/a&gt;. I’m not sure how old it is.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Mac Wi-FI: Gruber Needs to Let It Go (and Maynor and Ellch Should Ignore the Challenge)</title><link>/blog/mac-wi-fi-gruber-needs-to-let-it-go-and-maynor-and-ellch-should-ignore-the-challenge/</link><pubDate>Tue, 05 Sep 2006 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/mac-wi-fi-gruber-needs-to-let-it-go-and-maynor-and-ellch-should-ignore-the-challenge/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Last Friday I was packing up for a weekend trip with my wife to Tuscon when my faithful RSS reader chased me down with the latest post on Daring Fireball. I ignored it over the weekend, but think it’s time for a response.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Totally Off Topic: A Very Sad Day</title><link>/blog/totally-off-topic-a-very-sad-day/</link><pubDate>Mon, 04 Sep 2006 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/totally-off-topic-a-very-sad-day/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;There are very few genuine, passionate people in this world. Today, with the death of Steve Irwin, there is one less.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Introducing Chris Pepper</title><link>/blog/introducing-chris-pepper/</link><pubDate>Sun, 03 Sep 2006 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/introducing-chris-pepper/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I’d like to take a moment and introduce a new contributor to Securosis.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Chris Pepper is a senior systems administrator at Rockefeller University in NYC and longtime contributor to &lt;a href="http://www.tidbits.com" title="TidBITS"&gt;TidBITS&lt;/a&gt; and various other &lt;a href="http://www.macosxpowertools.com/" title="http://www.macosxpowertools.com/"&gt;publications&lt;/a&gt;. Chris is one of the most knowledgeable sysadmins I’ve ever known and the first person I turn to when I need command-line support on various *nix flavors or Mac.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Just a Spoonful of Obscurity Makes the DefCon Level Go down!</title><link>/blog/just-a-spoonful-of-obscurity-makes-the-defcon-level-go-down/</link><pubDate>Sun, 03 Sep 2006 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/just-a-spoonful-of-obscurity-makes-the-defcon-level-go-down/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Rich,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;It feels heretical, but I can agree that obscurity can provide some security. The problem comes when people count on secrecy as their &lt;em&gt;only&lt;/em&gt; or primary security.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Encryption is Cheaper than Destruction</title><link>/blog/encryption-is-cheaper-than-destruction/</link><pubDate>Fri, 01 Sep 2006 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/encryption-is-cheaper-than-destruction/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I like to think &lt;a href="http://blogs.zdnet.com/threatchaos/" title="http://blogs.zdnet.com/threatchaos/"&gt;Richard Stiennon&lt;/a&gt; and I are good friends. He was at my wedding in Mexico. I took him and his son skiing up at Copper Mountain where I used to patrol. For a time he even rented space in my condo in Boulder while I was slowly moving to Phoenix. We’d swap my car out at the airport parking lot; it was very convenient.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Dealing with Security Vendor Exaggerations</title><link>/blog/dealing-with-security-vendor-exaggerations/</link><pubDate>Thu, 31 Aug 2006 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/dealing-with-security-vendor-exaggerations/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I generally don’t discuss “industry” issues here since that’s what I get paid to do at my day job. And if I start offering for free here, what I get paid to do over &lt;a href="http://www.gartner.com" title="Gartner"&gt;there&lt;/a&gt;, I may find myself offered the opportunity to do it for free on a permanent basis.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>What I Really Meant About Security Through Obscurity</title><link>/blog/what-i-really-meant-about-security-through-obscurity/</link><pubDate>Thu, 31 Aug 2006 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/what-i-really-meant-about-security-through-obscurity/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I’ve been publishing for in various formats for nearly 10 years now, and I have to admit I’m really enjoying some of the features of blogging. Aside from writing in a more personal voice, I actually appreciate the near instant feedback- from anyone- anywhere- of the blogosphere. I actually enjoy having my ideas challenged and debated.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Security is Like Dentistry</title><link>/blog/security-is-like-dentistry/</link><pubDate>Wed, 30 Aug 2006 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/security-is-like-dentistry/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Guess where I spent the day?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I’ll warn you now, I have a bad habit of taking metaphors too far.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>The 3 Dirty Little Secrets of Disclosure No One Wants to Talk About</title><link>/blog/the-3-dirty-little-secrets-of-disclosure-no-one-wants-to-talk-about/</link><pubDate>Tue, 29 Aug 2006 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/the-3-dirty-little-secrets-of-disclosure-no-one-wants-to-talk-about/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;As a child one of the first signs of my budding geekness was a strange interest in professional “lingo”. Maybe it was an odd side effect of learning to walk at a volunteer ambulance headquarters in Jersey. Who knows what debilitating effects I suffered due to extended childhood exposure to radon, the air imbued with the random chemicals endemic to Jersey, and the staccato language of the early Emergency Medical Technicians whose ranks I would feel compelled to join later in life.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Off Topic: A Little Perspective</title><link>/blog/off-topic-a-little-perspective/</link><pubDate>Mon, 28 Aug 2006 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/off-topic-a-little-perspective/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;This has nothing to do with security other than the fact Mike Rothman is a security analyst.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Sometimes it’s worth sitting back and evaluating why you’re in the race in the first place. It’s all too easy to get caught up in the insanity of day-to-day demands or the incredibly deceptive priorities of the corporate and government rat races.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Experiences with FileVault- Mac Encryption</title><link>/blog/experiences-with-filevault-mac-encryption/</link><pubDate>Sat, 26 Aug 2006 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/experiences-with-filevault-mac-encryption/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Believe it or not, despite accusations that that my coverage of the Mac wireless hack is all part of some &lt;a href="http://technovia.typepad.com/technovia/2006/08/is_the_macs_air.html#comment-21429823" title="http://technovia.typepad.com/technovia/2006/08/is_the_macs_air.html#comment-21429823"&gt;anti-Apple black PR conspiracy&lt;/a&gt;, I’m a Mac user. One that’s so addicted I bought my Mom one and had it shipped to me so I could “configure” it. Okay, really I had to send mine in for service and I needed another Intel Mac so I could run it off an external hard drive with an image of my MacBook Pro. I mean I might have been without it for, like, 5-7 days and that’s just not acceptable. How can I carry out my anti-Apple black PR conspiracy without a Mac to write my blog entries on?&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Voting Machine Idiocy- and a Proposal for a Reasonable Standard</title><link>/blog/voting-machine-idiocy-and-a-proposal-for-a-reasonable-standard/</link><pubDate>Thu, 24 Aug 2006 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/voting-machine-idiocy-and-a-proposal-for-a-reasonable-standard/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Ah Diebold, how we’ve missed you.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In yet another example of gross negligence with our most sacred political process we find our favorite manufacturer of ATMs and voting machines yet again in the news. This time with a series of failures in the Alaskan primary.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Home Security Tip of the Day: SpamSieve for Mac</title><link>/blog/home-security-tip-of-the-day-spamsieve-for-mac/</link><pubDate>Tue, 22 Aug 2006 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/home-security-tip-of-the-day-spamsieve-for-mac/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;One of the advantages of being a paranoid security geek is you slowly acquire a familiarity with consumer security tools to prevent any of the bad nastiness you comment on from happening to your own system. While I’m sure some of my remotely hosted servers will get cracked on occasion since I don’t have full control over them I’ve taken it as a personal point of honor to defend my personal computers from &lt;a href="https://www.youvebeenhacked.ru"&gt;www.youvebeenhacked.ru&lt;/a&gt; to the bitter end. Every now and then on slow news days I’ll highlight some of these tools and techniques to help readers protect their own systems. Since I use Macs, PCs, and even a dash of Linux there should be some good nuggets for all platforms.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Another Take on the Mac Wireless Hack</title><link>/blog/another-take-on-the-mac-wireless-hack/</link><pubDate>Mon, 21 Aug 2006 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/another-take-on-the-mac-wireless-hack/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;On Friday the Mac Wireless hack issue exploded again after Apple PR issued a carefully worded press release. Next thing you know one of my favorite sites, &lt;a href="http://tuaw.com" title="http://tuaw.com"&gt;The Unofficial Apple Weblog&lt;/a&gt; posts a headline that’s &lt;a href="http://www.tuaw.com/2006/08/18/secureworks-admits-to-falsifying-macbook-wireless-hack/" title="http://www.tuaw.com/2006/08/18/secureworks-admits-to-falsifying-macbook-wireless-hack/"&gt;just wrong&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Concerts vs. Airports- the Really Short Version</title><link>/blog/concerts-vs-airports-the-really-short-version/</link><pubDate>Sun, 20 Aug 2006 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/concerts-vs-airports-the-really-short-version/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;After posting &lt;a href="http://securosis.com/2006/08/20/the-role-and-effectiveness-of-security-screening-in-public-spaces-including-airports/" title="http://securosis.com/2006/08/20/the-role-and-effectiveness-of-security-screening-in-public-spaces-including-airports/"&gt;Concerts vs. Airports: The Role and Effectiveness of Security Screening in Public Places&lt;/a&gt; I realized it was a tad long and I might bore some of you, so here’s the crib notes:&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Concerts vs. Airports: The Role and Effectiveness of Security Screening in Public Spaces</title><link>/blog/concerts-vs-airports-the-role-and-effectiveness-of-security-screening-in-public-spaces/</link><pubDate>Sun, 20 Aug 2006 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/concerts-vs-airports-the-role-and-effectiveness-of-security-screening-in-public-spaces/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;As previously posted I have a fair bit of experience with security screening in large facilities. With all the hype about airports these days it’s a good time to review the screening process and the role it plays in securing public areas. While one of the risks of security is believing expertise in one domain means expertise in all areas I believe large facilities/events and airports are related closely enough that we can apply the lessons of one to the other.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>